110022_Complete File - Historical_20190227

_ _
��tr.-�,, .T��._s �����, e� -�.., ��,,,���..,o

aci lity uu er: 11_22
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of desi��?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
( Are th�:re lazoor:s or storage pends n s*te whv-,h need to be properlU c'osed?
SnrueYu e3 1x6°yi!1 SrHo dln,7 Fonds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes DA No
❑ Yes §4 No
0 Yes M No
[]Yes p No
Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type . grA.(�Ua&q&.Q..r.�1....... ...............................................
....................................................................... ....
16. "Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
' Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/'inspection with on-site representative?
For Certified Facilities Oniv
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
p No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
Zia No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
lid No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
X No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes p No
❑ Yes ❑ No
n ap am any Xtb answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. ;
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
2. There is a discharge from the watering trough overflow, milk parlor, & milk room to a small tributary to Newfound
Creek. The watering trough overflow needs a shutoff valve control. An NOV will be issued.
9. - 13. The lagoon is completed but not operational. The construction of two pump stations and installation of piping needs to
be completed.
117. - 19. The construction of the irrigation system is not complete. This facility currently land applies animal waste with a
manure spreader. A dry stack is being built.
,_A
Reviewer/Inspector Name Ma Y_ Ha er
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �/n A Dater /
cc: Division of Water OualiYy, Water QualAy Section, Facility Assessment Unit
4/30/97

/riP

0

December 22, 2004
Michael F. Easley, Governor
—' William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL 7004 0750 0000 2589 9620
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Dale Teague
Charles Teague Dairy
35 Hickory Hill Farm Road
Leicester, North Carolina 28748
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Compliance Inspection — Record Keeping
Charles Teague Dairy
Facility No. 11-22
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Teague:
On December 14, 2004, Bev Price of the Division of Water Quality's Asheville Regional Office conducted a routine
compliance inspection of the waste handling system for the Charles Teague Dairy. It was noted that the facility
does not have a certified operator in charge. Additionally, there were no soil or waste samples collected for 2004.
This is a violation of the General Permit #200000 and your waste utilization plan. Please respond to this office
within 15 days of receipt of this notice indicating what measures you have taken to address these violations.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Bev Price at (828) 296-
4500.
Sincerely,
G. Landon Davidson, P.G.
Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor
cc: Rocky Durham, Division of Soil & Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office 610 E. Center Ave. Ste.
301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Aquifer Protection Section Central Files
Aquifer Protection Section Asheville Regional Office Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778
Aquifer Protection Section
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
None hCarolina
Nurally
Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]

Dale Teague
Dale Teague Farm
35 Hickory Hill Farm Road
Leicester, North Carolina 28754
Dear Mr. Teague:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Lrolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Thank you for submitting the Lagoon Closure Form. Permit number AWC110022 has been
rest hded because all animals have been removed and all lagoons are closed. You should no
longer receive invoices for the annual permit fee but if you do, please contact Todd Bennett at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Paul Sherman
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Fran McPherson
Asheville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Central Files
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone:
Internet: www.ncwatgqualily.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1:
Fax 2:
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper Customer Service:
NorthCarolina
Aeur,711Y
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]

a

Animal Waste. Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form
(Please t�m,r print all information that does not require mature)
General Information:
Name of Farm: �' �a ('l/
-er Facility No:�- �
Owners) Name:_ 1 ,' H J. urn w /n
Mailing Address:
t,C1C-C
o wK+01011 Foe,,&
Phone No: 5.IS – ,?,3.63��
County: ga""Zo +l
Operation Description (remaining animals only):
o Please check this box if there will be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure. If there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure, please provide the following information on the animals that will remain.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
o Wean to Feeder
o Feeder to Finish
o Farrow to Wean
o Farrow to Feeder
o Farrow to Finish
o Gilts
o Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
o Layer
o Non -Layer
Type of Beef No. of Animals
o Brood
o Feeders -U
o Stockers
Other Type of Livestock:
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the 2H .0217 threshold?
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes?
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?: NpK6
Type of Dairy No. of Animals
o Milking
o Dry
o Heifers
o Calves
Number of Animals:
Yes o No 0
Yes o 0 0
(Name) , ��! �C'\CC. of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division of
Water Quality's-�154�e,, .%k\j, Regional Office`(see map -on back) was contacted on 5 `t OtP (date)
for notification of the pending closure of this pond or lagoon. This notification was at least 24 hours prior to the start
of closure, which began on (41 5Oto (date). —n,\;5 Was no+ ?j{hrg. :),riar
�},rl dad
I verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan, which meets all NRCS
specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21 of the North Carolina
General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the MRCS Technical Guide
Standard 360. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste liquids and sludges
have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been removed, all slopes have been
stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Address (Agenc ): u ,2 Ol $5 1 6 r�hS
Signature: r
r �
Phone No.:464'�/2-519
Date-
Return
ate
Return within 15 days following completion of animal water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Unit RECEIVED
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PLC - 1 March 18, 2002
i. J e,4.0'.4
F,N,- Me Regional Office
as3rc air (a9ry=yt,P�,'a'rio7,u

Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form
(Please ty ;r print all information that does not require nature)
General Information:
�' (r.0. C ¢ s �G�Lc�}�.c-c. ci- Ih y Facility i oZ
Name of Farm: tY No: ;L
_�-
Owner(s) Name: Ly n is 13 M W K
Mailing Address: 0to#btoIt V6 e-' Phone No F,t.S
L.cjres�' All, AS") County:
Operation Description (remaining animals only): -
o Please check this box if there will be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure. If there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure, please provide the following information on the animals that will remain.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
o Wean to Feeder
o Feeder to Finish
o Farrow to Wean
o Farrow to Feeder
o Farrow to Finish
o Gilts
o Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
o Layer
o Non -Layer
Type of Beef No. of Animals
o Brood
o Feeders _50
o Stockers
Other Type of Livestock:
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the 2H .0217 threshold?
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes?
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?: &NG
Type of Dairy No. of Animals
o Milking
o Dry
o Heifers
o Calves
Number of Animals:
Yes o 6-0 -0—)
Yes o 0D
(Name) of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division of
Water Quality's Regional Office (see map on back) was contacted on (date)
for notification of the pending closure of this pond or lagoon. This notification was at least 24 hours prior to the start
of closure, which began on, (date).
I verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan, which meets all NRCS
specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21 of the North Carolina
General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of Land Owner (Please_ Print): L
Signature:
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the NRCS Technical Guide
Standard 360. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste liquids and sludges
have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been removed, all slopes have been
stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Address
^ /4ea dpe 144 e. Ak Phone No.: -4- LS 19
a 0.01 Date: J -1_041
Return within 15 days following completion of animal water storage
N. C. Division Of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PLC - 1 March 18, 2002
IM AU 11 2006
Regional

rte;

_6,sure Form
Subject: Re: Pond Closure Form
From: Bev Price <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 13:00:56 -0400
To: Gary Higgins <[e-mail]>
Gary,
Put today's date in the notification date space. Put the date of the closure in the
next blank space (actual closure begin date) and just put a note out to the side that
notification was not 24 hours prior.
Bev
Gary Higgins wrote:
Thanks Bev. We will get you a copy of the completed form and a copy in
the mail ASAP. What should we put in the middle section where it asks
if we notified you?
T
-----original Message -----
From: Bev Price [mailto:[e-mail]] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 8:11 AM
To: Gary Higgins
Subject: Pond Closure Form
Gary,
If you have any questions, give me a call.
Bev
Bev Price - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Aquifer Protection Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Bev Price <[e-mail]>
NC DENR - Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Aquifer Protection Section
1 of 1 5/12/2006 8:39 AM

Subject: Re: WSP Closure
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:26:25 -0400
From: Keith Larick <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR DWQ
To: Bev Price <[e-mail]>
Bev,
We can hold off on the change form. Unless the former lessee/permit holder says he wants the permit out
of his name, then we probably should have them do it.
Keith
Bev Price wrote:
Keith,
I have given the pond closure form to the landowner and Buncombe Soil &
Water are working with her to secure funding to have the pond closed. The
land owner wants the pond closed and the permit rescinded. She plans to
have a beef cattle (pasture, under threshold) operation instead of leasing
to a new dairy. Is it still necessary to do the change of ownership if the
closure process is in the works? Thanks
Bev
Keith Larick wrote:
Bev,
It looks like we need to do a change of ownership. If the lessee has
removed all animals and is off of the site, then responsibility for the
WSP goes back on the landowner. So if we do a change of ownership, we
can re -issue the permit in the owner's name. Any other questions let me
know.
Keith
Bev Price wrote:
Hi Keith,
I have a facility that is looking to close their WSP and get the permit
rescinded.
The permit holder is not the land owner. Whose responsibility is it tc
close the
pond. Thanks.
10/12/2004 3:35 PM
1 of 2

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
2090 U.S. HIGHWAY 70
SWANNANOA, NORTH CAROLINA 28778
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
TO: Earn OA,<alts
FAX: SA -- 0.51- ego y
F
707 M M, IffB
I (--p-
#
.-e
# OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 2
MESSAGE: If questions, please call 8281296-4500
tj8u aiq bt e Ae ire- lore- 4 c�
NorthCarolina
Natural4il

Rt";"Cl 20c)
It)
;xv
ih
a r
6e C,/A-r4,m/ 12
)of 0 coo/up--c-I
Ar,7, )Pcv� r
Ce resci"d- LOW ca�gk, e 4-4)
Up

..�.��.��..�� .
.�
..
�d
(\
� .
�
a
:}

ging
Subject: Re: holding pond closing
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 10:23:18 -0400
From: Keith Larick <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR DWQ
To: Bev Price <[e-mail]>
Bev,
Sounds like we have two different topics. If the WSP is closed, the permit can be rescinded. At this point,
the beef rattle operation could start up and wou not need to be permitted, assummR it was a pasture
operation.
The point of closure is that the WSP can't be used anymore for storage of animal waste, so I don't think
they can have the WSP closed to NRCS standards and still be available for use as a WSP later. In order for
it to be considered closed it either has to be breached or converted to a farm pond. Most WSPs are too
small for conversion to a farm pond to
helps.
Keith
Bev Price wrote:
Keith,
guess NRCS could provide guidance there. Hope this
Under what circumstances would they not need a permit? I did fail to mention yesterday
that the potential new lessee will be beef cattle not dairy so there would be no milk parlor
wash water.Also, regarding the question of closing of ponds; again I failed to mention
an important piece of information. If the waste holding pond is "closed" can it be kept in
tact for future use as a waste holding pond as opposed to a farm pond? Sorry for the confusion.
Bev
Keith Larick wrote:
Bev,
They can leave the pond intact and still have it be "closed." I'm not sure of the exact procedure, NRCS
should be able to help them. Once it is closed, we can rescind the permit. I think there is a NRCS
farm pond standard that it would need to meet.
For the new lessee, just because the cattle are on pasture doesn't mean that they would not need a
permit. They would still need to deal with milking parlor wash water, etc. It is possible that they
would not need a permit though. Let me know if you have any other questions.
Keith
Bev Price wrote:
1 of 2 9/2/2004 11:21 AM

.,sing
Keith,
I have a property owner who has leased property to a dairy farm
that is now out of business. Once the permit is rescinded and the
holding pond has been closed, can the pond be left in tact for
possible future use as a holding pond. The property owner has a
potential new lessee for cattle (on pasture not confined). Thanks
Bev
Bev Price- Bev.PriceQncmai.l.net
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Bev Price - Bev.Pricegncm.ail.net
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
9/2/2004 11:21 AM
2 of 2

Subject: Re: cattle permit???
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:42:49 -0400
From: "J. R. Joshi" <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR DWQ
To: Bev Price <[e-mail]>
Yes, that's what my understanding is.
If they do not rescind the
for any v-167ations. I am not sure if he wants to do that. So, rescission
t and still operate under the threshold the current permittee is
step.
Once this permit is rescinded, then they can stay under the threshold without a permit unless some
violations require them to get an individual permit....
Don't feel like you are bothering me. I will be glad to pass any info that may be helpful.
Bev Price wrote:
ible
Hi J.R.,
I'm sorry to bother you again but I'm not quiet sure I understood your response to one of the
questions regarding the Teague Farm. Is this correct?: Only after the current permit is rescinded
can the new lessee begin operation AND the new lessee can operate without a permit as long as they
are under threshold numbers. Thanks for your help J.R.
. bev
U. R. Joshi" wrote:
Good questions.
1, Permit requires that the pond be properly closed before rescinding the permit. They should complete
the enclosed form and send it to Keith Larick with a request to rescind the permit. They probably want
to mention in this form that they will go below the threshold numbers.
2. This farm was a weird one. The owners gave permission for the lessee to be permittee. I guess once
the farm has been properly closed and the permit has been rescinded, the new lessee probably may
operate below the threshold numbers Just make sure that the owners know that they (not the lessee)
will be responsible for any environmental compliance (violations).
Hope this helps. Maybe Paul can add to this interpretation...
Bev Price wrote:
Hi J.R.,
I have some questions regarding the Dale Teague Farm in Buncombe
County. The dairy sold out on Aug. 9th (depopulated). The original
owner Charles Teague died some time ago. The waste holding pond
1 of 3 9/3/2004 8:13 AM

is still open but they plan to pump it down as soon as possible.
Question#1: What do they need to do to get the permit (COC)
rescinded?
Question#2: The property owner (Lynn Brown) is looking for someone else to
lease the land. She has a potential leasee - someone with probabl not
more than 100 head of cattle (not dairy). The cattle will be on pasture,
not confined, except in small groups during winter months for feeding.
Since the property is still under the Teague name, what does the new
leasee need to do, if anything? Thanks
Bev
Bev Price - Bev.Pricegncmail.net
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
J. R. Joshi
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail]
Bev Price - Bev.Pricegncmail.net
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
J. R. Joshi
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
9/3/2004 8:13 AM
2of3

Subject: Re: cattle permit???
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:58:08 -0400
From: "J. R. Joshi" <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR DWQ
To: Bev Price <[e-mail]>
CC: paul sherman <[e-mail]>
Good questions.
1, Permit requires that the pond be properly closed before rescinding the permit. They should complete the
enclosed form and send it to Keith Larick with a request to rescind the permit. They probably want to
mention in this form that they will go below the threshold numbers.
2. This farm was a weird one. The owners gave permission for the lessee to be permittee. I guess once the
farm has been properly closed and the permit has been rescinded, the new lessee probably may operate
below the threshold numbers Just make sure that the owners know that the (not the lessee) will be
responsible for anv environmenta comp lance violations).
Hope this helps. Maybe Paul can add to this interpretation...
Bev Price wrote:
Hi J.R.,
I have some questions regarding the Dale Teague Farm in Buncombe
County. The dairy sold out on Aug. 9th (depopulated). The original
owner Charles Teague died some time ago. The waste holding pond
is still open but they plan to pump it down as soon as possible.
Question#1: What do they need to do to get the permit (COC)
rescinded?
Question#2: The property owner (Lynn Brown) is looking for someone else to
lease the land. She has a potential leasee - someone with probabl not
more than 100 head of cattle (not dairy). The cattle will be on pasture,
not confined, except in small groups during winter months for feeding.
Since the property is still under the Teague name, what does the new
leasee need to do, if anything? Thanks
Bev Price - Bev.Price@,ncmail.net
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
1 of 2 9/3/2004 7:56 AM

emit fee
Subject: Re: animal waste permit fee
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:26:27 -0400
From: "J. R. Joshi" <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR DWQ
To: Bev Price <[e-mail]>
I don't think there is any application fee for animal permits. Rest of
your interpretation is correct.
Bev Price wrote:
>J. R.
>If someone is making an application for an Individual Animal Waste
>Permi t,
>is there an application fee? The information from the Non -Discharge
>Permitting
>Unit: Fees, indicates that animal waste permit annual fees are issued
>after a permit
>is issued. It doesn't address specifically the application fee, unless
>I'm misinterpreting
>the information. Any words of wisdom would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks
>Bev
>Bev Price - [e-mail]
>North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
>Asheville Regional Office
>Division of Water Quality
>2090 U.S. 70 Highway
>Swannanoa, NC 28778
>Tel: [phone]
>Fax: [phone]
J. R. Joshi
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone] ext 363
Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail]
1 of 1 9/3/2004 7:56 AM

CoM N. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
+�"�� PROTECTION
NCDNENR
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
2090 U.S. HIGHWAY 70
SWANNANOA, NORTH CAROLINA 28778
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
TO:
�wm
# OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER:
MESSAGE: If questions, please call 8281296-4500
©��F W A
T fi�QG
Nne
orthCarolina
iA1-rf:ris*/7l t

Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form
(Please': or print all information that does not require ;nature)
General Information:
Name of Farm: Facility No: -
Owner(s) Name:
Mailing Address: Phone No:
County:_
Operation Description (remaining animals only):
o Please check this box if there will be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure. If there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure, please provide the following information on the animals that will remain.
Operation Description.
Type of Swine No. of Animals
o Wean to Feeder
o Feeder to Finish
o Farrow to Wean
o Farrow to Feeder
o Farrow to Finish
o Gilts
o Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
o Layer
o Non -Layer
Type of Beef No. of Animals
o Brood
o Feeders
o Stockers
Other Type of Livestock:
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the 2H .0217 threshold?
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes?
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?:
Type of Dairy No. of Animals
o Milking
oDry
o Heifers
o Calves
Number of Animals:
Yes o No o
Yes o No o
(Name) of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division of
Water Quality's Regional Office (see map on back) was contacted on (date)
for notification of the pending closure of this pond or lagoon. This notification was at least 24 hours prior to the
start of closure, which began on (date).
I verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan, which meets all NRCS
specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21 of the North
Carolina General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of Land Owner (Please Print):
Signature: Date:
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the NRCS Technical Guide
Standard 998. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste liquids and
sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been removed, all slopes have
been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print
Address (Agency
Signature:
Phone No.:
Return within 15 days following completion of animal water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PLC - 1 March 18, 2002

Division of Water Quality
F] Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 110022 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC110022 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Buncombe Region: Asheville
10
Date of Visit: 10/26/2005 Entry •Time:1 JkWAM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Dale Teaaue Owner Email:
Owner: Dale Teaoue Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 35 Hickory Hill Farm Rd Leicester NC 28748
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°37'35" Longitude: 82°42'27"
From Asheville, take NC63 Leicester Hwy then a left on Newfound Road, then right on Old Newfound Road, then turn right on Brown
Town Road ,dairy is on left about 1/2 mile.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative Dale Teague Phone:
24 hour contact name Dale Teague Phone:
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
S ata p> , �,0�� J 0�W u ll�tf,®�+,�/L IPI4sA&'
Je-1 s4iq& emPtl
0
3Yer
Q1it
Page: 1

Permit: AWC110022 Owner -Facility: Dale Teague
Facility Number: 110022
Inspection Date: 10/26/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Ie
- F: B:
Page: 2

�
~,
p�nnu m^C110022 Owner �pmom�:oam Teague pomx�Number: 110022
.
�^
/^
Inspection Date: 10/26m005 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: nvunno
Discharge '& Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
0
El
F1
rl
Discharge originated at:
Structure�
Application Field
Other
u
a. Was conveyance man-made?
0
C1
0
11
». Did discharge reach Waters nfthe State? (if yes, notify ovvQ)
[]
[]
[]
[]
o.Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d,Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify cmvQ)
[]
[]
[]
[]
2.|othere evidence ofupast discharge from any part ofthe operation?
[
[]
[]
[]
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
[]
[]
[]
[]
NateCollection, S�� &T�etment �
You
No
NA
ws
^.|ustorage capacity less than adequate?
71
F1
nyes, iuwaste level into structural freeboard?
[]
o. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large trees, severe erosion,
Fl
[]
[]
[]
seepage, etc.)? '
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through owaste management or
[]
[]
[l
[]
closure plan?
r.Doany orthe structures need maintenance orimprovement?
[]
[]
[]
[]
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry
[]
[]
[]
[]
stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
[]
[]
[]
[]
|mpmw:monn
\mo�eApplication
Yes
No
NA
ws
aoUvoothat need maintenance urimprovement?
1o.Are there any mquirebuffers, compliance altm
0
0
0
0
11.}othere evidence ofincorrect application?
[][][][]
nyes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
[]
Frozen Ground?
[]
Heavy mma|o(Cv.Zn, e�)r
�
[]
pAwv
[]
|oPAN '1o%/1Omo?
[]
Total P205?
F1
Failure mimmmomtemonu�muugointo bare m
Flx|Y _
acceptable crop
Outside onammptm
71
Evidence ofwind drift?
`^
Application outside ofopp|imN
'
Clunonaar
Crop Type 1
Crop Type o
Crop Type n

Permit: AWC110022
Inspection Date: 10/26/2005
H
Owner - Facility: Dale Teague
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
H
Facility Number: 110022
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)?
n
n
n
n
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
n
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
n
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
n
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
n
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
n
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
n
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Checklists?
n
Design?
n
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
n
n
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after ? 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
❑
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
n
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
n
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
❑
n
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
n
n
n
Page: 4

1.
Permit: AWC110022 Owner -Facility: Dale Teague
Facility Number: 110022
Inspection Date: 10/26/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
n
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
n
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
n
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
n
n
n
n
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
n
n
n
n
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
n
n
n
n
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n
n
n
n
Page: 5

Subject: Re: Dale Teague Farm
ZZ Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 13:29:23 -0500
From: Keith Larick <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR DWQ
To: Bev Price <[e-mail]>
Bev,
They can use fescue pasture in the plan.. They just have to modify the plan and it has to be applied at the
agronomic rates, cropping windows, etc. The fescue crop does have to be utilized, if cows are out on the
pasture it shouldn't be an issue, otherwise it could be cut for hay.
Keith
Bev Price wrote:
Keith,
Can the actively growing crop be fescue (pasture), that which is growing
there now - or does the crop have to be one that is listed in Teague's WUP?
(corn silage or barley). Buncombe County SWCD thought maybe they could apply
to the designated fields as fescue is growing there now, rather than planting
a crop. Thanks Again.
Bev
Keith Larick wrote:
Bev,
The closure plan is set up like a WUP. It has to meet the NRCS
Standards, one of which is an actively growing crop. They can do the 30
day pre -plant, but they do have to actually plant a crop if they do
that. If any other questions come up let me know.
Keith
Bev Price wrote:
Keith,
The Buncombe County Soil & Water Cons. folks are preparing a closure
plan for the Teague Dairy waste pond per Lynn Brown. Since the Teague's
are no longer operating the dairy they have not and will not be planting
any receiving crops. Can the wastewater be applied to the adjacent
fields even though no crops have been planted? Thanks
1 of 2 2/23/2005 9:46 AM

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r; North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Y Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
November 2, 2005' ' F�
e
Mr. Dale Teague
Teague Dairy Farm
35 Hickory Hill Farm Road
Leicester, North Carolina 28748
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Charles Teague Dairy— Facility# 11-22
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Teague:
On October 26, 2005, I conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste handling
system for the Teague Dairy. Even though the dairy is no longer in operation you are still required to
maintain the waste holding pond, record waste levels and apply waste at agronomic rates. It is my
understanding that the waste pond is slated for closure. When the pond is closed out according to
NRCS Standards you may have the permit rescinded.
Thank you for your assistance during the inspection. If you have any questions regarding this
inspection or need assistance of any kind, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Please seethe attached inspection report for additional comments.
Sincerely,
BeverAvrice
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Gary Higgins, Buncombe County Soil & Water Conservation District 155 Hilliard Ave. Ste. 204
Asheville, NC 28801
Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO
Noce Carolina
Aturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality — Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section FAX [phone]
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Re6ycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

i
j Division of Water Quality
F� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number 110022 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC110022 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Insoection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Buncombe Region: 'Asheville
Date of Visit: 10/26/2005 Entry Time: 11:00 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Dale Teague Owner Email:
Owner: Dale TeaguePhone: 828-683-3235
Mailing Address: 35 Hickory Hill Farm Rd Leicester NC 28748
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°37'35" Longitude: 82°42'27"
From Asheville, take NC63 Leicester Hwy then a left on Newfound Road, then right on Old Newfound Road, then turn right on Brown
Town Road ,dairy is on left about 1/2 mile.
Question Areas:
W Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative Dale Teague Phone:
24 hour contact name Dale Teague Phone:
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price Phone:
Inspector Signature: r .2°-"�- Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
The Teague Dairy is no longer in operation. The dairy herd was sold in August 2004.
The dry stack is empty.
There are two silage pits; one pit is empty, the other is approximately 1/3 full. The silage is covered with plastic and secured with tires.
Although the dairy is no longer in operation the waste holding pond must be maintained according to the permit and the waste must be
applied at agronomic rates. It is my understanding that the waste pond is slated for closure. When the pond is closed out according
to NRCS Standards, the permit may be rescinded.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC110022 Owner -Facility: Dale Teague Facility Number: 110022
Inspection Date: 10/26/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 125 0
Total Design Capacity: 125
Total SSLW: 175,000
Waste Structures
Tvoe Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond LIQUID POND 18.00 42.00
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry
stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
n■nn
n
n
n
nn■n
nn■n
nn■n
n
■
n
Cl
n
■
n
n
Yes
No
NA
NE
n■nn
El
n■nn
n■nn
n■nn
n■nn
n■nn
Page: 2

®►
i
Mr. Dale Teague
Charles Teague Dairy
35 Hickory Hill Farm Road
Leicester, North Carolina 28748
Dear Mr. Teague:
f` Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
December 22, 2004
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Charles Teague Dairy — Facility # 11-22
Buncombe County
Z`'
On December 14, 2004, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste
handling system for the Charles Teague Dairy. You indicated that the dairy is no longer in business and
that the herd was sold on August 9, 2004.
Even though the dairy is no longer in operation you are still required to abide by the permit until
such time as it is rescinded. The waste holding pond must be maintained according to the permit and
waste utilization plan. When the pond is closed out according to Natural Resource Conservation Service
Standards, you may have the permit rescinded. One area of concern noted during the inspection was
with regard to record keeping. The soils and waste analyses were not collected for 2004 and there was
no certified operator in charge for the facility. A Notice of Violation addressing these issues will follow this
letter.
Thank you for your assistance during the inspection. If you have any questions regarding this
inspection or need assistance of any kind, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Please see the attached inspection report for additional comments.
Sincerely,,-,,
_lv' lE�"
Bev Price
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Gary Higgins, Buncombe County Soil & Water Conservation District 155 Hilliard Ave. Ste. 204
Asheville, NC 28801
Aquifer Protection Section Files ARO
�.One Carolina
tura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality — Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section FAX [phone]
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet: h2o.enr.state.naus
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

of Visit O. Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
'Data of Visit:12/14/2004
Facility Number 11 22
�� Time: -71
9:OOam
* Not Operational Q Below Threshold
M.Permitted Certified ® Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: T4/.2014.4.......
Farm Name: Dalelogul:................................ ............................... ........................ County: Blancon1bg ....................................... A,A............
Owner Name: Dile......................................... league..........................
Phone No:(.8z�.fi&r.�5........................................................
Mailing Address:S.i.Gory.dill.l;xm.QA.......................................................... i~uxeuster.... .0........................................................ 2.8.7.4.8..............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
From Asheville, take NC63 Leicester Hwy then a left on Newfound Road, then right on Old Newfound Road, then turn right +
on ]Brown Town Road ,dairy is on left about 1/2 mile.
❑ Swine E] Poultry ® Cattle [I Horse Latitude 35 • 37 35 Longitude 82 ' 42 27
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a.If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Stricture 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ....... waste..pmd ...... ........ dry -slack ........ .................................... ................................... ......................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 32 12
12/12103 Continued

Facility Number: 11-22 Date of Inspection 12/14/2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the inteo of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees,18ere erosion, t'
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or yes ®1�W
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? El Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? El Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
12. Crop type Pastrue-cool season corn silage barley
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below N Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes N No
Air Quality representative immediately.
2. Small amount of silage leachate. The leachate had not reached surface waters.
17. Pipe does not discharge below water level, no odor noticed.
21. The permit was not available for review.
23. Waste and soil samples were not collected for 2004. IRR -2 forms were not complete.
25. Facility does not have a certified operator in charge.
;{
Reviewer/InspectorNaine
Reviewer/Inspector Signature... �lti,r �`iZc tee:
12/12/03
❑ Field Copy N Final Notes
Date: 1A V- Of/
Continued

22 Date of Inspection 12/14/2004
ds & Documents
/-nave Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ®Yes ❑ No
oes the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
j(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes N No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ® Yes ❑ No
N Waste Application N Freeboard N Waste Analysis N Soil Sampling
24,. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NFIDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
■ Yes XNo
Q Yes ONit
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
Fl-:] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
12/12/03

Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Asheville xegional umce
WATER QUALITY SECTION
December 19, 2003
Mr. Dale Teague
Charles Teague Dairy
35 Hickory Hill Drive
Leicester, North Carolina 28748
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Charles Teague Dairy - #11-22
Animal Waste Management System
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Teague:
On December 18, 2003, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the Charles Teague
Dairy, with your assistance. The purpose of the inspection was to determine the compliance status
of your facility. The maintenance and condition of your facility appeared to be good. Your records
still are in need of improvement and there is no certified operator for this facility. Failure to improve
these deficient areas before the next inspection may be considered a violation of your animal waste
management plan and North Carolina Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2H 0.0217. You will find a
copy of the inspection report attached for your records.
Finally, you should make every effort to become a Certified Operator, as soon as possible.
Should have any questions regarding this inspection you may contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Lar Frost_
E ironmental Chemist
Enclosure
xc: Gary Higgins - SWCD
Jeff Young
59 Woodfin Place Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
%TOW"
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

LR
1pe of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
eason for Visit O Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit, 12/18/2003 Time: 1100
Facility Number 11 22
Not (; perational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 RegisteredDate Last Operated or Above Threshold: ................
Farm Name: DAI.e.���tgutr ................ ... County: I Itg>tam :Y ................. FARQ ...........
Owner Name: IDAW......................................... Igag>ate........................................................ Phone No: (. 2. )..6 3-32 5..................................... .............
Mailing Address: .......................................................... ........:......... h,d4:OS>tg#:..Zj.0 ........................................................ 2.8.7.4.8 ..............
FacilityContact: ........................................................ .......... Title:.......................................................... Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: ................................................................ Integrators........................................................ .................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............... .................. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
ro,
om Asheville, take NC63 Leicester Hwy then a left on Newfound Road, then right on Old Newfound Road, then turn right
i Brown Town Road ;dairy is on left about 1/2 mile.
❑. Swine ❑ Poultry 0 Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 37 35 Longitude 82 42 27 �°
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [i Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? [] Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......... pondA l..........................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 25
05/03/01 Continued

:FacilityNumber: 11-22
Date of :Inspection 12/18/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste ADnlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [ ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) Fescue (Hay) Corn (Silage & Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
■ C4 •
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
13 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
Cecord keeping has not improved significantly since last inspection.
,his facility remains without a certified operator since the death of Mr. Charles Teague.
,he facility appears to be maintained well.
Reviewer/Inspector Name121
Keit
_..r
mA
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: /Z
05/03/01
Continued

�r;r r
I
BUNCOMBE COUNT
SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
155 Hilliard Avenue, Suite 204 (828) 2504785
Asheville, NC 28801 FAX: [phone]
August 14, 2003
Dale Teague
35 Hickory Hill Drive
Leicester, NC 28748
Dear Mr. Teague:
It was a pleasure meeting with you during our operation review on August 11, 2003. You
are doing a good job with maintenance/operation of your waste management system.
There are a few items that need to be done to bring your operation into compliance with
state laws regarding confined animal operations as of the date of the review. One is to
have a Certified Operator on site. I will check the state web site and contact the
Cooperative Extension Service to see when the training is available. Waste samples are
required within 60 days of each waste application, both for the dry stack (slurry) manure;
and the liquid pond waste (liquid). Also, I will get you a clearer map of your application
fields, and we will work on getting the field numbers to match on your records. The map
you currently have is difficult to read. I noted in the review that the liquid holding pond
needs to be pumped down as soon as possible since it is over the maximum fill level.
Again, thanks for meeting with me on Monday. We greatly appreciate your efforts to
maintain good water quality in the Newfound Creek area. Please give us a call if you
need anything.
Sincerely,
Gary Hi ins, �ector
Buncombe SWCD
cc: Larry Frost
NC DENR, Division of Water Quality
Rocky Durham
NC DENR, Division of Soil and Water Conservation

nical Assistance Site Visit Re
Div"�ion of Soil and Water Conservation""
Iatural Resources Conservation Service
Soil and Water Conservation District
Other...
Facility Number
- O Date: �` ,(—i�
Time: /* ,�%
Time On Farm:
Farm Name
ct cc (3t�-!S� � i'dy
County
Phone: Phone:�:�•.>3'�'1,?"
Mailing Address
surface waters or wetlands?
Onsite
Representative
Representative
'D�;_4-�G�t�-�
Integrator
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
Tvne Of Visit
¢"'Operation Review
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
❑ Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry L2tattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Purpose Of Visit
outine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
1pagl-ry
S
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ yes
Dln�o
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ yes
Purpose Of Visit
outine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
1pagl-ry
S
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ yes
1pagl-ry
S
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ yes
Dln�o
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
h I ho
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands?
❑ yes
Dln�o
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ yes
E no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees,
❑ yes
no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding
❑ yes
E21ho
requiring DWO notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment
❑ yes
E -lb
I;
and/or pubic eat �
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? Eay"e"s ❑ no
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier S L-�/Y�[ ��5 l C F
Level (Inches) ,(,
CROP TYPESFt�t-
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES! � �luf "C ��' % lit( �,t 2-
7.
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

,v AT Michael F. Easley, Governor
F9QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Judf North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
- i Alan W. Klimek, P.E.,Director
Division of Water Quality
March 28, 2003
CERTIFIED MAID ,x
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED��� a t
Dale Teague „>
Charles Teague
35 Hickory Hill Farm Road
Leicester NC 28748
Subject: Application No. AWC110022
Additional Information Request
Charles Teague Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Buncombe County
Dear Dale Teague:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary review of the subject application. Additional information is
required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by April 27, 2003:
1. It was recently notified to us that this farm is currently under the new ownership of Dale Teague. If so, please complete
the enclosed Notification of Change of Ownership.
2. This office currently has a waste utilization plan (WUP) for this facility that is dated 10/29/2000 The plan was written
for 125 dairy operation. The plant available nitrogen for corn silage in that plan appears to be high (up to 3301bs/acre).
Please verify that the same WUP is being followed on this farm and, if so, have the technical specialist provide
explanation for the high nitrogen rate in some of these fields in the narrative portion of WUP. If you have modified the
WUP since then, please submit a copy of most recent WUP that reflects correct number of animals, crops grown, field
utilized and has field maps with acreage clearly marked on the maps.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be
signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter
must be submitted on or before April 27, 2003 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in
accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 211 .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a
violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
Sincerely,
J. R. Jos i
Soil Sc' ntist
Non- ischarge Permitting Unit
cc: Asheville Regional Office, Water Quality
Buncombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File WWA
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet http://h2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu
NMENR
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center _ Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 5Q% recycled/100/6 post -consumer paper

wArF,�QG
O `C
Charles Teague
Charles Teague
35 Hickory Hill Farm Road
Leicester NC 28748
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
January 13, 2003
Facility Number 11 - 22
Subject: Public Meetings for Draft Renewal of State Non -Discharge Animal Waste Operation General
Permits
Dear Producer:
Your animal waste management facility is scheduled to be issued coverage under the Animal Waste
Operation General Permits in the near future. The Division of Water Quality (Division) staff is currently
in the process of renewing the Animal Waste Operation General Permits and is scheduled to have the
permit reissued by early April 2003. Once the permit is reissued, your facility would be eligible for
coverage under the reissued permit.
The Division has published a public notice regarding these renewed general permits. A copy of
the draft animal waste operation general permits and fact sheets are available at the website
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu/
or by writing or calling:
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Telephone number: [phone], ext: 574
The Division will be conducting public meetings regarding these renewed permits. The following is a
iist of dates, times, and locations of the public meetings:
February 3, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Kenansville — James Sprunt Community College
February 4, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Williamston — Martin Community College (Bldg. 2 Auditorium)
February 6, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Iredell — Iredell County Center
Further information can be obtained by reviewing the Fact Sheet available at the website and address
listed above.
Cc: Asheville Regional.Office, Division of Water Quality w
Buncombe Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit Application File 11 - 22
MUM
> .
NCTME
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet hftp://h2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

�� of North Carolina�
impartment of Environment
and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
w
Affl'J.KP�AF�j
•
NCDEN
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WATER QUALITY SECTION
December 23, 2002
Mr. Dale Teague
Charles Teague Dairy
35 Hickory Hill Drive
Leicester, North Carolina 28748
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Charles Teague Dairy - #11-22
Animal Waste Management System
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Teague:
On December 20, 2002, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the Charles
Teague Dairy, with your assistance. The purpose of the inspection was to determine the
compliance status of your facility. The maintenance and condition of your facility appeared to be
good. However, two deficiencies in your animal waste management plan were noted. First, your
records are in need of improvement; no soil analysis, waste analysis or PAN calculations were
available. Next, there is no certified operator for this facility. Failure to improve these deficient
areas before the next inspection may be considered a violation of your animal waste
management plan and North Carolina Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2H 0.0217. You will find a
copy of the inspection report attached for your records.
The following actions should be taken before the next inspection:
1) You should review all of your records and update them as required by your animal waste
manage plan.
2) You should make every effort to become a Certified Operator.
You are encouraged to contact Mr. Gary Higgins with Buncombe County Soil and Water
Conservation District at [phone] to assist you in your efforts to improve these areas.
Asheville Regional Office, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled\110% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Teague
December 23, 2002
Page 2
Finally, thank you for your assistance during the inspection. Should have any questions
regarding this inspection you may contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
La Frost
Environmental Chemist
Enclosure
xc: Gary Higgins — SWCD
Jeff Young
Asheville Regional Office, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled\110% Post Consumer Paper

Type of Visit 0• Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 22 .,. Date of Visit: Time:
12/20/2002 0930
0 Not O erational O Below Threshold
13 Permitted IN Certified U Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Charles.19ague.................................................................. ........................... County: UUUV..9njbe........................................ Q............
.
Owner Name: Lou7ise.....................................league ........................................................ Phone No: (.$28)..X83-3Z�.5........:................................................
Mailing Address: 35..R ckory. llj.k:a:m.Roan.......................................................... �,eleester..NG........................................................ 2$7.4 ..............
Facilitv Contact: 12al.e.'deal}ug..................................................... Title: Qpjzrator ........................................... Phone No: 2. rk 3,1 (........................
Onsite Representative: QaIe..T.eague..........
................... Integrator:...........................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:...........................
...............
Location of Farm:
From Asheville, take NC63 Leicester Hwy then a left on Newfound Road, then right on Old Newfound Road, then turn right
on Brown Town Road ,dairy is on left about 1/2 mile.
El Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 37 35 Longitude 82 ' 42 27 G°
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon El Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon. system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection R: Treatment
■' 66
- rN .
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway ❑ Yes 9 No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......... pond.t l..........................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 24
05/03/01 Continued

-1 0
Facility Number: 11-22 Bate of Inspection 12/20/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Graze) Fescue (Hay)
❑ Yes
El Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes J@ No
❑ Yes ER No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 0 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0 No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes C9 No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 9 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? El Yes 0 No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy 9 Final Notes
keeping must improve as soon as possible. The operator is not completing all calculations required including PAN and soil
Dale Teague should become a certified operator as soon as possible. The facility has not had a certified operator since Mr. Charles
me passed away.
Reviewer/Ins ector Name���°'���'
P 4rry,.Fros
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
05/03/01 Continued

tine O Complaint Q Follo
11
facility Number J1� I Date of Inspection l�y ""�"r cit ftEGIQAgt 6rA(
J
,J Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered [3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Chu. ���.. � `t.).Gt.. `� ..... County: U -
Farm Name: .......... t. ...... ./........................................ 1?L..�.1.a.:...
���
Owner Name; ........ l•� ..:.a.. .:-....................................:....................... Phone No:....... . ... 3 —
Facility Contact: .. �L:: +....: lit.. E'...........................'I'itle:....� Jt'r ............................. Phone No: .j '(sad :�l��S
. ........v .......
1'Iailiing Address:.....lG��l.........CP.'..-.-....................... .. ...± �l.Lre���.�.....!.Y..�:................��..7�9:....................
Onsi�e Representative: 7C e 7-G�G4� Integrator:............................................................
Certified Operator:....... J ........................................................... Operator Certification Number:.................
.........................
Loca�iou of Farm: I r,_
f
......: � ...� ..... ....��t' .1.....-.....A"H............................ ..:........................................................................
.
tl
Latit ►de [�' ` 0" Longitude �• �` ��"
Design Current Design Current Design Current
5swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
El
Wean to Feeder
❑
Feeder to Finish
❑
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
E]
Gilts
E]
Boars
❑ Layer j airy 1/ l
❑ Non -Layer I JEJ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacityo 5—
Total
Total SSLW 17 T, bU0 �f
Number of Lagoons 1 G - Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding ,Pon ds /Solid Traps JEI No Liquid Waste Management System
D►sel', &Stream Impacts
1. Is Many discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
210
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
O - Ko
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of theState'? (Ii'yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmi0
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon stem'? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
� gyp' � > ( >� y Q
❑ Yes
o
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
1;�<
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yeso
Wasle Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [:1 Spillway
❑ Yes
_
21� 0
Structure `1 Structure 21 Structure 3 Structured Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: A?'t,!(y
�J l
Freeboard (inches): .............�.�_ ......... .............................
5. Me there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
U -No
seepage, etc.)
3/2 /9)
Continued on
back

X there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed throw -1h a waste management or
%closure plan'.)
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste Structures require maintenance/iinprovemcnt''
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, g*awed markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of overapplication? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type _
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)'?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'.,
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment`?
I_Mired. Records & f)ocuments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps. etc.)
19. Does record keeping. need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard. waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency".
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0; N6 yiola>iotis:or deticienctes were nat;ed iluriri fhis;t: Yoil :will reeeiye Bio; further;
..:.:.:.... ... . ..... ........... ............. .
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes W `�o
❑ Yes Q No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes "lo
❑ Yes R<
❑ Yes [DKo
❑ Yes -No
❑ Yes [ o
❑ Yes 2-1�0
❑ Yes [—a-Tqo
❑ Yes 2N0
[Pies ❑ No
❑ Yes No
C; -'t -es ❑ No
❑ Yes �Io
❑ Yes La No
P/Y'es ❑ No
❑ Yes 2_ o
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
c'1 &/yQ,%4V r 1-5 Ce C u f j1 ✓� iuL �t I .c C �Jr s" C � �G e G t f?Cz S /l uj� Ce-�Z
Lk I {ofinl L' 4C, -4i c,
L
&1 s 1,z,
Reviiewer/Inspector Name �t!,
Rcviiewer/inspector Signature: Date: pp L;

-BUNCOMBE COUN I'Y
SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
155 Hilliard Avenue, Suite 204 [phone]
Asheville, NC 28801 FAX: [phone]
November 1, 2002
Dale Teague
35 Hickory Hill Drive
Leicester, NC 28748
Dear Mr. Teague:
It was a pleasure meeting with you during our operation review on October 9, 2002. You
are doing a good job with maintenance/operation of your waste management system.
There are a few items that need to be done to bring your operation into compliance with
state laws regarding confined animal operations as of the date of the review. One is to
have a Certified Operator on site. If you need information on how to obtain the
certification, please contact me. Additionally, the PAN must be calculated on each field
receiving waste from your operation. This involves taking waste samples as well as soil
samples at the intervals called for in your waste utilization plan. The last item is the
installation of a gauge marker in the liquid waste storage pond. We will be glad to assist
you with establishing elevations when you install the marker. The marker should be
installed within 30 days of receipt of this letter. We can supply you with the forms to
record weekly waste levels once the marker is installed.
Again, thanks for meeting with me on October 9th. We greatly appreciate your efforts to
maintain good water quality in the Newfound Creek area. Please give us a call if you
need anything.
Sincer ly,
G H
i is D'' ecto
Buncombe SWCD
cc: Roger Edwards
NC DENR, Division of Water Quality

,--.,Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation a la I
Other AgencyJi 1 A1C 1 � 1w�-�%�'�7 -'
Type of Visit O �C,/ompliance Inspection Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit q�p Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other
DEC
❑ Denied Access
�_...
:hate of ti'rsrf.: "I imtr:
a
Facility Number
o Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted ® Certified ® Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
/ County: ..\ .......................dY..�.............
Farm Name: ....L.�CF'.(.G' ?........fes rl ��',.....GU.0 �r.........................................
�-�' x,21— (v �':j •` �"
Owner Name: .... ;.4L� .................... i...�4/f�.<`L........................................... Yhone No: r, 12.3 5/ v
Mailing Address:...h�....r.....:<..G..`G aC. �......�1 G:.I..J..C� t W�......� ..:............ ..�.1..�t }....PV.................�Fl. z.!G ,1 •.............. ........
Facilitv Contact: vall< ....7 .. (................... ..........
.ritle:... 4.. .a. -for............................... Phone No:.. .( .�14'..—.1. �•�l
Onsite Representative: c���:....� ��.......................................................... Interator:......................
................................................
f�
Certified Operator: ................................................... .................... ........................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
//V,' 4, 3 o .ti�tJ.uu-arty' ' t�rW► o`� �/�-Giv vice�,,�% pcict -► �.lti (•�/;t `
h y T'
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry [Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 35 Longitude �f 2 • �`"
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry Capacity
Population C the
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder--
❑ Layer
0aiFy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
E] Gilts
Total SSL W
(7 j O U W
E] Boars
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface DrainsPresent ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps I I 1 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream.Irnftacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
El Yes VNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If ciischanLe is ohservcd, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes NNo
h if d;schaioc is observed. dict it reach Water ol, the State? (II" ves, noti('y DWQ)
El Yes �'No
c. Ifdisehar«c i; what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dues dischar«c hvpass a l wools system'? (If ycs, notify DWS)) ❑ Yes allo
2. Is there evidence ofpast discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes N0
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters ol' the State other than from a discharge? ❑ YesNo
Waste Collection & Trcatmeni
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm star wc) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes o
Suucture i Structure 2 SIRletUrc Structure -4 Structure Structure (
Idcntilirr: .!.1..�r.4.4G�..l...�.'G3..!�.....................................................
.............................................
!f
Frechoard (inches); �J �
05103101 --------_------- —-------- — -- Continued

Date of Inspection ( V-0�, Printed on: 10/26/2000
;.;re any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes (�J( No
seepage, etc.)
o.' Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? El Yes �No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes (�(No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 1' No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequat gau�markersith required maximum and minimum liquid level
1`�
elevation markings? 111
PPS l
Waste Application `
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes j/No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes �60
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes I No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 2�No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes (No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ,E!(No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes rNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available'?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes 11 NrNo
Oyes ❑ No
'Yes
❑ No
ZYes
❑ No
[-]Yes
Pj�No
)I-kYes
Aw
❑ Yes Xf No
❑ Yes 0�(No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONO
0: N,6-viol"aiioris;or- deficiencies •were nofed• du -ring -this:visit. - Y.;witl-receive iio further ;
corres oriclence: about. this visit.::: ' ............................. : :: .
Comments (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
#
-- -----///1
Reviewer/Inspector Name G;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� Q, nate: 5/110

i
aer: of Inspection —cv! Printed on: 10/26/2000
:'Saes
a' Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes10
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes t<No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes .ENo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes J�No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes . No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? [:]Yes kNo
5/00

BUNCOMBE COUNl Y
SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
155 Hilliard Avenue, Suite 204 [phone]
Asheville, NC 28801 FAX: [phone]
December 12, 2001
Dale Teague (Facility Number: 11-22)
Teague Dairy
35 Hickory Hill Drive
Leicester, NC 28748
Dear Mr. Teague:
This letter is in follow-up of the Operation Review on December 10, 2001. During the
review, no discharges from your dairy operation were observed. Your system is doing
the job it was designed to do in terms of collection and storage of animal waste. The dry
stack and liquid storage pond have been maintained well.
It would be a good idea to locate the Certificate of Coverage, the waste utilization plan
and the Permit and possibly keep all the records together. We also have some concern
about getting the PAN calculations done on each field. To do this you will need to keep
detailed records on the amount applied each time you irrigate or spread manure. As we
discussed, we will schedule a meeting in the near future to go over the necessary forms
and calculations with you in detail.
Overall, your operation is meeting the intent of the non -discharge rules. With some work
on the PAN calculations and the other items mentioned your operation should fully meet
the requirements of the regulations.
Sincerely,
Gary Hi
Buncombe SWCD
cc: Max Harter, NC DENR, Division of Water Quality

Of North Carolina` p
,,epartment of Environment
V-7
and Natural Resources00
Asheville Regional Office _
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary NCDENR
Kerr T. Stevens,., Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Division: of Water Quality ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 15, 2001
Mr. Dale Teague
Charles Teague Dairy
35 Hickory Hill Farm Road
Leicester, North Carolina 28748
Subject Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Charles Teague Dairy. #11-22
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Teague:
Please find attached my report of inspection of your dairy's
animal waste handling system that I conducted on June 15, 2001. As we
discussed during the inspection, sampling and analysis of manure solids
from your dry stack and liquid slurry from your irrigation pond must
be completed within 60 days of crop application (before or after) I
have attached copies of the forms for both manure solids (SLD -1
application record for all fields; SLD -2 for each field crop) and
Liquid slurry irrigation (IRR -1 and IRR -2) for your use.
As noted in the report, the general permit for this dairy is
being processed and should be issued in the near future. I was very
sorry to hear of your father's passing and in this regard, the current
owner of the Charles Teague Dairy needs to be reflected in ,the permit
when it is issued. It will be necessary to complete the attached
Change of Ownership forms and return them to me for handling. You may
use this form to make any other changes you deem appropriate.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please call me if I
may be of assistance in completion of any of the attached forms or if
you have any questions. I may be reached at this office; telephone
[phone].
Si c're1 ,
2 L. Haner
Environmental Chemist
xc Gary Higgins
Davis Ferguson
JR Joshi
59 Woodfin Place, Asheville North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone]" FAX [phone]
An Equal. Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/100/c post -consumer papei

Di ion of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 11 22 Date of Visit: 6-15-2001 Time: 1005 Printed on: 6/15/2001
O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
13 Permitted M Certified ® Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Chad.es.1eavc ................. County: RM11colu k........... . JRQ..
Owner Name: Gtt;ttaes ......... ....... .. TCamc................................................. .....:. Phone No: 5
Mailing Address: 3S.11ic a>tiy.tlilt.k�t��1st.ltQasl........................................................... Lewes]ter..tN ........................................................ ?$7M..........
Facility Contact: I w. .Uagur .................................................... Title:....................... ......... .................... Phone No:...................................................
Dnsite Representative: Dale,.:eagtlte.................. Integrator:
.............................................................. ............................................
Certified Operator:.Charigs,,,,o............. Tcagug,-_deceaed....... ................ Operator Certification Number•
X09.9.7.
Location of Farm:
From Asheville, take Hwy. 63 to Georgetown. Take a left and go to Country Food Store on right. Turn right on Browntown +
Rd. dairy is on left about 1/2 mile. Newfound Creek area.
[:1Swine El Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 37 , 35 Longitude 82 • 42 6 27 6G y
Design Current
owrne Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder_
❑ Feeder to Finish
[] Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area IN Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps ID No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
L. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water or the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in.gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
!. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
>. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Vaste Collection & Treatment
I. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure IStructure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .Irregati on.piand..................................................................................................................................................................................
'reeboard (inches): 1$
ncinsm r
Design Current
Design Current
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capaci!j Population
❑ Layer___�_
® Dairy
125 96
❑Non -Layer
e
❑ Non -Dairy
FO -Other
Total Design Capacity
125
Total SSLW
175,000
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area IN Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps ID No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
L. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water or the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in.gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
!. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
>. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Vaste Collection & Treatment
I. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure IStructure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .Irregati on.piand..................................................................................................................................................................................
'reeboard (inches): 1$
ncinsm r

Cnmmentc' lrefer 10 auestinn #a:' ExDiairi anv YES antwers.and/ar anv recommiendadons. or anv. other comments '
❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
7 - Permit being processed. Issuance has been delayed due to untimely death of Charles Teague (1-15-01).
Change of Ownership forms being sent with this report._
9 - Operator of farm is Dale Teague, son. Dale Teague advises that manure analysis is scheduled to be done in next few days together
with sample of irregation lagoon. Manure from dry stack recently land applied. Irregation system has not been used this crop
season. No liquid fertilizer applied:
1 - Charles Teague was the certified operator for this farm. Dale Teague is making arrangements to become certified
4 - Inspector plans followup to assist in pan calculatigns and form completion.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Max
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
f
�1 Date: �—��:
70
.,er: 11-22 Date of Inspection 6-15-2001 Printed on: 6/15/2001
_.e there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes 'N
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid lever
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
11. Is there evidence of overapplication? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Crop type ` Corn (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in, the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes'
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop needimprovement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit, readily available?
®Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes ,❑
No
20..:. Is facility not -in compliance with. any. applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑.Yes
_No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
® Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Cnmmentc' lrefer 10 auestinn #a:' ExDiairi anv YES antwers.and/ar anv recommiendadons. or anv. other comments '
❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
7 - Permit being processed. Issuance has been delayed due to untimely death of Charles Teague (1-15-01).
Change of Ownership forms being sent with this report._
9 - Operator of farm is Dale Teague, son. Dale Teague advises that manure analysis is scheduled to be done in next few days together
with sample of irregation lagoon. Manure from dry stack recently land applied. Irregation system has not been used this crop
season. No liquid fertilizer applied:
1 - Charles Teague was the certified operator for this farm. Dale Teague is making arrangements to become certified
4 - Inspector plans followup to assist in pan calculatigns and form completion.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Max
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
f
�1 Date: �—��:
70

05103/01 C6..
Facility Number: 11-22 Date of Inspection 6-15-2001 Printed on: 6/15/20
)dor Issues
?6. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below H Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
?7. Are there any, dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
X Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
2-9. Is, the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes IN No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
,Additional Comments, an or rawutgs:
26 rural farming community. influent to holding pond will be extended below liquid level as necessary

tate of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 13, 2000
Mr. Charles Teague
Charles Teague Dairy
35 Hickory Hill Farm Road
Leicester, North Carolina 28748
Dear Mr. Teague:
1 • •
NCDEN
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Charles Teague Dairy - #11-22
Buncombe County
On October 26, 2000, I conducted a routine on-site inspection of
animal waste handling system for the Charles Teague Dairy. The
inspection showed that the farm was in compl-lance with regulations
being administered by this Agency; 15A North Carolina Administrative
Code 2H .0200 and the approved animal waste management plan. I
understand that your General Permit Application for operation of a
Cattle Waste Management Facility is still being processed.
A copy of the report is attached for your review. The main comment
concerns improvement of PAN calculation and tracking records. If you
have any questions concerning the Report or any other related matters,
please do not hesitate to contact me at 251-6208.
Si ely
Haner
Environmental Chemist
xc: Gary Higgins
Davis Ferguson
59 Woodfin Place, Asheville North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

hype of Visit • Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Season for Visit O Routine. O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
+Facility Number 11 22.M"i Date of Visit: 11-26-2000 Time: 1330 Printed on: 11/9/2000
rNot Operational Q Q Below Threshold
3 Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Ckltxlgsca=r........................................................................................ County: DIAIMCQMb.9 ....................................... Ali(?............
)weer Name:GhgXles.......... :........................ 16M ........................................................ Phone No:
•..........................................
'acility Contact: Chad. .1mgt g ............................................ Title: Phone No:
Mailing Address:111.k.&IrM.R9.4d.......................................................... Ia�x�� iew.lY.C............................. ..... 287.'k .
................................. ......................
)nsite Representative:>>hxl�age...................................... Integrator:
'_ertified Operator: a d.tmV............................................. Operator Certification Number: 2,9917 .............................
.ocation of Farm:
'rom Asheville, take Hwy. 63 to Georgetown. Take a left and go to Country Food Store on right. Turn right on Browntown +
td. dairy is on left about 1/2 mile. Newfound Creek area.
Swine [I Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 37 35 `c Longitude 82 • 42 —2-77
Design Current
awme Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry. Capaci Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ® Dairy 125 125
❑ Non-LayerT I0 Non -Dairy
❑Other
Total Design Capacity 125
Total SSLW 1_.=
Number of Lagoons Q Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ID No Liquid Waste Management System
►ischaras & Stream Impacts
Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Field Area
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
taste Collection & Treatment
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .................1.......,.........,......................................................,..................................................................................................
eeboard (inches): 60

t
Continued on back
.z% 11-22
d Date of Inspection ll -26-2000 Printed on: 11 /0/2000
❑ Yes
.nere any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
to No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
®No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Fescue (Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
wi6lations,or- deficiencies were :noted :dur' ing this visit. N u'I receive no further ` .
corresuondence abort this -visit.
17 - General Permit not issued to date.
19 - PAN calculations need improvement
Reviewer/Inspector Name Max Hiner.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
® Yes
❑ No .
❑ Yes
® No
[]Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
AL

X26 - rural area - farmer will address problem when necessary.
cine
—"o
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
`
`
Date of Inspection 11-26-2000 Printed on: 11 /9/2bL
Facili Number: 11-22
ty
Mor Issues
?6. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
® Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
?7. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
® No
?8. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near, the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
a Yes
❑ No
X26 - rural area - farmer will address problem when necessary.
cine
—"o

�r 11 22 Lu oon Number ............ Lagoon Ide, Jier irregatiQn..pQOc
.etive (Inactive Latitude 35 37 35
Waste Last Added .......................................................
Longitude 82 42 23
Determined by: [I Owner ❑ Estimated By GPS or Map? ❑ GPS 0 Map
GPS file number:
Surface Area (acres): Q, ........................
Embankment Height (feet): IQ .............................
Distance to Stream: pa less than 250 ft O 250 feet - 1000 feet O greater than 1000 ft
By measurement or Map?
Down gradient well within 250 feet?
Intervening Stream?
Distance to WS or HOW (miles):
Overtopping from Outside Waters?
®field Measurement ❑ Map
O Yes O No -
O Yes O No
0<5 05-10 O>10
O Yes *No O Unknown
Spillway O Yes p No Adequate Marker Q Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches): 60
inspection date 11-26-2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
® Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 60
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
*Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current MRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly -Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
O No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
application equipment
and/or Sprayfield O Yes © No O Unknown
unavailable
comments
fail to make contact O Yes O No
with representative
R
I

July 18, 2000
BUNCOMBE COUNTY
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Suite B-210, 31 College Place, Asheville NC 28801
TEL: [phone] FAX: [phone]
J.R. Joshi
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Joshi:
Enclosed are copies of Charles Teague's (AWC110022) permit application preliminary engineering review
letter, and letters from Jeff Young, Environmental Engineer with the Division of Soil and Water
Conservation. The following items from the May 30, 2000 preliminary review have been addressed:
1. The letter from Jeff Young dated February 25, 1999 verifies an adequate irrigation system
is in place and completes Mr. Teague's certification.
2. The letter from Jeff Young dated June 9, 2000 addresses the issue of plant available
nitrogen amounts in the waste utilization plan.
3. Jeff Young's letter dated June 9, 2000 confirms that the animals are confined 100% of the time.
Items 4-7 of the preliminary review letter are currently being addressed by Buncombe SWCD staff. A new
FSA map is needed to complete the waste management plan. When a new waste management plan is
completed, it will be sent to you in duplicate, along with copies of the emergency action plan, insect control
checklist, odor control checklist, and mortality management checklist. If you have any questions regarding
this information, please give me a call at [phone].
Sincerely,
`�fox,(�
Jo Ann McCall
Soil Conservationist
enclosures
cc Charles Teague
Max Haner
Jeff Young
#21
.+.
CONSERVATION PLANNING • WATER QUALITY ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION STREAM PROTECTION
AGRICULULTURE COST SHARE SOILS INFORMATION URBAN CONSERVATION WILDLIFE HABITAT

tate of North Carolk�,_&
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Charles Teague
35 Hickory Hill Farm Road
Leicester NC 28748
Dear Charles Teague:
r
i�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
May 30, 2000
Subject: Application No. AWC110022
Additional Information Request
Charles Teague
Animal Waste Operation
Buncombe County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by June 29, 2000:
1. Your facility was conditionally certified on 10/15/98 pending purchase and installation of waste application
and handling equipment. Please verify that such conditions have been fulfilled.
2. Your waste utilization plan shows plant available nitrogen rate based on `experience with other liquid
storage ponds". Current guidelines suggest either using book values (NRCS standards 633) or to submit a
minimum of three years of records of both nutrient concentrations and annual liquid volume to determine
the farm averages. For dairies with storage ponds, a minimum of two samples must be collected annually
for such analysis. Please consult your technical specialist to address this issue in your waste utilization plan.
3. Please specify the percent of time the animals are confined to the barn.
4. The field map should indicate corresponding acreage associated with each field.
5. Nitrogen application rate to corn silage in fields 8A, 4, and 513 appears high. Please submit documentation
to justify these rates or have the rates revised to reflect realistic yield expectations for the soil types
indicated.
6. Application window for corn silage includes February 15 to June 30. February 15 date appears too early for
corn for these mountain soils. Please clarify the discrepancy.
7. Emergency action plan, insect control checklist, odor control checklist, and mortality management
checklists are missing in your permit application and should be submitted as part of the package.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information
should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this
letter must be submitted on or before June 29, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance
with 15A N.CA.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

plication No. 11-0022
Charles Teague
Page 2
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
Sincerely,
JR Jos i
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Asheville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File

JAMES B. HUNTJR
a
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
June 9, 2000
Jeff Parker, Soil Conservationist
Buncombe Soil and Water Conservation District
31 College Place, B-210
Asheville, NC 28801
Dear Jeff:
I've had the opportunity to review my design notes for the Teague Dairy (facility #11-22)
waste management system. I also reviewed the waste utilization plan prepared for the facility.
The assumption made for plant available nitrogen (PAN) for the liquid waste is valid and is
supported by USDA-NRCS Conservation Practice Standard Code 633 (Waste Utilization).
From the USDA-NRCS Agricultural Waste Management Field Handbook Part 651, the
following characteristics of dairy waste are given:
Weight — 80lbs/d/1000#
Nitrogen — 0.45lbs/d/1000#
'All values are for lactating cows, manure as excreted, Table 4-5
(125cows)(1400#/cow)(80lbs/d/1000#)(365d/yr)(lton/2000#) = 2555 tons/yr MANURE
(125cows)(1400#/cow)(0.45lbsN/d/1000#)(365d/yr) = 28744 lbs N/yr TOTAL NITROGEN
Since the dairy cattle are confined 100% of the time, nearly all the manure will be scraped and
stored in the manure dry -stacking facility. USDA-NRCS Conservation Practice Standard
Code 633 states that feedlot scraped manure contains 101bs/ton of total nitrogen.
(2555tons/yr)(10lbsN/ton) = 25550 lbs/yr TOTAL N in solid manure contained in dry -stack
28744 IbsN/yr — 25550 IbsN/yr = 3194 lbs/yr TOTAL N in wastewater stored in pond
Liquid volume produced annually = 1530000 gallons
AVERAGE CONCENTRATION OF TOTAL N IN WASTEWATER = 3194lbsN/153QQQOgallons
= 2.09 lbs/1000 gallons
PAN for irrigated wastewater = (0.50)(2.09 lbs/1000 gallons) = 1.04 lbs/1000 gallons
The above calculations combined with waste analyses from similar operations justify the use
of the wastewater PAN value used in the certified waste utilization plan. The calculations only
consider application losses and do not take in account any other volatilization, denitrification
or storage losses that further reduce PAN.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
V/LPE
u,
ironmental Engineer
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50 RECYCLED/1 Ory POSTCONSUMER PAPER

1y i7
b
W
s
_a
4
I
NORT ('CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
February 25, 1999
Max Haner, Environmental Chemist
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
59 Woodfin Place, Interchange Building
Asheville, NC 28801
Dear Max:
On October 15, 1998, 1 certified the waste management system installed at the
Charles Teague Dairy (facility number 11-22) in Buncombe County. The certification,
however, was conditional pending the purchase and installation of an irrigation system.
The conditional certification stipulated the irrigation equipment must be in place by
March 1, 1999.
I visited the dairy farm yesterday to verify delivery and installation of an irrigation
system. Mr. Teague has purchased and installed the necessary irrigation equipment
for application of animal waste on crops specified in his waste utilization plan. The
equipment is capable of applying waste at rates that do not exceed those specified in
the CAWMP.
This letter is serving as Mr. Teague's verification of delivery and installation and thus
completes the certification process. If additional documentation is required, please
contact Jeff Parker with the Buncombe Soil and Water Conservation District. If you
have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
viff oung, PE
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Charles Teague
Jeff Parker
DWQ, Non -Discharge Branch, Compliance Unit
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOOOFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Type of Visitvcompliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
11 Reason for Visit �outine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other p Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time: 0 Printed on: 10/24/2000
p Not Operational p Below Threshold
p Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: Cbaxles.T-cages............................................................................................. County: Runcambe ........................................ ARO............
Owner Name:.Charles .................................. league ....................................................... Phone No: (828.)..68,3-3235 .......................................................
FacilityContact: ................................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: 3S. iic>toxy. illF.axon.Raad ........................................................... 1 eicatrr..NC......................................................... 287.48 ..............
OnsiteRepresentative: .......................................................................................................... Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator: Charles .................................. 1eague .............................................. Operator Certification Number:2l149.7..............................
Location of Farm:
rom Asheville, tae Hwy. 63 to Georgetown. Take a left and go to Country Food Store on right. Turn right on BrOWntOWn A
Id. dairy is on left about 1/2 mile. Newfound Creek area.
p Swine p Poultry ®Cattle E3 Horse Latitude ©• ®` F-757" Longitude ®° .
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes 17ko
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes IdNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13 Yes ciNo
Waste Collection & Treatment YY
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes p No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:..................................................................................... .... ................................ ....................................
Freeboard. (inches): ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................

90-26 lagoon Number ............ Lagoon P, -- :ratifier closest.to.bldg
:;sive 0Inactive
%Waste Last Added
Determined by:
Latitude
'. .. Longitude
Owner ❑ Estimated By CAPS or lilt, ? IN ❑ Map
GPS file number: a
Surface Area (acres):
Embankment Height (feet):
Distance to Stream: p less than 250 ft p 250 feet - 1000 feet p greater than 1000 ft
By measurement orMap? ❑ Field Measurement M Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes p No
Intervening Stream? O Yes *No
Distance to WS or HQ (miles): O < 5 O 5 - 10 p > 10
Overtopping from OutsideWaters? O Yes p No O Unknown
Spillway O Yes *No AdequateMarker O Yes p No
inspection date 2/2/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 0
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
*Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
p No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
p Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
lication equipment fail to make contact O Yes 0 No
and/or Sprayfield (*Yes O No O Unknown with representative
unavailable
comments pond # 1 and 2 combine for 1.28 acres,
I'V

amber: 11_22 Date of Inspection Printed on: 10/24/2000
,r Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Yes p No
QA
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes grNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not locatednear the liquid surface of the lagoon? ® Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 0 Yes &lo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes O -No

:;er:/ 11_22 Date of Inspection " Printed on: 10/24/2000
ctiere any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? �(ie/ trees, severe erosion, ® Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes Az'No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes bNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes hdNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes gyNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes tNo
11. Is there evidence of over app lication? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload 13 Yes is No
12. Crop typeC (G
13. Do the receiving';crops differ wit hose designated i4 the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes % 'No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes �o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? p Yes KNo
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? p Yes rANo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes �No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? p Yes dNo
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? `
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) p Yes o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) Kr Yes p No
77
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? [3 Yes No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? p Yes bfNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) p Yes �No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ® Yes rwNo
II
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? p YesK``N�I o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? p Yes INo
tY �To:violations' or deficiencies -were - oted :during. this visit. ' Yap w will y' eeeive no further
.......................... ... .......................
• corx6s 64dek aboitf this MISIC • . • . ' : -' . - ..... . -. .... .
Name
u
"
M
x
IReviewer/Inspector
Name
x
IReviewer/Inspector

Routine ® Complaint Q follow-up of DWQ inspection ® Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection I /4�� 124 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted Certified 13 Conditionally Certified
�®Registered ® Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ....... ......... .. rL'..............� .... Jam/ 11L/'.................... County:/ .....................................
Owner Name: i ................ Phone No:... ! '�` �� S
........ .. J�...................................... ..................... ......... ...............................
Facility Contact: ......................... ................` .. Title: ..... 6..4�1�..? '�.................................... Phone No:......:........ ............
Mailing Address: ... ..........................
..... � ..�' ....... ..... ..........................................................................................................
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:....
Location of Farm:
: .................
Integrator: ......................................................................................
Operator Certification Number:..�.� �.- .................
3 Latitude • 3 u ` ��Wza*t A . .......................................................................................................................................................
Longitude +►. `
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacitypaeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure
Identifier:
It
Freeboard (inches): ....�... .......
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes �60
❑ Yes KNo
Structure 6
...............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, E] Yes IN
seepage, etc.)
Continued on back
3/23/99

e of Inspection �lJ
fere structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
Asure plan? ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, au ed markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? kyes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ()(No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑l Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type "'<--16Cjc
13. Do the receiving crops dkfer with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reguired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? 1�
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not incompliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? /�
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) A
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: �Vo •yiolaiioris or def de dile vcxere noted• dliurifid this;visit; • Yoix wiil •reeeiye yid Mirth& • : -
: comes ondence: about. this visit.
r
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
❑ Yes No
❑ YesNo
Yes kNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes KNO
XYes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes KNO
E] Yes ["Vo
❑ YesNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 9No
A,
3/23/99

D f Inspection
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) / ll*-
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? 4—
Jkl—
�QYes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes `4NO
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [ 9 -No
❑ Yes ❑ No
3/23/99

of North Carolir
liepartment of Environment "
and Natural Resources •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Bunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary NCDENR
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999 q C2 t! N1
11 U
Charles Teague JAN I
Charles Teague
35 Hickory Hill Farm Road
Leicester NC 28748WATER QQUALITY SECTION
ASHEVILL E REGIONAL gri
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 11-22
Buncombe County
Dear Charles Teague:
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. 1RR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD I, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Asheville Regional Office
Buncombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
J� 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
J An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

North Carolina ,
,artment of Environm& t
end Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
June 22, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Charles Teague
Charles Teague
35 Hickory Hill Farm Road
Leicester NC 28748 '
Farm Number: 11 - 22
Dear Charles Teague:
You are hereby notified that Charles Teague, in accordance with G. S. 143-215.1OC, must apply
for coverage udder an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm
has sixty (60) days to submit the attachedapplication and all supporting documentation. In accordance
with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or
operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT
OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be returned
within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter.. Failure to submit the application as required may also
subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated
following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Wanda Frazier with the Asheville Regional Office at [phone].
,;ncerely,
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Asheville Regional' Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

NCDENR
4h
NORTH PROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION SHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
May 13, 1999
Mr. Charles R. Teague
35 Hickory Hill Road
Leicester, N.C. 28748
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Charles Teague Dairy #11-22
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Teague:
On May 10, 1999, I conducted a routine compliance
inspection of the animal waste handling system for the
Charles Teague Dairy. The inspection showed that the farm
was in general compliance with regulations being
administered by this agency; Title 15A, North Carolina
Administrative Code 2H .0200. A copy of the report is
attached for your review. It is consistent with the draft
completed in your presence and left with you following the
inspection.
Thank you for your cooperation during this inspection.
Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this
report in more detail, please do not hesitate to contact me
at [phone].
Sin' el 11Z
zm�q L�HAner
Environmental Chemist
Gary Higgins
Davis Ferguson
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801-2414
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

le moutme p %-omptamt p rouow-up of liwtl inspection p rbliow-up of DSWC review p Other -�
Kati �i#'Ins ee__=iii,,
Facility Number �Ii— 3 1 't�J
Time or Insper ion � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted M Certified #onditionally Certified M Registered p Not Operattona Date Last Operated: ...........................
Farm Name: ClIa-rIM-1cague.............................................................................................. County: Buncombe ARO
Owner Name: Charles „ Tea ue ......,,_„_„............. ,,,,,_ Phone No: 828 683-3235
S..........................)............................................................................
Facility Contact: Charles.Teague..............................................Title: ov CI=................................................. Phone No: same.........................................
Mailing Address: 35 Hickory Hill Farm Road, Leicester NC 28748
........................ ............................................................................................................ ..........................
Onsite Representative: Charles.Teague,D.ale.Teague............................................. Integrator: .......................................................................................
Certified Operator: Charles R ............................. jg:A&Mg .............................................. Operator Certification Number: 20997.............................
Location of Farm:
rrom,.9shev„.11e,,taKe,tiwy. bi_to,Georgetown,,,l;ake,a lett ani!_go,to.Country Food Store,on,.nb„t.._....urn rig t.on,,,,rown own _,.j
claAry..is.sn.lift..ab4t.l/.2..entitle...NefQsttnd.Cr�cl�.area.......................•--.......................................................
._ _
Latitude _35_7 a - T-�� F_3577,1 Longitude
Design Current Design -Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
0
Wede
-
tFeeder
p ceder toF-iris
❑ F arrow to can
�
❑
P arrow to
1, ceder
❑
P arrowtoo
Pains —
'--�
❑
U11ts
❑
Boars
Number of Lagoons 1
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
❑ Layer
125
❑ on- aver
® Dairy 125 1
125
❑ Non -Dairy. 1. 1—�
❑ Other�
Total Design Capacity 125
Total SSLW 175,000
u
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
iiisiharo,es 4 Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If dlschartw is observed, was the cone- ince 111,111-Madd?
b. If discharoc is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify DWQ)
e. If dischar,c is observed, what is the estinlatc:d flow u1 gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notifti I)1N!Q)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection eft ,rreatnient
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2
Identifier: ...........lag.Qmia........................................
freeboard (inclies): .............>60.............. .............................
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
5. Are there any inu iediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
3/2.3/99 seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes 51 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes % No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes % No
Stricture 6
❑ Yes M No
Continued on buck

a22 Df Inspection
actures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a was eeanagement or
,,:Pan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/i nprovement?
3. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding p PAN
12. Crop type Barley Corn (Silage & Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Re(ttii.red fgeeords tyz 1)ocuments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
IS. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notifv regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
[3 Yes N No
C3 Yes pj No
Yes 1& No
® Yes p No
t] Yes ® No
p Yes No
p Yes X No
p Yes X No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes 51 No
p Yes H No
p Yes 2 No
p Yes p No
p Yes X No
M Yes p No
p Yes Z No
p Yes X No
p Yes X No
p Yes :g No
p Yes X No
p Yes % No
X No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question#)'.EsPlam any VES,answers- recommendations or, othercomments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations: (use additional pagesi as4 necessary)
9 Maximum marker present in laszoon . A graduated level marker will be needed when general permit certificate of coverage
119. Soil test results not available - sample submitted for analysis 4/10/99

Facility um er: 11_22 Date or
Spertion
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe From the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ® Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are here any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes 11 No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes p No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes p No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes M No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No
I In' /A"

r
s
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
February 25, 1999
Max Haner, Environmental Chemist
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
59 Woodfin Place, Interchange Building
Asheville, NC 28801
Dear Max:
On October 15, 1998, 1 certified the waste management system installed at the
Charles Teague Dairy (facility number 11-22) in Buncombe County. The certification,
however, was conditional pending the purchase and installation of an irrigation system.
The conditional certification stipulated the irrigation equipment must be in place by
March 1, 1999.
1 visited the dairy farm yesterday to verify delivery and installation of an irrigation
system. Mr. Teague has purchased and installed the necessary irrigation equipment
for application of animal waste on crops specified in his waste utilization plan. The
equipment is capable of applying waste at rates that do not exceed those specified in
the CAWMP.
This letter is serving as Mr. Teague's verification of delivery and installation and thus
completes the certification process. If additional documentation is required, please
contact Jeff Parker with the Buncombe Soil and Water Conservation District. If you
have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
� K�
i
o ng, Pironmental Engineer I
cc: Charles Teague
Jeff Parker
DWQ, Non -Discharge Branch, Compliance Unit
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 30, 1998
Ir. Charles R. Teague
�5 Hickory Hill Road
Leicester, N.C. 28748
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Charles Teague Dairy #11-22
Buncombe County
)ear Mr. Teague
On November 24, 1998, I conducted a routine compliance
_nspection of the animal waste handling system for the
,harles Teague Dairy. The inspection showed that
:he farm was in general compliance with regulations
)eing administered by this agency; Title 15A, North
:arolina Administrative Code 2H .0200 A copy of
:he report is attached for your review.
The report is consistent with the draft copy completed
Ln your presence and left with you following the
Lnspection. Comments contained in the report, in part,
iddress the need to complete installation of irrigation
equipment by March 1, 1999. Additionally, record keeping
needs improvement.
Thank YOU for your attention to this matter. Should
you have any questions or wish to; discuss this report in
r more detail, please do not hesitate to contact me at (828) ,
251-6208.
Sic rely
<..,, 0L. Haner
Environmental Chemist
xc• Gary Higgins
Davis Ferguson
INTERCHANGE BUILDINGS 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASH EVILLER NC 28801 -2414
PHONE [phone] FAX 828-25 T-6452
r
AN.EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -5096 RECYCLED/1090. POST -CONSUMER PAPER

01
411outine ;"Complaint p o o%v-up o inspection p Follow-up of DSW C review p Other
Facilitv Number Bate of luspeetion 1
1-24-98
Tine of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
M Registered X Certified a Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 113 Not Oper-a-d"o-n-T-1 Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .Charlea.Toague........................................................................................ County: Buncombe ARO
Owner Name Charles.... . Teague........................................................ Phone Na: X828) 6$3-3235....... ..........................................
Facility Contact. Charlea.Teague..............................................Title: Owner ................................................ Phone No: Sam ........................................
Mailing. Address: 35 Hickory, Hill, Farm. Road........................................................... .L,ecgstgr,.NC 28748,.............
Onsite Representative: Chacles.T.eague,.Dale.Teague............................................. Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator: Charles R,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Teagug.............................................. Operator Certification Number. 20997.............................
Location of Farm:
ift
em. x ,. e. �r .. tea.. oagexnc$n.... a. an gn ta.. a�un .. uQ taxx.an.xa ... uxn.xa .on ro.w.nta-`: j,,...
ji((1 lliUfV 1`J VlldC1L avuui, li y, uiuc. i�c�iv„uuu �.a cca� as cs!x..................................................................................................................................................
Latitude 3f G 1 ✓J BGG Longitude F e F-4T_11
�Gi
rck::l
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes X No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man -wade? p Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach. Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes" ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated floes in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
J. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? [3 Yes No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ® No
7/25197 Continued on buck

aci ity Number: 11_22
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Satruciures t La ii3'Jnds 1'lEl'9181�it°i.it:t'.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: .................L.........................
Structure 4
F1
❑ Yes 11 N
❑ Yes ® No
Stricture 5 Structure 6
Freeboard(ft): ............. >UO.............. .............................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Wa.rre ppikation
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ........Com.(Silage.&.Crrain)..................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For C`ertilled �r Permitted Facilid s Oniv
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
R , o. vto ations or deficiencies were noted during this- visit., You,will receive- no further
,correspondence about -this visit
adlor any
tional page
►j - iveeu ievei marxer in lagoon.
19 - urregation equipment on order - sufficient storage space in lagoon, pump stations fully operable
22 - Record keeping needs improvement
o additional visit needed until after 3-1-99 - equipment due to be operational.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes H No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes X No
p Yes M No
❑ Yes 11 No
❑ Yes H No
N Yes ❑ No
13 Yes ® No
❑ Yes X No
IM Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes ® No

❑ DSWC Aniiiial Feedlot Operation Review
WDWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
lntine 0 C 01uDlaint O Follow -un of DWO inspection O Follow-up of D;SWC review O Other �
Facility Number
Date of Inspection/I .G - I14J
Time of Inspection V= 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered Certified Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..�,:„7
Eelam Name:...........t!✓ ! , ..... .......1.ffi.. .%b!'J................... County:....... 13 ...............................
Owner Name: ............ .... -,........................................vIhoae No:...:..O......................
� -&S.......................
Facility Contact: ... t,1...'.(�4'..........eTC�3itlep............................................................... Phone No: (`....... .
Mailing Address:.. .................................... ........... .....:'9r .f`...�.. ............
Onsite Representative:. ................r.....8'(C��........-----........... Integrator:...............................
Certified Operat.ork......0_6040 .....?. ...................................................... Operator Certification Number:.. T.�U......,,
Location of Farm:
.........................................
Latitude • :`
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
..............................................................................................................................................
Longitude M•”
JLJ Non -Layer I I f.
Other
Non -
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUrnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 'No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes $t.No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? [ Yes "No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7/25/97 Continued on back

�e there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
='Structures (Lagoons Bolding Ponds Flush Pits etc.l
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure '2
Identifier: ....t . �...........:.................................
Freeboard (ft): ........../..1e ....................................
.. .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
:Structure 3 Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
Structure 5
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waters of the State; notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..................
.. s.........................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? j
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?���
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? CAJ U7 LAa7 a 5-1-7
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only.
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No violations or deficiencies were,noted during this visit. You.will receive no further
correspondence about this visit. U.,KZt 7 '�
❑ Yes gNO
Structure 6
0 Yes o
❑ Yes 9No
❑ YesNo
; Yes [] No
❑ Yes LlNo
..........................................
❑Yes NO
❑ YesNo
❑ Yes ANo
*Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes f
El Yes `4NO
KYes ® No
Q Yes KNO
M Yes Id No
❑ Yes No

Aniri' Waste Management Plan CerYcation
Name of Farm: 21.4QZ Facility No: //_--22-
Owner(s)
ZZOwner(s) Name:Phone No: 1,2V_6 )�,?f
Mailing Address:
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: 6aA1C6/UlZ
Latitude and Longitude:° �'/' 4e' Integrator: Al 1A—
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.):
�gT l b,�l✓ /ic�lci� s�aRE t
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
a Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
O Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
C! Gilts
❑ Boars
Q-5 A41L,9_5 DAIRY IS QA/ [err 4-r AXE' 1 14dl7 e&JW_.
Type of Poultry
❑ Layer
❑ Pullets
No. of Animals
Typeof�,�attle No. of Animals
IdDairy 1?-5-
Q
2S❑ Beef
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Expanding Operation Only
Previous Design Capacity Additional Design Capacity. Total Design.,Capacity.-`
Acreage Available for Application: zc(% k7 Required Acreage: ,_D&'A,
Number of Lagoons / torage Pon l Total Capacity: 0 OX Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or(NO lease circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
convevance or from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must
be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A
change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed)
within 60 days of a title transfer. /7 /� 11f
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature:
AWC -- August 1, 1997
1
Date: _/ V -
Date:

Tem nical Specialist Certific'Ation
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM)
as specified in 15A NCAC 211.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may
sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically
competent.
IL Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
❑ Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
Ri/ New. e2ipanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
�\\ Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
GARqz11/1r�ve been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
a%64 nical Specialist (Please Print): ou
hatiorsn/�- pCdg 7I✓ &c Sort ,4AA) w"/� C COA/S. Date Work Completed: 31 /97
r 7 A
v� � s
9 luE AiC. aeo t Phone No.: I �Z.57_&Za6
r
0-1 '+. Date:
1j1j1)'i;+and Applic tionlSite (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
/%y�3;able for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Q NamTechnical Specialist (Please Print): .T� A'y L. �ou�G
RAY L11j1j+1,ni21
Check
W/ Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
❑ Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
v'',,��tlnitlrrlls� '/
♦♦���4 CAR f'Technical Specialist (Please Print): F_ L • ?10u�iC
� � ' ''� �/�r�1P Ca✓S69 Date Work Completed: A/
Affi % DE�/R Di✓ OF Sots. &42 P
- S ress jAgincy): 28 D Phone No. Z,$ 2s1 -62a8
0 Date:
v° �c Signx�
''•�Fd�a!�C �QV>aiugust 1, 1997 2

, tcation and Handlif.-, ;.Equipment
the appropriate box
❑ Existing or expanding facility with existing waste application equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
Jaaf
0
``a��a�trlatrr!!!!i
.�\A CAR pL
[IPA
�1
!!ll 111111 ij>>,`
E)
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
New. expanded, or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for spray irrigation. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
New expanded or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for land spreading not using
spray irrigation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
65ptained as part of the plan). 1 /
f T4hnical Specialist (Please Print): JF�FREV, L . 7ou"J&
it 26SiZ )IV 06 50/1- 4AIV u/47i�A CQ„ /S6e✓ Date Work Completed: 7
ra ,* enc V400 i -i j1 I cF C Z990 I Phone No.: ZS -&Z09
` , l Date: r ck
SI, WUP, RC or 1)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
I?vjanagement Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
�\A CARO,
�°........® fl,�r� gality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
iaf 'ef 'ri ,chnical Specialist (Please Print): J.T CRF Y' L • YOuA/&
SMdliatiii Ak 78/R D/✓ OF,5o1L 4A11b ti/,f T:2: -R Ca✓sE2✓. Date Work Completed: -512619
021676 °
Addres;:'genc Gig/ �I%G Phone No.:
c�;` ' : - . ( � : r Date: % : 15) G
. EY L.
iiia`
1 �i iWritten Noti a of New or Expanding Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
AWC -- August 1, 1997
Date:
Date:

�eYta zcaton t.,-nstallation
j'Collection, Storage, Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
``1111,,,,,,'1111 For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
�e�CA
Tgchnical Specialist (Please Print): S:rEFFt -V ` , V6UA1C
t g liDti/ of So/L A In ►�/ � ��nI'SegV. Date Work Completed: 16115-196
t421sA�rac&A rnanrv)- S- i /.v-inCu/ Di ec c .4<N<�1� �. Ale- ;�R�o � Phone No.: %SZs )ZS/- �Zog
Date: rU
�,����R� B ��?a�nd A licationSiteWUP
Check the ,appropriate box
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
❑ Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the;,
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):C! r' , )Q %� F
Affiliation / � A (,-r 1�e -5' 0 Date Work Completed: %0
Address
Signature:
No.
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and
if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion from a
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement
action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
AWC -- August 1, 1997
Date:
Date:

,jff Controls from Ea, -.or Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Application and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or I)
Check the appropriate block
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
�0/-C,-ol nditio'' nal approval: Animal waste applicati n and handling equipment specified in the plan has been
purchased and will be on site and installed by 6,511-01 99 (month/day/year); there is adequate storage to
°rtieaata��
hold the waste until the equipment is installed d until the waste can be land applied in accordance with
sss°'ss+g� t'rA�Q�>, the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to
,...•o..,•Z/,� j ,✓sem the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
%
a Q�Q 1Ya T&hnical Specialist (Please Print): ERF`/ L, �oGcA/6
l:
liatioV 4 1,5X I -)IV OF /L 4�A0 k47n 6gnh Date Work Completed:
021676
• Addrg�sS%rncy): i� ,E Iu.G AIG Z�/Phone No.: ZS ZS -�i208
%"F�•• .� ko ° ' . Date: ;
�� w"
Ae following signature block is only to
be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DFM. , It
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
dor
�w as"� /�/�f_�•si
Date: / ® - / 5 --% F
Date:
Control, Insect Control and Mortality Management (a1), a1, wuJr, K%- or a)
control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The mortality
system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
T&hnical Specialist (Please Print): TEfFREV L • ��/cy -
AA DE / L)IV Oc So/L AAlo tl✓,g7;j�R Con/SEs2✓. Date Work Completed: lo1
V11 &6- A%G Z$g01 Phone No.: ZS -(,P90,8
Date: !O -
C
AWC -- August 1, 1997

,aurn the completed",",,'rm to the Division of Water Quahty�- the following address: -
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality, Non-Discharge Branch,
Compliance Unit
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in
your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC — August 1, 1997 6

-,�
{c

I Site Requires Immediate Attention: No
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: '?-// —, 1995
Time: -7: SSA*
Farm Name/Owner: J �IEII&LE _P4 2-Y
Mailing Address: 3 5 /f-ickoxv A4ZL (�Fl-B ZTJC9S%rz&, AX ZP7
County
Integrator: Phone:
Oil Site Representative: CAL"(a T--woct, Phone: (704) 64P3 - 3 ZS5
Physical Address/Location: 44WZrd�
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle x
/.OX .5
Design Capacity: 0*4& 2Sv Number of Animals oil Site: .
DEM Certification Number: ACE— DEM Certification Number: ACNEW—
Latitude:' 5- 31 Longitude: g 2 4 1- Elevation: 20Z 0 Feet
Opp Circle Yes or No A4 -
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the hft 0n(s)7 es or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or NoAJI*-
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes r No Is the cover crop adequate? (Sr No
Crop(s) being utilized;
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwelli ii
& Yes Yes
r No
100 Feet from Wells7 r No
Is the animal,waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line SLreani?�eqsr No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map ue Line7 Yes oe
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devicCS7r No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequa e waste management records dines of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
'Opover crop)? Yes ok,,N6
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.

b
ol }
0
890,000 FEET 1343 344 345 4213011 I 1346 (Enka 192 -SW)
4455 11 SW
Tennessee Valley Authority
tical Survey* i 'j�l► �2 2 SCALE D1:24000
MN
i, and TVAGN 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 400c
uric methods
942 4112 p 5 0
80 MILS 0159'
lorth American datum 17 MILS Contour interval 20
)rth Carolina / - Uy NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DA7
m
erse Mercator grid ticks,
UTM GRID AND 1990 MAGNETIC NORTH
I American Datum 1983 DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
:ers south and FOR SALE BY U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, DENVER, COLOW
Cl -
shed corner ticks AND U.S. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AND SYM

Owner Name: Charles .................................... Teague........................................................ Phone No: 683-3235
•---••--•-•...............................
Mailing Address: 35 Hickory Hill Farm Road Leicester NC 28748
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:.............................
.........................................................
Certified Operator: Charles....................................Teague.............................................. Operator Certification Number:.....,...................................
Location of Farm:
en eavmg,,s„eg,,,.e,,,,,,,, t e-,,, wy;,,,,,,,,o, orge,own,t,,,,,e a ,eft an,,,,go to,,,,,oun„ry,,,00,,,,,,,,ore,onrig,,,,,, urn rig„t,on
-.--,
...... Q n�. d,.. i .i .on.def . �o�xt.al .u�e:.......................................................................................................................................................................... 1
Latitude . 'E=" Longitude
inNot Operational Date Last Operated: .....................................................•--------......................---...................................................................
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
p Wean to Feeder p Far
® Feeder to Finish
13 Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes p No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes; notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes p No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes p No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

gate of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Charles Teague
35 Hickory Hill Farm Road
Leicester NC 28748
Dear Charles Teague:
IN• •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROL A-D&F.ABTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT
May 30, 2000
Subject: Application No. AWC110022
Additional Information Request
Charles Teague
Animal Waste Operation
Buncombe County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by June 29, 2000:
1. Your facility was conditionally certified on 10/15/98 pending purchase and installation of waste application
and handling equipment. Please verify that such conditions have been fulfilled.
2. Your waste utilization plan shows plant available nitrogen rate based on `experience with other liquid
storage ponds". Current guidelines suggest either using book values (NRCS standards 633) or to submit a
minimum of three years of records of both nutrient concentrations and annual liquid volume to determine
the farm averages. For dairies with storage ponds, a minimum of two samples must be collected annually
for such analysis. Please consult your technical specialist to address this issue in your waste utilization plan.
3. Please specify the percent of time the animals are confined to the barn.
4. The field map should indicate corresponding acreage associated with each field.
5. Nitrogen application rate to corn silage in fields 8A, 4, and 5B appears high. Please submit documentation
to justify these rates or have the rates revised to reflect realistic yield expectations for the soil types
indicated.
6. Application window for corn silage includes February 15 to June 30. February 15 date appears too early for
corn for these mountain soils. Please clarify the discrepancy.
7. Emergency action plan, insect control checklist, odor control checklist, and mortality management
checklists are missing in your permit application and should be submitted as part of the package.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information
should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this
letter must be submitted on or before June 29, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance
with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 11-0022
Charles Teague
Page 2
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
Sincerely,
JR �Jos C/
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Asheville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment 1 • 0
and Natural Resources r
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary NCDENR
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director NoRTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
August 2.0, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Charles Teague
35 Hickory Hill Farm Road
Leicester NC 28748
Subject: Special Agreement
Facility Number: 11-22
Charles Teague
Buncombe County
Dear Charles Teague:
Attached for your records is a copy of the signed Special Agreement approved by the
Environmental Management Commission.
The terms and conditions of the Special Agreement are in full effect. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley, of our staff, at (919) 733-
5083, extension 581.
Sincerely,
6
A, Preston Howard, Jr.,
ATTACHMENTS
cc: ARO Regional Office
Buncombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File -4
Central Files 3
Shannon Langley19
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper
... _... _._. .

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE
IN THE MATTER OF SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 11-22
CHARLES TEAGUE
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Charles Teague, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as
the Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H.0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the Commission
as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to develop
an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or exceed
all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with all aspects
of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent,.neither party will file a petition for a
contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER!' desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by October 15, 1998.

r�
Farm Number: Number: 11-22
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) ,OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, 'stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant
or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship
with the "OWNER!';
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 11-22
Special Agreement
Page
7. The "OWNER', uponsignatureof this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Charles Teague
"Print Name -of Owner
Date r
A.
Liggnature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date .9' /yr — Irr
P,..,AChairman of the Commission

State of North Carolina
Department of Environn1ent
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETLLRN RECEIPT
RE UESTED
Vergie Brown
35 Hickory Hili Farm Road
Leicester NC 28748
NORTH CA�TMROLINA DEP NT ■ ,
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURE� OF
Jul 1 7 AI_ RESOURCES
Y , 1998
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal W
Charles Teague ante M agement Plan
Facility Number: 11-22
Dear Vergie Brown: Buncombe County
As Per Senate Bill 1217
Agreement w , which was ratified on June 21, 1996
which was received on February,and your a
Commission (EMC) hereby 27= 1998, the Enviro PPlicaton for S
order to y Proposes to enter into a s Din ManagementFacial
mow additional time for Vergie Brown to
management special agreement with Vergie Brown in
Phan (CAWMp) for the subject faclityobtain and implement a Certified animal
Please find enclosed the proposedWaste
terms of the attached schedule Special Agreement. If you agree attention of "Sh Y°U must sign, date and return the enclosed bide b
your receipt of this Langley" at the letterhead address w' Y the dates and
P his letter. Within fourteen (14) calendar days
If you have. ahead Y of
Agreement, please Provide implemented your CA
WMP or a not wish to enter into the Special
calendar days of with a response to Mr. Sh
Your receipt of this letter. mon an within fourteen (14
Please be advised that nothin
responsibilit or g in this letter should be taken
as Y liability for failure o comply with all terms
General Statutes 143-215.1 removing from you the
conditions of this agreement that
theto
me d conditions of the North Carolina
rules promulgated thereunder.
injunctions and not met shall. be subject to civilpenalties,� dates and
all other enforcement tools available to the t to civil
c '
n of Water uality. Penalties,
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh,
An Equal O ' North Carolina 2'7626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Pportunity Affirmative mative Action Employer 50% Telephone hone 19-73
048
Post -consumer paper

Farm Number: 11-22 �.
Special Agreement
Page 3
7• The "OWNER", upon signature of this
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and c '
Special Agreement, will u expected to
g• This Special Agreements conditions of this: document.
waste hall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
management plan.
For Charles Teague
Print Name of Owner
Sig nature
ofO
Owner Date
to
For the North Carolina Environmental Management
g t Commission:
Chairman of theCommission Date

N
vs E.
L
E
2
mom)
�
��\�
��
El
E
E
o
45
L
E
2
mom)
El
E
E
o
45
L
E

0
O
F
E,

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment„
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
[
MEMORANDUM �
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor 2 0
908
FROM: Shannon Langley m�ER RSG SECTION
1EON
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number
/ Ldc),
If you have any questions, please call me at 733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Divisi6n of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT f
(INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMENT)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility): e��&4eL S=�
2. Facility No.:
3. Facility Name:
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's'Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
//, � A 'f / P " q t4 e--
5. Mailing Address: SS --4�Z / C Le 0 e V A" �'// 7"m -m i�A, /,9
City: ;re C-0 'T tne State': Al- C zip:
Telephone No.: (I -P—* ) 3— Z 2 -?,!;'
6. County where facility is located: 9 U A/ C- 0 04
/ I r L
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle): xt z
8. Application Date:
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan* so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office - or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
711, 9 t? s
FORM SPAG 1198 Page 1 of 4

2. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
waste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include:
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Fundsexpended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
'Z
FORM SPAG V98
Page 2 of 4

Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
I
Applicant's Certification:
attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the MC has been rev wed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand if all required parts of this application are not completed and if all
required supporting information and attachments are not included this application package will
Print Name of Owner
oiguQlUlG Vl Vw11\d
FORM SPAG 1198
Date
Page 3 of 4
-71' i99�
/95T
/9FIr

i
% Required Items:
One (l) original and two (2) copies of the completed and appropriately executed
application,form, along with any attachments.
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT
(INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMENT)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility):
2. Facility No.:
3. Facility Name:u-�-
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
5. Mailing Address: .���> G �0.-
City: _ State: y%. G , Zip:
Telephone No.: (-Z,0'55J" LES 3 Z 2 .
6. County where facility is located: 0-111i�^�
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle): ra&2�
8• Application Date:
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31,,1997,.will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
FORM SPAG`1/98 Page 1 of 4

AD
ONPku
z
I
z
L
a
a
:O
a
I
o�
tn
er
N
M
h
5
d
w
A.
�
a
C
N
z
z
z z
N
cn
4
¢a
M
x
N
v a
N
�
U
OU
a
a
N
N
z;
A
V
44
a
.
O
c�
'n
O
N
�o
rNi
o
U
�
J
0 f3/]
aa
Z.A
AD
ONPku
z
I
z
L
a
:O
tn
er
N
M
h
�
M
A.
=z
C
N
z
z
z z
N
lz
cl,knw
0
v a
N
�
(
OU
N
N
N
A
V
44
a
O
c�
'n
N
�o
rNi
aa
En- : CD
� z
W x a �
�--�
A'0p ,
cn p a.
5 0
a
w0 ca
0
P4
5�0�
�a�aa
*�
a
vWi
W
a.
o
cn
.cs
A
A
z
tV
z
i
z
I
z
L
A.
=z
z
z
z z
v a
N
�
(
44

�A'
Mate of North Carolua
Department of Environment, ® •
and Natural Resources"
Division of Water Quality
in M_
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
NCW&
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MEMORANDUM
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Shannon Langley
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement r.
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number
Any comments that the regional office can provide on the issuance of a special agreement to this
facility by the EMC would be greatly appreciated. Please provide any comments in writing (e-
mail messages are acceptable) to me as soon as possible.
Thank you for your timely assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at
733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer ' 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT
(INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMENT)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility):
2. Facility No.:
3
9_0
Facility Name:
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
5. Mailing Address:
City: State:
C__—zip: ef 7
Telephone No.: ( 7-0 3 Z S
6. County where facility is located:
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle):
8. Application Date: 2
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
-22
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page l of 4

2. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
waste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include:
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Funds expended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
FORM SPAG 1/98
Page 2 of 4

II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Applicant's Certification:
I . attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the EMC has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand if all required parts of this application are not completed and if all
required supporting information and attachments are not included,,this application package wi
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 3 of 4

Required Items:
Oneoriginal and two (2Zcoies the completed and appropriately executed
application form along with any attachments.
THE, COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 4 of 4

.a e of North Carolina"�
�7 aliment of Environment,
alth and Natural Resources
ivision of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Vergie, Margie & Lynn Brown
35 Hickory Hill Farm Road
Leicester NC 28748
Dear Mr. Brown
November 5, 1997
Subject: Change of Ownersh
Facility Number 11
Buncombe County
U
We were recently notified of your purchase of the Charles Teague Dairy; which was previously owned by Mr.
Charles Teague in Buncombe County. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has assigned this farm facility
number 11-22 which you will find on the attached sheets. Please reference this facility number on all
correspondence with DWQ that is in reference to this farm. Please complete the attached Notification of
Change of Ownership form naming you as the owner to the best of your ability so that we may update our
records. If this farm is no longer being operated for swine, please complete the attached form and attach a
note that the farm is no longer operated and that you would like the farm to be removed from our Active
Animal Operations Registration List.
You are also required to designate a Certified Operator in Charge for this facility. Please use the enclosed
form to designate the Operator in Charge for this facility. All facilities were required to designate an Operator
in Charge by January 1, 1997. To obtain certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training
and pass an examination by December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of
animal waste management systems is available. Please contact your local county agency for training dates and
times. As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend
to operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a
contract operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether
you or another person, must complete the enclosed application form.
DWQ would like to take this opportunity to remind you that per the terms of the Environmental Management
Commission 15A NCAC 2H .0200 Rules, all registered animal operations must obtain and implement a
certified waste management plan. by .December 31, 1997. ;; For technical assistance in obtaining a certified
waste management plan, please contact Buncombe County Soil & Water Conservation District.
If you have any questions regarding waste management regulation for animal operations please contact the
Buncombe Co. S&WCD at 704-251-4906 or you may contact me at 919-733-5083 ext. 502. Thank you for
your assistance.
cc: Buncombe Co. S&WCD
". w. ille Regional Office
Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Sincerely,
Sue Homewood
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

VdAT�y�,." ,�
Michael F. Easley, Governor
�Jr
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 3, 2003
Dale Teague
Teague Dairy Farm
35 Hickory Hill Farm Road
Leicester NC 28748 u " i
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC11022
m Teague Dairy Farm
�11i % O 1 0 Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
11
and Application System
Buncombe County
Dear Dale Teague:
In accordance with your application received on January 26, 2001, we are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Dale Teague, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment; storage
and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the
operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Teague Dairy
Farm, located in Buncombe County, with an animal capacity of no greater than annual average of 125 dairy
ed in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
cows, and the application to land as specifi
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system inconformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the
General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the
required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste
production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as
provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation of future
samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is inaccurate you will
need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable laws,
rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate under this
permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more,
the Permittee must submit documentation '
to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any
wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the
CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through
143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the General
Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet http://h2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu
ACT
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
DENR customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

r
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership . changea plication must be submitted ,
Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right, to apply for
an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this process. Unless such a
request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Asheville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality.
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General
Permit, please contact J. R. Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
v
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Asheville Regional Office,, Water Quality Section
Buncombe County Health Department
Buncombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC 11022
NDPU Files

Producer: Dale Teague �' o
tknk
Location: Brown Town Road in Newfound
Telephone: [phone]
Type of Operation: Dairy
Number of Animals: 125 Holsteins
(Design Capacity)
Storage Structure(s): Liquid Waste Storage Pond and Dry Stack
Application Methods(s): Irrigation & Spreader
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste
should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the
fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. You must have the
animal waste analyzed to determine nutrient content as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within 60 days of the date of application before each application
cycle. Soil nutrients in all fields where waste will be applied must be analyzed at least
annually so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown. Soil test and waste analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste application
records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Lime must
be applied to application fields as recommended by soil test to maintain the plant
uptake of nutrients.

r
W--S TE UTILIZATION P AN
Charles,Teagiie Page 2 07131'03.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. With special precautions, (see Required Specification No. 4) waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is a violation of
the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) .0200 regulations.
5. Wind conditions at the time of field application of waste should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop. Otherwise apply waste no
earlier than 30 days prior to planting a crop or prior to forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting or otherwise incorporating the waste below the soil surface will conserve
nutrients and reduce odor problems.
7. Zinc and copper levels in the soils in all fields where waste is applied shall be
monitored and alternative application fields shall be used when these metals approach
excess levels.
This plan is based on waste application by irrigation and broadcasting with a spreader. If
you choose to alter the method(s) of application in the future, you need to revise this plan.
Nutrient levels for various waste application methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for dairy systems in North Carolina. Actual acreage requirements shall be based on
waste analysis reports from storage structures in your waste management system.
Your liquid waste storage pond (storage structure) is designed for 180 days of temporary
storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6
MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your structure be
higher than the maximum storage marker except in the event of a 25 year, 24 hour storm.
This level is marked by a 4'inch by 4 inch pressure treated post. Your dry stack is
designed for 120 days of storage. Manure must be removed from the structure before it
can discharge from the ramp end.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying
the waste.
The waste management system which is covered by this waste utilization plan shall be
operated only by persons which hold a valid certificate as an operator in charge of an

Cliarles' Teague

Total animal waste generated in one years is approximately:
1591 Lbs. PAN per year form liquid waste
+ 10987 Lbs. PAN per year from solid waste
12578 Total lbs. PAN per year
Applying the above amount of waste as calculated above is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
Values used above are based on analysis of waste from similar livestock operations in
North Carolina (source: USDA-NRCS FOTG Practice Standard 633 -Waste Utilization).
Actual nutrient content of the waste from this system may vary from these values. Waste
analysis should be made of the actual waste as soon as possible after significant waste
accumulates in the storage structure(s).
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements. In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North
Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addressesnitrogen.

F
WASTE APPLICATION TABLES
The crop fields shown in the Waste Application Tables that follow are available for waste
application. It will not be necessary and may not be desirable to apply waste to each of
these fields in any given year.
The Lbs. of Nitrogen Per Acre shown in the tables are estimated annual nitrogen (N)
requirements of the crop to be grown based on the potential productivity of the soil and
assuming no double cropping.
The Recommended Lbs. of N to be Applied per acre indicates the Nitrogen that can be
reasonably applied to the crop and used by the crop in a timely manner using animal
waste alone. It will not be practical to meet all the nutrient needs of some crops with
animal waste. Supplemental applications of commercial fertilizer may be required during
the growing season in order to meet all crop nutrient needs. It is assumed that for certain
row crops only a fraction of the total annual nitrogen requirement can be applied using
animal waste.
The landowner shall record the actual waste application volume made on each field on the
Department of Water Quality Waste Application Record Form.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in the field application tables:
Nitrogen
Crop
Production
Requirement
Code
Crop
Unit
Lbs./unit
CS
CORN - SILAGE
TONS
10 - 12 lbs.
HCS
HAY, COOL SEASON, NOT GRAZED
TONS
40 - 50 lbs.
PCS
PASTURE, COOL SEASON
AUM
13.34
Barley
BARLEY
BUSHELS
1.7 to 2.4

SOIL
SOIL
COMMENTS REGARDING SUITABILITY
CODE
TYPE
OF SOILS FOR WASTE APPLICATION
313e
Hayesville 15-30%
Suitable — High Soil loss
dormancy period)
the plan narrative)
244c
Braddock 8-15%
Suitable for Waste application
to be made prior to maturity
121 b
Tate Loam 2-8%
Suitable for Waste application
during severe winters when no
233 b
Dillard 0-6 %
Suitable for Waste application
Recommend split application
33
lotla Loam
Suitable for Waste Application
applied by Nov. 30 and remaining
WASTE APPLICATION WINDOWS
CROP
APPLICATION WINDOW
RESTRICTIONS, SPECIAL
(includes 30 day pre -plant,
NOTES, ect.
preemergence or prior to breaking
(to be considered and/or noted in
dormancy period)
the plan narrative)
Corn silage
March 15 — June 30
When possible last application is
to be made prior to maturity
Barley
September 1 - March 15
No Nitrogen is to be applied
during severe winters when no
growth occurs
Recommend split application
with 20-40% of total PAN to be
applied by Nov. 30 and remaining
PAN balance to be applied after
Jan. 31.
Tall Fescue
For the mountain region,
recommend no more than 30 lbs.
PAN per acre be applied per
month for June & July if moisture
is not limiting growth. Apply zero
nitrogen Dec. and Jan.
Recommendations for
establishment year- assumes fall
planting with initial applications
less than 60 lbs PAN per acre
from 1 week preplant through 4
weeks post plant. An additional
25 lbs may be applied in Nov.
through Dec.

Table 1: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract -
No.
Field
No.
Soil
Type
Code
Crop
Code
Realistic
Anticipated
Yields
Acres'
Useable
Lbs. N
Required
Per Ac.
Recommended
Lbs. N
To
Applied2
No
Fields
Owned
By
Producer
TOTALS THIS TABLE
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required buffer
areas which border streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed
may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial
fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield
expectation.

Table 2: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG
TERM LEASE
SOLID WASTE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached) (Required only if operator does
not own adequate land [see Required Specification 2])
Tract
No.
Field
No.
Soil
Type
Code
Crop
Code
Lbs.
N per
Acre
Acres'
Useable
Lbs.
N
Utilized
Month
Of
Application
5551
7
244c/331e
PCS
110
19.9
2189
Aug.1 -July 31
5551
9
121 B
CS
286
4.0
1144
March 15-June3o
5551
13
313E
CS
198
6.6
1307
March 15-June3o
5551
15
313E
PCS
80
32.0
2560
Aug.1 —July 31
5551
16
313E
CS
198
2.7
535
March 15-June30
5551
1
313E
CS
198
15.0
2970
March 15-JUne30
5551
2
313E
CS
198
25.9
5128
March 15-June3o
5551
8
313E
CS
198
3.9
772
March 15-June3o
5551
3
313E
CS
198
10.7
2119
March 15-June3o
5551
12
121 B
CS
286
5.5
1573
March 15-June3o
5551
10
121 B
CS
286
6.9
1973
March 15-June3o
5551
11
313E
CS
198
2.6
515
March 15-June3o
5551
14
313E
CS
198
3.0
594
March 15-June3o
TOTALS THIS TABLE
138.7
23479
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required buffer
i
areas which border streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed
may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial
fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N. must be based on realistic yield
expectation.

Tract
No.
Field
No.
Soil
Type
Code
Crop
Code
Lbs.
N per
Acre
Acres'
Useable
Lbs.
N
Utilized
Month
Of
Application
5551
9
121 B
Barley
84
4.0
336
July 1 —April 30
5551
13
313E
Barley
63
6.6
416
July 1 - April 30
5551
16
313E
Barley
63
2.7
170
July 1 -April 30
5551
1
313E
Barley
63
15.0
945
July 1 —April 30
5551
2
313E
Barley
63
25.9
1632
July 1 -April 30
5551
8
313E
Barley
63
3.9
245
July 1 -April 30
5551
3
313E
Barley
63
10.7
674
July 1 -April 30
5551
12
121 B
Barley
84
5.5
462
July 1 — April 30
5551
10
121 B
Barley
84
6.9
580
July 1 -April 30
5551
11
313E
Barley
63
2.6
164
July 1 -April 30
5551
14
313E
Barley
63
3.0
189
July 1 —April 30
TOTALS THIS TABLE
86.8
5813
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required buffer
areas which border streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed
may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial
fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield
expectation.

Tract
No.
Field
No.
Soil
Type
Code
Crop
Code
Lbs.
N per
Acre
Acres'
Useable
Lbs.
N
Utilized
Month
Of
Application
5551
4
233B
cs
220
5.4
1188
March 15 -June 30
5551
6
33
cs
288
5.4
1555
March 15 -June 30
5551
4
233B
Barley
105
5.4
567
March 15 -June 30
5551
6
33
Barley
105
5.4
567
March 15 -June 30
TOTALS THIS TABLE
10.8
3877
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus the required buffer
areas which border streams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed
may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial
fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield
expectation.