20190250 Ver 1_401 Application_20190208

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Line 363 M&R Station
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑✓ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
Piedmont Natural Gas proposes to install a new 16" steel natural gas distribution line inside of a 30' wide private easement located
north and west of the intersection of Rushmore Dr. and Ballantyne Commons Pkwy in Charlotte, NC. This line will be fed from an
existing regulator station and will tie into an existing 12" distribution system located along Ballantyne Commons Pkwy. The purpose of
the project will be to provide additional and more reliable service to existing and future customers in the greater Charlotte Area and is
located at Lat Long (35.057186, -80.862044), requiring approx. 4.943 ac. of earth disturbance, including approx. 1.313 ac. of wetlands.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Applicant: Megan Plassman, Piedmont Natural Gas
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Jacqueline M. McCort, Maser Consulting P.A.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: N/A
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Latitude: 35.057186, Longitude: -80.862044; Rushmore Drive
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 22364369, 22315101, 22315102, 22315111
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: McAlpine Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Catawba
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

r
MASER
C 8Y 11 LtiAC F. A.
Engineers
Planners
Surveyors
Landscape Architects
Environmental Scientists
February 8, 2019
VIA EMAIL
David Shaeffer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Re: Pre -Construction Notification — NWP No. 12
Rushmore Drive Proposed 16" Steel Distribution
Rushmore Drive
City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
MC Project No. 17004827A
Dear Mr. Shaeffer:
5275 Parkway Plaza Boulevard, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28217
T: 980.245.3161
F: 704.973.7962
www.maserconsulting.com
Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG) is installing approximately 2,700 linear feet of a new 16 -inch steel
distribution gas line feeding from an existing 12" distribution regulator. The purpose of the project
will be to provide additional and more reliable service to meet the demand of its existing customers
in the greater Charlotte area. The Project is located at Lat Long (35.057186, -80.862044) and will
require approximately 4.943 acres of earth disturbance, including 1.313 acres of wetlands. Based
upon regulations set forth in Section 404/401 of the Clean Waters Act, the proposed project will
result in temporary and permanent impacts to waters of the U.S.; therefore, PNG is submitting the
following information to satisfy the requirements of a Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) in
accordance with Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 12 and the corresponding North Carolina Water
Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3884. Based on project design and impacts, written approval
from the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) is NOT required and
the 401 Certification is automatically approved in conjunction with the approved 404 Permit.
Enclosed by copy of this correspondence and completed PCN, we are requesting your written
concurrence with this NWP 12 and WQC 1884 Permit Application. PNG is seeking to start
construction promptly.
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction

■
MASER
s I r: I l t I N i R L
David Shaeffer
MC Project No. 17004827A
February 8, 2019
Page 2 of 2
Should you have any questions in regard to the enclosed, or require additional information, please
contact me by telephone at [phone] or via email at jmccort&maserconsulting com.
Very truly yours,
MASER CONSULTING P.A.
(Ja ueli M. McCort
ssociate, Ecological Services
JMM/TD
Enclosures - USACE/NCDWQ Application w/Appendices
R:\A11Offices\Charlotte\Projects\2017\17004827A\Reports\Ecological\PCN\190208_Submission Materials\001_190208_jmm_USACE cover
letter.docx

a pp W R rE�<
o Niii� -r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑X Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Rushmore Drive Proposed 16" Steel Distribution
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Multiple owners of record- See attached sheets
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Sponsor
4b.
Name:
Megan Plassman
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Piedmont Natural Gas
4d.
Street address:
4301 Yancey Road
4e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28217
4f.
Telephone no.:
704-587-3455
4g.
Fax no.:
704-587-3189
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Jacqueline M. McCort
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Maser Consulting P.A.
5c.
Street address:
5275 Parkway Plaza Boulevard, Suite 100
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28217
5e.
Telephone no.:
980-245-3161
5f.
Fax no.:
704-973-7962
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
see attached list of owners of record
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.057186 Longitude: 80.862044
1 c.
Property size:
4.943 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
McAlpine Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c.
River basin:
Catawba
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site currently consists of bottom hardwood palustrine forested wetland (PFO) and palustrine emergent wetland (PEM). The site is located within a
heavily developed commercial and residential area with steep slopes leading from the wetland to the development. Also located within the site is a
sanitary sewer easement. Please see the attached document for additional supporting information.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.663
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To provide additional, safe, reliable, and efficient energy to Piedmont's existing and future natural gas customers throughout the greater Charlotte Area
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Please see the attached document for additional supporting information.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Land Clearing
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.395
W2 T
Land Clearing
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.918
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
1.313
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
A stream flows through the wetland, but is located outside of the project limits.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Please see the attached document for additional supporting information.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Please see the attached document for additional supporting information.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.395 acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes X❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The total area of earth disturbance is 4.943 acres. There is no proposed increase in impervious surface.
In consultation with the City of Charlotte, a
Stormwater Management Plan is only required when the net increase from pervious to impervious is greater than 1 acre. However, a site-specific
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been developed and submitted to NCDEQ-DMLR for approval of General Permit No. NCG010000.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
N/A
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
N/A
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes X❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
E] Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑X Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS iPac was reviewed. See agency consultation responses.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The project site is not located near the Atlantic Ocean, and therefore, does not contain Essential Fish Habitat as identified by the National Marine
Fisheries Service. This was verified through the NOAA EFH Mapper (www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper.index.html)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCHPO was contacted; See agency consultation response. A Phase I Archaeological Identification Survey was prepared by Commonwealth
Heritage /Group, Inc. and submitted to NCHPO on 11/27/18, which documented that no archaeological sites were present. NCHPO response pending.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project involves the placement of an underground natural gas distribution pipeline. No above -ground structures or buildings are proposed. The
pre-existing ground elevations will be maintained post -construction.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
North Carolina Flood Risk Information System (FRIS), http://fris.nc.gov/fris/Home.aspx?ST=NC and
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Stormwater Services 3d Floodzone Mapping - http://meckmap.mecklenburgcountync.gov/3dfz/
Megan Plassman
?�
12/31/2018
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.
Page 10 of 10

A. Applicant Information
Following is a list of owners of record within the limits of disturbance for the Rushmore
Drive Proposed 16" Steel Distribution project. For construction within Parcels #002, #003,
#004, and #006, the respective owners have authorized USACE access to the property while
the final recorded permanent and temporary construction easements are pending. In
addition, construction is proposed within Tax Parcels 22315105 and 22311113 (Deed Book
4369, Page 740), owned by Mecklenburg County, at the northern end of the project. Within
these tax parcels, Piedmont Natural Gas has an existing easement, located in Deed Book
9007, Page 296. Since all activities will be limited to an existing easement through these
two tax parcels, additional authorization by Mecklenburg County is not required.
3. Owner Information:
Tract No.
Name on Recorded Deed
Deed Book and Page No.
Responsible Party (if app
Street Address
City, State, Zip
Telephone No.
Fax No.
Email Address
Tract No.
Name on Recorded Deed
Deed Book and Page No.
Responsible Party (if app
Street Address
City, State, Zip
Telephone No.
Fax No.
Email Address
Tract No.
Name on Recorded Deed
Deed Book and Page No.
Responsible Party (if app.)
Street Address
City, State, Zip
Telephone No.
Fax No.
Email Address
Parcel #002
22364349
Ballantyne Meadows Homeowner Association, Inc.
Deed Book 13666, Page 831
Heather Skinner
c/o Hawthorne Management Company, P.O. Box 11906
Charlotte, NC 28220
Parcel #003
22315101
NW Rushmore Two, LP
Deed Book 31605, Page 979
Michael Beste
11605 N. Community House Road
Charlotte, NC 28277
Parcel #004
22315102
Ballantyne Corporate Park Owners Association, Inc.
Deed Book 30338, Page 485
Julie R. Hobbs
11510 N. Community House Road, Suite 150
Charlotte, NC 28277

Tract No.
Name on Recorded Deed
Deed Book and Page No.
Responsible Party (if app
Street Address
City, State, Zip
Telephone No.
Fax No.
Email Address
Parcel #006
22315111
NW Rushmore One, LP
Deed Book 31605, Page 971
Elizabeth Grove
11605 N. Community House Road
Charlotte, NC 28277

AUTHORIZATION TO ACCESS PROPERTY
Parcel # D02
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION, 6,254 acres of vacant land off of Ballantyne Commons Parkway
V16
PARCEL ID: 223-384-49
STREET ADDRESS: Vacant land
PROPERTY OWNER, Beflantyne Meadows Homeowners Association, Inc.
c/o. Hawtharne Management Company
P. 0. Box 11906
Charlotte, NC 28220
S
, the owner or legal
representative of the registered property owner(s) of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
representatives of Piedmont Natural Gas, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C, Division of
Water Resources to access the property for the purposes of reviewing the area within the proposed
gasline easement for the presence of jurisdictional waters of the U.S. It is understood that if necessary,
Piedmont will work to acquire necessary permits from the U,S. Army Corps of Engineers and N.C.
Division of Water Resources that may be necessary to construct and maintain the pipeline on the
property referenced above.
SIGNED DATE

AUTHORIZATION TO ACCESS PROPERTY
Parcel # 003
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Map Book 58, Page 339
PARCEL ID: 223-151-01
STREET ADDRES& 1101 Rushmore Drive, Charlotte, NC 28277
PROPERTY OWNER: NW Rushmore Two, LP
M iG 68 f DB5 +e „ _ , the owner or legal
representative of the registered property owner(s) of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
representatives of Piedmont Natural Gas, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.G. Division of
Water Resources to access the property for the purposes of reviewing the area within the proposed
gasline easement for the presence of jurisdictional waters of the U.S. It is understood that if necessary,
Piedmont will work to acquire necessary permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and N.C.
Division of Water Resources that may be necessary to construct and maintain the pipeline on the
property referenced above.
/ I
iol �
y !9 r8
SIGNED DATE

AUTHORIZATION TO ACCESS PROPERTY
Parcel # 004
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Map Book 58, Page 156
PARCEL ID: 223-151-02
STREET ADDRESS: 5.41 acres of vacant land
PROPERTY OWNER: Ballantyne Corporate Park Owners Association, Inc.
17.51.0 N. Community House Road, Suite 150
Charlotte, NC 28277
I J
14 b5
the owner or iegal_
representative of the registered property owner(s) of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
represen atives of Piedmont Natural Gas, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of
Water Resources to access the property for the purposes of reviewing the area within the proposed
gasline easement for the presence of jurisdictional waters of the U.S. It is understood that if necessary,
Piedmont will work to acquire necessary permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and N.C.
Division of Water Resources that may be necessary to construct and maintain the pipeline on the
property referenced above.
SIGNED DATE

AUTHORIZATION TO ACCESS PROPERTY
Parcel # 006
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 13.773 -acre parcel
PARCEL ID: 223-151-11
STREET ADDRESS: 10840 Ballantyne Commons Parkway, Charlotte, NC 28277
PROPERTY OWNER: NW Rushmore One, LP
11605 Community House Road
Charlotte, NC 28277
�lita►�hC�r��e
, the owner or legal
representative of the registered property owner(s) of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
representatives of Piedmont Natural Gas, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of
Water Resources to access the property for the purposes of reviewing the area within the proposed
gasline easement for the presence of jurisdictional waters of the U.S. It is understood that if necessary,
Piedmont will work to acquire necessary permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and N.C.
Division of Water Resources that may be necessary to construct and maintain the pipeline on the
property referenced above.
-7119 1 IX
SIGNED DATE

The following Sections correspond to the Sections outlined on the USACE/DWQ PCN
Application Form.
A. Applicant Information
This PCN is being provided to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for approval and
compliance with applicable conditions of a NWP No. 12 as they pertain to §404/10 and
§401 of the Clean Waters Act. Written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ), is not required since no perennial or intermittent streams have
been identified within the project boundary.
The Project Sponsor
(Applicant)
Piedmont Natural Gas
Megan Plassman
4301 Yancey Road
Charlotte, NC 28217
Agent/Consultant for Applicant
Maser Consulting P.A.
Jacqueline M. McCort
5275 Parkway Plaza Blvd
Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28217

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
3. Proiect Description
3e - Piedmont Natural Gas is installing approximately 2,700 linear feet of a new 16 -inch steel
distribution gas line feeding from an existing 12" distribution regulator. The purpose of the project will
be to provide additional and more reliable service to meet the demand of its existing customers in the
greater Charlotte area. The Project is located at Lat Long (35.057186, -80.862044) and the project will
require approximately 4.943 acres of earth disturbance, including 1.313 acres of wetlands. The
Project will meet the requirements for approval under a Nationwide Permit No. 12. The current
design includes mechanized clearing in a forested wetland and wetland impacts greater than 0.1
acres; therefore, a Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is required. A Project Location Map and
other site drawings are included in Appendix A.
Construction of a gas pipeline consists of distinct phases: clearing, grading, lowering in,
backfilling, and restoration. A figure depicting typical pipeline construction is shown
below.
Typical Pipeline Construction Sequence
I� Surveying and Staking Many months ahead of cunsrruction, field Surveys are conducted along rhe propoud pipeline rouse, or right-of-way, to better undersrand environmental,
development and Focal issues.A final route is then salecled. The specific location of the selecled rouse is Then marked with stakes.
7a) Trenching These
pipes are already
coated to prevent
corrosion -The
integrity of the weld
is inspected, and the
weld joint i5 coared
Note: These iii ar a6am are
cvrxewual and general fn
natum: specific constructron and
restoration fechrnrques cnufdvasy
denendrng a cirnrr-sw-ces.
2) front -End Clearing pare YOWher [oWiliom permit, crews begin W prepare for tonslitdon by grading the
right-of-way and temporary work space to remove trees and prepare the working space.
3] Right -of -Way Grading In cultivated areas, the topseR aropg the right•ol•way is
stripped by bulldozer and stared in piles for careful replacement later.
8) Final Coating and
Inspection In agricullur-
af areas, carelul alten-
lion is paid to properly
sepaiat ng and storing
the topsoil and subsoil
so they do not mhc The
pipe coating is inWted
one more time
4) Sidriging Pipe Crews then ie -stake the center of the trench, lay out or
"siring' sections of Che pipe along the right -of -way -
9) Lowering Pipe Into
Trench The pipe is
lowered into the trench
where it is surveyed and
Laid within prepared
trench bottom.
Sj Bending Plpe Crews bend and
weld the pipe into one long piece.
10) Pad, 6adrffll,
Rough Grade The
french is then backfilled
wah subsoil land Sepa-
rated topsoil Set aside in
many areas) -
fi} Lineup, Initial Weld the pipeline
will follow the contours of the land.
11 j Testing Final Tie- n
Wore operation, soarer is
used to test the pressure 121 Final Clean -UR Full
of the line and enure the Re5tOratiOn Final grading
structural integri,of the is performed and topsoil
pipe and welds. spread over work area using
a bulldozer.
In general, approximately 60 -foot lengths of 16 -inch pipe will be trucked to the site, strung
along the easement, and placed on skids (wooden pedestals). Specialized machines will be
used to bend individual segments of the pipe to fit the contours of the trench where

necessary. The pipe segments will be welded together, x-rayed, inspected for structural
integrity, and then lowered into the trench. Permanent trench breaks will be installed where
necessary and then backfilled with excavated subsoil and topsoil. In certain areas, such as
residential areas and wetlands, efforts will be made to segregate topsoil from the subsoil and
backfilled as such. Following final backfill, affected areas will then be cleaned up by rough
grading and temporary seeding (if necessary), followed by final grading, permanent seeding
and mulching to restore the easement as close as possible to pre -disturbance contours and
conditions.
Prior to construction activities, all easement boundaries (e.g., workspace limits) will be
clearly delineated and flagged so that no clearing/grubbing occurs beyond these boundaries.
Wetland and stream boundaries will be clearly marked prior to any clearing activities.
Vegetation within wetlands require mechanized clearing, and generally no grubbing or
below ground vegetation removal will occur, with the exception of the area directly over the
trench line. Pipeline construction activities, such as welding, x-raying, and coating will take
place in the upland area. Vegetation within the working side of the ROW will require
grinding of stumps to ground surface, leaving the existing root system in place. At times, a
tree stump or two directly under a temporary bridge/matting may be removed to facilitate
safe passage of equipment and stability of mats. Appropriate erosion and sediment control
devices will be installed immediately after clearing and prior to initial soil disturbance. The
temporary mats and bridges shall remain in place until final grading and permanent seeding
is completed.
4. Jurisdictional Areas
Investigations were conducted within and adjacent to the project site to identify land use,
plant community types, and presence of regulated wetland and water resources. Locations
of wetland features were captured utilizing a hand-held Trimble GPS unit with sub -meter
accuracy. Jurisdictional features are depicted on the Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
Impact Plan drawings available in Appendix A.
Plant community types were investigated for wetlands and waterbodies. Wetlands and
waters were identified as emergent, scrub/shrub, or forested wetlands, perennial streams,
intermittent streams, or ephemeral channels (stormwater ditches, seeps). Perennial streams
and intermittent streams are typically considered waters of the U.S. Streams are considered
perennial if they contain base flow throughout the year which is supported with
groundwater. Intermittent streams are those which contain base flow at least a portion of
the year which is supported with groundwater. Ephemeral channels, stormwater ditches and
seeps are sometimes considered waters of the U.S. In ephemeral channels and stormwater
channels, the primary sources of hydrology are snow and rain precipitation. Stormwater
channels are manmade features specifically constructed for the conveyance of surface water
from upslope areas. Seeps may discharge groundwater or surface water. These channels
can be considered waters of the U.S. if they exhibit an Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM),
are tributary to jurisdictional waters, or if they are built in waters of the U.S. or wetlands.
The OHWM is that line on the shore established by the fluctuations of water and typically
characterized by a clear, natural line impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in the
character of soil, destruction of terrestrial vegetation, or the presence of litter and debris
(USC Title 33). Stormwater channels are also considered waters of the U.S. in the absence
of an OHWM, if the channel connects two wetlands or waters of the U.S. or are tributary to
jurisdictional waters. Waters of the U.S. are ultimately determined based on the outcome

of a USACE jurisdictional determination.
Maser Consulting conducted wetland and waterbody field delineations in February 2018.
Investigations were conducted to identify and delineate the extent and location of
jurisdictional waters and wetlands within the Project study area. The field investigation
identified two regulated waters of the U.S., a palustrine forested wetland and a
predominantly emergent wetland. A stream was observed in the vicinity, but outside of the
project limits. A complete wetland delineation report is included as Appendix B.

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
The Project involves permanent impacts that will occur as a result of trench excavation,
temporary side casting of materials, placement of timber mats for equipment crossings, and fill
for safe operation and maintenance at the M&R Station. Every effort during the planning stage
of the Project was made to minimize the impacts to forested wetlands by installing the proposed
pipeline as far out of the wetland as possible. However, due to construction constraints and an
existing sanitary sewer easement and infrastructure, the removal of trees and stumps within the
trench line and a portion of the station location in forested wetlands (PFO) will be required, thus
resulting in permanent impacts. Typically, such disturbed areas associated with the pipeline
installation return as emergent wetlands (PEM) following construction. Although the project
will result in the conversion of these forested wetlands to herbaceous wetlands, it will not result
in a loss to waters of the U.S. As previously stated, temporarily impacted wetlands, along the
temporary work space used during construction, will be allowed to re -vegetate naturally to their
pre -disturbance condition. In all aspects, the disturbed areas will be restored to their original
grade and contour following construction. Geographical location of each wetland and stream
crossing along the proposed route and proposed erosion sediment control Best Management
Practices (BMP) at each crossing are included on the Erosion and Sediment Control (ES&C)
Plans as Appendix C.
Wetland Impacts
Project -wide total wetland impacts will be 1.313 acres and will encompass 0.918 acres of
temporary impacts and 0.395 acres of permanent impacts. Permanent impacts will be due
to conversion. Impacts associated with the 30 -ft wide private easement will result in the
conversion of PFO to PEM of 0.395 acres. Within the temporary easements and additional
temporary workspace (ATWS) areas, existing trees will be cut flush to the ground and
grubbing will not be required, leaving the root mass intact. Following construction, the
temporary work easements and areas will be restored, seeded, and allowed to return to pre -
disturbance vegetative condition and will not result in a conversion, as future mowing or
maintenance will not occur following construction. A Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
Impact Plan is provided in Appendix A.

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
Avoidance and Minimization
To avoid and minimize impacts to the waters of the U.S. within the project area, Piedmont
looked at various alternate project location and pipeline routes. Other alternatives either
impacted more wetlands, were not constructible due to topographic features, or impacted
additional private land. The chosen location was located as far out of the wetland area as
possible; however, due to an existing sanitary sewer easement, existing business park and
residential development, and steep slopes to the east, the wetland could not be avoided all
together.
Impacts to wetlands are minimized, as one long wetland crossing at the northerly limits of
the project area will be constructed using HDD. Thus, the wetland will not be disturbed at
this location.
Wetland impacts will be minimized during construction through the use of equipment mats at
each crossing, and the use of trench plugs to prevent alterations to wetland hydrology.
Additionally, construction equipment operating within the wetland will be limited to that
necessary to complete the installation and restoration activities. Wetland vegetation will be cut
by hand or grinded to ground level, leaving the existing root mass in place to promote re -growth.
To the extent practical, wetland topsoil will be separated from the underlying subsoil in areas
disturbed by trenching. Where, based on field observations, wetland soils are not "stackable"
due to saturation, additional ECDs will be installed along the construction corridor to prevent
off -ROW impacts. Within wetlands, yearly vegetation maintenance activities will only be
conducted in within the proposed permanent easement areas. All other TWS and ATWS areas
will be seeded with a native wetland seed mix and allowed to re -vegetate naturally.
Mitigation
Construction of the project will result in the permanent conversion of forested wetland
(PFO) to emergent (PEM). Although conversion is considered a temporary impact, it
typically requires some level of compensatory mitigation. The mechanized clearing of the
forested wetland will result in a conversion of 0.395 acres of forested wetlands. The
NCDWQ and USACE have accepted a 1:1 ratio for previous projects similar in nature.
The project will impact a wetland where the conversion will be greater than 0.10 of an acre
and may require mitigation for those impacts greater than 0.1 acre. Based on these calculations,
the project will require the mitigation of riparian wetlands. Since there are not enough
credits available in the Catawba 03050103 bank, Piedmont Natural Gas plans to provide
payment in -lieu for the appropriate amount of loss and conversion of wetlands of 0.395
acres. A Payment In -lieu request letter was submitted to the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (NCEEP) and accepted on January 29, 2019. A copy of the
correspondence is included in Appendix D.

E. Stormwater Management
The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater program regulates
construction activities that disturb more than one acre. The proposed Project falls under the
general requirements to be covered under the new Construction NPDES Stormwater General
Permit NCGO100000 providing that the required ground stabilization and basin design are
included in the Erosion and Sediment Control (E&SC) Plan (Appendix Q.

F. Supplementary Information
Endangered Species and Desimnated Critical Habitat
To comply with applicable section of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) 1973, Maser
Consulting conducted a desktop analysis followed by field review for Threatened and
Endangered (T&E) Species within the Project site and initiated consultation with the US
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP). Consultation letters were sent to the USFWS and NCNHP for their review of
the Project and the potential impact on T&E Species. Final responses from USFWS and
NCNHP are included in Appendix D.
During the pre -survey desktop analysis, the following five (5) listed T&E species had the
potential of being present within the Project footprint:
Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) - During summer, northern long-eared bats
roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees.
Males and non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. This
bat seems opportunistic in selecting roosts, using tree species based on suitability to retain bark
or provide cavities or crevices. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns
and sheds. Northern long-eared bats spend winter hibernating in caves and mines. During the
initial site review, Northern Long Eared Bat habitat including caves, roost trees, or other
potential habitat (i.e. dead trees, crevices, etc.) were not observed. Piedmont Natural Gas will
conduct tree clearing during winter months (between September 1 and March 31) to the best of
its ability when practical to minimize the potential impact.
Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorate) - The Carolina heelsplitter requires cool, clean,
well -oxygenated water. Stable, silt -free stream bottoms appear to be critical to the species.
Typically, stable areas occur where the stream banks are well -vegetated with trees and shrubs.
Although the project is in the vicinity of McAlpine Creek, the project does not require crossing
or impacting the stream or stream bank. The wetlands to be disturbed do not contain the required
habitat to support the Carolina Heelsplitter.
Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii) — Habitat characteristics includes sandy, loamy swales and
depressions, acidic and circumneutral uplands, and rocky open woods. This sumac grows best
where disturbance has maintained an open area. The project location is a predominately forested
wetland that has not been disturbed. Soils in the area are classified as Monacan Loam (MO) and
are typical of floodplain areas.

Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) — This species occurs in full to partial sun
and is found in areas with poor soils, such as thin clays that vary from wet to dry. It is believed
that this species once occurred in natural forest openings or grasslands. Many of the remaining
populations occur along roadsides. Based upon observations during the field reconnaissance,
the existing site conditions do not support this habitat.
Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigate) — This plant occurs in open sunny areas in which it
receives little competition from other plants. It requires neutral to alkaline soils rich in calcium
and magnesium with good drainage. The existing site conditions includes forested wetland with
very little understory and open sunny areas and therefore does not support the habitat.
Upon completion of environmental surveys, Maser Consulting did not observe the potential
habitat or any individuals of the above-mentioned species. The USFWS and NCNHP
correspondence letters in Appendix D concur with Maser Consulting's conclusion that the
project will have no potential impacts on endangered species.
Historical or Prehistoric Cultural Resources
On July 12, 2018, Maser Consulting submitted a letter to the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Office (NCSHPO) requesting a review of their files and a determination of "No
Affect". A review of the SHPO GIS mapping indicated there are no historic properties within,
or adjacent to the Area of Potential Effect (APE). The NCSHPO response, dated August 10,
2018, required a comprehensive archaeological survey. The results of the archaeological survey
were forwarded to NC SHPO on November 27, 2018. The final response from NC SHPO,
dated December 20, 2018 concurred with the findings that no sites were reported and no
additional work is necessary (Appendix D).

i
LIST OF APPENDICES
A. Figures
B. Wetland Delineation Report
C. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
D. Agency Correspondence

i
APPENDIX A
FIGURES

w Y VA
f • ` N f .$vyn
KY;: 2,640 1,320 0 2,640Feet ■
7 w e
1 inch = 2,640 feet s
GA SCAa
;r=
'J �'v\ '- .. i y OLaxm h•' �~V t. :`• f� •,"•.•- : �r ..'.•• •. .,• - _. `_-'+� r..
h. >� r,' lob r.' ' �. rte■, '� 4
♦�cJ f`. `_ - 4 -
Project Location: `.
' ���i"■ - ��` £ ,� '"'. _ '!' ��.5 - � - . - �- stiff ��"����r�; �1 � �"� • ;:_..
-�} �� :•�, Y"7" - �• ire\?- 1..t �L. S •'1..r�l. .•
4— - .� _ ftz -S1 _
_ r _ y /
17
ow
CO
IJI
Vis_ - �y■ —� r
A 1
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
�• �.�
Prepared For:
MPiedmont Project Location Map Figure
Y Natural Gas Rushmore Drive Distribution Project
Prepared By: CharlottOMecklenburg County, North Carolina
e ffic
5275 Parkway Plaza Z711
Charlotte, NC 2821007 y Date: MC Project #: Drawn By: Project Location
T: 704,973 - 7962 MAS E R
www.moserc onsulting.com June 18, 2018 17004827A AAP

1V
N
W
E
SITE
\ o.
\ \�1 A
Os Oq
?(j� SIG C�
C S PKW
\
�0
\�
VICINITY MAP
I" = 1000'
15savirnrrr SEIMR Enuavr \ \ \ \ l
QWUD Jag Na 100 -94 -ran
G`
\
VkQODED NFL
\
\
/ G,
RIGHT OF WAY CONFIGURATION
\Jr\
W W
W err/gj\
PROPOSED EASEMENT
G �� G PROPOSED GAS LINE
WETLAND W 102 (OPEN CUT):
PROPOSED EASEMENT
- \ v, .� w
10' PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
b
W W W W W
7,523 SQ.FT.
0.17 ACRES W W W
W W
W 6��
— — PROPOSED TWS
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
9,664 SQ.FT. \
0.22 ACRES
N, +
\ —
k_ W
NOTES: �,b
WFZ
LEGEND
I. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND W
W W W W W w
DISTANCES IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. AREA �\
BY COORDINATE COMPUTATION.
W W w
0 TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
W
2. THIS MAP IS NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
3. WETLAND AND STREAM DATA WERE PROVIDED TO w
W W W
WFL
W\ ✓ ✓ W W /
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
MASER CONSULTING P.A. IN SHAPEFILE FORMAT BY
MASER CONSULTING P.A. ON FEBRUARY 13, 2018.
4. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN IS TO SHOW THE
�, �\ W
WETLAND AREA
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES AND DELINEATED BY
/
MASER CONSULTING.
5. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE
e
/ 515 /
— — — — PROPOSED EASEMENT
COORDINATES (NAD 83/NSRS 2011).
PROPOSED TWS
100 0 100
\ /
G PROPOSED GAS LINE
/
—G EXISTING GAS LINE
SCALE: 1" l��f =
����'�
REV DATE D B WN DESCRIPTION
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.
IMPACT PLAN OF RUSHMORE PIPELINE
� PROTECT YOURSELF
ALL STATES REQUIRE NOTIFICATION
OF EXCAVATORS, DESIGNERS, OR
$CALE: DATE: DMWN BY: CHECKED BY:
F R
FOR
ANY PERSON PREPARING TO
DISTURB THE EARTH'S SURFACE
.iV i \
C 8 N S U L T I N 6 P. A
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
ANYWHERE IN ANY STATE
Kno iee below.
Call cef—p. di&
SHHOW 01/30/19 CJK/TAH NMG
' -
NAME
PRO17O 4827A
Office Locations:
FOR STATE SPECIFIC DIRECT PHONE NUMBERS
VISIT: W W W.CALL81 ICOM
C-SESCG
17004827A C-SESC-EXBT
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction
■ Red Bank, NJ ■ Lehigh Valley, PA
www.maserconsu l ting.com ■ Clinton, NJ ■ EMon, PA
HEET TITLE:
Engineers • Planners •Surveyors ■ Hamilcon, NJ ■ Philadelphia, PA
■ Harbor, NJ ■ Pittsbur PA
Lands Architects • E,,ironmental Saiendsts
�Pe ■ o wale, NJ ■ Tampa, L
NJrlando, FLSore of N C Firm No. C-4042 ■ Mt Laurel, NJ ■ Miami, FL
RUSHMORE PROPOSED
12" STEEL DISTRIBUTION
IMPACT PLAN I OF 2
CHARLOTTE OFFICE
75 Prkway Plao Boulevard■Mt.Aringt
Suite 100
■ Albany, NY ■ t1sonvllle, FL
•New Windsor, NY ■ SSterling, VAWestchester,
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Charlotte, NC 28217
49""
I
I OL 2
V
NY Norfolk, A
Charlotte NC ■ Alb uquerq
Raleigh, Nuec ■ Colambia MoNM
MECHI.ENBLJRG COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

N
CROSSING METHOD:
HDD
EX/ST//yG
C) SITE
SEX/STj
- GAS z/NE. ANG E=EMENT
are
W
E
5p.�
EX/STjNGIE
Wµ}LW %%X_.%%%
M_
EN
.
\ SPKWY
WWWW
.G
WO©DED
_
G
G
. . . rrnAll�P
VICINITY MAP
y .3.
-o W
I"= 1000'
`O
RIGHT OF WAY CONFIGURATION
OPEN CUT CROSSING
. '
PROPOSED EASEMENT
' �I
. , . ` . ` W `
0
T G G PROPOSED GAS LINE
W
I
N
PROPOSED EASEMENT
♦ ♦ ♦ u- ♦ W
o
WETLAND-W101: WW .W
., `W.W`WWW`W .rtwlW
30' PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
—PROPOSED TWS
9,745 SQ.FT.
W W
,
0.22 ACRES
I
HDD CROSSING
VARIABLE TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
LL II
30,224 SQ.FT.
0.70 ACRES
CROSSING
METHOD: OPEN CUT
EXISTING EASEMENT
T
NOTES:
I. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND "'
DISTANCES IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. AREA
'"
W W W W W
4,\
G G �- PROPOSED GAS LINE
1 °0 p
IM �G � EXISTING GAS LINE
-
BY COORDINATE COMPUTATION.
2. THIS MAP IS NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
N
EXISTING EASEMENT
3. WETLAND AND STREAM DATA WERE PROVIDED TOLEGEND
MASER CONSULTING P.A. IN SHAPEFILE FORMAT BY
. ' ' ' " ' ' " " "
MASER CONSULTING P.A. ON FEBRUARY 13, 2018.
. �
4. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN IS TO SHOW THE
' . . W W WOODED
� TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES AND DELINEATED BY
MASER CONSULTING.
y y
PERMANENT CONVERSION AREA
5. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE
\
COORDINATES (NAD 83/NSRS 2011).
HDD - IMPACT AVOIDANCE AREA
/ / \
�
W �
� WETLAND AREA
00 0 100
. .�4 �,
— — — — PROPOSED EASEMENT
PROPOSED TWS
SCALE: I" = 100'
\
G PROPOSED GAS LINE
G EXISTING GAS LINE
REV DATE ID—NI DESCRIPTION
JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S.
//••��y—
PROTECT YOURSELF
IMPACT PLAN OF RUSHMORE PIPELINE
ALL STATES REQUIRE NOTIFICATION
OF _ATORS. DFSIGNERS, OR
SCALE: DATE: DMWN BY: CHKKED BY:
F R
FOR
ANY PERSON PREPARING TO
DISTUR6 THE EARTH'S SURFACE
.iV i \
C 0 N SULTING P.A.
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
ANYWHERE IN ANY STATE
Knmrn below.
Call bdmyoa di&
s1HOW 01/30/19 CJK/TAH NMG
' -
PROTECT NUMBER: DRAWING NAME
Office Locations:
FOR STATE SPECIFIC DIRECT PHONE NUMBERS
VISIT: W .CALL81 ICOM
W W COM
17OD4827A C-SESC-EXBT
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction
■ Red Bank, NJ ■ Lehigh Valley, PA
erco nsu lting.com ■ Clinton, Nl ■ Enh'
PA
HEET Trt�E:
Engineers • Planners • Surveyors ■ Hamilton, NJ ■ Philadelphia, PA
■ Harbor, NJ ■ PitObur PA
Lands Architecas • E-1—mental Sd-ti is
�Pe ■ o wale. NJ ■ Tampa, L
■ Mt. Arlingt NJ ■ Orlando, FL
RUSHMORE PROPOSED
I2" STEEL DISTRIBUTION
IMPACT PLAN 2 OF 2
CHARLOTTE OFFICE
5275 Parkway Plao Boulevard
Sore of N C Firm No. C-4042 ■ Mt Laurel, IN ■ Miami, FL
■ Albany, ■ la<rling,
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Suite 100
Chadoae, INC 16117
SHEET NUMBER:
AFL
nd
c�M.p,. Is. n:,., ce�.�M1are rw wal,�e. ml. n.�l • New Windsor, NY ■ SSterling, VA
■ Wewhester, NY ■ Norfolk, A
my d, a,r pvq V
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
. Phone:
Charlotte NC ■ Albuquerque NM
Raleigh, NC ■ Colurnbla, Mo
NORTH CAROLINA
4.973.5962
Fax: [phone]
^ OL
L I L

i
APPENDIX B
WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT

V)
Ln
U
V
L
am
W
CL
M
U
U1
J
s!7
0
Ln
L,
'i7
a
LU
IVLVL%A a
0 N S U l T I N 8 P. A.
MOM
www.maserconsulting.com
Wetland Delineation Report
Piedmont Natural Gas
Rushmore Drive 16" Steel Distribution
Rushmore Drive & Ballantyne Commons Parkway
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
November 1, 2018
Prepared For
Piedmont Natural Gas
4301 Yancey Road
Charlotte, NC 28217
Prepared By
Maser Consulting P.A.
5275 Parkway Plaza Blvd, Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
MC Project No. 17004827A

i!q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
PROJECT INFORMATION................................................................................................ 1
2.0
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 2
3.0
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION.............................................................................................. 2
4.0
BACKGROUND INFORMATION.................................................................................... 2
4.1
U.S. Geological Survey Map............................................................................................ 3
4.2
Soil Survey........................................................................................................................ 3
4.3
Federal and State Wetland Maps..................................................................................... 3
5.0
WETLAND DELINEATION METHODOLOGY.............................................................. 4
6.0
WETLAND DELINEATION PARAMETERS.................................................................. 4
6.1
Vegetation.........................................................................................................................4
6.1.1
Freshwater Wetland Plant Communities...................................................................... 5
6.1.2
Upland Plant Communities.......................................................................................... 6
6.2
Soils.................................................................................................................................. 6
6.3
Hydrology.........................................................................................................................7
7.0
NAVIGABLE WATER NEXUS......................................................................................... 7
8.0
WETLAND DELINEATION RESULTS............................................................................ 7
9.0
CONCLUSIONS..................................................................................................................8
10.0
REFERENCES.................................................................................................................... 9
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A — SITE FIGURES
APPENDIX B — PHOTOGRAPHS
APPENDIX C — WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1. Project Location Map (U.S.G.S. Map)
FIGURE 2. Soil Series Map
FIGURE 3. National Wetlands Inventory Map
FIGURE 4. Project Site Map
WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT PAGE i
RUSHMORE DRIVE DISTRIBUTION PROJECT NOVEMBER 2018
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC

ri
1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
Site Location
Rushmore Drive
Municipality
Charlotte
County
Mecklenburg
State
North Carolina
Latitude/Longitude
35.057186 N / -80.862044 W
(Subject Property)
U.S.G.S. Quadrangle
Charlotte, NC
Wetland Area W 101
Wetland Delineation Areas
Wetland Area W 102
Nearest Stream
McAlpine Creek tributary (off-site)
(on-site/off-site)
Navigable Water Nexus
Wetland Areas W 101 & W 102 — Wetland abuts McAlpine Creek tributary
which drains to McAlpine Creek, which drains to Sugar Creek and
ultimately drains to the Catawba River (TNW).
*RPW = relatively permanent waters, TNW = traditionally navigable waters
Isolated Wetlands/Waters
No
Present (Yes/No)
WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT PAGE 1
RUSHMORE DRIVE DISTRIBUTION PROJECT NOVEMBER 2018
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC

2.0 INTRODUCTION
The site, located along Rushmore Drive northwest of the intersection of Rushmore Drive and
Ballantyne Common Parkway (herein referred to as "Subject Property" or "Property") in
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, was investigated to determine the location and
extent of wetlands or waters subject to Federal or State regulatory jurisdiction. According to the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
regulations described in Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 CFR Section 328.3 and 40 CFR
Section 230.3) respectively, wetlands are "...areas that are inundated or saturated with surface or
ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances
do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions."
Currently within the State of North Carolina, the USACE is typically the lead agency responsible
for verifying the accuracy of freshwater wetland delineations and authorizing encroachments into
freshwater wetlands. The USACE regulates all jurisdictional wetlands within the State.
This report was prepared for the submission of a Pre -Construction Notification to the USACE.
3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The project site appears on the Charlotte, NC Quadrangle of the U.S. Geological Survey Map
(Figure 1). The project site consists of forested land, maintained utility right-of-way, existing
roads, and landscaping associated with the corporate office park. The site is located northwest of
the intersection of Rushmore Drive and Ballantyne Commons Parkway. A tributary of
McAlpine Creek runs from south to north immediately west of the project's limit of disturbance.
Photographs of the project site and representative wetland and upland areas are included in
Appendix B.
4.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Several sources of information were reviewed to determine the likelihood of freshwater
wetlands/waters occurring on the subject property.
WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT PAGE 2
RUSHMORE DRIVE DISTRIBUTION PROJECT NOVEMBER 2018
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC

4.1 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP
The subject property appears on the Charlotte, NC Quadrangle of the U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS) Map (Figure 1) and is depicted as undeveloped land forested land. The USGS Map
depicts a blue -line stream identified as McAlpine Creek to the north of the site.
4.2 SOIL SURVEY
The Web Soil Survey (Soil Survey) (Figure 2) depicts the following four (4) map units on the
property and provides the corresponding drainage descriptions:
• Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes (MeB) — Well Drained with a
depth to water table at over 80 inches.
• Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes (MeD) — Well Drained with a
depth to water table at over 80 inches.
• Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (MO) Somewhat poorly
drained with a depth to water table at about 6 to 24 inches.
• Wilkes loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes (WkE) — Well Drained with a depth to water table
at over 80 inches.
Based on the soil map units documented for the property and the corresponding descriptions,
areas of the subject property that contain Monacan loam soils are most likely to contain
freshwater wetlands, primarily due to the shallow seasonal high-water table.
4.3 FEDERAL AND STATE WETLAND MAPS
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) (Figure 3) identifies the following freshwater wetlands
on the subject property:
Riverine — Running through the property.
Palustrine Forested Wetland — Located adjacent to the riverine wetland.
Palustrine Emergent Wetland — Located on the northern portion of the property within the
utility right-of-way.
WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT PAGE 3
RUSHMORE DRIVE DISTRIBUTION PROJECT NOVEMBER 2018
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC

5.0 WETLAND DELINEATION METHODOLOGY
The wetland delineation methodologies developed by the USACE and the USEPA, as described
in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1 and the
Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic & Gudf
Coast, were utilized during our investigation. These methodologies generally involve the review
of three parameters (vegetation, soils, hydrology) when making a wetland or non -wetland
determination.
The property was walked, community types were characterized, and preliminary wetlands/waters
boundaries were established on the property. Sample stations were then established along the
preliminary wetlands/waters boundaries to examine vegetation, soils, and hydrology. Using this
data, final wetlands/waters boundaries were established at the sample stations, from which
obvious changes in vegetation, soils, and hydrology was used to extend the wetlands/waters
boundaries to the next sample station and/or the property boundary.
Four (4) representative sample stations were established along the wetland boundary within the
project site. At each sample station, a detailed description of vegetation, soils, and hydrology
was performed according to the above -referenced methodologies.
6.0 WETLAND DELINEATION PARAMETERS
6.1 VEGETATION
The USACE defines hydrophytic vegetation as the sum total of macrophytic plant life that occurs in
areas where the frequency and duration of inundation or soil saturation produce permanently or
periodically saturated soils of sufficient duration to exert a controlling influence on the plant species
present (Environmental Laboratory 1987).
WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT PAGE 4
RUSHMORE DRIVE DISTRIBUTION PROJECT NOVEMBER 2018
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC

Table 1. Plant Indicator Status CateLories*
Indicator Category
Indicator Symbol
Definition
Obligate Wetland
OBL
Plants that occur almost always (estimated probability >99%) in
Plants
wetlands under natural conditions, but which may also occur
rarely (estimated probability <1 %) in nonwetlands.
Facultative Wetland
FACW
Plants that occur usually (estimated probability >67% to 99%) in
Plants
wetlands, but also occur (estimated probability 1 % to 33% in
nonwetlands).
Facultative Plants
FAC
Plants with a similar likelihood (estimated probability 33% to
67%) of occurring in both wetlands and nonwetlands.
Facultative Wetland
FACU
Plants that occur almost always (estimated probability 1% to
Plants
<33%) in wetlands, but occur more often (estimated probability
>67% to 991/6) in nonwetlands.
Obligate Upland
UPL
Plants that occur rarely (estimated probability <1%) in
Plants
wetlands under, but occur almost always (estimated probability
>99%) in nonwetlands under natural conditions.
* Categories were originally developed and defined by the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory and subsequently
modified by the National Plant List Panel. The three facultative categories have been subdivided by (+) and (-)
modifiers. FAC+ species are considered to be wetter (i.e. have a greater estimated probability of occurring in wetlands)
than FAC species, while FAC- species are considered to be drier (i.e. have a lesser estimated probability of occurring in
wetlands) than FAC species.
Generally speaking, the hydrophytic vegetation parameter is satisfied when more than 50 percent of
the dominant species are OBL, FACW or FAC (Table 1) on the list of plant species that occur in
wetlands, which was prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The following is a list of species
typically observed within each plant community on the subject property; however, some plants
normally present on the site may not have been apparent or were difficult to identify to species level
during the time of year the delineation was performed:
6.1.1 Freshwater Wetland Plant Communities
a. Wetland Area W101: This is a palustrine emergent wetland delineated by flag
numbers W101-1 through W101-5 and palustrine forested wetland delineated by
flag numbers W 101-201 through W101-218. Representative plant species within
the emergent wetland include the following: broadleaf cattail (Typha latifolia),
arrow arum (Peltandra virginica), pickerel weed (Pontederia cordata), and rice
cutgrass (Leersia oryzoides). Representative plant species within the forested
wetland include the following: American sycamore (Platanus occcidentalis),
black willow (Salix nigra), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), and river birch
WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT PAGE 5
RUSHMORE DRIVE DISTRIBUTION PROJECT NOVEMBER 2018
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC

(Betula nigra), Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum), and Japanese
honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica).
b. Wetland Area W102: This is a palustrine forested wetland delineated by flag
numbers W102-101 through W102-106. Representative plant species within
include the following: sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), American sycamore,
green ash, box elder (Acer negundo), Japanese honeysuckle, Japanese stiltgrass,
sedges (Carex sp.) and a rush (Juncus sp.).
6.1.2 Upland Plant Communities
a. Upland forest located adjacent to the forested wetland was identified by the
following species: white oak (Quercus alba), flowering dogwood (Cornus
florida), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), and
tulip poplar (Liriodendron tuilipifera), among others.
b. Upland maintained utility right-of-way found at the northern project limits, near
the end of Dovehunt Place, was identified by the following species: blackberry
(Rubus sp.), bush clover (Lespedeza sp.), goldenrod (Solidago sp.), Japanese
honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), deer tongue (Dichanthelium clandestinum) and
American wisteria (Wisteria frutescens), among others.
The National Wetland Indicator Status for typical species observed within plant communities
along representative portions of the delineated wetland boundary are included on the Wetland
Determination Data Forms (Appendix Q.
6.2 SOILS
Hydric soils are defined as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding
long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part of the
soil (USDA 2003).
The soils observed in upland areas on the property generally consisted of clayey loams with a
matrix chroma that was equal to or greater than 4. The soils in the wetland areas were variable,
but for the most part, exhibited low chroma matrices with redoximorphic features.
WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT PAGE 6
RUSHMORE DRIVE DISTRIBUTION PROJECT NOVEMBER 2018
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC

6.3 HYDROLOGY
The delineated wetlands exhibited primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology.
Positive indicators of wetland hydrology on the property included the following:
Wetland Area W101: This wetland area exhibited inundation, water -stained leaves and drift
deposits, indicative of the presence of surface water. In addition, vegetation species in the area
consisted of wetland species that passed the FAC -neutral test and hydric soils were identified.
Wetland Area W102: This wetland area exhibited water -stained leaves and drift deposits,
indicate of the presence of water moving on the surface. In addition, vegetation species in the
area consisted of wetland species that passed the FAC -neutral test and hydric soils were
identified.
7.0 NAVIGABLE WATER NEXUS
The subject property drains to McAlpine Creek which is tributary to Sugar Creek and ultimately
to the Catawba River. The Catawba River is a traditionally navigable water. Based on the
described drainage sequence, wetlands on the subject property which drain to the McAlpine
Creek tributary appear to have a nexus to a navigable water. The navigable water nexus is
subject to USACE verification.
8.0 WETLAND DELINEATION RESULTS
Two (2) areas of freshwater wetlands/waters were delineated on the subject property. These
areas are identified as W 101 and W 102 which correspond to the numeric prefixes of the wetland
delineation flag numbers. A summary of the delineated wetland and water areas is provided in
Table 2. The surveyed limits of the freshwater wetlands/waters are shown the Project Site Map
(Appendix A).
WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT PAGE 7
RUSHMORE DRIVE DISTRIBUTION PROJECT NOVEMBER 2018
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC

Table 2. Summary of Delineated Freshwater Wetlands/Waters
Wetland Area
Flag Points
Wetland Type
Area
Wetland Area W 10 1
W101-1 to W101-5;
PEM/PFO
1.269 acres
W101-201 to W101-
218
Wetland Area W 102
W102-101 to W102-
PFO
0.394 acre
106
PFO = Palustrine forested; PSS = Palustrine scrub -shrub; PEM = Palustrine emergent; OW = Open Water
9.0 CONCLUSIONS
Freshwater wetlands/waters were delineated on the subject property by Maser Consulting in February
2018. The delineated wetland areas are identified as W101 and W102. The location and jurisdictional
status of the delineated wetlands are subject to USACE verification. Freshwater wetlands/waters were
delineated on the subject property using the methodologies outlined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1 and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic & Gulf Coast.
WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT PAGE 8
RUSHMORE DRIVE DISTRIBUTION PROJECT NOVEMBER 2018
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC

10.0 REFERENCES
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual" Technical
Report Y-87-1. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
Environmental Laboratory. 2012. "Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coast". Technical Report ERDC/EL TR -09-19.
US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Miss.
Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying
and Delineation Jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil
Conservation Service, Washington D.C. Cooperative technical publication. 76 pp. plus
appendices.
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of
Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/.
Accessed February 2018.
USDA, NRCS. 2003. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 5.01, G.W.
Hurt, P.M. Whited, and R.F. Pringle (eds.). USDA, NRCS in cooperation with the
National technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Fort Worth, TX.
R:\AllOffices\Charlotte\Projects\2017\17004827A\Reports\Ecological\PCN\wetland delineation\181101_jmm WetDe1Rptdocx
WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT PAGE 9
RUSHMORE DRIVE DISTRIBUTION PROJECT NOVEMBER 2018
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC

i
APPENDIX A
SITE FIGURES

Ma 7
W r•Y VA
TN
2,640 1,320 0 2,640 --
Feet ■ W+ E
1 inch = 2,640 feet s
GA Sc
JO-"** K
F1 10100—
J�~ Project Location
i ivy,
4Z\
�
i�ai_ y .
iat�
401
N.
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, -cubed
Prepared For.,
01Piedmont Project Location Map Figure
11 Natural Gas Rushmore Drive Distribution Project
Prepared By: CharlottOMecklenburg County, North Carolina
e ffic
5275 Parkway Plaza Z711
suite
Charlotte, NC 2821007 '. Date: MC Project #: Drawn By: Project Location
T:704,97,1.7911 MASE T7
www.maserconsulting.com i June 18, 2018 17004827A AAP

BJP14
0
r4t-
4p#
•. ti: •_
d• 1
r . ,
r u• r �
LL f r
AN
V *� ,."" +
r
NO i� - ; m
Sqj
Its! Ike
+�i►,, - 10
.00
1 i
AIM
WoeOoh`
\ 1 ,.
es-
11101101
ox
/d�� • 01111
CIO
of r _ •• �
Tara Glenn Ct o ,r e o o o0
Earhhstar Geographies, CNES/Airbus ©S, USDA, USES, AeroGf�ID, IGN, and the GIS User C'ornmunity

r + r '� •� wL�l'J ,
+
� r
i r
+ r.
0.
NO bo W
0,V
r
o
Tgqww
1 w
10,
JOP
.a
� 1110hgrIla Dr
2j d� O i
g IL
VITA 11
�,0,o x Tara Glenn Ct
1

i
APPENDIX B
PHOTOGRAPHS

Piedmont Natural Gas
Rushmore Drive Proposed 16" Steel Distribution
Charlotte, North Carolina
2017-2018
MC Protect No. 17004827A
Photograph B: Culvert at intersection of Rushmore Drive and Ballantyne
Commons Parkway, discharging into stream adjacent to project area.

� l' a� :r i� y i •� a� t i f
�jr ''�'--. �- 'f'' ��• -itch'! +''�
Jam' '''' ���,.. � ` � • �`- r ' "%.� � e i r � ��rr �
- `� o'-'.�:: - . -� . �-..•- r�.F�-. '' . mac. j 'titin.' :� ;a•1. •' -
is �• •�' .•r`

- •-� . Imo,{' w
" .�c.j.. "' _ �'-.`. •..-t- '.,- . �. �- ~ : ..fir 'ir ��' r
�.' r•!g � �•{.:, [� :,yam.. is 'n a.i°� .r*:._ e+.[ _ :.
op
�- `Ail
w- �- r►ik ^�� i I + yr y ,W 7
iap-
--'�,,,,,,pp��,, ��o'Y•`-� ••h 'rte b�. y y y,�• � � .�;
']
iF'p f..-�.� tom. yriti' ���-1b ��'��. . i1•, • % Yr '.'�.�i��'I �a 1 � #

� � f. .� .:' + "•;• yy � .•.' ... 'f- it -T i. .-...�.: '--m�•':d-' •xPlie
:111 _-�±n :'9'F• �'ra -�'• '' 4�' r �'�',�• ��.•;iS
.. . � . � � . � -•fi-' .�' Sys....-.
• .+ice - -: - �, ! '` - � -�i �.�iC�._•C- -� .rr.

; 4W
Piedmont Natural Gas
Rushmore Drive Proposed 16" Steel Distribution
Charlotte, North Carolina
2017-2018
MC Protect No. 17004827A
Photograph G: View into interior forested wetland, typical of southern project
area.

; 4V
Piedmont Natural Gas
Rushmore Drive Proposed 16" Steel Distribution
Charlotte, North Carolina
2017-2018
MC Protect No. 17004827A
Photograph H: Creek flowing through emergent wetland in utility right-of-way
at northern project limits.

i
APPENDIX C
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority. AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Rushmore Drive Proposed 16" Steel Distribution City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 02/27/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: W101-103
Investigator(s): S. Ryan/J. McCort Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.0592686 Long: -80.8635787 Datum: WGS-84
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam, 0 to 2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PSS1Ch
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
appears as pond on aerial photos
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W101-103
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Due to the limited area of the wetland that was accessible on foot due to inundation and to the limits of the easement, sample plots were limited to a
15 -foot radius in which all strata were sampled. There was no tree, sapling, shrub, or woody vine present in this portion of the wetland.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
HDsoiuie uominam
inaicaior
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15 foot radius)
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 30 x 1 = 30
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 foot radius)
FACW species 60 x 2 = 120
1.
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
2.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 90 (A) 150 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.67
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15 foot radius)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Typha latifolia
20 Yes
OBL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Peltandra virginica
10 No
OBL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Scirpus cyperinus 30 Yes FACW
4. Polygonum pensylvanicum
30 Yes
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
90 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover: 45
20% of total cover:
18
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 foot radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Due to the limited area of the wetland that was accessible on foot due to inundation and to the limits of the easement, sample plots were limited to a
15 -foot radius in which all strata were sampled. There was no tree, sapling, shrub, or woody vine present in this portion of the wetland.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W101-103
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 5/3 90 Loamy/Clayey
3-5 10YR 4/2 90 10YR 5/4 3 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
`Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority. AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Rushmore Drive Proposed 16" Steel Distribution City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 02/27/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: U101-103
Investigator(s): S. Ryan/J. McCort Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.0593190 Long: -80.8640255 Datum: WGS-84
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg fine sandy loan, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: U101-103
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
FACU species 35 x 4 = 140
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 65 (A) 230 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.54
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
15 =Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3 1 Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Due to the project limits in the vicinity of the wetland boundary, sampling areas were limited to a 15 -foot radius in which all strata were sampled
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicatc
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius)
% Cover Species?
Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius )
1. Solidago sp.
30 Yes
2. Phytolacca americana
10 No
FACU
3. Dichanthelium clandestinum
20 Yes
FAC
4. Eupatorium serotinum
10 No
FAC
5. Lonicera japonica
10 No
FACU
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
80 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40
20% of total cover:
16
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius )
1. Rubus allegheniensis
15 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: U101-103
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
FACU species 35 x 4 = 140
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 65 (A) 230 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.54
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
15 =Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3 1 Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Due to the project limits in the vicinity of the wetland boundary, sampling areas were limited to a 15 -foot radius in which all strata were sampled
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: U101-103
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8 5YR 4/4 90 Sandy
8-12 7.5YR 4/6 80 Sandy
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
? Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority. AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Rushmore Drive Proposed 16" Steel Distribution City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 02/27/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: W101-204
Investigator(s): S. Ryan/J. McCort Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.0588092 Long: -80.8629276 Datum: WGS-84
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam, 0 to 2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W101-204
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius)
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Platanus occidentalis
10 Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
20 Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3. Salix nigra
10 Yes
OBL
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
40 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover:
8
OBL species 10 x 1 = 10
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius)
FACW species 30 x 2 = 60
1.
FAC species 25 x 3 = 75
2.
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 75 (A) 185 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.47
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum
25 Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Lonicera japonica
10 Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
35 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover: 18
20% of total cover:
7
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius )
1. Vitis sp.
10 Yes
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Due to the project area limits in the vicinity of the wetland boundary, sample plots were limited to a 15 -foot radius in which all strata were sampled
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W101-204
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 5/2 90 Mucky Loam/Clay saturated at surface
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
X Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority. AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Rushmore Drive Proposed 16" Steel Distribution City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 02/27/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: U101-204
Investigator(s): S. Ryan/J. McCort Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.0590546 Long: -80.8626060 Datum: WGS-84
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 8 to 15% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No wetland indicators observed.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius )
1. Platanus occidentalis
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 15
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius )
1. Rhus copallinum
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute
Uominant
% Cover
Species?
20
Yes
10
Yes
Sampling Point: U101-204
idicator
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
50.0% (A/B)
30 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6
15 Yes FACU
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius )
1. Dichanthelium clandestinum 10
2. Microstegium vimineum 10
3. Lonicera japonica 10
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
I
Yes FAC
Yes FAC
Yes FACU
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
FAC species 20 x 3 = 60
FACU species 35 x 4 = 140
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 75 (A) 240 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.20
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: I Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Due to the project area limitations in the vicinity of the wetland boundary, the sampling plots were limited to a 15 -foot radius in which all strata were
sampled.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: U101-204
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8 5YR 5/4 90 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority. AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Rushmore Drive Proposed 16" Steel Distribution City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 02/27/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: W101-215
Investigator(s): S. Ryan/J. McCort Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.0570405 Long: -80.8621562 Datum: WGS-84
Soil Map Unit Name: Wilkes loam, 15 to 25% slopes NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W101-215
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius)
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Salix nigra
20 Yes
OBL
Number of Dominant Species
2. Acer negundo
10 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
40 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover:
8
OBL species 30 x 1 = 30
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
FAC species 40 x 3 = 120
2.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 70 (A) 150 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.14
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum
20 Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Typha latifolia
10 Yes
OBL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex sp. 10 Yes
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
40 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover:
8
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Due to the limited project area, the sampling plot was measured with a 15 -foot radius in which all strata were sampled
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W101-215
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 5/2 95 Mucky Loam/Clay saturated at 1" below surface
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
X Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority. AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Rushmore Drive Proposed 16" Steel Distribution City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 02/27/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: U101-215
Investigator(s): S. Ryan/J. McCort Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.0572230 Long: -80.8618261 Datum: WGS-84
Soil Map Unit Name: Wilkes loam, 15 to 25% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: U101-215
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
15 -foot radius) % Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
15 -foot radius)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Maintained lawn
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Due to the limited project area in the vicinity of the wetland boundary, sampling plots were limited to a 15 -foot radius in which all strata were sampled
This area consisted of a sloping maintained lawn.
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: U101-215
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-10 2.5YR 4/4 95 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority. AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Rushmore Drive Proposed 16" Steel Distribution City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 02/27/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: W102-103
Investigator(s): S. Ryan/J. McCort Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.0558339 Long: -80.8605759 Datum: WGS-84
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 8 to 15% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W102-103
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius)
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Platanus occidentalis
10 Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
15 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Acer negundo
15 Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Salix nigra
10 Yes
OBL
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 25
20% of total cover:
10
OBL species 10 x 1 = 10
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius)
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
1.
FAC species 55 x 3 = 165
2.
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 80 (A) 215 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.69
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium vimineum
20 Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Juncus sp.
5 Yes
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
25 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover: 13
20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius )
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
5 Yes
FAC
2.
Rubus allegheniensis
5 Yes
FACU
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Due to the limited project area in the vicinity of the wetland boundary, sample plots were limited to a 15 -foot radius in which all strata were sampled
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W102-103
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 5/2 90 Mucky Loam/Clay saturated at 1" below surface
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
X Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority. AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR -07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Rushmore Drive Proposed 16" Steel Distirbution City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 02/27/18
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: U102-103
Investigator(s): S. Ryan/J. McCort Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 20
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.0561492 Long: -80.8605483 Datum: WGS-84
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 8 to 15% slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: U102-103
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius)
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Pinus taeda
10 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20 Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Ailanthus altissima
10 Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10 Yes
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 42.9% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 25
20% of total cover:
10
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
2.
FACU species 40 x 4 = 160
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 70 (A) 250 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.57
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Solidago sp.
15 Yes
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Microstegium vimineum
10 Yes
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
25 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover: 13
20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15 -foot radius )
1.
Rubus allegheniensis
10 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Due to the limited project area in the vicinity of the wetland boundary, sample plots were limited to a 15 -foot radius in which all strata were sampled
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: U102-103
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12 2.5YR 4/4 95 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116 -4 -SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

i
APPENDIX C
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN

INDEX OF SHEETS
SHT.
No.
DESCRIPTION
I
COVER SHEET
2
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
3
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
4
GENERAL NOTES
5
SHEET INDEX
6
SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
7
SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
8
SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
9
SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
10
SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS
SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS
12
SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS
. LATEST EROSION CONTROL PLANS
REVISION
FOR
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
r6111 Piedmont
Natural Gas
RUSHMORE PROPOSED 16" STEEL DISTRIBUTION
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROPOSED 16" STEEL
NATURAL GAS L1N\E
n G�
G_
100 -YEAR
FLOODPLAIN
WETLAND
BOUNDARY
1 200 a 200
O°ASO �F
IL
0P I
SCALE: V - 200'
SER
C O N S U L T I N G P. A.
Costumer Loyalty through Client Sndaf don
sulxing.com
Engineers • PI""' • Seneyorsa•efLand—pe Architects • Environmental Sciendsrs
DRCe Lo
• Red Bank Nf • Mc Laurel, NJ •tI LE
Valley, PA • Orlando, FL
• Climm�, NI • Albanl, NY • Eawn, PA • Miami, FL
• HamHlmb f • LWndsor,� • Riladel" PA • 1re- yVA
•n ar or, NJ gm firer Rxmburtl�, PA olk,
NJ • Columbia, MD pa, • Albuquerque NM
• Mc Niingon, NJ 5sare of N.C. Firm No. AM2 • CM1arloaa NC
au ada ae....a. maane °Foaaa
LOCATION MAP
SCALE: I " = 200'
NCDOT COMMENTS DIR9l20I9.
DESCRIPTION
EROSION CONTROL PLANS
FOR
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
RUSHMORE PROPOSED
16" STEEL DISTRIBUTION
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
49v
AS SHOWN
"ABWIBllB
-CJRIIN y
CMENMGY
NUMBER.
17W9827A
ID NI -NAME
C-SESC-OVER
---
COVER SHEET
-PRq[I7
CHARLO EOFFICE
Twelve Parkway Place
T
se loo
5275 Parkway Rau 13-1 erd
C-SE01
Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: [phone]
FFT `meek.
Fax: [phone]
01 Of 12

ECT DESCRIPTION
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS IS UPGRADING ITS NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION IN AND
AROUND CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA. THIS UPGRADE INCLUDES THE
INSTALLATION OF APPROXIMATELY 2,787 LINEAR FEET (LF) OF NEW 16 -INCH
DIAMETER STEEL PIPE. THE PROJECT WILL BE WITHIN EXISTING 30' AND 50' WIDE
PERMANENT PNG UTILITY EASEMENTS; HOWEVER, ADDITIONAL WORKSPACE AT
CERTAIN PROPOSED HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL (HDD) DRILL LOCATIONS
WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FROM PRIVATE LANDOWNERS.
THE NORMAL CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT WILL BE I S -FEET WIDE (10 -FT PERMANENT
AND 5 -FT TEMPORARY) ALONG THE PROPOSED ROUTE. THE TOTAL ACREAGE OF
DISTURBANCE IS 4.92 ACRES.
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE UTILITY EASEMENT AND CONSISTS OF GRASSY
ROAD SIDE, RESIDENTIAL LAWNS, AND RESIDENTIAL AND ROADWAYS. WETLANDS,
100 YEAR FLOODPLAINS AND SANITARY SEWER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS ARE LOCATED
ALONG THE ROUTE.
SCHEDULE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PIPELINE IS ANTICIPATED TO BEGIN ON JULY 30, 2018 AND BE
COMPLETED BY NOVEMBER 31, 2018. ONCE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS IT IS
ANTICIPATED TO LAST FOUR MONTHS.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE
ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN
MANUAL, LATEST EDITION INCLUDING REVISIONS.
THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES FOR THIS PROJECT INVOLVE THE
STRATEGIC PLACEMENT OF A VARIETY OF DEVICES INCLUDING:
• SILT FENCE
• ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES
• INLET PROTECTION
• EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS
• MOVABLE/TEMPORARY DIVERSION BERMS AND/OR FILTER SOCK WATTLES
MOST OF THESE DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRADING.
ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED
DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE
CEASED AND ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. ADDITIONAL EROSION
AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE NOTES
I. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY LAND DISTURBANCE ONSITE AND
DURING THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, AN APPROVED COPY OF THE E&SC
PLAN WITH PLACARD, APPROVAL LETTER, AND A COPY OF THE NPDES PERMIT
WITH A MINIMUM OF 30 DAYS OF SELF -INSPECTION REPORTS ARE TO BE KEPT ON
SITE UNTIL PROJECT CLOSURE BY NC DEQ OFFICE. THESE DOCUMENTS MUST BE
KEPT CURRENT AND UP TO DATE.
2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE
OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES.
3. ALL WORK IS TO OCCUR WITHIN THE LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE BOUNDARY AS
INDICATED ON THE PLANS. THESE AREAS MUST BE CLEARLY MARKED AND
FENCED OFF BEFORE CLEARING AND GRUBBING OPERATIONS BEGIN.
4. LIMIT TREE REMOVAL TO ONLY WHAT IS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION.
S. IF ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE FAILS TO FUNCTION AS INTENDED, THE
ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY.
6. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED DOWN GRADIENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION
AREA AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS.
7. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE LOCATIONS ARE SHOWN AT APPROXIMATE
LOCATIONS. FINAL LOCATIONS WILL BE DETERMINED AT THE
PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING.
8. WATER, WHICH ACCUMULATES IN THE OPEN TRENCH, SHALL BE COMPLETELY
REMOVED BY SILT BAG PUMPING, BEFORE PIPE PLACEMENT AND/OR BACKFILLING
BEGINS.
9. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY
AFTER GROUND DISTURBANCE OCCURS. THE LOCATION OF SOME OF THE
EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY HAVE TO BE ALTERED FROM THAT SHOWN
ON THE PLANS IF DRAINAGE PATTERNS DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE DIFFERENT
FROM THE FINAL PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSIBILITY TO ACCOMPLISH EROSION CONTROL FOR ALL DRAINAGE
PATTERNS CREATED AT VARIOUS STAGES DURING CONSTRUCTION.
r6111 Piedmont
Natural Gas
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
I. OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL AND PERMITS.
2. HOLD PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING. CALL NC DEQ LQS AT THE MOORESVILLE
REGIONAL OFFICE AT 704-663-1699 TO SCHEDULE PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING
AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PROJECT ACTIVATION.
3. FLAG CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
4. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WITH MINIMAL LAND DISTURBING
ACTIVITIES.
5. BEGIN CLEARING. INSTALUREPLACE ANY DAMAGED EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES IMMEDIATELY, AS REQUIRED.
6. BEGIN PIPE INSTALLATION.
7. IN WETLAND AREAS:
7.1. KEEP CLEARING AND EXCAVATION TO A MINIMUM.
7.2. DIVERT ALL SURFACE WATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ONTO
UNDISTURBED AREAS ADJOINING THE WETLANDS.
7.3. REMOVE WETLAND MATTING IMMEDIATELY WHEN THEY ARE NO LONGER
NEEDED.
7.4. SMOOTH AND APPROPRIATELY STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS. SEED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS.
7.5. PROVIDE PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF ALL DISTURBED WETLANDS.
8. SOIL STABILIZATION SHALL BE ACHIEVED ON ANY AREA OF A SITE WHERE
LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED
ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE:
• ALL PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES AND ALL SLOPES
STEEPER THAN 3:1 SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT
STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE BUT IN
ANY EVENT WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE LAST LAND -DISTURBING
ACTIVITY.
• ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR
PERMANENT STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER AS SOON AS
PRACTICABLE BUT IN ANY EVENT WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE LAST
LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
9. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED AND STRAW OR VIA
HYDROSEEDING. PLACE EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS ALONG STEEP SLOPES AS
REQUIRED AND SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS.
10. AFTER SITE IS STABILIZED AND FINAL INSPECTION AND SIGNOFF FROM LOCAL
STORMWATER OR ENGINEERING REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN OBTAINED, REMOVE
ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND INSTALL PERMANENT
VEGETATION OF THE DISTURBED AREAS.
EROSION CONTROL DEVICE NOTES
I. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE UTILIZED AT ALL INGRESS/EGRESS
LOCATIONS FROM PUBLIC ROADS. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY
ACTION TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSPORT OF MATERIAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION
SITE ONTO R.O.W. PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH FRESH STONE MAY BE
REQUIRED. ALL MATERIALS SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED FROM SITE
TRAFFIC ONTO ROADWAYS OR INTO STORM DRAINS MUST BE REMOVED
IMMEDIATELY.
2. SEDIMENT TRAPS SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 50 FEET OUTSIDE STREAMS
AND/OR WETLANDS.
3. DEWATERING STRUCTURE, USED DURING HYDROSTATIC DISCHARGE TESTING,
LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED AND FIELD VERIFIED WITH STORMWATER
INSPECTORS FROM MECKLENBURG COUNTY.
4. GROUND STABILIZATION, SUCH AS WHEAT STRAW APPLICATION, MUST BE
APPLIED WITHIN 14 DAYS FROM THE LAST LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY. FOR
STEEP SLOPES, THAT AREA MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS.
5. ALL GROUND COVER TO BE APPLIED PER CONDITIONS OF THE NPDES PERMIT OR
IN CRITICAL AREAS, AT END OF DAY.
6. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG STREAMS FOLLOWING PIPELINE
INSTALLATION AND FINAL GRADING UNTIL THE AREA IS STABILIZED.
ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROTECT AREA STREAM AND/OR
WETLANDS, IF PRESENT.
7. ALL TIMBER BRIDGES/MATS CROSSING STREAM, WETLANDS, OR CONVEYANCES
MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF THE DAY OR IMMEDIATELY AFTER CROSSING
IF SEDIMENT IS DEPOSITED BEFORE OR DURING A RAIN EVENT. SEDIMENT
REMOVED FROM BRIDGES MUST BE PLACED IN A CONTAINED AREA AWAY FROM
JURISDICTIONAL WATER OR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES.
8. STREAM AND WETLANDS, IF PRESENT, SHALL BE RETURNED TO ORIGINAL GRADE
UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, TEMPORARY BRIDGES SHALL BE USED
TO CROSS STREAMS.
MAINTFNAN['F
I. ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES INCLUDING PLANTED AREAS
SHALL BE INSPECTED EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER EACH
RAINFALL OCCURRENCE THAT EXCEEDS ONE-HALF INCH. DAMAGED OR
INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AS NECESSARY BY THE
END OF THE DAY.
2. CLEAN SILT FENCE BARRIERS WHEN THEY ARE APPROXIMATELY 50% OBSTRUCTED
BY SEDIMENT OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.
#V4 SER
C 0 N 5 U L T I N G P. A.
Cesromer Loyalty through Clwu Sndaf doe
g.c
Engineers • Plannen • Surveyors"•eflanduape Architects • Environmental Sciendsrs
J • New Windsor, NY
N
NJJ • Columbia, M6"T
-NJ S..&MC. FirmI
GRASSED AREAS WILL BE MOWED AT LEAST ONCE PER YEAR.
EQUIPMENT AND OPERATION MAINTENANCE - EQUIPMENT UTILIZED DURING
THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ON A SITE MUST BE OPERATED AND MAINTAINED
IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO PREVENT THE POTENTIAL OR ACTUAL POLLUTION OF
THE SURFACE OR GROUND WATERS OF THE STATE. FUELS, LUBRICANTS,
COOLANTS, AND HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, OR ANY OTHER PETROLEUM PRODUCTS,
SHALL NOT BE DISCHARGED ONTO THE GROUND OR INTO SURFACE WATERS.
SPENT FLUIDS SHALL BE CLEANED UP AND DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER SO AS
NOT TO ENTER THE WATERS, SURFACE OR GROUND, OF THE STATE AND IN
ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS.
GENERAL NOTES
I. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOULD BE LOCATED AND MARKED IN THE FIELD
PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.
2. FILL, COVER, AND CLEAN TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AT THE END OF EACH DAY
IS RECOMMENDED WHERE PRACTICAL. IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS OR WITHIN ANY
ACTIVE ROADWAYS, ADEQUATE OPEN TRENCH PROTECTION MUST BE
PROVIDED AT THE END OF EACH WORKDAY.
3. THESE PLANS ARE FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PURPOSES ONLY AND
DO NOT APPLY TO CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.
4. THE EXISTING CONTOUR LINEWORK IN THIS DRAWING IS GIS DATA FROM
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS.
S. IF A FRACTURE IS OBSERVED DURING THE BORING OF A STREAM CROSSING,
WORK MUST BE IMMEDIATELY HALTED, AND ALL LOST LUNRICANT/MUD MUST BE
REMOVED FROM THE STREAM. THE FRACTURE HOLE WILL BE SEALED AND THE
SITE WILL BE EVALUATED BEFORE CONTINUATION OF BORING.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM CLEARANCE OF 24" BETWEEN THE
PIPELINE AND ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES.
CONSTRUCTION SITE POLLUTANTS
EQUIPMENT AND OPERATION MAINTENANCE - EQUIPMENT UTILIZED DURING
THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ON A SITE MUST BE OPERATED AND MAINTAINED
IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO PREVENT THE POTENTIAL OR ACTUAL POLLUTION OF
THE SURFACE OR GROUND WATERS OF THE STATE. FUELS, LUBRICANTS,
COOLANTS, AND HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, OR ANY OTHER PETROLEUM PRODUCTS,
SHALL NOT BE DISCHARGED ONTO THE GROUND OR INTO SURFACE WATERS.
SPENT FLUIDS SHALL BE CLEANED UP AND DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER SO AS
NOT TO ENTER THE WATERS, SURFACE OR GROUND, OF THE STATE AND IN
ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS.
MATERIAL HANDLING - HERBICIDE, PESTICIDE, AND FERTILIZER USAGE DURING
THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FEDERAL
INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT AND SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH LABEL RESTRICTIONS.
SELF INSPECTION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
MINIMUM SELF INSPECTION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS
UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY:
A RAIN GAUGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD WORKING ORDER ON THE SITE
UNLESS ANOTHER RAIN -MONITORING DEVICE HAS BEEN APPROVED.
A WRITTEN RECORD OF THE DAILY RAINFALL AMOUNTS SHALL BE RETAINED
AND ALL RECORDS SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
OR AUTHORIZED AGENT UPON REQUEST. IF NO DAILY RAIN GAUGE
OBSERVATIONS ARE MADE DURING WEEKEND OR HOLIDAY PERIODS, AND NO
INDIVIDUAL -DAY RAINFALL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE, THE CUMULATIVE RAIN
MEASUREMENT FOR THOSE UN -ATTENDED DAYS WILL DETERMINE IF A SITE
INSPECTION IS NEEDED. (NOTE: IF NO RAINFALL OCCURRED, THE PERMITTEE
MUST RECORD "ZERO".)
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED TO
ENSURE THAT THEY ARE OPERATING CORRECTLY. INSPECTION RECORDS MUST
BE MAINTAINED FOR EACH INSPECTION EVENT AND FOR EACH MEASURE. AT A
MINIMUM, INSPECTION OF MEASURES MUST OCCUR AT THE FREQUENCY
INDICATED BELOW:
3.1. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE
INSPECTED BY OR UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE PERMITTEE AT LEAST
ONCE EVERY SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS, AND
3.2. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSPECTED BY
OR UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE PERMITTEE WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER
ANY STORM EVENT OF GREATER THAN 0.50 INCHES OF RAIN PER 24 HOUR
PERIOD.
ONCE LAND DISTURBANCE HAS BEGUN ON THE SITE, STORMWATER RUNOFF
DISCHARGE OUTFALLS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY OBSERVATION FOR EROSION,
SEDIMENTATION AND OTHER STORMWATER DISCHARGE CHARACTERISTICS
SUCH AS CLARITY, FLOATING SOLIDS, AND OIL SHEENS. INSPECTIONS OF THE
OUTFALLS SHALL BE MADE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS AND
WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER ANY STORM EVENT OF GREATER THAN 0.50 INCHES OF
RAIN PER 24 HOUR PERIOD.
INSPECTIONS ARE ONLY REQUIRED TO BE MADE DURING NORMAL BUSINESS
HOURS. WHEN ADVERSE WEATHER CONDITIONS WOULD CAUSE THE SAFETY OF
THE INSPECTION PERSONNEL TO BE IN JEOPARDY, THE INSPECTION CAN BE
DELAYED UNTIL IT IS DEEMED SAFE TO PERFORM THESE DUTIES. (TIMES WHEN
INSPECTIONS WERE DELAYED BECAUSE OF SAFETY ISSUES SHOULD BE NOTED IN
THE INSPECTION RECORD.) IF THE INSPECTION CANNOT BE DONE ON THAT
DAY. IT MUST BE COMPLETED ON THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY.
NC- COMMENTS UIR9l2019.
DESCRIPTION
6. TWENTY-FOUR HOUR REPORTING FOR VISIBLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITION
6.1. THE PERMITTEE SHALL REPORT TO THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
CENTRAL OFFICE OR THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL OFFICE ANY VISIBLE
SEDIMENT BEING DEPOSITED IN ANY STREAM OR WETLAND OR ANY
NONCOMPLIANCE WHICH MAY ENDANGER HEALTH OR THE ENVIRONMENT.
ANY INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED ORALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY
WITHIN 24 HOURS FROM THE TIME THE PERMITTEE BECAME AWARE OF THE
CIRCUMSTANCES.
6.2. A WRITTEN SUBMISSION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE APPROPRIATE
REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY WITHIN 5 DAYS OF
THE TIME THE PERMITTEE BECOMES AWARE OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES. THE
WRITTEN SUBMISSION SHALL CONTAIN A DESCRIPTION OF THE SEDIMENT
DEPOSITION AND ACTIONS TAKEN TO ADDRESS THE CAUSE OF THE
DEPOSITION. THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY STAFF MAY WAIVE THE
REQUIREMENT FOR A WRITTEN REPORT ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS.
7. RECORDS OF INSPECTIONS MADE DURING THE PREVIOUS 30 DAYS SHALL REMAIN
ON THE SITE AND AVAILABLE FOR AGENCY INSPECTORS AT ALL TIMES DURING
NORMAL WORKING HOURS, UNLESS THE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PROVIDES A SITE-SPECIFIC EXEMPTION BASED ON UNIQUE SITE CONDITIONS
THAT MAKE THIS REQUIREMENT NOT PRACTICAL. OLDER RECORDS MUST BE
MAINTAINED FOR A PERIOD OF THREE YEARS AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION AND
MADE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. THE RECORDS MUST PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF
EACH INSPECTION INCLUDING OBSERVATIONS, AND ACTIONS TAKEN IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THIS PERMIT. THE PERMITTEE SHALL RECORD THE
REQUIRED RAINFALL AND MONITORING OBSERVATIONS OF THE INSPECTION
RECORD FORM PROVIDED BY THE DIVISION OR A SIMILAR INSPECTION FORM
THAT IS INCLUSIVE OF ALL THE ELEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE DIVISION'S FORM.
USE OF ELECTRONICALLY -AVAILABLE RECORDS, IN LIEU OF THE REQUIRED PAPER
COPIES FOR INSPECTION WILL BE ALLOWED IF SHOWN TO PROVIDE EQUAL
ACCESS AND UTILITY AS THE HARD -COPY RECORDS.
8. INSPECTION RECORDS MUST INCLUDE, ATA MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING:
8.1. CONTROL MEASURE INSPECTIONS: INSPECTION RECORDS MUST INCLUDE
AT A MINIMUM: 1) IDENTIFICATION OF THE MEASURES INSPECTED, 2) DATE
AND TIME OF THE INSPECTION, 3) NAME OF THE PERSON PERFORMING THE
INSPECTION, 4) INDICATION OF WHETHER THE MEASURES WERE OPERATING
PROPERLY, 5) DESCRIPTION OF MAINTENANCE NEEDS FOR THE MEASURE, 6)
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN, 7) DATE OF ACTIONS TAKEN, AS WELL AS
THE DATE AND AMOUNTS OF RAINFALL RECEIVED.
8.2. STORMWATER DISCHARGE INSPECTIONS: INSPECTION RECORDS MUST
INCLUDE AT A MINIMUM: 1) IDENTIFICATION OF THE DISCHARGE OUTFALL
INSPECTED, 2) DATE AND TIME OF THE INSPECTION, 3) NAME OF THE PERSON
PERFORMING THE INSPECTION, 4) EVIDENCE OF INDICATORS OF
STORMWATER POLLUTION SUCH AS OIL SHEEN, FLOATING OR SUSPENDED
SOLIDS OR DISCOLORATION, 5) INDICATION OF VISIBLE SEDIMENT LEAVING
THE SITE, 6) ACTIONS TAKEN TO CORRECT/PREVENT SEDIMENTATION, AND
7) DATE OF ACTIONS TAKEN.
8.3. VISIBLE SEDIMENTATION FOUND OUTSIDE THE SITE LIMITS: INSPECTION
RECORDS MUST INCLUDE: 1) AN EXPLANATION AS TO THE ACTIONS TAKEN
TO CONTROL FUTURE RELEASES, 2) ACTIONS TAKEN TO CLEAN UP OR
STABILIZE THE SEDIMENT THAT HAS LEFT THE SITE LIMITS AND 3) THE DATE
OF ACTIONS TAKEN.
8.4. VISIBLE SEDIMENTATION FOUND IN STREAMS OR WETLANDS: ALL
INSPECTIONS SHOULD INCLUDE EVALUATION OF STREAMS OR WETLANDS
ONSITE OR OFFSITE (WHERE ACCESSIBLE) TO DETERMINE IF VISIBLE
SEDIMENTATION HAS OCCURRED.
9. VISIBLE STREAM TURBIDITY - IF THE DISCHARGE FROM A SITE RESULTS IN AN
INCREASE IN VISIBLE STREAM TURBIDITY, INSPECTION RECORDS MUST RECORD
THAT EVIDENCE AND ACTIONS TAKEN TO REDUCE SEDIMENT CONTRIBUTIONS.
SITES DISCHARGING TO STREAMS NAMED ON THE STATE'S 303(d) LIST AS
IMPAIRED FOR SEDIMENT -RELATED CAUSES MAY BE REQUIRED TO PERFORM
ADDITIONAL MONITORING, INSPECTIONS, OR APPLICATION OF
MORE -STRINGENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT THE
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS ARE NEEDED TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
FEDERAL OR STATE IMAIRED-WATERS CONDITIONS. IF A DISCHARGE COVERED
BY THIS PERMIT ENTERS A STREAM SEGMENT THAT IS LISTED ON THE IMPAIRED
STREAM LIST FOR SEDIMENT -RELATED CAUSES, A TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD
(TMDL) HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THOSE POLLUTANTS, THE PERMITTEE MUST
IMPLEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE THAT THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS FROM
THE SITE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ASSUMPTIONS AND MEETS THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPROVED TMDL.
EROSION CONTROL PLANS
FOR
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
CHARLOTTE OFFICE
RUSHMORE PROPOSED
Twelve Parkway Place
Suim loo
16" STEEL DISTRIBUTION
5275 Parkway Rau Boulevard
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Charlotte, NC 28217
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
4.516 8295
Phoee:70.383.1984
Fax: [phone]
AS SHOWN "AUWIBIIB aA C"K CM[NMGY
M07 McEB: oaA N�N�ME
I1W9827A C-SESC-OVER
ME�T1 EROSION CONTROL
NOTES
C-SE02
02 of 12

SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS
THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NC DEQ EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL SECTION 6.10 AND 6.11.
TEMPORARY SEEDING
SEEDBED PREPARATION:
• LIMING - APPLY LIME ACCORDING TO SOIL TEST RECOMMENDATIONS. IF THE PH (ACIDITY)
OF THE SOIL IS NOT KNOWN, AN APPLICATION OF GROUND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE
AT THE RATE OF I TO I Y2 TONS TONS/ACRE ON COARSE-TEXTURED SOILS AND A MINIMUM
OF 2 TONS PER WITH 3 TONS PER ACRE IN CLAY SOILS OR PER SOILS TEST. APPLY
LIMESTONE UNIFORMLY AND INCORPORATE INTO THE TOP 4-6 INCHES OF SOIL. SOILS
WITH A PH OF 6 OR HIGHER NEED NOT BE LIMED.
• FERTILIZER - BASE APPLICATION RATES ON SOIL TESTS. WHEN THESE ARE NOT POSSIBLE,
APPLY A 10-10-10 GRADE FERTILIZER AT 700-1,000 LB/ACRE. BOTH FERTILIZER AND LIME
SHOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THE TOP 4-6 INCHES OF SOIL. IF A HYDRAULIC SEEDER IS
USED, DO NOT MIX SEED AND FERTILIZER MORE THAN 30 MINUTES BEFORE APPLICATION.
• SURFACE ROUGHENING - IF RECENT TILLAGE OPERATIONS HAVE RESULTED IN A LOOSE
SURFACE, ADDITIONAL ROUGHENING MAY NOT BE REQUIRED, EXCEPT TO BREAIC UP LARGE
CLODS. IF RAINFALL CAUSES THE SURFACE TO BECOME SEALED OR CRUSTED, LOOSEN IT
JUST PRIOR TO SEEDING BY DISKING, RAKING, HARROWING, OR OTHER SUITABLE
METHODS. GROOVE OR FURROW SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 ON THE CONTOUR BEFORE
SEEDING (PRACTICE 6.03, SURFACE ROUGHENING).
PLANT SELECTION:
SEE SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS TABLE.
SEEDING:
EVENLY APPLY SEED USING A CYCLONE SEEDER (BROADCAST), DRILL, CULTIPACKER SEEDER. OR
HYDROSEEDER. BROADCAST SEEDING AND HYDROSEEDING ARE APPROPRIATE FOR STEEP
SLOPES WHERE EQUIPMENT CANNOT BE DRIVEN. HAND BROADCASTING IS NOT
RECOMMENDED BECAUSE OF THE DIFFICULTY IN ACHIEVING A UNIFORM DISTRIBUTION.
SMALL GRAINS SHOULD BE PLANTED NO MORE THAN I INCH DEEP, AND GRASSES AND LEGUME=
NO MORE THANY2 INCH BROADCAST SEED MUST BE COVERED BY RAKING OR CHAIN
DRAGGING, AND THEN LIGHTLY FIRMED WITH A ROLLER OR CULTIPAKER. HYDROSEEDED
MIXTURES SHOULD INCLUDE A WOOD FIBER (CELLULOSE) MULCH.
MULCHING:
THE USE OF AN APPROPRIATE MULCH IS REQUIRED UNDER THE FOLLOWING HARSH SITE
CONDITIONS:
• SEED IN IN FALL FOR WINTER COVER (WOOD FIBER MULCHES ARE NOT CONSIDERED
ADEQUATE FOR THIS USE),
• SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1,
• EXCESSIVELY HOT OR DRY WEATHER,
• ADVERSE SOILS (SHALLOW, ROCKY, OR HIGH IN CLAY OR SAND), AND
• AREAS RECEIVING CONCENTRATED FLOW.
IF THE AREA TO BE MULCHED IS SUBJECT TO CONCENTRATED WATERFLOW, AS IN CHANNELS,
ANCHOR MULCH WITH NETTING (PRACTICE 6.14, MULCHING).
PERMANENT SEEDING
SOIL PREPARATION OF AREAS TO BE SEEDED:
PREPARATION FOR PERMANENT STABILIZATION SHALL NOT BEGIN UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION
AND UTILITY WORK WITHIN THE PREPARATION AREA HAS BEEN COMPLETED.
TILL OR DISC THE PREPARED AREAS TO BE SEEDED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF FOUR (4) 4NCHES.
REMOVE STONES LARGER THAN THREE (3) INCHES ON ANY SIDE, STICKS, ROOTS AND OTHER
EXTRANEOUS MATERIALS THAT SURFACE. IF NOT INCORPORATED DURING THE SOIL
PREPARATION PROCESS, ADD PH MODIFIER AND FERTILIZERS AT THE RATE SPECIFIED IN THE SOIL
TEST REPORT.
RE -COMPACT THE AREA UTILIZING A CULTIPACKER ROLLER. THE FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE A
SMOOTH EVEN SOIL SURFACE WITH A LOOSE, UNIFORMLY FINE TEXTURE. ALL RIDGES AND
DEPRESSIONS SHALL BE REMOVED AND FILLED TO PROVIDE THE APPROVED SURFACE DRAINAGE,
SEEDING OF GRADED AREAS IS TO BE DONE IMMEDIATELY AFTER FINISHED GRADES ARE
OBTAINED AND SEEDBED PREPARATION IS COMPLETED.
SEEDBED PREPARATION:
• LIMING - APPLY LIME ACCORDING TO SOIL TEST RECOMMENDATIONS. IF THE PH (ACIDITY)
OF THE SOIL IS NOT KNOWN, APPLY GROUND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AT THE RATE OF
75 LBS/1,000 SQ. FT. APPLY LIMESTONE UNIFORMLY AND INCORPORATE INTO THE TOP 4-6
INCHES OF SOIL. SOILS WITH A PH OF 6 OR HIGHER NEED NOT BE LIMED.
• FERTILIZER - BASE APPLICATION RATES ON SOIL TESTS. WHEN THESE ARE NOT POSSIBLE,
APPLY A 10-10-10 GRADE FERTILIZER AT 700-1,000 LB/ACRE. BOTH FERTILIZER AND LIME
SHOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THE TOP 4-6 INCHES OF SOIL. IF A HYDRAULIC SEEDER IS
USED, DO NOT MIX SEED AND FERTILIZER MORE THAN 30 MINUTES BEFORE APPLICATION.
MULCHES AND TACKING AGENTS:
THE MULCH MUST COVER A MINIMUM OF EIGHTY (80) PERCENT OF THE SOIL SURFACE AND
MUST BE SECURED BY A TACKING AGENT, CRIMPING, OR PROTECTIVE BIODEGRADABLE
NETTING. NETTING THAT INCORPORATES PLASTIC MESH AND/OR PLASTIC TWINE SHOULD
NOT BE USED IN WETLANDS, RIPARIAN BUFFERS OR FLOODPLAINS DUE TO THE POTENTIAL OF
SMALL ANIMAL MORTALITY. SEE SECTION 6.14 FOR DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS AND PRODUCT
APPLICATIONS.
r6111 Piedmont
Natural Gas
STABILIZATION IN WETLANDS, RIPARIAN BUFFERS, AND FLOODPLAINS:
• OBTAIN SOIL TESTS TO DETERMINE SOIL TYPE, PH, TEXTURE, AND AVAILABLE NUTRIENTS.
• BASED ON THE SOIL TESTS PROVIDE A SCHEDULE OF NUTRIENTS AND OTHER SOIL
AMENDMENTS THAT WILL BE REQUIRED.
• SELECT A SEEDING MIX OF NON-INVASIVE SPECIES THAT WILL PROVIDE IMMEDIATE
STABILIZATION (A SHORT-TERM ENVIRONMENT THAT WILL SUPPORT AND COMPLIMENT
PERMANENT VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION) AND INCLUDE A SELECTIVE NATIVE SPECIES MIX
THAT WILL EVENTUALLY PROVIDE A PERMANENT COVER (A LONG-TERM ENVIRONMENT
THAT, WITH MINIMAL MAINTENANCE, WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE ROOT AND LEAF COVER).
• INVASIVE SPECIES ARE TO BE AVOIDED. IF NATIVE SPECIES AND INTRODUCED
NON-INVASIVE SEED SOURCES ARE NOT AVAILABLE, PROTECTIVE MATTING THAT WILL
HOLD AND FOSTER THE DEVELOPMENT OF NATIVE COVER FROM ADJACENT SEED SOURCES
SHOULD BE USED. CONTINUOUS MAINTENANCE MUST BE EMPLOYED UNTIL THE SELECTED
SPECIES HAVE MATURED AND ARE NO LONGER SUSCEPTIBLE TO COMPETITION FROM
INVASIVE PLANTS. IF NO ALTERNATIVE TO THE USE OF INVASIVE SEEDS AND PLANTS IS
AVAILABLE. INVASIVE APPROVED ON THE PLANS MAY BE UTILIZED ONLY WITH STRICT
CONTAINMENT MEASURES OUTLINED IN DETAIL ON THE PLANS, IN THE CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
a
Taae[+ar
0,plawa Muk -
Coe. arae
Wlal.m x•Ie .. Bee! wren
Bab
Sac..
141
Pry,u tw md,
6kWd•wne Fan klwel or
Wlttl.b3 wM.A .
IwPw nmrJ
umvrlhwW: ewd
r dby hwd.—ch-:r,w¢
EnE
Emory rery ra My Imm,
.ned.
bo .ckwo
iM14ue on.ps
E4 I—
Ak Pt
T—rMll, 121. ttleOwftn. Aayy
maws gI.-mrsd 7 G wM nn.deiksd a .8 eIo
kks
(CAN BE USED IN
Md' _11M a...•,. axra s�rdl•r nr
50
Lloyd omvdpv Wow,
Ox L
hth.w Nal4na¢�n M• 10..
W_ Aber
G.Gt lulu
Ma••n
Af.g 4wt d,e w s.wd s>dWtr.
Not"."I mere 01"s.V1.
A.rraarray
.n.pnar.r.
Mp b. hWa. 0—A uw In
lyrepau AJS
.,.ofiodk.rw
ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING
hm, dry W_thQ
Berk
35.W1cyero. AB Wf, alkeda•Ra
+111Wy MOM" 9M h!4.w..—p
FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS
WITH ASPHALT, NETTING, OR
ren.rar-nsl.u, ori..
nwldl¢, ww hrld oa I�I�
TO EXTEND BEYOND JUNE
Gar . l.b
OF SOIL TESTS OR APPLY 2,000
LB/ACRE GROUND RAL
LIMESTONE AND 750 LB/ACC RE
750 LBI
eEp1mN1•C,'.
Gwn •Iws
4!!k-
Wv�nrddnd (nW
Apply •dTh,.," W.•r w CYC
(CAN BE USED IN
ALMO)
In 4eg►u
Nd iW uue n I- ke
Beim
1 -gym
GG". naryd ld
RYE (GRAIN)
boo.d.s
..pypWirq
REPAIR AND REFERTILIZE DAMAGED AREAS IMMEDIATELY. TOPDRESS
ban r,m,n+Ned.
klwrn
WN ."d M kl
DEERTONGUE
ANCHORING TOOL.
WITH 50 LB/ACRE OF NITROGEN IN MARCH. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO
Jule nm
iwf a aee
F,aeyy , ft-, 9wlver
WIIM— waleH.ssr. Buis x4.
EXTEND TEMPORARY COVER BEYOND JUNE 15, OVERSEED WITH 50
dI N. �*.rn
U.ed wlh es8•n.e,
FlGarpaas lwt
Coe. arae
Wlal.m x•Ie .. Bee! wren
Bab
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
Ured Mn ]k_tn,
6cera
t:par a••
Wlttl.b3 wM.A .
IwPw nmrJ
SPECIES
RATE (LB/ACRE)
EnE
Emory rery ra My Imm,
15 to 25
+_w
nslfml.
ca.b—Ah .l AXly9Msa[diasm 4atr eJxio,
120
G©1d+[an Yr [henna Slit Iaam,
maws gI.-mrsd 7 G wM nn.deiksd a .8 eIo
kks
(CAN BE USED IN
fmgdnar h o nnnamlo d 25 35 gd! I." a P.
50
Lloyd omvdpv Wow,
Ox L
cN.m.w ■reilmr•�
WETLANDS)
0to4
Ma••n
Isera.
Not"."I mere 01"s.V1.
A.rraarray
.n.pnar.r.
OMIT ANNUAL LESPEDEZA WHEN
lyrepau AJS
.,.ofiodk.rw
ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING
P"mrr" SR
FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS
OF SOIL TESTS OR APPLY APPLY
GROUND AGRICULTURAL
DURATION OF TEMPORARY COVER IS NOT
T_ race
FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS
WITH ASPHALT, NETTING, OR
Qn W)
NOT kJ WETLANDS)
TO EXTEND BEYOND JUNE
Gar . l.b
OF SOIL TESTS OR APPLY 2,000
LB/ACRE GROUND RAL
LIMESTONE AND 750 LB/ACC RE
750 LBI
A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL.
A DISK WITH BLADES SET
M-..}
MAY I -AUG. 15
GERMAN MILLET
Na 6ll[I, Cama• Lmed Ty-_
ess "m urwly endorsemet a armarz
kLi=
44,MASER
C 0 N 5 U L T I N G P. A.
C_._ L.y I:ry through Clwu Sndfa don
g.c
Engineers • Planners • Su,veyorse ee flanduape Architects • Environmental Sciendsrs
j J Alban!, ­ "1
NJ • New Windsor, NY
N
NJJ • Columbia, M�"T
n" NJ S.. d N.C. Firm I
NCDOT COMMENTS DIR9y2019.
DESCRIPTION
TEMPORARY SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS - PIEDMONT REGION
5011 pe
SEEDING MIXTURE
Bab
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
2 to S
DATES
SOILAMENDMENTS
MULCH
MAINTENANCE
SPECIES
RATE (LB/ACRE)
EnE
Emory rery ra My Imm,
15 to 25
Gm[
JAN. I - MAY I
RYE (GRAIN)
120
G©1d+[an Yr [henna Slit Iaam,
4 to 15
kks
(CAN BE USED IN
ANNUAL LESPEDEZA (KOBE IN PIEDMONT)
50
Lloyd omvdpv Wow,
2 to 8
MhH
WETLANDS)
0to4
OgA
oakbara cdt loam.
APPLY 4,000 LB/ACRE STRAW.
Pk
SEPT. I - IMAY I
OMIT ANNUAL LESPEDEZA WHEN
I S
INOT IN WETLANDS)
ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING
REFERTILIZE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE. RESEED, REFERTILIZE
FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS
OF SOIL TESTS OR APPLY APPLY
GROUND AGRICULTURAL
DURATION OF TEMPORARY COVER IS NOT
VI
FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS
WITH ASPHALT, NETTING, OR
AND MULCH IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE.
NOT kJ WETLANDS)
TO EXTEND BEYOND JUNE
OF SOIL TESTS OR APPLY 2,000
LB/ACRE GROUND RAL
LIMESTONE AND 750 LB/ACC RE
750 LBI
A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL.
A DISK WITH BLADES SET
REFERTILIZE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE. RESEED, REFERTILIZE
AND MULCH IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE.
MAY I -AUG. 15
GERMAN MILLET
40
(CAN BE USED IN
ALMO)
10-10-10 FERTILIZER
NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE
USED AS A MULCH
AUG. IS -DEC. 30
RYE (GRAIN)
120
REPAIR AND REFERTILIZE DAMAGED AREAS IMMEDIATELY. TOPDRESS
ANCHORING TOOL
MAY i - APRIL I
DEERTONGUE
ANCHORING TOOL.
WITH 50 LB/ACRE OF NITROGEN IN MARCH. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO
EXTEND TEMPORARY COVER BEYOND JUNE 15, OVERSEED WITH 50
LB/ACRE KOBE IESPEDEZA IN LATE FEBRUARY OR EARLY MARCH.
* SEEDING SPECIFIED MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH AN APPROVED EQUAL.
PERMANENT SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS - PIEDMONT REGION
5011 pe
SEEDING MIXTURE
Bab
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
2 to S
DATES
SOILAMENDMENTS
MULCH
MAINTENANCE
SPECIES
RATE (LB/ACRE)
EnE
Emory rery ra My Imm,
15 to 25
Gm[
MAY 15 - AUGUST IS
GERMAN MILLET
10
G©1d+[an Yr [henna Slit Iaam,
4 to 15
kks
(CAN BE USED IN
0 to 6
8
Lloyd omvdpv Wow,
2 to 8
MhH
WETLANDS)
0to4
OgA
oakbara cdt loam.
APPLY 4,000 LB/ACRE STRAW.
Pk
SEPT. I - IMAY I
SERICEA LESPEDEZA (LESPEDEZA CUNEATA
I S
INOT IN WETLANDS)
DUMONT')
Tb0
FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS
OF SOIL TESTS OR APPLY APPLY
GROUND AGRICULTURAL
ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING
WITH ASPHALT, NETTING, OR
VI
APRIL IS -JUNE 30
BERMUDA GRASS
25
NOT kJ WETLANDS)
LIMESTONE AT THE RATE OF 7S
LBS/1,000 SQ. FT. APPLY A
10- GRADE FERTILIZER AT
A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL.
A DISK WITH BLADES SET
NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE
REFERTILIZE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE. RESEED, REFERTILIZE
AND MULCH IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE.
DEC. I -MAY I
SWITCHGRASS (PANICUM VIRGATUM /
IS
(CAN BE USED IN
ALMO)
USED AS A MULCH
WETLANDS)
700-1,000 LB/ACRE.
ANCHORING TOOL
MAY i - APRIL I
DEERTONGUE
21
iCAN BE USED IN
WETLANDS)
* SEEDING SPECIFIED MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH AN APPROVED EQUAL.
$011 Legend
sym6ol
5011 pe
e
Bab
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
2 to S
Sao
IMF
Badln rLeflflCly Llt loam.
Badln &amln 511 IOam,
St. Is
15 to 45
Enc
Enna very cohmy loam,
4 to 15
EnE
Emory rery ra My Imm,
15 to 25
Gm[
Gnrgeolllp mit loam,
4 to 15
Ga[
G©1d+[an Yr [henna Slit Iaam,
4 to 15
kks
vaisev sdt loam,
0 to 6
8
Lloyd omvdpv Wow,
2 to 8
MhH
ML•enkeirrer cdann silt loam,
0to4
OgA
oakbara cdt loam.
0 to 2
Pk
Ru.i.a w
TbB
Tam% tNF$Mery dItIo .
2 to a
Tb0
Terra: rharmery sUHOam,
s to is
VI
Water
TABLE 5: STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT SUMMARY
TYPE OF IMPACT AMOUNT APPROVED [NON -REPORT
404!401 WETLAND 0.92 ACRES tNPORARY IMPACT
404/401 WETLAND 0.39 ACRES PERMANENT IMPACT
404/401 STREAM 0.00 LF TEMPORARY IMPACT
404/401 STREAM 0.00 LF PERMANENT IMPACT
SEEDING STABILIZATION TIMEFRAMES
SITE AREA DESCRIPTION
STABILIZATION
TIMEFRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
­7NUMBER.
17W9827A
oaAwwc
C-SESC-OVERVER
DITCHES, AND SLOPES
7 DAYS
NONE
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HQW)
7 DAYS
NONE
ZONES
err Numaea
Fax: [phone]
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
7 DAYS
NONE
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER
14 DAYS
LENGTH AND ARE NOT STEEPER
THAN 2:1.14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN
SLOPES FLATTER THAN 4:1
14 DAYS
LENGTH AND ARE NOT STEEPER
THAN 2:1.14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED
EROSION CONTROL PLANS
FOR
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
RUSHMORE PROPOSED
16" STEEL DISTRIBUTION
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
49v
ASL'
aAUW I8ll8
-7
CMENMG Y
­7NUMBER.
17W9827A
oaAwwc
C-SESC-OVERVER
­­­
­1EROSION CONTROL
EROSION
CHARLOTTE OFFICE
Twelve Parkway Place
Sale loo
NOTES
5275 Parkway Rau Boulererd
Charlotte, NC 28217
C-SE03
Phone: [phone]
err Numaea
Fax: [phone]
03 of 12

PIPELINE REPLACEMENT GENERAL NOTES GRADING NOTES VARIATIONS IN PLAN OR PROFILE BORE PRE -REAMING REQUIREMENTS
I. ALL CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE MOST
UP TO DATE SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS OF PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS.
2. WORK SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH OSHA TITLE 29 SECTION OF THE CODE OF
FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND ALL OTHER FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AND
REGULATIONS.
3. ALL LOCATIONS AND/OR ELEVATIONS OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON
ALL PLANS ARE BASED ON UTILITY COMPANY RECORDS, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,
FIELD MEASUREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT RELY ON THIS INFORMATION
AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. A DETAILED VERIFICATION OF THE SIZE,
LOCATION AND DEPTH SHALL BE MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ANY
EXCAVATION AND DIAL 811 FOR ONE CALL TO VERIFY.
4. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITY'S (PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE) THAT MAY EXIST IN THE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL UTILITY
OWNERS SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ONE CALL TIME
REQUIREMENTS IN ADVANCE OF ANY EXCAVATION WHERE UTILITIES MAY BE
PRESENT AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR ALL REPAIRS OF EXISTING UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS
AND AVOID DAMAGING THEM DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGES.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL PAVEMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION TO
PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS TO THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS OF THE
REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DOT HAVING JURISDICTION.
7. THE GAS MAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A MINIMUM OF 24 -INCHES IN CLEARANCE
TO ALL OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES. IF NOT POSSIBLE,
PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR.
8. DRAINAGE PIPES AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AND OTHER
MATERIALS RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION. ALL PIPES AND STRUCTURES SHALL
BE MAINTAINED AND CLEANED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
9. ALL SLOPES THAT ARE DISTURBED SHALL BE RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL
GRADES AND STABILIZED SEED/STRAW AND TACK AS NEEDED.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS
PER THE PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION.
CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL CONTROLS AS PER THE
REGIONAL OFFICE OF WATER QUALITY HAVING SAID JURISDICTION.
11. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY AND CONVENIENCE OF
THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND THE RESIDENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED
CONSTRUCTION AREA.
12. CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS, (INVERTS, UTILITY
ROUTES, CROSSING AND DIMENSIONS) IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO THE START OF ALL
UTILITY WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ALL DISCREPANCIES TO THE
OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.
13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES
AND TAKE CARE TO PROTECT UTILITIES THAT REMAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL
REPAIR ANY EXISTING UTILITY TO THE LOCAL STANDARDS AT THE
CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AND COORDINATE ALL CONSTRUCTION WITH THE
APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY.
14. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFORM WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND LAWS AND
OBTAIN APPROVAL AS NECESSARY PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.
15. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION BETWEEN EXISTING
PAVEMENT AND NEW PAVEMENT AND ADJUST GRADES AS NECESSARY.
16. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL CHIPPING DEBRIS DURING AN CLEARING
OPERATION AT THE PROJECT SITE.
17. ALL UTILITIES AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE LOCATED
HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES COMMENCING AND ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS
WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED GAS LINE, BORES, OR OTHER
CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR ANY REDESIGN
REQUIRED.
18. LAND FARMING OF DRILLING MUD ON THE PIPELINE EASEMENTS WILL BE THE
CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER IN
ADVANCE OF SUCH ACTIVITY.
I. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING FEATURES (PAVEMENT,
CURBS, WALKS, DRIVEWAYS, YARDS, LANDSCAPING, ETC.) TO NEW CONDITIONS
AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
2. TRENCHES CUT INTO EXISTING ROADWAYS OR DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE SAW -CUT
AND SHALL BE BACKFILLED AT 100% TO FINAL SUBGRADE ACCORDING TO THE
REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DOT.
3. ALL CONCRETE FOR CURBS AND SIDEWALKS SHALL BE 3500 PSI CONCRETE.
4. ANY WORK THAT IS UNACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE, LOCAL
REPRESENTATIVE, OR UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED
BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL EXPENSE.
5. ALL PAVEMENT MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE
REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
6. ALL PAVEMENT STRIPPING SHALL BE THERMOPLASTIC OR APPROVED ALTERNATIVE.
7. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PROJECT SAFETY, INCLUDING
PROVISION OF ALL APPROPRIATE SAFETY DEVICES, TRAFFIC CONTROL AND
TRAINING REQUIREMENTS.
I. ALL APPROVED EROSION CONTROL AND POLLUTION DEVICES SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED, INSTALLED, MAINTAINED, AND REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS,
REGULATIONS, ORDINANCES AND POLICIES.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS AFTER FINAL
GRADING IS COMPLETED, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. CONTRACTOR SHALL
ESTABLISH PERMANENT SOIL STABILIZATION.
3. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS AT THE POINT
WHERE CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES EXIT THE CONSTRUCTION AREA AND
MAINTAIN PUBLIC ROADWAYS FREE OF TRACKED MUD AND DEBRIS.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK ALL GRADES AND DIMENSIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR
TO STARTING WORK AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER.
S. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL PERTINENT PROVISIONS OF THE
MANUAL OF ACCIDENT PREVENTION AND CONSTRUCTION ISSUED BY AGC OF
AMERICA, INC. AND THE SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS OF CONSTRUCTION
ISSUED BY THE U.S. DEPT. OF LABOR.
6. VEGETATION OR TREES INSIDE THE PERMANENT EASEMENT AND TEMPORARY
WORK AREAS SHALL BE REMOVED, OR PER PNG REPRESENTATIVE'S INSTRUCTIONS.
7. TOPSOIL STRIPPED FROM CUT AND FILL AREAS SHALL BE STOCKPILED FOR USE ON
DISTURBED AREAS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE AT A MIN. OF 6" AND SHALL
SUPPLY ADDITIONAL TOP SOIL IF INSUFFICIENT QUANTITIES EXIST ON SITE.
8. POSITIVE DRAINAGE SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AS THE FIRST ORDER OF WORK AND
SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION. SOIL
SOFTENED BY PERCHED WATER TABLE IN FOUNDATION AND PAVEMENT AREAS
MUST BE UNDERCUT AND REPLACED WITH SUITABLE FILL MATERIALS THAT ARE
APPROVED BY A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. ALL GROUNDWATER INFILTRATION
INTO EXCAVATIONS SHOULD BE EXPECTED, AND WATER SHALL BE REMOVED
USING GRAVITY DRAINAGE OR PUMPING METHODS.
9. THE LOCATION OF ALL DIVERSION SWALES AND DITCHES SHALL BE FIELD
ADJUSTED TO AVOID TREES AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
WALK THE ALIGNMENT OF THESE AREAS AND VERIFY.
10. ALL STOCKPILED TOPSOIL OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE CONTAINED SO SEDIMENT
RUN-OFF IS CONTROLLED AND WILL NOT CONTAMINATE AREA STREAMS.
11. ALL SITES USED FOR DISPOSAL AND/OR STOCKPILES SHALL BE PERMITTED FOR
SUCH ACTIVITIES. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN
ALL PERMITS. COPY OF PERMITS MUST BE APPROVED AND PROVIDED TO THE
INSPECTOR PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK ON ANY PROPERTY. FAILURE
TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN THE CONTRACTOR REMOVING ALL ILLEGALLY PLACED
MATERIAL AT THEIR EXPENSE.
12. ONCE ALL TOPSOIL HAS BEEN STRIPPED AT THE STATION AREAS, PROOF ROLLING
SHALL BE PERFORMED ON THE EXPOSED SUBGRADE WITH A LOADED TRUCK TO
VERIFY UNSTABLE SOILS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE THESE AREAS BY
UNDERCUTTING AND REPLACING UNSTABLE AREAS WITH COMPACTED SELECT
MATERIAL.
13. ALL FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE OF ORGANIC MATTER, TRASH AND OTHER
DELETERIOUS MATERIALS CONTAINING NO ROCK FRAGMENTS LARGER THAN 6"
IN ANY DIRECTION.
14. ALL STRUCTURAL FILLS SHALL HAVE A STANDARD PROCTOR MAX. DRY DENSITY
OF 90 POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT (PCF) OR GREATER AND A PLASTICITY INDEX (PI)
OF 30 PERCENT OR LESS. ALL MATERIAL USED AS A SOIL FILL SHALL BE TESTED AND
APPROVED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER BEFORE PLACED.
I5. ALL FILL SHALL BE COMPACTED AS PER THE SPECIFICATIONS.
16. ALL PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE FINISH GRADE.
PROPER ADJUSTMENT SHOULD BE MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE
SUBGRADE.
17. ALL EXISTING ELEVATIONS, CONTOURS, AND BENCHMARKS SHOWN ON PLANS
ARE BASED ON NAD88.
18. CONTRACTOR TO SHAPE ALL DITCHES ACCORDING TO TYPICAL SECTIONS OR
SPECIAL DETAILS.
19. ONLY MATERIAL MEETING THE CONTRACTOR'S GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S
REQUIRMENTS FOR EMBANKMENT SHALL BE USED.
20. ALL EXCAVATIONS ARE UNCLASSIFIED WITHOUT REGARD TO THE MATERIALS
ENCOUNTERED. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE AND DRAW HIS OWN
CONCLUSIONS TO THE CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. LINE AND GRADES SHOWN
SHALL BE ACHIEVED WITHOUT ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION.
21. ALL ASPHALT PAVEMENT, AGGREGATE BASE AND CONCRETE MATERIALS AND
CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE REGIONAL OFFICE OF
THE DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
22. ALL PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE SHOWN AT 2 FOOT INTERVALS.
23. ALL AREAS DISTURBED OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION DURING THE LIFE
OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
24. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISPOSE OF ANY MATERIAL ON OR OFF THE PROJECT
SITE IN A REGULATORY FLOOD ZONE AS DEFINED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT AGENCY WITHOUT APPROVAL BY SAME. ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE
DISPOSED OF IN AN UPLAND (NON -WETLAND) AREA AND ABOVE THE ORDINARY
HIGH WATER MARK. THIS DOES NOT ELIMINATE THE NEED TO OBTAIN ANY
OTHER LICENSES OR PERMITS THAT MAY BE REQUIRED BY ANY OTHER FEDERAL,
STATE, OR LOCAL AGENCY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT.
25. USE SPOIL FROM TRENCH EXCAVATIONS TO DIVERT FLOW FROM UPSLOPE AREAS.
USE CARE IN SPOIL PLACEMENT TO AVOID BLOCKING NATURAL SURFACE
OUTLETS.
I. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT AS INDICATED
ON THE PROJECT PLANS WITH A 12 FOOT VARIANCE.
2. ALL CONTROL POINT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE MINIMUM COVER AND
SHALL NOT BE REDUCED. CONTRACTOR CAN ONLY DRILL DEEPER WITH
ENGINEER APPROVAL.
3. CONTRACTOR MAY REQUEST CHANGES TO THE PROPOSED VERTICAL AND
HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT OF THE INSTALLATION AND THE LOCATION OF THE
ENTRY AND EXIT POINTS FOR HDD BORES. ALL PROPOSED CHANGES SHALL BE
SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER AND RECEIVE APPROVAL OF THE OWNER PRIOR TO
STARTING WORK.
COMPANY HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED ALL THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
ABOVE GRADE AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN WERE TAKEN FROM VISIBLE
APPURTENANCES AT THE SITE, PUBLIC RECORD, MAPS PREPARED BY OTHERS AND
LIMITED QUALITY LEVEL B DESIGNATION, IF ANY. MASER CONSULTING, P.A. MAKES NO
GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH
UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. MASER CONSULTING, P.A.
FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE IN THE
EXACT LOCATION INDICATED. THEREFORE, RELIANCE UPON THE TYPE, SIZE, AND
LOCATION OF UTILITIES SHOWN SHOULD BE DONE SO WITH THIS CIRCUMSTANCE
CONSIDERED. DETAILED VERIFICATION OF EXISTENCE, LOCATION AND DEPTH
SHOULD ALSO BE MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ANY DECISION RELATIVE
THERETO IS MADE. LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES SHOULD BE CONFIRMED WITH THE
APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. A VALID 811 CALL TICKET SHALL BE IN HARD BEFORE
ANY EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE. AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINE IS DAMAGED ONCE
EVERY SIX MINUTES NATIONWIDE BECAUSE SOMEONE DECIDED TO DIG WITHOUT
FIRST CALLING 81 I. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. WWW.CALL81 ICOM
BORE PILOT HOLE REQUIREMENTS
I. CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN
INSTRUMENTATION WHICH WILL ACCURATELY LOCATE THE PILOT HOLE,
MEASURE DRILL STRING AXIAL AND TORSION LOADS, AND MEASURE DRILLING
FLUID DISCHARGE RATE AND PRESSURE.
2. OWNER SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO THESE INSTRUMENTS AT ALL TIMES AND THEIR
READINGS.
3. THE CONTRACTOR WHEN REQUESTED BY THE OWNER, WILL PROVIDE
INSPECTION HOLES AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO VISUALLY VERIFY THE
LOCATION AND CONDITION OF THE DRILLED PIPELINE.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLOT THE ACTUAL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL
ALIGNMENT OF THE PILOT HOLES AT INTERVALS NOT EXCEEDING 20 FEET, AND
CORRESPONDING WITH THE PROJECT STATIONING AND DATUM.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AND UPDATE AN "AS BUILT" PLAN AND PROFILE
AS THE PILOT BORE IS ADVANCED.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL GRANT THE OWNER ACCESS TO ALL DATA READOUTS
PERTAINING TO THE POSITION AND INCLINATION OF THE BORE HEAD WHEN
REQUESTED, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE EXPLANATIONS OF HIS POSITION
MONITORING AND STEERING EQUIPMENT.
7. THE ACTUAL PILOT HOLE EXIT POINT SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN TWO (2)FEET
LATERALLY OF THE EXIT POINT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. LONGITUDINALLY,
THE ACTUAL EXIT SHALL BE NO MORE THAN FIVE (5)FEET SHORT OR FIVE (5) FEET
PAST THE EXIT POINT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.
8. ALL PILOT HOLES SHALL BE DRILLED ALONG THE PATH SHOWN ON THE PLAN
AND PROFILE DRAWING MAINTAINING THE SPECIFIED TOLERANCES.
9. THE OWNER SHALL APPROVE THE ALIGNMENT OF THE PILOT BORE BEFORE THE
REAMING PHASE OR PIPE PULLING MAY COMMENCE.
10. IF THE PILOT BORE FAILS TO CONFORM TO THE ABOVE TOLERANCES, OWNER
MAY, AT HIS OPTION, REQUIRE A NEW PILOT BORE TO BE MADE.
11. IN ALL CASES, RIGHT-OF-WAY RESTRICTIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE
LISTED TOLERANCES.
12. NO PILOT HOLE WILL BE ACCEPTED IF IT WILL RESULT IN ANY OF THE PIPELINE
BEING INSTALLED IN VIOLATION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY RESTRICTIONS.
13. CONCERN FOR ADJACENT UTILITIES AND/OR STRUCTURES SHALL TAKE
PRECEDENCE OVER THE LISTED TOLERANCES. LISTING OF TOLERANCES DOES NOT
RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR FROM RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAFE OPERATION OR
DAMAGE TO ADJACENT UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES.
14. ALL BEND RADII SHALL BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THOSE LISTED IN THE
PROJECT PLANS.
BORE INSTALLATION
I. ALL HDD DRILLS TO BE INSTALLED BY WIRE LINE PROCESS.
2. CONTRACTOR IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESE PLANS AND WILL
DETERMINE THE EXACT METHOD AND TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLETING THE HDD
CROSSINGS. EXCAVATED MUD PITS CONSTRUCTED IN THE ENTRY AND EXIT
LOCATIONS WILL BE LIMITED TO THE PIPE BORE HOLE AREA ONLY.
3. AFTER COMPLETING THE DRILLING DIRECTIONAL WORK, THE ENTRY AND EXIT
PIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS.
4. THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IS AVAILABLE FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO THE
BORING LOGS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S
CONVENIENCE AND ARE A REPRODUCTION FROM THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.
THIS SUBSURFACE INFORMATION IS PRESENTED IN GOOD FAITH AND IS NOT
INTENDED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR PERSONAL INVESTIGATION, INDEPENDENT
INTERPRETATIONS OR JUDGEMENT OF THE CONTRACTOR.
I. AFTER THE PILOT HOLE IS ACCEPTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM A
REAMING AND PRODUCT PIPE PULL.
2. THE MAXIMUM PRE -REAMING SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE COMPANY
SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR'S APPROVAL UNLESS
APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
3. BUOYANCY MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE
CONTRACTOR. ANY BUOYANCY MODIFICATION PROCEDURE PROPOSED FOR USE
SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER FOR APPROVAL. THE CONTRACTOR IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO THE PULL SECTION RESULTING FROM
BUOYANCY MODIFICATIONS.
BORE PULLBACK REQUIREMENTS
I. CONTRACTOR SHALL PULL EXTRA LENGTH OF PIPE SO ONE JOINT CAN BE
INSPECTED.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPORT THE PIPE PULL SECTION AS IT PROCEEDS DURING
THE PULLBACK SO THAT IT MOVES FREELY AND IS NOT OVER STRESSED.
BORE DRILLING FLUIDS
I. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE COMPOSITION OF ALL DRILLING FLUIDS TO
THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT USE ANY DRILLING FLUID THAT DOES NOT COMPLY
WITH THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING, TRANSPORTING, AND
STORING ANY WATER REQUIRED FOR DRILLING FLUIDS.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAXIMIZE RECIRCULATION OF DRILLING FLUID SURFACE
RETURNS.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SOLIDS CONTROL AND FLUID CLEANING
EQUIPMENT OF A CONFIGURATION AND CAPACITY THAT CAN PROCESS RETURNS
AND PRODUCE DRILLING FLUID SUITABLE FOR REUSE.
6. DISPOSAL OF EXCESS DRILLING FLUID IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS, RIGHT-OF-WAY AND WORKSPACE AGREEMENTS,
AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT DRILLING FLUID DISPOSAL PROCEDURES TO OWNER
FOR APPROVAL.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY BEST EFFORTS TO MAINTAIN FULL ANNULAR
CIRCULATION OF DRILLING FLUID.
9. DRILLING FLUID RETURNS AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THE ENTRY AND EXIT
PITS SHALL BE MINIMIZED.
10. IN THE EVENT THAT ANNULAR CIRCULATION IS LOST, CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE
ACTION TO RESTORE CIRCULATION.
11. IF INADVERTENT SURFACE RETURNS OF DRILLING FLUIDS OCCUR, CONTRACTOR
SHALL IMMEDIATELY CLEAN AND COLLECT.
ENVIRONMENTAL NOTE:
THIS SET OF PLANS IS NOT DEPICTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS OR A
CERTIFICATION/WARRANTY REGARDING THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY IMPACTED SITE CONDITIONS. MASER CONSULTING HAS
PERFORMED NO EXPLORATORY OR TESTING SERVICES, INTERPRETATIONS,
CONCLUSIONS, OR OTHER SITE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RELATED TO THE
DETERMINATION OF THE POTENTIAL FOR TOXIC, RADIOACTIVE, OR OTHER TYPE OF
CONTAMINANTS AFFECTING THE PROPERTY AND THE UNDERSIGNED PROFESSIONAL
IS NOT QUALIFIED TO DETERMINE THE EXISTENCE OF THE SAME. SHOULD
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION OR WASTE BE DISCOVERED, THE OWNER AND
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS
AND REGULATIONS.
1�Y lI W ER EROSION CONTROL PLANS AS SHOWN DAOWI -WN 11: C"[NMGev.
FOR � PRD, R HDMaER.
Piedmont ­ 82 A C -SERC -OVER
-
aaaomea Loyalq rnmG9n aieRa sadara�doR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
" x ° g. r. ° m CHARLOTTE OFFICE
Natural Gas EROReere .ala""ere . sreroaa.a vn apeaAreniettt . ErvinRmeRtt1S a"watt Twelve Park wayPlae GENERAL NOTES
RUSHMORE PROPOSED
orr««aaon s"ite loo C-SE04
. Rad -1, INJ • Mc lalIu��rel, Nf • LeM1i�VaIIq, PA . orla°a°, rL 16" STEEL DISTRIBUTION 1111 Parkway Rau 13 -1 -rd
• Hlamilmn, NJ • Wew"Wi°r, NY • RiladelpM1ia, PA �ce�mn FVA _ Charlotte, NC 2821]
"o1I A CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NNJ • Rxmbu ,PA 1 02106119 TAH NC- COMMENTS DIR912oI9. TAH
r�°"aSe°NJ . cowmnQ nb"' . Pa,'i . Nbuqueryue NM MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Phone: [phone] a�"""�R
• MC Arlington, Nf Stare of N.C. Firm No�C4042 • CM1arl°tta NC DRAWN CHECKED Fax: [phone]
mar drcmmia,u...�,,.xTew. nuwmae....a, maanw.e�a vi.n.mb..7 ra.Nh�-�,yn..n.....m.a..,. mM.� REV DATE ,,.. DESCRIPTION e. O4 Of I2

■ • • I SHEET 06 .
G_G
mac_
lk
r6111 Piedmont
Natural Gas
►, SHEET 07
If G G 04
•
is •
•Ap •
if
SER
C O N S U L T I N G P. A.
C.-- Loyalty through Client Sndaf don
sulxing.com
Engineers • Planners • Suneyorsa;e L duape Architects • Environmental Sciendsrs
OB « Lo
• Red Bank NJ • Mc Laurel, NJ .O Lehl� Valla, PA • Orlando, FL
• Ch..' NI • AlbanlI, NY • Eawn, PA • Miami, FL
• HamHlmb f • Wew Windsor, • RiladelpM1ia PA • 1- yVA
a ar or, NJ esm firer Rxmburtl�, PA olk,
NJ • Columbia, MD pa, • Albuque_._NM
• N, Niingon, NJ smre of N.C. Firm No. U042 • CM1arl.:. NC
au ada a.....a.maane°Foca-Nhwn..nomm. �,.
NCDOT COMMENTS DIR9l20I9.
DESCRIPTION
EROSION CONTROL PLANS
FOR
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
RUSHMORE PROPOSED
16" STEEL DISTRIBUTION
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
44V
AS SHOWN
DABWIBllB
�CJRT
CXeNMGY
PaDJ[NUMBER.
I7W9827A
DBAwlrvc NAME
C-SESC-OVER
FFr•lnF.
SHEET INDEX
CHARLO EOFFICE
Twelve Parkway Place
suhl loo
5275 Parkway Rau 13-1 erd
C-SE05
Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: [phone]
FFr NumaFa
Fax: [phone]
05 of 12

25' SANITARY SEWER EARNT
CMIO DRAWING JOB N0. 254-95
SILT FENCE [TYP.)1 LI Mif50F DI STORRANCE
PROPOSED I6- STEEL GAS LINE
' GgDE 2D36 PG.
; DUKE ppWER CdMPANY EASEVENT
V
MB9PG61DS 1995 PG_ 70,• OB 1991 PG. 551,
—moi:--ts ds -4'c --ds x—asis— r/
r ti y
•.I �} `� � "! Y 1, �' wan LEnavEAeLE � f
I' { '•�, DIVERS'014 SARS{TYP.)
PFEOMONT NA TUR L
I ' ISI GAS IkEGULA TOR E EMENT
} ` D 9007 PG296
FLOODPLAIN �' , 41 • I
�Y
' �xrsrlNG _ � _— '• • I
-t
CONSTFULTION OPEN Cur _--f lei jMjjjjIjjjjjjdjjjjjjjjjj rj..i"
METHOD STA d-70 TO 1 *00
SF
c
HOED
SrA I -w TO 8.50
T
ol
LEGEND
WETLAND MATTING CROSSING
Vow CE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
+ WATTLEIMOVABIE DNERSION RARS
iR IP INLET PROTECTION
= _ _ CONTOURS
PROPERTY LINE
STREAM CENTERLINE (GIS)
TF— WETLAND BOUNDARY
IDD -YEAR FLOOOPWIN
LIMITS OF DISNRBANCE
FASF2+FllT LIMITS
—9i— ACT FENCE
G— PROPOSED GAS LINE
LG
CONSMUC TION
METHOD
30 0 30 60
SCALE: P' = 30'
_ SER EROSION CONTROL PLANS AS SHOWN : ...... NG NAMCEK r. CReNMGev.
FOR PRD,EGT:8Z7A.
Piedmont4 ITIiW 82 A C-SESC-P AN
C O N G U L i I
MASER
P. A. -
a:comer L.r I:ry th..gh aie Sndef den PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
aulxi"q.c"m CHARLOTTE OFFICE sH RSOIL EROSION &
Natural Gas ERgReers . P1aRRen . suneyonOft,LdaaapeA hies . EmiroRmeRa1S eRda Twelve PakwayPlae SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
RUSHMORE PROPOSED
once L«adon seize loo
. R8aeaeklNI) • Mc laIu�rel,Nf • LeM1i�PaIl ,PA . Oda -,FL 16" STEEL DISTRIBUTION 5275 Parkway Rau Boulevard C-SE06
• Hlamilmn,Nf • A"w Zror, • Riladelphf,PA : S.rfim FLA Charlotte, NC 28217
:Hare "r, N) gpgrer :RmButl,PA oIA CITY OF CHARLOTTE ITN"�R
empa,FL • Albugeeryue NM 02IObll9 TAH NCDOTCOMMENTSDIR9l20I9. TAH Phone: [phone]
. COIu.."I. MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
• MC Arlington, M Stare of N.C. Firm No.Ci042 • CM1arlotta NC DRAWN CHECKED Fax: [phone] r�
�amw moria w...�,rFxTew. nu ad�a••...a.maane-°Foaa �yeN h,�.n..nomm.-m.a..,. m,,,..� REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION DY O6 (!f L

. � . ,' LIM1T5 OF DISTi1R8ANCf --�-
--moo -
! i
I
..
OF
-
F
r
- - RAAPPiAIN i
I- WATTLeMOVEABLf
DIVERSION BARS ITYP.)
l � 1
[[ PRO P05E1) 1675TUL GAS LINE -.00
. - ` �_i•r' r 5 1�=Sam � .I' Y� �" � �,� �_ _ � � �
WETLAND
BOUNVARY
II.
.� . _. _� r-----• -- � ir. YYom�.. _
-iSF
� rau �laa�clr.�l
SILT PENCE ".I-.
-a. L
J.
..---
CONSMUL— [ONHDD
METHOD SFA 1+00 TO 6+50
r611
Piedmont
Natural Gas
fAMASER
co Ks uis I Ms F.l
[.>m„�:r ar.in mmivn ni.,.l smna<ve.,
gc
E*rcers • {gM.rs • S�rv.prs [ rL.� �P�W�ryRKy [ �.e�l5cienta[s
ol4e ��1'
. Pee Bvi ry a nc lawx. M S� µ+•n. Yn . [Puma. IL
[ 5tlgrmyn�rvyl mm� � � L . M YCYry/i
v-.. M , w ��F r. ifY • Mae�tiyM i ry��vl.
µ^L^� P9 Stile oFNG ihm No. Com!
oW " -, rvrmic—
RE DAZE b0.RWN DESCRIP m
APEN CUT
STA 8+SOTO 25+30
EROSION CONTROL PIANS
FOR
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
RUSHMORE PROPOSED
16n STEEL DISTRIBUTION
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA
L�ENG
!P_YV A•'CIM' � �
9011. EFIeMIG ,I.9
rrl�nt�lo►
C-SED7
{°n Baa
LmQll VF'
NI IYIL
CC 6RLsC3'LVN
W'110i)
9011. EFIeMIG ,I.9
f�.IMFW-CONTROL PLAN
C-SED7
07 Z4 12

7,
N,
x�Ypr. q�%� tt1�1mJ �
zl*
snc +e+ � 3wr1 aair
]ak-nrr eocn rce� .-K- S 3ms� � - - fo
e� E _ — s _ .
• - - - _t ti� ti»--^ �} �� �° �c cmc n `������� � �.- a -.
���- ~-{+-`rn 1d� 54ry.11j Vit.
/I �• -LIM11.51J"P L]]5rUR13ANCE _
013
--f __ - __ - - •_ - PROPOSED I er?UL GAS
UNE
_ _ 'RAL 1 y1 SSO IA nA���riy� NSr
a485
Wil p
--N
- aou DN WATTLE"OVEASLE _
- ---��—�__g3yER5fON BARS IrYP.j
WETLAND MATTING CROSSING
8181.1 £•r -' � -� — Ty} � � � %� 4 ,i � CE CONSTRUCFIONEMRANCE
NY� CId,.C] — �'�� _ -- _ - �� _ .�, - � % _ .� I ��"� '• S WATTLEIMOVABLE DIVERSION BARS
� — F— — � � �` J �' � � I IP INLET PROTECTION
4 •7 — } CONTOURS
PROPERTY LINE
STREAM CENTERLINE (GIS)
O__ 0•Plr �'��� E.2$F,>,�iYi � �: 100-YEAR FL1-OODPLAIND—N
-A{)f )PAPwrLIMITS OF DISTURRANCE
- — JCA@ NO. 2�J-45 —
EASEMENT LIMITS
SF SILT FENCE
1
• - —G PROPOSED GAS LINE
30 D 30 60
VONSTRUCTION OPEN CUT C•CINS TR L' C] ]ON
M1=']'I]OL7 STA 8K0 TO 25.30 MET] 10D SCALE
: V= 30
AMER �SS DATE oRA�N�� ji, NMG
EROSION CONTRA. PLAINS AS SHOWN OW IBllB CfK CR NMG r
FORPRo,­ H McER.
Piedmont U P S l 1 1 L 8 P �IiW 82 A C-SESC-PLAN
CuaatgmeP Loyalty:nro„gn aleRc sad:racdeR PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
aulxi�g.com CHARLOTTE OFFICE sH RSOIL EROSION &
Natural Gas Engneers. Plannen.5uneyo Oft.LduapeArchiec . EmironmenalSiens Twelve Park wayPlae SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
RUSHMORE PROPOSED
Oft. L«scion seize loo
. RaaBanklNI, • MCLaIIu��rel,N, • LeM1i�Valley,PA . Oda�ao,FL Ib° STEEL DISTRIBUTION 5275 Parkway Rau Boulevard C-SE08
• R8id mn, Nf • WewaW —', • RiladelpM1ia, PA : �'rea�i FLA Charlotte, NC 28217
:Hareo.,N) g�Rnbutl,PA oII A CITY OF CHARLOTTE �NM�R
empa,FL • Albuquerque NM 02IObll9 TAH NCOOT COMMENTS OIRBl2019. TAH Phone: [phone]
. Colu_I
bi M� MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
• MC Arlington, N, Stare of N.C. Firm No.Ci042 • CM1arloaI NC DRAWN CHECKED Fax: [phone] r�
�amw moria w...�,rFxTew. au ad_ae....a.maana-"Foss ..any ge.n..nomm._m._..,. mM.� REV DATE BV DESCRIPTION BY OH Of 12

PPOPOSEO/3.66 ACRE , r.sel+mo,¢D'"cP
11 MM OF Uh–L JK6ANCE .r..
n: fcWi�: s7aBq'P:Tr A
SILT FENCE MR)
L,: I
11� ;
3N r
WETLANO
P ' BOUNDARY
r611Piedatumont
Naas
SER
C O N S U L T I N G P. A.
C.-- Loyalty through Client Sadafacdon
g.c
Engineers • Planners • Surveyors O11 ft, L duape Architects • Environmental Sciendsrs
ORice Loc
• Red Bank NJ • Mc Laurel, NJ .O LeM1i� Valley, PA • Orlando, FL
• Clinm�y NI • AlbanlI, NY • Eawn, PA • Miami, FL
• HamHlmb f • Newzr-r,,N • RiladelpM1iA PA • Sre"nyy VA
• n ar or, NJ • -h--, Rxmburtl�, PA • olk,
NJ • Columbie,M� pa, • Albu.:.: ue. NM
• Mc N1ingon, NJ S.. of N.C. Firm No. AM2 • CM1arloaa NC
uiwa ae.-..a. maane°Foa'a .. aNhe.n..nom m.-,.
1�
EROSION CONTROL PLANS
FOR
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
RUSHMORE PROPOSED
16" STEEL DISTRIBUTION
NCDOTCOMMENTSBI S-19. TAH CITY OF CHARLOTTE
DESCRIPTION CHECKED MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
BY
30 0 30 60
SCALE: 1" = 30'
49v
AS SHOWN
LEGEND
RACJRY
I
GMFNMGY
WETLAND MATTING CROSSING
DBAw1Nc NAME
C-SESC-PLAN
---
SOIL EROSION &
®Q CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
N
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
— WATTLEIMOVABLE DIVERSION BARS
C-SE09
Charlotte, NC 28217
�P INLET PROTECTION
Phone: [phone]
eEr NumaFR
CONTOURS
PROPERTY LINE
OC� C7f IZ
STREAM CENTERLINE (GIS)
T7— —ND BOUNDARY
_
IBB -YEAR FLOODPLAIN
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EASEMENT LIMITS
.
SF SILT
—G— PROPOSEDFENCE
GPS LINE
1�
EROSION CONTROL PLANS
FOR
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
RUSHMORE PROPOSED
16" STEEL DISTRIBUTION
NCDOTCOMMENTSBI S-19. TAH CITY OF CHARLOTTE
DESCRIPTION CHECKED MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
BY
30 0 30 60
SCALE: 1" = 30'
49v
AS SHOWN
I DAB1Itll18
RACJRY
I
GMFNMGY
F`07NUMBER.
I709827A
DBAw1Nc NAME
C-SESC-PLAN
---
SOIL EROSION &
CHARLOTTE OFFICE
Twelve Park way Place
seiloo
re
SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
5275 Parkway Rau Boulevard
C-SE09
Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: [phone]
eEr NumaFR
Fax: [phone]
OC� C7f IZ

INSPECTION: COMPOST FILTER SOCKS SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH SIGNIFICANT RUNOFF EVENT (I
INCH OR GREATER).
MAINTENANCE: ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN IT REACHES HALF THE ABOVE GROUND HEIGHT
OF THE SOCK AND DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER DESCRIBED ELSEWHERE IN THE PLAN.
REPAIR: DAMAGED SOCKS SHALL BE REPAIRED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS OR REPLACED
IMMEDIATELY.
1.5X 17 PLIED G
ALTERNATVESTAKINGOPTION COMPOST TOCK IS'.,12' TYPICAL) .
WORKMEA EAT BEPROTECTED
2" MIN
SECTION n.s
IS X1.5' WOODEN STAKES PLACED ID O.C.
■
® AREATOBE eM
ALTERNATNESTAKING OPTION _ PROTECTED
lol N.1OTSM
OMEET SPECIFICATIONS
2. FILTER MEDIA'FILL TO MEET APPLICATION .
REQUIREMENTS
3. CO POST MATERIAL TO BE DISPERSED ON SITE, AS
PLAN- DETERMINED BY ENGINEER.
COMPOST SOCK FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL
NTS
INSPECTION: WATTLES SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH SIGNIFICANT RUNOFF EVENT 6IINCH OR
GREATER).
MAINTENANCE: ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN IT REACHES HALF THE ABOVE GROUND HEIGHT
OF THE WATTLE AND DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER DESCRIBED ELSEWHERE IN THE PLAN.
REPAIR: DAMAGED WATTLES SHALL BE REPAIRED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS OR
REPLACED IMMEDIATELY.
FILTER SOCK
DIVERSION (TYP)
24" MAN TER
SEE NOTE 7
6" MIN. FREEBOARD
INSTALL BEGINNING OFROLL IN
6'X6' ANCHOR TRENCH, STAPLE,
BACKFILL AND COMPACT SOIL.
EROSION CONTROL MATTING. INSTALL TO HEIGHT
AT FREE BOARD DEPTH. SEE NOTE 5
INFILL MATERIAL (FILIRIXX
CRONNCMEDIA-) SEE NOTE 6
2'12'x36° WOODEN STAKES PLACED 10' O.C.
SINGLE INSTALLATION SECTION VIEW
N.T.S.
NOTES:
1. REMOVE SEDIMENT MGM NE UPSLOPE SID E OF THE FILTER SOCK DIVERSION WHEN ACCUMULATION
TH
HAS REACHED 1/2 OF E EFFECTIVE HEIGHT OF NE FILTER SOCK DIVERSION. SEDIMENT SHALL ALSO
BE REMOVED DURING INSTALLATION OF FINAL STABILIZATION MEASURES (E.G. EROSION CONTROL
MATTING, SEEDING, MULCHING, ETC.) TO UNIT POTENTIAL DISTURBANCE FROM CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT WHILE VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHING,
2. SLOPES GREATER THAN 5% MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL STABIUZATON PRACTICES AS DETERMINED BY
NE ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR.
3. TUE M R SOCK DIVERSION SHALL BE FILLED 'MTI( FlLTREX% KROWINGYAEDIA"' OR APPROVED EQUAL
AND BE DO AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION.TH
SOIL OR AND MAY BE ADDED TO E GROWINGMEDIA'"
TO ADD MIGHT AND BALLAST TO THE RUNOFF DIVERSION.
4. IF UNDERMINING IS OBSERVED CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN GROWING MEDIA PACKING
TO
AT E OF FILTER SOCK DIVERSION.
5. EROSION CONTROL MATTING INSTALLED UNDER AND ADJACENT TO NE FILTER SOCK DIVERSION FOR
ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE NORTH AMERICAN GREEN C-125^' OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT AND SEEDED
AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATON. REFER TO TABLE 2: TEMPORARY CLEAN WATER DIVERSION OF THIS
PLAN SET FOR NE REWIRED NORTH AMERICAN GREEN (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) UNING
ASSOCIATED WITH THE PIPELINE FILTER SOCK DIVERSIONS. REFER TO NE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
DETAIL (ECB) ON PAGE 3 FOR PROPER INSTALLATION OF EROSION CONTROL MATTING.
6. INFILL MATERIAL (M_TREXX GROMINKAIEDIATM OR APPROVED EQUAL) SHALL BE MODIFIED TO REDUCE
PERMEABILITY AND PROMOTE VEGETATIVE CROWN IN ACCORDANCE WN BMP REQUIREMENTS. NE
KROWTH
NGMEDIATM SHALL BE DISPERSED ON SITE OR E FILTER BOOK DIVERSION SHALL BE REMOVED
ONCE THE DISTURBED AREA HAS BEEN FERMI STABILIZED OR AS DETERMINED BY NE
ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR.
7. MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE HEIGHT OF A 24" FILTER SOCK IS 19', THEREFORE TOTAL DEPTH IS ALSO 19'.
EFFECTIVE HEIGHT MINUS FREEBOARD (6') SHOULD NOT EXCEED 13`.
B. EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHOULD NOT EXTEND UPHILL PAST NE LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE
r6111Piedmont
Natural Gas
FILTER SOCK
DIVERSION / WATTLE
701L S1DE N WORK SIDE
3o TOPSOILNDSTRIPPING W
r TOPSOIL TRENCH
I SPOIL
[]H
I I
UNDISTURBED SOIL (UNDISTURBED SOIL
DITCH LINE TOPSOIL STRIPPING
ALSO USED IN NON -SATURATED WETLANDS
'MOTH OF
TOPSOIL STRIPPING
SPOIL SDE WORK SIDE
TOPSOIL
TRENCH
SPOIL
j TRENCH
N
UNDISTURBED SOIL UNDISTURBED SOIL
DITCH PLUS SPOIL SIDE SEGREGATION
NOTES:
1. ALLOW FOR A 3' SEPARATION BETWEEN THE TOPSOIL PILE AND THE TRENCH SPOIL.
2. RETURN TRENCH SPOIL TO TRENCH AND COMPACT. FEATHER OUT EXCESS SPOIL OVER STRIPPED AREA
LEAVING A LOW CROWN CENTERED OVER THE TRENCH. ALLEVIATE COMPACTION OF SUBSOILS OVER THE
STRIPPED AREA.
3. RETURN TOPSOIL EVENLY OVER THE STRIPPED AREA AFTER TRENCH HAS SUFFICIENTLY SETTLED OR HAS
BEEN COMPACTED.
4. ALLEVIATE COMPACTION OF TOPSOIL OVER ENTIRE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
5. SEGREGATED TOPSOIL MAY NOT BE USED FOR PADDING THE PIPE.
6. INSTALL SEDIMENT BARRIER AS SHOWN ON PLAN.
TOPSOIL SEGREGATION
TRENCH SLOPE (%)
4ASER
,M
C D N G U L i I N G P. A.
Cusromer Loyalty through Client Sadsfacdon
ulx ng.c
ineers III
SPACING L (m
DARD
<5
1,000
AD ED
5 - 15
500
FILL
15 - 25
300
•GUY, BEMONIIE, OR CONCRETE RULED SACKS
25 - 35
200
•GUY, BENIONIIE, OR CONCRETE AMD SACKS
35 - 100
100
GUY, BENTONITE, OR CONCRETE FlUED SACKS
>100
50
1 -FILLED BAGS (WET1E0) OR MORTARED STONE
t0l
FULL
DEPTHTABLE
13.1 FOR MATERIAL
SECTION VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
CE
I� TRENCH PLUG SPACING
f�
(L) �T
TRENCH PLUG
SLOPE
PIPELINE
PIPE PIPE INVERT
TRENCH BOTTOM
BEDDING
PROFILE VIEW
TABLE 13.1
NOT TO SCALE
MAXIMUM SPACING AND MATERIALS I'M TRENCH PLUGS
•TOPSOIL ANY NOT BE USED TO FILL SACKS.
IMPEFV0JS TRENCH PLUGS ARE REDUIRED FOR ALL STREAM, RIVER, WEIIAND, OR OTHER
WATER BODY CROSSINGS. RAN TRENCH PRIGS ME NOT TO BE USED IN
WETLANDS.
ADAPTED
FROM MARYLAND DOE
-77777
TRENCH PLUG INSTALLATION
TRENCH SLOPE (%)
4ASER
,M
C D N G U L i I N G P. A.
Cusromer Loyalty through Client Sadsfacdon
ulx ng.c
ineers III
SPACING L (m
TRENCH PWC MATERIAL FOR FlLIED SACI(S
<5
1,000
WY, BENTONITE, OR CONCRETE FlUEO SACKS
5 - 15
500
•GUY, BENTONITE, OR CONCRETE FlUEO SACKS
15 - 25
300
•GUY, BEMONIIE, OR CONCRETE RULED SACKS
25 - 35
200
•GUY, BENIONIIE, OR CONCRETE AMD SACKS
35 - 100
100
GUY, BENTONITE, OR CONCRETE FlUED SACKS
>100
50
1 -FILLED BAGS (WET1E0) OR MORTARED STONE
EngPlanners • Suneyorsa Wa rlanduape Architects • Emironmenml ScienOsrs
j 1 � Albanl, SNI
NJ • New Windsor, NY
NJ
NJ • Columbia, FID
�
na• N1 Stare of N.C. Firm I
NCOOT COMMENTS DIR6Y2019.
DESCRIPTION
INSPECTION: FILTER/SILT BAGS _
SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY
AND AFTER EACH SIGNIFICANT
RUNOFF EVENT d INCH OR
GREATER). �^
MAINTENANCE FILTERISILT
BAGS SHALL BE REPLACED I 5
WHEN THEY BECOME HALF -
FULLOFSEDIMENT. �FaBAG .v_
REPAIR: IF ANY PROBLEM IS
DETECTED, PUMPING SHALL (�
CEASE IMMEDIATELY AND NOT
RESUME UNTIL THE PROBLEM IS
CORRECTED.
.� r�.A'dusTA{Tx'AsEe`Avio
pT.AN`klk`yFl
e
- U
m--csaWr:
E �[EVAiIONNE'N_f
LOW VOLUME FILTER BAGS SNAIL BE IMDE FROM NEON-.TSWOYIId. GEOIEXIIIE MATERIAL SEWN W11H HIGH STRENGTH,
DOUBLE SIRCHED 'J' TYPE. THEY SHALL BE CAPABLE OF TRAPPING PARTICLES LARGER THAN 150 MICRONS
fBGH VOLUME FILTER BAGS MAY BE WE FROM WOVEN GEOTE%TILES THAT MEET THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS:
PROPERTY IEBf METHOD MIN TV STM0.NtO
AVC. WIDE WIDTH 5TRENGN MIN D -48B4 60 IB/IN
CRAB TENSILE ASTM D-4632 205 W
PUNCTURE ASTM 0-4833 1100
MULIFN BURST ASRA D-3766 350 PSI
W RESISTANCE ASTM 0-4355 70%
A05 % RETAINED MIN D-4751 80 SIEVE
A SJRMIE MFM6 OF ACCESSING THE 84G WIN MACHINERY REQUIRED FOR DISPOSAL PURPOSES NUSF BE MNVIDED. FILTER &iG5 SMALL BE
REPLACED WHEN THEY BECOME K FULL 6 SEDIMENT. SPARE 81KS SMALL BE KEPI AVNIABIE FOR FEPV.CENFM 6 MDSE THAT HAVE FAILED OR
ARE FILLED. BMS TO BE PLACE) ON STRAPS TO FACILITATE FEMOIPL UNLESS BAGS CONE WIN LIFTING STRAPS AIRDWY ATTACHED.
BAGS SMALL BE LOCATED IN WELL-VEGDATED (GRASSY) OTrtA AND DISCHARGE ONTO STABLE, EROSgN RESISTANT Ofd"M. WHERE NIS IS NOT
FOSSIRE, A GEOIEI(IILE UNCERUYMENF AND FLOW PATH SMALL BE PROVIDED. 8105 MY BE PLACED ON FILTER STONE TO INCREASE DISCHARGE
CAPMRY. BAGS SMALL NOT BE PLACED ON SLOPE GREATER IIWN A. MR SLOPE EXCEEDING 5& CLFM ROOK OR OSIER NON-DIDDIBIE AND
NON-POLLUTING N41B§OL MAY BE PLACED UNDER THE 81G TO REDUCE SLOPE STEEPNESS.
NO DOWNSLOPE SEDINEM BMMER B REWIRED FOR MOST INSTALLATIONS. COMPOST BERN OR COMPOST FILTER SOCK SMALL BE INSTALLED BELOW
BAf3 LOCKED IN FDI OR EV WATERSHEDS, N11HIN 50 FED OF ANY RECEIVING SURFACE WATER OR WHERE GRASSY MFA B NOT AVAILABLE.
THE PUMP DISCHARGE HOSE SMALL BE INSERTED INFO THE BMS IN THE MANNER SPECIFIED ED THE MANUFACTURER AND SECURELY DAMPED. A
PIECE OF PVC PIPE IS RECOMMENDED FOR THIS PURPOSE.
THE PUMMNG ME SHALL BE NO GREATER 1WW 750 GPM OR '� THE 14XIMUN SPECIFIED BY THE NMUFACIURED, WHICHEVER IS (ESS. PUMP
MAKES SH011 BE FLOATING AND SCREENED.
FILTER BAGS SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY. IF ANY PROBLEM! IS OETECIED, PUMPING SHALL COIF IMMEDIATELY AND NOT RESUME UNTIL TMA MA HE
PROBUAI IS CORRECTED.
ADAPTED FROM PAGER
REMOVED WHEN IT REACHES HALF THE ABOVE GROUND HEIGHT
OF THE FENCE AND DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER DESCRIBED ELSEWHERE IN THE PLAN.
REPAIR: DAMAGED SILT FENCE SHALL BE REPAIRED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS OR
REPLACED IMMEDIATELY.
Pe@a[aM.S3aI.*
ATaeAaYmtMrppA _.
SILT FENCE
1 of 2
THE TREALH.
I
TRENCH DEWATERING
P'cA1(R-T1FE�iiFf�!fKOSo5NP 3G£7FlCAT(ONS-SEffIfN. E'F7T££RfiE '3`B°ffAA¢.3}'AfP,.3f7#
01NST9UU`TJN19+Gi1cAtlOxs:
K3AVaf
L RLQ ydthEefikerkfi o£sV Yea DS%lNlrwerghfdFpolyakRrs PeNye G;.wf@TSUs hfiMbyN.
m�eooh wppee F gtoifirregmTeareak %•Az K646L,vd3dii tumnsa padfn4;£rRxNNSTB,
!u'�APi7aeNPTlfermbriCAhPMfl3 tpaLaxf ultraoiVl$�aAM Ammo ars fo preW midTrtam PffimAbt efM°TA"
MKP#.tad MsaMe,coasCrIIciRfi (� #aY4mLlePoWret2�Nas}2PF
K tSWVreTTIAtpestsYor v.EFETSY§Peslces6td p:R3Y6�a@#murksfeelMrth 4'arffehRth ER5iE2C.:MA(le_'�
titsesf�vrersnaue'amf �w.iiaNaza4artLmxgfe
8. RNr."rkn�rf4me'nCbT3[arrW�(51�3gEHi8�c'i56D�;lko WWt'TcrlfSadiia`klinrt3ftli159,g"aTd "d h"aaWi€A1'
5�'F�o1L'vrAec
SCS
4. (C'aottMeseblmestt:tnaiernfsiaedards eedth.ore.rcaatreggRgynihe7cPdlteariatifrcs.
W, IP,Rynr�yhar@�,�glK pj,`AHe'Te{Mpentm.Peedaes na enceM7$'Tn�'ai2bPYR MRYP.Ope¢,APNp5c lBlgher(.eRb:...sPPY
bpppy�(yglyrp[S'pJ'WaSp}'yglFcrent so taus urenffjf }traRw.F�
atNL{r§{gsflYNq,Acont mous. cuttadtW(epR[Nh oldrgbam`e(EO W�$aq@wW_N(ltnJgnefp®
1rt81i�, �gY45fil t nW uPP�a�tWt�4k [siiRMb@T�'ar1aP �4tBfi4sd�N
� SWTPunxaxv�mrMNpA#g1'fLri 5 'K nta r€AutAhi wfkW. NP�}41sa 51S
'VfsSlWf4uRti1.M�§U)AaM t neem sa:tee¢�xwYx+e' N�emVa�ip�N Ls't.'mifk�amR�'tldkM
gg{pMppM. `Aysr+�'>aa'*� :snoalc na mmmom.6yrnoand sae:erex¢th,
Mal(tH h'WekTlse§Tt MiWNx sea :spa ma.JmU.m, yfVet apart $ypEgrtyess55ngyN liexh3
seosmlyUitYdlNe gwued a mNhOYm�f 22nches
+� u.eb���r Nryy�r tP ,Pa gJ PTM n aPcoart= eMrzY
,rN�%adM-eEtWwY Pgre e� P n n .e oar,a; n g_
"� 'AMHSB _B€b:;�; �i�§g{a=iQe M eeP & P Rosea P nal±PsbyN,1P$fY
'INN�M'NUsuW:�al):
s&'. t LtNhdsesdl�rR�la$PTARm m#s aeef'Ahgtesa
a', ISN1kFtlIMiMtt6aMAwt4 NkA .}peTiktylalaT,c�TsgSp UppYr, Thorougntompamon olFhe backtiBrb �NKa'1
!38<:�hEeQei/omkR[ti.
WR �IWCUIYasTfil[erlFatu¢Ya#B[N�tirWY.
INS3sA14At7D[$.KgE➢11:1iATW{k}
z 'f�2aae�tmene�a:Pas..dnwiaEreaarea:Y�aawdar�k�a�me mmmle or.fnerervte. aneeA.,amn.�fe. ru
'NayeYAasy.
F.. I$4)ail PRs W'{c6{WB:M;iN ar'Nt-d #eas anabiAeA?PaA�E!aailpNkaPlMwlmns_,
IYLi#)aYI p9 2T a1 ep;m'tl, tl : fan akj. _.. _�M'a @%.Llosea A '�fi,tP�S{a�c, seg,R{Af�Alis'(-.
DP 44P.
f b c'fra_ Ps(
tecp
4 MTMpIIPost m npyk fac g rem am c.
AAY� A S F btL A earn I1_oSkWlth n = � II edvf MrAi th ap acn VmLti2M1'bY;ry35 AttYeA Shue
K)p'�e2aiQ§Stlq�'GeWHMd1�1kYn rbc, wit cM1 pPrnw.Ks;Wtl IN.aFNIt-Also ndiefhplAd pN
IpoaNeWc�B:mlanpsa Ml wneo-sisnrepea maBMV,�rnaesiae:
5. B}eP:aPPurm9rouafxdA,efw i iy .nuadihe :3ities.
a INP!^@.Ntilf2rv2¢+^[MtitdA NG •��, _.. '_.. ___.'
��. IL.`4mPaoTmauwSYjimR2s}�t�c,�'AAWci tl�a•�f+aimmeeatew rP]dra [TWLIt{epc�Ja¢iKs'l!Ui.
',tR@TrogCrrpeN AWiN411agp3M'3k1$Meer.&Std(1;.-._. hu�0}G°naSP9T'3�2i4 "etch. lfomPaakAnAs.1W.
LSNk'ths:aaa giber+each fsylkre:�Sn d Merl sT+4 Mfi
SILT FENCE
2of2
i0 FlL1ER BAG (PWB).
SPOIL PILE PUMP
SUCTION LINE
FILTER FABRIC
PIPELINE TRENCH FLOATING IIRME
PIPELINE
ELEVATION
N.T.S.
1. 'NATER PUVBPEO OJC OF TRENCH MALL NOi BE LYSCHARGFD INTO W:s.TFYWAYS. WATER
' SHAsl BE OTSCHA'tfr11 INTO A PTL� BAG OR CEWATERING STRUCTURE
I 2. FWP SY.ALL 9E LLiV"ROLLm SG TI{AF CP9GaARGE BOB NOT C's£4=CCM' OENATRING
STRUCTURE.
J. WMP SIYCTCN NOSE VUST NOT BE ALLOWED Tv COME YN CONTACT YNTH TRENCH BOTTOM.
' PRCb1510NS VVST SE MADE TO ELEVATE THE SUCTION HOSE i0 .4T LEAST ONE =00T
I
ABOVE THE BOTTOM C THE PYr'E TREAC1f UNT'd 80TTtllt DEWATERiYG :5 NiOESSARY.
I
4. DEWATERING SHALL NO' CCfAR OUTING TIMES 0- HEA'iY RAINFALL EXCEPT AS REQUIRED
TO PREVENT F-OCOING Of CCNSTRUC'ICN EWfFMENT LCGAIEO IH BLTRE (cf15 AND
[BENCHES
5. FL'VP WATER FILAR BAG (PAS) SHALL. BE FLVCEO ON A NIIL VEs£TAIEO PfYcA AWAY
FRED CCNSTRJCTCN 50 MA` FiIERED WATERMA 15 #OT FETtIRNEO TO
I PUMPED WATER FILTER SAG
EROSION CONTROL PLANS
FOR
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
RUSHMORE PROPOSED
16"
STEEL DISTRIBUTION
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
AS SHOWN DAOWIBllB -CJKT GMENMGY
TmolEcr NUMBER. DRAWING NAME
I]ON62]A C-SESC-DTLS
CHARLOTTE OFFICE
16IL EROSION &SEDIMENT
Twelve Parkway Place
sUire loo CONTROL DETAILS
5275 Parkway Mau Boulevard C -SEI O
Charlotte, NC 28217
INSPECTION: SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH SIGNIFICANT RUNOFF EVENT (#INCH OR
GREATER).
MAINTENANCE: ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHALL BE
Phone: [phone]
eEr NUNaER
Fax: [phone]
1
IO Of I2

IEP
O Aoe NIS
W1011,
A RTn1 BIL
Kr olrNAIA1IG
DAS� JlRPlLE
(SEF DUAL q]
OERI1 to DIEU
Own L-ROR OF
11010:
9�ESr 9'KdBf'N rS w iYEIHI Y TIS a w SAB ,01TmR to Rav
SlTSSOGE AE3E Mows 6 Y mm' A EI'm r 4lIw "M
1 R10 MO, R SP01_ RM Wyl OE Omuta. Dar nfX sialldr WM30
� TIE aesi oBRAflm 4w ARE Im IEOd Om
1 �R 11R4ER3
8RDWI " v P n Ialn IFipwFN IFsfCc* G ES➢'8.9FI!
A Il11EA E1QtW not
0DI
E PIT MIO IFrlr1YIF RI �11[L K nowTIyfA1[X A
: wELLPNr. SndCRF1E n4 m-1EN Wu
a IMI nAf•11F 5 e S F Parr m EN]MYAU soli PIR, WRw014L S IT
IMIT /IR �'NrfF FInVtr UPRAL !G'L . Pr�F 16 L♦1MBLtYJIr rf
! 03MTR1CICN w> E T ul b TEPP M Dk^al! VFUI 6 tHEIS of yy ilES
1, eor MOEI k Di -T-'0 IlRy1 Sq Plsfi N (a'EER 10 SBIPIIF BWAY 1118.
6 R EOLOR Itl W T i f M NN SreR roh RO+IN, 4M1EM Sa11Sk WAY OE
w
4EaDFm AI]Er8 nr CMRE ClpS1eRTD4 RI]P CF k rt n[ C1Q Q Im1P.
N wuilrl In nb rc.,k rErtn m IR LAwloneEllrk kunslr aMwc
'� RKOiIr D 3nsEFr aILAEAS
APweva menwvs
c
a•.4-
BORED ROADI
RAAFDAII CROSSING
ar.rt J'
3116' pal •rased a f r9w
s+e.r e,lnl.
��Inn
LIRI .rutY Of MnlfrES01,1 F9 07009
A geolextlfe on derlayrnenf shall be used isnder the wood mAt.
M TLH9P&1dATiTN[:IN
N'EILANDSGx AT WW PDXII.,
P
Piedmont
Natural Gas,11
-
HLIRI2ONPAL
DDLEC110NAL DRILL
4 lip
MASER
� C O Y Y II l F l E E Y.. L
C——r Loyal ry through Cr— Sndacden
u lxing.com
Engineers • Planners • Surveyors • rL duape Architects • Environmental Scientlsrs
C: d. L«
• Red Bank NJ • Mc Laurel, NJ atI L:h Valley, PA • Orlando, FL
• Clinm�y NI • AlbanlI, NY • Eawn, PA • Miami, FL
• HamHlmb f • Wew Windsor, • RiladelpM1ia PA • 11 nyy VA
a ar or, NJ esm firer R mburtl�, PA ol1
—.1—aNJ • Columbia, MD pa, • _d'deryae. NM
ilagmn,Nla.,...a..n, anWnSsare of N.C. Firm No. U042 �n..re.• CJM1arloaav
�4I ..ALR
IMPECTION: EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER
EACH SIGNIFICANT RUNOFF EVENT 4INCH OR GREATER) UNTIL GROUND COVER IS
ESTABLISHED.
MAWTENANCE: MONITOR AND REPAIR THE BLANKETS AS NECESSARY.
REPAIR: ANY AREAS OF THE BLANKETS THAT ARE DAMAGED OR NOT INCLOSE CONTACT
WITH THE GROUND SHOULD BE REPAIRED AND STAPLED.
ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS
TABLE
SLOPE (H:V) LENGTH (FT) EROSION CONTROL
MATTING
2:1 0-40 S75
3:1 0-55 S75
® 1
m a
nplrax. ley Elea `-- rasasa
'rwyrC4sr9Rr• Rb'T 1�V1. Pr+m�r 7'
NCDOT COMMENTS DIR9l2DI9.
DESCRIPTION
o f—
A. b
ro-� E w ar rrr xea
HORtZOwrM- F1fOF.CTIOHAL DRI 1.
M1'+Ih
'reAfhl MQrrMlxdaGu
irAllE eFrxrMEilkIO h
P400�4'ON I
AMI RiAAeiD� CL1@ACifO! J �,
t
tt
5�1
liAnrwa,TTvpDTYOF, � � A
/ RpL
nDM [ah - or 9N y
• Dlrn . a IeAtuT.ulw
---------------
�TWIeTTA
3'
eRFRAeF ■FEn AES
'i
nrn.'wr,c FA'Pux*nr �
j liF�,cent ai¢sc as[pB
eRF�X 1� ksefk:AI NE01
'
II
1
I AelEi1105NrA.�AETs/gPq
__ - RrGDINrr;feEp utAPLIrF i•RTTE�
UR r1ElRHEtilAril LF rl01n Cw w.PY
� r1 �� eEllecp-wrTw
(0.9m)
IHFB�FJkT SeIDG[P MDT >* pnl Ap9 FT rWi><e• IWN t'arFa tl yA%U"
SfRETrJI�RMUS'rMWRAN pLAns2r-0vE0...raG nif P]IWE:.fir 1LANIiET
roman w'Em+racT n,+T+r+r s*rr�I rrAne+lweF•r
1101 lw CLP
lyra
I. MAY JL AIERDIRAI.S eyu Et wR 1p mlme m m€. MID N W FtiN D IrE RoclL
0 161N14b x �NIQ.
i �1AQ( +E41�IE i3M']I yl m N SW,A f,41nON AS [t 1fY a< SiLrE
aL
%3o, ANG ok44
l SO EF FR3 BP NJ4'16, AfLG, .PI]
A- ME NB
{. 'a , = mm IXNfi PR $ O t rb Mol II B -Mr C 40E WAl3Allr EllllC'lNy'iM.
&4.
Ar �Mlm Ig4sBT NR} •JME ta 5T,v1t ro trgrbr oMl>=€ cvrttKr wn ml. cD Mut
SYET'SI a TE 1E CrsS M N,VJeOMIG[ s1Be W/AN'4"111uel- �S.
1-9D'F1A14 Dr TE 41/1gT
N As
E aNie'TEO in9h 91'12 5F M9 J.iFP aEc Er;Rt AFTEF EA(M WIfD EHIR n1RL EgE2ENaL
KAiFT¢a i4 f5TN1LLiD TO A IOMIIM UIFIIRI SFRICE'llFdl]BiRIR 6/NhlEa NSA
ID R FI
NDNbR LF oP'W.91 a1/arEi' `SSW R 11r"fpnp BR 11ER+'E[0 r1Tab1 F gLFl01E arsY
]. w��ru+r ST1A13 9VL.L 9E BHO
519PIFF]F1RL Aril:
rdElR1[r0R 3Wi ICE a w o WT 51l1R FD11 5r BE AFTFA Tuw 11
w
2. rRTfdyli 1PPIR➢ TAOAM D:lOR2 SIIYIEIS AW � LiV M IifU A V6
"otto rlml Nmp
EB0510N CONTROL SLANUT
MA54R
HLIRI2ONPAL
DDLEC110NAL DRILL
4 lip
MASER
� C O Y Y II l F l E E Y.. L
C——r Loyal ry through Cr— Sndacden
u lxing.com
Engineers • Planners • Surveyors • rL duape Architects • Environmental Scientlsrs
C: d. L«
• Red Bank NJ • Mc Laurel, NJ atI L:h Valley, PA • Orlando, FL
• Clinm�y NI • AlbanlI, NY • Eawn, PA • Miami, FL
• HamHlmb f • Wew Windsor, • RiladelpM1ia PA • 11 nyy VA
a ar or, NJ esm firer R mburtl�, PA ol1
—.1—aNJ • Columbia, MD pa, • _d'deryae. NM
ilagmn,Nla.,...a..n, anWnSsare of N.C. Firm No. U042 �n..re.• CJM1arloaav
�4I ..ALR
IMPECTION: EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER
EACH SIGNIFICANT RUNOFF EVENT 4INCH OR GREATER) UNTIL GROUND COVER IS
ESTABLISHED.
MAWTENANCE: MONITOR AND REPAIR THE BLANKETS AS NECESSARY.
REPAIR: ANY AREAS OF THE BLANKETS THAT ARE DAMAGED OR NOT INCLOSE CONTACT
WITH THE GROUND SHOULD BE REPAIRED AND STAPLED.
ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS
TABLE
SLOPE (H:V) LENGTH (FT) EROSION CONTROL
MATTING
2:1 0-40 S75
3:1 0-55 S75
® 1
m a
nplrax. ley Elea `-- rasasa
'rwyrC4sr9Rr• Rb'T 1�V1. Pr+m�r 7'
NCDOT COMMENTS DIR9l2DI9.
DESCRIPTION
o f—
A. b
ro-� E w ar rrr xea
HORtZOwrM- F1fOF.CTIOHAL DRI 1.
M1'+Ih
NS}ECTIOM SILT FENCE MTLFTS SHALL BE INSPECTED WEFML f ANSI AFTEF
EACH sIGNIHCANT BUNCO EVENT r INCA OR znyAM) uNTt GROUND
COVER 6 ESTASUSHFb
MWN�T-NW�CL NOHTTDM AND OvAik OUTLETS AS NECESUkI
FEMIR A,Ny ARERSOT T]-EaL !-ET THAT ARE DAMACFb OR NOT IN CLO`,ie
Co AET w,TH THE QKJ IW Q5s4� BE REPAIRED AND STAPLED FLOW DIRECTION
FILTER OF 57. it 11 4 11
WASHED STONE .
SILT FENCE FABRIC ��" ._ T •ti^ ,'�' . _1'r e
OVERLAP HARDWARE T -t •{: i•s
CLOT14 BY 12 INCHES
STEEL FENCE _
WIRE FENCE PLAN VIEW''5T EEL FENCE POST
FNLTER OF k Wf4OTE
WASHED STpNE .Z r• APPLICABLE FOR DRAINAGE AREAS NO MORE THAN if4 ACRE.
2 USE ASA REPAIR OF SILT FENCE FAILURES.
P LAW DIAECT€ON _ +:,� s -=r! 1 3. BURY WIRE FENCE, HAROWAFiE CLOTH, AND SILT FENCE FABRIC 6INCHES .
SIDI
TOWN OF APE)
STANI)ARDS
EROSION CONTROL. PLANS
FOR
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
RUSHMORE PROPOSED
16" STEEL DISTRIBUTION
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
urc
As 9Rome
Pur
a.re
FRI
:iy�aW"
MIID
�TWIeTTA
3'
SOIL- EROSION & SEDIMENT
rt
CHARLOTTE OFFICE
Twelve Parkway Place
Swire loo
CONTROL DETAILS
5275 Parkway Rau Boulererd
(0.9m)
Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: [phone]
FFT wuneFx
Fax: [phone]
6'
.Sm)
3.3'
Q 3:1 Slopes (B)
33'
(lm)
O 2:1 Slopes (C)
O
O
Q 1:1 & Steeper Slopes (D)
1.15 Staples per SQ.YD.
O Medium/High Flow Channel (D)
Q High Flow Channel And
©
�
Shoreline (E)
2,._5„
2"-5"�
2a1_5„
2„3n
(5-12.5cm)
(5-12.5cm)
(5-12.Scm)
(5-12.Scm)
2'
2'
2' 10"
4, (0.6m)
4,
(0.6m)
4,
(0.6m) (25cm)
(1.2m)
(1.2m)
O O
(1.2m)
b O
1.6'
20"(O.Sm)
20"(0.5m)
(O.Sm)
00
O
3.3'
10"(25cm)
O
(V)
O O (0)
O O
3.3'
O
0 0 0
0 0 O(lm)O
17 .9wples per
SQ.YD
3.4 Staples per SQ.YD.
3.75 Staples per SQ.YD.
NOTES:
Use ECMDS® for more accurate
staple pattern selection.
- FORTH
Disclaimer:
elasa a•
AMER)CM
The
information presented herein is general design information only. For specific applications,
GREEN'
consult
an independent professional for further design guidance.
MOI Sr. Wou&L-C'yntiir1e11 Ad.
PIF: M0 -722-2040
OrawilTO Not To Scale
PmnvOiu, IN J7633
.m>:rBeamm
CIaw1T on: 3-7677
NS}ECTIOM SILT FENCE MTLFTS SHALL BE INSPECTED WEFML f ANSI AFTEF
EACH sIGNIHCANT BUNCO EVENT r INCA OR znyAM) uNTt GROUND
COVER 6 ESTASUSHFb
MWN�T-NW�CL NOHTTDM AND OvAik OUTLETS AS NECESUkI
FEMIR A,Ny ARERSOT T]-EaL !-ET THAT ARE DAMACFb OR NOT IN CLO`,ie
Co AET w,TH THE QKJ IW Q5s4� BE REPAIRED AND STAPLED FLOW DIRECTION
FILTER OF 57. it 11 4 11
WASHED STONE .
SILT FENCE FABRIC ��" ._ T •ti^ ,'�' . _1'r e
OVERLAP HARDWARE T -t •{: i•s
CLOT14 BY 12 INCHES
STEEL FENCE _
WIRE FENCE PLAN VIEW''5T EEL FENCE POST
FNLTER OF k Wf4OTE
WASHED STpNE .Z r• APPLICABLE FOR DRAINAGE AREAS NO MORE THAN if4 ACRE.
2 USE ASA REPAIR OF SILT FENCE FAILURES.
P LAW DIAECT€ON _ +:,� s -=r! 1 3. BURY WIRE FENCE, HAROWAFiE CLOTH, AND SILT FENCE FABRIC 6INCHES .
SIDI
TOWN OF APE)
STANI)ARDS
EROSION CONTROL. PLANS
FOR
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
RUSHMORE PROPOSED
16" STEEL DISTRIBUTION
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
urc
As 9Rome
Pur
a.re
aas9.m
Ly
:iy�aW"
MIID
�TWIeTTA
CSESi. nTL3
SOIL- EROSION & SEDIMENT
rt
CHARLOTTE OFFICE
Twelve Parkway Place
Swire loo
CONTROL DETAILS
5275 Parkway Rau Boulererd
C -SE
Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: [phone]
FFT wuneFx
Fax: [phone]
1
11 of 12

0jww FXTEq L1GI RDa.
K
MONENY
VIM mrL
i R'R84'4
�+mIBiT 9PDL �f
w.� PPB,E
` �� ➢EMmR 11{F
Nor TO
CRS RCMt x11rt me RNPI I +
a!i Art
IAR w8A91FA
d1 w3l
14BW17P+ RR WE 5)
AUWiP WATlR r1I1P NF•OAweamb
",Y WtEArt W WAt[RINc �w[nuE
RIL4i,11VIAW WANNNVV& .THE PDX--EQ MFl NOT M 5511E
Duk lam
iTEAR RETl.Y4 NQ ADVIES M DBTNL FDuom' VE PPOM MLUIEi
I AE .4NM sAE1Nc W NQ kog RFI *U VW -01 6 ALLM Wr Im REE 4 AE"K. RAK! 1u EV UN1 SPI
hb S 1m FE3 8 EPW Illi BDIIOrrf wlF 'BRWV Y -4E mWf16 01918 IIF 'AE•INN R 16%.x• AS rHfiM
ON OANINS AND SINMU N6
+ PRFFIEGOEB 11AiEl1R YWL AFS tJINE NE111aD /�1 DI M aveE4 >rf ff Rm �1alA.eI41 mpJmeR.
M 1Qs r 1 a Alar M Om rt BSE 4 MDI AL TESTI" 0 b4 i" I.
W Bwx M Y+NEC
i1E Ir M 911 a 11E OEiAE.0 SuIrEE111A IIFSXION MN rNam AW IYL•mC Am gr W. m¢ T' i'
Q1lMC f EIS W. YAC eZSE RTS Rimle 6 TYE yq1 NAE, Nd SERi1r 6YNB'6 mRE Ap Tawam La TK
III)MLIAG aF M iK GTJ9� uuu m,aAnrt T1REBvlc TFKIAiI Tz XET.Ym rwT�s sal re smEnEr Ee oar TE
DngauLToll wwa1�
l J r PM%➢i tr TIN 511WP:' ND R�IIS PLIh116 W Drtd,TLT PER iFE 11E11O1 IDIE W Iu 4PINI Nv RF1h4 130" CA
Ac9r LAaY1TS FRpI TK N'GT i 118 IAIMt -+n w EA:RAApE srIIY� nE tlEF rdPEcwt AFD EIW MIEAWP W SEE
BETBIYIE INR SA7EFt 16 ATf➢ ASRLREIKTIRI EDI{SiREIe' i1ED1�1 NNRWII p 1TWIT 41y95 1A1f1Y INBBE RE RPPeII 98C W
DO NO fl y
L EOIntY TaTRI UE LF'a 511w.r ttv TY50/ a rot snJur.Oi SSLwy xP� m .: nw ffrm w . wTErtul owM
Lf- 1E NOES. AS DEI��r1Ym R+ TE e4ffl _ ROM iEdA3Atm W971L PRf IMV BF � m UI SVA BAOC C
[ "rIAg1 MIs e• lE fJC ?' KILYTA :AMID E P I1a0A RO TREACNfi
A iWIU •I�.w! R[M1,IAn .i frD*b wER BE PIPE CMD D I FEUkC 61 M 1 KP TO AAI. IOMI 1
,6IEYSY3 WIE- 5. 1 nlrp.pl /I.a IIE1I,'it F PI HbgED �mAsdrAt uIR 1ME o>�yp 1S ppgE)[q gspl PLI
A1B Al=lllty i4 [TI: ID 4Meti I•LL vo E TEE 1FE ITOIW d IE DI
°ff SITE{ YAi g F.6Gl1FR 1RRNr Eln RAItNO AnAVE1N 10 A'A'E eRE11tll 011 ,0 5A10[A1 NEm 1V19{E M I(TJffl WIND
WAm➢ Y NE fYll'LE i]]rTYe CTAAPr IIIc 1m fY-T R in1lE1 iCiw Yr INIffi APPwYG Er DRrdI[vrr_ 6w,
la LLNFA•M PPC PAFfR 10. 9R�1 RUC 11EXDE YRSFALL IIOOI r W5
L NlTEXptl1L RAT At g NR AP Kk-t)ry
I}. AWK WYE 10 IEA! PfE'A �Yv1 TEA°rl�mAlT, IapIACi NFSOR nF r5TN1 H1RWllrrllr DFADrI mn91.
I?_ SM) PAEF�IG Td 11us c�I rEaMDE VPQI DIfIMFFN
u rkfD D$R1FiL NTjmF6 AFNya
VNSATURATRU WCI-LAND
L\57ALLAT70N PRQCFD11RF-
j �hlASER
MK47AONI NL rs7'AWTECr*G rSHALL rE IN5PECTED WEENY AND AFTER EA<H RUNO" FPWT
MAINTENANCE: SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN IT REACHES HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE STONE.
REPAIR: DAMAGED OR CLOGGED INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IMMEDIATELY.
DOT NO. 57 CLEAN STONE
CONCRETE BLOCK
GRATE
PLAN VIEW
WIRE MESH
GALVANIZED, 11 GA.
OR PLASTIC MESH,
0R� CONCRETE 1/2 IN. OPENING
FLATTER \ �
INLET
NOTES:
MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA = 1 ACRE.
KEEP THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER AT LEAST 12 INCHES AND NO GREATER THAN 24 INCHES. DO NOT
USE MORTER. TOP OF BLOCK SHALL BE ADJUSTED IF PONDED WATER WOULD POSE A SAFETY HAZARD
TO TRAFFIC.
IF NEEDED, GIVE LATERAL SUPPORT TO SUBSEQUENT ROWS BY PLACING 2 X 4 WOOD STUDS THROUGH
BLOCK OPENINGS.
SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN IT REACHES HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE STONE DAMAGED OR
CLOGGED INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IMMEDIATELY.
BLOCK AND GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION 1p
NOT TO SCALE
r6111 Piedmont
Natural Gas
((N4'QE
ifOIRRAR4R18 IfW
� trLuel %EKT Kw
- ,
II ! I Isiv PR I
° I �p � I t%� r1E8 FN1DF
eaa °JGL DQWYm� Td� ��
EmF 4
TLTN4 FpRdLDR atRRErR1IA
®IEXiE �IEaNE I I PF mcrWx I
I � nE A.�FTW. v nc
=K=0cpN Ln1rE61
�FRTFR 970f
N71 TO 1 i 1
ala IN25
' RAN
I- EDA: 1llI,Y4 RLUd'� A14 ASrFL1 XE11114 `.,LJG R9CR RI IxEYdtl4 Id! ID WALE
IA UNB RCE 10 CR R711F11M1C Q W1W 6AaRHM 5 kll LAW tm f91 ff
■"IAAF RACE � NYs1C Sa P036 1m FFQ EICI fRU1 E[PJt9 d%MdTY.
mIU4K TEW'ORYQE ' � 111F1+0-rc sl w' K DF 11GlAID BNr4YEE5 9 91AaN BM DTNWO 4W
9qrs ym
I Wm AmyPan -MAWr, NSTA L 5WAm RINNEr1 AT MFA tw# 5 IT FE'hAN Al) AIM WN, IETL W Miss
to P1NUr6 w TFEE YvAM 00 OWN A71AM TO ,MEMT DEE TI100 13i- fA WE WGBE OF ALINWE 6TErs W RDor
EGIDR Fri W IRST WTK FA;4 O -W N'AEiLOW I11{%9g THE r V FRECO 124 EMYEfSaVIAL N9 WRIN KW WE
1nb '�4h w y m A WNMA 01I6'TRitR REDff RLWISL m T MT TE U[EF1 M a01EEAL MX 0 No.
wlAroyPFt.
A W= 6RRVRR SWL IV BE AEWM W MIYFATED SIN 00MNS.
!.
tam mvi° EA`A'AIIDC {PWRILW Enl!® )w iRADr9 bLM2a Slrsvlm PA PBQAeIam D>19TIEMt YA75 Ale
R➢95. T9 EMPI0M FimIER E FN3:AlwOI m EtllA1ETIF M6 NS ISP EPI RAi+rF A Rrt EAOPAY 9w1 LR II 11inE
IIyDLr M AEJIAI4 9r am TME wM F miuma, Bow m vIium ELr N � w AE 31Dr4.S INTAL
i FNiAwTL MYNA 9MRG NE. •},, ' M ITPE • NERIl4 lal CxF]Er CUIOC AE•1M•' MIHW 1m iFu w lERW4 ®IYIQRI,
LKM Apwnam er Ohm-+•1Ern rrvF%�.oE
ua[ RUTc HlAS M 1I E9i U 1MfLWm AETu2u IWt4 WISS FIRM TV PYF N/LDENF.
Id Fu]II PNS w PIAS LLRTfE-A N74L ffl A FDG AND m
M I RA.1E rs " ft --N TfSLTRN TUW4*- AND N51ML PNFAE1aN1 EII EwN LCIRR0.
I- 4111E W NINA UTL?a 4 SEE I y�- BA1rIEIM ARRA YEMANA WN EtlI
1A ADIAK[ r3nw 1191E M NW eA IEIMO TDP 1D d TOD !1 PWr EPAFI]BE 9DLbIL Idl[[i1 r 11F LR. is ER' DOfll MD
E uEELTEO W TME raEcmx. NS 9M
DIUNDATED WETLAND
QKSTALLATWN PRUCFUURS
INBFECFIOPL ROCK CONSTNlX71ON Fr1TRANCE SHALL N Ip9PpCTEO WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH
5WNIEI :MIT RUNOFF EVENT K NCH OR GAFATER)
MAOMNANCE ADO STONE TO Fwmm qu FTOP DREsnNG wK 7, sTONET A5 NEEDED TO PREVENT
MLtD OR SWIMENT FROM LEAVING RHE SITE
REPAIR. DAMAGED ROCK CONETRUCTIgN ENTKAWNS $HALL BE REPpREEMRTPLACED IHMEDIATRT
1 WuNIABIE
n' l03�1 Ia IN 111114).
NIN
FLY3lAW7 RM➢M,>'
sS rEA1Rc '-��iN FILL
'&'M' F WIN B' AA TD n PPF R9 FIE'ScAA�s
E.
PROflLE
PLAN VIEW '= s
R MMAIFAa; BEWt USED TV OWM PRUPM OYER FM PIPE
HQI!E5_
I RCMONF TFpyp1 FPoUr TO rYSTALLA hOH 11F ROd O]N51RLR'TQA ENIFWACF E[IETIP
40DK 084E il[.% RIDN a LNTRANICE
x RUNOET 9RALL K UI TED FROM RDADMAV N A E 17y 9EQMEyT RE WAL 9IP
PANN TO ENTTM,AC 400 r NV6 C" EATUNKI
F U%NTA&E BERI% 9 U- BF IMRTAOED YHEEEKR tF1104AL MWR1 > PE 15 uSED ARG
wprflr W`�A F.ffTW Sti• u#tuFAMIT, E G RAD' cT1ET=WSC f•CpTTceD.
LIhLL 6E SIEo APrptAxAA FELT F0. 5iE ITE NK1i BEIM0. �Qswv-
F YANIENAI{y I+oom •�NSmIxi10H Dry raANKE Twarl S$ A W BE [ucS1AI. 1,
YARITANEy TO TME 5PEWE9 DIIWENNQA B'/ ABBINL Rt A ROOEAttE 5n
MANTAON 5TE FOR TRS PLM CM All ArWWr IT XnN IM I N FAVED HDAPKn'r
RIAU a NEMDMEB Alp REnRIEO To 'm COOM1OWN SEE RWmF rc.R
EAD4511YI' kyM4ni EY SEBIYErT AM 9DNL DEPG = ON RVADWWT, EATEHO LENGN
pF .1[10E Li' vNIADTIEAY MrNMM BY 0 9r f PASwEE.FS ON111. TlXAB 1" IS
ALI ENArED OR -4gr&6 XNs NACA YA9 NRW RWWRAr BR Sr1E(Py0 NE DEPM6 ,
INTO NUADNAV IWOS5. St*t w DUL-VOIS. W 01AER WN1414R. QUIW;S IT NOT
ACCEPTABLE
A.S
r cER.o-EsuLrlc s F.A.
C.,=.r Loyal ry through Client SadOxt-
u lxing.c"m e
Engineers a Planners N Surveyors a rL duape Architects • Environmental Sciendsrs
j J � Albanl, �"1
NJ • New Windsor, NY
NJ
NJ • Columbia, MD"T
na• NJ 5sare of N.C. Firm I
ROCXICZ FRUCT10N ENTRANUL
rn�
CFYRI5T RiEll 9ltl FANOWIAD
_EDNF.YTr S '�aRe
sl� 9YNEY I 61wIEx , I AJMeI[
NAM
1L'�JJ IS?-i4YYm SFE3x,�e
wt
I_ cyaT%.ErrTA116-0e�r _I
my TO %kLf ' 9lP PR
Q AAn RADA
RNNIEa wAmRLrsA w o. 0" EDN wrtm
FIXA'.-O[WhTfW.:s•LCAI.14 ''Nn
2UYA1[m oEwATT3Erc STW [-nnE
FNin[f�THE AA}ROy4817ay Th.PBI
r+<aFn Irn NOT TO SC4E
•. Fuc �Tuw s71nBYu A14 AISTlIi 9ElA4Fle 3Eals FAA•]! m WAYFIIG
x0 lFIW1AQR aAeolrc rp iF1Ela1A Ar +sallE m11RE11F � ALFAm IlREI 1m FEES of YETIR4. AAJJ[E
T4 RVL114' m Perls Im rLv a¢11 FmI AI[nJI4 9EaDYN
3 WALL TEYPCINRr 9U4 rEAKIM sP y F w IEIF.VA NUUMAWS A( 900 uX NFRWSS Am
wav alm
1. NRTALI RICiY3OlTF9 fAPKSIr NATE 1104=1 ERRE ERlA6 AREA M TIE 100M SEE S 1W C1IDRLCI91
mNILTi
t A'® Mslml rETA.Im A611a1 �.Pc]FFIIeos c mf/ ®1ow[s ur AE1r+EF /10 �m tmis Rls.m
mFis
e. LNR F1XLL1c DF vt;= xP�s ll4 llxrLRIC icTrnai m TI°mu 0141 T1[ 1 LIE m Y�R ORbC RI
�EEIMR�Wf]TIR l�lP1iW x-IEAI�MF IMN1d�SWeTpEI ��IG1 FI �XS AdLHKFN
S IMV `TOIPS � � •TT IIIaINDAE vnE DF RIE NWf-R-
i. IpIEOI SPAhID UL11 NOT TE � N SRLAIJER'YIL DtFIQr[IAE
!. A6nE wo MIAS AT RE ZQ3 Er TERWNP L111L Jl FAER N Trd1PJ
11. 2AE1AUR/a AWWX 11 XEF1A1Dg WY R On 11E PFS 7v^•1ll 6 F,BtifAi M RDIM TO Uy- DWE RE7 M
LPYEDaai mf61KOW IFROM FIF W%W 15 TO PRO= c'Wflh J.%1 INIL W09%" 5 LM�
R Ri[D AN I� N DIM 1B W11,1ZE THE JIMMI w RYE R[ TIEMWI IS OPLr.
10. PMS 3ELjW YM rE 1A O= 0 NRTIN 11E TETLIAR AnKEM TO F K TMACR OR F SAbN4 ANG
t ISM THE IULW ARD R ' k W 03KREN ,'IKW AM vfnA11 Ipl FRT � KWO Ixmm T,
I➢YS5 ANRIID @/ DedBLhYDfAk. 119frICR
1I-EP,wo RS PREF M warku Way"TK" Rugg.
12. E9AL6C SIEVE M IE]R P.PE-cCAra1MN." IEr MPDGR"R M 45ML rMANDR W" =191
13. iE1gE PREFUNIU m 1fWlE Eini fEl11MD8 r e LYYPIEAY.
I4, WP MMM N IDM MFA
FAe SATLTRATLD W RT LANID
IN5TALdTIE1N PRO(M7URP
NC -COMMENTS DIR9lLOI9.
DESCRIPTION
CONSTRUCTION FENCING
EROSION CONTROL PLANS
FOR
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
RUSHMORE PROPOSED
16" STEEL DISTRIBUTION
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
AS SHOWN
DAOWIBllB
-CJKt
CRENMGY
"07NUMBER.
1709827A
DRnwING NAME
C-SESC-DTLS
SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENT
CHARLOTTE OFFICE
T -1 -Parkway Place
SU IBD
CONTROL DETAILS
5275 Parkway Mau Boulevard
C -SE 12
Charlotte, NC 28217
Phone: [phone]
err NunaER
Fax: [phone]
12 of 12

i
APPENDIX D
AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE

QPP�MENT OF
FISH &ILDLIFE
SERVICE
2A United States Department of the Interior
o
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICEp�r
gRCH 3 1a Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street Suite #B
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
November 19, 2018
Matthew McCort
Maser Consulting
Charlotte Regional Office
5275 Parkway Plaza Boulevard, Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Dear Mr. McCort:
Subject: Listed Species Assessment for Proposed Rushmore Drive Natural Gas Line Project,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (MC Project No. 17004827A)
On October 16, 2018, we received a letter from you that included the federally listed species
survey results for the subject project. Your letter and surveys were conducted as a result of
recommendations included in an August 27, 2018 letter from Mr. Byron Hamstead of this office.
We have reviewed the information that you presented and the following comments are provided
in accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.§ 4321 et
seq.); the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the Migratory
Bird Treaty Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 703); and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Project Description
According to the information provided, the proposed project would consist of a 16 -inch diameter
steel natural gas line within a 30 -foot wide easement corridor in Charlotte, North Carolina. The
project area consists of cleared open space, forest, wetlands, and transitional habitats along
maintained roadways and utility rights-of-way. Surrounding land use is dominated by residential and
commercial developments. The proposed work would disturb 4.943 acres including 1.313 acres of
wetlands. The proposed work would entail horizontal directional drilling (HDD) below wetlands
(approximately 500 linear feet) and two roadways along the proposed alignment. Your
correspondence indicated that the proposed work would not disturb the unnamed tributary to
McAlpine Creek within the project area.
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
According to the information you presented, three federally listed species were assessed for
potential occurrence within the project site boundaries including: 1) Smooth coneflower
(Echinacea laevigata) currently federally listed as endangered; 2) Michaux's sumac (Rhus

Mr. Matthew McCort — Maser Consulting 2
michauxii) currently listed as endangered; and 3) Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus
schweinitzii) currently listed as endangered. Personnel from Maser Consulting conducted
surveys for these species within areas of suitable habitat September 21 and 26, 2018, and
October 4, 2018. No individuals of either species were found during surveys and you have made
a "no effect" determination for smooth coneflower, Michaux's sumac, and Schweinitz's
sunflower. We concur with your "no effect" determinations for these three species. Therefore,
we believe the requirements under section 7 of the Act have been fulfilled. However, obligations
under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this
identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously
considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this
review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the
identified action.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on this project. We ask that you refer to our
August 27, 2018 letter for additional comments and recommendations for minimizing the
potential impacts of this project. Please contact Mr. Bryan Tompkins of our staff at
828/258-3939, Ext. 240, if you have any questions. In any future correspondence concerning
this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-18-400.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Govemor Ray Cooper SKretaryy Susi H_ Hamilton
NCNHDE-6391
July 5, 2018
Seth Ryan
Maser Consulting PA
5275 Parkway Plaza Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28217
RE: Ballantyne Infrastructure Proejct; MC_17004827A
Dear Seth Ryan:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of
natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile radius of the project area, if any, are also
included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of the project
area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance. Contact
information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund easement, or Federally -listed
species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler&Dncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS: Tele hone: 019', 7D7-8107 LOCA.TICN
16`1 MaiI Ser,rice Center wrr&ncnhv.org 121 VVest hones S-reat
Ralaigh, NC 27899-1881 Ralaigh, NC 27603

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Ballantyne Infrastructure Proejct
Project No. MC_17004827A
July 5, 2018
NCNHDE-6391
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Pro'ect Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name ommon Name
Element Accuracy Federal
State
Global State
Group Observation
Occurrence Status
Status
Rank Rank
Date
Rank
Vascular Plant 7775 Acmispon helleri Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil 1994-06-03
X? 3 -Medium ---
Special
G5T3 S3
Concern
Vulnerable
Vascular Plant 13743 Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur 1800s
Hi? 5 -Very ---
Endangered
G3 S2
Low
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner
Owner Type
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County
Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on July 5, 2018; source: NCNHP, Q2 April 2018. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-6391: Ballantyne Infrastructure Proejct
gIVA
0
-c C
j`
640 R cAlpine Creak
I
T—r,gdon
gR' Toringdon
`D o Circle
N
N \°w Ln ��19dn°V
co,
Fgan\Ma\
�o
rn e
\
Fo 0
prgton \ c Dr r -
p � \ (�� � Ballanry ne '521•
o j 5Q Village
\ = Gafesmnc' Ln J
c \ ;
�4 Klkhu»r Dr �' o hic<lalla L.
\ VC
Metmbna '
Ec holarsl
Academy
Whiteoak
m
�F
n,
Endharen }�
EL--,
\ ->yl� Da nhY Ro
/
r m
Cy 101
PR
colmamonz
e �v
�ilrj,gYne G,mm°� k
�-3C0
\fig `�..
Easl
m
nn
�a cJ 0,o F:99Wswn`'
OOromrF V< �(n 2\4 CY
°
bt
9A
c1
Ball
\\
9�Ie \•c
'
E
h
a�»<,.:rnnl9an
O `
0
°
ev aalbnyna
.�
\fin
'lub
}
o aYsid
� v
T 2
O n
ys
G
Cuy\"� 6mm
n
O� \ P $aG0
HCl
?F
``,,,d Q
2 \ 1
y v
N \ O
Pn meC
�>
�yys R,rJge
p Dr Jockey
A�
SQ'
albnt
_
Country
clue ��
L
N d
R
\9.p
y
Krkhurn
c
g' nrn:s (:f i
f•'.f?It
ap: e fire
Q7
W
,no,
\y
9
� �
�
a
Ballan tyn l�
.bun,
i.aks Dr
July 5, 2018
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
1:22,146
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.3 0.6 1.2 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong),—astopo, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and
the GIS User Community

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
December 20, 2018
Thomas Bailey
Master Consulting P.A.
5275 Parkway Plaza Blvd, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28217
[e-mail]
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Phase I Archaeological Identification Survey Report, Rushmore Natural Gas Pipeline,
Ballantyne Commons Parkway, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, ER 18-1651
Dear Mr. Bailey:
Thank you for letter of November 27, 2018, forwarding copies of the above -referenced report. We have
reviewed the information provided and offer the following comments.
Commonwealth Heritage Group (CHG) completed a Phase I archaeological survey within the area of ground
disturbance consisting of 100% visual reconnaissance and 9 shovel tests on approximately 5 acres. CHG
reported heavily disturbed and wet conditions that prevented additional subsurface investigations. No sites
were reported.
We concur with the findings in CHG's report and agree with their recommendation that no further
work is necessary.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act and
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or
environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES (DMS)
IN -LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM Revised 4/23/2015
Complete requested information, sign and dateemail to [e-mail] . Attachments are acceptable for clarification
purposes (location map, address or lat long is required). Information submitted is subject to NC Public Records Law and may be
requested by third parties. Review meetings are held on Tuesday afternoons.
CONTACT INFORMATION
APPLICANT'S AGENT
APPLICANT
1. Business/Company Name
Maser Consulting
Piedmont Natural Gas
2. Contact Person
Jacqueline McCort
Megan Plassman
3. Street Address or P O Box
5275 Parkway Plaza Blvd, Suite 100
4301 Yancey Road
4. City, State, Zip
Charlotte,NC 28217
Charlotte, INC 28217
5. Telephone Number
980-245-3161 Ext. 5633
704-587-63455
6. E -Mail Address
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
PROJECT INFORMATION
7. Project Name
Rushmore Drive 16 -inch Steel Distribution Project
Charlotte
8. Project Location (nearest town, city)
9. Lat-Long Coordinates or attach a map
See Attached Map (35.057186, 80.862044)
10. County
Mecklenburg
Catawba HUC-8 (03050103)
11. River Basin & Cataloging Unit (8 -digit)
(See Note 1)
Owner Type: Q Government Private
12. Project Type *indicate owner type and
write in project type (e.g. school, church, retail,
residential, apartments. road utilities, military,
Project Type: Utility (Natural Gas)
etc.)**
13. Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) (e.g., 0.13)
0.395
14. Non -Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.)
0.00
0.00
15. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.)
16. Stream Impact (ft.) (e.g. 1,234)
Warm
Cool
Cold
NIA
NIA
NIA
17. Riparian Buffer Impact (sq. ft.)
Include subwatershed If Jordan or Falls Lake:
Zone 1:
Zone 2:
NIA
N/A
18. Regulatory Agency Staff Contacts
NCDWR:
USACE: David Shaeffer
Other:
Check (,.) below if this request is for a;
By signing below, the applicant is confirming they have
revision to a current acceptance
read and understand the DMS refund policy posted at
nceep.net and attached to this form.
renewal of an expired acceptance
Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent:
extension of unexpired acceptance
- 12/31/2018
Date:
a
Note 1: For help in determining the Cataloging Unit, visit:w(43k.nce *,gel or contact DMS
Direct questions to Kelly Williams at 919-707-8915 or [e-mail] or to the front desk at 919-707-8976

Refund Policv for Fees Paid to DMS In -Lieu Fee Programs (9121/2009
Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to make clear the circumstances and process under which a
permittee can obtain a refund while simultaneously balancing customer service and responsible
business practices. This policy applies to all refund requests made on or after the publication date of
this policy.
Policy Statement: The policy of DMS is to allow for refunds under certain conditions.
1. All refund requests must be made in writing to the DMS In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator at
kelly.williamsencderingov.
2. All refund requests are subject to fund availability. DMS does not guarantee fund availability for
any request.
3. The request must either come from the entity that made the payment or from an authorized agent.
Third parties requesting refunds must provide written authorization from the entity that made the
payment specifying the name and address of the authorized refund recipient.
4. Refund requests related to unintended overpayments, typographical errors or incorrect invoices
should be brought the attention of the In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator as soon as possible. Such
requests are typically approved without delay.
5. Payments made under the incremental payment procedure are not eligible for refunds.
6. Refund requests made within nine months of payment to DMS will only be considered for requests
associated with projects that have been terminated or modified where the permittee's mitigation
requirements have been reduced. Such requests must be accompanied by written verification from the
permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the permits have been rescinded or have been
modified, or the mitigation requirements have been reduced.
7. Refund requests made more than nine months from the payment date will only be considered for
permits that were terminated or modified to not require any mitigation. Such requests must be
accompanied by written verification from the permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the
permits have been rescinded and/or mitigation is no longer required.
8. Refund requests not meeting the criteria specified above are not eligible for a refund.
9. Refund requests that meet the criteria above will be elevated to DMS Senior Management for
review. The following considerations apply to all refund requests:
a. availability of funds after consideration of all existing project and regulatory obligations
b. the date the payment was made
c. the likelihood DMS can use the mitigation procured using the payment to meet other
mitigation requirements
10. Once a refund has been approved, the refund recipient must provide a completed W-9 form to the
DMS In -Lieu fee Program Coordinator within two weeks in order to process the refund though the
State Controller's Office.
11. All decisions shall be final.

ROY COOPER
Governor
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental QuWtry
MICHAEL S. REGAN Janua 29, 2019
Secretary January
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Dlrector
Megan Plassman
Piedmont Natural Gas
PO Box 33068
Charlotte, NC 28233 Expiration of Acceptance: 7/29/2019
Project: Rushmore Drive 16 -inch Steel Distribution Project County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type
8 -di it HUC
I Catawba + 03050103 Riparian Wetland
Impact Quantity
0.395
'"DMS proposes to utilize the Catawba 03 Expanded Service Area to meet the mitigation requirement.
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
ames. B Stan r-
sse Management Supervisor
cc: Jacqueline McCort, agent
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
47 W.Jones Street 11652 Mad Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919,7078976