20190184 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190211

DWR - -.,,
l bion of Water tXefearces
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
k5 Yes
C No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes O No
Change only ff needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
Version#*
20190184
1
Is a payment required for this project?
C No payment required
What amout is owed?*
C Fee received
C $240.00
O Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone] Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Spring Drive Drainage Improvements
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Keven Arrance
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
2/11/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Hare Snipe Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C; NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.87162
Longltude:
-78.70558
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
A. Processing Information W
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes M, No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
V Nationwide Permit (MNP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
O Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 03 - Maintenance
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
P 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular r7 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit r/ Riparian Buffer Authorization
Individual Permit
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: Cl Yes r No
For the record onlyfor Corps Permit: r Yes r No
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
C Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
O Yes r No
19. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r, Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
O Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
O Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
V Owner ❑ Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
O Yes O No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
City of Raleigh (easement)
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
Melanie Nguyen, P.E.
2d. Address
Street Address
127 W Hargett Street
Address Line 2
Cfty
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27601
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
State / Ruvirm/ Mon
INC
a�rdry
USA
2f. Fax Number:

1b. Subdivision name:
(ff appropriate)
Westavia
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Raleigh
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2c. Project Address
Street Address
6916 - 6940 Spring Drive
Address Line 2
ab'
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Hare Snipe Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C; NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010803
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
0.55
State / Roeince / Region
NC
Cbuntry
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project site consists of a drainage and stream channel that has previously been stabilized with riprap and placed in culverts to accommodate residential driveways. Existing culverts
consist of 24 -inch diameter reinforced concrete pipes (RCPs) and 36 -inch corrugated metal pipes (CMPs). The project site includes and abuts maintained lawns associated with single-
family residences within the City of Raleigh. Trees are present in the residential lawn areas. A pedestrian bridge crosses over the stream near the downstream terminus of the project.
The land use in the project vicinity is primarily residential in a suburban setting.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
O Yes d No O Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
PCN Figure 1.pdf
2.5MB
4e. Attach an 81/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
PCN Figure 3.pdf 3.82MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
215
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The project area is experiencing flooding of driveways and structures resulting from rainfall belowthat of a 2 -year storm event. The purpose of the project is to reduce the frequency
and severity of flooding on residential properties.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project involves (1) removal of five existing 24 -inch RCPs, four existing 36 -inch CMPs, and three existing sanitary sewer laterals and cleanouts; (2) replacement of the listed RCPs,
CMPs, and sewers; and (3) grading and relining the open channel reaches. The RCPs and CMPs will be replaced in place with new twin parallel 36 -inch RCPs. The new culverts will
include a headwall and wingwalls at each end for bank stability. The sanitary sewer laterals and cleanouts will be replaced in accordance with the City of Raleigh Public Utilities
Department's standards. The existing riprap in the drainageway and stream channel will be removed, and the channel will be graded to re-establish positive drainage. The graded
channel will be lined with riprap between the proposed replacement culverts, similar to the existing condition. Affected driveways, stone walls, guardrails, and mailboxes will be restored
upon completion of construction. Disturbed areas will be reseeded to blend with the existing abutting lawn areas upon completion of final grading.
Direct impacts of the project will result from replacement of existing culverts, grading the open channel reaches, and replacement of existing riprap in the open channel reaches upon
completion of grading. Existing trees in the riparian buffer will be removed to accommodate the construction activities, as depicted on Sheet CO2. Indirect impacts to the stream may
result from the tree removal. The equipment that is anticipated to be used includes a backhoe and/or excavator.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
2019.01.09 100% Spring Drive. pdf 18.43MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
Sa. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
G Yes
0 No
0 Unknown

Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
4 Preliminary d Approved d Not Verified O Unknown d WA
Corps AID Number:
Sc. If Sa is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): IC Arrance, L. Diebolt
Agency/Consultant Company: Hacen and Sawyer
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
O Yes O No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory U
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams -tributaries W Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
113a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name* 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width* 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S7 Replace culvert Temporary Culvert Ure Snipe Creek Intermittent Both 10 81
Average (feet) (linear feet)
g2 Grade and replace
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts: 31. Total temporary stream impacts:
0 215
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
215
3j. Comments:
The entire length of stream within the project area has been previously impacted by the installation of driveway culverts and riprap stabilization. The
project involves maintenance -related replace
1 -allowable
P
l!T to Hare Snipe Creek
No
12,820
1,261
riprap
Temporary
Rip Rap Fill
Ui to Hare Snipe Creek
Intermittent
Both
10
Average (feet)
134
(finearfcet)
ment and correction of grading within the previously permanently impacted stream channel.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Oieck all that apply.
m Neuse r! Tar -Pamlico
❑ Catawba [7 Randleman
❑ Goose Creek [7 Jordan
Lake
❑ Other 11
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp . Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
6d
13
6h. Total buffer impacts:
1 -allowable
P
l!T to Hare Snipe Creek
No
12,820
1,261
6h. Total buffer impacts:

Zone 1 Zone 2'
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 12,820.00 1,264.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 12,820.00 1,261.00
61. Comments:
Buffer encroachment is proposed in order to protect epsting structures.
Supporting Documentation
PCN Figure 5.pdf
2.27MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation W
1. Avoidance and Minimization
Its. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Avoidance of all impacts can only be accomplished by a No Action alternative, which does not meet the purpose or need of the project. The project
has been designed to impact only the portions of the stream that have been previously permanently impacted and to retain the character of the
previously implemented permanent impacts. The proposed project is the minimum necessary to meet the purpose of the project.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
To the e)dent feasible, work will be performed from the abutting upland areas. Best management practices in addition to sedimentation and erosion
control measures will be implemented during all phases of construction. No live concrete shall come into contact with surface waters. All nark will be
performed in dry stream conditions, which will be established and maintained using a temporary pump -around system. Pumped water will be
discharged through a filter bag to protect downstream water quality. Al equipment and vehicle maintenance will be performed away from jurisdictional
areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
0 Yes 0 No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why -
The project involves only temporary impacts to a previously permanently impacted stream channel. Mitigation is not required for this maintenance effort.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
O Yes 0 No
What type of SCM are you providing?
❑ Level Spreader
❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
❑ Wetland Seale (higher SHWT)
❑ Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
m Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
0 Yes O No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
0 Yes 0 No
Comments
G. Supplementary Information U
1. Environmental Documentation

Ia. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
O Yes O No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
O Yes d No
Comments:*
The project does not meet any of the minimum criteria to trigger a SEPA review. The project is not funded by, initiated by, or on lands owned by the
federal government.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
O Yes O No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
O Yes O No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will not result in additional development as it involves restoring proper stormwater drainage in an already developed area. No new
residential or commercial development will be supported or made possible by the project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?
O Yes O No O NA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
O Yes d No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
O Yes d No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
O Yes O No O Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
O Yes d No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
O Yes O No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
O Yes O No
Sh. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
O Yes O No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
O Yes O No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
The IPaC tool was consulted to identify species that may occur in the project vicinity. The project area was evaluated by eperienced biologists for the
potential to provide suitable habitat for the federally protected species identified by IPaC.
Consultation Documentation Upload
IPaC3_20190205.pdf 864.89KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
O Yes O No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The NOAA NMFS online mapper for Essential Fish Habitat was reviewed relative to the project area.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
0 Yes 0 No

7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
HPOWEB was consulted to identify historic properties, structures, and districts in the vicinity of the project.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
SHPO_20190205.pdf 371.67KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
O Yes O No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA FIRM panel 3720078700J, effective May 2, 2006
Miscellaneous
Comments
The City of Raleigh is negotiating with the residential property owners relative to the proposed easement in which the work will be performed. Construction will not commence until after
the drainage easement is recorded by the Wake County Registrar of Deeds. Phone numbers and email addresses for the residential property owners are not available. Therefore,
individual property owners are not listed on the ePCN. They are identified on the attached plans for reference.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Stream Determination—Spring Dr_20190201.pdf
PCN Figure 2.pdf
PCN Figure 4.pdf
2.74MB
1.69MB
2.27MB
Signature Qj
G? By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Keven Arrance
Signature
04".
Date
2/11/2019

AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER
PROJECT LOCATION:
Along east side of Spring Drive in Raleigh, North Carolina
STREET ADDRESS:
6916 — 6940 Spring Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina
Please print:
Applicant: City of Ra
Applicant Contact
Person: Melanie Nguyen
The undersigned applicant of the proposed project do hereby authorize
Keven Arrance
(Consultant / Agent)
of Hazen and Sawyer
(Name of Consulting
Firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
the attached permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Applicant's Mailing Address (if different than property above):
PO Box 590, Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Applicant Signature: Date: 02/08/2019

r<r
COWcer
wy
keF
ti a � � CpC2' � � , G -j ��' �'� . t`RC� � • I" \.. �1� ��..��.C�,_C,i1�,,��I,
cm
CoU
Ja
3 CPF3 - Com' 1
0. '
J'7 I `, r-, RC7 ¢ _ L dC�
i 0 •'
ARK
0-2
Af3Z
mLi2 9
'1��• �'�ti�1Fk� -''
GU
CL
lie AP
Y1
Approximate Project Location " " (AC2 --'
Ch
WY M
� tf ,;�' - �.,�•s• `,� '�, ASC); �r.3 � � � , �.�.,
c8`+y
ic
! µg.F
i 4 {�L �f
Figure 2 - Soil Survey
O Hazen NOT TO SCALE Stream Determination Request
A""
Spring Drive Drainage Improvements
City of Raleigh, NC

BAYSPRINC
J
fr
O
Z
r
� El
S'gti
ORiti f
�2J
Legend
OLimits of Disturbance
Sewer Lateral
'f
Existing Storm Pipe
Ephemeral Channel
Jurisdictional Stream
® Jurisdictional Stream Area
Zone 1 Buffer
Zone 2 Buffer
SCALE Figure 4
O Hazen w E 1 in
= 100 feet Existing Conditions Map
0 50 100 Spring Drive Drainage Improvements
Feet City of Raleigh, NC

Project Limits I,
BAYSPRING LN
OO"1
Stream S2 - Temporary Impacts
Unnamed Tributary to Hare Snipe Creek
134 feet of grading and riprap replacement
Zone 2 -Permanent Impacts
I 1,261 square feet - allowable
Stream S1 - Temporary Impacts
Unnamed Tributary to Hare Snipe Creek
M 81 feet of culvert replacement
Legend
OLimits of Disturbance
Existing Easement
Zone 1 -Permanent Impacts
Proposed Easement 12,820 square feet - allowable
Sewer Lateral �T
Proposed Culvert
z
Jurisdictional Stream s
Zone 1 Impacts
Zone 2 Impacts
SCALE Figure 5
"n 1 inch = 100 feet Proposed Impacts Map
0
0 Hazen
50 100 Spring Drive Drainage Improvements
Feet City of Raleigh, NC
-
Stream S1 - Temporary Impacts
Unnamed Tributary to Hare Snipe Creek
81 feet of culvert replacement
Zone 2 -Permanent Impacts
I 1,261 square feet - allowable
Stream S1 - Temporary Impacts
Unnamed Tributary to Hare Snipe Creek
M 81 feet of culvert replacement
Legend
OLimits of Disturbance
Existing Easement
Zone 1 -Permanent Impacts
Proposed Easement 12,820 square feet - allowable
Sewer Lateral �T
Proposed Culvert
z
Jurisdictional Stream s
Zone 1 Impacts
Zone 2 Impacts
SCALE Figure 5
"n 1 inch = 100 feet Proposed Impacts Map
0
0 Hazen
50 100 Spring Drive Drainage Improvements
Feet City of Raleigh, NC

February 5.2018 1:22.244
O 015 0.3 n.ami
NR Points NR Boundaries
��
em NR|ndi�dua|LinUng �—� National Register Boundary O 0.25 0.5 1 xm
NRLioUng.Gone �
��
m
WN Boundary orovstpud/RemovodwRusUno
�—
SL Points
NRHDCenter Point M Town of o"ry, State of w"^^ o"ron"° onr. s°,/. *sne. o"""m.
SLIndividual Entry INCREMENT p.wow.oneo
A
oLand DOE entry
1`111-
WofreV Or
fF
al c
landon Park
fbadPWA
leppo Lin
r.1 'Pk3raA<�'
A
Of
WAKE
Old Colony
Lj
Flan
9�jhrkSe4pc Ln
9AIllbrook Rd
> 0'.
car twrip,
13
Dr
April Pl
ry
i Pe
'41Y oi 111c
Tr yr
February 5.2018 1:22.244
O 015 0.3 n.ami
NR Points NR Boundaries
��
em NR|ndi�dua|LinUng �—� National Register Boundary O 0.25 0.5 1 xm
NRLioUng.Gone �
��
m
WN Boundary orovstpud/RemovodwRusUno
�—
SL Points
NRHDCenter Point M Town of o"ry, State of w"^^ o"ron"° onr. s°,/. *sne. o"""m.
SLIndividual Entry INCREMENT p.wow.oneo
A
oLand DOE entry