Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190198 Ver 1_17BP10R111 PA 17-12-0023 No Archaeological Survey Required Form Br No 326 SR 1505 Over Stumplick Br Union_20190213Project Tracking No.: 17-12-0023 oa�"�� NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM :� ,Q, Q 9 � c �. .. '�s a. This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not ��' � � ;���� r�', . F - . ,� o� valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the �:<, � .��.� '�:,.� � Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. � Q. PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: WBS No: Br. No. 326 County: Document Union F.A. No: 17BP.10.R.111 Federal Permit Required? MCC Funding: � State ❑ Federal � Yes ❑ No Permit Type: usace Project Description: NCDOT proposes to replace Bridge No. 326 on SR 1505 (Roanoke Church Road) in place over Stumplick Branch in Union County near Unionville. An offsite detour has been identified for use during construction. The current bridge is very small and the proposed length of the new project is less than 500 feet with a bridge about 50 feet in length. Preliminary design plans were provided which guide establishment of the Area of Potential Effects (APE). For purposes of this review, the APE is 500 feet in length with consideration of 50 ft to either side of the existing SR 1505 and current Bridge No. 326, or 100 ft total width. This is a state funded undertaking with federal action through USACE permitting, therefore Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act applies far archaeological review. SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: The bridge to be replaced is in a rural setting with woods and agricultural fields adjacent to the APE. USGS mapping (Bakers) and aerial photography was studied (see Figures 1 and 2). Google streetview tool shows a very small crossing at the project area over a ditch or canal sized Stumplick Branch which may have been channelized. Plowed agricultural fields extend to the current ROW on the south side. The north side is wooded. According to USGS mapping and GIS resources (data layer created by NCDOT archaeologist Paul J. Mohler), no cemetery is present at the APE or immediately nearby. Historic maps were examined. The 1914 Soils Map of Union County (MC.097.1914d) shows SR 1505 road in roughly the same location. A structure, probably a house, is shown at that time some distance away to the west, south of the road though outside of the APE. The Office of State Archaeology was visited to review archaeological mapping and to reference any known archaeological surveys and sites. This helps establish an archaeological context for comparison. There are no recorded archaeological sites in the nearby vicinity. An environmental review for archaeology is closeby at the northwest quadrant though did not result in an archaeological survey (ER 02-9898). Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: The bridge replacement will be constructed on the same location and alignment using an offsite detour. No new ROW is required, though there are easements in place outside of the existing ROW for construction. The new bridge overlaps the existing facility and therefore over previously disturbed soils. The majority of the APE is disturbed, a poor archaeological context. There are no recorded archaeological sites or cemeteries within the APE. A previous environmental review at the APE did not receive a recommendation for an archaeological survey. "No ARCHAEOLOCY SURVEYREQCIIRED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 1 of 4 Project Tracking No.: 17-12-0023 The context doesn't indicate a high probabilty for archaeological sites within the small, altered APE. It is unlikely that significant, intact archaeological remains would be present and impacted by the bridge replacement project. For archaeological review, this federally permitted undertaking should be considered compliant with Section 106. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: � Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence Other: 10/12/2018 LOGIST Date "No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED"form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 2 of 4 Project Tracking No.: 17-12-0023 � . � � . �_, �.. ' i U`,�1;' �� �. � � ' � - � 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet `- J • / , � f .l ' % / � . ... y • i � � i —¢ ; . ' a' ,3�� � . _ _ � �-c- ' .., ' s�: ` _ � � ���' . � , - , _ N � � _ y : . � q , ��, w . ` . _o .� '�1�- ��� i , � =e r�� . � t` � . � ! �- � � y _ _ . �-- � • ,�' .. �, - J � � . m � � • � hr �, �. . - , � ��. �,�: ',�-� .,-- , � s � � , �,, . . - � _ - ' �i. --� -� ��'• •� �� i � � . ` _ -�� ` - • '� � ,T . � • n� �� ' 890326!`CS ; � . ',..`,., . _.. - - , . - , . . . .� , �; � • - .. . _ �.. :_ . _ , , �1 �,_ , f . - 1 • . - - _: � `" i ` - _ ■ t - . , .. . , , �L 6 � r, Ftc�ndkr CA � .. ' ' ; _ , �, `_ 'r L . `�' � ' j - . � . • r � � _ _ �� � �• -t..: ,_ : . -` t _ � ' + '-_. - � � �l . . �•� �— . � �1. . .. ,. .. � s _ . � r '. .' � . -� ' . � .. / � �'��— � ��y� � i..`� f � ��" ���__ ��... � � � � '` ' ` /`�` -� �� � ��� '� r, Q . �, - _ . _ _ f� ' '�' �. f y , .. � � � �1 . l:� '���,\ "� . � j � ss� � �6+.. �' � �� � . -ti; : ! '� ���}{ ����,-y������ �`. �� `7N � - -- ' �` _ _ --' � r . . 890360 � . , -- '''-�: iJar"'�"_'i:c . � ' � � � ' r-. '� ._- • � 7 , . -- :: • �- �'.��'�'_ � .� ��� \�'�`�- �` �� _ � , C� uNioN ti Bakf.CS • - '' Z-' ` - '�. + � . 890444= � � ^ � . . � �r . �. , � . � �, ..\ � ._ i \ _-,�t , 'y �. � L�•- � , • - - . . . • s � r�-.1, 4`� `y�1�. ,� - T ��,�, , � i �- ` . `� - ''�', � .' � .1 '` � � � -T. *�` �, �.. . • .�. ` . S� -.- . �j � � � • �',1 �� ._. -' �r 4}`"�, _ ., , . � , s� . �� �'�� � - •j , L , ' � �//j} '''� �% } ~ � � '', '. _, _ - . � %. �' �; �' � 5 ,'a z,, ` �"`�� /j S. . �4 � ` • � � ,} �` • j,. � • • �•, � • f , . � , - � � ��y�►� 1,-ti • - __' ^ ;� � o - � ' � i � ��, 's3 ' I ' , - � � ti, ,. ' • . _ - �{ I�� _ �' . �`, y_ - � 890041 � � . ., � . � ` � � r' .• , • s .�j� ,n ��`.�`� • ,� . � ,�� �Y � � - \� ` � , �:� r _.i.rat.. ('h �`�, w� � ! 4YSt \!i y 7' � 1 '•� . � � - �`� � �J"S � � � ' . .-r .. E.9� 1`� -�. �`. , r . _ � .. seoza� . �� ,�+ � � , . ` ` .., • . ��.`-��- e:. � •" � � . ��.= � a��: , �._ E� *` : � �f,- . ! , � ` � - , � �fS�V �fxC � � � : ' �f ��`� . �� . `_____ � � � � �� ' � c ' ' [`rOsSIi�iiclti ,'� .,i . - -��. * _ ,+ ��� ]� - 890466 . ,. _ � 89 417 r,y_. . . ' . • . � _ � ��i{ � . • I 1 - _ '� � � , . CopyrigM�.O 20'13 Natlonal Geo9raphis; S lety. I-cube�, Esri, HERE. Garm'n OO OpenS�ree�Map�contr'bu�ors a L the G,IS user community Figure 1. Vicinity of PA 17-12-0023, the replacement of Br. No. 198 on SR 1536 (James Porter Road) over Kelly Creek/Lyon Swamp Canal in Bladen County, shown on USGS mapping (Kelly). The APE is shown in yellow. "No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUTRED` form for the Amended Minor Transportation Pr�ojeets as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 3 of 4 Project Tracking No.: 17-12-0023 -�.� O N � � � �L �_ � � J � � .-: 0 200 400 � UNION R � _ _ _ � � s"o�se`_ Bakers �"`'�' �i.'` - .� . 800 Feet i� � � ,_ � � �� +� o: � tM.. � � �'�`-� _ . . � � � / � � ' �� — . ' . , � _ _ f ' , a • �. , .� "� 8 ,� _ . . � . , , . ,. A . _ . ,� , �� �r",,�_; . � ' �� � � ' ¢ -- � � , ` .�, ;�;� � � .�� .� . � �_ -� � � �-� � � . '� r_; - -- � , h' � 1l...Y e - . .�.:.� _ ��� � ^� N �'' - _ � � ,� . ` ' � . ,_ » . � � �,uF� .��ilalGoL (.c�Fgc.-a l� (., Jn��li aCM1E�r, r�iDS�Y31\U�AE'X,G t JVry.A.roJ J I fv.l�r �..n(ssL�l �.��.� .... Figure 2. Aerial map of the proposed replacement of Br. No. 326 on SR 1505 (Roanoke Church Road) over Stumplick Branch. The approximate APE is shown in yellow. Note the possible channelization indicated from GIS stream location vs. the current branch. "No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUTRED` form for the Amended Minor Transportation Pr�ojeets as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement. 4 of 4