810012_Complete File - Historical_20190213

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan D. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 26, 2002
Mr. Jerry Boone
Boone's Dairy
182 Goldfinch Lane
Rutherfordton, North Carolina 28139
Subject: Animal Operation Site
Inspection
Facility Number 81-12
Rutherford County
Dear Mr. Boone:
Asheville Regional Office
Enclosed is a computer-generated report from the inspection conducted
on August 23, 2002. This report is for your files.
The operation of your animal waste management system (lagoon and spray
fields) is satisfactory. The required records are being maintained and are
available for inspection. The lagoon has approximately 72 inches of
freeboard, with evaporation rate high.
The request has been received in Raleigh for your removal from the
certified animal waste management list. Should you increase your herd size
above 100 head, it is required that you notify this agency and you management
plan be re-evaluated.
Thank you for your time and assistance during the inspection. If you
have any questions or if I may be of assistance in the future please, do not
hesitate to contact me at 828-251-6208.
Sincerely,
°ZL
Roger C. Edwards
Wastewater Consultant
Enclosure
CC: Donald Morrison, Rutherford County MRCS
Water Quality Section, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, NC 28801-2414 Telephone: [phone] Customer Service
Fax: [phone] 623-7748

Ili
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 8/23/2002 Time:
Facility Number 81 12
— 40 =Not Operational ! Below Threshold
Q Permitted ® Certified ® ConditionalIy Certified j3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
FarmName: .4.oma.' .A 17CJ'................................................................................................ County: �iuthinkoxd...................................... r�RQ............
DwnerName: Jgr.ry....................................... B.O.Q.11V .......................................................... Phone No: .2 4-97.64...........................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: 18j.. 4�df �h.L.alle........................................................................... Ruthgrfnxdfo?n. [.............................................2.&.3.9..............
DnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:JQanu..................................... D.Q.9KIP ................................................ Operator Certification Number:2.............................
Location of Farm:
Dff Hwy. 74 west of Rutherfordton turn left onto Clark Rd., second road to left is Goldfinch Lane. Boone's Dairy is 1/4 mile +�
m right.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse, Latitude 35 • 25 30 Longitude 82 • OS 03 «
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
3ischaraes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[I Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/nun?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
!. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
t. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes ® No
rVaste Collection & Treatment
i. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ®.Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......Bj ldo c.B.arn.........................................................................................................................................................................................
'reeboard (inches): 72 inches
5100

r
Number: 51-12 Date of Inspection 8/23/2002 Printed on: 8/26/2002
here any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 9 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
■ ►-1 •
❑ Yes ® No
IN _� •
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
EVT�'d •yiel;atioris;or de, " *' es•wer;e;" *' :dpring•this; visif: ;You;wily ;reee ve•ido•furtlier• ; • ; -
corres o�ndence. aboui thas visit.
Comments (refer to que`shon #) Explain anyYES answers and/or any recommendations d- ani other comments r
Use drawings of.facihty�to better explain (use aclditaonal necessary} �-�.. �Y `'
sztuatrorrs pagesxas .-- ��., _,z �M�
112
Reviewer/Inspector Name ~' F,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ti / Date: 64 d 1 5100

Facility Number: 81-12 Date of .Inspection 1 8/23/2002 Printed on: 8/26/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below El Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ®No
5100

® Division of Water Quality
® Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number B j Date of Visit: Q .23 0 Time: == Printed on: 7/21/2000 0
=Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
_1 f
Farm Name: C dlilt. ...... _ 1> f2 Countv: 1�:......`2 dZQ................................................
......................................
Owner Name: ��`R l� i 1 old Phone No: ZB .� ��'................................
.......—.•....................................................................................r....................................................... ....
Facility Contact: ��..rj�................s! 1OO/.[�...................Title: ... L'�L£?[�� ...... Phone No:��.�.�.�.7
rr J.
/� / / 1 ...�./.�.................. / ....................... .. ....
Mailing Address:..1..B...IZ ... (poled 16"U" C_4.......F-l4�clE Liu r`t ` 2 R( Y'E.4...... file ..2. fws �....
............................................
Onsite Representative:CRy_QOti(� Integrator: ,,..�i�
(....................................................................
Certified Operator:MEiI►In(...........................bpo ,,,,.,.._„ Operator Certification Number:,.,���or. ,...�
......... ....................
Location'of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude FRT *` Ej 37-
Design. `Current.
Canacity Ponnlatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ hilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design
Current
Poultry
Capacity Po ulation ' Cattle capacity Population
❑ Layer KDairy 7 }
❑ Non -Layer I Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Opacity
Total SSLW
Namb�r of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface DrainsPresent ❑
Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding
Ponds/ Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
lllischarges & atream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 121 No
Discharge originated at: E] Lagoon El Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes & No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Z No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 'O No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes U[No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I /Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier .2-`1 C'''..L�t
Freeboard (inches):
510 Cnntinuad nn hnrL

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection ' Z3 ®�—
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes Lej No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 0 No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 0 No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes M No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 10 No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes QA No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
A.
05/03/01

Facility Number:? j — j Date of InspectionPrinted on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
El Yes
®No
seepage, etc.)
Comments (refer to question #):' Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. .
Use drawings of facility, to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ;
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100
immediate public health orenvironmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
§M No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[DNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
EffNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
['No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
C) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents ,,yy
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? A/,-—,�.��-�� "G✓�
E] Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
[j Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
R] No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
B No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
ED No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative'?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
10 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
.... yiol.. ..s. . def c..... v.� ..noted during this;v....Y.o.... r. e. . . .Bio' further. :
... res fidence: about: this visit: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :
Comments (refer to question #):' Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. .
Use drawings of facility, to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ;
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100

ro�2
AQG _
. :Michael F Easley
ovrr
• G eor. .
r William G. Ross, Jr.; Secretary
>_ North Carolina Department.of Environment and NaturalResources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division -of Water Quality
Asheville Regional Office
WATER QUALITY SECTION
july 2, 2005•
Mr. Jerry Boone
Boone's Dairy
182 Goldfinch Lane
Rutherfordton, North•Carolina 28139
Subject: Animal.Operation Site
Inspectiony
FacilitNumber. 81-12
Rutherford County
Dear Mt. Boone:.."
Enclosed is a computer -generated', report from the inspection conducted
on June -29, 2001.. -This report is.,for your files.
The operation of your animal waste management system (lagoon'and spray
fields) is satisfactory. No. waste has .been applied since August of 2000.
Your efforts fencing your cattle out -of the. streams and installing well water
...supply points for your cattle is a positive: -for surface water "quality
.protection in many ways. Your record keeping"has improved, with all required_.
records available during inspection.:,
_.... _.
7.
Thank you for your time and assistance; during, the inspection. If you
'have any questions or if I may of assistance please, do not hesitate to:
contact me at
828-251-.6208.
Sincerely,
;��
RogeY C. Edwards
Wastewater Consultant
Enclosure
CC:. Donald Morrison, Rutherford County -MRCS
Water Quality Section, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville,. NC 28801-2414' Telephone: .[phone] Customer Service.'

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied
Facility Number 81 12 Date of Visit: 6/29/2001 Time: 1330 Printed on: 7/2/:
O Not
Operational ® Below Threshold
® Permitted ®Certified ®Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
FarmName: 9Rxtlr.' . i7CY........................................................................_. ................ County: RUMUfff.d ...................................... AR5
Owner Name: JexT.y....................................... 1).Q.Q.1me .......................................................... Phone No: 89. ...._..
omT
Facility Contact:exT1'.oQxtlr.................................................... Title: Qw.ur................................................. Phone No:......_.._................._..................._..
.
�
Ih�nsro�rc afr�o`tl"arrd Water Canserty tto� � � """
�`
. ��,
�
�3Qer,Aency
Off Hwy. 74 west of Rutherfordton turn left onto Clark Rd., second road to left is Goldfinch Lane. Boone's Dairy is 1/4 mil
t Y.i
on right.
i
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry '® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 2S 30 Longitude 82 •
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied
Facility Number 81 12 Date of Visit: 6/29/2001 Time: 1330 Printed on: 7/2/:
O Not
Operational ® Below Threshold
® Permitted ®Certified ®Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
FarmName: 9Rxtlr.' . i7CY........................................................................_. ................ County: RUMUfff.d ...................................... AR5
Owner Name: JexT.y....................................... 1).Q.Q.1me .......................................................... Phone No: 89. ...._..
Mailing Address: 1$2..G4.1.dc.i�a10........................................................................... 1?ulthle? fQxdl4af.N............................................. 28139.............
Facility Contact:exT1'.oQxtlr.................................................... Title: Qw.ur................................................. Phone No:......_.._................._..................._..
OnsiteRepresentative: ............................................................................................................ Integrator:.....................................................................................
Certified Operafor:Jg oa----------------- ---)XQ.9laq........_.................. Operator Certification Number: l 6 ............................
Location of Farm:
Off Hwy. 74 west of Rutherfordton turn left onto Clark Rd., second road to left is Goldfinch Lane. Boone's Dairy is 1/4 mil
+�
on right.
i
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry '® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 2S 30 Longitude 82 •
,Design Current Design Current Design Curren
Swine Ca acr. Po .ulation. Poultry Ca aci Po ulation Cattle Ca aci --p ;ulati
n
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ®Dairy 80 81
❑Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder JE1 Other . -
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity 80
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW 112,000
_.._
Nirnpber af� agoum = . 1 [] Is Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ® Spray Field Are
Holding I'ozxdsi ` oiid'TrapS. ;1 0 ❑ No Liouid Waste Manas<ement Svstem
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ENO
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Stricture 5 Structure b
Identifier: ...............#i`1...............--..................................................................--.................................... ......................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 120

81-12 Date of .Inspection 6/29/2001 Printed on: 7/2/2001
We re any immdiate threats to the -integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, D yes N No
-- - - seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? D Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? D Yes N No
9. Do any, stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes' N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancehinprovement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? D Excessive Ponding D PAN (] Hydraulic Overload D Yes N No
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? D Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? D Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? D Yes' ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? D Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste'Management Plan readily available?
(ie/. WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is -facility not in compliance with any -applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
D Yes N No
D Yes' N No
D Yes N No
D Yes
N No
D Yes
N No
D Yes
® No - -
❑ Yes
® No
■ ►6-
D Yes N No
D Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? D Yes N No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.

Type of Visit 4F. Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit lQ Routine O Complaint. O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: '-` Time:
10 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
13 Permitted ® Certified ® Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ....13..a., �.&a.-.'�........111. ............................. ........................... County: ...'...:�'..�. 9a/......................./`1 ......
Owner Name:.. .R...............................[.�.4�fi2E1L ..................... Phone No:... :z ,!..✓��„............4...p............... ..............
Facility Contact: ......................................../...�..................................... Title:................................................................ Pho%ne,/No:..............................
......
...............
Mailing Address: ..%.. .... � CY7`uPf7?1, ..... f�..................................... r...... QI % ...................... .....l 1..............
.... ........... ..........
OnsiteRepresentative: .................................................ra........................................................ Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:..„ �.A,,.w....................... ..��. 'v ...................................... Operator Certification Number:,L/.,���................
Location of Farm: �/�
W y 77 k.i£S' o G e�l=o /1 `�e�� O,t C-iit"Z - Sc�Q�I f/ : c'�'f i S &o1 rtCA
T ..-...: a__.1.. 1 d 7 IS 1 1. 1 .f1 i I..
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Str//ucture 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: .....(.........................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
5/00
❑ Yes 90 No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
[+ No
,
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
19 -No
® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: ] / — t Date of Inspection Olo
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there -structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
i
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Ig No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop typeFSCCf�
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes to No
C) This facility is pended fora wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 02 No.
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: 0
•vi01'ati6ris'or deficiencies i4re noted• during this'visit; Y;ou will-cecate Bio #;utther
correspondence: agouti this visat�
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes !SNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N No
E]'Yes 9 No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes E No
❑ Yes ®No
I ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ I Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 02 No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes M No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes JRNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes (a No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes *No
AdditionalComments an or rawings•
4
I
5100

Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title:
Mailing Address:..1.$2.GoldfxtwkLanye..............................................
OnsiteRepresentative: ..............................................................................
Certified Operator
Location of Farm:
......... Phone No: ....................................................
....... Rutherfardtmm.N.C.............................................. 28139 ..............
..... Integrator: ............................................................
.... Operator Certification Number:21.5.65 .................
Hwy. 74 west of Rutherfordton on Clark Rd., second rive on left is Goldrinch Lane.
JAI
[3 Swine [3 Poultry ®Cattle [3 Horse Latitude ©• ®I ®« Longitude ®• ®4 ®44
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to E
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lai
Ilolding Ponds] So
In No
rea
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ' ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13 Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............................................................................................................................................. ......
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6

Facility Number: 81_12 I Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 10/4/2000
5. Are t here any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are I here structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closi re plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do a iy of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do afiy stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do he receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) oes the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Do(,!s the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Re uir d Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Dos the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Do s record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to, notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Do Is facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Wei e any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
CY iv'V161ations`or-deficiencies•were_noted,•during.this visit. •I'uu•will-xeceivc no* further. .
....................... ....... .......................
co r6s 66dek Obitf this:vis"t. . .
Comments (refer to question #) Ex Iain an YES answers and/or an recommendations or any other comments
'. P Y Y
Use dr wings of face ty to better a iplain situatioi s (use addifioi►al pages as>n cessary) ,
_: `:

Lagoon Number
Last Added
Determined by: ❑ Owner ❑ Estimated
Surface Area (acres):
Embankment Height (feet):
0.3
.1.0 .............................
Lagoon Identifier belaur..milking-barn ....................
Latitude FI -1 7171
Longitude
By GPS or Map? ❑ GPS® ap
GPS file number:
Distance to Stream: 0 less than 250 ft p 250 feet - 1000 feet p greater than 1000 ft
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes p No
Intervening Stream? O Yes p No
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): 0<5 O5-10 0>10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes p No O Unknown
Spillway p Yes O No Adequate Marker *Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches): 02 ......................................
inspection date, 8/2/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid (g Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 52
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
*Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
p No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
p Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fail to make contact
and/or Sprayfield O Yes p No O Unknown with representative O Yes (g No
unavailable
comments

Pirl orth Carolina
rtment of Environment
nd Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Jerry ' Boone
Boone's Dairy
182 Goldfinch Lane
Rutherfordton NC 28139
Farm Number: 81 - 12
Dear Jerry Boone:
/ • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 6, 2000
You are hereby notified that Boone's Dairy, in accordance with G.S. 143-215:10C, must apply for coverage under
an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm�Iias sixty (60) days to submit the attached
application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session
1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. You application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter.. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed.original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Stephanie Milam at [phone] extension -544 or
Wanda Frazier with the Asheville Regional Office at [phone].
Sinc ,
c
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Asheville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An.Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

i
I
NORTH CAROLINA D'ARTM NT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 7, 2000
Mr. Jerry Boone
Boone's.Dairy
i
182 Goldfinch Lane.
Rutherfordton, North Carolina 28139
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Operation Site
.Inspection
Facility Number 81-12
Rutherford County
Dear Mr.. Boone:
Enclosed is a computer generated report from the
inspection conducted on August 2,' 2000. This report is for
your files..
The operation of your animal waste management system (lagoon
and.spray fields) is satisfactory. The training manual has,
example forms to be used in recording keeping. Using these
forms will simplify record keeping. Maintaining records in
a notebook similar to the training manual will help with
organization. Enclosed are forms for recording freeboard-
levels/
reeboardlevels/
Thank you for your time and assistance during the
inspection. If you have any questions or if I may be of
assistance please, do not hesitate to contact me at
828-251-6208.
Sincerely,
r Roge�Y C . Edwards
Wastewater Consultant
Enclosure
CC: Donald Morrison, Rutherford County NRCS
• v
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801-2414
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
an for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
�SFacility Number 81 12 Date of Visit: 8/2/2000 Time: 1320 Printed on: 87/2000
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified ® Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
FarmName: 44m�.':s],�i1r3................................................................................................ County: Ru(InAnd ...................................... ARQ......
Owner Name:,Igx►y....................................... Rqaat .......................................................... Phone No:
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:.........................................
Mailing Address: 18Z..oad>t;ala.arx�........:......... .............
......... :.................................. 1uthurfQxd1o.?Q............................................. x$1.9....
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: JQan.........................4Q1U�................................................ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Off Hwy. 74 west of Rutherfordton on Clark Rd., second drive on left is.Goldfinch Lane.
❑ Swine El Poultry ®Cattle El Horse Latitude 35 • 25 30 1, Longitude 82 • OS 03
Design .. Current DesYgn Current esrgn Current
Swsne Cs ,acit . Po ulatran.. Poultry -Via` aci Po ulath) Cattle Gahac ty .1 .nnnlaih
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer I j ® Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1 10 Non-Dav
❑ Other
Total Destgn Capacity
Total SSLW
80 1 87
80
112,000
:t
Nui%►ber.:of Lagoons 1
Holding Ponds / Solxd'Traps k
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
NND
Discharge originated at: [ILagoon [I Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
® N
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes
® N
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated .flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
END
?. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® N
3.. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
OND
bVaste Collection & Treatment
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
® N
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
,reeboard (inches): 52"
-.-

i umber: 81=12 Date of .Inspection 8/2/2000 Printed on: $/7/2000
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes,'Z No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site whieh are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes. N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public-health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reguired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
yiolatioiis'or ;defciencies-*ete noted dptiug•this'visit: 'You'wiu receive ito further ;
.corresponden . about this .visit. : .
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 'N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
19. No records of freeboard levels. Records are disorganized, improvement is necessary in all areas of record management..Suggest
using the training manual or that system (note book with tabs) to maintain reocrds in the future.
Reviewer/Inspector Name itoger CFdwards Y'" s 4 }
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100

Facility Number: 81-12 Date of Inspection 8/2/2000 Printed on• 8/7/201
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ® Yes ❑
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes
6. Discharge pipe from confinement building discharges on' a sloping concrete pad which allows the liquid to enter the lagoon/pond
rith no agitation.
5100

611✓0 IR I'<
14) Routine ® Complaint ® Follow-up of DWQ inspection ® Follow-up of DSWC review ® Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection 6MH
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified. [3 Registered JE3 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name::S...I.amxs .......................... County:.. i� � 72 r2c! .....
Owner Name:�.yi.4�S%�.................... ................. Phone No:. �. .`.,.?..�.. �/ ..........................
Facility Contact: ,-P R .y. 8.0.0.kbc.. ............ Title: Phone No:
/I sN9�/'s.....................................................................................
Mailing Address: ..�..��Z.....{%{..!li......f-................................................I. ...4F:X.�s.Xe./�,t .............................2..,�?.�'..Q....
Onsite Representative: .Rx..3„ ..t nu.c ........ Integrator: ........................................
Certified Operator:. Q,A MIJ........:................. B.O.QA(e ....................................... Operator Certification Number:..2,.�S.65 .................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ' =, E=" Longitude • 6 46
Design,., ;.'Current
$wine Capacity" Population Pc
❑ Wean to Feeder r—
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
®`
Design Current
> ° Cattle„ Capacity 'Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
.Ti
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is, any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes 0 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes f No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): .................. ...................................... .........:,6...... 2 . +..............................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspection F3 O
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? . ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 12 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes jo No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes 9B No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 91 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type L"53u
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
IT. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. 'Does the facility fail to have all. components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, fre-e5oard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20 Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time.of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�: X4,6-* olatidiis:or• def cieneies •mere h6 fed. d4tiiig �this:visit: • Yoir wiil•teeeiye Bio flurth&
correspondence. a�aut this .visit.
in #) "Explain any -TES answi
❑ Yes 2 No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes IE No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes J@ No
❑ Yes ® No
i
El Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Namer
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Facility Number: B — l Date of Inspection lFj/Z3�
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes Ir No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e..residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No o'
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe of a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No u�

p Routine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DS C review p Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: $egist ed.........................................................................(ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: Boone's Dairy ......................... County: Rutherford
.....................................................................................
Owner Name: Jgrry......................................... Boone Phone No: 286-0440
................................................................................................................................
Mailing Address: Rt 5 Boz 342A Rutherfordton NC 28139
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:.........................................................................
Certified Operator:&1:ry,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-Boone Operator Certification Number:..................
.................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ®« Longitude ®• ®6 ®16
ICI Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ...........................................:.............................................
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
iS <i<�r R
. > .k
,'fSs"�?ri-aX''`+�r}
.:�' tl,.t} �, o.! -.�.0 r♦t�-� 2� <t''uY' ".F-.�`.>-. ./ar c..4..`�. ♦`..
4�wn
u-
,y'v',,,�h,,.i
tt<�-e�7
mbe�Sr
iT + .Y!♦`
nbNNr
Xhoy♦ S} ! i
lJ,:•..v :.
�Tfi /[2 -.it ♦3`< 'W -^.w } Alm:>s'�� ♦iy
....3Mi�[�'.�2.s,}k
.
can to Feeder Par
yJi %�
p p
4 a 110
Feeder to Finish
r01
�: p NoneLayer o NoDairy
Farrow to Wean
��
6” "V rtX`2'ti^% {� � i�s�2a� C� � 5` ��}ni,+- ^, y'f �1 >�'O. '•.� ���!'S�'- A.}� .,C1.`4Y+4 1' {
r4 X # lli �. }>}
'fir `�
r :'
�h
c'C{ ;(i 1nQ y`� 1 ♦ Yet`" ht L\� X1 1 4`.{Y
X{c a hi? f \ .. .. ..
� `#f t } Kl� ♦ t �� Ti
�c•Z �!'}!•'l♦��k45. �"�f?
St \ JSCV ?�- �1?• �fR 3
/l "^� S !
!
S
a R
z ; �� Type of Livestock `
❑Other
�sf
h tY 7 t n ..:"Yv .'`ri'?: i # ;�2� y, ..t<T• w '�. r,�:::`rG'1K�ryii>:'5. ,�:.r "...nvs}'.: c ;`>\�TM'r'�..<. <.� •.f :z'i't
[ � 4 fit. l C}.' 1 �? H{ G� '.G J .;::>.a?; •. •. .}� S l F - 3 +;.Y.
�'!c:s4 i' ls'/' Y 1. ✓i J Sqh,,r\
�t �'Y.?fi'i � .� l `:{. P,�\
n�.y�G4.:a
... ..>'r!.
f.v 5:..\.�<... A%<?fe - i... -N ii.. ... ;ih,�S .K�"�•iC�<y
,;:Se YB3} yX✓\�-.'a ':Y I ir. }/� k.. �e 4� J•�F l-�"h'�
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes []'No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes p No - -,
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? El Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated now in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes; notify DWQ) p Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes p No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holdingpnnds) require p Yes p No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued
on back
Farrow to Feeder
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes []'No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes p No - -,
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? El Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated now in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes; notify DWQ) p Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes p No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holdingpnnds) require p Yes p No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued
on back

1 13 Division of Soil
i
Division of Son
i 1 13 Division of wet
Other Agency -
aint 0 Follow -111) W
Facility Number
ction"'OFollow-up of DSWC review 00ther
Date of Inspection
Time of inspection 24 hr. (Iih:nub)
❑ rinitted 0 Certified 13 Cmiditivinally Certified [3 Registered H3 Not Operational I Date Last Operatvd: ...........
Farm N11"Ir: ..3c Al County; ...............................................................
............... ....... . ................. ..........
..........
Ownce Nairne: . ............................................. ........... none NO: .................................................
..... �: ................
Facility Contact: .7s6m(� ......... E).0.0N.E .................. Tide: .,0 .. W.10� ................................ Phone No . ........... I ........'....'7.7..... -¢.
Mailing Addre%%: 'Al (!,# L4To
N ................
.......... 6P4�0
................................ .....
.... Z. apel� .0,0 11 E:
.......... y
.. ..........
....... ................................................ Integrator: ......................................................................
..................... ............................................. Operator Certification Number:..l$6.4,� ................
Location of Faron
.7.�4
.. ....... &j
-C-r ....... 0..r .,...K.e ..dzRAE)AP.7a o.%) &PRAZo-K ....... to .... MIL -C................
.e ..... RL) (_f . .... -/ . ...... 0.6
.1 .. j .. RZ.-C
Latitude =•11K].=
Design Current
Swine Canaritv Ponealutinn
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder it) Finish
ffFnrrow to Wean
arrow to Fecdcr
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ (jilts
Roars
Longitude
I
DeAp Current Design Current
PGV*7 C apacity Poulation Cattle Capacity Population
Mayer L IM Dairy I
Q Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy I
Total Design Capacity Sp
Total Ssz. 0 0 a.
m
I
M-
-4: Subsurface Drains Present
Number of Lagoons F-1 Lagoon Area T❑13 S,
Holding Foods / Solid Traps No Liquid Waste ManaLtment 5ysteert
DisrhaMg.%
fiL!,jtKeanj intuacty
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
U)i%0i;%rgv tinglitatt:0 at: E3 Lagoon E3 Spray Field E3 Other
a. [I'dischargC-C is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
t,. If ahtirh,ugc 1% observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated fluw in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Ifycsi, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any patt of the operation?
3.. Were thcreany adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
4. Is storage capacity (11rcuboard plus stunt storage) less than adequate? [3 Spillway
tinea gun: I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Field Area
Ej Yesa Na
[]Yes DNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
[I Yes ❑ No
[3 Yes 9 No
[I yes No
[I Yc% -M No
Structure 6
I-rechoard (inches): ...161� .. ................. ................................... ..............
.5. Arc there :any immediatc threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (it/ trees, severe trosiun, F-1 Yvs M No
-3/2-1/99 seepage, etc.) Continued on back

8 _ 12—Date of Itt pectiuu C
d
437
_11"
tt++� utus tut which an: not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
�
0 Yes
ol:ui'
Yd
® No
(if ally t+f questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses all
inttnediuttr public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
Yes;
®No
anv of thr arurtun•% liecd maintenance/improvement?
0 Ycs
No
Dous :tnv I+:+rt tot lilt- waxtc management system niher than waste structures require tnaintenanee/improvement'?
0 Yes
® No
t.). Do ally st,t, .)oras lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and rninirnurn liquid level
' ® No
I
rlryatitxt cuart tnit,7
Yac
® No
11-astr 1l1rliiati�+»
kill it, 11o"VY w9itinal 1.)WQ of emergency situations as required by General Penni.)?
IR Arc thcrr .un httlTrtx that recd maintCnand;c/itnprovetnent?
[] Yr
No
I I. L•. there c%idcnce of, .)over app lication? ❑ Excessive Ponding 0 PAN
❑ Yes
® No
I �. c'tt,,, ty,,,• �' CLIC Aak2. E
❑ Yes
0 No
Do the rrre•irime , r,t,rr: dil7er with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Mattagetnent Plan (CAWMP)7
Ycx�
0 No
I {. a) t),n % th, lar,,ny lack adequate acreage for land application:?
❑ Ya.
a No
hr t t,+r• the tacifity nerd a wettable acre determination?
0 Yes
0 No
t: t -this fai ility is hrndoi ti,r a wcttithlc acre determination?
0 Ycs
® No
15. Docs Ile rv%civing crop need improvement?
0 Yes
® No
lf,. is them a L+.•k n1' atlrgnitle wit:te application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
lteiLuircdl Records &- Dili: nmm�t%
-
17.
Fail to hav,• t't•rttlivaw tf'Covertge & General Permit readily availahfe?
0 Yes
® No
Is.
!.)tors tilt' 1*361ity fail it, havo all cumponcnts of the Certified Animal Write Management Plan readily available?
ti,•/ W1 11'. Owk-klists, design, traps,
Yes;
®No
111
Does rrr„r,l k. -ving ncef impro"Venient? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & s+ail sample reports)
0 Yes.
®No
'►t
Is rar11+ty nta nt-ctmnpliant:c. with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'?
0 Yes
' ® No
I
Did Ow Ltctiuy 1:111 to haw: a aclivcly c�atified operator in charge?
0 Yes
® No
".
kill it, 11o"VY w9itinal 1.)WQ of emergency situations as required by General Penni.)?
tic/ tlir.t I,.u,tc. hccho:utl ptuhlcat+s, over upphcation)
❑ Yrs
® No
t,
Did RV%`irwt:rlln..);til to discuss review/inspection with un -site representative?
❑ Yes
0 No
24.
Dtiv-, tactltty rt•t,uur :+ ti,lk -up vici( by same agency?
❑ Yds..
®No
Wtvt• any- :tthlttir)nal 1+tuh1cliv; noted which carie noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
�: i'Vti vil►) ttit)ris.r►j' X11'-tjl'�ten0j1. •1,1q a 1110040&10-04bYttjr wilj iyc qQ hoc -
ctirri Joiitlenm Aatit: this .visit.'
Comments (refer to question #): Explatn-ang; . 111111:. twolihmendationi or atsy ot>bec:comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain slttuieto' a� u
tib7E 5 gADiTr'aaA L IX -4164r, d N fflt4Os l -1-n vE / tan/ 4)e -.s" f IV AN
IV C4E2 ill, -7 ALC IV641 rK TA2d-
Keviewrr/Insimclor Name DOM Q(_O
!Levi+ wrrlttt�pt t l++r Si,,ttahtre: n m„ n 7 X
A cs 76ch/
Date: Wil- .d. 9ci

F .
P f 1 L Ihite of Lncpection - ¢• Q
V2i 99
to d1wh,ugC p1pe tium the 4imfinement building to the storage pond or lagoon tail to discharge atfor below
[] Yep
No
1 level of lag.o i or storage. lkmd with no agitation?
thereany dead :unmals nol disposed of properly within 24 hours?
F
❑ Yes
No
ere any rvidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
j_j Yes
® No
roads, ht ildirtg �tructurv, and/or public pmperty)
211.
is the land :r}�plicatmn .pray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
(] Y,.
Nu
.10.
Were ally ivajon trtaintenanCe problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
ur hrokcn fan hladc(N). omli .rahle `hotter;. c1c.)
0 Yep
IN No
i t .
Do the animals feed storage buts gill to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yc
W No
;?.
1?o tlrc flush t:urksheti :r suhrircrgcd fill pipe or a permaAendtemparary cover?
❑ Yca
N No
V2i 99

Q Division of 9oi1 and' • �I o
Q Division of Solt awl
Q Division of W444 ,'
0 Other Agency
tint• 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number_. -u -` Date of Ins ection 8-
F_ -p
Time of inspectiolt 24 hr. (hh:mm)
a Per .milted 0 C'ertitied Q [ •unditionally Certified Q Registered 0 Not Opera—tio—n—all Date Lust Operatvd:
Farm Nom+ l0/� C �S%
1
C.ountr-
1>wner Name:
Q phone No:
Facility Contact: SER ........��aaNE ...............Title:..QNC%Z._ .. Phone No: .... . 6'...9... 7.. .
Mailing Address: �1,. eJ. 60jw.N� A N� ..... ,JY. . ....... Q
1.)nc,tc Itel>rrscntatty, :
....C� O1j1 E
Integrator:
........................................................... _................................ _................................
- I
Ccrtifird Operatvr:.�3-/VlP Nho.-C-)llC operator Certir"tcation Number•....Z....•q15
Ligation of Farm:
........ .-...7..�4..... .�s.T-.....�.r..........a ... ..............�..ppI. A.x....... A.� �a4-r_..
.
..... ...........
2n!.if%.I�..,.C.�......11�.....s.��.! ..®r�..._..."r'T...3...1i?'4.......D�V......C�F...��.?�N.... a
Latitude • �a �--�.0 ��1•a
77 Design Current
^,�+<
ILAPacily reputation
VIMIFaff
n to i�ccdc.r
cr til Finish
ow to wean
ow to Finish
Longitude ® •OD` ail"
l"
bedp Current Design Current
PO t•7 C- apadty. Population Cattle Capadty Population
® Layer 0 Dairy 0
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity $p `
Total SSLW ! l Z a a a
Number of Lagoons '� Subsurface Drain.+ Present
Lagoon Area 173 Ti
4 -
Bolding Ponds / Solid Trope No LI uid Waste Mama ement Sys
teett
Discharees tit Stream ln_ Macty
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
t)isch;n f;� urs} in:acd ;,t: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. II'discharge. is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
t,. ff- tliisch,ugc ,s observed. did it reach Water of the State:? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. U„c-,, discharge bypass a lagoon system? (:f yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of pwa discharge from any part of the•operation?
Z. Were there any adverse rtnpat:ts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
K'ttsic Collection & Trvatmtnt
4. Is storage capacity (Ircutward plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
titrucnn,: I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
I,Icnt ificr:
Area
❑ Yes 0 No
® Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Ycs ® No
Structure h
rcrhoard
......................................................
1t11iltc.sl:................................................•....I................................•......•.............,.................................
... .......
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ief uses, severe trosion, ❑ Ycs 0 No
seepage, etc_)
3123199 seepage,
un buck

/ —IZ
Date u1' I mpeclion
'•,00runeN on :ile which aro not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
au' ❑ ® No
Yc�
(if any atf questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses all
inullediute public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
rht any of thr ,Itiat•luti- nee-tt maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yt s ® No
ltotws pall tet Iht• watt' management system nther than waste structures require liriinlenatlee/improvement'? ❑ Yo: : _ j No
tl.
Dually snr, ttuis lark adequale, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation m:ukulpa'! ❑ yev No
i
W;IsI 1 ► ►fit-alinn
IR Are Ihcrc mil? buffers that need tn;liatenant;c/improvement? ❑ Y":� No
11. L• there c% iticace of over 1ppIIcalloll? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ YapsNo
I .�. t•utplyp'.
13 -Do Iht• wk'6 14! holt:: diller with those; designated in the Certified Animal Waste Munavement Phan (CAWMP)? ❑ YC -81 _ No
I.1- al Dov.., the lartltt)' tai l: adc:quatc acreage for land application? ❑ Yas; No
hl [Mv% lhr facility need a wettable arse determination' ❑ Yes' - No
e I This Lleilily is penticti till- a weltahlc at re; determination' ❑ Yes: ®No
IS. IA,cs Ulc rciciving trop need improvement? ❑ Yes - No
Ifs. Is Ihcrc a 1-1 nl aticaloalc waste: applicatiun equipment? ❑ Yes, ® No
ItctLtircd li;crnrd�.� IMctm_mnts
17. Fall ate have t•e-1-411w-11v of (-ewer ge. & General Permit readily availahle?
I t;. Otic : file• facility I:lil lu havo :Ill Components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
,-he' Alias• aicsign, maps. etc.)
1t1 'I )ors tr, I,r�I.Ar�;plill ilex) imilrovement?.(ie/ irrigation, freehnard, waste analysis nc soil s:unplc reports)
tiny nta in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in eifect,at the time of design?
I M41 Ilse lak-silly fall it, ll:lvc a actively Certified operator in charge?
F;111 to n,tlily rtgiollal I)WQ eel elllergency Situations as required by General Permit?
lir/d►.rcltaa,cc, t,ra•In►:ud pea►l►la:111%, overapplication)
23. Did Art icwcr/ln.pccten' t:1il to dist:usx review/inspection with un -silo representative?
24. Ihna tan Ildv ra•yuoo ;t tallow -tilt visit by sante agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Jbid...
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes _ No
❑ Yes ® No
Q Yap: ® Na
'S. Wt -it, any :ulehrion:el I+rt,hlellim noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
�' �Vti yitt►l ttk►rix ►t• do jvje.noie$ -W 'rjD jtlpttg• dt i ;fltjs:vjsjt; Yojt ivili•t�ttt*$iyc srlo' ftt�tjleta:,
l•1f111'S�)tllttjCltiC.atbis'tit:lhig v--
Cominettts (refer to question M)t Explata
Use drawings of facility to better explain
paillds araecessary):
it comments.
td YE S A0,017-10NA L 1&41647`r'd N fflt-4a /-114 VE &C -Al P&g y N 4 Aj �
0;6/ 6a
Kevie•we•r/Impeelor Name
Itawit•wrr/Iil+pa•e•Inr tiil;t1:1111
Acs zectz
r
4-0 a to -PA -1 nate: g- .2. q9
i
:i V'49

8 J— 1 L t)ssic rsf' IitslscetfonM-7771
rl"11• dISch.rsge InlIt: burn the Cotsfinernent building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below (] Ye.% ® No
1�wel of lagocm of storage. Ihmd with no agitation?
1:1.1t"
re any dead animals not di%pused of properly within 24 hours'! ❑ Ycs 6 Nrp
Ally cvidrncc unwind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, © Ye -sI ® No
roads, huilding aructure, and/or- public: property)
.i
29 is dr.: I:nul al )III .pray :yrcm intake nix located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yc. ' . INNu
0. W%:rc :mv m: lm rnaintenanc:e problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fsn htadcm. moperable vhssiter:, cic.) ❑ Ycss ® No
i
31. 1)u the anissrrls fcrd mtPrage Illis fail to have appropriate cove! ❑ Yes IS Nu
.12. 1)o the (lush tanks Iacl. a ,uhinerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover? ❑Yea; IF N..
3121/99

NORTH CAROLINA. DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION'
June.14, 1999
Mr. Jerry Boone
Boone's Dairy
182 Goldfinch Lane.
Rutherfordton,'North Carolina
Dear Mr. Boone:
28139
Subject: Animal Operation Site
Inspection
Facility Number 81-12
Rutherford County
Enclosed is a computer.generated report from
inspection conducted.on May 20, 1999. This report
your files.
the
is for
The operation of your animal waste management system;
(lagoon -and spray fields) is satisfactory'. The animal waste
management plan was, designed for eighty (80) confined,
animals. On the date on inspection, you stated you had 8i
confined animals. Based on the level in your lagoon, one,
animal is not a problem, however care should be take to
operate within requirements of the animal waste management
plan. The training manual has example forms to.be used in
recording keeping. Using these forms will simplify record
keeping and reduce time necessary for record review during
an inspection.
Thank you for your time and assistance during the
inspection. If you have any questions or if I may be of
assistance please, do-not.hesitate to contact me at..
828-251-6208.
Sincerely;
RoXr C. Edwards
Wastewater Consultant
Enclosure
CC: Donald Morrison, Rutherford County NRCS
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLEj NC 2880'1-2414
PHONE [phone] FAX.[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION .EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
3
a °'e
_ZA
' µ
,. .. ..:
w
NORTH CAROLINA. DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION'
June.14, 1999
Mr. Jerry Boone
Boone's Dairy
182 Goldfinch Lane.
Rutherfordton,'North Carolina
Dear Mr. Boone:
28139
Subject: Animal Operation Site
Inspection
Facility Number 81-12
Rutherford County
Enclosed is a computer.generated report from
inspection conducted.on May 20, 1999. This report
your files.
the
is for
The operation of your animal waste management system;
(lagoon -and spray fields) is satisfactory'. The animal waste
management plan was, designed for eighty (80) confined,
animals. On the date on inspection, you stated you had 8i
confined animals. Based on the level in your lagoon, one,
animal is not a problem, however care should be take to
operate within requirements of the animal waste management
plan. The training manual has example forms to.be used in
recording keeping. Using these forms will simplify record
keeping and reduce time necessary for record review during
an inspection.
Thank you for your time and assistance during the
inspection. If you have any questions or if I may be of
assistance please, do-not.hesitate to contact me at..
828-251-6208.
Sincerely;
RoXr C. Edwards
Wastewater Consultant
Enclosure
CC: Donald Morrison, Rutherford County NRCS
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLEj NC 2880'1-2414
PHONE [phone] FAX.[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION .EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
3
a °'e
,. .. ..:
W-1
NORTH CAROLINA. DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION'
June.14, 1999
Mr. Jerry Boone
Boone's Dairy
182 Goldfinch Lane.
Rutherfordton,'North Carolina
Dear Mr. Boone:
28139
Subject: Animal Operation Site
Inspection
Facility Number 81-12
Rutherford County
Enclosed is a computer.generated report from
inspection conducted.on May 20, 1999. This report
your files.
the
is for
The operation of your animal waste management system;
(lagoon -and spray fields) is satisfactory'. The animal waste
management plan was, designed for eighty (80) confined,
animals. On the date on inspection, you stated you had 8i
confined animals. Based on the level in your lagoon, one,
animal is not a problem, however care should be take to
operate within requirements of the animal waste management
plan. The training manual has example forms to.be used in
recording keeping. Using these forms will simplify record
keeping and reduce time necessary for record review during
an inspection.
Thank you for your time and assistance during the
inspection. If you have any questions or if I may be of
assistance please, do-not.hesitate to contact me at..
828-251-6208.
Sincerely;
RoXr C. Edwards
Wastewater Consultant
Enclosure
CC: Donald Morrison, Rutherford County NRCS
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLEj NC 2880'1-2414
PHONE [phone] FAX.[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION .EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

ritted
mpinint p ruuuw-up ui iivrq w3pectiun p ruuuw-up vi ua"It review p viner
umber
Date of' Inspection
Throe rf Inspection► ©24 hr. (hh:mm)
PeCert�ed C. Conditionally Certified a Registered p Not peratsona Date Last Operated:.. ..........................
Farm Name: Rahn-1-I)AirY......•••-.••..•••..I.••- Count Rutherford ARO
Owner Name: Jerry,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;, Boone Phone No: 704-286-976;1,,,,,,,
................................................................................. .............
FacilityContact: ..................................:............................................Title:................:........................ .............................................. Phone No:
Mailing Address: 182, Goldfinch Lnne................................:.......................................... ltutherfordton.C............................................: 28139..............
OnsiteRepresentative: Jexxy. Me...............................................................................: Integrator:..................................:....................................................
Certified Operator: Joann Boone Operator Certification Number: 21565
111.............................................ne................................................ ............................
Location of Farm:
7.�k �rest.af Ruxt�er>axdta�t.Q� .Olazlt Hsl,, se�a>xd .tliax�.n�a.teft.xs.Galdfincht.Lane..............................
..............................................................:
Latitude �i`-3�# s 77-2376 F--30—"66 Longitude • J-705-16 1--JY37-1 6•
Swine
esign urrent-Design-.. =7r—enI7 Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity - Population
[3
Wean toeec
eC
[3
P ee er to
1, misli
p
k arrow to
can
C3
Farrow to
k ee er
p
arrow to
I, rms
p
s
E3
Boars
Number. of )Iia oons; 1 p Subsurface Drains Presefit p agoon ren in Spray Field Area
Holding Pond1.7 s L Sohd Traps p o rqur rite . anagement ystem
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field p Other.
a. If discharge is observed.. was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If ves, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse'impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection c& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: .................................... .................................... ....................................
Yes ® No
Yes §1 No
Yes ® No
E3 Yes M No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes jj No
Structure 6
Freeboard(inches): ...............72......................................................................................................................... ................................... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, p Yes 11 No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

'.i
Date of Inspection
7any
are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑ Yes ®No
P(questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
ipublic health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes H No
Ve9D0s any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? (3Yes IN No
a
nyy stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes,, ,j No
Waste Application
buffers
'
Yes,j M No
10. Are there any that need maintenance/improvement?
❑
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes: ® No
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes,' 11 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes; ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes. H No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes:., ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
[3 Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes X No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily'available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes 11 No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ® Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes lj No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes §j No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) p Yes H No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ,® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes X No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
■ No. violations or deficiencies. were noted: during this.visit. Vou.will receive• no: further . .
correspondence about this visit.: : "
omments re erta question p am any S answers an or any recommen tions orany of ercomments�
:Use drawmgs of facility to better ezplam srtuat►ons (use add�honakpages as�neeessa•
Reviewer/Inspector Name
_ f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
a 1. 11111 inn

i ' 3lLS/yy
f
Date of Inspection
arge pipe from the confinement building to the storage.pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below p Yes ® No
of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
ere any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?. p Yes' ® No
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,p Yes, No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the. land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p YeNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes; N No
;i
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes, M. No
i
32.. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes; R No
r r 4 r xLx�
.,.. ..� .... Fa. �G.'i 'Y_�.. r_v agg
' I
t
i
i
i
�i
T

®Division of Soil and=Waters ConseaRzahon°- Operafion.Itevfew ` .
® Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality ,Compliance Inspection
0 Other Agency - Operation Review
J® Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection ® Follow-up of DSWC review ® Other
Facility Number I
Date of Inspection S 2v/
�„ Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified ® Conditionally Certified ® Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ...&1q.&. s.......�::�.!2%....................................................................... County ... c ....... d .......... .......................
e' / _ ( V
Owner Name:. C' Z ......1_ 1-®C.hV41................ ........................... Phone No:..�.Z.U... ��J.��.�..��...7...........
....... .......................... .................-........
Facility Contact: ..........................................
Mailing Address: .........................................
Onsite Representative: ............................................
Certified Operator:..Z-6.(ti'f!Utq.......................
Location of Farm:
........ Title: ................................................................ Phone No:..........
................................................................................................................................................. ...........
............................................................ Integrator:........................................................................
„&O..dL.................................... Operator Certification Number:.,,,�L( f
t............... :.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................�
Latitude • �� o.� Longitude • �' �r
Design Current.,Design Current Design Current
Swine , .
Capacity Population- ";Poultry '. Capacity, Population. Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
LNijinber of Lagoons . � ❑ ❑ Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding -Ponds / Solid Traps, ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
■ R I•
❑ Yes L1140
❑ Yes all o
❑ Yes
EI -1<0
❑ Yes
1'No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑-5-0
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): .......... .�.,�........................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

Facility Number: ( — `Z Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which and not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes 2<0
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes F,1160-
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes; o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes; S2 o
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes, ®'Nio
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ YesO
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes' To
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes!
(9-Tqro
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes;
B<0-
'oc)
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes•tom
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes-
®IQo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®Tlo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes,! Q fqo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) Ll?.YesI ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes; ❑,Pd'o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
El Yes:
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes• 2N__O
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes; 53-90—
25. Were "any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes Leo
.... yiolaiic. . or def cier�... v.� .. noted turing this* visit. • Y;oit Wiil•t. ee6*ci fio; further • ; ;
corres• on' deuce: about: this visit.:::::::: :::::: • : • : • : • : • : • : • : • ::::::::: :
Comments (refer to question #): `Explain"any YES -answers and/or' any recommendations or any other comments.`
Use drawings of facility to better, explain situations. (useadditional pages as necessary)
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,4
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

Facility Number:' f — f Date of .Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
911.0
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
Q o
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
<o
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land intake located liquid lagoon?
Ye's
No
application spray system not near the surface of the
❑
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or��
40
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
ElYeIs
!.
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
E3<o
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
I<O
3/23/99

l
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
September 30, 1998
Mr. Jerry Boone.
Boone's Dairy
182 Goldfinch Lane
Rutherfordton, North Carolina
Subject': Animal Operation Site.
Inspection
Facility'Number 81-12,
Rutherford County
Dear Mr. Boone:
G.
Enclosed is a computer generated report from the
inspection conducted on July 9, 1998. This report is for
your files.
Please continue to maintain records of the amount of
waste applied, location of waste applied; maintenance of
equipment used for waste application, and any other
information that will be useful in managing your waste
disposal.. Thank you for your time and assistance during,the
inspection. If you have any questions or if I may be of.
assistance please, do hesitate to contact me at 828-251
6208.
Sincerely,
Roger C Edwards
Wastewater Consultant
CC: Donald Morrison, Rutherford Co. NRCS
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801-24 1 4
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 O o POST -CONSUMER PAPER

r c.onservatio
p]
16 itouttne p e:ompiamt p rouow-up of VWQ inspection. p FC
Facility Number
p Registered ® Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
Farm Name: Bonnn:s.Dairy.......
molian
ow -up of uwwu review p utner
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm
p Not Operationa Date Last Operated:
................................................ County: Rutherford AR(
OwnerName: Jerry ........................................ B0.0ne .......................................................... Phone No: R28-28.6-.9.7.64 .............................
Facility Contact: Jeri:y..B.oonn....................................................Title:Gwiter ................................................ Phone No:.......................
Mailing Address:182.Goldfznch.1a.ng........................................................................... RutherfardWaNC ..............................................
Onsite ,iet•r. Representative: ..y..
Boone .......................................................
Certified Operator:Joann....................................... B.ann,e.......................
Location of Farm:
Latitude
Swine Capacity Population
❑ can to Feeder
❑ Feeder to tuts
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Integrator: ......................
Operator Certification Number:
Longitude ®P ®� ®"
Lw�i�,ui l.cuL ..LCSI�II �.UI
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle. 'J.,..Capacity Popu
❑ Layer
❑ on -Layer
❑ Other
Total. Design Capacity
Total SSLW _;
'' -�E
Number of Lagoon / Holdmg Ponds. ❑ u sur ace rams resent ❑ Lagoon Area
pray ie
ea
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® N
2.
Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® N
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
®
o
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water) (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
®
o
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
®
o
3.
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
HIs
o
4.
Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
®
o
5.
Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
CK1,0
maintenance/improvement?
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
Cg No
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge'?
❑ Yes
® No
7/25/97
Continuer/ on
back

nDate of Inspection
ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ® No
®..:..o.vto ations. or a i cien.cies-were.note uring this v.isit:ou. will.receive no' urt er . • .
ojrreso nOegee abut t4is visi>�:
Reviewer/Inspector Name Roger C. Edwards
Reviewer/Inspector>Si *fibre: `��_ , �- ,� , , . ,.<«(� Date: �3 h.
c
ty (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
® No
Structure 1 Structure -2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
10.Is
entitier: 1
reeboard(ft):................f.............................................................................................................................................................
...................................
seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® N6
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
Ig No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ....................... Fescue ...................... ...................... Fesc7ue.................................................................................. ...................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
C] Yes
® No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
[]Yes
® No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
® No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
® No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
® No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
p Yes
® No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
® No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onlv
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
®No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
® No
®..:..o.vto ations. or a i cien.cies-were.note uring this v.isit:ou. will.receive no' urt er . • .
ojrreso nOegee abut t4is visi>�:
Reviewer/Inspector Name Roger C. Edwards
Reviewer/Inspector>Si *fibre: `��_ , �- ,� , , . ,.<«(� Date: �3 h.
c

Date of Inspection 9
E:Eaci
lityNumber
Time of Inspection / 3 zC' 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Registered E3 Certified E] Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 8 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:....... a �.. �... i 7 Countv:.... �....!:°�Z..l oLil ..................9.:`$.......
OwnerName:...... tQ 5 y/ ....................... : PP_4.4........................................ Phone No:.. '. .......... ..:.:. .. .7......................`�
Facility Contact: c ? �2[.r...... 1 .4°.�?.t'l.�:................. Title:........ .`l..tt7!.f..t:: �................. Phone
Mailing Address':......c�.z....6n. u ..:/..`. tec G1 /11 ti ...P c 2 (. !.........�`�.....�./..0 ... �ti 1.3. 1....
.....................
Onsite Representative:.. D t ak/...........B ke;�r4,:—......................................... Integrator: .......................................................................................
Certified Operator;...`, c?.. &v.................................................................................. Operator Certification Number;... 16,65... .
Location of Farm:
Latitude 3�j •. l� 3 tom. « Longitude • D� Qz3
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ INo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon El Spray Field ❑Other /
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes WNo
i
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �(No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ( No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ( No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certifiedoperator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number:.... ....... ...... �..L .
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
I
❑ No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
9No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
CL
Structure 6
............................ ............................ ............................ ............................
.....
�.......
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
P�No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
XNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
gNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
i
�
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
El Yes
5No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
I
�
15. Crop type ....��r�,I................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑Yes
No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
19No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
No
For Certified Facilities Only
6 i,
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
gNo
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
�No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
Reviewer/Inspector Name 's
r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
cc: urvisrQif of Water duality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

:. -: ,.; ..:
Facility Number '' ; Farn Number Logkup $1 a:12
®� Operation Type
{
att a
1.'
Owner
eriy
OOne
Requested enterision m writing?
-....
;esaigrj:Cap ,
D AFO?
Farm Name
OOne S airy1110
:'
Yes No'
0
..
County
_ .
Ut a ®r4.
-, Previous Cases Stop process�rigt`
Address
. _ _.. .... ... :':
o Inc ane
1 I 1 1 I
L I !I'll
,
, , ,,
ut a Or ton
1.Removed
Certified
Region
Reply Due
Letter `Date
Reply
,
e ,
Received
,
Date certlficd tetter received
.>: _.
A `received'.
P!?
eS On a On Ime%
p
r ;
P
,_ ,.. .. ... .. .,-...
❑ Waiting or government agency o design
:..
Plan developed but did not want to
implement as developed
11
On DlStllet sign up sheet'
❑
❑ Waiting for Cost Share
:[�O �]
Reason ,
❑Inability to get a contractor
for not b'emM
certified
Poor weather
` '
❑ Out of business
;
S
Other
C l l `
1
❑
_.., Lti,q
[`
t t I
`.
.., -
,.. . ;
ctions__taken,.to.becorne;certM&d by deadline 12egion comments
AM; ,""",
, '-,;�',;�," 7­',�,;,,.r",�,f'.;_'Ir . . ". ,
new ag®on.w.as.comp ete ............e.........
recom... n.. s..issuanCe.®...t.. a s.pec.�a....
.",
.ent..h.as..bo..en..d.e.i.ive. .�Ao..
agr... m�.nt..s�� �..a."gg�ct..fsith..e#foxk"..ki! s....
;
1.irri.g.ati.on..e.quip.
the site,,,,,Weather,P.erljnitt n,g,,the. rdgation,,,
been..demonstraited..................................................................
...
t
11-11
......... ....
systam..ill..be..i.nstap.led.,...........................................
4
`
tcccnd.dcdti.ne a�iF.;-9J-;...............................
/
There..is, n®..dsci�arge. to..surFace.watet ,........
i. L f f 41 f
11
.....................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
f,
1 .
.......................................................................................................................
.�,
....................................
"� 3 ;j ` ,
:.Comments and`contacts'f ryi Animal -Compliance :Centrat'.Off�ce
and c`o'ntacts "
:. ,
-
.......................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
r �;
F-
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
{ �• , k11{
� -
...........................................................................................................................-
............................................................................................................................
r• �rl,r
..:
) t.
'r��, ,�,r­ �'.'�`�',::
c; ,'�
:
v� .:
� r,
...........................................................................................................................
.:
.:.
.............................................
...............................................................................;
";,-.,�-;�.'-;;?�,�,,.�,'�'�.-'r;,,,,�� ��,."",:�q�.�;--,:"��'-,!."",�",�.s�,.;-. -,.!,. _�`�.,�'�� "",,". _ .
1 I rr­,�,115.�:,:t'1.1-4:,�,z- ­.',":Z�: ."r,! q
:, 'r��r.��,.-". :L �'� % ,,,.�,r!,,r;,�,�:,�.,,,,,,,'..,,., �,:,...�,�""";��,,.,'�!��.,,.�;.
,'�r�,rr .'; ". ;r -�',; -,� ." �, ;
; , ,�2�"
�� , :�� .. . .... .. .
_�V,,��;t��,���:�.- , " � '. , ,
�, .'r 'r ,_.. - - , � I ,,,'-
..��t . ..... �.-�l:,f,�.'.:��",".�..i��.,.,.�,.;, - - .
�:� ,� 1, * _ ,, I r, ':�;-,��,'�����..�"",-�','�.�, r �., -,- -- - I . -. ..... �', - ,,,,.. rj�� ,�
,- ,
, � , , , � '
. 1, , , 1',
t:._;. 7,.,,_L,:,,
� t'�'�; ��:'� ,.� -
'
,
I -,,
Mr ,
_ , ,
, _ _
- . ,
:
T ; ";� ` �
,_ " - ; .
, . , -'! ' . , , . ;; ,
.. "
� I I- . , . - �, - I r,
';'� ;'. � -'f,�L-,. �'
" ' - -
- �'
,�;: ,� ,
%
�t;� ��. , , ,r,
,.
.
" , -11 ,, t
"
, - I -
�:.-,
_
I - ., , r r,'. .
_ _,7, _ �_
I ..;., ;r
, _'�'__ , _""__ 'r ,
;
, ;" ,
, .1, :,��,
I ;
, ," ,.� I I - .
, , , , , . i� . , ,"r rr ; r'
,,, , , , , . .
,
, !
�." t�, �;-, ; 7�,�:r: ,, , ,t�, ,:., ., , �� t� , �' r'jj,".,7�;, " ' 1. r : �;
- , ' ' " .., .
.1, I
, ,� � , ', -
' - —
- 'I )
, , , , " ! t"
" , .Z ,
I.1
' '
,�,,,, ,
r
,III -� ,��r �
Correspondance,
111�1,.." 77W,, -,.,-,q
I � .1 I � �,"'
.-
... .
:.. _ . -
-
,
.. - - ,�' � �, - -:,--, , - ; . ;G.
I � I ,
,
�.,'-r , 1�,,r : _, �' " ' ; . � I I
;" � " , , I- - , ,. � ,, I I q . I . '... z ,� , ,%"�� � , �, o,-, "t" ,,�,� . , - I„, � ” : I- , � - � , , .',, r,,;
.. . -- . I " �, -,; �� r, q�
..
..
..
-�%.r * -.11 1-1*--�1'r1-,---- - .'' --- I --... , .
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
.. 1.
r ,", - � , ,,t,r- I �, � ,..! *1.i�: ;�� , " - -, -�. -.1,011 -,,,-:,�-�,,,��,
� . �-., I r" L, , , �, - .. ;�,� - , . �,�, �- - �; , , -,
" "
." - I I -.- . - ,, '"' -.- - - --

11112!1997 88:35 7042516452 ,RAGE 91
bF. C. D$PARIUNT (]F RXYZROMMMT MW IMTiJRAL RESOURCES
DMS -TO i QF 1MTER QMM=y
WATT I" BECTION
�D A
PAX o:
DAM s
:RWMCMFAL o rc$
59 HOODLUM VLACE
ASaEVILLS, NORTH CKROLIMA 28801
PUt1 f7Q4J251-6308 FAA/704/251-6452
# OF DAMS -MICLWXM ISIS COVIms
�lSS If a ��as 2D8.
TO'd
LO:TT L66T-ZIT-f10N

201d 14101
Fax Note 7671
Date f�
/
pages
From _..
oFax#
Co.
Phone #
Fax #
\ \ k u
A W MAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:
Faeili#.p II) N=3ber: J- ---- - County: u7' C—R
d 1�
OPERATOR uN CRAPGE /Q � !1!,/ ..
+1r'a Boo Mf-
1� Olne 2 milinp A lrlrA-cc 1 (a --> %4,l 1�
City qnEL,�r m d State- . ' zip -du I 3 9
Certificate # / Socisd &ccu:ity # R3X"
Work Pkag Hume Pbone
Signature r r.- Date ,ll /y- —5,7
Mailing.Aaddressl � �. Gi#yUXUdoA P�
State I+r Zip l Telepha�ae# - 9''70
Sigua
Plisse Mail to: WpCSOCC
Division or Water Quality
P. 0. Box 29,533
Ealeigh, N.C. 27626-0535
Za•d IeO:TT L66T-EIi-00N

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
59.WOODFIN PLACE
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801
PHONE/704/251-6208 FAX/704/251-6452 �.
TO: 14IDc--1'Z goigg—c-7
FAX #: 70z/- 2�-7 ` q<31 `7
FROM: �2/zC1s
DATE:
# OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER:
MESSAGE: If questions, please call 704/251-6208.

Date of Inspection
=Facility Number g� f
Time of Inspection f 2 t`J 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status: registered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes travel and vrocessinty)
----------------
Farm Name: .B.D? ea.....15......lbA .�................................................................. County:..1�.t�..�l1��Ft:��......................, .....L................
Land Owner Name: M.� ` ... O.D.AlF......................................... Phone .... . i
l7�
Facility Conctact:.... ..tT ' ..............! �l�f!f�' ........... Title:.. %1.�!? t-..` .................... '7�ta/- ZTC 2-6 ..........
... Phone No :................................ -....`1
Mailing Address: -As'.. .. ..................... Lac IJ1..?�Ild — R. ... IfV(.........1l1.�............, ......
�ci2ll��
Onsite Representative :......................... .0 Q r. '.................................................. Integrator:......................................................................................,
Certified Operator:... 5�...r................o..................................., Operator Certificate .........................................,
Certification Number•
Location of Farm:
Latitude • 4 u
Longitude
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
I
If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes No
P
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Ye
❑ Yesr—fR(-No
v
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes'0
Continued on back

Facility Number: (.
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (1,agoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1✓ Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
----------« -- -
Structure 5
❑ Yes Po
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes NfNo
Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? XYes ❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes [�'No
(If in excess of W , or ru olentering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
fo
15. Crop type o e es
A5s��........ Chi..............................................................
.....................................................................
16. Do the receive(�1 �-m El ?0"
!No
17. Does the facil G� 5
/7� ❑ Yes ONo
18. Does the rece CO aZ ❑ Yes 0 No
19. Is there a lack �p \f ❑ Yes KNo
20. Does facility ❑ Yes PNo
21. Did Reviewer ❑ Yes XNo
For Certified Fa( L
22. Does the faci ❑ Yes-2fNo
23. Were any a& �'jCc�L ; ❑ Yes RNo
24. Does record 1 L� -Yes ❑'No
� ��Ar-1z
vz ��j«�a C,.' -Z711 bL rn,,S41,y 711s
3 �<<
/1o 26cspz c/ A L)14 -r/4 �— nKus 7 �s
cPbC QNULZ/.pL=CIS 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit4/30/97\
l 1. PJ rD r D � vl !^rte G /' -- �G�i`�O7/t% eo C/ w S� 2 C �or S 'C piP I

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
December 5,1996
Jerry Boone
Boone's Dairy
Rt 5 Box 342A
Rutherfordton NC 28139
Dear Mr. Boone:
1DEHNR
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Boone's Dairy
Facility ID #: 81-12
Rutherford County
Q
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
lqlr,� z( (fA-e,�A
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Asheville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System `"` Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper 1

Fli
i 1 ;
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
PPFFP'
!` Facility No. 431 -12 -
DIVISION
! 12DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: u �' _'1995
Time 13z U
Farm Name/Owner: o onl
Mailing Address:
County.f
m4k•
Integrator:
On Site Representative:
Physical Address/Location:
Phone: 70V -z.14, 2765/1
C147C C4,2k 20AW
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: 8'O
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 35 26 3 0_' Longitude: R2 05 03 Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: r�cuE s c/o ur-_Je
i
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?� or No
100 Feet from Wells? ®e or No ,
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes oie
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes o
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flUshing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o Iz�o • If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the'facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
- - .-. %n �r - - - **-
'� • . 7,1 J R
v
Inspe or Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Si iat e.
Use Attachments if Needed.

�
"'4dp \
�•
I l
I
:
�abnno >de •
� Y i ' / ..•'/•
Ce
�'
n ^ /�
/000 ��
1
1340
_ • V'
-
of 0\0'
n
/\JJJ
n
Al
,od
1. • 00
Clio
000
00
/
-rte1105
1
',
J✓ qq
em
�, CelliBw
6
q/
aA • /
1• n /' I
Qan'��p 60
\
/�,/'
9
"
oJ•�
q e
q
e' '4'b
ll•, ,oso Net
� /
�
e
^
t I �• , �• vl.'.
S ' I•
O .1�
0 �
� u
� �
' ' y�l I �'
-- 9 •uu
;)ped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey
lrol by USGS, NOS/NOAA, and North Carolina Geodetic Survey
,graphy by photogrammetric methods from aerial photographs
n 1978. Field checked 1979. Map edited 1982
ection and 10,000 -foot grid ticks: North Carolina coordinate
';m (Lambert conformal conic)
0 -meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid, zone 17
7 North American Datum
,lace on the predicted North American Datum 1983
e the projection lines 9 meters south and
nelers west as shown by dashed corner ticks
'01 1 5•
MN
ON
_3Y1_
62 MILS0.37'
T1 -MILS
UTM GRID AND 1982 MAGNETIC NORTH
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
�"i
ar
`02 403 (PEA 6
SCALE 1
I ; a
1000 0 1000 2000 301
1 .5 C
CONTOUR INTE
NATIONAL GEODETIC
THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIO
FOR SALE BY U. S. GEOLOGICAL S
A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS
s� I�
klo11.a� We,