HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190198 Ver 1_17BP10R111 PA 17-12-0023 No Archaeological Survey Required Form Br No 326 SR 1505 Over Stumplick Br Union_20190213Project Tracking No.:
17-12-0023
oa�"�� NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM :�
,Q, Q 9 � c �. ..
'�s a. This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not ��' � �
;���� r�', . F - .
,� o� valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
�:<, � .��.�
'�:,.� � Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. � Q.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
WBS No:
Br. No. 326
County:
Document
Union
F.A. No:
17BP.10.R.111
Federal Permit Required?
MCC
Funding: � State ❑ Federal
� Yes ❑ No Permit Type: usace
Project Description: NCDOT proposes to replace Bridge No. 326 on SR 1505 (Roanoke Church Road) in
place over Stumplick Branch in Union County near Unionville. An offsite detour has been identified for
use during construction. The current bridge is very small and the proposed length of the new project is less
than 500 feet with a bridge about 50 feet in length. Preliminary design plans were provided which guide
establishment of the Area of Potential Effects (APE). For purposes of this review, the APE is 500 feet in
length with consideration of 50 ft to either side of the existing SR 1505 and current Bridge No. 326, or 100
ft total width. This is a state funded undertaking with federal action through USACE permitting, therefore
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act applies far archaeological review.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
The bridge to be replaced is in a rural setting with woods and agricultural fields adjacent to the APE. USGS
mapping (Bakers) and aerial photography was studied (see Figures 1 and 2). Google streetview tool shows
a very small crossing at the project area over a ditch or canal sized Stumplick Branch which may have been
channelized. Plowed agricultural fields extend to the current ROW on the south side. The north side is
wooded.
According to USGS mapping and GIS resources (data layer created by NCDOT archaeologist Paul J.
Mohler), no cemetery is present at the APE or immediately nearby.
Historic maps were examined. The 1914 Soils Map of Union County (MC.097.1914d) shows SR 1505
road in roughly the same location. A structure, probably a house, is shown at that time some distance away
to the west, south of the road though outside of the APE.
The Office of State Archaeology was visited to review archaeological mapping and to reference any known
archaeological surveys and sites. This helps establish an archaeological context for comparison. There are
no recorded archaeological sites in the nearby vicinity. An environmental review for archaeology is closeby
at the northwest quadrant though did not result in an archaeological survey (ER 02-9898).
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
The bridge replacement will be constructed on the same location and alignment using an offsite detour. No
new ROW is required, though there are easements in place outside of the existing ROW for construction.
The new bridge overlaps the existing facility and therefore over previously disturbed soils. The majority
of the APE is disturbed, a poor archaeological context. There are no recorded archaeological sites or
cemeteries within the APE. A previous environmental review at the APE did not receive a recommendation
for an archaeological survey.
"No ARCHAEOLOCY SURVEYREQCIIRED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of 4
Project Tracking No.:
17-12-0023
The context doesn't indicate a high probabilty for archaeological sites within the small, altered APE. It is
unlikely that significant, intact archaeological remains would be present and impacted by the bridge
replacement project. For archaeological review, this federally permitted undertaking should be considered
compliant with Section 106.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: � Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
Other:
10/12/2018
LOGIST
Date
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED"form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 4
Project Tracking No.:
17-12-0023
� . �
� . �_, �.. '
i
U`,�1;' �� �. � � ' � - � 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet `-
J • /
,
� f .l ' % / � . ...
y • i � � i —¢
; . ' a'
,3�� � . _ _ � �-c- ' .., ' s�: ` _
� � ���' . � , - , _
N � �
_ y : . � q , ��, w . ` .
_o .� '�1�- ��� i ,
� =e r�� . � t` � .
� ! �- � �
y _ _ . �-- � • ,�' .. �, - J � � .
m � � • � hr
�, �. . - , � ��. �,�:
',�-� .,-- , � s � � , �,, . . - � _ - ' �i.
--� -� ��'• •� �� i � � . ` _ -�� ` - • '� � ,T
. � • n� �� ' 890326!`CS ; � . ',..`,., . _.. - -
, .
- , . .
. .� ,
�; � • -
.. . _ �.. :_ . _
, , �1 �,_ , f . - 1 • . - -
_:
� `" i ` - _ ■ t - .
,
..
. ,
,
�L 6 � r, Ftc�ndkr CA � .. ' ' ; _ , �,
`_ 'r L . `�' � ' j - . � . • r � � _
_ �� � �• -t..:
,_ : .
-` t _
� ' + '-_. -
� � �l . . �•� �— . � �1. . .. ,. ..
� s _ . �
r '. .' � . -� ' . � ..
/ � �'��— � ��y� � i..`� f � ��" ���__ ��... �
� � � '` ' ` /`�` -� �� � ��� '� r, Q . �, - _ . _ _
f� ' '�' �. f y , .. � � � �1 . l:� '���,\ "� . � j � ss� � �6+.. �' � �� � .
-ti; : ! '� ���}{ ����,-y������ �`. �� `7N � - -- ' �` _ _ --' � r . .
890360 � . , -- '''-�: iJar"'�"_'i:c . � ' � � � ' r-. '� ._- • � 7
, . -- :: • �- �'.��'�'_ � .� ��� \�'�`�- �` �� _ �
, C� uNioN ti Bakf.CS • - '' Z-' ` - '�.
+ � . 890444= � � ^ � . . � �r . �. , � . � �, ..\ � ._ i \ _-,�t , 'y �. �
L�•- �
, • - - . . . • s � r�-.1, 4`� `y�1�.
,� - T ��,�, , � i �- ` . `� - ''�', � .' �
.1 '` � � � -T. *�` �, �.. . • .�. ` . S� -.- .
�j � � �
• �',1 �� ._. -' �r 4}`"�, _ ., , . � , s� . �� �'�� � -
•j , L , ' � �//j} '''� �% } ~ � �
'', '. _, _ - . � %. �' �; �' � 5 ,'a z,, ` �"`�� /j S. .
�4 � ` • � � ,} �` • j,. �
• • �•, � • f
, . � , - � � ��y�►� 1,-ti
• -
__' ^ ;� � o - � ' � i � ��, 's3
' I ' , - �
� ti, ,.
' • . _ - �{ I�� _ �' . �`, y_ - � 890041 � � . ., � . � ` �
� r'
.•
, • s
.�j� ,n ��`.�`� • ,� . � ,�� �Y � � - \� ` � , �:� r
_.i.rat.. ('h �`�, w� � ! 4YSt \!i y 7' � 1 '•� .
� � - �`� � �J"S � � � ' . .-r .. E.9� 1`� -�. �`. , r . _ � ..
seoza� . �� ,�+ � � ,
. ` ` .., • . ��.`-��- e:. � •" � � . ��.= � a��: , �._
E� *` : � �f,- . ! , � ` � - , � �fS�V �fxC � � � : ' �f ��`� . �� .
`_____ � � � � �� ' � c ' ' [`rOsSIi�iiclti ,'� .,i . - -��. * _ ,+
��� ]�
- 890466 . ,. _ � 89 417 r,y_. .
. ' . • . � _ � ��i{ � .
• I 1 - _ '� � � , . CopyrigM�.O 20'13 Natlonal Geo9raphis; S lety. I-cube�, Esri, HERE. Garm'n OO OpenS�ree�Map�contr'bu�ors a L the G,IS user community
Figure 1. Vicinity of PA 17-12-0023, the replacement of Br. No. 198 on SR 1536 (James Porter Road) over Kelly Creek/Lyon Swamp Canal in
Bladen County, shown on USGS mapping (Kelly). The APE is shown in yellow.
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUTRED` form for the Amended Minor Transportation Pr�ojeets as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of 4
Project Tracking No.:
17-12-0023
-�.�
O
N
�
�
�
�L
�_ �
� J
� � .-:
0 200 400
�
UNION
R �
_ _ _ � �
s"o�se`_ Bakers
�"`'�' �i.'` -
.� .
800 Feet
i�
� � ,_
� � ��
+�
o: �
tM..
�
�
�'�`-� _ . . � � � / � � ' �� — . ' . ,
� _ _ f ' , a • �.
, .� "� 8
,� _
.
. � . , ,
. ,. A . _
. ,� , �� �r",,�_; .
� ' �� � � '
¢ -- � �
, ` .�, ;�;� �
� .�� .� . � �_ -� �
� �-� � �
. '� r_; - -- � ,
h' �
1l...Y e - . .�.:.� _ ���
� ^�
N �'' - _ � � ,� . ` '
� .
,_ » . �
� �,uF� .��ilalGoL (.c�Fgc.-a l� (., Jn��li aCM1E�r, r�iDS�Y31\U�AE'X,G t JVry.A.roJ J I fv.l�r �..n(ssL�l �.��.� ....
Figure 2. Aerial map of the proposed replacement of Br. No. 326 on SR 1505 (Roanoke Church Road) over Stumplick Branch. The
approximate APE is shown in yellow. Note the possible channelization indicated from GIS stream location vs. the current branch.
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUTRED` form for the Amended Minor Transportation Pr�ojeets as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
4 of 4