The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About540002_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20190128Division of Water Resources ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 540002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS540002 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Lenoir Region: Washington Date of Visit: 01/28/2019 Entry Time: 10:30 am Exit Time: 11:30 am Incident #: Farm Name: Owl Pond, Heath Farm & Hog City Owner: Raymond Otis Collier Mailing Address: 1373 Davis Mill Rd Physical Address: Mark N Smith Rd Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Location of Farm: SR 1121 and 1 mile South of Nobles crossroads and the farm is on the left Owner Email: Phone: 252-684-4204 Deep Run NC 28525 Deep Run NC 28525 Integrator: J C Howard Farms Latitude: 35' 06' Longitude: 77° 40' 31" Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Danny R Grant Operator Certification Number: 17676 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Danny Grant On -site representative Danny Grant Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone: Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: Soil Test 10-2-18 w/ highest lime .6 tons Cu & Zn values w/in range Waste Analysis 9-17-18 .57 .55 .56 5-9-18 .79 1.2 .36 1-12-18 .53 42 .48 "Hog City bermuda /sm grain field need maintenance. Small grain broadcast. If crop fails reduce Coastal PAN w/ amount applied to small grain. Calibration 6-7-18 w/ 1 gun-80gpm & 2gun-160gpm Sludge Survey 5-22-18 Hog City 1 Thick-2' LTZ-5.17' Pump intake-5') 26% Sludge Ratio Page 1 of 6 Permit: AWS540002 Owner: Raymond Otis Collier Facility Number: 540002 Inspection Date: 01/28/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Hog City 3 Thick-1.82' LTZ-6.91' Pump intake-7.8' } 15% Sludge Ratio Heath Thick-.90' LTZ-7' Pump intake-4' } 11 % Sludge Ratio Owl Pond New Thick-.21' LTZ-6.99' Pump intake-T } 2% Sludge Ratio Owl Pond Old Thick-3.02' LTZ-2.98' Pump intake-4.5' } 43% Sludge Ratio Crop yield complete Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond w/ irrigation Page 2 of 6 Permit: AWS540002 Owner: Raymond Otis Collier Facility Number: 540002 Inspection Date: 01/28/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions Swine Swine - Farrow to Wean 4,321 I 4,103 Total Design Capacity: 4,321 Total SSLW: 1,870,993 Waste Structures Effective Built Closed Designated Observed Type Identifier Date Date Date Freeboard Freeboard Lagoon 1 - HOG CITY - OLD 03/02/2005 19.20 33.00 Lagoon 2 - HOG CITY - NEW 03/02/2005 19.20 32.00 Lagoon 3 - OWL POND PRIMARY 03/02/2005 19.20 25.00 Lagoon 4 - OWL POND FINAL 03/02/2005 19.20 13.00 Lagoon 5 - HEATH 03/02/2005 19.20 25.00 Page 3 of 6 Permit: AWS540002 Owner: Raymond Otis Collier Facility Number: 540002 Inspection Date: 01/28/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ MEIEI Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ MEI ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ MEI ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans Page 4 of 6 Permit: AWS540002 Owner: Raymond Otis Collier Inspection Date: 01/28/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: Reason for Visit: 540002 Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed Crop Type 3 Coastal Bermuda Grass (Hay) Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Goldsboro Soil Type 2 Norfolk Soil Type 3 Wagram Soil Type 4 Stallings Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Stocking? ❑ Page 5 of 6 Permit: AWS540002 Owner: Raymond Otis Collier Facility Number: Inspection Date: 01/28/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: 540002 Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Crop yields? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ ❑ ❑ appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Other Issues Yes No NA NE 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ ❑ ❑ and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ ❑ ❑ contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field ❑ Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ CAW M P? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Page 6 of 6