HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190198 Ver 1_17BP10R111 SAW 2018-01851 PJD signed_20190213U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2018-01851 County: Union U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Bakers
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: North Carolina Deuartment of Transportation
Mr. Larry Thompson
Address: 716 W. Main Street
Albemarle, NC 28001
Telephone Number: 704-301-4881
E-mail: lthompson(a�ncdot.�ov
Size (acres) 18 acres Nearest Town Monroe
Nearest Waterway Richardson Creek River Basin Rockv River
USGS HUC 030501013 Coordinates Latitude: 35.052525
Longitude: -80.536734
Location description: Roanoke Church Road and Stumulick Branch Creek, north of Monroe, in Union Countv, NC.
Indicate Which of the Following Applv:
A. Preliminary Determination
� There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters have been
delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries
of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation maps, Figures 1-3, dated 8/1/2018. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction
determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of
computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made
on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on
the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the
Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD,
which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district far further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the waters
have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the permit evaluation process.
Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA
jurisdiction over all of the waters at the project area, which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable
permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able
to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can
be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon far a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters on your project area/properiy delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish
this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by
the Corps.
❑ The waters on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. The
approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly suggest you have
SAW-2018-01851
this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey
will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in
the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official
identified below on DATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808-2808 to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction ar
placement of structures, ar work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Ms. Nicholle BraspennickY at 704-510-0162 or
Nicholle.M.B raspennickx(a� usace. armv. mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary iurisdictional determination
form dated 10/12/2018.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, ar anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeal5 InfOPmatlOn (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA fnrm to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
�0�� Digitallysignedby
MFTfHEWS.MONlE.K128C861633
Corps Regulatory Official: M~� DateU3�8^0.13 35�3-0400EK�389861633�
Date of JD: 10/12/2018 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable
SAW-2018-01851
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm ape�f?p=136:4:0
AW-2018-01851
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: North Carolina Department of File Number: SAW-2018-01851 Date: 10/l2/2018
Attached is:
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
Permit or Letter of
See Section below
I,�
:
0
0
�
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permissi
PERMIT DENIAL
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
SECTION I- The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
or the Coros reeulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, ar(c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your wark is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify ihe Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
SAW-2018-01851
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II- REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Ms. Nicholle Braspennickx CESAD-PDO
Charlotte Regulatory Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262 Phone: (404) 562-5137
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Ms. Nicholle Braspennickx, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: (404) 562-5137
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 10/12/2018
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: North Carolina Department of Transportation, Mr.
Larry Thompson, 716 W. Main Street, Albemarle, NC 28001
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, NC DOT/SR 1505 (Roanoke
Church Rd.), Bridge 326, over Stumplick Creek, SAW-2018-01851
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROiTND INFORMATION: Roanoke Church Road and Stumplick
Branch Creek, north of Monroe, in Union County, NC.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Union City: Monroe
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.052525 Longitude: -80.536734
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Richardson Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
� Office (Desk) Determination. Date: September 28, 2018
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount of Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
aquatic resources in which the aquatic resource
Site Number Latitude (decimal Longitude (decimal review area (acreage resources (i.e., ��may be" subject (i.e.,
degrees) degrees) wetland vs. non-
and linear feet, if Wetland waters) Section 404 or Section
applicable 10/404)
Stumplick 35.052482 -80.536744 511 linear feet Non-wetland 404
Branch
Stream A-I 35.053547 -80.538374 282 linear feet Non-wetland 404
Stream A- 35.053015 -80.537256 514 linear feet Non-wetland 404
P
Stream B 35.052587 -80.536282 213 linear feet Non-wetland 404
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, dttring an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor: Figures 1-3,
from Three Oaks Engineering, dated August 2018.
� Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
� Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
� Other information (please specify):
Stream Stumplick Branch flows to Richardson Creek which flows to Rocky River. Rocky River,
in turn, flows to the Pee Dee River, an interstate water of the U.S. Corps of Engineers regulations
at 33 CFR Part 328.3(a)(5) assert Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction over tributaries to other
waters of the U.S. Therefore, Stumplick Branch may be a water of the U.S. Streams A-I, A-P
and B flow to Stumplick Branch. Therefore, Streams A-I, A-P, and B may be waters of the U.S.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarilv been
veri�ed bv the Corps and should not be relied upon for later iurisdictional determinations.
Digitally signetl by
MATfHEWS MOMEK.t28066)633
OR� DN:r-US,o=U.S.Government,
� ou=DOD,ou=VKl,ou=USA,
a rn=MhTfHEWS.MONTE.K.128486J
633
Date: 2018.10.1213:54:40 -04'00'
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff inember completing PJD
10/12/2018
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.
r`��tte
/ ,,. `",t_ J_ y�.�-
i !
�
�:" �9l I c',, � �
j' j r3'} �! r}I � �
_� � �
i
[?, �
t
��
� ��
2
�. ;r
� r-.�'.
��.4 �
��, � �� " �,
��'�4 � s�_ �,
` ►r,
` ..
��r, ��, � xF+Sc t'
ti � � 1- r { . �'
� F ��.4 3'�, ��' �� � ._ ..
5-'4y� ��. y�#�� S. .-
,r� , ery�,,,�y} �,A_y "`�.._ 4 f � g�? .
I �ry . � ' ii" � �;4 ,��Al:V'�'a . � � .
� ��Rf}rIrOP. a � - a► �.� M! � • ��# r �
�� -` I i1- '. �' ���Y .1.�� � _.r « y �'a Y �'�� '�.��,.
1 If� r
.l � t�t ye� .k. i i'� i► .t►..w-tw�r�?'��1" ' a
,
I I ��+ �� � ' � - '41 � _ - . �_
� � � '� " • ,
I I �� �
—_ ' �• a � • � '.
—___—_ L—__ R
O OpenStreetMap (and) ' �s.
contributors, CC-BY-SA � � �
• !► �,�}� ' f� x,, � �.�
a ��1�.
�' f. `r Y r,� -�v •, s`k. { v�+r�s-�.. .a� � . , ,...sR, a�, ;.
's
. �--� � � � r i _
, { — ,� '�g � ��1�`�� a� y�-��:�'' *�;� ��
.�Ts�'�j- .�k �� '�`� '}-`��""f� 1 r�.� �'�. _
S `'r� ,� � ti �.+v. �y,�. 4 '..'���,r � °n
# ',�y" - t . -
���r � i� �^.. i ' y � ��t ,_,P +�� � '���, � ? .�,L4 S , as , r •� -�
��+ �� ��� * F � ?� �.Ye A, . �+ ��. . -. ,
A ;
��.�� :� .1 , .., . `''���,. �; �"� �,�, Bridge 326 ��, �� =;�-,,� ,
"�.`�'" �� � �� � `�' ���: �t'�"�, '�`�,�, �� �,�_�>� ,��,�,,-�� ' � � '
y K�� � \ ��� � Y� � *` � t�� � �t =� 4 = al..,.,'v" _q4e��. � *. .. �
,rw �. .. f
.�� • .Y �, 1N'�y'i 'J+� q � ,. a
����` � ti . , '� � Roanoke Church Rd'�`��� � o
� �r � �r �j '�'�� � �`.� '*�" � '� � � $ �
-
_
. �
, ,. , ��..� �,_ )3. �� • �,� r�� ���, .
.
� .: . , ,
iF !F'� -� . k „ / �'�- �,� -�� `4
.� , , � _ �� j � , _.-+ __ � . _ y ' ,�� ��� � �, � •.�
i.. . �� �..-�. � 'J -}. � I ,� x F� �� ��' �
•.
. `
e F � ., r
" �— .
, ,
' ' ,ry ' .
� . +� 6
_, H •. .. . � . .
. , :�r--- .�" ' �y ; r
._.' '1A �.i� ,. � ::. . � : ��; ,�o �''-.,. . f.��r c �.a. �.._.._, .y . � +t..,t :
*� � i: � � ��^
f
7
t: � �� � r ,,.;�
, ��- �*++..�, �, , -. ,�- � � �-----� �
�`•: ;I ` � �� � �ta ��, ,� !��:�
' � 1' � • � ��"'� • `�S"'�»S; . � � .; ' '�' .
. u `"�•�� , �7� "�a� •
� f
� • �,.. � / 4$,'�'``4 ,, � '* mC�r ��,, 5�.,. . , � �i �
, � ��+ ��:,.. �. �'N','" S5, ��.�� y��
.. . U /
4 � a_
� �! � `
,� r .� �;;� .�
_ 0 Bridge 326
Road
NHD Stream
NHD Lake/Pond
� Study Area
�___� County Boundary
�� +' a'_''�t���.r,� � � *�
� `• € r �
�,� . . , , .
�« _� , �r 'h � •, , '� 1
.�'�, .
•F '� , 7 � ��. � "�'. ..N�. P �
�" "", , - � _ ;,, '� 4
.�� � + N�` �,� ' � E �
� � ��,�,� s�► ; .
*'� ,..�M'��,� ..� y- � �`�'k �'� , �,,r�a•�w�""�'_� �, ,� '
=
~��',p u 'a� � �, ��° � � �a
i• ?'� k�}'���,i � Y` � "._��;v nh'�+P ,. �"�:''.�c7`�r�,4 e . �y ��'�'����a �
.�"�"� �� � �'.�M... � �� � E• . ' ' �--�..�J
� + �•�:• �� . i� � f' � f; , ,� � , �. �
,�- � r , y� " ��'' �'� �1` C`{"�' ; - �C� K: _ ' � `F• � �� _ _ ��
�e , r � : ;� t
_ ♦ y i- �e. . ` _ i +� ��, ` ,k � �i%e,.
�._ ,}; , . '� r � NC Center,fior�Geographie�lnformation &•Analysis
����p.��E��lA��� Prepared For:
V
� xoAry
� a � r49
� � Q�� ��
y� oP� � �
��� , �� �4
"'V � 3 S� +�� �Fyr a F SA�pS4v
Replacement of Bridge 326 on SR
1505 (Roanoke Church Road)
over Stumplick Branch
17BP.10.R.111
Project Vicinity Map
Union County, North Carolina
oate: August 2018
Scale: 0 250 500 Feet
� � �
Job No.:
18-601
Drawn By: Checked By:
NMS NDH
Figure
� ��,1N'E�ERIy� �
� �
�� �
a
;' �
��9�1�33l�1��'s
Prepared For:
� � �
� ��
� o.
4 �
�� � {
�'r
�c � a
Replacement of Bridge 326 on SR
1505 (Roanoke Church Road)
over Stumplick Branch
176P.10.R.111
Topographic Map
Union County, North Carolina
Date: August 2018
Scale: 0 50 100 Feet
i � i
Job No.:
18-601
Drawn By: Checked By:
NMS NDH
Figure
_ _ ` � . �_ e x� �.� '1: t � 1 �, �' ,'*�� '
.� , �
� - -- a ►: + �Y*3'' ,,,, - �: a�a � -
��`� /!� t � �
��'. k�'le, 'k � "4^ ��y,
"i. - r�t .�r,r ���"�5 ,�� , A �-q�� � ' }f _z�;
� ' -. "� `�� � �. Y,� r'� ,� tt�^ ��` �"�� .
a �� � ��` � .h w - ... - y d Js� l� } � � � �P� i"4. ..
'�f � � 4 �' *�A � � ;�fi ' - • .� �l� Y, s� �'l��� :��' d:�` �''at,�.+
��'pn +�. s � � t� ��' y q" l *� 4�i. i .. .
�i�� i � S%� �'�'y� L'�J's1S, x� y,� •��, 1v�ti, 4i �v r"�,, � i
` � �.� � � ��-�4 � �� ��~ ?�r. � � - � �� ,y�'0. � ^- ' ��yw� v:'�a�,: � �, ''� � � '�., ,�,, �ti�. � . - a �'4,:�.�.�
.�' � y� �. [` � I �` ,� :1 q � � tS ,�•yl+�j'^�: +�t�' .. a n `� y.��1 �' r w°�'�'i �' �, � ' "8 � „:� c S
y � `y, � �� �% Y F Y. S .Fj �� � .. ,�i�i,� s'�r�[y�, 1 �, . t y`T"1 .
. . # S ,�Y.�'. 1 ,tj�'. 'L' 4 . d � .x�? �- . 1 6•�...� i � ',[�C� �1 y� . . y`"R ge�.
� �e � ��
,r ,.
��
�
�
r'� `��� �'�� ��'S� `� ..,j� � �" ���{��y �, � �a'+�r� ,�'��� f �'� ��ry� -� , �' . '��y •
4,7 T��. ��, , p• t'� k� �M„"'�, u"'F � ' +� `� } .. �3 ehti,,
yi'}� � �� �" � : ,, �?t' � � �''+1��=�'�y� �° . , �..t 'J' �C}� ti� � ,'hg,+� ,�� , ,„,o ti
• s
�'` #�� � ' • � ` ' � 4 ��'°.�,�'�s ,
k ��� � � � � �
,� � , , t . . ,�'"� � ��
, �
,
,r �t �; , z` � � '?� �. >�.r s.
4�,
.. . . x ,
r +t.1 � 1 �j.
, �3 � `� :>- � �' ,�" ' }� c � �,�, �
•J'��.;' ��+/ � � 'L ��s�,',�' ' �
� �� �" ''� � � .
� Y,�tL�'.'` 'R� ' � ` � h,a�'�'.; ' �'`�� ��'.. `'�"�l �' �. r . '�
, ���' � ' � �:'
r P'R..., g� „ � , � r i , ,� "+ t c � �`4 � � .\
�� �1 l ,�[
�; �� 45;. ���L, , 'r �, P,y"`�ti.;;j��' �,�,��ayi * ' qs k. N f 'ii� . 1 lq4 �•\� a 4��" �`_
� � � � `^�.. v �.
,�. �Tr� ¢� "�r,.� .4��. •t � t."�.a
�� '�3 ��' �. 1 j���,� Y � � y�� I( �. y � 4 � 7+� � :...
,���y 'L "i .. �' � ��� . � T 4 '. � � (��•'
�� -�"1 �� 4 a�� 1 .ya•h•M1 � �, _ �I � 7•� S . ��y �• �. � `� •.� �, y. ;�y.�''.
��t 3 n _ ILfi '. �� / r. � a#, J
� + �, �. ' . �� �,�
����y � �' � "t. *�',�, :� q�,.,r,�• � ;, e , : q.,•,
�:� '� ��. f �� � � R �e. 3
� ��7�" t'�r�,� � ri �`'� �` � `r�,- #." ir��y�-*�,, w+4 , �'� Y`
F� , .e yr" ,�,�:�y �. . 's�, SA ���,a�'�; ' "it i �s x � � � '
d` �r
�..�3�`'1;y` i , ;�q�C-Y-'�'+���'ti1' Y`�a?.{�' #��� . _ ,� ��,'� 5 ���� � �!r
* .1�w,}, Y a� r � �,� �} � ' �.��Y C � � h� 1 X *�1 �I.
�' . •l , .� �� .: `h �y�� ` �! '� � ,. �� _ '` �+i:.° � : ��: ';���,�„ � { ` k � y r'� �
��!'` 3d ,�'���'`� f'ti. .f�. ��a.. �4 .. �� � � � �� � � .�� � �� � �,�
.. „ � � � ��° �' ~ `
ti i1
�
,
� � 4; ..
-�
+a Z•.. iy,�` � . .. . r
. �' S` . Gni` +� . 't � ,��?i , ' • - � "
,� � ♦
� ,��- 'r� ° . t �'_- K�'. � w i��'!��.
sl +.� 4 4 �~ w�'C�� {�,�jy N° JU d� Y, i��� A-� � i' "3w A `Ii.�
' . ' �,4 y • � ' ` '� � �J '� �. +'X1,a��' �:
, � �'� x. �'Stumplick BranchY �,��'�� ��s j�-� �� �+'':s � ��� �, .;� �� �;.�1,�
�' h ' � ��,� . � r . .�# t,�r,ti lEP_' ' �- . f9 �. '-0"`��c'. ,�' � ��� .�}i-.zA�..T ". ' �.c~
g �`• �<
� t ��'ti�, y;�*• � Roanoke Church Rd . �
'� ;: .�; . ,'�• �,,�, �. "
� , 4. �� � ' �'�.• � t ' .
��r � .t � � ' y'
� Bridge 326 ` `
� � '�_. .. � � . . ... -. � i ._ � .. . .
� s�ry;: ..
. , �
� � 4_
M1Y
� b, ,�E'S � "�+. �',
r,����
,+� �� `
� _" � �c s`;�'�.
� Bridge 326
— Potential Perennial Stream
Potential Intermittent Stream
— Road
� Study Area
��I��
�.
� ��
A S
•" � li
F � A�
*', S
• � r
� i
��` {
... �.
.�� ���
,'�'tFr
,r��{,
� t� -
�, � _
� ,� -
fl ...- «"f`+, ,i
� }
,���
� , ' `I
�
..p ��yj.�,�
�.'4��� .
yI
�� .
�� �p' i
���
��• �
,�
.
�t �'
for Geographic Information &Analysis
����6l�EERIN�, �
yv,,� � �
W p
y ; �
`�'�'��33l�1`��'�'
Prepared For:
�toAry
° � r49
Q�� ��
o � �Y=
P,� � �4
�Fyr aF SA�pS4v
Replacement of Bridge 326 on SR
1505 (Roanoke Church Road)
over Stumplick Branch
17BP.10.R.111
Jurisdictional Features Map
Union County, North Carolina
oate: August 2018
Scale: 0 50 100 Feet
Job No.: I i I
18-601
Drawn By: Checked By:
NMS NDH
Figure