20180182 Ver 1_DRAFT_Red Barn MP Appendices_Dec 2018_20190218

Site Protection Instrument
The following pages provide the Draft Survey Plat and Conservation Easement Documents for the
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Project. These documents were submitted to the USACE on September
4th, 2018.

PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
Robert H. Merritt, Jr.
Bailey & Dixon, LLP
Post Office Box 1351
Raleigh, NC 27602
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEED FOR PERMANENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made this day of
2018 by and between G. Eddie Johnson and wife, Carol S. Johnson
("Grantor"), whose mailing address is 224 Beth Lane, Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030 and EPR
Conservation Easement Holdings, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company, whose mailing address
is 559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 ("Grantee").
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by
context.

RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and being in Surry
County, North Carolina (PIN: 5010-00-71-3049), more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto
and incorporated herein (the "Property");
WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not-for-profit or educational corporation, or trust qualified
under § 501 (c) (3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, the purposes or powers of which include
one or more of the purposes (a) through (d) listed below;
(a) retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open -space aspects of real property;
(b) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational, educational, or open -
space use;
(c) protecting natural resources;
(d) maintaining or enhancing air or water equality.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or aesthetic value
of the property in its natural state, which includes the following natural communities: wetlands, streams
and riparian buffers. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain streams, wetlands and
riparian resources and other natural values of approximately 15.825 acres, more or less, and being more
particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated fully herein by reference (the
"Conservation Easement Area"), and prevent the use or development of the Conservation Easement Area
for any purpose or in any manner that would conflict with the maintenance of its natural condition.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Conservation Easement Area
is a condition of the approval of the Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) and Mitigation Plan for the Red
Barn Mitigation Bank, Department of the Army (DA) Action ID Number SAW — 2017-10927, entitled
"Agreement to Establish the Red Barn Mitigation Bank in the Yadkin River Basin within the state of North
Carolina", and entered into by and between Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC acting as the

Bank Sponsor and the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers (Corps), in consultation with the North
Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). The Red Barn Mitigation Site has been approved by the Corps
foI use as a mitigation bank to compensate for unavoidable stream and wetland impacts authorized by
DA perm its.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of enforcement shall be held by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District ("Third -Party," to include any successor agencies), and
may be exercised through the appropriate enforcement agencies of the United States, and that these
rights are in addition to, and do not limit, the rights of enforcement under the Department of the army
instrument number SAW -2017-01927 ("Mitigation Banking Instrument", or any permit or certification
issued by the Third Party.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and representations contained
herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, Grantor hereby unconditionally and irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its
heirs, successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and
character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over the Conservation Easement Area described on
Exhibit B, together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation values thereof, as follows:
ARTICLE I
DURATION OF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation Easement is an easement in
gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor, Grantor's personal
representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and licensees.
ARTICLE II
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent wifih the purpose of this
Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Conservation Easement Area shall be preserved in its natural
condition and restricted from any developmenfi that would impair or interfere with the construction values
of the Conservation Easement Area.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and uses are expressly
prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder.
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of
the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any introduction of non-native plants and/or
animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building, mobile home,
asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising display, antenna, utility pole, tower, conduit,
line, pier, landing, dock or any other temporary or permanent structure of facility on or above the
Conservation Easement Area.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or commercial
activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes are prohibited.
D. Agricultural, Grazin
and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal husbandry and
horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming, cutting or mowing
of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the Conservation Easement Area except as provided in the
Mitigation Plan. Mowing of invasive and herbaceous vegetation for purposes of enhancing planted or
volunteer trees and shrubs approved in the Mitigation Plan is allowable once a year for no more than five
(5) consecutive years from the date on page 1 of this Conservation Easement, except where mowing will
negatively impact vegetation or disturb soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed by Ecosystem
Planning and Restoration, PLLC and shall not violate any part of Item L of Article II,
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways on the
Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or modification to existing roads, trails or walkways.

G. Si na e. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Conservation Easement Area,
except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation values of the Conservation
Easement Area, signs gg directions or proscribing rules and regulations for the use of the
Conservation Easement Area and/or signs identifying the Grantor as owner of the Conservation
Easement area.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or hazardous waste, or
any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or other materials on the Conservation.
Easement Area is prohibited.
1. Excavatin. ,Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling, excavation,
dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals or other materials,
and no change in the topography of the land in any manner on the Conservation Easement Area, except
to restore natural topography or drainage patterns. For purposes of restoring and enhancing streams and
wetlands within the Conservation Easement Area, Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC is allowed
to perform grading, filling, and excavation associated with stream and wetland restoration and
enhancement activities as described in the Mitigation Plan and authorized by Department of the Army
Nationwide Permit 27.
J . Water �
uali
and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or altering or tampering with water
control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage
patterns. In addition, diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into,
within or out of the easement area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into
waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered or
extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a transferable development
rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or otherwise.

L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, CI UI vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited other than for temporary or
occasional access by the Sponsor, Ecosystqui Planning and Restoration, PLLC, The Grantee, its
employee
monitorinc
and agents, successors, assi
the restoration
nsI and the Co
oses of constructing, maintaining and
enhancement and preservation of streams wetlands. and riparian areas within
e Conservation Easement Area.
M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Conservation Easemenfi Area
which is or may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant, the preservation of the Conservation
Easement Area substantially in its natural condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is
prohibited.
ARTICLE Ill
GRANTOR'S RESERVED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs, successors or
assigns, the right to continue the user of the Conservation Easement Area for all purposes not
inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not limited to, the right to quiet enjoyment of
the Conservation Easement Area, the rights of ingress and egress, the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the
Conservation Easement Area, the right to sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Conservation
Easemenfi Area, in whole or in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to the terms
of, and shall specifically reference, this Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its successors and
assigns, including Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC acting as the Bank Sponsor, the right to
construct and perform activities related to the restoration, enhancement, and preservation of streams,
wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation Easement Area in accordance with
the approved
Red Barn Mitigation Plan, and the Mitigation Banking instrument described in the Recitals of this
Conservation Easement.

ARTICLE IV
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representative, successors and assigns, and the Corps, shall have
the right to enter the Property and Conservation Easement Area at all reasonable times for the purpose of
inspecting the Conservation Easement Area to determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives,
heirsI successors, or assigns, is complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this
Conservation Easement. The Grantee, Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC, and its authorized
representatives, successors and assigns, and the Corps shall also have the right to enter and go upon
the Conservation Easement Area for purposes of making scientific or educational observations and
studies, and taking samples. The easement rights granted herein do not include public access rights.
ARTICLE V
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, and the Corps are allowed to
prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation Easement Area that is inconsistent with the purposes
of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Conservation Easement
Area that may be damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation
Easement by Grantor that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify the Grantor in
writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice to correct the
conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains uncured after thirty (30) days, the Grantee
may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive
and other relief. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice,
to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of the terms of
this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be
derived from this Conservation Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such
circumstances damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The
rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other
rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement. The costs of a
breach, correction or restoration, including Grantee's expenses, court costs, and attorneys' fees, shall be
pGild by Grantor, provided Grantor 10
determined to be responsible for the breach. The Corps shall have

tHU same rights and privileges as the said Grantee to enforce the terms and conditions of this
Conservation Easement.
B. No failure on part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision hereof shall
discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or provision hereof or affect the
right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of a subsequent breach or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Agreement shall be construed to entitle Grantee
to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the Conservation Easement Area resulting
from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of God
or third parties, except Grantor's lessees or invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by
Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to
property or harm to the Conservation Easement Area resulting from such causes.
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the Property in fee
simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which may be imp aired by the granting
of this Conservation Easement or that there are no outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or
other interests in the Property which have not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation
Easement
. Grantor further warrants that Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived
from and arising out of this Conservation easement, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the
Property against the claims of all persons.
B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this Conservation
Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any interest in all or a portion of the
Conservation Easement Area,
The- Grantor agrees to provide written notice of such transfer at least sixty
(60) days prior to the date of the transfer. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this
Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Conservation
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Easement Area or any portion thereof and shall not be amended, modified or terminated without the prior
written consent and approval of the Corps.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation
Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees
that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the
interest will be a qualified holder pursuant to 33 CFR 332.7 (a) (1), N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34, et, sem., and
§501 (c) (3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees
that .the terms of the transferor assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to
continue in perpetuity the conservafiion purposes described in this document.
Entire
reement and Severabili
. The Mitigation Banking instrument: MBI with
corresponding Mitigation Plan, and this Conservation Easement sets forth the entire agreement of the
parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations,
understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be
void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and
effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership,. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, assessments,
fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property free of any liens or other
encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor, except those incurred after the date hereof, which are
ressly subtect and subordinate to the Conservation Easement.
Grantee shall not be responsible for
any costs or liability of any kind related to the ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of
the Property, except as expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the
obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to the
exercise of the Reserved Rights.
F. Long -Term Mana
ement. If livestock operations wi11 be maintained on the property,
Grantor is responsible for all long-term management activities associated with fencing to ensure livestock
do not have access to the Protected Property. These activities include the maintenance and/or

replacement of fence structures, as deemed necessary by the Grantee, to ensure the aquatic resource
functions within the boundaries of the Protected Property are sustained.
G. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the continued
use of the Conservation Easement Area for the conservation purposes, this Conservation Easement may
only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial proceeding.
H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation Easement Area is taken in
the exercise of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the Restrictions imposed by this
Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in appropriate actions at the time of such taking
to recover the full value of the taking, and all incidental and direct damages due to the taking.
I. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest immediately
vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area is sold,
exchange, or involuntarily converted following an extinguishment or the exercise of eminent domain,
Grantee shall be entitled to the fair market value of this Conservation Easement as determined at the time
of the extinguishment or condemnation.
J. Notification Any notice, request for approval, or other communication required under this
Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the following
addresses (or such address as may be hereafter specified by notice pursuant to this paragraph).
To Grantor: G. Eddie Johnson and Wife, Carol S. Johnson
224 Beth Lane
Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030
To Grantee: EPR Conservation Easement Holdings, LLC
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
To Sponsor: Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606

To the Corps:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
K. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this Conservation
Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a reasonable period of time after
the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to make an assignment pursuant to this Conservation
Easement, then the Grantee's interest shall become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance
with an appropriate proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction.
L. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in a writing signed
by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the qualification of this Conservation
Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation
purposes of this grant.
M. Present Condition of the Conservation Easement Area. The wetlands, scenic, resource,
environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Conservation Easement Area, and its current use
and state of improvement, are described in Section 3 and Section 7 of the Mitigation Plan prepared by
Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor and Grantee to be complete and accurate as of the date
hereof. Both Grantor and Grantee have copies of this report. It will be used by the parties to assure that
any future changes in the use of the Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with the terms of this
Conservation Easement. However, this report is not intended to preclude the use of other evidence to
establish the present condition of the Conservation Easement Area if there is a controversy over its use.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for the
aforesaid purposes.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day and year
If above written.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
state aforesaid, certify that
this day and acknowledged
(SEAL)
G. Eddie Johnson, Grantor
(SEAL)
Carol S. Johnson, Grantor
,the undersigned Notary Public of the county and
G. to
Eddie Johnson and wife, Carol S. Johnson, personally appeared before me
me that they voluntarily signed the foregoing document.
WITNESS my hand and notarial stamp or seal this the
, 2018.
(SEAL)
My Commission Expires:
00448679/1
Notary Public
(Typed or printed name of Notary Public)

501000-71®3 049)
BEG-T�ING at an iron pin near a large poplar, corner of lands this
day sold to P.R. Marion and runs thence S 58 degs. W 12.66 chains
to a white oaks thence N 76 degs. W 12.22 chains to a stake; thence
S 84 /2 deg. W 3.30 chains to a birch on bank of Stewart's Creek;
thence up the said creek as it meanders about 11 1/2 chains to a point
on the East side of said creek opposite a large willow; thence N 22
deg E about 11 chains to a maple at head of ditch; thence with Critz
and Davis line East 21 chains to an iron pin, corner of lands this day
conveyed to P.R. Marion; thence S 17 1/2 deg. E 19 chains to the
beginning, containing 56 1/2 acres, more or less, being the West
portion of the E.L. Patterson Homeplace.
.A.lso all rights of ingress and egress that the parties of the first part
have in and to a roadway leading to the above lands from the
Franklin Road.
The above referenced property is the same land conveyed to G.
Eddie Johnson and wife, Carol S. Johnson, by deed recorded at Book
033 Page 644, Surry County Registry.

E�:HIBIT B
Legal Description
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Surry County, NC
A permanent Conservation Easement over portions of land in Mt. Airy Township, Surry County,
North Carolina, as shown on map entitled "Conservation Easement for Ecosystem Planning and
Restoration, LLC, Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site, dated , 2018, prepared
by Turner Land Surveying, PLLC (P-0702) and recorded in Plat Book , Page
Suny County Register* of Deeds and being a parcel owned by G. Eddie
Johnson and wife, Carol S. Johnson (PIN: 5 010-00-71-3 049) more particularly described as
follows:
1. Permanent Conservation Easement (PIN: 5010-00-71-3049) A-1
Beginning ata 5/8" rebar with cap set, said rebar being the northwest corner of G. Eddie Johnson
et ux. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1033, Page 644), also being the common corner with
Johnson Family Farm, LLC (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1124, Page 547), and said rebar
being located N 52°2223" W a distance of 4,306.11' from NCGS monument "AIRVIEW" with
NCGS Grid Coordinates [NAD83(201 1)] N=9993400.46 USft, E=1,520,179.10 USft; thence,
from the point of Beginning, S 88°32'04" E a total distance of 881.24' to a rebar and cap set in
the southern line of Lot 17 of the Walnut Tree subdivision (see Plat Book 9, Page 40), passing
corners along said line at the following nine (9) distances, (1) a distance of 115.94', with the
common line of Johnson Family Farm, to an existing 3/8" rebar, said rebar being the southwest
corner of Lot 3 of the LLS Associates subdivision (see Plat Book 12, Page 134); (2) thence, with
the common line of LLS Associates subdivision, a distance of 124.47' to a point; (3) thence a
distance of 124.01' to an existing 3/4" rebar; (4) thence a distance of 68.91' to an existing 1" iron
pipe; (5) thence a distance of 55.09' to an existing 1" iron pipe, said iron pipe being the southeast
corner of Lot 1 of LLS Associates subdivision and the southwest corner of Lot 20 of Walnut
Tree subdivision; (6) thence, with the common line of Walnut Tree subdivision, a distance of
108.00' to an existingl/2" rebar; (7) thence a distance of 100.00' to an existing 3/8" rebar; (8)
tI ence a distance of 100.00.' to a point; (9) thence a distance of 84.82' to the aforementioned
rebar and cap set in the southern line of Lot 17 of Walnut Tree subdivision; thence, leaving said
common line, continuing through the Johnson property with the conservation easement
boundary, S 03 ° 11'3 9" W a distance of 97.52' to a rebar and cap set; thence S 7999'08" W a
distance of 223.59' to a rebar and cap set; thence N 85'1 V52" W a distance of 509.00' to a rebar
and cap set; thence S 13°08'34" W a distance of 110.37to arebar and cap set; thence S 30°07'34"
E a distance of 94.80' to a rebar and cap set; thence S 62° 11' 16" E a distance of 424.73' to a rebar
and cap set; thence S 39°09'03" E a distance of 211.63' to a rebar and cap set; thence S 40°25'1"
W a distance of 99.17 to a rebar and cap set; thence N 571708 W a distance of 596.53' to a
rebar and cap set; thence N 37°21'33" W a distance of 310.50' to a rebar and cap set in an existing
ditch on the common line with Johnson Family Farm; thence, with the said common line, N
10
22°46'56" E a distance of 191.76' to the point of Beginning; containing 5.542 acres, more or less,
and shown as Easement Area "A-1" on the above -referenced plat

2. Permanent Conservation Easement (PIN: 5010-00-71-3049) A-2
Beginning at an axle found next to a 45" Poplar tree, said axle being the common corner of G.
Eddie Johnson et ux. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1033, Page 644), Doris H. Vernon (now
or formerly, see Deed Book 660, Page 499), and Roy Lee Oakley et ux. (now or formerly, see
Deed Book 1115, Page 977), and said axle being located N 49°22'39" W a distance of 2,167.32'
from NCGS monument "AIRVIEW" with NCGS Grid Coordinates [NAD83(201 1)]
N=9995400.46 USft, E=1,520,179.10 USft; thence, from the point of Beginning, with the
common line of Oakley, S 57°09'22" W a distance of 527.93' to a rebar and cap sets thence,
leaving said common line, continuing through the Johnson property with the conservation
easement boundary, N 65°2837" W a distance of 334.21' to a rebar and cap set; thence N
43'46'3 1 " W a distance of 245.75' to a rebar and cap set; thence N 77°50'42" W a distance of
104.45' to a rebar and cap sets thence S 20°44'50" W a distance of 211.72' to a rebar and cap set;
thence S 77'05'13 W a .distance of 78.70' to a rebar and cap set; thence N 09°43'21 " W a
distance of 1.17.50' to a rebar and cap set; thence N 23'42'4011 E a distance of 408.72' to a rebar
and cap set; thence N 47°23'00" W a distance of 137.72' to a rebar and cap sets thence N
40025'20" E a distance of 105.13' to a rebar and cap sets thence S 46'14'55' E a distance of
110.94' to a rebar and cap set; thence S 76'10'43 " E a distance of 407.97to a rebar and cap sets
thence S 02°36'35" E a distance of 313.85' to a rebar and cap set; thence N 85°15'55" E a distance
of 256.3 7' to a rebar and cap sets _ thence N 5 8'45'13 " E a distance of 297.60' to a rebar and cap
set on the western line of George Vernon Davis et ux. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1609,
Page 647); thence, with the common line of Davis, S 19°37'44" E a distance of 62.65' to a Y2"
iron pipe found next to an existing 1" iron pipe, said iron pipe being the southwest corner of
George Davis and the northwest corner of Doris Vernon; thence, with the common line of
Vernon, S 16°42'32" E a distance of 134.05' to the point of Beginning; containing 9100 acres,
more or less, and shown as Easement Area "A-2" on the above -referenced plat.
3. Permanent Conservation Easement (PIN: 5010-00-71-3049) A-3
Beginning at an existing 5/8" rebar, said rebar being the common corner of G. Eddie Johnson
et ux. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1033, Page 644) and Deborah M. Beasley et al. (now
or formerly, see Deed Book 1555, Page 895 and Plat Book 34, Page 125, Tract Two), and said
rebar being located N 70°06'54" W a distance of 3,333.68' from NCGS monument
AIRVIEW" with NCGS Grid Coordinates [NAD83(201 1)] N=999,400.46 USft, E_
1 ,520 179. 10 USft; thence from the point of Beginning, with the common line of Beasley, S
82°34'43 " W a distance of 13 5.3 6' to a rebar and cap set; thence, leaving said common line,
continuing through the Johnson property with the conservation easement boundary, N
16°52'47" E a distance of 160.47to a rebar and cap set; thence N 66°30'04" E a distance of
117.00' to a rebar and cap set; thence N 80°35'08" E a distance of 232.78' to a rebar and cap
set; thence S 09°43'21 " E a distance of 116.20' to a rebar and cap set; thence S 80°25'28" W a
distance of 158.46' to a rebar and cap set; thence S 54°39'28" W a distance of 13 8.14' to the
point of Beginning; containing 1.183 acres, more or less, and shown as Easement Area "A-3"
on the above -referenced plat.

4. Access to the P
Also conveyed herein
ermanent
Conservation Easements
Es, the right of ingress, egress
and regress to the permanent Conservation
Easements) described above, by way of and over the Property as provided in this Conservation
Easement Deed and as
00448756 / 1
maybe provided on the Plat referenced above.

PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
Robert H. Merritt, Jr.
Bailey & Dixon, LLP
Post Office Box 1351
Raleigh, NC 27602
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF SURRY
DEED FOR PERMANENT
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made this day of
2018 by and between Deborah M. Boyd and spouse, Terry G. Boyd, of 286
Cletius Moser Trail, Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030, Greta M. Boyd, a widow, of 194 Cletius Moser
Trail, Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030, and Portia M. Oakley, unmarried, of 1603 S. Main Street, Suite
200, Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030, (collectively "Grantor") and EPR Conservation Easement
Holdings, I.I.C.
a North Carolina limited liability company, whose address is 559 Jones Franklin Road,
Suite 150, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 ("Grantee").
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by
context.
1

RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and being in SUry
County, North Carolina, (PIN: 5010-20-70-7007) more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto
and incorporated herein (the "Property");
WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not-for-profit or educational corporation, or trust qualified
under § 501 (c) (3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, the purposes or powers of which include
one or more of the purposes (a) through (d) listed below;
(a) retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open -space aspects of real property;
(b) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational, educational, or open -
space use;
(c) protecting natural resources;
(d) maintaining or enhancing air or water equality.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or aesthetic value
of the property in its natural state, which includes the following natural communities: wetlands, streams
and riparian buffers. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain streams, wetlands and
riparian resources and other natural values of approximately 6.606 acres, more or less, and being more
particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated fully herein by reference (the
"Conservation Easement Area"), and prevent the use or development of the Conservation Easement Area
for any purpose or in any manner that would conflict with the maintenance of its natural condition.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Conservation Easement Area
is a condition of the approval of the Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) and Mitigation Plan for the Red
Barn Mitigation Bank, Department of the Army (DA) Action ID Number SAW -2017-01927, entitled
"Agreement to Establish the Red Barn Mitigation Bank in the Yadkin River Basin within the state of North
Carolina", and entered into by and between Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC acting as the
2 a
o

Bank Sponsor and the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers (Corps), in consultation with the North
Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). The Red Barn Mitigation Site has been approved by the Corps
foI use as a mitigation bank to compensate for unavoidable stream and wetland impacts authorized by
DA perm its.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of enforcement shall be held by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District ("Third -Party," to include any successor agencies), and
may be exercised through the appropriate enforcement agencies of the United States, and that these
rights are in addition to, and do nofi limit, the rights of enforcement under the Department of the army
instrument number SAW -2017-01927 ("Mitigation Banking Instrument", or any permit or certification
issued by the Third Party.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and representations contained
herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, Grantor hereby unconditionally and irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its
heirs, successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and
character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over the Conservation Easement Area described on
Exhibit B, together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation values thereof, as follows:
ARTICLE I
DURATION OF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation Easement is an easement in
is
gross,
with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor, Grantor's personal
representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and licensees.
ARTICLE II
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent with the purpose of this
Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Conservation Easement Area shall be preserved in its natural
condition and restricted from any development that would impair or interfere with the construction values
oI
the Conservation Easement Area.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and uses are expressly
pI ohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder.
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of
the natural features of the Conservation Easemenfi Area or any introduction of non-native plants and/or
animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building, mobile home,
asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising display, antenna, utility pole, tower, conduit,
line, pier, landing, dock or any other temporary or permanent structure of facility on or above the
Conservation Easement Area.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industria(, residential and/or commercial
activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes are prohibited.
D. Agricultural, Grazin
and Horticultural Use_
Agricultural, grazing, animal husbandry and
horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming, cutting or mowing
of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the Conservation Easement Area except as provided in the
Mitigation Plan. Mowing of invasive and herbaceous vegetation for purposes of enhancing planted or
volunteer trees and shrubs approved in the Mitigation Plan is allowable once a year for no more than five
(5) consecutive years from the date on page 1 of this Conservation Easement, except where mowing will
negatively impact vegetation or disturb soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed by Ecosystem
Planning and Restoration, PLLC and shall not violate any part of Item L of Article II.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways on the
Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or modification to existing roads, trails or walkways.
G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Conservation Easement Area,
except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation values of the Conservation
Easement Area, signs giving directions or proscribing rules and regulations for the use of the

Conservation Easement Area and/or signs identifying the Grantor as owner of the Conservation
Easement area.
Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or hazardous waste, or
any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or other materials on the Conservation
Easement Area is prohibited.
Excavatin
Dredgin
�r Mineral Use_
There shall be no grading, filling, excavation,
dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals or other materials,
and no change in the topography of the land in any manner on the Conservation Easement Area, except
to restore natural topography or drainage patterns. For purposes of restoring and enhancing streams and
wetlands within the Conservation Easement Area, Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC is allowed
to perform grading, filling, and excavation associated with stream and wetland restoration and
enhancement activities as described in the Mitigation Plan and authorized by Department of the Army
Nationwide Permit 27.
J. Water Quali
and f�rainanP Pattern_
There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or altering or tampering with water
control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage
patterns. In addition, diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into,
within or out of the easement area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into
waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered or
extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a transferable development
rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or otherwise.
Q
Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all -terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited other than for tem
rary or
occasional access by the Sponsor, Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC, The Grantee, its

r.
employees and agents
successors, assi
H
s, and the Corps for purposes of constructin
monitoring the restoration, enhancement and
III
fihe Conservation Easement Area.
and
reservation of streams wetlands, and riparian areas VVI IH
M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Conservation Easement Area
which is or may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant, the preservation of the Conservation
Easement Area substantially in its natural condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is
prohibited.
ARTICLE III
GRANTOR'S RESERVED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs, successors or
assigns, the right to continue the user of the Conservation Easement Area for all purposes not
inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not limited to, the right to quiet enjoyment of
the Conservation Easement Area, the rights of ingress and egress, the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the
Conservation Easement Area, the right to sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Conservation
Easement Area, in whole or in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to the terms
of, and shall specifically reference, this Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its successors and
assigns, including Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC acting as the Bank Sponsor, the right to
construct and perform activities related to the restoration, enhancement, and preservation of streams,
wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation Easement Area in accordance with the approved
Red Barn Mitigation Plan, and the Mitigation Banking instrument described in the Recitals of this
Conservation Easement.
ARTICLE IV
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representative, successors and assigns, and the Corps, shall have
the right to enter the Property and Conservation Easement Area at all reasonable times for the purpose of
inspecfiing the Conservation Easement Area to determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives,
heirs, successors, or assigns, is complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this
Conservation Easement. The Grantee, Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC and its authorized

representatives, successors and assigns, and the Corps shall also have the right to enter and go upon
tHt! Conservation Easement Area for purposes of making scientific or educational observations and
studies, and taking samples. The easement rights granted herein do not include public access rights.
ARTICLE V
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, and the Corps are allowed to
prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation Easement Area that is inconsistent with the purposes
of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Conservation Easement
Area fihat may be damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation
Easement by Grantor that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify the Grantor in
writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice to correct the
conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains uncured after thirty (30) days, the Grantee
may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive
and other relief. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice,
to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of the terms of
this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be
derived from this Conservation Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such
circumstances damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The
rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other
rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement. The costs of a
breach, correction or restoration, including Grantee's expenses, court costs, and attorneys' fees, shall be
paid by Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach. The Corps shall have
the same rights and privileges as the said Grantee to enforce the terms and conditions of this
Conservation Easement.
B. No failure on part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision hereof shat(
discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or provision hereof or affect the
right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of a subsequent breach or default.
.....................................................

C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Agreement shall be construed to entitle Grantee
to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the Conservation Easement Area resulting
from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of God
or third parties, except Grantor's lessees or invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by
Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to
property or harm to the Conservation Easement Area resulting from such causes.
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the Property in fee
simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which may be imp aired by the granting
of this Conservation Easement or that there are no outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or
other interests in the Property which have not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation
Easement. Grantor further warrants that Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived
from and arising out of this Conservation easement, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the
Property against the claims of all persons.
B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this Conservation
Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any interest in all or a portion of the
Conservation Easement Area. The Grantor agrees to provide written notice of such transfer at least sixty
(60) days prior to the date of the transfer. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this
onservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Conservation
C
Easement Area or any portion thereof and shall not be amended, modified or terminated without the prior
written consent and approval of the Corps.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation
Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees
that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the
interest will be a qualified holder pursuant to 33 CFR 332.7 (a) (1),Gen. Stat.
§501 (c) (3) and 3 1
70 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees

that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to
continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document.
Entire Agreement and Severabili
. The gation Banking Instrument: MBI with
corresponding Mitigation Plan, and this Conservation Easement sets forth the entire agreement of the
parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations,
understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be
void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and
effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, assessments,
fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property free of any liens or other
encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor, except those incurred after the date hereof, which are
0
�ress��
subject and subordinate to the Conservation Easement. Grantee shall not be responsible for
any costs or liability of any kind related to the ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of
the Property, except as expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the
obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to the
exercise of the Reserved Rights.
F. Long -Term Man
ement. If livestock operations will be maintained on the property,
Grantor is responsible for all long-term management activities associated with fencing to ensure livestock
do not have access to the Protected Property. These activities include the maintenance and/or
replacement of fence structures, as deemed necessary by the Grantee, to ensure the aquatic resource
functions within the boundaries of the Protected Property are sustained.
G. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the continued
use of the Conservation Easement Area for the conservation purposes, this Conservation Easement may
only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial proceeding.
H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation Easement Area is taken in
the exercise of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the Restrictions imposed by this

Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in appropriate actions at the time of such taking
tU recover the full value of the taking, and all incidental and direct damages due to the taking.
I. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest immediately
vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area is sold,
exchangeI or involuntarily converted following an extinguishment or the exercise of eminent domain,
Grantee shall be entitled to the fair market value of this Conservation Easement as determined at the time
of the extinguishment or condemnation.
J. Notification Any notice, request for approval, or other communication required under this
Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the following
addresses (or such address as may be hereafter specified by notice pursuant to this paragraph).
To Grantor: Deborah M. Boyd and spouse, Terry G. Boyd
286 Cletius Moser Trail
Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030
Greta M. Boyd
194 Cletius Moser Trail
Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030
Portia M. Oakley
1603 S. Main Street, Suite 200
Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030
To Grantee: EPR Conservation Easement Holdings, LLC
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
To Sponsor: Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
To the Corps: US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
K. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this Conservation
Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a reasonable period of time after
tHU
occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to make an assignment pursuant to this Conservation

Easement, then the Grantee's interest shall become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance
with an appropriate proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction.
L. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but onlywriting signed
by a(I parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the qualification of this Conservation
Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation
purposes of this grant.
M. Present Condition of the Conservation EasementArea.
The wetlands, scenic, resource,
environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Conservation Easement Area, and its current use
and state of improvement, are described in Section 3 and Section 7 of the Mitigation Plan prepared by
Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor and Grantee to be complete and accurate as of the date
hereof. Both Grantor and Grantee have copies of this report. It will be used by the parties to assure that
any future changes in the use of the Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with the terms of this
Conservation Easement. However, this report is not intended to preclude the use of other evidence to
establish the present condition of the Conservation Easement Area if there is a controversy over its use.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for the
aforesaid purposes.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day and year
first above written.
(SEAL)
Deborah M. Boyd, Grantor
(SEAL)
Terry G. Boyd, Grantor
Greta M. Boyd, Grantor
Portia M. Oakley, Grantor
(SEAL)
(SEAL)

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, ,the undersigned Notary Public of the county and
state aforesaid, certify that Deborah M. Boyd and spouse,Terry G. Boyd, personally appeared before me
this day and acknowledged to me that they voluntarily signed the foregoing document.
2018.
WITNESS my hand and notarial stamp or seal this the day of
(SEAL)
Notary Public
(Typed or printed name of Notary Public)
My Commission Expires:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, ,the undersigned Notary Public of the county and
state aforesaid, certify that Greta M. Boyd, a widow, personally appeared before me this day and
acknowledged to me that she voluntarily signed the foregoing document.
2018.
WITNESS my hand and notarial stamp or seal this the
(SEAL)
My Commission Expires:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
Notary Public
(Typed or printed name of Notary Public)
I, ,the undersigned Notary Public of the county and
state aforesaid, certify that Portia M. Oakley, unmarried, personally appeared before me this day and
acknowledged to me that she voluntarily signed the foregoing document.
2018.
WITNESS my hand and notarial stamp or seal this the day of
(SEAL)
Notary Public
(Typed or printed name of Notary
My Commission Expires:
00448684/1
Public)

INee 5010=20=7Om7OO7)
being all of Tract Two, containing 18.079 acres, more or less, as
shown on survey of Joe L. Cooke, PLS, L�2970, dated December
2, 2017 and recorded in Plat Book 34, Page 125, Surry County
registry.
00448822 / 1

r
EXHIBIT B
Legal Description
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Burry County, NC
py
A permanent Conservation Easement over portions of land in Mt. Airy Township, Burry County,
North Carolina, as shown on map entitled "Conservation Easement for Ecosystem Planning and
Restoration, LLC, Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site, dated , 2018,
prepared by Turner Land Surveying, PLLC (P-0702) and recorded in Plat Book ,
Page , Surry County Register of Deeds and being a parcel owned by
Deborah M. Beasley, Greta M. Boyd and Portia M. Oakley (PINo5010-2O-7O-7007) more
articularldescribed as follows :
1. Permanent Conservation Easement (PIN: 5010-20-70-7007) B-1
Beginning at an existing 5/8" rebar, said rebar being the common corner of G. Eddie Johnson et
ux. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1033, Page 644) and Deborah M. Beasley et al. (now or
formerly, see Deed Book 1555, Page 895 and Plat Book 34, Page 125, Tract Two), and said rebar
being located N 70006'54" W a distance of 3,333.68' from NCGS monument "AIRVIEW" with
NCGS Grid Coordinates [NAD83(201 1)] N=999,400.46 USft, E=1,520,179.10 USft; thence,
from the point of Beginning, continuing through the Deborah Beasley et al. property with the
conservation easement boundary, S 22054'39" W a distance of 155.94' to a rebar and cap sets
thence S 66014'24" E a distance of 80.95' to a rebar and cap sets thence S 43'05'20" E a distance
of 450.73' to a rebar and cap set; thence S 62009'15" E a distance of 134.18' to a rebar and cap
set; thence S 79034'25" E a distance of 260.18' to a rebar and cap set; thence S 65°02'50" E a
distance of 358.07' to a rebar and cap set; thence S 89038'06" E a distance of 214.83' to a rebar
and cap set; thence S 11 °28'21 " W a distance of 62.62' to a point on the common line with Terry
G. Beasley et ux. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1446, Page 358); thence, with the common
Line of Terry Beasley et ux., S 739709" 17'09" W a distance of 13 6.58' to an existing 5/8" rebar, said
rebar being the common corner with Terry G. Beasley et ux. and Terry G. Beasley et ux. now or
formerly, see Deed Book 489, Page 1175 and Deed Book 315, Page 169); thence, with the
corrimon line of Terry G. Beasley et ux., N 67°45' 10" W a distance of 461.23' to an existing 3/4"
iron pipe, said iron pipe being the common corner with Terry G. Beasley et ux. and Shawn A.
Moser et ux. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1555, Page 898 and Plat Book 32, Page 180, Tract
2); the common line of Moser, N 79°43' 18" W a distance of 487.93' to an existing
thence, with
5/8" rebar; thence N 34°41'41 " W a distance of 401.60' to an existing 5/8" rebar; thence N
71 °2932" W a distance of 94.12' to an existing 5/8" rebar; thence N 82°3 9'01 " W a distance of
13 0.28' to a point in Stewarts Creek; thence, leaving said common line, N 210 5 8'3 7" W a distance
of 200.50' to a point in Stewarts Creek, said point being the common corner with Johnson; thence,
with , th the common line of JohnsonN 82034'43" E a distance of 55.00' to an existing 5/8" rebar;
thence N 82034'43" E a distance of 149.55' to rebar and cap set; thence N 82°34'43" E a distance
of 13 5.3 6' to the point of Beginning; containing 4.771 acres, more or less, and shown as Easement
Area "B-1" on the above -referenced plat.
00448758 / 1

1. Permanent Conservation Easement (PIN: 5010m LU= / U-7007) B-2
Beginning at an existing 5/8" rebar, said rebar being the common corner of Greta M. Boyd (now
or formerly, see Deed Book 320, Page 98), Deborah M. Beasley et al. (now or formerly, see Deed
Book 1555, Page 895 and Plat Book 34, Page 125, Tract Two) and Terry G. Beasley et ux. (now
or formerly, see Deed Book 1446, Page 358), and said rebar being located N 80°29'41" W a
distance of 1,905.65' from NCGS monument "AIRVIEW" with NCGS Grid Coordinates
[NAD83(2011)] N=999,400.46 USft, E=1,520,179.10 USft; thence, from the point of Beginning,
through the Deborah Beasley et al. property with the conservation easement boundary, N
11'28'21 " E a distance of 63.18' to an existing 5/8" rebar, said rebar being the common corner
with Richard Dwayne Chandler et ux. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1616, Page 667); thence,
with the common line of Chandler, S 76°51'43" E a distance of 358.60' to an existing 5/8" rebar;
thence S 64041'19" E a distance of 509.89' to an existing 5/8" rebar; thence S 06007'17"
E a
distance of 109.67' to an existing 5/8" rebar; thence S 87001'56" W a distance of 97.91' to an
existing nail in the base of a Spanish Oak; thence N 79000'28" W a distance of 40.3 9' to an existing
5/8" rebar, said rebar being the common corner with Boyd and Chandler; thence, with the
common line of Boyd, N 21 01 F07" E a distance of 29.48' to a point, thence N 67018'51 " W a
distance of 169.01' to an existing 5/8" rebar; thence N 54018'51 " W a distance of 110.00' to an
existing 5/8" rebar; thence N 39025'41" W a distance of 140.07' to an existing 5/8" rebar; thence
.178003'56" W a distance of 381.67' to the point of Beginning; containing 1.835 acres, more or
less, and shown as Easement Area "B-2" on the above -referenced plat.
2. Access to the Permanent Conservation Easements
Also conveyed herein is the right of ingress, egress and regress to the permanent Conservation
Easements) described above, by way of and over the Property as provided in this Conservation
Easement Deed and as may be provided on the Plat referenced above.
00445758 / 1
00448758 / 1

Robert H. Merritt, Jr.
Bailey & Dixon, LLP
Post Office Box 1351
Raleigh, NC 27602
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF SURRY
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made this
2018, by and between Shawn A.. Moser, a free trader, ("Grantor") whose
address is 259 Cletius Moser Trail, Mount Airy, North Carolina, 27030 and EPR Conservation Easement
Holdings, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company, whose address is 559 Jones Franklin Road,
Suite 150, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 ("Grantee").
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by
context.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and being in Surry
County, North Carolina, (pin: 5919-02-79-1649) more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto
aHU
incorporated herein (the "Property") and Grantor has the status of a free trader with respect to the

Property pursuant to that certain Quitclaim Deed recorded at Book 1631, Page 4997 Surry County
Registry;
WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not-for-profit or educational corporation, or trust qualified
under § 501 (c) (3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, the purposes or powers of which include
one or more of the purposes (a) through (d) listed below;
(a) retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open -space aspects of real property;
(b) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational, educational, or open -
space use;
(c) protecting natural resources;
(d) maintaining or enhancing air or water equality.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or aesthetic value
of the property in its natural state, which includes the following natural communities: wetlands, streams
anA
riparian buffers. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain streams, wetlands and
riparian resources and other natural values of approximately 1.005 acres, more or less, and being more
particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated fully herein by reference (the
"Conservation Easement Area"), and prevent the use or development of the Conservation Easement Area
for any purpose or in any manner that would conflict with the maintenance of its natural condition.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Conservation Easement Area
is a condition of the approval of the Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) and Mitigation Plan for the Red
Barn Mitigation Bank, Department of the Army (DA) Action ID Number SAW -2017-01927, entitled
"Agreement to Establish the Red Barn Mitigation Bank in the Yadkin River Basin within the state of North
Carolina and entered into by and between Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC acting as the
Bank Sponsor and the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers (Corps), in consultation with the North
Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). The Red Barn Mitigation Site has been approved by the Corps

for use as a mitigation bank to compensate for unavoidable stream and wetland impacts authorized by
DA permits.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of enforcement shall be held by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District ("Third -Party," to include any successor agencies), and
may be exercised through the appropriate enforcement agencies of the United States, and that these
righfis are in addition to, and do not limit, the rights of enforcement under the Department of the array
instrument number SAW -2017-01927 ("Mitigation Banking Instrument", or any permit or certification
issued by the Third Parfy.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and representations contained
herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, Grantor hereby unconditionally and irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its
heirs, successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and
character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over the Conservation Easement Area described on
Exhibit B, together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation values thereof, as follows:
ARTICLE I
DURATION OF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation Easement is an easement in
is
gross,
with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor, Grantor's personal
representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and licensees.
ARTICLE II
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent with the purpose of this
Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Conservation Easement Area shall be preserved in its natural
condition and restricted from any development that would impair or interfere with the construction values
oI
the Conservation Easement Area.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and uses are expressly
prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder.
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of
the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any introduction of non-native plants and/or
animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building, mobile home,
asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising display, antenna, utility pole, tower, conduit,
line, pier, landing, dock or any other temporary or permanent structure of facility on or above the
Conservation Easement Area.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use_. Industrial, residential and/or commercial
activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes are prohibited.
D. Agricultural, Grazin
and Horticultural Use.
Agricultural, grazing, animal husbandry and
horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming, cutting or mowing
of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the Conservation Easement Area except as provided in the
Mitigation Plan. Mowing of invasive and herbaceous vegetation for purposes of enhancing planted or
volunteer trees and shrubs approved in the Mitigation Plan is allowable once a year for no more than five
(5) consecutive years from the date on page 1 of this Conservation Easement, except where mowing will
negatively impact vegetation or disturb soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed by Ecosystem
Planning and Restoration, PLLC and shall not violate any part of Item L of Article Il.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways on the
Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or modification to existing roads, trails or walkways.
G. Si na e. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Conservation Easement Area,
except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation values of the Conservation
Easement Area, 01
gns giving directions or proscribing rules and regulations for the use of the

Conservation Easement Area and/or signs identifying the Grantor as owner of the Conservation
Easement area.
Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or hazardous waste, or
any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or other materials on the Conservation
Easement Area is prohibited.
Excavatin
.__Dred in
or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling, excavation,
dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals or other materials,
and no change in the topography of the land in any manner on the Conservation Easement Area, except
to restore natural topography or drainage patterns. For purposes of restoring and enhancing streams and
wetlands within the Conservation Easement Area, Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC is allowed
to perform grading, filling, and excavation associated with stream and wetland restoration and
enhancement activities as described in the Mitigation Plan and authorized by Department of the Army
Nationwide Permit 27.
J. Water Quali
and Drainage Pattern.
There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or altering or tampering with water
control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage
patterns. In addition, diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into,
within or out of the easement area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into
waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered or
extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a transferable development
rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or otherwise.
Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all -terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited other than for tempora
or
occasional access by the Sponsor, Ecosystem_ Planning and Restoration, PLLC, The Grantee, its
.....................................................

employees and agents
successors, assigns
and the Corps for purposes of constructing, maintaining and
monitorina the restoration, enhancement and preservation of streams wetlands, and riparian areas within
thU Conservation Easement Area.
M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Conservation Easement Area
which is or may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant, the preservation of the Conservation
Easement Area substantially in its natural condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is
prohibited.
ARTICLE III
GRANTOR'S RESERVED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs, successors or
assigns, the right to continue the user of the Conservation Easement Area for all purposes not
inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not limited to, the right to quiet enjoyment of
the Conservation Easement Area, the rights of ingress and egress, the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the
Conservation Easement Area, the right to sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Conservation
Easement Area, in whole or in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to the terms
of, and shall specifically reference, this Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its successors and
assigns, including Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC acting as the Bank Sponsor, the right to
construct and perform activities related to the restoration, enhancement, and preservation of streams,
wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation Easement Area in accordance with the approved
Red Barn Mitigation Plan, and the Mitigation Banking instrument described in the Recitals of this
Conservation Easement.
ARTICLE IV
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representative, successors and assigns, and the Corps, shall have
the right to enter the Property and Conservation Easement Area at all reasonable times for the purpose of
inspecting the Conservation Easement Area to determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives,
heirs, successors, or assigns, is complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this
v

Conservation Easement. The Grantee, Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC ,and its authorized
representatives, successors and assigns, and the Corps shall also have the right to enter and go upon
thV Conservation Easement Area for purposes of making scientific or educational observations and
studiesI and taking samples. The easement rights granted herein do not include public access rights.
ARTICLE V
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, and the Corps are allowed to
prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation Easement Area that is inconsistent with the purposes
of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Conservation Easement
Area that may be damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation
Easement by Grantor that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify the Grantor in
writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice to correct the
conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains uncured after thirty (30) days, the Grantee
may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive
and other relief. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice,
to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of the terms of
this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be
derived from this Conservation Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such
circumstances damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The
rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other
rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement. The costs of a
breach, correction or restoration, including Grantee's expenses, court costs, and attorneys' fees, shall be
paid by Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach. The Corps shall have
the same rights and privileges as the said Grantee to enforce the terms and conditions of this
Conservation Easement.
B. No failure on part of the Grantee to enforce any covenantor provision hereof shall
discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or provision hereof or affect the
right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of a subsequent breach or default.

C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Agreement shall be construed to entitle Grantee
to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the Conservation Easement Area resulting
from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of God
or third parties, except Grantor's lessees or invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by
Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to
property or harm to the Conservation Easement Area resulting from such causes.
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the Property in fee
simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which may be imp aired by the granting
of this Conservation Easement or that there are no outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or
other interests in the Property which have not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation
Easement. Grantor further warrants that Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived
from and arising out of this Conservation easement, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the
Property against the claims of all persons.
B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this Conservation
Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any interest in all or a portion of the
Conservation Easement Area. The Grantor agrees to provide written notice of such transfer at least sixty
(60) days prior to the date of the transfer. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this
Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Conservation
Easement Area or any portion thereof and shall not be amended, modified or terminated without the prior
written consent and approval of the Corps.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation
Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees
that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the
interest will be a qualified holder pursuant to 33 CFR 332.7 (a) (1), N.C. Gen. Stat. § .121-34, et. sem., and
§501 (c) (3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees

that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to
continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document.
D. Entire
reement and Severabili
. The gation Banking Instrument: MBI with
corresponding gation Plan, and this Conservation Easement sets forth the entire agreement of the
parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes a(I prior discussions, negotiations,
understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be
void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and
effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, assessments,
fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property free of any liens or other
encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor, except those incurred after the date hereof, which are
expressly subject and subordinate to the Conservation Easement. Grantee shall not be responsible for
any costs or liability of any kind related to the ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of
the Property, except as expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the
obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to the
exercise of the Reserved Rights.
F. Long -Term Management. If livestock operations will be maintained on the property,
Grantor is responsible for all long-term management activities associated with fencing to ensure livestock
do not have access to the Protected Property. These activities include the maintenance and/or
replacement of fence structures, as deemed necessary by the Grantee, to ensure the aquatic resource
functions within the boundaries of the Protected Property are sustained.
G. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the continued
use of the Conservation Easement Area for the conservation purposes, this Conservation Easement may
only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial proceeding.
H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation Easement Area is taken in
the exercise of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the Restrictions imposed by this

Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in appropriate actions at the time of such taking
to recover the full value of the taking, and all incidental and direct damages due to the taking.
I. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest immediately
vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area is sold,
exchange, or involuntarily converted following an extinguishment or the exercise of eminent domain,
Grantee shall be entitled to the fair market value of this Conservation Easement as determined at the time
of the extinguishment or condemnation.
J. Notification Any notice, request for approval, or other communication required under this
Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the following
addresses (or such address as may be hereafter specified by notice pursuant to this paragraph).
To Grantor: Shawn A. Moser
259 Cletius Moser Trail
Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030
To Grantee: EPR Conservation Easement Holdings, LLC
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
To Sponsor: Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
To the Corps: US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
K. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this Conservation
Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a reasonable period of time after
the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to make an assignment pursuant to this Conservation
Easement, then the Grantee's interest shall become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance
with an appropriate proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction.

L. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in a writing signed
by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the qualification of this Conservation
Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation
purposes of this grant.
M. Present Condition of the Conservation Easement Area.
The wetlands, scenic, resource,
environmentalI and other natural characteristics of the Conservation Easement Area, and its current use
and state of improvement, are described in Section 3 and Section 7 of the Mitigation Plan prepared by
Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor and Grantee to be complete and accurate as of the date
hereof. Both Grantor and Grantee have copies of this report. It will be used by the parties to assure that
any future changes in the use of the Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with the terms of this
Conservation Easement. However, this report is not intended to preclude the use of other evidence to
establish the present condition of the Conservation Easement Area if there is a controversy over its use.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for the
aforesaid purposes.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day and year
first above written.
(SEAL)
Shawn A. Moser, Grantor
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, ,the undersigned Notary Public of the county and
state aforesaid, certify that Shawn A. Moser, a free trader, personally appeared before me this day and
acknowledged to me that they voluntarily signed the foregoing document.
WITNESS
m
(SEAL)
y hand and notarial stamp or seal this the
2018.
Notary Public
(Typed or printed name of Notary
My Commission Expires:
00448686/1
day of
Public)

tti
r Llee
DW IF1,511
9Lv
!! !.. f
6L & &azd Ap di 4; 2,016, aucila=aediaplat Book 32 Pap 124, SurrY
:. • 0 ./ f : " i i : i ctUr ■l. •. _ 1 ! 1 : i R 1 % ii1i1
• !.' !'! as Lines a�-.• .moiL17 •{ 1e 1 8, •
Iwo
01 r"Ird
at: %aia 00
0 :■ : {'
NO
No 1. :•. .i• :e
a-

Legal Description
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Surry County, NC
z A permanent Conservation Easement over portions of land in Mt. Airy Township, Surry County,
North Carolina, as shown on map entitled "Conservation Easement for Ecosystem Planning and
Restoration, LLC, Red Barn Mitigation B a:nk Site, dated , 2018,
prepared by Turner Land Surveying, PLLC (P-0702) and recorded in Plat Book ,
Page ,Surry County Register of Deeds and being a parcel owned by
Shawn A. Moser, a free trader, (PIN: 5919-02-79-1649) more particularly described as follows:
1. Permanent Conservation Easement (PIN: 5919-02-79-1649) C-1
Beginning at.an existing 5/8" rebar, said rebar being the common corner of Shawn A. Moser et ux.
(now or formerly, see Deed Book 1555, Page 898 and Plat Book 32, Page 180, Tract 2) and
Deborah M. Beasley et al. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1555, Page 895 and Plat Book 34,
Page 125, Tract Two), and said rebar being located N 79°51'54" W a distance of 2,996.65' from
NCGS monument "AIRVIEW" with NCGS Grid Coordinates [NAD83(2011)] N=999,400.46
USft, E=1,520,179.10 USft; thence, from the point of Beginning, continuing through the Moser
property with the conservation easement boundary, N 42° 12° 19'° W a distance of 43 5.04' to a rebar
and cap set; thence S 64°58'22" W a distance of 81.82' to a rebar and cap set; thence N 79� 14' 11 "
W a distance of 96.78' to a point in Stewart's Creek; thence N 11°27'57" E a distance of 72.47' to
a point in Stewart's Creek, said point being the common corner with Beasley; thence, with the
corrlmon line of Beasley, S 82°3 9'01 " E a distance of 13 0.28' to an existing 5/8" rebar; thence S
71°29'32" E a distance of 94.12' to an existing 5/8" rebar; thence S 34°41'41" E a distance of
401.60' to the point of beginning; containing 0.532 acres, more or less, and shown as Easement
Area "C-1" on the above -referenced plat.
2. Permanent Conservation Easement (PIN: 5919-02-79-1649) C-2
Beginning at an existing 5/8" rebar, said rebar being the common corner of Shawn A. Moser et ux.
(now or formerly, see Deed Book 1555, Page 898 and Plat Book 32, Page 180, Tract 2) and
Deborah M. Beasley et al. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1555, Page 895 and Plat Book 34,
Page 125, Tract Two), and said rebar being located N 79°51'54" W a distance of 2,996.65' from
NCGS monument "AIRVIEW" with NCGS Grid Coordinates [NAD 83 (2011)] N=999,400.46
USft, E=1,520,179.10 USft; thence, with the conl.mon line of Deborah Beasley et al., S 7943' 18"
E a distance of 487.93' to an existing 3/4" iron pipe, said iron pipe being the connnon corner with
Deborah Beasley et al. and Terry G. Beasley et ux. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 489, Page
1175 and Deed Book 315, Page 169); thence, with the common line of Terry Beasley et ux., S
32°OS' 16" W a distance of 80.64' to a rebar and cap set; thence, leaving said common line,
continuing through the Moser property with the conservation easement boundary, N 72°50' 16" W
a distance of 239.77' to a rebar and cap set; thence N 67°52'32" W a distance of 224.72' to the point
of Beginning: containing 0.473 acres, more or less, and shown as Easement Area "C-2" on the
above -referenced plat.
L

3. Access to the Permanent Conservation Easements
Also conveyed herein is the right of ingress, egress and regress to the permanent Conservation
Easements) described above, by way of and over the Property as provided in this Conservation
Easement Deed and as may be provided on the Plat referenced above.
00448759 / 1

PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
Robert H. Merritt, Jr.
Bailey & Dixon, LLP
Post Office Box 1351
Raleigh, NC 27602
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEED FOR PERMANENT
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made this day of
2018 by and between Terry G.. Beasley and spouse, Deborah M. Beasley
("Grantor") whose mailing address is 286 Cletius Moser Trail, Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030 and EPR
Conservation Easement Holdings, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company, whose mailing address
is 559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 ("Grantee").
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by
context.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and being in Surry
County, North Carolina, having PIN Numbers 5919-00-79-7501 and 5919-08-89-1501, more particularly
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (together the "Property");

WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not-for-profit or educational corporation, or trust qualified
under § 501 (c) (3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, the purposes or powers of which include
one or more of the purposes (a) through (d) listed below;
(a) retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open -space aspects of real property;
(b) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational, educational, or open -
space use;
(c) protecting natural resources;
(d) maintaining or enhancing air or water equality.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or aesthetic value
of the property in its natural state, which includes the following natural communities: wetlands, streams
and riparian buffers. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain streams, wetlands and
riparian resources and other natural values of approximately .745 acres, more or less, and being more
particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated fully herein by reference (the
"Conservation Easement Area"), and prevent the use or development of the Conservation Easement Area
for any purpose or in any manner that would conflict with the maintenance of its natural condition.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Conservation Easement Area
is a condition of the approval of the Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) and Mitigation Plan for the Red
Barn Mitigation
Bank, Department of the Army (DA) Action ID Number SAW -2017-01927, entitled
"Agreement to Establish the Red Barn Mitigation Bank in the Yadkin River Basin within the state of North
Carolina and entered into by and between Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC acting as the
Bank Sponsor and the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers (Corps), in consultation with the North
Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). The Red Barn Mitigation Site has been approved by the Corps
for use as a mitigation bank to compensate for unavoidable stream and wetland impacts authorized by
DA permits.

WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of enforcement shall be held by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District ("Third -Party," to include any successor agencies), and
may be exercised through the appropriate enforcement agencies of the United States, and that these
rights are in addition to, and do not * 7 the rights of enforcement under the Department of the army
instrument number SAW -2017-01927 ("Mitigation Banking Instrument", or any permit or certification
issued by the Third Party.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and representations contained
herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged,, Grantor hereby unconditionally and irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its
heirs, successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and
character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over the Conservation Easement Area described on
Exhibit B, together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation values thereof, as follows:
ARTICLE I
DURATION OF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation Easement is an easement in
gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor, Grantor's personal
representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and licensees.
ARTICLE II
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent with the purpose of this
Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Conservation Easement Area shall be preserved in its natural
condition and restricted from any development that would impair or interfere with the construction values
of the Conservation Easement Area.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and uses are expressly
prohibiteJ,
restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder.

A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of
the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any introduction of non-native plants GIH V1
animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building, mobile home,
asVhalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising display, anfienna, utility pole, tower, conduit,
lineI pier, landing, dock or any other temporary or permanent structure of facility on or above the
Conservation Easement Area.
Industrial. Commercial and Residential__Use.
1 ndustrial, residential andlor commercial
activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes are prohibited.
ricultural. Gratin
and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal husbandry and
horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming, cutting or mowing
of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the Conservation Easement Area except as provided in the
Mitigation Plan. Mowing of invasive and herbaceous vegetation for purposes of enhancing planted or
volunteer trees and shrubs approved in the Mitigation Plan is allowable once a year for no more than five
(5) consecutive years from the date on page 1 of this Conservation Easement, except where mowing will
negatively impact vegetation or disturb soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed by Ecosystem
Planning and Restoration, PLLC and shall not violate any part of Item L of Article II.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways on the
Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or modification to existing roads, trails or walkways.
G. Si na e. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Conservation Easement Area,
except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation values of the Conservation
Easement Area, signs giving directions or proscribing rules and regulations for the use of the
Conservation Easement Area andlor signs identifying the Grantor as owner of the Conservation
Easement area.

H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or hazardous waste, or
any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or other materials on the Conservation
Easement Area is prohibited.
Excavatin
Dredain
or Mineral Use.
There shall be no grading, filling, excavation,
dredgingI mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals or other materials,
and no change in the topography of the land in any manner on the Conservation Easement Area, except
to restore natural topography or drainage patterns. For purposes of restoring and enhancing streams and
wetlands within the Conservation Easement Area, Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC is allowed
to perform grading, filling, and excavation associated with stream and wetland restoration and
enhancement activities as described in the Mitigation Plan and authorized by Department of the Army
Nationwide Permit 27.
J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or altering or tampering with water
control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage
patterns. In addition, diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into,
within or out of the easement area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into
waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered or
extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a transferable development
rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or otherwise.
L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all -terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited other than for temporary or
occasional access by the Sponsor, Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC, The Grantee, its
emplovees and agents, successors, assigns, and the Corps for purposes of constructing, maintainin

monitorina the restoration, enhancement and preservation of streams wetlands, and rVarian areas within
the Conservation Easement Area.
M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Conservation Easement Area
which is or may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant, the preservation of the Conservation
Easement Area substantially in its natural condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is
prohibited.
ARTICLE III
GRANTOR'S RESERVED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs, successors or
assigns, the right to continue the user of the Conservation Easement Area for all purposes not
inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not limited to, the right to quiet enjoyment of
the Conservation Easement Area, the rights of ingress and egress, the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the
Conservation Easement Area, the right to sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Conservation
Easement Area, in whole or in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to the terms
of, and shall specifically reference, this Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its successors and
assigns, including Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC acting as the Bank Sponsor, the right to
construct and perform activities related to the restoration, enhancement, and preservation of streams,
wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation Easement Area in accordance with the approved
Red Barn Mitigation Plan, and the Mitigation Banking instrument described in the Recitals of this
Conservation Easement.
ARTICLE IV
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representative, successors and assigns, and the Corps, shall have
the right to enter the Property and Conservation Easement Area at all reasonable times for the purpose of
inspecting the Conservation Easement Area to determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives,
heirs, successors, or assigns, is complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this
Conservation Easement. The Grantee, Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC, and its authorized
representatives, successors and assigns, and the Corps shall also have the right to enter and go upon

the Conservation Easement Area for purposes of making scientific or educational observations and
studies, and taking samples. The easement rights granted herein do not include public access rights.
ARTICLE V
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, and the Corps are allowed to
prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation Easement Area that is inconsistent with the purposes
of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Conservation Easement
Area that may be damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation
Easement by Grantor that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify the Grantor in
writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice to correct the
conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains uncured after thirty (30) days, the Grantee
may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive
and other relief. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice,
to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of the terms of
this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be
derived from this Conservation Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such
circumstances damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The
rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other
rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement. The costs of a
breach, correction or restoration, including Grantee's expenses, court costs, and attorneys' fees, shall be
paid by Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach. The Corps shall have
the same rights and privileges as the said Grantee to enforce the terms and conditions of this
Conservation Easement.
B. No failure on part of the Grantee to enforce any covenantor provision hereof shall
discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or provision hereof or affect the
right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of a subsequent breach or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Agreement shall be construed to entitle Grantee
to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the Conservation Easement Area resulting

from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of God
or third parties, except Grantor's lessees or invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by
Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to
property or harm to the Conservation Easement Area resulting from such causes.
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the Property in fee
simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which may be imp aired by the granting
of this Conservation Easement or that there are no outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or
other interests in the Property which have not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation
Easement. Grantor further warrants thafi Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived
from and arising out of this Conservation easement, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the
Property against the claims of all persons.
B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this Conservation
Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any interest in all or a portion of the
Conservation Easement Area. The Grantor agrees to provide written notice of such transfer at least sixty
(60) days prior to the date of the transfer. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this
Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Conservation
Easement Area or any portion thereof and shall not be amended, modified or terminated without the prior
writ
ten consent and approval of the Corps.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation
Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees
that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the
interest will be a qualified holder pursuant to 33 CFR 332.7 (a) (1), N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34, et. sem., and
§501 (c) (3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee furt
her covenants and agrees
that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to
continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes described in th10
document.

D. Entire Agreement and Severabili
. The Mitigation Banking Instrument: MEI with
corresponding Mitigation Plan, and this Conservation Easement sets forth the entire agreement of the
parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations,
understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be
void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and
effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership.. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, assessments,
fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property free of any liens or other
encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor, except those incurred after the date hereof, which are
exaressly subject and subordinate
the Conservation Easement. Grantee shall not be responsible for
any costs or liability of any kind related to the ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of
the Property, except as expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the
obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits fihat may apply to the
exercise of the Reserved Rights.
F. Long -Term Management. If livestock operations will be maintained on the property,
Grantor is responsible for all long-term management activities associated with fencing to ensure livestock
do not have access to the Protected Property. These activities include the maintenance and/or
replacement of fence structures, as deemed necessary by the Grantee, to ensure the aquatic resource
functions within the boundaries of the Protected Property are sustained.
G. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the continued
use of the Conservation Easement Area for the conservation purposes, this Conservation Easement may
only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial proceeding.
H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation Easement Area is taken in
the exercise of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the Restrictions imposed by this
Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in appropriate actions at the time of such taking
to recover the full value of the taking, and all incidental and direct damages due to the taking.

I. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest immediately
vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area is sold,
exchange, or involuntarily converted following an extinguishment or the exercise of eminent domain,
Grantee shall be entitled to the fair market value of this Conservation Easement as determined at the time
of the extinguishment or condemnation.
J. Notification Any notice, request for approval, or other communication required under this
Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the following
addresses (or such address as may be hereafter specified by notice pursuant to this paragraph).
To Grantor: Terry G. Beasley and Deborah M. Beasley
286 Cletius Moser Trail
Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030
To Grantee:
To Sponsor:
To the Corps_:
EPR Conservation Easement Holdings, LLC
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
K. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this Conservation
Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a reasonable period of time after
the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to make an assignment pursuant to this Conservation
Easement, then the Grantee's interest shall become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance
with an appropriate proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction.
L. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in a writing signed
by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the qualification of this Conservation
Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation
purposes of this grant.

M. Present Condition of the Conservation Easement Area.
The wetlands, scenic, resource,
environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Conservation Easement Area, and its current use
and state of improvement, are described in Section 3 and Section 7 of the gation Plan prepared by
Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor and Grantee to be complete and accurate as of the date
hereof. Both Grantor and Grantee have copies of this report. It will be used by the parties to assure that
any future changes in the use of the Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with the terms of this
Conservation Easement. However, this report is not intended to preclude the use of other evidence to
establish the present condition of the Conservation Easement Area if there is a controversy over its use.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for the
aforesaid purposes.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day and year
first above written.
(SEAL)
Terry G. Beasley, Grantor
Deborah M. Beasley, Grantor
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
(SEAL)
I, ,the undersigned Notary Public of the county and
state aforesaid, certify that Terry G. Beasley and spouse, Deborah M. Beasley, personally appeared
before me this day and acknowledged to me that they voluntarily signed the foregoing document.
2018.
WITNESS my hand and notarial stamp or seal this the day of
(SEAL)
My Commission Expires:
00448688/1
Notary Public
(Typed or printed name of Notary Public)

(PIN: 5919�00m79�7J01)
ffiat CWWn lot or pa=l(s) of tmd slituated In the City of INA, Townft of MOUNT,$
m Lo
it: i . 'c s, a . ! • '' • . ! :_!. ! !_ . a- ' , t
Ok
a
_ = :1 1, 1. '! .:tL ' [II :tI] ! • 1. _
iPS y_ North degrea
• nun, t 117.70 w
a31B�:-lt•
PmPedy &uth 62 &wm i' Mmo East 31434 M ! -- to an k071, 018 0a M01
:Lmo mming Y'.il Mwtss :1.r South1. i+
imn and North 55 depm 27 nuns 04 sm. West 328.01 fed to an aw, the point of
BEGINNING? �,•. ilii li {. a :.
May !
! 9��, and 1 '1 :. ►•"' • ' 1 \• �- f ,1 1 that '! 1•�•. 1, k. i•�.1:- i'r deed
recorded in book 308 at Pase 716, Smq COUntY ReghtftYs
11 11111 11111111111111 11111111111 11111 Pill 11 111 111111111111 1111111 Jill 111 1 1 1 1 11111 iiiiii Ii I I
_ "'t tT. .t �. � P1 .7 1 1, +F� r .• a. .r % .
t '/: *1' i•:- • and i. _ • �.s :: \' � it !' 1
tom! i. .{". �!. L .�:. •. .••.�t. - -runs a1mg the northem boundary of the abovI3....dmfibed pmpeny 4acent to lot 2vriot of way aad a=ess alsmmt shall not nm with the land of 01a D. Mo= and abdititles
Inl : t/:m- North 75 ! ' '1: e.•. 30 minutes
:.: ' iii feet .{ an /: t :t. p .i d=ce North
degr= 12 minutes East 461 *2 feet as it =9= 8nd recwsm amd bmwh to a maple
"de of the branchs, ffiei= &nah 59 degrm 23 Mhultm West 603 fed to the
the South W
int of begi mita 3.84 =vs mom or leu and being part of ffid lmd as
ede peed Book 158, at Page 4984
avey
am road and
00 2r'BBGn%qING at aa isron Pm
�• • :'1 \t. 1.1
SON
Isom
I AN
lk
•
�i : - :.� 4 ! s : i t p .\ {. Wit. f! .i t t : '' • � - � .� ! 'i ` 1 - f :it,
!' wi ' '• :! '� �J:

•' 61 ••
ale
•. /�, ,;
_ .�::; ::
ced recordedin Book 315 Page 169 and Book 489 Page 1175 and -designated as Surry
ounty axrmel MEW 5919 00 79 75014

Legal Description
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Surry County, NC
A permanent Conservation Easement over portions of land in Mt. Airy Township, Surry County, North
Carolina, as shown on map entitled "Conservation Easement for Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, LLC,
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site, dated , 2018, prepared by Turner Land Surveying,
?LLC (P-0702) and recorded in Plat Book , Page , Surry County
Register of Deeds and being parcels owned by Terry G. Beasley and wife, Deborah M. Beasley, (PIN:
5919-00-79-7501 and PIN: 5919-08-89-1501) more particularly described as follows.
1. Permanent Conservation Easement (PIN: 5919-00-79-7501) D
Beginning at an existing 5/8" rebar, said rebar being the common corner of Terry G. Beasley et ux. (now
or formerly, see Deed Book 489, Page 1175 and Deed Book 315, Page 169), Deborah
M. Beasley et al. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1555, Page 895 and Plat Book 34, Page 125, Tract
Two), and Terry G. Beasley et ux. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1446, Page 3 5 8), and said rebar being
located N 82'35'30" W a distance of 2,060.09' from NCGS monument "AIRVIEW" with NCGS Grid
Coordinates [NAD83(201 1)] N=999,4008*
46 USft, E=1,5205,179. 10 USft; thence, with the common line of
Terry Beasley et ux., S 57'40'30" W a distance of 32.53' to a rebar and cap sets thence, leaving said common
Line, continuing through the Terry Beasley et ux. property with the conservation easement boundary, N
31'58'59" W a distance of 77.43' to a rebar and cap set; thence N 72'50'16" W a distance of 3 82.61' to a
rebar and cap set on the common line with Shawn A. Moser et ux. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1555,
Page 898 and Plat Book 32, Page 180, Tract 2); thence, with said common line, N 32°05'16" E a distance
of 80.64' to an existing 3/4" iron pipe, said iron pipe being the common corner with Moser and Deborah
Beasley et al.; thence, with the common line of Deborah Beasley et al., S 67'45'10" E a distance of 461.23'
to the point of Beginning; containing 0.602 acres, more or less, and shown as Easement Area "D" on the
above -referenced recorded plat.
2. Permanent Conservation Easement (PIN: 5919-08-89-1501) E
Beginning at an existing 5/8" rebar, said rebar being the common corner of Terry G. Beasley et ux. (now
or formerly, see Deed Book 489, Page 1175 and Deed Book 315, Page 169), Deborah
M. Beasley et al. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1555, Page 895 and Plat Book 34, Page 125, Tract
Two), and Terry G. Beasley et ux. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1446, Page 358), and said rebar being
located N 82'35'30" W a distance of 2,060.09' from NCGS monument AIRVIEW" with NCGS Grid
Coordinates [NAD83(201 1)] N=999,400.46 USft, E=1,520,179.10 USft; thence, with the common line of
Deborah Beasley et al., N 73'17'09" E a distance of 13 6.5 8' to a points thence, leaving said common line,
continuing through the Terry Beasley et ux, property with the conservation easement boundary, S 11 °28'21 "
; thence N 81°58'59" W a distance of 144.12' to a rebar and cap
W a distance of 78.34' to a rebar and cap set
set on the common line with Terry G. Beasley et ux.; thence, with the common line, N 57°40'30" E a
distance of 32.53' to the point of Beginning; containing 0.143 acres, more or less, and shown as Easement
Area "E" on the above -referenced plat.
3. Access to the Permanent Conservation Easements
Also conveyed herein is the right of ingress, egress and regress to the permanent Conservation Easements)
described above, by way of and over the Property as provided in this Conservation Easement Deed and as
maybe provided on the Plat referenced above.
0448760/ 1

PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
Robert H. Merritt, Jr.
Bailey &Dixon, LLP
Post Office Box 1351
Raleigh, NC 27602
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF SORRY
DEED FOR PERMANENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made this day of
2018 by and between Greta M. Boyd, a widow ("Grantor") whose mailing
address is 194 Cletius Moser Trail, Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030 and EPR Conservation Easement
Holdings, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company, whose mailing address is 559 Jones Franklin
Road, Suite 150, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 ("Grantee").
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by
context.
�..

RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and being in Surry
County, North Carolina, (PIN: 5919-00-89-4216) more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto
and incorporated herein (the "Property");
WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not-for-profit or educational corporation, or trust qualified
under § 501 (c) (3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, the purposes or powers of which include
one or more of the purposes (a) through (d) listed below;
(a) retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open -space aspects of real property;.
(b) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational, educational, or open -
space use;
(c) protecting natural resources;
(d) maintaining or enhancing air or water equality.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or aesthetic value
of the property in its natural state, which includes the following natural communities: wetlands, streams
and riparian buffers. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain streams, wetlands and
riparian resources and other natural values of approximately 1.225 acres, more or less, and being more
particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated fully herein by reference (the
"Conservation Easement Area"), and prevent the use or development of the Conservation Easement Area
for any purpose or in any manner that would conflict with the maintenance of its natural condition.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Conservation Easement Area
is a condition of the approval of the Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) and Mitigation Plan for the Red
Barn Mitigation Bank, Depart
ment of the Army (DA) Action ID Number SAW -2017-01927, entitled
"Agreement to Establish the Red Barn Mitigation Bank in the Yadkin River Basin within the state of North
Carolina", and entered into by and between Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC actin1

Bank Sponsor and the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers (Corps), in consultation with the North
Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). The Red Barn Mitigation Site has been approved by the Corps
for use as a .mitigation bank to compensate for unavoidable stream and wetland impacts authorized_by
DA perm its.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of enforcement shall be held by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District ("Third -Party," to include any successor agencies), and
may be exercised through the appropriate enforcement agencies of the United States, and that these
rights are in addition to, and do not limit, the rights of enforcement under the Department of the army
instrument number SAW -2017-01927 ("Mitigation Banking Instrument", or any permit or certification
issued by the Third Party.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and representations contained
herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, Grantor hereby unconditionally and irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its
heirs, successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and
character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over the Conservation Easement Area described on
Exhibit B, together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation values thereof, as follows:
ARTICLE I
DURATION OF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation Easement is an easement in
gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor, Grantor's personal
representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and licensees.
ARTICLE II
PROHIB[TED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent with the purpose of this
Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Conservation Easement Area shall be preserved in its natural
condition and restricted from any development that would impair or interfere with the construction values
of the Conservation Easement Area.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and uses are expressly
pI ohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder.
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of
thV natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any introduction of non-native plants and/or
animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building, mobile home,
asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising display, antenna, utility pole, tower, conduit,
line, pier, landing, dock or any other temporary or permanent structure of facility on or above the
Conservation Easement Area.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential__Use. Industrial, residential and/or commerc
activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes are prohibited.
ricultural
Grazin
ial
and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal husbandry and
horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming, cutting or mowing
of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the Conservation Easement Area except as provided in the
Mitigation Plan. Mowing of invasive and herbaceous vegetation for purposes of enhancing planted or
volunteer trees and shrubs approved in the Mitigation Plan is allowable- once a year for no more than five
(5) consecutive years from the date on page 1 of this Conservation Easement, except where mowing will
negatively impact vegetation or disturb soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed by Ecosystem
Planning and Restoration, PLLC and shall not violate any part of Item L of Article II.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways on the
Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or modification to existing roads, trails or walkways.
G. Sisigns shall be permitted on or over the Conservation Easement Area,
except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation values of the Conservation
Easement Area, signs giving directions or proscribing rules and regulations for the use of the

Conservation Easement Area and/or signs identifying the Grantor as owner of the Conservation
Easement area.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or hazardous waste, or
anY placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or other materials on the Conservation
Easement Area is prohibited.
Excavati n
Dredgin
or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling, excavation,
dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals or other materials,
and no change in the topography of the land in any manner on the Conservation Easement Area, except
to restore natural topography or drainage patterns. For purposes of restoring and enhancing streams and
wetlands within the Conservation Easement Area, Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC is allowed
to perform grading, filling, and excavation associated with stream and wetland restoration and
enhancement activities as described in the Mitigation Plan and aufihorized by Department of the Army
Nationwide Permit 27.
J. Water Quality and Dra
inage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or altering or tampering with water
control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage
patfierns. In addition, diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into,
within or out of the easement area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into
waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered or
extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a transferable development
rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or otherwise.
L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all -terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited other than for tempora
occasional access by the Sponsor, Ecos
Planning and Restoration, PLLC, The Grantee, its
or

employees and agents
successors. assi
H
s, and the Corps for
monitoring the restoration, enhancement and preservati
U Conservation Easement Area.
urposes of constructing, maintainin_g and
of streams wetlands, and riparian areas within
M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Conservation Easement Area
which is or may become inconsistent with fihe purposes of this grant, the preservation of the Conservation
Easement Area substantially in its natural condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is
prohibited.
ARTICLE III
GRANTOR'S RESERVED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his persona( representatives, heirs, successors or
assigns, the right to continue the user of the Conservation Easement Area for all purposes not
inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not limited to, the right to quiet enjoyment of
the Conservation Easement Area, the rights of ingress and egress, the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the
Conservation Easement Area, the right to sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Conservation
Easement Area, in whole or in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to the terms
of, and shall specifically reference, this Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its successors and
assigns, including Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC acting as the Bank Sponsor, the right to
construct and perform activities related to the restoration, enhancement, and preservation of streams,
wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation Easement Area in accordance with the approved
Red Barn Mitigation Plan, and the Mitigation Banking instrument described in the Recitals of this
Conservation Easement.
ARTICLE IV
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representative, successors and assigns, and the Corps, shall have
the right to enter
the Property and Conservation Easement Area at all reasonable times for the purpose of
inspecting the Conservation Easement Area to determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives,
heirs, successors, or assigns, is complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this

Conservation Easement. The Grantee, Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC Ecosystem Planning
and Restoration, PLLC, and its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, and the Corps shall
aIso have the right to enter and go upon the Conservation Easement Area for purposes of making
scientific or educational observations and studies, and taking samples. The
herein do not include public access rights.
ARTICLE V
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
easement rights granted
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, and the Corps are allowed to
prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation Easement Area that is inconsistent with the purposes
of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Conservation Easement
Area thafi may be damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation
Easement by Grantor that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify the Grantor in
writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice to correct the
conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains uncured after thirty (30) days, the Grantee
may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive
and other relief. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice,
to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of the terms of
this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be
derived from this Conservation Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such
circumstances damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The
rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other
rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement. The costs of a
breach, correction or restoration, including Grantee's expenses, court costs, and attorneys' fees, shall be
paid by Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach. The Corps shall have
the same rights and privileges as the said Grantee to enforce the terms and conditions of this
Conservation Easement.

B. No failure on part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision hereof shall
discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or provision hereof or affect the
right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of a subsequent breach or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Agreement shall be construed to entitle Grantee
to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the Conservation Easement Area resulting
from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of God
or third parties, except Grantor's lessees or invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by
Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to (ife, damage to
property or harm to the Conservation Easement Area resulting from such causes.
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the Property in fee
simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which may be imp aired by the granting
of this Conservation Easement or that there are no outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or
other interests in the Property which have not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation
Easement. Grantor further warrants that Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived
from and arising out of this Conservation easement, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the
Property against the claims of all persons.
Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this Conservation
Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any interest in all or a portion of the
Conservation Easement Area,
The Grantor agrees to provide written notice of such transfer at least sixty
(60) days prior to the date of the transfer. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this
Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Conservation
Easement Area or any portion thereof and shall not be amended, modified or terminated without the prior
written consent and approval of the Corps.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation
Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees

that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the
interest will be a qualified holder pursuant to 33 CFR 332.7 (a) (1), N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34, et. sem., and
§501 (c) (3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees
that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to
continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document.
D. Entire Agreement and Severabili
. The Mitigation Banking Instrument: MBI with
corresponding Mitigation Plan, and this Conservation Easement sets forth the entire agreement of the
parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations,
understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be
void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and
effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, assessments,
fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property free of any liens or other
encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor, except those incurred after the date hereof, which are
ressly subject and subordinate to_the Conservation Easement. Grantee shall not be responsible for
any costs or liability of any kind related to the ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of
the Property, except as expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the
obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to the
exercise of the Reserved Rights,
F. Long. -Term Management, If livestock operations will be maintained on the property,
Grantor is responsible for all long-term management activities associated with fencing to ensure livestock
do not have access to the Protected Property. These activities include the maintenance and/or
replacement offence structures, as deemed necessary by the Grantee, to ensure the aquatic resource
functions within the boundaries of the Protected Property are sustained.

G. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the continued
use of the Conservation Easement Area for the conservation purposes, this Conservation Easement may
oMY be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial proceeding.
H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation Easement Area is taken in
the %-01 of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the Restrictions imposed by this
Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in appropriate actions at the time of such taking
to recover the full value of the taking, and all incidental and direct damages due to the taking.
I. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest immediately
vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area is sold,
exchange, or involunfiarily converted following an extinguishment or the exercise of eminent domain,
Grantee shall be entitled to the fair market value of this Conservation Easement as determined at the time
of the extinguishment or condemnation.
J. Notification Any notice, request for approval, or other communication required under this
Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the following
addresses (or such address as may be hereafter specified by notice pursuant to this paragraph).
To Grantor: Greta M. Boyd
194 Cletius Moser Trail
Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030
To Grantee: EPR Conservation Easement Holdings, LLG
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
To Sponsor: Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, PLLC
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
To the Corps.:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
K. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this Conservation
Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a reasonable period of time after

the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to make an assignment pursuant to this Conservation
Easement, then the Grantee's interest shall become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance
wIth an appropriate proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction.
L. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in a writing signed
by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the qualification of this Conservation
Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation
purposes of this grant.
M. Present Condition of the Conservation Easement Area. The wetlands, scenic, resource,
environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Conservation Easement Area, and its current use
and state of improvement, are described in Section 3 and Section 7 of the Mitigation Plan prepared by
Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor and Grantee to be complete and accurate as of the date
hereof. Both Grantor and Grantee have copies of this report. It will be used by the parties to assure that
any future changes in the use of the Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with the terms of this
Conservation Easement. However, this report is not intended to preclude the use of other evidence to
establish the present condition of the Conservation Easement Area if there is a controversy over its use.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for the
aforesaid purposes.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day and year
first above written.
(SEAL)
Greta M. Boyd, Grantor
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OFI
1, ,the undersigned Notary Public of the county and
state aforesaid, certify that Greta M. Boyd, a widow, personally appeared before me this day and
acknowledged to me that she voluntarily signed the foregoing document.

WITNESS my hand and notarial stamp or seal this the
(SEAL)
My Commission Expires:
00448691 /1
Notary Public
day of
(Typed or printed name of Notary Public)

(p1N: 5919-00-89-4216)
SITUATED IN THE: COUM7 OF SURRY AIM 9VITE 0F4 NORTIi CAROLIMi
9EGIN14ING M 'A .DRIVM1 IRON PIPE ON hOWM 9IDL OF A 30 FOOT
ROAD LEADING TO TERRY 13rzoAS EY PLACE• ALSO TERRY, REASLEY
SOUS.' ST CORI NER AM RtNi g NORTH 12 DEG. 30• M111. EAST PASSING '
BEASLEY' COMM 540 7~.TO M IRON PIPE AT SML $ERCH OR
TIM NORTAT SIDS OF $IWCHv UMICE UP 11ORTA SIDE OF BRANCH
SOUM 73 DEG. EA.9T 412 FEST TO ii STAYJ3 CIETIUS MOSM CORNER
OF 30/10.0 AME • TRACT # THENCE T114119 IIIS t;INE 94U`ItI1 3.5 DEG. EAST .
140. FSPIT • TO A. SPANISH OAK; TH idCO Sot M 54 D913 EAST 1104 Fri QT
TO A IiICKOPLY J THRINCE. SOUTH 5 DEG. FMT 16 FEET 'TO A SPAUTISIt
OA ,., ViENCE• SOU S'ii 21 DEG o 30 MIZ7 . SrES T STILL WITH MOSER S
LINE 130 FEET TO A LARGES' MITE 04V OY* VOR H SIDE OF 30 z; GU's,'
ROADI TlLE14CS WITTI NURTH SIDE OF SAILD ROAD AS F" LLOWS ; SOUTH
'79 DEG. t. 1ST' 40'0& FESIsTr 41 NORTH" 015 Dia. 30 MT.N. WEST M FEET;
N OR't'it E S DEG . WEST 31 FE4T TO THE EEGI` 111iC f CON'£AMM 5.6 0
ACRES MORE OR LESS. A OR 109 OF s . C. DUNPMR LMM4
Pdrmanent Parcel rrumbex3, 5919000914216 .

EXHIBIT S
Legal Description
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Surry County, NC
A permanent Conservation Easement over portions of land in Mt. Airy Township, Surry County,
North Carolina, as shown on map entitled "Conservation Easement for Ecosystem Planning and
Restoration, LLC, Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site, dated 2018,
prepared by Turner Land Surveying, PLLC (P-0702) and recorded in Plat Book ,
Page , Surry County Register of Deeds and being a parcel owned by Greta M.
Boyd (PIN: 5919-00494216) more particularly described as follows.
1. Permanent Conservation Easement (PIN: 5919-00-89-4216) F
Beginning at an existing 5/8" rebar, said rebar being the common corner of Greta M. Boyd (now
or formerly, see Deed Book 320, Page 98), Deborah M. Beasley et al. (now or formerly, see Deed
Book 1555, Page 895 and Plat Book 34, Page 125, Tract Two) and Terry G. Beasley et ux. (now
or formerly, see Deed Book 1446, Page 358), and said rebar being located N 80°29'41 W a
distance of 1,905.65' from NCGS monument "AIRVIEW" with NCGS Grid Coordinates
NAD83(2011)] N=999,400.46 USft, E=1,520,179.10 USft; thence, from the point of Beginning,
with the common line of Deborah Beasley et al., S 78°03'56" E a distance of 381.67to an existing
5/8" rebar; thence S 3 9°25'41 " E a distance of 140.07' to an existing 5/8" rebar; thence S 54'18'51 "
E a distance of 110:00' to an existing 5/8" rebar; thence S 67° 18'51 " E a distance of 169.01' to a
point; thence S 21'1 F07
W a distance of 29.48' to an existing 5/8" rebar, said rebar being the
common corner with Deborah Beasley et al. and Richard Dwayne Chandler et ux.
now or
formerly, see Deed Book 1616, Page 667); thence, leaving said common line, continuing through
the conservation easement boundary, N 66°30'06" W a distance of 483.56'
the Boyd property with
to a rebar and cap set; thence N 75'08'38" W a distance of 279.03' to a rebar and cap set on the
common line with Terry Beasley et ux.; thence, with said con inion line, N 11 °28'21 " E a distance
of 81.23' to the point of Beginning; containing 1.225 acres, more or less, and shown as Easement
Area "F" on the above -referenced plat.
2. Access to the Permanent Conservation Easements
Also conveyed herein is the right of ingress, egress and regress to the permanent Conservation
Easements) described above, by way of and over the Property as provided in this Conservation
Easement Deed and as may be provided on the Plat referenced above.
0448762/
1

REVIEW OFFICER CERTIFICATION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF SURRY
I, REVIEW OFFICER OF SURRY COUNTY,
CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION IS
AFFIXED, MEETS ALL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDING FOR
WHICH THE REVIEW OFFICER HAS RESPONSIBILITY AS PROVIDED BY LAW.
REVIEW OFFICER DATE
I, ELISABETH G. TURNER, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNI
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER
SUPERVISION (DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOOK_ AS
SHOWN ); THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE
INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION SHOWN HE F
THIS MAP; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION AS CA LA 1:
AND THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED IN ACCORD CE 4
NUMBER, ANDS AL THIS 31AS AMENDED. WITNESS sSI
t 9A&F WY2018`' t l t
I, ELISABETH G. TURNER, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR # L-4440,
CERTIFY TO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING AS INDICATED:
X d. THAT THIS PLAT IS OF A SURVEY OF ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUCH
AS THE RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT ORDERED
SURVEY, OR OTHER EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION.
ELISABETH G. TURNER, P.L.S. #L-4440
\Ii
N F
JOHNSON FA ILY FARM, LLC
D.B. 1124, PG. 547
D.B. 497, PG. 575
PIN: 5010-00-53-9021
EX
DITC1
ICY
h
a� oQ
CREEK
BAN
� 5/8"REBAR
w/CAP SET
PIN
WALNUT TREE SUBDIVISION
17 �1 ` - - - P.B. 9, PG. 40
\ a❑. EX. SHED -POSSIBLE ENCROACHMENT
HERRING ST. \ ©POSSIBLE LANDSCAPING ENCROACHMENT
/ P B 12 PG. 134 16 \ > \
r- r r E EX. 1 -STORY WOOD FRAME BUILDING
Point ofO 19 18 17 N/F d❑ EX. SHED
ieginninq I O O// O 20 I I �j RALPH LLEE COE \
3ERB 1 "EIP I a' b. I C. d. �/ & wife, DOROTHY COE /
D.B. 564, PG. 89
ERB S88'32'04'E - E 881,24'_ E 3 B" 0� PIN: 5010-20-72-9031
HL
S88`32'05'E 473.96' 1 "EIR\
1 15y94'
724.47'7 124.01 'r.�68.91 ' 1 EIP 108' 16
2" 106_;_' 100' 84.82' I PROPERTY LINE l
W W W W W� W W W �RB +
p� ,�• w .i. .i, w w .i. .i,55.09', - � +EX. STREAK& i, � -
�� I 1 RB
moo' I �ryyw wv W wv W vv vr N85 527 WWWW
I I II /L 1
EE
-� l
/WI I TRL•509.00' S79'19,08101 N/F223S9 an(/�WifeSqMY 8 M UTILITY EASEMENT p1N=08DB. 353, PG.
02 34
Z y� 37
l.>'j tel. y yI I W# 114/
ss o I--3 m)Or
16„ I I o c^
y F 4 I I oI- ��
W W
o �� y�Z^
O&i
Z
AREA 'A- Itis
5.542 ACRES
N/F
GEORGE VERNON DAVIS
S9G W W W and wife,
Ste, MARGARET SMITH DAVIS
W VkLIFE ESTATE
1"ERB D.B. 1609, PG. 647
v
PIN: 5010-20-81-5289
1
\2fi y I9 �' R2B
ew
N
�R\0\ W w W w 52610
40
O 1p
.I
w
X/F
MBER / /Xry W AREA 'A-2" W W wN
1. 183 ACRES N80'35108E T
232.78'
L1 A W W
\ Point of i
/�/\ Beginning16
CENTERLINE \"E v
34
STEWARTS CREEK '43
IS PROPERTY LINE N8 d .55' IPL) L12
orq
b. 9.100 ACRES
1 2"EIP N/F
N77'50'42"W 2 NEXT TO DORIS H. VERNON
104.45' 41� 1"EIP D.B. 660, PG. 499
N85'1555"E � W Point of- � PIN: 5010-20-81-7030
256.37' Beginning +
a AXLE
y. Cv y. .� J. .V y. y y y. y. y y .i, � w •� NEXT TO /
45"POPLAR /
.� .� (gyp +. s
1"EIP N/F
JEAN PATTY
PORTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN A DESIGNATED FEMA FLOOD
HAZARD ZONE PER FIRM MAP #3711501000) & #3711501900) EFFECTIVE REVISED DATE
AUGUST 18, 2009.
10. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS WERE NOT EXAMINED AS PART OF THIS
SURVEY.
11. THE EXISTENCE OR NON-EXISTENCE OF WETLANDS ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS NOT
BEEN DETERMINED BY THIS SURVEY.
12. UTILITIES ARE SHOWN WHERE ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES WERE VISIBLE AND
ADJACENT TO CONSERVATION EASEMENT.
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK ,PAGE
N� RB
o cr
O cA_
o�
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES NAD83(201 1) DATUM
TAKEN FROM PLAT BOOK 34, PAGE 125 IN THE SURRY COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS
OFFICE.
3. THE AREA SHOWN HEREON WAS COMPUTED USING THE COORDINATE COMPUTATION
METHOD.
4. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SERVE AS A REFERENCE FOR THE CREATION OF A
CONSERVATION EASEMENT. THIS PLAT IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. THE LAND PARCELS
AND THEIR BOUNDARIES AFFECTED BY THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ARE NOT CHANGED
BY THIS PLAT.
5.5/8" REBAR WITH CAP SET AT EASEMENT CORNERS.
6. LINES NOT SURVEYED ARE SHOWN AS A DASHED LINETYPE AND WERE TAKEN FROM
INFORMATION REFERENCED ON THE FACE OF THIS PLAT.
7. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT AND THEREFORE
MAY NOT SHOW ALL ENCUMBRANCES UPON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A LICENSED
ATTORNEY-AT-LAW SHOULD BE CONSULTED REGARDING CORRECT OWNERSHIP, WIDTH, AND
LOCATION OF EASEMENTS AND OTHER TITLE QUESTIONS REVEALED BY A TITLE
EXAMINATION. THE SURVEYOR HAS MADE NO INVESTIGATION OR INDEPENDENT SEARCH FOR
ENCUMBERANCES, RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OWNERSHIP, TITLE
EVIDENCE, OR OTHER FACTS THAT AN ACCURATE AND CURRENT TITLE EXAMINATION MAY
DISCLOSE.
8. SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS, RIGHT OF WAYS, AND/OR ENCUMBRANCES THAT MAY AFFECT
THE PROPERTY(S).
9.A
N/F
G. EDDIE JOHNSON and wife,
CAROL S. JOHNSON
D.B. 1033, PG. 644
D.B. 233, PG. 179
PIN: 5010-00-71-3049
OWNER ADDRESS:
224 Beth Lane
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
REF. 4
N/F
TERRY G. BEASLEY and wife,
DEBORAH M. BEASLEY
D.B. 489, PG. 1175
D.B. 315, PG. 169
PIN: 5919-00-79-7501
OWNER ADDRESS:
286 Cletius Moser Trl.
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
+ lb '061v rfE5 8"ERB E MATO H L I N E
V /'ROPE-Rry 8p2 76' 1 "EIR w/BOLT &
REF. 2 L/N 33" WHITE OAK RpPEOg'29' N/F a
ROY LEE OAKLEY p
D.B. 1115, PG. 977
PIN: 5010-20-80-3191
REF. 2
N/F
DEBORAH M. BEASLEY,
GRETA M. BOYD, and
PORTIA M. OAKLEY
D.B. 1555, PG. 895
P.B. 34, PG. 125, Tract Two
PIN: 5010-20-70-7007
OWNER ADDRESS:
286 Cletius Moser TH.
Mt. Airy,NC 27030
N/F
TERRY G. BEASLEY and wife,
DEBORAH M. BEASLEY
D.B. 1446, PG. 358
PIN: 5919-08-89-1501
OWNER ADDRESS:
286 Cletius Moser Trl.
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
N/F
SHAWN A. MOSER and wife,
TERESA H. MOSER
D.B. 1555, PG. 898
P.B. 32, PG. 180, Tract 2
PIN: 5919-02-79-1649
OWNER ADDRESS:
169 Scarlett Ln.
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
N/F
GRETA M. BOYD
D.B. 320, PG. 98
PIN: 5919-00-89-4216
OWNER ADDRESS:
194 Cletius Moser Trl.
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
PROPERTY EASEMENT EASEMENT
AREA (ACRES)
. .
jREF. 1 - JOHNSON A-1 5.542
PIN: 5010-00-71-3049 A-2 9.100
A-3 1.183
REF. 2 - BEASLEY, g-1 4.771
BOYD, & OAKLEY
PIN: 5010-20-70-7007 B-2 1.835
MOSER C-1 0.532
PIN: 5919-02-79-1649 C_2 0.473
X
x X x X x X x X x REF. 4- BEASLEY p 0.602
x x x x x PIN: 5919-00-79-7501
REF. 5 - BEASLEY E 0.143
PIN: 5919-08-89-1501
REF. 6 - BOYD F 1.225
[�\X=IPIN:
PLAT DATE:
I "EIP
N/F
JASON RYAN BECK and wife,
KEENIA J. BECK
D.B. 1451, PG. 984
PIN: 5010-20-80-8225
CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA SUMMARY
(KI)
Point of Beginning
for Legal Descriptions
PL
PROPERTY LINE
5919-00-89-4216
TOTAL EASEMENT AREA
25.406
PARRIES
T4 L5
and
LARRY DAVIS CONNER
REF. 1
D.B. 660, PG. 499
PIN: 5010-20-80-8694
+ lb '061v rfE5 8"ERB E MATO H L I N E
V /'ROPE-Rry 8p2 76' 1 "EIR w/BOLT &
REF. 2 L/N 33" WHITE OAK RpPEOg'29' N/F a
ROY LEE OAKLEY p
D.B. 1115, PG. 977
PIN: 5010-20-80-3191
REF. 2
N/F
DEBORAH M. BEASLEY,
GRETA M. BOYD, and
PORTIA M. OAKLEY
D.B. 1555, PG. 895
P.B. 34, PG. 125, Tract Two
PIN: 5010-20-70-7007
OWNER ADDRESS:
286 Cletius Moser TH.
Mt. Airy,NC 27030
N/F
TERRY G. BEASLEY and wife,
DEBORAH M. BEASLEY
D.B. 1446, PG. 358
PIN: 5919-08-89-1501
OWNER ADDRESS:
286 Cletius Moser Trl.
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
N/F
SHAWN A. MOSER and wife,
TERESA H. MOSER
D.B. 1555, PG. 898
P.B. 32, PG. 180, Tract 2
PIN: 5919-02-79-1649
OWNER ADDRESS:
169 Scarlett Ln.
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
N/F
GRETA M. BOYD
D.B. 320, PG. 98
PIN: 5919-00-89-4216
OWNER ADDRESS:
194 Cletius Moser Trl.
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
PROPERTY EASEMENT EASEMENT
AREA (ACRES)
. .
jREF. 1 - JOHNSON A-1 5.542
PIN: 5010-00-71-3049 A-2 9.100
A-3 1.183
REF. 2 - BEASLEY, g-1 4.771
BOYD, & OAKLEY
PIN: 5010-20-70-7007 B-2 1.835
MOSER C-1 0.532
PIN: 5919-02-79-1649 C_2 0.473
X
x X x X x X x X x REF. 4- BEASLEY p 0.602
x x x x x PIN: 5919-00-79-7501
REF. 5 - BEASLEY E 0.143
PIN: 5919-08-89-1501
REF. 6 - BOYD F 1.225
[�\X=IPIN:
PLAT DATE:
I "EIP
N/F
JASON RYAN BECK and wife,
KEENIA J. BECK
D.B. 1451, PG. 984
PIN: 5010-20-80-8225
CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA SUMMARY
(KI)
LEGEND:
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPERTY LINE
LINE NOT SURVEYED
TIE LINE
- - -EXISTING STREAM
- - - - EX. EASEMENT
oHe OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES
- - - -RIGHT OF WAY (GIS)
� EASEMENT CORNER
REBAR &CAP SET
Qo PROPERTY CORNER
(DESCRIBED)
EIP EXISTING IRON PIPE
ERB EXISTING REBAR
EIR EXISTING IRON ROD
N/F NOW OR FORMERLY
O CALCULATED CORNER
P. o. B.
SEE SHEET 2
OF 2 FOR
NC GRID TIE
INFROMATION.
P/OA/
LINE TABLE
LINE BEARING DISTANCE
L1 S03' 11:39 "W 97.52'
L2 S 13'08:34 IN 110.37'
L3 S30'0734 E 94.80'
L4 S40'25'141N 99.17'
L5 S7705'13 W 78.70'
L6 N09'4321'1N 117.50'
L7 N47'23'OOIY 137.72'
L8 N40'25 20 E 105.13'
L9 S46' 14 55 E 110.94'
L10 S 19'3744 E 6265'
L11 S16042 32 E 134.05'
L12 58234 %F3 IN 135.36'
L 13 N16'5247 E 160.47'
L 14 N66'30 04 E 117.00'
L15 S0904321 E 116.20'
L16 580'25 28 IN 158.46'
L 17 S54'39 `287W
TIE LINE TABLE
LINE BEAR/NG DISTANCE ttPE
71 S2734'26'E 53.94' TIE
T2 N21'57'111N 56.44' TIE
T3 S80'16'391N 50.02' TIE
T4 S81'45471N 50.03' TIE
T5 S0721291N 130.53' PL
T6 S06'35 23'1N 133 64' PL
*T/f=T/E ONLY PL=PROPERTY LINE TIE
Point of Beginning
for Legal Descriptions
PL
PROPERTY LINE
5919-00-89-4216
TOTAL EASEMENT AREA
25.406
LEGEND:
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPERTY LINE
LINE NOT SURVEYED
TIE LINE
- - -EXISTING STREAM
- - - - EX. EASEMENT
oHe OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES
- - - -RIGHT OF WAY (GIS)
� EASEMENT CORNER
REBAR &CAP SET
Qo PROPERTY CORNER
(DESCRIBED)
EIP EXISTING IRON PIPE
ERB EXISTING REBAR
EIR EXISTING IRON ROD
N/F NOW OR FORMERLY
O CALCULATED CORNER
P. o. B.
SEE SHEET 2
OF 2 FOR
NC GRID TIE
INFROMATION.
P/OA/
LINE TABLE
LINE BEARING DISTANCE
L1 S03' 11:39 "W 97.52'
L2 S 13'08:34 IN 110.37'
L3 S30'0734 E 94.80'
L4 S40'25'141N 99.17'
L5 S7705'13 W 78.70'
L6 N09'4321'1N 117.50'
L7 N47'23'OOIY 137.72'
L8 N40'25 20 E 105.13'
L9 S46' 14 55 E 110.94'
L10 S 19'3744 E 6265'
L11 S16042 32 E 134.05'
L12 58234 %F3 IN 135.36'
L 13 N16'5247 E 160.47'
L 14 N66'30 04 E 117.00'
L15 S0904321 E 116.20'
L16 580'25 28 IN 158.46'
L 17 S54'39 `287W
TIE LINE TABLE
LINE BEAR/NG DISTANCE ttPE
71 S2734'26'E 53.94' TIE
T2 N21'57'111N 56.44' TIE
T3 S80'16'391N 50.02' TIE
T4 S81'45471N 50.03' TIE
T5 S0721291N 130.53' PL
T6 S06'35 23'1N 133 64' PL
*T/f=T/E ONLY PL=PROPERTY LINE TIE
Point of Beginning
for Legal Descriptions
PL
PROPERTY LINE
138.14'
200' 0' 200' 400'
SCALE: 1 inch = 200 feetoom RNER
P.O. BOX 148
SVJANNANOA, NC 28778
P-0702 (919)-827-0745
LAND SURVEYING www.turnerlandsurveying.com
Certified DBE/WBE
SURVEY DATE: MAR. 2018 DRAWN BY: DST/EGT TLS PRO).: 18-003
SURVEYED BY: DST REVIEWED BY: DST/EGL
CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR
ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION, LLC
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
(USAGE Action ID Number )
MT. AIRY TOWNSHIP SURRY COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
CAD FILE:
RED BARN CE D
SCALE: 1 "=200'
SHEET
1 of 2
200' 0' 200' 400'
SCALE: 1 inch = 200 feetoom RNER
P.O. BOX 148
SVJANNANOA, NC 28778
P-0702 (919)-827-0745
LAND SURVEYING www.turnerlandsurveying.com
Certified DBE/WBE
SURVEY DATE: MAR. 2018 DRAWN BY: DST/EGT TLS PRO).: 18-003
SURVEYED BY: DST REVIEWED BY: DST/EGL
CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR
ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION, LLC
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
(USAGE Action ID Number )
MT. AIRY TOWNSHIP SURRY COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
CAD FILE:
RED BARN CE D
SCALE: 1 "=200'
SHEET
1 of 2
Point of Beginning
for Legal Descriptions
PL
PROPERTY LINE
200' 0' 200' 400'
SCALE: 1 inch = 200 feetoom RNER
P.O. BOX 148
SVJANNANOA, NC 28778
P-0702 (919)-827-0745
LAND SURVEYING www.turnerlandsurveying.com
Certified DBE/WBE
SURVEY DATE: MAR. 2018 DRAWN BY: DST/EGT TLS PRO).: 18-003
SURVEYED BY: DST REVIEWED BY: DST/EGL
CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR
ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION, LLC
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
(USAGE Action ID Number )
MT. AIRY TOWNSHIP SURRY COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
CAD FILE:
RED BARN CE D
SCALE: 1 "=200'
SHEET
1 of 2

REVIEW OFFICER CERTIFICATION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF SURRY
I, REVIEW OFFICER OF SURRY COUNTY,
CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION IS
AFFIXED, MEETS ALL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDING FOR
WHICH THE REVIEW OFFICER HAS RESPONSIBILITY AS PROVIDED BY LAW.
REVIEW OFFICER DATE
M
CENTERLINE v
STEWARTS CREEK \ :204.5582.34'43"E
IS PROPERTY LINE (PL)
149.55'
AREA "C-1"
0.532 ACRES
N/F
HULL BROTHERS LUMBER
COMPANY, INC.
D.B. 456, PG. 49
D.B. 489, PG. 1
PIN: 5010-00-50-5252 c
/
of
"inning WPgnW
W
L 16
L12
/8"
r1EIP
"Ell N/F
JEAN PATTY PARRIES
L5 2 and
T4 'I'6g. 09 2 LARRY DAVIS CONNER
REF. 1 283 y 551• 99
PIN 5010-20-80-8694
33
NSk 8 r / V P'?O' 4'
0,
N/F
RANDY E'MOSER and wife,
DONNA B. MOSER
D.B. 1555, PG. 902
P.B. 32, PG. 180 Tract 3
PIN: 5919-02-79-0296
ERB"
2¢ / 5 //� OS.
Ek6 2
o..
F
�3?AREA "B_
4.771 ACRES
Point of.
Beginning
AREA "C-2
0.473 ACRES
`v S 9* 425"
X18 E
5 8'
EIB
N/F
DEBORAH M. BEASLEY,
GRETA M. BOYD, and
PORTIA M. OAKLEY
D.B. 1561, PG. 29
D.B. 1555, PG. 8 5
P.B. 34, PG. 54 1
PIN: 5919- -0
I, ELISABETH G. TURNER, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER Y
SUPERVISION (DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOOK_ AS P
SHOWN ); THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED A AR
INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION SHOWN ON F 0
THIS MAP; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION AS CA ULATE : 1 0. REF. 1
AND THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED IN AC O E WI S. 0
AS AMENDED. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL NA R 1 A N/F
NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 31st DA OF MAY, 18. G. EDDIE JOHNSON and wife,
CAROL S. JOHNSON
D.B. 1033, PG. 644
D.B. 233, PG. 179
ELISABE T v
# 440 PIN: 5010-00-71-3049
o OWNER ADDRESS:
224 Beth Lane
996 Mt. Airy, NC 27030
1, -ELISABETH G. TURNER, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR # L-4440,
CERTIFY TO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING AS INDICATED:
X d. THAT THIS PLAT IS OF A SURVEY OF ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUCH
AS THE RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT ORDERED
SURVEY, OR OTHER EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION.
ELISABETH G. TURNER, P.L.S. #L-4440
NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 OF 2 FOR GENERAL NOTES.
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK , PAGE
REF. 4
N/F
TEERRY G. BEASLEY and wife,
DEBORAH M. BEASLEY
D.B. 489, PG. 1175
D.B. 315, PG. 169
PIN: 5919-00-79-7501
OWNER ADDRESS:
286 Cletius Moser Trl.
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
�I F 13
S
8 ).
x x x efts- O
70
x xxxxxx x X67
23'
x x )t x x P
382 s�E "K, x :'/ x
rr " L4
ERB T1j �P
0
h�
�for REC (NARY
R1C \NgRD
SNgRONNE N/F
1 fi gVCeNCN'D
pl N
5919-, G16S Gyq661-
owDER a w'fe,
c
S76• , j9600he
X358 a43 E
\ E�E
0.602 ACRES / �43� L42 TT �2j 838'�g,
PR° AREA „Err 1 Q 9,p3,
l� 0.143 ACRES N
O AREA F
1.225 ACRES
1�P" REF. 5 E�e
30' ACCESS EASEMENT
P.B. 34, PG. 125
V58
_ETIUS - Ela N FBRADLEY JOSEPH LINEBERRY and wife,
MINDY DIANA LINEBERY I
/ D.B. 1603, PG. 458
P.B. 34, PG. 54 Tract 5
PIN: 5919-08-88-2864
I
(9E2 REF. 3
N/F
Q
DEBORAH M. BEASLEY,
SHAWN A. MOSER and wife,
GRETA M. BOYD, and
TERESA H. MOSER
PORTIA M. OAKLEY
MATC H L I N E
j
P.B. 32, PG. 180, Tract 2
P.B. 34, PG. 125, Tract Two
PIN: 5919-02-79-1649
PIN: 5010-20-70-7007
I
OWNER ADDRESS:
NEXTERBO
1 "EIR w/BOLT &
�\�E
ER 2,�
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
N/F
JASON RYAN BBECK
33" WHITE OAK
ROP Og'29
N/F
al
and wife,
KEENIA J. BECK
L24
5
ROY LEE OAKLEY
D.B. 1115, PG. 977
o
a
D.B. 1451, PG. 984
130.28'
L26
PIN: 5010-20-80-3191
29.48'
PIN: 5010-20-80-8225
N67'18 51 "W
169.01'
L28
N54'18 51"W
110.00'
`v S 9* 425"
X18 E
5 8'
EIB
N/F
DEBORAH M. BEASLEY,
GRETA M. BOYD, and
PORTIA M. OAKLEY
D.B. 1561, PG. 29
D.B. 1555, PG. 8 5
P.B. 34, PG. 54 1
PIN: 5919- -0
I, ELISABETH G. TURNER, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER Y
SUPERVISION (DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOOK_ AS P
SHOWN ); THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED A AR
INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION SHOWN ON F 0
THIS MAP; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION AS CA ULATE : 1 0. REF. 1
AND THAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED IN AC O E WI S. 0
AS AMENDED. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL NA R 1 A N/F
NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 31st DA OF MAY, 18. G. EDDIE JOHNSON and wife,
CAROL S. JOHNSON
D.B. 1033, PG. 644
D.B. 233, PG. 179
ELISABE T v
# 440 PIN: 5010-00-71-3049
o OWNER ADDRESS:
224 Beth Lane
996 Mt. Airy, NC 27030
1, -ELISABETH G. TURNER, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR # L-4440,
CERTIFY TO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING AS INDICATED:
X d. THAT THIS PLAT IS OF A SURVEY OF ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUCH
AS THE RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT ORDERED
SURVEY, OR OTHER EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION.
ELISABETH G. TURNER, P.L.S. #L-4440
NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 OF 2 FOR GENERAL NOTES.
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK , PAGE
REF. 4
N/F
TEERRY G. BEASLEY and wife,
DEBORAH M. BEASLEY
D.B. 489, PG. 1175
D.B. 315, PG. 169
PIN: 5919-00-79-7501
OWNER ADDRESS:
286 Cletius Moser Trl.
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
�I F 13
S
8 ).
x x x efts- O
70
x xxxxxx x X67
23'
x x )t x x P
382 s�E "K, x :'/ x
rr " L4
ERB T1j �P
0
h�
�for REC (NARY
R1C \NgRD
SNgRONNE N/F
1 fi gVCeNCN'D
pl N
5919-, G16S Gyq661-
owDER a w'fe,
c
S76• , j9600he
X358 a43 E
\ E�E
0.602 ACRES / �43� L42 TT �2j 838'�g,
PR° AREA „Err 1 Q 9,p3,
l� 0.143 ACRES N
O AREA F
1.225 ACRES
1�P" REF. 5 E�e
30' ACCESS EASEMENT
P.B. 34, PG. 125
V58
_ETIUS - Ela N FBRADLEY JOSEPH LINEBERRY and wife,
MINDY DIANA LINEBERY I
/ D.B. 1603, PG. 458
P.B. 34, PG. 54 Tract 5
PIN: 5919-08-88-2864
I
(9E2 REF. 3
N/F
N/F
DEBORAH M. BEASLEY,
SHAWN A. MOSER and wife,
GRETA M. BOYD, and
TERESA H. MOSER
PORTIA M. OAKLEY
D.B. 1555, PG. 898
D.B. 1555, PG. 895
P.B. 32, PG. 180, Tract 2
P.B. 34, PG. 125, Tract Two
PIN: 5919-02-79-1649
PIN: 5010-20-70-7007
OWNER ADDRESS:
OWNER ADDRESS:
169 Scarlett Ln.
286 Cletius Moser Trl.
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
Mt. Airy,NC 27030
S112821 W
(9D) REF. 6
INN/F
TEERRY G. BEASLEY and wife, GRETA M. BOYD
DEBORAH M. BEASLEY D.B. 320, PG. 98
D.B. 1446, PG. 358 PIN: 5919-00-89-4216
PIN: 5919-08-89-1501 OWNER ADDRESS:
OWNER ADDRESS: 194 Cletius Moser Trl.
286 Cletius Moser Trl. Mt. Airy, NC 27030
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
P.O. BOX 148
RNER SWANNANOA, NC 28778
0
P-0702 (919)-827-0745
0-1 'LAND SURVEYING www.furnerlandsurveying.com
Certified DBE/WBE
SURVEYDATE: MAR. 2018 DRAWN BY: DST/EGT TLS PROJ.: 18-003
SURVEYED BY: DST REVIEWED BY: DST/EGLPLAT DATE:
EkB
s6QQ
7
\� 5/8 /
ERR /
'I'ss•
X835 E
I
1F 2'
E
AXLE -
AXLE
F.AWOE W. -I 910A
1.835 ACRES
/ NCGS 'A/RVIEW"
a� 1 NAD83 (NSRS201 1)
ti h NC GRID COORDINATES
g �^
N. 999,400.46 USFT
0989, rG1 E.• 1,520, 179. 10 USFT
EIR
REF. 2 5j" _
ERB
L33 r- . ^ N: 999,357.44 USFT tQ
6'
LINE TABLE
E.• 1,519,391.40 USFT 1 t
LINE
I BEARING
DISTANCE
L18
S2254 39'W
155.94'
L19
S66' 14 24 E
80.95'
L20
S62009'15"E
134.18'
L21
S89'38 O6 E
214.83'
L22
S112821 W
62.62'
L23
S73' 17 09'W
136.58'
L24
N712932'W
94.12'
L25
N82'39'01'W
130.28'
L26
N21'11 07 E
29.48'
L27
N67'18 51 "W
169.01'
L28
N54'18 51"W
110.00'
L29
N392541 "W
140.07'
L30
N112821 E
63.18'
L31
S06 -07'17 -E
109.67'
L32
S8701'56"W
9791'
L33
N79000 28 W
40.39'
L34
N112821 E
81.23'
05
S64'58 22 W
81.82'
L36
N79'14'11 "W
96.78'
07
All 12757 E
72.47'
L38
S32005'16 W
80.64'
09
N675232'W
224.72'
L40
S5740'30"W
32.53'
L41
N8158 59 W
77.43'
L42
S112821'W
78.34'
L43
N8158 59'W 1
144.12'
1.835 ACRES
/ NCGS 'A/RVIEW"
a� 1 NAD83 (NSRS201 1)
ti h NC GRID COORDINATES
g �^
N. 999,400.46 USFT
0989, rG1 E.• 1,520, 179. 10 USFT
EIR
REF. 2 5j" _
ERB
L33 r- . ^ N: 999,357.44 USFT tQ
6'
TIE LINE TABLE
E.• 1,519,391.40 USFT 1 t
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
T7
N72'2723E
34.31'
1 2'
T8
N73'17'09'E
34.04'
EP
T9
N7745'02E
3247'
dT/E
T10
N112821E
83.75'
EfP4„
T11
N755224'W
186.60'
-
T12
S89'5853E
132.59
T13
S845531 E
125.26'
PL
TN
S21')1'09VY
99.54'
PL
T15
530'35'05 "W
130.39'
TIE
T16
S67 -56'12 -E I
147.93'
PL
-TI£=TI£ ONLY PL=PROPERTY LINE TIE
1.835 ACRES
/ NCGS 'A/RVIEW"
a� 1 NAD83 (NSRS201 1)
ti h NC GRID COORDINATES
g �^
N. 999,400.46 USFT
0989, rG1 E.• 1,520, 179. 10 USFT
EIR
REF. 2 5j" _
ERB
L33 r- . ^ N: 999,357.44 USFT tQ
6'
ti
E.• 1,519,391.40 USFT 1 t
EASEMENT
AREA (ACRES)
L26 T72
T13
LINE NOT SURVEYED
5/8"ERB L32 5l8" (TIE)
a ERRB
5l8"
ERRB
1 2'
A-2
1.5"EIP next to �NAIL in base
39"White Oak of Span. Oak
o
7
EP
S 86'52'28" W
_
REF. 2
BOYD,
PIN: 5010-20-70-7007
/
788.87'GROUND
(788.92'GRID)
B-1
REBAR & CAP SET
EfP4„
B-2
30' ACCESS EASEMENT
-
COMBINED
FACTOR= 1.00005/�64
P.B. 32, PG. 146
EXISTING REBAR
C-1
EXISTING IRON ROD
P.B. 32, PG. 180
I
T T
CALCULATED CORNER
x x x x x x x x x
x
x x x x x
REF. 4-
PIN: 5919-00-79-7501
BEASLEY
for Legal Descriptions
D
PROPERTY LINE
0.602
HOWARD EDWARDS and wife,
I
E
SHARONETTE EDWARDS
0.143
[�'\\=IPIN:
REF. 6 - BOYD
5919-00-89-4216
D.B. 1561, PG. 32
F
1.225
P.B. 32, PG. 180 Tract 4
25.406
PIN: 5919-08-88-9985
CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA SUMMARY
LEGEND:
PROPERTY
EASEMENT
EASEMENT
AREA (ACRES)
REF. 1 -JOHNSON
PIN: 5010-00-71-3049
LINE NOT SURVEYED
A-1
TIE LINE
5.542
A-2
9.100
EX. EASEMENT
A-3
1.183
- - - -
REF. 2
BOYD,
PIN: 5010-20-70-7007
- BEASLEY,
& OAKLEY
EASEMENT CORNER
B-1
REBAR & CAP SET
4.771
B-2
1.835
EIP
REF. 3
PIN: 5919-02-79-1649
- MOSER
EXISTING REBAR
C-1
EXISTING IRON ROD
0.532
C-2
0.473
CALCULATED CORNER
x x x x x x x x x
x
x x x x x
REF. 4-
PIN: 5919-00-79-7501
BEASLEY
for Legal Descriptions
D
PROPERTY LINE
0.602
REF. 5
PIN: 5919-08-89-1501
- BEASLEY
E
0.143
[�'\\=IPIN:
REF. 6 - BOYD
5919-00-89-4216
F
1.225
TOTAL EASEMENT AREA
25.406
LEGEND:
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROPERTY LINE
LINE NOT SURVEYED
TIE LINE
- - -
EXISTING STREAM
- - - -
EX. EASEMENT
oHE
OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES
- - - -
RIGHT OF WAY (GIS)
0
EASEMENT CORNER
REBAR & CAP SET
PROPERTY
EIP
EXISTING IRON PIPE
ERB
EXISTING REBAR
EIR
EXISTING IRON ROD
N/F
NOW OR FORMERLY
O
CALCULATED CORNER
Point of Beginning
P. o. B.
for Legal Descriptions
PL
PROPERTY LINE
200' 0' 200' 400'
SCALE: 1 inch = 200 feet
CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR
ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION, LLC
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
(USACE Action ID Number )
MT. AIRY TOWNSHIP SURRY COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
CAD FILE:
RED BARN CE D
SCALE: 1 "=200'
SHEET
2 of 2

Site Photographs
The following photographs document the existing conditions of the four unnamed tributaries to
Stewarts Creek and four delineated wetlands of the Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site. EPR first visited
UT1 and UT2 in November 2016 and have performed site investigations throughout 2017 and
2018 to document conditions and trends throughout the Site.

Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site —Appendix 2 Photographs
UT1a looking downstream where it enters the Site. Small bedrock outcrop in the foreground (2016).
UT1a looking upstream where it enters the site. Hillslope erosion and banks severely trampled by cattle
(2018).

Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site —Appendix 2 Photographs
Deposition around UT1a gage installed in March 2018 (June 2018).
UT1a Cross section 1. Both banks eroding (2016).

Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site — Appendix 2 Photographs
Nickpoint within UT1a (2018).
UTI existing alignment — West project boundary between corn field and pasture. Fence is at top of left
bank (2016).

Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site —Appendix 2 Photographs
Wetland A within the pasture (2016). UTI will be relocated to this area.
UT2a where it enters the site (2018). Both banks severely trampled by cattle.

Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site —Appendix 2 Photographs
UT2a Cross section (2016). Significant incision and bank erosion.
UT2a within Wetland B — No defined bed and bank. Cattle have access to entire area (2016).

•��� _° p; .fie � �� � n �'a�
R
je
r.. ! ' !' _ � .�.� ter- —�-: •- �
gw-
ow

Ah
f
Ilk, c t`,
a �k
47YA 4ti

�.,'
5
Wit; ,.�- ",�• - \ ,
w
b;
w

y; •�P.e. �� � Ir
47, 't
I
�- S-

Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site —Appendix 2 Photographs
UT3c — aggraded area where flow accesses wetland C (2016).
UT3c overbank flow through the wetland C (2016).

Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site —Appendix 2 Photographs
UT3d —Typical incised and entrenched, but vegetated conditions on UT3d (2018).
UT3d — Confluence with Stewarts Creek (2018).

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: SAW -2018-01441 County: Surry U.S.G.S. Quad: Dobson
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Kevin L. Tweedy
Address: 559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raliegh, NC 27606
Telephone Number: 919-388-0787
Size (acres): 24 acres Nearest
Town: Raliegh
Nearest Waterway: Stewarts Creek Coordinates: 36.4898,-80.6411
River Basin/ HUC: Upper Pee Dee
Location description: The prosect is located at Ester Drive/Timeless Trail, Mount Airy, NC.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat
all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely
an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area,
which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have
the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the
Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33
USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation
that can be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. If you wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon
completion. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA

jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact William Elliott at
828-271-7980, ext. 4225 or [e-mail].
C. Basis for Determination:
See attached preliminary jurisdictional determination form.
The site contains wetlands as determined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the
Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountain and Piedmont
Region (version 2.0). These wetlands are adjacent to stream channels located on the property that exhibit indicators
of ordinary high water marks. The stream channel on the property "is an unnamed tributary (UT) to" Stewarts
Creek.
D. Remarks:
The potential waters of the U.S., at this site, were verified on-site by the Corps on November 7, 2018 and are as
approximately depicted on the attached Potential Wetland/Waters Map (dated July 2018)
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate
participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the
Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to
this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you
will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal
this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801

In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria
for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the
NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by N/A (Preliminary -JD).
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence. * *
Corps Regulatory Official:
ELLIOTT.WILLIAM.ANDib.11y li-d by
0-1-1-1-g1-1—AN—Y-6—
DN: r -US,. -I. Government ou=DOD, ou=PKI,
THONY.1048694604 —1.) A201=ELL—W— 10 52ILLIAMAN ONY-69460,
William Elliott
Issue Date of JD: December 20, 2018 Expiration Date: N/A Preliminary JD
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure
we continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http:Hcorpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0.
Copy furnished:
Greta Boyd 194 Cletius Moser Trail. Mount Airy NC 27030,
Deborah Beasley 286 Cletius Moser Trail, Mount airy NC 27030,
Edward Johnson. 224 Beth Lane, Mt Airy NC 27030,
Shawn Moser 259 Cletius Moser Trail, Mount Airy, NC 27030

SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http://www.usace.army.miUMissions/CivilWorks/Re ugulatoo ProgramandPermits.aspx or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD.
The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps
district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Kevin L. Tweedy File Number: SAW -SAW -2018-01441 I Date: December 20, 2018
Attached is: See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
❑
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
®
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http://www.usace.army.miUMissions/CivilWorks/Re ugulatoo ProgramandPermits.aspx or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD.
The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps
district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record
of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the
administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may
provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: William Elliott
CESAD-PDO
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
828-271-7980, ext. 4232
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn.: William Elliott, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JD: December 20, 2018
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Kevin L. Tweedy
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raliegh, NC 27606
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
CESAW-RG-A, SAW -2018-01441,
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The project is located at Ester Drive/Timeless Trail, Mount Airy, NC.
State: NC County/parish/borough: Surry City: Mt Airy
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): 36.4898, -80.6411
Universal Transverse Mercator: N/A
Name of nearest waterbody: Stewarts Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination. Date: December 20, 2018
® Field Determination. Date(s): November 7, 2018
Use the table below to document aquatic resources and/or aquatic resources at different sites
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION
Site
Centered Coordinates
Estimated Amount
Type of Aquatic
Geographic
Number
(decimal degrees)
of Aquatic Resource
Resources
Authority to Which
in Review Area
Aquatic Resource
Latitude Longitude
(linear feet or acre)
"May Be" Subject
WA
36.4908
-80.6424
1.2 ac
® Wetland
® Section 404
❑ Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
WB
36.48896
-80.6400
2.4 ac
® Wetland
® Section 404
❑ Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
WC
36.48665
-80.6422
0.8 ac
® Wetland
® Section 404
❑ Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
WD
36.48495
-80.6358
0.4
® Wetland
® Section 404
❑ Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
UT1
36.49185
-80.6420
1170
❑ Wetland
® Section 404
® Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
UT2
36.48891
-80.6409
2188
❑ Wetland
® Section 404
® Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
UT3
36.48579
-80.6397
2836
❑ Wetland
D Section 404
® Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
UT4
36.4858
-80.6390
89
❑ Wetland
❑ Section 404
® Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404

The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area,
and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the various types
of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN),
or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant
has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the
permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make
an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to
request an AID before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation
being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual
permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with
all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps
has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit
authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or
undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that
activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any
administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in
any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will
be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the
review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD
finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA
Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply) - Checked items should be included in subject file.
Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of preliminary JD requester:Vicinity Maps
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of preliminary JD requester.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rational:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
® U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® USGS map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Dobson.
® Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey.
Citation: Surry County, NC
❑ National wetlands inventory (NWI) map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) / Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):
or ® Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and
should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Digitally signed by
ELLIOTT WILLIAMANTONY.194604
ELLIOTT.WILLIAM.AN DN: USS,—U.S. Gmernmentao=DoD,
THONY.1048694604 con=ELLIOTT.WILLIAM.ANTHONY.1048694604
Date: 2018.12.20 10:54:17 -05'00'
William Elliott, December 20, 2018
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing
preliminary JD
Original on File
Kevin L. Tweedy
Signature and date of person requesting
preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the
signature is impracticable)
Two copies of this Preliminary JD Form have been provided Please sign both copies. Keep one signed copy.for your record
and return a signed copy to the Asheville Regulatory Field Office by mail or e-mail.
US Army Corps of Engineers- Wilmington District
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established time
frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

4F :, '�'•��' � ail'
00
z
Y16 F N� , ♦
�. Qhsw 7 Q
> zLd
LY w R
4Ld
Ld
�:.
4r
1 -
✓y
q.w
c
fT Y
W
� k
w
L\I
W
}
ILO
Z
jO
L w
D
6'
7r �
i
LL
z
{ SIB
r�
1110,--71
F
9
�i
W
w
L\I
W
ILO
Z
9
�i
W
w
L\I
W
ILO
Z
jO
L w
D
VQ
i
LL
z
m Ln
W
L.L.
r.
y N
N
O U-
0 n
O
N
0
w
ry
LL

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Red Barn Mitigation Bank City/County: Mt. Airy/Surry Sampling Date: 6/18/2018
Applicant/Owner: Ecosystem Planning and Restoration (both) State: NC Sampling Point: WA, WB up
Investigator(s): A. James, C. Jones Section, Township, Range: --
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P136 Lat: 36.491898 Long: -80.642550 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Toast-Bannertown complex NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No V/
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Located in active cow pasture.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
✓ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1 None observed
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1 None observed
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Festuca arundinacea
2 Persicaria pennsylvanica
3 Solanum carolinense
4 Bidens frondosa
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 None observed
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sampling Point: WA, WB up
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
0 = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is:53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
0-
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
65 YES NI
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
25 YES FACW
5 NO FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5 NO FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
100 = Total Cover
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation /
Present? Yes No V
0 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA, WB up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % TVpe' Loc'
Texture Remarks
0-12 2.5Y 4/3 100
sandy Gay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TIF 12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Soil is somewhat compacted.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Red Barn Mitigation Bank City/County: Mt. Airy/Surry Sampling Date: 6/18/2018
Applicant/Owner: Ecosystem Planning and Restoration State: NC Sampling Point: WA
Investigator(s): A. James, C. Jones Section, Township, Range: --
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P136 Lat: 36.491749 Long: -80.643281 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Dillard fine sandy loam NWI classification: PEM1
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
The flow of UT1 would normally be confined to a ditch along the northern edge of the property; however, a
sediment dam has prevented this flow from entering the ditch. Instead, the hydrology from UT1 is running into the
pasture and feeding WA. WA is in an active cow pasture and there is some evidence of soil compaction and
trampling in the wetland. All herbaceous vegetation.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓ Saturation (A3)
✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
✓ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 0-4
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Water may be perched, or hydrology
from UT1 is providing surface
saturation.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1 None observed
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1 None observed
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5x5 )
1 Ludwigia alternifolia
2 Bidens frondosa
3 Persicaria pensylvanica
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 None observed
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sampling Point: W4
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
0 = Total Cover
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
0 = Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
60 YES FACW
- Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
30 YES FACW
20 NO FACW
110 = Total Cover
0 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/1 100 silty clay loam
4-12+ 10YR 5/1 90 10YR 5/8 10 C PL, M sandy clay loam coarse sand mixed with clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Red Barn Mitigation Bank City/County: Mt. Airy/Surry Sampling Date: 6/18/2018
Applicant/Owner: Ecosystem Planning and Restoration State: NC Sampling Point: WB
Investigator(s): A. James, T. Barrett Section, Township, Range: --
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: -80.639541 Long: 36.488652 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Colvard and Suches NWI classification: PEM1
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Located within active cow pasture, though the wetland is not grazed as actively as the surrounding
area; all herbaceous vegetation; channels with standing water throughout.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
✓ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓ Saturation (A3)
✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
✓ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 0.5
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Y No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WB
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 None observed
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
0
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1 None observed
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0
4.
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is:53.01
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
0—
= Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Persicaria pensylvanica
40
YES FACW
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2 Juncus effusus
30
YES FACW
3 Vernonia noveborecensis
25
NO FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4 Leersia oryzoides
15
NO OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5 Carex lurida 10 NO OBL
6 Juncus coriaceus 10 NO FACW
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
130 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
height.
1 None observed
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
6•
Present? Yes No
0
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WB
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-12+ 10YR 4/2 70 5YR 4/6 30 C PL Silty clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V( No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site City/County: Surry Sampling Date: 06-06-18
Applicant/owner: Ecosystem Planning and Restoration state: NC Sampling Point: WC up
Investigator(s): A. James, C. Gears Section, Township, Range: --
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillSlope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P136 Lat: 36.486284 Long: -80.641614
Soil Map Unit Name: CsA-Colvard and Suches soils NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes J v l No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present?
_ Slope (%): 22=4
Datum: NAD83
Yes= No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil 0, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No= Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No=
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No ❑ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No 0 Depth (inches):
n
Saturation Present? Yes Q No' " ' Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WC up
5. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9 ft (1 m) in height.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
40 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Y FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
= Total Cover Vegetation /
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1 Present? Yes n No=
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size. 30' rad )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Acer rubrum
25
Y FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2. Quercus falcata
30
Y FACU
3. Platanus occidentalis
20
N FACW
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (g)
4. Quercus alba
25
Y FACU
5. Betula nigra
15
N FACW
Percent of Dominant Species
50
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A�g)
6. Fagus grandifolia
20
N FACU
135
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover: 68
20% of total cover: 27
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
15' rad
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species x 1 =
1. Ligustrum sinense
10
Y FACU
FACW species x 2 =
2. Betula nigra
10
Y FACW
FAC species x 3 =
3. Rosa multiflora
25
Y FACU
FACU species x 4 =
4. Crataegus viridis
5
N FACW
UPL species x 5 =
5. Rubus allegheniensis
10
Y FACU
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = BIA =
60
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 30
20% of total cover: 12
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is:53.01
2
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
5.
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6•
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20
20% of
total cover: 8
Herb Stratum 5' rad
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
(Plot size: )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Viola canadensis
10
Y FAC
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Microstegium vimineum
30
Y FAC
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9 ft (1 m) in height.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
40 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Y FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
= Total Cover Vegetation /
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1 Present? Yes n No=
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence
Sampling Point: WC up
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-12+" 10 YR 5/6 100 SaL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lininq, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
D Redox Depressions (F8)
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: None
❑ ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site City/County: Surry Sampling Date: 6-6-18
Applicant/Owner: Ecosystem Planning and Restoration State: NC Sampling Point: WC wet
Investigator(s): A. James, C. Gears Section, Township, Range: --
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): none
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P136 Lat; 36.486764 Long: -80.642265
Soil Map Unit Name: RbD-Rhodhiss-Bannertown Complex NWI classification:
Slope (%): 00=2
_ Datum: NAD83
PEM
Are climatic / hydrolo is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _L v l No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes= No
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes "0 No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes I v l Nowithin a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes J V L No
Remarks:
Adjacent stream is incised due to headcut just within upstream wetland boundary; upstream area of wetland is also
receiving large amounts of sandy sediment from the adjacent stream.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
E] Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
.❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
�] Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
F-1 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
.❑✓ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No Q Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No= Depth (inches):
n
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No' ' Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
3.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' rad )
1, Leersia oryzoides
5C
2. Murdannia keisak
2E
3. Carex lurida
3C
4. Carex vulpinoidea
1E
5. Vernonia noveboracensis
1 C
6. Persicaria sagitatta
1 C
7.
Column Totals:
50% of total cover: 70
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Y OBL
N OBL
Y OBL
N OBL
N FACW
N OBL
140 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 28
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: WC wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Q 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is:53.01
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? YesFV No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence
Sampling Point: WC wet
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-2" 10 YR 6/3 100 -- Sand coarse sand
2-12+" 10 YR 5/1 95 7.5 YR 4/4 5 C PL, M SaL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lininq, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
D Redox Depressions (F8)
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: None
❑✓ ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site City/County: Surry Sampling Date: 06-06-18
Applicant/Owner: Ecosystem Planning and Restoration (both) State: NC Sampling Point: WD up
Investigator(s): A. James, C. Gears Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 3-5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P136 Lat: 36.484986 Long: -80.635957 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: RbD-Rhodhiss-Bannertown complex NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
Point taken on what appears to be an old dam.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WD up
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont –Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Prunus caroliniana
50
Y FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2
Betula nigra
15
Y FACW
Total Number of Dominant
3•
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5•
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
65%
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' rad
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1
Ligustrum sinense
25
Y FACU
FAC species 0 x 3= 0
2
Rubus allegheniensis
15
Y FACU
FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
5' rad
40%
= Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb
Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Verbesina alternifolia
35
Y FAC
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2
Microstegium vimineum
10
Y FAC
3.
Lespedeza cuneata
5
N FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
50%
= Total Cover
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad )
height.
1
Smilax rotundifolia
25
Y FAC
2
Lonicera japonica
20
Y FACU
3
Toxicodendron radicans
10
N FAC
4.
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
6.
Present? Yes ✓ No
55%
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont –Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WD up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12"+ 2.5 Y 5/2 100 SiCI
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: None
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site City/County: Surry Sampling Date: 06-06-18
Applicant/Owner: Ecosystem Planning and Restoration State: NC Sampling Point: WD wet
Investigator(s): A. James, C. Gears Section, Township, Range: --
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P136 Lat: 36.484930 Long: -80.635873 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: RbD-Rhodhiss-Bannertown complex NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
May have been site of an old pond, based on presence of what appears to be a small, breached dam.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓ Saturation (A3)
✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
✓ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WD wet
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
0%
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' rad
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1
Carpinus caroliniana
30
Y FAC
FAC species 0 x 3= 0
2.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0
5.
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
10.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
5' rad
30%
= Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb
Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Leersia oryzoides
40
Y OBL
- Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2
Vernonia noveboracensis
10
N FAC
3.
Carex vulpinoidea
10
N OBL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
q
Juncus effusus
5
N FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5
Persicaria pensylvanica
25
Y OBL
6.
Boehmeria cylindrica
10
N FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
Lycopus americanus
20
N OBL
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
120%
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
height.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
Vegetation
6.
Present? Yes ✓ No
0%
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WD wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12"+ 10 YR 2/1 100 SiCIL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: None
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
✓ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ®B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
El ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot
Accompanies user rvianuai version o.0
USACE AID #
NCDWR#
Project Name
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Date of Evaluation
6/6/2018
Applicant/Owner Name
Ecosystem Planning & Restoration
Wetland Site Name
WA
Wetland Type
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Assessor Name/Organization
A. James, C. Jones
Level III Ecoregion
Piedmont
Nearest Named Water Body
Stewarts Creek
River Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit
03040101
County
Surry
NCDWR Region
Winston-Salem
❑ Yes ® No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-deqrees)
36.4908, -80.6424
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ®B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
El ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
❑B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ❑A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. ❑A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
❑A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
®C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
®A ®A ®A > 10% impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
®C ®C ®C >- 20% coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D >- 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F ❑F ❑F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer- assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_ 50 feet
❑B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
®D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
®<_ 15 -feet wide ❑> 15 -feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑Yes ®No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
El Exposed - adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet
®C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet
7 ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet
❑ H ❑ H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
®C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
❑A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size -wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
❑A
❑A
❑A
>- 500 acres
❑B
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
❑D
From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
n
From 10 to < 25 acres
❑F
❑F
n
From 5 to < 10 acres
®G
®G
n
From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H
❑H
n
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
❑I
❑I
❑I
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J
❑J
❑J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K
❑K
®K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness - wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>- 90%) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas - landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A
❑A
>- 500 acres
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
From 10 to < 50 acres
❑E
®E
< 10 acres
®F
❑F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
®Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect - wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >- 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
❑ B 1 to 4
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
®B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
®A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
TAA WT
o ❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ❑C ❑C Canopy sparse or absent
g ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
❑B ❑B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C ❑C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
_�E ❑B ❑B Moderate density shrub layer
U) ❑C ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
-0 ❑A ❑A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ®D
x
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Area was evaluated as a non -tidal freshwater marsh due to long-term conversion to predominantly herbaceous vegetation (area has been cleared
for agriculture/cattle since at least the 1930's). Intensely disturbed by cattle grazing.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WA Date of Assessment
6/6/2018
Wetland Type Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh Assessor Name/Organization
A. James, C. Jones
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Condition
Function Sub -function Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition
NA
Sub -surface Storage and
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
Retention Condition
NA
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
NA
Hydrology
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Water Quality
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Particulate Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Habitat
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Physical Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
MEDIUM
Veqetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Ratina Summar
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ® Yes ❑ No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ®B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
El ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot
Accompanies user rvianuai version o.0
USACE AID #
NCDWR#
Project Name
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Date of Evaluation
6/6/2018
Applicant/Owner Name
Ecosystem Planning & Restoration
Wetland Site Name
WB
Wetland Type
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Assessor Name/Organization
A. James, T. Barrett
Level III Ecoregion
Piedmont
Nearest Named Water Body
Stewarts Creek
River Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit
03040101
County
Surry
NCDWR Region
Winston-Salem
❑ Yes ® No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-deqrees)
36.48896, -80.6400
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ® Yes ❑ No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ®B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
El ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
❑B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ❑A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. ❑A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
❑A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
®C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10% impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
❑C ❑C ❑C >- 20% coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D >- 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F ❑F ❑F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
®G ®G ®G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer- assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_ 50 feet
®B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
®<_ 15 -feet wide ❑> 15 -feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
El Exposed - adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
®A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet
❑ H ❑ H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
®C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
❑A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size -wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
❑A
❑A
❑A
>- 500 acres
❑B
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
❑D
From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
n
From 10 to < 25 acres
❑F
❑F
n
From 5 to < 10 acres
®G
®G
n
From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H
❑H
n
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
❑I
❑I
❑I
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J
❑J
❑J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K
❑K
®K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness - wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>- 90%) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas - landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A
❑A
>- 500 acres
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
®D
From 10 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
< 10 acres
®F
❑F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
®Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect - wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >- 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
❑ B 1 to 4
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
®A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
7C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
®A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
TAA WT
o ❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ❑C ❑C Canopy sparse or absent
g ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
❑B ❑B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C ❑C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
_�E ❑B ❑B Moderate density shrub layer
U) ❑C ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
-0 ❑A ❑A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
®A ❑B ❑C El
V.t�i
xil� RW
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Area was evaluated as a non -tidal freshwater marsh due to long-term conversion to predominantly herbaceous vegetation (area has been cleared
for agriculture/cattle since at least the 1930's). Intensely disturbed by cattle grazing.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WB Date of Assessment
6/6/2018
Wetland Type Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh Assessor Name/Organization
A. James, T. Barrett
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Condition
Function Sub -function Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition
NA
Sub -surface Storage and
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
Retention Condition
NA
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
NA
Hydrology
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Water Quality
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Particulate Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Habitat
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Physical Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
MEDIUM
Veqetation Composition
Condition
HIGH
Function Ratina Summar
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ®B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot
Accompanies user rvianuai version om
USACE AID #
NCDWR#
Project Name
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Date of Evaluation
6/6/2018
Applicant/Owner Name
Ecosystem Planning & Restoration
Wetland Site Name
WA
Wetland Type
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Assessor Name/Organization
A. James, C. Jones
Level III Ecoregion
Piedmont
Nearest Named Water Body
Stewarts Creek
River Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit
03040101
County
Surry
NCDWR Region
Winston-Salem
I-1 Yes IRI No
Precioitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-dearees)
36.4908. -80.6424
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ®B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
❑B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ❑A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. ❑A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
❑A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
®C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
®A ®A ®A > 10% impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
®C ®C ®C >_ 20% coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D >_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F ❑F ❑F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer - assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_ 50 feet
❑B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
®D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
®<- 15 -feet wide ❑> 15 -feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑Yes ®No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed - adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet
®C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D F From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F F From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet
❑H F < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
®C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
❑A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size —wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
❑A
❑A
❑A
>_ 500 acres
❑B
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
❑D
From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
❑E
From 10 to < 25 acres
OF
❑F
❑F
From 5 to < 10 acres
®G
®G
R
From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H
❑H
R
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
71
71
71
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J
❑J
❑J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K
❑K
®K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A
❑A
>_ 500 acres
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
From 10 to < 50 acres
❑E
®E
< 10 acres
®F
❑F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
®Yes [:]No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C.°
❑A 0
❑ B 1 to 4
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
®B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
®A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
T
o ❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ❑C ❑C Canopy sparse or absent
o ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
Cn
❑B ❑B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C ❑C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
1E ❑B ❑B Moderate density shrub layer
Cn ❑C ❑C Shrub layer sparse or absent
-a ❑A ❑A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution —wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
❑B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ®D
4 TT
774,11
I. �lP'fll
WWW r$ k S 1 7
X.
NIS- jy
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Area was evaluated as a non -tidal freshwater marsh due to long-term conversion to predominantly herbaceous vegetation (area has been cleared
for agriculture/cattle since at least the 1930's). Intensely disturbed by cattle grazing.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WA
Wetland Type Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Date of Assessment 6/6/2018
Assessor Name/Organization A. James, C. Jones
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub -function Ratina Summa
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
NA
NA
Sub -surface Storage and
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Retention
Condition
NA
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition MEDIUM
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Ratina Summa
Function
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Hydrology
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Particulate Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Physical Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition MEDIUM
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Ratina Summa
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ® Yes ❑ No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ®A Not severely altered
❑B ❑B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®D ®D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot
Accompanies user rvianuai version o.0
USACE AID #
NCDWR#
Project Name
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site
Date of Evaluation
06-06-18
Applicant/Owner Name
Ecosystem Planning & Restoration
Wetland Site Name
WD
Wetland Type
Headwater Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
A. James, C. Gears
Level III Ecoregion
Piedmont
Nearest Named Water Body
Stewarts Creek
River Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit
03040101
County
Surry
NCDWR Region
Winston-Salem
❑ Yes ® No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-deqrees)
36.48495, - 80.6358
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ❑ Yes ® No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ® Yes ❑ No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ®A Not severely altered
❑B ❑B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®D ®D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
❑B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
®C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ❑A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
®B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
❑A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
®B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ❑A ❑A > 10% impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
❑C ❑C ❑C >- 20% coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D >- 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
®E ®E ®E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F ❑F ❑F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer- assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_ 50 feet
®B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
®<_ 15 -feet wide ❑> 15 -feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
El Exposed - adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E ®E From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet
❑H ❑H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
®B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
®A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
❑B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size -wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
❑A
❑A
❑A
>- 500 acres
❑B
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
❑D
From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
n
From 10 to < 25 acres
❑F
❑F
n
From 5 to < 10 acres
❑G
❑G
n
From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H
❑H
n
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
❑I
❑I
❑I
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
®J
®J
®J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K
❑K
n
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness - wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>- 90%) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas - landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A
❑A
>- 500 acres
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
From 10 to < 50 acres
®E
®E
< 10 acres
❑F
❑F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect - wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >- 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
®B 1 to 4
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
®B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
TAA WT
o ❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
g ❑A ❑A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
®B ®B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C ❑C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A ❑A Dense shrub layer
_�E ❑B ❑B Moderate density shrub layer
U) ®C ®C Shrub layer sparse or absent
-0 ®A ®A Dense herb layer
_ ❑B ❑B Moderate density herb layer
❑C ❑C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C El
x
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WD Date of Assessment
06-06-18
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization
A. James, C. Gears
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Condition
Function Sub -function Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition
MEDIUM
Sub -surface Storage and
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
Retention Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Hydrology
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Habitat
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Veqetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Ratina Summar
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
ProjectiSite:
Latitude:
Evaluator: R'S��
County: Su
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent ?��
Stream Determination (circl a
Other D.,
if a 19 or erenniat if a 30'
Ephemeral Intermitte erenni
.g. eQuad Name: n; J6
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
<::�_
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
�'
3
3. In -channel structure ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sg uence
0
1
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1.5
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
25. Algae
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
[ �5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
�S ..a
11. Second or greater order channel
K9 Flo*
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = P. < )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0
15 Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 _-Y-6,t-T)
C. Biology (Subtotal=
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrebenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24 Amphibians
0.5
1
15
25. Algae
0.5
1
1 5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75; OBL = 1 5 O r=
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
0
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:;S
Project(Site: � �? ��
Latitude: 22
Evacuator:
County: 66
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determ� circle one)
Other L-
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral d ermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if? 19 or perennial Na 30'
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 3�-�
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank
15 Sediment on plants or debris
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
No = 0 C..Yes_= z
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool. step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
=Y
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
1 5
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
45731
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
15
11. Second or greater order channel
iJa""6
Yes = 3
1
1
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2-
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1 0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
c5p 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 C..Yes_= z
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
Q�
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
�3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
9
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
=Y
0.5
1
1 5
23. Crayfish
05
1
1 5
24, Amphibians
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26_ Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75:
= 1. Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods- See p. 35 of manual -
Notes: r ver -Nor
yu
)
cav'
Sketch: YI
1
1
tj

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
07 J\
Date; r7
ProjectfSite:�1 ZY
Latitude: 7,,,s. Fl�g
Evaluator:
County:'J✓
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent ��
Stream Determination (circle e)
Ephemeral Intermitte i�ttnia
Other dDOL60 IN
e.g. Quad Name:
if _ 19 orperennial if i 30•
»
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = l 7 • S
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
_
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0 05
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
_>
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5 1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
cf�
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
Cm
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
efT>
3
8. Headcuts
-°tj"
1
.2
3
9. Grade control
271
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
1:14").= 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated. see dicussa ns in manual
B. Hvdroioav (Subtotal = I 5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
Cii S 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 05
1.5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C41C€s 3._
C. Biology (Subtotal=
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2 1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2 1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) ZF7
1 2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1 2
3
22. Fish
0.5 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5 1
1 5
24 Amphibians
0.5 1
1.5
25, Algae
0.5 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 075; OBL = 1_5 <gher = 0,
•perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Forth Version 4.11
Date: t)(Z (s
ProjectlSite: ��1� %t'A-f1}�it. �
Latitude: -5x1,Li Is
Evaluator: k Tom C !�'
County:
Longitude::. �^�✓;
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 5
Stream Determination(' one
Other
Quad Name:
2
Ephemeral Intermitter Perennial
e.g.
if z Igor perennial if z 30'
1
2
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 19-)
0 1 2
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
23. Crayfish
5. Activeirelict floodplain
0
1
1.5
24, Amphibians
Depositional bars or benches
0
1
[j36.
27.
25. Algae
Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
8, Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
R Hvciminov (5uhtntal = q 1
12. Presence of Base ow
0 1 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2
3
14. Leaf fstter
1.5 1 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5 3 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1 0 1 0.5 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
INo = 0 I Yes =
1
f: Rinlnnv (Riihtotal = i I
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22, Fish
0
.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24, Amphibians
0
1 .
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 'Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes: G .t C i( < i
r ur
2I
+f r
Sketch:
41

7Vd- "Wn CtrP-Am irlPntifientinn Farm Vomian 4.11
Date: (t! r
Project/Site: '?. J;A f1A)v i 7
Latitude: _310.
Evaluator: A, � � � �.,ry
County: Su 2. -IL
Longitude: -
Total Points:
Stream Determi tiab circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 'l,
�-
Ephemera Intermittent erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if> 30'
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = . S
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
0
0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
,Yes = 31
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
(0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
S. Headcuts
0
1
2
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
° artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R W rlrnlnrni !Ci Eh+n+nl = -4 S 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
V
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0`1
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5;
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
1
No = 0
,Yes = 31
0.5
r' Pinin!Q� ih+nfnl = I'0
1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish 0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish 0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians '0)
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 they= 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

SOIL & SITE INVESTIGATION
Red Barn Project Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
Ecosystem Planning & Restoration
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27606
Prepared by:
324 Blackwell Street, Suite 1200
Durham, NC 27701
(919) 732-130
46
4
John C. Robert
June 28, 2017

INTRODUCTION
Ecosystem Planning & Restoration (EPR) is investigating the feasibility of on-site stream and
wetland mitigation within the Yadkin Pee Dee basin (8 -digit HUC 03040101). The project site is
off Timeless Trail in Mount Airy, Surry County, NC (Figure 1). Three Oaks Engineering (Three
Oaks) has been retained to perform a Soil & Site Investigation that describes and classifies the
soil within a portion of the study area to make a determination as to its present and/or past
hydric status.
The study area is adjacent to Stewarts Creek and a channelized unnamed tributary. The land is
pasture, currently in use for livestock.
METHODOLOGY
The field investigation was performed on June 201h, 2016 by John C. Roberts, LSS. A transect of
soil borings was completed adjacent to and across the proposed UT1 stream alignment. Soil
descriptions were produced and evaluated via hand -turned soil auger borings. Each boring was
classified based on soil characteristics indicating the hydric soil status. Boring locations were
located with a GPS Unit with sub -meter accuracy and are shown on the attached figures. Hydric
soil status is based upon the MRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the Unities States - A Guide
for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils (Version 8.1, 2017).
RESULTS
Nine (9) soil borings were advanced within the study area (Figure 1). Soil borings were described
and classified based on soil characteristics into one of the two categories below.
Hydric over Hydric. — Borings rated as Hydric over Hydric occurred in a concave drainageway.
Overburden material was noted overlying a buried hydric soil layer. The overburden material
appeared to have originated from current and past agricultural and livestock uses. The
overburden material appears to have been in place long enough that it has developed weak soil
structure and a "poorly drained" drainage classification. Hydric indicators with clear evidence of
active reduction and oxidation reactions were noted in the current surface and the buried
surface, both of which met indicator F3 Depleted Matrix. Hydrophytic vegetation was generally
adjacent to the Hydric borings
F3 Depleted Matrix. A layer that has a depleted matrix with 60 percent or more chroma of 2 or
less and that has a minimum thickness of either:
a. 5 cm (2 inches) if the 5 cm is entirely within the upper 15 cm (6 inches) of the soil, or
b. 15 cm (6 inches), starting within 25 cm (10 inches) of the soil surface.
Non -Hydric. — Borings rated as Non -Hydric occurred along convex and linear landscape positions.
Drainage classifications were identified as either "moderately well drained" or "well drained".
Red Barn Site Soil Investigation June 28, 2017
Three Oaks Job 17-736 2

Gleyed soil horizons were not encountered to 60 inches or auger refusal. Borings 1-5 occurred
along a fluvial ridge landform (Figure 1). Boring 1 exhibited a silt loam textured surface and clay
loam textured subsurface with a "moderately well drained" drainage classification. Borings 2-5
all exhibited very similar soil characteristics and would be classified as one soil unit; a loamy sand
textured surface and subsurface horizons with natural drainage classification of "well drained".
Borings 8 and 9 were advanced along the linear slope/toe slope landscape position on the north
side of the concave drainageway. Auger borings were terminated at 36 and 32 inches due to
subsurface rock. These two borings exhibited sandy loam and sand clay loam textured surface
horizons and sandy clay loam textured subsurface horizons with a "moderately well drained"
drainage classification.
CONCLUSION
Soil borings were advanced and classified as either "Hydric over Hydric" or "Non -Hydric".
Borings rated as Non -Hydric occurred along convex and linear landscape positions. Drainage
classifications were identified as either "moderately well drained" or "well drained". Borings
rated as Hydric over Hydric occurred in a concave drainageway and given a "poorly drained"
drainage classification.
Profile descriptions along the fluvial ridge indicate the soil has developed at its current location
with very little manipulation. The lack of soil wetness indicators throughout the soil profile,
drainage classification, and degree of soil development appears to substantiate surface water as
well as the general flow pattern historically did not flow along the current location of the
channelized unnamed tributary. Evidence of a current and historic wetland presence was noted
at borings 6 and 7 occurring in a concave drainageway and is likely the more historical drainage
pattern to Stewarts Creek.
The findings presented herein represent Three Oaks professional opinion based on our Soil
Investigation and knowledge of the current regulations regarding wetland mitigation in North
Carolina and national criteria for determining hydric soil.
Red Barn Site Soil Investigation June 28, 2017
Three Oaks Job 17-736 3

z r � I ti I�
r I '� 1 l
_ _I I � _
r r' � � . •II
i � •1� f—•� �• 1 ' , �r 1 � f � ��� r F ' 11
rI `Iwi'I} �'rrrrr 1' 1+� Ir ir11
1 1, �: �� 1 •1:
� i� � �y�� _ �� ~�~ _ :�:: I rte• — � _=_ r �� � I !ll
�"_ 11 � ` L� � � •r 411 1 1 •� � � � ' 1 � I L
—
, -� � � ,� ti ~ — x � � •� r r �r r
b 1In
� �+rte � - rr -•k�, _t�5• � � � � r! i � t
� b2 'b9
_� 1 ti ��•�ti ti -. ��
Y b7
r 1� b3 .
b6 L s r
b4
r b5
ti r —
Soil Borings
Non -Hydric
r
Hydric over Hydric
Transects ��• -r���
Proposed Easement
l�
Prepared For:
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
Soil & Site Investigation
Red Barn Project Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Date.
June 2017
scale:
0 50 900 Fee!
I
Job No
17-736
Drawn By:
Checked By.
Nms
I JCR
Figure

SOIL EVALUATION FORM
Three Oaks Engineering
324 Blackwell Street, Suite 1200
Durham, NC 27701
919.732.1300
Job: 17 - ) Yo
County: sV+1y
Date: %'ZO -/7
Sheet:--L—of I
n
a
Structure /
Texture
Consistence /
Mineralogy
Matrix
Color
Mottle Colors
(Quantity, Size, Contrast, Cblor)
SIL
VAR Sd ftJ
10Y&YZ
Y
12
M S1L
SS sA
y 3�
��w
Z
IM SSC CC
Z �'s. SP
yk (1/9
I w
vp 51' CL
FiC s s tP
/Loy/ y/4,
C,
1110
,M S-
So PO
Z.5y:�/2
C,7 F 2. CI 5/3
)@
JM s'Rc ` L s
yt, ;:,- r :
1�p� y/�
k1
13
1 W 563k L S
Yf-k / 5n PO
I0 ,2
5'l12
3u
wkj CL
I ;: )r
J"k `l�
-•
3
Z
l l
VfK -;0 Pj
,: 1/3
r ;bk JL SF�
s� c'�
R q/ 1y
C
5,Z
o �"� cS
V Ff) Sa ;7.)
t 0
1"), 56K 9L
F (Z / So fa
/:s•, s/Z
C, Z.
,y
fl
z
lvw(.o�e
yc)
1 M sr,c / L s
V/1- is
/Oy2
✓+'SSS SL
vfe/ s7!'r)
2y
61Y
C
layk
5�
Evaluated by: �C R

SOIL EVALUATION FORM
Three Oaks Engineering
324 Blackwell Street, Suite 1200
Durham, NC 27701
919.732.1300
Job: 17- 73(.
County: '�'urry
Date: (o -Z o- /7
Sheet: Z of Z
0
ro
0
a
a
Structure /
Texture
Consistence/
Mineralogy
Matrix
Color
Mottle Colors
(Quantity, Size, Contrast, Color)
�0-if Va
c.,
Url
12
il�sr�4FRZ
14�
Cl-
fj55,
lOv y/
L
55,? s?
c 2 rq _ryk `' G c 2 D 1oy2 b
AR
e Co
3
lm
SS. 5P
Ole s/
C,2, P 5-Q y/
�w.
30
1A 50e c'
1 ` , so
10A Y/T
I r, z, P 10YR VAt
JCL
FR Ap
0'1 W3
t, Z. F 10yL z 7 y Ci
��
ems
sssP
Joyf��/2
u,
c �, C VR /
J0
/
F�
3D
rCU Pa{c c�
J 1 /
lav2'°ly
c. ?"P /sYk'512 7
C.
36
0 r
.► st.
F If, so
jj-► 4l
9-k S/Z D r ('I3
Cr
6
C
10 Pi
/0-(
C
3z
o �, S2
r SaPa
,vy
C r
31q
Evaluated by: C-

C
C:
O
N
LLI
UT1 SurveyProfile
Distance along stream (ft)
• CH
O WS
♦ BKF
♦ LB
o RB
+ P3
x P4

W
UT1 - XS1
O Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 5.86 Dbkf = .92 Abkf = 2.99
0 20 40 60 80 100
Horizontal Distance (ft)

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Red -Barn
Reach Name: UT1
Cross Section Name: xSl
Survey Date: 03/09/2018
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
0
15
30
55
63
64.5
65.7
65.9
65.9
67
69.5
71
71.6
72.2
73.5
76
78
79
82
=S ELEV
NOTE
-------------------------------------------------------
998.07
Right
997.09
993.74
997.34
993.74
997.38
993.04
996.76
LTOB
994.11
9.13
993.12
-----
992.67
LEw
992.34
TwG
992.49
1.56
992.66
REw
992.73
0.42
993.04
0.32
993.04
BKF
993.51
0.44
994.5
13.95
995.34
9.16
995.98
RTOB
996.76
0.95
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left Side Right Side
Slope 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
993.74
993.74
993.74
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
993.04
993.04
993.04
Floodprone width (ft)
9.13
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
5.86
2.93
2.93
Entrenchment Ratio
1.56
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.42
0.53
0.32
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.44
width/Depth Ratio
13.95
5.58
9.16
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
2.49
1.54
0.95
wetted Perimeter (ft)
6.53
3.96
3.45
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.38
0.39
0.28
Begin BKF Station
65.74
65.74
68.67
End BKF Station
71.6
68.67
71.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left Side Right Side
Slope 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)

River Name:
Reach Name:
Sample Name:
Survey Date:
Size (mm)
RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
Red -Barn
UT1
UT1 XS1
03/09/2018
TOT # ITEM % CUM
0 - 0.062
0
0.00
0.00
0.062 - 0.125
1
0.99
0.99
0.125 - 0.25
2
1.98
2.97
0.25 - 0.50
28
27.72
30.69
0.50 - 1.0
21
20.79
51.49
1.0 - 2.0
27
26.73
78.22
2.0 - 4.0
7
6.93
85.15
4.0 - 5.7
4
3.96
89.11
5.7 - 8.0
9
8.91
98.02
8.0 - 11.3
2
1.98
100.00
11.3 - 16.0
0
0.00
100.00
16.0 - 22.6
0
0.00
100.00
22.6 - 32.0
0
0.00
100.00
32 - 45
0
0.00
100.00
45 - 64
0
0.00
100.00
64 - 90
0
0.00
100.00
90 - 128
0
0.00
100.00
128 - 180
0
0.00
100.00
180 - 256
0
0.00
100.00
256 - 362
0
0.00
100.00
362 - 512
0
0.00
100.00
512 - 1024
0
0.00
100.00
1024 - 2048
0
0.00
100.00
Bedrock
0
0.00
100.00
D16 (mm)
0.37
D35 (mm)
0.6
D50 (mm)
0.96
D84 (mm)
3.67
D95 (mm)
7.22
D100 (mm)
11.3
Silt/Clay (%)
0
Sand (%)
78.22
Gravel (%)
21.78
Cobble (%)
0
Boulder (%)
0
Bedrock (%)
0
Total Particles = 101.

C
COO
O
W
UT1 XS2
O Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 376.1 Dbkf = 7.93 Abkf = 2983.7
-300.7 0.0 300.7
Horizontal Distance (ft)

C
COO
O
W
UT1 XS2 Trim
O Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 6.05 Dbkf = .97 Abkf = 2.85
180 185 190 195 200 205 210
Horizontal Distance (ft)

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Red -Barn
Reach Name: UT1
Cross Section Name: XS2_Trim
Survey Date: 09/17/2018
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
187
0
983.43
LTB
188.5
0
983.26
983.13
190.7
0
982.24
BKF
191.8
0
982.14
-----
193
0
981.42
LEW
193.6
0
981.35
TWG
194.5
0
981.42
REW
195.4
0
981.79
0.88
196.3
0
981.97
5.7
197
0
982.39
1.61
197.5
0
982.67
4.07
198.6
0
983.17
0.4
200.5
0
983.96
RTOB
207
0
984.64
196.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
983.13
983.13
983.13
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
982.24
982.24
982.24
Floodprone width (ft)
9.73
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
6.05
3.03
3.02
Entrenchment Ratio
1.61
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.47
0.41
0.53
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.89
0.89
0.88
width/Depth Ratio
12.87
7.43
5.7
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
2.85
1.24
1.61
wetted Perimeter (ft)
6.43
4.12
4.07
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.44
0.3
0.4
Begin BKF Station
190.7
190.7
193.73
End BKF Station
196.75
193.73
196.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

River Name:
Reach Name:
Sample Name:
Survey Date:
Size (mm)
RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
Red -Barn
UT1
UT1 XS2
03/09/2018
TOT # ITEM % CUM
0 - 0.062
0
0.00
0.00
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.00
0.00
0.125 - 0.25
9
5.92
5.92
0.25 - 0.50
45
29.61
35.53
0.50 - 1.0
38
25.00
60.53
1.0 - 2.0
38
25.00
85.53
2.0 - 4.0
14
9.21
94.74
4.0 - 5.7
6
3.95
98.68
5.7 - 8.0
2
1.32
100.00
8.0 - 11.3
0
0.00
100.00
11.3 - 16.0
0
0.00
100.00
16.0 - 22.6
0
0.00
100.00
22.6 - 32.0
0
0.00
100.00
32 - 45
0
0.00
100.00
45 - 64
0
0.00
100.00
64 - 90
0
0.00
100.00
90 - 128
0
0.00
100.00
128 - 180
0
0.00
100.00
180 - 256
0
0.00
100.00
256 - 362
0
0.00
100.00
362 - 512
0
0.00
100.00
512 - 1024
0
0.00
100.00
1024 - 2048
0
0.00
100.00
Bedrock
0
0.00
100.00
D16 (mm)
0.34
D35 (mm)
0.5
D50 (mm)
0.79
D84 (mm)
1.94
D95 (mm)
4.11
D100 (mm)
8
Silt/Clay (%)
0
Sand (%)
85.53
Gravel (%)
14.47
Cobble (%)
0
Boulder (%)
0
Bedrock (%)
0
Total Particles = 152.

C
COO
O
W
UT1 XS3
O Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 4.18 Dbkf = .68 Abkf = 2.85
0 20 40 60 80
Horizontal Distance (ft)

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Red -Barn
Reach Name: UT1
Cross Section Name: xS3
Survey Date: 03/09/2018
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
0
974.2
970.66
31
0
975.01
969.81
38
0
974.1
LTOB
41
0
972.41
2.09
43.2
0
970.42
-----
44.2
0
969.91
0.68
46
0
969.81
BKF
46.3
0
969.47
LEw
46.3
0
969.14
1.43
48
0
968.96
TwG
49.5
0
968.99
0.43
50
0
969.67
48.09
52
0
971.21
50.18
54
0
971.98
RTB
75
0
973.94
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
970.66
970.66
970.66
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
969.81
969.81
969.81
Floodprone width (ft)
8.35
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
4.18
2.09
2.09
Entrenchment Ratio
2
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.68
0.68
0.68
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.85
0.85
0.85
width/Depth Ratio
6.15
3.08
3.07
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
2.85
1.42
1.43
wetted Perimeter (ft)
5.07
3.43
3.33
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.56
0.41
0.43
Begin BKF Station
46
46
48.09
End BKF Station
50.18
48.09
50.18
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

W
UT1 Stream Gage June2018
O Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators V Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 4.99 Dbk` _ .66 Abkf = 3.31
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Horizontal Distance (ft)

C
O
N
LU
UT2a
0 210 420 630 840 1050
Distance along stream (ft)
0 CH
O WS
♦ BKF
♦ LB
O RB
t LEW
X P4

C
O
N
W
101
1010
UT2b
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Distance along stream (ft)
0 CH
O WS
♦ BKF
♦ LB
O RB
t REW
X P4

UT2c Profile
1020--
1018--
1016--
0
018
1016O
Ca
_O 1014
--
LU
1012
1010 L--
1925
1990 2055 2120
Distance along stream (ft)
o
2185
2250
• CH
WS
BKF
• LB
RB
+ LEW
P4

w
C
COO
O
W
UT2 XS1
O Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 6.78 Dbkf = .58 Abkf = 3.94
0 20 40 60 80
Horizontal Distance (ft)

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Red -Barn
Reach Name: UT2
Cross Section Name: xSl
Survey Date: 03/09/2018
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
0
1002.94
998.01
9
0
1001.08
997.21
16
0
1000.41
LTOB
16
0
998.49
3.93
17
0
997.65
-----
18
0
997.21
BKF
18.5
0
996.9
0.72
18.5
0
996.66
LEw
18.5
0
996.56
1.72
20
0
996.41
TwG
22
0
996.52
0.38
23.6
0
996.64
REw
24
0
996.74
25.32
24.2
0
997.32
ROOT
25.2
0
997.1
ROOT
25.8
0
997.65
29
0
998.63
RTOB
32
0
998.43
35.5
0
999.39
70
0
999.95
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
998.01
998.01
998.01
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
997.21
997.21
997.21
Floodprone width (ft)
10.4
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
6.78
3.39
3.93
Entrenchment Ratio
1.53
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.58
0.66
0.51
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
0.72
width/Depth Ratio
11.69
5.17
7.71
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
3.94
2.22
1.72
wetted Perimeter (ft)
7.63
4.55
4.52
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.52
0.49
0.38
Begin BKF Station
18
18
21.39
End BKF Station
25.32
21.39
25.32
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0

River Name:
Reach Name:
Sample Name:
Survey Date:
Size (mm)
RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
Red -Barn
UT2
UT2 XS1
03/09/2018
TOT # ITEM % CUM
0 - 0.062
0
0.00
0.00
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.00
0.00
0.125 - 0.25
29
22.83
22.83
0.25 - 0.50
22
17.32
40.16
0.50 - 1.0
16
12.60
52.76
1.0 - 2.0
26
20.47
73.23
2.0 - 4.0
19
14.96
88.19
4.0 - 5.7
10
7.87
96.06
5.7 - 8.0
5
3.94
100.00
8.0 - 11.3
0
0.00
100.00
11.3 - 16.0
0
0.00
100.00
16.0 - 22.6
0
0.00
100.00
22.6 - 32.0
0
0.00
100.00
32 - 45
0
0.00
100.00
45 - 64
0
0.00
100.00
64 - 90
0
0.00
100.00
90 - 128
0
0.00
100.00
128 - 180
0
0.00
100.00
180 - 256
0
0.00
100.00
256 - 362
0
0.00
100.00
362 - 512
0
0.00
100.00
512 - 1024
0
0.00
100.00
1024 - 2048
0
0.00
100.00
Bedrock
0
0.00
100.00
D16 (mm)
0.21
D35 (mm)
0.43
D50 (mm)
0.89
D84 (mm)
3.44
D95 (mm)
5.47
D100 (mm)
8
Silt/Clay (%)
0
Sand (%)
73.23
Gravel (%)
26.77
Cobble (%)
0
Boulder (%)
0
Bedrock (%)
0
Total Particles = 127.

C
COO
O
W
UT2 XS2
O Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 19 Cb _tf = .2l Abkf = 3.95
Horizontal Distance (ft)
150

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Red -Barn
Reach Name: UT2
Cross Section Name: xS2
Survey Date: 03/09/2018
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
0
1001.36
995.98
13
0
998.96
995.48
31
0
998.39
-----
50
0
997.71
14.28
64
0
997.98
-----
72
0
996.97
LTOB
73.5
0
996.3
0.5
74
0
995.86
84
76.3
0
995.13
2.36
78
0
995.15
14.26
79.6
0
995.13
LEw
80.3
0
994.98
TwG
81
0
995.12
REw
84
0
995.02
84.5
0
995.49
BKF
92
0
995.37
94
0
995.46
97
0
995.99
100
0
996.14
107
0
995.18
186
0
996.27
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
995.98
995.98
995.98
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
995.48
995.48
995.48
Floodprone width (ft)
86.89
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
18.28
4.63
14.28
Entrenchment Ratio
4.75
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.21
0.3
0.17
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.5
0.4
0.5
width/Depth Ratio
87.05
15.31
84
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
3.77
1.4
2.36
wetted Perimeter (ft)
18.55
5.09
14.26
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.2
0.28
0.17
Begin BKF Station
75.2
75.2
79.83
End BKF Station
94.11
79.83
94.11
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side

C
COO
O
W
UT2 XS3
O Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 8.4 Dbkf = .68 Abkf = 5.67
0 20 40 60 80
Horizontal Distance (ft)

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Red -Barn
Reach Name: UT2
Cross Section Name: xS3
Survey Date: 03/09/2018
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
0
992.07
Right
12
0
989.68
986.99
16
0
989.66
LTOB
20.51
11.47
985.93
BKF
21.4
0
985.25
4.26
23.5
0
985.13
LEW
25
0
984.87
TWG
26
0
985.1
REW
28.3
0
985.57
6.55
31
0
987.17
COW PATH
32.5
0
987.48
COW PATH
39
0
989.98
RTOB
60
0
989.78
24.65
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
986.99
986.99
986.99
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
985.93
985.93
985.93
Floodprone width (ft)
11.47
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
8.4
4.14
4.26
Entrenchment Ratio
1.37
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.68
0.7
0.65
Maximum Depth (ft)
1.06
1
1.06
width/Depth Ratio
12.35
5.93
6.55
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
5.67
2.89
2.78
wetted Perimeter (ft)
8.83
5.39
5.43
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.64
0.54
0.51
Begin BKF Station
20.51
20.51
24.65
End BKF Station
28.91
24.65
28.91
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

N
C
O
cB
O
W
UT2 Stream Gauge XS - June 2018
O Gage XS 06182018 ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 8.1 Dbkf = .96 Abkf = 7.81
0 5 10 15 20
Horizontal Distance (ft)

LU
UT3
0 150 300 450 600 750 900 1050 1200 1350 1500 1650 1800 1950 2100 2250 2400 2550 2700 2850 3000
Distance along stream (ft)
• CH
O WS
♦ BKF
♦ RB
O LB
t LEW
X P4

C
COO
O
W
UT3 X-1
O Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 4.66 Dbkf = .5 Abkf = 2.32
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Horizontal Distance (ft)

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Red -Barn
Reach Name: UT3
Cross Section Name: UT3 x-1
Survey Date: 03/07/2018
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 100 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 10 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
5.33
104.67
4
6.4
103.6
7.8
9.09
100.91
11
9.81
100.19
11.9
10.27
99.73
12
11.76
98.24 bkf
13
12.33
97.67 LEw
14.6
12.42
97.58
16
12.33
97.67 REw
19.5
9.33
100.67
22.3
8.75
101.25
26
5.23
104.77
28.5
4.9
105.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
98.9
98.9
98.9
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
98.24
98.24
98.24
Floodprone width (ft)
5.48
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
4.66
2.33
2.33
Entrenchment Ratio
1.17
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.47
0.53
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.66
0.64
0.66
width/Depth Ratio
9.32
4.97
4.4
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
2.32
1.09
1.23
wetted Perimeter (ft)
5.03
3.13
3.19
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.46
0.35
0.38
Begin BKF Station
12
12
14.33
End BKF Station
16.66
14.33
16.66
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

C
O
CO
W
101
95
UT3 X-2
O Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 5.52 Dbkf = .48 Abkf = 2.64
4.1 19.0
Horizontal Distance (ft)

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Red -Barn
Reach Name: UT3
Cross Section Name: UT3 x-2
Survey Date: 03/07/2018
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 100 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 10 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
8.14
101.86
Right
2.3
9.61
100.39
97.9
5
10.74
99.26
97.27
7
11.36
98.64
-----
8
12.06
97.94
2.77
9
12.3
97.7
-----
9.7
12.48
97.52
field bkf
10.01
0
97.27
BKF
10.5
13.13
96.87
5.89
11.5
13.29
96.71
LEw
12
13.36
96.64
TwG
13.2
13.29
96.71
REw
15
13.2
96.8
12.76
16
12.32
97.68
15.53
17.5
11.02
98.98
17.5
7.99
102.01
19.4
7.86
102.14
20.2
7.37
102.63
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
97.9
97.9
97.9
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
97.27
97.27
97.27
Floodprone width (ft)
8.09
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
5.52
2.75
2.77
Entrenchment Ratio
1.46
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.48
0.49
0.47
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.63
0.63
0.59
width/Depth Ratio
11.5
5.65
5.89
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
2.64
1.34
1.3
wetted Perimeter (ft)
5.87
3.5
3.54
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.45
0.38
0.37
Begin BKF Station
10.01
10.01
12.76
End BKF Station
15.53
12.76
15.53
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
shear stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

River Name:
Reach Name:
Sample Name:
Survey Date:
Size (mm)
RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
Red -Barn
UT3
UT3 XS2
06/01/2018
TOT # ITEM % CUM
0 - 0.062
0
0.00
0.00
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.00
0.00
0.125 - 0.25
4
3.96
3.96
0.25 - 0.50
2
1.98
5.94
0.50 - 1.0
17
16.83
22.77
1.0 - 2.0
0
0.00
22.77
2.0 - 4.0
1
0.99
23.76
4.0 - 5.7
0
0.00
23.76
5.7 - 8.0
9
8.91
32.67
8.0 - 11.3
0
0.00
32.67
11.3 - 16.0
18
17.82
50.50
16.0 - 22.6
0
0.00
50.50
22.6 - 32.0
41
40.59
91.09
32 - 45
0
0.00
91.09
45 - 64
8
7.92
99.01
64 - 90
1
0.99
100.00
90 - 128
0
0.00
100.00
128 - 180
0
0.00
100.00
180 - 256
0
0.00
100.00
256 - 362
0
0.00
100.00
362 - 512
0
0.00
100.00
512 - 1024
0
0.00
100.00
1024 - 2048
0
0.00
100.00
Bedrock
0
0.00
100.00
D16 (mm)
0.8
D35 (mm)
11.91
D50 (mm)
15.87
D84 (mm)
30.36
D95 (mm)
54.38
D100 (mm)
90
Silt/Clay (%)
0
Sand (%)
22.77
Gravel (%)
76.24
Cobble (%)
0.99
Boulder (%)
0
Bedrock (%)
0
Total Particles = 101.

River Name:
Reach Name:
Sample Name:
Survey Date:
RIVERMORPH PARTICLE SUMMARY
Red—Barn
UT3
Bar Sample
06/08/2018
SIEVE (mm) NET WT
16
0.16
8
0.08
4
0.65
2
2.9
PAN
20.01
D16 (mm)
0
D35 (mm)
0
D50 (mm)
0
D84 (mm)
2.03
D95 (mm)
3.84
D100 (mm)
16
Silt/Clay (%)
0
Sand (%)
83.83
Gravel (%)
16.17
Cobble (%)
0
Boulder (%)
0
Bedrock (%)
0
Total weight = 23.8700.
Largest Surface Particles:
Size(mm) weight
Particle 1: 16 0.04
Particle 2: 16 0.03

C
COO
O
W
UT3 X-3
O Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbkf = 8.03 Dbkf = .54 Abkf = 4.34
0 10 20 30 40 50
Horizontal Distance (ft)

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Red -Barn
Reach Name: UT3
Cross Section Name: UT3 x-3
Survey Date: 03/07/2018
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 100 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 10 ft
TAPE
FS
ELEV
NOTE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0
8
102
8
9.31
100.69
11
9.45
100.55
22
9.5
100.5
25.5
9.74
100.26
28
10.6
99.4
30
10.88
99.12
31.2
11.02
98.98
31.7
12.3
97.7
32.4
12.36
97.64 TwG
34.2
12.32
97.68
35
12.23
97.77 EOw
38.6
12.26
97.74
39.5
11.7
98.3 BKF
40.2
10.7
99.3
41
10.01
99.99
41.7
8.36
101.64
46
8.13
101.87
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Sectional Geometry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)
Channel
Left
Right
Floodprone Elevation (ft)
98.96
98.96
98.96
Bankfull Elevation (ft)
98.3
98.3
98.3
Floodprone width (ft)
8.75
-----
-----
Bankfull width (ft)
8.03
4.01
4.02
Entrenchment Ratio
1.09
-----
-----
Mean Depth (ft)
0.54
0.59
0.49
Maximum Depth (ft)
0.66
0.66
0.56
width/Depth Ratio
14.87
6.77
8.2
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
4.34
2.38
1.96
wetted Perimeter (ft)
8.61
4.97
4.71
Hydraulic Radius (ft)
0.5
0.48
0.42
Begin BKF Station
31.47
31.47
35.48
End BKF Station
39.5
35.48
39.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entrainment Formula: Rosgen Modified Shields Curve
Channel Left side Right side
Slope 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/sq ft)
Movable Particle (mm)

W
UT3 Stream Gage Section
O Ground Points ♦ Bankfull Indicators ♦ Water Surface Points
Wbk` = 7.32 Dbk` _ .46 Abkf = 3.36
0 5 10 15
Horizontal Distance (ft)

Site Information and
Performance Standard Stratification
Project Name:
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site
Reach ID:
UT1a
Restoration Potential:
Level 3 - Geomorphology
Existing Stream Type:
B
Proposed Stream Type:
C
Region:
Piedmont
Drainage Area (sqmi):
0.05
Proposed Bed Material:
Sand
Existing Stream Length (ft):
863
Proposed Stream Length (ft):
1590
Stream Slope (%):
1.6
Flow Type:
Perennial
River Basin:
Yadkin-PeeDee
Stream Temperature:
Coolwater
Data Collection Season:
Winter/Spring
Valley Type:
Confined Alluvial
Notes
1. Users input values that are highlighted based on restoration potential
2. Users select values from a pull-down menu
3. Leave values blank for field values that were not measured
FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Exisiting Condition Score (ECS)
0.25
Proposed Condition Score (PCS)
0.66
Change in Functional Condition (PCS - ECS)
0.41
Percent Condition Change
164%
Existing Stream Length (ft)
863
Proposed Stream Length (ft)
1590
Additional Stream Length (ft)
727
Existing Functional Foot Score (FFS)
216
Proposed Functional Foot Score (FFS)
1049
Proposed FFS - Existing FFS
834
Functional Change (%)
386%
FUNCTION BASED PARAMETERS SUMMARY
Functional Category
Function -Based Parameters
Existing Parameter
Proposed Parameter
Hydrology
Catchment Hydrology
0.16
0.16
Reach Runoff
0.51
0.70
Hydraulics
Floodplain Connectivity
0.00
1.00
Geomorphology
Large Woody Debris
0.01
0.51
Lateral Stability
0.14
1.00
Riparian Vegetation
0.22
0.61
Bed Material
Bed Form Diversity
0.86
1.00
Plan Form
0.00
0.80
Physicochemical
Temperature
0.52
0.57
Bacteria
Organic Matter
0.28
0.56
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Biology
Macros
0.25
0.53
Fish
BMP FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Existing BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP FFS - Existing BMP FFS
0
Functional Change (%)
386%
FUNCTIONAL FEET (FF) SUMMARY
Existing Stream FFS + Existing BMP FFS
216
Proposed Stream FFS + Proposed BMP FFS
1049
Total Proposed FFS - Total Existing FFS
833
Functional Change (%)
386%
FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY REPORT CARD
Functional Category
ECS
PCS
Functional Change
Hydrology
0.34
0.43
0.09
Hydraulics
0.00
1.00
1.00
Geomorphology
0.25
0.78
0.53
Physicochemical
0.40
0.57
0.17
Biology
0.25
0.53
0.28

Site Information and
Performance Standard Stratification
Project Name:
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site
Reach ID:
UT1c
Restoration Potential:
Level 3 - Geomorphology
Existing Stream Type:
0.23
Proposed Stream Type:
C
Region:
Piedmont
Drainage Area (sqmi):
0.07
Proposed Bed Material:
Sand
Existing Stream Length (ft):
0
Proposed Stream Length (ft):
738
Stream Slope (%):
0.3
Flow Type:
Perennial
River Basin:
Yadkin-PeeDee
Stream Temperature:
Coolwater
Data Collection Season:
Winter/Spring
Valley Type:
Unconfined Alluvial
Notes
1. Users input values that are highlighted based on restoration potential
2. Users select values from a pull-down menu
3. Leave values blank for field values that were not measured
FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Exisiting Condition Score (ECS)
0.00
Proposed Condition Score (PCS)
0.66
Change in Functional Condition (PCS - ECS)
0.66
Percent Condition Change
0.23
Existing Stream Length (ft)
0
Proposed Stream Length (ft)
738
Additional Stream Length (ft)
738
Existing Functional Foot Score (FFS)
0
Proposed Functional Foot Score (FFS)
487
Proposed FFS - Existing FFS
487
Functional Change (%)
1.00
FUNCTION BASED PARAMETERS SUMMARY
Functional Category
Function -Based Parameters
Existing Parameter
Proposed Parameter
Hydrology
Catchment Hydrology
0.00
0.23
Reach Runoff
0.70
Hydraulics
Floodplain Connectivity
1.00
Geomorphology
Large Woody Debris
0.00
Lateral Stability
Biology
1.00
Riparian Vegetation
0.72
Bed Material
Bed Form Diversity
1.00
Plan Form
1.00
Physicochemical
Temperature
0.57
Bacteria
Organic Matter
0.56
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Biology
Macros
0.53
rFish
BMP FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Existing BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP FFS - Existing BMP FFS
0
Functional Change (%)
0.46
FUNCTIONAL FEET (FF) SUMMARY
Existing Stream FFS + Existing BMP FFS
0
Proposed Stream FFS + Proposed BMP FFS
487
Total Proposed FFS - Total Existing FFS
487
Functional Change (%)
0.46
WARNING: Sufficient data are not provided.
FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY REPORT CARD
Functional Category
ECS
PCS
Functional Change
Hydrology
0.00
0.46
0.46
Hydraulics
1.00
Geomorphology
0.74
Physicochemical
0.57
Biology
0.53

Site Information and
Performance Standard Stratification
Project Name:
Red Barn
Reach ID:
UT2a
Restoration Potential:
Level 3 - Geomorphology
Existing Stream Type:
B
Proposed Stream Type:
C
Region:
Piedmont
Drainage Area (sqmi):
0.08
Proposed Bed Material:
Sand
Existing Stream Length (ft):
1019
Proposed Stream Length (ft):
1197
Stream Slope (%):
0.9
Flow Type:
Perennial
River Basin:
Yadkin-PeeDee
Stream Temperature:
Coolwater
Data Collection Season:
Winter/Spring
Valley Type:
Unconfined Alluvial
Notes
1. Users input values that are highlighted based on restoration potential
2. Users select values from a pull-down menu
3. Leave values blank for field values that were not measured
FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Exisiting Condition Score (ECS)
0.37
Proposed Condition Score (PCS)
0.73
Change in Functional Condition (PCS - ECS)
0.36
Percent Condition Change
97%
Existing Stream Length (ft)
1019
Proposed Stream Length (ft)
1197
Additional Stream Length (ft)
178
Existing Functional Foot Score (FFS)
377
Proposed Functional Foot Score (FFS)
874
Proposed FFS - Existing FFS
497
Functional Change (%)
132%
FUNCTION BASED PARAMETERS SUMMARY
Functional Category
Function -Based Parameters
Existing Parameter
Proposed Parameter
Hydrology
Catchment Hydrology
0.48
0.48
Reach Runoff
0.43
0.60
Hydraulics
Floodplain Connectivity
0.39
1.00
Geomorphology
Large Woody Debris
0.02
0.75
Lateral Stability
0.41
1.00
Riparian Vegetation
0.07
0.55
Bed Material
Bed Form Diversity
0.48
1.00
Plan Form
0.00
1.00
Physicochemical
Temperature
0.86
0.86
Bacteria
Organic Matter
0.28
0.56
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Biology
Macros
0.25
0.53
Fish
BMP FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Existing BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP FFS - Existing BMP FFS
0
Functional Change (%)
132%
FUNCTIONAL FEET (FF) SUMMARY
Existing Stream FFS + Existing BMP FFS
377
Proposed Stream FFS + Proposed BMP FFS
874
Total Proposed FFS - Total Existing FFS
497
Functional Change (%)
132%
FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY REPORT CARD
Functional Category
ECS
PCS
Functional Change
Hydrology
0.45
0.54
0.09
Hydraulics
0.39
1.00
0.61
Geomorphology
0.20
0.86
0.66
Physicochemical
0.57
0.71
0.14
Biology
0.25
0.53
0.28

Site Information and
Performance Standard Stratification
Project Name:
Red Barn
Reach ID:
UT2b
Restoration Potential:
Level 3 - Geomorphology
Existing Stream Type:
F
Proposed Stream Type:
C
Region:
Piedmont
Drainage Area (sqmi):
0.2
Proposed Bed Material:
Sand
Existing Stream Length (ft):
929
Proposed Stream Length (ft):
1077
Stream Slope (%):
0.3
Flow Type:
Perennial
River Basin:
Yadkin-PeeDee
Stream Temperature:
Coolwater
Data Collection Season:
Winter/Spring
Valley Type:
Unconfined Alluvial
Notes
1. Users input values that are highlighted based on restoration potential
2. Users select values from a pull-down menu
3. Leave values blank for field values that were not measured
FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Exisiting Condition Score (ECS)
0.29
Proposed Condition Score (PCS)
0.70
Change in Functional Condition (PCS - ECS)
0.41
Percent Condition Change
141%
Existing Stream Length (ft)
929
Proposed Stream Length (ft)
1077
Additional Stream Length (ft)
148
Existing Functional Foot Score (FFS)
269
Proposed Functional Foot Score (FFS)
754
Proposed FFS - Existing FFS
484
Functional Change (%)
180%
FUNCTION BASED PARAMETERS SUMMARY
Functional Category
Function -Based Parameters
Existing Parameter
Proposed Parameter
Hydrology
Catchment Hydrology
0.39
0.39
Reach Runoff
0.55
0.62
Hydraulics
Floodplain Connectivity
0.00
1.00
Geomorphology
Large Woody Debris
0.02
0.60
Lateral Stability
0.24
1.00
Riparian Vegetation
0.01
0.40
Bed Material
Bed Form Diversity
0.50
0.92
Plan Form
0.00
1.00
Physicochemical
Temperature
0.86
0.86
Bacteria
Organic Matter
0.28
0.56
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Biology
Macros
0.25
0.53
Fish
BMP FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Existing BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP FFS - Existing BMP FFS
0
Functional Change (%)
180%
FUNCTIONAL FEET (FF) SUMMARY
Existing Stream FFS + Existing BMP FFS
269
Proposed Stream FFS + Proposed BMP FFS
754
Total Proposed FFS - Total Existing FFS
485
Functional Change (%)
180%
FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY REPORT CARD
Functional Category
ECS
PCS
Functional Change
Hydrology
0.47
0.50
0.03
Hydraulics
0.00
1.00
1.00
Geomorphology
0.15
0.78
0.63
Physicochemical
0.57
0.71
0.14
Biology
0.25
0.53
0.28

Site Information and
Performance Standard Stratification
Project Name:
Red Barn
Reach ID:
UT2c
Restoration Potential:
Level 3 - Geomorphology
Existing Stream Type:
F
Proposed Stream Type:
C
Region:
Piedmont
Drainage Area (sqmi):
0.22
Proposed Bed Material:
Sand
Existing Stream Length (ft):
240
Proposed Stream Length (ft):
244
Stream Slope (%):
0.3
Flow Type:
Perennial
River Basin:
Yadkin-PeeDee
Stream Temperature:
Coolwater
Data Collection Season:
Winter/Spring
Valley Type:
Unconfined Alluvial
Notes
1. Users input values that are highlighted based on restoration potential
2. Users select values from a pull-down menu
3. Leave values blank for field values that were not measured
FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Exisiting Condition Score (ECS)
0.29
Proposed Condition Score (PCS)
0.66
Change in Functional Condition (PCS - ECS)
0.37
Percent Condition Change
128%
Existing Stream Length (ft)
240
Proposed Stream Length (ft)
244
Additional Stream Length (ft)
4
Existing Functional Foot Score (FFS)
70
Proposed Functional Foot Score (FFS)
161
Proposed FFS - Existing FFS
91
Functional Change (%)
131%
FUNCTION BASED PARAMETERS SUMMARY
Functional Category
Function -Based Parameters
Existing Parameter
Proposed Parameter
Hydrology
Catchment Hydrology
0.39
0.39
Reach Runoff
0.55
0.62
Hydraulics
Floodplain Connectivity
0.00
1.00
Geomorphology
Large Woody Debris
0.02
0.60
Lateral Stability
0.24
1.00
Riparian Vegetation
0.01
0.40
Bed Material
Bed Form Diversity
0.50
0.87
Plan Form
0.00
0.00
Physicochemical
Temperature
0.86
0.86
Bacteria
Organic Matter
0.28
0.56
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Biology
Macros
0.25
0.53
Fish
BMP FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Existing BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP FFS - Existing BMP FFS
0
Functional Change (%)
130%
FUNCTIONAL FEET (FF) SUMMARY
Existing Stream FFS + Existing BMP FFS
70
Proposed Stream FFS + Proposed BMP FFS
161
Total Proposed FFS - Total Existing FFS
91
Functional Change (%)
130%
FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY REPORT CARD
Functional Category
ECS
PCS
Functional Change
Hydrology
0.47
0.50
0.03
Hydraulics
0.00
1.00
1.00
Geomorphology
0.15
0.57
0.42
Physicochemical
0.57
0.71
0.14
Biology
0.25
0.53
0.28

Site Information and
Performance Standard Stratification
Project Name:
Red Barn
Reach ID:
UT3a
Restoration Potential:
Level 3 - Geomorphology
Existing Stream Type:
G
Proposed Stream Type:
B
Region:
Piedmont
Drainage Area (sqmi):
0.06
Proposed Bed Material:
Gravel
Existing Stream Length (ft):
1476
Proposed Stream Length (ft):
1410
Stream Slope (%):
2.5
Flow Type:
Perennial
River Basin:
Yadkin-PeeDee
Stream Temperature:
Coolwater
Data Collection Season:
Winter/Spring
Valley Type:
Colluvial
Notes
1. Users input values that are highlighted based on restoration potential
2. Users select values from a pull-down menu
3. Leave values blank for field values that were not measured
FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Exisiting Condition Score (ECS)
0.61
Proposed Condition Score (PCS)
0.84
Change in Functional Condition (PCS - ECS)
0.23
Percent Condition Change
38%
Existing Stream Length (ft)
1476
Proposed Stream Length (ft)
1410
Additional Stream Length (ft)
-66
Existing Functional Foot Score (FFS)
900
Proposed Functional Foot Score (FFS)
1184
Proposed FFS - Existing FFS
284
Functional Change (%)
32%
FUNCTION BASED PARAMETERS SUMMARY
Functional Category
Function -Based Parameters
Existing Parameter
Proposed Parameter
Hydrology
Catchment Hydrology
0.39
0.39
Reach Runoff
0.45
0.67
Hydraulics
Floodplain Connectivity
0.35
1.00
Geomorphology
Large Woody Debris
0.05
0.72
Lateral Stability
0.03
0.85
Riparian Vegetation
0.48
0.73
Bed Material
Bed Form Diversity
0.69
0.93
Plan Form
1.00
1.00
Physicochemical
Temperature
0.67
0.67
Bacteria
Organic Matter
1.00
1.00
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Biology
Macros
1.00
1.00
Fish
BMP FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Existing BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP FFS - Existing BMP FFS
0
Functional Change (%)
32%
FUNCTIONAL FEET (FF) SUMMARY
Existing Stream FFS + Existing BMP FFS
900
Proposed Stream FFS + Proposed BMP FFS
1184
Total Proposed FFS - Total Existing FFS
284
Functional Change (%)
32%
FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY REPORT CARD
Functional Category
ECS
PCS
Functional Change
Hydrology
0.42
0.53
0.11
Hydraulics
0.35
1.00
0.65
Geomorphology
0.45
0.85
0.40
Physicochemical
0.84
0.84
0.00
Biology
1.00
1.00
0.00

Site Information and
Performance Standard Stratification
Project Name:
Red Barn
Reach ID:
UT3b
Restoration Potential:
Level 3 - Geomorphology
Existing Stream Type:
Bc
Proposed Stream Type:
Bc
Region:
Piedmont
Drainage Area (sqmi):
0.06
Proposed Bed Material:
Gravel
Existing Stream Length (ft):
186
Proposed Stream Length (ft):
190
Stream Slope (%):
1.5
Flow Type:
Perennial
River Basin:
Yadkin-PeeDee
Stream Temperature:
Coolwater
Data Collection Season:
Winter/Spring
Valley Type:
Colluvial
Notes
1. Users input values that are highlighted based on restoration potential
2. Users select values from a pull-down menu
3. Leave values blank for field values that were not measured
FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Exisiting Condition Score (ECS)
0.67
Proposed Condition Score (PCS)
0.84
Change in Functional Condition (PCS - ECS)
0.17
Percent Condition Change
25%
Existing Stream Length (ft)
186
Proposed Stream Length (ft)
190
Additional Stream Length (ft)
4
Existing Functional Foot Score (FFS)
125
Proposed Functional Foot Score (FFS)
160
Proposed FFS - Existing FFS
35
Functional Change (%)
28%
FUNCTION BASED PARAMETERS SUMMARY
Functional Category
Function -Based Parameters
Existing Parameter
Proposed Parameter
Hydrology
Catchment Hydrology
0.39
0.39
Reach Runoff
0.45
0.67
Hydraulics
Floodplain Connectivity
0.53
1.00
Geomorphology
Large Woody Debris
0.05
0.72
Lateral Stability
0.57
0.85
Riparian Vegetation
0.48
0.73
Bed Material
Bed Form Diversity
0.63
0.88
Plan Form
1.00
1.00
Physicochemical
Temperature
0.67
0.67
Bacteria
Organic Matter
1.00
1.00
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Biology
Macros
1.00
1.00
Fish
BMP FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Existing BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP FFS - Existing BMP FFS
0
Functional Change (%)
28%
FUNCTIONAL FEET (FF) SUMMARY
Existing Stream FFS + Existing BMP FFS
125
Proposed Stream FFS + Proposed BMP FFS
160
Total Proposed FFS - Total Existing FFS
35
Functional Change (%)
28%
FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY REPORT CARD
Functional Category
ECS
PCS
Functional Change
Hydrology
0.42
0.53
0.11
Hydraulics
0.53
1.00
0.47
Geomorphology
0.55
0.84
0.29
Physicochemical
0.84
0.84
0.00
Biology
1.00
1.00
0.00

Site Information and
Performance Standard Stratification
Project Name:
Red Barn
Reach ID:
UT3c
Restoration Potential:
Level 3 - Geomorphology
Existing Stream Type:
F
Proposed Stream Type:
C
Region:
Piedmont
Drainage Area (sqmi):
0.1
Proposed Bed Material:
Gravel
Existing Stream Length (ft):
974
Proposed Stream Length (ft):
1097
Stream Slope (%):
1.5
Flow Type:
Perennial
River Basin:
Yadkin-PeeDee
Stream Temperature:
Coolwater
Data Collection Season:
Winter/Spring
Valley Type:
Unconfined Alluvial
Notes
1. Users input values that are highlighted based on restoration potential
2. Users select values from a pull-down menu
3. Leave values blank for field values that were not measured
FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Exisiting Condition Score (ECS)
0.59
Proposed Condition Score (PCS)
0.79
Change in Functional Condition (PCS - ECS)
0.20
Percent Condition Change
34%
Existing Stream Length (ft)
974
Proposed Stream Length (ft)
1097
Additional Stream Length (ft)
123
Existing Functional Foot Score (FFS)
575
Proposed Functional Foot Score (FFS)
867
Proposed FFS - Existing FFS
292
Functional Change (%)
51%
FUNCTION BASED PARAMETERS SUMMARY
Functional Category
Function -Based Parameters
Existing Parameter
Proposed Parameter
Hydrology
Catchment Hydrology
0.39
0.39
Reach Runoff
0.45
0.67
Hydraulics
Floodplain Connectivity
0.39
0.75
Geomorphology
Large Woody Debris
0.05
0.72
Lateral Stability
0.42
0.85
Riparian Vegetation
0.56
0.60
Bed Material
Bed Form Diversity
0.58
0.97
Plan Form
0.00
1.00
Physicochemical
Temperature
0.67
0.67
Bacteria
Organic Matter
1.00
1.00
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Biology
Macros
1.00
1.00
Fish
BMP FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Existing BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP FFS - Existing BMP FFS
0
Functional Change (%)
51%
FUNCTIONAL FEET (FF) SUMMARY
Existing Stream FFS + Existing BMP FFS
575
Proposed Stream FFS + Proposed BMP FFS
867
Total Proposed FFS - Total Existing FFS
292
Functional Change (%)
51%
FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY REPORT CARD
Functional Category
ECS
PCS
Functional Change
Hydrology
0.42
0.53
0.11
Hydraulics
0.39
0.75
0.36
Geomorphology
0.32
0.83
0.51
Physicochemical
0.84
0.84
0.00
Biology
1.00
1.00
0.00

Site Information and
Performance Standard Stratification
Project Name:
Red Barn
Reach ID:
UT4
Restoration Potential:
Level 3 - Geomorphology
Existing Stream Type:
G
Proposed Stream Type:
B
Region:
Piedmont
Drainage Area (sqmi):
0.02
Proposed Bed Material:
Sand
Existing Stream Length (ft):
87
Proposed Stream Length (ft):
110
Stream Slope (%):
4
Flow Type:
Intermittent
River Basin:
Yadkin-PeeDee
Stream Temperature:
Data Collection Season:
Valley Type:
Colluvial
Notes
1. Users input values that are highlighted based on restoration potential
2. Users select values from a pull-down menu
3. Leave values blank for field values that were not measured
FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Exisiting Condition Score (ECS)
0.18
Proposed Condition Score (PCS)
0.40
Change in Functional Condition (PCS - ECS)
0.22
Percent Condition Change
122%
Existing Stream Length (ft)
87
Proposed Stream Length (ft)
110
Additional Stream Length (ft)
23
Existing Functional Foot Score (FFS)
16
Proposed Functional Foot Score (FFS)
44
Proposed FFS - Existing FFS
28
Functional Change (%)
181%
FUNCTION BASED PARAMETERS SUMMARY
Functional Category
Function -Based Parameters
Existing Parameter
Proposed Parameter
Hydrology
Catchment Hydrology
0.56
0.56
Reach Runoff
0.25
1.00
Hydraulics
Floodplain Connectivity
0.25
1.00
Geomorphology
Large Woody Debris
0.00
0.02
Lateral Stability
0.03
0.85
Riparian Vegetation
0.31
0.49
Bed Material
Bed Form Diversity
Plan Form
Physicochemical
Temperature
Bacteria
Organic Matter
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Biology
Macros
Fish
BMP FUNCTIONAL CHANGE SUMMARY
Existing BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP Functional Feet Score (FFS)
0
Proposed BMP FFS - Existing BMP FFS
0
Functional Change (%)
175%
FUNCTIONAL FEET (FF) SUMMARY
Existing Stream FFS + Existing BMP FFS
16
Proposed Stream FFS + Proposed BMP FFS
44
Total Proposed FFS - Total Existing FFS
28
Functional Change (%)
175%
WARNING: Sufficient data are not provided.
FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY REPORT CARD
Functional Category
ECS
PCS
Functional Change
Hydrology
0.56
0.56
0.00
Hydraulics
0.25
1.00
0.75
Geomorphology
0.11
0.45
0.34
Physicochemical
Biology

Channel Formation Data
0.04
Channels with Ordinary
High Water Mark •
O
Y = 0.0231X-0.461 Cp O 0 •
iv
Q0 0 • : • •
NO
0.004 — •
d
■
•
Channels without Ordinary •
High Water Mark
0.0004
10 100 1000
Drainage Area (acres)
CM
■
Poorly Defined
o
Moderately Defined
o
Well Defined
0
NC Coastal Plain RR
•
GA Coastal Plain RC
o
Texas RR
0
Florida
Trendline
Power (Trendline)
10000

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
May 30, 2018
Re: Initial Evaluation of the proposed Red Barn Mitigation Bank (SAW -2017-01927), Surry County, NC
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, LLC
Attention: Mr. Kevin Tweedy, PE
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Dear Mr. Tweedy:
This letter is in regard to your prospectus document for the proposed Red Barn Mitigation Bank. The
proposal consists of the establishment and operation of a commercial mitigation bank located in the Upper
Yadkin River Basin. The Red Barn mitigation site is a 24 -acre stream and wetland mitigation site located
west of South Franklin Road, approximately 0.5 -mile west of Mt. Airy, in Surry County, North Carolina
(36.4898°N, -80.6411°W).
The Corps determined the prospectus was complete and issued a public notice (P/N # SAW -2017-
01927) on March 30, 2018. The purpose of this notice was to solicit the views of State and Federal
agencies and other parties either interested in or affected by the proposed work. Attached are all
comments received in response to the public notice from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources.
The Corps has considered the information provided in the prospectus document, comments received
in response to the public notice, and information that was discussed during on-site reviews conducted on
December 19, 2017. We have determined that the proposed mitigation bank appears to have the
potential to restore and enhance aquatic resources within the Upper Yadkin 8 -digit Hydrologic Unit Code
(HUC) 03040101 of the Yadkin River Basin. However, we have significant concerns with some of the
proposed restoration and enhancement activities for the mitigation site as detailed in the attached
comments. The bank sponsor may proceed with preparation of a draft Umbrella Mitigation Banking
Instrument (UMBI) provided the concerns are adequately addressed in the draft UMBI submittal.
We appreciate your interest in restoring and protecting aquatic resources. If you have questions
concerning the path forward for the proposed mitigation bank, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone], extension 59.
Sincerely,
Digitally signed by HUGH ESANDRE—ADE.12583-65
HUGHES.ANDREA.WADE.1258339165 °N„ „E5'AN REwAOE°,258339165
Date: 20180601 ,0'.3606-0400'
Andrea W. Hughes
Mitigation Project Manager
Enclosures
Electronic Copy:
NCIRT Distribution List

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
CESAW-RG/Hughes May 30, 2018
MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
SUBJECT: Proposed Red Barn Mitigation Bank - Comments Received in Response to the Public Notice
PURPOSE: The comments listed below were received in response to the Prospectus document during
the 30 -day comment period in accordance with Section 332.8(g) of the 2008 Mitigation Rule.
Project Name: Red Barn Mitigation Bank, Surry County, NC
USACE AID#: SAW -2017-01927
Todd Bowers, USEPA, April 20, 2018:
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
Andrea Leslie, NCWRC, April 30, 2018:
SEE ATTACHED COMMENTS
Mac Haupt, NCDWR, April 26, 2018:
1. UT1- this reach began behind the hill/knoll adjacent to some houses, ran down slope where it is
ditched to Stewart Creek and has been since the 1930's. EPR proposes to take it offline and
curve it around following the floodplain grade until it meets up with UT2. There was little flow on
the site visit (December 19, 2017), however, it has been dry in the area.
Once the proposed stream makes the turn into the larger floodplain the slope decreases
significantly. DWR's impression is that the remainder of the reach would likely be a wetland
instead of the maintained single thread channel. In fact, it appears that once (in the proposed
alignment) UT1 makes the turn to come down into the floodplain (of Stewarts Creek) until its
confluence with UT2 is at high risk of being a wetland and not a single thread stream.
2. UT2- begins at the fence at the easement line. The first 350-450 feet of UT2 has enough slope to
maintain channel features, however, once the reach gets to the floodplain/toe of slope, there are
a lot of wetlands and the stream will likely have difficulty maintaining a single thread channel.
DWR believes the middle section of UT2 will be more wetland -like than stream -like.
3. UT3- where UT2 and 3 come together it does seem more restoration like than enhancement like.
The final design will depend on how each tributary is designed. The majority of UT3 was incised
and was transporting a fair amount of sand downstream. Some areas showed bench
development and there was discussion as to why restoration was needed on much of the reach.
4. Another concern for DWR on UT3 was the wetland at the bottom of the reach and I stated I did
not want that wetland to lose function with a stream channel being built through it (which is the
proposal).
5. In conclusion, there is significant stream restoration footage at risk of being more wetland like
than stream like. DWR would strongly advise the designer that this project is at risk of not
delivering the stream credits that the provider desires.

USA CE Mitigation Team, May 23, 2018
1. You must include a JD with the draft mitigation plan. The JD map should depict and label each
wetland area separately. Labels used in the JD must match the labels used in mitigation plan
maps and figures.
Additional buffer credits: You must provide a map depicting the buffer boundaries as well as the
accompanying buffer calculation spreadsheet and shapefiles. The spreadsheet is available on the
RIBITS website under the Bank and ILF Establishment tab.
3. During the site visit, the IRT requested that the sponsor provide baseline data to support the
proposed treatments. Page 5 states that field investigations were conducted to evaluate and
document existing conditions including cross-section surveys, photographic documentation,
pebble counts, bank erosion estimations, and other observed site conditions and stressors. The
document refers to Table 3 for a summary of the information. However, Table 3 only provides
stream length, watershed drainage area, NCDWR Stream Identification Score, and stream
classification. The information provided is not sufficient to justify the proposed restoration and
enhancement activities.
4. Property lines, utility easements, roads, and road crossings should be clearly depicted on maps.
5. UT1: Based on a review of historic topographic maps (1893, 1953, 1955, and 1964) and historic
soils map (1932), there is no evidence to support the assumption that UT 1 historically flowed
parallel to Stewarts Creek and through the existing pasture/floodplain. Based on the historic
maps, this area would more likely support a wetland system. Restoration of the upper portion of
UT1, where there is adequate slope to support a single thread channel, appears to be an
appropriate treatment.
6. UT2: The historic maps listed above do not provide evidence of a relic channel at this location
within the floodplain/pasture. In addition, regarding the "wetland splay", we do not support
construction of BMPs within jurisdictional areas. BMPs should be located upstream or adjacent
to jurisdictional features.
7. UT3: The historic maps appear to support a single thread channel in this approximate location.
However, during the site visit the IRT expressed concerns with some of the proposed treatments
for this tributary, including potential loss of wetland function associated with stream restoration
activities. The draft mitigation plan should include data (cross section surveys, pebble counts,
bank erosion estimations, etc.) to support the proposed treatments and credit ratios, and activities
should be designed to minimize impacts to wetlands.
8. The prospectus suggests that if monitoring determines a portion of a stream system is functioning
as a wetland, the Sponsor will seek wetland credit. Please be aware that we cannot arbitrarily
switch credit methodology in the middle of monitoring. Should issues arise, the sponsor must
submit an adaptive management plan to the IRT for consideration. The draft mitigation plan
should include a discussion of potential issues and remedial actions under the adaptive
management section.
HUGHES.ANDREAMADE.1 DNic-US—U.S. Government ou ED DAou=12583
PKI, oo USA,
258339165 cn-HUGHES ANDREAMADE 1258339165
Date: 2018.06.01 10:36:58 -04'00'
Andrea Hughes
Mitigation Project Manager
Regulatory Division

� North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission D
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Andrea Hughes
Mitigation Project Manager, US Army Corps of Engineers
FROM: Andrea Leslie`'C��c°'C��
Habitat Conservation, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
DATE: 30 April 2018
SUBJECT: Comments on Red Barn Mitigation Bank Prospectus
Surry County
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed
the prospectus for the Red Barn Mitigation Bank. NCWRC has not yet visited the site, and our
review is limited, depending on the information provided in the prospectus. The prospectus
proposes stream restoration and enhancement on over 8,084 feet of stream to net 8,270 Stream
Mitigation Units (SMUs) and wetland restoration and enhancement on 4.5 acres of wetland to
net 3 Wetland Mitigation Units (WMUs) in the Yadkin River Basin (03040101).
The site is primarily agricultural, located on 24 acres of conservation easement, and will involve
restoration and enhancement on three unnamed tributaries (UTs) to Stewarts Creek. Priority 1-2
are proposed for restoration reaches.
UT 1 currently follows the northern property line and appears channelized into another
channelized stream at an approximate 90 -degree angle. The prospectus proposes to reroute this
stream through an agricultural field, following subtle topographical differences; this rerouting
will actually increase the length of this stream by 148 ft. The proposed stream route does include
some degraded wetlands along the middle portion of the route, and the applicant states that there
is the potential that restoration reach may function more as linear wetlands. If this occurs, the
applicant states that wetland mitigation credit instead of stream credit will be sought for this area.
If this is the intention, success criteria and monitoring per these criteria should be provided for
both stream and wetland.
UT2 begins at an area of cattle loafing, and it is a wide area with much sediment deposition. The
prospectus proposes to stabilize this area as a `wetland splay area', designed to store sediment
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Red Barn Mitigation Bank Page 2 April 30, 2018
Surry County
from upstream; this area will function as a best management practice (BMP) and not be included
in the mitigation credits. We support the use of BMPs to control nutrients and sediment
originating from the site or upstream properties.
There is little information included for the wetland areas to be addressed, and we request that
additional information be provided. There is no description of the wetland areas to be addressed
nor a description of how restoration and enhancement will be achieved, aside from improving
hydrology by raising the adjacent stream elevation.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If we can be of further
assistance, please contact Andrea Leslie at [phone] or at andrea.leslie(&ncwildlife.org.
ec: Travis Wilson, NCWRC

Memorandum to the Record
April 20, 2018
Agency Comments for the Red Barn Mitigation Bank Final Prospectus and Public
Notice (SAW -2017-01927) associated with the Red Barn Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Bank (Site) in Surry County, NC
Andrea,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback and comments on the proposed Red Barn
Mitigation Bank (Bank or Project) Final Prospectus as the primary component of the Red Barn Stream
and Wetland Mitigation Bank. Ecosystem Planning and Restoration (EPR) has presented a viable plan
to provide compensatory mitigation for jurisdictional stream and wetland impacts associated with the
US Army Corps of Engineers Clean Water Act Section 404 permit program. The site, as presented in
the final prospectus is expected to provide approximately 8,270 cool temperature stream mitigation
units (SMU) through a combination of stream restoration and enhancement of three unnamed
tributaries of Stewart Creek in the Yadkin Pee -Dee watershed (HUC 03040101). Additionally, efforts
will be made to restore and enhance 4.5 acres of wetland to provide approximately 3.0 riparian wetland
mitigation units (WMU). The Red Barn site will also provide an excellent opportunity for the
restoration, enhancement and preservation of forested riparian buffers of the streams within the project
conservation easements. No nutrient offsets or riparian buffers are presented specifically for additional
compensatory mitigation credit except in areas where buffer widths exceed 30 feet from the stream
banks.
Note: It is understood that several site visits have been made by IRT members during the development
of site feasibility to provide mitigation credit. In that regard I feel it necessary to mention that I have
not been on-site during this process and that my comments may reflect a lack of on-site observation
and evaluation. Many of the comments below will necessarily apply to the mitigation site plan as well.
As some minor concerns remain, the EPA Region 4 Ocean, Wetlands and Stream Protection Branch
offers the following site-specific comments as they pertain to the Red Barn Mitigation Final Prospectus
dated March 2018:
General: The Bank Sponsor did an excellent job responding to comments from EPA pertaining
to the draft prospectus of November 2017. Most of the concerns raised are no longer an issue
and I recommend that the project proceed as intended with IRT approval. I request that the
sponsor include correspondence from the IRT in the appendices to allow for cross -agency
review of comments.
Section 5.2/Page 15: UT2 has a wetland splay area described in the restoration plan. This splay
area is not shown in Figure 9 Mitigation Concept Map as it was in the draft version.
Recommend including this splay area is included in all concept maps moving forward.
Section 5.2/Page 16: Along with the description of enhancement activities of UT3 I recommend
that this section include language of "Enhancement II" which is the intended approach
according to Figure 9 Concept Map and Table 6 on Page 18.

Section 5.2/Page 16: Recommend including a citation for Shafale and Weakley 1990 in the
References Section 9.
Table 6/Page 18: Proposed Mitigation Summary. I am concerned with the rather large
additional amount of credits being proposed (1070 SMU increase from the draft version). It
appears that most of this additional credit (960 SMU) is coming directly from an additional 960
linear feet of restoration on UT 1. The concept map (Figure 9) shows no change in UT 1
dimension or pattern and the language in Section 5 does not account for such a large increase in
estimated restoration length from the draft version. EPA requests that the sponsor provide a
brief explanation to the IRT about this substantial increase in restoration length for UTI.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback, comments and concerns with the Red Barn
Mitigation Bank Final Prospectus in Surry County, NC associated with Public Notice and Corp ID
SAW -2017-01927. I believe the sponsor has provided a viable plan to offset impacts to waters of the
US that will be incurred within the Upper Yadkin River 01 watershed service area. If you or the
sponsor have any questions or need clarification on any of the comments stated above, please contact
me at 404-562-9225 or at [e-mail].
Best Regards,
Todd Bowers
Comments submitted to Andrea Hughes and Steven Kichefski (SAW-PMs) via email on April 20, 2018

�..ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
March 16, 2018
Marella Buncick, Endangered Species Biologist
USFWS Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville NC 28801
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, LLC
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone: [phone]
www.eprusa.net
RE: Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site, Yadkin River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03040101,
Surry County, NC
Dear Ms. Buncick,
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration (EPR) respectfully requests review and comment from the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) regarding the implementation of the subject
project. This request is to comply with the Nationwide Permit general conditions and to develop
the environmental documentation required by the proposed action. Project details are presented
below.
The project is comprised of multiple parcels off Cletius Moser Trail and Timeless Trail,
approximately 0.5 miles south of NC 89 and 0.5 west of the City of Mount Airy in Surry County,
North Carolina (Figure 1). Figure 2 depicts the project on the United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Dobson, NC 7.5 -minute topographic map at 36.4898 N and -80.6411 E and is comprised
of six parcels, here indicated by the following Parcel ID Nos.: 501000713046, 591900791439,
591900797501, 591900894216, 591908883852, and 591908891501.
The Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site was identified to provide in-kind mitigation for unavoidable
stream and/or wetland impacts. Segments of this stream network have been identified as incised,
eroding, and no longer connected to their floodplains. In total, almost 7,200 linear feet will be
restored through the relocation of streams to their approximate historic locations and reconnection
with the historic floodplain. To that end, new channels will be constructed within the existing crop -
and pasture -land with excavation depths ranging from 1-4 feet. All work will take place within a
24 -acre conservation easement shown on the attached Figure 2.
Construction activities will take place within jurisdictional waterbodies requiring Section 401 and
404 permits from the NC Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the US Army Corps of
Engineers. Grading activities will require a Sediment and Erosion Control permit from the NC
Division of Land Quality. Portions of the site are located within a mapped FEMA floodplain and
will require coordination with Surry County Floodplain Administrators.
As of June 1, 2017, the USFWS lists four federally protected species and three federal species
of concern for Surry County, not including the Bald Eagle, which is protected under the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act (Table 1). A brief description of the federally protected species
habitat requirements follows, along with the Biological Conclusion rendered based on field

assessments of the project area. Habitat requirements are based on the current best available
information.
Table 1. Federally listed species for Slurry County
Common Name
Scientific Name
Federal Status
Habitat Present
Biological
Conclusion
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus
BGPA
No
N/A
leucocephalus
Bog turtle
Glyptemys
T (S/A)
Yes
Not Required
muhlenber ii
Northern long-
Myotis
T
Yes
MA-NLAA
eared bat
septentrionalis
Robust redhorse
Moxostoma
FSC
No
N/A
robustum
Brook floater
Alasmidonta
FSC
No
N/A
varicose
Carolina hemlock
Tsuga caroliniana
FSC
No
N/A
Schweinitz's
Helianthus
E
No
No Effect
sunflower
schweinitzii
Small whorled
Isotria
T
Yes
No Effect
po onia
medeoloides
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance with another listed
species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to
Section 7 consultation. In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to Georgia) was listed as T(S/A)
(threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S/A) designation bans the collection and interstate and international commercial
trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private
landowners in North Carolina, part of the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
FSC = Federal Species of Concern. FSC is an informal term. It is not defined in the federal Endangered Species Act. In North Carolina,
the Asheville and Raleigh Field Offices of the US Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) define Federal Species of Concern as those
species that appear to be in decline or otherwise in need of conservation and are under consideration for listing or for which there is
insufficient information to support listing at this time. Subsumed under the term "FSC" are all species petitioned by outside parties
and other selected focal species identified in Service strategic plans, State Wildlife Action Plans, or Natural Heritage Program Lists.
N/A — Not applicable to FSC
MA-NLAA — May Affect -Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Bog turtle
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: April 1 — October 1 (visual surveys); April 1- June 15
(optimal for breeding/nesting); May 1 -June 30 (trapping surveys)
Habitat Description: Bog turtle habitat consists of open, groundwater supplied (spring fed),
graminoid dominated wetlands along riparian corridors or on seepage slopes. These
habitats are designated as mountain bogs by the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program, but they are technically poor, moderate, or rich fens that may be associated with
wet pastures and old drainage ditches that have saturated muddy substrates with open
canopies. These habitats, found between 700 and 4,500 feet above mean sea level in the
western Piedmont and mountain counties of North Carolina, often support sphagnum
moss and may contain carnivorous plants. Soil types (poorly drained silt loams) from which
bog turtle habitats have been found include Arkaqua, Chewacla, Dellwood, Codorus
complex, Hatboro, Nikwasi, Potomac — lotla complex, Reddies, Rosman, Tate —
-PROVIDING ECOSYSTEMPLANNING AND RESTORATION SERVICES TO SUPPORTA SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT -

Cullowhee complex, Toxaway, Tuckasegee — Cullasaja complex, Tusquitee, Watauga,
and Wehadkee.
Biological Conclusion: Not Required
Species listed as threatened due to similarity of appearance do not require Section 7
consultation with the USFWS. The wetland areas in the easement provide potential
habitat for the bog turtle. However, they are unlikely to occur due to the fact that the area
has been used intensively by cattle, and periodically for crops, for many years. In addition,
a review of NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) records indicates no known bog turtle
occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Northern long-eared bat
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: June 1 — August 15
Habitat Description: In North Carolina, the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) occurs in the
mountains, with scattered records in the Piedmont and coastal plain. In western North
Carolina, NLEB spend winter hibernating in caves and mines. Since this species is not
known to be a long-distance migrant, and caves and subterranean mines are extremely
rare in eastern North Carolina, it is uncertain whether or where NLEB hibernate in eastern
North Carolina. During the summer, NLEB roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in
cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees (typically >_3 inches dbh). Males and
non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. This bat
has also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns and sheds, under eaves of
buildings, behind window shutters, in bridges, and in bat houses. Foraging occurs on
forested hillsides and ridges, and occasionally over forest clearings, over water, and along
tree -lined corridors. Mature forests may be an important habitat type for foraging.
Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Forested areas suitable as roosting habitat for the NLEB exist in the study area. However,
as of June 7, 2016, the USFWS does not indicate that Surry County contains any
confirmed hibernation or maternity sites for the NLEB. Therefore, this project will not
require incidental take and is exempted under the final 4(d) rule guidelines. In addition, a
review of NCNHP records indicates no known NLEB occurrences within 1.0 mile of the
study area.
Schweinitz's sunflower
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: late August -October
Habitat Description: Endemic to the Piedmont of North and South Carolina, the few sites where
this rhizomatous perennial herb occurs in relatively natural vegetation are found in Xeric
Hardpan Forests. The species is also found along roadside rights-of-way, maintained
power lines and other utility rights-of-way, edges of thickets and old pastures, clearings
and edges of upland oak -pine -hickory woods and Piedmont longleaf pine forests, and
other sunny or semi -sunny habitats where disturbances (e.g., mowing, clearing, grazing,
blow downs, storms, frequent fire) help create open or partially open areas for sunlight. It
is intolerant of full shade and excessive competition from other vegetation. Schweinitz's
sunflower occurs in a variety of soil series, including Badin, Cecil, Cid, Enon, Gaston,
Georgeville, Iredell, Mecklenburg, Misenheimer, Secrest, Tatum, Uwharrie, and Zion,
among others. It is generally found growing on shallow sandy soils with high gravel
-PROVIDING ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION SERVICES TO SUPPORTA SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT -

content; shallow, poor, clayey hardpans; or shallow rocky soils, especially those derived
from mafic rocks.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
There is no suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower in the conservation easement.
Much of the easement is comprised of pasture land, grazed or maintained to the wood
edge. In addition, a review of NCNHP records indicates no known occurrences of the
sunflower within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Small whorled pogonia
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: mid-May - early July
Habitat Description: Small whorled pogonia occurs in young as well as maturing (second to third
successional growth) mixed -deciduous or mixed-deciduous/coniferous forests. It does not
appear to exhibit strong affinities for a particular aspect, soil type, or underlying geologic
substrate. In North Carolina, the perennial orchid is typically found in open, dry deciduous
woods and is often associated with white pine and rhododendron. The species may also
be found on dry, rocky, wooded slopes; moist slopes; ravines lacking stream channels; or
slope bases near braided channels of vernal streams. The orchid, often limited by shade,
requires small light gaps or canopy breaks, and typically grows under canopies that are
relatively open or near features like logging roads or streams that create long -persisting
breaks in the forest canopy.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Wooded hillsides in the conservation easement provide habitat for small whorled pogonia.
However, all restoration work will occur within the floodplains, and the hillsides will not be
impacted. In addition, a review of NCNHP records indicates no known occurrences of the
pogonia within 1.0 mile of the study area.
If EPR has not received response from you within 45 days, we will assume that the USFWS does
not have any comment or information relevant to the implementation of this project at the current
time. We thank you in advance for your timely response, input, and cooperation. Please contact
me at the above phone number or address with any question.
Sincerely,
Cidney Jones, PE
-PROVIDING ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION SERVICES TO SUPPORTA SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT -

[NCNHP] North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2001. Guide to Federally Listed Endangered
and Threatened Species of North Carolina. Raleigh, NC. 134 pp.
[NCWRC] North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 2006. Bog Turtle Fact
Sheet.http://www.ncwildlife.org/Portals/0/Conserving/documents/nongame_bogturtle_hires.pdf.
(Accessed: March 13, 2017).
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, N.C.
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, NC. 325 pp.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016. NC County NLEB consultation areas.
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/NLEB in WNC.html (Accessed March 13,
2018)
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016. Small -whorled Pogonia Fact Sheet.
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/plants/smallwhorledpogoniafs.html. (Accessed: March
13, 2018).
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. NLEB Fact Sheet.
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nleb/pdf/NLEBFactSheetOl April2O15.p
df. (Accessed: March 13, 2018).
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2014. Northern Long -Eared Bat (NLEB) Interim
Conference and Planning Guidance. USFWS Regions 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6.
https://www.fws.gov/northeast/virginiafield/pdf/NLEBinterimGuidance6Jan2O14.pdf. (Accessed:
March 13, 2018).
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011. Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_schweinitz_sunflower.html. (Accessed: March 13, 2018).
[USFWS] United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Asheville Ecological Services Field Office.
2011. Bog Turtle (Glyptemys
muhlenbergii).https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/listed species/bog_turtle.html. (Accessed:
March 13, 2018).
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Optimal Survey Windows for North Carolina's
Federally Threatened and Endangered Plant
Species.https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pdfs/survey_window_for_plants.pdf. (Accessed: March 13,
2018).
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. Schweinitz's Sunflower Recovery Plan. Atlanta,
GA. 28 pp.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1992. Small Whorled Pogonia (Isotria medeoloides)
Recovery Plan, First Revision. Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 75 pp.
-PROVIDING ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION SERVICES TO SUPPORTA SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT -

; ,RG INIA
NvRIH CAP.0Li1JA
Ry I Piot j
Op,
t
c'p R d
t
�O C
qis �9
.z
W-PmG9t -_ O"ak�Ra 89
M t Airy ,
Ry
i1
I?
PROJECT LOCATION
36.489851 N
-80.641183 E _
�A
,i.:,tidd Rd
S
S,
S
q�
vf,
C
�y
M
d
Legend rndy"A 601
Proposed Easement �; ;;�; 6, 0
Ararat ' Ary
PREPARED FOR:
0 1 2 RED BARN SITE
USACE
Miles VICINITY MAP
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
PREPARED BY:
FIGURE 9 SURRY COUNTY, NCARESTORATION
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &

ell
9.X !,North Surry v 11 • J� v l n V✓iT� ` \ V. ` ra ESM
k High_ Sch r� / , . :.•vp _. f
Cem
1062 S/ „cg' C •
Qemi
oast7r` J y, I //a •`•ch } toe b O ^Or1Ye tl! ` '
AL-
UT
1 1 u , i00 rCem • O
Q d J��JL.' ,r •� •S'.. ,i
Legend
Proposed Easement
PREPARED FOR:
0 1,000 2,000 RED BARN SITE USACE
Feet USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
PREPARED BY:
FIGURE 2 SURRY COUNTY, NC ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION

�..ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
March 16, 2018
Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
109 East Jones Street, Room 258
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE: Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Catalogue Unit 03040101
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley,
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, LLC
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone: [phone]
www.eprusa.net
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration (EPR) is planning to conduct stream and wetland
restoration/enhancement activities for the above referenced project. We are requesting your
office to review and comment on any possible issues that may emerge with respect to
archaeological or cultural resources associated the proposed stream and wetland
restoration/enhancement project. Included in this package are USGS site topographic maps at
1:24,000 scale, and relevant site photographs.
The project is comprised of multiple parcels off Cletius Moser Trail and Timeless Trail,
approximately 0.5 miles south of NC 89 and 0.5 west of the City of Mount Airy in Surry County,
North Carolina (Figure 1). Figure 2 depicts the project on the United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Dobson, NC 7.5 -minute topographic map at 36.4898 N and -80.6411 E and is comprised
of six parcels, here indicated by the following Parcel ID Nos.: 501000713046, 591900791439,
591900797501, 591900894216, 591908883852, and 591908891501.
The Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site site was identified to provide in-kind mitigation for
unavoidable stream and/or wetland impacts. Segments of this stream network have been
identified as incised, eroding, and no longer connected to their floodplains. In total, almost 7,200
linear feet will be restored through the relocation of streams to their approximate historic
locations and reconnection with the historic floodplain. To that end, new channels will be
constructed within the existing pasture -land with excavation depths ranging from 1-4 feet. All
work will take place within a 24 -acre conservation easements shown on the attached Figure 2.
There are no existing structures with the proposed conservation easement. The majority of the
site has historically been disturbed due to past and current management for cattle grazing and
rearing and crop production. Furthermore, no architectural structures or archeological artifacts
have been observed or noted during preliminary surveys of the site for restoration purposes.
According to SHPO's online GIS Mapping Application (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) accessed on
March 13, 2018, there are no historic structures located within 1 mile of the site.

Construction activities will take place within jurisdictional waterbodies requiring Section 401 and
404 permits from the NC Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the US Army Corps of
Engineers. Grading activities will require a Sediment and Erosion Control permit from the NC
Division of Land Quality. Portions of the site are located within a mapped FEMA floodplain and
will require coordination with Surry County Floodplain Administrators.
Please contact me at the above phone number or address with any question.
Sincerely,
Cidney Jones, PE
Water Resource Engineer
-PROVIDING ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION SERVICES TO SUPPORTA SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT -

�..ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
March 16, 2018
Shannon Deaton
Habitat Conservation Program Manager
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
1721 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, LLC
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone: [phone]
www.eprusa.net
RE: Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site, Yadkin River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03040101,
Surry County, NC
Dear Ms. Deaton,
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration (EPR) respectfully requests review and comment from the
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) regarding the implementation of the
subject project. This request is to comply with the Nationwide Permit general conditions and to
develop the environmental documentation required by the proposed action. Project details are
presented below.
The project is comprised of multiple parcels off Cletius Moser Trail and Timeless Trail,
approximately 0.5 miles south of NC 89 and 0.5 west of the City of Mount Airy in Surry County,
North Carolina (Figure 1). Figure 2 depicts the project on the United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Dobson, NC 7.5 -minute topographic map at 36.4898 N and -80.6411 E and is comprised
of six parcels, here indicated by the following Parcel ID Nos.: 501000713046, 591900791439,
591900797501, 591900894216, 591908883852, and 591908891501.
The Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site was identified to provide in-kind mitigation for unavoidable
stream and/or wetland impacts. Segments of this stream network have been identified as incised,
eroding, and no longer connected to their floodplains. In total, almost 7,200 linear feet will be
restored through the relocation of streams to their approximate historic locations and reconnection
with the historic floodplain. To that end, new channels will be constructed within the existing crop -
and pasture -land with excavation depths ranging from 1-4 feet. All work will take place within a
24 -acre conservation easement shown on the attached Figure 2.
Construction activities will take place within jurisdictional waterbodies requiring Section 401 and
404 permits from the NC Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the US Army Corps of
Engineers. Grading activities will require a Sediment and Erosion Control permit from the NC
Division of Land Quality. Portions of the site are located within a mapped FEMA floodplain and
will require coordination with Surry County Floodplain Administrators.
As of March 13, 2018, the USFWS lists four federally protected species and three federal species
of concern for Surry County, not including the Bald Eagle, which is protected under the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act (Table 1). A brief description of the federally protected species

habitat requirements follows, along with the Biological Conclusion rendered based on field
assessments of the project area. Habitat requirements are based on the current best available
information.
Table 1. Federally listed species for Slurry County
Common Name
Scientific Name
Federal Status
Habitat Present
Biological
Conclusion
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus
BGPA
No
N/A
leucoce halus
Bog turtle
Glyptemys
T (S/A)
Yes
Not Required
muhlenber ii
Northern long-
Myotis
T
Yes
MA-NLAA
eared bat
se tentrionalis
Robust redhorse
Moxostoma
FSC
No
N/A
robustum
Brook floater
Alasmidonta
FSC
No
N/A
varicose
Carolina hemlock
Tsuga caroliniana
FSC
No
N/A
Schweinitz's
Helianthus
E
No
No Effect
sunflower
schweinitzii
Small whorled
Isotria
T
Yes
No Effect
0 onia
I medeoloides
T = threatened. A taxon 'likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance with another listed
species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to
Section 7 consultation. In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to Georgia) was listed as T(S/A)
(threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S/A) designation bans the collection and interstate and international commercial
trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private
landowners in North Carolina, part of the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
FSC = Federal Species of Concern. FSC is an informal term. It is not defined in the federal Endangered Species Act. In North Carolina,
the Asheville and Raleigh Field Offices of the US Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) define Federal Species of Concern as those
species that appear to be in decline or otherwise in need of conservation and are under consideration for listing or for which there is
insufficient information to support listing at this time. Subsumed under the term "FSC" are all species petitioned by outside parties
and other selected focal species identified in Service strategic plans, State Wildlife Action Plans, or Natural Heritage Program Lists.
N/A — Not applicable to FSC
MA-NLAA — May Affect -Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Bog turtle
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: April 1 — October 1 (visual surveys); April 1- June 15
(optimal for breeding/nesting); May 1 -June 30 (trapping surveys)
Habitat Description: Bog turtle habitat consists of open, groundwater supplied (spring fed),
graminoid dominated wetlands along riparian corridors or on seepage slopes. These
habitats are designated as mountain bogs by the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program, but they are technically poor, moderate, or rich fens that may be associated with
wet pastures and old drainage ditches that have saturated muddy substrates with open
canopies. These habitats, found between 700 and 4,500 feet above mean sea level in the
western Piedmont and mountain counties of North Carolina, often support sphagnum
moss and may contain carnivorous plants. Soil types (poorly drained silt loams) from which
bog turtle habitats have been found include Arkaqua, Chewacla, Dellwood, Codorus
-PROVIDING ECOSYSTEMPLANNING AND RESTORATION SERVICES TO SUPPORTA SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT -

complex, Hatboro, Nikwasi, Potomac - lotla complex, Reddies, Rosman, Tate -
Cullowhee complex, Toxaway, Tuckasegee - Cullasaja complex, Tusquitee, Watauga,
and Wehadkee.
Biological Conclusion: Not Required
Species listed as threatened due to similarity of appearance do not require Section 7
consultation with the USFWS. The wetland areas in the easement provide potential
habitat for the bog turtle. However, they are unlikely to occur due to the fact that the area
has been used intensively by cattle, and periodically for crops, for many years. In addition,
a review of NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) records indicates no known bog turtle
occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Northern long-eared bat
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: June 1 - August 15
Habitat Description: In North Carolina, the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) occurs in the
mountains, with scattered records in the Piedmont and coastal plain. In western North
Carolina, NLEB spend winter hibernating in caves and mines. Since this species is not
known to be a long-distance migrant, and caves and subterranean mines are extremely
rare in eastern North Carolina, it is uncertain whether or where NLEB hibernate in eastern
North Carolina. During the summer, NLEB roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in
cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees (typically >-3 inches dbh). Males and
non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. This bat
has also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns and sheds, under eaves of
buildings, behind window shutters, in bridges, and in bat houses. Foraging occurs on
forested hillsides and ridges, and occasionally over forest clearings, over water, and along
tree -lined corridors. Mature forests may be an important habitat type for foraging.
Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Forested areas suitable as roosting habitat for the NLEB exist in the conservation
easement. However, as of June 7, 2016, the USFWS does not indicate that Surry County
contains any confirmed hibernation or maternity sites for the NLEB. Therefore, this project
will not require incidental take and is exempted under the final 4(d) rule guidelines. In
addition, a review of NCNHP records indicates no known NLEB occurrences within 1.0
mile of the study area.
Schweinitz's sunflower
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: late August -October
Habitat Description: Endemic to the Piedmont of North and South Carolina, the few sites where
this rhizomatous perennial herb occurs in relatively natural vegetation are found in Xeric
Hardpan Forests. The species is also found along roadside rights-of-way, maintained
power lines and other utility rights-of-way, edges of thickets and old pastures, clearings
and edges of upland oak -pine -hickory woods and Piedmont longleaf pine forests, and
other sunny or semi -sunny habitats where disturbances (e.g., mowing, clearing, grazing,
blow downs, storms, frequent fire) help create open or partially open areas for sunlight. It
is intolerant of full shade and excessive competition from other vegetation. Schweinitz's
sunflower occurs in a variety of soil series, including Badin, Cecil, Cid, Enon, Gaston,
Georgeville, Iredell, Mecklenburg, Misenheimer, Secrest, Tatum, Uwharrie, and Zion,
-PROVIDING ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION SERVICES TO SUPPORTA SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT -

among others. It is generally found growing on shallow sandy soils with high gravel
content; shallow, poor, clayey hardpans; or shallow rocky soils, especially those derived
from mafic rocks.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
There is no suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower in the conservation easement.
Much of the easement is comprised of pasture land, grazed or maintained to the wood
edge. In addition, a review of NCNHP records indicates no known occurrences of the
sunflower within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Small whorled pogonia
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: mid-May - early July
Habitat Description: Small whorled pogonia occurs in young as well as maturing (second to third
successional growth) mixed -deciduous or mixed-deciduous/coniferous forests. It does not
appear to exhibit strong affinities for a particular aspect, soil type, or underlying geologic
substrate. In North Carolina, the perennial orchid is typically found in open, dry deciduous
woods and is often associated with white pine and rhododendron. The species may also
be found on dry, rocky, wooded slopes; moist slopes; ravines lacking stream channels; or
slope bases near braided channels of vernal streams. The orchid, often limited by shade,
requires small light gaps or canopy breaks, and typically grows under canopies that are
relatively open or near features like logging roads or streams that create long -persisting
breaks in the forest canopy.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Wooded hillsides in the conservation easement provide habitat for small whorled pogonia.
However, all restoration work will occur within the floodplains, and the hillsides will not be
impacted. In addition, a review of NCNHP records indicates no known occurrences of the
pogonia within 1.0 mile of the study area.
If EPR has not received response from you within 45 days, we will assume that the NCWRC does
not have any comment or information relevant to the implementation of this project at the current
time. We thank you in advance for your timely response, input, and cooperation. Please contact
me at the above phone number or address with any question.
Sincerely,
Cidney Jones, PE
-PROVIDING ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION SERVICES TO SUPPORTA SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT -

[NCNHP] North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2001. Guide to Federally Listed Endangered
and Threatened Species of North Carolina. Raleigh, NC. 134 pp.
[NCWRC] North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 2006. Bog Turtle Fact Sheet.
http://www.ncwildlife.org/Portals/0/Conserving/documents/nongame_bogturtle_hires.pdf.
(Accessed: March 13, 2018).
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, N.C.
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, NC. 325 pp.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016. NC County NLEB consultation areas.
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/NLEB in WNC.html (Accessed March 13,
2018)
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016. Small -whorled Pogonia Fact Sheet.
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/plants/smallwhorledpogoniafs.html. (Accessed: May
13, 2018, 2017).
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. NLEB Fact Sheet.
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nleb/pdf/NLEBFactSheetOlApril2O15.p
df. (Accessed: March 13, 2018.)
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2014. Northern Long -Eared Bat (NLEB) Interim
Conference and Planning Guidance. USFWS Regions 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6.
https://www.fws.gov/northeast/virginiafield/pdf/NLEBinterimGuidance6Jan2O14.pdf. (Accessed:
March 13, 2018.)
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011. Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus
schweinitzii).https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_schweinitz_sunflower.htm1. (Accessed:
June 8, 2017).
[USFWS] United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Asheville Ecological Services Field Office.
2011. Bog Turtle (Glyptemys
muh/enbergii).https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/listed_species/bog_turtle.html. (Accessed:
March 13, 2018).
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Optimal Survey Windows for North Carolina's
Federally Threatened and Endangered Plant
Species.https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pdfs/survey_window_for_plants.pdf. (Accessed: March 13,
2018).
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. Schweinitz's Sunflower Recovery Plan. Atlanta,
GA. 28 pp.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1992. Small Whorled Pogonia (lsotria medeoloides)
Recovery Plan, First Revision. Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 75 pp.
-PROVIDING ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION SERVICES TO SUPPORTA SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT -

0 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
April 10, 2018
Cidney Jones
Ecosystem Planning & Restoration
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27606
SUBJECT: Red Barn Mitigation Site
Dear Ms. Jones:
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) received your March 16
letter regarding a stream restoration project on Stewarts Creek and unnamed tributaries in Surry County.
You requested review and comment on the project. Our comments on this project are offered for your
consideration under provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
Details were not provided in the letter on design of the project. The project is proposed as a mitigation
project and will involve stream relocation to historical locations and reconnection to the historic
floodplain.
This project should not impact wild trout resources. We recommend that riparian buffers that are to be
reestablished be as wide as possible, given site constraints and landowner needs. NCWRC generally
recommends a woody buffer of 100 feet on perennial streams to maximize the benefits of buffers,
including bank stability, stream shading, treatment of overland runoff, and wildlife habitat.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Please contact me at (828) 803-
6054 if you have any questions about these comments.
Sincerely,
Andrea Leslie
Mountain Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Cidney Jones
From: Cidney Jones
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 12:06 PM
To: Kim Bates; Erin Bennett
Subject: RE: Surry County Full Delivery Stream Project
Attachments: Red Barn Figures_FEMA.pdf; Stewarts Creek Tribs Figures_FEMA.pdf
Hi Kim,
Attached are vicinity and FEMA mapped floodplain figures for both of the projects. I'll provide some more detail on the
work proposed for each of the projects below. Both projects will do earthwork (primarily excavation) within the
Stewarts Creek Floodplain and the mapped floodway. For both projects the easements will become vegetated with
riparian buffer species, so once the trees establish, the floodplain roughness would be increased from the surrounding
agricultural land uses. The areas outside of the conservation easement will remain in their agricultural land uses and due
to the relatively small width of the easements within the FEMA cross sections, the land use change is not likely to change
the BFEs.
Red Barn (RB) —The tribs will be meandered through the low parts of the valley. We will be meeting grade
within the existing wetlands (no more than 0.5ft of excavation and less than 0.5 ft for any fill) and excavating
some where we propose wetland creation (max excavation depth in that proposed wetland is 0.8 ft). Once we
are within the mapped floodway, all the proposed work is stream enhancement. The streams will keep their
existing alignment and we're going to be excavating a bankfull bench. The drainage area for the project into
Stewarts is 0.3 sq.mi.
Stewarts Creek Tributaries — This project includes some work on Moore's Fork which is a FEMA mapped stream
and we have prepared a CLOMR for this portion of the work (it's going through a QC before we submit it but
should be coming your way in the next month). The vicinity map attached shows the conservation easement for
both areas (Moore's Fork and Stewarts Creek Tribs) but the following figure zooms in on just the tribs to
Stewarts Creek. The western trib on this project hits the outskirts of the floodway in an area where the
proposed stream will be meeting the existing grade. Where the tributaries enter Stewarts Creek in the mapped
floodway, there will be excavation and no fill. The western trib DA will be 0.11 sq.mi. while the eastern trib will
be 0.18 sq.mi.
The FIS (2016) indicates that the Stewarts Creek model was re -delineated, i.e. new floodplain delineations but previously
effective hydraulic analysis and BFEs were used. We went looking for the effective model for Stewarts Creek for this area
and it seems to be a HEC -2 model from 1982. We contacted NCDPS to get a copy of the model and have what they think
is the effective model but before we went about getting this model into a recent version of HEC -RAS we wanted to check
with you to see if a No -Rise is likely and what might be needed for a No -Rise submittal on these projects.
Best, Cidney
From: Kim Bates <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 8:30 AM
To: Erin Bennett <[e-mail]>
Cc: Cidney Jones <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Surry County Full Delivery Stream Project
Thanks much ... I'd like to see location specifics and a quick summary of the proposed work before discussing. If no -rise
certification is possible or already in existence I can sign off quickly and we would just need to issue a zoning permit for
the work.

Kim Bates
Surry County Planning and Development
122 Hamby Road
Dobson, NC 27017
336 401-8300
Fx 336 401-8354
From: Erin Bennett <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 5:04 PM
To: Kim Bates <[e-mail]>
Cc: Cidney Jones <coones @eprusa.net>
Subject: Surry County Full Delivery Stream Project
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Surry County Network. Do not click links or
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. When in
doubt, please call the sender (do not use the number listed on the email in question).
Mr. Bates,
Cidney Jones and I are both working on separate stream restoration projects in Surry County. Both projects contain un-
named tributaries that flow in to Stewarts Creek. We were wondering if you had time for a call this week to discuss
these projects? We can provide you with any information that you think is necessary to discuss these projects.
Thank you for all your help,
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
■
RESTORATION
Erin Bennett, PE
Water Resources Engineer
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27606
(0): 919-388-0787
(F): 919-388-0789
(M): 828-735-1083

', PROJECT
VICINITY MAP J
INDEX OF SHEETS
1... TITLE SHEET
1 A ... STREAM CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
GENERAL NOTES
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
2 ... TYPICAL SECTIONS
2A -2H ... DETAILS
3-3B... TABLES
4-21... PLAN AND PROFILE
22-25... VEGETATION PLAN
GRAPHIC SCALES
20 10 0 20 40
PLANS
20 10 0 20 40
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
5 2.5 0 5 10
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
SURRY COUNTY.
LOCATION: SURRY COUNTY, NC
TYPE OF WORK: STREAM RESTORATION
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION UTI
STA. 10+00.00
SHEET 5 SHEET 4
�Z
rn S,S,
F�
StiFF s
T) ?
9 SNE�� 1
SHEET 12 0
SHE,
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION UT2
STA. 10+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION UT2 gT� r r
STA. 34+90.84
END CONSTRUCTION UT I
SyF� STA. 38+66.34
T2
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION UT4
END CONSTRUCTION UT3 s syE STA. 10+00.00
STA. 37+94.39 yF� ,T r8 sy
X49 EFT 1 >
Sy�FTr6
SyFFT lgBEGIN
0 00 00 CONSTRUCTION UT3
END CONSTRUCTION UT4
STA. 1 1 +34.1 1
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTIONENGR. JAPPROV.1 DATE
1 1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN I CJ I KLT 112/21/1
PREPARED FOR:
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD
SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
LETTING DATE:
CIDNEY JONES, PE I
PROJECT ENGINEER
PROJECT ENGINEER
PROGRESS DRAWING I
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

STREAM CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
0
ROCK J -HOOK JH — SF — SAFETY FENCE
ROCK VANE Rv — TP — TAPE FENCE
OFFSET ROCK CROSS VANE ov — — SILT FENCE
ROCK CROSS VANE xv ce CONSERVATION EASEMENT
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
DOUBLE WING DEFLECTOR
*`NOTE: ALL ITEMS ABOVE MAY NOT BE USED ON THIS PROJECT
GENERAL NOTES
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO INSTALL INSTREAM STRUCTURES USING
A TRACK HOE WITH A HYDRAULIC THUMB OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO PLACE
BOULDERS, AND STRUCTURES.
2. WORK IS BEING PERFORMED AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PLAN.
THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD MAKE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO REDUCE
SEDIMENT LOSS AND MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF THE SITE WHILE
PERFORMING THE CONSTRUCTION WORK.
3. CONSTRUCTION IS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN SUMMER 2019.
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 12/21/1
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
777-7
PROJECT # SHEET NO.
092 1A
SYMBOLOGY /
NOTES
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
TEMPORARY SILT CHECK
— - 20 — - EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
ROOT WAD Rw
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
oo
GRADE CONTROL LOG J -HOOK LJH
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
®
LOG VANE Lv
— —
— BANKFULL BENCH (GRADE)
®
LOG STEP Ls
— —
PROPERTY LINE
OCD
ROCK STEP Rs
ACCESS ROAD
LOG CROSS VANE xv
10+00
I STREAM THALWEG
CONSTRUCTED CASCADE cc
STREAM TOP OF BANKS
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE cR
FOOT BRIDGE
�o o
BOULDER CLUSTER
�-
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
%K74"NaNk
LOG ROLLER LR
PERMANENT FORD STREAM CROSSING RFc
GRADE CONTROL WOODY RIFFLEE)
®
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE TO BE
DETERMINED AT 100% DESIGN
TREE REMOVAL
TREE PROTECTION
TOEWOOD WITH GEOLIF I O
GEOLIFT
SOD MATS sM
CHANNEL FILL
_
DITCH PLUG
DEBRIS JAM DJ -T#
®
GRADE BANK 2:1 OR FLATTER
r4 -RB-
EXISTING WETLANDS
SINGLE WING DEFLECTOR
DOUBLE WING DEFLECTOR
*`NOTE: ALL ITEMS ABOVE MAY NOT BE USED ON THIS PROJECT
GENERAL NOTES
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO INSTALL INSTREAM STRUCTURES USING
A TRACK HOE WITH A HYDRAULIC THUMB OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO PLACE
BOULDERS, AND STRUCTURES.
2. WORK IS BEING PERFORMED AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PLAN.
THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD MAKE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO REDUCE
SEDIMENT LOSS AND MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF THE SITE WHILE
PERFORMING THE CONSTRUCTION WORK.
3. CONSTRUCTION IS SCHEDULED TO BEGIN SUMMER 2019.
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 12/21/1
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
777-7
PROJECT # SHEET NO.
092 1A
SYMBOLOGY /
NOTES
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

TYPICAL SECTIONS
"A" AND "B" TYPE CHANNELS
VARIES WBKF VARIES
is
P,
- - _ -
N
S ABKF ❑
2
S1
W7 W2
TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION
WPOOL
� m
APOOL ❑ ❑
Sq
C�
TYPICAL POOL CROSS SECTION
"C" TYPE CHANNELS
WBKF VARIES
- ABKF N
S1
W1 W2
❑
TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION
q VARIES WPOOL VAR]
D3 S3
APOOL 6
D4 Sq 5
W3 W4 W5 W6
TYPICAL POOL RIGHT CROSS SECTION
PROJECT #SHEET NO.
092 2
DETAILS
B and Bc STREAM TYPE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION DIMENSIONS
C, Cb, and E STREAM TYPE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION DIMENSIONS
Stream
Station
ABKF
WBKF
W1
RIFFLES
W2 D1
D2
S1
S2
APool
WPool
W3
POOLS
W4
D3
D4
S3
S4
UT2
32+47 to 34+91
7.0
9.8
2.8
2.1 0.1
0.9
20:1
2.51
17.6
14.5
3.1
4.1
0.2
1.6
20:1
2.5:1
UT3
10+00 to 24+10
24+10 to 26+00
3.0
4.5
6.2
7.6
2.0
2.4
1.1 0.1
1.5 0.1
0.6
0.6
33:1
15:1
2:1
2:1
6.7
9.0
7.5
9.0
0.8
0.8
1.5
1.5
0.1
0.1
0.7
1.5
7.5:1
0.6
2:1
2:1
UT4
10+00 to 10+341
1.3
4
1.3
0.7 0.04
0.37
33:1
2:1
3.0
5.3
0.8
0.8
0.4
0.4
2:1
2:1
PROJECT #SHEET NO.
092 2
DETAILS
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 12/21/1
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
ECOSYSTEM
.. PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
PROGRESS DRAWING I
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
C, Cb, and E STREAM TYPE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION DIMENSIONS
RIFFLES
POOLS
Stream
Station
ABKF
WBKF
W1
W2 D1
D2
S1
S2
APool
WPool
W3
W4
WS
W6
D3
D4
S3
S4
S6
10+00 to 25+90
3.0
7.0
2.5
1.0 0.1
0.5
20:1
2:1
6.8
9.7
3.6
1.8
1.8
2.4
0.6
0.6
6:1
3:1
2:1
UT1
25+90 to 31+28
3.0
5.0
2.2
0.3 0.3
0.5
7:1
0.6:1
3.2
5.3
2.4
1.2
0.5
1.2
0.6
0.6
4:1
2:1
1:1
31+28 to 38+66
4.0
7.5
2.1
1.6 0.1
0.6
20:1
2.5:1
7.6
10.5
4.5
2.2
0.8
3.0
0.75
0.75
6:1
3:1
2:1
10+00 to 21+97
4.0
7.5
2.1
1.6 0.1
0.6
20:1
2.51
7.6
10.5
4.5
2.2
0.8
3.0
0.75
0.75
6:1
3:1
2:1
UT2
21+97 to 32+47
7.0
9.9
2.1
2.8 0.14
0.9
20:1
2.51
11.4
12.9
5.3
2.7
1.4
3.5
0.9
0.9
6:1
3:1
2:1
26+00 to 36+97
4.5
7.6
2.4
1.5 0.1
0.6
15:1
2:1
10.5
11.5
6.0
0.0
2.5
3.0
1.50
0.00
4:1
N/A
2:1
uT3
r-
36+97 to 37+94
7.0
9.5
3.0
1.8 0.1
0.8
30:1
2:1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 12/21/1
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
ECOSYSTEM
.. PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
PROGRESS DRAWING I
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

OFFSET ROCK CROSS VANE SPECIFICATIONS
MATERIALS: SPECIFICATIONS:
SPECIFICATIONS:
TYPE: GRANITE OR COMPARABLE
TYPE: GRANITE OR COMPARABLE
SIZE: T.B.D.
BOULDER
TYPE: HARDWOOD
NUMBER OF HEADER ROWS. 1
SIZE: 12 INCH 0 MIN.
NUMBER OF FOOTER ROWS: 1
FILTER FABRIC
TYPE: TYPE 2 NON -WOVEN
NUMBER OF FOOTER LOGS: 1
WIDTH UPSTREAM: 6 FT MINIMUM
STONE BACKFILL
CLASS AAND ON-SITE ALLUVIUM (50/50 MIX)
NOTES FOR OFFSET ROCK CROSS VANE'
1 . STRUCTURE DIMENSIONS AND MEASUREMENTS ARE SHOWN ON THE
STRUCTURES TABLE SHEET.
2. DIG ATRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER ROCKS AND PLACE FILL
ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF VANE ARM, BETWEEN THE ARM AND STREAMBANK.
3. PLACE FOOTER ROCKS AND THEN HEADER ROCKS TO ACHIEVE DESIGN
DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS.
4. USE HAND PLACED STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF HEADER
AND FOOTER ROCKS.
5. PLACE FILTER FABRIC BEGINNING AT THE TOP OF HTE HEADER ROCKS AND
EXTENDING DOWN TO THE DEPTH OF THE FOOTER ROCKS, THEN OUTWARD
THE DISTANCE SPECIFIED IN THE STRUCTURES TABLE SHEET.
6. INSTALL STONE BACKFILL AS SHOWN, TO THE DIMENSIONS INDICATED IN THE
STRUCTURES TABLE SHEET.
7. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM
SIDE FO THE STRUCTURE WITH ONSITE ALLUVIUM TO THE ELEVATION
OF THE TOP OF HEADER ROCK.
LOG VANE SPECIFICATIONS
MATERIALS:
SPECIFICATIONS:
TYPE: GRANITE OR COMPARABLE
BOULDER
SIZE: T.B.D.
TYPE: HARDWOOD
LOGS
SIZE: 12 INCH 0 MIN.
NUMBER OF HEADER LOGS: 1
NUMBER OF FOOTER LOGS: 1
TYPE: TYPE 2 NON -WOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
WIDTH UPSTREAM: 6 FT MINIMUM
STONE BACKFILL
CLASS A AND ON-SITE ALLUVIUM (50/50 MIX)
NOTES FOR LOG VANE STRUCTURES:
1. STRUCTURE DIMENSIONS AND MEASUREMENTS ARE SHOWN ON
THE STRUCTURE TABLES SHEET.
2. LOGS SHOULD BE STRAIGHT, HARDWOOD, AND NOT ROTTEN.
3. BOULDERS MUST BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO ANCHOR LOGS.
4. SOIL SHOULD BE COMPACTED WELL AROUND BURIED PORTIONS OF LOGS.
5. BOULDER SHOULD BE PLACED ON TOP OF HEADER LOG FOR ANCHORING.
6. FILTER FABRIC SHOULD BE NAILED TO THE LOG BELOW THE BACKFILL.
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 2/21 /1
OUTSIDE ARM
LOG
BELOW STRE
OFFSET ROCK CROSS VANE
INSIDE ARM
— NO GAPS BETWEEN ROCKS
\\-\- \ SCOUR POOL (EXCAVATED)
U�C1G'!N PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER
PLAN VIEW
IZ - ELEVATION POINT (SEE STRUCTURE TABLES)
HEADER ROCK
BANKFULL
2
FLOW � 3 ARM SLOPE
STONE BACKFILL -,lu
FOOTER ROCK
FILTER FABRIC
PROFILE VIEW A -A'
VANE OUTSIDE ARM
ROCK
LOG VANE LD
A'
_SGS BURIED IN
STREAMBANK
AT LEAST 5'
PLAN VIEW
0 - ELEVATION POINT (SEE STRUCTURE TABLES)
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
FLOW
HEADER
HEADER LOG—
FOOTER
SVpPti y
FOOTER LOG
PROFILE VIEW A -A'
STONE BACKFILL
FLOW
FILTER
FABRIC
SECTION B - B'
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
PROJECT # SHEET NO.
092 2A
DETAILS
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

IZ - ELEVATION POINT (SEE STRUCTURES TABLE)
ROCK CROSS VANE SPECIFICATIONS
MATERIALS:
SPECIFICATIONS:
TYPE: GRANITE OR COMPARABLE
BOULDER
SIZE: 2 FT X 2 FT X 3 FT
LOGS
NUMBER OF HEADER ROWS: 1
NUMBER OF FOOTER ROWS: 1
TYPE: TYPE 2 NON -WOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
WIDTH UPSTREAM: 6 FT MINIMUM
NOTES FOR CROSS VANE STRUCTURES:
1. DIG ATRENCH BELOW THE STREAM BED FOR FOOTER AND HEADER
ROCKS, FILTER FABRIC AND STONE BACKFILL.
2. PLACE FOOTER ROCKS AND THEN HEADER ROCKS TO ACHIEVE
DESIGN DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS.
3. USE HAND PLACED STONE TO FILL GAPS AND VOIDS ON UPSTREAM
SIDE OF THE HEADER AND FOOTER ROCKS.
4. PLACE FILTER FABRIC BEGINNING AT THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCKS
AND EXTENDING DOWN TO THE DEPTH OF THE FOOTER ROCKS, THEN
OUTWARD THE DISTANCE SPECIFIED IN THE STRUCTURES TABLE SHEET.
5. INSTALL STONE BACKFILL AND ONSITE ALLUVIUM AS SHOWN, TO THE
DIMENSIONS INDICATED IN THE STRUCTURES TABLE SHEET.
6. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM
SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE WITH ONSITE ALLUVIUM TO THE ELEVATION OF
THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCK.
LOG STEP SPECIFICATIONS
MATERIALS:
SPECIFICATIONS:
TYPE: HARDWOOD
SIZE: LENGTH - 2 X WBKF, 12 INCH 0 MIN.
LOGS
NUMBER OF HEADER LOGS: 1
NUMBER OF FOOTER LOGS: 1
TYPE: TYPE 2 NON -WOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
WIDTH UPSTREAM: 6 FT MINIMUM
NOTES FOR LOG STEP STRUCTURES:
1. LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 12 INCHES IN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT,
HARDWOOD, AND RECENTLY HARVESTED.
2. LOGS>24 INCHES IN DIAMETER MAY BE USED ALONE WITHOUT AN ADDITIONAL
LOG. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHOULD STILL BE USED TO SEAL AROUND LOG
3. PLACE FOOTER LOGS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) LOG. SET HEADER LOG
APPROXIMATLEY 3 INCHES ABOVE THE INVERT ELEVATION.
4. CUT A NOTCH IN THE HEADER LOG APPROXIMATLEY 50 PERCENT OF THE
CHANNEL BOTTOM WIDTH AND EXTENDING DOWN TO THE INVERT ELEVATION.
5. USE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO SEAL GAPS BETWEEN LOGS.
6. PLACE TRANSPLANTS FROM TOE OF STREAMBANK TO TOP OF STREAMBANK.
7. TRANSPLANTS CAN BE SUBSITUTED WITH COIR FIBER MATTING AT THE
DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER.
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 2/21 /1
INVERT
LFOOTER
ROCK
B'
PLAN VIEW
SILL
ROCK CROSS VANE CV
7
HEADER ROCK
TOP OF BANK / BANKFULL (SEE NOTE 1)
F�y 2,6 1,7
LOW
3.5
ONSITE ALLUVIUM
FOOTER ROCK
FILTER FABRIC
ONSITE ALL
LOG STEP LS
BOTTOM OF BANK
TOP OF BANK
0�J
I___ ___
BI_` W B
5' A 5,
W RIFFLE WIDTH LOG WEIR
(SEE TYP
TOP OF BANK W
PLAN VIEW
BOTTOM OF BANK
PROFILE VIEW A -A'
VANEARM
PROJECT # SHEET NO.
092 j 213
DETAILS
TRIM FILTER FABRIC EVEN WITH
FRONTEDGE OF HEADER ROCK
HEADER ROCK
ONSITE ALLUVIUM -\,,,......'.'
FILTER FABRIC FOOTER ROCK
PROFILE VIEW B - B'
INVERT
TOP OF STREAMBANK
FLOW
STREAMBED
'OUR P001- O BACKFILL (ON-SITE ALLUVIUM)
HEADER LOG
O �GEOTEXTILE: FABRIC
FOOTER LOG
4' MINIMUM -----I
SECTION 6A -
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
SECTION C - C'
INVERT AND POOL
SECTION B -B'
POOL WIDTH (SEE TYP)
BAS FLOW
COIR FIBER MATTING = COIR FIBER MATTING
SECTION C -C'
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
ODER LOG
OTER LOG
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
I LL
/ RIFFLE WIDTH (SEE TYP) \
POOL WIDTH (SEE TYP I
C
C'
SCOUR
SOD MAT
` _POOL
SOD MAT
A
I___ ___
BI_` W B
5' A 5,
W RIFFLE WIDTH LOG WEIR
(SEE TYP
TOP OF BANK W
PLAN VIEW
BOTTOM OF BANK
PROFILE VIEW A -A'
VANEARM
PROJECT # SHEET NO.
092 j 213
DETAILS
TRIM FILTER FABRIC EVEN WITH
FRONTEDGE OF HEADER ROCK
HEADER ROCK
ONSITE ALLUVIUM -\,,,......'.'
FILTER FABRIC FOOTER ROCK
PROFILE VIEW B - B'
INVERT
TOP OF STREAMBANK
FLOW
STREAMBED
'OUR P001- O BACKFILL (ON-SITE ALLUVIUM)
HEADER LOG
O �GEOTEXTILE: FABRIC
FOOTER LOG
4' MINIMUM -----I
SECTION 6A -
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
SECTION C - C'
INVERT AND POOL
SECTION B -B'
POOL WIDTH (SEE TYP)
BAS FLOW
COIR FIBER MATTING = COIR FIBER MATTING
SECTION C -C'
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
ODER LOG
OTER LOG
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE SPECIFICATIONS
MATERIALS:
SPECIFICATIONS:
TYPE: HARVESTED ON-SITE OR COMPARABLE
RIFFLE BED MATERIAL
SIZE: CLASS BAND 57 STONE (50/50 MIX)
THICKNESS: 16 INCHES MIN.
COIR FIBER MATTING
SEE DETAIL
NOTES FOR CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE STRUCTURES:
1. GRADE STREAMBED AND BANKS TO PROPOSED DIMENSIONS PER
TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION AND PROFILE.
2. EXCAVATE TRENCH BELOW PROPOSED STREAMBED ELEVATION
EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN RIFFLE THICKNESS.
3. INSTALL COIR FIBER MATTING ALONG STREAMBANKS ENSURING
MATTING IS SUFFICIENTLY TRENCHED ALONG TOE OF BANK.
4.FILL TRENCH WITH RIFFLE BED MATERIAL TO FINAL DESIGN STREAM GRADE.
NOTE:
COMPACT BACKFILL USING ON-SITE HEAVY EQUIPMENT IN 10 INCH LIFTS.
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 2/21 /1
TOP OF
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE CR
BOTTOM
WIDTH
0
J
PLAN VIEW
HEAD OF RIFFLE
FLy
1 RIFp�E RIFFLE THICKNESS
'OE OF BANK 2 —
(7 �
RIFFLE BED MATERIAL POOL
B'
PROFILE A - A'
BOTTOM
WIDTH COIR FIBER
COIR FIBER MATTING
MATTING (SEE DETAIL)
'FLE BED MATERIAL (SEE DETAIL)
TOP OF BANK
0
n — TOE OF BANK
COIR FIBER MATTING SHOULD BE
RIFFLE THICKNESS TRENCHED THROUGH RIFFLE BED MATERIAL
RIFFLE BED MATERIAL
SECTION B - B'
0 - ELEVATION POINT (SEE STRUCTURE TABLES)
PLAN VIEW
DITCH PLUG
UNCOMPACTED BACKFILL
COMPACTED BACKFILL_ 1 .5' MINIMUM
FINISH GRADE
3,N SHEETS
7 ,
OF BANK
DITCH INVERT
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
COMPACTED
SECTION A -A'
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
77
PROJECT #SHEET NO. ,
092 2C
DETAILS
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

A LOG ROLLER G
LOG ROLLER SPECIFICATIONS
MATERIALS:
SPECIFICATIONS:
BANKFULL
SEE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE DETAIL
TYPE: HARDWOOD
TOE OF BANK
TOE OF BANK
NUMBER OF HEADER LOGS: 1
�0
B
BANKFULL
NOTES FOR LOG ROLLER STRUCTURES:
1. STRUCTURE DIMENSIONS AND MEASUREMENTS ARE SHOWN ON
THE STRUCTURE TABLES SHEET. NUMBER OF LOGS MAY VARY.
o
�
70°-80°
o 0 2
BURY INTO BED/BANK
5 FEET OR GREATER
(TYPICAL)
B
12" DIAMETER
SCOURS
I POOL
OR GREATER
I
I �
PROTECT BANK USING TOE WOOD
(SEE DETAIL)
IY
BACKFILL WITH
C
r
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
MATERIAL
(SEE DETAIL)
\
o
70°-80°
SCOUR 1
POOL
BURY INTO BED/BANK
5 FEET OR GREATER
(TYPICAL)
r.r -r.zx
RIFFLE WIDTH
IN POOL AREAS10(9
D
o,
70°-80°
4
i
D
SCOUR'
POOL I
5
LOG ROLLER SPECIFICATIONS
MATERIALS:
SPECIFICATIONS:
RIFFLE BED MATERIAL
SEE CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE DETAIL
TYPE: HARDWOOD
LOGS
SIZE: LENGTH = 2 X WBKF, 1 2" DIA.
NUMBER OF HEADER LOGS: 1
TYPE: TYPE 2 NON -WOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
WIDTH UPSTREAM: 6 FT MINIMUM
NOTES FOR LOG ROLLER STRUCTURES:
1. STRUCTURE DIMENSIONS AND MEASUREMENTS ARE SHOWN ON
THE STRUCTURE TABLES SHEET. NUMBER OF LOGS MAY VARY.
2. LOGS SHOULD BE STRAIGHT, HARDWOOD, AND NOT ROTTEN.
3. SOIL SHOULD BE COMPACTED WELL AROUND BURIED PORTIONS OF LOGS.
4. FILTER FABRIC SHOULD BE NAILED TO THE LOG BELOW THE BACKFILL.
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 2/21 /1
1--► A'
FLOW
I
PLAN VIEW
- ELEVATION POINT (SEE STRUCTURE TABLES)
A
1-
PROJECT #SHEET NO.
092 2D
DETAILS
F4,Ow
THALWEG
A'
BACKFILL WITH
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLEFILTER FABRIC
MATERIAL (TYPICAL)
(SEE DETAIL)
SECTION A -A'
SEE TYPICAL CROSS SI
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
5tl.1 IVIV t5-tY
SECTION DIMENSIONS
VARIES
btl.l IVIV L-1,'
HEADER LOG
4
MIN.
FOOTER LOG
SECTION D - D'
5 -
MIN.
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
RIFFLE MAX DEPTH
SEE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION DIMENSIONS
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

PLAN VIEW- 1
TRENCH EXCAVATION
COIR FIBER MATTING
COMPACTED BACKFILL -
UNDISTURBED
EARTH
/• COIR FIBI
%\ MATTING
DEPTH
SEESTRUCTURE
TABLES
:CAVATE CUT TRENCH (SEE NOTE 3)
TOE WOOD WITH GEOLIFT TW
1
NSTALL ROOTWADS
'ERPENDICULAR TO FLOW
SEE NOTE 4)
W I
!Z m
OF
4 W 41 A
J �
tiJ
A�
\ � 4
PLAN VIEW - 2
ROOTWAD INSTALLATION
LIVE CUTTINGS PLACED UNDERNEATH
COIR FIBER MATTING
SPECIFICATIONS:
BRUSH MATERIAL
GEOLIFTS- 5 FT WIDE AND 2 FTTHICK.
ENCASE IN COIR FIBER MATTING
(SEE SPECIFICATIONS)
ROOTWAD MATERIAL
- LIVE CUTTINGS
4
DENSE BRUSH LAYER: N,.
CONSISTING OF LIMBS,
BRANCHES, SMALL LOGS
ON-SITE ALLUVIUM
WIDTH
SEE STRUCTURE TABLES
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 2/21 /1
BASEFLOW
- UNCONSOLIDATED BACKFILL:
SOIL AND COBBLE
ROOTWAD
FINISHED BED J
ELEVATION
SECTION VIEW
- ELEVATION POINT (SEE STRUCTURE TABLES)
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
PLAN VIEW - 3
BRUSH LAYER INSTALLATION
POINT BAR OF CHANNEL
(SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS)
PROJECT #SHEET NO.
092 2E
DETAILS
INSTALL BRUSH MATERIAL (SEE NOTE 5).
AFTER BRUSH LAYER HAS BEEN COMPLETED
INSTALL SOIL LAYER (NOTE 6) AND COVER
WITH COIR FIBER MATTING (NOTE 7).
PLACE LIVE CUTTINGS IN LAYER ON TOP
OF COIR FIBER MATTING (SEE NOTE 8).
TOE WOOD SPECIFICATIONS
MATERIALS:
SPECIFICATIONS:
BRUSH MATERIAL
TYPE: BRUSH MATERIAL
SIZE: MIN. 5 FT LONG. 1 INCH DIAMETER
ROOTWAD MATERIAL
TYPE: HARDWOOD
SIZE: MIN. 6 FT LONG MIN. 12 INCH DIAMETER
COIR FIBER MATTING
SEE DETAIL
NOTES FOR TOE WOOD STRUCTURES:
1. STRUCTURE DIMENSIONS AND MEASUREMENTS ARE SHOWN ON THE
STRUCTURE TABLES SHEET.
2. DIG A TRENCH ALONG BANK WHERE TOE WOOD IS TO BE INSTALLED,
TO THE DEPTH AND WIDTH SPECIFIED IN THE DETAILS AND STRUCTURE
TABLES. IF TOE WOOD IS BEING PLACED IN A LOCATION WHERE THERE IS
NOT EXISTING GROUND, PLACE FILL MATERIAL AND COMPACT TO FORM
THE TRENCH FOR THE TOE WOOD MATERIALS.
3. EXCAVATE TRENCH BELOW TOEWOOD GRADE (PLAN VIEW 1). TO ELEVATION
POINTS 2 AND 4.
4. INSTALL ROOTWADS PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW AS SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW 2.
5. INSTALL BRUSH MATERIAL INCLUDING BRANCHES, LOGS,
AND BRUSH, AND AT LEAST 1 "IN DIAMETER. LARGE MATERIALS
AND SMALL MATERIALS SHALL BE MIXED, PLACED IN LAYERS NO MORE
THAN I FOOT DEEP, COVERED IN ATHIN LAYER OF ONSITE ALLUVIUM, AND
COMPACTED BEFORE PLACING THE NEXT LAYER OF TOE WOOD MATERIAL.
CONTINUE PLACING MATERIALS TO FORM A DENSE LAYER OF WOODY
MATERIALS AND ONSITE ALLUVIUM TO THE DEPTH AND ELEVATIONS SPECIFIED
(PLAN VIEW 3).
6. PLACE AN UNCONSOLIDATED LAYER OF SOIL AND COBBLE ON TOP OF BRUSH
LAYER.
7. COVER SOIL AND COBBLE LAYER IN COIR FIBER MATTING.
S. INSTALL LIVE CUTTINGS, INCLUDING BRANCHES AND BRUSH, AT LEAST 5 FEET
IN LENGTH, AND AT LEAST 1 INCH IN DIAMETER.
9. CONSTRUCT GEOLIFTS OR PLACE TRANSPLANTS AS SPECIFIED OR DIRECTED
BY THE ENGINEER) TO REBUILD THE STREAMBANK ABOVE THE TOE WOOD LAYER.
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

z
9
NOTES:
HARVESTING
1. USE FULL-SIZE LOADER, OR SIMILAR APPROVED EQUIPMENT, FOR EXCAVATING,
TRANSPORTING, AND PLACING ON-SITE SOD MATS.
2. DISTURB SOD MATS AS LITTLE AS POSSIBLE AND MAINTAIN SOIL MOISTURE.
3. MINIMUM MAT DEPTH IS 10 INCH.
PLACEMENT
1. PLACE SOD MATS FROM TOE OF STREAMBANK TO TOP OF STREAMBANK
ORTOEWOOD.
2. SOD MATS CAN BE SUBSITUTED WITH COIR FIBER MATTING AT THE
DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER.
SMALLANCHORSON
2'CENTERS
COIR FIBER
MATTING
ANCHORS ON
2' - 3' CENTERS
MATTING
IN TRENCH
SOD MAT HARVESTING
SMALL ANCHOR TRENCH
ON 1' CENTERS
ANCHOR OVERLAP
ON 1' CENTERS
-► F- 6" OVERLAY(MIN)
PLAN VIEW
F 18"-24"
mP)
BACKFILL -
SOD MAT SM
SOD MATS
BASEFLOW
101N WIDTH
MIN REFER TO
STRUCTURE
TABLE
COIR FIBER MATTING
LARGE
ANCHORS ON
3'CENTERS ALONG CENTER
LARGE
ANCHORS ON
2' CENTERS ALONG TOE
EXISTING
GROUND
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KILT 12/21/18
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
SOD MAT PLACEMENT
MAT POINT BARS WITH COIR FIBER MATTING
WHERE INDICATED ON PLANS
OFSTREAMBANK
MATTING PLACEMENT
SEE PLAN VIEW SHEET FOR MATTING LOCATIONS
TYPICAL MATTING PLAN VIEW
OF STREAMBANK
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
777
PROJECT # SHEET NO.
092 2F
DETAILS
LARGEANCHORS
2" X 2" (NOMINAL)
WOODEN STAKE
1"
2"
1-1 2"
24"
SMALLANCHORS
WOODEN STAKE
11"
J
1 "(NOMINAL)
STAPLE
12"
ANCHOR OPTIONS
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
- 6" MIN
SMALL ANCHORS ON
VCENTERS
IN TRENCH
-
MATTING SHALL BE
�� ��� �� ^�
PLACED IN TRENCH,
NOTES:
BACKFILLED, AND COMPACTED
1. IN AREAS TO BE MATTED, ALL SEEDING, SOIL
AMENDMENTS, AND SOIL PREPARATION MUST BE
STREAM BED
6" BURIED BELOW STREAMBED
COMPLETED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF COIR
FIBER MATTING.
BACKFILL WITH
2. WOODEN STAKES ARE PREFERRED. USE OF STAPLES
STREAMBED MATERIAL
AS SMALL ANCHORS MUST BE PRE -APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KILT 12/21/18
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
SOD MAT PLACEMENT
MAT POINT BARS WITH COIR FIBER MATTING
WHERE INDICATED ON PLANS
OFSTREAMBANK
MATTING PLACEMENT
SEE PLAN VIEW SHEET FOR MATTING LOCATIONS
TYPICAL MATTING PLAN VIEW
OF STREAMBANK
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
777
PROJECT # SHEET NO.
092 2F
DETAILS
LARGEANCHORS
2" X 2" (NOMINAL)
WOODEN STAKE
1"
2"
1-1 2"
24"
SMALLANCHORS
WOODEN STAKE
11"
J
1 "(NOMINAL)
STAPLE
12"
ANCHOR OPTIONS
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

CULVERT SPECIFICATIONS
MATERIALS:
SPECIFICATIONS:
GRAVEL
TYPE: #57 STONE AND CRUSHER RUN (50/50 MIX)
FILL
TYPE: ON-SITEALLUVIUM
Z
TYPE: TYPE 2 NON -WOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
WIDTH UPSTREAM: 6 FT MINIMUM
NOTES FOR CULVERT STRUCTURES:
1. TYPE 4 BEDDING, POSITIVE EMBANKMENT CONDITION.
2. CLASS I OR STRONGER SIZE T.B.D. MINIMUM TO BE INSTALLED.
3. STABILIZE FILL AROUND CULVERTS WITH CLASS B STONE.
STABILIZE REMAINING ROAD SIDE SLOPES WITH EROSION
MATTING ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS.
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 2/21 /1
I
� mmmm
-mmmmm
1. INSERT PLANTING BAR AS
SHOWN AND PULL HANDLE
TOWARD PLANTER.
W IEIII III
-I I IIEIII=11
III I II=III=III
=1 I III=III=11
III S I I -I 11=1 11=1 I I
IIH�I I EI I EI 11-I I I1 -I I
II�IETEIII
4. PULL HANDLE OF BAR TOWARD
PLANTER, FIRMING SOIL AT
BOTTOM.
DIBBLE PLANTING METHOD
USING THE KBC PLANTING BAR
WIDm-
2. REMOVE PLANTING BAR AND
PLACESEEDING AT CORRECT
DEPTH.
III -111-
M-01 1 I 1111
I I LL -1
1 1 I�
5. PUSH HANDLE FORWARD
FIRMING SOIL AT TOP.
F-2 INCH
W=ll1
�(Lml T I
-III-I I I1=1 I
W illlllllllllllll111
3. INSERT PLANTING BAR 2 INCHES
TOWARD PLANTER FROM SEEDING.
I I I
6. LEAVE COMPATION HOLE
OPEN. WATER THOROUGHLY.
PLANTING NOTES:
PLANTING BAG t8l
DURING PLANTING, SEEDLINGS SHALL
BE KEPT IN A MOIST CANVAS BAG OR
SIMILAR CONTAINER TO PREVENT
THE ROOT SYSTEMS FROM DRYING.
KBC PLANTING BAR
PLANTING BAR SHALL HAVE A BLADE
WITH A TRIANGULAR CROSS SECTION,
AND SHALL BE 12 INCHES LONG,
41NCHES WIDE AND 1 INCH THICK
AT CENTER.
ROOT PRUNING
ALL SEEDLINGS SHALL BE ROOT PRUNED,
IF NECESSARY, SO THAT NO ROOTS
EXTEND MORE THAN 10 INCHES BELOW
THE ROOT COLLAR.
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
VARIABLE CULVERT 1
REQUIRED COVER DEPTH
T.B.D.
CULVERT DETAIL
T.B.D.
DOWNSTREAM INLET ELEV.
T.B.D.
Z
T.B.D.
DOWNSTREAM INLET STA.
T.B.D.
FARM PATH ELEV.
T.B.D.
2
z
GRAVEL
EXTEND GRADE
O
TO
EXISTING GROUND
SLOPE 10: 1 TO
OOO
2pp OO p QO p �O°p
U
q 0 (
pOIOJpS�C3f`
EXISTING GROUND
FILTER FABRIC
CLASS B
STONE
FILL Z FILL
( TYPICAL )
CULVERTSIZE
z Z (T.B.D.)
O O
CROSS SECTION
Z
Z
FILTER FABRIC
I�I--
IL
GRAVEL
(TYPICAL)
19 FT
CLASS B
STONE
Z�
27
FILL
�
Z
z
0
LENGTH =T.B.D.
UPSTREAM
DOWNSTREAM
CULVERT
CULVERT
INVERT
PROFILE VIEW ALONG STREAM
INVERT
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
VARIABLE CULVERT 1
REQUIRED COVER DEPTH
T.B.D.
UPSTREAM INLET ELEV.
T.B.D.
DOWNSTREAM INLET ELEV.
T.B.D.
UPSTREAM INLET STA.
T.B.D.
DOWNSTREAM INLET STA.
T.B.D.
FARM PATH ELEV.
T.B.D.
mopp ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
PROJECT # SHEET NO.
092 2G
DETAILS
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

CLASS B RIPRAP OVERLAIN
WITH CLASS A RIPRAP
CROSS SECTION
NOTES:
1 . CONSTRUCT STREAM CROSSING WHEN FLOW IS LOW.
2. HAVE ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT ON-SITE
BEFORE WORK BEGINS.
3. MINIMIZE CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAMBANKS.
COMPLETE ONE SIDE BEFORE STARTING ON THE OTHER SIDE.
4. INSTALL STREAM CROSSING AT RIGHTANGLE TO THE FLOW.
5. DIVERT ALL SURFACE RUNOFF FROM CONSTRUCTION SITE
ONTO UNDISTURBED AREAS ADJOINING THE STREAM.
6. ALIGN ROAD APPROACHES WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE
CROSSING FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 30 FEET.
7. GRADE SLOPES TO A 5:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER. TRANSPLANT
SOD FROM ORIGINAL STREAMBANK ONTO SIDE SLOPES IF POSSIBLE.
S. MAINTAIN CROSSING SO THAT RUNOFF IN THE CONSTRUCTION
ROAD DOES NOT ENTER EXISTING CHANNEL.
9. A STABILIZED PAD OF STONE BACKFILL, LINED WITH GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC SHALL BE USED OVER ACCESS SLOPES.
10. WIDTH OF THE CROSSING SHALL BE 20FEET.
1 1. INSPECT STREAM CROSSING AFTER RUNOFF - PRODUCING RAINS TO
CHECK FOR BLOCKAGE IN CHANNEL, EROSION OF BANKS, CHANNEL SCOUR,
STONE DISPLACMENT, OR PIPING. MAKE ALL REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY TO
PREVENT FUTHER DAMAGE TO INSTALLATION.
G
SECON
A °I
PERMANENT FORD STREAM CROSSING PFC
INSET
SURFACE FLOW DIVERSION
5.0 FT
MIN. 3"
OF 0.5 FT
CLASS A
STONE
INSET
GRADE CONTROL WOODY RIFF
BACKFILL WITH
ON-SITE ALLUVIUM
ISOMETRIC VIEW OF GRADING
SURFACE FLOW DIVERSION
PRIMARY LOGS
SANDY SOIL BACKFILL J
SECONDARY LOGS AND WOODY DEBRIS -
SECTION A -A'
PRIMARY LOGS TRANSPLANTS OR LIVE STAKES
O SPACE EVERY 5'-7'
SEE TYPICAL SECTION FOR
BANKFU I CHANNEL DIMENSIONS BANKFULL ELEVATION
SET INVERT BASED ON
L /
HEADER LOG \ DESIGN STREAM PROFILE
A ENDINVERT / /
PLAN VIEW HEADER LOG
FOOTER LOG
NOTES:
1. PRIMARY LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 12" OR MORE DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT,
AND RECENTLY HARVESTED AND EXTENDING INTO THE BANK 5' ON EACH SIDE.
2. SECONDARY LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 1" IN DIAMETER AND NO LARGER THAN 10", AND EXTEND INTO THE BANK 2 FEET ON EACH SIDE.
WOOD MATERIAL SHALL BE VARYING DIAMETER TO ALLOW MATERIAL TO BE COMPACTED. BURIED INTO BURIED INTO
3. ROOTWADS AND COIR FIBER MATTING CAN BE USED INSTEAD OF TRANSPLANTS OR LIVE STAKES, PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER. BANK BANK
4. AFTER TRENCH HAS BEEN EXCAVATED A LAYER OF SECONDARY LOGS AND WOODY DEBRIS SHOULD BE PLACED WITH SECTION B - B'
MINIMAL GAPS. A LAYER OF ON-SITE ALLUVIUM SHOULD BE APPLIED TO FILL VOIDS BETWEEN SECONDARY LOGS
BEFORE ADDITIONAL LAYERS ARE PLACED.
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 12/21/18
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
PROJECT # SHEET NO.
092 2H
DETAILS
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 12/21/18
STRUCTURE TABLES
STRUCTURE TABLE TO BE
DETERMINED AT 100% DESIGN
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
PROJECT #SHEET NO. ,
092
TABLES
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

VEGETATION SELECTION
Zone 1 - Live Staking (Stream Banks)
Live stakes will be installed along all stabilized bank areas, as indicated on the planting plan sheets, details, and according to the
construction specifications. Live stake all disturbed banks with a single row at a 1,742 live stakes per acre (5'x 5' spacing). Not
all of the species listed may be planted. Commercial availability may dictate which species are actually planted.
Approx. Number of Wetland Indicator
Scientific Name Common Name %by Species Stems Status
Comus amomum Silky dogwood 40% xxx FACW
Salixsericea Silky willow 30% xxx OBL
Salix nigra Black willow 20% xxx OBL
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 10% xxx FAC
Total 100% xxx
Total Planting Area for Livestakes xxx acre(s)
Temporary Seeding
Temporary herbaceous seed mixtures for the restoration site shall be planted in all disturbed areas. Temporary seed shall be
applied according to the construction specifications and the information specified below.
Scientific Name Common Name Rate Dates
Secale cereale Cereal Rye Grain 130 lbs/acre September to March (Cool Season)
Urochloa ramosa Browntop Millet 30 lbs/acre April to August (Warm Season)
ITotal Planting Area for Temporary Seeding acre(s)
Zone 2 - Riparian Buffer (Permanent Seeding)
This permanent seed mixture shall be planted in all disturbed areas as specified on the plans as Zone 2. This permanent seed
mixture shall be applied with temporary seed, as defined in the construction specifications. This permanent seed shall be
applied at a rate of 25 lbs/acre.
Wetland
Scientific Name Common Name % by Species Indicator Status
Elymus virginicus
Agrostis perennans
Panicum virgatum
Rudbeckia hirta
Coreopsis lanceolata
Andropogon gerardii
Juncus effusus
Schizachyrium scopadum
Sorghastrum nutans
Tripsacum dactyloides
Virginia wildrye
20%
Autumn bentgrass
15%
Switchgrass
15%
Black -Eyed Susan
10%
Lance -Leaved Tick Seed
10%
Big Blue Stem
10%
Soft Rush
5%
Little Blue Stem
5%
Yellow Indian Grass
5%
Eastern Gamma Grass
5%
Tota I
100°6
Total Planting Area for Permanent Seeding:
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 2/21 /1
11.9 acre(s)
FACW
Zone 3 - Wetlands (Permanent Seeding)
This permanent seed mixture shall be planted in all disturbed areas as specified on the plans as Zone 3. This permanent seed
mixture shall be applied with temporary seed, as defined in the construction specifications. Permanent seed shall be applied at
a rate of 25 1bslacre.
Total
100%
10%
Wetland
Scientific Name
Common Name
% by Species
Indicator Status
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
23%
FAC
Elymus riparius
Riverbank Wildrye
20%
FACW
Panicum dichotomiflorum
Smooth Panicgrass
14%
FACW
Carex vulpinoidea
Fox sedge
12%
OBL
Panicum ngidulum
Redtop Panicgrass
8%
FACW
Dichanthelium clandestinum
Deer -tongue
8%
FAC
Bidens frondosa (oraristosa)
Beggars Tick
7%
FACW
Juncus effusus
Soft Rush
4%
FACW
Persicaria pensylvanica
Pennsylvania smartweed
2%
FACW
Sparganum americanum
American Bur Reed
2%
OBL
Total
100%
10%
' Total Planting Area for Permanent Seeding:
7.0 acre(s)
Tridens flaws Purple Top
Zone 4 - Uplands (Permanent Seeding)
FACU
FACU
This permanent seed mixture shall be planted in all disturbed areas as specified on the plans as Zone 4. This permanent seed
mixture shall be applied with temporary seed, as defined in the construction specifications. Permanent seed shall be applied at
a rate of 25 1bslacre.
FACU
Coreopsis lanceolata Lance -Leaved Tick Seed
5%
FACU
Wetland
Scientific Name Common Name
% by Species
Indicator Status
Elymus virginicus Virginia wildrye
15%
FACW
Tripsacum dactyloides Eastern Gamma Grass
13%
FACW
Agrostis scabra Rough bentgrass
12%
FAC
Panicum virgatum Switchgrass
12%
FAC
FACU
Carex vulpinoidea Fox Sedge
10%
OBL
FAC
Tridens flaws Purple Top
10%
FACU
FACU
Schizachyrium scoparium Little Blue Stem
8%
FACU
FACU
Coreopsis lanceolata Lance -Leaved Tick Seed
5%
FACU
FAC
Elymus hystnx Bottlebrush Grass
5%
UPL
FACW
Sorghastrum nutans Yellow Indian Grass
5%
FACU
FACU
Festuca ovina var. duriuscala Hard Fescue
4%
UPL
FACU
Rudbeckia hirta Black -Eyed Susan
1%
FACU
FACW
Total
100%
Total Planting Area for Permanent Seeding:
1.4 acre(s)
Zone 5 - Areas Outside of Easement (Permanent Seeding)
This permanent seed mixture shall be planted in all disturbed areas as specified on the plans as Zone 5. This permanent seed
mixture shall be applied with temporary seed, as defined in the construction specifications.
Permanent seed shall be applied at
the rate shown below.
Scientific Name Common Name Rate
Dates
Poa pratensis Kentucky 1 Ib/1,000 sq.ft.
August -September (Cool Season)
Schedonorus arundinaceus Tall Fescue 5 Ib/1,000 sq.ft.
Total 6 lbs/1,000 sq.ft
Total Planting Area for Permanent Seeding:
5.3 acre(s)
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
PROJECT # SHEET NO. ,
092 J1 k A
TABLES
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

VEGETATION SELECTION
Zone 2 - Riparian Vegetation
Zone 4 - Upland Vegetation
Scientific Name
Common Name
Riparian vegetation species (bare -roots) shall be planted in the areas designated on the plans using the
species mixture and
Upland vegetation species (bare -roots) shall be planted in the areas designated on the plans using the species mixture and
percentages listed below. Riparian species shall be planted at an overall density of 680 stems per acre (8' x 8' spacing). All
percentages listed below.
Species shall be planted at an overall density of 680
stems per acre (8' x 8' spacing). All species
species will be planted according to the plans, details, and construction specifications.
Not all of the species listed may be
will be planted according to the plans, details, and construction specifications.
Not all of the species listed may be planted.
planted. Commercial availability may dictate which species are actually planted.
20%
FACW
Commercial availability may dictate which species are actually planted.
Swamp chesnut oak
20%
FACW
Quercus phellos
Wetland
10%
FAC
Ulmus americana
Wetland
Scientific Name Common Name
%by Species
Indicator Status
Scientific Name
Common Name
%by Species
Indicator Status
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore
20%
FACW
Caryaglabra
Pignut Hickory
10%
FACU
Betula nigra River Birch
15%
FACW
Carya tomentosa
Mockemut Hickory
10%
NI
Quercus phellos Willow Oak
15%
FAC
Cercis canadensis
Redbud
5%
FACU
Carpinus caroliniana Ironwood
10%
FAC
Cornus florida
Flowering Dogwood
5%
FACU
Diospryos virginiana Persimmon
10%
FAC
Diospyros vlrginiana
Persimmon
10%
FAC
Quercus nigra Water Oak
10%
FAC
Ilex opaca
American Holly
5%
FACU
Ulmus americana American Elm
10%
FACW
Juniperus virginiana
Eastern Red Cedar
5%
FACU
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry
5%
FACW
Lidodendron tulipifera
Tulip Poplar
10%
FACU
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
5%
FACW
Oxydendrum arboreum
Sourwood
5%
UPL
Total
100%
Prunus serotina
Black Cherry
5%
FACU
Quercus alba
White Oak
10%
FACU
Total Planting Area for Riparian Vegetation 11.9 acre(s)
Quercus falcate
Southern Red Oak
10%
FACU
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
10%
FACU
NI = No indicator status
Total
100%
Zone 3 - Wetland Vegetation
percentages listed below. Species shall be planted at an overall density of 680 stems per acre (8'x 8' spacing). All species
will be planted according to the plans, details, and construction specifications. Not all of the species listed may be planted.
Commercial availability may dictate which species are actually planted.
Total Planting Area for Wetland Vegetation 1= acre(s)
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KILT 12/21/1
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
Total Planting Area for Upland Vegetation 1.4 acre(s)
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
777-7 PROJECT # SHEET NO.
092 3B
TABLES
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
Wetland
Scientific Name
Common Name
%by Species
Indicator Status
TREES
Betula nigra
River Birch
25%
FACW
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
20%
FACW
Quercus michauxii
Swamp chesnut oak
20%
FACW
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
10%
FAC
Ulmus americana
American Elm
10%
FACW
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green ash
5%
FACW
SHRUBS
Alnus serrulata
Tag Alder
5%
OBL
llexverticillata
Winterbeny
3%
FACW
Cephanlanthus occidentalis
Buttonbush
2%
OBL
NI = No indicator status
Total
100%
Total Planting Area for Wetland Vegetation 1= acre(s)
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KILT 12/21/1
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
Total Planting Area for Upland Vegetation 1.4 acre(s)
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
777-7 PROJECT # SHEET NO.
092 3B
TABLES
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

JD.

\ 01 \ \
E
I \ C \
I \ CE
I CE
oo / / _ o BANKFUIIL BENCH
_
���
� f
\ 4%�_
\ \ \ \ � \\ 1 BANK> FJLL BE CH-
--x
H\ \
i
■■■■■
zl
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
0
I
\
e kcili ;; :bail■.:::::::::::s
\
OD
MENEM
w
20
................................................
e
20
40
......................MENNEN
■■■ani■■■■■I1■■■■■■■■■■■
MEMO.....
■■■■0■■■■0
0000■000■■0000■000..............................■
\ 01 \ \
E
I \ C \
I \ CE
I CE
oo / / _ o BANKFUIIL BENCH
_
���
� f
\ 4%�_
\ \ \ \ � \\ 1 BANK> FJLL BE CH-
--x
H\ \
i
15+00
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 1212111
16+00
17+00
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
18+00
19+00
PROJECT## SHEET NO.
092 5
PLAN /
PROFILE
Mq �,
co�NFsy�
ry FT6
■■■■■
zl
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
0
e kcili ;; :bail■.:::::::::::s
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
OD
MENEM
w
20
................................................
0
20
40
......................MENNEN
■■■ani■■■■■I1■■■■■■■■■■■
MEMO.....
■■■■0■■■■0
0000■000■■0000■000..............................■
1111■
-
■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
_■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1111■
.....
■■■■■■■■■■
..........
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
................■..............
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
.................................................
1111■
_
_ _
-
■W■■
Y■W■
YW
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■n■■■■■■■■n■■■■■■■■n■■■■■
-1111■
■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■n■■■■■■■■n■■■■■■■■n■■■■■
■■■■■
1111■
•
-
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■n■■■■■■■■n■■■■■■■■n■■■■■
00W ■W■W■■
WY■Y■■ W■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1000■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■0000
-
_
■■000■■0000■000■■000■■000■■000■■000■■000■■000■
■■■■■■■■000■■■■n■■■■■■■■n■■■■■■■■n■■■■■
-1111■
1111■
�
_
iiiii
■■■■ n■■■■■■■■
■■■■■nn■ nn■nn■
■■■■■
1111■
■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■n■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■n
■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■WW■■■
nn■
n■
�
■■
■1
- ■
_ _ 1111■■
■n■■■
■
■
-■1111
1111■
1111■
P'ri■■
- ■
1111■
_
1111■
■■■■■
1111■■
■■■■■0■
-
_
mob .
■
■
■■■
000
■0000
■■■■■
00■000■
iiiii■■■■■
■
■
���00
■■■■■
■
■
00
■
—
■■■■■
■1111
■■■■■■■■■■
■■a■■■■■■■
■
■
■
■■
1111■
■■■■■
■
■
■
■
1111■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■11111
■
■
■■
1■■11
1111■
1111■
1■■■■■■
1111■■
__•••■
■
■
■
■
1111■
■■■■■■■■■■
■
1111■
1111■
1111■a■
■
��a0■_
■
—■1111
1111■
■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■
■■■
n■■■■■■
1111■■
1111■
1111■
■■■■■a■
1111■a■
■■■■■■n
■■■■■■■■
UH
■■a■■■
■■a■■■
■
■■■■■
1111■
000000■■00
■■■■■■■■■■
■000■■■■0■■0000000
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■000■
1111■
■■■■■■0
1111■■■
— ■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
1111■■
1111■■
■
_
-
■■■■■
1111■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■aaa■■■■■■■a■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1111■■
1111■■
■■■■■a■
1111■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■a■■■■■■
_ ■■a■■■
■■■■■■
■
■
_ ••
■■
_
■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■aaa■■■■■■■■■■
1111■■■
1111■■■
Nmm
-
-
■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■
■1■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■
■■1 1111■■■
■■■� 1111■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■a■■■■■■■
■■1111
■■a■■■
■
■
■■■■■■■■■
■a■■■■■■■
1111■■
1111■■
-
—
-
-■■■■■
1111■
1111■
■■■■■
■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■an■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■u■■■■■nnnn
■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■au■■■■■■■■■■■ni■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■iii■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■ni■■n■
■■■a■■■■■■■■■■We
■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■nn■■■■■a■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■nn■■■■■■■■■
n■■■a■■■
■
■
■
■a■■■■■■■
■a■■■■■■■
■■■■1111■
.
1111■■
1111■■
1111■■
■
■
■
■
®■■■11
iiiii
11■111■■1111■111■■1111■111■■1111■111■■1111■111■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■iii■■■■■■
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii■■■■■iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiii■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■nn■■■■■■■■■
■
i
■■■■■■■■■
iiiiiiiii
1111■■
iiiiii
■
■■iii
■
i
iiiii
1111111
1111111111
1111111111
1111111111
1111111111
1111111111
1111111111 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
1111111111
1111111111
1111111111
iii i1
iiiiiiiii
iiiiii
ii 11111
i
15+00
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 1212111
16+00
17+00
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
18+00
19+00
PROJECT## SHEET NO.
092 5
PLAN /
PROFILE
Mq �,
co�NFsy�
ry FT6
SCALE (FT)
la W
EL9
—
zl
0
OD
w
20
10
0
20
40
SCALE (FT)
la W
EL9
—
i
■
■
■■ 1111■ ■■■
■
■i■ '
0000■
■■ 1111■ ■■■■■a
■■ 1111■ ■■■■■■ani■■■■■■a
■■■ani■■■■■I1■■■■■■■■■■■
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

� N
—�\ — 1026 —
1025
' / 1
102425 0
v _
CE -1023— +
EXISTING GROUND
1,015
20+00
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 12/21/18
21+00
v �
�z
o,
/-REIMIOVE AND DISPO OF FENCE
zpDE THE CONSERVATIQN EASEMENT
�0
DESIGN BANKF
PROJECT #SHEET NO.
092 6
PLAN /
PROFILE
\N
20 10 0 20 40
SCALE (FT)
■■■■■
moommi
■■■
■ • ■
■■
ME■■E■
o
■W■■Y■■ W■■■■■■■
ilii■■
■■■■■■
F11\000000000000■
■■■■
....
iiiii
YY■Y■■■
ilii■■■■Y
■ ■
YY■YW YY■
z:
i
i
ilii■
ilii■
•
H m1
No,
■■ 000011■■
■
■■■
_
M
■
■■
�■■
■ •
■■
■■
—ilii■
ilii■
■■■
M
•n 0
■■ ■0011
0000 000011
ilii■
Mill■
■■■■■ull.fl■■■■■■
■■■
ilii■■
■00 E
■
■■.'
001MEN■
001!■■■■
■
■■
■■
■■■
■■■ 9!J
'�
■■
001!■■■
■
-ilii■
ilii■
■■■
■ilio/ Inl
!J■.1
001!■■■
001
■
■■
■■
11111
imm11mmommo11111001100100101
■■ ■
• ■
moll
ammom
■■■■■ullf■■■■■■■
1■■■■1111■ll■■■■■
ilii■
■■■
■■■■■■■■�■
11001i
■11■■■
■illi
■00000000
■■ ■
7P
ii.
.■■■■11■■■■
_•■r•••7p■ ■■■■■■■■■■
i7••=•'[[9 f9—mlm=
■11■■■■
7 ■::
■
■.■0000MENEM
l■
IYEM ....
M!!! s ■.=11G7C
nommm
■■ ■
■ ■
■■■■00■■■■■■■■■■11�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.�_�
ilii■■11■■■■■■■■
ilii■
■11■■■■■■■■
■
■■
■
0000000000
0000000000
000000■■■■0000
000000
�II�i■000000000000000000■■■■!r�1
■■■■■■�11.1J ■000000000000000000
\
■■YLAl14
0
0
■■■
■11EnE■E■E
■■ 0011■■■■■■■■
nnE
o
on
o■no■■qua
mom"" "' nY■■Yn
nouoo
noraiE■
noh!Irmn
■
■■
■o■■■
■■■■00
■■
■■■■■■■■1a11"
■■■■■■■■00F1100i■■■■■■■■■■■■000061'900■■00
•J■■■■■■■■■■■■ViLV■■■■
■ ■
looll-
ilii■
■■■■00
loo■
000000■0000
—
000000000
■■■
■■■■■■JIM■ ilii■Y■■■
■■0000L•:1lB■■
■00
■■■000000■00
000000■0000
■■■■■
00000
■■■■■■■■■WIIYI7
00
■000000000000000000
noY�uwl nouon
■■0000L1:1■■■■■00
nouuno
■■
■■
no0
MENNEN
ilii■■
0
00
00����Il����������������r��r����
■iiiiiIinM
• ------i-
1,015
20+00
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 12/21/18
21+00
v �
�z
o,
/-REIMIOVE AND DISPO OF FENCE
zpDE THE CONSERVATIQN EASEMENT
�0
DESIGN BANKF
PROJECT #SHEET NO.
092 6
PLAN /
PROFILE
\N
20 10 0 20 40
SCALE (FT)
DESIGN THALWE
22+00
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
23+00
24+00
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
rAECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
25+00
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
■ • ■
■■
■■
o
■W■■Y■■ W■■■■■■■
ilii■■
■■■■■■
F11\000000000000■
■■■■
....
■■WYY■
YY■Y■■■
ilii■■■■Y
■ ■
YY■YW YY■
ilii■
ilii■
•
H m1
No,
■■ 000011■■
-
nW_uennn■
00E■■■d1t00■■■■■■
■■
■■
ilii
■■
■■ ■0011
0000 000011
■
Mill■
■■■■■ull.fl■■■■■■
iell_l■■■■■■
H3HUMB
■ ■
■■
■■
■■
■■ ■
■■ ■
ilii■
■■■■■
i
■IIY■■■■■■
■ ■
■ ■
■■
■■
■Il■
■■ ■
• ■
■■■■■ullf■■■■■■■
1■■■■1111■ll■■■■■
■
■
■■
l■
■■ ■
■■■■■11111■■■■■■■
■
l■
■■ ■
■ ■
ilii■■11■■■■■■■■
ilii■
■11■■■■■■■■
■
■■
■
■
■
■■■
■11EnE■E■E
■■ 0011■■■■■■■■
■ ■11■■■■■■■■
0
ii■■1w
■iiiiiIinM
I■000000■fflH■■■■■■■■■■00■00100■100000000
000000000000000000■
0000000000
.
000000000000■■00000000000000NN[700000000000000■0000000000
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Nil■100■■I■■■■
0000000000
-
0000000000000000■I■■■■ilii■
I■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■
ill�J■■■■■000000■■■■■
■■0000■■00
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■""011■■■■■■■00■■■■■
ilii■
ilii■
■■■■■■00n00
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■
NONE■■■■■
11111111-
1111••1111
1111111••1
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111.
....
■■■■■■
1■■■■
111••11111
■■■■■■■■■
DESIGN THALWE
22+00
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
23+00
24+00
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
rAECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
25+00
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

1 1,040
1,025
a 1,020
m
/
N
5
IL
U
1,015
— — —x PROJECT # SHEET NO.
REMOVE AND DISPP��OF FEI�ICE �X 0z'
092 7
IN ID -THE--CONSE1�VATION EASEMENT —
�X
PLAN
'p21/ CE x __,�� cF PROFILE
_ •Y / 'J' ,y, 2 –
1020,
%
PLACE LARGE WOODY DEBRIS
26+00 IN THE FLOODPLAIN AT THE
DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER
30
In
m
rri
OD
30
30 30
I
oN / 20 10 0 20 40
SCALE (FT)
DESIGN BANKFU
rD w
H I–
W W
W O 0�0 — O �`01 O N 00 00 O Olit O M O (0 O 7 O V O M Orc-,El�w"
0 0 0 0 O 00 O M O 1- O r O (4 O M O (0 0 [r 0 7 0 N O N O O O O O OD O 00 O OD O 4] O 4J O (0 O V O V O M O N O N TW
2 N OM OM OM OMO MOM OM OM OM OMO OMOM ON ON ONON ON ON ON ONON ON ON ON ON ON O�O� O� O�O� O� O�O�O
m M m M W _
(J) O N V M M O C N O O O O N Cn M CA M CA O O T N m D V O O O N O Op Q n A M m (A W O N O O r O r O A N O M O 7 0 M m D O O O OD n W m O p a0 CP W p O M O
+ O + O + O+ O + O O O N M V' (O I� W OM M IC1 1� r (P W O N N M a O r W O O M M V (D (D I� 00 O W
(n (n +o +o +o +o+� +�
+ 0 0 0 + o + o + o+ o + _
_ _ _ + o o + o + o + o+ o + o + o + o + o + o + + _ _ _
In - o o +o +o +o +o+o +o +o+� +�
_ _ _ _ _ _ __ 0 0 0 + o + o + o + In(� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ oN 1a7 (D O O (O (O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (o (o - m - co -co- - n - - 1� - r -I� oh r - n - r m -� - m - m m aoN W 00 Cn O W -OzIIIIIII II N N N N N N NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NWd W J II J II J II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II IIII II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II 11 II II II
OW W J J J J_ J_ J J J— JJ—J J J_ JJJ J — aw aw aw Ewa wawaw Ew EwEwawwawawEwEwEwaw awaw E.wawawawaw EL Lu Ew EL Lu Ewaw Ew Ewaw aw a awaw J
_ _
U
U
C O h O to O V O N O 0 0 O OJ O I� M O N
G O OM O O O (•� O I� O M O (p O M O V O M O M O M O O M O N
(V Cn
A
O O ro pj O O O O O O M 0 0 V CU O O I� pj O O to of O (n CAO t 6i O 0 O m (V pj O m O N O O
a0 CY1 M � _O O O O O O a O M
O � CA W ()) M N O M N CU O CO Q1 N (D (P V LL� c0 p (M 00 O � N V Op M (V O W O OD O Op O W
+ O + O O O N + O� } O I� + O m } O + O M + O to + O 1� + O Q� N + O
N (t7 O r O N O N + O N + O N + O N + O N + O I� + O I� + O } O Op } O W + O O M (O M
_ _ _ a0 Op 7 OD V Op W O0
II II N II O N II II N II II O II O II 11 r II ^ N 11 r N II r 00 N �1 a0 N II W
J II J M II J II J N II �I J N II �I J N II II J N II II J N II II J N 11 II J N 11 N 11 II J N II J N + O + O + O + O
a 4J d W } O �I J d W II J lL W �I J d W �I J d W II J d W II J d W II II II II II OD W O W
- a W �1 W d LL� d W W d W d W a wa W a w d W d Wa w d W a W II d W d W N - LI It
W
25+00
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 12/21/18
26+00
27+00
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
28+00
29+00
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
rAECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
30+00
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

JD.

JD IS
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..
....■:■■n■ ....■:■■u....■:■■
....■:■■1....■:■■1
.....:..■ ....■:■■....■:■■....■:■■....■:■■■....■:.....■:■■....■:■■....■:■■.....:.......:..n■....■:■■■■■■
.....:■..■■u....■:■■1■■....■:■■1■■■
..■■■...■■■o..■■■.
0 .■.■.■.■.■.■.■.■.■....■.■■■■■■.W
...Y............................................................................................000..■■■0■.■■■■■■■■.:::::::::
......
mmmmmm
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::no............:.........................1
:■■....■....■:■■.■.■:■■.■.■:■■■.■..:...1.■..:......■.■:■■■.■.■:■■.■.■i■...■i■ :■:::i::::::::.........■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
--
■■■■■■■■:i
mom
MINIMUM
■■..........
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::: 000■::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::..:■:■:■::■:■:■::■:■:■::■:■:■::■:■:■::■:■:■::■■::■::■:■:■::■:■:■:■:■::■:■::■:■:■::■:■:■::■:■:■■:::■:■:■
:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■..■■■
■....n:.....■:■■....■:■■....■:■■.....:■......:■.....■:■■....■:■■....■:■■....■:■■■....■:.....■:■■....■:■■■....■:■■■■■o.....:.....
■■■
■11■
■■■■moommmoom■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■
-
.■■■■■■Y■■■o■■■■o■■.■.■■■o■■■■n■n.0■0.■0.■0..■
HIS HIS
o■■■■■■■■■■■■11..■1■■n■11.■■■n■■■.
rn000
.■■■■n■■■..■no■......■o■■o■un■o■■o..■o■■Yo■■■■.■..■■■on■■o■o■.■.■o■■■■■■■....:..■
uoo■
.■■ .. ■ ..... ......
mom on ■ ■■■1■ ■■■■■■ �■■
momm,o
■.uIIMMMMMMMM
mom on ■ mooloon momma■ ■h14Ilmommommo■■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■n■■■■..■■■■■■■■.
mom on ■ 000.0■■■■Ilma'J 000000 ■►�m100000000■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■n■■■■..■■■■■■■■.
-
■■■m■
■■■ ■■ ■■■■■■11■■■■m■m■■VI;i,■■.m■..moon
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■■.■■.■.■.■■.■■.■■...■.■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■Y.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■Y■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
momon ■ ■■1 00000■MENNEN moon
mom ■. ■ 01 000000 moonmoon
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Y
0000000000000000000000000000000000010000■■■■■■■ommmoomm■■■
-
m
mom■■.
■.
00000
00000 00000
00000 00000 00000
0000010000
............■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■
Immom moomm moomm
iii l■■ ■■
Jr 7[ 111..1■on
00000000000000000000000000000■1000000000000000000■100000000.10000■■■■■■■■■.
.............■■■■■.......
1111■ ��■■■■■■■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■.■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■Y■■■■■
7 moon
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Y■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Y■■■■■■■■Y■■■■■■■■Y■■■■■
-
�� ..
mom■�■■■ 1111■■0
■■I -' m■m■■■■■■■■■■■■■mm■■111■■111■■111■■11111111■■111■■111■■11111111■
on nommonoi 0 mom no
mom moll
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMno
monom■■■■■ ■■■■■n■■■II ■■ ■■■■..■■■■■■■■. .■■■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■.
-
.......... .........II■ ■■. ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■ • ......■
■■■■■..... ■■■■■■■■■II■■.. 1111■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ • ■■■■■. ■..........■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.....■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
...........................■.........■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.........■■■■■■■■........
monom■■■■■ nommommomll mom ■ mom■.■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■1 .■■Y■ ■■■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■■n■■■■..■■■■■■■■.
■■■■■■■■■■ nommommoolloom■ mo■■.■ ■■■■..■■■■■■■■. moomm ■■■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■
.........................■..■■Y■■■■■■■■■■■■■.....Y.....
-
ono■■■■■■■ ■■■■■u■nll.■■■ 1111.■ ■■■■..■■■■■■■■. ■■■Y■ ■■■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■n■■■■..■■■■■■■■.
m■m■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■II.■■■ 001■■.■ ■■■■..■■■■■■■■. ■■■■■■ ■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■.
■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■II.■■■ 1111.■ ■■■■..■■■■■■■■. .1111■ ■ ■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■moon
■■ mommonomom ■ommoommomll■■■■■ 1111.■ ■■■■..■■■■■■■■. .■■Y■ ■■■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■
•■
■■■■■■■■■■■0011■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
..............................Y..................Y.....
00 ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ommommoomll ■■■■0 mom■■■■■■■■Y■■■■■ no■ 0 0111■■■.00■■■■■■..00■n■■■■..00■n■■■■..01111111111■
00 moYommoommo■ n.■■■■■■■■■II.■■■■■ ■■■■.■ ■■■■..■■■■■■■■. a .■■Y■ ■ ■■■■m■n■001■■100000000000000■001000000000000■0010000■mmom
..............................Y..................Y....1
moomm■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Y■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Y■■■■■
-
.. ■.............. ..............II....■■■■ .....■ ...... ■■■■■■■■■■......... ...... ■ ■...............■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.......................................................
.. ■.............. ..............II....■■■■. .....■ .mm■... ■■■■■■■■■■.......... ...... ■ ■
....
'Ili
■■n n■n■■■..■■■■n■■n. Ann■■..■■■■n■■■II.■■■■n■■■. ■■■■.■ ■■on■■■ ■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■ .■■■■■■ u■■■nl Y■■■.■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■■■■■■■■■■■..■■■■n■■■■.■■■■■■■■..■■■nn■■■..■■■■■■■■.
Wn■■nnn.■Yn■■n■■■■.■■■■n■■n.nuY■■■■■..■■■■n■■■II.■■■■n■■■..nn■■■■■■..■■un■■■.1■■■■■■W■u1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Inl■■■■■■■■■■Y a■■■■■■Ilu .1111null..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■■.■■■■■■■■..■■■nn■■■..■■■■■■■■.
-
.■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■I1.■■■■n■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■Y■Y■■..■■■■■■■■..■■Y■■Y■■■■■Y.... nomYmo■■..■■Y■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■n■■■■..■■■■■■■■.
.■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■I1.■■■.................................................................................■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■.
.■■■■■00000..00000000■00000..0000■■■0000■..■■■■■■00...00■■■■00000011.0000■000000000■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■.■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■0010000■..■■■.■■■■..■■■00100000.
-
■ ■ ■
nnnn■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■. nnnn■On■..■■■■■■■■IIR0118061,111:04 .■ 1111■Y ■. ■■■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■Y■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■n■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■.
.................................................Pma.........Ll..........■■■■■■moo■■■■■■■■■■............................................................■■■■■moo■■■■■moo■■■■■moo■■■■■1111■............■■0.moo■■■■■■■■■■............■■■■■■.......
.......................................■.............■.■rrr■■■■i.r.rrr irr...........■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■............................................................■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■............■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■......■■■■■n■■■■■■■■■■■■■
nnnn■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■.■nnn■nnn■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
nnnn■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■nn■nnn■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■n■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 0000010000 0000010000 0000000000 MEMMOMMEME MEMMOMMOMM nommommoon nommommoon nommommoon nommommoon nommommoon nommommoon nommommoon
nommommoon
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
nommommoon
nommommoon
nommommoon
nommommoon nommommoon nommommoon MMMMMMMMII
.■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■n■■■■..■■■■■■■■..■■■■■■■■.
JD IS

!=F0�!rm ,,
J S
■

z
0
/ � / 1 �y.C� � � '�..,,/ '--••—..mss � \ � a ^' �
I
/ / Z0
IF
IF % IF F1oL�/IF
IF FIF IF oX
IF IF I / IF
IF IF
� 9TH
F
1020 —
x IF IF
41 IF IF < ' / 'F
15+00
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 12/21/18
16+00
17+00 18+00 19+00
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
Q_
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
re -m RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
PROJECT## SHEET NO.
092 11
PLAN /
PROFILE
20 10 0 20 40
SCALE (FT)
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
ONE oou.
W W■t■■
MEN
MENEM
NOON■
�
K �
■■ VW ■■Wo■W
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■
•
—
ONION
NOON■
atttt
_
r.�{.aa
��
��
M
�
!i
■■
■■
tt
haat
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■1
■atttttttta
atttttttta
atttttttta
atttttttta
attttttttaatttEttttaatttEttttaatt
■■■■■1■�■■•
■■
NOON■
�NNtnaata■
. JNo■Fi6,:•
tt
■■
haat
NOON■
attttEtttaattttEtttaattttttttaattttttttaattttttttaatttaEtttaatttaEtttaatt
Y■■■■■■■■■■■■■���mmoom■■■
®atttt
NOON■
•
■ommEL•7
•
_
■■ r
'`•
_
� �
NOON■
■■■■■■■■■■■
NOON■■
o
ONION
oo■
■■■■■■■■ ■■
o■ oo■o ■.
NOON■
o.
■■■I■■■■■■�
o. _ ■r.■oE
■■■■■
o o.
NOON■
■ENE■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■ NOON■■■
OMNI
■■■ '
NOON
NOON■
■■■
r
■■■si■■!
01111122 ■■■
■{�■L•i
■■■{� ■moi
■■
-
NOON■
atttt
■■■ NOON■■■
tNNN■
■■■■11■
�ttttlla
■■■■11■■■
NNW
I
■■■11 ■■■■11
■■Otll atoll
NOON■II■■ ■■1
tttttl W W
BIB
t■t
■■ {::11 i■■■■■
to aiilLJtttta
.,
L•Y {r■!"N•N■■■!� ■..1
�tii [:Ja L^�L1�7■NNt. R�
at
—ONION
a■■t■
nit■■■11■
IN 111111
■
mmmmll ■■■■11
■■■■11 iii■11
tttAl:ta
■■■
BIB
•
to ' t■■■■
■■ ■NONE
�■L' J
�N■■
■■
NOON■
NOON■
�
■■11■■■■�11■
��••��11[__nm
■■■■11 ■■■■11
■ooll■000ll
■■
■
■■
■■
■■■
NOON■
■
■■
■■ NOON
■■ . ■■■■■Worm
�oNm
■EEE■
ooE
■
■
■tlli�rra..
■
..
..
■.
■ u
o.
o.
o
o
■ ■
■ ■
.■ EEE■
.■BIB oo
�■..
■■�u■s
-
11111
■■■::::::::►viii::::::t
�:iltt■tnA
il
iiiiit
ii ....
ME
mom
iiiME
iMi � r{�aiii
�����
tttta
attttll��ta
atttttNN
���I�tt■tttt33t
•� A7.Att���M�tMEltl�t��
YY.i
IL'_.r!
on MMMM■■■■MMM���
■■■■■■YY�YOW
�ENE�
■ENE■
mmmmmmmmIImmmmmmmm
■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■o
00 �����
■
�Yf ::memmg�■■
■■■■■■off■t
In 111111H
aG..
o:
mm
■
■EEE■
oto
otr_ur.7o
ot000■
tu uuEluu
o
■
■ o
■....
.........
oo o.00
■.�_
■
rr
o-
■
-
NOON■
ONION
�uo■
■■■■■ommomI0t■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■li�lll77■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■o:i110i■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■ ■■
■■o ■■■
■■■■■■■■
NOON■■
NOON■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■o■■■
■
■o■■E
■■■■ �
■■■■
NOON■■
_
on
�:b■\
■
A■
atttt
NNNNa
N■NNtNNl■+A1l1
tNNlNII��Na
■■■■tNNNNa■■
ff i■
t■o■aa■N■■tt■N■t■tt■N■o■tt■t■■tt■oo■tt■■■tt■■o■tt■■■tt■a■■■aa■
N
to■aa■t■tt■
atttlllt
tat
to.t.a..ao.t.
aa■oaa.tt■tt.tt■ttt.tt■ott.t■ot■.tt■o.tt■.tt■.
■E■utE.E■tt.ttt■olt.tt■lt.tt■ott.aa■aa.
aaoa.ttt.tt.t.ttot.t■t.ttot.ttt.ttot.ttt.aa.a.
ttlltaatttEtttta
aaoa.ttt.tt.t.ttot.t■ot.tl{■.N�xw.lu1l:l1l:N�.C.:a■iil:
E■o■a:t■■t.t■■tt■■t■oott■■tt■■tt■■tt■■tE■■a
E■■at■■tt■■tt■■t■■oootE■■■t
N■■■■E■■■■tNNN
E■■:oO■a■t■■:N■t■t■■:t■■t■t■■:o■■t■■oo:ootott■■:o■■t■t■■:■■t■t■■:o■■t■■■:■■t■a
a■■:.■■a■
iEoo:0t0tt■■■:o■■tt■■:■■tt■■:o■■■tt■■:■■aa■■:.■■
aa■■:o■■■tt■■:■■tt■■:o■■■tt■■:■■tEoo�uoott■■:■o■tt■■:o■■.t■■:■■■.t■■:o■■.a■■:■■
.a■■:o■■N■
--®
OON
BIB
■■lWIEi■:
I
■■
■■■■II■ttt
:
BIB
:
■■■■■o■■■■■■■■0i11■uuu■......MENEM
_11*7mmmmmmmmmmattt
................
■■■■t
BIB
o■aa■■tt■t■tt■o■tt■■tt■uInt■I—o■tt■■tt■Nott■a■aa■
■■■■■
ioi■II■■■■■
NO■
■■.
■■■■■o■■■■■■■G
■ 7
• �
■■a
NaaNOttO.OttO.NttN.■tt■.
■tt■■aa■
1aa■■tt■■tt■l0tt■■tt■o■tt■N■tt■o■tt■■tt■■■aa■
■
■■■■■■mmmm■
o■■■■■n■■
■a■■t■■tIL.f'L�J
Cl.��.■tN■t■■■O■a■
■aa■■:o■a■Ett■■:■t■■tt■■:o■t■Ett■■:■t■■aEoo:.otort■E■:o■to■,t■■:■t■R\r■■:ellG•7t�oo:aJfia"[ff■:{l[{
:.r■■:r9.l7I■�t■■:o■t■■"t■■:■t■■rt■■:o■t■o
NOON■
tt■tt■Vtto■tt■■■tt■
■■■aatttottttullllottt■ttt■ottt■tta■■a
NO■
tttt
Ettot■a
Eo
BIB t.
tt■ttttt■
lll>aatttEtttta
■tt
tt■
tNino.It
:111: :100
MENEM
.........................s...........i......
o■
■mmmmllmmmmm
MENEM ....
■■..
.................
11
:::.
.......
......................
15+00
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 12/21/18
16+00
17+00 18+00 19+00
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
Q_
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
re -m RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
PROJECT## SHEET NO.
092 11
PLAN /
PROFILE
20 10 0 20 40
SCALE (FT)
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
ONE oou.
W W■t■■
MEN
20+00
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

JD.

111111111111111Vd
11 it"O 8111111111111111111111111111!1111111111111111111111111111111
•• n1111111■■111111111111111111.111111111111111111111111111111
1111111111111111111111111
7Y1111111111111111111111
111111111111111LiE�1111111111■111111111■111111111'!Ilui111111111111111111111111111
111111111■11111Ifi!`J1111111111■111111111■111111111vI1G7111111111111111111111111111
�►1Wa111111111111111111111
�7i1p�111111111111111111111
111n1111111111L7J
111n11111111nW
111111n11111111n11111111n11nY I1._7111111111111111111111111111
1111111n11111111n11111111n111iAi IIR1111111111111111111111111111
WALi1111n111111111111111
ENGi1111n111111111111111
111111111111111R11n1■1111111111111111111111111111.11■7111111111111111111111111111
1110001
olorrrr■ 00000 001100 oo0ola um0001001nn.lnnnn111w�>•11111n11n1100001
A ffl=111111111111111111111
1110
111111111■111111■11■■1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
0 01 0101■0100000 00000 00000 uoo001100001100001
00/00000 00000
111111111■111111■11■■111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
MEN 1111111
111111111■111111111■■1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
111111111■111111111■111111111■111111111■111111111■1111■1111■1111■1111■1111■1111■1111111111111111111111111111111
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
..................::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::......

irnnm
■rr
a.■
rr■000r
nouon m000r -
i■
oouu■■
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii1111iiiiiiION!
o■000■
oouoo o■000■
irrrrrrrr■rrrrrrrr■rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
irrrrrrrr■rrrrrrrr■rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
UHN
irrrrrrrr■rrrrrrrr■rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrr■rrrrr■■■■■■■■■■■■■■rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
irrrrrrrr■rrrrrrrr■rrrrrrrrrrrrrr
rrrorrrrrrorrrrrrrrrr
i■000■
iouoo
oomo■
oouoo
o■000■
o■000■
o ill. o■000■
o■o■ o■000■
rrrrrrrr■rrrrrrrr■■rrrrrrrr■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
irrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
irrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
irrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������..........�
■■■■■■■■■■a■■■00■■■■a■■■00■■■■a■■■00■■■■a■■■00■■■■a■■■00■■■■■Y■00■■Y1■■■00■■Y1■■■00■■Y1■■■00■■Y1■■■00■■■■a■■■00■■■■a■■■00■■■■a■■■00■■■■a■■■00■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■...■ ■■■■■■■■■0■■■■■
iiiii - • iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiii......................................................................................................... ii iiiiii
■■■■■ ttt■tttt■■■■t■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■tt■■■■■■■■tt■■■■■■■■■■■■w ■t■■■■■■
■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■MM■■■■a■■■MM■■■■a■■■MM■■■■a■■■MM■■■■a■■■MM■■■ M■■■■1■■■MM■■■■1■■■MM■■■■1■■■MM■■■■1■■■MM■■■■1■■■MM■■■■a■■■MM■■■■a■■■MM■■■■a■■■MM■■■■a■■■MM■■■■a■■■MM■■■■a■■■■M■■■aa■■■MM■■■aa■■■MM■■■■1■■■M
■■■■■ _ ■■■Y Y■■■■0■■■■■■00■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ mw■�Y■■■■■■Y■■■■■■■■Y■■■■■■■■Y■■■■■■■■■aa■■■■■■■■aa■■■■■■■■aa■■■■■■■■aa■■■■■■■■aa■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ m■■■■■■■■■■Y■■■■■
■■■■■ — ■0 ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ __■■■■■Y1■■■00■■Y1■■■00■■Y1■■■00■■■■a■■■00■■■■a■■■00■■■■a■■■00■■■■a■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ —
I■ -
■■■■■ _ ■■ ■� ow■ w■www■ o■000. o■000. o■000■ ■■ E0000E oo.00E oo.00. ooloo. ooloo. ooloo. o■000E E0000. ooloo. colo oo..0000E
■■■■■ _ ■■ _ ■ ow...... o■000. o■000. o■000■ ■■ oo.00E oo.00E oo.00. ooloo. ooloo. ooloo. o■000E ooloo. oo111111111111,0oooo. oo.00E
■■■■■ p - ■■ Ym■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■n■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
ME NONE
..... .. — = 1� _ 0■ 0■■■■■■■■00■■■■■■t■0■■■t■■■■■0■■m■■■■00■■■■MEM■00■■■■■■■■00■■■■■■■■00■■■00■■■00■■■00■■■00■■■00■■■00■■■■■ ............................... MEMEMMEMEMEMEME
MENEM■■■■■ 00
ME _ M■ _ Y■■00■■■■1■■■00■■■■1■■■00■■■■1■■■00■■■aa■■■00■■■aa■■■00■■■aa■■■00■■■a■■MMMMMM■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
..... ME • M■ _................................................................................................... ...............
■■■■■ ■■■ _ ww■■Y■■■ ■■ W■■■■ .................■■■....■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■..■■■ -mill■....■■■■■■ ■10,01■.■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■
ill - ■■■■■■■■■■a■■■00■■ME■ME■■■ME■■■1111111111■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ —
■■■■■ ■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■no1 no■no1 no■■■■■■ ■■■n■■■■■ ■■■n■■■■■ ■■■nn ■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■
����� \���� ■■■■W F7 aGN.V��W41i7! _■■■�������aW��■t■W�������������������MEaWMM■t■WEMM..�MMm����
■■■■■ - — ■■■ _ ■■■■■■■ Y■■■■■■■tt■ t■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■ ■■ - ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■aa■ MMMMM■M■Y■■■■■
ME■E■ M■ ■■■■■■■ _ ■■■w M■■■..■MMMMMMM■M.■■■■■
■■■■■ .■ EBB ME - MEMO..■■M.■■■■■
■■■■■ ■1 ■■m ■ ■■■,. ■■■■■■■ a■■■11■■■■1■■■1
■■■■■ ■■ ■■ _ ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ 0■■Dw■!J - ■■■■■■■ a■■■00■■■■1■■■0 —
■■■■■ ■■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■� 0■■0■IIwiO ■■■■■■■ a■■■00■■■■1■■■0
■■■■■ ■■ ■■ •
■■■■■■■■■■ ■ME ■■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■C_ ■■■■017L1—i:•M= 00■11■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■ ■■■■ ■■ ■0 ■■■■■
—
■■■■■ ■■ 00 ■0 ■■■■■■00■00 ■0 ■0 Milli ■■ ■■■■■■■■Y ME■EM
EMMM■ ■M ■■ ■ ME 1MME EMIT■1. ME ■.
■■■■■ M 0 ■ 1■ ■■■0■000■00 ■■ 110
0,10
■1 MM.■.■.0.0■■ YY■■■
■000■00■■■■■ ■E ■■■
Y■■■■■■■■■■■0■■0N ■00 0■l ■0 ■ ME■■E■ ■■■■■■■■1■■■■
—
■■ 11■■■■■■■ _ ■ mwmw ■■■■■■■■Y1■■■0
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■t■■■■ ■t■■■■11■■■■■■■ ■■■Ilt■■■■011■Ott■■11■■■■Ott■■■■■■mt■.a■ 0■0000000010000
■■■■■ t■tttt0■ttt■tttt0■ttt■tttt0■t■■■■■■t0 ■ttt■tttt0■■Y■■■■■■0 ■■■■■011■■■■■■■ ■■ ■11■■■■0011■■■■■■1100■■■■■■■■0■■MEMMEII■0 on 00 ■■■■■ ■■00000■000■t■■■■■■■■■00000■■■■■■■■t■■000■000t■■■■■■■■■■0 ■OMM■011■■■■■■■ ■■ 1■■m ■ �� ■■■■■■■■Y1■■■0
MOM■■ ■■■0000■000■■■■■■■■■■■x0000■■■■■■■■■0■000■Y■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■011■■■■■■■ ■■ ■ ■0000■■■■■Y■■■■
MENEM 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111ii���iiin .■ �M11 •LU 1 - _ _ _ ■■■■■■.E■■■1■■■■
on ■■ _
oo■ o■■oa■o■■E0 ■■ o■■■■o■■oa■o■■.0o0■■■o■■oa■o■■.0o0■■■o■■oa■o■■.0u11■■o■■u■1o■■n mnlesson
o■■ ■■00■ ■■aooa■oo■■.MooM■oo■■■■ww■■■1oo■■■■o
M■■■■ M.N. n■■■■■■■■■■■■■1■■■o■■0■■■■■ m0■■■■■■■■■ 0o ■■ ■■■■■MM■
M■ no
■M
■■■■■ ■■■■■■0 ■0■■■■0■■■00■■■■0■■■00■■■■0■■■011■■■-mitt■00■■t■■■■■00■tt�t■■■0 ■■■■■ ■ ■Ott■■■■■■
no ■■ ■ Y■■00■■■00■■■■■■■■0 —
■■■■■ 000■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■oe__In'i•■_m�ycu■0�:ra110�et,1•!M■■o ■■■■■ ■ ■Ott■■■■■■ ■■ ■■ ■ ■oo■o■000■
■■■■■ ■■■■■00 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■000■L'�L'iiY\Y.YfOiY■i:: YYL'.-I��■■■0 ■■■■00■ ■ ■■aa■■■00■
ME
M■ ■ a■■■00■■Y1■■■0
■■■■■ ■■■■■00■0■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1■■■00■ ■ ■■a■■■■00■ ■ ■■00■ ■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■Y1■■■0
■■■■■ ■■■■■00■0■■■■a■■■■■■■Yn■■■■■■Yn■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■Y■■■■■00Y■■■■■■■■■■Y1■■■00■ ■FL LU ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ . - ■■■00■ ME ■ ■■■■■■■■Y1■■■0
EMMM■ M■■MM1E■111■■MMME EMMM■■MMME EMMM■■MMME EMIT■MME EMMM■■MMME E■■■■M■■■..■.M.MMMME EMMM.MMMME EMMM.MMMME EMMM■MMMME EMMM■MMMME EMMM.MMMME EMMIM� m■■MMm E�....■.�mw ■■■■■■■■■■■■ t1 MMM■■■ t1 ■ • ■■■■■.■■M.MMMME
1■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1■■■■t■■■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■11■■■aa■■■11■ ■■ ■■■11■■■■ ■■ ■ a■■■11■■■■1■■■1
1■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■1■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■1■■■■1■■■■1■■■■1■■■■1■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■1■■■■1■■■■1■■■11■■■■1■■■11■■■aa■■■11■ ■■ ' ■■■■■■■■■1 ■■ ■ a■■■11■■■■1■■■1
....................................................................................................................... iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiMENOMONEE ME HEMOMMIMME ii ■iii■
■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■t■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■tt■■■■■■■■■■■m ■■■■■■■m
MEMO ■■■■■wm u■■tt■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
0■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■a■■■■M■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■0■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1■■■0M■■■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■■■1■■■M
1■■■■■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■1■■■■1■■■■1■■■■1■■■■■■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■1■■■■1■■■■1■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■1■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■aaa■■11■■■aa■■■11■■■■1■■■1
1■■■■a■■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■1■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■11M■■MMME EMMM■■MMME EMMM■■MMME
A JD IS
EMII■11MME
EMMM■■MMM
■000■■■■n ■■■■■■■■n ■■■■■■■■n
■0■■000n
■■■■■■■■■
■000■■■■n ■■■■■■■■n ■■■■■■■■n
■0■■000n
■■■■■■■■■

FOJD-.Dl

FOJD-.Dl

JD.

JD.
■

JD.

L MATCHLINE SHEET 23
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROV DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 2/21/1
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
EGOSYSTEIM
PLANNING &
RAI RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
PROJECT ## SHEET NO.
092 22
VEGETATION
PLAN
Im
1p
°a
z
1111111111 \I
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

EPR

PROJECT ## SHEET NO.
�4
ON
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROY DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 2/21/1
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
EGOSYSTEIM
PLANNING &
RAI RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
U)
N
F
W
W
2
In
W
Z
J
S
U
I-
Q
00
j
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

N
F-
W
W
2
U)
W
Z
J
2
U
F -
Q
PROJECT #SHEET NO. ,
ncal�) 11�F
N
REVISIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION ENGR. APPROY DATE
1 DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN CJ KLT 2/21/1
RED BARN MITGATION BANK SITE
SURRY COUNTY. NC
EGOSYSTEIM
PLANNING &
RAI RESTORATION
559 JONES FRANKLIN RD, SUITE 150
RALEIGH, NC 27606
LICENSE # P-1 182
PROGRESS DRAWING
FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION

Red Barn Mitigation Site
Stream Data
AREA (1999 Curve)
AREA (Revised Curve)
AREA (Field Measurement)
AREA (Typical)
Abkf (ft')
Abkf (ft)
Abkf (ft)
Abkf (ft2)
Stream
Reach
Existing DA (mi2)*
DA (mit)
Predicted
Predicted
Field
Design
UT1a Start
0.05
2.9
1.8
2.5-2.9
3.0
UT1
UT1b end/ UT1c start
0.07
3.6
2.3
NA
3.0
UT1c end
0.0
0.0
UT2a start
0.08
3.9
2.5
3.9-4.0
4.0
UT2
UT2b start
0.13
0.20
7.2
4.8
Incised and entrenched gulley,
no bankfull indicator.
7.0
UT2c end
0.15
0.22
7.7
5.2
7.0
UT3a start
0.05
2.9
1.8
2.3-2.6
3.0
UT3b Start - include UT4
0.06
3.3
2.0
4.0
UT3d - mid
0.09
4.1
2.6
4.3
4.0
UT3
UT3e start
0.10
4.6
3.0
4.0
UT3f start
0.25
0.32
10.0
6.9
10.0
0.0
0.0
UT4
0.02
1.3
0.7
*Existing DA shown where DA differs based on re -alignment of UTI
Harman, W.H. et al. 1999. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams. AWRA Wildland Hydrology Symposium
Proceedings. Edited by: D.S. Olsen and J.P. Potyondy. . AWRA Summer Symposium. Bozeman, MT. Note: Bankfull Area Curve Revised in
2012 by Harman.

BANKFULL AREA
Regional Curve for Bankfull Characteristics in Rural Piedmont, NC
1000
y = 21.43xo.68
do 00 y = 15.886xo.7432
0000,0
100
N
100,
Q
L
000
000 0000
0100 000
Q
i
10
W UT1
♦ UT2
UT3
+ Revised Regional Curve Data
+ 2018 small site additions
+ Power (Rural Piedmont INC (Harman et al., 1999))
Power (Revised Curve - 2012)
1
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
Watershed Area (Sq. Mi.)

Prepared By:
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
Red Barn UT1 a 10+00 to 25+90
Morphological Table
Existing
Design Criteria
Design
Parameter
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Minimum
Maximum
Minimum
Maximum
Stream Name
UT1a
Typical "C" Type Channel
Design Criteria
UT1a
Rosgen Stream Type
B5
C5b
C5b
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.05
0.05
Reach Length (ft)
863
1590
Bankfull Width (ft)
5.9
6.1
6.0
6.5
7.3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4 0.5 0.4
0.4
0.5
Width/Depth Ratio
12.8
14.0
13.4
10.0
18.0
14.0
18.0
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
2.5
2.9
2.7
3.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7 0.9 0.8
0.4
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth Ratio
1.6
2.0
1.8
1.2
1.4
1.2
1.4
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)
9
10
9
30
40
3
Entrenchment Ratio
1.6
1.6
1.6
2.2
4.0
4.3
5.8
m
Max Pool Depth (ft)
0.5
1.0
0.7
0.7
1.6
oRatio
of Max Pool Depth to
Bankfull Depth
1.1
2.2
1.6
2.0
3.5
2.0
3.0
Pool Width (ft)
5.0
7.8
6.4
9.0
11.7
Ratio of Pool Width to BankfulF
Width
0.8
1.3
1.1
1.3
1.7
1.3
1.7
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
18
38
25
16
50
Ratio of Pool to Pool Spacing
to Bankfull Width
3.0
6.4
4.3
1.5
7.0
2.3
7.2
Bank Height Ratio
2.1
6.5
4.3
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
Meander Length (ft)
96
256
177
49
73
Meander Length Ratio
16.1
43.0
29.6
7.0
12.0
7.1
10.6
E
Radius of Curvature (ft)
22
130
62
14
20
Radius of Curvature Ratio
3.7
21.8
10.3
2.0
3.5
2.1
3.0
a
Meander Belt Width (ft)
13
29
21
10
39
Meander Width Ratio
2.2
4.9
3.5
NA
8.0
1.4
5.6
Sinuosity
1.05
1.20
1.6
1.23
o
a
Valley Slope (ft/ft)
0.022
0.020
WS Slope (ft/ft)
0.021
0.016
Pool Slope (ft/ft)
Not Measured
0.001
Ratio of Pool Slope to WS
Sloe
Not Measured
0.06
a,
00
D16 (mm)
0.4
0.4
D35 (mm)
0.6
0.6
D50 (mm)
1.0
1.0
D84 (mm)
3.7
3.7
D95 (mm)
7.2
7.2

Prepared By:
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
Red Barn UT1c 31+28 to 38+66
Morphological Table
Existing
Design Criteria
Design
Parameter
Minimum Maximum Average
Minimum I Maximum
Minimum Maximum
Stream Name
UTI
Typical "C" Type Channel
Design Criteria
UT1
Rosgen Stream Type
C5
C5
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.07
Reach Length (ft)
738
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.9 8.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4 0.7
Width/Depth Ratio
10.0 16.0
12.0 16.0
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
4.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.5 0.9
Bankfull Max Depth Ratio
1.2 1.4
1.2 1.4
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)
65 220
g
Entrenchment Ratio
2.2 4.0
8.7 29.5
Max Pool Depth (ft)
0.9 2.0
o
Ratio of Max Pool Depth to
Bankfull Depth
2.0
3.5
2.0 3.0
Pool Width (ft)
9.7 12.7
Ratio of Pool Width to BankfulF
Width
1.3
1.7
1.3 1.7
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
20 53
Ratio of Pool to Pool Spacing
to Bankfull Width
4.0 7.0
2.7 7.1
Bank Height Ratio
1
1.0 1.1
1.0 1.1
Meander Length (ft)
64 83
Meander Length Ratio
7.0 12.0
8.6 11.1
E
Radius of Curvature (ft)
17 24
Radius of Curvature Ratio
2.0 3.5
2.2 3.2
a
Meander Belt Width (ft)
27 47
Meander Width Ratio
3.5 8.0
3.6 6.4
Sinuosity
1.20 1.60
1.37
o
o_
Valley Slope (ft/ft)
0.004
WS Slope (ft/ft)
0.00272
Pool Slope (ft/ft)
0.001
Ratio of Pool Slope to WS
Slope
0.37
�B
00
D16 (mm)
0.4
D35 (mm)
0.6
D50 (mm)
1.0
D84 (mm)
3.7
D95 (mm)
7.2

Prepared By:
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
Red Barn UT2a 10+00 to 21+97
Morphological Table
Existing
Design Criteria
Design
Parameter
Minimum
I Maximum I
Average
Minimum
I Maximum
Minimum Maximum
Stream Name
UT2
Typical "C" Type Channel
Design Criteria
UT2
Rosgen Stream Type
65, D5 through wetland
C5
C5
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.08
0.08
Reach Length (ft)
1019
1197
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.8
19.0
12.9
6.9
8.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.2 0.6 0.4
0.4
0.7
Width/Depth Ratio
11.7
91.4
51.5
10.0
15.0
12.0
16.0
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
3.9
4.0
3.9
4.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.5 0.8 0.7
0.5
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth Ratio
1.3
2.0
1.7
1.2
1.4
1.2
1.4
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)
10
89
50
40
100
g
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
4.7
3.1
2.2
4.0
5.4
13.4
Max Pool Depth (ft)
0.8
1.2
0.9
0.9
2.0
oRatio
of Max Pool Depth to
Bankfull Depth
2.0
2.9
2.3
2.0
3.5
2.0
3.0
Pool Width (ft)
8.1
8.1
8.1
9.7
12.7
Ratio of Pool Width to Bankfull
Width
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.7
1.3
1.7
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
18
38
26
25
54
Ratio of Pool to Pool Spacing
to Bankfull Width
1.4
2.9
2.0
4.0
7.0
3.4
7.2
Bank Height Ratio
2.0
2.8
2.3
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
Meander Length (ft)
288
288
288
48
83
Meander Length Ratio
22.3
22.3
22.3
7.0
12.0
6.4
11.1
E
Radius of Curvature (ft)
40
69
55
17
24
Radius of Curvature Ratio
3.1
5.4
4.2
2.0
3.5
2.2
3.2
a
Meander Belt Width (ft)
67
67
67
19
48
Meander Width Ratio
5.2
5.2
5.2
3.5
8.0
2.6
6.5
Sinuosity
1.08
1.20
1.6
1.28
o
o_
Valley Slope (ft/ft)
0.00991
0.011
WS Slope (ft/ft)
0.00914
0.00886
Pool Slope (ft/ft)
Not Measured
0.001
Ratio of Pool Slope to WS
Sloe
Not Measured
0.11
�B
00
D16 (mm)
0.2
0.2
D35 (mm)
0.4
0.4
D50 (mm)
0.9
0.9
D84 (mm)
3.4
3.4
D95 (mm)
5.5
5.5

Prepared By:
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
Red Barn UT2b 21+97 to 32+47
Morphological Table
Existing
Design Criteria
Design
Parameter
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Minimum
I Maximum
Minimum Maximum
Stream Name
UT2
Typical "C" Type Channel
Design Criteria
UT2
Rosgen Stream Type
F5
C5
C5
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.13
0.20
Reach Length (ft)
929
1077
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.4
8.4
8.4
8.4
10.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7 0.7 0.7
0.6
1.0
Width/Depth Ratio
12.1
12.1
12.1
10.0
15.0
10.0
15.0
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
5.7
5.7
5.7
7.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.1 1.1 1.1
0.7
1.4
Bankfull Max Depth Ratio
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.2
1.4
1.2
1.4
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)
12
12
12
40
70
g
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
1.4
1.4
2.2
4.0
4.3
7.5
Max Pool Depth (ft)
1.3
2.1
1.7
1.1
3.1
oRatio
of Max Pool Depth to
Bankfull Depth
1.9
3.0
2.5
2.0
3.5
2.0
3.0
Pool Width (ft)
11.5
16.0
14.4
12.1
15.8
Ratio of Pool Width to Bankfull
Width
1.4
1.9
1.7
1.3
1.7
1.3
1.7
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
128
339
246
26
122
Ratio of Pool to Pool Spacing
to Bankfull Width
15.2
40.4
29.3
4.0
7.0
2.8
13.1
Bank Height Ratio
4.3
4.3
4.3
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
Meander Length (ft)
542
542
542
86
165
Meander Length Ratio
64.5
64.5
64.5
7.0
12.0
9.2
17.7
E
Radius of Curvature (ft)
35
121
73
16
33
Radius of Curvature Ratio
4.2
14.4
8.7
2.0
3.5
1.7
3.5
a
Meander Belt Width (ft)
127
127
127
19
66
Meander Width Ratio
15.1
15.1
15.1
3.5
8.0
2.1
7.1
Sinuosity
1.03
1.20
1.6
1.25
o
o_
Valley Slope (ft/ft)
0.00515
0.004
WS Slope (ft/ft)
0.00501
0.00316
Pool Slope (ft/ft)
Not Measured
0.001
Ratio of Pool Slope to WS
Sloe
Not Measured
0.32
�B
00
D16 (mm)
0.2
0.2
D35 (mm)
0.4
0.4
D50 (mm)
0.9
0.9
D84 (mm)
3.4
3.4
D95 (mm)
5.5
5.5

Prepared By:
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
Red Barn UT2c 32+47 to 34+91
Morphological Table
Existing
Design Criteria
Design
Parameter
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Minimum
I Maximum
Minimum
Maximum
Stream Name
UT2
Typical "C" Type Channel
Design Criteria
UT2
Rosgen Stream Type
F5
B5c
B5c
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.15
0.22
Reach Length (ft)
240
244
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.4
8.4
8.4
9.2
10.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7 0.7 0.7
0.6
0.9
Width/Depth Ratio
12.1
12.1
12.1
10.0
15.0
12.0
15.0
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
5.7
5.7
5.7
7.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.1 1.1 1.1
0.7
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth Ratio
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.2
1.4
1.2
1.4
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)
12
12
12
72
124
g
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
1.4
1.4
2.2
4.0
7.4
12.8
Max Pool Depth (ft)
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.2
2.6
oRatio
of Max Pool Depth to
Bankfull Depth
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.0
3.5
2.0
3.0
Pool Width (ft)
16.0
16.0
16.0
12.6
16.5
Ratio of Pool Width to Bankfull
Width
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.3
1.7
1.3
1.7
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
339
339
339
41
50
Ratio of Pool to Pool Spacing
to Bankfull Width
40.4
40.4
40.4
4.0
7.0
4.2
5.2
Bank Height Ratio
4.3
4.3
4.3
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
E
Meander Length (ft)
0
0
0
NA
0
0
Meander Length Ratio
-- -- --
--
--
Radius of Curvature (ft)
0 0 0
0
0
Radius of Curvature Ratio
-- -- --
--
--
Meander Belt Width (ft)
0 0 0
0
0
Meander Width Ratio
- -- --
--
--
Sinuosity
1.01
1.01
o
o_
Valley Slope (ft/ft)
0.005
0.004
WS Slope (ft/ft)
0.005
0.003
Pool Slope (ft/ft)
Not Measured
0.001
Ratio of Pool Slope to WS
Sloe
Not Measured
0.29
�B
00
D16 (mm)
0.2
0.2
D35 (mm)
0.4
0.4
D50 (mm)
0.9
0.9
D84 (mm)
3.4
3.4
D95 (mm)
5.5
5.5

Prepared By:
j
j--I
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
Red Barn UT3a 10+00 to 24+10
Morphological Table
Existing
Design Criteria
Design
Parameter
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Minimum
I Maximum
Minimum I Maximum
Stream Name
UT3
Typical "B" Type Channel
Design Criteria
UT3
Rosgen Stream Type
B/G 5
B4
B4
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.06
0.06
Reach Length (ft)
1476
1410
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.7
6.3
5.5
6.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4 0.5 0.5
0.5
Width/Depth Ratio
9.3
15.8
12.2
12.0
18.0
13.0
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
2.3
4.1
3.0
3.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.6 0.7 0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth Ratio
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.4
1.2
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)
5
9
8
9
14
c
g
Ul
Entrenchment Ratio
1.1
1.8
1.4
1.4
2.2
1.4
2.2
a
Max Pool Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
1.9
1.5
oRatio
of Max Pool Depth to
Bankfull Depth
1.6
2.0
4.1
2.0
3.5
3.1
Pool Width (ft)
7.3
7.6
7.4
7.5
Ratio of Pool Width to Bankfull
Width
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.1
1.5
1.2
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
5
30
19
3
31
Ratio of Pool to Pool Spacing
to Bankfull Width
1.0
5.4
3.4
0.5
5.0
0.5
5.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1 8.0
2.7
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
Meander Length (ft)
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Meander Length Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
E
Radius of Curvature (ft)
-
--
--
°'
c�
Radius of Curvature Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
a
Meander Belt Width (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
Meander Width Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sinuosity
1.12
1.10
1.2
1.05
m
o
Valley Slope (ft/ft)
0.02707
0.02707
WS Slope (ft/ft)
0.02412
0.02174
0.03111
Pool Slope (ft/ft)
0.00750
0.0000
0.0088
a
Ratio of Pool Slope to WS
Slope
0.31
0.00
0.4
0.00
0.40
�5
cu
0°
D16 (mm)
0.8
<2mm
0.8
D35 (mm)
11.9 <2mm
11.9
D50 (mm)
15.9 <2mm
15.9
D84 (mm)
30.4 2.0
30.4
D95 (mm)
11 54.4 3.8
54.4

Prepared By:
j
j--I
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
Red Barn UT3b 24+10 to 26+00
Morphological Table
Existing
Design Criteria
Design
Parameter
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Minimum
I Maximum
Minimum I Maximum
Stream Name
UT3
Typical "B" Type Channel
Design Criteria
UT3
Rosgen Stream Type
B4c
B4c
B4c
Drainage Area (sq mi)
26.00
0.06
Reach Length (ft)
186
190
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.7
6.7
6.7
7.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7 0.7 0.7
0.6
Width/Depth Ratio
10.2
10.2
10.2
12.0
18.0
13.0
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.0 1.0 1.0
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth Ratio
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.2
1.4
1.2
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)
10
10
10
11
17
c
g
Ul
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
2.2
1.4
2.2
a
Max Pool Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
1.9
1.5
o
Ratio of Max Pool Depth to
Bankfull Depth
1.1
1.4
2.9
2.0
3.5
2.6
Pool Width (ft)
--
--
--
9.0
Ratio of Pool Width to Bankfull
Width
--
--
--
1.1
1.5
1.2
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
5
30
19
12
46
Ratio of Pool to Pool Spacing
to Bankfull Width
0.8
4.4
2.8
1.5
6.0
1.5
6.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
Meander Length (ft)
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Meander Length Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
E
Radius of Curvature (ft)
-
-
--
°'
c�
Radius of Curvature Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
a
Meander Belt Width (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
Meander Width Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sinuosity
1.02
1.10
1.3
1.02
m
o
Valley Slope (ft/ft)
0.01560
0.01560
WS Slope (ft/ft)
0.01587
0.01530
Pool Slope (ft/ft)
0.01587
0.0000
0.0061
a
Ratio of Pool Slope to WS
Slope
1.00
0.00
0.4
0.00
0.40
�5
.0
m
0°
D16 (mm)
0.8
<2mm
0.8
D35 (mm)
11.9 <2mm
11.9
D50 (mm)
15.9 <2mm
15.9
D84 (mm)
30.4 2.0
30.4
D95 (mm)
54.4 3.8
54.4

Prepared By:
j
j--I
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
Red Barn UT3c 26+00 to 36+97
Morphological Table
Existing
Design Criteria
Design
Parameter
Minimum Maximum
Average
Minimum
I Maximum
Minimum I Maximum
Stream Name
UT3
Typical "C" Type Channel
Design Criteria
UT3
Rosgen Stream Type
'F4
C4
C4
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.10
0.10
Reach Length (ft)
974
1097
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5 0.5 0.5
0.6
Width/Depth Ratio
14.8
14.8
14.8
10.0
15.0
13.0
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7 0.7 0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth Ratio
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.2
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)
9
9
9
25
75
c
g
Ul
Entrenchment Ratio
1.0
7.1
3.1
>2.2
3.3
9.9
a
Max Pool Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
1.9
1.5
oRatio
of Max Pool Depth to
Bankfull Depth
1.3
1.7
3.5
1.5
3.5
2.6
Pool Width (ft)
--
--
--
11.5
Ratio of Pool Width to Bankfull
Width
-
-
--
1.2
1.7
1.5
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
5
30
19
27
53
Ratio of Pool to Pool Spacing
to Bankfull Width
0.7
3.7
2.4
3.5
7.0
3.5
7.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
2.9
2.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
Meander Length (ft)
--
--
--
53.0
106.5
Meander Length Ratio
-
-
-
7.0
14.0
7.0
14.0
E
Radius of Curvature (ft)
-
-
-
19.0
26.5
c�
Radius of Curvature Ratio
-
-
-
2.0
3.5
2.5
3.5
a
Meander Belt Width (ft)
-
-
-
26.5
61.0
Meander Width Ratio
-
-
-
3.5
8.0
3.5
1
8.0
Sinuosity
1.06
1.20
1.4
1.20
m
o
a-
Valley Slope (ft/ft)
0.01680
0.01680
WS Slope (ft/ft)
0.01780
0.01531
0.03000
Pool Slope (ft/ft)
Not Measured
0.0000
0.003
Ratio of Pool Slope to WS
Slope
Not Measured
0.00
0.20
�5
cu
0°
D16 (mm)
0.8
<2mm
0.8
D35 (mm)
11.9 <2mm
11.9
D50 (mm)
15.9 <2mm
15.9
D84 (mm)
30.4 2.0
30.4
D95 (mm)
54.4 3.8
54.4

Prepared By:
Ira))) ��� ECOSYSTEM
. PLANNING &
RESTORATION
Red Barn UT4 10+00 to 11+34
Morphological Table
Existing
Design Criteria
Design
Parameter
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Minimum
I Maximum
Minimum I Maximum
Stream Name
UT4
Typical "Bc" Type Channel
Design Criteria
UT4
Rosgen Stream Type
B/G 4
B4c
B4c
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.02
0.02
Reach Length (ft)
87
134
Bankfull Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
N/A N/A N/A
0.3
Width/Depth Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
12.0
18.0
13.0
Bankfull Area (sq ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
N/A N/A N/A
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.2
1.4
1.3
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
7
12
c
g
Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.4
2.2
1.7
2.9
Max Pool Depth (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.8
oRatio
of Max Pool Depth to
Bankfull Depth
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.0
3.5
2.5
Pool Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.3
Ratio of Pool Width to Bankfull
Width
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.1
1.5
1.3
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
6
25
Ratio of Pool to Pool Spacing
to Bankfull Width
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.5
6.0
1.5
6.0
Bank Height Ratio
>3.0
>3.0
>3.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
Meander Length (ft)
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Meander Length Ratio
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
E
Radius of Curvature (ft)
--
--
-
=
Radius of Curvature Ratio
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
m
Meander Belt Width (ft)
--
-
--
--
Meander Width Ratio
-
-
-
-
-
Sinuosity
1.06
1.10
1.3
1.06
o
Valley Slope (ft/ft)
0.05521
0.00833
WS Slope (ft/ft)
0.05196
0.00784
Pool Slope (ft/ft)
N/A
0.0000
0
iL
Ratio of Pool Slope to WS
Slope
N/A
0.00
0.4
0.00
0.00
�5
2
m
00
D16 (mm)
N/A
N/A
D35 (mm)
N/A
N/A
D50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
D84 (mm)
N/A
N/A
D95 (mm)
N/A
N/A

Maintenance Plan
The Site shall be monitored on a regular basis and a physical inspection of the site shall be
conducted a minimum of once per year throughout the post -construction monitoring period until
performance standards are met. These site inspections may identify site components and
features that require routine maintenance. Routine maintenance should be expected most often
in the first two years following site construction and may include the following:
Component/Feature
Maintenance through project close-out
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include securing of loose
coir matting and supplemental installations of live stakes and other target
Stream
vegetation along the channel. Areas where stormwater and floodplain flows
intercept the channel may also require maintenance to prevent bank failures
and head -cutting.
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted
plant community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may
Vegetation
include supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive
plant species shall be controlled by mechanical and/or chemical methods. Any
vegetation control requiring herbicide application will be performed in
accordance with NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
Beaver
Beaver and associated dams are to be removed as they colonize until the project
is closed.
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction
between the mitigation site and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be
Site Boundary
identified by fence, marker, bollard, post, tree- blazing, or other means as
allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundary markers
disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as
needed basis.
Farm road crossings within the site may be maintained only as allowed by
Farm Road Crossing
Conservation Easement or existing easement, deed restrictions, rights of way, or
corridor agreements.

Financial Assurances
Financial assurances will be in a form that ensures that the District Engineer will receive
notification at least 120 days in advance of any termination or revocation. In addition, the
Sponsor shall also be responsible for providing adequate funding to monitor and maintain the
Bank throughout its operational life, which is 7 years from the date of the construction or on the
date that the last of the credits is sold, whichever is later. The Long-term Steward will serve as
the third party to receive the funds and ensure the work is completed. A copy of the proposed
performance bond template is included in this appendix.
Prior to the initial credit release, the Sponsor will provide adequate Financial Assurances in the
form of a performance bond, acceptable to the Corps and the IRT, in the amount of $973,000
which is sufficient to finance the construction, implementation, monitoring, and maintenance of
the Site (see Tables 1 and 2 below).
Table 1. Construction and Implementation Costs for the Red Barn Bank Site.
Implementation Activity
Estimated Cost
Earthwork and Plantings
$825,000
Fencing
$75,000
Monitoring Instrumentation
$5,000
Total
$905,000
Table 2. Monitoring and Maintenance Costs for the Red Barn Bank Site.
Monitoring and Maintenance Activity
Estimated Cost
Replanting (includes all costs)
$5,000 * 3 = $15,000
Fence repair (includes all costs)
$2,000 * 2 = $4,000
Monitoring of streams and wetlands
$5,000 * 7 = $35,000
Instrumentation repairs
$500 * 4 = $2,000
Invasive species control
$1,000 * 5 = $5,000
Reporting and administration
$1,000 * 7 = $7,000
Total
$68,000
After the mitigation project has been successfully constructed and planted in conformance with
the approved mitigation plan, and as confirmed by a field inspection to be conducted by the
Corps and/or IRT, the Corps will authorize the release of the construction Financial Assurances
(Table 3). The Bank Sponsor may request release of the Financial Assurances with submittal of
the as -built and post- construction report.
Additional financial assurance to insure the successful maintenance of the Bank shall be provided
annually through the monitoring period, with the bond amount reduced annually as provided in
Table 3 upon approval of submitted monitoring reports.

Table 3. Performance Bonding Amounts and Reduction Schedule for Red Barn Bank Site.
Activity
Reduction
Percentage (%)
Reduction
Amount
Bond
Amount
Initial Performance Bond
---
---
$973,000
Approved As -Built Report
93%
905,000
68,000
Approved Year 1 Monitoring
1%
$9,714
$58,286
Approved Year 2 Monitoring
1%
$9,714
$48,572
Approved Year 3 Monitoring
1%
$9,714
$38,858
Approved Year 4 Monitoring
1%
$9,714
$29,144
Approved Year 5 Monitoring
1%
$9,714
$19,430
Approved Year 6 Monitoring
1%
$9,714
$9,716
Approved Year 7 Monitoring
1%
$9,716
$0
Total
100%
$973,000
---

Bond No.
Maintenance and Monitoring
Performance Bond
Penal Sum: $
Know All Men By These Presents,
That we, [name] of [address] (hereinafter called the Principal), as Principal, and [bonding
company] with an office at [address], a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of
[state] (hereinafter called the "Surety"), as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, (hereinafter called the "USACE") and the [name
and address of party that will receive the funds in the event of default], (hereinafter called
the "Obligee"), up to the maximum penal sum of [amount] Dollars ($ amount) (hereinafter
called the "Maximum Penal Sum"), for the payment of which we, the Principal and the Surety,
bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally,
firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS, the Principal has entered into the [name] Mitigation Banking Instrument
(hereinafter called the "MBI") with the USACE, dated the [day] day of [month], [year], which
includes the Final Mitigation Plan for the [name of mitigation site] (the "FMP") to ensure that
aquatic resources within the boundaries of the mitigation site will be [enter appropriate
activities (ex. restored, enhanced, monitored).]
WHEREAS, the principal promised to deliver to the USACE and the Obligee a Bond substantially
in the form hereto upon completion and compliance with construction and other criteria of the
LIMBI, FMP, and permits.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH that this Bond
will not be released in whole or in part until the Principal receives written verification from the
USACE that the conditions for release in the FMP have been fully met. If the above bounden
Principal shall meet the final performance standards as defined in the FMP, then this obligation
shall be null and void; otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect. This bond is subject to
the following conditions:
1) This bond shall remain in full force and effect for a period of [number] years. [If the
bond will be reduced on an annual basis, include the following statement and fill in the
columns below.] The Maximum Penal Sum of this bond may be reduced by the USACE, by
these scheduled amounts:
Year Reduction Revised Penal Sum
1 $ $
2 $ $
3 $ $
4 $ $
5 $ $
6 $ $
7 $ $
2) USACE shall issue a full and final release of this Bond when the [enter event. Ex:

construction activities are complete and/or seven year monitoring period is complete; all
monitoring reports have been submitted and have been approved by the USACE; and the
success criteria identified in the FMP have been achieved and approved by the USACE.]
This Bond shall not be released in whole until the Principal receives written verification from the
USACE that all the conditions for release have been satisfied.
3) If any payment under this Bond, as set forth in subsection 4 (b) below, is made, then the
outstanding penal sum of the Bond shall be reduced by the corresponding amount of such
payment. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, the aggregate liability of
the Surety is limited to the Maximum Penal Sum stated above, regardless of the number or
amount of claims brought against this bond and regardless of the number of years this bond
remains in effect. The USACE shall issue a full and final release of this Bond and any and all of
Surety's obligations hereunder when Surety has tendered payment in whole, or in parts equal to
the aggregate sum, of the Maximum Penal Sum of this Bond.
4) The Surety's obligation under this Bond shall arise after the USACE has notified the
Principal of their failure to abide by, or cure default conditions related to, the terms and
conditions of the FMP. Upon notice of the Principal's default under the FMP, the Surety, in its
sole discretion and notwithstanding any of the provisions of the above, shall remedy the
Principal's default by taking action under 4) a) or 4) b) below. In the event that the Surety either
fails to respond to USACE's notice of default within thirty (30) business days of receipt of said
notice, or fails to honor Surety's commitments under this bond to the full satisfaction of the
USACE, then Surety shall remedy such default in accordance with subsection 4) c) below:
a) Remedy the default of the Principal to the full satisfaction of the USACE by a
reasonable date determined by the USACE; or
b) Immediately tender to the Obligee, that portion of the Maximum Penal Sum that the
Obligee determines, in their discretion, is due and owing and necessary to remedy the
default. If payment is tendered to the Obligee under this subsection, the Obligee shall
immediately become a Surety or Sureties to this Bond, or
c) In the event that the Surety fails to respond within thirty (30) business days to the
USACE's notice of default, or to honor commitments to the full satisfaction of the
USACE under paragraph a) or b) of this section within a reasonable time to be
determined by the USACE, the remaining portion of the Maximum Penal Sum may, at
the election of the Obligee, immediately become due and owing and paid to the Obligee.
The Obligee under this paragraph shall immediately become a Surety or Sureties under
this bond for the remaining term of the bond.
5) Surety shall have no obligation to the Principal, USACE, the Obligee, or any other person
or entity for any loss suffered by the Principal, U S AC E, the Obligee, or any other person or
entity by reason of acts or omissions which are or could be covered by the Principal's
general liability insurance, products liability insurance, completed operations insurance or any
other insurance. Under no circumstance shall the USACE be responsible to arbitrate any
insurance claims made, declined or disputed under this Bond.
6) The Surety hereby waives notification of amendments to the LIMBI, permits, applicable
laws, statutes, rules, and regulations, and agrees that no such amendment shall in any way
alleviate its obligation on this Bond.

NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING CONTAINED IN THE AGREEMENT TO THE
CONTRARY, THE LIABILITY OF THE PRINCIPAL AND SURETY UNDER THIS BOND IS
LIMITED TO THE TERM BEGINNING THE DAY OF , 20_, AND
ENDING THE DAY OF , 20_. AND
ANY EXTENSIONS OR RENEWALS OF THE REFERENCED AGREEMENT SHALL BE
COVERED UNDER THIS BOND ONLY WHEN CONSENTED TO IN WRITING BY THE
SURETY. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT THE REFUSAL BY THE SURETY TO EXTEND
THE TERM OF THIS BOND SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A DEFAULT BY THE
PRINCIPAL, AND SHALL NOT GIVE RISE TO A CLAIM OR DEMAND AGAINST THE
SURETY UNDER THIS BOND.
In accordance with 33 C.F.R. § 332.3(n)(5), the Surety shall provide the USACE and the Obligee
written notification at least 120 days in advance of termination, revocation, or modification of
this Bond.
No right of action shall accrue on this bond to or for the use of any person or corporation other
than the USACE or the Obligee named herein, or their successors or assigns.
The above -bounden parties have executed this instrument under their several seals, dated this
day of , 2016, the name and corporate seal of each corporate party being
affixed and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative, pursuant to authority of
its governing body.
Principal: [sponsor]
[enter name and title]
Surety: [bond company]
Attorney -in -Fact
Obligee: [name of person to receive
funds]
Director or Acting Director

Site Name:
USACE Action ID:
NCDWR Project Number:
Sponsor:
County:
Minimum Required Buffer Width':
Mitigation Type
Restoration (1:1)
Enhancement 1 (1.5:1)
Enhancement II (2.5:1)
Preservation (5:1)
Other (7.5:1)
Other (10:1)
Custom Ratio 1
Custom Ratio 2
Custom Ratio 3
Custom Ratio 4
Custom Ratio 5
Totals
Buffer Zones
Max Possible Buffer (square feet)°
Ideal Buffer (square feet)-'
Actual Buffer (square feet)6
Zone Multiplier
Buffer Credit Equivalent
Percent of Ideal Buffer
Credit Adjustment
Total Baseline Credit
7321.47
Surry
30
Mitigation Ratio
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
SAW -2018-1441
NA
NCDOT
Creditable Stream
7561.00
Baseline Stream Credit
6920.00
362.67
38.80
7321.47
Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator
Buffer Width Zone (feet from Ordinary High Water Mark)
less than 15 feet
>15 to 20 feet
>20 to 25 feet
>25 to 30 feet
>30 to 50 feet
>50 to 75 feet
>75 to 100 feet
>100 to 125 feet
>125 to 150 feet
226830
75610
75610
75610
302440
378050
378050
378050
378050
225841.1472
74162.10389
72751.80986
71402.73834
279512.9778
346299.3887
347347.7666
349307.3696
353258.5441
222027.9977
71837.1232
70013.87871
68455.49348
238419.8894
166225.4503
70180.91486
40890.53084
29661.77416
50%
20%
15%
15%
9%
7%
6%
5%
3%
3660.73
1464.29
1098.22
1098.22
658.93
512.50
439.29
366.07
219.64
98%
97%
96%
96%
85%
48%
20%
12%
8%
-61.81
-45.91
-41.33
-45.33
562.06
246.00
88.76
42.85
18.44
Credit Loss in Required Credit Gain for Net Change in
Total Credit
Buffer Additional Buffer Credit from Buffers
-194.37 958.11 763.74 8085.21
1Minimum standard buffer width measured from the top of bank (50 feet in piedmont and coastal plain counties or 30 feet in mountain counties)
2Use the Custom Ratio fields to enter non-standard ratios, which are equal to the number of feet in the feet -to -credit mitigation ratio (e.g., for a perservation ratio of 8 feet to 1 credit, the multiplier would be 8).
3Equal to the number of feet of stream in each Mitigation Type. If stream reaches are not creditable, they should be excluded from this measurement, even if they fall within the easement.
chis amount is the maximum buffer area possible based on the linear footage of stream length if channel were perfectly straight with full buffer width. This number is not used in calculations, but is provided as a reference.
5Maximum potential size (in square feet) of each buffer zone measured around all creditable stream reaches, calculated using GIS, including areas outside of the easement. The inner zone (0-15') should be measured from the top of the OHWM or the edge of the average stream width if OHWM is not known. Non -creditable stream
reaches within the easement should be removed prior to calculating this area wtih GIS.
6Square feet in each buffer zone, as measured by GIS, excluding non -forested areas, all other credit type (e.g., wetland, nutrient offset, buffer), easement exceptions, open water, areas failing to meet the vegetation performance standard, etc. Additional credit is given to 150 feet in buffer width, so areas within the easement that are
more than 150 feet from creditable streams should not be included in this measurement. Non -creditable stream reaches within the easement should be removed prior to calculating this area wtih GIS.

Wilmington District Mitigation Bank Credit Release Schedule
Project Name: Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site County:
Sponsor Name: Kevin Tweedy 8 -Digit HUC:
USAGE Action ID: SAW -2018-1441 Year Project Instituted:
NCDWQ Action ID: Date Prepared:
Surry
03040101
2018
Total Potential Credits
Credit Classification
Stream Credits
Forested Wetland Credits
Wetland
WarmCool
Water
Water
Cold
Water
Riparian
Riverine
Riparian
Non-Riverine
Non -Riparian
Coastal
Potential Credits from Mitigation Plan
Scheduled Release Date Date
Non -Riparian Releases Coastal
8,159
15%
2.56
15%
2 (Year 0/As-Built)'
Potential Credits from As -Built Survey
15%
15%
3 (Year 1 Monitoring)
10%
10%
12-21-2018
Contingencies (if any): None
Signature of Wilmington District Official Approving Credit Release
1- The first credit release milestone is based on the potential credits stated in the approved mitigation plan.
2 - The first credit release shall occur upon establishment of the mitigation bank, which includes the following criteria:
1) Execution of the MBI or UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE;
2) Approval of the final Mitigation Plan;
3) Mitigation bank site must be secured;
4) Delivery of the financial assurances described in the Mitigation Plan;
5) Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
6) 404 permit verification for construction of the site, if required.
3 - The second credit release is based on the credit totals from the as -built survey, and may differ slightly from the credit totals stated in the mitigation plan.
4 - A 15% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
Date
Current and Future Credit Releases
Stream Credits
Forested Wetland Credits
Non -Forested Wetland
Credits Projected Actual Release
Credit Release Milestone
Scheduled Warm Cool
Releases Water Water
Cold Scheduled
Water Releases
Riparian Riparian
Riverine Non-Riverine
Scheduled Release Date Date
Non -Riparian Releases Coastal
1(Bank/Site Establishment)" Z
15%
15%
15%
2 (Year 0/As-Built)'
15%
15%
15%
3 (Year 1 Monitoring)
10%
10%
10%
4 (Year 2 Monitoring)
10%
10%
15%
5 (Year 3 Monitoring)
10%
15%
20%
6 (Year 4 Monitoring)
5%
5%
10%
7 (Year 5 Monitoring)
10%
15%
15%
8 (Year 6 Monitoring)
5%
5%
NA NA
9 (Year 7 Monitoring)
10%
10%
NA NA
Stream Bankfull Standard'
10%
NA
NA NA
NA NA NA Varies'
Total Credits Release to Date
Contingencies (if any): None
Signature of Wilmington District Official Approving Credit Release
1- The first credit release milestone is based on the potential credits stated in the approved mitigation plan.
2 - The first credit release shall occur upon establishment of the mitigation bank, which includes the following criteria:
1) Execution of the MBI or UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE;
2) Approval of the final Mitigation Plan;
3) Mitigation bank site must be secured;
4) Delivery of the financial assurances described in the Mitigation Plan;
5) Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
6) 404 permit verification for construction of the site, if required.
3 - The second credit release is based on the credit totals from the as -built survey, and may differ slightly from the credit totals stated in the mitigation plan.
4 - A 15% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
Date

Wilmington District Credit Release Schedule and Milestones for Streams
Total Released
Total Released With
Credit Release
Release Activity
Interim Release
Without Bankfull
Bankfull Standard
Milestone
Standard Met
Met'
1 Bank Establishment'
15%
15%
NA
Completion of all initial physical and biological
2
°
15%
30%
NA
improvements made pursuant to the Mitigation Plan
Year 1 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are
3
10%
40%
NA
stable and interim performance standards have been met
Year 2 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are
4
10%
50%
NA
stable and interim performance standards have been met
Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are
5
10%
60%
NA
stable and interim performance standards have been met
Year 4 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are
6
5%
65%
75%
stable and interim performance standards have been met
Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are
7
10%
75%
85%
stable, performance standards have been met
Year 6 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are
8
5%
80%
90%
stable, performance standards have been met
Year 7 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are
9
10%
90%
100%
stable, performance standards have been met
1- The first credit release shall occur upon establishment of the mitigation bank, which includes the following criteria:
1) execution of the MBI or UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE;
2) approval of the final Mitigation Plan;
3) the mitigation bank site must be secured;
4) delivery of the financial assurances described in the Mitigation Plan;
5) recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
6) 404 permit verification for construction of the site, if required.
2 - A 10% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met
(4 bankfull events in separate years).

Credit Release
Milestone
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Wilmington District Credit Release Schedule and Milestones for Forested Wetlands
Release Activity Interim Release Total Released
Site Establishment' 15% 15%
Completion of all initial physical and biological
15% 30%
improvements made pursuant to the Mitigation Plan
Year 1 monitoring report demonstrates that interim
performance standards have been met
Year 2 monitoring report demonstrates that interim
performance standards have been met
Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that interim
performance standards have been met
Year 4 monitoring report demonstrates that interim
performance standards have been met
Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that interim
performance standards have been met
Year 6 monitoring report demonstrates that interim
performance standards have been met
Year 7 monitoring report demonstrates that performance
standards have been met
40%
50%
65%
70%
85%
90%
100%
1- The first credit release shall occur upon establishment of the mitigation bank, which includes the following criteria:
1) execution of the MBI or UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE;
2) approval of the final Mitigation Plan;
3) the mitigation bank site must be secured;
4) delivery of the financial assurances described in the Mitigation Plan;
5) recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
6) 404 permit verification for construction of the site, if required.