The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About440006_Complete File - Historical_20190213Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested Edwin & Grover Bryson 78 Winthrop Road Waynesville, NC 28786 Dear Mr. Edwin & Grover Bryson: Michael F. Easley Governor William G. Ross, Jr. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality Asheville Regional Office WATER QUALITY SECTION December 10, 2002 Subject: Removal of Certified Status From Animal Waste Facilities Facility Number: 44-6 Status: Not Regulated Regulated Animal Waste Facility Haywood County For quite some time now, the Division of Water Quality has regulated Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO's) and animal facilities with wet waste management systems for compliance with both the North Carolina General Statutes (N.C.G.S. 143-215.1(a)(I)) and the North Carolina Administrative Code (15A NCAC 2H .0217 and 15A NCAC 2H .0204). After review of last year's inspection, previous inspections, and your facility file, it has been determined by this office that your activity does not fall within the above cited regulations based on your method of waste management and disposal. Your facility file will be closed out at this time and you will no longer be inspected for compliance with the animal- waste management inspection program. Nothing in this document should be taken as absolving you of your responsibility for complying with all state regulations and General Statutes. If you should have any .questions regarding this, letter, please do not hesitate to* contact either Mr. Kevin Barnett or Mr. Keith Haynes of my staff at 828.251.6208. Sincerely, Forrest R Westall, Water Quality Regional Supervisor cc: Non -Discharge Permitting Unit (Attn: Sue Homewood) NC Division of Soil and Water (Attn: Jeff Young) Haywood County Co-operative Extension Service Asheville Regional Office (Attn: Keith Haynes) Water Quality Section. 50 Woodfin Place Asheville, NC 28801-2414 Telephone: 828/251-6208 Customer Service Fax: 828/251-6452 1 800 623-7748 } NORTH ROLINA DEPARTM T OF ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE WATER QUALITY SECTION January 10, 2000 Mr. Edwin Bryson 78 Winthrop Road Waynesville,.North Carolina Subject: Animal Operation Inspection Edwin & Grover Bryson Farm Facility Number 44-6 Haywood County Dear Mr..Bryson: Please find a printed copy of the Inspection Report for the routine on-site inspection of your animal operation. The inspection was conducted on November 10, 1999. If you have any questions concerning the Report or any other related matters, please do not hesitate to contact me at 251-6208. Sincerely, D. Keith Hayn Environmental Specialist xc: Haywood Soil & Water Office INTERCHANGE BUILDING, S9 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801-2414 PHONE 828-251-6208 FAX 828-251-6452 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER 10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other Facility Number 44��6 Date of Inspection 11/10/99 Time of Inspection 1000 24 hr. (hh:mm) ® Permitted E Certified El Conditionally Certified Registered 0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: FarmName: ............................................................. County: Haywood .......................................... ARO............ Owner Name: EdrAimA .Gxaxer ............... Bryn.au.......................................................... Phone No: (828).6.27-62.7.3 ....................................................... FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:................................................... Mailing Address: 711.Wbatbrop.RoaLd.............................................................................. W..aymcamuk...NC.................................................. Z87.86 ............. OnsiteRepresentative: Ngjap ................................................................................................ Integrator:...................................................................................... Certified Operator: Edwk.G ............................... Brymon .............................................. Operator Certification Number: 2M.7.4 .............................. Location of Farm: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Calve�Y .7�...7Q2.....no:i�C1Y...af. c.�umaiusica�......ld...nits.am.rigi►t.fxaua.antcxaecti.nm.n�I:.4Q.aaud.�Ii~HvYy.2A........................................... ..................................................... . Latitude 35 a 34 10 6a Longitude 82 a 57 i 20 LL Discharees & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [j Yes' M No Discharge originated at: [] Lagoon [] Spray Field Q Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? F1 Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Q No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Ifyes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [2 Spillway Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier: ................................... Freeboard (inches): ❑ Yes [] No [] Yes 0 No 0 Yes 0 No [] Yes [] No Structure 6 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, j] Yes ❑ No seepage, etc.) 3/23/99 Continued on back Printed on 12116/09 Reauired Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? [] Yes []No 18.. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) [3 Yes [] No 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 0 Yes 0 No 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? [] Yes [] No 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) [] Yes ❑ No .23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? El Yes 0 No 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? [] Yes 0 No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 0 Yes [l No Fi:No-'Kolatfi*s O:defkWi cies•ive>:eXotedAuKak0isvisit:: '4u*01'receive:nOI.Oft. er: :corresoundenc�e -about -ihis.visit .................... ..... I .. I ......... is a beef cattle operation with no waste management system. The animals are fed at the feed lot during the Winter, but are not 1. It is recommended that the owners request that the farm be removed from the database. ARO will concur. Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: on 12/16/99 11/10/99 tuber: 44-6 of Inspection re there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ure plan? 0 Yes [l No (if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 0 Yes [[ No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? [] Yes [I No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? 0 Yes p No Waste Application 10_ Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes p No 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN 0 Yes Q No 12. Crop type 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? [] Yes [] No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? [3 Yes [] No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? 0 Yes [l No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes [[ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 0 Yes [l No 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? 0 Yes 0 No Reauired Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? [] Yes []No 18.. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) [3 Yes [] No 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 0 Yes 0 No 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? [] Yes [] No 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) [] Yes ❑ No .23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? El Yes 0 No 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? [] Yes 0 No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 0 Yes [l No Fi:No-'Kolatfi*s O:defkWi cies•ive>:eXotedAuKak0isvisit:: '4u*01'receive:nOI.Oft. er: :corresoundenc�e -about -ihis.visit .................... ..... I .. I ......... is a beef cattle operation with no waste management system. The animals are fed at the feed lot during the Winter, but are not 1. It is recommended that the owners request that the farm be removed from the database. ARO will concur. Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: on 12/16/99