WQ0003191_ARO complete file_20190130

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
GROUNDWATER SECTION
March 4, 1991
,.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bob Cheek, Permits and Compliance Unit Supervisor
Raleigh Central Office
THROUGH: Donald R. Link, Regional Groundwater Supervisor //(��
Asheville Regional Office /0
0
FROM: Laura Kay Dechant, Hydrogeologist
Asheville Regional Office
SUBJECT: Deletion of Groundwater Monitoring Requirements Request
Permit No. WQ0003191
Renewal Permit No. 12456
Smith & Sons Paving Company, Incorporated
Pineola Paving Plant
Avery County, North Carolina
Attached is a request from Smith & Sons Paving Company, Incorporated for
deletion of groundwater monitoring requirements from the subject permit.
The wastewater recycle system is no longer in operation, and a permit from
the Air Quality Section for operation of a baghouse is pending issuance.
Please contact me if you foresee any problems for deleting the groundwater
monitoring requirements from Permit No. WQ0003191.
LKD/gc
Attachment

Smith & Sons paving Co, Inc.
P.O. Box 250 Hwy. 181
Pineola, North Carolina 28662
Feburary 20, 1991
North Carolina Dept. Of Enviromental,
Health And Natural Resources
Attn: rts. Kay Dechant
59 Woodfin Place
Ashville, North Carolina 28801
Dear !!s. Dechant,
At this time Smith & Sons paving Co, Inc. has submitted a
request to install a baghouse at our asphalt ficility in
Pineola, North Carolina. We are awaiting a responce from
Air Quality Control division. We are requesting that all
ground water requirements for permit # WQ0003191 please be
deleted as we are closing our recycle ponds, per the
instalation of a baghouse upon receipt of our permit.
Thank you for all cooperation concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
V-
}} �F d
Bruce C. Smith
Smith & Sons Paving Co, Inc.
FEB 2 21991

19
State of North Carolina Asheville W"I'la"Office
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources ,Asheville, North Carolir}a
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
June 29, 1990
Mr. Bruce C. Smith, Secretary/Treasurer
Smith & Sons Paving Co., Inc.
P. O. Box 250
Pineola, NC 28662
George T. Everett, Ph.D.
Director
Subject: Permit No. WQ0003191
Renewal Permit No. 12456
Recycle Ponds
Pineola Paving Plant
Avery County
Dear Mr.Smith:
In accordance with your application received March 5,1990, we are forwarding herewith
Permit No. WQ0003191, dated June 29,1990, to Smith & Sons Paving Co., Inc. for the subject
wastewater recycle system.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until May 31, 1995, and shall be
subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein. Please pay particular attention to the
monitoring requirements in this permit. Failure to establish an adequate system for collecting and
maintaining the required operational information will result in future compliance problems.
Issuance of this permit hereby voids Permit No. 12456 issued November 18, 1984.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable to you,
you have the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within 30 days
following receipt of this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming
to Chapter 150B of North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P.O. Box 11666, Raleigh, NC 27604. Unless such demands are made this permit shall
be final and binding.
One set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If you need
additional information concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Lindsay L. Mize at 919/
733-5083.
cc:
Y�
Avery County Health Department
A'shgVille Regional 0"
Groundwater Section Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
RECYCLE SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North
Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Smith & Sons Paving Co., Inc.
Avery County
FOR THE
continued operation of settling ponds and recycle system consisting of one (1) 36 feet x 8 feet
settling pond and one (1) 33 feet x 8 feet settling pond connected in series, one (1) 125 GPM
pump and approximately 200 feet of 2 -inch force main to convey treated water back to scrubber to
serve Smith & Son Paving Company Asphalt Plant with no discharge of wastes to the surface
waters, pursuant to the application received March 5, 1990 and in conformity with the project
plan, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and approved by the Department
of Environment, Health and Natural Resources and considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until May 31, 1995, and shall be
subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
1. This permit shall become voidable unless the facilities are constructed in accordance with
the conditions of this permit, the approved plans, specifications, and other supporting
data.
2. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes described in
the application and other supporting data.
3. The facilities shall be properly maintained and operated at all times.
4. This permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the facilities to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit request must be
submitted to the Division of Environmental Management accompanied by an application
fee, documentation from the parties involved, and other supporting materials as may be
appropriate. The approval of the request will be considered on its merits and may or may
not be approved.
5. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those as
may be required by this Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement
wastewater treatment or disposal facilities.

1

a
The sludge generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed of in accordance with
General Statute 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management.
7. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for damages
to surface or groundwaters resulting from the operation of this facility.
8. The facilities shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to
prevent the discharge of any wastewater resulting from the operation of this facility.
9. Diversion or bypassing of untreated wastewater from the treatment facilities is prohibited.
10. Freeboard in the settling ponds shall not be less than one (1) foot at any time.
11. Any monitoring deemed necessary by the Division of Environmental Management to insure
surface and ground water protection will be established and an acceptable sampling
reporting schedule shall be followed.
12. Adequate inspection, maintenance, and cleaning shall be provided by the Permittee to
insure proper operation of the subject facilities.
13. The Permittee or his designee shall inspect the wastewater recycle facilities to prevent
malfunctions and deterioration, operator errors and discharges which may cause or lead to
the release of wastes to the environment, a threat to human health, or a nuisance. The
Permittee shall keep an inspection log or summary including at least the date and time of
inspection, observations made, and any maintenance, repairs, or corrective actions taken
by the Permittee. This log of inspections shall be maintained by the Permittee for a period
of three years from the date of the inspection and shall be made available upon request to
the Division of Environmental Management or other permitting authority.
14. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property,
premises or place on or related to the recycle system at any reasonable time for the
purpose of determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that
must be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of
groundwater, surface water, or leachate.
15. The annual administering and compliance fee must be paid by the Permittee within thirty
(30) days after being billed by. the Division. Failure to pay the fee accordingly may cause
the Division to initiate action to revoke this permit as specified by 15 NCAC 2H .0205
(c)(4).
16. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may subject the
Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Environmental Management in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6.
17. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with any and
all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by other government
agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
18. A set of approved plans and specifications for the subject project must be retained by the
Permittee for the life of this project.
2

19. Noncompliance Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the Asheville Regional Office,
telephone no. 704/251-6208, as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on
the next working day following the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of any
of the following:
a. Any occurrence at the wastewater treatment facility which results in the treatment of
significant amounts of wastes which are abnormal in quantity or characteristic, such
as the dumping of the contents of a basin or tank; the known passage of a slug of
hazardous substance through the facility; or any other unusual circumstances.
b. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that render the facility
incapable of adequate wastewater treatment such as mechanical or electrical failures
of pumps, aerators, compressors, etc.
C. Any failure of a pumping station, sewer line, or treatment facility resulting in a
by-pass directly to receiving waters without treatment of all or any portion of the
influent to such station or facility.
d. Any time that self-monitoring information indicates that the facility is not in
compliance with its permit limitations.
Persons reporting. such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter
form within 15 days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report must outline
the actions taken or proposed to be taken to ensure that the problem does not recur.
20. The Permittee, at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of this permit, shall request its
extension. Upon receipt of the request, the Commission will review the adequacy of the
facilities described therein, and if warranted, will extend the permit for such period of time
and under such conditions and limitations as it may deem appropriate.
GROUNDWATER REQUIREMENTS
21. Within 90 days of permit issuance, three (3) monitor wells, one (1) upgradient and two (2)
downgradient, must be installed to monitor groundwater quality. The well shall be
constructed such that the water level in the well is never above or below the screened
(open) portion of the well at any time during the year. However, the location and
construction details for these wells shall be approved by the Asheville Regional Office,
from which a well construction permit must be obtained.
22. The monitor wells must be sampled initially after construction (and prior to waste disposal
operations) and thereafter every April, August, and December for the following parameters:
TDS (500.0) TOC
pH (6.5-8.5 standard units) Water Level
aldehydes (Formaldehyde, Isobutyraldehyde, N-Butyraldehyde, Isovaleraldehyde)
The measurement of water level must be made prior to sampling for the remaining
parameters.
3

The measuring points (top of well casing) of all monitoring wells shall be surveyed relative
to mean sea level (M. S. L.). The depth of water in each well shall be measured from the
surveyed point on the top of the casing. The water level elevations shall then be determined
relative to M. S. L..
The numbers in parentheses represent the maximum allowable concentrations in
groundwater for the various analytical parameters, as specified in 15 NCAC 2L
[Groundwater Classifications and Standards]. Unless otherwise noted, the concentrations
are given in milligrams per liter.
If TOC concentrations greater than 10 mg/1 are detected in any downgradient monitoring
well, additional sampling and analysis must be conducted to identify the individual
constituents comprising this TOC concentration. If the TOC concentration as measured in
the background monitor well exceeds 10 mg/l, this concentration will be taken to represent
the naturally occurring TOC concentration. Any exceedances of this naturally occurring
TOC concentration in the downgradient wells shall be subject to the additional sampling
and analysis as described above.
The results of the sampling and analysis shall be sent to the N.C. Division of
Environmental Management on Form GW -59 (Compliance Monitoring Report Form)
every May, September, and January.
23. The Compliance Boundary for the disposal system is specified by regulations in 15
NCAC 2L, Classifications and Water Quality Standards applicable to the groundwater of
North Carolina. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards beyond the
Compliance Boundary is subject to penalty provisions applicable under General
Statute 143-215.6(1)a. The sale of property, by the Permittee, which is
within or contiguous to the disposal system site may alter location of the Compliance
Boundary.
For facilities permitted on or after December 30, 1983, the Compliance Boundary is
established at the lesser of 250 feet from the perimeter of the waste disposal site, or 50 feet
within the property boundary.
If the title to any property which may affect the location of the Compliance Boundary is
changed, the permittee shall notify the Division Director within 14 days. The Director shall
then establish a modified Compliance Boundary which will be done as a modification to the
Permit.
The REVIEW BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by regulations in 15
NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. A REVIEW BOUNDARY is
established around disposal systems midway between the Compliance Boundary and the
perimeter of the waste disposal area. When the concentration of any substance equals or
exceeds the maximum allowable concentration of that substance at the REVIEW
BOUNDARY, as determined by monitoring, the permittee shall either (i) demonstrate,
through predictive calculations or modeling, that natural site conditions, facility design and
operational controls will prevent a violation of standards at the Compliance Boundary; or,
(ii) submit a plan for the alteration of existing site conditions, facility design or operational
controls that will prevent a violation of standards at the Compliance Boundary, and
implement that plan upon its approval by the Director.
24. Any additional groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed necessary by the Division, shall
be provided.
25. Issuance of this permit voids Permit No. 12456 issued November 18, 1984.
M

Permit issued this the 29th day of June, 1990
rNORIH CAROLINA IAVO
�-/V rV""�
George T. Ever(
Division of Envi
By Authority of
'AL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
tal Management Commission
5

FROM F A. h & S;j n 2
TO 17f '516452
Smith & Sons Paving Company, Inc.
President - Samuel 0. Smith P. 0. Box 4.4 — Fineola, NC 28662 [phone]
1-3
T`c., , -, IM.
p . 0 1
15 SENT
TOTAL VAG'IE __3
VI

FROM TO 170`516452
Smith & Soas Paving Co, Inc,
P.O. Box 250 Hwy. 181
Pineola, North Carolina 28662
I
-e
- :,t. A, 1990
Moth Carol.ina Dept. Of Enviromental,
Realth, And Natural ReEources
Ground Water Section
Attn! Mr. Bob Cheek
P, O. Box 27681`
Raliegh, North Carolina 2761,1-7687
Rt: Ilirleola Asphalt plzln'--
��
�,q-e c)ur ourrentwet vias -'h syztevit with
t -ie ulatirlq
n i�aq oill iv-tAe,,4se I need for; circ
h�" �J n .Y..! s !^;;h o -1 � I c- G.It ox.- t h e e S 3 d o f 0 u -r P Ll v 1. i -E
De cs�mbe r
!'17 �,t ro u ' i ct t h P- I S th o f L
C,,oncevn-ing thi6 xat-Uiar.
'S J' � I C. '� t e, 1 y ,
ai j-.� C/ IE„G". e '2�
Paving co, 111C.
P.02

FROM S -t- ns TO 17@A516452 P, 07.
,mith & sons Paving Co. I=
PQ, Box 250 SWy. 1SI
pineola, NorLh Carolina 28662
nowamber 11, 1990
North varolina Dept, ot Enviromental,
Raavcn And Naturai VesOutces
ALLn. Ks. Kdv DeChant
09 woodfin
A,nville, Worth Carolina 2880-1
947 Pait 4 WQ0003191
Recycle Ponds
Dean Hn. Dechant,
efcyance to out telephone convmrsation of RAW December
1990, please kind enclomed COPY Of letter Send LO Mr, DO)
oweek on 6epV 14. 1990 in referance to closing our recYui cir,
pond ana installing a bag house to car firAlity. I aw UPMW
to iind his reaponce at Lhib time. I am sure it you talk
,,,h ,, h, h,w jubued to us 5ome coraspondanne conCernin'
this matter. Sorry It has taken a long time to gZA
,,tozmaujon to you has been very busy a$ this is oar lasT-
week jur tbr Paving year. we will he installing OUr baq
House in the winter as weather pOrWUS-
Should you need any additionaL intormation concerning this
,,ttex please feel free to call ut at 704-733-5226
Thank YOU jar all too,eration ooncerning this matter,
sincerely,
y
C. Smith
Smith & sons Paving CO3 Inc.
TOTAL P.03

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
May 31, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: Don Safrit
THROUGH: Bob Cheek
FROM: Jeff Lautier C4
SUBJECT: Smith & Sons Paving Company, Inc.
Wastewater Lagoon
Permit Renewal
Avery County
WQ0003191/GW90087
(Mark Hawes: DEM SERG Review Engineer)
The Groundwater Section has reviewed the subject permit
renewal request and recommends reissuance of the permit with the
following conditions:
1. Within 90 days of permit issuance, three (3) monitor
wells, one (1) upgradient and two (2) downgradient,
shall be installed to monitor groundwater quality. The
well(s) shall be constructed such that the water level
in the well is never above or below the screened (open)
portion of the well at any time during the year.
However, the exact location and construction details
for these wells shall be approved by the Asheville
Regional Office, from which a well construction permit
must be obtained.
2. The monitor wells shall be sampled initially after
construction and thereafter every April, August and
December for the following parameters:
TDS (500.0) TOC
pH (6.5-8.5 standard units) Water Level
aldehydes (Formaldehyde, Isobutyraldehyde,
N-Butyraldehyde, Isovaleraldehyde)
The measurement of water level must be made prior to
sampling for the remaining parameters.
1900
Groundwater Section
Asheville Revlonal Office

The measuring points (top of well casing) of all
monitoring wells shall be surveyed relative to mean sea
level (M.S.L). The depth of water in each well shall
be measured from the surveyed point on the top of the
casing. The water level elevations shall then be
determined relative to M.S.L..
The numbers in parentheses represent the maximum
allowable concentrations in groundwater for the various
analytical parameters, as specified in 15 NCAC 2L
[Groundwater Classifications and Standards]. Unless
otherwise specified, the units for these concentrations
are expressed as milligrams per liter.
If TOC concentrations greater than 10 mg/1 are detected
in any downgradient monitoring well, additional
sampling and analysis must be conducted to identify the
individual constituents comprising this TOC
concentration. If the TOC concentration as measured in
the background monitor well exceeds 10 mg/l, this
concentration will be taken to represent the naturally
occurring TOC concentration. Any exceedances of this
naturally occurring TOC concentration in the
downgradient wells shall be subject to the additional
sampling and analysis as described above.
The results of the sampling and analysis shall be sent
to the N.C. Division of Environmental Management on
Form GW -59 [Compliance Monitoring Report Form] every
May, September and January.
3. The Compliance Boundary for the disposal system is
specified by regulations in 15 NCAC 2L, Groundwater
Classifications and Standards. An exceedance of
Groundwater Quality Standards beyond the Compliance
Boundary is subject to the penalty provisions
applicable under General Statute 143-215.6(1)a. The
sale of property, by the Permittee, which is within or
contiguous to the disposal site, may alter the location
of the Compliance Boundary.
For facilities permitted on or after December 30, 1983,
the Compliance Boundary is established at the lesser of
250 feet from the perimeter of the waste disposal area,
or 50 feet within the property boundary.
If the title to any property which may affect the
location of the Compliance Boundary is changed, the
Permittee shall notify the DEM Director within 14 days.
The Director shall then establish a modified Compliance
Boundary which will be done as a modification to the
Permit.

The REVIEW BOUNDARY for the disposal system is
specified by regulations in 15 NCAC 2L, Groundwater
Classifications and Standards. A REVIEW BOUNDARY is
established around disposal systems midway between the
Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the waste
disposal area. When the concentration of any substance
equals or exceeds the maximum allowable concentration
of that substance at the REVIEW BOUNDARY, as determined
by monitoring, the permittee shall either (i)
demonstrate, through predictive calculations or
modeling, that natural site conditions, facility design
and operational controls will prevent a violation of
standards at the Compliance Boundary; or, (ii) submit a
plan for the alteration of existing site conditions,
facility design or operational controls that will
prevent a violation of standards at the Compliance
Boundary, and implement that plan upon its approval by
the Director.
4. Any additional groundwater quality monitoring, as
deemed necessary by the Division, shall be provided.
JL/ja
cc: Don Link
Central Files
Permit Issuance Files

� - � _
� i
v ��-

GROUNDWATER SECTION GW
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RECORD OF WASTE DISPOSAL PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW
REVIEW BY .,�ac� A'l'f aw;1_L DATE G f = FIELD INVESTIGATION? (Y/N )
FACILITY NAME 5ai COUNTY a err
LOCATION 4 S / /S/ FS v V/
TYPE OF DISPOSAL SYSTEM ( LAGOON, ETC.) Zza 1,126 A DESIGN CAP. ( GPD) �
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY fYl elf l
`. 11A
l
SIZE OF IMPOUNDMENT (FT. SQ) 164 _33 - I gX 31, & / OR SIZE OF APPLICATION AREA
WASTE SOURCE: 0 MUNI SLUDGE MUN. W. WATER []PRIMARY SECONDARY [] TERTIARY
IND. SLUDGE [DIND.' W. WATER OTHERS
DISTANCE FROM WASTE - SOURCE TO NEAREST: STREAM FT., WELL FT.
FOR WELL. TYPE OF USE S / , DEPTH , PUMP RATE ( EST. )
WHAT DESIGN CONDITIONS WILLREDUC / INCREASE CHANCI' OF GW CONTAMINATION:
WHAT NATURAL SITE CONDITIONS wu.C_KDUCE'/ INCREASE CHANCE OF GW CONTAMINATION:
% ' alb A/C'c1 �� G'����i9�'/��'���. ��� fh�F ill"
DEPTH TO: BEDROCK'�-FT. , SEASONAL HIGH W. T. ;2 D FT., ANNUAL W. T. FLUX: 3-/,0 FT.
SURFICIAL AQUIFER BEDROCK/ ARTESIAN AQUIFER
GEN. l (THOLOGY colli _ zl r/& Lit 5, 17s—Zo ,
HYD. COND. #Ak&_a&2 FT./DAY O MEASURED nos,,, FT./DAY MEASURED
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
THICKNESS '�0 FT.
NO. OF MONITOR WELLS: PROPOSED: UPjo DOWN EXISTING: UP 0 DOWN 40
FROM WORKSHEET: SITE NUMERICAL DESCRIPTION = 21 '0 b _y_ Z_
�T' , 1 2 3 4 5 (�6�� 6A 6B
SITE GRADE (HYDROGEOL.) =1 �� SITUATION GRADE =
PROPOSED SAMPLING SCHEDULE & PARAMETER(S) : 5��/`�� 7.`�f�s d �P�� 41
I
C,W-AR RA%AeoH A/A7 HVI) MZIONAI SIIPFI?V

/ .__\
�` �i / ` i
��

WASTE DISPOSAL PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW WORKSHEET
. FaclNty• �,� sem ��:r�
calrty
gin►#: g
evlewep :
oare :
Determine the mance Point vokre 0 1 2 3 4 b 6 7 8 9
on ground between corelamination source Didanoe an 2000 ♦ 300
Wolersupply(1welof es
mon 1000-2000 1a0-209 99 7b-149 b0-74 3b-49 20-34 10-10 0-9
drearro. Distance In 6200+ 1001- 310D 251-500 101-160 31-60
feet 3100-6200 4101-1000 161-250 61-100 0-30
�ICtss: If water table In pemwable bedrock pt. value -6. In Doody permeable bedrock
pl. vakM - 4
+Tits Point value 0 1 2 3 4 b 6 7 8 9
to the o theWater table
Meters 60+ 30.60 20-29 12-29 6-11 5-7 3-4 15.25 5.1 0
to the water table Feet 200+ 91-200 61-90
below bass of con- 36-60 26,iS 16.25 ala 3-5 0.2 0
lamination source
more than 5 % of
the year.
2021
Edknde wader
Water table Gradient Gradert
Gro lent
Grodent Graders
Cmdert
table gradient
��
gradient arta ar" from dna*
bu than
less than greater
damn shi
flowdirection al wafer hid
2 peroenf
2 peraert than 2
V=2greater
O
supples the
toward
towered Percent
Percent
permeate
are closer
water
wafer toward
toward
1
than 1000
supply but
supply water
wafer
25-29
moon
not the
and Is the apply
uippiy
3E
40
anticipated
anticipated but not
and Is the
7F
8E
direction of
drodt of the anti.
anticipated
20-24
OC
flow
flow coded
direction
4D
aE
5G
direction
of flow
7G
8F
9H
Of flow
60-74
Step
krnate of
.rmeoblBy-
sorption for the
waste disposal sle.
(2) A Row - Rock > 100
OA
lest below
2A
4A
-tote
6A
(3)l Cokrm -bedrock
PSN
peffneableLL
More than 95
O
1
19
LUO
(4)11 cOlurm - bedrock -
II
permeate
it
Clay with Clean
no rrK" Sand with Sand with gravel or
than 50 % 15-30% lou than Clean fine coarse
Clay sand rev u a ..L- .--A —A
Distance Pt. Value
(Rep 1)
Depth Pt. Vokre
W.T. (Step 2)
Graded Pl. Value
(Stop 3)
More than 30
OA
2A
4A
6A
5A
9A
More than 95
1
I
i'
II
1
it
I
It
1
II
I
II
25-29
08
1C
I
2F
3E
40
5F
6E
7F
8E
9G
9M
75-94
20-24
OC
2C
1E
3D
4D
aE
5G
6F
7G
8F
9H
9N
60-74
15-19
CO
38
1F
4C
4E
6C
5H
7D
7H
5G
91
90
46-59
10-14
OE
4B
2D
58
4F
6D
51
7E
71
9D
OJ
9P
26-45
3-0
1B
68
2E
78
5C
7C
bJ
61)
71
9E
9K
90
10-27
Leu than 3
16
88
3C
5C
51)
98
5K
9C I
7K
9F
91.
9R
less than 1
Bedrock at land surface: l - 5Z. 11- 9Z
22"
Degree of confidence In accuracy of values
Sfeo 6e
Pont of concern with regard to eonfamirart souses is
We : It Bedrock at kind unlace, urs 10 (pkw appropriate bHer)
A - very confident
B - forty confident
C -with any r onfidenoe
W - near by wet
S - spring / dream
B - perkneler or oomplarae
Additional Oudfflw (Circle Or* One)
D - Cone of depression of noorby purvoV well hos,
Of all 11e1y, INkwnoe conton* at Now
E - Distance in Step 1 based on separation from
contaminant PlUfne rather than point source
F a Wade source In groundwater discharge area,
thus mi innd prcurxtwder oorton xMm d depth / didamos
M - SUld moundnp under due highly Ikely
P - SNe has poor percolation potential (Vow at 3 or leu in Step 4 )
G a Wade source In groundwater recharge area
T . Wafer fdAo in wry Ng* 11octtred or caverou rock
Category
(Stop 4)
Confidence
(Step 5)
S
Potent of Concern
(Step 6A)
Qualifier
(Step M

WASTE DISPOSAL PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW WORKSHEET (CONT.)
Ikea 7
3% Numerical deK*tlon
.1.. - 4 "
Told Step 1 Shp 2 Shp 3 Skip 4 Shp 6
( Add Step 1- 4 (Om# bttm) )
Site Grade land on Hydrogeotogic Pa rngtm
Stop 60k Shp 68
Abt d
To be used for Step 9 ( Natural) and Step 10 (Modified)
(Step 10)
Hazard Pbt*ntkA Mat* Idenfltlet (HPFA )
PROBABK17Y OF
( Chose Ons) D
G I
CONTA MNATION
i
B
E H +
Saks
A
C F
G
-7104
9
HPMI
Stec 9
aa.a
?
Mag 'aN `n0000ptable
Acceplanoe unosrtat+
Told
Penn / Sorp. HPlur
(1) PNrn*rioai Site Oe�c(pMon (from Stop 7)
pmbobly
D
'
+
Q) PAR VALUE (Stags 3)
2-1
�_ 2,7
SITUATION RATING : (1) - (2)
®
_
(table below)
unoccaptable
SITUATION GRADE
no site H0
'
co ofu
pee table below)
s SITUATION GRADE
itto RR IRcaT
1.--
orrx
(ee table below)
SITUATION RATING TABLE
The probab'M of contffnm* otlon Rom Nhiatlam having vakm between 17 and - 7 Is dNllcutt to oategatle
wtkloctorly. lhwofore,"fang* of vakm repmenbd by grades 6 and C. k designed only by a question mark
Acceptance of ryectbn of ao Nin for Rte Intended purpose k a resporubNMy of tine parscukv reguklkxy agency
and may depend on pP*clal fegt*wrw nb of the agency of an f*adbMty and execution of approved
engineering of o dte ( Stop* 4).
To be used for Step 9 ( Natural) and Step 10 (Modified)
(Step 10)
SITUATION RATING
PROBABK17Y OF
SITUATION
(Combined Value)
CONTA MNATION
i
DEGREE OF ACCEPTABILITY
GRADE
Saks
Improbable
probably oocspkible
A
-7104
9
ProbobN acceptable or
B
aa.a
?
Mag 'aN `n0000ptable
Acceplanoe unosrtat+
c
441o+7
Ppm,
pmbobly
D
+8 of more
Very Probable
Atnodcvrtah to be
F
unoccaptable
The probab'M of contffnm* otlon Rom Nhiatlam having vakm between 17 and - 7 Is dNllcutt to oategatle
wtkloctorly. lhwofore,"fang* of vakm repmenbd by grades 6 and C. k designed only by a question mark
Acceptance of ryectbn of ao Nin for Rte Intended purpose k a resporubNMy of tine parscukv reguklkxy agency
and may depend on pP*clal fegt*wrw nb of the agency of an f*adbMty and execution of approved
engineering of o dte ( Stop* 4).

STATE o
�&
+� QlIM1 Nva
� EIV
State of North Carolina f� `?�` '
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Mr. Bruce C. Smith
Smith Sons Paving Co.
P.O. Box 44
Pineola, NC 28662
Dear Mr. Smith:
GROUNDWATER SECTION
July 24, 1989
SUBJECT: Smith & Sons Paving Co.
Renewal of Permit No. 12356
Avery County
WQ0002000/GW89221
R. Paul Wilms
Director
As part of the Division of Environmental Management's
comprehensive approach in addressing the impact of waste
treatment, storage, or disposal projects on the environment,
your permit application has been forwarded to us for assessment
of the potential impact of the project on groundwater quality.
Our initial review indicates that the data submitted is
not sufficient to make this assessment.
Before your application can be processed therefore, you
are requested to submit the following information to the
Groundwater Section. This information should be submitted in
full within 60 days of the date of this letter. Failureto
comply may result in the returning- of this application as
incomplete.
1. A map of the site, to scale, showing the settling ponds, all
facility -related structures and all property boundaries
surrounding the site.
2. Information as to the presence or absence of any wells
located within
500 feet
of the
waste treatment/disposal
facility. Any
such wells
should
be accurately located on
the site map,
and labeled
as to
their primary usage (ie.
drinking water,
monitoring,
etc.).
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

3. A complete description of the process describing the origin
of the wastewater. Are there any chemicals utilized in the
process which would contribute to the waste stream? If so,
please describe the type and estimated quantities used of
any such chemicals.
4. A chemical analysis of the typical wastewater which is to be
discharged into the settling ponds. The wastewater sample
should be obtained from a point in the system prior to
discharge into the first settling basin, and analyzed for
the following parameters:
Purgeable Halocarbons
Purgeable Aromatics
Aldehydes (formaldehyde, isobutyraldehyde,
n-butyraldehyde and isovaleraldehyde)
The analytical methods used should be the appropriate EPA
method having the lowest detection limit.
5. If available, please provide construction details for the
two (2) settling basins. Are the basins lined or unlined?
6. What is the approximate volume of wastewater which is
discharged to the settling basins?
Please feel free to contact the Groundwater Section, at
[phone], if clarification or information is required.
Sincerely,
P.0 '4�1
Michael D. Cleary
Hydrogeologist
Permits Group
MDC/tej
cc: Don Link
Pandy Jones
Mike Cleary
Central Files'
Permit Issuance Files

i �, /- �.�

. it Czi•Va t
MEMORANDUM
Groundwater Section
TO: �pq �� k Asheville Regional Office
DATE:
FROM: Bili Reid
SUBJECT: Application for
kei;mit
Amendment of Permit No.�s-6
Facility Name
• ---_- �.�'"",�L4 i� �[i h �a yr it e�0 ,
County �vlr v _, _
Type of Project : ' , , f- -�� A V ICt .S
�r
Applicable Permit Numbers : WQ000;L000 GW Fq,1_1
EPA
l
AC
We have received a copy of the above referenced application,
which was sent to your -regional office for comment on or about
S_�_/ // , 1989.
You should review the application package for completeness and
adequacy of relevant information and submit your request for
additional information to me (via telephone or memo) by
SL 1989 so that all required information can be
requested from the applicant at one time. A copy of our formal
request to the applicant for additional in
provided to you.. formation will be
If you do not require additional information from the
applicant to complete your evaluation of the project, you should
review the application package and submit your comments to me by
, 1989.
If a copy of the application package has not been made
available to your office, PLEASE LET ME KNOW IMMEDIATELY so that a
copy can be forwarded to you as soon as possible.
MDC/APPMEMO

GROUNDWATER SECTION GW
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RECORD OF WASTE DISPOSAL PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW
-..
REVIEW BY _ DATE '22 FIELD INVESTIGATION? (Y/N) 1
c. COUNTY ,/
FACILITY NAME 4 :
LOCATION �` AI, �/�' IS K � � �."
TYPE OF DISPOSAL SYSTEM ( LAGOON, ETC.) fr DESIGN CAP. ( GPD ).4
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY yy.. " 'e, ` "
r
V
SIZE OF IMPOUNDMENT (FT. S6)) �'�f` ` `' & / OR SIZE OF APPLICATION AREA
WASTE SOURCE : Q MUN. SLUDGE MUN. W. WATER: E]PRIMARY SECONDARY EITERTIARY
[]IND. SLUDGE [IND. W. WATER OTHERS
DISTANCE FROM WASTE -SOURCE TO NEAREST: STREAM SO FT., WELL 1TA2 FT.
�„ ' ' , DEPTH `�' . PUMP RATE( EST.) '~<=
FOR WELL: TYPE OF USE t" • ,
WHAT DESIGN CONDITIONS WILL REDUCE/ INCREASE CHANCI= OF GW CONTAMINATION:
WHAT NATURAL SITE CONDITIONS WILL REDUCE/ INCREASE CHANCE OF GW CONTAMINATION:
`I
DEPTH TO: BEDROCK °a -FT, SEASONAL HIGH W. T. 9r FT., ANNUAL W. T. FLUX: -/h FT.
SURFICIAL AQUIFER I BEDROCK / ARTESIAN AQUIFER
GEN. LITHOLOGY
HYD. COND. FT./DAY El MEASURED, F; FT./DAY O MEASURED
s
11 ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
THICKNESS ""I FT.
NO. OF MONITOR WELLS: PROPOSED: UP r DOWN ; EXISTING: UP /2 DOWN
FROM WORKSHEET: SITE NUMERICAL DESCRIPTION 2— L —
T 1 2 3 4 5 6 6A 6B
SITE GRADE (HYDROGEOL.) _ ® SITUATION GRADE _
PROPOSED SAMPLING SCHEDULE & PARAMETER(S) :
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS:�`�>' / `✓
/. AL1/ ,
gr
t
GW -48 Revised 8/87 HYD. REGIONAL SUPERVISOR

WASTE DISPOSAL PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW WORKSHEET
GW*: �7
DateDetermine the distance
Steo 1
on Ground between can, Point vokie 0 1 2 3 4 5
ta>rnolionsorceand Distance In 2000+ 6 7 8 9
water supply, meters 1000 -2000''150 - 299 711- 149 74 35 - 49 10-19
Slen 2
Edhx to the depth
to the water table
below base of coil.
lorninatbn source
more than 5 % of
the year.
EdQnade water
table Gradient
ham cortamt►
ation We
Step 4
Estimate of
permeability-
surtkn for the
waste disposal site.
Distance in
ibst
6200+ - 20-34
1001- 3100 251 -600 101- 160
31-60
0-9
NDIAL
3100- 6200 501- 1000 161-250 61-100
greater
2 percent
0 -30
H water table In permeable bedrock Pt. value -6; In poorly permeable bedrock
toward
Pont vak�e
Pt. value = 4
0 1
aro closer
1000
water
Meter
2 3 4 b 6 7
8
9
Feet
60+ 30.60 20-20 12-29 8-11 b-7 3-4 13-25
200+
5-1
0
supply
but not
91-200 61-90 360 26-35 16-25 9-15 3$
0.2
0
oma n
Wader table
Agent and away from almost
- les than
lesskass tt►m Gradient
Gradient
slow wafer Ilat
2 percent
greater
2 percent
greater
SU PPIN That
toward
thon 2
towaed
2
aro closer
1000
water
percent
waterthon toward
percent
toward
Met
Met
supply but
not the
soppy water
and h the
wader
20-24
Pem1BCble
supply
but not
supply
and Is the
11 Column - bedrock Rel.
directionoedf
dke0cled
dicecthe antF
anticipated
O J
�,
ikov
flow cipated
direction
direction
of flow
1 II
ADO
of flow
I
0 cokxnn - Rock > 100
Gay with
Nbre than
feet below
9
j9G9M
land
90
Sand with
surface
E
25-29
1 column - bedrock
�
15-30%
less than
Clean fine
poorly
O Z
20-24
Pem1BCble
W
OA
11 Column - bedrock Rel.
Y
15-19
kr ver
O J
�,
10-14
pem�eatKs
Z
U
3-9
1 II
ADO
1 11
I
I
Less than
Sten 5
Degree of confidence in occouracy of values
A = very confident
B = fairly confident
S}ao 6A C = 9Uesdkmote (with low confidence)
Point of concem with regard to contarnlrnort souroe k : W. nearly well
S = spring / dream
B = perimeter of compliance
Sfaa 68 AddR-Qualifier (Circle Orty One)
D = Cone of depression of nearby pumping well has,
or will likely. Influence contorntart now
E = Didance In Step 1 based on separation from
contorr*xrd plume rather than point source
F = Waste source In groundwater discharge area,
thus minimal grokrndwater oontonsnation at depth / didamoe
K = Area underlain by cauerous limestone
Clean
gravel or
coarse
Distance'
r
Depth
W.T.
Gradient
Gay with
More than 95
j9G9M
75 - 94
no more
Sand with
Sand with
U1
C (1)
lay
than 50 %
15-30%
less than
Clean fine
sand
cat
15%cloy
sand
46-59
OA
2A
4A
6A
8A
9J
1 )
28-45
Y
1
1 II
I II
1 11
I
9L
OB iC
1D 2F
3E 4G
5F 6E
7F
II
8E
OC 2C
lE 3D
4D 5E
5G 6F
7G
8F
CO 3B
1F 4C
4E ;bC
5H 7D
7H
eG
OE 48
2D 5B
4F 6D
51 7E
71
9D
iB 6B
2E 7B
5C 7C
SJ 8D
7J
9E
1B 8B
3C 8C
5D 9g
SI( 9C
7K
9F
Bedrock of kind surface: I = 5Z, I I = 9Z
Note : K Bedrock at land surface, use 10
A = very confident
B = fairly confident
S}ao 6A C = 9Uesdkmote (with low confidence)
Point of concem with regard to contarnlrnort souroe k : W. nearly well
S = spring / dream
B = perimeter of compliance
Sfaa 68 AddR-Qualifier (Circle Orty One)
D = Cone of depression of nearby pumping well has,
or will likely. Influence contorntart now
E = Didance In Step 1 based on separation from
contorr*xrd plume rather than point source
F = Waste source In groundwater discharge area,
thus minimal grokrndwater oontonsnation at depth / didamoe
K = Area underlain by cauerous limestone
Clean
gravel or
coarse
Distance'
r
Depth
W.T.
Gradient
M = Fluid mounding under site highly likely
Pt. Value
f
Category
r
Confidence
\_
Point of Concern
P = Sife has poor percolationQualifier
potenibl (value of 3 or loss h Step 4 )
Q - Waste source in groundwater recharge area
T = Water tattle in very highly fractured or caverous rock
y = Site underlain by I or more ariedorn aquifers
More than 95
j9G9M
75 - 94
U1
9H
9N60
-74
Z
91
90
46-59
c
9J
913
28-45
Y
0
9K
9Q
10-27
r
9L
9R
Less than 1
M = Fluid mounding under site highly likely
Pt. Value
f
Category
r
Confidence
\_
Point of Concern
P = Sife has poor percolationQualifier
potenibl (value of 3 or loss h Step 4 )
Q - Waste source in groundwater recharge area
T = Water tattle in very highly fractured or caverous rock
y = Site underlain by I or more ariedorn aquifers

Hazard Poten w Mafrbt IdentQler
(ChodeOne) D G I
B E H
A C F +
HPMI
(1) NumwW Site Description (*am Step 7 ) Total Perth/Soap. IiPM
RJ PAR VALUE ftQ9L --lit
SITUATION RATING: (1) - (� �3
Sten 10
SITUATION RATING (oft modlcations)
SITUATION GRADE (see table below) _
SITUATION RATING TABU:
To be used for Shop 9 ( Natural) and Step 10 (ModMed )
SITUATION RATING
PROBABILITY OF
SITUATION
(Combhed Value)
CONTAMINATION
DEGREE OF ACCEPTABILITY
GRADE
8 or less
Improbable
Probably acceptable
A
-7110-4
9
Roboby acceptable or
B
marginally unacceptable
-3 to +3
9
Aooeptarae uncertain
C
+4 to +7
Probably
Probablyunaooeptobie
D
or margholy acceptable
+8 or more
Very Probable
Atnostoeriah to be
F
unacceptable
The probabilty of contamamhatton tom situations tavlIng values between t 7 and - 7 Is dMIcult to categorte
satisfactorily. Therefore, thk range of values represented by grades B and C, Is designed only by a question mark
Acceptance or rejectlon of as stle for ft Intended purpose Is a responsibility of the particulaf regulatory agency
and may depend on special requirements of the agency or on teadbIW and executlon of approved
englneedng of 0 $ite ( Stage 4 ).

/. \
/,�
_% I �_!

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dc,' �I
DATE: 3« 9_ 90
FROM: ( JC,050n1
l
ie V of
Greunawater Section
Asheville Re iana! Office
SUBJECT: Application for r/�enewa /Amendment of Permit No. 12 q.�-6
New Permit
Facility Name ,guv &)A PRVI116 4�DF tA)& i
County 4EP,y _
Type of Project
SCTT-?'V6
Pa.U^D -
it 2 lines
rz1t4ZT
%�CA9VrS;&
Applicable Permit
Numbers
: WQ
®a® 31 C'j
GW
90 o67
EPA
AC
We have received a copy of the above referenced applidetion,
which was sent to your regional office for comment on or about
9P0µ % , 19 qC)
You should review the application package for completeness and
adequacy of relevant information and submit your request for
additional information to me (via telephone or memo) by
ka# l% , 1990 so that all required information can be
requested from the applicant at onetime. A copy of our formal
request to the applicant for additional information will be
provided to you.
If you do not require additional information from the
applicant to complete your evaluation of the project, you should
review the application package and submit your comments to me by
AtA,r
ta 30 19 o
If a copy of the application package has not been made
available to your office, PLEASE LET ME KNOW IMMEDIATELY so that a
copy can be forwarded to you as soon as possible.
MDC/APPMEMO

,.
Fr