Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20180990 Ver 1_AWT Reply to USACE Comments_20190129z T\ 2 Engineers and Soil Scientists Agri -Waste Technology, Inc. 501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203 Apex, North Carolina 27502 919-859-0669 www.agriwaste.com January 29, 2019 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Andy William, USACE FROM: Ms. Julie Davidson, Agriwaste Technology Mr. Steve Gould, Ridgemont Subdivision (applicant) SUBJECT: Reply to Comments from USACE for 404 Permits for Stream Crossing-Ridgemont Subdivision The following are comments made by the USACE and AWT's reply in regards to the 404 permit needed For the stream crossing to access lots 23 and 26 in Ridgemont Subdivision in Franklin Co., NC. AWT's reply is shown in blue. 1.Proposed impact amounts cannot be determined based on the submitted Pre - construction Notification (PCN) and attached plans. The PCN (Page 6, Section 3. Stream Impacts) lists two (2) impact sites. S1 for 64 linear feet and S2 for 64 linear feet. Section 3i. states the total permanent stream impacts are 128 linear feet. However, the plans only indicates one crossing located between lots 23 and 26, leading to lots 24 and 25. Please clarify the correct number of crossings and/or correct Page 6 of the PCN and/or provide additional plans for the second crossing. There is only one stream crossing. Therefore, there is only one impact site for this project. 2. Please provide a profile drawing of the proposed crossing(s). The drawing should indicate that the proposed culvert will be place in accordance with Section 3.6 of the Wilmington District Regional Conditions, which states, "culverts 48 inches in diameter or less shall be buried to maintain aquatic passage and to maintain passage during drought or low flow conditions, and every effort shall be made to maintain the existing channel slope". Your current plans do not indicate the proposed burial depth of the culvert. Please see Attachment 1 for details. 3. The map labelled Project Site maps states the stream crossing is not to scale. Please provide this set of plans that is to scale. Please see Attachment 1 for details. 4. In previous cases where we have permitted shared driveways, applicants have re-applied and stated that they were unable to sell lots with shared driveways. Please provide some documentation from the current developer stating the lots with a shared driveway can be sold without adding any additional crossings. There will be no further driveway crossing requests for these properties. The buyers will have a shared driveway agreement that will be placed in the deed. This is per developer Steve Gould. 5. The map labelled Tar Pamlico Buffer Impact Map states, "if a dissipater pad is installed at the downstream end of the pipe, it will be 24' long, 8' wide with 36' of 20' Class B rip rap. The PCN and plans do not indicate a rip rap dissipater pad. Please clarify if a dissipater pad will be installed. If so, please indicate the impacts on the PCN and provide plan view and profile plans/drawings indicating the dissipater pad. Please be aware that the project must be designed to meet general condition #2, Aquatic Life Movement. This conditions states all permanent and temporary crossing of waterbodies shall be suitably culverted, bridged or otherwise designed and constructed to maintain low flows to sustain the movement of those aquatic species. Typically, dissipater pads are constructed so the top of the rip rap is even with the existing streambed on the outlet side of the culvert, in order to comply with general condition #2. Please see Attachment 2 for detail. 6. The PCN indicates that the stream(s) to be crossed are perennial. Typically, during installation water within the stream will be diverted around the construction site. As such, temporary fill and/or a temporary diversion channel is placed so that work would occur in the dry. Please provide plans and/or modifications to the PCN and/or drawings, indicating how the crossing(s) will be constructed in the dry. Please see Attachment 3 for details. 7. Please indicate if there are any other culverted stream crossings located within the completed portion of the Ridgemont Subdivision (lots 1-23 and lots 26-35). There are no other culverted stream crossings for this project. There is just one culverted crossing planned. Additional information that will be helpful in expediting the review of this permit application is as follows: 8. Please provide pictures/routine wetland determination data/NCDWR stream forms for the sites numbered 1-3 on the attached map. See Attachment 4 for wetland/stream ID sheets and pictures. Additionally, I have included a revised version of your map with the sites numbered on it. The wrong project area was marked. I have circled the correct project area and included wetland evaluation areas 1 and 2. These areas match the wetland data sheets. Also, I have attached the buffer determination sheet received by the DWQ 9. Please provide a description of the stream habitat and/or mussel survey information at the proposed stream crossing and/or any information regarding potential mussel habitat (Dwarf wedgemussel, Tar River spinymussel) at the proposed crossing(s) location. This information will be used to inform the Threatened and Endangered Species affect determination for Section 7 of the Federal Endangered Species Act. The Nationwide permit verification for this project cannot be finalized until Section 7 consultation is complete. Please see the Endangered Species Review. See Attachment 5 Attachment 1 Stream Crossing Details DISSIPATO D SEE SCHEDULE HW#1 FOR DIMENSIONS _ Sta. 5+7249 n� HW#4 — Rim: 319.93 \ Sta. 5+66.94 Inv. In: 301.00 _ I im: 06.6,5- \ Inv. Out- I In: '/AP1. of STREA IMC NCRETE PACTS: C C PIT 133 LF 1,136 SF / CLEARING LIMITS (0 CONSTRUCTION 06 ENTRANCE / co 4 �- / 1I82 I � I R. T�.Pq 1 I V• ►- �W(#3- ImX .47 \� ta.5+52.84 S FENCE N Inv. Out: 305.00 Rim: 311.33 Inv. Out: 310.00 ► . INSTALLATION NOTES: 1. Culverts 48 inches in diameter or less shall be buried to maintain aquatic passage and to maintain passage during drought or low flow conditions, and every effort shall be made to maintain the existing channel slope. 2. Culverts shall be buried 20% of their nominal diameter below stream bed. 48" culvert shall be 9.6" below stream bed. 18" culvert shall be 3.6" below stream bed. Field verify inverts. Notify engineer of any required adjustments based on field staking. 3. Dissipator pad shall be constructed so the top of the rip rap is even with the existing streambed on the outlet side of the culvert. Graphic Scale �i 00 �—U V) 00 I- U W co coo L U7 3:w m N 2 In }, C/) O o U 1' LUZ U o 2 0 U m LU C) W Z .� m — 0) a� N J Q o z V U . � o 0 -E� z C) LL.)�� r n v L H..L D 4L� LLI 7 `o w z� � W �Z LU LJ- a)>�— �L—Z o) w Cd Cr co M a- Y = (4 cz U TU J-0 o a � N � c'7 _ CY) N CO � U a J D CN zzV o� Z C/)O Z U J D IL ry Q Z z0 U — ry JO W LL 0O z �—U 4_r } U CO • _ 0 m Q }, C/) O o U Ev o m m m m m m m — 0) a� -g o . � o z O� r n v L H..L 0 M a w a p Z O a C C C C C C C W d E E E E E E E 0 E E E E E E E U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z U U U U U U U rn o � NN N N N N N N N Q (6 (6 (6 f0 (6 (6 (6 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H -H -H -U-, J D CN zzV o� Z C/)O Z U J D IL ry Q Z z0 U — ry JO W LL 0O z �—U 4_r CU CO • _ 0 z }, C/) O o U Ev o o E a) >� 2 — 0) a� -g o . � o _0 O� r n v L H..L J D CN zzV o� Z C/)O Z U J D IL ry Q Z z0 U — ry JO W LL 0O z Attachment 2 Dissipater Dad Information INSTALLATION NOTES: 1. Culverts 48 inches in diameter or less shall be buried to maintain aquatic passage and tmaintain passageduring drough or ow flow conditions, and every 1-ffort shall be made to maintain the existing channel slope. 2. Culverts shall be b ied 20% of th minal diameter below - stream bed. 48" culvert shall be 9.6" below stream bed. 18" culvert shall be 3.6" below stream bed. Field verify inverts. Notify engineer of any re uir d adjustrnents based on fi Id staking. 3. Dissipator ad shall The const ucted so Ithe top olf the rip rap is eve with the existing streambed on the outlet side of the culvert. PV1 STA. 5+85.00 PVI ELEV. 3'9.42 LOW PT. STA. +60.64 LOW PT. ELEV. 325.62 K = 71/'x 0 .5` 8^8 V e AD26.39 \ I/ 0 0 0 CD r q:r o co CN coo 3:> =c I i5653=: > > �.JLIVILI V I W max, standard stre h fabric with wire fence SITE AREA DESCRIPTION STABILIZATION 6' max. extra strength fobric without wire ence W Q J PerRneterdikes, swales, ditches, slopes 7 days O � 7 days None post O onto O 0) r� 6 a Pkstic ar u � N 66 Slopes 3:1 or flatter 00 C\I Wire Lir� greater 00 co 14 days + co EMBANKMENT T Lo ED Naturae p U + co ground 1 W Z .r Q SPILLWAY (rrin) J 8" down d 4" J 00. forward along Z Q W the trench (ft) (in) (A W V) SILT FENCE OUTLET SHALL BE PROVIDED IV fabric (A W Wire �� 0 DOWNSTREAM OF SKIMMER OUTLETS. AREA SHALL BE SEEDED AND JUTE MESH INSTALLED {ence F_ CU C.0 'z Cross -Section 0.30 View W Filter 324 Steel fabric Backfill trench post and co r,pact Natural LL thoroughly ground •' •' M ■�• Ire •;• UpSioP¢ LLI (13 min} [�a min (B 24. :. J� U o 20 co 3 8 24 1.45 N Lr) 325.30 18.50 HIM 226 970 Cl) = O - N 0) 0.30 5.6 M � M � U 9.1 18 19.4 84.20 310.00 r - Z Fid M I / 301.00 o 18 3 3 9 C:) Ln Lo o 302.43 326.00 325.30 2287 \ M 6) M + M w \ _ S Cn / \ I/ 0 0 0 CD r q:r o co CN coo 3:> =c I i5653=: > > �.JLIVILI V I SILT FENCE STABILIZATION TIMEFRAMES W max, standard stre h fabric with wire fence SITE AREA DESCRIPTION STABILIZATION 6' max. extra strength fobric without wire ence W Q J PerRneterdikes, swales, ditches, slopes 7 days None Ste el 7 days None post (r,-4 O co O O 0) r� Slopes steeper than 3:1 7 days Pkstic ar u � N wire ties Slopes 3:1 or flatter 14 days 7 days for slopes than 50' in length. Wire Lir� greater fence 14 days None, except for perimeters and HOW Zones. LU EMBANKMENT T Lo ED Naturae p U 5+50 ground 1 W Z .r Q SPILLWAY (rrin) J 8" down d 4" ^�^,, 00. forward along Z 24 the trench (ft) (in) o Filter V) SILT FENCE OUTLET SHALL BE PROVIDED IV fabric BASIN BOTTOM Wire �� 0 DOWNSTREAM OF SKIMMER OUTLETS. AREA SHALL BE SEEDED AND JUTE MESH INSTALLED {ence F_ CU C.0 'z Cross -Section 0.30 View W Filter 324 Steel fabric Backfill trench post and co r,pact Natural LL thoroughly ground •' •' M ■�• Ire •;• UpSioP¢ LLI (13 min} min (B 24. :. J� U o 20 SILT FENCE STABILIZATION TIMEFRAMES (Effective ALIO. 3, 2011) SITE AREA DESCRIPTION STABILIZATION TIMEFRAME EXCEPTIONS W Q J PerRneterdikes, swales, ditches, slopes 7 days None High Quality Water (HQM Zones 7 days None N W O CO (r,-4 O co O O 0) r� Slopes steeper than 3:1 7 days If slopes are 10' or less in length and are not steeper than 2:1. 14 days are allowed. u � N L U'^) V! Slopes 3:1 or flatter 14 days 7 days for slopes than 50' in length. N Cl) M M Lir� greater All other areas with slopes flatter than 4:1 14 days None, except for perimeters and HOW Zones. NO SCALE Pine Outlet to Flat Area- La rea- FILTER OF 1 INCH DIAMETER d 57 WASHED STONE --1 tom: 514T FENCE FABRIC TO OVERLAP HARDWARE CLOTH BY 12 INCHES 1 --SILT FENCE FABRIC ON WIRE FENCE STEEL f1:14CE POST WIRE FENCE HARDWARE CLOTH FILTER OF 1 INCH DIAMETER g 57 WASHED STONE FLOW DIRECTION 18' HARDWARE CLOTH ON WIRE FENCE PLAN VIEW FENCE POST NLm: USE SILT FENCE OUTLETS ONLY WHEN DRAINAGE AREA DOES NOT EXCEED 1/4 ACRE AND THERE 15 A COW AREA, USE ASA REPAIR OF SILT FENCE FAILURES, 1 STEEL FENCE ;;?!,AT!;" OST SET 1 �r Section AA blanket Pipe # a ChaTiel a� ��rrI{ _ �xi.!A! pis i* �._• - WA n„ati FRONT VIEW AND SILT FFNCE FABRIC 6 INCHES INTO --.. THE TRENCH SILT FENCE OUTLET NO SCALE Notes 1. La is the length of the riprap apron. 2. d =1.5 times the maximum stone diameter but nD1 less than 6 3. In awell-defined channel ex- tend the apron up the channel banks to an elevation a1 6' above the maximum tailwater depth or to the top of the bank, whichever is less. 4. A filter blanket or filter fabric should be installed between the riprap and soil foundation. STANDARD DISSIPATOR PAD NO SCALE Excavate channel to design Over -lop 6" min. grade and cross-section +J Design depth Longitudiral '14 anchor trench Overcut channel 2" to a a during seedbed preparatic Typical installation with erosion control blankets or turf reinforcement mats Intermittent check slot Longitudinal anchor trench 5hingle-lap spliced ends or begin new Prepan installi tempi NOTES: 1. Design velocities exceeding 2 ft/sec require temporary blankets, mats or similar liners to protect seed and sail until vegetation becomes established, 2. Grass -lined channels with design velocities exceeding b ft/sec should include turf reinforcement mots EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INSTALLATION DETAIL NO SCALE LINE AND SYMBOL LEGEND SFO SILT FENCE OUTLET U SKIMMER BASIN # 1 BASIN PLAN 1` SEE CHART FOR W Q J "A = a a: j�> 4-0 3" STONE N W O CO (r,-4 O co O U SKIMMER BASIN # 1 BASIN PLAN 1` SEE CHART FOR = U ELEVATIONS AND DIMENSIONS v) 00 O N 4-0 3" STONE N W O CO (r,-4 O co O O 0) r� .0 V! STONE PAD: LU W � N o � N L U'^) V! INSTALL 4'X 4' (O 0-6 N Cl) M M Lir� LJ (� � L LU EMBANKMENT T Lo ED Z p U 5+50 W 1 W Z .r Q SPILLWAY (rrin) J ^�^,, 00. �J Z O L � �D/� W 0 (ft) (in) o LL . Y) V) SILT FENCE OUTLET SHALL BE PROVIDED IV OA BASIN BOTTOM 10 �� 0 DOWNSTREAM OF SKIMMER OUTLETS. AREA SHALL BE SEEDED AND JUTE MESH INSTALLED 7 F_ CU C.0 'z LLl W 0.30 � W cm 324 LU V L LL >O- >Cd M Cr LLI (13 1 = (B CzT U J� U o 20 co 3 8 24 1.45 N Lr) 325.30 18.50 HIM 226 970 Cl) = O - N 0) 0.30 5.6 M � M � U 9.1 18 19.4 84.20 310.00 r - FES cC04 OUTLET DISSIPATOR INLET PROTECTION (E23 FES CL - CL - CL - CL CLEARING LIMITS SIF SIF SF - SF SILT FENCE TDD - TDD - TDD - TDD TEMPORARY DIVERSION X X X X PERIMETER FENCE ROPE CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION SURFACE DEWATERING DEVICE v% SKIMMER BASIN # 1 BASIN PLAN SEE CHART FOR = U ELEVATIONS AND DIMENSIONS O } U 4-0 3" STONE N W O CO BASINS PER STANDARD DETAILS O 0) r� .0 V! STONE PAD: m Q O M L U'^) V! INSTALL 4'X 4' (O EMBANKMENT\\ N Cl) M M • 0 0 z PAD, 3" STONE O N M M N Cl) co co Cl) M co co / EMBANKMENT T Lo ED I 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 1 7+00 7+50 (ft) SPILLWAY (rrin) WATER LEVEL BASIN SECTION ^�^,, 00. - ? (in) tiny (Rlsec) 00 (ft) �D/� W 0 (ft) (in) tin) O V) SILT FENCE OUTLET SHALL BE PROVIDED IV OA BASIN BOTTOM (ft) (EL) �� 0 DOWNSTREAM OF SKIMMER OUTLETS. AREA SHALL BE SEEDED AND JUTE MESH INSTALLED SEE CHART FOR ELEVATIONS AND DIMENSIONS F_ -,EZ 0 0 UPON INSTALLATION. 0.30 104.3 ■ � cm 324 48 23.5 94.00 305.00 V L U) ^, M HIl41 a 301.00 20 35 3 8 24 1.45 5.80 306.80 326.00 325.30 18.50 HIM 226 970 104 w 0) 0.30 5.6 5.6 0.1069 0.0130 9.1 18 19.4 84.20 310.00 p - Z Fid M 301.00 6 18 3 3 9 a 1.43 302.43 326.00 325.30 2287 w wEEEEEEE� U 0000000 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z U U U U U U U rn o � N f6 f6 f0 N f6 f6 f0 O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ SURFACE DEWATERING DEVICE v% SKIMMER BASIN # 1 BASIN PLAN SEE CHART FOR = U ELEVATIONS AND DIMENSIONS O INSTALL BAFFLES AT ALL Lf) Lf) M9 4-0 3" STONE OUTLET: = U INSTALL 2'X 2' DISSIPATOR Q INSTALL BAFFLES AT ALL Lf) Lf) M9 ''^^ 3" STONE N W O CO BASINS PER STANDARD DETAILS O 0) r� .0 V! STONE PAD: aJ CO_O u7 O M L U'^) V! INSTALL 4'X 4' (O EMBANKMENT\\ N Cl) M M • 0 0 z PAD, 3" STONE O N M M N Cl) co co Cl) M co co / EMBANKMENT T Lo ED I 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 1 7+00 7+50 (ft) SPILLWAY (rrin) WATER LEVEL BASIN SECTION ^�^,, 00. - ? (in) tiny (Rlsec) 00 (ft) �D/� W 0 (ft) (in) tin) V) SILT FENCE OUTLET SHALL BE PROVIDED IV OA BASIN BOTTOM (ft) (EL) �� 0 DOWNSTREAM OF SKIMMER OUTLETS. AREA SHALL BE SEEDED AND JUTE MESH INSTALLED SEE CHART FOR ELEVATIONS AND DIMENSIONS 140 -,EZ 0 0 UPON INSTALLATION. 0.30 104.3 ■ � cm 324 48 23.5 94.00 305.00 V L U) ^, HIl41 Horizontal Scale 0 50 100 150 Vertical Scale 0 5 10 15 z Cn O Z U �~ <z z0 U J0 W LL F- 0 z Q !�2O aJ Lf) Lf) M9 L2 O r V V N M N W O CO W W N N O 0) r� O V M N aJ CO_O u7 O M O V) W (O }� N Cl) M M N M M N M M O N M M N Cl) co co Cl) M co co V co co co 70 I 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 (ft) 00 (rrin) (inftr) (ds) (ds) (Rift) (in) tiny (Rlsec) 00 (ft) (ft) (ft) (in) tin) (ft) 0 {ft) (ft) (EL) (EL) (ft) FVA2 48.75 2,470 140 10 7.13 0.30 104.3 104.3 0.0426 0.0130 324 48 23.5 94.00 305.00 V L Horizontal Scale 0 50 100 150 Vertical Scale 0 5 10 15 z Cn O Z U �~ <z z0 U J0 W LL F- 0 z Storm D -d TtaW CidcuMons A sbucture Inlet From To Area Length of V ttershed Height of lAkttershed tc Time of Carp Storm Intensity 25 C For Inlet Area Q Flow (Q=UA) Q Total Flow Slope n= Cain Pipe Siwe Pipe W dl Pipe Invert In Size Length Bev. Inv. OLd Ellev. CBTop Bev. stone Sive Disdpatar Pad Pad Pad lhdaww Zone Wtdtl Pad LaVM MN HWD Depth NCDOT Cross Pipe Depth Sevaallon HW CL Shoulder BLtifer (ac) (ft) 00 (rrin) (inftr) (ds) (ds) (Rift) (in) tiny (Rlsec) 00 (ft) (ft) (ft) (in) tin) (ft) eft) {ft) (ft) (EL) (EL) (ft) FVA2 48.75 2,470 140 10 7.13 0.30 104.3 104.3 0.0426 0.0130 324 48 23.5 94.00 305.00 NA HIl41 301.00 20 35 3 8 24 1.45 5.80 306.80 326.00 325.30 18.50 HIM 226 970 104 5 8.32 0.30 5.6 5.6 0.1069 0.0130 9.1 18 19.4 84.20 310.00 NA Fid M 301.00 6 18 3 3 9 0.95 1.43 302.43 326.00 325.30 2287 Horizontal Scale 0 50 100 150 Vertical Scale 0 5 10 15 z Cn O Z U �~ <z z0 U J0 W LL F- 0 z Attachment 3 Work Around Drawing HW#1 \ Sta. 5+7219 Rim: 319.93 \/ Inv. In: 301.00 Inv. Ou DISSIPATOR PAD SEE SCHEDULE FOR DIMENSIONS HW#4 CLEARI ITS Sta.5+66.94 llm: 06. / SILT FENC In: CONC ETE Pi. 0/ WASH IT I / /8" F li M I CONSTRUCTION NCE J - 12iin�32�:47 Inv. Out: 305.00 6" SUCTION ENERi' I)ISSIPilli k DEVVTERINCE DEVICE k, T- NP;i Ii TO A1,101 OFA ALL }LJb,7 "La AND PI aC5 SE-CLl ?L -LY 9 f C'•J4"� � ti � � { 00 r� IMPERV Q 101 1 � � r w4�GTIC'f,III�� -Dry OF Bee%li y fr` I ffl!'t il-wi l iL L i IVYili ARF,A NCDEQ STREAM DIVERSION DETAIL NO SCALE Specification Data ACDEU Priming Assisted Centrifugal Pump Diesel Engine Driven Aut SUNBELT Quiet FIowTM Sound Attenuated Pump RF.I.f n F•11. -M .F VU{{'ISK SP.RYI['P.$ Size 12" x 12" 2003 Rental Soultions Guide PAGE 4&5 PUMP SPECIFICATIONS Capacity of Pump in U.S. Gallon Total Head per Minute (GPM) at Continuous Casing: Gray Iron No. 30. Maximum Operating Pressu re 71 psi and includes a Nitrile tube P.S.I. Feet performance 50.0 115 1550 1550 1550 1550 1550 43.4 100 2500 3200 3200 3200 3200 34.7 80 3100 4300 5000 5300 5300 26.0 60 3200 4400 5200 5800 6300 17.3 40 3350 4500 5300 5950 6500 8.7 20 3500 4650 5400 6000 6500 Suction Lift 25' 20' 15' Liquid Level Controls: (Plug and Play) Single and Double Float Controls Panel Includes: Tachometer, Hourmeter, Coola 2003 Rental Soultions Guide PAGE 4&5 PUMP SPECIFICATIONS Snap-Tite Discharge Hose Size: 12" x 12" (305 mm x 345 rnm) Flanges. features a "lay -flat" design Casing: Gray Iron No. 30. Maximum Operating Pressu re 71 psi and includes a Nitrile tube (5 kglcrn?)." and cover coupled with , • • Enclosed Type, Three Vane Impeller: Ductile Iron No. 60-40-18. Handles PA12A60-B-6068T SHOWN 3" (76 mm) Diameter Spherical Solids. end (male x female), with ;r ' Impeller Shaft: Stainless Steel No. 17-4 PH. Replaceable Wear Rings: Impeller -Ductile Iron No. 80-60-03. two stainless steel band Suction Head - Bronze No. C83600. rr/' RNINGI Seal Plate: Gra y Iron No. 30. (2" and 3" I.Q. hose has only one band clamp at each end)_ Bearing Housing: Gra y Iran No. 30. Do not use in explosive atmosphere or for pumping Seal: Mechanical, Oil -Lubricated, Double Floating, Self -Aligning. Silicon volatile flammable liquicis. Carbide Rotating and 5tationaryFaces.Stainless Steel No.3165tationary Seat. Fluorocarbon (DuPont Vitd►'r or Equivalent) and Buna -N E las to- 155.0890 mers. Stainless Steel No. 18-8 Cage and Spring. Maximum TemperatuENGINE SPECIFICATIONS of Liquid Pumped 160F (71_C). q Model: Jahn Deere 6068T "Power Tech'. "Consult Factory for Applications Exceeding Maximum Pressure andlor Type: Six Cylinder, Four Cycle, Turliharged, LiqUi 11 Temperature indicated. Cooled Diesel Engine. Shaft Sleeve: Stainless Steel No. 304. Displacement: 414 Cu. In, (6,8 liter). Priming Chamber: Gra y Iron No. 30. Governor: Mec hanical. Discharge Check Valve: Gray Iron No. 30 Housing; Buna-N Flapper. Lubrication: Forced Circulation. Radial Bearing: Single Row Roller. Air Cleaner? Dry Type. Thrust Bearing: Open Double Ba II. Oil Reservoir: 20 U.S. Qts. (19 liter) Dry; Bearing Lubrication: Oil. 19 U.S. Qts. (18 liter) Refill. Flanges: Gra y Iron No. 30. Fuel Tank: 320 U.S. Gals. (647 liter). Gaskets: Vegetable Fiber, Resistant Sy nthetic Rubber, and Cork. Full Load Operating Time: 52 1 0 Rings: Buna-N. Starter: 12V EI Pct ric. Hardware: Standard Plated Steel. Standard Features: Low Oil Pres SUFeand High Coolan Bearing and Seal Cavity Oil Level Sight Gauges. Temperature Safety Shut Down Switches. Instrume t Liquid Level Controls: (Plug and Play) Single and Double Float Controls Panel Includes: Tachometer, Hourmeter, Coola 20 Temperature Gauge, Oil Pressure Gaug e, Verni *50 Ft. (15 m) Standard Length; 150 Ft- (4Sm)Maximum; Specify Length at Throttle Control, On/Off Key Switch, and Ammet Time of Order. Mufflerw/Guard and Weather Cap. Mechanical, Standard Equipment. HoistingBail. Skid Base (Environmental Skid), Oil -Lubricated Seals allow running dry continuously JOHN DEERE PUBLISHED PERFORMANCE: Strainer. Gear- Driven Air Compressor. Maximum Continuous BHP 153 (114 kW) (@ 2500 RPM Optional Equipment: Battery. Maximum Dynamic BHP 170 (127 1 LR 2500 RPM THE GORMAN-RUPP COMPANY MANS FIELD , OHIO It0111t1MNiP GORMAN-RUPP OF CANADA LIMITED ST, THOMAS, ONTARIO, CANADA PUMPS Specikaticns 5ubjectto Change WOW Notice Printed in U.S. DIVERSION PUMP DETAILS NO SCALE W 'L 0 1n U U CL a HOSE AND FITTINGS SPECS FOR LATERAL PUMPING SYSTEMS Kanaflex Suction Hose is ideal for heavy-duty fluid handling) Snap-Tite Discharge Hose applications. It is very durable and lightweight, constructed of features a "lay -flat" design corrugated PVC hose with smooth bare coupled galvanized and includes a Nitrile tube RaLler-type fittings at each end (male x fen ie}, and cover coupled with , • • with two spiral bolt clamps at Bauer -type fittings at each a a each end. Each hose includes end (male x female), with ;r ' closure, bail, socket, and ring. two stainless steel band Hose Strainers are also clamps and one T -Bolt clamp at each end available for each size of hose. (2" and 3" I.Q. hose has only one band clamp at each end)_ LD. Lemig SUCTION! Max. PSI 6larneter Cat -Class 2' to 50 11 Its. 155.0875 r 20' so 18 Its. 155-0880 Y 10' 50 1911 155.0885 r 21Y 50 31 Its_ 155.0890 f 16' 40 33161. 155-0895 r 26 40 50 Its. 155.0900 6' 16' 35 71 Its. 155.0965 6- 20• 35 1i9 its. 155.0916 r fly 30 99 lbs- 155.0915 a' 26' 30 155lbs. 155-1020 16' fly 20 151 Its. 155.6925 12' 19 20 294 its. I 155 0930 Note: 12" siictian)lose 1S Y8Ci1dY1T ruUxr,, not CLIraga1W PVC Bauer -Type Carnlack Fittings Fittings Sunbelt Rentals offers an extensive inventory of Bauer -Type and Camlock fittings to adapt hoses and piping to existing customer installations. tD. Length Max. PSI 6larneter HOSE STRAINERS vmght Cat -Class 2` 2 IDS_ 155-M n r 2 IDS. 155.0940 a" 3 Ds. 155-4945 6 7 K 155.0950 8 9 1 155.0955 10' 31111 1$5-0964 12' 42 rbs_ 155.0965 Bauer -Type Carnlack Fittings Fittings Sunbelt Rentals offers an extensive inventory of Bauer -Type and Camlock fittings to adapt hoses and piping to existing customer installations. tD. Length Max. PSI Weigh cal -class 2" 50' 160 21165. 153.0975 3" 59 100 39165. 155-M 4" 25' 1W 35105. 155A9115 4" 50' 100 5516s. 155.0990 6" 25' 75 58165. 155-rf995 6" 5e 75 90 lbs. 155.1000 8" 25' 50 98 lbs. 155.1065 s" 50' 50 168 lbs. 155.1010 JVaie: Lay -Flat dscharge hose is ivl 5atabk, foihf7 i -pressure appkaoons such as forcemain sewer bypasses. Wilcox Composite Hose is designed for high-pressure applications such as forcemain sewer bypasses. It is also chemical resistant, flexible, and lightweight. Each hose is coupled with steel, full -face flanges. Note. 12" hose Wed obwe is high-pressue mbar (not l iicox). DIVERSION PUMP DETAILS NO SCALE SUNBELT RENTALB PUMP & POWER SERVICES Pump Elevation 310 ft Suction elevation 305 ft Discharge elevation I D. Length Max_ PSI might W-C4'tss 4- 10' 250 105165. 155-10M 4- 2a 250 16016s. 150035 6" 11 250 145165, 155-1040 6- 29 250 220 IDS 155.1045 8" 10' 250 2271D5. 1511150 8" 20' 250 346165, 155-1455 1 12" 1U 150 525 IDS. 1,; -_i W Note. 12" hose Wed obwe is high-pressue mbar (not l iicox). DIVERSION PUMP DETAILS NO SCALE SUNBELT RENTALB PUMP & POWER SERVICES Pump Elevation 310 ft Suction elevation 305 ft Discharge elevation 301 ft Suction pipe 6 in Suction length 30 ft Discharge pipe 8 in Discharge length 100 ft Suction static head 5 It Discharge static head -9 ft Pump flowrate 500 gpm min N 1500 gpm max DIVERSION PUMP DETAILS NO SCALE Graphic Scale 20' 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' U \ �`\ G •.......... M`V 00 C/) _W: �Sao 4_0 V) N Q, _ �> O Z ■O 7Ej U Of N 0 U M`V 00 C/) �U pIz 4_0 () �11 a �> O Z ■O 7Ej U Of N 0 N r n W LLI C N o m w J Z M U uJ U Zo o it LULu J Z } Q Q N o Z �L i c Z S oILL �} N NLOW M M a 0 ^W Lu Z LU aSr'z w LL (D >rnCZ - o ��w z �- �_ M cid> V J� U o a t- 00 N M j ! M� co v U o 0 0 N 0 0 U M`V O C/) �U pIz 4_0 0 C: � �> O Z ■O 7Ej U 0 O2 N z 0 a a W o z �- o a U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z U U U U U U U o M f6 l0 f0 f6 f6 l0 f0 � Cn M`V O C/) �U pIz 4_0 0 C: U) �> O Z ■O 7Ej U Cn a) C/) a) 0 4_0 0 C: U) ■ - D•C: 0 O2 N ca ELL 70C 0 W 7 4_0 0 C: U) V H Z C/)0 Z U J � �ry �U) �Z Qz Z U - ry J 0 Lu LL �0 Z Attachment 4 Wetland Datasheets Pictures Buffer Determination Sheet by DWQ WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: Ki dA6YrwrtA City/County: �� /) Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: 6 iGV ('7,su C State: N C Sampling Point: j Investigator(s): STPD' k,5 I Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 'yS Subregion (LRR or MLRA): f Lat: 3 4S ,<,030L/ Long:-&. 5-01213S-2 S W ?- Datum: SP �f �L Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:.no+ i dt&,f t -J Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No,","' (If no, explain In Remarks.) / Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yesy No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No V Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (66) _ Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) —Drainage Patterns (610) _ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316) _ Water Marks (61) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (82) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (63) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Iron Deposits (135) _ Geomorphic Position (132) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (134) _ Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No `/ Depth (Inches): Water Table Present? Yes No �_ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No _vl Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: �U-- L� US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: L (7,� C� ) ° Cover Species? Status 2.j�} j I.tli U G —+- 3.DYn6 m 4. 5. = Total Cover C� 50% of total cover: O�a,) 20% of total cover: / Sapling Stratum (Plot size: -4 0. 57 C 6 ) 3. _ 0_ - -3 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: j) 20% of total cover: Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 0 . 5 d e_ ) 2. 3. 4. = Total Cover Samplinq Point: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species ' That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Q " 1 (AIB) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species_ x2= FAC species '� �i x3= V FACU species ? x4= 1-4 a UPL species x5= Column Totals: (A)2 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3 , �7- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Plot size: �-�. i �G Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, Herb Stratum ( ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. n p �f1LLr (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 8. iE _ = Total Cover 50% of total cover: _ G 20% of total cover:_ Woody �Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1.-a�,' ,Qy� - �c) f�F� 6, P� 2. Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic _ = Total Cover Vegetation % 50% of total cover: L 20% of total cover: 2 • (I Present? Yes No Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) I-<� �, z- = '-41 1 Dom, l / hob S FARtP.m Mnunt ins and PiPdmnnt - Version 2.0 SOIL l Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features finches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks �-5 o yRz S-/,IL5 LFS S- /9 s -s 0/11) ILs7-✓ SaX 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (37) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if /obsrved): Type: �9r+avcf �/rX Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No� Remarks: /I/o �yalric Ys. �GZI�Y! 4e�`y //%L'/52W. �" �e-�` � �d ri Clio✓e �r'�yvtvt �.�7a-s'1n`�•' � 1�� {erns beech I/'eci ireenbrier Vl r 4"1.,., Cv'eye'r^ Xa oil%4 fie, Grud� ati- �� Guc,c,ML, __ I'UlQ�rw�ti� 4• r;�,,,,t 174)1 1 'G Ixlebd US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: P eiyi.- ?t City/County: { YlAlk6 n Sampling Date: 4� :�- Applicant/Owner: 5kyt.- Cs', J State: ML Sampling Point: aD 9 Investigator(s): PPS. kms. �i?1 Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):SI' < s(s p� Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): S Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L Lata.l �tn'aot4 u a 35-1 Long: ✓ZK.`5�«� �j 8100 Datum: JO,ce, nim Soil Map Unit Name: WLI kf-- iJ kAe—rCQZ NWI classification: i'I,oj- •rd(rtfiE-2 Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: 5u P I `mow, fi q tz- 9 qb HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) _ Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) —Drainage Patterns (610) _ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (616) _ Water Marks (61) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Iron Deposits (65) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Water -Stained Leaves (69) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) _ Aquatic Fauna (613) _ FAC -Neutral Test (135) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: G 0 �Q C� ) % Cover S ecies? Status 1. kf-d ()1ro lc, ?-J FAc- 2. iN N' r. da L 10 fA-(tx- 3.f%iC,IC0M - Sl &Akt- �rdttL Total Cover 50% of total cover: JD 20% of total cover: 1A Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 1. fbYtl bt-a-n G 2. POW1 ' iLn Rn L I - - �— v F:C,U. 3. I S = Total Cover Sampling Point: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species lr That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x2= FAC species x3= Ld FACU species l' x4= 3b D UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: Ta- (B) 3 "! Prevalence Index = B/A = . 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: — 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size: C 0 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 1 — 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0' 2 — 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 3. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) — 4. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 5. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:_ Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1- Lbn s -f rr-" 41.-, Lb 3. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 0 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: - Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic / 10 = Total Cover 9Vegetation 50% of total cover: J 20% of total cover: Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Sem ,0 ,z *f — — -I,�-" p tL--tt to ��-(✓S US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the k C/q /a�g Sampling Point_ Depth �inches _ 0-1 Matrix Redox Features Texture Remarks L PS Color moist Ion Y 4 % Color (moist) % Type Loc 1 4-19 7.5yj2s4 cbo rsL, 1 -Zo 7. S��sq /o o �2v -z /a Y2 S/19 �oYf� Q/ zo �o (s frr�r%s nc-r{{�n �3T �tr'eG�w �2po�S'�'t — Ytb'�' rec�a�C basea�• �grSl- �'l�urc,� ager: 25-3 jou LFs_1 y2 ! YZ �� l�6 uKli72Ss �nd�cQ�r�B D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) ` Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): sail2e as � / _ Dark Surface (S7) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ` Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ` Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (1713) (MLRA 136, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) _ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) f7e e 9 �i f aha ve S- '-Pf5l m Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes Noy US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0 - IA' )6c W. Iv '01 ' Yjm nc- j A 17i N_ W_ 414 i �7 � r r - Y �- -4 I MM y +ems 6 y 1-4 Picture S -Sample 2 Upper Canopy Picture 6 Sample 2 Location/Saplings/Herbs Project Coordinates: SAW -2018-01618 Project Area N 36.135791 N, -78.501916W (Ridgemont, LLC/Ridgemont Subdivision)W E Point #1 36.136452 N, -78.501235 W NC State Plane Ft S' a Ar MkAw- I 1 _ SAW -2018-01618 t 1 • 2 r• - ,r # t 3 r .7 M � r Legend USA Topo Maps Copyright:© 2013 Nation Geographic Society, i -cubed, NC Counti /, N cCGIAC OneMap, US EPA 0 500 1,000 2,000 ' Feet Reviewed on: U.S. Army corps Date: 8/10/2018 of Engineers@ Water Resources ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY July 25, 2018 Ridgemont LLC - Attn: Steve Gould 833-A Wake Forest Business Park ' Wake Forest, NC 27587 ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN Secreta y LINDA CULPEPPER Interim Director Subject: Buffer Determination Letter TPBRRO #18-239 Franklin County Determination Type - Buffer Intermittent/Perennial ❑ Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233) Start@ . ® Tor -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259) F1 Intermittent/Perennial Determination (where local buffer USGS To o ordinances apply) ❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 213 .0267) (governmental and/or interjurisdictional Throughout projects) Project Name: Address/Location: Stream(s): Ridgemont End of Naxos Way, Ridgemont Subdivision, Franklinton, NC UT to Middle Creek Determination Date: July 24, 2015 Staff: Stephanie Goss Stream E/I/P* Not Subject Subject Start@ . Stop@ Soil Survey USGS To o A X Throughout X *EIIIP = Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial Explanation: The stream(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey of Franklin County, North Carolina and/or the most recent.copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each stream that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined to not be at least intermittent or is not present. Streams that are checked "Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be at least an intermittent stream. There may be other streams located on the property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but may be considered jurisdictional according to; the US Army Corps of Engineers. This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DVM may 'request a determination by the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty' (60) days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing._ If sending' via US Postal Service: 'c/o Karen Higgins, DWR — 401 & BufferPermitting Unit; 1617 Mail. Service Center; Raleigh, XC 2 7699-1617. If sending via Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section http://portal.ncdenr.oig/web/wd/ops 1628 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone: (919) 791-4200 Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: (919) 788-7159 Ridgemont Franklin County July 25, 2018 Page 2 of 2 delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.): Karen Higgins; DWR — 401 & Buffer Permittinn Unit; 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604. This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within sixty (60) days. This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884. If you have questions regarding this rminati n, please feel free to contact Stephanie Goss at (919)791-4256. Sin rely, Danny Smith Supervisor, ter Quality Regional Operations Center cc: RRO DWR File Copy Julie Davidson via e-mail at jdavidsonAat riwaste.com wtv g� *� r e rC 18-239: Ridgemont 41� Stream A: Subject i ► R �i7. .egend: Approximate project boundary: 54,411h, Map provided by NCDEQ Division of Water Resources Locations are approximate and are provided for reference only :: 18-239: Ridgemont Stream A not 4-jc depicted on map )9,-78.5072 5TA1Fo. J Map provided by NCDEQ Division of Water Resources Legend: FM y Locations are approximate -Approximate project boundary:- y ✓ I' d 'V and are provided for reference only :: ANVr Engineers and Soil Scientists Agri -Waste Technology, Inc. 501 N. Salem St. Suite 203 Apex NC 27502 P: 919.859.0669 www.agriwaste.com Project Site Soils Map Ridgemont Subdivision Steve Gould Franklin Co., NC N IMPORTANT NOTES: 1. Stream Crossing is not to scale. 2. This stream is an un -named tributary to Middle Creek. 3. This driveway crossing is proposed to impact - 64 linear feet of stream. 4. This project is located in Floodzone ID X which means it is not inside a 100 yr. floodplain. 5. This project is necessary to gain access to lots 24 and 25. It is intended to be a shared driveway for these lots. 6. The planned shared driveway is designed as a DOT Q25 with headwalls to minimize impacts. 7. CAD drawing was provided by Cawthorne, Moss, and Panciera, P.C. Professional Land Surveyors DrawnDavidson eviewed By: Jeff Vaughan _ �• fI'. , - - �'t y i' = - _`_ - _"c 1W - 7. ,,..- '�_• ,J - UUU Sig ft 1� !a irr _. ,♦� , ' , � ���+i S L=. a+ ,�l �l� •1 �- 'V`">.,F f ..'�'• -r- PA �3;A14:sq•f �0;38�'g�y,�/♦��'fr i — 1 . I r ll. '/ F`� ., °4 ° V a i 4 \ t � ' 7 �' V\! -_Ay •` 0 �98', `-''-� }Vt I $ eti /+/ '��{ - - i `,:r�♦� y t .`,ica= v q i° �u,te'xtu - _IJU} '.,�ji t3�.a� �'fJerJ.90 M w°�l'Iff,a,e (i! - �• :.. �,>Q,�¢ .y„• 45 � C Al' V. !'• ;�J�, i 1 +p�, qtr ` �,�� �• �"tR °'^`y, '�..�e�" � � y 910 9 i✓ � � 1 • r C3rg�5.Sq?� t %-• 01 rc'` t _/ , a y.f l :k' ' if ,�4 �w.� � �� .�� y � � / � • � � _ ��•'�i^4���. 4r t t '°` r?*,\ ti .3 ��a. --1 \ ai.' �4 �•• ' f —� � n• "�• - - 39,OQCr SOL a4 a0., ij, t 4/ 0.,746 ° '1 .689,' A .- �g3 6%Qr� s�13 � .� `,EVA V. • �/ .; jfy ..yam �_ f / ♦ y' i 1 f ` .. 76 S. AC, Ji` , .. ...-. AIR Legend a alp' >' Stream Crossing v (D Parcel 4r Soil Types Web Soil Surve _ - ' yp y� i J F' / ` ; :'r 45 90 x180 7 270 360 t t , .;,� . Fee f- -tib' '.. t Mformi sis —This map was created for proposed planning purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a plat or survey map of any type.— Agri -Waste Technology, Inc. 501 N. Salem St. Suite 203 Apex NC 27502 P: 919.859.0669 www.agrimste.com Project Site USGS Topographic Map Steve Gould Franklin Co., NC N IMPORTANT 1. Stream Crossing is not to "PD scale. 2. This stream is an un -named tributary to Middle Creek. 3. This driveway crossing is proposed to Impact - 64 linear feet of stream. 4. This project is located in Floodzone ID X which means it is not inside a 100 yr. floodplain. - 5. This project is necessary to gain access to lots 24 and 25. It Is intended to be a shared driveway forthese lots 6. The planned shared driveway is designed as a DOT 025 with headwalls to minimize impacts. 7. CAD drawing was provided by Cawthome, Moss, and Fancier P.C. Professional Land Surveyors A' {{ Y. a� f `l �• � 1 .if ♦ �1 1 'z lex.. A, .. b.. SI"E DATA 62.5 125 -500 250 375 Fa -- This map was created for proposed planning purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a plat or survey map of any type.— Julie Davidson United States Department of the Interior Agri -Waste Technology, Inc. 501 N. Salem St., Suite 203 Apex, NC 27502 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Raleigh ES Field Office Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 October 9, 2018 Re: Ridgemont Subdivision — Franklin County, NC Dear Mrs. Davidson: This letter is to inform you that the Service has established an on-line project planning and consultation process which assists developers and consultants in determining whether a federally -listed species or designated critical habitat may be affected by a proposed project. For future projects, please visit the Raleigh Field Office's project planning website at https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html. If you are only searching for a list of species that may be present in the project's Action Area, then you may use the Service's Information, Planning, and Consultation System (IPaQ website to determine if any listed, proposed, or candidate species may be present in the Action Area and generate a species list. The IPaC website may be viewed at https://ecos.fws.gov/ii)ac/. The IPaC web site contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), a list of federal species of concern' that are known to occur in each county in North Carolina, and other resources. Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized, funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or ' The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to federal species of concern. evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the web site often for updated information or changes. If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys. If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects, before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles. With regard to the above -referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act. Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action. However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species, including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction. Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction site and any nearby down -gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site. The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality. 2 We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary). We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at (919) 856-4520 ext. 26. Sincer ly, / W to Benjamin Field Supervisor Attachment 5 Fish Wildlife Service Section 7