810010_Complete File - Historical_20190213

FACILITY
COUNTY CLASS
MAILING ADDRESS
RESPONSIBLE FACILITY OPERATOR
OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVE
TELEPHONE NO.
WHERE LOCATED
�
l EyG
0�
NPDES PERMIT NUML �`E� � c I)NA
STATE F,
DATE ISSUED ;
EXPIRATION DATE \
,
STREAM: NAME
CLASS
7()10
SUB -BASIN
NUMBER
'.LASS
m
'JED

Rutherford Soil and Wafev Consem9tion District
C.2,8139 29�?-
Ph: [phone] ext.3 FAX: 01? (D it, t i - i c
Roger N. Maney
Box 97
Bamardville, NC 28709
Dear Mr. Maney:
WV 1 3 2001;
'Ttr
J1
November 8, 2001
0
A note of verification on the condition of Penland Dairy for Blair Burrage.
This farm has an animal waste system in place, a waste utilization plan and a waste application
system to properly distribute the waste
This farm is certified to met 0200 -regulation (E0000934).
From the NRCS standard the'farm is in good order being check on 7/9/01.
m ."�
Donald Morrison, District Water Quality Specialist
Rutherford Soil and Water Conservation District
cc:
Ap"h, Ae"76""i-IfEe
KORMEdwards-,

Facility Number 8 1 -10
Subject: Facility Number 81-10
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 09:33:29 -0400
From: Jeff Young <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR - Asheville Regional Office
To: Roger Edwards <[e-mail]>
Roger -
Apparently all Roger Maney needed to issue a permit to ship milk from
facility number 81-10 was a letter stating the farm had an adequate
waste system and current waste utilization plan. An engineer isn't
necessary to verify this information, so Albert Moore will take care of
the matter by furnishing Mr. Maney with the aforementioned letter. As
far as I am concerned, the matter has been resolved. Contact me if you
have any questions.
-Jeff
Jeff Young - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Jeff Young <Jeff.Youna a,ncmail.net>
NC DENR - Asheville Regional Office
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
1 of 1 7/9/2001 10:55 AM

p Routine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: Cerlified............................................................................. (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: Swan Land Dairy.......................................................................................... County: Rutherford.............................................................
..................... .......
Owner Name: Steve Penland
.......................................................................................
Mailing Address: Rt. 3 Box 1524
Onsite Representative
Certified Operator
Location of Farm:
Phone No: 245-6600
.......................................................................................
Forest City NC 28043
............... Integrator:......................................................................................
............... Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Latitude ®• ©1 ®6G Longitude B 31 ®G6
p Not Operational Date Last Operated: ................................................................................
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
ku-r'(,i
�fc 2ti� k: -`� 5"�c:o.,y x.\ l:L.�n c n. ��,t 4. ` ,n b rw ., i {� ,< ✓,� r i.c } �,�. < - ,.: �,..: T.> 3� tit.
1ST e3,, # i1
Gx :•:: i\ r> 2s. Xxy<'x G umbel 1 cs f < , ,> >S ti , e I er E> , i y r C ,. , . z, rNuInberL
S z., ..:ri:•: `4 is `�:R23;?; .gr•.> ,!,. . r �. ,; ��< , � `=.�4•.; ,.,:.; ).,• >:ia:, ,...o^., n .f� 3 k� •Sf,9 `>-` },v ::C•:;. <. , r
�h f
er 60
a50
Non D
"> ❑ Non Layer ? ❑ any
ti -
��• y5i 6y.. > F��yr _{ 7\ kn yam, 1., �• F1'4y y Z`^f7 ° 'i zl i^,'^. fs) rl,�, y,a. s�3.J 'Y\,��.1 'LJ' ivr R
rt i� ,4 4�<y�a c'\ vSt J •r ,y �, � ti� r < `o ,ter ti w.e,•w� �r•� 5Yt- Y x F -t \ � tr S 'r < ?�'� S+SY`` � i
�? ?:<,. �+Z \�. w�xk,? 1".,, i.1 >••\•�?,y.�.,; ,� ,.,`.3., ,yY S " �"ti•>:`«? 'S.i�?� : !:! 5� ti'"'.;ri•r'.,�ipd
2y � K\r � / :g...� gid'•.,' 4.� v1v ...3:s.c.�.+�,\ sr,,.,e...,ii�e .. f ..�s`�':�a.?; s?ks'�ct t�<nx> �v 3 �•,�>.': � p
S �; e • ❑Other Type of Livestock `>S i � F t � x � ''!t`7l> f• �? �
� :z� 5 , r c Y �y . 5 � a ti•.;?, -;:. :`�;.;..,•,:;><-::��::4>:-M;:r-•�•:�?,y�q:':\:n_:� e�< r o:c5_i .zY.\:.. :��..,r.. Cy . ,; �-,o.. �.;v+.
!:Dy. '.:k'n;�i�` .7?c•..�...sx .; ..n.. ,n ..,,s,; ,<Sn. n �. ,.a.r .Z• ,,�.ti,.s;.,.
-,r.r 'ter;- !•,
.�.> v,�.??$•'-,• ,.N., ,,;mss ':h�: 3''; <>....-.',< ;, r
„ > „<,. ,. ... ,..5 z:>,: ... <. .,;, , . _ ..... ..n?n ..:��E:..<. ,. ,:. ,%x ,�>< S`'r•':o-.,. £ >. < .,.ti., :i � v < a,<, .et 'ems; - ^� , y - , >_f z �'r'<
❑ can to ee er ❑ Par
[3 Feeder
{
❑ U surface
to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
t^_rte �;�umber�gf,L`ag�Om3 ��o1d_u�' �'On�ds; {'���Lrr,• �Vrams • .resen t� ��>
}�,i�:+rla,;,.•a;y :�t5%%'! racist:<ao:'i��: c:�{. Y �.�Y: ;fr{;��.zcn 3 <�`^, Fty�•j�j•,.
,may j r ti �{ S S; �'«: r« / . ,",i:",,.�, r<�..;, �y vz •u �Y , :�� 3 �,�•u {Y . YY,;.
`y'.`%•-�{,`:.:�:%ti`!:�::;�.ow; <'?hu•,''•y�,Y'C?" r r. ti" "�.<a•�v:T. va'+y'r-ry.':n:H y`p ,,, '3 r� ti.- �✓ 3^'i.''�.•',�,k
CCa
• ;
�?f- .� • ¢; , .',�'-•< >, .w;>, i�;.s� ..�.��;• l r v,,.. :• .k. �.z� !'�,r,_�?s.'�. ❑ g 2%<C� ❑ P y ��`y, .•�'f` '.�;a;<,
'�w,iak�'�. 2':'����;; s�.�.,?x�;:',3. .nr-�'�'''�� 3a,2 x�>:�.v:s;{;S{�. �E-. ;t•;•�'",• ?, 5.�..3` :^¢
..-.��
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [3 Yes p No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed; what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3 Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? [3 Yes ❑ No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? []Yes
❑ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holdingpnnds) require p Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
GV ames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
/ LT?W,A • 21
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
January 15, 1998
Steve Penland
Swan Land Dairy f
564 Leach Road r
Forest City NC 28043
Subject: Removal of Registration
Facility Number 81-10
Rutherford County
Dear Steve Penland:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an active animal
waste management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H.0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain and implement a certified animal waste management plan and notify the Division
of Water Quality prior to stocking animals to that level. Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal
waste management plans are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 1,000
Poultry with a liquid waste system 30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
Sincerely,
JAN 2 0 199 I
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: IAsh�uihe_ W� a"ter b u y; egronal= ffice
Rutherford Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

N'. C. DEPARTMENT OFA ` ENVIRONMENT AND -'NATURAL
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
TO:
FAX #:
FROM:
DATE: !
RESOURCES
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
59 WOODFIN PLACE
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801
PHONE/704/251-6208 FAX/704/251-6452
# OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER:
MESSAGE: If questions, please call 704/251-6208.
A
o$�

EO Id 7G101
L6jv-z,s
sfso-9ZR`z ari'q mm
r,s6z:0s 'o -d
immo a
ooh$ gptmb -]vM
CI :oj
•s naa ua�3 s o; i�rsd !i' s e MTSI.Al(l
ox i xma i
`M&= Am jW quoumpbal mares OOi4 gr alp W= uopundo oW 30
3?xti Ply atp puof-2{ sp==;o xmFm OW a qus M aPWP I Pim 'CtVg una i
ra ds�gs-$i 'E '°lt� X941 '!�-OSZpU ploqVWqt 24PAIL131
SQ36�lgS $:7' ow p'S p
ants UO sFM.ua ()Am v4mgjo 7uo
noquado AW od saint AV
(tea ou) Atuo ami
.St uousado StU
put,I I -A -ac,a� =uI►o
:aoqum� ,t1gi��
-anqump u0powtgaiatp1*f4
s gni ur aseal� •� M ODZO' HZ -21P laaut•EOe saoP cwt ltgthO Cg WU
210
zo•d F-Z:3T L66T-20-00N

BRANCH - WQ Fax:[phone] Oct 27 '97 16:43 F.01/02
State of North Carolina
l7epartment of Environ i meet, #
Health and Natural gesources
Division of Water Quality
<z James B. Bunt, Jr-, GaV*ernor
Wayne McDevitt, Secret
�+ A. Pr on Howard, Jr * ., Director
October 27, 199
OR U
�s-,
TO:. Roy Davis
Regional Supervisor - Asbevi3le
FROM: Shannon Shannon Latigley
, 99J
SUBJECT: Animal Operations to receive assessments for not
�1 Designating �n Operator in Responsible Charge
Attached -is a list of animal operations in your region without a properly designated Operator in
Charge. Civil assessment uses are going to be prepared against each of these facilities daring
the first weep of NovembIr-Please review this list carefully and inform me of any facilities '
In
this list which should NOT receive a civil assessment and why they should not receive the
assessment. I plat, to genefate the letters On lit ecv$, 1997. sa please resppnQ by phone, fax
car courier by Wednesday, November 5, 1997.
'nank you for your assistance in this matter., If you have any questions, please call Sharon
Langley at 733-50$3, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Operator case preparation files
i (/� /tet � — o �s35 •
1 .1
,0,0
P.D. Box 29535, Raleig)h, Ngrth CAronno 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Aft`wmadve Action Employer 60% recyeloM056 post-consnmer paper

rt i luNZ�, bMINLA - WW Fax :[phone]
EatCHity
�Gggb!xa
h
ARO
Caldwell
14-1
rr ple Oaks k'aM
Henderson
45—S
S3 Mk, Farm
Rutherford
81-10
Swan Land Dairy
Oct 27 '97 16:43 P.Cr2/02
Anim od Operation
S2ffiLSt A d
Ronald C_ Bowman
4737 Eke Starnes Rd
Charles Sexton Rt 3, Box 113
Steve Penland 564 Leach Road

NOV-03-1997 12:23 P.Oi
C. DEPARTMUM OF ZMW3:R*IMNMM AIM MTURAL RESOURi=a
I)TV:Egl:off or IMTRR.QUIMITT
MATER QUALITY SECTIOU
ASBBVXLLE iMIOXAL OFFICE
.59 WooDFXK PLACE
p.SM9WXLL'M, NORTH CAROLnM 28803.
-ErRoNg/704/2SI-6208 PAX/704/251-6452
OF PAMS TKZS COVIM-.
la C&II 7n4/25T-62fte
If 9990

ate of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
WATER QUALITY SECTION
October 17, 1997
Mr. Steve Penland
Swan Land Dairy
564 Leach Road
Forest City, North Carolina 28043
Subject: Animal Operation Site Inspection
Facility Number 81-10
Rutherford County
Dear Mr. Penland:
Enclosed is a computer generated report from the inspection
conducted on August 27, 1997. This report is for your files, you
may destroy the carbon copy you received on the day of inspection.
The next certification examination is on December 11, 1997 at
the Collett Street Recreation Center in Morganton. The application
to take the examination along with the $10.00 fee must be in
Raleigh 30 days (mail before November 10) prior to the examination.
Also, remember to maintain records of amount of waste
disposed of, location of waste disposal, maintenance records for
equipment used for waste disposal, and any other information useful
for waste management. A copy of your certified animal waste
management plan must be available during inspections. Thank you
for your time and assistance during the inspection.
Sincerely,
Roger C. Edwards
Wastewater Consultant
CC: Donald Morrison, Rutherford Co. NRCS
Interchange Building, 1;4 Voice 704-251-6208 FAX [phone]
59 Woodfin Place, f An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 501. recycled/10% post -consumer paper

s
`p Division of Soil and Water Conservation p Other Ag
®Division of Water Quality
p outme ()Complaint ® o ow -up o inspection q o ow -up oFIJSWC review OZ3tKer
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 1020 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status: p Registered p Applied for Permit HR, r i 11, ze , 11 V
® Certified p Permitted s "t nd x
A Not Operational 1 Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Swan Land Dairy County: Rutherfoxd ....................................... ARO............
OwnerName: Stexe.Xcula ud ........................................................................................... Phone No: 704-2.45=5611 ..........................................................
Facility Contact: .Slete:Penlrand...............................................Title:awner ................................................ Phone No: .104:245-5.611......................
Mailing Address:..56.4.Leanh..Raad.................................................................................. Earest.0ty".Ac ................................................... Z80.4a ..............
Onsite Representative: Sfeye.P.enla:ad............................................................................ Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
4/30/97 Continued on back

81_10
I ity not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
Pn7.i
dd the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
4.0
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop tvpe...................... Eescue-----------------------
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
[]Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to queshonz#)Explam:any YES answers and(nr anyrecommendations or an otherxcomments
9- -
_
„<r..,;...._ �:..�;. y.: x:... d aeYr r s
^�� ' ffi � �;;% -z .-
TJse draw►ngs£of facthty "to etter explain situattons fuse adcli0onal,pages as�necessary)
�... _.d .. ..���� , s . ,
q°
Note' Current.population(81) exceeds`the�design capacity o£ 60 Due to method of operation, thekactual�capac ' ap earn`
f
„�� ti "A hty` Pr
to be greater than the design capacity :The operator
'OEM_
scrapes and givesiaway the manure instead of placmg'it m they }
fi5
it Y 4;'
S3+✓ wF 3 t y 3Y 3"wV 'S ,f'£ V' ,:
lagoon �NRCSIS&W'is reevaluating this plan F t�� t��
i
' 1
'Yrry3fp'�i .. Y,..: '': '� F
��� m5 tf -.✓' T� t {�„ }Z
-7 The-ownenpIans to take the�animalaeerhfication exam on ESeptember 11, 1997
Zhel „
13 agoon needsl hquid.IeveLmarker
� Y 3 t i � 5 ? :.. i4k � ': .' � S ,.l �
-' `L fS 9 %� ✓ ��': ����"�� 51' L; �iD�� y`-,.
.,� $ly'
X24 �Ihere were no �rec�ordssavatlable .The mspecto�xecominended the type: of records�to be kept � � � �� ��` >�,�
�
,� { � � �( 6 ^. Fz /✓'$j✓H L� l �.Y./ t 4 tY P5X 4 � d T .t?� r .td � d� .% �..�.+� � k tt
_-L�k.r �, . A ... - _ M .�.:a.S . b rt. rF A.va- F •S�i ,� ab % '.. � 5 �' ✓. �'* { ..�
Reviewer/Inspector Name I2ogerC Edwards "� ' s ”"" z
,R
, »<
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc. utyaiun uj crater Lluaury, warer Luaury aecuon, rac[irty Assessment Unit
4/30/97

Facility Number � � ,/ c:J
Farm Status: [3Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
.....................................................................................................................................................
;� � 1.
FarmName:.. .... �. !.`................................................
......
:�Ct
County:...................................
.............
Land Owner Name:. �.:�� i:......I-E �..�r.:i/f4�....0
:Phone No: %�%� �G 1 r'
...........................
.......................... �.................
r
Facility Conctact:.... . L...a ..... .�:........................................... (. y tC!
l � P ; 1; ................................ fF `1 _ ,f r�.
Title:.,. ...................... Phone No:.
Mailing Address:....:'..4.... :k :��......F`:'r................................................
.................
-;
f c,f 3 7 t�y� c� }
............... ........ ......................., ..... s......�...........
r
Onsite Representative: .::`. ?l.�` r::..I,/.........................................................,
/....... '
r
Integrator:
.......................................................................................
Certified Operator: .................................................. ................................................ ; ..........:... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0
L-�4 « Longitude 4 «
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes QNo
❑ Yes O'No
❑ Yes [9 -No
❑ Yes
ElNo
❑ Yes
[2- Io
❑ Yes
ED No
El Yes
,r
�
®`No
Continued on back

Facility Number: 1....... .
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
El Yes
❑ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?'
❑Yes
[]1No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/ins ection with on-site representative? P P
El Yes
O`No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly -closed?
❑Yes
[]`No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
D`Y s
❑ No
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[D`No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
E
................ ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................
Structure 6
............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
❑ No I
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
0'No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
1 -Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑b'No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ........�r t '2. {........ ?? ;:?:' 5 .................. .........................................
16.+.Do,-the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑-Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑Yes
❑'No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
[9-1 o
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
El Yes
No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
. ❑ No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/ins ection with on-site representative? P P
El Yes
O`No
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
D`Y s
❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
El Yes
[]'N
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
[9'I'es
❑ No
Mr. L1 A f `(14 r1i, w C ; v L0.11 A 7' .L a S ,`{ t
C:;e.r2e,1f#Itfi�(!=<^ FFtCtextr+C`talcir='C 7`��r t `! �4`{rlij �e(�T.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
''
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: t�<— �.{ +'� r�- ,t�
r• � � � r»�.�c.�.�3 Date.
LIG. tvoioa u,/ rruler Sruamy, water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit
4/30/97

't
Producer:Gres Swanser
Ucation:Rutherford County
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation:Dairy
Number of Animals:60 Cows
(Design Capacity)
U'�SEP 121997 C �'-'.
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed to determine nutrient content before each
application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that
all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop
to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special
precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to
10 tons per acre per year.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
(NCDEM) .0200 regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.

IV -
t
6. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and
to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be
applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more
than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on
proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples
to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
2

ESTIMATE OF VOLUME OF WASTE PRODUCED
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
From Storage Lagoon:
Milking Parlor wash water
14560 cu.
ft.
per
yr.
Normal runoff
31537 cu
ft.
per
vr.
Rainfall evap
16388 cu.
ft.
per
yr.
in/yr
62485 cu.
ft.
per
yr =17 ac.
animals X gallons of excess water/animal/day X days
gallons of water per year
Total animal waste and waste water volume
generated in one year is approximately
gallons or 17 acre -inches.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
1000 gallons of waste X 0.8 lbs. PAN/1000 gallons of waste =
22 lbs N/Ac.In=
374 lbs. PAN/year.
From Daily feedlot scraping:
60 animals on lot 250 of the time yield 1200 lbs PAN/yr.
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
Values used above are based on analysis of waste
from similar livestock operations in North
Carolina which broadcast liquid manure slurries
(source: USDA-NRCS FOTG Practice Standard 633 -
Waste Utilization page 633-14). Actual nutrient
content of slurry pumped from this system may vary
from these values. Waste analysis should be made
of the actual slurry as soon as possible after
significant waste accumulates in the tank.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be
over applied if application is made based on
Nitrogen alone. This plan only addresses
Nitrogen.
3

0
N
The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over
application of nutrients or other elements.
4

IV
The crop fields shown on Tables 1 thru 3 are available for waste
application. It will not be necessary and may not be desirable to
apply waste to each of these fields in any given year. It is assumed
that for row crops only a fraction of the total annual nitrogen
requirement can be applied using animal waste.
The Lbs. of Nitrogen Per Acre shown in the tables are estimated annual
nitrogen (N) requirements of the crop to be grown based on the
potential productivity of the soil and assuming no double cropping.
The Recommended Lbs. of N to be Applied per acre indicate the Nitrogen
that can be reasonably applied to the crop and used by the crop in a
timely manner.
The landowner is encouraged to develop a method to record the actual
waste application volume made on each field. The Livestock Waste
Spreading Record sheet attached is an optional means of keeping such a
record.
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Recommended
Realistic Lbs. N Lbs. N to
Tract Field Soil Crop Anticipated Acresl Required to be
# No. Type Yield Useable Per Ac. Applied
2
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus
the required buffer areas which border streams or residential
areas.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources
such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted
for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
5

f
G
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(NAME AND LOCATION OF LEASED OR AGREED PROPERTY)
(Agreement with
adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required
only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification
2])
Recommended
Lbs. N
Lbs. N to
Tract Field Soil Crop
Anticipated Acresl
Required
to be
# Type
Yield Useable
Per Ac.
Applied 2
See footnotes for Table 1.
A

n-
n
Table 3: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(NAME AND LOCATION OF LEASED OR AGREED PROPERTY)
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 2])
Recommended
Lbs. N Lbs. N to
Tract Field Soil Crop Anticipated Acresl Required to be
#Type Yield Useable Per Ac. Applied
2
See footnotes for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Total
Amount of N Produced
Deficit
This summary indicates that only about ??? percent of the total annual
nitrogen requirements can be provided for the crops as listed for the
fields available using animal waste produced on this farm.
7

Pr
6
Your-f-acilty-is- designed—for,-"3-65----"days_ _of temporary storage and --the,-.
temporary_stor..age-must--be--removed--on-the --average= of onee.-every_
-12 --- -MONTHS. In no instance- should- -the --volume--.of waste being
-stor-ed =in---you-r -structure .exceed -Elevation -_94:0--
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
Conservation Service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
A PASTURE SYSTEM IS CURRENTLY BEING USED TO HOUSE DAIRY COWS ON THIS
FARM. CATTLE ARE ON THE PASTURE APPROXIMATELY 80% OF THE TIME. NO
FEED WILL BE FED IN HOLDING AREA FOR MILK PARLOR EXCEPT DURING
EXTREME BAD WEATHER. MANURE WILL BE STORED ON CORNER OF FEEDLOT FRO
UP TO 2 WEEKS. IN EXTREMELY WET WEATHER, LOT MAY NOT BE SCRAPED FOR
3 TO 4 DAYS. TWO OR 3 WEEKS OF STORAGE WILL PROVIDE STORAGE FOR
EXTREMELY WET PERIODS.
(Use additional sheets as needed to describe the operation of the
system within the context of the livestock operation)

F3
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field No.
Tract No.
Soil Type
Crop AP1.71
3
2352
724C2
FESCUE
K?ph Le,,C�O" �1 � - 1 , L11

THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION
WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.

NOTE TO FIELD OFFICE PERSONNEL PREPARING THIS PLAN:
The following items must be addressed in the Waste Utilization Plan in order for
the plan to meet the minimum requirements of the .0200 rules and NRCS
standards. All of these concerns may not be applicable for a given operation.
Additional concerns may have to be addressed at certain operations. These items
express the minimum requirements. Where necessary, the planner/designer is to
elaborate on these concerns or add others as applicable. Comments within these
items that are in parenthesis, are underlined, and are bold typed are for Field
Office reference only and are not to be included in the landowner's copy of the
plan. This note is also provided only for Field Office reference and is not to be
included in the landowner's copy of the plan.
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
Illegal discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day
by the Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge
continues.
2. (The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he
shall provide NRCS with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the
land for waste application for the life expectangy of the production facility. It is
the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals method of utilization, or available land).
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate
conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the
rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS)
or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall
be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used
where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers"
required by DEM. fSee FOTG Standard 393 — Filter Strips and Standard 390
(Interim) — Riparian Forest Buffers._ l
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
12

REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North
!'.....,7;...�� *- rl,., T ..1..,;....1 V—P r.,. — n..;.7...,..., 1
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the
crop is not damaged by burning or smothering of the plant. This is an important
consideration where swine, poultry or other ammonia rich waste is being surface
applied. Surface broadcast solids or slurries may damage crops if leaf surfaces are
matted. Generally waste should be applied such that no more than 20 to 25 percent
of the leaf area is covered. This should not normally be a concern where diluted,
low nutrient waste is irrigated or surface broadcast from a liquids holding structure.
Where crops are severely damaged due to waste application, the plants cannot
assimilate the nutrients and discharge of pollutants to surface waters is likely to
occur.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop
on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance
may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter
strips are present. (See Standard 393 — Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right—of—
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over—spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior
converted wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that
discharge directly into water courses, and only then at agronomic rates provided the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a
maximum operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25—year, 24—hour storm
event in addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
13

I
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
14

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: S wtj-(L) - L Aj 3') 12 _&.1'QY
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications,
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) before
the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 -
year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on-site at
the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDEM
upon request.
Name of Facility Owner:
(Please print) ;!1„
Signature:
Date: I 141 %6
Name of Manager (If different from owner) : C:'y r r i"
Signature: Date: L �126
Name of Technical Specialist-: (Please print) Nk", o 1--e-
Affiliation:
Address (Agency):
U 50 I'A r-3 }z. c s
( 2 k s. )V\ -a N^ S \-� e'e_�
Signature: �,L&_P_-j j�_] hb- <"- Date:
15

i,
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 'T1 -/Q
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: u ,7- `/ '1915
Time: /13
a
I -.
Farm Name/Owns
Mailing Address:
County:'-VL1Ht inn A d
Integrator:
On Site Representative:
Physical Address/Location:
Phone:
Phone: 7a U- zys- 6� 00
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: L ® Number of Animals on Site: _K7
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 39 Longitude: $ 552 ' 3a" Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Qor No Actual Freeboard: --2—Ft.
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or to Was any erosion observed? Yes o No
Is adequate land available for spray? es r No Is the cover crop adequate? QWor No
Crop(s) being utilized-
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Ye or No
100 Feet from Wells? Ose or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or®
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes ore
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man=made devices? Yes oto • If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the•facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or©o
Additional Comments: Uuju&//2 we)Rknu� �4a So �((� GIJ,a
�.L- �o -Ij.ixss! /� sd/i
.Q A -74-•o 0j, �u c c `S 7`Z� Ht Ax" in >> Er-CDIQ- �I o'1'• WAS k-
Inspe for Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
s '
Use Attachments if Needed.

,
�Danlel o �,
77
'JL
— •(gip•/J\ 11
/TI h re CrovS
.I�960, f T _ _
1 11 1_
f �?�,. ,-� _• -_�^�/ �� ���/� l)Ch rni fig. 0\�J f'�� U �] ' 9 • �•
' `..-._--�\; ---' \� •✓
Uh5/
_
ILL
_ U $ P N,I%1
I JL
• � \ ° V '930 \� / 980 ° � -��-
:�
988 r .\
600
Oj • � � I� � CII phu Pring O //
Nlgow
�• �� X929
.� 0 1,900
� bllylVSp In 9 ij � •• � / � \
\_ 41
U fig 900 1 \
�• •i \\ II° /•� ✓ / \ \� 800
�t6 55' X17 HARRIS 2 Ml. Ita000m.E •. INTERIOR-toEOLOGICAL SURVEY. WASHINGTON. .C.-11988 81-5
I MILE ROAD CLASSIFICATION
0 6000 7000 FEET Heavy-duty Light-duty .....................
1 KILOMETER Medium -duty............ Unimproved dirt
0 U. S. Route O State Route
QUADRANGLE LOCATION RUTHERFORDTON SOUTH, N. C.
STANDARDS N3515—W8152.5/7.5
!TON, D. C. 20242
NVAILABLE ON REQUEST 1966

F.
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. `'/-/
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: I , 1995
f Time: 1230
Farm Name/O Wner: A eEz
Mailing Address: /n 2- ? & kltm n/fd
County: p tli E R 4 o -d
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: / I'm Vkc c ny Phone: 7,9 V- z,1cd- zg1/0
Physical Address/Location: 1.2-5 Pd a m Ro-44 5R 1983
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry ✓' Cattle
Design Capacity: 15000 Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:_' 19 ' 35 " Longitude: '91 -° 1/% _f�'� Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)7 Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized;
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria7 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: VZd&-A,/ FQrns s pc`z
Insp for Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
—742A4
Si nat e
Use Attachments if Needed.

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. P'/
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: �� `� , 1995
Tuner ii3o
Farm Name/Owner: <
Mailing.
County:
Integrator:
Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone: Zj!�L— 6Oi]
Physical Address/Location: 5'qa u� �l42-7 --
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry . Cattle JeLt7arx�y
Design Capacity: 6-0 Number of Animals on Site: 17
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: to
Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes" or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) QLes r No Actual Freeboard: --g—Ft. _ Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or(D Was any erosion observed? Yes orq&
Is adequate land available for spray?es or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: 65_62s -
Does the the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes r No
100 Feet from Wells? es r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes ot&
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes ols If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or Vo
Additional Comments:
,�'e-k(f. ee(wmteA
InspeJtor Name
Signat e
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

Is
OM►B76•12 091SEM 1 t02A=
Elm RcxlW m imr=dl=Atxmdon
i%6l ky x4Qbi:.��
UM MirATIONRMORD
DAA:J -4C c-3 . , M
CaIuct: , mNames
�Lrdti►: �.. � �
Agent Y"sd tag Sita; AL6.�J- t. Phone: 7� 2 W'7M 8 17
Oa SimRq=mntadvo: ��•s� • .._r.,i Ahnuc:
i'hysieal Adtiraw: l5al sm a
Mailing Addkss: _i2f 3 'lam,[. � - -
Type oroperatiott: rSMm Pnashiyt
Design Caput . tea Nnmberreflttticm& as Situ: 6W
73pa 4f IMP=dasi: tirtntnd -'-„ Aerial
CIMTa'Pce Qr I4
Dc= the Ajdsnd WM* Lngaun have sufrwlmt f cAawd of t Foot +25 ye4r24 bass sfotm *v=t
(app=fiwviy ] Foot t7 jncbcs)(IasDff No Acqual ruccbnard: L Fm:j —Z MNgm
Por fagOi[ies W!Lh malt; Lissa cm lagena► phase aditss the other leSc=' r= =board wader Lice
cauun= t "don.
Was rtnY ta:opuro obrered fry tbmla$ooa(sp YesNo 1 amm erosion of ft &m7: Yes
It adccluaQa land avaiiubie iiar land ch
rn►?(Y s a is thacovar crag adcgnam?j? s'r
I �
Fax to CR 19) 735-3539 Signaty aFAgeat
to 'd . IMOSai6 'tut SIMI
b©•d
Ts:TT s66T-oz--inr

11'
'Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 'T1 I d
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: u ,2 ,1995
Time: It 11�
Farm Name/Own(
Mailing Address:
County: EU ht8--R4 &d
Integrator:
On Site Representative:
Physical Address/Location:
U
Phone:
Phone:
Type of Operation:' Swine. Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: S7
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: _° 16 '71 "'0" Longitude: i 52 ' .3n " Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1. Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Gpor No Actual Freeboard: —2—Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or& Was any erosion observed? Yes otzp
Is adequate land available for spray? es r No Is the cover crop adequate? QLe No
Crop(s) being utilized;
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?(Ye or No
100 Feet from Wells?'e or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes""'or
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or&
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes oro. If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the'facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or
Additional Comments: 0aJM,-1z w6047Jr. 10Z" S�r� c /,l�nf�se �o ��s a� s42II�
{,.R1 ✓
Inspe for Name -
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
kZ FC c-A2C s 0-r WAS 1,5- 1) p /red
Use Attachments if Needed.

°. o oJ• I1
a a) .:Daniel
_
• \ � 1
/ 0 111
J1 a ra Grov
1 q6 y
6 • ` �i/
Q Mornin \"�iIJ • 9� 1
J o J_l�i
\1 Q00
•\ \ ;-\ ;..- J/ r��. 900 iJ
�o I $ • JJ II 0
° •� •\ °V •9J0 \ _' C_.J 980
oI
I
•968 O
/ r
l
/� Q j ` • GSuIPhu prin 0 .
T
7 Y
0 ; 9p0 : o O p _U" v
a _
0
900 3
aoo I rr
O • o , 9 d I \ �,. �o \ �r 900 ,1 � �
I. • ` bllyl\ po'n �\OV\ � • : o � o �� J t
g3�^ O --
/.1V aoo
416 55' 417 HARRIS 2 MI. I 418p0Um.E. INTERIOR+GEOLOGICALSURVEY. WASHINGTON. .C.-11988 81052
I NILE ROAD CLASSIFICATION
6000 7000 FEET Heavy-duty Light-duty .....................
I KILOMETER Medium -duty............ Unimproved dirt
C3 U.S. Route O State Route
QUADRANGLE LOCATION RUTHERFORDTON SOUTH, N. C.
;TANDARDS N3515—WB152.5/7.5
-ON, D. C. 20242
rAILABLE ON REQUEST 1966