Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190211 Ver 1_U-5875 Allen Road Final NRTR_20190215NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT Widening of SR 1203 (Allen Road) from SR 1467 (Stantonsburg Road) to US 13 (Dickinson Avenue Extension) Pitt County, North Carolina TIP U-5875 WBS Element No. 44677.1.1 THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit Natural Environment Section December 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS ......................................................1 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................... 1 3.1 Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Water Resources ................................................................................................................. 2 4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES .............................................................................................. 3 4.1 Terrestrial Communities .................................................................................................... 3 4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed .....................................................................................................4 4.1.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Coastal Plain Subtype) ............................................... 4 4.1.3 Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods (Blackwater Subtype) ........................................ 4 4.1.4 Mesic Pine Flatwoods .................................................................................................... 4 4.1.5 Terrestrial Community Impacts ..................................................................................... 4 4.2 Terrestrial Wildlife ............................................................................................................. 5 4.3 Aquatic Communities ......................................................................................................... 5 4.4 Invasive Species ................................................................................................................... 5 5.0 JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES .................................................................................... 5 5.1 Clean Water Act Waters of the U.S . ................................................................................. 5 5.2 Clean Water Act Permits ................................................................................................... 6 5.3 Coastal Area Management Act Areas of Environmental Concern ................................ 6 5.4 Construction Moratoria ..................................................................................................... 7 5.5 N.C. River Basin Buffer Rules ........................................................................................... 7 5.6 Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Navigable Waters .................................................... 7 5.7 Wetland and Stream Mitigation ........................................................................................ 7 5.7.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Impacts ................................................................... 7 5.7.2 Compensatory Mitigation of Impacts ........................................................................ 7 5.8 Endangered Species Act Protected Species ...................................................................... 7 5.9 Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act ................................................................. 10 5.10 Endangered Species Act Candidate Species ................................................................. 10 5.11 Essential Fish Habitat ..................................................................................................... 10 6.0 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................11 Appendix A Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Project Study Area Map Figure 3. Jurisdictional Features Map Figure 4. Natural Communities Map Appendix B Scientific Names of Species Identified in Report Appendix C Stream and Wetland Forms Appendix D Qualifications of Contributors LIST OF TABLES Table1. Soils in the study area ....................................................................................... 2 Table 2. Water resources in the study area ................................................................... 3 Table 3. Physical characteristics of water resources in the study area ....................... 3 Table 4. Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area .................................. 5 Table 5. Jurisdictional characteristics of water resources in the study area ............. 6 Table 6. Jurisdictional characteristics of wetlands in the study area ......................... 6 Table 7. Federally protected species listed for Pitt County ......................................... 8 Natural Resources Technical Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION STIP U-5875, Pitt County, N.C. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen and upgrade SR 1203 (Allen Road) for approximately 2.3 miles from SR 1467 (Stantonsburg Road) to US 13 (Dickenson Avenue Extension to a four-lane, divided facility with a raised median and curb and gutter with an at-grade railroad crossing near SR 1276 (Landfill Road) in Greenville (Figure 1). Bicycle and pedestrian improvements may also be included with the project. 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS All work was conducted in accordance with the NCDOT Natural Environment Section standard operating procedures and July 2012 NRTR template. Field work was conducted on August 24, 2016. Jurisdictional areas identiiied in the study area were verified by Tom Steffens of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Garcy Ward of North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) on November 3, 2016. The principal personnel contributing to this document were: Principal Investigator: Christopher Dustin Education: B.S. Environmental Science, 2009 Experience: Environmental Scientist, SEPI Engineering & Construction, 2015-Present Cal� Engineers and Consultants, 2010-2015 Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineations, natural communities assessment, GPS, GIS, Microstation, and document preparation Investigator: Education: Experience: Jason Hales, PWS M.S. Marine Science, 2001 Environmental Project Manager, SEPI Engineering & Construction, 2012-Present Environmental Scientist, Vertas, 2006-2012 Environmental Scientist, ESP Associates, 2004-2006 Environmental Scientist, CZR, 2002-2004 Responsibilities: Wetland and stream delineations, natural communities assessment, and T&E species assessment Additional personnel who contributed to portions of the field work and/or documentation for this project were Susan Westberry and Wendee Smith. Appendix D lists the qualifications of these contributors. 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES The study area lies in the coastal plain physiographic region of North Carolina. Topography in the project vicinity is comprised large, flat interstream divides with scattered stream systems (Figure 2). Elevations in the study area range from December 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report STIP U-5875, Pitt County, N.C. approximately 15 to 30 ft. above sea level. Land use in the project vicinity consists primarily of agricultural iields with scattered rural residences. Infill development is present in small portions and contains higher density residential and commercial uses. There are a limited number of small, forested areas concentrated mainly adjacent to stream features. 3.1 Soils The Pitt County Soil Survey identifies twelve soil types within the study area (Table 1). Table 1. Soils in the study area Soil Series Ma in Unit Draina e Class H dric Status Bibb com lex Bb Poorl Drained H dric Coxville fine sandy Co Poorly Drained Hydric loam Craven fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent CrB2 Moderately Well Drained Non-Hydric slopes, eroded Exum fine sandy loam, ExA Moderately Well Drained Non-Hydric 0 to 1 ercent slo es Goldsboro sandy loam, GoA Moderately Well Drained Hydric* 0 to 1 ercent slo es Goldsboro sandy loam, GoB Moderately Well Drained Non-Hydric 1 to 6 ercent slo es Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent Ly Somewhat Poorly Drained Hydric* slopes Norfolk sandy loam, 0 NrA Well Drained Non-Hydric to 1 percent slopes Norfolk sandy loam, 1 NrB Well Drained Non-Hydric to 6 percent slopes Ocilla loamy fine sand, OcB Somewhat Poorly Drained Hydric* 0 to 4 ercent slo es Rains fine sandy loam, Ra Poorly Drained Hydric 0 to 2 ercent slo es Wagram loamy sand, 0 waB Well Drained Non-Hydric to 6 ercent slo es *- Soils which are primarily non-hydric, but which may contain hydric inclusions 3.2 Water Resources Water resources in the study area are part of the Tar-Pamlico River basin [U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03020103]. Six streams were identified in the study area (Table 2). The location of these water resources is shown on Figures 3-1 to 3-4. The physical characteristics of the streams are provided in Table 3. 2 December 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report Table 2. Water resources in the study area STIP U-5875, Pitt County, N.C. Stream Name Map ID NCDWR Index Best Usage Number Classification UT1 to Greens Mill Run Stream SA 28-96 C;NSW UT2 to Greens Mill Run Stream SB 28-96 C;NSW UT3 to Greens Mill Run Stream SC 28-96 C;NSW Greens Mill Run Green Mills Run 28-96 C;NSW UT4 to Greens Mill Run Stream SD 28-96 C;NSW UTS to Greens Mill Run Stream SE 28-96 C;NSW Table 3. Physical characteristics of water resources in the study area Map ID Bank Bankful Water Channel Velocity Clarity Hei ht ft) Width (ft De th (in Substrate Stream SA 4-5 6-10 12-24 sand moderate slightly turbid Stream SB 8-10 4-6 12-24 sand moderate slightly turbid Stream SC 3-4 5-7 6-12 sand moderate slightly turbid Greens Mill 6-8 8-10 12-18 sand moderate slightly Run turbid Stream SD 3-4 5-7 6-12 sand moderate slightly turbid Stream SE 4-6 6-8 12-18 sand moderate slightly turbid There are no designated Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQV�, or water supply watersheds (WS-I or WS-II) within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area. There are no designated anadromous fish waters or Primary Nursery Areas (PNA) present in the study area. Greens Mill Run does not appear on the North Carolina 2014 Fina1303(d) list of impaired waters. One linear stormwater conveyance was delineated within the study area (delineated as UT6 to Greens Mill Run). This feature was deemed non jurisdictional during the field verification with USACE and NCDWR. 4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES 4.1 Terrestrial Communities Four terrestrial communities were identified in the study area: maintained/disturbed, mesic mixed hardwood forest (coastal plain subtype), coastal plain bottomland hardwoods (blackwater subtype), and mesic pine flatwoods. Figure 4 shows the location and extent of these terrestrial communities in the study area. A brief description of each December 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report STIP U-5875, Pitt County, N.C. community type follows. Scientific names of all species identified are included in Appendix B. 4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed Maintained/disturbed communities include lands in which the vegetation is periodically mowed, such as roadside shoulders and residential lawns. This community also includes agricultural fields that support soybean, tobacco, corn, and hay production. Maintained/disturbed areas are dominant in the study area and are present immediately alongside the roadway and extend down the fill slope. Within the project area, the maintained/disturbed community consist primarily of mowed grass and weedy edge species such as fescue and clover. Included in this type is also ornamental landscape plantings near churches and housing complexes as well as scattered loblolly pine trees in residential yards. 4.1.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Coastal Plain Subtype) The mesic mixed hardwood forest community is scattered throughout the study area in small wooded patches. The community is dominated by sweetgum, water oak, red maple, and black cherry in both the over- and midstory. The midstory also contained Chinese privet and raspberry. The herb layer is sparse and only poison ivy and muscadine grape were observed. 4.1.3 Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods (Blackwater Subtype) The coastal plain bottomland hardwood community type occurs in two small areas associated with the larger stream systems in the study area. Dominant species include red maple, American elm, water oak, willow oak, sweetgum, and loblolly pine. Poison ivy and muscadine grape were present in the herb layer. Wetland WB is located within the coastal plain bottomland hardwood community type. 4.1.4 Mesic Pine Flatwoods Mesic pine flatwoods are present in three small areas on the west side of Allen Road. This community consists of a loblolly pine overstory. The understory was sparse and contained sweetgum, red maple, and Chinese privet. 4.1.5 Terrestrial Community Impacts Terrestrial communities in the study area may be impacted by project construction as a result of clearing, grading, and paving of portions of the study area. At this time, decisions regarding the final alignment and design of the proposed project have not been made. Therefore, community data are presented in the context of total coverage of each type within the study area (Table 4). Once a final alignment and preliminary design have been determined, probable impacts to each community type will be calculated. 4 December 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report STIP U-5875, Pitt County, N.C. Table 4. Coverage of terrestrial communities in the study area Communit Covera e (ac.) Maintained/Disturbed 78.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Coastal Plain Subt pe) 6.7 Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods (Blackwater 3 � Subt e) Mesic Pine Flatwoods 2.9 Total 91.5 4.2 Terrestrial Wildlife Terrestrial communities in the study area are comprised of both natural and disturbed habitats that may support a diversity of wildlife species (those species actually observed are indicated with *). Mammal species that commonly exploit forested habitats, wetlands, and stream corridors found within the study area include species such as eastern gray squirrel*, gray fox, striped skunk, white-footed mouse, eastern cottontail, raccoon, Virginia opossum, and white-tailed deer. Birds common to the area include turkey vulture*, red-shouldered hawk, red-tailed hawk, American robin, northern cardinal, eastern towhee, American crow*, eastern bluebird, northern mockingbird, Carolina wren, song sparrow, white-throated sparrow, rock dove, pileated woodpecker, mourning dove, blue jay, American goldfinch, northern flicker, European starling, and tufted titmouse. Reptile and amphibian species that may use terrestrial communities located in the study area include the rough green snake, copperhead, rat snake, eastern box turtle*, eastern fence lizard, American toad, bullfrog, green anole, gray treefrog, and five-lined skink. 4.3 Aquatic Communities The aquatic community in the study area consists of portions of iive perennial stream systems. These streams could support Eastern mosquitofish, largemouth bass, grass carp, chain pickerel, gizzard shad, bowfin, flathead catfish, various darters, various shiners, and various sunfish. 4.4 Invasive Species One species from the NCDOT Invasive Exotic Plant List for North Carolina was found to occur in the study area. Chinese privet (Threat) is present in the mesic pine flatwoods and mesic mixed hardwood forest community types. NCDOT will manage invasive plant species as appropriate. 5.0 JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES 5.1 Clean Water Act Waters of the U.S. Six jurisdictional streams were identified in the study area (Table 5). The location of these streams is shown on Figures 3-1 to 3-4. NCDWR stream determination forms are included in Appendix C. The physical characteristics and water quality designation of the 5 December 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report streams are detailed in Section 3.2. The streams within the study area have been designated as warm water streams for the purposes of stream mitigation. Table 5. Jurisdictional characteristics of water resources in the study area Compensatory River Basin Map ID Length (ft.) Classification Miti ation Re uired guffer NCDWR USACE Stream SA 238 Intermittent No No Yes Stream SB 80 Perennial Yes No Yes Stream SB 60 Intermittent No No Yes Stream SC 206 Perennial Yes No Yes Greens Mill 376 Perennial Yes Yes Yes Run Stream SD 265 Perennial Yes No Yes Stream SE 766 Perennial Yes Yes Yes Total 1,991 One jurisdictional wetland (WB) was identified within the study area (Figure 3). Wetland classification and quality rating data are presented in Table 6. The study area lies within the Tar-Pamlico River basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020103). USACE wetland delineation forms and NCDWR wetland rating forms are included in Appendix C. A description of the terrestrial community at WB is presented in Section 4.1 (Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods, Blackwater Subtype). STIP U-5875, Pitt County, N.C. Table 6. Jurisdictional characteristics of wetlands in the study area NCWAM Hydrologic NCDWR Wetland Map ID Classification Classification Ratin� Area (ac.) WB Bottomland Hardwood Forest Riverine 14 0.01 5.2 Clean Water Act Permits Total 0.01 The proposed project has been designated as a State Environmental Assessment (EA) for the purposes of North Carolina (State) Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation. A Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 will likely be applicable to the project. The USACE holds the final discretion as to what permit will be required to authorize project construction. If a Section 404 permit is required then a Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) from the NCDWR will be needed. 5.3 Coastal Area Management Act Areas of Environmental Concern Pitt County is not a designated coastal county in North Carolina, therefore Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) regulations do not apply. 6 December 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report STIP U-5875, Pitt County, N. C. 5.4 Construction Moratoria No construction moratoria are expected for the project. In an email dated December 21, 2016 Travis Wilson of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) confirmed that WRC would not request an in water work moratorium on the project. 5.5 N.C. River Basin Buffer Rules The project study area falls within the protection area afforded by the Tar-Pamlico Buffer Protection Rules. Buffer mitigation requirements were determined during the jurisdictional determination field verification meeting and are shown in Table 5. 5.6 Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Navigable Waters Greens Mill Run has not been designated by the USACE as a Navigable Water under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. 5.7 Wetland and Stream Mitigation 5.7.1 Avoidance and Minimization of Impacts The NCDOT will attempt to avoid and minimize impacts to streams and wetlands to the greatest extent practicable in designing alternatives. At this time, no final design decisions have been made. 5.7.2 Compensatory Mitigation of Impacts The NCDOT will investigate potential on-site stream and wetland mitigation opportunities once fmal designs have been completed. If on-site mitigation is not feasible, mitigation will be provided by North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). 5.8 Endangered Species Act Protected Species As of March 9, 2015 the United States Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) lists four federally protected species for Pitt County (Table 7). Additionally, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) lists the federally endangered Atlantic sturgeon. A brief description of each species' habitat requirements follows, along with the Biological Conclusion rendered based on survey results in the study area. Habitat requirements for each species are based on the current best available information from referenced literature and/or USFWS. 7 December 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report Table 7. Federally protected species listed for Pitt County STIP U-5875, Pitt County, N.C. Scientific Name Common Name Federal Habitat Biological Status Present Conclusion Picoides borealis Red-cockaded woodpecker E No No Effect Trichechus manatus West Indian manatee E No No Effect cipenser oxyrinchus Atlantic sturgeon E No No Effect ox rinchus lliptio steinstansana Tar River spinymussel E Unknown Undetermined E - Endangered T - Threatened MA-LAA — May Affect-Likely to Adversely Affect Red-cockaded woodpecker USFWS optimal survey window: year round; November-early March (optimal) Habitat Description: The red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) typically occupies open, mature stands of southern pines, particularly longleaf pine, for foraging and nesting/roosting habitat. The RCW excavates cavities for nesting and roosting in living pine trees, aged 60 years or older, and which are contiguous with pine stands at least 30 years of age to provide foraging habitat. The foraging range of the RCW is normally no more than 0.5 miles. Biological Conclusion: No Effect The study area does not contain any open, mature stands of pine trees. The majority of the study area is developed or in agriculture and the forested areas in and near the study area are dense and very fragmented. There is not habitat for RCW in the study area. A review of NCNHP records, performed by NCNHP staff on September 7, 2016 indicates no known RCW occurrence within 1.0 mile of the study area. West Indian manatee USFWS optimal survey window: year round Habitat Description: Manatees have been observed in all the North Carolina coastal counties. Manatees are found in canals, sluggish rivers, estuarine habitats, salt water bays, and as far off shore as 3.7 miles. They utilize freshwater and marine habitats at shallow depths of 5 to 20 feet. In the winter, between October and April, manatees concentrate in areas with warm water. During other times of the year habitats appropriate for the manatee are those with sufficient water depth, an adequate food supply, and in proximity to freshwater. Manatees require a source of freshwater to drink. Manatees are primarily herbivorous, feeding on any aquatic vegetation present, but they may occasionally feed on fish. Biological Conclusion: No Effect The study area is more than 20 miles from any estuarine habitats and does not contain any streams large enough to support manatee. A review of NCNHP 8 December 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report STIP U-5875, Pitt County, N.C. records, performed by NCNHP staff on September 7, 2016 indicates no known West Indian manatee occurrence within 1.0 mile of the study area. Tar River spinymussel USFWS optimal survey window: year round Habitat Description: The Tar spinymussel is endemic to the Tar and Neuse River drainage basins in North Carolina. This mussel requires a stream with fast flowing, well-oxygenated, circumneutral pH water. The bottom should be composed of unconsolidated gravel and coarse sand. The water needs to be relatively silt-free, and stream banks should be stable, typically with many roots from adjacent riparian trees and shrubs. Biological Conclusion: Undetermined Habitat availability for Tar River spinymussel will be determined at a later time. A review of NCNHP records, performed by NCNHP staff on September 7, 2016 indicates no known Tar River spinymussel occurrence within 1.0 mile of the study area. Atlantic sturgeon USFWS/NMFS optimal survey window: surveys not required; assume presence in appropriate waters Habitat Description: Atlantic sturgeon spawn in freshwater in the spring and migrate to estuarine waters where they spend most of their lives. Spawning occurs in moderately flowing waters in the deep parts of large rivers between the salt front and fall line of large rivers. They occur in most major river systems along the eastern seaboard of the United States. The species prefers the near shore marine, estuarine, and riverine habitat of large river systems. Sub adults and adults live in coastal waters and estuaries when not spawning, generally in nearshore areas dominated by gravel and sand substrates. Long distance migrations away from spawning rivers are common. Large freshwater rivers that are unobstructed by dams or pollutants are imperative to successful reproduction. Biological Conclusion: No Effect Streams within the study area do not contain suitable habitat for Atlantic sturgeon. The streams within the study area are all small and slow moving. The study area is located more than 15 miles from a large river system and more than 30 miles from estuarine waters. A review of NCNHP records, performed by NCNHP staff on September 7, 2016 indicates no known Atlantic sturgeon occurrence within 1.0 mile of the study area. Northern long-eared bat The USFWS has developed a programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the USACE, and NCDOT for the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT 9 December 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report STIP U-5875, Pitt County, N.C. projects and activities. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is "May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect". The PBO provides incidental take coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for five years for all NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Pitt County, where STIP U-5875 is located. 5.9 Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forest in proximity to large bodies of open water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within 1.0 mile of open water. A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area, as well as the area within a 1.13-mile radius (1.0 mile plus 660 feet) of the project limits, was performed on August 22, 2016 using 2014 color aerials. No water bodies large enough or sufiiciently open to be considered potential feeding sources were identified. Since there was no foraging habitat within the review area, a survey of the project study area and the area within 660 feet of the project limits was not conducted. Additionally, a review of NCNHP records, performed by NCNHP staff on September 7, 2016 indicates no known bald eagle occurrence within 1.0 mile of the study area. Due to the lack of habitat and known occurrences, it has been determined that this project will not affect this species. 5.10 Endangered Species Act Candidate Species As of March 9, 2015, there are no Candidate species listed for Pitt County. 5.11 Essential Fish Habitat Pitt County is considered an inland county. No Essential Fish Habitat is present in or within 1.0 mile of the study area. 10 December 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report 6.0 REFERENCES STIP U-5875, Pitt County, N.C. Conant, R. and J.T. Collins. 1991. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians (Eastern and Central North America). 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 450 pp. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, Mississippi. Environmental Laboratory. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Regulatory Assistance Program. ERDC/EL TR-10-20. November 2010. Dorcas, Michael E. 2005. A Guide to Snakes of North Carolina. Davidson College. Menhinick, E. 1991. The Freshwater Fishes of North Carolina. Raleigh, North Carolina: NCWRC. National Wildlife Federation. 2007. Field Guide to Birds of North America. Sterling Publishing Co., Inc. New York. N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. 1995. Guidance for Rating the Values of Wetlands in North Carolina. Fourth version. N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. 1997. Common Plants of North Carolina. Water Quality Section. Report #97-01. August 1997. N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. 2014. Tar-Pamlico River Basin Water Resources Plan. Raleigh, North Carolina. http://deq.nc. og v/map-pa%tar-pamlico-river-basin N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. 2014. 2014 NC 303(d) List — Category 5 Final. December 19, 2014. http://portal.ncdenr. org/c/document_librar�get_file?uuid=140d4802-dc9e-4e4a- 8db2-lec3a336ceca&groupId=38364 N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. 2013. Surface Water Classifications. Tar-Pamlico River Basin. Updated December 12, 2013. https://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs- public/Water%20Quality/Planning/C SU/Surface%20Water/River%20Basin%20 Water%20Quality%20Classifications%20as%20of%20Dec%209%202013/Tar- Pam_Hydro_order.pdf 11 December 2016 Natural Resources Technical Report STIP U-5875, Pitt County, N.C. N.C. Department of Transportation. 201 L TE Plant Habitat Descriptions. June 29, 2011. NCDOT, Project Development and Environmental Analysis. Natural Environment Section. N.C. Department of Transportation. 2012. Invasive Exotic Plants of North Carolina. Cherri Smith. NCDOT, Project Development and Environmental Analysis. Natural Environment Section. N.C. Department of Transportation. 2012. TE Animal Habitat Descriptions. June 26, 2012. NCDOT, Project Development and Environmental Analysis. Natural Environment Section. N.C. Wetland Functional Assessment Team. 2010. N.C. Wetland Assessment Method (NC WAM) User Manual. Version 4.1, October 2010. N.C. Department of Transportation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 1183 pp. Rohde, F.C., R.G. Arndt, D.G. Lindquist, and J.F. Parnell. 1994. Freshwater Fishes of the Carolinas, Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 222 pp. Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDEHNR. Raleigh, North Carolina. 325 pp. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1974. Soil Survey of Pitt County, North Carolina. In cooperation with the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station. Issued November 1974. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species, Pitt County, North Carolina. Updated March 9, 2015. United States Geological Survey. 2013. Greenville SW, North Carolina, Topographic Quadrangle (7.5-minute series). Webster, W.D., J.F. Parnell, and W.C. Biggs. 1985. Mammals of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Maryland. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press. 255 pp. 12 December 2016 Appendix A Figures ������� � �L� i��*�� :�'�I���i/r���~1 rr 1%�:y►i�� �t��1►��� ��� ��),� ����� �'"J' �1I H. S,, John P EastFW Arthur c w�o .,� ;� � �,,,,: ,, �OY M1pq,f Fa�m q� � 4 A Ln l� I. �Nry � r PittGreenville Airport� � y' �a r r wUS Project Vicinity E �'r5 � Greemille f fOthSl � E' /q�h E . �!+ `�Hll�Blvd�`" . � n � > �F �a�i y w 9' y ; �s � ;� •� a 6 Qa a S� 4 EF��o � � ' . ,, _ ,;� ; A P`�OF piOR71i �RO G,� h~ * * F o 99i �� �FHf O! TRATjS��� E PI E N G I N E E R I N G & C O N S T R U C T I O N Figure 1 - Project Vicinity U-5875 SR 1203 (Allen Road) from SR 1467 (Stantonsburg Road) to US 13 (Dickenson Avenue Ext.) Widen to Multilanes Pitt County, North Carolina December 2016 h 9�, � w �,^ �: E MacGreqa Uuv;ns Itd �r — ✓ul�a Ln I ' J411IrP�IItT�Y — -�- �\�� _ �,a'-- - - - _—_ ---- c-------- i g�n�h ln m F a 0 Stan[onsbwg Rd ft�P� � ry N Teakwood Dr GreatLaur�r gweet Bay Dr � t� Pye �*, on �\`�s Q�c i;06� � Guy =+ es�o ��o �f` O� � Smflh �+r �i�� PaAc � __ � 2� . -� - -'- -'- � 2rol��nhi . - ¢ F �_ i-4•i 9��i' 'a SPring,�, g�o� :13,� v� e� - � a Marvin Jar s � i,P� �+ d �o fco P �Qp, g�C �O 0 Evan 4 � � Pa O R � � � hill y Gmenville Country Club 'carm Rd Sw ����!//e g/yp o` 'z 11 � r a I O� � WestPo�� Legend g�s��y v � U-5875 StudyArea � _-- � ��e S` --==St��4�� � � �' J`S��c, c m �4 6ryer��,,Or o� O X ese��� .,.. ..i;, 4•�, Q� u v= � > �oo � a �m` � � This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and shown herein does not meet NC 47-30 Requirements and 1 inch - 1 000 feet -K +� therefore is not for design, construction, or recording or transfer of title. The Exhibit was compiled from � � Figure 2: Project Study Area Map fOF �°��. available information obtained from the sources lis[ed below. �P ���, Sources: GRAPHIC SCALE U-5875 - SR 1203 (Allen Road) f* * NCDOT, NC OneMap, ESRI SR 1467 (Stantonsburg Road) to �A � � 0 400 800 1,600 US 13 (DiCkinson Avenue Ext.) � � E N G I H E E R I N G � November2o16 ''�rq��� CO N STRUCTI�N Feet Widen to Multilanes 1 � 1 � � , ' � I R � � � � ' � �.-} � � "' �n ` ` � I '� +� � 'r'�k l �, y+�,, �, � � � •,, , y� , � ' « f ' �a � E�" ,� �+ i` + A A� � � o � �-� � ' t> • �+ �� �,� f .� � �' � � , ,. � ��i��,�� . , � , �+ k � � • R f ,� , � •.�i f ' � y . � � ' � �� Y�. N'7� + �1•` '� . 'r ��� ;� �•' � . �/e •, �t J .` . � t * -;��qj� . ! 1 ' f i : , � I' . . • � . . � , .. . .. , , • ..� ' �; f . .. " .:'� , , ' •E � ' . "?� i , , � ` . ( �' . . rs. f . .�.. � , ' .y ' :� r . ' ' � -. � � - � R4 � �a ��'� � � . + I' , r. ` , �� �!� � , � , ,� � � . �,� Au� ��� ���;'� � . y � �, . _ i . • f Y_1,4 �r.` _. _. . � �i,.�j � „ .�� � ., Y ` . � s ' - • w �� , ,` `F-4' '', y'�. f . ` � _ ,.�. _ - � ... . R . . .� -,� � � , � - �, � 1� �"'4, :. „l��"'F � *a� `� . .W � ,��,, � _ - F�• ' ;�,r+ �f � •.� � �I - � .•�� i .. � r — �. e r . e • ~��r i �` �'.;�' 1 � ��� ��~ t y��', s �� � . • . �r, 4 � e. J,� _`', � �^! =M � � `� ' 'ai: � ._ ' � �, � , A' „, * , . � �. _ kl � �' � • ' ' � . r ' _ _�� f � � �� � . � 'w..... +"� ,�� � � i !f ' C � ,,.� Y - � � x � .�,� - F � _ - . y �`� .' �'r . . , � , •. ♦ - � . �,� r' y{�,, ,,�: �t � %" �q 1 �-. :� ��,: � r-. :: - ., . 1� � ' ,;�,�� , � _,, . ,��',�,; v ,�, _. ; �t t .� � �" t �+ �,�_�. Legend � " �."' + s� ' y.,' , �;,�� , , ._ � .,, �,� , � U-5875 Study Area - , .�-, `� � y `' � r . ► ,�' � y ; ' � t �"�,., � ? � _ � U-5875 Upland Sample Point r- . ' .__ ,� �,��."� � `' -•* . �. � ,� � U-5875 Wetland Sample Point �_ � '''' . ,� � � , � � �` ' � � � U-5875 Delineated Wetlands '� � �:�` F•r�'� �Q `�- . �� �� � � U-5875 Delineated Streams = �� � .�� - � ` . � ,}., - +,. � . _ Perennial "�' - �, , �+�I�' �'°°� ' „ � �►�. r" � ,,�,�' _ . m_ r . .. --�--• Intermittent � � � � f r � 1 �w •�` �' � � � ` � � .." r� � , y �� +��.i - �. +�,' f. p-'� ` + . •% • � --�--• Linear Stormwater Conveyance , �"'`! � ` � �'` y..� � , �,� �, � .� �` Roads '� � ` ' � � �i ••T * R�� * . . � This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and shown herein does not meet NC 47-30 Requirements and � ppprN� thereforeisnotfordesign,construction,orrecordingortrensferoftitle.TheExhibitwascompiledfrom 1 inch - 100 feet Figure 3��: Jurisdictional Features Map .-� available information obtained from [he sources listed below. Streams and Wetlands: All featureslocated in tiv the feld were recorded using a Trimble GEO 7X GPS with supposed sub-meter accuracy, GRAPHIC SCALE U-5875 - SR 1203 (Allen Road) y � so���es: SR 1467 (Stantonsburg Road) to �:9 � NCDOT, NC OneMap, SEPI, ESRI �v �� E N G I H E E R I N G S� US 13 (Dickinson Avenue Ext.) November2016 5 Feet Widen to Multilanes ���„�� c o N s T e u �� i o� This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and shown herein does not meet NC 47-30 Requirements and � ppprN� thereforeisnotfordesign,construction,orrecordingortrensferoftitle.TheExhibitwascompiledfrom 1 inch - 100 feet Figure 3��: Jurisdictional Features Map .-� available information obtained from [he sources listed below. Streams and Wetlands: All featureslocated in tiv the feld were recorded using a Trimble GEO 7X GPS with supposed sub-meter accuracy, GRAPHIC SCALE U-5875 - SR 1203 (Allen Road) y � so���es: SR 1467 (Stantonsburg Road) to �:9 � NCDOT, NC OneMap, SEPI, ESRI �v �� E N G I H E E R I N G S� US 13 (Dickinson Avenue Ext.) November2016 5 Feet Widen to Multilanes ���„�� c o N s T e u �� i o� This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and shown herein does not meet NC 47-30 Requirements and Q � ppprN� thereforeisnotfordesign,construction,orrecordingortrensferoftitle.TheExhibitwascompiledfrom 1 inch - 100 feet Figure 3�aJ: Jurisdictional Features Map .-� available information obtained from [he sources listed below. Streams and Wetlands: All featureslocated in tiv the feld were recorded using a Trimble GEO 7X GPS with supposed sub-meter accuracy, GRAPHIC SCALE U-5875 - SR 1203 (Allen Road) y � so���es: SR 1467 (Stantonsburg Road) to �:9 � NCDOT, NC OneMap, SEPI, ESRI �v �� E N G I H E E R I N G S� US 13 (Dickinson Avenue Ext.) November2016 5 Feet Widen to Multilanes ���„�� c o N s T e u �� i o� !� � 4 ' I x. , '.-* '`�� : .� � .e 9•. . � - . �� ; � �'w -•t � . i : 1 . .. : .. ` � Y�,. . � � �� . _ ,, : � y �,•. � � �; ,K � � -�� �# , ` • . _ � -,�;, ,� ' ti�`';..� - . �► - " . � �f'�'M� � � . 'q A ��°�s... �' _ti r � � _ � 6 � f ,, 1� � + p^ �:�. �* � ` � � -- � + r �� � � '�• 'ii� ;�- - . _ � K=,� __ . . , . : � , , . , ,, _ . _ ' „c� ; .+�.� - �"i ; .� r �, � '` � '� Je y`� � ' , `,. ,, • ` ; '• ���`7�,-�-�-° � _ } ., E • - �, -__. �.. � . P .. �. . ,� �.� �,� , �" � � �A 1 S� ��r : .x ,, * ., s�.+ Gre'en -- v�,Y - - .- .� p�c . , � • . . . � 1 � +r„_ � . 'x��'. . � ville Southwest g � a � . �F �- ��"� •p � �_ . . Q,,, � d s -- 1 . �;.. . . r � � � � ��_ .�L `r ♦ � � �, � �- . ,�-` - . � �yt ' `` � yr' ��� � � t' � , sis .' �,. , � • � �_ r •!1 a , Le end � � � � �, . _ - _ ,� � g � - ,. f �,,,�►�' �,,f- . � �� - , f' 1 � , ° - F - � �',� :. , ,� ��►• -+. �,� � • � � - ; ,, . . . � _ , .. � U-5875 Study Area �- ry;' ` � � ,,: �•�.,�, � " , � � U-5875 Upland Sample Point � °' .�, s,�,_ =� . � -..,� � _��' •� .. d� ' • . 't - � � U-5875 Wetland Sample Point * � � , - ; . � U-5875 Delineated Wetlands ��'�'tf�'��-M ' �` 2 � ,� � � �-� U-5875 Delineated Streams �- ��� ` � = Y� � � �����,. . `� Perennial ��,� � ' ,,* ' d --�--• Intermittent ` � -�' • •r_ - ��` .,"''���� '� � : . : . . . z , . �, . - , . . , s ,.. > , , . . , - � .- . .�...,,�.���, : .: , _ � � --�--• Linear Stormwater Conveyance ' • f ' �� " �E��"��'.- 3 � Roads �;.- --�� , � ,�' - ,� :.• A�'.�� , ,�, X` � , ��45 ' �`_ . `.: ,r. -.�, £ ' _ • �.� ` ,; . �� This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and shown herein does not meet NC 47-30 Requirements and /� � ppprN� thereforeisnotfordesign,construction,orrecordingortrensferoftitle.TheExhibitwascompiledfrom 1 inch - 100 feet Figure 3�T: Jurisdictional Features Map .-� available information obtained from [he sources listed below. Streams and Wetlands: All featureslocated in tiv the feld were recorded using a Trimble GEO 7X GPS with supposed sub-meter accuracy, GRAPHIC SCALE U-5875 - SR 1203 (Allen Road) y � so���es: SR 1467 (Stantonsburg Road) to �:9 � NCDOT, NC OneMap, SEPI, ESRI �v �� E N G I H E E R I N G S� US 13 (Dickinson Avenue Ext.) November2016 5 Feet Widen to Multilanes ���„�� c o N s T e u �� i o� ��.► ^ t ��.-s+■�-.. ��. , �• � � . � , '� �� r�;}� '� k� � 'f's�� ' _ -+� •, ,t � 1��� �j y, � _ . �� „�� M - wt � : �� � �„�, S^M �. � t� _ . : �` ��...,.. `4,,� .- \� , ..'--:. �� . ,r. � a � :f , �lt ` � E � w • � •�/ k � .w� �y � � �� r� . a # 4!' ,` � �' • . ��� �i `\t�� ,. +r'�,�, ' �� ^' � ��� �' � . ! � _ . . � �°�" 4 . � ., � ,. Y� , .' e , ` t • � � � : � . � � H � � • � � � �•� ` ~ •� � � .. . . 'L y . .,,. � . . � � �; ' � � i � r . .. �,r • . - .�, , . �. ,. � ' � y/ ,t 4 `• � . , ' '' �e , t"t . , . C. �� � , � l. � ; +. . � ' .� � � ,�'�:� ' � ,, :�, � �'' � �y � , . . � �� ��� � `�� � �� e � 4 . }' � � 4 � � # +■rvr �' � i �' - �� _7�w.:+. _ —"" `�.. , '• .. a � o � - 1 ,� �� �` „ _o +�'t.s _ 3 � ��,� � I ' r � a � � �o- �� * +. a. F r{ � � ' ` � � 1. 4 +ey ;, d . . . . .+ � � . � .*��R �� 3�I} t.Fil� — - I . 54 7 � � ' - . . � . � � `! * � � i �q0 � Y � .- '�, a �,. �� ,� � � Po�� , .. �_� � ,� q ' r' �� - . � � � � � -p . a � � �� '�"� -...� � '��'�,��� t';� r.. � � ��'��� .�-a ' } �� � , .�� .� �� y. ' � -- _— � �- � � `i Y �� . - � i. ' - /a �. _ , . y.. '°' � '`, . �. � }* 4 � Q a , � --� �� �� - . � .� � ' ' � - _ �,w a� . . �. � 5 .. � ^�e ��� � .'p� �' - .� .� 1 � �. � � .- �'t ^ # i��.__ `�.a � � t� r� - i ,� � a -+� � � � � � . _� pJ\e� Rd - , , . __ _ , � r . ..«_: , ��a . , �� � , � ��. . v . -V - — - � -- r ` , � _ • �v ,�� �� � :l .�_'''; _: � '!I�r�� � , � , , �, � .. f a . + � i � � } ' ` ;/ �,"+�' � ' '� � �. . —„` ,'� ' � �" � � rt � � � .�N� -� � �� i "` '. � � , ,...yij� � .-y�.•a�,-"''��-`� y� .. O' ` �� y -� �N6 �,� . ix�{� '``-�. - x , � ' 4� - i . � � ��..,'p9, � � ; �- .#f ., cos �3'�Peyt n Cir 4 � � � 1 ' � i . � ��� S��O '{ �. s�'� �CF��� �1 .,�� ,`v�y. � � � Park West Dr � ; � , .4 '� � � �,�" , ,� � : . _ � . . ., ����. � � ; � . � . �� � ,� � � s �Jr . � {. - � , ��*_ 1 � `''} '�-+� �� . �.. f � � � �.. ��_ � �� � � . r� ^,� . : : � {q � O`� �� �. � �� � � � _ ' .. _ F:# . ._ ,�. `�` � \• � � _ ,,,� _ � -. � � � � � � - � ' +#. � " � , '�' , � '`..� = # Q� -�x�' , . -_ ��r �` `'� . - . � . . y�. •,� �� ;�„_ ' �' J � y � �..- U 4� " �"'�' ,^'� � ` �� � �. �' '�' � r "� . � � , , ' - 44 9� _ ,. ... : - .�.� - . - + �' ' �• . � , � � � N _ . �`�;�� - ' '��.��� '� � . �. - •� �,. - .5 � . - � _ . �r. . . �. � �ti.� � s � �O. ~ �' _, _ _ „ � �' � ` � '�,. � F ,r i n� _ � � �: - - �� r . _ . - _ __ J � � a� M p ., . ..t� O � ��. 0 1 � � . � �����- ��� . y ' . ' i�, ,� s� � � � '� PO # {F�� ��"' , . k � _. � . e .. Cy �. �,� #' °� # � � * � �,�,�� � � * fr. � � .71�� q,� •r" �� � � �� � . _ � ,. . _ �. . : _ � . rM.�,� � � � ., ��'.�.1 -' ' �` � � � y` � . • . � . '� �' � .. �a i: � �. . . , �. �' ._.s ._ . "�•S � ?�°ati,� �.' ,. �. ,� . , � ' a�'y iF � � �� r � � - . _ _y+ ..-...- ��. � ` .y -. .. �` � �� � ,�r. , . . i , � . i� � _ .s � , � • . , ,- _ . � � ' - � 1 � �' * s = �� . � r. �_ + , �R �.' !s' n �� . � �� . . .� * � � � — � I �. - T �ry r � .. * � '�"` �� i . � � � -y Y * �-- � � � � � � � n � �-+ w , � a� � � �� �. � : � " � 4 � • .. _� �� � �� � � \� � � �,._r�� �. _ _ i _ •w� - s�, � ' � . _ . � �� . , • • � � � - � � _ ,� . � � - y 't' �, � - �i � • . � • - k _ . � . �, � t i , � _ �` . � �� _�, "° .ht.Y�y--,._� :. � � ,�� _ 'r i� , �r[ �° F .�Allendale Dr r � ' � � � - � �� ' _ . �_...x ,f r� �' �� � , ' . . � i,�' .d*,M1' �. � . � .. . Y`r , . � r �- .., ! � � #� _ . . .` * � ~� a � +4 jr�" J t • �� - � �� :� . yy.. .. � .. '� . . .� . ; �� � � S� �' -� 1 'O F — .r� .�„}, .,��� . _ . . w F � ! '' �� d � � �_ . y . Legend ����-` • �a._ o f " . _�' ���" ' - � t � � - � � U-5875 Study Area `�._ ��.,, � � =�'�� +� � . � �` „� ^",�.. . +. �.. ��' � � . �. ' +�� �'� NaturalCommunity _ � ' �y,. �� �.� , .��`,��� � ���� f* , -�-``��� �� �. Maintained/Disturbed � �''� �� ,.# � , . � � i� .. ' ! � �� V ...,,,�.�-t � .�. `*� +r �.� r ` r ri � � � . � r '�"� ,. �' � ..Yyi _ i `.� . � . � ; � . r ,y ��'''�-����� � , I � . . ' F I � . �4 d.. . .; * � ,f �+.� _�• � � - � Yp ) � r , � .. _ .`�. Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods Blackwater Subt e � - � . . ' �'J� � �`�= , ��. + �-� .� ,,, Bethes�`` � � � �` ' ��Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Coastal Plain Subtype) � ,o�r�` �<� � � '�� . +�'; � �. � t� • F . - , da p,.�, � - � � — ,�,� � 5� � td r �' � ' ; , ti . ' i � �. } . ,� f..* � � +�.�,n,► A r�\\ � ;r G� �C� . � , , rtir �• ,*, , ,� �.' � ! �� � , „° -•w , ' � � : � . . . . • MesicPine Flatwoods �„� •'� �, ����`�` � �o�or. � _ 4r- r� `��,' � _ .';,;��.�. „ , � . ,�, .� . , . � � t+, „ �r . �j , .:. ' . � . . � . ' � � ]� ''#. , f� •` � j Roads � �, '� �k� � , — � � . � r . �a ��`� '�i +� �'+ T � ` � � '� � � . F .� * � +. � .. _ i � ,"R'. � * r � a� .� � �� ' � This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and shown herein does not meet NC 47-30 Requirements and 1 inch — 800 feet . K +� therefore is notfordesign, construction, or recording ortransferoftitle. The Exhibitwas compiled from � Figure 4: Natural Communities Map M1eoF 4°� available information obtained from the sources lis[ed below. � ���, Sources: GRAPHIC SCALE U-5875 - SR 1203 (Allen Road) f* * NCDOT, NC OneMap, ESRI SR 1467 (Stantonsburg Road) to �A � � 0 400 800 1,600 US 13 (DiCkinson Avenue Ext.) � � E N G I H E E R I N G � November2o16 ''�rq��� CO N STRUCTI�N Feet Widen to Multilanes Appendix B Scientific Names of Species Identified in Report Plants Common Name American elm Black cherry Chinese privet Clover Corn Fescue Hay Loblolly pine Muscadine grape Poison ivy Raspberry Red maple Soybean Sweetgum Tobacco Water oak Willow oak Animals Common Name American crow American goldfinch American robin American toad Blue jay Bowfin Bullfrog Carolina wren Chain pickerel Copperhead Darter Eastern bluebird Eastern box turtle Eastern cottontail Eastern fence lizard Eastern gray squirrel Eastern mosquitofish Eastern towhee European starling Five-lined skink Flathead catfish Scientific Name Ulmus americana Prunus serotina Ligustrum sinense Trifolium sp. Zea sp. Festuca sp. Lolium sp. Pinus taeda Vitis rotundifolia Toxicodendron radicans Rubus sp. Acer rubrum Glycine max Liquidambar styraciflua Nicotiana sp. Quercus nigra Quercus phellos Scientific Name Corvus brachyrhynchos Spinus t�istis Turdus migratorius Anaxyrus americanus Cyanocitta cristata Amia calva Rana catesbeiana Thryothorus ludovicianus Esox niger Agkistrodon contortrix Percina sp. Sialia sialis Terrapene carolina carolina Sylvilagus floridanus Sceloporus undulates Sciurus carolinensis Gambusia holbrooki Piplio erythrophthalmus Sturnus vulgaris Plestiodon inexpectatus Pylodictis olivaris Common Name Gizzard shad Grass carp Gray fox Gray treefrog Green anole Largemouth bass Mourning dove Northern cardinal Northern flicker Northern long-eared bat Northern mockingbird Pileated woodpecker Raccoon Rat snake Red-shouldered hawk Red-tailed hawk Rock dove Rough green snake Song sparrow Shiner Striped skunk Sunfish Tufted titmouse Turkey vulture Virginia opossum White-footed mouse White-tailed deer White-throated sparrow Scientific Name Dorosoma cepedianum Ctenopharyngodon idella Urocyon cinereoargenteus Hyla versicolor Anolis carolinensis Micropterus salmoides Zenaida macroura Cardinalis cardinalis Colaptes auratus Myotis septentrionalis Mimus polyglottos Hylatomus pileatus Procyon lotor Elaphe sp. Buteo lineatus Buteo jamaicensis Columbia livia Opheodrys aestivus Melospiza melodia Notropis sp. Mephitis mephitis Centrarchidae Baeolophus bicolor Cathartes aura Didelphis virginiana Peromyscus leucopus Odocoileus virginianus Zonotrichia albicollis Appendix C Stream and Wetland Forms WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Pro]ecvsite: U-5875 Allen Road c�ty�cour,ty: Greenville/Pitt Co Sampling Date: 8/24/2016 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: �1C Sampling Point: WB UP Investigator(s): SEPI - JasOn Hales Section, Township, Range: NA Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): COIlV2X Slope (%): � �% Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T �at: 35.603266 �ong: -77.420428 Datum: NAD 83 soii nnap unit rvame: Rains fine sandy loam (Ra) NWI classification: UPLAND Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Remarks: HYDROLOGY Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Yes No ✓ � ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No Yes No Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applvl _ Surface Soil Cracks (66) _ Surface Water (A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (62) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): 1la Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): na Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Ila Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No � (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot sizes: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status �. Liquidambar stvraciflua 40 ves FAC 2. Prunus serotina 15 ves FACU 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Saplinq Stratum ( ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 55 = Total Cover = Total Cover Shrub Stratum ( 3� ) �. Liquidambar stvraciflua 5 ves FAC 2. Quercus niara 5 ves FAC 3. 4. 5. 6. �. 10 = Total Cover Herb Stratum ( 30 ) �. Toxicodendron radicans 5 ves FAC 2. Vitis sp. 5 no 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woodv Vine Stratum ( 30 ) 1. VItIS Sp. 2. 3. 4. 5. 10 = Total Cover 5 no = Total Cover Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Sampling Point: WB UP Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species 55 x 3= 165 FACU species 15 x 4= 60 UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 70 (A) 225 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.21 ✓ Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is s3.0' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: TYee - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shl'Ub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in height. H2Cb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. WOOdy Vllle - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes � No US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: WB UP Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks 0-6 2.5Y 5/3 100 fine sand 6-15+ 2.5Y 6/6 100 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric Soil Present? Yes No � fine sand CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U� _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present. _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Pro]ecvsite: U-5875 Allen Road c�ty�cour,ty: Greenville/Pitt Co Sampling Date: 8/24/2016 ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: �1C Sampling Point: DP-WB W21 Investigator(s): SEPI - JasOn Hales Section, Township, Range: NA Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): COIlCaV2 Slope (%): � �% Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T �at: 35.603061 �ong: -77.421031 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Blbbs Complex (Bb) NWI classification: PF01A Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Remarks: Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applvl _ Surface Soil Cracks (66) _ Surface Water (A1) ✓ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ✓ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (62) ✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) ✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): 1la Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): na Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Ila Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Point: DP-WB Wet Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot sizes: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species �. Acer rubrum 80 VeS FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Ulmus americana 10 no FACW Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 �q�g� 6. � Prevalence Index worksheet: 90 = Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv: Saplinq Stratum ( 30 ) OBL species x 1= �. Ulmus americana 5 ves FACW FACW species X 2= 2, FAC species x 3= 3, FACU species x 4= 4, UPL species x 5= 5. Column Totals: (A) (B) 6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 7. Shrub Stratum ( ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. �. Herb Stratum ( 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woodv Vine Stratum ( 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 0 = Total Cover = Total Cover Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: = Total Cover ) TYee - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shl'Ub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in height. 5 = Total Cover -- --�--,--- --�-------- ------------ ✓ Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is s3.0' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) H2Cb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft(1 m) in height. WOOdy Vllle - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes � No US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: DP-WB Wet Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators. Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks 0-16+ 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 5/8 10 C M fine sandv loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De Hydric Soil Indicators: RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linina. M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric _ Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) ✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U� _ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) _ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present. _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SA-09 Date: Nov 3, 2016 Project/Site: U-5875 Allen Road Latitude: 35.578564 Evaluator: ason Hales/Garcy Ward County: itt Longitude:-77.432701 Total Points: � Greenville SW 26.5 Stream Determination: Other: Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name: >19 or perennial if >30 Intermittent A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =12_5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE 1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1 3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 � ool se uence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 � 5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 � 6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 � 7. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 2 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 � 9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 � a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual. B. 12 13 14 15 16 17 �ydrology (Subtotal =9 ) Presence of Baseflow Iron oxidizing bacteria Leaflitter Sediment on plants or debris Organic debris lines or piles Soil-based evidence of hiqh water table? Absent Weak 0 1 0 1 1.5 1 0 0.5 0 0.5 No=O Moderate Stron 2 3 2 3 0.5 0 1 1.5 1 1.5 Yes=131 SCORE 3 0 1 1 1 3 C. BiOlOgy (Subtotal =5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Stron SCORE 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 1 19. Rooted u land lants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 20. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 1 2 3 0 21. A uatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 23. Cra ish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 24. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 25. AI ae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 26. Wetland lants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0 'perenniai stream may aiso be identitied using otner metnods. See p.3b ot manuai. Notes: UT to Greens Mill Run (Class C,NSW; Tar-Pamlico Basin). Strea is not a blue line on Topo map. Bank Height (feet) Bankfull Width (feet) Water Depth (inches Channel Substrate 6-10 12-24 lightly Turbid Sketch: NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SB-01/Pipe Outlet Date: Nov 3, 2016 Project/Site: U-5875 Allen Road Latitude: 35.589178 Evaluator: ason Hales/Christopher Dustin County: itt Longitude:-77.432943 Total Points: � Greenville SW 25.5 Stream Determination: Other: Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name: >19 or perennial if >30 Intermittent A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =14 � Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE 1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1 3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 2 ool se uence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 � 5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 � 6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 � 7. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 � 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 � 9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 � 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual. B. 12 13 14 15 16 17 �ydrology (Subtotal =4.5 ) Presence of Baseflow Iron oxidizing bacteria Leaflitter Sediment on plants or debris Organic debris lines or piles Soil-based evidence of hiqh water table? Absent Weak 0 1 0 1 1.5 1 0 0.5 0 0.5 No=O Moderate Stron 2 3 2 3 0.5 0 1 1.5 1 1.5 Yes=131 SCORE 2 0 1.5 0.5 0.5 0 C. BiOlOgy (Subtotal =? ) Absent Weak Moderate Stron SCORE 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 19. Rooted u land lants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 20. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 1 2 3 0 21. A uatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 23. Cra ish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 24. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 25. AI ae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 26. Wetland lants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0 'perenniai stream may aiso be identitied using otner metnods. See p.3b ot manuai. Notes: Unnamed UT to Greens Mill Run (Class C,NSW; Tar-Pamlico Basin). Stream is not a blue line on Topo map. Length is evaluated from Culvert Outlet to Rip-Rap in Stream Channel. Bank Height (feet) Bankfull Width (feet) Water Depth (inches Channel Substrate 10 2-24 lightly Turbid Sketch: NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SB-04/RipRap Date: Nov 3, 2016 Project/Site: U-5875 Allen Road Latitude: 35.589178 Evaluator: ason Hales/Christopher Dustin County: itt Longitude:-77.432943 Total Points: � Other: Greenville SW 31.5 Stream Determination: Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name: >19 or perennial if >30 Perennial A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =19 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE 1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 2 3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 2 ool se uence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2 5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 � 6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2 7. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 2 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 � 9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 � 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual. B. 12 13 14 15 16 17 �ydrology (Subtotal =5.5 ) Presence of Baseflow Iron oxidizing bacteria Leaflitter Sediment on plants or debris Organic debris lines or piles Soil-based evidence of hiqh water table? Absent Weak 0 1 0 1 1.5 1 0 0.5 0 0.5 No=O Moderate Stron 2 3 2 3 0.5 0 1 1.5 1 1.5 Yes=131 SCORE 3 0 1.5 0.5 0.5 0 C. BiOlOgy (Subtotal =? ) Absent Weak Moderate Stron SCORE 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 19. Rooted u land lants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 20. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 1 2 3 0 21. A uatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 23. Cra ish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 24. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 25. AI ae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 26. Wetland lants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0 'perenniai stream may aiso be identitied using otner metnods. See p.3b ot manuai. NOt2S: Bank Height (feet) Unnamed UT to Greens Mill Run (Class C,NSW; Tar-Pamlico Bankfull Width (feet) Basin). Stream is not a blue line on Topo map. Length is Water De th inChes evaluated from Rip-Rap in stream channel to confluence w/ Channel Substrate Greens Mill Run. . . . . 10 2-24 lightly Turbid Sketch: NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 sc @ s� Date: 8/24/2016 Project/Site: U-5875 Allen Road Latitude: 35.588741 Evaluator: ason Hales County: itt Longitude:-77.432733 Total Points: � Other: Greenville SW 34 Stream Determination: Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name: >19 or perennial if >30 Perennial A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =17_5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE 1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1 3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 2 ool se uence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2 5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 � 6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2 7. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 2 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 � 9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual. B. 12 13 14 15 16 17 �ydrology (Subtotal =9 ) Presence of Baseflow Iron oxidizing bacteria Leaflitter Sediment on plants or debris Organic debris lines or piles Soil-based evidence of hiqh water table? Absent Weak 0 1 0 1 1.5 1 0 0.5 0 0.5 No=O Moderate Stron 2 3 2 3 0.5 0 1 1.5 1 1.5 Yes=131 SCORE 2 1 1 1 1 3 C. BiOlOgy (Subtotal = 7�5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Stron SCORE 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2 19. Rooted u land lants in streambed 3 2 1 0 2 20. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 1 2 3 1 21. A uatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 23. Cra ish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 24. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 25. AI ae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 26. Wetland lants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0 'perenniai stream may aiso be identitied using otner metnods. See p.3b ot manuai. NOt2S: Bank Height (feet) Greens Mill Run where Stream SC and Stream SD confluence. Bankfull Width (feet) (Class C,NSW; Tar-Pamlico Basin). Stream is a solid blue line on Water De th inChes Topo map. Channel Substrate -10 2-18 lightly Turbid Sketch: NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 sc-o3 Date: Nov 3, 2016 Project/Site: U-5875 Allen Road Latitude: 35.589411 Evaluator: ason Hales/Garcy Ward County: itt Longitude:-77.433073 Total Points: � Other: Greenville SW 31.5 Stream Determination: Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name: >19 or perennial if >30 Perennial A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =17_5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE 1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 2 3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 � ool se uence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2 5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 � 6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 � 7. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 2 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 � 9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual. B. 12 13 14 15 16 17 �ydrology (Subtotal =�o ) Presence of Baseflow Iron oxidizing bacteria Leaflitter Sediment on plants or debris Organic debris lines or piles Soil-based evidence of hiqh water table? Absent Weak 0 1 0 1 1.5 1 0 0.5 0 0.5 No=O Moderate Stron 2 3 2 3 0.5 0 1 1.5 1 1.5 Yes=131 SCORE 2 2 1 1 1 3 C. BiOlOgy (Subtotal =4 ) Absent Weak Moderate Stron SCORE 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2 19. Rooted u land lants in streambed 3 2 1 0 0 20. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 1 2 3 1 21. A uatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 23. Cra ish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 24. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 25. AI ae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 26. Wetland lants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0 'perenniai stream may aiso be identitied using otner metnods. See p.3b ot manuai. Notes: SC above confluence with Stream SD (Class C,NSW; Basin). Bank Height (feet) Bankfull Width (feet) Water Depth (inches Channel Substrate 7 12 lightly Turbid Sketch: NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SD-06 Date: Nov 3, 2016 Project/Site: U-5875 Allen Road Latitude: 35.589539 Evaluator: ason Hales/Garcy Ward County: itt Longitude:-77.433486 Total Points: � Other: Greenville SW 30.5 Stream Determination: Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name: >19 or perennial if >30 Perennial A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =17_5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE 1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1 3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 � ool se uence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2 5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 � 6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2 7. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 2 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 � 9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 3 a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual. B. 12 13 14 15 16 17 �ydrology (Subtotal =�o ) Presence of Baseflow Iron oxidizing bacteria Leaflitter Sediment on plants or debris Organic debris lines or piles Soil-based evidence of hiqh water table? Absent Weak 0 1 0 1 1.5 1 0 0.5 0 0.5 No=O Moderate Stron 2 3 2 3 0.5 0 1 1.5 1 1.5 Yes=131 SCORE 2 2 1 1 1 3 C. BiOlOgy (Subtotal =3 ) Absent Weak Moderate Stron SCORE 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 1 19. Rooted u land lants in streambed 3 2 1 0 0 20. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 1 2 3 1 21. A uatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 23. Cra ish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 24. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 25. AI ae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 26. Wetland lants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0 'perenniai stream may aiso be identitied using otner metnods. See p.3b ot manuai. Notes: (Class C,NSW; Tar-Pamlico Basin). Stream a dashed blue line on Topo map. Bank Height (feet) Bankfull Width (feet) Water Depth (inches Channel Substrate 7 12 lightly Turbid Sketch: NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SE-05 Date: Nov 3, 2016 Project/Site: U-5875 Allen Road Latitude: 35.603495 Evaluator: ason Hales/Garcy Ward County: itt Longitude:-77.421507 Total Points: � Other: Greenville SW 30 Stream Determination: Stream is at least intermittent if e.g. Quad Name: >19 or perennial if >30 Perennial A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =13_5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE 1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1 3. In-Channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple- 0 1 2 3 2 ool se uence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2 5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3 � 6. De ositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 � 7. Recent alluvial de osits 0 1 2 3 2 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 � 9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 � a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual. B. 12 13 14 15 16 17 �ydrology (Subtotal =9 ) Presence of Baseflow Iron oxidizing bacteria Leaflitter Sediment on plants or debris Organic debris lines or piles Soil-based evidence of hiqh water table? Absent Weak 0 1 0 1 1.5 1 0 0.5 0 0.5 No=O Moderate Stron 2 3 2 3 0.5 0 1 1.5 1 1.5 Yes=131 SCORE 2 1 1 1 1 3 C. BiOlOgy (Subtotal = 7�5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Stron SCORE 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2 19. Rooted u land lants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 20. Macrobenthos note diversit and abundance 0 1 2 3 1 21. A uatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 23. Cra ish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 24. Am hibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 25. AI ae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 26. Wetland lants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0 0 'perenniai stream may aiso be identitied using otner metnods. See p.3b ot manuai. Notes: Unnamed UT to Greens Mill Run (Class C,NSW; Tar-Pamlico Basin). Stream shown as a dashed blue line on Topo map. Bank Height (feet) Bankfull Width (feet) Water Depth (inches Channel Substrate 2-18 lightly Turbid Sketch: Appendix D Qualifications of Contributors Investigator: Wendee Smith Education: B.S. Natural Resources: Ecosystem Assessment, 1999 Experience: Environmental Director, SEPI Engineering, 2015-Present Environmental Group Manager, Mulkey, Inc. 2005-2015 Environmental Scientist, HSMM, 2001-2005 Environmental Scientist, LandMark Design Group, 1999-2001 Natural Systems Specialist, NCDOT, 1999 Responsibilities: QA/QC Investigator: Susan Westberry, AICP, PWS, CPESC Education: M.S. Botany, 2003 Experience: Senior Environmental Planner, SEPI Engineering & Construction, 2015-Present Environmental Scientist, URS, 2005-2015 Environmental Scientist, Stantec, 2003-2005 Responsibilities: Natural communities assessment and document preparation