The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20190224 Ver 1_Riparian Buffer Authorization_20190218DWR 1 go 2 4 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Resources Division of Water Resources 15A NCAC 02B .0233 (8)(b), .0243 (8)(b),.0250 (11)(b), .0259 (8)(b),.0267 (11)(c), .0607 (e)(2) - Buffer Authorization FORM: BA 10-2013 A. Applicant Riparian Buffer Authorization Form Information 1. Project Information 1a. Name of project: Altec Creedmoor Building C Expansion 1 b. County: Granville 1c. Nearest municipality: Butner 1d. Subdivision name: N/A 1e. Is the project located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1f below. El Yes ® No 1f. Is the project located within a NC Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? EJ Yes ® No 2. Owner Information 2a. Name on Recorded Deed: Altec Industries Inc. 2b. Deed Book and Page No. DB 1681 PG 36 2c. Map Book and Page No. (include a copy of the recorded map that indicates when the lot was created): BK 47 PG 155 2d. Responsible Party (for Corporations): ALTEC INDUSTRIES 2e. Street address: 1515 IVAC WAY 2f. City, state, zip: CREEDMOOR, NC 27522 2g. Telephone no.: 919-528-8029 2h. Fax no.: N/A 2i. Email address: Tokso.pak@altec.com 3. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 3a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Civil Site Engineer 3b. Name: Hayden Brown 3c. Business name (if applicable): Caprine Engineering 3d. Street address: 2730 19t1 St. S 3e. City, state, zip: Birmingham, AL, 35209 3f. Telephone no.: 256-653-0669 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Hayden. brown@caprineeng.com 4. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 4a. Name: 4b. Business name (if applicable): 4c. Street address: 4d. City, state, zip: 4e. Telephone no.: 4f. Fax no.: 4g. Email address: FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 1 of 5 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 0886098369 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36008'14.4"N Longitude: 78°43'30.5"W 1c. Property size: 100.04 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Upper Falls Lake 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS -IV 2c. River basin: Neuse 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Concrete pavement parking, maintained open landscaping used for industrial facility. 3b. Attach an 8 % x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the site 3c. Attach an 8 % x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey Map depicting the project site 3d. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 520 3e. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Building Expansion of 3,775 sq. ft.+ Chassis Parking. A Stormwater BMP is required (Wetland) 3f. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Resin storage Expansion (3,775 s.f.) to the building. Disturbing less than an acre of land, while adding 23,000 s.f. impervious area for truck access and chassis storage. Also constructing a stormwater wetland which will outfall into the stream (Zone 1 buffer). Earth moving equipment will be used for this project. Outfall will slowly disperse normal stormwater flows as it is designed to drain in a span of 2-3 days for attenuation. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/ project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown Comments: We are reducing nutrient loading into the stream 4b. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/ Consultant Company: I Other: 4c. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. S. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown 5b. If yes, explain and detail according to "help file" instructions. Awaiting permit from city of Butner, while making revisions/authorizations. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No 6b. If yes, explain. FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 2 of 5 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Stormwater wetland used to mitigate nutrient loading for nitrogen and phosphorus, preventing eutrophication. 1. Buffer Impacts 2. Buffer Mitigation 2a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? 1a. Project is in which protected ® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba basin? ❑ Randleman ❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek 1b. Individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. Total buffer mitigation required: Buffer impact Reason for impact Type of impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2 number — (exempt, mitigation impact impact Permanent (P) allowable, required? (sq ft) (sq ft) or Temporary allowable w/ mitigation) B1 ® P ❑ T Stormwater outfall allowable Unnamed/ledge ❑ Yes ® No 100 creek B2 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No B3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No B4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No B5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No B6 ❑ P ❑ T I ❑ Yes ❑ No Total buffer impacts 1c. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Stormwater wetland used to mitigate nutrient loading for nitrogen and phosphorus, preventing eutrophication. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Installing a sediment barrier (wattles) to protect stream from erosion and sediments. 2. Buffer Mitigation 2a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes ® No 2b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation and calculate the amount of mitigation required in the table below. Zone Reason for impact Total impact (square feet Multiplier Required mitigation s uare feet Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 Total buffer mitigation required: 2c. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or NC EEP proposed? ❑ Yes ❑ No 2d. If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC EEP. 2e. If no, then discuss what type of mitigation is proposed. 2f. Comments: FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 3 of 5 C. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued FORM: SSGP3080 8-13 Page 4 of 5 E. Diffuse Flow Plan All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of ❑ Diffuse flow stormwater treatment. Include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flow will be ® Other BMP maintained. If a Level Spreader is proposed, attach a Level Spreader Supplement Form. 1a. If due to site constraints, a BMP other than a level spreader is proposed, please provide a ❑ Yes ® No plan for stormwater treatment as outlined in Chapter 8 of the NC Stormwater BMP of public (federal/state) land? Manual and attach a BMP Supplement Form. 1 b. F. Supplementary Information by First Class Mail via the US Postal Service: 1. Environmental Documentation OR NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use ❑ Yes ® No Raleigh, NC 27604 of public (federal/state) land? For all other projects sent by delivery service 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an ❑ Yes ® No OR Karen Higgins environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch 1617 Mail Service Center Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1617 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document been finalized by the State ❑ Yes ® No Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) Comments: 2. Violations 2a. is the site in violation of DWR Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .0500), Isolated Wetland ❑ Yes ® No Rules (15A NCAC 02H.1300), DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian i Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B.0200)? 2b. ermit application? Is this an after-the-factpP P C1 Yes ® No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): Ap icant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Send 3 complete sets of this form and accompanying documents to the following.- For ollowing: For government transportation projects sent For government transportation projects sent by by First Class Mail via the US Postal Service: delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.).- tc.):NC NCDWR, Transportation Permitting Unit OR NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center 512 N. Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1617 Raleigh, NC 27604 For all other projects sent by First Class Mail For all other projects sent by delivery service via the US Postal Service (UPS, FedEx, etc.): Karen Higgins OR Karen Higgins NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch 1617 Mail Service Center 512 N. Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1617 Raleigh, NC 27604 FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 5 of 5 vragwry ~ ANWMM~ ul0 !F*=6"= *4P4MwA~ I U PA(C4" I owunwa XMIS p1tv"N"MwbM OR964"1► Rolf DAe"Oft t6 boo= an 4, aarrs %L 4147 ll SwwjwdPMpwWOf Absc Wksbift brt --!�OBWZ - amov60we - IIwDCoeBM DiftDooss6orA2018 - Sods raMW - Alleilio A AGaiuMbOwAIVAnobby Book—Page— A7 ME— 4 I�MyMMIMI�/r IY *WVft*4*WAAk-W*�swdw" dmmdmdbdil 11 .6" IW.03 "moan �vaww%:6 .us~ . ibi Obd"."O. 6=6A me I U PA(C4" I owunwa XMIS p1tv"N"MwbM OR964"1► Rolf DAe"Oft t6 boo= an 4, aarrs %L 4147 ll SwwjwdPMpwWOf Absc Wksbift brt --!�OBWZ - amov60we - IIwDCoeBM DiftDooss6orA2018 - Sods raMW - Alleilio A AGaiuMbOwAIVAnobby Book—Page— A7 ME— 4 36- 8 VN Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map *A**Ik -TeIeCom Dr 'v Mr. T 7 oil M -VA -11a - y7g be valid a 704400 700.500 704WO 704700 Map Scale: 1:4,180 fpdrdEd on A portrA (8.5' x 11") sheet Metiers N 0 50 IOD 200 0 200 400 wo 1200 pm)ecWn: Web Men Oxw a"dnates: WGS84 E* bcs: UTM Zone 17N IAGS84 6 ■ 36- & 34' N 36* 0 G"N MAPLEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Custom Soil Resource Report Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation rrr Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Mi Aerial Photography 7 MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Granville County, North Carolina Survey Area Data: Version 19, Sep 10, 2018 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: May 25, 2016—Nov 17. 2017 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map Unit Polygons .. Soil Map Unit Lines 0 Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water O Perennial Water V. Rock Outcrop + Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip f Sodic Spot Custom Soil Resource Report Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation rrr Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Mi Aerial Photography 7 MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Granville County, North Carolina Survey Area Data: Version 19, Sep 10, 2018 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: May 25, 2016—Nov 17. 2017 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In AOI Percent of AOI ChA Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 1.5 2.9% 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded ------------------- --------- CrB Creedmoor coarse sandy loam, ------------------- 17.9 — -- 35.2% 2 to 6 percent slopes --------------- CrC ------- Creedmoor coarse sandy loam, ---------- 11.81. 23.3% 6 to 10 percent slopes Urc Urban land-Iredeil-Creedmoor 19.6T 38.6% 2 to 10 percent -- --- Lcomplex, slopes --- ---- --- -- --- — -- Totals for Area of Interest i i �A ll 04 " y r r ol � •.IIt, • i i. r *t' +4 i5b�tA�HrsSDNtd'r • ` OY Botnar. . 44C►w WT �+ •_�, ., �.(.l.Y/� , � ` A. 870 870 ODE M' r� � Cat'•r traits '� �Jp'k '�j�� '► lMrlJi�wrt i,p � � , G i,;yl` Gam Pf'" - _Can _ i Project Site' CAM 7.8°45' '03, '0+� 2 OW DD4 FtEr '05 '05 42'3U' (r7WDOOOR) atee n .rw•