20190294 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190304

DXR -,,
pbblen of wMer ftwources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r, Yes
C No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
O Yes O No
Charge only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
Version#*
20190294
1
Is a payment required for this project?
C No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
6 Fee needed - send electronic notification
C $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Wilmington Regional Office - [phone] Chad Coburn:eads\cccoburn
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Artesa Village Apartments
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Corey Novak - Land Management Group
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
3/4/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Unnamed tributary to Calabash Creek
Basin
Lumber
Water Classification
SA; HOW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
33.896677
Longitude:
-78.495603
tc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
A. Processing Information W
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Brunswick
Is this project a public transportation project?*
O Yes G No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r- Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
P Nationwide Permit (MNP)
r- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes f No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
18
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
V 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record onlyfor DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
401 Water Quality Certification - Egress
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? *
d Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
4 Yes O No
O Yes O No
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes r No
11. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
d Yes E No r Unknown
tj. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
O Yes O No
B. Applicant Information (J
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner R_ Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Age nVConsultant for this project?
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Carolina Dreams Golf LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
Eric Frankovitch
2d. Address
Street Address
337 Penco Road
Address Line 2
atY
Weirton
Postal ( Zip Q)de
26062
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from
State / Province / Region
West Virginia
Qbuntry
USA
2f. Fax Number:

3a. Name:
Stephanie Norris
3b. Business Name:
Artesa Village Apartments, LLC
3c.Address
Street Address
P.O. Box 15025
Address Line 2
City
Wilmington
Postal / Zip Code
28408
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(K apprqx1ate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Sunset Beach
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
105514238468
2c. Project Address
Street Address
High Market St.
Address Une 2
City
Sunset Beach
Postal / Zip Code
28468
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Unnamed tributary to Calabash Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
SA; HOW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Lumber
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
030402080302
4. Project Description and History
State / Rovince / Region
North Carolina
tbuntry
USA
3e. Fax Number:
2b. Property size:
4.96
State / Province / Rtion
North Carolina
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is currently undeveloped and forested. Adjacent land use is mostly mixed use commercial/residential.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
6 Yes r No r, Unknown
4d. Attach an 81/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS Topo Map.pdf 479.31 KB
4e. Attach an 81/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
NRCS Soils Map.pdf 329.85KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.30

4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
Pone
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to construct a multi -family residential development. Wetland impacts are needed to construct a building and a stornvmter pond.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
This project includes the construction of an apartment complex This project will have three 3 -story buildings, one club house, parking, a stormwater pond, and associated utilities. The
construction areas will be cleared of vegetation, and fill material will be brought to the site to level the area of disturbance. Utilities will be installed. Track hoe, loader, dump truck, bob
cat, and other standard construction equipment will be used.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
ARTESA IMPACTS 022619 LMG.pdf 706.77KB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
Sa. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?
O Yes O No
Comments:
The wetland delineation was field verified on 2/6/19. The JD has not been received yet at the time of
this application submittal.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
O Preliminary 6 Approved O Not Verified O Unknown O WA
Corps AID Number:
Sc. If 5a is ves. who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Corey Novak
Agency/Consultant Company: Land Management Group
Other:
O Unknown
Sd. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination He determination was made bythe Corps or DWR
The wetland delineation was field verified on 2/6/19. The JD has not been received yet at the time of this application submittal.
Still. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
O Yes O No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory U
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
m Wetlands ❑ Streams -tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason(?) 2b. Impact type * (?) 2c. Type of W. * 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested * 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
1
2g. Total Temporary
Fill
P
Small -Basin Wetland
Wetland A
Yes
Both
0.150
(acres)
2
Excavation
P
Pine Flat
Wetland B
Yes
Both
0.020
(acres)
Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.170
2h. Comments:
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.170

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation t^�
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The project engineer attempted to minimize wetland impacts within the site when developing the site plan. Building No. 1 and several parking spaces
were shifted to reduce wetland impacts. However, one wetland is situated near the center of the site. Another wetland is situated down -gradient of the
impervious surface, which is where the stormwater pond needs to be. Complete avoidance of these wetlands would make the site unbuildable,
especially when considering property line setbacks.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Silt fencing will be used during construction to reduce sediment from eroding into jurisdictional areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
O Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR 17, Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
V Mitigation bank C Payment to in -lieu fee ❑ Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Quantity.
Non -riparian wetland 0.2
Attach Receipt and/or letter
3c. Comments
A 1:1 ratio is proposed since the impacted wetlands are low -quality. Wetland Impact 1 has disturbed soil and is dominated by black willows. Wetland
Impact 2 is a tiny, slight depression in a pine flat. Neither wetland has a direct hydrologic connection to downstream waters. The high-quality wetland
has been avoided.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) c�)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
G Yes O No
If no, explain why:
The project is in the Lumber River Basin.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
rYes MNo
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes E`, No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes C, No
3. Stormwater Requirements
3a. Select whether a completed stormwater management plan (SMP) is included for review and approval or if calculations are provided to document the project will not cause
degradation of downstream surface waters.*
r, Stormwater Management r Antidegradation
Plan Calculations
3b. Stormwater Management Plan
3c. Antidegradation Calculations:

Comments:
The project engineer is currently working on a stormwater management plan. The plan will be submitted to the State, County, and Town for approval.
G. Supplementary Information U
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
O Yes 6 No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
C Yes 4 No
Comments:*
State funds are being used which are called from the Workforce Housing Loan Program, which does not require NEPA or SEPA. This loan program is
administered by NC Housing Finance Agency.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.11300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
C Yes O No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
C Yes 4 No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project will not provide access or utilities to adjacent undeveloped properties. No additional impacts are anticipated in the future on this property.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
O Yes C No C WA
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater will tie into local municipality system.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
0 Yes C No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
O Yes C No
Sc. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
O Yes
C No
C Unknown
What Federal Agency is involved?
The applicant is applying for a USDA RD538 guaranteed loan which will be issued through/from a
private lender.
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
C Yes O No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
O Yes C No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
C Yes O No
Sh. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
C Yes d No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
C Yes O No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?

The NC Natural Heritage Program GIS data was used to determine the known presence of federally -listed species. No federally listed species are
known to occur on the site. The Atlantic sturgeon, West Indian manatee, and American alligator have been documented within a one -mile radius of the
site. There is no suitable habitat for these species on the site. No blasting or percussive activities are anticipated to occur during construction. Pilot
Environmental also contacted the Raleigh USFWS office. The USFWS issued a letter stating that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect
any federally listed species or designated critical habitat.
Consultation Documentation Upload
USFWS Letter.pdf 6.45MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
O Yes d No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The NOAA Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat Mapper GIS Program was used to determine the presence of Essential Fish Habitat. No EFH has been
designated near the project area.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. WIII this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
O Yes 6 No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS mapping resource was used to determine the presence of cultural or historic
resources. No cultural or historic resources were noted within the site. Pilot Environmental also contacted the SHPO office. SHPO indicated that they
are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
SHPO Letter.pdf 1.51 MB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
O Yes O No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
The FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer kmz (version 3.1) was used to determine the boundaries of the 100 -year floodplain.
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Signature
m By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Corey Steven Novak
Signature
0 c_.51 �406
Date
3/4/2019

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I/we, the undersigned, hereby authorize Land Management Group to act as our agent in the
preparation and representation of information related to the Section 404/401 permit application for
A?-Ty5A VI U AG6E project. All questions in regards to this project
should be directed to Land Management Group.
Sincerely,
Applicant
Fdr-= ARTESA V►1,1 &FC - APAiCFMU,U iS)%C,
PHA�1� L• r�o�R15
Print Name
Zf2e
f20 1'9
Date

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi 11. l lam lton
January 8, 2019
Matt Carter
Pilot Environmental, Inc.
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
Office of Archives and I listory
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Construct Artesa Village Apartments, High Market Street, Sunset Beach, PEI 3761, Bladen County,
ER 18-4140
Dear Mr. Carter:
Thank you for your letter of December 5, 2019 concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act and
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or
environmental.reviewnncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 hast Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

United States Department of the Interior
Matt Carter
Pilot Environmental Inc.
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh FS Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
February 1, 2019
Re: Artesa Village Apartments - Brunswick County, NC
Dear Mr. Carter:
This letter is to inform you that the Service has established an on -tine project planning and
consultation process which assists developers and consultants in determining whether a
federally -listed species or designated critical habitat may be affected by a proposed project. For
future projects, please visit -the Raleigh Field Office's project planning website at
httpa:,';'�� �4y.f4ys, u� fraiGi h' htnil. If you are only searching for a list of species that maybe
present in the project's Action Area, then you may use the Service's Information, Planning, and
Consultation System (IPaQ website to determine if any listed, proposed, or candidate species
may be present in the Action Area and generate a species list. The IPaC website may be viewed
athttps://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. The IPaC web site contains a complete and frequently updated list
of all endangered and threatened species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), a list of federal species of concern, that
are known to occur in each county in North Carolina, and other resources.
Section 7 of the Aci rCquirCa tltdi, ali iWerai agencies (or their designated r►on-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
I The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
�,prcre�-. I lv�Av%cr, we rewntmend.that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above -referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down -gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
2

We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
[phone] ext. 26.
Sincerely,
/,/7/ 1000 . , k
Pe a Benjamin
Field Supervisor

L:\Wetlands\2018\LMG 18.360\Maps
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NRCS GIS data
Artesia Village Apartments
Brunswick County, NC
November 2018
LMG # 18.360
Koo
dJ� I
x
a
110 -
�' Legend
w,. Soils
V
DSL—NAME
Fo
KrB
.1i Lo
Ma
9PLMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY1. company
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
N
0 100 200
Figure 4
Soils Map
%I
400
i Feet

I �
J� F
{J I y
26
s , I
Ll
IP
f
' f .
* _ .ter a"w:: t = •~
• i .. r'.. rte_ {{. r,.#y.. fry � � t 6�`+ ■ + r � }j
+r
IL IPL
*� r_x w2 WL
%
it
! kI SYS. Y * ,M1 s. 5k 5 cat J
Ramp
�
N
L:\Wetlands\2018\LMG18.360\Maps 0 500 1,000 2,000
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute. Feet
Map Source: USGS Brunswick County Topo Mosaic
Artesia Village Apartments tLMG
Brunswick County, NC Figure 2
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP USGS Topo
November 2018 a DAVEA- company Map
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
LMG # 18.360 Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

Curve Table Line Table
Arc Chord Tangent Chord Name--- Direction -- -Length
Name Delta Radius Length Length Length Direction PL1 S 71012'36" W 17.28
---------------------------------------------------------------- PL2 S 32053'59" W 65.21
C1 24°35'17" 190.00 81.54 80.91 41.41 S 58°55'07" W
ANGELS INREAC4OONdk�3 FONTS, LLC
B.E.M.C.
MB 7 PG 353
24200013
i
-- J
I„U IEU fief_
L.E `lE LC•o�:FN7
DEVELOr'I�/IENT
,
28' /t',9E%ASEMENT I
MAP BOOK 72 PAGE 60 I
VILLAGE PARK CONOONINIUN I
MAP BOON 35 PAGE 10
VILLAGE PARK CONDOMINIUM
MAP BOOK 35 PAGE 10
CAROLINA DREAMS GOLF, LLC
MB 10'fL;PX;GEf S AdIACT 2
COIvOWAREA
2420000991
I SEASID d0 NH p INC.
I 4A4.
&J SEAS IDs sl tcNNf,�M M�$, INC.
24 ��36D
a�
U
sunset Blvd.
Location Map
SITE
Live Oak Drive
No Scale
NC 179
c�
s_
a
(SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I. G ANDERSON GREENE, CERTIFY THAT THIS
MAP WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN,_(
ACTUAL WETLAND SURVEY MADE UNDER je SIP
E'R 1
THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED J� O�p
still"r.
2018. EXCEPT AS NOT
• Q`0.••�ESSIp,
SIO
G ANDERSON GREENE s PL SEAQ
� 3370
L I CENSE N0.`
V
'0FRS &
Jggggr
1' I fTNTRE L- Y
1 100 50 0
10101 200
A SURVEY REFEREN
MAP BOOK 104 PA
GRAPHIC SCALE:
1~= 100'
WETLAND IMPACT EXHIBIT
DESIGNED: GAG
DATE: 10.*16,*18
OWNER: CAROLINA DREAMS GOLF. LLC
AzzNSTROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
CAROLINA DREAMS GOLF,
LLC
SURVEY REFERENCE
DRAWN:GAG
SCALE: 1"■ 100'
ADDRESS 337 PENCO ROAD
102-0 CINEMA DRIVE C-0647
PORTION OF TRACT 1 MAP BOOK
104 PACE 1
MAP BOOK 104 PAGE 1
APPROVED:GAG
SHEET 1 OF i
WE I RTON, WEST VIRGINIA 26062
PHONEV
WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA 28403
[phone] [phone] FAX
�
SHALLOTTE TOWNSHIP BRUNSWICK COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
W:\Master\PW-1351\DGN\ARTESA SURVEY.dgn
------------------------------------------------------------------