20190200 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190213

D1�VR
�irlslan af Water Resources
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
F Yes
C' No
Is this project a public transportation project?"
� Yes r No
Change only rf needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
20190200
Is a payment required for this project?*
f No paymentrequired
� Fee received
f Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer"
Rob Ridings:eads\rgridings
Information for Initial Review
Ve rsion# *
1
Reviewing Office *
Central Office - [phone]
1a. Name of project:
Replacement of Franklin Bridge 66 over Shocco Creek on NC 58 (176P.5.R.87) and replacement of Warren Bridge 9 over Overflow for Shocco Creek on NC 58 (17BP.5.R.72)
1a. Who is the PrimaryContact?*
Chris Murray
1b. PrimaryContact Email:* 1c. PrimaryContact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
2/13/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Shocco Creek
Basin
Tar-Pamlico
Water Classification
28-79-22: Class C NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
3620909 -78.10301
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Franklin
Warren
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Is this a NCDOT Project?*
r Yes r No
(NCDOT only) T.I.P. or state project number:
::
WBS # (�)
17BP.5.R.87 (Franklin Bridge 66) and 17BP.S.R.72 (Warren Bridge 9)

1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
�J Section 404 Permit (�tlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
rJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified bythe Corps?
f Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
14 - Linear transportation
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
,r! 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
� Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
� Individual Permit
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Er,�ress
rJ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after-the-fact permit application?*
� Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
G Yes �' No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
� Yes r No
Acceptance LetterAttachment
17BP.5.R.72 mitigation letter DMS.pdf
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
C' Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
� Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
fJ Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
C' Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
NCDOT
2b. Deed book and page no.:
NCDOT and various owners
2c. Responsible party:
2d. Address
Street Address
2612 N. Duke Street
Address Line 2
�Y
Durham
Wstal / Zip Code
27704
S[ate / FYwince I Region
NC
Country
USA
71.S1KB
*
C' Yes r No
C' Yes r No
�,

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(rf appropriate)
1 c. Nearest municipality / town:
Centerville
2. Project Identification
2a. Propertyldentification Number:
Warren 2869562724, Warren 2961406397
and Franklin 013529 and 012635
2c. Project Address
Street Address
near 4094 Highway 58
Address Line 2
�Y
Louisburg
Fbstal / Zip Code
27549
2f. Fax Number:
2b. Property size:
5.5
State / Rovince I F�gion
NC
Country
USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Shocco Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
28-79-22; Class C NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Tar-Pamlico
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030201020104
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Land surrounding the e�tisting NC 5$ Franklin Bridge 66 and Warren Bridge 9 is described as primarily bottomland hardwood forest and is not developed. Franklin Bridge 66 crosses
Shocco Creek and Warren Bridge 9 crosses Overflowfor Shocco Creek.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
� Yes r No � Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
17BP.5.R.72 and 17BP.5.R.87 USGS map.pdf 1.34MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
17BP.5.R.72 and 17BP.S.R.87 soil survey.pdf 1.3MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.32 ac
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
170 lineaer feet
_;
�
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*

Ebsting Franklin Bridge 66 and Warren Bridge 9 are structurally deficient and require replacement of these structures. An off-site detour is problematic due to the length of the detour.
Additionally, the roadway in Ihe project limits is below acceptable design standards. The replacement Franklin Bridge 66 and Warren Bridge 9 will be constructed on new location to the
west of the existing alignment. Traffic will be maintained on existing alignment during construction of the hnro bridge structures. See below info regarding existing and proposed structures
for each site:
Franklin Bridge 66:
Ebsting structure: 1@ 41 ft-7 in reinforced concrete deck on girders with reinforced concrete vertical abutments on pile footings.
Proposed structure: 1@ 105 ft-0 in and 1@ 25 ft-0 in 39 in box beam that spans Shocco Creek on new alignment to the west of ewsting NC 58.
Warren Bridge 9:
Ebsting structure: 1@ 22 ft-0 in reinforced concrete slab on reinforced concrete full height abutments.
Proposed structure: The proposed structures are 3@ 12 ft-0 in x 9 ft-0 in reinforced concrete box culvert that is 57.6 ft long . The culvert is located on new location to the west of
existing NC 58 and serves to connect wetland systems on both sides of the relocated NC 5S.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Project requires relocation and construction of new sUuctures on new alignment to the west of the ewsting NC 58. Indirect impacts may resutt from changes to the hydraulic pattern in
the immediate area. New Franklin Bridge 66 completely spans Shocco Creek but is located upstream of the existing Franklin Bridge 66. New Warren Bridge 9 is a three-barrel culvert
located upstream of the existing Warren Bridge 9. Installation of the three-barrel culvert at the designed location is to connect upstream and downstream drainage patterns in the
wetland system and adjacent bottomland hardwood forest. Both existing Franklin Bridge 66 and existing Warren Bridge 9 will be completely removed. Additionally, the ewsting NC 58
roadbed and fill slope will be removed down to natural grade and graded to drain towards the east.
4j. Please upload project drewings for the proposed project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
Sa. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes
r No
Comments:
PJD application sent via email from David Cooper to E. Alsmeyer on 11/14/2016
Sb. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
C' Preliminary r Approved C' Not Verified r Unknown C' WA
Corps AID Number:
Sc. If Sa is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Heather Smith and David Cooper
Agency/Consultant Company: Ecological Engineering
Other
Sd1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
C' Yes r No
r Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activit�/?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
fJ Wetlands II� Streams-tributaries rJ Buffers
r Open Waters Ir Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts

2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.320
2h. Comments:
See stream/wetland permit drawing for Warren Bridge 9(17BP.5.R.72).
3. Stream Impacts
Reason for impact (�)
ge removal and bank
�ilization
ge removal and bank
�ili�ation
k stabilization
k stabilization
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.320
36.Impact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction� length�
Stabilization
Stabilization
Stabilization
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
100
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
253
3j. Comments:
See stream/wetland permit drawing for Franklin Bridge 66 (17BP.5.R.87).
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
� Neuse
� Catawba
� Goose Creek
r Other
Creek
Creek
Creek
Creek
Perennial
Perennial
Perennial
Perennial
Average(feet) (linearfeet)
� 82
Average (feet) (linear feet)
� 60
Average(Feet) (linearfeet)
0 171
Average(feet) � Qinearfeet)
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
153
,r! Tar-Pamlico
r Randleman
r Jordan Lake
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 8,176.00 5,898.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 8,176.00 5,895.00
6i. Comments:
See buffer permit drawing for Franklin Bridge 66 ( VBR5.R.87).
Supporting Documentation
340066_PermitDrawings_20190205.pdf 1.84MB
340066_PermitDrawings_Buffer_20190207.pdf 1.52MB
920009_PermitDrawings_20190207.pdf 2.46M6
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation -

1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
An on-site meeting was held on January 26, 2017 to discuss the expected results of a mussel survey, possible roadway design issues and new
crossing structures with Travis Wilson (NCWRC), Gary Jordan (USFWS) and various staff members from the NCDOT, Stewart Engineering, Ecological
Engineering and RK&K. The findings of the meeting indicated that the best alignment to avoid and reduce impacts to Shocco Creek and known
population of ewsting protected mussel species was to realgn the roadway on new location to the �+,�st. The new spanning structure at Franklin Bridge
66 will completely span the open water of Shocco Creek. The new crossing structure at Warren Bridge 9 is a three-barrel culvert. This was determined
to be an acceptable structure since the e�sting structure conveys runoff through the adjacent wetland and bottomland hard�nrood forest. Fill slopes
have been steepened to reduce watland impacts. The existing structures and abandoned roadbed will be removed down to natural ground and
graded to drain. Further avoidance and minimization efforts are described in the attached Warren 9 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS and
Franklin 66 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT COMMITMENTS.
1b. Specificallydescribe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction activities will be monitored by NCDOT Division envirionmental staff and Resident Engineer inspectors. They will evaulate construction
and determine howto minimize impacts during construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
F Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
r DWR jJ Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
r Mitigation bank II7 Payment to in-lieu fee I� Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached.
� Yes r No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
Mitigation for wetland impacts are proposed for the project.
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0.32
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules7
F Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
rJ Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SFNVT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
r Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
17BP.5.R.72 SWMP.pdf
17BP.S.R.87 SWMP.pdf
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
� Yes r No
223KB
113.69KB
�
Comments:
Project will comply with NCDOT permit.
G. Supplementary Information "

1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federallstate/local) funds or the use of public (federallstate) land?*
r Yes �' No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparetion of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environme ntal Policy Act (NEPAISEPA)? *
� Yes r No
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House?*
C' Yes r No
Comme nts: *
Document will not need to be submitted to the State Clearing House.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
f Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
C' Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project involves replacement of ewsting structurally deficient bridges with new structures on new alignment to the v�st of exsting NC 58. The bridges
and adjacent roadway are designed to only provide the amount of traffic currently travelling through the area. The new bridges and new adjacent
roadway provide the footprint of twn lanes of traffic and roadside shoulder.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?"
� Yes r No � fWA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? *
r Yes r No
Sb. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
G Yes r No
Sc. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
Sd. Is another Federal agency involved?*
C' Yes
r No
C' Unknown
Se. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
� Yes r No
S. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Significant consultation with USFWS and NCWRG Full information regarding howthe project affects federally protected mussel species are provided
in the Environmental Summary for USACE for Franklin 66, Environmental Summary for USACE for Warren 9, informal consultation letter from USFWS
for Warren 9 and Franklin 66 and use of the mussel PBO for Franklin 66.
Consultation Documentation Upload
17BP.5.R.72 and 17BP.5.R.87 FINAL USFWS concurrence request.pdf 574.85KB
20190212_letter_Service to NCDOT_Bridge 920009.pdf 44.96KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat? *
f Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
Mapping
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No

7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
Consultation with State Historic Preservation Office and NCDOT HEU.
Franklin 66:
Historic Architecture:
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Effects Required Form dated September 23, 2016 indicates Bridge 66 is a Determined Eligible bridge based on
NCDOT Historic Bridge Inventory. Effects Required result.
Memoranda of Agreement (MOA) for NCDOT to replace Bridge 9 and 66 at the borders of Warren and Franklin Counties will adversely affect the
existing bridges Qetter from USACE to Mr. Reid Nelson, Advisory Council of Historic Preservation (dated March 7, 2018). Note that this covers the
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) among the USACE, NCDOT and NCSHP for Replacement of Bridge 66 on NC 58 over Shocco Creek in Franklin
County (WBS 17BP.S.R.87).
Photo-documentation for Bridge 66 on NC 58 over Shocco Creek, PA-16-09-005, Franklin County, ER 17-0179 (dated April 30, 2018) indicates the
mitigation measures in the MOA have been met.
Archaeology: No Archaeological Survey Required Form dated December 2, 2016.
Warren 9:
Historic Architecture:
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Effects Required Form dated September 23, 2016 indicates Bridge 66 is a Determined Eligible bridge based on
NCDOT Historic Bridge Inventory. Effects Required result.
Memoranda of Agreement (MOA) for NCDOT to replace Bridge 9 and 66 at the borders of Warren and Franklin Counties will adversely affect the
existing bridges Qetter from USACE to Mr. Reid Nelson, Advisory Council of Historic Preservation (dated March 7, 2018). Note that this covers the
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) among the USACE, NCDOT and NCSHP for Replacement of Bridge 66 on NC 58 over Shocco Creek in Franklin
County (WBS 17BP.S.R.87).
Photo-documentation for Bridge 66 on NC 58 over Shocco Creek, PA-16-09-005, Franklin County, ER 17-0179 (dated April 30, 2018) indicates the
mitigation measures in the MOA have been met.
Archaeology: No Archaeological Survey Required Form dated December 2, 2016.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
Franklin 66 Archaeology No Survey.pdf
Franklin 66 full MOA documentation.pdf
Franklin 66 Hist Str EFFECTS REQUIRED.pdf
Warren 9 Archaeology No Survey Form.pdf
Warren 9 Hist Str ADVERSE EFFECTS form.pdf
Warren 9 Hist Str Photodoc Letter.pdf
Warren 9 Hist Str Signed MOA.pdf
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in a FEMMdesignated 100-year floodplain?*
� Yes
r No
Sb. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Project is located in Zone AE and was studied by Limitied Detailed methods.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Consultation with NCDOT hydraulics Unit and reviewof stormwater management plans.
Miscellaneous
513.23KB
4.13M6
1.96 MB
1.17M6
5.1MB
97.82KB
1.45MB
Comments
See attached Environmental Summary for USACE for Franklin 66 and Environmental Summary for USACE for Warren 9. Also. see Warren 9 and Franlin 66 Final Environmental Project
Commitments.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Environmental summary for USACE for Warren 9.pdf
Environmental summary for USACE for Franklin 66.pdf
17BP.5.R.87 Franklin 66 FIPIP,L ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT COMMITMENTS.pdf
17BP.S.R.72 Warren 9 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT COMMITMENTS.pdf
Signature
�7 By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
121.66KB
132.8KB
87.56KB
80.92KB
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
. I agree that submission of this PCN form is a"transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Artide 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions AcY');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions AcP');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Christopher A. Murray
Signature
crf�,:s ytuj2�,4r

Date
2/13/2019