440004_Complete File - Historical_20190213

Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Gay Angel
14 Crestview Road
Waynesville, NC 28786
Dear Mr. Gay Angel:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Asheville Regional Office
WATER QUALITY SECTION
December 10, 2002
Subject: Removal of Certified Status From
Animal Waste Facilities
Facility Number: 44-4
Status: Not Regulated
Regulated Animal Waste Facility
Haywood County
For quite some time now, the Division of Water Quality has regulated Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations (CAFO's) and animal facilities with wet waste management systems for compliance with both
the North Carolina General Statutes (N.C.G.S. 143-215.1(a)(I)) and the North Carolina Administrative
Code (15A NCAC 2H .0217 and 15A NCAC 2H .0204). After review of last year's inspection, previous
inspections, and your facility file, it has been determined by this office that your activity does not fall
within the above cited regulations based on your method of waste management and disposal.
Your facility file will be closed out at this time and you will no longer be inspected for compliance with the
animal waste management inspection program.
Nothing in this document should be taken as absolving you of your responsibility for complying with all
state regulations and General Statutes. If you should have any questions regarding this letter, please do not
hesitate to contact either Mr. Kevin Barnett or Mr. Keith Haynes of my staff at 828.251.6208.
Sincerely,
;Forrest Xestall,
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Non -Discharge Permitting Unit (Attn: Sue Homewood)
NC Division of Soil and Water (Attn: Jeff Young)
Haywood County Co-operative Extension Service
Asheville Regional Office (Attn: Keith Haynes)
Water Quality Section, 50 Woodfin Place Asheville, NC 28801-2414 Telephone: [phone] Customer Service
Fax: [phone] 623-7748

A Il NOTE
© The Mead Corporation
Nk
N
'
y `�� ?�,�I.
f ! ° '�I
• X'S Tis y .
v ° < � .
fill101
i t
w
�7
au
A Il NOTE
© The Mead Corporation

r.. Cr'3e..: "S �^,x• P^rrt„=�'3,; �:iTY`t�.'i._
I -
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMET OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTARVEV1LLE REGIONAL OFFicE
August 23, 2000
Mr. Gay Angel
14 Crestview Drive
Waynesville, North Carolina 28786
Subject: Animal Operation Inspection
Gay Angel Farms
Facility Number 44-4 & 44-7
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Angel:
Please find attached a printed copy of the Inspection
Report.s for the routine on-site inspections of your animal
operations. The inspections were conducted on July.21,
2000.
If you have any questions concerning the Reports or any
other related matters, please do not hesitate to contact me
at 251-6208.
Sincerely,
�1
D. Keith Haynes
Environmental Specialist
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801-2414
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

I
Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
E:Fa:ci�lityNum�ber 44 4 Date of Visit: 7/21/2000 Time: 1030 Printed on: 7/28/2000
rO Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted M Certified [3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
FarmName: say..AngelEarm.......................................................................................... County: HaMiju l.......................................... ARG ............
Owner Name: Gay. ........... _............................. Aulgel............................................. . Phone No: 828..92Gr11C1..................................
............. .........................
FacilityContact: Gay.Augel....................................................... Title:.......................................... ................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: 1.4.Cxcatyjcw.Arive............................................................................. W.U.nelylk.N.0 ................................................... 2.8786.............
OnsiteRepresentative: ............................................................................................................ Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.Gay.F...................................... Angel................................................ . Operator Certification Number: 2.U35 .............................
Location of Farm:
Hwy. 215 South from Canton Go 2.5 miles and farm is on the left.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry IN Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F 35 • 29 30 Li Longitude F 82 F 54-1-
b.
a
Discharees & Stream Iin acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?Yes
❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/miri?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes f9 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway [] Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ........................................................................ .
..............................................................................................................................................

Wumber: 44-4 Date of Inspection 7/21/2000 printed on: 7/2$/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures oii-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ]] Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
© No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
j No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? [] Yes ❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) Yes [] No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
... .... aip:d'e# i�nie� ....xe n .......... •visit........ e�eave A ......:me fi
Corresp�ndencte about phis:�as:............. f
-.feed lot is currently a corn field. Animals are fed on site only during the Winter months and then are not confined. Watering tanks are
site and the animals have no access to the river. The facility could be removed from the database at the owners request. (All questions
, answered are not applicable.)
Name
viewer/Ins ec or ........................................................................................................................................................
p
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,' , _, �- �%tl/I+.ra_ Date: /% <Jo Clan

Type of Visit) Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 44 Date of Visit: 7/21/2000 Tune: 1000 Printed on: 728/2000
=Not Operational ® Below Threshold
Permitted M Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .......................,
Farm Name: Gay. A.ageraruL.......................................................................................... County: lay. jjad..........................................iA............
OwnerName: Gay.............,..............................A Aixggl ........................................................... Phone No: ..........................................................
FacilityContact: Gay.. ngel....................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: J4.Gcesjyicw.Arixe............................................................................. WaymemaAc ................................................... 287.86.............
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: Gary.1...................................... Amgel................................................. Operator Certification Number: 21335 .............................
Location of Farm:
Elwy. 209 and go 1.5 miles and turn Rt. on Richland Creek Rd. and go .5 miles and the farm is on the left. +
[I Swine El Poultry • ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude F 35 a 32 53 �� Longitude 82 " 56 30 �6
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes g No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 19 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................

5. Rcility Number: 44-7 Date of Inspection 7/21/2000 printed on:
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
7/213/2000
Cl Yes
r] Yes
No
F] Yes
[( No
Ej Yes
[] No
❑ Yes
© No
j Yes
No
El Yes
C9 No
[] Yes
Q No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
Cl Yes
No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
F1 Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
Yes
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
Yes
No .
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
0 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
j] Yes
CK No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
Yes
0 No '
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
0 Yes
[l No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
[{ Yes
0 No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
[j Yes
0 No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
[ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
Yes
No
i
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
IR No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0 Yes
59 No
V:y`�oia>riQ4s.4r.d.466dcies WkeXoted,duir 4kXhii-*44:. Y'Ou *U1.rkeive:np ex.
•correspoudencle'about this.vasit - ...... ...... .
acility is a pasture operation which is currently a corn field. Cattle are fed at a roffed area during the Winter months, but are not confined. +
)therwise, animals are pastured in other locations. The facility could be removed from the database at the owners request. (All questions
of answered are not applicable.)
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 17--%; - dw rinn

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Gay Angel
14 Crestview Drive
Waynesville, North
Dear Mr. Angel:
WATER QUALITY SECTION
December 20, 2001
Carolina 28786
'will
NCDENF1
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Animal Operation
Gay Angel Farms
Facility Number
Haywood County
Inspection
44-4 & 44-7
Please find attached a printed copy of the Inspection Reports for
the routine on-site inspections of your animal operations. If you have
already received a copy of the 2001 Inspection Reports,. please disregard
these.
If you have any questions concerning the Reports or any other
related matters, please do not hesitate to contact me at 251-6208.
Sincerely,
D. Keith I
Hayn s
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
59 Woodfin Place, Asheville North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 2/6/2001 Time: 1:00
w� �•:,�� �> a �a. c O Not Operational ® Below Threshold
Permitted E Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: Gay..A.ngel Earm................................................................................ ........... County: Haywo.Qd .......................................... AR4?............
OwnerName: Gay ........................................... Angcl........................................................... Phone No: 828.926:-.0.681 ...........................................................
Mailing Address: 1 4.G.reakyxCty..l?x7.Ye..................................
............................................W..aymeax1ll,e.ZYG.................---............................... 7.82.86 .............
FacilityContact: G.ay.Amgel....................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: ...............................
Certified Operator:.GA.......................................... AAgel..................
Location of Farm:
... Integrator: ............
Operator Certification Number:,2.U3,5.............................
Ilwy. 215 South from Canton Go 2.5 miles and farm is on the left. +
El Swine El Poultry ®Castle C] Horse Latitude 35 E 29 30 �� Longitude 82 1 52 54 ��
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? E[ Yes Eg No
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon Q Spray Field [] Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? El Yes El No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify D WQ) [] Yes E] No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes E3 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? E] Yes [9 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes 0 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [] Spillway El Yes ED No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
0.5/03/01 mm Cnnfinuad

rityNumber: '44-4
Date of Inspection 2/6/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
0 Yes ❑ No
[l Yes [( No
❑ Yes Q No
[l Yes [I No
[l Yes F1 No
] Yes Q No
[i Yes E] No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes El No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes- El No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? [j Yes E] No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes El No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[i Yes [:I No
0 Yes EINo
l-7. Yes ] No
❑ Yes Z No
• Yes [j No
• Yes El No
[j Yes Q No
Yes [) No
0 Yes p No
El Yes D No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes [i No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
[] Field Copy [] Final Notes
acility is a pasture operation. Questions are not appliable to the operation.
e ie ct
R v wer/Ins a or Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05/03/01
Cantinued

Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
` Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
2/6/2001 11:40
® Not Operational ® Below Threshold
[3 Permitted M Certified E3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
FarmName: Ga'.AngdEarm............................................................................. .......... County: Hitywggd .......................................... ARO
Owner Name: Gay ........................................... Angel...............................
Mailing Address: L4..CXest l:9Pn.Jp xe..................................................
Facility Contact: Ga,}:- gol....................................................... Title:
Onsite Representative: ................................................................................
............... Phone No: $2;g-Q26=06$1..........................................................
..ay.ne'aY.xU'XC.................................................... Z87.86 .............
............................................. Phone No:
... Integrator:
Certified Operator:.Cry'.......................................... Augel................................................. Operator Certification Number:2M5 .............................
Location of Farm:
Hwy. 209 and go 1.5 miles and turn Rt. on Richland Creek Rd. and go .5 miles and the farm is on the left.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 6F- 53 �� Longitude 82 Ea 56 16 30
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ED Lagoon El Spray Field [I Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ..................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ................................... .
asm3ia I
0 Yes E9 No
[j Yes [] No
Yes [l No
F] Yes E] No
[j Yes [9 No
E] Yes 0 No
[] Yes []No
Structure 6
............................
canfinund

it )eluMber: 44-7 Date of Inspection 2/6/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 0 Yes []No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? []Yes P1 No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? D Yes [,€ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? [] Yes [l No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? E] Yes E] No
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? El Yes El No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding [I PAN [I Hydraulic Overload [] Yes E] No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? n Yes G No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[I Yes
n No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?]
Yes
Q No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
Yes
[3 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
[] Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Yes
0 No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
C No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
[ Yes
[] No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
[] Yes
[I No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
0 Yes
Q No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? I
❑ Yes
Q No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
El Yes
El No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
0 Yes
El No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
in 1\To violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
05/03101 Cantinued