330003_Inspection_20190208

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0Com • nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: A/ J ( (( Arrival Time: n q/-7 Departure Time: /b 5 n County: Region:
Farm Name: t 14-(/�S 7b k)VL '1 '- #, Owner Email:
Owner Name: f j(._v1 '7' rI ° f Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: ()Bug/ C•l3 • 13u h�-r h Integrator: pi r t/ ) S
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish _Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
1 eeder to Finish 7 O2 1-/p V7 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? /
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes o N NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes U +o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA n NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 3 - O 3 Date of Inspection: 2/7 / /
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. , ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
GI P J fib.Y1/Q.y Ll k(4/h/
C :S r c s-- s / - /9- I i 6��� ea✓mil�s�-S a /L
y
Reviewer/Inspector Name: / Phone: 79 I - god
q
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �3 Cl SIB Ply&l( Date: pZ/7 1 (
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015

Facility Number: 33 - a 3 Date of Inspection: ,.2( 7 r / 7
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): /9 it / 9 4( Z 5/ ye I`
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes (2, A ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. El Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 1 3&P k 47 5h-iJu i 4-in 5'
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE-
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes N El NA ❑ NE
•
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA El NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
Reguired Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA El NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No El NA 0 NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists El Design ❑Maps El Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
El Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA El NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No El NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued