WQ0013037_Staff Report_20190222

State of North Carolina
.go Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
February 21,2019
To: Non-Discharge Unit Application No.: W00013037
Attn: Ranveer Katyal Facility name: 356 Marshall Rd SIR
County: Chatham
From: Joan Schneier
Raleigh Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non-discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non-
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or❑No
a. Date of site visit: 01/29/2019
b. Site visit conducted by: J. Schneier
c. Inspection report attached? ❑Yes or®No
d. Person contacted: Chris Walker and their contact information: (919)270- 1462 ext.
e. Driving directions: Are correct in BIMS
2. Discharge Point(s):
Latitude: Longitude:
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Classification:
River Basin and Subbasin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
H. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes or❑No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions(soils, depth to water table,etc)consistent with the submitted reports? ❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site(property lines, wells, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no, please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR04-14 Pagel of5

6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g., hydraulic,nutrient) acceptable? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑Yes or❑No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals,will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If yes,attach list of sites with restrictions(Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
11. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
III.EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge(ORCs)for the facility? ❑Yes.❑No ®N/A
ORC: Certificate#: Backup ORC: Certificate#:
2. Are the design,maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ❑ Yes or❑No
If no, please explain:
Description of existing facilities: Roughly: Septic tank, dosing tank, surface sand filter, chlorinator, pump storage
tank,high water alarms,9050 sq ft spray field with 7 heads.
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow: 360 gpd
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know(i.e., equipment condition,function,maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.).
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils,topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit(e.g., drainage added,new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes,please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or❑No
If no, please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates(e.g., hydraulic,nutrient)still acceptable? ®Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ❑ Yes or®No
If no,please explain: See comment 4
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no, please explain:
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 WQ0013037 Page 2 of 5

11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no, please complete the following ex and table if necessary):
Monitoring Well Latitude Longitude
0 , 11 0 1 11
0 , II 0 1 11
0 , „ 0 ,
11
0 1 II 0 , II
0 , II 0 ,
11
12. Has a review of all self-monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR,NDMR,NDAR, GW)? ❑Yes or❑No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: n/a
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes, please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
®No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments(i.e.,NOV,NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle,please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no, please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ®No ❑N/A
If yes,please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Not likely
17. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 W00013037 Page 3 of 5

IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non-Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item Reason
n/a
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
n/a
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
n/a
5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ Deny(Please state reasons: )
6. Signature of report preparers
Signature of regional supervisor:
Date:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 WQ0013037 Page 4 of 5

V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
1- The facility lat-long was slightly tweaked in BIMS.
2- The center of the field was GPSed in 2015 with point averaging and differential correction at 35.813113, .
-79.236646.
3- Please add a pump each^to the dosing and pump/storage tanks (total of 2).
4- This system evidently never had a rain sensor, as checked on the ground and earlier permits.
5- RRO Note-This parcel is close to some of the Purvis Land&Timber lots but is not one of them.
6- RRO Note-The house is new and replaced a trailer that was in the same location earlier but burned a few years
back. The principal components of the system were re-used but portions had to be re-worked.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 W00013037 Page 5 of 5

11 11 1 1 / •
iT_�� .� Z -lwlr • a >T •c]: a 't'"G c- 5,' >i7•. 1 - - ..,t -aa• .K �...
w +• a e' a s 4 4.#' a ''�et 1, IL _' S f, ' �` ! "°,' Yr `3t✓..ja+y+��r"�`';
.} .E4' WCI a .a
R p l
�« }, iF�� rf ^° a . r�- . � ro`a7+' r, . � �t'� g, thaw ♦R:
1� s,�, •'��r '� . f r," r # ;.� g" ." +a 'i r % w %Q�Q.,«f',�..�`�b
• is •-..`S 4 5i « - ;. .. ♦ I`I rla 1+ `y 1 .�..{.+ n /? !j
iR .• .' a�YI r '' 4 ih'S'• • 1 e � at � t r}�e r 'fad, � «� ��R?a... >i i w {tf* !Yr � r i 1 y A � t r +Y'l ♦ aa,!' _ r q,.
1 K i . • . 11 Y� 1
^°`
1 f _a ! M S �• �, '•dY J xgy5t L. h
'} ,', 1 ♦*qy t per+ ��+'�..+''. y• ,I 3' 4 a1Ji99 «♦ (I i, r_ V
x@�:+«...`,..*;` k' a�,i,� y•j�,i r_ w ti, �x'S„geyv. . w ;t, � ,t."�
t•. ,� }
sY ya�t 't.f i. � 1'•` x.MMv',. ' *t+ �M • s{4i>;, {, .M # t".
RR• tiF. n 4r - id+ t # tl if". «ip""«r # ` .p • .^ ;' c--`t'�e
�. �5 t 1} 4
Pr 5,-« � • ,,d• � .v 1�'^.fit �e t �F:. yk x t�?� .t,. +� .x' *� Y.
#,ri] ;F r i f. .• A i r '+`.rro t e,l 5* k #z % Fy ia#* 'a,� 3 ,re +e „�. e � 4 . ,t 1 5
�� t;v fire �,t', k f ! _a' r" !'tS •i t * + i•«1
,P !•'� v�,f, Y ` t*'S a., •�,"�"fir a.��-^ f 1, " F Y "t' w � � • �' �' '
ry, �F Sh •* � � 1-, - , r
'� Mh1';4r; #a•�x W r �R,ylky , h, ] r �, I,,,�,/` tt. ,k. K^'
!'"�� f xr�, w f S' c • ��k Gi•�c � ' i + 1/l`.i�V.lri ,k
t a.• er �'SriAe°+1•.�a.ry t.� �k Y8. „�! 3..-. . ., •` ti
t . I iry + w a'• ri' trr l; Ei ''xy*, R#Y i ; d. .tt s• 59•nt(,'.:1
Ar
r,�nb+� fk�h{� } rar'� aI 1, �% i r -0 r Y'� f �p 5 j r•Y w. r y-;•`F"-'�.Y r � i.. yR
, rf
�'� �*[ri yr tF .y f _�1 it at F r ` flr f 'y•� � � '. � R t /r & .. 11 N .. .°,., �,•
5 � -4 }. Z '} i � 1, . k L •t ' �.F
•ii iv' a• :,7 ,A Y. 4}y. 1_ !'� 'ryc� a• �C'�". i i. •��wi.F •f A r. a n. �:'il L 5..,° •F
IM
} •
s. A ^ - a - •rl
`i
t

-/
Marshall
(1 YH7}�TL '�-,ter l»Y' .. YIY la'C InY .• .
O �J
NYYWd
YT la1n
TYrr YYY'
IrwYNq.»
'0..xLw leq N,.N
r
Ydnily Map ,:: ::p
...
a
SUR
.. CMNYYYWNIaV.Ir f�Wrq ZYirIlOM11n xuhidYM. 0.M 1WrIN�s�is. .
' w Y.»RLYY/.Y1nbYMY»(LXaaas '. - _
. I:.YYmwY✓�}LaS'Yr+M. .. ... .. .:'.. i .. - -.. .. iYMRLTH IC ..IIY»Yrrp'n' � .
'.YNIY».i»YIFNIw�Y»»vI»nYNI':__. .•..• ...
vxgaTwr " .
NGgiLallaldugrSibdNaqn -.. ..
-
t.�.www�
General Noles..
orYN
• .. .. CwNIY. .• LIY TIY XLd MhMi»/MY11wLw. ... ..
:LEGEND: J. .. rJ
hn Edward Foster, Jc, I -
.
t ryT
B CWNrtOroYI M1CFI .: :. .. I .:
HadfwTovaiship -
cMianglgLNVY�NnaONNCa YI .im chatlt m Nidh Carolina 4
l pwga.xMTnq umu uvknuY[ - I4 J=,aaq,'aPhMStuwntfao
� ..
' :_., iionLYeaemuanrou LI(1 rnl sYY r•m;� v»Yb m.w..lr wa Cwo"
♦7 MLMDWN "' .. .... � »I.YYNNr�Ir» . L ryYYwY wYYn.+