810002_Complete File - Historical_20190213

Dear Javan Calton,
John E. Skvarla, III`
Secretary
Calton Dairy Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Rutherford County
Reference is made to your request for rescission of the subject animal waste permit with the
submission of a completed Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form on
April 12, 2013. Staff from our Regional Office has confirmed that this Coverage is no longer
required. Therefore, in accordance with your request, Certificate of Coverage No. AWI810002
is rescinded, effective immediately.
If, in the future, you wish again to operate an animal waste management system you must first
apply for and receive a new animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage. Operating an animal
waste management system without a valid animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage will
subject the responsible party to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day.
Please contact the Asheville Regional Office at [phone] if it would be helpful to discuss
this matter further.
Sincerely,
Thomas A. Reeder
cc: Asheville Regional -Office; Aquifer -Protection -Sec_ tion _
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Rutherford County Soil & Water Conservation District
Fran McPherson, DWQ Budget Office Please waive any overdue fees
Permit File AWI810002 I �'S g Qd�
AUlG 131013 J
Asl'leville Regional Office
---Aquifer Protection
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699=1636
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] NorthCaroUa
Internet: www.ncwatemualitv.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer r 6 `
MCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory
Thomas A. Reeder
Governor
Director
August 9, 2013
Javan Calton
-
Calton Dairy Farm
660 Calton Road
Bostic, NC 28018
Subject: Permit No. AWI810002
Dear Javan Calton,
John E. Skvarla, III`
Secretary
Calton Dairy Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Rutherford County
Reference is made to your request for rescission of the subject animal waste permit with the
submission of a completed Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form on
April 12, 2013. Staff from our Regional Office has confirmed that this Coverage is no longer
required. Therefore, in accordance with your request, Certificate of Coverage No. AWI810002
is rescinded, effective immediately.
If, in the future, you wish again to operate an animal waste management system you must first
apply for and receive a new animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage. Operating an animal
waste management system without a valid animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage will
subject the responsible party to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day.
Please contact the Asheville Regional Office at [phone] if it would be helpful to discuss
this matter further.
Sincerely,
Thomas A. Reeder
cc: Asheville Regional -Office; Aquifer -Protection -Sec_ tion _
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Rutherford County Soil & Water Conservation District
Fran McPherson, DWQ Budget Office Please waive any overdue fees
Permit File AWI810002 I �'S g Qd�
AUlG 131013 J
Asl'leville Regional Office
---Aquifer Protection
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699=1636
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] NorthCaroUa
Internet: www.ncwatemualitv.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer r 6 `

Certificate of Coverage A�,- 810002 _
Calton Dairy
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
-.-the DWQ prior to a name change.or change'in ownership. --- - - -
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Asheville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] .ext. 502.
/Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
RutherfordCounty Health Department
,Ashe-v llezRegional;Officel-Water-Quality=Se -xionr
Rutherford County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

Javan Calton
Calton Dairy
660 Calton Rd
Bostic NC 28018
Dear Javan Calton:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 1, 2004
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
2004 C�
GpW,A1ER SECTION
F�OUNL OFFICE
ASHEVILLE REGIONA
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC810002
Calton Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System ,
Rutherford County
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on January 30, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Javan
Calton, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC810002 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Calton Dairy, located in Rutherford County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 300 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of.animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please gay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section -Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone] / Internet: li2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
North
Apt

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically -transferable. A-name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to,a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Asheville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information_ concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone]. .
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Asheville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Rutherford County Health Department
Rutherford, County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC810002
APS Central Files

Michael F. Easley, G
William G. Ross Jr., Si
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Re
Coleen H. Sullins, I
Division of Water
March 28, 2008 a. E C E I V E
Javan Calton APR 18 2008
Calton Farms
660 Calton Road Asheville Regional Office
Bostic, NC 28018 A uifer Protection
Subject: Permit No. AW1810002
Calton Farms.
Animal Waste Management System
Rutherford County
Dear Javan Calton:
In accordance with your March 14, 2008 permit modification request, we are hereby forwarding to you
this Permit issued to Javan Calton authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management
system. You had requested to drop the animal population at this facility to zero until such time as the
waste storage lagoon at this facility is properly closed, as you no longer wished to maintain it as an active
cattle farm.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system'including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste structures on the Javan Calton Farm, with an annual capacity of no greater than an
annual average of 0 milk cows.
The Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until February 29, 2013 and replaces the COC No.
AWC810002 issued to this facility on October 1, 2004. You are authorized and required to operate the
system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the Permit. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in number of animals authorized by this Permit (as provided
above) will require a CAWMP and a modification to this Permit and must be completed prior to actual
increase in number of animals.
Please carefully read this Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping. and reporting.
The issuance of this Permit does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all
applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, or federal) nor convey any property rights,
in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T. 0111(c), a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards, a 100 -ft separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwatergualiiy.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer -50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
No°e Carolina
Aiura!!y
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

n
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and"conditions specified in this Permit may result in
revocation of this Permit or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C, the
Clean Water Act, and 40 CFR 122.4 1, including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under this Permit after the expiration date of this Permit, an
application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days .prior to expiration.
This Permit is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application,must be submitted to
the Division prior to a.name change or change in ownership.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Asheville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal -Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (Record -Keeping Forms Package)
cc: Rutherford County Health Department
Rutherford County Soil and Water Conservation District
rAsheville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS070047

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
INDIVIDUAL CATTLE ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Javan Calton
Rutherford County
FOR:THE
continued operation and maintenance.of an animal waste management system for the Javan Calton Farm
(Facility), located in.Rutherford County, consisting of 0 (zero) milking cows and the application to .land
as specified in the Facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
following specified conditions and limitations:
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The animal waste management system operated under this Permit shall be effectively
maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of pollutants
to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. Application of waste to terraces and grassed
waterways is acceptable as long as it is applied in accordance with Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) Standards and does not result in a discharge of waste to
surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. If the Facility has a discharge of waste that reaches
surface waters or wetlands resulting from a storm event more severe than a 25 -year, 24-
hour storm, it will not be considered to be in violation of this Permit, as long as the
Facility is in compliance with its CAWMP and this Permit.
2. No discharge of waste shall result in a violation of the water quality standards established
for receiving waters as per Title 15A, Subchapter 2B, Section .0200 of 'the North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC) and Title 15A, Subchapter 2L of the NCAC.
3. The facility's CAWMP is hereby incorporated by reference into this Permit. The
CAWMP must be consistent with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances, and standards
(federal; state and local) in effect at the time of siting. design, and certification of the
Facility.
4. Any proposed increase or modification to the annual average that exceeds the thresholds
set by North Carolina General Statues (NCGS) 143-215.1OB(1) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and the Permit prior to modification of the Facility.

Animal waste shall not be applied within one hundred (100) feet of an}
exception of monitoring wells. The allowable distance to monitoring wells shall be
established on a case-by-case basis by the Division.
II. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REOUIREMENTS
1. The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and the land application equipment and
fields shall be properly operated properly and maintained at all times.
2. A vegetative cover shall be maintained as specified in the Facility's CAWMP on all land
application fields and buffers in accordance with the CAWMP. No waste shall be
applied upon areas not included in the CAWMP.
3. Soil pH on all land application fields must be maintained in the optimum range for crop
production.
4. Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern for the receiving
crop. In no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff
during any given application event.
5. If manure or sludges are applied on conventionally tilled, bare soil, the waste shall be
incorporated into the soil within two (2) days after application on the land. This
requirement does not apply to no -till. fields, pastures, or fields where crops are actively
growing.
Pesticides, toxic chemicals, and petroleum products shall not be disposed of in the animal
waste management system.
7. Domestic and/or industrial wastewater from showers, toilets, sinks, etc. shall not be
discharged into the animal waste management system. Washdown of stock trailers
owned by and used to transport animals to and from the Facility only will be permissible
as long as the system has been evaluated and approved to accommodate the additional
volume. Only those cleaning agents and soaps that are EPA -approved according to their
labels, will not harm the cover crop, and will not contravene the groundwater standards
listed in 15A NCAC 2L may be utilized in the Facility covered by this Permit.
Instruction labels are to be followed when using cleaning agents and soaps.
8. Disposal of dead animals resulting from normal mortality rates associated with the
Facility shall be done in accordance with the Facility's CAWMP and the North Carolina
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS) Veterinary Division's
statutes and regulations.
9. Unless accounted for in temporary storage volume, all uncontaminated runoff from the
surrounding property and buildings shall be diverted away from the waste
lagoons/storage ponds to prevent any unnecessary addition to the liquid volume in the
structures.

A protective, vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all earthen
lagoon/storage pond embankments (outside We of embankment to maximum pumping
elevation), berms, pipe runs, and diversions to surface waters or wetlands. Trees, shrubs,
and other woody vegetation. shall not be allowed to grow on the lagoon/storage pond
embankments. All trees shall be removed in accordance with good engineering practices.
Lagoon/storage pond areas shall be accessible, and vegetation shall be kept mowed. .
11. At the time of sludge removal from a lagoon/storage pond, the sludge must be managed
in accordance with the CAWMP. When removal of sludge from the lagoon is necessary,
provisions must be taken to prevent damage to the lagoon dikes and liner.
12. Lagoons/storage ponds shall be kept free of foreign debris including, but not limited to,
tires, bottles, light bulbs, gloves, .syringes or any other solid waste.
13. The Facility must have at least one of the following items at all times: (a) adequate
animal waste application and handling equipment, (b) a lease, or other written agreement,
for the use of the necessary equipment, or (c) a contract with a third party applicator
capable of providing adequate waste application.
14. No waste shall be applied iri wind conditions that might reasonably be expected to cause
the mist to. reach surface waters or wetlands.
15. The. Permittee shall maintain buffer strips or.other equivalent practices as specified in the
Facility's CAWMP near•feedlots, manure storage areas, and land application areas.
16.. Waste shall not be applied on land that is flooded, saturated with water, frozen, or snow
covered at the time of land application.
17. Land application of waste is prohibited during precipitation events., The Permittee shall
consider pending weather conditions in making the decision to land apply waste.
18. Land application activities shall cease on any application site that exceeds a Mehlich 3
Soil Test Index for Copper of greater than 3,000 (108 pounds per acre) or Zinc of greater
than 3,000 (213 pounds per acre).
19. Any major structural repairs to lagoons/storage ponds must have written documentation .
from a technical specialist certifying proper design and installation. However, if a piece
of equipment is being replaced with a piece of equipment of the identical specifications,
no technical specialist approval is necessary [i.e. piping, reels, valves, pumps (if the
gallons per minute (gpm) capacity is not being increased or decreased), etc.] unless the
replacement involves disturbing the lagoon/storage.pond embankment.
M. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. An inspection of the animal waste collection, treatment, and storage structures, and
runoff control measufes shall be conducted and documented at a frequency to insure
proper operation For example, lagoons/storage ponds, and other structures should be
inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage, damage by animals or discharge.

2.
Highly visible waste -level gauges shall be maintained to mark the level of
lagoon storage pond that does not gravity feed through a free flowing transter pipe into a
subsequent structure. The gauge shall have readily visible permanent markings. The
waste level in each lagoon with a waste level gauge shall be monitored and recorded
weekly on forms supplied by, or approved by, the Division.
A representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis, including pH, phosphorus, copper, and
zinc, shall be conducted on each application field receiving animal waste at least every
three (3) years. An analysis of the animal waste shall be conducted in accordance with
recommended laboratory sampling procedures as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application. .
This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen Zinc
Phosphorus Copper
4. The Permittee shall record all irrigation and land application event(s) including hydraulic
loading rates, nutrient loading rates and cropping information. The Permittee shall also
record removal of solids and document nutrient loading rates if disposed on-site or record
the off-site location(s). These records must be on forms supplied by, or approved by, the
Division.
If, for any reason, there is a discharge from the animal waste management system
(including the land application sites), to surface waters or wetlands, the Permittee is
required to make notification in accordance with Condition III. 9. The discharge
notification shall include the following information:
a. Description of the discharge: A description of the discharge including an estimate of
the volume discharged, a description of the flow path to the receiving surface waters
or wetlands and a site sketch showing the path of the waste. Also, an estimation of
the volume discharged.
b. Time of the discharge: The length of time of the discharge, including the exact dates
and times that it started and stopped, and if not stopped, the anticipated time the
discharge is expected to continue.
c. Cause of the discharge: A detailed statement of the cause of the discharge. If caused
by a precipitation -event, detailed information from the on-site rain gauge concerning
the inches and duration of the precipitation event.
d. All steps being taken to reduce, stop and cleanup the discharge. All steps to be taken
to prevent future discharges from the same cause.
e. Analysis of the waste: A copy of the last waste analysis conducted as required by
Condition III. 3.
6. A copy of this Permit, the Facility's COC, certification forms, lessee and landowner
agreements, the CAV/MP, and copies of all records required by this Permit and the
Facility's CAWMP shall be maintained by the Permittee in chronological and legible
form for a minimum of three (3) years.

Within fifteen (15) working days of receiving the request. from the Division, the
Permittee shall provide to the Division one (1) copy of all requested information and
reports related to the operation of the animal waste management system. Once received
by the Division, all such information and reports become public information, unless they
constitute confidential information under North Carolina General Statutes (NCGS) 132-
1.2, and shall be made available to the public by the Division as specified in Chapter 132
of the NCGS.
The Division may require any additional monitoring and reporting (including but not
limited to groundwater, surface water or wetland, waste, sludge, soil, lagoon/storage pond
levels and plant tissue) necessary to determine the source, quantity; quality, and effect of
such waste upon the surface waters, groundwaters or wetlands. Such monitoring,
including its scope, frequency, duration and any sampling, testing, and reporting systems,
shall meet all applicable Division requirements.
Regional Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as
soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following first
knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events:
a. Any discharge to ditches, surface waters or wetlands.
b. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or
equal to that required in Condition V. 2. of this Permit.
C. Over applying waste either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or
where runoff enters surface waters _or wetlands.
d. Failure of any component of the animal waste_ management system resulting in a
discharge to surface waters or wetlands.
e. Any failure of the animal waste management system that -renders the Facility
incapable of adequately receiving, treating or storing_the waste and/or sludge.
f. Any deterioration or leak in a lagoon/storage pond that poses an immediate threat
to the environment or human safety or health.
For any emergency, which requires immediate reporting after normal business hours,
contact must be made with the Division of Emergency Management at 1-800-858-0368.
The Permittee shall also file a written report to the appropriate Division Regional Office
within five (5) calendar days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report
shall outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to
ensure that the problem does not recur: The requirement to file a written report may not
be waived by the Division Regional Office.

IV. INSPECTIONS AND ENTRY
The Permittee shall allow any authorized representative of Department, upon the
presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law and in
accordance with reasonable and appropriate biosecurity measures, to:
a. Enter the Permittee's premises where the regulated Facility or activity is located or
conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this Permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any recordsthat must be kept under the
conditions of this Permit;
c. Inspect, at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and
control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this Permit;
and,
d. . Sample or monitor, at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit
compliance, any substances or parameters at any location.
V. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. The issuance of this Permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for
compliance with all applicable surface water, wetlands, groundwater and air quality
standards or for damages to surface waters, wetlands or groundwaters resulting from the
animal operation.
2. The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the
Facility's CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds
must not,exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain a 25 -year, 24-hour
storm event plus an additional one (1) foot of structural freeboard except that there shall
be no violation of this condition if: (a) there is a storm event more severe than a 25 -year,
24-hour event, (b) the Permittee is in compliance with its CAWMP, and (c) there is at
least one. (1) foot of structural freeboard.
Any containment basin, such as a lagoon or a storage .pond, used for waste management
shall continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of this Permit until
properly closed. When the containment basin is properly closed in accordance with the
Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) North Carolina Standard for Closure of
Waste Impoundments, February 2005 or any subsequent amendment, the containment
basin shall not be subject to the requirements of this Permit. The Permittee must submit a
letter to the Division to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of
closure of all containment basins.
Closure shall also include a minimum of 24 hours pre -notification of the Division and
submittal -of the Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form to the
address identified on the form within fifteen (15) days of completion of closure.

Failure of the Permittee to maintain; in full force and effect, lessee and landowner
agreements, which are required in the CAWMP, shall constitute grounds for revocation
of its COC to operate under this Permit.
5. This Permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the Facility to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a Notification of Change of
Ownership form must be submitted to the Division, including documentation from the
parties involved and other supporting materials_ as may be appropriate.
6. The issuance of this Permit does not prohibit the Division from reopening and modifying
the Permit, revoking and reissuing the Permit, or terminating the Permit as allowed by the
appropriate laws, rules, and regulations.
7. The Groundwater Compliance Boundary is established by.15A NCAC 2L and 15A
NCAC 02T .0111(c).. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality. Standards at or beyond the
Compliance Boundary is subject to the requirements of 15A NCAC 2L and the Division
in addition to the penalty provisions applicable under. the NCGS.
VI. PENALTIES
1. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this Permit; the Facility's
CAWMP; and/or applicable state law; may subject the Permittee to an enforcement
action by the Division including but not limited to the modification of the animal waste
management system, civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
2. The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this Permit. Any Permit
noncompliance constitutes a violation of state .law and is grounds for enforcement action;
for Permit coverage termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of
Permit coverage renewal application.
y
3. It shall not be a defense for a Permittee in an enforcement action to claim that it would
have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain
compliance with the conditions of this Permit.
This Permit issued the 28th day of March, 2008.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number AWI810002

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 810002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AW1810002 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rutherford Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 09/28/2012 Entry Time: 12:00 PM Exit Time: 12:30 PM
Farm Name: Calton Dairy
Owner: Javan Calton
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 660 Calton Rd Bostic NC 28018
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Phone: [phone]
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'03" Longitude: 81'47'48"
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd (SR 1745). Travel 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm is on the left
and right sides of the road.
Question Areas:
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Javan Calton Phone:
On-site representative avan Calton Phone:
Primary Inspector: Ed and illia s Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date: L42 �
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
The facility has not operated as a dairy since 2003. Mr. Calton has contacted the Rutherford County S&W Conc. District and NRCS
for assistance with closure of the facility. They hope to begin closure this fall.
Mr. Calton was not on site at the time of the inspection.
The waste pond appeared to be in good condition.
Page: 1

Permit: AW1810002 Owner -Facility: Javan Calton
Inspection Date: 09/28/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 810002
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
kaste Pond WASTE POND 34.80
Page: 2

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H'Sullins
Director
February 3, 2011
Mr. Javan Calton
Calton Dairy
660 Calton Road
Bostic, North Carolina 28018
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Calton Dairy — Facility # 81-2
Rutherford County
Dear Mr. Calton:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
On February 2, 2011, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste handling
system for Calton Dairy.
I have enclosed the Lagoon/Waste Pond Closure Form as you indicated during the inspection
that you are ready to proceed with closure of this facility. Please contact Mr. Travis Ringo with
Rutherford County Soil &Water Conservation District for assistance with the closure process.
Please see the attached report (Inspection Summary Page 1) for additional comments. Thank
you for your assistance during the inspection. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate
to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
r
i
Beverly' e
Environmental Specialist
Enclosures
Cc: Travis Ringo, Rutherford County Soil & Water Conservation District 121 Laurel Drive
Rutherfordton, NC 28139 w/enclosures
rt�►qulfaTaRmtediemiRectiGnaFfies ARO
orehCarolina
NAaiur AY
North Carolina Division of Water Quality — Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section FAX [phone]
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency.
r: 810002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWI810002 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Rutherford Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 02/02/2011 Entry Time: 12:30 PM
Exit Time: 01:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Calton Dairy
Owner Email:
Owner: Javan Calton
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 660 Calton Rd
Bostic NC 28018
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°27'03" Longitude: 81 °47'48"
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd
(SR 1745). Travel 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm is on the left
and right sides of the road.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Certified Operator:
Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hourcontact name Javan Calton
Phone:
. On-site representative Javan Calton Phone:
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price Phone:
Inspector Signature: % '��� Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Mr. Calton is ready to proceed with closure of the waste pond. The facility has not been operated as a dairy since 2003.
Approximately 70 beef cattle are pastured.
The freeboard marker needs to be re -set.
Weeds need to cut from the pond dam.to allow for thorough inspections.
Page: 1

Permit: AW1810002 Owner -Facility: Javan Calton
Inspection Date: 02/02/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Regulated Operations
Facility Number: 810002
Reason for Visit: Routine
Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle - Milk Cow 0 0
Total Design Capacity: 0
Total SSLW: 0
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WASTE POND 34.80 96.00
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ❑
■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ❑
■ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ■ ❑ Cl ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Page: 2

Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form
(Please or print all information that does not require nature)
Fame of Farm: Facility No:.
Owner(s) Name:
Mailing Address: Phone No:
County:_
Operation Description (remaining
animals only):
o Please check this box if there will be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure. If there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure, please provide the
following information on the animals that will
remain.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
Type of Dairy No. of Animals
o Wean to Feeder
o Layer
o Milking
o Feeder to Finish
o Non -Layer
o Dry
o Farrow to Wean
Type of Beef No. of Animals
o Heifers
o Farrow to Feeder
o Brood
o Calves
o Farrow to Finish
o Feeders
o Gilts
o Stockers
o Boars
Other Type of Livestock:
Number of Animals:
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the G.S. § 143-215.1OB threshold? Yes o No o
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes? Yes o No o
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?:
(Name) of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division of
Water Quality's Regional Office (see map on back) was contacted on (date)
for notification of the pending closure of this pond or lagoon. This notification was at least 24 hours prior to the
start of closure, which began on (date).
I verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan, which meets all NRCS
specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21 of the North
Carolina General Statutes 'if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of Land Owner (Please Print):
Signature:. Date:
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the NRCS Technical Guide
Standard 360. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste liquids and
sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been removed, all slopes have
been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
Return within 15 days following completion of animal water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality ,
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PLC -1 May 4, 2007

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 810002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AW1810002 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rutherford Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 02/02/2011 Entry Time:12:30 PM Exit Time: 01:00 PM Incident M
Farm Name: Calton Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Javan Calton
Mailing,Address: 660 Calton Rd Bostic NC 28018
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Phone: [phone]
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'03" Longitude: 81 °47'48"
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd (SR 1745). Travel 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm is on the left
and right sides of the road.
.Question Areas:
0 Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: '
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Javan Calton Phone:
On-site representative Javan Calton Phone:
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
a
GtA
LINSO GLc�S��-ern^
<621- S1, IA'), r1)10 r-1,J\I )
d—fib caw,*- ar) Pas4w-e,
V�5 �o CICriL��e
Page: 1

Permit: AW1810002 Owner - Facility: Javan Calton
Inspection Date: 02/02/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Type Identifier
Facility Number : 810002
Reason for Visit: Routine
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
i
kaste Pond
WASTE POND
Structure
34.80
1 "
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ Cl
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
3. Were -there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
❑ Q
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
(b ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ � ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the ermit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, R ❑ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks) N V�_S�l (b� y� �c�iL� t.5 Vib� q0� to �2 C' (0sed dd,
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ q ❑ Q
improvement?
Page: 2

NCDENit
Orth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
March 9, 2010
Mr. Javan Calton
Calton Dairy
660 Calton Road
Bostic, North Carolina 28018
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Calton Dairy Facility # 81-2
Rutherford County
Dear Mr. Calton:
On February 25, 2010, 1 conducted,a, routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste. ,
handling system for Calton Dairy. The facility was found to be in, compliance with
permit conditions.......
You should record weekly freeboard measurements for your waste holding pond. I
have enclosed Freeboard Forms for your convenience. The freeboard marker was
knocked down .and should be re -set'. You should finish clearing brush/weeds from the
dam. to allow for thorough inspections:. :
I have enclosed the regulations for new/expanding farms should you or anyone else
decides to resume dairy. operations on your farm. If you do not intend to resume the
operation; the waste pond may be•closed.according to NRCS Standards. Once the
pond is properly closed you will be removed the Division of Water Quality annual.
inspection. list.
N0ne
hCarolina
atura!!�
North Carolina Division of Water Quality— Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section FAX [phone]
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet h2o.enr.staie.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/AffirmaNe Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Calton
March 9, 2010
Page 2
Please see the attached report for additional comments. Thank you for your assistance
during the inspection. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Beverly Price
Environmental Specialist

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation .
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 810002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AM810002 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rutherford Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 02/25/2010 Entry Time: 11:45 AM Exit Time: 12:15 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Calton Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Javan Calton 'Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 660 Calton Rd Bostic NC 28018
Physical Address:
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'03" Longitude: W47'48"
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd_ (SR 1745). Travel 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm is on the left
and right sides of the road.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name . Javan Calton Phone:
On-site representative Javan Calton Phone:
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price Phone: ag(o- 1/G�S
Inspector Signature:Date:.
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Continue to remove brush/weeds from the pond dam
Re -set the freeboard marker.
Record freeboard levels weekly.
Page: 1 .

Permit: AWI810002
Inspection Date: 02/25/2010
Owner - Facility: Javan Calton
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Nt
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k1ste Pond WASTE POND 34.80 48.00
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1„ Is any-dischatge observed from any part of the operation?
Q
■
Q
11
Discharge originated at.
n
n
■
n
Structure
❑
■
n
Q
Application Field
n
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
n
■
n
b Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes notify DWQ)
❑
n
■
Q
Page: 2
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ).
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
n
Q
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
0000
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0000
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
Q
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑
.❑
Q
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
■
000
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
p
n
improvement?
Page: 2

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
- ❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 810002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AW1810002 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rutherford Region: Asheville
-a5 -
Date of Visit: 02/23%2010 Entry Time: 11:45 AM Exit Time: 12:15 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Calton Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Javan Calton Phone: [phone]
FAS- 455-03-V c�/l
Mailing Address: 660 Calton Rd Bostic NC 28018
Physical Address:
Facility Status: '0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'03" Longitude: 81'47'48"
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd (SR 1745). Travel 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm is on the left
and right sides of the road.
Question Areas:
0 Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Javan Calton Phone:
On-site representative Javan Calton Phone:
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price Phone:
Inspector Signature. Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
�(11 ,- /7-7 J t
&,V
.112Cur 1 U4),
k�� LA �A 0;—- C'A
Page: 1

Permit: AW1810002 Owner - Facility: Javan Calton
Inspection Date: 02/23/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
Facility Number: 810002
Reason for Visit: Routine
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond
WASTE POND
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
34.80
'LX L
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
q ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5: Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?CA brLk'4' p ` Jlk-,
❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks) Rj _ SA Fcs
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
improvement?
Page: 2

y
A4MCDENR
worth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources .
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H, Sullins
Director
Aquifer Protection Section
February 18, `2009
Mr. Javan Calton
Calton Dairy
660 Calton Road
Bostic, North Carolina 28018'
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Calton Dairy — Facility # 81-2
Rutherford County
Dear Mr. Calton:
Dee Freeman
- Secretary
On February 11, 2009, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste
handling system for Calton Dairy. Your permit for zero (0) cows was issued (March 28, 2008)
since your last inspection. Although the requirements for this permit are fewer than the -previous
permit, you are still required to maintain the pond and manage any waste according to permit
conditions. You should record weekly freeboard measurements for your waste holding pond. I
have enclosed Freeboard Forms for your convenience.
Please see the attached report for additional comments. Thank you for your assistance during
the inspection. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (828) 296-
4685.
Sincerely,
Beverly Prig
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Donald Morriso
North Carolina Division of Water Quality — Asheville Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Section
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
NRCS 121 Laurel Drive Rutherfordton, NC 28139
o thCarolina
. atcrr�rll�
2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

M.Division of Water Quality
(� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility
cility Number : 810002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWI810002 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rutherford Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 02/11/2009 Entry Time: 11:30 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Calton Dairy
Owner: Javan Calton
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 660 Calton Rd Bostic NC 28018
Physical Address:
Phone: [phone]
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'03" Longitude: 81°47'48"
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd (SR 1745). Travel 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm is on the left
and right sides of the road.
Question Areas:
W Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Javan Calton
On-site representative Javan Calton
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price
Inspector Signature
Secondary Inspector(s):
Operator Certification Number:
Title
Phone
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
2 //7109
Inspection Summary:
Calton Dairy has been out of business since July 2003. Waste storge pond is still intact and being maintained. When/if the pond is to
be closed out, it must be closed according to NRCS standards. DWQ must also be notified of the closure.
Your permit requires you to record freeboard measurements on a weekly basis. Freeboard forms have been provided.
Page: 1

Permit: AW1810002 Owner - Facility: Javan Calton Facility Number : 8100
Inspection Date: 02/11/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
2 Cattle - Milk Cow 0 0
Total Design Capacity: 0
Total SSLW: 0
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Desiqned Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WASTE POND 34.80 72.00
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
®
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Q
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
F1
IF
®
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
fl
®
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
0
®
El
0
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
0
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ Ig ❑ fl
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ® ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ® n n—
or
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
n®nn
n®nn
nEgnn.
Page: 2

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 810002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AW1810002 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rutherford Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 02/11/2009 Entry Time:11:30 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Calton Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Javan Calton Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 660 Calton Rd . Bostic NC 28018
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'03" Longitude: 81'47'48"
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd (SR 1745). Travel 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm is on the left
and right sides of the road.
Question Areas:
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Javan Calton Phone:
On-site representative Javan Calton Phone:
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price Phone:
Inspector Signature:' Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
,A
pohd
Page: 1

Permit: AW1810002 Owner - Facility: Javan Calton Facility Number: 810002
Inspection Date: 02/11/2009
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 2

Mr. Javan Calton
Calton Dairy
660 Calton Road
Bostic, North Carolina 28018
Dear Mr. Calton:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
grlh Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
� I
L ��, ` Coleen H. Sullins, Director
L 1 t Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
February 28, 2008
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Calton Dairy — Facility # 81-2
Rutherford County
On February 20, 2008, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste
handling system for Calton Dairy. You indicated that you had been out of the dairy business
since July 2003. Although the dairy is no longer in operation, the waste holding pond must still
be maintained.
Please see the attached report for additional comments. Thank you for your assistance during
the inspection. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (828) 296-
4500.
Sincerely,
Ed Williams
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Donald _Morrison,_Rutherford County NRCS 121 Laurel Drive Rutherfordton, NC 28139
'Aquifer"'Protection Section -'Files -.ARO
NorthCarolina
�atur�rlly
North Carolina Division of Water Quality — Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section FAX [phone]
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
E] Other Agency
Facility Number: 810002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC810002 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Rutherford Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 02/20/2008 Entry Time:10:00 AM
Exit Time: 11:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Calton Dairy
Owner Email:
Owner: Javan Calton
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 660 Calton Rd
Bostic NC 28018
Physical Address:
Facility Status: n Compliant n Not Compliant
Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°27'03" Longitude: 81°47'48"
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd
(SR 1745). Travel 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm is on the left
and right sides of the road.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Certified Operator:
Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Javan Calton
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Edward M Williams
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Calton Dairy has been out of business since July 2003. Waste storage pond is still intact and being maintained. When/if the pond is to
be closed out, it must be closed according to'NRCS standards. DWQ must also be notified of the closure.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC810002 Owner - Facility, Javan Calton Facility Number: 810002
Inspection Date: 02/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Jnr... -a.. aa_....a.. _...,
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�aste Pond WASTE POND 19.00 60.00
Discharges & Stream Impacts TeS NO NA n
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field
Other fl ,
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
n
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
0,
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe Q ■ fl n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry ❑ ■ Q fl
stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■
improvement?
Page: 2

1 _
f-
-i
`C
Mr. Javan Calton
Calton Dairy
660 Calton Road
Bostic, North Carolina 28018
Dear Mr. Calton:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
LE C 0 P y Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
August 29, 2007
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Calton Dairy — Facility # 81-2
Rutherford County
On August 22, 2007, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste
handling system for Calton Dairy. You indicated that you had been out of the dairy
business since July 2003. Although the dairy is no longer in operation, the waste
holding pond must still be maintained.
A small to medium poplar tree is growing on the south end of the waste pond. One
groundhog hole was also observed on the southwest top of the dam. Trees, shrubs and
weeds -should be -removed from waste storage pond embankments and a protective
vegetative cover should be established and maintained. Vegetative cover for dam
embankments should consist of a suitable growth of grass. Bare embankment slopes
are susceptible to erosion. Tree and brush growth on embankments is also undesirable,
as it provides cover for burrowing animals; prevents a thorough inspection of the
embankment; provides an avenue for seepage as roots decay; and if trees tip over
during windstorms, the loss of soil around the root mass can compromise the integrity of
the embankment. It is recommended that you contact a technical specialist to evaluate
the poplar tree on the pond dam.
None hCarolina
)aEum!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality — Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section FAX [phone]
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer -50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Calton �)
August 29, 2007
Page 2
Regarding your permit status; you have the option of applying for a State Individual
Permit since you no longer have confined animals but still have an intact waste ponc
you choose this option you should fill out Sections 1 and 2 of the attached State
Individual Permit Application Form and sign it on Page 3. The Individual Permit will
allow you to discontinue paying the annual fee. Also, please include your latest We
Utilization Plan (WUP) and a cover letter explaining the permit request. You must
continue to record rainfall and.freeboard levels on the forms provided to you during the
inspection. If you choose not to apply for a State Individual Permit, you will be required
to abide by all conditions of the current permit.
Please see. the attached report for additional comments. Thank you for your assistance
during the inspection. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
�J�VV
Beverly Price
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Donald Morrison, Rutherford County NRCS 121 Laurel Drive Rutherfordton, NC
28139
quiter-Protection--S=ection--Fii-es-ARO

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 810002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC810002 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rutherford Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 08/22/2007 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 10:45 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Calton Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Javan Calton
Mailing Address: 660 Calton Rd Bostic NC 28018
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant. Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'03" Longitude: 81°47'48"
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd (SR 1745). Travel 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm is on the left
and right sides of the road.
Question Areas:
ji Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Other Issues
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Javan Calton Phone:
On-site representative Javan Calton Phone:
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price Phone:
Inspector Signature: � 'u''yr Date:
Aflo7
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Calton Dairy has been out of business since July 2003. There are currently 150 beef cattle on pasture. Waste storage pond is still in
tact. When/If the pond is to be closed out, it must be closed according to NRCS Standards. DWQ must also be notified of closure.
#7. One groundhog hole was observed on the southwest side of the pond (top of dam). Weeds and small woody vegetation should be
cut from the west side of the dam. A small to medium sized poplar tree is, growing on the south end of the dam. It is recommended
that you have a technical specialist determine whether or not the tree is a threat to the integrity of the dam and if so, the best method
for removing the tree.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC810002 Owner - Facility: Javan Calton Facility Number: 810002
Inspection Date: 08/22/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle - Milk Cow
W-0 0
Total Design Capacity: 300
Total SSLW: 420,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Desianed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond WASTE POND 19.00 72.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC810002 owner - Facility: Javan Calton Facility Number: 810002
nspection Date: 08/22/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
iischarges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ in 13 C1
Discharge originated at:
❑
Structure
❑
Application Field
Other
❑
❑
■ ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑ .
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
C1
M
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
®
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
,improvement?
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
®
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑
■
❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
®
❑
❑
Page: 3
9

Permit: AWC810002 Owner - Facility: Javan Calton Facility Number : 810002
Inspection Date: 08/22/2007
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 4

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
.Animal Feeding Operations Permit Application Form
(THIS FORMMAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
State Individual Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. 1, Facility name:
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: "
1.3 Mailing address:
City, State: Zip:
Telephone number (include area code):
1.4 Physical address:
City, State: Zip:
Telephone number (include area code): ( ) -
1.5 County where facility is located:
1.6 Facility location (directions from nearest maj or highway, using Sk numbers for state roads):
1.7 Farm Manager's name (if.different from Land Owner):
1.8 Lessee's / Integrator's name, (if applicable; circle which type is listed):
1.9 Facility's original start-update: Date(s) of facility expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility number:
2.2 Operation Description:
Please enter the Design Capacity of the system. The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste
management structures were designed.
Tyne of Swine No. of Animals Tyne of Poultry No. of Animals Tyne of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Farrow to Wean (# sow) ❑ Turkey ❑ Beef Stocker Calf
❑ Farrow to Feeder (# sow) ❑ Turkey Poults ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Farrow to Finish (# sow) ❑ Dairy Heifer .
❑ Wean to Finish (# sow) ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Gilts ❑ Milk Cow
❑ Boar/Stud
❑ Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-STATE-I-E 1/10/06
Page 1 of 5

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the app
system): Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP):
2.4 Number of lagoons: - Total Capacity (cubic feet): Required Capacity (cubic feet):
Number of Storage Ponds: Total Capacity (cubic feet): Required Capacity (cubic feet):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO (circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the waste management system? YES or NO (circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? YES or NO (circle one)
2.8 Brief description of treatment process:.
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST:
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for State Individual Permit
- Animal Waste Operations;
3.2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste'facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land.applied and a county road map with the location of the
facility indicated;
3.3 Three copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a permit application for
animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components., Some of these components may not have been required at the time
the facility was certified but should be added to the CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) mustinclude the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and
utilized by the facility
3:3.2 The method by which waste is. applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, injection, etc.)
3.3.3. A map of every field used for land application
3.3.4 . The soil series present on every land application field
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications
3.3. 10' A site schematic
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.); please be sure to include any site
evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to your facility
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your
submittal. (Composting, waste transfers, etc.)
FORM: AWO-STATE-I-E 1/10/06 Page 2 of 5

CANT'S CERTIFICATION:
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
Ias
s application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge, I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
Date
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I,
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name .listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING, ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS UNIT
1636 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1636
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-STATE-I-E 1/10/06 Page 3 of 5

6. SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION:
This form must be completed by the appropriate DWQ regional office and included as a part of the
project submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the, surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow toward) in
which this animal waste management system will be operated must be determined by the appropriate DWQ regional office.
Therefore, you are required, prior to submittal of the application package, to submit this form, with items 1 through 6
completed, to the appropriate Division of Water Quality Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor (see page 6 of 10). At a
minimum, you must include an 8.5" by. 11 " copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located. Identify the
closest downslope surface waters- on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the classification,
reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and submit the
application package.
6.1 Farm Name:
6.2 Name & complete address of engineering firm:
Telephone number: (
6.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters:
6.4 County(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located
6.5 Map name and date:
6.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature, and Date:
TO: REGIONAL AQUIFER PROTECTION SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located, as identified on the attached map segment(s):'
Name of surface waters:
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed classification, if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel:
(All attachments must be signed)
Date:
FORM: AWO-STATE-I-E 1/10/06 Page 4 of 5-

)F WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (9/05)
nal APS Supervisor
-- - - - -- o -way 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
[phone]
Fax'[phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee
Polk
Clay
Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancey
Jackson
Duplin
Fayetteville Regional APS Supervisor
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5094
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Washington Regional APS Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beaufort Jones
Bertie
Lenoir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Currituck
Perquimans
Dare
Pitt
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Duplin
Mooresville Regional APS.Supervisor
610 East Center Avenue
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Raleigh Regional APS Supervisor
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chatham
Nash
Durham .
Northampton
Edgecombe
Orange
Franklin
Person
Granville
Vance.
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Warren
Lee -
Wilson
Wilmington Region APS Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore
Alexander
, Lincoln
Brunswick New Hanover
Bladen
Richmond
Cabarrus
Mecklenburg
Carteret Onslow
Cumberland
Robeson
Catawba
Rowan
Columbus . Pender
Harnett
Sampson
Cleveland
Stanly
Duplin
Hoke
Scotland
Gaston
Union
Montgomery
Iredell
Winston-Salem Regional APS Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alamance
Rockingham
Alleghany
Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
FORM: AWO-STATE-I-E 1/10/06
Page 5 of 5

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 810002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC810002 ❑ -Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rutherford Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 08/22/2007 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 0 5 Incident #:
Farm Name: Calton Dairy
Owner: Javan Calton
Owner Email:
- Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 660 Calton Rd Bostic NC 28018
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'03" Longitude: 81'47'48"
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd (SR 1745). Travel 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm is on the left
and right sides of the road.
Question Areas:
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Javan Calton Phone:
On-site representative. Javan Calton Phone:
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price Phone'
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
1 4�D CQ -Wt
aP.tr on
laJes�
0'� pa„S�v��
A TT 0/4 (Kn
r
re
_ -e__- s+Y/` ® Q y �a l ® h� �aG(,L/h e-�� Page: 1
en
d v
ct
l b d A,6SI—

Permit: AWC810002 Owner - Facility: Javan Calton Facility Number: 810002
Inspection Date: 08/22/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WASTE POND 19.00
Page: 2

Aquifer Protection Section
January 4, 2007
Mr. Javan Calton
Calton Dairy
660 Calton Road
Bostic, North Carolina 28018
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Calton Dairy . y —Facility # 81-2
Rutherford County
Dear Mr. Calton:
On December 15, 2006, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste
handling system for the Calton Dairy. You indicated that you had been out of the dairy business since
July 2003. Although the dairy is no longer in operation, the waste holding pond must still be maintained.
In order to keep a general permit for the facility active and discontinue paying an annual fee, you must fill
out Sections 1 and 2 of the attached State Individual Permit Application Form and sign it on page 3. Also,
please include 'a cover letter explaining the permit request. A requirement of the permit is to record
rainfall and weekly freeboard. Attached is a rainfall/freeboard recording form.
The waste pond had approximately 60 inches of freeboard. Please see the attached report for additional
comments.
It was a pleasure meeting you and I appreciate your assistance during the inspection. If you have
any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ed Williams
Environmental Specialist
, Governor
, Secretary
Resources
E. Director
ter Quality
Enclosure
Cc: Donald Morrison, Rutherford County NRCS 121 Laurel Drive Rutherfordton, NC 28139
WAggif_errProtection Section -Files -ARO-- , WortLCarolina
' ` Naturldil
North Carolina Division of Water Quality — Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section FAX [phone]
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other'Agency
Facility Number: 810002 FacilityStatus: Active Permit: AWC810002 ❑Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rutherford Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 12/15/2006 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM
Farm Name: Calton Dairy
Owner: Javan Calton
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 660 Calton Rd Bostic NC 28018
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Phone: [phone]
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'03" Longitude: 81 °47'48"
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd (SR 1745). Travel 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm is on the left
and right sides of the road.
Question Areas:
N Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Other Issues
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Primary -Inspector: Edward M Williams
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
The waste pond appeared to be maintained properly.
Operator Certification Number:
Title
Phone:
Date:
Phone
Page: 1

r'
Permit: AWC810002 Owner - Facility: Javan Calton
Inspection Date: 12/15/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 810002
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 300 0
Total Design Capacity: 300
Total SSLW: 420,000
Waste Structures
rrl., A n.ro SRtart nate Desianed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
RYFU
Fa,te Pond
WASTE POND
19.001.
60.00
Page: 2

)02
)6
I
Owner -Facility: Javan Calton
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure "
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
7
Facility Number: 810002
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
& Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or, closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑ rl
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ Cl
improvement?
Other Issues
Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n ■ n ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC810002
Insoection Date: 12/15/2006
Owner - Facility: Javan Calton
inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 810002
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 4

i _ a
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 810002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC810002 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine -County: Rutherford Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 12/15/2006 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Calton Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Javan Calton Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 660 Calton Rd Bostic NC 28018
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'03" Longitude: 81 °47'48"
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd -(SR 1745). Travel 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm is on the left
and right sides of the road.
Question Areas:
0 Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment N Other Issues
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Operator Certification Number:
Title
Primary Inspector: Edward M Williams Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Phone
Page: 1

Permit: AWC810002 Owner - Facility: Javan Calton Facility Number: 810002
Inspection Date: 12/15/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Tvue Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�-ste Pond WASTE POND 19.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC810002 Owner - Facility: Javan Calton Facility Number : 810002
Inspection Date: 12/15/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
❑
❑
❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
❑
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
❑
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
❑
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑
❑
❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
01100
Page: 3

Permit: AWC810002 Owner - Facility: Javan Calton Facility Number : 810002
Inspection Date: 12/15/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 4

of `"A�F9
O� pG
'r
o Y
Mr. Javan Calton
Calton Dairy
660 Calton Road
Bostic, North Carolina 28018
Dear Mr. Calton:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Aquifer Protection Section
October 7, 2005
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Calton Dairy — Facility # 81-2
Rutherford County
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
On October 6, 2005, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste handling
system for the Calton Dairy. You indicated to me that you had been out of the dairy business since July
2003. Although the dairy is no longer in operation, the waste holding pond must be maintained according
to the permit and waste management plan until such time as the permit is rescinded. The permit may not
be rescinded until the waste pond has been properly closed. If/when you decide to close the waste pond,
please notify me in order to obtain the required forms. The waste pond had approximately 40 inches of
freeboard. Please see the attached report for additional comments.
It was a pleasure meeting you and I appreciate your assistance during the inspection. If you have
any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Beverly Price
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc: Donald Morrison, Rutherford County NRCS 121 Laurel Drive Rutherfordton, NC 28139
CAquifer=_P_r_otecti6-n•Section-Files- ARO'
North Carolina Division of Water Quality — Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778
Aquifer Protection Section
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
NoO�thnCarolina
Natundil
Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water. Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 810002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC810002 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection .Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rutherford Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 10/06/2005 Entry Time:11:00 AM Exit Time: 11:15 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Calton Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Javan Calton Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 660 Calton Rd Bostic NC 28018
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator:
Location of Farm:. Latitude: 35027'03 Longitude: 81'47'48"
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd (SR 1745). Travel 0.8.mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm is on the left
and right sides of the road.
Question Areas:
Waste Collection & Treatment
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative Javan Calton Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price Phone: �8^$- xy4` '`{-TOO
J
Inspector Signature:.= Date: 10-7-05
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
The Calton Dairy has been out of business since July 2003. There are currently between 150-200 beef cattle on pasture. Watering
devices have been installed and cattle are fenced out of the stream. Waste application equipment is on site and available. The waste
storage pond had approximately 40 inches of freeboard. Slurry pond is also still intact. If/when the ponds are to be closed out they
must be closed according to NRCS standards. DWQ must also be notified upon closure of ponds.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC810002 Owner - Facility: Javan Calton Facility Number: 810002
Inspection Date: 10/06/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 300 0
Total Design Capacity: 300
Total SSLW: 420,000
Waste Structures
Tvne Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond 7WASTE POND 19.00 40.00
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes.
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
(_1
■
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe erosion,
j -j
■
�]
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑
■
n
n
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
❑
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry
n
■
0
n
stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Page: 2

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 810002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC810002 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rutherford Region: Asheville
Date of Visit: 10/06/2005 Entry Time: 14--.00-AM Exit Time: i Incident #:
Farm Name: Calton Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Javan Calton
Mailing Address: 660 Calton Rd Bostic NC 28018
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Phone: [phone]
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'03" Longitude: 81'47'48"
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd (SR 1745). Travel 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm is on the left
and right sides of the road.
Question Areas:
M Waste Collection & Treatment
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Jc,yan Cc, 14n
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
oh_$ of ht sincSf-� J��� �� i,� Goi:-� S��•
�r•2C 1-so0,rC}
S�Ltrr� I" C^��- btJ •:.�..1,� oaf�"'"•�-�,�w v I r�TY J. p o%v�-
,'+ _� o o -all o •^
L'S . CJ4,e u I Sa
j� is-eei� ; r` S -i -o-11 �d {��� C�-�-�--Z. � -�2r GJ.-� �t,(SC� � •� s �-ci 1 f
b,JL l z.r•PSJ i v
Page: 1

Permit: AWC810002 Owner - Facility: Javan Calton Facility Number: 810002
Inspection Date: 10/06/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry
stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
1>0i1o tv 4-D'o 0 `t- c.fk-)
1 a,�
Yes No NA NE
nnnn
11
nnnn
nn❑n
nnnn
nnnn
Page: 2

Michael F. Easley, Governor
yWilliam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
—i
Aquifer Protection Section
December 30, 2004
Mr. Javan Calton
Calton Dairy
660 Calton Road
Bostic, North Carolina 28018
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Animal Waste Handling System
Calton Dairy — Facility # 81-2
Rutherford County
Dear Mr. Calton:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
On December 22, 2004, 1 conducted a routine Compliance Inspection of the animal waste
handling system for the Calton Dairy. You indicated to me that you had been out of the dairy business
since July 2003. Although the dairy is no longer in operation, the waste holding pond must be maintained
according to the permit and waste management plan until such time as the permit is rescinded. The
permit may not be rescinded until the waste pond has been properly closed. If/when you decide to close
the waste pond, please notify me in order to obtain the required forms. Please see the attached report
for additional comments.
It was a pleasure meeting you and I appreciate your assistance during the inspection. If you have
any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,�CSC%�
1 �
:1 J
Bev Price 709
Environmental Spe
I
t.t, ion
Enclosure
Cc: Donald Morrison, R t erford Cour>ty NRCIS 121 L,,
Aquifer Prtotection Secti©n Files A, Rpt
North Carolina Division of Water Quality — Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. High'
Aquifer Protection Section
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
/a 1 t aa' -d z-�Q .
A� !u., ��d &, , � N C' QZ1,3 �--
So$ - a-9 7~ H2 -a -a Y�z
Carolina
2cS fura!!y
eQ'tiS�va�(t�� 7Jas��fi:�'

aon of Water,Quahty
;ion of'Sozl and Water Conservation =
0 Other Agencrby
;-
e of Visit Oi Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral
O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Facility Number 81 2
12/22/2004 Time: 11:15am
• Not O erational ® Below Threshold
IN Permitted IN Certified ® Conditionally Certified ® Registered
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: G.a1t9A.);i ry............................................................................................. ..... County: Ruft.rfor.d ...................................... ARQ............
OwnerName: JAYAr...................................... c.alt9>x.........................................................
Phone No: 2.4.5:-.QQA ....................................................................
MailingAddress: f6Q..CaltoxI.Rd......................................................................................
N.0 .............................................................. U.01.8 ..............
.Facility Contact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................
Phone No: ...................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: ...........................................................................................................
Integrator:...............:......................................................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................
Operator Certification Number:........... ...............................
Location of Farm:
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd (SR 1745). Travel, 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm
Is on the left and right sides of the road. w
❑ Swine El Poultry ® Cattle E] Horse Latitude 35 • 27 03 G° Longitude 81 ' 47 ' 48 «
Swine
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
Design.,,,. Current .- Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry, ':Capacity Population Cattle -Capacity.Population
❑ Dairy 1 300
10
❑ Non -Dairy I
I150
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge .is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes El No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Stricture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......waate..pnnd................................................................................................................
......................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 60
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 81-2
Date of Inspection 12/22/2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [:]Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or au' quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name Bev Price Y,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,/51V Date: /w-, �-o-y
12/12/03 Continued

81-2 Dati,of Inspection 12/22/2004
V
o have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form [:]Crop Yield Form [:]Rainfall ❑Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
12/12/03
The Calton Dairy is out of business. The dairy was depopulated in July 2003. There are currently 150 catttle (pasture operation) on
site. Mr. Calton indicated that he might consider leasing the dairy to an operator in the future. Waste applications have not occurred
since July 2003.
12/12/03

sign -of Water Quality;
} 0 Sion of,Soil,and Water Conservation
• � � ,�,.. -.. . - �.� .Q.Other Agency.
Type of Visit@ Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notificatiorl O,Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: Time:
81 2
r Not O erational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified C1 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Galtoal.])Airx.................................................................................................. County: liuth. do d...................................... ARQ ............
OwnerName: JAyAlk...................................... Calt.911 .......................................................... Phone No: 245=0.63.8 ....................................................................
Mailing Address: .................. B.Q.$.tjr..NC .............................................................. 2.8.03,8 ..............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: ...............................
.......... .........
Lj k
el,X* ....­­;W...­
epresentative:...................................................
Certified Operator:PpX�ot��.,. Zulu fit. ncw( .
............... Altoal.... f......
Location of Farm: 5" / 61!:� Mai -I fi. Rk � o /;a /'W
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd (SR 174:
is on the left and right sides of the road.-4?0,,rt,, C
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 •
Design Current
Swine Cnnaeity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
In/tegrator:...............0A.j.+:�/]................(. �.............................. A
Operator Certification Number:]
L%o.S XV- Gaily. ,t t.� ,
Travel 0.8 mile on Calton �Dairy R4. The farm +
s¢Jva( ro J Coin
0 GL Longitude 81 • 47 48
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population,
❑ Layer ® Dairy 300
❑ Non -Layer I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 300
Total SSLW 420,000
Discharjes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon - ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Stnicture 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .....� ................................................................................................................................................................... ......
Freeboard (inches):
05/03/01
Continued

f vision of Water Quality
(o .vision of Soil and Water Conservation
® Other Agency
Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other
❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 81 2 Date of Visit: 12/19/2003 Time: 10:30 AM
r Not O erational O Below Threshold
® Permitted B Certified ® Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: C.&OX►.Dalry...................................................
Owner Name: JayA....................................... .........
Mailing Address: OQ..C;I1191l.RSA.......................................
FacilityContact: .....................................................................
Onsite Representative: ...........................................................
Title:
Certified Operator: k'orpstj................................. U110j1.................................
Location of Farm:
County: Rxilthuford...................................... ARQ............
PhoneNo: 2.4.5-0.63.8....................................................................
..9511..1` C.............................................................. M.018 ..............
......................................... Phone No:...................................................
... Integrator: ......................................................................................
Operator Certification Number:2,21QZ .............................
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd (SR 1745). Travel 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm
Is on the left and right sides of the road.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 27 03 Longitude F 81 0 47 48
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer JJZ Dairy 300
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 300
Total SSLW 420,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present❑ Lagoon Area IN Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: E] Lagoon El Spray Field F1 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Stricture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ...............................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
Continued

Vthere
er: 81-2 Date of Inspection 12/19/2003
y immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, `severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? E] Yes El No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [ ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
dairy to an operator,but to date this has not happened.
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: J Date:
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or''any recommendations or any other comments. -
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. ( use additional pages as necessary)' i ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Calton Dairy is out of business. There are no animals on site. The lagoon has a 6 foot free board. Mr. Calton would like to lease the
dairy to an operator,but to date this has not happened.
Reviewer/Inspector Name L<rQ,t� 11L�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: J Date:
05/03/01
Continued

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 30, 2002
Mr. Forrest Javan Calton
Calton's Dairy
660 Calton Road
Bostic, North Carolina 28018
Subject: Animal Operation Site
Inspection
Facility Number 81-2
Rutherford County
Dear Mr. Calton:
Alan D. Klimek P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Asheville Regional Office
Enclosed is a computer-generated report from the inspection conducted
on August 23, 2002. This report is for your files.
Record keeping for your facility has improved however two weeks of
lagoon levels had not been recorded for August. The lagoon behind the
milking barn is now closed out and the finial grading is in process. Your
efforts to fence cattle out of the streams are appreciated. The woody
vegetation on the lagoon bank must be removed immediately. Bush hogging the
area around the lagoon will improve working conditions during removal of
solids.
You expressed interest in not remaining on the certified animal waste
management list. To be removed from the list your population would have to
be less than 100 and you would need to send in the attached form. If you
choose to be removed from the list you must notify this agency if you herd
population increases above. 100 so that your waste management plan can be re-
evaluated.
Thank you for your time and assistance during the inspection. If you
have any questions or if I may be of assistance please, do not hesitate to
contact me at 828-251-6208.
Sincerely,
Roger C. Edwards
Wastewater Consultant
Enclosure
CC: Donald Morrison, Rutherford County MRCS AT . ,
NCDENR
Water Quality Section, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, NC 28801-2414 Telephone: [phone] Customer Service
Fax: [phone] 623-7748
IN

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 81 2 Date of Visit: 8/23/2002 `rime: 0940
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified ® Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.. .......................
Farm Name: Ca1toiG.Rairy.................................................................................................. County: RuzherKQrd......................................R. Q............
OwnerName:,Aynl......................................altom......................................................... Phone No: 2.4.5-9.63.....................................................................
MailingAddress: 0II..Calton.JRd...................................................................................... 1Q.stxg..N............................................................... 2.$.Q:L8 .............
FacilityContact: .......................... .................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: korest.�T................................. Calton............................................... Operator Certification Number:2.2142.............................
Location of Farm:
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd (SR 1745). Travel 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm
is on the left and right sides of the road.
ElSwine ElPoultry
® Cattle E]Horse Latitude 35 • 27
03 " Longitude
81 • 47 ' 48
Design Current Design
Gurxent
Design :' current
Stene
Capac%ty Population Poultry „ , ;, . Cauacity
_.Poptilati oii, Cattle ,
,,, , ., ,;Capacity Population.
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
Dairy 300 120
Non -Dairy
. Total Desitgni-Capacity
t Total; SSL
300
420,000
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is obseived, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Stricture 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Stricture 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...BeLow..loafing, ...................................................................................................................................................................................
areeboard (inches): 36
05103101 Continued

Vity Number: 81-2
Date of Inspection 8/23/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay) Corn (Silage & Grain)
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
5. Samll tree on lagoon bank. Should be removed immediately.
7. Area around lagoon needs to be bush hogged, growth over waist high.
15. Receving crop has low coverage, this is due to drought and is beyond the operators control.
19. Records overall look good, missing two weeks of lagoon levels for August.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Date:
05/03/01
('ntfinuod

Facility Number: 81-2 Date ispection 1 8/23/2002
Jdor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Additaona omments and/or ..,W_Dra�sznQS
...:.......ti » ..,.
AL
'a
T
05103101

L—ivision of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review . 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit:. 23 b2 Time: E::= Printed on: 7/21/2000
Q =Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated orAbove Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Rl. 7�................................................ County:..�.p.. 4fevL; td
..........................................
.................................................. ..........
Owner Name:.rP ............. .... ��:%' Atl......................... ................ Phone No:... 6... .y-tl .DG3.�?............................
..
Facility Contact: .! °fit �&-Af.......•...••.. Title k Phone No: xy5' b& 3 8
Mailing Address: ,•.(�? (s' 4—�?l...i !A(..r42
.......... ...........................I................ ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: /• ,Q� �, ��� F+C ..................••... Integrator:..,s`R(/f�
Certified OperatorN3 ,,,,,,•.,•.,•_,,,•,,.,, , . Operator Certification Number:.•z/c'J'Z-
............... ...........................
Location 'of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3 5 • 2 7 `F d 3 " Longitude �• y7 ' y8
mo
SWi
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Boars
Design Current
Canneity Pnnnlafinn
Design Current Design Current
Poultry' Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Po ulation
❑ Layer FC]Non-Dairyl
airy
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total 9SLW
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present Iff Lagoon Area
Holding Ponds / SoGd Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ElLagoon ElSpray Field F1Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Spray Field Area
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:.,............................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100
❑ Yes 60 No
❑ Yes 95 No
❑ Y"e's No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes @$No
El Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6

i,,__ivision of Water Quality
Q' Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number , / f d Date of Visit: cg,�;Z3RL Time: E:::� Printed on: 7/21 /2000
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
13 Permitted 0 Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified Q Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: / , !:... County:...... c.e...................................................1.......................
........''..''........................................................
Owner Name:ot............. Phone No: ' a(°
T ................... ............................ .........................
Facility Contact: 4 �} � u��(4 ? -.7 q5 -.6'6.3.
r�
...r.`................................................. Title:.......................,........... ...... Phone No: 0
Mailing Address: (a 61 { L 41 / 1e�XJ ��.i"'7dy/ ��.......................... ........... .. ....
.......................................................................... ...
Onsite Representative..ter. c _ld•��
...... .............--•--................................................................. Integrator:... 1/!
Certified Operator:. rz�� . �t A- � Operator Certification Number:...
........... ............ . ...............................
Location "of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude3 • � % 6 7 3 '6 Longitude � • s �8 «
Number of.Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lag --n Area
"Ho di
ng Ponds /Solid Trips] No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: E] Lagoon [I Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Spray Field Area I
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment ,
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? , ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:....4...............................................................
........................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 1A,19ev7i. (L-
5100 i
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
Design Current '
/
Design Current Design Current
'ty No
k _ 6tvine _ Ca aci Population
Poultry
Capacity Po ulation Cattle'
Ca ci ; Population
❑?No
Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
KDairy C (`J
d
' [3 Feeder to Finish
❑Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
Gilts
Boars
Total SSLW
Number of.Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lag --n Area
"Ho di
ng Ponds /Solid Trips] No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: E] Lagoon [I Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Spray Field Area I
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment ,
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? , ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:....4...............................................................
........................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 1A,19ev7i. (L-
5100 i
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
[] No
/
❑ Yes
'ty No
❑ Yes
9, No
❑ Yes
❑?No
E9 Yes ❑
Structure 6
Cantinued

Facility Number: i — Date of Inspection _3 10-3 Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie( tr es', severe erosion,
® Yes
❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
`+ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? �� 4,-4_&C— J �,_
Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
O' No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
R] No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
R] No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
OE No
�j
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with th se designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
W No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
E No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?❑_/
Q No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? �"Gc e - e tJ�` `
L1 Yes
e��FYes
-e--
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
2 No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) �+„ Kg titer
El Yes
No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
it No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®-No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative`?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®'No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
EE No
0:X0 •yolatidiis ;or df cie dAL•*&Lngted• diu-ring this;visit: • Yoit will •reeeye iio furthr • ; -
.
corresoordeike:ahoutthis' • : • . .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
J
✓ o"�-� �tL /-1 � . �f
1-1,-5 � , 1 4' / ® 2_ vC/L =,.,G
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
5/00

Facility Number: i — Date of Inspection 2 0
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes M No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 0 No
roads, building structure, and/or public property).
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 0 No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ElYes NO No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged ,fill pipe or a permanentitemporary cover? ❑ Yes it No
O5103101

FPP
'0F W A TFRP
Michael F. Easley
�O G Governor
----- --- William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
>_ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
�' Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
Asheville Regional Office
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 2, 2001
Mr. Forrest Javan Calton
Calton's Dairy
660 Calton Road
Bostic, North Carolina 28018
Subject: Animal Operation Site
Inspection .
Facility Number 81-2
Rutherford County
Dear Mr. Calton:
Enclosed is a computer-generated report from the inspection conducted
on June 29, 2001. This report is for your files.
Record keeping for your facility has improved, with all required
records available during the inspection. The lagoon behind the milking barn
must be closed out as soon as possible. I understood this lagoon was to have
been closed out over a year ago. Every effort should be made to fence cattle
out of the streams. The installation of -wells or other auxiliary watering
facilities should -be made available for your cattle.
Thank you for your time and assistance during the inspection. If you
have any questions or if,I may be of assistance please; do not hesitate to
contact me at
828-251=6208.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
CC: Donald Morrison, Rutherford County NRCS
Water Quality Section, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, NC 28801-2414 Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
.NC-DENR,
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
.�—
Roger
C.
Edwards
Wastewater Consultant
Enclosure
CC: Donald Morrison, Rutherford County NRCS
Water Quality Section, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, NC 28801-2414 Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
.NC-DENR,
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

;viSlon: Of Water Qnallty s '.;
Dinsion of Sotl and Water Conservations ,t$
Oth
� � ��• : ,� �
e r
ri'"2
t
,1. _ r. ._... .1. --._-F .�.,
(Type of Visit S Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit S Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 81 2 Date of Visit: 6/29/2001 Time: 1015 Printed on: 7/2/2001
ro Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
M Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .............
FarmName: Cahon])A,iry.................................................................................................. County: ;.uthcdo d...................................... AR ............
Owner Name: JAyatA......................................
% ......................................................... Phone No: $a$ -24S -U6 ...........................................................
MailingAddress: 660-CAIM.U.Rd.................................... .... costae. C............................................................... $Q $......
.............................................. ........
Facility Contact:JAY.m.C.altan.................................................. Title: O. i.Upa...................... Phone No
Onsite Representative: a.Y.a70.dtkP.A►.............................................................................. Integrator:.............................
Certified Operator: k9lxe t1aY0d1..................... G lto�............................................... Operator Certification Number: 2.21Q2.............................
Location of Farm:
From Forest City take SR 1006 north 7 miles to Calton Dairy Rd (SR 1745). Travel 0.8 mile on Calton Dairy Rd. The farm +
is on the left and right sides of the road.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry M Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 276 F--03711 Longitude 81 • 47
Design Current
Sine Canneiiv .Pnnnlafinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design 'Current .
Poultry'
Ca aci _ Po ulation Cattle
Capacity. Population
❑ Layer JS Dairy 300 150
❑ Non -Layer n -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 300
Total SSLW 420,000
Nom er 6f Lag6ons1 2 I❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area
Holding Ponds % Solid Traps �� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
Spray Field Area
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the'Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? M Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: i1
■ 0
■ 6 M
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes M No
Structure 6
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 24
nsin3inI

umber: 81-2
Date of .inspection 6/29/2001
Printed on: 7/2/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay) Corn (Silage & Grain)
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in 'charge?-
22.
harge?22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer,o question #) �s�51am any YES answers and/or any recommendations ar atiy other comments"`°
Use drawings of fac�hiy�to better explain sxtuafrons (use ddithi-J-1-j—
El Field Copy El Final Notes
8. Hose reel is out of service due to the hose being brittle, which results in breakage when used.
The inactive lagoon behind the milking barn has been scheduled to close out for over a year, with no progress being made. This lagoon
must be closed out as soon as possible. Cattle should be fenced out of the streams. Auxiliary watering should be supplied for the cattle.
El
Reviewer/Inspector Name r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
uJivJiui

Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ORoutine O Complaint. O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: ©d Z� 4 Time:
� �-
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted��+Certtified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated orrr Above
Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: .0 �. 4',A...lA,�8(......................................... ........................... County: 1 . ..1: gia .................. ��.......
OwnerName:. ......................... .... n/7.`a,Fq........ Phone No:.....................................................................................:.
FacilityContact: ......................................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
%/..... �7/�f ,fes � p) /�
Mailing Address:... ,LL 4....:......../. C/ .................................................. yp...Q�lk—c........ .�.��...� ................................... .16AY-6......
Onsite Representative:.2........0&I.T 9.W ....................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..
Location of Farm:
c S .
1006 - o2 , 7mr calk a nr/ R Csk,7�15 ��U� o� D� i
4
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry M Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3 • ®° " Longitude ©• 6 64
Design,' Current
,.,Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
[:]Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons . .
Holding Ponds_ / Solid Traps,:
Design . Current Design Current
.Poultry Ca aci l'o ulation Cattle Ca aci Po "ulation.
❑ Layer I I RM Dairy 1 320 1-5 p
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity®
Total. SSLW
❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made.'
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ....`...... c ........................ .................................... ................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches): ry Llie
5/00
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes [t No
/u/w
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes 9 No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Continued on back
hvmonof Vtiater �uah
DwtsW of Sil and', Va Conser�ah4n
'
Other
.genclt°
3
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ORoutine O Complaint. O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: ©d Z� 4 Time:
� �-
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted��+Certtified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated orrr Above
Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: .0 �. 4',A...lA,�8(......................................... ........................... County: 1 . ..1: gia .................. ��.......
OwnerName:. ......................... .... n/7.`a,Fq........ Phone No:.....................................................................................:.
FacilityContact: ......................................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
%/..... �7/�f ,fes � p) /�
Mailing Address:... ,LL 4....:......../. C/ .................................................. yp...Q�lk—c........ .�.��...� ................................... .16AY-6......
Onsite Representative:.2........0&I.T 9.W ....................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..
Location of Farm:
c S .
1006 - o2 , 7mr calk a nr/ R Csk,7�15 ��U� o� D� i
4
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry M Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3 • ®° " Longitude ©• 6 64
Design,' Current
,.,Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
[:]Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons . .
Holding Ponds_ / Solid Traps,:
Design . Current Design Current
.Poultry Ca aci l'o ulation Cattle Ca aci Po "ulation.
❑ Layer I I RM Dairy 1 320 1-5 p
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity®
Total. SSLW
❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made.'
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ....`...... c ........................ .................................... ................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches): ry Llie
5/00
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes [t No
/u/w
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes 9 No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Continued on back

(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit "O'Routine O Complaint_ O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:? l^f �Y�re� Time: f ark
Facility Number i' / f� �
Q Not Operational ® Below Threshold
13 Permitted ® Certified ® Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold•
FarmName: ...... `eta;: u.....: ;`:.'2 ......................................... County: ..:..!.. re.................:!...........................................
OwnerName:...::. f('''.' ................1...........?;............................................ Phone No:.....................................................................................:.
FacilityContact: ........................................................................ Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:., c 17 �... f� �� a �c�......... i .................................................... .. .. ; ....i .. �........ Fir......................................... .. G /d .......
..................
-`CAI Integrator: Representative:f........:.......................
Certified Operator: ................................................... Operator Certification Number:......7
.....................................................................................................
Location of Farm:
_R. ^ r r -i 1 !t ! ,} -k.. � �.�• f .-. f `! ii I �� r� • ��? .AsiL FLS.
_�:5 Y•• f _) K,' / Yui V � `� f'.�ilJi 1 i%t (d��+< Z eCa"> -J i�ra f i c5p1 r� �ii4. �..i N�,' ?'/�L✓`_t� t a 6Pd��'- �F - -
d° di r} E1 pd3 "f
❑ Swine [IPoultry E]Cattle [IHorse Latitude - • f? ? Ei 'r Longitude • (" �" c?
Desi Current
e Capacity Poaulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
,,pacityPo ulation.
Ioiumber.of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
IJoidi 'g Ponds'/ Solid Traps;, ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less thaw adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:....N{
.................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): r ftr
5/00 f
'❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 -No
Q Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
..............................................................................................................
Continued on back
Design . Current
Poultry
Capacity. Population Cattle i
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity r
L
Total SSLW` 'C
Design Current
,,pacityPo ulation.
Ioiumber.of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
IJoidi 'g Ponds'/ Solid Traps;, ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less thaw adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:....N{
.................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): r ftr
5/00 f
'❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 -No
Q Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
..............................................................................................................
Continued on back

Facility Number: 8l — 7 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes M No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes�No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ® Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type / c-scu,;- ARS/ - 7,t.,x1I e PAXAf
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes E No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
C) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
JN No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
iff No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
It No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
IN No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
11 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
yiol'aiioris'or def cleneies were noted• during it is'visit! • y0t1 wiil •receive ,io #'urth�r'
ctirresporie�enee. a out tftB vasflt.........:.......................... .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain: any YES; answers and/orany recommendations or any other comanents
Use drawings of facility to Better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
0.,+ v r�k�Mt� — /SSE . 2 �Er D-&%#l45fZe��e�c( c+:,c`�• A,
14yed $8 /iintJ Mr�rn15 tAP-Al ucs� �� �l c�mw� %c.- 1'
.....
Reviewer/Inspector Reviewer/Inspector Name -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100

Facility Number: — of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes [-]No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of witid drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5100

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 7, 2000
Mr. Javan Calton
660 -Calton Road
Bostic, -'North Carolina 28018
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Operation Site.
Inspection
Facility Number 81-2
Rutherford County
Dear Mr. Calton:
Enclosed is a computer generated report from the
inspection conducted on August 2, 2000. This report is for
your files.
During the inspection it was noted that records were
not being maintained for the freeboard level in the lagoon.
It is required that freeboard levels be recorded weekly.
Record management is an important aspect of the overall'
animal waste management process. I suggest better
organization of your records, using the training manual
approach (notebook with tabs) or another method of
organizing your records.
Thank you for your time and assistance.during the
inspection. If you have any questions or if I may be of
assistance please, do not hesitate to contact me at
828-251-6208.
Sincerely,
0
Roger C. Edwards
Wastewater Consultant
Enclosure
cc: Donald Morrison, Rutherford County NRCS
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801-2414
. PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
A. Rnn—
...---

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complai6t O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
1 Date of Visit: 8/2/2000
Facility Number Time: 0945 Printed on: 8/7/2000
10 81 2
Not Operational 10 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified ® Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...................
FarmName: Callan.DWry.................................................................................................. County: RUJI ler.�axd....................................... Q............
OwnerName: Jay.ga........... :.......................... C.81t.911 ......................................................... Phone No: 2.4.5-.Q.63.$....................................................................
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Mailing Address: 660..Callsn.Rd......................................................
Onsite Representative: ..........................................................................
Certified Operator:jFRr.rgSt.JaYan..................... C.411Q.0 ...............
Location of Farm:
dos.M.-Ac................................................................ 2$QI...............
Integrator:..........................................................
Operator Certification Number: 2.21.Q2.
1'1 V1111'VlUaL \.1Lj Lane Un 1VVV 11V11.11 / HILIV3 LV 1..41LV111/ally Jill k3JN 1 /47). 1FUVel U.0 mile on t,airon "airy nu. -ime farm
is on the left and right sides of the 'road.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F 35 •F 27 03 Longitude 81 'F 4T714 F 48 °1
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine; (nna'city Pnmllatinn Poultry .(=anae,ty Pni„ilait Cattle r�..�..,F., »,.....r;+, ...
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
129liauy 1 300 1 125 1
J❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total;V gn Capacity
T.ota1SSL�V
300
42
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ® Spray Field Area d
Hoidmg Ponds / Solid; yaps :❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharizes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from -any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ® Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
�. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
S. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Naste Collection & Treatment
1. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Stricture I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...............#.1.....................................................................................:
'reeboard (inches): 48"

racifi�ty:N:umber: 81-2 Date of Inspection 8/2/2000 Printed on: $/7/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ' ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ® No
Renuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal.Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes ® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
D' NO.*ii)fatiolis;or defcienciet-W&e:noted during-this'visit.; XdU'Wili jreedW,ild.fli;rther- ;
corresp ondence. about this :visit. ' .: .. ...... ' ..:.... • ... • . ...
9. No records of freeboard levels. Records are disorganized; improvement is necessary in all areas of record management Suggest
sing the training manual or that system to maintain records in the future.
IV
Reviewer/Inspector Name Roger C dward; '
E
�`
a .`,
x 1
$
Reviewer/Insnectnr Siunatnre_ �..a_, /'

Facility 1�umber: 81-2 Date spec tion 8/2/2000 Printed on: 8/7/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ® Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.' residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ® No
5100

vision of Water Quality
_ vision'of Soil and Water Conservation
p Other Agency
Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other ❑ Denied Access
F_ Facility Number
0 Permitted N Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date of Visit 8/7/2000
p Not Operational p Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Callon.Darr..y................................................................................................... County: Rutherford ARO
Owner Name:,IaXan....................................... Caltan.......................................................... Phone No: 245-0.63.8 ........................................ I...........................
FacilityContact: ............................................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: 66.0 Caltna Rd....................................................................................... RosticANC ............................................................... 2,810IR ..............
OnsiteRepresentative: .......................................................................................................... Integrator:.......................................................................................
Location of Farm:
Fxaun..F..az,est. City.tale.SR..1.Q0G.�noxth..7..xniles. tea.Caltnn..Ilaizy..Bd..(SR.I.7..45�,...Txaysl.0..8..m�ile.an..Calton.Aairy..Rd,...T)�e.I'a.rna...
is.�an.the.lelt.and.righh.sides..af.th s.c�zad.......................................................................................................................................................................................
Swine p Poultry ® Cattle p Horse
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Ems
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ ayer In Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I ❑ on- airy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 300
Total SSLW 420,000
Number of Lagoons Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name
4
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
10/4/2000

Comments Facility Number Date of Visit 8/7/2000 Printed on: 10/4/2000
AMILIU1131 Comments Major VI awpigs.4
I
1

umber 81 _ 2 agoon Number a........... Lagoon ntifier belaw..loafing-area .....................
Active 0Inactive
Waste Last Added...........................................................
Determined by: p Owner ❑ Estimated
Latitude
Longitude
By GPS or Map? p UP6 Ig Map
GPS file number:
Surface Area (acres): g.8a.......................
Embankment Height (feet):.1.0.............................
Distance to Stream: p less than 250 ft p 250 feet -1000 feet p greater than 1000 ft
By measurement or Map? p Field Measurement ® Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes p No
Intervening Stream? O Yes *No
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): O < 5 p 5 - 10 O > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes *No O Unknown -
Spillway © Yes O No Adequate Marker *Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches): 48 ......................................
inspection date 8/7/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 48
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
p Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
p No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
p Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment
and/or Sprayfield O Yes p No O Unknown
unavailable
comments
fail to make contact O O
Yes g No
with representative
I'r

E
14D Routine ® Complaint ® Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review ® Other
Facility Number j Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection E= 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted S3 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
7 �...
Farm Name: �A!'T..�?l�f.....�y/..fi:�.�i.�/........................................................... County:..... +k 7'...t`R 2
Owner Name: ��.1�ntai.......................... �RI.fCI.......................................... Phone No:..5{. "�.rl.y .....�..............................
.......... %f ............ .... .............
Facility Contact: 't!.t/ nl.....s��IL..� ....................... Title:.®uJ,l��:..��...................................... Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: �v(c� 0 CSA/f Ofj -RO.46 ....................................... 2..©.�. ?.
'..
Onsite Representative: �.9 f/A/U! �OI?� Integrator:
............... ................................................................................................
Certified Operator:,,ro2Pt�� CQ(Li ...............
��ftV I�.f 14 / ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Operator Certification Number:,,,,�:,�,%.,Q,„
...................:......... ............... .............. .........
Location of Farm:
.................................................................................................................................:.......:............................................................................................................. .
�. ..�
Latitude 5 • ;Z 7 ` 0" Longitude j • y % ' /�� "
FsZine ,
Design Current Design;; Current :; Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity ;Population Cattle,
. -"-.."Capacity -Population- �.
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ElYes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes 91 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes a No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? E Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): 4 G....................................................................................................................................................................................
. ............ ................... .
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — e of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? . ❑ Yes EB No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level /
elevation markings? /.q ' � bu�'1'� P�? .r°fZ IT' JVi0P� �c=f�raz►2��� -moi' m4v,. lc -1 M,(13 tke ❑ Yes O.No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 9 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes SNo
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes It No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c)"This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 19 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
IT. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all. components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
Affl
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, free card, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20: Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time.of design?
' r
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
10 yiol'atigris:or• def dencies were ixoied• during •this•visit: • :You will reeeiye Bio further .
correspondence. about this .visit.
on #) .Explain any YES answers an. or any"recommendation
better explain situations (use additional -pages asnecessary):;
❑ Yes [j No
Yes &No
"Yes ® No
l�
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes M No
A6
Reviewer/Inspector Name ' � — 77
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

I of Inspection �.
Ador Issues
6.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below '
❑ Yes
No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
ENO
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e..residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
IN No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
® Yes
❑ No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
IS No
A.1

- Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC810002
Calton Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rutherford County
Dear Javan Calton:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation -General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on January 30, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Javan
Calton, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC810002 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Calton Dairy, located in Rutherford County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 300 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established- for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
NCDENR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper
May 1, 2003
Javan Calton
NAM
I
Calton Dairy
660 Calton Rd%
Bostic NC 28018
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC810002
Calton Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rutherford County
Dear Javan Calton:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation -General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on January 30, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Javan
Calton, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC810002 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Calton Dairy, located in Rutherford County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 300 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established- for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
NCDENR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the,; CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A'through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish .to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after .the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. ,A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change,in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Asheville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Asheville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Rutherford County Health Department
Rutherford County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC810002
NDPU Files
1
11
111
1

V -
;y
Producer: JAVAN CALTON
ge✓
Location: LOCATED ON CALTON DAIRY ROAD 6 MILES
NORTH OF
BOSTIC NC
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: DAIRY
Number of Animals: 300 COWS
(Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater.
The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce
the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the
fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization
plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are
strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the
waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen'than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as
they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation
exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities..
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than
5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff
to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind
odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop
production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not
more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on
proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste
samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
1

Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
300 animals X14 oral./cow X 1 cu. ft/7.48 gal. X .75
collected x 60 days =25267 cu ft/ 60 days
Direct rainfall (Dec -Jan) 8.1911 - evan 2.011 = 6.19" X 7755 scr ft
manure sutructure = 4000 cu ft/ 2 months.
Total storage: 25267 cu ft + 4000 cu ft = 29267 cu ft/ 2 mo X 6 =
175602 cu ft/yr =1313000 gal/yr = 5443 tons/yr. (amt.) waste/year
in dry stack.
LAGOON STORES 52 AC. IN OF RUNOFF, WASHWATER ETC. PER YEAR.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
300 animals X76 lbs X .75 collected = 17100 lbs PAN /Yr (PAN
from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
52 AC IN WASTE IN LAGOON X 20 LBS PER AC IN = 1044 PAN.( AVERAGE
PAN OF 20 LBS./AC.-IN FROM SAM BINGHAM BASED ON NUTRIENT TEST IN
SIMILIAR OPERATIONS.)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
RYE
3643
715
724C2
CORN -SIL
14.7
156
21.8
3302
MAY
SMGR HAY
2
100
if
2180
OCT
3643
18
724C2
CORN -SIL
14.7
156
3.8
592
MAY
SMGR HAY
2
100
"
380
OCT
4801
1
72402
FES -PAST
2.7
100
8.1
730
FEB
3643
5
4A
CORN -SIL
20
220
17.8
0
----
SMGR HAY
2
100
if
290
OCT
3643
25
724C2
FES -PAST
2.7
100
15.5
910
DEC
3643
16
724D2
FES -PAST
2.5
94
18.5
1739
JUL
4800
1
724C2
FES -PAST
2.7
100
19.4
1940
DEC
3643
6
72402
FES -PAST
2.7
100
21.2
2120
FEB
3643
17
724C2
FES -PAST
2.7
100
6.2
620
JUL
3643
34
724D2
FES -PAST
2.5
94
6.9
491
JUL
3643
35
724D2
FES -PAST
2.5
94
17.2
1425
MAR
3643129
724D2
FES -PAST
2.5
94
34.3
1425
AUG
Total 1190.7 118144
2
jOp
Q
0
eo
301(10
14 q0
G40
a
O
C�
�i QZ
��44

* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other
sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be
accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal
Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties
of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses
ali nutrients.. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 21)
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. NAcres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
*
See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 190.7 18144
Table 2
Total 190.7 18144
Amount of N Produced 18144
•j%-- Deficit 1 9,3910
3

NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for
periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge
will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements.
The manure will be spread with a 3500 gallon GEHI Slinger -spreader
wagon. The volume of manure to spread will be about 11480 cu. ft.
per month X 12 months = 137760 cu ft per year.
The dry stack will need to be cleaned out about every 2 months.
11480 cu ft per month X 2 = 22960 cu. ft. X 7.48 gal/cu. ft =
171741 gal per 2 months. 171741gal/2 mo./ 3500 gal/load = 50 loads
per cleanout. Each full load will contain about 55-60 lbs of N.
4.

See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization
of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field Soil Type Crop Application
No. Rate (In/Hr)
7-15 72402 NT -CORN SIL 0.4
SM GR SIL
Application
Amount (I n . )
Q� S
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IP WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, NOWEVER A SUMAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for 360 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
_12 MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being
stored in your structure exceed Elevation 91.0
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly soil
Conservation service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the waste.
Narrative of Operation: Although the lagoon is designed for 12
months of storage, it will be pumped two times a year. It.will
be pumped twice each year during May and again in October.
The following pumping rates will be used with the Long traveling
gun that is now on the farm:
See the attached irrigation compupations.and irrigation map.,
There were two abandoned lagoons on the farm. One of these lagoons
has been closed out. A copy of the lagoon closure plans is
attached. The second -lagoon will be closed out according to NRCS
standards.
5

LAGOON CLOSURE PLAN i
NAME: Javan Calton
LOCATION: on SR1745 just off Sunshine
660 Calton Road
Bostic Rd. in Sunshine
Bostic, NC 28018
Tract 3643 Rutherford County
Phone: [phone]
COUNTY: Rutherford
Date Prepared:
LAT./LONG: 35027'0"
81°47'30"
HU NO.: 03050105070040
Regional Division of Water Quality Phone: [phone]
Plan prepared by: Donald Morrison
NCACSP Technician
[phone]
See attached waste analysis report dated: ir� l 11 q7
NOTE: NRCS or SWCD personnel must be onsite while the lagoon is being closed for them to
certify the closure of the lagoon
GENERAL
Lagoons Nos.. 1A and 1B were constructed in 1971 for a dairy operation. 1B was designed to catch
the solid and 1A would trap all the liquid. These lagoons served 100 head dairy. Mr. Calton moved
this operation across the road to increase his number of milking cows. He leased the facilities at 1A
and 1B for 5 years to another dairyman.
Lagoon No. 2 which was built and ready for use -in 1979 became two small for his operation. He
abandoned it in 1978. He moved his animal waste system in a system designed for 300 cows which
was cost shared with NCACSP funds.
VOLUME TO BE REMOVED
Lagoon lA is 75'x75' with a depth of 8 feet. Total volume of waste to be removed (liquid and
sludge) is 201,196 gallons. Lagoon 1B is 150'x50' with a depth of 3 feet. Total volume of waste to
be removed (liquid and sludge) is 107,038 gallons. Lagoon No. 2 is 300'x75' with a depth of 5 feet.
Total volume of waste to be removed (liquid and sludge) is 491,436 gallons.
LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE
Buffer areas along creeks and roads will be honored. Most of this waste will be applied to fescue
pasture. Pounds of nitrogen will result from waste analysis which will be shown in the waste analysis
section. Amount of nitrogen per crop, per acreage. will be calculated and shown.

Lagoon Closure Plan
Javan Calton
Rutherford County
SPECIFICATIONS
The lagoon will be agitated with a PTO driven chopper pump for sufficient time to create a slurry
from the sludge. Waste will be applied in a manner not to exceed the hydraulic loading capacity of
the soil and not to exceed the crop nitrogen requirements. If sludge or build up is still evident a drag
line or front end loader will remove the remaining containments.
Closure of this operation must be done without runoff of the effluent. Do not land apply while it is
raining or when the ground is saturated.
These three lagoons will be breached to NRCS standard or probably cosmetic grading to the entire
dam area.
The breach area or the total dam area will be seeded according to NRCS standards.
Waste analysis will be shown.
Map of fields for applying animal waste will also be shown.

NCACSP Manual
NC-ACSP-WMP
Waste Management Plan Statement
ADDENDUM TO NC-ACSP-2
1. A waste management plan for the operation which benefits by
Agriculture Cost Share Program CPO toZ q- df has
been developed in accordance with N.C. NRCS Technical Guide
specifications. The waste management plan accounts for the
environmentally safe treatment, storage and application of
all animal waste generated by the operation.
2. The waste management plan includes maps -and soil losses of
the fields to which animal waste is to be applied.
3. The Cooperator(s) have signed, agreed to the conditions of
.the waste management plan and received a copy of the waste
management plan.
4. A copy of the waste management plan with original signatures
is a permanent part of the District's cooperator file.
5. Any changes to the size or type of animal operation will
require that the waste management plan be revised and new
signatures obtained.
Technical Representative
Date
October 1996 Page VI -47

5/1/97
San`
leof .i a
R.
Sample ID:
WDtlii tri
Waste Code:
ALD
Description:
,VaT�p+rle ID:
YWQL.
Waste Code:
1LD
7escription:
n >
w
Grower., Calton, Javan Copies To: County Extension Director
660 Calton Rd. USDA-NIY/ RCS -Rutherford
Bostic, NC 28018
f USDA-NRCS-Rutherford
astQ naySZS e�orL Farm: Federal Building, Room 202
121 South Main St.
Rutherford County
Ruthe o
rf rdton, NC 28139
} E.
Labbr..aoRe 111tS :Y 5ruv".6g a fiT 4da�;! F z 3 r .a
twlilor%unles <ofhe" �r_y
,...,...._. .,. .:, _X ('ia ra;�e<tiQ%d '�`��, skz
N P S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo Cl
Total 35.0 VL 19.1 44.6 94.6 28.7 11.0 42.4 1.01 0.53 0.47 0.27
EV -NN L VL M M L M M M M M
-NO3
NH4 Na Ni Cd A Al Se Li PH SS C.N DM% CCE0 I
OR -N 25.5 6'09
Urea L
N
Total 154 L
IN -N
-NO3
P
38.8
L
K
118
L
Ca
121
M
M9
43.5
M
S
21.6
L
Fe
76.2
M
Mn
1.79
M
Zn
0.74
M
Cu
0.64
M
B Mo Cl C
0.23
M
-NH4
OR -N
Urea
Na
Ni
Cd.
A
Al
Se
Li
PH
SS
ON DM% CCE% ALE(J
2.7.8 6.57.
L

CAft& weWhk Ano
Tmvdin6 rAM Fidd Dm dbm4 MIM9
Hard Rose Traveling Gun System
FIELD DATA SHEET
-`1 Make and model number ;5;i a✓ Rei. Lo
2. Hose length d [fed) and hose inside diameter (ID)_
3. Gun make and model number Aek."
/
4. Gun nozzle size finch]. _ [inch], ring orifice. taper bore orifice.
S. Gun arc angle -73 D [degrees]
6. Travel lane spacing __ [ ]. Indicate whether uniform _ random.
Number of ea lerio rhyhants . fiber of interior hydrants
--
7. Gun wetted diameter [fl- meaFietz
on c
8. Gun pressure ?O fog'. t �0 S
gauge,
determined from gun charts, calm&ted (show calculations)
**9- Operating pressure at hose reel fPsi - observed at worldn$ gauge,
*10-' Stir line size __ provided by owner.
PP13► -- [tel (gym Pump to last hydrant).
** 11. Supply line length feet (maximum pumping distance).
12. Supply Brie type QVC, . )
** 13.
Pump make and model number
**14. Pump capacity,
**IS. Engine make and model number
or
**16. Electric motor horsepower and rpm AM frpm]
Note: It is strongly recommended that operating pressure at the reel and gun wetted
diameter be field determined. -
* Locate each hydrant on a copy of the map_ Indicate the start and stopof the
sprinkler cart
for each travel lane and show distance traveled Show the location of the supply line.
Irrigated acres will be determined by travel lane
** Optional data, furnish where possible.
*** Information famished by
and/or
ignah�ue—of Owner orFaality Represe�tive
Printed Name of Owner or Facility Representative
Sipatrrre of Technical Specialist
Printed name of Tedmical Specialist .
Date ;?-2e-4 4
Date
*** Only the person or persons collecting the data should Sign the data sheet.

imp W9W& Aaa ' Traveling Gun Campy idkind Walahed. 2-20.9
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
: COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm Number (Identification) 7.36 q-2 Field Number (Identification) 7 /(d
2. Irrigation System Designation V Existing Irrigation System New/ Expanded Irrigation System
3. Number of Travel Lanes # Interior Lanes #Exterior Lanes __[feet] Length ofpull(LI)
# Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes _ jfeet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes _[feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted Diameter q- [feet] From field data sheet
5. Spacing / Z�0 Hydrant Spacing [feet] 70 [as percent of wetted diameter]
V
6. Hydrant Layout Multiple Hydrants Single Hydrant F.accessivdy spaced Hydrants.
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based m patterer spacing and travel lane location.
�y, r• , Travel Lane Length (Ll) Interior or=4,efExterior (LandRydrant)
D , qs (a) Acres start end of puff from Tabled Column
® (b) Acres middle portion of puff (LI) I?q I
(Pull Length r Lo [feet] X Wetted Width ' [feet]) /43,560
(c)' Acres stop enol of pull from Table Column
I .b Total acres for Travel Lane. L mgth (LI) (Sum: a + b + c)
-- cTravel Lace Length (LZ) Interior or __Z rior (LaneiHydrant)
•'
6A S (a) Acres start end of pull from Table 16e Column
3, Vq SUP (b) Acres middle portion of puff (L1)
(Pull Length__;gZ"5'[feet] X Wetted Width ZQ 1 [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
! 12— Total acres for Travel Lane Length (I,2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel Lane Length (1,3) Interior or Exterior (LanelHydrant)
o .W a) Acres start end of pull from Table -- EE7 Column
r` c w I ' b� (b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll)
(Pull Length 7j9 [feet] X Wetted Width _ Z9 I [feet]) 143,560
�— (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for Travel Lane Length (13) (Sum: a + b + c)
S. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the
field. Sum all of these and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
�(o (a) Acres per Travel Lane Length (Li) X — # Lanes = 7a Q Acres
_ (b) Acres per Travel Lane Length (L2) X ( # Lanes Acres
7,10 (c) Acres per Travel Lane Length (L3) X 1 # Lanes = 7, to Acres
Total CAWMP Wettable Acres for fi �kd (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Date:

� Pb
wI4�Aqg 'I
W414J .Z
bbl,l r�.f
o z(0040`)
�ti
U� /� • = QEF
96 _ god

CONC. PAVEMENT
'1'X2" T9 G JOINT WITH PAVEMENT
"GONG. SLAB 12 DIAM. (N0.4) STEEL BARS,
4.,
WELL COMPACTED 'EARTH' 'HEAVY PAPER TO
PREVENT BONDING. OF
WALL TO RAMP
NOTE
✓
ON ON 16" HEAVYWEIGHT CONCRETE TWO CORE BLOCK
BLOCK WITH ALL CORES FILLED PREFERRED
WITH CONCRETE -S
,C DIAM. PIPE, IO'O.C. FOR
WEEP HOLES
ICU. FT. CRUSHED STONE
-to BOARD G.L.
OR GRAVEL AROUND INTAKE
A
BOTTOM OF 'FOOTING ONG. SLAB
MUST BE BELOW FROST
LINE
3t- 8*
SECTION THRU RAMP SUPPORTED ON
GRAVITY CONCRETE . BLOCK WALL
"CONC. PAVEMENT
/I"X24TI1G JOINT WITH PAVEMENT
-8" GONG. SLAB
I/; DIAM. (NO.4) STEEL
BARS
WELL C MUE - -------- •
3 -
HEAVY PAPER TO PREVENT -
BONDING OF WALL TO
RAMP
91 4"
4! DIAM. PIPE, 101 O.C.
FOR WEEP HOLES
I CU. FT. CRUSHED STONE'BOARD G.L.
OR GRAVEL AROUND INTAKE
-P+ 6* ••6"I - •Z-4" GONG. SLAB
BOTTOM OF FOOTING
MUST BE BELOW FROST
INE
SF-- --T-4 R RAM-CL-SUPP-ORTM ON ----
Ar GONG. PAVEMENT
[
rXeTaG JOINT WITH PAVEMENT 7 ir GONG. SLAB F-, 1/2" DIAM. (N0.4) STEEL
j BAR$
WELL COMPACTED EARTH HEAVY PAPE
3! -
PREVENT BONDING
9 OF WALL TO RAMP
2 - NO. 4 BARS -Iexrxmr BLOCK
NO. 4 BARS, I6"O.r-
4! DIAM. PIPE, 10'0.C,
FOR WEEP HOLES
I CU. FT. CRUSHED STONE
OR GRAVEL AROUNDJNTAK BOARD
G.L.
NO. 4 BARS, 301O.C. 23•GONG. SLAD
!7` '�-lf-:T 7=�
j2' N0-3 BARS,
D.C.
4- P"
SECTION THRU RAMP SUPPORTED ON
REINFORCED BLOCK WALL
12!

FARM BUILDING .
PLAN N0.
.T"AVAN CANTON
MANURE RAMP
A manure ramp is a great help in loading manure from a paved lot onto a spreader. A tractor
with blade can be used to scrape the lot and push the manure directly on the spreader, or
manure may be piled in a storage area (not over one week during fly season) and pushed on
the spreader when ready for hauling. Allow 10 sq. ft. per cow storage area for 1 to 2 weeks'
storage. Provide a reinforced concrete wall approximately 2' high around storage area.
The ramp must be high enough to clear the spreader. The plans.show 5'-4" clearance, but
check the dimensions of the spreader to -be used. The area under the ramp should be paved
or graveled.
Afety bars shown on the
above sketch may be added
G
J
to the ramp to reduce the
LOUNGING BARN
danger of accidentally
Z
driving a tractor over the
J
end. These can be made
® — — — — — — — — — — — — —
from two pieces of 1k"
_ PAVED LOT
pipe inserted through the
SLOPE
concrete forms and bent up
at an angle of about 450.
The bars should extend
about 18" into the slab
and should be tied to the
reinforcing steel.4
SILO j SLOPS T �l3 Y
R
1
j STORAGE
AREA
High quality concrete is I1� DRAIN
important for strength and TYPICAL PLAN SHOWING RAMP LOCATION'li
durability. If ready -mix IN DAIRY LOOSE HOUSING LAYOUT
is used, specify not less
than 6 -sacks of cement per cu. yd., not more than 6 gallons of water per sack of cement, 3 inch
slump, 6% entrained air, and 1'k" maximum size aggregate. If you are mixing on the job, the
' above specifications should be met. Try a 1:2k:3 mix, and adjust proportions of sand and stone
if necessary to get a workable mix - "mushy" but not "soupy". Proper curing is important.
Spray with commercial curing compound, or keep the concrete wet for 7 days by covering with
wet straw or sawdust.
Aapted from Virginia Polytechnic Institute Circular 876.

ate!
J
! �
•
•
1'
WATERSHED -AREA MEASUREMENTS
CROPLAND _.ACRFS PASTURE- ACRES
WOODLAND -ACRES TOTAL_ACRES*�
SKETCH - OF PROPOSED POND SHOWINGBORINGS !
L'O"ald. "fers"Ce Point in center Ims of dam and identifso on sketch.,'
■■■■■M■®®®■■
■■■■MIME■■®MEN
MEN
0
INt®�
MEN
®■■■®■■■■■®®
■��
2d!.®
■
E0■
MMM-
®MENU®®■®®
EINE
MEN
®■■
"No
ON
NONE®■■■
■MEMO■■■
10111
so
M ®
MM
NOMINEES
■
■■■■®OMEN
MMM■■
■M®HIMEMEEE
M■■■■■s■®
010
No
■■®®■■■■■■■■■■■■
mom
mom
■_M
ON
■m®
■■■■N®E■®■
M111
■■Mom
0101■
■E
■■■■®®ERNE
ok-211■■■MM■M■■M■■■N■■■m
No
MUSEUM
MM■SEEMS
so®■■EMMEMN
No
ON
M■MEME■E
■ o0
No
0
■■■■■EE
®®■®®■■MERE■1010011001®■■■■
®■®®■®■
mom
NEEMENOMME
-BORING
Pandedarsa
(Confinued an back who* nwAaw
uiulllllllll=mu=uu =1031001010
®®I=I��■�■■I■■IE ■I®!®�■�®!®!®►■:■1®MINIM
®I®loll ®I■ I I■INS■
®�■IMI■�■!■�I !■;OtMI■!E!®SEI■�®•EIN;EIEIE
■'®!®IM'E� I■
•EI®I■I■■I■■I®!®;■IES■I®I®
EIEIEM� I■ I I®IIEIEI IE Im
�'�I�■ilM�®t ;Et®:■!■'■IMI®�®i®i■IEIE'EIE!■1011■
■®®�®I■®I®
E1`®I®I■®I■SEI®I®'®IE"■I®IE
■ !®I®�®IE ®I®�,®IEI®IE
®!®i ! i
minWIN INK EI■IEI®®I�LEIEINI MI■'■I®I
!1 /•-
�.:

INSTRUCTIONS
All dams built with technical assistance from the Soil Conservation Service
must have a'hazard classification assigned.by the person responsible for
approving the design. Most farm ponds, except in borderline cases, can
be classified after a complete field investigation without assuming failure
and making breach studies. This data sheet is to be used for recording
the information obtained through field studies and for documenting the
hazard classification. Where there is a possibility for loss of life or
major property damage from a dam failure, an approved breach routing
procedure is to be used. (Consult with the -area engineer.)
Hazard classifications of dams are' made by evaluating the possibility
for loss of life and the extent of damage that would result if the dam
should suddenly breach --that is --a section of the dam be suddenly and
completely washed out: It is to be assumed that a wall of water will be
rele'd
ased.equal to the height.of the'am- This flood wave will be reduced
in height as it ..mo'v'es down the flood plain. The wave height (depth of
flooding) should'be evaluated fora sufficient distance downstream until
the estimated flood level will not cause significant damage to improvements,
such as homes, buildings,.roads, utilities,reservoirs, etc. The breach
flood level will be reduced depending on the valley storage, slope, and
openess of the flood plain; however, in a narrow steep val.ley slopes
steeper than 10% should be given special consideration. One method of
evaluation is- to compare available valley storage (under flood conditions)
to impoundment storage (figured to the top of the dam) for each reach
evaluated with.a judgment -estimate made of the flood wave height at all
critical points downstream.
Should there be any questions about the hazard classification for a dam,
the area engineer should be consulted before making design commitments.

=Department of Agriculture
soil Conservation Service
NC -ENG -34
September 1980
File Code: 210
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
Landowner fQ d -QA/ Ca 40 t t County {lfer ,-�eeV
Community or Group. No.,-�&.:5 / 1 Conservation Plan NO:.
Estimated Depth .of Water to Top of Dam / Ft. Length of Flood Pool 150 Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation q7- 7
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach 71)1.5 km,� �e o ca fe I AJ e d r
iE�l3 o -- o- lam•/ c8•c7 E7 obi 1E �- j i.il tet 1. %Qj1F! Na r<74 4 5.-4rQ.QiYI o •fir ..:> hL14,Id
h2 ht �a'�►'t��oa� �a a of Irk or &imaa��.pir
Hazard Classification of Dam Ea.� b, c) (see NEM -Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (I, II, III, n V)
Concurred By 0-dk-Z-4A 1� �� �. 1) C
name title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on.reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date
Date 1-1E W'
.:
Est.: El ev.
Est., Elevation
,Kind of;
Improvements:
of Breach
Reach:
Length:.Width:
Slope:. Land Use
; Improvements
Above.. :Floodwater Above
Mood Plain:
Flood Plain
Ft,
Ft,
%
Ft.
Ft.
1
20
/
Ale A) 4t
2
s,46,44-14wy
jr,
3 .
Vic-
2o?)
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach 71)1.5 km,� �e o ca fe I AJ e d r
iE�l3 o -- o- lam•/ c8•c7 E7 obi 1E �- j i.il tet 1. %Qj1F! Na r<74 4 5.-4rQ.QiYI o •fir ..:> hL14,Id
h2 ht �a'�►'t��oa� �a a of Irk or &imaa��.pir
Hazard Classification of Dam Ea.� b, c) (see NEM -Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (I, II, III, n V)
Concurred By 0-dk-Z-4A 1� �� �. 1) C
name title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on.reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date
Date 1-1E W'

VEGETATION SPECIFICATION
Rip and disk all disturbed area 5" deep. Incorporate two tons of lime
per acre. Apply 1000 pounds of 10-10-10 per acre and smooth seedbed.
Uniformly apply 60 lbs. of fescue seed per acre and 25 lbs. of Abruzzi
rye grain per acre. Seeding should be completed between March 15 and
June 1 or August 15 and October -15. Immediately mulch with 2 tons of
small grain straw or tame hay per acre. Reseed any rilled or gullied
areas that may developed.
Note: SCS will determine area to be seeded before vegetative work is
started.

Page 4 of 4
C. The fencing shall be fastened to each end post, corner post and,pull
post by wrapping each horizonal strand around the post and tying it
back on itself with not less than three tightly wound wraps.
d. The fencing shall be fastened to wooden line posts by means of
staples. Woven wire fencing shall be attached to alternate horizontal
strands. Each strand of barbed wire shall be attached to each post.
Staples shall be driven diagonally with the grain of the wood and at
a slight downward angle and shall not be driven so tightly as to bind
the wire againist the post.
e. The fencing shall be fastened to steel or concrete line posts with
either two turns of 14 gauge galvanized steel or iron wire or the
post manufacturer's special wire clips.
f. Wire shall be spliced by means of a Western Union splice or by
suitable sleeves applied with a tool designed for the purpose.
The Western Union splice shall have not less than 8 wraps of each
end about the other. All wraps shall be tightly wound and closely
spaced.. Splices made with splice sleeves shall have a tensile
strength not less than 80 percent of the strength of the wire.
Reference: Fences for the Farm and Rural Home, USDA Farmers Bullentin No.
2241, and Material Specification 591.

Page 3 of 4
e. Steel Fence Posts and Braces
Steel fence posts and braces shall conform to the requirements of Federal
Specification RR -F-221.. Posts with punches tabs for fastening the wires
shall not be used.
Steel line posts - Style 1 -
"T" Section
1 3/8"
x 1 3/8" x 1/8" thick.
Style 2 -
"U" Section
2" x 1
1/4" x 3/321F
Style 3 -
"L" Section
2" x 2"
x 1/4'
f. Brace Installation
Brace or pull post assembly shall be installed in straight fence sections
at intervals not to exceed 20 rods on level land or at other points of
changes in slopes and curves. Double span assemblies shall be used for
lengths over 10 rods. Brace assembly shall consist of horizonal timbers
between posts with a double strand of No. 9 gauge wire attached to the top
and base of the center pull post or two diagonal timbers placed between
Pull posts or end assembly may be substituted for horizontal timber with
wire brace.
g. Setting Posts
All posts shall be set and maintained in vertical position. Posts may be
hand set or set with post driver. If hand set, all backfilled material
shall be thoroughly tamped. Posts holes shall be at least 6 inches larger
than the diameter or slide dimension of the posts. If power driven, wood
posts shall be sharpened to a dull point.
Earth backfill around posts shall be thoroughly tamped in layers no thicker
than 4 inches and shall completely fill the post hole up to the ground
surface. Concrete backfill around posts shall be rodded into '-.glace in
layers not thicker than 12 inches, eith earth or concrete, shall be
crowned up around posts at the ground surface.
No stress shall be applied to posts set in concrete until at least 24 hours
after the concrete has set.
h. Barbed wire - In warm weather a stretch of 100 feet should sag 4 inches
in the middle and 2 inches in cold weather.
Wire at end posts, corner posts and braced line posts assembly shall be
wrapped and attached to itself with 3 twist. Braced line posts assemblies
will be stretched to center posts.
3. Attaching Fencing to Posts
The fencing shall be stretched and attached to posts as follows:
a. The fencing shall be placed on the inside of the posts facing the
area being protected, except on curves. 'Where appearance is
critical, fence may be fastened to the "outside" of the post.
b. The fencing shall be placed on the outside of curves.

1
Page 2 of 4
Spacing of barbed wire on post shall be as shown in the following diagram:
IN—
a. Barbed Wire
VIu
All barbed wire shall consist of 2 strands of wire with 4 point barbs
spaced not more than 5 inches apart. Galvanized barbed wire shall be
fabricated from 12k gauge or 15k gauge strand wire and shall meet the
requirements of ASTM A121.
b'. - Weight _ of • Zinc --Coating
Zinc coating shall be a minimum of Class I or 0.30 ounces per ft2
c. Staples
Staples used to fasten fence wire to wood posts shall be 9 -gauge galvanized
wire with a minimum length of 1k inches for sofy woods and a minimum length
of one inch for close -grain hardwoods.
d. Wood Fence Posts and Braces
Wood posts and braces shall be black locust, red cedar, osage orange,
redwood, pressure treated pine of other wood of equal life or stremgth.
At least half the diameter of red cedar or redwood posts shall be in
heartwood. Pressure treatment shall conform to Material Specification 585.
The posts shall be sound, new, free from decay, with all limbs trimmed
substantially flush with the body. They shall be substantially straight
throughout their length.
Posts 5 inches or larger in diameter shall be used for anchor posts(gate,
corner,end, and braced -line posts). Line posts shall be at least 3h
inches in diameter(small end). Four or 5 inch posts shall be used for
barnlots, corrals, and other confined areas and in sandy and wet soils.
Anchor posts shall be set A feet in the ground and line posts shall be
set 2 feet.
Wood line posts - 6# feet or longer, 3h inch minimum diameter.
Wood corner, gate and brace posts - 8 feet or longer, 5 inch minimum diameter•.`

FENCING FOR LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION(FT.)
DEFINITION
Fencing for the purpose of excluding livestock from stream channels or
from areas of waste management systems.
MP
To:(1) Exclude livestock from areas of waste management systems. (2)
to prevent damage to stream banks and pollution of streams by livestock
(3) to provide suitable access to drinking water for livestock.
CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES
Any area needing protection from or access to.
SPECIFICATION GU=pE
1. Fence Line Clearing
Fence lines will be cleared of brush and trees; gullies and steep banks
may require grading.
2. Type and Height of Fence
Fence for cattle shall consist of four strands barbed wire fence.
The fence shall be supported by line post, 10 feet apart for barbed wire.
Line posts may be spaced up to 16'h feet for sfiort distance in low use areas
and where soil or terrain conditions prohibit closer spacing. Brace post
shall be set 8 feet from corner or anchor post. Wire may be nailed to
trees(not recommended)when trees are in line of the fence, but should be
attached to a board or 2X4 that has been attached to the tree. The general
use of existing trees as line posts is not recommended.

3. Settling .Basin Cost
Concrete - 20.667' x 80 ft. x 4"/12" = 551 cu. ft.
= 20.4 cu. yds.
20.4 cu. yds. @ $90.00/cu-.yd.
Concrete -Block
250 = 8" block @ $1.54/block
250 - block @ z ton/100 block @ $18.00/ton
250 block @ 3 bags cement/100 block @ $4.25/bag
Grading cost figure in waste storage gond excavation.
$1,836.00
$385.00
22.50
31.87
$439.37
9

r
3,238 lbs. @ $.74/lb. = $2,396.12
Slab Concrete and Curb
1800 3712.5
.333X 160 x 30 +:45 x 82..51
8" x 8" x 228'
75 cu. yds. @ $90.00/cu.yd. = $6,750.00
Total $15,071.12
1836 cu. ft.
101 cu. ft.
1937 cu. ft. = 72 cu. yd.
use 75 cu. yd.
2. Push Off Ramp Cost
Concrete in Footing = 4'2"xll.5xl ft.= 47.9 cu. ft.
3'x42'xl ft. = 126 cu. ft.
173.9 cu.. ft. = 6.4 cu. yd.
Concrete in Slab and Curb = 9'x27x8"/12" =,q 162
+ 8" tfx �6" ;,x.: 27'x2 = 18
/12 /12 180 cu. ft. = 6.7 cu.yd.
Concrete in Block Wall 70x5:' `;x 5" `„x: 88” _
/12 /T2 /12"
+ 13 x 5%12" x 9/12" x 88/12" _
20 cu. yds. @ $90.00/cu.yd. = $1,800.00
400 - 8" concrete.block @ $1.54/block
80 - 12" concrete block @ $1.94/block
480 block @ 2 ton/100 blck.@ $18.00/ton
480 block.@ 3 bags cement/100 block @ $4.25/bag
Steel - No. 4 bars 283 + 223 = 506 ft. x .668 lb/ft.
@ $.74/lb.
Total
89 cu. ft.
30 cu. ft.
119 cu. ft. = 4.4 cu. yd.
17.5 cu. yd.
use 20 cu. yds.
concrete
$616.00
':155.20
43.20
61.20
250.12
$2,925'::}2
Grading cost included in waste storage pond excavation.

l
IX. Operation and Maintenance Plan
The waste management system will keep pollutants out of the creek if
the 25 yr. - 24 hr. storage capacity is maintained in the waste storage
pond and diversion for polluted water and clean water are maintained
around the system.
Whenever the waste storage pond level reaches elevation 92.9 or 2.1
ft. below the top of dam, the storage volume should be irrigated. A
post will be set with its top at this elevation.
7
The settling basin is designed to remove as many solids as possible
prior to runoff water and milking parlor wash water reaching the waste
storage pond. This will extend the life of the pond. The settling
basin should be cleaned out periodically to maintain its settling capacity.
Vegetation around waste storage pond and structures should be mowed annually
and any erodied areas patched. Fencing should be checked and repaired as
required. Keep vigorous growth of fescue around waste storage pond area.
APPENDIX: Summary of Component Cost
Manure storage structure $15,071.12
Push off ramp 2,.925.72
Heavy use area 738.50
Waste storagpLpond,grading 17;404.00
Concrete chute 299.98
--Se-tt-ling. basin %" --1j,275-37-
Piping 1,902.50
.Fencing and gates 1,081.40,
Vegetation 789.00 y2/ fR
Note: Grading for all components. included in waste storage pond grading.
1. Cost of Solid Storage Structure
Grading cost included in waste storage pond grading cost.
Reinforced concrete
8" x V x 84'- =
.75'x4.91.6'x84'-3"x4"x84' _
Total
23.7 cu. yd. @ $250.00/cu.yd. = $5,925.00
Reinforcing steel
No. Qty. Lgth Total Length Size Type
T1 84 5-10 490-0 4 1
T2' 84 6-1 511-0 5 2
T3 84 5-10 490-0 4 2
T4 33 30-0 990-0 4 1
# 4 bars - 1970 ft. = 1316 lbs:
# 5 bars - 511 ft. = 533 lbs.
weldwire fabric - 6615 sq. ft. = 1389 lbs.
Total 3,238 lbs.
336.00
-302.72
.638.72 cu.ft.=23.7 cu.yd.

1 1 6
VIII. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Limitations
Manure spread in bottomland cropland should be incorporated
immediately after spreading.
Manure spread on pastureland near streams and on steep slopes should
be spread during dry periods.
Manure should be spread on sandier soils during the winter months
and on tight clayey soils during the drier.months.
An aerial photo attached points out areas suited for spreading
manure during certain times of year.
Irrigation,Vater shall be applied at a recommended rate of .3 inch per
hour fora maximum of 7 hrs. per day for a total of 2.1 inches per day.
An intetval of 5 days in grass and 8 days on cropland is recommended.
B.. Volume of Manure to Spread
.tpd 11,480 cu. ft./month = 360 ton/month = 4320 ton/yr-.-
r��j(o� = 137,760 cu.ft./yr.
�o-
C� a' C. Estimated Nutrient Content
D. Manure will be tested and applied according to soil test recommendations.
If P 2 0 5 is the limiting factor and soil test show that 60 units of
P 2 0 5 are required per acre, the following areas will be required.
Acres = 20,000 lbs. P 2 0 5 /60 lbs. P205/ac. = 333 acres
E. Nitrogen, P205 and K20 available in cow manure will not provide all
nutrients needed by corn or pasture. Commerical fertilizer and
lime will also be needed to maintain good fertility.
F. Consider rotation of pastures because of the frequency that manure
will -be spread on pastures.
Per Month
Per Year
N - 11.6
lbs./ton X 360 ton
4,166 lbs.
50,000 lbs.
P205- 4.6
lbs./ton X 360 ton
1,667 lbs.
20,000 lbs.
K 2 0 - 6.9
lbs./ton X 360 ton'
2,500 lbs.
30,000 lbs.
D. Manure will be tested and applied according to soil test recommendations.
If P 2 0 5 is the limiting factor and soil test show that 60 units of
P 2 0 5 are required per acre, the following areas will be required.
Acres = 20,000 lbs. P 2 0 5 /60 lbs. P205/ac. = 333 acres
E. Nitrogen, P205 and K20 available in cow manure will not provide all
nutrients needed by corn or pasture. Commerical fertilizer and
lime will also be needed to maintain good fertility.
F. Consider rotation of pastures because of the frequency that manure
will -be spread on pastures.

Design
Feedlot area = 26,136 sq. ft.
Rainfall intensity - 10 yr. - 1 hr. = 2.3"/hr.
Flowrate = 0.01 (26,136 sq.ft.) (2.3"/fir.) = 601 gal/min.
A common design is to use 2 sq. ft. of surface area for each gal/min.
of flow.
Surface Area = 2 x flowrate = 2 (601) = 1202 sq. ft.
Width x length = 20x60
The site will allow at least a 20'x60 settling basin. Using concrete
block construction the settling basin height = 3 block high.
See attached work sheet for cost of settling basin.
V. Piping
Length of 6" PVC from present outlet to settling basin - 25 ft.
Length of 12" pipe from settling basin to waste storage pond - 165 ft.
A diversion will carry runoff water if 12" pipe fills to capacity.
25 ft. - 6" PVC.Sch 40 @ $3.50/ft. $87.50
165 ft. - 12" PVC Sch 40 @ $11.00/ft. $1;815.00
$1,902.50
VI. Fencing
Total length of fencing 1202 ft. @ $.70/ft. $841.40
4-12 ft. gates @ = $60.00 each $240.00
$1,081.40
Fencing to be completed inaccordance to the attached specifications.
Vegetation Specifications
Vegetation to be completed according to the attached specifications.
Cost Estimate
1.5 ac. @ $526.00
n
$789.00
5

8. Sizing waste storage pond
Try: t101 _1 150
s r
Volume = 7.1 F
110x200)+ ( 138.4x228.4). :+ 4 ( 124x214.2
6
189,363 cu. ft.(This volume is close enough)
Total volume to top of dam
60 r(110x200)+(150x240)+4(130x220)1
= 287,333 cu. ft.. = 6.6. ac. ft. (Not dam safety pond)
b. Concrete Chute
8'x27'x4"/12" -�-- 71.93 cu. ft.
+1.5'x4 W x2 = 12.0 cu. ft.
83.93 cu.ft.=3.1 cu.yd.
3.1 cu yds. @ $90.00/cu.yd.
Steel 5'x27'=135 sq.ft. @ 21 lbs./100 sq.ft. @ $.74/lb
c. Grading Cost
Excavation 8,702 cu. yds. @ $2.00/cu.yd.
III. Diversions
4
$279.00
$ 20.98
$299.98
$17,404.00
All clean water shall be diverted away from waste storage structure and pond.
See drawing for typical cross-section required.
IV. Settling Basin
If runoff water from the feedlot is allowed to enter storage pond directly;
the pond will fill with manure solids and decrease the ponds capacity.to
store runoff. A settling basin will increase life of waste storage pond.

3
2. Normal runoff for 1 year
period
Concrete
CN 95 30 day CN
85
Drainage
Area = 0.8 ac.
MONTH NORMAL RAINFALL
NORMAL RUNOFF
NORMAL EVAPORATION
January
4.04
2.48
1.0
February
4.11
2.55
1.5
March
4.60
3.00
2.0
April
3.69
2.19
3.0
May
3.52
2.04
4.0
June
3.64
2.14
4.5
July
5.09
3.45
4.5
August
4.68
3.07
4.0
September
3.46
1.99
3.0
October
3.31
1.85
2.0
November
3.02
1.60
1.5
December
4.15
2.60
1.0
47.31
28.96
32.0
Normal runoff = 28.96 in. x .8 ac. x 43,560 sq.ft./ac. = 84,100 cu.ft./yr.
12 in./ft/
3. Rainfall minus evaporation on the pond surface
47.31" - 32.0" = 15.31" = 1.3 ft./yr.
4. 25 year - 24 hr. runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 7" runoff = 6.41"
25 yr. - 24 hr. runoff = 6.41" x .8ac. x 43,560 sq.ft. = 18,615 cu.ft.
12 in./ft.
5. 25 yr. - 24 hr. rainfall on pond surface
Rainfall = 7" = 0.6 ft.
6. Freeboard use - 1 ft.
7. Summary of storage volumes
i. milking parlor wash water 87,600 cu. ft.
ii. normal runoff 84,100 cu. ft.
iii. 25 yr. - 24 hr. runoff 18,615 cu. ft.
190,315 cu..ft.
iv. rainfall minus evaporation 1.3 ft.
v. 25 yr. - 24 hr. rainfall(direct) 0.6 ft.
vi. freeboard.': 1.0 ft.
2.9. ft.
Note: Soilds accumulation was not considered in waste storage pond since
a settling basin will be installed.

AI
-------- --- --------- --
--- --------
. . .......
rlyly
- ----- PW
. . . ........... . ..
----------

X,75 -
z4 -r- -
57 Z&7 y�l

Since a diversion will be located below the structure to carry
polliitdd- water to waste storage pond, the 25 year -24 hour rain-
fall will not be added to top of design storage volume. Rainfall
minus evaporation will also not be considered.
See attached drawing for waste storage structure. The computed
volume for 5.5 ft. of storage is 27,823 cu.ft. Storage will be
slightly more than 2 months.
b. Earthfill and Garding
Excavation and earth fill will be required for the waste storage
structure. Since the earth fill will come from.waste storage pond
excavation, the cost for this work will be included in the waste
storage pond excavation cost.
C. Push Off Ramp
See attached worksheet for cost of push off ramp.
d. Heavy Use area
A loading area at the entrance to solid storage area will need
heavy use area protection. An area 40'x4O',:4M­ have 6" ASC stone
over filter cloth. The cost are computed below.
Gravel - 40'x4O'x.5' = 800 cu. ft. = 29.6 cu. yd. = 45 ton
45 ton @ $8.50/ton . $382.50
Filter cloth with stables
40'x40' = 1600 sq. ft. =178 sq. yds.
@ $2.00/sq.yd. $356.00
TOTAL $738.50
II. Waste Storage Pond
The waste storage pond will include a couple components. They are: waste
storage pond and concrete chute.
a. Design Volumes
1. Milking Parlor Wash Water
i. pipeline and milker wash water 60 gal./day
ii. tank wash water 30 gal./day
iii. .milk house floor wash water 500 gal./day
iv. cow wash water 1200 gal./day
v. wasted drinking water 10 gal./day
1800 gal./day
= 240 cu.ft./day
Total volume = 240 cu. ft./day x 365 days = 87,600 cu.ft.

Project: Waste Management System
Owner: Javan Calton
Job Class: IV
County: Rutherford
Dairy Size: .300 cows
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
1
System Designed by:
Approved by:
Date:
Mr. Calton scrapes manure daily and would like a system to efficiently and
economically control all pollution problems. Two systems were reviewed in
detail and a cost analysis was made. Mr -.Calton reviewed requirements and
cost of each system and made the following decisions:
Albert Moore
Jimmy Andrews
Sam Bingham
Sam Bingham
Feb. 1988
Mr. Calton wi•11 scrape the manure to a manure storage structure and.handle it
as a thick slurry. Manure will be stored for 60 days in the structure. Land
to spread waste is available with two months of storage. He plans to load a
slinger type manure spreader with a front end loader and spread on corn and
pasture .land.
Feedlot runoff water and milking parlor wash water will be excluded from the
manure storage structure and will be stored in a waste storage pond. A settling
basin will be constructed for runoff water and mil'kisig parlor wash water. Man—
ure solids will be removed from the stelling basin as necessary to maintain some
storage capacity. The waste storage pond will store polluted water for a one
year storage period. Water will be used to irrigate cropland. A diversion will
be constructed below settling basin and manure storage structure to handle any
polluted water from the structures.
No one besides landowner owns houses within 300 ft. of the waste management
structures.
Mr. Calton's well is located over 300 ft. away from either waste storage structure.
I. Manure Storage Structure
The manure storage will include several different components. They are:
storage structure, earth fill and grading, push off ramp and heavy use area.
a. Storage Structure
Dairy cows are pastured but all feeding is in the feedlot. It is
estimated that 75% of manure produced will be collected. The
average weight of dairy cows are 1400 lbs.
Volume -of = 12.5 gal/day cow x .75 = 376.cu..ft./day
�300manure collected'. It cows 7.48 gal/cu.ft: yvu
= 11,280 cu.ft./day
It is anticapted that 200 cu. ft./month of wasted feed will be collected.
Total Storage Volume = 11,480 cu.ft./month
= 22,960 cu.ft./2 month

4163
y
o�
Ilk
a
V
m
v
a
S•
a
a�
�
O
C
y � I
c/
�
3 3
t
1
<
�
-
D
a
V
m
v
a
S•
a
a�
�
y � I
c/
�
3 3
1
s � �
�52
ol
b.�
•/ //�,�Q/b I_ 1

16. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet to dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
17. Waste shall not be applied on other property or public right-of-ways.
18. Animal waste applied on grassed waterways shall be at agronomic rates and in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
19. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored
and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excess
levels. Soil test and waste analysis records shall be kept for 5 years.
20. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate. No
ponding shall occur.
21. Records of waste application shall be maintained to establish actual application
rates. The records will include date of application, amount of waste applied per
acre by tract number and field number, most recent waste analysis and soil test
report, and the realistic yield expectation (RYE) nitrogen rate. Waste application
records .shall be maintained for 5 years.
22. Proper calibration of application equipment should be done to ensure uniformity
and accuracy of spreading rates.
23. Animal waste should be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should be considered also.
24. It is the responsibility of the owner of the dairy to secure an update of the waste
utilization plan when there is a change in the operation, number of animals
(increase), method of utilization or available land.
C

and disinfectants are used which have been labeled as readily biodegradable by
the manufacturer.
7. Disposal of dead animals shall be done in accordance with the North Carolina
Department of Agriculture (NCDA) regulations and the Waste Utilization Plan.
B. Grazing of animals on application sites shall be controlled in accordance with
USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service Standards.
9. Solid materials such as, but not limited to, bottles, gloves, syringes, silo covers or
any other solid waste from the dairy operation shall be prevented from entering
hI G 1425 -Me ^c, I -C Iciii system and shall be disposed of properly.
10. The facility must have either adequate animal waste application and handling
equipment on site, a lease for the use of necessary equipment, a contract with a
third party applicator or a contract for the purchase of the equipment. In all
cases, the equipment must be capable of applying the waste on sites specified in
the Waste Utilization Plan and at rates not to exceed agronomic and hydraulic
loading for the sites.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied to wetlands or surface water or shall not reach
wetlands or surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances
(pipes or ditches), direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is prohibited.
Illegal discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation by the Division of Water Quality for every day the
discharge continues.
12. Animal waste shall be applied on land eroding at less than 5 tons per acres per
year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons but less
than 10 tons per acre per year providing grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen. When animal waste is to be applied on acres
subject flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland.
When applied to conservation -tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast, provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding.
14. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This
distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate
vegetative filter strips are present.
15. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.

Additional Considerations and Requirements
1. The collection, treatment and storage facilities shall be properly maintained and
operated at all times; this also includes the land application equipment and sites.
2. A suitable vegetative cover shall be maintained on all land application sites and
buffers in accordance with the Waste Utilization Plan. No waste may be applied
on fields not approved by or prepared in accordance with the Waste Utilization
Plan.
3. An acceptable pH of the soil shall be maintained on all land application sites to
insure an optimum yield for the crop(s) being grown.
4. The plant available nitrogen (PAN) application rates and hydraulic loading rates
identified in the Waste Utilization Plan shall not be exceeded.
5. Application of animal waste on land which is used to grow crops for direct human
consumption (e.g., strawberries, melons, lettuce, cabbage, etc.) shall not occur
within 30 days prior to or during the planting of the crop or at any time during the
growing season, or in the case of fruit bearing trees, 30 days prior to breaking
dormancy. For fiber and food crops, which undergo further processing,
application of animal waste shall not occur within 30 days of harvesting. If waste
is to be applied to bare soil, the waste shall be incorporated into the soil within
24 hours after the application, on land.
6. Domestic wastewater from showers, toilets, etc. shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system. Wash vats required to be connected to the
animal waste management system by the Grade A Pasteurized Milk Ordinance
Part Il, Section 7, Item 5r are exempt from this requirement. Wash -down of
stock trailers owned by and used on the dairy only will be permissible as long as
the design accommodates the additional wastewater and as long as detergents

WASTE TREATMENT
Waste treatment refers to changing the characteristics of the waste by
biological, chemical, or physical means. Liquid waste collected from
the feedlot, parlor, milkroom, and exposed lot areas and holding area
will receive little or not treatment while stored in the waste storage
pond. the pond will not be operated as a waste storage pond (no
treatment volume will be maintained ) and frequent waste applications
will minimize treatment. Temporary storage of manure in the dry stack
will not result in significant biological treatment because of the
relatively short storage period.
WASTE STORAGE
The storage components of the system are the animal waste storage pond
and the dry stack. The pond stores approximately six months of liquid
waste produced by 300 lactation Holstein cows. The waste storage pond
was designed to store all liquid waste plus rainfall and runoff form the
25-yr,24-hr storm event. Rutherford Soil and Water Conservation
District will establish a marker indicating the maximum liquid operating
level. The dry stack will be cleaned before the waste reaches the
loading area.
WASTE UTILIZATION
Utilization of waste is where nutrients in the waste are recycled by
applying them to actively growing crops of pasture and hay or on
cropland prior to planting. Liquid manure stored in the waste storage
pond will be applied using a traveling gun irrigation system. Waste from
the dry stack will be applied with a Slinger -Spreader tank. Waste will
be applied in uniform manner not exceeding the nitrogen requirements of
the crop. Liquid waste will be applied to actively growing crops or to
fallow fields no more than 30 days prior to planting. The nutrients
available in the solid and liquid waste must not exceed the agronomic
requirements for the realistic yield expected for the respective crop.
Complete details of application amounts, fields, crops and timing are
contained in the Waste Utilization Plan prepared for the farm.

Wastewater should not be removed at a rate higher than one foot of depth
per day. Rapid drawdown of the pond level may cause sloughing of the
interior side slopes thus damaging the waste storage pond. Care must
aslo be exercised when agitating the pond. If the impeller of an
agitation pump is placed too close to the bottom or sides of the waste
storage pond scouring may occur damaging the waste storage pond. A
floating suction assembly is recommended for the irrigation pump to
minimize scouring by liquid as it enters the suction line.
A vigorous stand of vegetation shall be maintained on the dam. grass
provides a surface that can be easily inspected and maintained. Trees
and brush are not permitted to grow on the dam. Their deep root systems
provide paths for water to travel, and uprooted trees create large holes
weakening the dam. Brush also creates difficulty when inspection the
surface of the dam. Elimination for trees and brush will lessen the
chances that burrowing animals will reside in the dam. Vegetation on
the dam shall not be mowed to a height of less than four inches.
Exclude livestock from the dam. Livestock are not permitted to graze
the vegetation at any time since they can damage the vegetation and
create ruts, holes and bare spots.
Inspect the dam periodically, especially after significant rainfall
events, for signs of erosion. Rills and gullies shall be filled with
suitable soil, compacted, and reseeded as soon as possible. Gullies
left unrepaired may cause more serious damage to the dam , threatening
the entire structure.
Regularly inspect the downstream face of the dam for signs of seepage.
Signs of seepage include wet areas and spring-like flows. Presence of
wetland plants like cattail and bullrush may also be.a sign of seepage.
Seepage must be repaired as soon as possible by installing an upstream
blanket or other approved method. Consult the Rutherford Soil and Water
Conservation District for the appropriate repair method.
The dam must be closely inspected for cracks (traverse and
longitudinal). Cracks wider that one fourth inch wide or well-defined
cracks indicate serious problems. Traverse cracks indicate differential
settlement along the dam and providea path for seepage. Longitudinal
cracks along the dam may be the first sign of a slide or slump. All
cracks shall be repaired immediately by placing clay in compacted layers
in the crack. All'repairs must be monitored frequently to determine if
the dam is continuing to settle, slide, or slump. Consult the
Rutherford Soil and Water Conservation District for additional repair
procedures. Regularly inspect the dam for sink holes, misalignment
along the dam, and boils. These conditions are indications of a
potential failure and require immediate action. Follow the instruction
outlined in the EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN.

An inventory of equipment related to each function will be made and
checklists developed as necessary , for preventive maintenance and
inspection. A supply of spare parts to keep the system operation will
be kept on site. Nameplate data, reference manuals, catalogs, drawings,
and a copy of this document will be kept on site for proper operation
and maintenance of equipment used in the system
Mr Calton is responsible for maintaining records of waste application as
well as waste sample analyses and soil analyses for each field receiving
waste applications. These records must be maintained and available at
the farm for at least five years. the certified waste management plan
and maps of farm fields receiving animal waste and their acreage must
also be kept on the farm to satisfy the Division of Water Quality(DWQ)
and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation's(DSWC) annual farm
inspection procedures. Keeping accurate records, along with the
implementation of proper BMPs on the farm, is the primary method for
proving to DWQ, DSWC and the general public the waste management system
is not causing an adverse environmental impact.
WASTE PRODUCTION
This waste management system design is based on the waste production
estimates for 300 Holstein dairy livestock, which are all lactating and
confined 75% of each day. Exceeding either of the number or type of
livestock may invalided the design and waste utilization plan, thus
jeopardizing the system's permitted status. The system was designed
based on an annual PAN production of 18144 pounds.
WASTE COLLECTION.
The collection of waste pertains to the capture and gathering of manure
and wastewater so it can be further managed. Manure is collected from
the feedlot and holding area with a tractor and scrape blade and scraped
into the dry.stack. The Dry stack can store up to 60 days of waste
accumulation.
Wastewater is collected from the parlor, milkroom, and uncovered lot
area with a network of PVC pipes catch basins, and curbs. The wastewater
flows by gravity to the waste storage pond located beside the dairy.
The Waste storage pond provides temporary storage for approximately
twelve months. The liquid waste storage pond and the dry stack shall be
operated in a manner so as not to discharge waste under any circumstance
except in a rainfall event more severe than the 25 yr- 24 hr storm. The
normal storage volume should never encroach on the storm storage.

GENERAL
This document outlines the operation and maintenance of a waste
management system for the Calton Dairy in Rutherford County, North
Carolina which comprises a certifiable animal waste management system as
described in NC DENR-DEM Administrative Code Section; 15A NCAC 2H
.0200 -Waste Not Discharged to Surface Waters.
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
The animal waste management system is designed to collect,'store, treat
and utilizes waste generated by 300 Holstein cows and the dairy
facility. Clean water is diverted away from the system by roofs,
gutters, curbing and earthen berms(diversions). Wastewater from the
dairy facility and rain falling on the feedlot flow by gravity to the
waste storage pond. Solid waste (manure, bedding and feed) are scraped
daily from the feedlot and lounging area and stored in a drystack.
Wastewater store in the waste storage pond is applied to a field
adjoining the lagoon by a traveling gun irrigation system. The waste
from the dry stack is spread on adjacent fields with a slinger spreader
tank.
OWNER/OPERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES
Mr Calton is responsible for the proper operation and maintenance of the
waste management system. Although the system was designed by agencies
of the Conservation Partnership (NRCS, SWCD, DSWC) using the best
available technology, it needs to be inspected, operated properly and
maintained in a safe manner if it is to operate as planned and designed.
Mr Calton is also responsible for obtaining certification training and
designation as a Type B Animal Waste Management System Operator for
himself or the operator of the system. As required by North Carolina
General Statue 90-47, owners of animal operations with waste management
systems must designate an 'operator in charge' for each of their
systems. An operator in charge is a person who holds a currently valid
certification to operate an animal waste management system and who has
primary responsibility for the operation of the system.
Mr. Calton must apply for a cattle waste operation general permit from
the state's Division of Water Quality as they begin issuing
Certifications of Coverage (COC). The certification authorizes the
owner to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, Waste Management plan
and the (COC)

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
CALTON DAIRY FARM
RUTHERFORD COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
MAY 12, 1999

Nlortality Management Methods
(check which methods) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Z! Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
0 Complete incineration
_! In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18. 1996

Source
.ift s1
lagoon
Lagoon
Agitation during sump
filling and drawdown
at 0 A
couveyauce
to
Q Sump tank covers
Odor
wastewater Cl Extend discharge point of pipes underneam
lagoon liquid level .
• volatile gas 0111SS1
• 11iological mixing;
• Agitation
,Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
Fj"'J Correct lagoon startup procedures;
inimum surface area -Io -volume ratio;
vm—inimurn agitation when pumping;
El Mechanical aeration;
A Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkicr I ligh pressure agitation; fR' Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
uuccics . Wind drift A Minimum recommended operating procedure;
f Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
C�JQ pump from second -stage lagoon;
Flush residual manure from pipes
Practices
. . � 1 .1, .,. 1 1 11111(1 11....,. 1)
at end of
slurry/sludge punlpings
f)cad alliluals • Carcass decomposition O
Proper disposition of carcasses
Slalwing lvalcf ilf(Illllll • Improper drainage;
Gralle and landscape suck that water drains
Iacililics • Microbial decomposition of
away from lilcililies
organic matter
Atud Iracked onto public poorly maintained access roads
farm access road maintenance
r1l:uls 1011111 I;Irm 1lcccss
Available Fru11 :
Addi1innal Inli,rnialion :
NCSI1, Courtly Extension Center
Caulc Manure. Management ; 020(1 Itule/BMP Packet
Management System • l.ake Wheeler Road Field Lnbor tory; EDAE 309-95
Dairy I:Ilucaliunal 11101 Manure
managenicm I'ur Livestock Manure Treatuleul and
Storage ; IillAl's 1113-83
NCSI I - I IA I:
I.agunll Design and
NIauagenienl of Dairy Wastewater; WWI 106-83
NCS11- IIA F
NCSIJ - IIAIi
l �allbl-11111111 n) N-la1111re and Wastewater Application Equipment; r -DAR
Manure Managen►enl: Odurs an(1 Flies;
Fact Sheel ,
p1tO1In. 1995 Confun nee Proceedings
Florida Conperative Rxlensioit
Nuis;u cc 1: uuecflls i1 Animal
. . � 1 .1, .,. 1 1 11111(1 11....,. 1)

01 A L-to
Dcvt P,-,
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
l ann5leael Dairy production C7 Vegclattve or wooaea uuuers
04,111cconunended best manabentenl practices
M *Ci od judgment anti common sense
Paved 11)151)r barn alley Wet manure -covered surfaces;
rape or flush daily
surl'accs P mote drying with proper ventilation
:��Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
Iydranls, pipes, stock tanks
Budded areas
Urine
1'rontote drying -with proper ventilation
I'anial microbial decomposition
Replace weal or manure -covered bedding
ALuwre dry slack -S
• Partial microbial decontpositi0n
I' vide liquid drainage for slored manure -
Stelrege t;urk 1)r basin
• Purlial microbial decomposition ;
1)0110111 or mid-level loading
Sul line:
• Mixing while filling ;
Ll Tank covers
Agitation when cn►plying�41iuhuiya
assn surface mals of solids;
lot runoff and liquid addilions
eAgitale only prior to manure removal
I-1 Proven biological additives or oxidants
• Partial microbial decomposition
W Liquid drainage front settled solids
Scaling basin Surfaces
• Mixing Willie filling
IY Remove solids regularly
ALilaawnt whwl c"11110ng
Flannre. Slurry or slue
Spicieder- 111111eIS
• Agilalion when spreading
Volatile gas emissions
I 11)cuvered manure, I • Volatile gas
slurry tie 011dgu till field drying
sill laces
I.Ius11 Itu11a Agilalion ol'rccycictl lagoon
lieluiel while tacks are lilting
Oulsi�ie elrnin.e ullecliolre Agilation (it
1)r j1)uclitin Ilexes conveysllnci:
.....i. b I ......... I.— 11 I(w(I Pam; I
6-
n n
n
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
Wash residual man11re frurn.spreader Wier use:
Prover, biological additives or oxidants
n %oil injection of slurry/sludges
n Soil incorporation within ,IB hrs
Spread in thin uniform layers lair rapier drying
n Proven biological additives or oxidants
n Flush lank covers;
t•I lixlend till laces to near bnllum ul't:nrla wish
anti -siphon vents
wastewater n Ilox covers

Suurce
Flush Clutters
I
�agumis and 1115
i
Excessive Ve6c1a1
Growth
Feed storage
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Accumulation of sol
• Crusted Solids
�DNIPS to Control Insects
Liquid Systems
O blush syslein is designed and operated -
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
❑ Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
ischarge
Maintain lagoons; settling basins and pits' where
pest breeding is apparent to minimtizc the
crusting of solids to a depth orno more than G -
13 inches over more Ulan 30% of surface.
Decaying vegetation ❑ Maintain vegetative control along uanKs 01
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
acctmiulation of decaying vegetative matter
along waters edge on impoundment's perimeter.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, Page
0
Ury Systcuts
Ucsig 1, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage.
CK Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter).
lgl-' Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around immediate perimeter of recd storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing adequate containment (e.g., .
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
/moisture grain products).
Gd Inspect for and reinove or break up accumulated
solids in Mier strips around reed storage as
needed.
Sk•
site Specific I'rnctices !.

D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of storage structure. Often this is seepage as
opposed to flowing leaks. Possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional
office; Phone [phone] . After hours, emergency number: 919- 733-3942. Your
phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the
incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have
been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property -or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number 828-
287-6075.
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 828-287-6010, local SWCD office phone number 828-
287-4817, and local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number 828-287-
4817.
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.

5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize
off-site damage.
a. Contractors Name:_C.L. Whitesides'Construction Co.
b. Contractors Address: 234 Rock Springs Chruch Road, Rutherfordton, NC
c. Contractors Phone: [phone]
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the storage structures (MRCS,
Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name:_Albert Moore, DC
b. Phone:_828-287-4817
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
daude%ach/nardkmgactplau.du
acts, 1996

J AvA rJ
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 828- - 251-6208
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 828-287-6075
SWCD 828- - 287-4817
NRCS 828- - 287-4817
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort
to ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility The following are some action items you
should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Storage Structure overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.

\. a
''.
.�
`.
\,
• _' •,
V
\. a

1�
I
slIw Ddu, ar
rN m.r d n µ
-,• } r'r I r o. INr 141�'ItiM+' u
` W S, u
wr I I N
rr1 iw
F,J� 1� dq I •
�a y
a pW 14
Mr i'r �`Lfi yy y 0.1
« �n•y:rB J'.7 � 1h II IR iIi��TUII Vr 11X,1. I i�,..Ulw{',Ir m-�",' a �I I L �I'�,lip N 11u ," Iy
4�, I,1II
lip, �M� JI »; �. •.1, Il. 1
"fin§Jim
� - '►' r M
;M#14
y,�IISw
IJP
_ �1gII,N, r�Uwlw
wu4 1
uM1 Slh
I m �I Iy�N,.,4u IM
MAXI a ;XMI
IMYV 'Vol
'...,,. rI IJI r IIr. .v,
I�13 ih4r b; I u,� T' r W „N, _ M nl
df N'I I u - I nn Y
` 10 WtlP Iy "
'1111 II _ i .r
VII.
§'I'hnn
lMlr c � llH ��s �f r F vklt �I I a� "rl ., ww•ue Itia. ", NIS � ': . 1 I. ��� .. „ W y ..
n p _
lI ,,w d glll��Wk r1:::
a y4 I[� •ilSh'SI Iw F l'y Nf�l'". "'�r1 iIN II I"Xv � r pY � . {. #
r I I n WII ��I: ��• a, N
PI
u1r1
hI ,
" AVI ...,'. �.W" .,.,. :'� �uN� ,r ,•.,r,y�M .:.. .,.e�XRil[91WX' ' ,,, ... yo-.
i 1K [ # U�r�,'1 d 1'n ri,"'T 1 "". Iw �l.,, I ,' I -Vi pIV`II ,^aIN ;.. d' 'I 'I�','� n •�uua-Po p..6:r r I I,' I,,. ��Ill^n
S 1r ;I ',.. I fiW1, : 1 .„ � � � M. {i , ,� '' ,,'I `' I .'I; 3 IMyil I, .., ,;. �,. ,,,.� � al, •�I. �, wr n�W; I Ih II�MIw,,,� a"I XII>M' ul �X'�^, M��Itrlr q� Pl3e ki.,,� „rl :r,' � I 3 �llw i �l? '4 �. � nil,,'m'1
• wN,,.;wl��' I. , .�- _ 'l �r� �II� ,I, ,I �, ,.• 'W� � I° "rill"� � � ~I� „ �I�,. I��II I�„ M *��I pI �� phlylN'���g
M'4 � ,ew.- " ,. + � I �. �� I I I ixll,l 1411° I � 11W, lu :'� C'NY"� r.. � 1':iL r1ry �l �IY i'�*i'" f ,; 'y IL � 'Iw I�IYI��I['�,IjV �WI'r ,. MW � "' {IMV" rel,,. IY► nl, ��I� , 'I.
"
s .` ' `� ; � `� ' �'§ � .. � " M r" � ,,¢ .,•1. �� M �.' II�. 11.. �""'Y, . I s,r., �:: �3 h` . " � I�w+, y
. �NJ
•/'� .1 • . "� Ir I JIB
e�' � i1� ! � v •, ,� �,i'�.1-. � MrR tin I 'MFrh�Ylll ,V
�'.,N�Nr �,"r�; ••`�� 'yam-._ r Ly t 1 '� 'r 4y�,� � .. °� �� � " r, � •1 ; ,� �� / ayk„ I���I '���11�`I, „�I ,i„ I., 1 �.�.. Yt IhI��S"1 hnl ° ^�'G''I.;
1014 1,!
INNM
^,..i
I .. • '� ,�', lr f rS J 11 � u M I v<N :, a vd
CIO
w► fir, i�.+ a`. - �:�'; ?4"' y �. ...r f "":�1'd: ' In. y er Ir"'i' 3 U rsN�1 't1�R rls r+r" r
� R ` M •..� 'Yrr .. il4 y,�, rNi,
r e '
Y,-+'` � � �N 4, w.; t.-, :+. ,,, • -+• ,`���rN� n: t ;. I�'� '�. ., ... '!',t"' � 11 :...� � y�°.... EJ§ W lrlllJn t5 X rra •ryg9 � `'N I :•er „�' S.
�.i�,!"�' � ��� ��: � r'X ��a y �'. .� � I I I !I'��:,1. .' �11µ��x111 drlr .�P'� 'tlII p,Y"11�'i1�1�1:, �'M iFiI�I�X,. .�I I I"�I XI r:� �r III r„�.
w
\s _'�. •r:,��� .r'�r�„ ,., '" W � rX ~�� � � � r' �nI�11,.'.r.. :, y`, w�x��1e ° " rlNldl S,1:. �114r�X� III11 I '.NN�"1 1315 • „ a ..':;¢�
« 3
a �S I' mw�P X hd1 F
rn r t r '
✓ � � ' W ma1N � � 11 ' (� � 1 I�wywx. s q Nrls
r
if"► Is r+Ni,,,�„7. Y h� 1hN,llhlpl'II� 1 4MN, 1�I��h,6� i' 1 r! •.V. , :I. tp Wl 1;1 .S '1; .. ,�,.
n
+ e + 1 it ,I” + t41
allm �•,. M, 1 II� r a ..e .� ,�4 .l,r 1 u Y^ .1,
., � I,' � yl � �' n ^ .��� IlA ,r w' " +.3 _.:i'.; -.. Y•e'1. �!}�"I'�IYYf ��id,. '. ,.I�1, su e. r .yy'1. .
�..r 1� �. ��d � { ■ .. ���� „��,� '.. :.1 'Y3���r''. ,. 9r'r p.9�" �I y •. � h M . ,.
� J � �.,. !, 1, nn � r14 ^ ,4% � •, �,. X ,: ibo I. �'. IT +r .II�,` I
Viiq N Xu �r
wlill�^VI��I uIl I X' I IIr II" ` h 111 a �'"� ' ."S rrM�Xr I " a1Vf i
„
� I. �.: 'n w X r:,,'iF n.l d W96 m "^N�.. ISG 11p�11.�I I4NIII:
4N �� �•: 'ra+1/ .�` " 1U13'k16�
� I I
.r^ • i +,- s s rrX��V:1. : 1 u1 �'iV �.,. i,� 4y1 I1
xt° fir'•��.' mY e .� „IIrIMIW.,�rX,4. $"I1, "grwVM�l'I '���IE •y qll"��.,'
a N
. rl:. y�lr IJd ihlh'I�' 1 V.�,v j rWl �M� 1- ° Pip..
p ryyp IIIN Irr rl1r, I �
N P"1'�ell� �16eI�N1�1ru I 1911 4 N � I p I
W p
n
1M `r • orr'.-
,fie Nn
Ir

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: CALTON DAIRY
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are
stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface wasters of the state from
a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed on-site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will
be available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: _JAVAN CALTON.
(Please print)
Signature: Date: 1 -D --i9
Name of Manager (I f different from owner) :
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) ALBERT MOORE
Affiliation: DISTRICT CONSERVATIONIST, NRCS
Address (Agency): NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
ROOM 202 FED BLDG, 121 S. MAIN ST.
RUTHERFORDTON, NC 28139
Signature: Q ,�(�:� ) , Date: S 12.-tjc�
9

18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited
to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas
should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and
structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended
or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and
erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc.,
should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent
breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
El

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading
rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter
cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water.
This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided
adequate vegetative filter strips are present. (See Standard 393 - Filter
Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -
spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that
discharge directly into water courses, and only then at
agronomic rates provided the application causes no runoff
or drift from the site.
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged
into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide
adequate storage for a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event in
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
7

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state
by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application,
or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is
prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to the
assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the
discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the
producer leither owns or has long term access to adequate land on which
to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land
to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy of a
written agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the
Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in
the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for
realistic. crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climate conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations
that restrict the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management
System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is
used the soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and
appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves the field. These
filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. [See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian Forest
Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to
conservation .tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding.
(See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
R

See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization
of waste water.
Field
No.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Soil Type
CropIApplication
Rate (In/Hr)
Application
Amount ( I n . )
7-15 724C2 NT -CORN SIL 0.4 2.95
SM GR SIL_I
_* ONLY 7 ACRES OF THIS FIELD WILL BE NEEDED TO USE THE
N FROM THE LAGOON. THE LAGOON EFFLUENT WILL BE IRRIGATED
IN SPLIT APPLICATIONS IN MAY AND OCT TO
PREVENT EXCESSIVE LOADING RATES OF WATER.
TRIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION. HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for 360 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
_12 MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being
stored in your structure exceed Elevation 91.0
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
Conservation Service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the waste.
Narrative of Operation:.Although the lagoon is designed for 12
months of storage, it will be pumped three times a year. It will
be pumped twice each year during May and again in October.
The following pumping rates will be used with the Long traveling
gun that is now on'the farm:
Use 70 psi
Taper nozzle size 1.2_ (Nelson 150)
355 gpm
Wetted diameter 300'
Travel Lane spacing 250'
hose pulled gun
Application rate=0.37 in/hr
Acres covered per hr = 0.3 ac/hr
Gross application rate= 2.6"
5

NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for
periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge
will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements.
The manure will be spread with a 3500 gallon GEH1 Slinger -spreader
wagon. The volume of manure to spread will be about 11480 cu. ft.
per month X 12 months = 137760 cu ft per year.
The dry stack will need to be cleaned out about every 2 months.
11480 cu ft per month X 2 = 22960 cu. ft. X 7.48 gal/cu. ft
171741 gal per 2 months. 171741gal/2 mo./ 3500 gal/load = 50 loads
per cleanout. Each full load will contain about 55-60 lbs of N.
4

* This N is from animal waste only. if nutrients from other
sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be
accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal
Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties
of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses
all nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land (see Required Specification 2))
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type . Per Ac.* Utilized Application
*
See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 190.7 18144
Table 2
Total 190.7 18144
Amount of N Produced 18144
Deficit 1 1913
3

Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
300 animals X14 gal./cow X 1 cu. ft/7.48 gal. X .75
collected x 60 days =25267 cu ft/ 60 days
Direct rainfall (Dec -Jan) 8.19" - evap 2.0" = 6.19" X 7755 scr ft
manure sutructure = 4000 cu ft/ 2 months.
Total storage: 25267 cu ft + 4000 cu ft = 29267 cu ft/ 2 mo. X 6 =
175602 cu ft/yr =1313000 gal/yr = 5443 tons/yr. (amt.) waste/year
in dry stack.
LAGOON STORES 52 AC. IN OF RUNOFF, WASHWATER ETC. PER YEAR.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
300 animals X76 lbs X .75 collected = 17100 lbs PAN /Yr (PAN
from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
52 AC IN WASTE IN LAGOON X 20 LBS PER AC IN = 1044 PAN.( AVERAGE
PAN OF 20 LBS./AC. IN FROM SAM BINGHAM BASED ON NUTRIENT TEST IN
SIMILIAR OPERATIONS.)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N * Acres Lbs. N Month of mlivv buA
# No. Type Per Ac. Utilized Application rJee�e�
RYE
3643
715
724C2
CORN -SIL
14.7
156
21.8
3302
MAY
SMGR HAY
2
100
If
2180
OCT
3643
18
724C2
CORN -SIL
14.7
156
3.8
592
MAY
SMGR HAY
2
100
IT
380
OCT
4801
1
724C2
FES -PAST
2.7
100
8.1
730
FEB
3643
5
4A
CORN -SIL
20
220
17.8
0
----
SMGR HAY
2
100
If
290
OCT
3643
25
724C2
FES -PAST
2.7
100
15.5
910
DEC
3643
16
724D2
FES -PAST
2.5
94
18.5
1739
JUL
4800
1
724C2
FES -PAST
2.7
100
19.4
1940
DEC
3643
6
724C2
FES -PAST
2.7
100
21.2
2120
FEB
3643
17
724C2
FES -PAST
2.7
100
6.2
620
JUL
3643
34
724D2
FES -PAST
2.5
94
6.9
491
JUL
3643
35
724D2
FES -PAST
2.5
94
17.2
1425
MAR
3643
29
1724D2
IFES-PASTI
2.5
941
34.3
1 1425
1AUG
Total 1190.7 118144
2
i©©
Q
S�3
C2
e)O
y7i t to
G46
C�
O
S50
i Q 2
Ct •5ct

Producer: JAVAN CALTON
Location: LOCATED ON CALTON DAIRY ROAD 6 MILES
NORTH OF
BOSTIC NC
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: DAIRY
Number of Animals: 300 COWS
(Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater.
The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce
the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the
fields where the waste is to be applied.. This waste utilization
plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are
strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the
waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and .the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as
they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation
exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities..
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than
5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff
to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind
odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop
production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not
more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based ori
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on
proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste
samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
1

Name sof Farm:
}
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
CALTON DAIRY
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we).know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are
stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface wasters of the state from
a storm event less severe than the 2.5 -year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed on-site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will
be available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: _JAVAN CALTON
(Please print) - 1-11
Signature: _�JW��Jj //j Date:
Name of Manak0r (I f different from owner) :
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) ALBERT MOORE
Affiliation: DISTRICT CONSERVATIONIST, NRCS
Address (Agency): NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
ROOM 202 FED BLDG, 121 S. MAIN ST.
RUTHERFORDTON, NC 28139
Signature: a tu_ d r) Date: 'S 12 -!n
9

18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,.
berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
,trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited
to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas
should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and
structures should be inspected,regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended
or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and
erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc.,
should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent
breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
8

method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order. to control conditions conducive to odor or
flies and provide uniformity of application..
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
. when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with. a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading
rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter
cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water.
This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided
adequate vegetative filter strips are present. (See Standard 393 - Filter
Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
- drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -
spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that
discharge directly into water courses, and only then at
agronomic rates provided the application causes no runoff
or drift from the site.
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
fcontinoed)
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged
into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide
adequate storage for a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event in
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
7

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state
by.runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application,
or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is
prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to the
assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the
discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which
to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land
to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide MRCS with a copy of a
written agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the
Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in
the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for
realistic. crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climate conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations
that restrict the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management
System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System _(ACS). If an ACS is
used the soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and
appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves the field. These
filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. [See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian Forest
Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding.
(See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(conUnued)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied. at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
6

,.., :. � .... r.. ':. i': :;.r::, i",< � �.,>. �. ::.. (� .: [�n s... - . i S'.. Y ' 31 1 £ i :3.:..\. '..•i-,
NCDA A .onamie.Divrsron :� QO.aRee „ o .� <..
y;
Grower.• Calton, Javan jCopies To.• County Extension Directofi
.w<<; �'�.. • 660 Calton Rd. USDA-NRCS-Rutherford
Sample LD•
Waste Code:
ALD
Bostic, NC 28018
WasteAnalysis
USDA-NRCS-Rutherford
e�7UYt Farm: Federal Building, Room 202
121 South Main St.
Rutherford County Rutherfordton, NC 28139
,. .... �.. �, a.., ..� ... ...:::.... < :,:F F .: .., :.:. .'>, �.. ..<� r „a ,..... is Y ,.. a?.:: ... ., •.i'
N P K Ca mg S Pe Mn Zn Cu B Mo Cl C
rotal 35.0 VL 19.1 44.6 94.6 28.7 11.0 42.4 1.01 0.53 0.47 0.27
INN L VL M M L M M M M M
NO3
NH4 Na Ni Cd A Al Se Li pH SS ON DM% CCB% ALE
OR -N 25.5 6.09
Urea L

NCACSP Manual
NC-ACSP-WMP
Waste Management Plan Statement
ADDENDUM TO NC-ACSP-2
1. A waste management plan for the operation which benefits by
Agriculture Cost Share Program CPO 9 S N - .9'7.. to Z!2 - QLhas
been developed in accordance with N.C. NRCS Technical Guide
specifications. The waste management plan accounts for the
environmentally safe treatment, storage and application of
all animal waste generated by the operation.
2. The waste management plan includes maps -and soil losses of
the fields to which animal waste is to be applied.
3. The Cooperator(s) have signed, agreed to the conditions of
.the waste management plan and received a copy of the waste
management plan.
4. A copy of the waste management plan with original signatures
is a -permanent part of the District's cooperator file.
5. Any changes to the size or type of animal operation will
require that the waste management plan be revised and new
signatures obtained.
Technical Representative Date
I
October 1996 Page VI -47

,y
` Lagoon Closure Plan
Javan Calton .
Rutherford County
SPECIFICATIONS
The lagoon will be agitated with a PTO driven chopper pump for sufficient time to create a slurry
from the sludge. Waste will be applied in a manner not to exceed the hydraulic loading capacity of
the soil and not to exceed the crop nitrogen requirements. If sludge or build up is still evident a drag
line or front end loader will remove the remaining containments.
Closure of this operation must be done without runoff of the effluent. Do not land apply while it is
raining or when the ground is saturated.
These three lagoons will be breached to NRCS standard or probably cosmetic grading to the entire
dam area.
The breach area or the total dam area will be seeded according to NRCS standards.
Waste analysis will be shown.
Map of fields for applying animal waste will also be shown.

T'
LAGOON CLOSURE PLAN
NAME:_ Javan Calton LOCATION: on SR1745 just off Sunshine
660 Calton Road Bostic Rd. in Sunshine
Bostic, NC 28018
Tract 3643 Rutherford County
Phone: [phone] COUNTY: Rutherford
Date Prepared: LAT./LONG: 35°27'0"
81°47'30"
HU NO.: 03050105070040
Regional Division of Water Quality Phone: [phone]
Plan prepared by: Donald Morrison
NCACSP Technician
[phone]
See attached waste analysis report dated: l F ` q 7
NOTE: NRCS or SWCD personnel must be onsite while the lagoon is being closed for them to
certify the closure of the lagoon
GENERAL
Lagoons Nos. lA and 1B were constructed in 1971. for a dairy operation. 1B was designed to catch
the solid and lA would trap all the liquid. These lagoons served 100 head dairy. Mr. Calton moved
this operation across the road to increase his number of milking cows. He leased the facilities at lA
and 1B for 5 years to another dairyman.
Lagoon No. 2 which was built and ready for use in 1979 became two small for his operation. He
abandoned it in 1978. He moved his animal waste system in a system designed for 300 cows which
was cost shared with NCACSP funds.
VOLUME TO BE REMOVED
Lagoon lA is 75'x75' with a depth of 8 feet. Total volume of waste to be removed (liquid and
sludge) is 201,196 gallons. Lagoon 1B is 150'x50' with a depth of 3 feet. Total volume of waste to
be removed (liquid and sludge)'is 107,038 gallons. Lagoon No. 2 is 300'x75' with a depth of 5 feet.
Total volume of waste to be removed (liquid and sludge) is 491,436 gallons.
LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE
Buffer areas along creeks and roads will be honored. Most of this waste will be applied to fescue
pasture. Pounds of nitrogen will result from waste analysis which will be shown in the waste analysis
section. Amount of nitrogen per crop, per acreage will be calculated and shown.

%A, 9 '-rr
a� �(.c)b1,?r6'f
Ix
= dd

we bbl- acro ' Tnvelina Gun r ;Wuufi W wow 2.2(j.."
i
' Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORIKSHEET
J
J'
,.. 1. Farm Number (Identification) qJ Field Number (Identification) 7 /G
2. Irrigation System Designation . Existing Irrigation System New/ Expanded Irrigation System
3. Number of Travel Lanes # Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes _,[feet] Length of pull(p)
# Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes _ jfeet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior Lanes # Exterior Lanes _[feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted Diameter _ Z- [feet] From field data sheet
5. Spacing / z Q Hydrant Spacing [feet] �� [as percent of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant Layout V Multiple Hydrants Single Hydrant Excessively spaced Hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location
Travel Lane Length (Ll) Interior orxterior (Lane/Hydrant)
q5-
(a) Acres start end of pull from TableIE r-F :22 Column
0. (b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI) *;q 1
{Pull Length t [feet] X Wetted Width [feet]} /43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
1 �® Total acres for Travel Lane.Length (Ll) (Sum: a + b + e)
--) v Travel Lane Length (U) Interior or /E-senor (Lane/Hydrant) ,
1) J 5 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table EL�'7v Column `
3 , q q AW (b) Acres middle portion of pull (I,1)
{Pull Length;fZ5-[feet] X Wetted Width Za 1 [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
—IL—Tot—a—, acres for Travel Lane Length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel Lane Length (I,3) Interior or !/Exterior (Lane/Hydrant)
!
--0.9
F(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column R
"b7 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1)
{Pull Length b [feet] X Wetted Width _ Zq I [feet]) 143,560
�— (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for Travel Lane Length (13) (Sum: a + b + c)
S. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each category in the
field_ Sum all of these and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
jQ ,p (a) Acres per Travel Lane Length (Ll) X Z. # Lanes = Zo,o Acres
_ (b) Acres per Travel Lane Length (L2) X [ # Lanes Acres
-2, to (c) Acres per Travel Lane Length (L3) X 1 # Lanes = 7,6 Acres
`Z7` Total CAWMP Wettable Acres for fi Od (Sum: 8a + 8b + 80

Hard Bose Traveling Gun System
FIELD DATA SHEET *
I Trawling Gun Field Data stied, 2/20199
Make and model number sin er Reil VKoAO_Q S,,; a 4 103
2. Hose length ofeet] and hose inside diameter (ID)_ ZS inch]
3. Gun make and model number tZ
4. Gun nozzle sized [iinch], ring orifice, taper bore orifice.
5. Gun arc angle _3, O [degrees]
6. Travel lane spacing [feet]. Indicate whether uniform, . random.
Number .of exterior�h Brants Number of interior hydrants
7. Gun wetted diameter feet]. measured, seed on
�4— (use , S
"' S. Gun pressure 70 fpsi]. observed at working gauge,
determined from gun charts, calculated (show calculations)
**9. Operating pressure at hose reel [osi]. observed at working gauge,
** 10. Supply fine size provided by owner.
PP y [inch] (from pump to last hydrant).
** 11. Supply One length feet (maximumpumping distance).
**12. Supply line tYPe QVC, . aluminurr4:....: ;
** 13. Pump snake and model number .
** 14. Pump capacity, [gpm].
**15. Engine make and model number
or
**16. Electric motor horsepower and rpm fhp] [rpm]
Note: It is strongly recommended thatoperating pressure at the reel and gun wetted
diameter be field determined. —
* Locate each hydrant on a copy of the map. Indicate the start and stop of the sprinkler cart
for each travel lane and show distance traveled. Show the location of the supply line.
Irrigated acres will be determined by travel lane
** Optional data, furnish where possible.
*** Information furnished by
uoxzi� and/or
ignatu= of Owner orFacility Representative
'
V -01M C4 14y,
Printed Name of Owner or Facility Representative
Signature of Technical Specialist
Printed name of Technical Specialist .
Date Date
*** Only the person or persons collecting the data should sign the data sheet.

PPPp7A&,ki w
.......................................................................
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization
of waste water.
Field
No.
7-15
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Soil Type Crop Application
Rate (In/Hr)
724C2 NT -CORN SIL 0.4
SM GR SIL
Application
Amount(In.)
FI�-;`1 ;
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE I9 NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION. HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for 360 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
_12 MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being
stored in your structure exceed Elevation _91.0
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
Conservation Service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the waste.
Narrative of Operation: Although the lagoon is designed for 12
months of storage, it will be pumped two times a year. It will
be pumped twice each year during May and again in October.
The following pumping rates will be used with the Long traveling
gun that is now on the farm:
See the attached irrigation compupations and irrigation map.,
There were two abandoned lagoons on the farm. One of these lagoons
has been closed out. A copy of the lagoon closure plans is
attached. The second -lagoon will be closed out according to NRCS
standards.
E

NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for
periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge
will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements.
The manure will be spread with a 3500 gallon'GEHI Slinger -spreader
wagon. The volume of manure to spread will be about 11480 cu. ft.
per month X 12 months = 137760 cu ft per year..
The dry stack will need to be cleaned out about every 2 months.
11480 cu ft per month X 2 = 22960 cu. ft. X 7.48 gal/cu. ft =
171741 gal per 2 months. 171741ga1/2 mo./ 3500 gal/load = 50 loads
per cleanout. Each full load will contain about 55-60 lbs of N.
4

* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other
sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be
accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal
Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties
of North Carolina to -have a nutrient management plan that addresses
all nutrients. This plan only addresses,Nitrogen.
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land (see Required Specification 2])
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N * Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Per Ac.. Utilized Application
*
See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 190.7 18144
Table 2
Total 190.7 18144
Amount of N Produced 18144
•jEh-- Deficit 1 9 -5!3 C)
3

Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, ft3,.tons, etc.)
300 animals X14 gal./cow X 1 cu. ft/7.48 caal. X .75
collected x 60 days =25267 cu ft/ 60 days
Direct rainfall (Dec -Jan) 8.19" - evap 2.0" = 6.19" X 7755 sg ft
manure outructure = 4000 cu ft/ 2 months.
Total storage: 25267 cu ft + 4000 cu ft = 29267 cu ft/ 2 mo. X 6 =
175602 cu ft/yr =1313000 gal/yr = 5443 tons/yr. (amt.) waste/year
in dry stack.
LAGOON STORES 52 AC. IN OF RUNOFF, WASHWATER ETC. PER YEAR.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
300 animals X76 lbs X .75 collected = 17100 lbs PAN /Yr (PAN
from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)'
52 AC IN WASTE IN LAGOON X 20 LBS PER AC IN = 1044 PAN.( AVERAGE
PAN OF 20 LBS./AC. IN FROM SAM BINGHAM BASED ON NUTRIENT TEST IN
SIMILIAR OPERATIONS.)
Applying the above amount of waste -is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely,
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of MJjJ"e* 1
`
# No. Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application �0 -
RYE .�
3643
715
72402
CORN -SIL
14.7
156
21.8
3302
MAY
SMGR HAY
2
100
"
2180
OCT
3643
18
724C2
CORN -SIL
14.7
156
3.8
592
MAY
SMGR HAY
2
100
if
380
OCT
4801
1
72402
FES -PAST
2.7
100
8.1
730
FEB
3643
5
.4A
CORN -SIL
20
220
17.8
0
----
SMGR HAY
2
100
if
290
OCT
3643
25
72402
FES -PAST
2.7
100
15.5
910
DEC
3643
16
724D2
FES -PAST
2.5
94
18.5
1739
JUL
4800
1
724C2
FES -PAST
2.7
100
19.4
1940
DEC
3643
6
724C2
FES -PAST
2.7
100
21.2
2120
FEB
3643
17
72402
FES -PAST
2.7
100
6.2
620
JUL
3643
34
724D2
FES -PAST
2.5
94
6.9
491
JUL
3643
35
724D2
FES -PAST
2.5
94
17.2
1425
MAR
3643
29
724D2
FES -PAST
2.5
941
34.3
1 1425
AUG
.L %.0 L. al I L7u. / �101YY I
2

pppppppp
LV 0-811 CD 0 0 �
....i.:....rVY.•Y.i::•:::.v�.... vv::::...:. r .. 'f ..:: i:::.:..:n.v:•.. is
vv �:::.:.: ...v...\+:::: n::::f ........vr v'?a:ii•: ii?i::aiii:>.
Producer.: JAVAN CALTON
Location: LOCATED ON CALTON DAIRY ROAD 6 MILES
NORTH OF
BOSTIC NC
Telephone:[phone]
Type Operation: DAIRY
Number of Animals: 300 COWS
(Design Capacity) '
RECEIVED
VYATER C3llAU d SEU101N1
(OCT 1 1 1999
Non-DiscL3rge Permil&g
The -waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater.
The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce
the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the
fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization
plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are
strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the
waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the .crop can utilize. Soil types are important as
they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation
exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities..
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than
5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste onsaturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result -in runoff
to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind
odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop
production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not
more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on
proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste
samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
1

L
8
0
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
CALTON DAIRY
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are
stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface wasters of the state from
a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed on-site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will
be available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: _JAVAN CALTON
(Please print) 7
Signature:
Date: .- 1';t, -`i?
Name of Man er(If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (please print) ALBERT MOORE
Affiliation: DISTRICT CONSERVATIONIST, NRCS
Address (Agency): NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
ROOM 202 FED BLDG, 121 S. MAIN ST.
RUTHERFORDTON, NC 28139
Signature: atu_d r) Date: S 12 :!n
E

y 4
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited
to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas
should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and
structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended
or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and
erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc.,
should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent
breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.

method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order. to control conditions conducive to odor or
flies and provide uniformity of application..
B. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading
rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter
cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water.
This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided
adequate vegetative filter strips are present. (See Standard 393 - Filter
Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -
spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that
discharge directly into water courses, and only then at.
agronomic rates provided the application causes no runoff
or drift from the site.
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged
into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide
adequate storage for a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event in
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
7

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state
by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application,
or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is
prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to the
assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the
discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which
to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land
to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy of a
written agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the
Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in
the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for
realistic. crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climate conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations
that restrict the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management
System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is
used the soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and
appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves the field. These
filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. [See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian Forest
Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding.
(See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
fcontinued)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
C-7