The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20190142 Ver 1_Bridge 164 Div 7 Packet_20190130� � 0� ��UC�Ut'IV C � O f�lack ntos� �,��¢ , _ - �Q Bifth Ln ' � � � �o�P E ^�hurch D o � � p �� ti 1 � I ! � � � 3 a � va � 1 \� � _ Cedar D� � � A ( Q � � � �� o� Etde D� � � O� � ° � a l � � � �• � - . �` g 9 oe¢ � H - _ 62 ' �� °a o° .. lamance Rd —_ _ � �n� ��O m � � Belle�nont-A � l-'. q � � � 0 � ,`� � ,\ � �� prma_^-_`-°-�� ',�� . -` \ � O, r � q.__l "- , . w P — � G � S µC Ni9h'waY � V D � M p� L J S�Qe = 1� °' � � � e ° �?, e # � Y �� . �� "�li �' !� - f , , � :— ' � � `�.�. � s�� J J O� PROJECT LOCATION �� 36.004142, -79.492367 ; Q O � A �O 7 � �r � y'�a � � ��'e� �F ` r -�-��.. _ �� ¢ — C7 c9y�.,nArng C'uar�Pi �ree. � . Q�� + Ci � a � Q��' _/ '� ,. •.� �'� - `+�� — . _ 1 r � „�+ � .' .. - ' �` �. � .- . � �� :' rti' - - ' � � 1�� '�, s '�'i� �J y 1 � �• _ � s �4 � ip �� ,`t � o '�i c" � :_.�j _ I�. Q� �6 .. ��. � T 0'\ ° 0 ?° y� �� _ v � _,1 ,,� sAA �—.� s �'P f� � � '`°� � � �� a f ob y. G� � I �dQ � s Trl �� , ea e od�'� A �� 1G ce a` P �y �a � m b�� O\`�e0� c v` e,� Q �o 0 as�p Legend ` s "._ F�� T .� �� _ �, � � ��,� �• _ _'�� . ,� � Study Area 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 �7BP.7.R.�06 �� Feet BR[DGE T 64 OVER NORTH PRONG �� STII�IKII�IG QUARTER CREEK OI�I SR '1 '1 '13 `��aa °°� FIGURE '1 PREPARED BY: DATE: STUDY AREA ALAMANCE COUNTY, NC �r P` ��& AUGUST l • • REsroRAG�o� 2017 1/ \•. �'�� 1T iA7/ " ) � � 4 ,/ � ` � \r I � '` , • /. - � 1\, � • � , � `f� I • � � ,�� / � � -f � , � v � r �� ^ ' ' II� � � \` 1 � ,, / {\ i. k �•,+ I 1 `�� , � \ �\ �J ' �� ' � � �� (�,' �� ', ' � - ' - �i . - ` �� \_ .� - � _ / , '`� �a _ ,• _ � r �.r .� � .�� _ � - = . � � -� , � ; f � ../ , � I � I` � �` f �• �' � �� 1�`r. � � ' � ,� �, , ,', ► t�3 � � -- � - _ . .� f ,� `,� � ,. .� ( `,�4 , �� ?� � J � �, �- ,` � � �/� �\ �� ;�'� � �. -, �1\, 0 r ;� a , �` . �, � �_ \~ � 1 y � � l� �'� � ��r�' . � . % 'Q ' 1 , '� '� � � _ �') � , ��t � � -� -..•� _ ` ` r , , i- •. _� ��%. =� '� �-✓� r = �i r - \ � .� :��/1�. �s_L �. � C��- __-_._.. �, -. � � �� ' � v � �� ,` I �� , i .. . . . '. � ': �-• .� ' ~ �r V i � f - � �� 1 r I , � ��. � ''��" ��1' '� -� �'� ti �� ' `�� ,, 1; a a�; "� c ; � .; " � ' ' h _ -, �,� � � �. f��...� • �� ,.- '� �_ _ i�, ,; � ti �-l� __ ��, �, �l• •y'� �• -`�` • �� _ � � - • � � -�-� f •-��-- . /d``~ /!.1`. ,�`�,t,'.:,�,' � _- - \,__ . /; • ' . V ' , �S� �� , � �. � � `��,� i . � � � ;+ ' �'�� • j � L; _ . . \ � \ � -_ ' • . _ . h - , � � A � � � ' � ► '� � � ` - � � 1 � �/ . �� t' `t / r �� _j� 1 � � ti 1 � , �� '' . �' �� ff� � � � ` '/.- �;� . � 1 �'� :�- • -�� a 'l, , \ � � � � •.,., �_ Sutton `� ,� � ._., . , . � f �-' �'�►�- ' -- �• a "1.r ' . .� � � -_ . .� , � �, ;� , � - �;,,,� r � �'' � , • / • �• 11.,�„ . , � r • �� .,►�� , ; - • � �- .l ' '. ' . _ i ' ` f g � ,�� '~ , ' ' _ ` . i l ' Legend � ' • �Q � r... � � - Study Area �,. � �, 't 'rt � 1 r � `� \ , _� 0 400 800 1,600 �7BP.7.R.�06 �� Feet BR[DGE '164 OVER NORTH PRONG �� STII�IKII�IG QUARTER CREEK OI�I SR '1 '1 '13 `��aa °°� FIGURE 2 PREPARED BY: DATE: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC ALAMANCE COUNTY, NC �'�„ REsroRq�,o A 2017 T �� , } � . . .... �. ; l � i �' s 'P t� ti , � ' r�H � �' _ � „ «�x ,k� . r•. �� ti t �.1i a �` � � �'. a p `�' •� ff �1F'` ,,�Z, W*�, yy �i. � �P�y '�`k'�'�� 4 .�', „' �i , L�'' ,�.-�� . �` ,-.f� , / T 1 �� ii i� fl. a� �� a '.,r •-�'` a��r . ' .� q ` ' ti , �' ' ,�, y rr4� � i� ��. ; ,� �t'w4 S �, w `�. �K. %: � � � '! ` ^ y ;. ` � . �: . � � � �i * x . � . � . +n-. . } rt� 1f y '�� , � �' ,� �J r .'�r,� •�i !� �i �.N {:. � `.� �� ti • '•1 i , �, ,r �F' < ' i {� ♦ ' �l I��.ry . � t . �;:'a .�.'` ,� d, ..;�--1i j * . ,t' n •�' -..w". �'• ' C,�f�;� i P � •'�J- '` M � �a f rt� �m y . . ��` g.. ir .>.,� ., '.yl` � � � ,S � g� �, �� ,'� � .r �� ..�� . �.. . �f �; _ "�"{ � �T `'� � �'� , � i.�'�'� 5 ' �. � `� � %r r ' y �.. ;�� y�� :. ' � � ;p "�: �Ix,,;y,�� ¢� � °r , a.��j.•. �. . < a �'��i , . ��, �) � �'r - - '� �, ie !r ''Zr.�'� �i � .4 y. '"-7,w s� +:r p' 4 ir_ N � c 4 4 ':'�' - ,�• ��`� �k' '' �`�� }t f ��*�,' � ` c� ~�;� � +� "1'��„ � J�,' f � � � .` � �< •'.��.. .�et ,� .� �� y^ t 4�'�+�'� vy•��4�► ,� ! ��.� �' i ti +�:�` � . .� `',,,�,d-' �� " ♦ � t ` �' � � .�w,. ,•,� � s � � � � �� u ; ' ,' �j . :,� �.� , i . �.'; � .',1 ' � �� ,.�� Y t " �� •�� t. '.��1.f~* � "r"Ar�' L `�; * � ��, � �, -_:. '1K � "�� +l'r�'� �'.�1� ri ..�, .- . Y �. a i v ��.�1 ��'� �� _ • \ w\:� � h,i+. re � � `r ��,:, ��' ,I�� ' , � i. .w�1 ;.�" . '9' �'. r � '`l ''� � b." ta�- ly ;C. • 1� ry ..a..� 1� � i� `�d��C :�. �. ' �r � ..t�� ; � . ' a ' .�+� .�h �; � t n .. �� T, i'Sr•' '• � .� . � �� ~ �� .�' ) . � � . 1i �.� ' ��k v ��i � 't�J" �'' 6 � �1 ��Y, 1 *a ud •it, ' ,� � , �j' ^.r ti w `y,� � *1l 1 � �� . ,p� �1� j"� ��it.��Axl '�I � � f�, . � .�r'g�'�.��. V �;; V� "� %� � F, � ' �q'i� i;ir �L" � �„J � � . Y .. . '�i'}: �::. � Y'� . �� . `��.' ..e '�� , y��. ,Z > � : � �� r ;�. y'.�,,�Nv, �� ,�, � � ' ."�f �,��~ ' �,Yi' � �` " 'R��. `' +'.�G1'r �r ��'�� +.�e ' � y,. � ' � t ,ie +�'w. � -*i: s. � ti � 3" j �3 � a r � . r1 `� �i,� �`� � �� t,,��"° '}i�' •�� #�a r ' ' . l� .b �.. i� .}� ey{� At ,. � �� > 'i''� � l�` � �i �y� �I il�f� i - �J � • J�' , �;!� d � ' f ��'r� � ��h''+ txR�'`_.'Sa �p. � �� i�k � :('��y. �1�X, . 4i � ��•t ,� �� ,r... �. �r y �;`t� �' '; x, t 'x ' � � l� _ � r.' � L>,; �� - � ' -t,: a•,. 'i'� .� f � � ?,d`'I• ,ity*" �� . Stif;t t '� ,� � ,� �' �. , � '.��. }+ 1rk•��`J�,�1.1�: � 4*!�,��`�� 8ii �e � �' ��1i� � ." (� ;,:ir.l��.''y'. ' ' . ` •;�. �� J : �• ; ` ;�: r i�, ��, � .�_ ,� . ` f � y ., v �� . l . � �. � �I �{� �� .. "�Y r �'� }'�'�• { '�� .?C1 �5, tll ♦ �! :r� !�� I ..�'i ♦ y� �, �' l,,}7� iiy!'l'�j 17 S � . � t�, �/y� Z- � r � ��.�x. , �`x�' -. . � �' 5��5 a � ��IluU.a_ a, � `,+�' � ^�t # t�Y �jc ! +ta. �.�i �.< .� f, - 4 � , - . �'r•., � '� e� ;. i , �''`^ . �� ,� r �; . �� t c' �� . , �., + �� ¢ ti . i - �� • ti . I' �. 1f �!a r 's�r'�, `:i' '� i � y`y . +� , w8 a: !lr ^'+\�'�l � ["li a � i ��, a * �. 1 , �r �, . . � i � �i�4 �, �,�.. ; , }}h f ' y k .; • *,' �•':;�� ,'�}�� + �,; • i Y A 't` � _ �; �,' � �T ! _ ' y� � R ,� � . � �y, :.'1 .�;, ': . �'r�� - 2 ' +� r S •r : � � � �i�, `� • : ,`� ia"^ ' �� . r _ 't'. 1 1 v _ ., .•'V� c' �. � . Me ' •f�' "��. � 1�, :0'li � ,fi., y � �' .. -• . .. .�" . ..3� rj;• �/r �ar i ,., �„ A. �..�� • . _ j� ,' r ,�,AI" � `, '�'f '�i .�,� �'�r , � �t � � �!'/ � . . w ... � . . ._ ��.� ��1 ,F{�. �r I� M�;��l�' � 3 - `� r. ' . ,f.�� • `''-.� >}�L�� j'f. 1� : � ,�t��' �ti' n � :. �Y r, � .+i*ri _ � � �r` {, .r i s� '' �� :: � iS �( �` t � � 1'It •� e\ � �� " . . . . . � • . . % t,�F-. c ;,�}'. � .A . '7��.�L. .a1'' .K' . fr ,,SS.. ,� W �� {-v . `wa� v . �� " 'j4'�':hi ,4' s 4 �dF .�'�t� .� '' ,� {' ;' St� ti', i. -� • � ,fl' '"k � yY,t y!`it�,i.a'�G- ' . h . , w .. .� ,w �', r ,F . q '�� ,`y� t n,'4�� . y,�� . S� , �t "�Y y �.� a� � �� . .,"a', • . 1; .r ' �1�� f��11 �.r � ,, y�4 '`�` t� , ! f , �•4 ' , l . �=1 i m•{ ..iw.i�fl'y',��1 ��ls,y��lJ �� / . � ' �Y�� 'JL ' � ' �y� 1�` � �j� ... . . � .N�f�.'�I:4� I: L. �� . �:.� . . � ' � ' • _ • � '. � ~ ��<r�� '.r` S �`� , .��:��;' � �� :�� S� :«.,� "/ NC DW Stream IdentificaHon Form Version 4.11 Date: � � '�, � ProjectlSit� ��`5`�;r .4y, ��- Latitude:� o w� .�3 a Evaluator: �? `� � ,•� County: / � � Longitude:_ �4, „� r>3 G.,•s�a Total Points: y Stream Determine�i (circle one) Other ��I.�,,, ,: Stream is aUeast intermittent �� Ephemeral I en Pe�ennial e.9. Quad Name'' �� if z 19 or rennial A2 30` .. A. Geomor hob (Subtotal =/ ) Absent Weak 18� Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, � � ri le- ool se uence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 � 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 �i' 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 8. Headcuts � 9. Grade control � 0.5 10. Natural vailey 0 0.5 11. Second or greater order channel o= 0� a artifcial ditches are not reted; see discussions in manual B. H drolo Subtotal = L� 12. Presence of Baseflow �� 1 13. Iron oxidizing bactena � 1 14. Leaf litter .'Yy'� 1 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles ��..� ,_,,,0.5 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? <_1Vn..=..0-� ' C. Biolo Subtotal = 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 2 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 2 20. Mac�obenthos (note diversity and abundance) 1 21. Aquatic Mollusks � 1 22. Fish ,� 0.5 23. Cre�sh ;,_Q. - 0.5 24. Amphibians 0.5 25. Algae 0.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: �aa.�4r,,� �1�:,�:�� di t��i' �-L <.�� e� � � -a..>. .,/. ,-r. :✓,. _ �.. _ .<-.t ,.�.__.... ,� .�. 2 2 � 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0.5 1 1 0 � E i 0 0 0 � 3 3 '3- 3 3 3 1.5 1.5 Yes = 3 3 3 0 1.5 1.5 0 0 3 3 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Sketch: "i`� c}l }o NI'S�'L USACE AID# DWQ # Site #_ (i�dicate on attached map) � STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: 1. Applicant's name: /1%! J�T � 3. Date of evaluation: '' �� 7 5. Name of stream: .5 (Z ��tLG, '� � 7. Approximate drainage azea: `` �v �G 9. Length of reach evaluated: ^' �U O 11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. Latitude (ex. 34.8723 t2): .3G � v d"'� 'S 3� 2. Evaluator's name: � C�t-J5�4: L 4. Time of evaluation: ! /,� /T �, 6. River basin: " �n �*" S. Stream order: � i /, 10. County: r�! ��c. a:�x;.-s<_ A 12. Subdivision name (if any): /�%a/'� � \ Longitude (ex.-77.556611): — 7�7, 'yS' � i 3 d Method ]ocarion detemilned (c'vcle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach unde�rjevaluation (note nearby roads and landmazks and at[ach map identifying stream(s) loca[ion): ��nn�h�n��G /i.e�� ca.;l'AV��s�e�� 1�� l.� L�-•.'�� JO.Jfi� ..� ��(:...cH�G 14. Proposed channel work (if 15. Recent weather conditions�. r�- � `f'.�; : ..'.�. 16. Site conditions at [ime of visit: � � ie a✓ 17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries tbitat F�� _Trout Waters _Outstanding Resowce Waters �Nutrient Sensitive Waters � Water Supply Watershed 1� �(I-Il� 18. Is there a pond or lake located ups[ream of the evaluation point? YE �O yes, esUmate the water surface area: 19. Does channel appeaz on USGS quad map? YE 'NO 20. Does channel appeaz on USDA Soil Survey. YES NO 21. Estimated waters6ed land use: �% Residen[ial _% Commercial _% Industrial `� % Agncu][ural � % Forested _% Cleazed / Logged _% Other ( ) 22. Bankfull width: `� �e 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): �' �':_� 24. Channel slope down center of sh�eam: X Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight _Occasional bends �Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel Instructions for completion ot worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by detemtining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, teaain, vege[a[ion, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each chazacteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the chazacteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessmen[ of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteris[ic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the swring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there aze obvious changes in the chazacter of a stream under review (e.g., [he stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the sheam may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a sepazate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach mus[ range between 0 and 100, wi[h a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. . Total Sco�e (from reverse): �� n . ' ' ;✓r+s�c. Evaluator'sSignature )�/� � �r Date �"5 �3 // � This channel evaluation form is iotepded to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by theFUnited States Army Corps of Engineers to make a pretiminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval aod does not imply a perticular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject ro change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26. �"Fo✓m �mr,��oQ gl � �201 �5 -ho ✓r�lL� �I'h7f-1— � (5 �c1►�cQ � kh.c� �2rr�ancc. S� i l SvYV� t-na�� l9 (�, —.{�,m�`f�,.,.��j �� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET J ECOREGION POINT RANGE # CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE Presence of tlow / persistent pools io stream 1 0-5 0-4 0-5 l (no flow or saturation = 0; shon flow = ma�c ooints) 2 Evidence of past 6uman alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 u (extensive alteration = 0; no altera[ion = max points) I 3 Riparianzone 0-6 0-4 0-5 �'� no buffer = 0; conti uous, wide buffer = max oints 4 Evidence of uutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 �I (extensive dischazges = 0; no dischazges = maac oints a 5 Groundwater discharge 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4 d (no dischazge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, e[c. = max points) � rU, Presence of adjacent floodplain � rn 6 0-4 0-4 0-2 y (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = mar poin[s) a � Entrenchment / floodplain access 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 (deepl entrenched = 0; frequent floodin = mac points) � 8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 (no wetlands = 0; lazge adjacent wetlands = max points) �—'� 9 Channel sinuosity 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3 3 (ex[ensive channelizafion = 0; nahval meander = max points) 10 Sediment input 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 � (extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = ma�c points) ll Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA• 0— 4 0— 5 (fine, homogenous = 0; lazge, diverse sizes = max points) � 12 Evideace of channel incision or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 I ,�r (deepl incised = 0; s[able bed & banks = max oints �E"„ Presence of major bank failures � 13 0-5 0-5 0-5 � (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points) �Root depth and density on banks , 14 0-3 0-4 0-5 F (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = ma�c points) � � Impact by agriculture, livestock, or 6mber production , � 15 (substantial impact =0; no evidence = ma�c points) 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 .j 16 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool compleaes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 I F no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = max oints � d Habitat compleaity F 17 0-6 0-6 0-6 ' i„� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points) Cj Canopy coverage over streambed $ Q � 8 (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = ma�c points) 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 Pi 19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0— 4 0— 4 �� (deeply embedded = 0; loose struchue = maac) � 20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 � no evidence = 0� common numerous es = max oints � � Z� Presence of amphi6ians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 � O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maic points) 0 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) � ^ � Evidenceofwildlifeuse A-6 O--S 0-5 . (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) � Total Points Possible 100 100 ] 00 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) '-� � '�Chese charactensUcs are not assessed m coastal streams. �^ > Cr F`. l�yS,G, :• �c?�. NC DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 i I � , � : �l �-y6./ Date: � � ProjectlSite: �' �"��' � I,�titude: � �i N. w�, v';_k';-� .�.�a,.i� � Evaluator. '� lL v� L County: �'re � v Longitude: 74, y�.� � Total Points: � Stream Determination (circt Other ' � Stream is at /easf intermittent z/ /" �-J'" � ��„'. -1'a aa�a�.�w.R,,.,,a�nz.zm ..so. -� Ephemeral Intermittent; erenniaJ. e.g.OuadName:�.' A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = c� ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a� Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 ��3�7 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 !�3.-� 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 !�2� 3 ri le- ool s uence 4. PaRicle size of stream substrate 0 1 3 5. Activelrelict floodplain 0 1 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 � 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 �- 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 ��3.- 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 �a,5 11. Second or greater order channel No =� Yes = 3 a artiTicial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. H drolo Subtotal = 12.Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 �� 13. �ron oxidizing bacteria � 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 QL5..� 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 �:5� 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? -"�Io.,=.D> Yes = 3 C. Biolo Subtotal = /a 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed � 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 ' 21. Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3� 22. Fish 0 -„ .5� 1 1.5 23. Crayfish c�L` 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 1 1.5 25. Algae 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Gltbe� =�0',. `perennial streams may also be ident�ed using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: G �,..... .�� 1,-5 v.-, �6"�: i��. r��:. � ti a:a�._ i� , _ �,- , � _ ,,, ,r r . ,:�.-. � %s � "h '" �,' � Sketch: 53 �r �F. N?sa� USACE AID# DWQ Site #_ (indicate on attached map) � STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET � � � Provide the following information for the stream reac6 under assessment: / � 1. ApplicanPs name: /✓G /� c� % 2. Evaluator's name: � L c t c .�%' 3. Date of evaluation: '� �� ! % ) 4. Time of evaluation: � / '% /� 5. Name of stream: .: Z ��<� �� 6. River basin: C� �c f�< �" 7. Approxunate drainage azea: r- SO /IG S. Stream order: � 9. Length of reach evaluated: ~/ SC� � 10. County:�j ,e ��...., .. < c 11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): /✓�/7 LatiNde(ez.34.872312): .3�.'-`�r^`°'t�'.F�,,r'+ Lotlgitude(ez.-77.5566I1): �%S,`/S,J,3i! Method bcation detecmined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach unde�r evaluation (note nearby roads and ]andmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): �,'.w�.<,,.��._ /Cr�� wA::ny.',.�.._�_ �_i t�l�' . .'IL 6.,.1�� A� ,.�� .___._�� 14. Proposed channel work 15. Recent 16. Site conditions at rime 7 17. Identify any specia] waterway classificarions {�own: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries H itat _Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters �Nutrient Sensitive Waters %- Water Supply Watershed��I� ��" 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation poin[? YES ;��f yes, estimate the water surFace area:� 19. Does channel appeaz on USGS quad map? YESj�IO. ` 20. Does channel appeaz on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO 21. Estimated watershed land use: �% Residentia] _% Commercial _% Indusirial '� 5% Agricultural '� J% Forested _% Cleazed / Logged _% Other ( 1 22. Bankfull width: �- �� 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): /-� 24. Channe] slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) /� GenUe (2 to 4%) 25. Channe] sinuosity: _Straight �Occasiona] bends _Frequent meander _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>IO%) Very sinuous _Braided channel Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by de[ernilning the mos[ appropriate ecoregion based on loca6on, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each chazacteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics iden[ified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the sheam reach under evaluation. If a chazacteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there aze obvious changes in [he chazacter of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the sheam may be divided into smaller reaches [hat display more continuity, and a sepazate fomi used [o evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and lOQ with a score of 100 represenring a stream of the highest quality. % `� Comments: �.r� �� ¢x�� J t t'r.�.�. e-� � .�'C •1`F�a.. � � I � � r f Evaluator's Signature ,. a' � � ..,�- Date � / a-'' /� � This channel evaluafion form is int nded to be used only as a guide to assist laudowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps o[ Engineers to make a preliminary assessmeot of stream quality. The total score resulfing from the completioo of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Foan subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26. -�'Forn-� am+-n�Q�� 8Il �2D(�L -�-n ►��jlcc#--f"h� S� iS�,c,ha{ �n -1'►,c� A'1 aM anc� S�� SU �'✓� m� (l�latJ� .—��Dm�S, �`t� STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mouutain � Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 �J (no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = mar poin[s) 1 2 Evidence of past human alterafion 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 `-� (extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = mas points) � 3 Riparianzone 0-6 0-4 0-5 �� no buffer = 0; conti uous wide buffer = max oints / 4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 � (extensive dischaz es = 0; no discharges = max points) 5 �5 Groundwater discharge 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4 � U (no dischaz e= 0; sprin s, seeps, wetlands, etc. = ma�c points) - r, Preseoce of adjacent floodplain � rn 6 0-4 0-4 0-2 J y (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = ma�c points) C� � Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 2 a' (deeply enirenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) � 8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 � (no wetlands = 0; laz e adiacent wetlands = max points) 9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 � (extensive channelizaUon = 0; natural meander = ma�c points) Sedimentinput ? 10 0-5 0-4 0-4 (extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points) 11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0- 4 0- 5 � (fine, homogenous = 0; lazge, diverse sizes = max points) Evidence of channel incision or widening 7 12 0-5 0-4 0-5 yyyEEF--�� dee 1 incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max oints � 13 Presence of major bank failures 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 ✓ (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = marz oints) � � 14 Root depth and density on banks 0- 3 0- 4 0- 5 F„ (no visible roots = 0; dense roots tivoughout = ma� points) - � Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber producHon � 15 0-5 0-4 0-5 (substautial impact =0; no evidence = mas points) 16 1'resence of riffle-poollripple-pool complezes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 � F no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = ma�c oints d Habitat complezity �' H 17 0-6 0-6 0-6 �,,,� Qittle or no habitat = 0; fre uent, varied habitats = ma�c points � �Canopy coverage over streambed 1 g (no shading vegetation = 0; condnuous canopy = max points) 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 j � 9 Substrate embeddedness NA• 0- 4 0- 4 �� (deeply embedded = O; loose structure = ma�c) r 20 Presence of sMeam invertebrates (see page 4) 0- 4 0- 5 0- 5 L/ � no evidence = 0� common, numetous es = mas oints � Z� Presenceofamphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 � 0 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) � 2z Presence of 6s6 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 ' � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = ma�c points) 23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0-. 5 � (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) Total Pointa Possible ]00 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 7`� `�l hese charactenst�cs are not assessetl m coastal streams. sa �.u..� 3 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: g/d, ; ProjecNSite: r�`�` ��'� �✓`'�. Latitude:�GoS" %-,.,.� '�, � 8 � Evaluator: /l L,. � County: ;j I'� � V Longitude: ,� q ,�S�d�,� ✓ �� I K 54��lM6 Total Points: Stream Determination circle one) Other,��!:� ti.� Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral IM itten3, e�ennial e.g. Quad Narhet if 2 19 or perennial il 2 30' �� -..__..--� A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = %� ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1 a� Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 3 3. Irnchannel structure: ex. riffle-poo�, step-pool, �'� � 2 3 ri le- ool se uence 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 T 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 �� 3 6. Deposilional bars or benches �� 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits ��.-� 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 ,:_�"�7 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 cLS-� 11. Second or greater order channel ,.--�-R7o = li� Yes = 3 a artifcial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. H drolo Subtotal = 12. Presence of Baseflow -' ff: `' 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria Y:�Q.,� 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 �"li.a�'? 0 15. Sediment on planls or debris 0.5 1 1.5 <... .: - 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 •`�...1.5.'� 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? =9.., Yes = 3 C. Biolo Subtotal = 18. Fibrous roots in streambed .�""3'-+ 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks c��' 1 2 3 22. Fish � 0.5 1 1.5 23. Cre�sh C4a 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians :nU',> 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae `'�`.> 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 r=�Q •perennial streams may also be identi�ied using oNer methods. See p. 35 of manual. NOiBS: /o �m �,/ �r S�<� �.- k ✓, C'�il c .�.s, , i � � `a� ��- �< - .,�� '�v .r Sketch: USACE AID# _ Sa �sr +, ��s4h. - ---- --- - — -- -- --- -- DWQ # Site #_ (indicate on attached map) -- — _ _ —__ . Isti(,�� Q STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessmeut: �f 2. Evalua[or's name: ^- L �..7 6-�' ! 4. Time of evaluation: !!7 d/�i 6. River basin: ��i� ��. � 8. Stream order: G� 10. County: 17�e .,-<��.rG 12. Subdivision name (if any): /1% i A 1. Applicant's name: /I�!-'��C.'�� .� 3. Date of evaluation: 8�� /�� 5. Name of stream: � Z K'r.a. �, .7 7. Approxima[e drainage azea: /`� SD /�G 9. Length of reach evaluated: y" 1� ii � 11. Site coordinates (if Imown): prefer in decimal degrees. ��'-••1 Latitude(ex.34.872312): 3�•�Ot'1pQ Longi[ude(ez.-77.556611): '%S �So'�d J � Method location detem�ined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note neazby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) loca[ion): �, I i k�..,..i�.�i��c l�C.�s.� a�vrJx�'<<_�f !., �� eN;l� :r.�"�� .� :'-d t�«,��.�'� 14. Proposed channel work 15. Recent > 16. Site conditions a[ time of visit: /'��{ c/4 ✓ 17. Identify any special waterway classifica6ons laiown: _Secrion ] 0 _Tidal Waters _Essenrial Fisheries Habjtat �+�- _Trou[ Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters �N�[rient Sensirive Waters xWater Supply Watershed �(I-I�(✓��>G 18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES �O If yes, estima[e the water surface azea: 19. Does channel appeaz on USGS quad map? YES � 20. Does channel appeaz on USDA Soil Survey? YE O 21. Estimated watershed land use: �% Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial �� % Agricultural �% Forested _% Cleazed / Logged _% Other ( �/ ) 22. Bankfull width: `� .�0 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): �- % 24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 ro 2%) � Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%) 25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight `�' Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel Instructfons for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by detemuning [he mos[ appropriate ecoregion based on location, [errain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each chazacteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics iden[ified in the worksheet. Scores should retlect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, en[er 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanarion in the comment section. Where there aze obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a sepazate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a slream of the highest quality. j j 1 Evaluator's Signature %� �'��. ��'� � -"�' Date �J�v � �, T6is channel evaluatlon form is int�oded to be used only as a guide to assist laodowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of t6is form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigafion ratio or requirement. Form subject [o change - version 06/03. To Comment, please ca11 9 1 9-87 6-844 1 x 26. -�'�o rw, a-��tr� gl � I�� s� -!a r�t��-��- � i s�d�r �.►�,� �l�yrr�w Su i � Sl.wve�- �� l `t (ol�� ' �YY'��rvtiGh, %�iL STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmoot Mountain 1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 (no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = ma�c points) �� 2 Evidence of past human alteration Q_ 6 0— 5 0— 5 � (extensive alterafion = 0; no alteration = ma�c points) 3 Riparianzoue 0-6 0-4 0-5 d no buffer = 0; conti uous, wide buffer = max oints 4 Evideoce of nutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 � (extensive dischazges = 0; no dischaz es = max points) .� 5 Groundwater discharge 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4 U (no dischazge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = ma�c points) i.. Presence of adjacent floodplain I rn 6 0-4 0-4 0-2 �a (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) a � Entrenchment / floodplain access 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 (de 1 entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = mas points) � 8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 (no wetlands = O; lazge adjacent wetlands = maac points) C� 9 Channel sinuosity 0— 5 0— 4 0— 3 C (extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = ma�c points 10 Sedimentinput 0-5 0-4 0-4 1 (extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = mac points) cr� ll Size & diversity of chanoel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 �/ (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maac points) 12 Evidence of channel incisiou or widening 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 ' ,'� de 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = mac oints — j13 Presence of major bank failures 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 _ � (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = mac points) � � 4 Root depth and densily on banks 0— 3 0— 4 0— 5 ? E„� (no visible roots = 0; dense roots tUroughout = ma�c points) � 15 Impact by agriwlture, livestock, or timber producHon 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 (substantial un act =0; no evidence = mac poin[s) �� 16 Presence of riffle-pooVripple-pool complezes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 `` no riffles/ri les or ools = 0� well-develo ed = mas oints � �Habitat compleaity E 17 0-6 0-6 0-6 � i„i (Gttle or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = ma�c points �Canopy coverage over sMeambed _� 18 (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points) 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 �, 19 Substrateembeddedness NA• 0-4 0-4 � (deepl embedded = O; loose structure = mas) � 20 Presence oi stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 � no evidence = 0� common, numerous es = maac oints /�" [� Z 1 Presence of amphibians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �'� O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maac oints) � 22 Presenceoffish 0-4 0-4 0-4 �% � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = mas ints) � Evidence of wildlife use _ . _ _ 0 �— 6 ... .0-�S — � . 0 —.5 � (no ev�dence = 0; abundant ev�dence = max pomt§ Total Points Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) ^� � ' 7 hese charactensGcs are not assessed m coastal streams. NC DWQ Stream Identif Date: ej'� � �r,; � � Evaluator: � � tn�„''.G Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent �J /� if2 19 oroerennial N2 30• �� emucmi wwues aie nui iatnq see mscusxwns in B. Hydrology (Subtotal = r, . S� ) 12. Presence of Baseflow 13. iron oxidizing bacteria 14. Leaf litter 15. Sediment on plants or debris 1 fi. Organic debris lines or piles 17. Soil-based evidence of high water table7 C. Biology (Subtotal = !� , � ) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 20. MaCrobenthos (note diversity and abundanc 21. Aquatic Mollusks 22. Fish 23. Cra�sh 24. Amphibians 25. Algae 26. WeUand plants in streambed 'perennial streams may also be identifed using o �� , .� ��:' . .4.',� GJe!'yC,� �s�,;ss� ic-� �� ProjecUSite: _ /tatitude:� o�y,� n'. �.c.... � G- h.� County: i1' Longitude: � �, ��Sd � %f Stream Determination (cir�laone)� Other (;,,,.rl. �� ,� Ephemeral Intermi@ent�- �.erennial- e.g. QuadName�. � rnanuai U 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 0.5 �- 1 G.S- 1 2 �- 2 "�� 0 1 0 1 0 0.5 �b= 0.5 0 0.5 �=� - � 0.5 FACW = methods. See p. 35 of manual. _ _ � 1 1 1 1 1 1 = 1.'sC 3 0 1.5 1.5 =3 0 0 0 1.5 1.5 1.5 Sketch: -�-I USACE AID# DWQ Site #_ (indicate on attached map) ��`;; ;,. STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the following informatlon for the stream reach under assessment: 1. ApplicanYs name: �✓� � 2. EvaluatoPs name: �. 4a05�"G 3. Date of evaluarion: g/a )/i � 4. Time of evaluation: �, ; en� t�M 5. Name of stream: sf� /1% t�h.,�.y- .Sd .'� �,-�_ �=�,. s�� .� .; 6. River basin: ��i.^.,� ^r.,� ✓ ' �-f � 3 H�/ 7. Approximate drainage azea: 7�0 5�� 8. Stream order: 9. Leng[h of reach evaluated: "' ��.'� � IO. C011Rty: ��ls ��.e �.G 5 11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):__�/%�� r LatiNde (ez. 34.872312): 3�, Op �/ l Ce S I,ongitude (ez.-77.556611): � 7 S, `l �i al `""! 3 Method locadon detemilned (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other_ 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying y (( r% / � 'I r A�....i-SV'f'b �'�v/s/ L::�.^n.a.... � �R.l.. �.l .,n'�...t .=r�,YM. 1T %1 14. Proposed channel work (if 15. Recent weather conditions: 16. Site conditions at time location): 17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Wa[ers _Essen[ial Fisheries Habitat _Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters � Nutrient Sensitive Waters �C Water Supply Watershed �(I-Il� 18. Is [here a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation poin[? YE NO If yes, estimate the water surface azea: ��D,� �u": -' 19. Does chacu�el appeaz on USGS quad map? ��.ES� NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ,;�� NO 21. Estimated watershed land use: ! o% Residentia] S% Commercial �%a Industrial ��'/o Agricultural !� % Forested �% Cleazed / Logged S% Other ( � 22. Bankfull width: =�' �d � 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): � 6 24. Channel slope down center of stream: �C Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>IO%) 25. Channel sinuosity: _Shaight �Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel InstrucNons for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropria[e ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be swred using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each chazacteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in t6e commen[ section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a s[ream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more conrinuity, and a sepazate form used [o evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of ]00 represenring a stream of [he highest qualiTy. Evaluator's Signature_ /� �,�'�� J . - t .. •�' Date �/�j �/ i This channel evaluation form is in nded to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and envi onmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Arroy Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quatity. The total score resulfing from the completioo of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a par6cular mifigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26. STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET i �r # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain 1 Presence of flow / persisteut pools in stream 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 (no flow or sa[uration = 0; stron flow = mar points) �i 2 Evidence of past human alteration 0— 6 0— 5 0— 5 �/ (extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points) "'I 3 Riparianzone 0-6 0-4 0-5 �/ no buffer = 0; conti uous, wide buffer = max ints 4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0— 5 0— 4 0— 4 � (extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maac points) a 5 Groundwater discharge 0— 3 0— 4 0— 4 r U(no dischazAe = 0; springs, seeps, weflands, etc. = max points) r.� Presence of adjacent floodplain z � 6 0-4 0-4 0-2 .,; (no flood lain = 0; extensive floodplain = ma�c poinu) � Entreuchment / floodplain access 0— 5 0— 4 0— 2 I p" (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = mvc points) 8 Presence of adjacent weUands 0— 6 0— 4 0— 2 (no wetlands = O; lazge adjacent wetlands = mas points) � 9 Channel sinuosity 0— S 0— 4 0— 3 z (extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = ma�c points) J 10 Sedimentinput 0-5 0-4 0-4 I (extensive de osition= O; little or no sediment = maac points) 11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0— 4 0— 5 � (fine, homogenous = 0; lazge, diverse sizes = max points) 12 Evidence of channel incision or wideniug 0— 5 0— 4 0— 5 �?+ de 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints E"' Presence of ma or bank failures a 13 � 0-5 0-5 0-5 % i„i (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points) ✓ � 14 Root depth and density on banks 0— 3 0— 4 0— 5 �. (no visible roots = 0; dense roots tUroughout = cnax points) .� � Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production i 15 0-5 0-4 0-5 (substanrial impact =0; no evidence = max points) 16 Presence of riftle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0— 3 0— 5 0— 6 � F no riffles/ri les or ools = 0; well-develo ed = ma�c oints d EIabitat compleaity �„E",i 1� little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points) 0— 6 0— 6 0— 6 4 �Canopy coverage over streambed / / 18 (no shadin vegeta6on = 0; continuous canopy = ma�c points 0— 5 0— 5 0— 5 � 19 Substrateembeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 �' (deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = maac) .i 20 Presence of stmam invertebrates (see page 4) 0— 4 0— 5 0— 5 � � no evidence = 0; common numerous es = maac oints � �% 21 Presence of amphibians 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 � � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maac oints) a � 22 Presence of fish 0— 4 0— 4 0— 4 �f � (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 4 � Evidence of wildlife use 0— 6 0-5 0— 5 — � (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) � Total Points Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) l' --.; * These charac[eristics aze not assessed in coastal streams.