Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20070062 Ver 1_401 Application_20070107Needham 2 Q o 7 0 0 6 2 Environmental Inc. Robert N. Needham, PWS Chip Jackson Tom Gulley, NCLSS#1256 9100 Charlestowne Rd. SE Office/Fax (910)202-0670 P.O. Box 960 Winnebow, NC 28479 jacksonchip@ec.rr.com Wilmington, NC 28402 Office/Fax (910)371-6082 Office/Fax (910)795-0319 needhambud@ec.rr.com tgulley@gmail.com January 9, 2007 ~, Brad Shaver Wilmington Regulatory Field Office ~®~ ~~ES~ P.O. Box 1890 ~;(~},~ Wilmington, NC 28402 RE: PCN for Tumbling Brook Lane- Tax Parcel# 749-2, Holly Ridge, Onslow County, North Carolina Dear Brad: Enclosed is the PCN Form and supporting documents for the requested fill on the above- mentioned tract, owned by John Louriero. We reviewed this site together on 6/26/06. The request is for 0.011 acres of impacts for an access driveway on an upland island containing lots 40 & 41. This is the only proposed wetland impact for the entire development. This is illustrated on the attached drawing labeled "proposed wetland impact". We are applying for this fill under a Nationwide 18 Permit. Enclosed are three copies of the survey for your signature. All wetland impacts have been avoided and minimized on this tract. The owner information is as follows: John Louriero 3732 Sunlakes Farm Road Apex, NC 27539 (919)427-4135 (phone) Please contact me to setup an appointment for an onsite review of this tract at (910)795-0319, (910)297-1282, or by a-mail at t~ulley~u~~mail.com. Sincerely, CC: Joanne Steenhuis ~b - d~ / DWQ -Raleigh ^'~ 1 J. Tom Gulley, Jr. ~~ North Carolina Soil Scientist # 1256 3 Sj, GU(~~ °~ ~'~ ~!~ g ly~ :~~~~ P! ~ z~~c~~ h , . ft §~_ Office Use Only' Form Version March OS 2Q070062 USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No. (If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".) I. Processing ~®U~~~~- 1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: ~+®~ ® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules ^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ ^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification 2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 18 3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is not required, check here: ^ 4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII, and check here: ^ 5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^ II. Applicant Information ``~' ~~ ~~~ ,Jr~i~ ` i~ ?lil'7 1. Owner/Applicant Information Name: John Louriero ~a _,< ~ -a „~s.3hf` Mailing Address: 3732 Sunlakes Farm Road '"~~~''''~`'"' ~~"""~~'~~~''~` ~~`'~~ Apex NC 27539 Telephone Number: 919-427-4135 Fax Number: E-mail Address: 2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.) Name: Tom Gulley Company Affiliation: Needham Environmental Inc. Mailing Address: PO. Box 960 Wilmington NC. 28402 Telephone Number: 910-297-1282 Fax Number: E-mail Address: tg illey~a~gmail com Updated 11/1/2005 Page 5 of 13 III. Project Information Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format; however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided. 1. Name of project: Tumbling Brook Lane 2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only 3. Property Identification Number (Tax P1N):_425601191857 4. Location County: Onslow Nearest Town: Holly Ridge Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Hwy 17 south to Holly Ride Left turn onto Sound Road this becomes Morris Landing Road. Left onto Hardison Road Ri>;ht on Tumbling Brook Rd. Right onto Tumbling Brook Ln. Property is located on left. 5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.) Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 34.4822 °N 77.5039 °W 6. Property size (acres): 39.5 acres 7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Kings Creek 8. River Basin: Cape Fear (Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.) Updated 11/1/2005 Page 6 of 13 9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Over 50% of the tract is old farmland, and the remaining portion is woodlands. The azea around this tract consists of residential homes. 10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: A culvert will be installed and covered with three feet of fill. The project area will be filled using a front end loader and dumptruck. 11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose is to provide access for two residential homes on an upland island. The two homes will shaze one access driveway. IV. Prior Project History If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits, certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project, list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with construction schedules. There is no prior project history. V. Future Project Plans Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application. There aze no futureproiect plans for this tract. VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts, permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and cleazly identifiable on an accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Updated 11/1/2005 Page 7 of 13 Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet. 1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The project plans to fill 0.011 acres of non-riQarian wetlands to create a driveway to access residential lots 40 & 41. The impacts are as follows• a culvert will be installed approximately 53 cubic yards of fill will be added and the slopes will be covered with rip-rap for stabilization. 2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and floodin . Wetland Impact Site Number (indicate on map) Type of Impact Type of Wetland (e.g., forested, marsh, herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within 100-year Floodplain es/no) Distance to Nearest Stream (linear feet) Area of Impact (acres) X 1 fill forested yes 800 0.011 Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.011 3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 19 4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included. To calculate acres e, multi ly len X width, then divide b 43,560. Stream Impact Number (indicate on ma) Stream Name Type of Impact Perennial or Intermittent? Average Stream Width Before Irn act Impact Length linear feet) Area of Impact (acres) Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) Updated 11/1/2005 Page 8 of 13 5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to fill. excavation. dredsins, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc. Open Water Impact Site Number indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody (if applicable) Type of Impact Type of Waterbody (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, ocean, etc.) Area of Impact (acres) Total Open Water Impact (acres) 6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project: Stream Im act (acres): Wetland Impact (acres): 0.011 Open Water Impact (acres): Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 7. Isolated Waters Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE. 8. Pond Creation If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application. Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond, local stormwater requirement, etc.): Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area: VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization) Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts Updated 11/1/2005 Page 9 of 13 were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The Construction plans were designed around all existing wetlands on the property. There is one upland island which contains lots 40 and 41. The proposed wetland fill is needed to access these properties The impact has been minimized by crossing the wetland at its narrowest point and having the two lots share the driveway. VIII. Mitigation DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial streams. USACE - In accordance with the Final .Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include, but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values, preferable in the same watershed. If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current version.). 1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is needed. Updated 11/1/2005 Page 10 of 13 2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at (919) 715-0476 to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP website at http://www.ncee~.net/pages/inlieureplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information: Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ) 1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No 2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA coordinator at (919) 733-5083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation. Yes ^ No ^ 3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^ X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ) It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion. 1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )? Yes ^ No Updated 11/1/2005 Page 11 of 13 2 3. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer multi Tiers. Zone* Impact (s uare feet) Multiplier Required Miti ation 1 3 (2 for Catawba) 2 1.5 Total * Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendiculaz from the top of the neaz bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ) Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed impervious level. XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ) Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. XIII. Violations (required by DWQ) Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules? Yes ^ No Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ) Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Enhancement, or Payment into the appropriate information as identified Updated 11/1/2085 Page 12 of 13 were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The Construction plans were designed around all existing wetlands on the property. There is one upland island which contains lots 40 and 41. The proposed wetland fill is needed to access these properties The impact has been minimized by crossing the wetland at its narrowest point and combining two potential wetland crossings into one common shared crossing. The developer has avoided any additional impacts throughout the development with the exception of this crossing to the upland island which can't be avoided. VIII. Mitigation DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial streams. USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on Januazy 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment aze minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include, but aze not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values, preferable in the same watershed. If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Cazolina (see DWQ website for most current version.). 1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/lineaz feet) of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is needed. No mitigation is proposed See section VII summary detailing avoidance and minimization. Updated 11/12005 Page 10 of 13 2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at (919) 715-0476 to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP website at http://www.nceep.net/pages/inlieureplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information: Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ) 1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No 2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA coordinator at (919) 733-5083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation. Yes ^ No ^ 3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^ X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ) It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion. 1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )? Yes ^ No Updated 11/1/2005 Page 11 of 13 2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer multi liers. * Impact Required Zone ,_______ r _,~ Multiplier *,~;«;,..,«;,.„ 1 I I 3 (2 for Catawba) r 2 1.5 Total * Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendiculaz from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1. 3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ) Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed impervious level. XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ) Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. XIII. Violations (required by DWQ) Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules? Yes ^ No Isthis anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ) Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No Updated 11/1/2005 Page 12 of 13 If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: XV. Other Circumstances (Optional): It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control). ~ b C~. ~.~~ I l5/v 7 Applicant/Agent's ignature Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Updated 11/12005 Page 13 of 13 iIAAPQ~E ~ ! 1i µ~1tiy ~5d92 Rn -~ ~~.,,~~~~~ra~~~y ~i ~'dfin y,' ~~ fN s~ V G~'' 4~` ct' ~~,r Cyprrss Brunti+ ~; i006 hAaaOuest, Inr ~ ~; ?D06 T-k Atlas .y~` Sir ~4~! .O~ ry ~~\ 1~ Q~ ' Sturrcp Sound ~~ ~ ~~ AlacarwA~r '~ ~p~ ~, N T V ,~. ~f 4G Y ~ L1~ ~ Thomas Landing r , ~ 4 ~ 'r `~~~ "P6 ~4 ~~, to - U~. :,:-.~. - -'~.. -' s sm.. . a - ' r /1LIY;n CtC OGR+R iI SITE SCALE 1" = 900' Joao Lourier Tax Parcel 749-2 Onslow County, NC 03-05-013 /COE Peckage.cdr Needham Environmental, Inc. Environmental Consultants Wilmington, N.C. APRIL 2006 Site Location 1 " ~ 300' Map Source: Onslow County, GIS Bonn i_ourier Needham Environmental, Inc. Tax Parcel 749-2 Environmental Consultants Onslow County, NC Generalized Soils Map Wilmington, N.C. 03-05-007 /COE Package.cdr April 2006 ,~ r '~ ~. .. ... .nr.. .,, }{t `~' .r~~~ ~`, Information provided by: Onslow County Online GIS d . • i~~I\e~;. .~ ~i' k ,, ~ "~?~~' ~'. ~.Z i2 4F S^ M :./:~~ Joao Lourier Needham Environmental, Inc. Tax Parcel 749-2 Environmental Consultants Onslow County, NC Wilmington, N.C. 2001 Color Aerial 03-OS-013/COE Padcagecdr April 2006 a4. r iywi{s' ~, ,k x r °jC#I~'~"' ~+ r 5c ~ ~ x~f ~. ~~ ~ ~ ~ "~~ X '~ ~ ~'~~ ill ~} r;~ K ~.,~ f', Jy t•! ar. ~ r ..> Y~4 i-' t ~{+~ ! ~'~+~ fir, ^' '~~, ~ `' ~', ;~A t ~<. -may { 'aW ~ ' '4 R ~., P ., s µ '~ S b e l`.{~yy`3' ~-Y F ~P~. `~ i x f5 ~3.~ ~ 9 * ro ,~~' `. s ~ `Y~a. ,,. ., ~'~ ~ `~{ ~ ~~ .~ >~ ~- s. o ~:, ~ 1~ '"~ '- kaff "~ '~, iT Lf,~Y a ,~.~; ~j F~,, s4r ~,'. ~,, ,~t~ a. ; 6 ~A 4~ ~y~- ~ ~ ~ , {,> ~-: x ~ ~ w ~~TT~'~+ ti~ s' r.~+~ •~~ i r~ ~+~ T V k ~~ g. r » Y X yy x r m': k ~ ~ ~s. ~~ ~ ~ ... ~;3 ~'~: ~~ ~~ ~- " ` v ~. *^., ~; ~. ~'. .. -h`r ~t":.~ ,+ ~K` . ~1 `~~' 3 'v ~~v~ ._.~ - ~'- '~=" r - s°` ~' ~'~ A 749-2 Information provided by: Onslow County Online GIS rr - i .._`+ u i~ If :s~~ Joao Lourier Needham Environmental, Inc. Tax Parcel 749-2 Environmental Consultants Project Boundary Onslow County, NC Wilmington, N.C. 03-05-013ICOE Packegecdr April 2006 ~, _~ ~~ ~.5 _ t 'ti ~~+ f,%_ .''r' - TopoZone -USGS Holly Ridge (NC) Topo Map Page 1 of 1 A~r~'~ "~IYJ:31kiW a ~ csltle ire ` ~^-r+ ~ f -u _ i ~ - r ~ JI- ~'i _ ~ ~ ~ r" i 4 ~~~ - - -- _` L ~ P i _,~ ? ~_~_ ~j~ ~I~ , r' ~ a ti1,' ,, K_._ _ _ "'' :137;1 `~ _ ~ / ;'~,~~; s,: ~ ~ ~j - ~ ~ ~ . _ _ - - ~~ _.:, `'ice . ~; ~~~*,~;~.. ': ~ ~' -- - ~ - - ,, I ~ ~J ~L /-' ~ _ R 1 r ~ y . ,- ' \ ~J J~ -- -- ~ ~ - r . ~~.1 ; (`-l ~ ' , ~ 5 J ,:.,~ bravo /~ ~ ._ ~ _: ~ _ ~ "~eaQo . , . , 1g~f` : . . Y , , t ~ .. ~ / ~. • ~ _ -. ~. ~ ~ Y I ~; ~I PERMU A -Q - ~ - iStA ~ ' ~~" 0 U.3 0.6 4.9 1.2 1.5 km 0 0.2 0.4 4.6 0.8 1 mi 34.4822°N, 77.5039°W (NAD83/WGS84) USGS Holly Ridge (NC) Quadrangle Projection is UTM Zone 18 NAD83 Datum http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?lat=34.48222&lon=-77.503 9&size=l&u=5 &layer =DR. M* M=-9.37 G=-1.418 1 /9/2007 _ __ ~ ~ 108 .31. ~3s _ ~ ~ ~~~""~~ .~ 23~ ,,/~ ``~ ~`~~` 234 ~ ~ ~~~ 245 Wetlands ~ E,3T ~ ti,~ 236 <,~~~ 233 r~ . \ ~ 244 ~^4i1 ~ B' ~ 2~ 23 ~>~~ 21 /~ ~ X39 23~ ~ ~ ~..- ~ ~ / ''' 842 241 ~ ~ ! Oat {'r" ~ 2« ~ ~ ~~ t ~ u~ c~i s~ ~t ~' ~ 2b ~ 4 ~ 818 ~ __--- ., - y ~~ ~ X1-Proposed Wetland Fill , ~. 214 Impact 0.011 acres •s?13 We'ttands ~ 42 ~``~ 212 ~+,. ~ € J 2~b '. i~, ~os~ 4,~ ~~ aye zoa ~~ ~~ X02 ~ ~`~ 24 V 1 " ~ 100' Joao Loureiro Needham Environmental, Inc. Tumbling Brook Ln Environmental Consultants proposed Wetland Impact Tax Parcel #749-2 Wilmington, N.C. Onslow County, NC January 2007 X1 Wetland Fill Impact 0.01 1 acres DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Paae 1 of 2 wetlands ProjecUSite: Tax Parcel# 749-2 Date: 06/23/06 ApplicanUOwner John Louriero County: Onslow investigator: Tom Gulley State: N.C. Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? 'e No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes ~ Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION ommant ant ecies tratum In icator ominant ant pec~es tratum ndicator Woodwardia areo/ata g cover obl 9. Osmunda cinnamonia cg over facw+ 10. Pinus taeda tree fac 11 Acer rubrum tree fac 12. Liquidambar stryacif/ua tree fac+ 13. Ilex opaca shrub facw+ 14. Myrica cerifera shrub fac+ _ 15. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (exclu~ uding FAC-) 100% Remarks: Data point taken in wetland flat behind farm fields. Meets the vegetation criteria. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Primary Indicators Stream,Lake, or Tide Gauge _ Inundated _ Aerial Photographs x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches Other _ Water Marks x No Recorded Data Available _ Drift Lines _ Sediment Deposits x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Depth of Surface Water: -- (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves _ Locat Soil Survey Data Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10 {in.) FAC-Neutral Test _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depth to Saturated Soil: 12 (in.) Remarks: Surface water indicators present. n.,.:,.,.aic:~.,~ Tn.. Dom..-n Ht 7d0_'J Paae 2 of 2 wetland JVILJ Map Unit Name (Series and Phase Muckalee loam Drainage Class: Four Field Observations axonomy (Subgroup): Typic Fluvaquents Confirm Mapped Type? es No Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) _ AbundancelContrast Structure, etc. muck loam; weak granular 0 - 6 A 10YR 3!2 - friable sandy loam; massive 6 - 20 Cg1 10YR 5!2 friable sandy loam; massive 2p+ Cg2 10YR 6/1 friable Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions _ Histic Epipedon x High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils _ Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime x Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions x Listed on National Hydric Soils List _ x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Surface soils meet the mucky modifer WETLAND Ut I tKMINA I tVIV Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? a No (Circle) (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? No Hydric Soils Present? a No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland(Ye~ No I -~-/~ Remarks: Wetland line flagged using numbered pink ribbons. John Louriero 3732 Sunlake Farms Rd. Needham Environmental, Inc. Apex, NC 27539-8392 P.O. Box 960 (919}427-4135 phone Wilmington, NC 28402 (919)779-9712 fax (910}795-0319 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Panes 1 of 2 uelands Project/Site: Tax Parcel# 749-2 Date: 06/23/06 County: Onslow Applicant/Owner: John Louriero State: N.C. Investigator: Tom Gulley Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Y~ Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION ommant ant Gies tratum ndicator ominant ant~cies tratum ndicator Myrica cerifera shrub fac+ 9. Pines taeda tree fac 10. Pteridium aquilinum g cover face 11. Liquidambar stryaciflua tree fac+ 12. _ 13. 14. 15. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (exclu~ uding FAC-) 75% Remarks: Data point taken near edge of field. Meets the vegetaion criterion. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Primary Indicators _ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge _ Inundated _ Aerial Photographs Saturated in Upper 12 Inches Other _ Water Marks _ x No Recorded Data Available _ Drift Lines -' _ Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Field Observations: _ Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) _ -Wester-Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Free Water in Pit: >20 (in.) _ _FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks) Depth to Saturated Soil: >20 (in.) Remarks: No hydrology indicators present. P t/S't Tax Parcel# 749-2 Pa e 2 of 2 u land svi~a ro ec 1 e. Map Unit Name (Series and Phasel Wando fine sand Drainage Class: One Field Observations e Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Udipsamments No Confirm Mapped Type? ' Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. fine sand 0 - 5 A 10YR 5/2 - sin le rained fine sand 5 - 15 C1 10YR 5/4 - sin le rained few, fine, distinct 1 OYR 4/4 fine sand >15 C2 7.5YR 5l6 few, medium, distinct 10YR 6l8 sin le rained Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions _ Histic Epipedon _ _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils _ Suifidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other {Explain in Remarks) Remarks: No hydric soil conditions observed in upland areas. rrr n~~I LIATIl141 VVC 1 IJ11V V Uc 1 cr~mn~n 1 Ivl~ Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ` e~ N (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x Hydric Soils Present? Yes o x is this Sampling Point Within a WetlanYes No Remarks: Wetland line flagged in pink ribbon. pprov y John Louriero Tom Gulley 3732 Sunlake Farms Rd. Needham Environmental. Inc. Apex, NC 27539-8392 P.O. Box 960 (919)427-4135 phone Wilmington, N.C. 28402 (919)779-9712 fax 910-297-1282 I, DomY Marco Podgvtt, do certKy t/qt this Dlat wf droen rrrtlrr M fuprrvblon fron on actual survey node uMer ny supervbkxs (acrd descrlptq~ rttorded M MoD Soak 10, Pogr IBJI tMt tM awidarkf Nt surveyed we dearly htlkohdl thot the rntb of preclsbn as calMotrtl M L5.000t/-i tMt tMf plat woo prrporrtl h nccartloncr rlth G.S. 17-% of nnentlrd. Vllrru M Drlphal slgnntun, rrgbtratkn nua6er and uol the 07 tloy of NowMSrr, P-. 2006. 0amy Morro Padgett, PLS L-2639 Thh aartlRM tnd Ihh copy M lhb pat attvrately dryicb the DauMmy of the NnrdMtkn of Seolkn 404 of the peon Water Acl Pureuani to Inc 1987 Caps of Engham WNkMa OdheNlon Mmud. M dNermhW by ine uMaelgrad on thla tlata Unleu than h a Maps b lM hw a our publlsMd requlalbna Nh dNamhatlan d Sectlan 104 ~r(edlMbn may M rNlad upon to a palad b 0ve yeah han Ub date. 91gMNrr of U.S Army Carps of Engheen OfOcld Dots a/ Slgrclun Notes N Fran Pant 9 To Print II Iz elth tM curter of o Branch ontl rlih Goose V Klnq Creek as shown on plot. Survry hforrathn taNen fran o ploS entltlyd N 'Survey for J1.Orwlopr+nt Custon Noner, LLL', prepored by Mall GNIrspN, PLS, doted MnrcT 11, 2006. Not frOn fctufl fbld swvfy, m m m m c",, r,. ~~`°~~ ~ r { (~ p ~ d1~~/'_1 Lat I7 yW ~ f'+ ~4~ \ e FLAeyf4n o'ylz -& r L~~ )1 d}~ ~,. I I xlnos Harbor Lot N \\ Qa ') C77/ ~ Sorah Podgeit Harnley 108/308 1 Wp;il NB 17 Pp 25 \ \ \ \ \ Lot 17 Lot IS ~ 1, Lat 2fi \\ Lot z3 \\ Lat 2z \\ lot 20 \\ Lot 19 \\ 108 \ 11 ~ \ \\ \N \` +>r 235 i79 Run of o Broncn \ 279 27 +01 yoy (~\ es 29~L79 C7g \\ 2/46,24 238 ~ 231 WWn 227 2Bdj '1.8^~~- ~ ~ 2B~ ~t~~ ~~7 ~3 < 248 / ~ r'~ Wetlonos ~ L37 J`'~ 23 <3~~233 ~ LBS l83 L82 ~ 276 l5 r 5<L n~3a' I p / \ r, 245 237 ~ 92 290 ''~ z Bt L86 ~7527~ )(\ 272 '~'v~ 210 ~ I 22 23 f`` LBA 18 > 50 241 -~ v ~ ~ y1f LB9 ~ 17 / ~ ~ ~ 268 273 L~ 25S ~ 291 \ 21 ~w5~ 241 ~~ E3~ +te \\ I / J) ~ \272 /y93 ~1 16 zn \ JI' ~- l ~b~/~L `L69 ~L70~ In ~ / L ~ u6 ~ p ~ ' ~ (v} 2% /q+' `/294 ~ \ m ~/ / 266 ~bt'/ M9 270 27l 256)J 24 UWands ~ - +~ 231 2a~ ~ \ \ \ ~ /~ y/ 237I~ +zX +a `~ L`~297y295 \/ 'fefx `/ \ +ea ,~~ 230 299 P \ ~ IS >m yyJ YeHnntls 'n ~ +~ ~(~ 2/ ~~ ~. ^~ \ r 1 6 ~ \ 075 ~ ~ \ 2 ~6 m 299 238 / ~ 26 I ~ ~ 1 1 rN129 \ \ / n+ 19 ~ ~ +n < ~ 218 1 25 1 1 a \ \ V /~ C \ 261260 / ~tb L~\(J ~ ~ 222 223 ~ J i,) 22R yy O \ la x» 2 ( ~ 4ep ~ /217 Lf9 L21~L2 ~ 3224 226 N \ 2 V /t ~ \ \ ~ 27 ~ ~16 219 220 ~ 221 308 +M L24 W2y L26 227 \ \ \ 20 ~ O v 215 W (~ 225 \ ~ \ ~ ~ O 21,44 Ac..y m n " ~ ~~+N ~ ~30b \ \ ~ ]3 Op1n 29 / \ 210 309/ ~+~ m \/ \ ae /\ ~ / 42 v 40 _' \ \ \ \ / / 212 9l0 ~~ / ~ `ei\30a NI /I \ \ V ^ 12 29 ( ~ / ~\ 211/( 208^ 31q ~ 098 /- fl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ \ '" /'\ \i / ~ / ~ e1o cs J a~ +u 31z ~~° V / ~ a ox3o2 `/ ~ O \ w 209 ~ o \ \ \ \ ,\ \ / l 4pf ~ ~/ ~ 206 l 313\t;J \ v// 11 / / \/ / /\ O l\y\ 2w 311 (112 ~ / ~ 301X \~c ,1 O \ ~ ` ~\ O flp \ / ~ / \ ~ n+X 205 `a-1 31~(/,J ~/~A, \~ ~ V ^ \ \/ ~ ~ m i7~ 31 J 1& ; ~ \ 1 > ~, \ / / "' 32 zD3z~\ 3z19t55`Ta~~ x 36Dx \~ ~~ ~ O \` /~ v' ~\ to ~ ~ / 'f' ~q51 zol ~\J V` ~\C\ \ ke f \\ m 0 \~ ~~~\ 0 ,,, "' \ \ ~ ~ V >„ ~ \ 37 / \ ~ ya / \ \3 // \\ // 218 \ ~A9p9 \~ O/~\ ~~ Lot o~µed \~ \ / \\ Lot II \ 4 / f9rEa - ~ \ efa' 7 \ s9 1tNI 1 lot 1 33 34 Lot 14 K6ps IbrbOr l] XB 49 Pq 21 BtJ ~A3g \\~~~ ~K~ Lot 13 \ 12 ~ h Donny Mrca Padgett, Rtglstered Lond Surveyor No. L-2639, crrtlfy to me or norr of t1u FWIOwVp as kidcated tnus~ A. TMS SHE S~lwy QeatH o SubdWfbn of Iona withh !M orw M a Canty or nunkpnOty Chet Ms on ordVace tMt repdatea porcNf of lontlt __B. TMt thls wrvry Is located h a county or nunklpollty tht Is unrrquloted or Ms nn rdhoce that re0baty parcels ai lardl __.L. TMt tHZ plat Ut of n survey of on extst6p porter or porcNS of Iandl _ 0. iMt thb survey b of an rxhthg hu4dnq a other SSrIKtITf, nI mtural ffntUrr, SUCK of n wotK[pUrfrl .__E. TMt thb survry Is n control survryl _ F. TMt tHr pat Is of a survey of onother category, wM ns the rrcanbinatlon of exlsthg porcNs, ocart-ordered survey, or otMr pxceptbn to the drFlNtbn of subdlUlEWrtl G TMt tM hiornaibn awsnblr to this surveyor is wcn tent 1 an unwble to nnkr o dshrnlnotkn to tM best of rry profrubnal oEONy os to provlslons coMoMd M (A) tMOUgh tF> a6ow. Danny Norco Padgett. PLS L-2639 Vetlantlf a 1 \\\\u` s~ 4aµ t-4q 'a• a~ ~ of °p0a Vlcnlty Mnp N.T.S. a tgq/, r S ~q b 'x Courfe LI Lt01 Beuing N '14' '. W N 4 V pstnnce 3' N 19'08' ' V 13.61' 1 N V .11' L 4 fi '26'3 V 4'00' W ' 14' ' V ' 0 1 ' V 62T LIDS ']6 ' V J' LI S V 19 ' L11 S S' 4 7' Llll 'OB 3068' Ll 64' 4.12' L 1 '1 .93' Ceuru Bearhq Distance 1 N t' Y 1.7 ' L 39' 3 V 1.9 ' 3 N 'W N 84.4' ' W LS N31' TV 49.' N 02 1 7 N 4!'41'11' V 4 b' LB S 40' 7' V / 7 N '/9 ' V 60.11' N • V 5 ' 11 N 3D~ 6'4 1 64' N 4A7 ' NOB '4Y V ' 14 N 24'1 .11' N N '9' 0' 7 N 3'0' 2, L s v3'or 4 1 s •4 4a N BB' I 42' 1 N 4'N' '10' 69.14' s n• 4 L21 S B2' ' E 7 , ' L23 N 6.6 ' N 1 S9B' L 7 le 3 ' L28 N 19' 1' ' V 6 1 ' N '00' 9M' L70 N 16' F W 1 .66' 1 N 2 1'SI W 51 32 N 26'SI' 6927' L33 N 6 '40'26' V 37D ' L 1 N 12'46'78' L99' L 96' ' 0' W 67:90' L36 9 4040' V 46' L37 N '1070' W 7066' L S 40' I V 6 D' 9 S 86' ' W 9.%' 40 S 19.0 ' 7 W 43.07 N S 334V V 47.47 S 6 11.09' V 3 0' 4 N 31.08'/8 73' L44 N W 3326' 1 N 31• V A U6 H '2C V 36 L4 1' 7' ' V 2 U 'S' W 41.1' U9 S 4' ' V 3 .6T N 83'06'49' V ' L51 11' E 7.8 ' L H %' v 13Jr L 64 / W 28 ' 1. V 10.40' 0239' V 4 I ' L 00'46' L S S1' 9 W 64.50 % S 't9' Y 2673' L g 4 43.78' L S 4' ~ V 7.t 6 61 N 'S2' ' v N 4 ' V 49.1 ' 44,4 L I D' 6 N 62' ' L 21 68 S 2' 37. 69 S ' L70 N 7 b 39.71' N 11' '4' N 70' ' 4 58.0 L N V 1 . ' V 4 N fit' ' Y ' L7 3 •µ, 7 6 7 N '. V < 1' 7 N L • 'V 6 0.4 6l'1"V S. ' L S 48'„~ V ' L N 1'I 50.6 LB4 ' V- 4 2' L 6' '10' 3.16' 4 V 49.49' B S 6 19' L S 41.50' S /' L ' fi' V 6. ' L N W 42.67' 'V 0' 9 V 10.1 94 11.00 W 56.7 L9 4 '1043' Y •70~ L N 6'51'1 1. L4 ' V p' A Survey For Joao Loureiro Legends o Iron Plpe • Iron Stake ^ Concrete Monument • P,K, Nall Bar Scale 1'= 100' 200 0 200 400 Stunp Sound Township, ~nslow County, North CaroNno Surveyed By. qIp Sheen Drown Br ONP 1 Of I natn Wetlands Detlneatlon par y cH. , r~1oa ~ 10/31/06 ProJrctLauwuo 7494 Danny M oreo Padgett, PLS Sneads Ferry, North Carolina 28460 Tele• (910) 327-1967 69D