The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20190141 Ver 1_Bridge 235 Division 7 packet_20190130FIGURE 1STUDY AREA prepared by:date:GUILFORD COUNT Y, NC 0 2,000 4,0001,000 Feet 17BP.7.R.107BRIDGE 235 OVERBIG AL AMANCE CREEK AUGUS T2017 PROJECT LOCATION35.983910, -79.657078 Legend Study Area FIGURE 2USGS TOPOGRAPHIC prepared by:date:GUILFORD COUNT Y, NC 0 800 1,600400Feet 17BP.7.R.107BRIDGE 235 OVERBIG AL AMANCE CREEK AUGUS T2017 Legend Study Area WkE EnC CoA EnC MhC2 EnB EnC FIGURE 3SOILS prepared by:date:GUILFORD COUNT Y, NC 0 150 30075Feet 17BP.7.R.107BRIDGE 235 OVERBIG AL AMANCE CREEK AUGUS T2017 Legend Study Area Congaree loam, 0-2% slope, frequently flooded Enon fine sandy loam, 2-6% slope Enon fine sandy loam, 6-10% slope Mecklenburg sandy clay loam, 6-10% slope, moderately eroded Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott complex, 15-45% slope CoA EnB EnC MhC2 WkE Bi gAl amanceCr eekSA SB SC WA Inset FIGURE 4JURSIDICTIONAL RESOURCES prepared by:date: # GUILFORD COUNTY, NC 0 300150Feet 17BP.7.R.107BRIDGE 2 35 OVERBIG AL AMAN CE CREEK MAY2018 Legend Wetlands Interm ittent Stream Perennial Stream Culvert Study Area WB SC SB FIGURE 5LIDAR prepared by:date:GUILFORD COUNT Y, NC 0 150 30075Feet 17BP.7.R.107BRIDGE 235 OVERBIG AL AMANCE CREEK AUGUST2017 Legend Study Area DEM ElevationHigh : 690.027 Low : 593.399 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Depression in wetland. Located adjacent to small stromwater BMP. May receive overflow from BMP. Bridge No. 235 over Big Alamance Creek Guilford 20 Feb, 2018 NCDOT WA wet R. Lepsic floodplain concave 0-1 LRR P 35.985078 -79.659065 NAD83 Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott complex PFO ✔ ✔ ✔✔ ✔ ✔ NC ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 3 0 ✔ Thin layer of sediments shows evidence3 of past standing water. ✔ ✔ ✔ Version 2.0 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) WA wet 2 2 100% 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 30' x 30' 0% 30' x 30' Platanus occidentalis 15 15 Y Y FAC FACW Liquidambar styraciflua 30' x 30' 0% 30' x 30' 0% 30% ✔ Very sparse vegetation. Only saplings trees present. ✔ Version 2.0 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: Version 2.0 WA wet 0-12+ 10YR 3/1 80 4.5YR 4/6 20 C PL sandy cl cl=clay loam ✔ ✔ 86$UP\&RUSVRI(QJLQHHUV (DVWHUQ0RXQWDLQVDQG3LHGPRQW±9HUVLRQ :(7/$1''(7(50,1$7,21'$7$)250±(DVWHUQ0RXQWDLQVDQG3LHGPRQW 3URMHFW6LWH&LW\&RXQW\6DPSOLQJ'DWH $SSOLFDQW2ZQHU6WDWH6DPSOLQJ3RLQW ,QYHVWLJDWRUV6HFWLRQ7RZQVKLS5DQJH /DQGIRUPKLOOVORSHWHUUDFHHWF/RFDOUHOLHIFRQFDYHFRQYH[QRQH6ORSH 6XEUHJLRQ/55RU0/5$/DW/RQJ'DWXP 6RLO0DS8QLW1DPH1:,FODVVLILFDWLRQ $UHFOLPDWLFK\GURORJLFFRQGLWLRQVRQWKHVLWHW\SLFDOIRUWKLVWLPHRI\HDU"<HV1R,IQRH[SODLQLQ5HPDUNV $UH9HJHWDWLRQ6RLORU+\GURORJ\VLJQLILFDQWO\GLVWXUEHG"$UH³1RUPDO&LUFXPVWDQFHV´SUHVHQW"<HV1R $UH9HJHWDWLRQ6RLORU+\GURORJ\QDWXUDOO\SUREOHPDWLF",IQHHGHGH[SODLQDQ\DQVZHUVLQ5HPDUNV 6800$5<2)),1',1*6±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ridge No. 235 over Big Alamance Creek Guilford 5/23/2018 NCDOT NC WB wet A. James 1 LRR P 35.983055 -79.656036 NAD83 Enon fine sandy loam PFO ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ Seep at confluence of SC and SB. ✔✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔0 ✔0 ✔ 86$UP\&RUSVRI(QJLQHHUV (DVWHUQ0RXQWDLQVDQG3LHGPRQW±9HUVLRQ 9(*(7$7,21)RXU6WUDWD±8VHVFLHQWLILFQDPHVRISODQWV6DPSOLQJ3RLQW $EVROXWH'RPLQDQW,QGLFDWRU 7UHH6WUDWXP3ORWVL]H&RYHU6SHFLHV"6WDWXV 7RWDO&RYHU 6DSOLQJ6KUXE6WUDWXP3ORWVL]H 7RWDO&RYHU +HUE6WUDWXP3ORWVL]H 7RWDO&RYHU :RRG\9LQH6WUDWXP3ORWVL]H 7RWDO&RYHU 'RPLQDQFH7HVWZRUNVKHHW 1XPEHURI'RPLQDQW6SHFLHV 7KDW$UH2%/)$&:RU)$&$ 7RWDO1XPEHURI'RPLQDQW 6SHFLHV$FURVV$OO6WUDWD % 3HUFHQWRI'RPLQDQW6SHFLHV 7KDW$UH2%/)$&:RU)$&$% 3UHYDOHQFH,QGH[ZRUNVKHHW 7RWDO&RYHURI0XOWLSO\E\ 2%/VSHFLHV [ )$&:VSHFLHV [ )$&VSHFLHV [ )$&8VSHFLHV [ 83/VSHFLHV [ &ROXPQ7RWDOV$ % 3UHYDOHQFH,QGH[ %$ +\GURSK\WLF9HJHWDWLRQ,QGLFDWRUV 5DSLG7HVWIRU+\GURSK\WLF9HJHWDWLRQ 'RPLQDQFH7HVWLV! 3UHYDOHQFH,QGH[LV 0RUSKRORJLFDO$GDSWDWLRQV3URYLGHVXSSRUWLQJ GDWDLQ5HPDUNVRURQDVHSDUDWHVKHHW 3UREOHPDWLF+\GURSK\WLF9HJHWDWLRQ([SODLQ ,QGLFDWRUVRIK\GULFVRLODQGZHWODQGK\GURORJ\PXVW EHSUHVHQWXQOHVVGLVWXUEHGRUSUREOHPDWLF 'HILQLWLRQVRI)RXU9HJHWDWLRQ6WUDWD 7UHH±:RRG\SODQWVH[FOXGLQJYLQHVLQFPRU PRUHLQGLDPHWHUDWEUHDVWKHLJKW'%+UHJDUGOHVVRI KHLJKW 6DSOLQJ6KUXE±:RRG\SODQWVH[FOXGLQJYLQHVOHVV WKDQLQ'%+DQGJUHDWHUWKDQIWPWDOO +HUE±$OOKHUEDFHRXVQRQZRRG\SODQWVUHJDUGOHVV RIVL]HDQGZRRG\SODQWVOHVVWKDQIWWDOO :RRG\YLQH±$OOZRRG\YLQHVJUHDWHUWKDQIWLQ KHLJKW +\GURSK\WLF 9HJHWDWLRQ 3UHVHQW"<HV1R 5HPDUNV,QFOXGHSKRWRQXPEHUVKHUHRURQDVHSDUDWHVKHHW WB wet 20 30x30 YES FACW - - - - - - Fraxinus pensylvanica - - 4 4 100 - - - - - - 20 30x30 YESLindera benzoin 10 FAC - - - - - - 00 - - 0 - - - - - - ✔ - - - - 10 30x30 Microstegium vimineum YES40 FAC Toxicodendron radicans 15 YES FAC Rosa multiflora 10 NO FACU - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 65 - - - - - - - - - - - ✔ 0 - 86$UP\&RUSVRI(QJLQHHUV (DVWHUQ0RXQWDLQVDQG3LHGPRQW±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wet 0-2 10YR 4/2 2-12+ 10YR 4/1 80 100 10YR 5/8 20 C M sandy clay sandy clay ✔ ✔ US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Slightly upslope of WA between WA and Alamance Church Road. Bridge No. 235 over Big Alamance Creek Guilford 20 Feb, 2018 NCDOT WA up R. Lepsic floodplain concave 0-1 LRR P 35.985078 -79.659065 NAD83 Wilkes-Poindexter-Wynott complex ✔ ✔ ✔✔ ✔ ✔ NC ✔ Hydrology indicators not present. ✔ ✔ ✔ Version 2.0 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) WA up 4 8 50% 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 30' x 30' Liriodendron tulipifera Quercus falcata Oxydendrum arboreum Acer rubrum 15 10 20 10 55% Y Y Y N FAC FACU FACU UPL 30' x 30' Acer rubrum Carpinus caroliniana 10 10 10 Y Y Y FAC FAC FAC Liquidambar styraciflua 30' x 30' Lonicera japonica 15 30 45% Y Y FACU FACU Rosa multiflora 30' x 30' 0% 30% Portion of area seems to be maintained. Affecting herbaceous vegetation. ✔ Version 2.0 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: Version 2.0 WA up 0-4 4-12+ 10YR 4/4 10YR 4/6 100 100 loam sandy loam ✔ Hydric soil indicators not present.