440007_Complete File - Historical_20190213

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
- -ENVIRONMENT AND. NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
November 13, 2000
Mr. Gay Angel
14 Crestview Drive.
Waynesville, North Carolina 28786
Subject: Animal Operation'Inspection
Gay Angel Farms
Facility Number 44-4 & 44-7
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Angel:
Please find attached a printed -copy of the Inspection
.Reports for the routine on-site inspections of your animal
,operations.
If you have any questions concerning the Reports or any
other related matters, please do not hesitate to contact me
at 251-6208.
Sincerely,
t. Keith Hayne
Environmental Specialist
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, S9 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801-2414
. PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]S2
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

N
of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 44 4 Date of Visit: 7/21/2000 Time: 1030 Printed on: 11/13/2000
O Not Operational 10 Below Threshold
U Permitted CertifiedConditionally Certified E3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
Farm Name: Gay..Angel..Earm........................................................................................... County: HaMmud .......................................... ARO............
OwnerName: Gay.ay ........................................... R991........................................................... Phone No: #21r 9 �-11;%1...........................................................
Facility Contact: Gay. -Angel., Title:................................................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address: 1d..Creaftmw.D . rixe............................................................................. Wayeayft.Mc .................................................... 28286 .............
Onsite Representative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:
Certified Operator: Saaa y..F..................................... Angel.............................................. .. Operator Certification Number: 2MJ.5 .............................
Location of Farm:
Ilwy. 215 South from Canton Go 2.5 miles and farm is on the left.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F 35 °"F 29 30 LongitudeF 82 52 54 u
J❑Subsurface Drains Present ��❑ Lagoon Area ea �❑
Spray
Field
Area
iso
No Liauid Waste
Discharmes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [J Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notifyDWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): .................................... .................................... ................n ................. .................................... .....................
❑ Yes No
El Yes [] No
❑ Yes n No
0 Yes ❑ No
0 Yes 9 No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
............................
..................... I......

t
rNumher: 44-4 Date of Inspection 7/21/2000 printed on: 11/13/2000
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[I No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[] No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[0 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type -
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time -of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)' ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes (] No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 oda toos: o.r elri�i�deieS•Wexe:noted:duH)ig ittiis•visit:: iii •W i:rkeiv:e:ab f4d- iex:
P .corresnandence'aftosashis.visit.::.........:....:...... .
e feed lot is currently a com field. Animals are fed on site only during the Winter months and then are not confined. Watering tanks are
site and the animals have no access to the river. The. facility could be removed from the database at the owners request. (All questions
answered are not applicable.)
Reviewer/Inspector Name

I
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 44 -Date of Visit: 7/21/2000 Time: 1000 Printed on: 11/13/2000
Operational • Below Threshold
E3 Permitted IM Certified 13 Conditionally Certified Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Gay..A:ngel.F.alrm.......................................................................................... County: Raw. aad.......................................... ARO ............
OwnerName: Gay...........:................................A ncl........................................................... Phone No: 1128.9.2..Qiilll.................................... .....
............ .....
FacilityContact: Gay..Amget....................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: 14..Cxes levy.Dxixe............................................................................. waymeaAkNE ................................................... Z87.86 .........
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:. Ay.F...................................... Auget ................................................ Operator Certification Number: 21335.............................
Location of Farm:
Rwy. 209 and go 1.5 miles and turn Rt. on Richland Creek Rd. and go .5 miles and the farm is on the left. A
E] Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 ' 32 ' S3 " Longitude 82 O 56 ' 30
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 5E No
Discharge originated at: E] Lagoon [j Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? D Yes El No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/inin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ]] Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ................................................................................................................................................................................
0 Yes (] No
C] Yes ❑ No
] Yes j] No
[j Yes No
[] Yes No
Structure 6
Freeboard(inches): .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................

s
WNumber: 44-7 Date of Inspection 7/21/2000 Printed on: 11/13/2000
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, Yes G No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? [] Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? M Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? [j Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? [] Yes 0 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes El No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes LT No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 9 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time -of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?'
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
..�o' .... ar :cue iedeiesi�'eye:doted...... k.... s..... ..... ive :oQ .... 'x :
•.
•corregnondeuco -a-hout'this•visit.'................................... .
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes 0 No
[] Yes 0 No
[] Yes [] No
]] Yes N No
[j Yes No
[] Yes No
[] Yes [] No
E] Yes N No
❑ Yes 0 No
0 Yes 9 No
ility is a pasture operation which is currently a corn field. Cattle are fed at a roffed area during the Winter months, but are not confined.
.erwise, animals are pastured in other locations. The facility could be removed from the database at the owners request. (All questions
answered are not applicable.)
<<:.;:;Reviewer/Inspector Name <.;<<; > .;:.;;;;:.:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: j 3 . on S/Iio

W ATTR.
QG
7
r
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Reguested
Gay Angel
14 Crestview Road
Waynesville, NC 28786
Dear Mr. Gay Angel:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Asheville Regional Office
WATER QUALITY SECTION
December 10, 2002
Subject: Removal of Certified Status From
Animal Waste Facilities
Facility Number: 44-7
Status: Not Regulated
Regulated Animal Waste Facility
Haywood County
For quite some time now, the Division of Water Quality has regulated Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations (CAFO's) *and animal facilities with wet waste management systems for compliance with both
the North Carolina General Statutes (N.C.G.S. 143-215.1(a)(I)) and the North Carolina Administrative
Code (15A NCAC 2H .0217 and 15A NCAC 2H .0204). After review of last year's inspection, previous
inspections, and your facility file, it has been determined by this office that your activity does not fall
within the above cited regulations based on your method of waste management and disposal.
Your facility file will be closed out at this time and you will no longer be inspected for compliance with the
animal waste management inspection program.
Nothing in this document should be taken as absolving you of your responsibility for complying with all
state regulations and General Statutes. If you should have any questions regarding this letter, please do not
hesitate to contact either Mr. Kevin Barnett or Mr. Keith Haynes of my staff at 828.251.6208.
Sincerely,
orrest R Westall,
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Non -Discharge Permitting Unit (Attn: Sue Homewood)
NC Division of Soil and Water (Attn: Jeff Young)
Haywood County Co-operative Extension Service
Asheville Regional Office (Attn: Keith Haynes)
Water Quality Section, 50 Woodfin Place Asheville, NC 28801-2414 Telephone: [phone] Customer Service
Fax: [phone] 623-7748

W A TF
PasleyMichael
F
F.
Governor
rWilliam
G. Ross, Jr.
>
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Asheville Regional Office
WATER QUALITY SECTION
December 10, 2002
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Gay Angel
14 Crestview Road
Waynesville, NC 28786
Subject: Removal of Certified Status From
Animal Waste Facilities
Facility Number: 44-7
Status: Not Regulated
Regulated Animal Waste Facility
Haywood County
Dear Mr. Gay Angel:
For quite some time now, the Division of Water Quality has regulated Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations (CAFO's) and animal facilities with wet waste management systems for compliance with both
the North Carolina General Statutes (N.C.G.S. 143-215.1(a)(I)) and the North Carolina Administrative
Code (15A NCAC 2H .0217 and 15A NCAC 2H .0204). After review of last year's inspection, previous
inspections, and your facility file, it has been determined by this office that your activity does not fall
within the above cited regulations based on your method of waste management and disposal.
Your facility file will be closed out at this time and you will no longer be inspected for compliance with the
animal waste management inspection program.
Nothing in this document should be taken as absolving you of your responsibility for complying with all
state regulations and General Statutes. If you should have any questions regarding this letter, please do not
hesitate to contact either Mr. Kevin Barnett or Mr. Keith Haynes of my staff at 828.251.6208.
Sincerely,
;orroest R Westall,
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Non -Discharge Permitting Unit (Attn: Sue Homewood)
NC Division of Soil and Water (Attn: Jeff Young)
Haywood County Co-operative Extension Service
Asheville Regional Office (Attn: Keith Haynes)
Water Quality Section, 50 Woodfin Place Asheville, NC 28801-2414 Telephone: [phone] Customer Service
Fax: [phone] 623-7748