20190211 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190215

D1�VR
�irlslan af Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
F Yes
C' No
Is this project a public transportation project?"
� Yes r No
Change only rf needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
20190211
Is a payment required for this project?*
f No paymentrequired
� Fee received
f Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer"
Garcy Ward:eads\gpward
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
U-5875 Allen Road Widening
1a. Who is the PrimaryContact?*
Jay B.Johnson
1b. PrimaryContact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
2/15/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Greens Mill Run
Basin
Tar-Pamlico
Water Classification
C; NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.591942
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Pitt
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Is this a NCDOT Project?*
G Yes r No
(NCDOT only) T.I.P. or state project number:
U-5785 Allen Road Widening
WBS # (�)
44677.1.1
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Ve rsion# *
1
Reviewing Office *
Washington Regional Office - [phone]
1c. PrimaryContact Phone:*
[phone]
Longitude:
-77.428315
::

�J Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
r Nationwide Permit (NWP)
rJ Regional General Permit (RGP)
� Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified bythe Corps?
F Yes r No
Regional General Permit (RGP) Number:
198200031 - NCDOT Bridges, Widening Projects 2015
RGP Numbers (for multiple RGPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
fJ 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r' Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
Forthe record onlyfor DWR401 Certification:
For the record onlyfor Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - E�ress
rJ Riparian Buffer Authorization
x
C' Yes R No
C' Yes G No
1f. Is this an after-the-fact permit application?*
� Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
F Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
� Yes r No
Acceptance LetterAttachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
C' Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
� Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
fJ Owner fJ Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
f Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Various
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
2d. Address
Street Address
Allen Road
Address Line 2
�Y
Greenville
Fbstal / Zip Code
27534
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
State / Aovince I F�gion
NC
Country
United States
2f. Fax Number:
[phone]

[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
NCDOT Jay Johnson
3b. Business Name:
3c.Address
Street Address
1037 W.H. Smith Blvd
Address Line 2
�ty
Greenville
Postal / Zip Code
27835
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:"
[e-mail]
S[ate / Awince I Region
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
[phone]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History �
1. Project Information �
1b. Subdivision name:
(rf appropriate)
1 c. Nearest municipality l town:
Greenville
2. Project Identification
2a. Propertyldentification Number:
2b. Property size:
2c. Project Address
Street Address
SR 1203 (Allen Road) from SR 1467 (Stantonburg Road) to US 13 (Dickinson Avenue EMension)
Address Line 2
(7ty S[ate / Awince / Region
Greenville North Carolina
Postal / Zip Code Country
27534 United States
3. SurFace Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:"
Greens Mill Run
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C; NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Tar-Pamlico
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030201030403
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Allen Road is in a rural residential section of Greenville that is actively transitioning into a residential, commuter community. Novant Health System is near the project on Stantonsburg
Road. Existing agriculture is transitioning to housing developments, condos, and apartment buildings.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
C' Yes r No C' Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
U-5875 Allen Road TOPO.pdf 291.35KB

4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
20180831_12075412212_17_Soil_Map.pdf
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.01 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1,991 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
881.06KB
The purpose of the proposed project is to increase capacity and improve mobility through intersection improvements, the addition of new travel lanes, and the installation of access
control measures throughout the corridor.
The proposed project is needed to increase capacity and improve mobility along Allen Road between Dickinson Avenue EMension and Stantonsburg Road. This section of Allen Road
betwaen Dickinson Avenue 6ctension and Stantonsburg Road is currently at or approaching capacity and therefore mobility is suffering. In order to provide for the development along
the proposed project corridor as well as in the surrounding area, NCDOT needs to make improvements such as adding newtravel lanes and implementing access control measures.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The Allen Road project will widen and upgrade Allen Road (S.R. 1203) for approximately 2.3 miles from Stantonsburg Road (S.R. 1467) to Dickinson Avenue Extension (U.S. 13) on the
western edge of the City of Greenville in Pitt County. The project will widen Allen Road to a fourllane, median divided roadway. The project includes curb and gutter along its entirety
and an at-grade railroad crossing just south of Landfill Road. Bicycle and pedestrian improvements will also be included with the project. The median width varies, but �nrould be 23 feet
wide in most locations. The project is included in the 201612025 NCDOT STIP as UI5875.
Allen Road is currently a three-lane roadway, consisting of tvYn travel lanes and a continuous center turn lane. There is currently no control of access and it is classified as a minor
arterial roadway. There are no bicycle or pedestrian facilities present. Stantonsburg Road is a five-lane roadway, consisting of four travel lanes and a continuous center turn lane.
Stantonsburg Road is classified as an other principal arterial roadway. Dickinson Avenue Extension is a twn-lane roadway classified as an other principal arterial to the east of the
intersection with Allen Road and a five-lane roadway consisting of tv.n travel lanes and a continuous center turn lane to the west of the intersection with Allen Road. West of Allen Road,
Dickinson Avenue E#ension is classified as a minor arterial. Traffic signals are present at the intersections with Stantonsburg Road and Dickinson Avenue Extension. No other signals
are present along the proposed project.
Allen Road is a north-south commuter corridor to the hospital and medical facilities along Stantonsburg Road. It is located on the v�stern edge of the City of Greenville and includes
land both within and outside the City of Greenville's jurisdictional boundary.
The project is not anticipated to result in any substantial negative direct, indirect, or cumulative impacts to the environment. The project will increase capacity of a roadway in an area
currently under development as a result of surrounding growth and changes in land uses. Adjacent growth and changes in land use would continue with or without the construction of
the project.
Equipment to be used would include equipment typical of roadway construction such as milling machines, graders, sweepers, dump trucks, asphalt pavers, and rollers.).
4j. Please upload project drewings for the proposed project.
U-5875_Rdy. pdf 22. S8MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
Sa. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the propertyor proposed impact areas?*
� Yes
r No
C' Unknown
Comments:
Streams and wetlands were delineated S/24/16 and verified by USACE and DWR on 11/3/2016.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved l' Not Verified � Unknown r WA
Corps AID Number:
Sc. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Christopher Dustin
Agency/Consultant Company: SEPI Engineering and Construction
Other
Sd. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
November 3, 2016 for USACE PJD Field Determination meeting.
Sd1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Allen Road - PJD Package_20161108_FINAL.pdf
Steffens_comments. pdf
Ward_comments. pdf
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
C' Yes r No
8.3MB
79.96KB
156.09KB
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
�
1. Impacts Summary

1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
rJ Wetlands 117 Streams-tributaries rJ Buffers
r Open Waters I� Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
0.010 0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.010
2h. Comments:
Impact area is <0.01 acres of w�tland, for mechanized clearing for the wetland swale installation.
3. Stream Impacts
❑ 3a. Reason for impact (') 3b.lmpact type * 3a Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction" length*
S1
Site 1A- Bank Stabilization Permanent Bank Stabilization SA Intermittent Both 8 33
and Scour Hole Repair Average(feet) pinearfeet)
Site 1A- Bank Stabilization Tem orar Bank Stabilization SA Intermittent Both 8 24
S2 p Y
and Scour Hole Repair Average(feet) pinearfeet)
S3
Site 1B- 60" RCP Permanent Culvert SA Intermittent Both 8 70
Average(feet) (linearfeet)
S4
Site 16- Bank Stabilization Permanent Bank Stabilization SA Intermittent Both 8 28
Average(feet) (linearfeet)
SS Site 16- Dewatering Temporary Dewatering SA Intermittent Both 8 12
Average(feet) (linearfeet)
Site 1C-2 7'x6' RCBC Permanent Culvert SA Intermittent Both 8 49
S6 @
Average(feet) (linearfcet)
S7
Site 1 C- Bank Stabilization Permanent Bank Stabilization SA Intermittent Both 8 111
Average(feet) pinearfeet)
gg Site 1C- Dewatering Temporary Dewatering SA Intermittent Both 8 23
Average(feet) Qinearfeet)
gg Site 2- 2@12'x9' RCBC Permanent Culvert Greens Mill Run Perennial Both 10 70
Average(feet) Qinearfeet)
S10
Site 2- Bank Stabilization Permanent Bank Stabilization Greens Mill Run Perennial Both 10 139
Average (feet) Qinear feet)
g�� Site 2- Dewatering Temporary Dewatering Greens Mill Run Perennial Both 10 40
Average (feet) (linear feet)
S12
Site 3- 7'u8' RCBC Permanent Culvert SE Perennial Both 7 106
Average (feet) (linear feet)
S13
Site 3-Bank Stabilization Permanent Bank Stabiliration SE Perennial Both 7 78
Average (feet) (linear feet)
S14 Site 3- Dewatering Temporary Dewatering SE Perennial Both 7 13
Average (feet) (linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
684
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
796
3j. Comments:
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
112
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact

6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Q�eck all tha[ apply.
r Neuse
r Catawba
r Goose Creek
r Other
fJ Tar-Pamlico
� Randleman
� Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type I 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name I 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
Site 1A- Bank Stabilization and Scour Fble P SA No 0 646
Repair
Site 1A- Bank Stabilization and Scour Fble T SA No 4,255 0
Repair
Site 1 B- 60" RCP T SA Yes 4,950 3,048
Site 1 B-Roadway Construction P SA Yes 777 458
Site 1G 2@7'x6' RCBC T SA Yes 9,109 4,975
Site1C-RoadwayConstruction P SA Yes 4,472 2,103
Site 2- 2@12'x9' RCBC T Greens Mill Run Yes 13,926 7,416
Site 2- Roadway Construction P Greens Mill Run Yes 3,695 2,053
Site 3- 7'x8' RCBC T SE Yes 9,557 5,836
Site 3- Roadway Construction P SE Yes 3,706 1,977
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Total Temporary impacts:
Total Permanent impacts:
Total combined buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
Supporting Documentation
U-5875_Buffer_Permit_20190110. pdf
U-5875_Wetland_Permit_20190110. pdf
Zone 1
41,797.00
Zone 1
12,650.00
Zone 1
54,447.00
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The widening was designed asymmetrically to utilize as much of the exsting right of way as possible.
1b. Specificallydescribe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The proposed project will use protective sediment and erosion control BMP's in accordance with NCDEQ Design Standards., Stormwater runoff control
structures will be designed using best management practices as detailed in the most recent version of NCDWQ Stormwater Best Management
Practices.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
� Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
,r! DWR rJ Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
� Mitigation bank rJ Payment to in-lieu fee I� Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
Zone 2
21, 275.00
Zone 2
7,237.00
Zone 2
28,512.00
9.7MB
10.52M6

4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
C' Yes r No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
352
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(squarefeet)
192,375
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
warm
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
All buffer impacts associated with road crossings (Sites 1 B, 1C, 2 and 3) require buffer mitigation regardless if the impact is temporary or permanent.
Zone 1 mitigation ratio is 3:1. Zone 2 mitigation ratio is 1.5:1.
Only permanent stream impacts resulting from culvert installation at Sites 2 and 3 require mitigation. Total new culvert length at both sites is 176 linear
feet. With a multiplier of 2, total stream mitigation requested is 352 linear feet.
Request for mitigation acceptance letter was submitted to NCDMS on 2/14/2019. The acceptance letter will be provided when received.
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more
information.
� Yes r No
Zone 2 Culvert installation and roadway construction
6f. Total buffer mitigation required
192,375
27, 866 1.5 41, 799
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
F Yes r No
6h. Attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services.
6j. Comments:
Request for mitigation acceptance letter was submitted to NCDMS on 2/14/2019. The acceptance letter will be provided when received.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
� Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
rJ Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
� Wetland Swale (higher SMNT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
r Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
U-5875_SMP_20181203.pdf
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
� Yes r No
Comments:
84.09MB
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact.

G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federallstate/local) funds or the use of public (federallstate) land?*
F Yes r No
�
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environme ntal Policy Act (NEPAISEPA)? *
r Yes r No
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House?*
G Yes r No
NEPAor SEPAFinal Approval Letter
SEPA.pdf
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
212MB
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?*
C' Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? *
f Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is not anticipated to result in any substantial negative direct, indirect, or cumulative impacts to the environment. The project �nrould
increase capaciry of a roadway in an area currently under development as a result of surrounding growth and changes in land use. Adjacent growth
and changes in land use would occur without the project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
C' Yes r No r fWA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? *
f Yes r No
Sb. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
F Yes r No
Sc. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
Sd. Is another Federal agency involved?"
f Yes r No
Se. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
�' Unknown
S. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
US Fish and Wildlife and the NC Natural Heritage Program Data, field surveys by SEPI biologist and NCDOT biological surveys group.
Consultation Documentation Upload
U-5875 Allen Road Final NRTR.pdf
U-5875 mussel report.pdf
U-5875 revised mussel report.pdf
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
C' Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The NOAA EFH (Essential Fish Habitat) mapper.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7.6SMB
5.74MB
131.21 KB

7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
SHPO online mapping and coordination with SHPO
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
SHPO. pdf
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
� Yes r No
445.96KB
Sb. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Overall topography and drainage patterns will not change significantly. No increase in base flood elevations would occur.
Sc. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Roodplain Mapping; FEMA FIRM panel 4667 (map no. 37204667400K)
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previouslyrequested.
Signature
*
rJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true., accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a"transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions AcY');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions AcP');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
. I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Robert Lepsic
Signature
,il.r•'/�'lt�r�f'�C!'
Date
2/15/2019