20180661 Ver 1_Additional Information Received Email_20180601

Moore, Andrew W
From: Kaylie Yankura <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2018 11:34 AM
To: Brown, David W CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Cc: Leslie, Andrea J; Hamstead, Byron; Moore, Andrew W
Subject: [External] RE: Second Request of Additional Information - Mud Creek Interceptor Sewer
Line
Attachments: 802 PCN - Revised Impact Table 5.31.18.pdf; 17100 Mud Creek Interceptor - Wetland
and Stream Impacts Revised 053118_Reduced.pdf; Clearwater Memo 5-31-18
_Reduced.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.<mailto:[e-mail]>
David,
Please see the responses below:
1) The re -submitted PCN wetland impacts table does not note the permanent impacts to forested and shrub -shrub
wetlands by conversion to herbaceous wetlands within the permanently maintained corridor along the utility right of
way. Please revise and resubmit this table noting in the comment section that approximately 0.5 acres of wetlands will
be permanently impacted due to conversion for the establishment of a 10 -ft wide permanent maintenance corridor.
Please see the attached/revised impacts table for the project. I apologize for prior confusion regarding this information.
2) The applicant is proposing broad impacts to WoUS for this project. Provide an analysis of alternatives to the proposed
sewer line alignment. This analysis should also include the feasibility of using alternative construction methods and
sewer line operation techniques in order to minimize impact to jurisdictional aquatic resources.
WGLA Engineering has prepared a memo addressing alternatives, which is attached for review.
3) The submitted documents do not note construction access points/corridors to the project area. Please submit
plans/maps locating these corridors and noting if impacts to WoUS will occur for these access features.
Please reference the figure included with the attached WGLA memo.
An updated impact map is also attached. Wetland Impacts #17 (W18), #18 (W19), and #19 (W21) were located in prior
converted cropland and have been removed from the impact map and impact table.
Please contact me if you have further questions or require any additional information.
Thanks,
Kaylie
-----Original Message -----
From: Brown, David W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 12:17 PM
To: Kaylie Yankura <[e-mail]>

Cc: Leslie, Andrea J <[e-mail]>; Hamstead, Byron <[e-mail]>; Moore, Andrew W
<[e-mail]>
Subject: Second Request of Additional Information - Mud Creek Interceptor Sewer Line
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Asheville, NC
Kaylie Yankura,
The Corps has received and reviewed your comments and documents per the Corps' request for additional information
dated March 26, 2018, for the Mud Creek Interceptor Sewer Line project in Hendersonville, Henderson County, NC. After
review and evaluation of the submitted documents, the Corps is requesting the following additional information.
1) The re -submitted PCN wetland impacts table does not note the permanent impacts to forested and shrub -shrub
wetlands by conversion to herbaceous wetlands within the permanently maintained corridor along the utility right of
way. Please revise and resubmit this table noting in the comment section that approximately 0.5 acres of wetlands will
be permanently impacted due to conversion for the establishment of a 10 -ft wide permanent maintenance corridor.
2) The applicant is proposing broad impacts to WoUS for this project. Provide an analysis of alternatives to the proposed
sewer line alignment. This analysis should also include the feasibility of using alternative construction methods and
sewer line operation techniques in order to minimize impact to jurisdictional aquatic resources.
3) The submitted documents do not note construction access points/corridors to the project area. Please submit
plans/maps locating these corridors and noting if impacts to WoUS will occur for these access features.
At this time, the request to utilize NWP 12 for authorization of impacts to WoUS is on hold until the above additional
information has been received. Once the Corps receives the information noted above we will be able to continue to
process your request. If you have any questions please contact me.
Sincerely,
David Brown, PG
Regulatory Specialist/Geologist
USACE Wilmington District -Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
828-271-7980, ext. 4232
[e-mail]

WGLA Engineering, PLLC
7245 th Avenue West
Hendersonville, NC 28739
[phone] wgla.com
►A1aAIs] :7_1RKul AI
TO: Ms. Kaylie Yankura
Clearwater Environmental
FROM: Will Buie, P. E. a,)d gue-�—
WGLA Engineering, PLLC
RE: Mud Creek Sewer Extension
Project Clarifications
WGLA# 17100
DATE: May 31, 2018
We are in receipt of your email with additional questions from Mr. David Brown with the US Army
Corps of Engineers related to the Mud Creek Sewer Extension project. Below is a summary of the
questions and responses to each:
2) The applicant is proposing broad impacts to WoUS for this project. Provide an analysis of
alternatives to the proposed sewer line alignment. This analysis should also include the feasibility of
using alternative construction methods and sewer line operation techniques in order to minimize
impact to jurisdictional aquatic resources.
During the planning for the proposed Mud Creek project WGLA, Henderson County and Fletcher
Academy considered a number of alternatives to eliminating the Fletcher Academy wastewater
treatment facility and discharge. These alternatives considered construction of a new wastewater
treatment facility for Fletcher Academy. This alternative was eliminated due to environmental
considerations. A new treatment plant would continue to discharge to a zero flow stream.
Additionally, the cost for the operation and maintenance of the new treatment plant would place a
considerable financial burden on Fletcher Academy. Finally, this alternative would not allow
Henderson County to eliminate a major pump station in their system.
Another alterative considered was installation of a pump station and force main in lieu of a gravity
sewer line. Based on preliminary cost estimates, this alterative would be more expensive than a
gravity sewer line when considering operation and maintenance costs of both the new pump station
and the existing Naples pump station that will be eliminated. Further, this alternative did not follow
or further the County and Cane Creek's sewer system master plan for providing sewer service to
areas not currently served.
C I V I L E N G I N E E R S & L A N D P L A N N E R S

Ms. Kaylie Yankura
May 31, 2018
Page 2
The alternative of the gravity sewer option was selected since is was a better solution
environmentally considering it eliminated a wastewater discharge. It provided access to sewer along
the route and was in keeping with the County's sewer system master plan. Further, the gravity sewer
option was considered the best option from a financial standpoint when considering operation and
maintenance costs.
During the course of design, alternative routes, in some locations, as well as wider corridors were
delineated for streams and wetlands. The delineation provided information so that the sewer line
routing could be adjusted slight to avoid or minimize impacts. In many cases however, adjustment of
the line was not possible to avoid all impacts. Additionally, the alternative route around the Garren
property (see attached Figure 5) would have resulted in a greater impact to forest wetlands.
Related to alternative construction methods, boring through or under the wetland areas was
considered but eliminated from consideration due to costs. The cost for a gravity sewer bore is
approximately $400 — 500 per linear foot. The cost for excavation and installation of a gravity sewer
line is less than half the cost of a bore. Further, it is very difficult to install a bore at the minimal
grade necessary to support the gravity sewer option. For those reasons, the alternative of a bore for
the sewer line was eliminated.
3) The submitted documents do not note construction access points/corridors to the project area.
Please submit plans/maps locating these corridors and noting if impacts to WoUS will occur for these
access features.
Please find attached a copy of a plan showing construction access locations for the project. The access will be
from Rugby Road, US Hwy 25, Old Asheville Road, existing farm roads and from the Fletcher Academy
property. These access locations have been approved by NCDOT and Fletcher Academy.
If you have further questions or need more information, don't hesitate to contact our office.
724 5th Avenue West, Hendersonville, NC 28739 Phone [phone] wglaxom

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number -
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
Wetland Impact
W1 ❑ P ®T
#1 -Wetland 1
PFO
® Yes
® Corps
0.345 AC
(W1), Sewer Line
El No
® DWQ
Installation
Wetland Impact
W1 ®P ❑ T
#1 -Wetland 1
PFO
® Yes
® Corps
0.172 AC
(W1), Maintained
El No
® DWQ
Corridor
Wetland Impact
W2 ❑ P ®T
#2 - Wetland 2
PEM
El Yes
® Corps
0.003 AC
(W2), Sewer Line
® No
® DWQ
Installation
Wetland Impact
W3 ❑ P ®T
#3 - Wetland 3
PEM
El Yes
® Corps
0.001 AC
(W3), Sewer Line
® No
® DWQ
Installation
Wetland Impact
W4 ❑ P ®T
#4 - Wetland 4
PFO
® Yes
® Corps
0.179 AC
(W4), Sewer Line
El No
® DWQ
Installation
Wetland Impact
W4 ®P ❑ T
#4 - Wetland 4
PFO
® Yes
® Corps
0.09 AC
(W4), Maintained
El No
® DWQ
Corridor
Wetland Impact
W5 ❑ P ®T
#5 - Wetland 5
PEM
El Yes
® Corps
0.019 AC
(W5), Sewer Line
® No
® DWQ
Installation
Wetland Impact
W6 [-] P ®T
#6 - Wetland 6
PFO
® Yes
® Corps
0.002 AC
(W6), Sewer Line
El No
® DWQ
Installation
Wetland Impact
W6 ®P ❑ T
#6 - Wetland 6
PFO
® Yes
® Corps
0.001 AC
(W6), Maintained
❑ No
® DWQ
Corridor
Wetland Impact
W7 [:1 P ®T
#7 - Wetland 7
PEM
El Yes
® Corps
0.004 AC
(W7), Sewer Line
® No
® DWQ
Installation
Wetland Impact
W8 ❑ P ®T
#8 - Wetland 8
PEM
El Yes
® Corps
0.003 AC
(W8), Sewer Line
® No
® DWQ
Installation
Wetland Impact
W9 ❑ P ®T
#9 - Wetland 9
PEM
El Yes
® Corps
0.002 AC
(W9), Sewer Line
® No
® DWQ
Installation
Wetland Impact
❑ Yes
® Corps
W10 ❑ P ®T
#10 - Wetland 10
PEM
® No
® DWQ
0.019 AC
W10 , Sewer
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Line Installation
Wetland Impact
W11 E] P ®T
#11 — Wetland 11
PEM
El Yes
® Corps
0.034 AC
(W11), Sewer
® No
®DWQ
Line Installation
Wetland Impact
W12 ❑ P ®T
#12 — Wetland 12
PFO
® Yes
® Corps
0.215 AC
(W12), Sewer
El No
® DWQ
Line Installation
Wetland Impact
W12 ®P ❑ T
#12 — Wetland 12
PFO
® Yes
® Corps
0.108 AC
(W12), Maintained
El No
® DWQ
Corridor
Wetland Impact
® Yes
® Corps
W13 ❑ P ® T
#13 — Wetland 13
PFO
❑ No
® DWQ
0.232 AC
(W13), Sewer Line
Wetland Impact
W13 ® P ❑ T
#13 — Wetland 13
PFO
® Yes
® Corps
0.116 AC
(W13), Maintained
❑ No
® DWQ
Corridor
Wetland Impact
W14 E] P ®T
#14— Wetland 15
PEM
El Yes
® Corps
0.029 AC
(W15), Sewer
® No
® DWQ
Line Installation
Wetland Impact
W15 E] P ®T
#15 — Wetland 16
PEM
El Yes
® Corps
0.025 AC
(W16), Sewer
® No
® DWQ
Line Installation
Wetland Impact
W16 E] P ®T
#16 — Wetland 17
PEM
El Yes
® Corps
0.053 AC
(W17), Sewer
® No
® DWQ
Line Installation
2g. Total wetland impacts
1.652
2h. Comments: Total Wetland impacts are 1.652 AC (Total Temporary Impacts = 1.165 AC, Total Permanent Impacts =
0.487 AC).
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ® T
Stream Impact #1
— Sewer Line
S1 — UT Mud
® PER
® Corps
2-5
20 LF
Installation
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S2 ❑ P ® T
Stream Impact #2
— Sewer Line
S2 — UT Mud
® PER
® Corps
15-25
20 LF
Installation
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S3 ❑ P ® T
Stream Impact #3
— Sewer Line
S3 — UT Mud
® PER
® Corps
2-5
20 LF
Installation
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S4 ❑ P ® T
Stream Impact #4
— Sewer Line
S5 — UT Mud
® PER
® Corps
2-5
20 LF
Installation
Creek
INT
®DWQ
S5 ❑ P ® T
Stream Impact #5
S6 — UT Mud
® PER
® Corps
2-5
20 LF
— Sewer Line
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Mud Creek Intercepter (+/- 13 AC)
... • , 71
�; _ ,"M`�'� +�` moi' ",:_ -
�. eet 5 • - t''' PotentiallyJurisdictonal Water Jurisdictional wetlands and waters identified on this map have
• � � `� fj Wetland (AC) Stream (LF) been located within sub -meter accuracy utilizing a Trimble
W1 3.077 S1 221.4
W2 0.003 S2 20.1 mapping grade Global Positioning System (GPS) and the
W3 0.001 S3 20.0 subsequent differential correction of that data. GPS points may
W4 0.269 s4 56.8 demonstrate uncorrectable errors due to topography, vegetative
r Ws 0.019 s5 20.0 t cover, and/or multipath signal error.
.J W6 0.003 S6 20.6
W7 0.004 S7 21.9 Note: The illustrated wetland and stream locations are '
f f W8 0.003
W9 0.002 approximate. These areas have been flagged in the field;
W10 0.019 however, they have not been surveyed. Although ClearWater
' W11 0.034 Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) is confident in our
❑ ; - _ _— W12 0.323 assessment, the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the only
W13 0.698 - agency that can make final decisions regarding jurisdictional
Sheet 5B W14 0.005 wetland and waters of the US delineations. Therefore, all
W 0.029 x
w1616 0.025 preliminary determinations are subject to change until written
` . W17 0.053 verification is obtained. CEC strongly recommends that written
W18 0.040 verification be obtained from the Corps prior to closing on the
1 "• ! •'� ' W19 0.008 property, beginning any site work, or making any legal reliance
n V. w20 0.515 on this determination.
Q W21 0.111
Total 5.241 Total 338.3
Q p_ This map was prepared by CEC using the best information
available to CEC at the time of production. This map is for
f] informational purposes only and should not be used to determine
precise boundaries, roadways, property boundary lines, nor legal
"•;; �,_ . K descriptions. This map shall not be construed to be an official
survey of any data depicted.
Sheet 5C &
Source Data: City of Hendersonville and field collected data.
4'.
Sheet 5E f F...
AI QW1-
.e{^
�
LTJ ?-
aA
x r Proposed Sewer Easement
Countours
C N
Linear Wetland ; j, {
Stream >>
Sheet 5D
Wetland (Forested) �
0 0.25 0.5 1
® Wetland (Herbaceous) 1l
Miles
Drawn by: AKT 11.30.17; CEC Project# 802 " NC 9 , P
Center,for Geo ra hio Informatio. is
Henderson County, [LearWaker Stream and Wetland
North Carolina Delineation Map Key
32 Clayton Street Figure 5

I
IGOR, E 1.01
t�
1� ?" zt--,.- ,
L -------.-
I
I
I
I
L--------- —
SUMMARY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACTS 120 LF TOTAL
(20 LF PER IMPACT)
PROPOSED TEMPORARY LINEAR
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.016 AC TOTAL)
PROPOSED FORESTED
WETLAND IMPACTS (1.466 AC TOTAL)
PROPOSED TEMPOARY HERBACEOUS
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.179 AC TOTAL)
GRAPHIC SCALE
em ao° ,om snm
(INFM)
Wetland ID
Right -of Way Width (ft)
Stream ID
Right -of Way Width (ft)
W1
40
S1
40
W2
25
S2
25
W3
25
S3
25
W4
25
S4
N/A
W5
25
S5
25
W6
25
S6
25
W7
25
S7
20
W8
25
W9
25
W10
25
W 11
25
W12
25
W13
25
W14
N/A
W15
25
W16
25
W17
25
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
724 5th AVENUE WEST
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28739
[phone]
WGLA.COM
NC LICENSE P-1342
MUD CREEK
INTERCEPTOR
HENDERSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
%till
_ 96. o�
0
SEAL
22989 0
o
0000
'let I I t
REVISIONS
DATE DESCRIPTION
omr
CQP
Know. wnars below.
Call beforeyou dig.
PROJECT 17100
DATE: 1/9/17
DRAWN BY: JWB
CHECKED BY: WRB
WETLAND AND
STREAM IMPACTS
OVERVIEW
FIGURE 3.0
SCALE: 1"= 1000'

CATAWBA RIVER ROAD
CONNECTION TO
EXISTING MANHOLE
GRAPHIC SCALE
(n+ rye )
OWNER:
CANE CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT
HENDERSON COUNTY
CONTACT: MARCUS JONES, PE
1 HISTORIC COURT HOUSE SQUARE
SUITE 6
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28792
[phone]
I
SUMMARY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY STREAM
-- IMPACTS 120 LF TOTAL
(20 LF PER IMPACT)
_A PROPOSED TEMPORARY LINE
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.016 AC jTOTAL)
PROPOSED FORESTED
WETLAND IMPACTS (1.466 AC TOTAL)
t
PROPOSED TEMPOARY HERBACEOUS -,O WETLAND IMPACTS (0.179 AC TOTAL)
STREAM IMPACT #1
• ` S1 (STREAM IMPACT)
• '� 20 LF
• WETLAND IMPACT #1
• W1 (FbRESTED IMPACT)
' 0.517 ACC -RES
MATCH LINE "A" SEE FIGURE 1.1
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
724 5th AVENUE WEST
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28739
[phone]
WGLA.COM
NC LICENSE P-1342

SUMMARY J'APROPOSED TEMPORiRY"STREA0IMPACTS 120 LF'TbTAL(20 LF PER IMPACT\)PROPOSED TEMPORARY LINEARWETLAND IMPACTS (0.016 AC TOTAL)0 PROPOSED FORESTEDWETLAND IMPACTS (1.466 AC TOTAL)0 PROPOSED TEMPOARY HERBACEOUSWETLAND IMPACTS (0.179 AC TOTAL)'
GRAPHIC SCALE
1N rm)
WETLAND IMPACT #2
W2 (LINEAR IMPACT)`
0.003 ACRES
TZ—
�.
^' ~
�
WETLAND IMPACT #3—
VYJ (LINEAR IMPACT)
0.001 ACRES
\
MATCH UNE "A" SEE FIGURE 1.0
WETLAND IMPACT #5
' vvo \ncmo*Ucuuo /xxr-*u/
0.019 ACRES\
�
WETLAND |MPACT| .
�& #° ( /
0.003 ACRES
'kTLAND IMPACT #7
--(LINEAR IMPACT)
0.004 ACRES
08 (LINEAR IMPACT)
WGmENGINEERING, PLLC
724 5th AVENUE WEST
*swosnonwmus.mnzmo
[phone]
| vmLA.«»m |
| woLICENSE p -13m |
MUD CREEK
INTERCEPTOR
HEwoERSONCoumTY
NORTH CAROLINA
/F
o
AL
22989 oa
REVISIONS
,
WETLAND |K4PACT—�
W4 /FORESTED IMPACT)
`~�
0.289 ACRES
STREAM IMPACT #2
52 (STREAM IMPACT)
20 LF
W9 (LINEAR IMPA
0.002 ACR S
— -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --'-- -- -- --
MATCH UNE "B" SEE FIGURE 1.2
PROJECT 17100
DATE: 1/9/17
DRAWN BY: JWB
CHECKED BY WRB
WETLAND AND
STREAM IMPACTS
�|��U�����
: /����/ ^�- .�.��

D
STREAM IMPACT #3-----
S3
3-----S3 (STREAM IMPACT)
20 LF'"
WETLAND IMPACT #10
W10 (HERBACEOUS IMPACT)
0.019 ACRES
x
o '
,T)
ES
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 400
( at rmr )
SUMMARY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY STREAM
-- IMPACTS 120 LF TOTAL
(20 LF PER IMPACT)
PROPOSED TEMPORARY LINEAR
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.016 AC TOTAL),
PROPOSED FORESTED
WETLAND IMPACTS (1.466 AC TOTAL)
OPROPOSED TEMPOARY HERBACEOUS
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.179 AC TOTAL)
WETLAND IMPACT #12--/-
2
12—/-2 (FORESTED IMPACT) / ; <,;\ ' •' ' -
0.323 ACRES
MATCH LINE "B" SEE FIGURE 1.1
S OLD ASHEVILLE RD
(SR 1533)
' i'• �' ;�';? --jJ i WETLAND IMPACT #13
1N13 (FORESTED IMPACT)
0.348 ACRES
f � 9 _
^� � % �-' � • \fes: \�
MATCH LINE "C" SEE FIGURE 1.3
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
724 5th AVENUE WEST
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28739
[phone]
WGLA.COM
NC LICENSE P-1342
MUD CREEK
INTERCEPTOR
HENDERSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
°°
o oy-
�°
a
o SEAL
22989 °
o
0
REVISIONS
DATE DESCRIPTION
•
•
Knowwha" below.
Call before you dlg.
PROJECT 17100
DATE: 1/9/17
DRAWN BY: JWB
CHECKED BY: WRB
WETLAND AND
STREAM IMPACTS
FIGURE 3.3
SCALE: 1 "= 200'

WETLAND IMPACT
W15 (HERBACEOUS IMF
0.029 A
WETLANE
W16 (HERBACE
W17 (1
MATCH LINE "C" SEE FIGURE 1.2
UMMARY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY STREAM
— IMPACTS 120 LF TOTAL
(20 LF PER IMPACT)
PROPOSED TEMPORARY LINEAR
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.016 AC TOTAL)
PROPOSED 'F'ORESTED
WETLAND IMPACTS (1.466 AC TOTAL)
GRAPHIC SCALE
° ,°o 2oo 4Co
( IN 1iCf )
'PROPOSED TEMPOARY HERBACEOUS
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.179 AC TOTAL)
BLUE RIDGE RAILROAD
MATCH LINE "D" SEE FIGURE 1.4
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
724 5th AVENUE WEST
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28739
[phone]
WGLA.COM
NC LICENSE P-1342
MUD CREEK
INTERCEPTOR
HENDERSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
`� 11111111/,�
o
o SAL '
22989o
4
F '
*o o INET
• l �'d I MI
REVISIONS
DATE DESCRIPTION
e
•
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
PROJECT 17100
DATE: 1/9/17
DRAWN BY: JWB
CHECKED BY: WRB
WETLAND AND
STREAM IMPACTS
FIGURE 3.4
SCALE: 1 "= 200'

MATCH LINE "D" SEE
FIGURE 1.3 8c 1.5
SUMMARY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACTS 120 LF TOTAL , a�
"•. •..--!
`
is "`
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
(20 LF PER IMPACT) \'t;;
,
�``
i' r
\
724 5th AVENUE WEST
PROPOSED TEMPORARY LINEAR `\
(' ' `aa {
"ate
M 1 '
-% '.,t
HENDERSONVILLE,NC 28739
[phone]
s�
WGLA.COM
WETLAND IMPACTS 0.016 AC TOTAL
(
1
i I
NC LICENSE P-1342
MUD CREEK
PROPOSED FORESTED
WETLAND IMPACTS (1.466 AC TOTAL) `` J i;%% / i) —.
/j;.
;L
PROPOSED TEMPOARY HERBACEOUSa`
O
/
fr �
` �
INTERCEPTOR
WETLAND IMPACTS (0.179 AC TOTAL)',
y ���t
� � t �/ � ; I
".
- _
HENDERSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER LINE "C"
+
BYERS CREEK
SEAL o
``',++
g 22989 0
Jr •I�'��/61
i
i
i�
REVISIONS
DATE DESCRIPTION
a�
s
Know. whaCs belOW.
Cell before you dig.
�+
✓
PROJECT 17100
DATE: 1/9/17
DRAWN BY: JWB
CHECKED BY: WRB
WETLAND AND
STREAM IMPACTS
GRAPHIC SCALE
,m m �
( D1 rm )
FIGURE 3.5
SCALE: 1"= 200'

SUMMARY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACTS 120 LF TOTAL
(20 LF PER IMPACT) — x
PROPOSED TEMPORARY LINEAR
(4—
WETLAND
-WETLAND IMPACTS (0.016 AC TOTAL)
PROPOSED FORESTED
j WETLAND IMPACTS (1.466 AC TOTAL)
y PROPOSED TEMPOARY HERBACEOUS
O WETLAND IMPACTS (0.179 AC TOTAL)
VCR
f � �
kimgmir
�
1 STREAM IMPACT #6th
��'r // j� J< S7\(STREAMI IMR,ACT, �'��,�t1:
._r/, �/�✓/i/i/L� ii%/ , f%i/ // � �\ L"' � \� \� � � 1 � �/,� r i j '.•��•`.•_�\�\ iii
20
�F /"./ "/j/j�.�ij� /�: !%if�,l��'t"' �J��` 'i \ � \\•��\\1;\\t ?,,iG ' \•,�,� � ,/r' '`�.
✓!�/�\\�:'•. , `Jig s}-.
i ! :. // j'// � ` � � I�� tri' �\�\\� \ � i � � `"tom .' \�'`, \ 1 t _ i•' I � _._. (I i ✓
// -`—� i it � �, / it �I � �'/,�,// �\ � \� '\ ri \�� ��. �., �, •` l 1 - �:, Cwt /�,' In 1 � �
WA
, ry �//�r�///i�`.. _�f � r r,. _4'111 1 �� � \_cy � ,ai N,F` ` tit' \`i+`�! � irr/�.� •.�..
o. 5 / \ t�'- t``•\\ `1\ �'''`.• •\ ``` i i fir..-,� //r
/BYERS CREEK
�•.1i
' ✓/ ter- ��jr ! /�/%,//� r w�� \ = r s �tAA,
g.
0/0
MATCH LINE SEE FIGURE 1.4
GRAPHIC SCALE
IN FM
WGLA ENGINEERING, PLLC
724 51h AVENUE WEST
HENDERSONVILLE, NC 28739
[phone]
WGLA.COM
NC LICENSE P-1342
MUD CREEK
INTERCEPTOR
HENDERSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
\\111111 IIIII/
°ov ,
0 0
22989 o
o
00 0\
f1111111
REVISIONS
DATE DESCRIPTION
0
ellrwp
Know. r:below.
Call before you dlg.
PROJECT 17100
DATE. 1/9/17
DRAWN BY: JWB
CHECKED BY: WRB
WETLAND AND
STREAM IMPACTS
FIGURE 3.6
SCALE: 1"= 200'