640074_NOV-2019-DV-0144_20190214

-d'uI I-wv -vi
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - ''4( 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Q'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: .-( i'iM Arrival Time: a - :®7.-- Departure Time: /‘-(AND County: Region:
Farm Name: /hii l'y►iOY) PO r Owner Email:
Owner Name: 14) a l lt. l4'74-►'y a S u V✓ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
•Onsite Representative: Y)�p h4.4() U l= UGC 14.4.-yt- Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish _Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
•
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operatio 9 Yes ❑ No El NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA El NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? /1,/)C 4/61)tvy ! SOcefr,c --
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 121<ro NA El NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ' ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: : (,' C/ - .7 / Date of Inspection: '1/y/ / 1
w
Waste Collection-&'Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes MEN.o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
C X l r
Identifier: F uu' (
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): I- `( Z `f 2 L/ 1 -7
•, 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
..
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
7
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a E Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental th eat,notify DWR
,` 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ?10 NA El NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Y.:;•(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
N.�
:u.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No NA E NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
-11.Is they vidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Excessive Ponding . Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground E Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
El PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ElApplication Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): jervn-tr , S'n 9 rig.;h V Ve4-J-t4
13. Soil Type(s): /
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 12 ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 1Ern
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No El NA NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 2 NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking El Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �uf
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 6 y - 7 L/ I Date of Inspection: Z/(y / /j7
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA . ]�NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Comp] 04 }' Vr-e-d, 6 ..( R i20 o y► T Burs d4-y) fay 0,vts ,4)h o►=
Lon a &wfr /,4-1 t444_3 j► 554,cl 4 2l2D U MI c v1 Wlbh 8nyi L—J II/ 7011.
C O 16.1 IA/xl i„ S- 0r t a c/ -r 11.s C ✓ t�12 ✓�- cl Soc 2 -� -}-� f%(G}✓w. ld r� d 5 4►-o n9
�-�a✓ t 44.5 , 6c * ✓� cl S (rtr7 tkvlL i n C:0 er.
o�, l) w Sfra Ha ita.d vuh 0YP v L444 ��
S �� I �r�/ds . d 1� 7' 2 5— V D sG ��pd
�L.�►- ¢ -� S�nJy C terra-�� )2 w I IJ rn I:- 1— �VUU/IVv�
h 0 s 5
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: Ciie) ??/ / Zv o
/— / q
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /3 LG 5 �t/� G�6L✓/// Date: ?-/
/
V (
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015