330004_Inspection_20190214

(D'bivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 3 - 6 1 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Qf Com ice Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: wilyag Arrival Time: a 9(,z) Departure Time: ,b 3-t, County: Region:
Farm Name: V ' /t211 Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: f�- ' C�� f Ci/P 0 iJ Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
/Wean to Feeder t 5 i0 119 "L Non-Layer Dairy Calf
' Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
•
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. •Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑VE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes NA ElNE2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes t4,,
❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 ;- 0L/ Date of Inspection: -/ t zf / / '
Waste Collection&Treatment
/ ----
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? El Yes r]j�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): _
Observed Freeboard(in): %��% �� S- r� �_ l (e `� % it ./
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �]/o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) r"
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑'No/ ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta-threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes / No. ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 21 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): /j L/�/ti c I.41/ s,-j r4 i n 5
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o'❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes E lac❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Er/No""
❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes New ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes AI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No 0/NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 3 - Q Lj Date of Inspection: .f // 9
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes "No El NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: /
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes —No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
S lW015 .e S.ur✓e y (vv d0ac2. >
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: 9 ,(- 4/ 2..c o
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1 2)Lc -)-✓„7 '/- ./C2- f/ Date: al
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015