Wq0019544_Staff Report_20190207

State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
" Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
February 7,2019
To: Non-Discharge Unit Application No.: W00019544
Attn: Sonia Graves Facility name: 206 Constance Spry Way SIR
County: Chatham
From: Joan Schneier
Raleigh Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non-discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non-
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals Please complete all sections as they are applicable
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ®Yes or❑No
a. Date of site visit: 02/01/2019
b. Site visit conducted by: J. Schneier
c. Inspection report attached? ❑Yes or®No
d. Person contacted: Tammy Sanders, AOWA, Inc. and their contact information: 252 242-7693 ext.
e. Driving directions: Were added in BIMS facility tab.
2. Discharge Point(s):
Latitude: Longitude:
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Classification:
River Basin and Subbasin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
11. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes or❑No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table,etc) consistent with the submitted reports? ❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site(property lines,wells, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no, please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR04-14 Pagel of5

6. Are the proposed application rates(e.g.,hydraulic,nutrient)acceptable? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment,storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or❑No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program: _
9.. For residuals,will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions(Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
11. Pretreatment Program(POTWs only):
M.EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
I. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge(ORCs) for the facility? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
ORC: Certificate#: Backup ORC: Certificate#:
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
Description of existing facilities: Roughly- Septic tank,2 Advantex AX20 pods, dosing tank and pump, high
water alarms,rain sensor, 0.37 ac drip area
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow: 600 gpd
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know(i.e.,equipment condition, function,maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.)
3. Are the site conditions(e.g., soils,topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained'appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or❑No
If no, please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit(e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary,new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes,please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ®Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates(e.g., hydraulic,nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or❑No
If no, please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ❑Yes or®No
If no, please explain: See comment 3
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 WQ0019544 Page 2 of 5

11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no,please complete the following ex and table if necessary):
Monitoring Well Latitude Longitude
O , II ,
O , „ O 1
11
O / II O , II
O , O O ,
11
12. Has a review of all self-monitoring data been conducted (e.g.,DMR,NDMR,NDAR, GW)? ❑Yes or❑No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: n/a
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes,please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
®No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments(i.e.,NOV,NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle,please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no, please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑Yes ❑No ®N/A
If yes,please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:Not likely sue to good infiltration in the forested field. However,the
closest edge of the field is less than 200 feet from a pond across the road, owned by Old Chatham Golf Club.
17. Pretreatment Program(POTWs only):
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 WQ0019544 Page 3 of 5

IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non-Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item Reason
n/a
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
III. 12 Not on 100 yr floodplain
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
n/a
5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold,pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ Deny(Please state reasons: )
6. Signature of report preparer:
Signature of regional supervisor:
Date:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 WQ0019544 Page 4 of 5

V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
1- The facility lat-long is correct.
2- The Feld location is at 35.847647, -78.929938, from an estimated center from averaged GPS plotted fence post
shots.
3- Please add a recirc pump and 2500 gal storage/pump tank to the facility description between the sand filter and
UV.
4- The house location was moved from the design plan (see map 2).The treatment area is now on the east side of the
house but will still meet setbacks,
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 W00019544 Page 5 of 5

-jFIle
IL
1v LWrA Er'. V-
Ar
r
e%411
We

Ma a of
�� `" �ra0O19s4y eebeitg1i D1aQran
OT16
401 Acres '
740_ '��
z/;APP,ROXIMATE\HOUSE
//LOCATION ANDS SIZE
,\ �01//, SrE-GENERAL VOTE
\ , `l `� `. �'�� �� `.��R.Ci.I• ., \ .� 2/ / i' Pf�o. 1 THIS SH ET
IN
�\` ��.\ \DI WD` \`\•� —— IG/fANK
\; \ i 7�S` `• tom` \ \` t` t \ ` tr T9NK, SEPTIC TANK Wnt
\\ \\ t \\ ADVANTEX
N
` k \ .//� UNITS
RL
UV UNIT
\ \ 115V GFCI CIRCUIfi=
\ IN CONTROL PANELj15—r
Al
PLAN VIEW —
SCALE. '1'=100' �� ----
=y
SCALE- 1" = 100'
i 0 50 = f00 200 . - 300
t
�� orrolret AII�TFS• '�