20070245 Ver 1_Individual_20070209

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS BASE
PSC BOX 20004
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA 28542-0004
N REPLY REFER TO:
5090.11.2
BEMD
FEB 0 e 2007
From: Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
To: Commander, United States Army, Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
NC 28403, Post Office Box 1890, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28402-1890 (Attn: Mr. Brad Shaver)
Subj: APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT FOR THE
MARINE CORPS SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND (MARSOC), MARINE
CORPS BASE (MCB), CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA)
Encl: (1) Application for Department of the Army Permit for the
Marine Corps Special Operations Command, Marine Corps
Base Camp Lejeune
16 1. The enclosure is submitted for review and approval of
construction of the Marine Corps Special Operations Command
(MARSOC) Complex and the MARSOC Waste Water Collection System on
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. Construction of
this project is to be awarded to a Design/Build Contractor who
will complete final designs for this project based upon the
current concept. Construction of proposed facilities is
expected to begin in Fall 2007 and last for approximately three
to five years.
2. Camp Lejeune proposes to mechanically clear, cut, and fill
an estimated 12.5 acres of wetlands and 12,800 linear feet of
stream to complete the project and future concepts for expansion
described in the permit application. Camp Lejeune proposes to
mitigate unavoidable wetland impacts with wetland mitigation
credits from the GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank and by payment
into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
3. Seven (7) copies of this application and a check for $475.00
have been provided to the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality, 401 Unit.

5090.11.2
BEMD
4. Please review this document and provide your concurrence or
recommendations that will allow Camp Lejeune to perform this
work. Point of contact is Mr. Martin Korenek, Environmental
Conservation Branch, Environmental Management Division, at
telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
4OHN R. TOWNSON
Director, Environmental Management
By direction of
the Commanding Officer
Copy to:
Stephen Rynas, NC Division of Coastal Management
Cyndi Karoly, NC Division of Water Quality (7 copies)``
Noelle Lutheran, NC Division of Water Quality
NAVFAC-MIDLANT (Attn: Debbie Bryant)
2

APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
(33 CFR 325/ Expires December 31 2004
The Public burden for this collection of information is *estimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should require
5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
Operations and Reports, 1215 .Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding an other provision of law,
subject to an y
no person shall les sub'Jy penalty for failing to comply with a collection of Information if It does not display a currently valid OMB control
number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection , Research and
Sanctuaries Act, -33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application ,for a
permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies.
Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit
be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
RFLOW Tn RF FO / Fn RV eDDJ rr eu n
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
lT S I THRU4 TOB
F/LLED BY rHE
not reauired)
Martin Korenek - Permit POC
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE
3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
RFLOW Tn RF FO / Fn RV eDDJ rr eu n
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
S. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE len oome is
Mr. John R. Townson - POC
not reauired)
Martin Korenek - Permit POC
6, APPLICANT'S ADDRESS
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
Marine Corps Base, PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542-0004
Marine Corps Base, PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542-0004
T. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE
10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CO DE
a. Residence ' NA
a. Residence NA
b. Business 910-451-5003
b. Business 910-451-7235
11 • STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, Design -Build CTR (TBD) to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE Iseemstrucrions,
Marine Corps Special Operations Command
'13. NAME OF WATERBODY. IF KNOWN (if...%r h/ )
New River and tributaries
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Onslow North Carolina
COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, iseeinstnxtionsl
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS tireprei
Stone Bay Ranges
(located north of NC State Hwy. 210)
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Take US 17N from Wilmington to Dixon. MARSOC is located north of Hwy 210 in areas near the
the Stone Bay Ranges Complex. Map of project area is provided.
ENG FORM 4345, Jul EDITION OF FEB 94 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW-OR)

18. Nature of Activity (Description of pro*a, kmkA re a// feetu esl
Construction of a Marine Special Operations Command complex including a headquarters
building, operations and supply storage buildings, armories, barracks, ammunition storage
building, security fencing, and underground utilities (sewer) across the New River. It will
also include a telephone distribution system, secondary power distribution system, data
distribution system, roads and parking.
19. Project Purpose (Dewribe the reason or wpose of the project, see irwn ctrors/
Build anew complex to support housing, training and security for a Marine Corps special
forces units including all ancillary facilities and utilities.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Cutting and filling is required to provide site locations for buildings, parking lots,
access roads, and utilities. Directional boring under waters of the U.S. will be required
for utility lines.
21. Type(s) of Material Beina Discharged and the Amount of Each Tvoe in Cubic Yards
Structural fill (clean and free of pollutants) and pavements, (stone/gravel/sand/concrete)
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
12.5 acres wetlands (estimate 9.0 acres of riparian wetlands and 3.5 acres of non -riparian
wetlands, 12,800 LF of estimated stream impacts), 1.41 acres temporary utility line impacts.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes = No UJ IF YES. DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
This project is confined to locations within the boundaries of the Marine Corps Base Camp
Lejeune. However, underground utilities will cross waters of the U.S. (New River, Onslow
County, North Carolina)
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL* IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVE
'Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
appiic tion is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
duly tF�ri�agent of the applicant.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The applicatioh must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than 510,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
D DATE DENIED
NCDWQ 401 Sec
401 Cert
NCDCM
Consistency
NCDENR
Erosion Ctrl
NCDENR
Stormwater
'Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
appiic tion is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
duly tF�ri�agent of the applicant.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The applicatioh must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than 510,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.

Marine Special Operations Command (MARSOC)
CWA Section 404 Individual Permit, Section 401 Certification Application
Project Narrative, January 2007
INTRODUCTION
The Secretary of Defense has directed that the United States Marine Corps stand-
up a Special Forces detachment to be known as the Marine Corps Special Operations
Command (MARSOC) and locate it at Camp Lejeune. The Special Operations
Command has been created to fill a new need not previously addressed by the Marine
Corps. The objective is to provide adequate training and operations facilities for special
missions training operations. An alternatives analysis was performed in order to
determine the best location for this unit on Camp Lejeune. The analysis considered
existing infrastructure, the ability to provide utilities and support services, proximity of
existing live -fire ranges, distance to airfields, security, and accessibility. The MARSOC
Complex will provide the facilities that are needed to meet the operational and training
requirements of the MARSOC headquarters and its subordinate operational units. The
site chosen for the MARSOC Complex is located in the Stone Bay area of Camp Lejeune
(FIGURE 1).
This undertaking consists of two distinct projects; the MARSOC Master Plan and
the MARSOC Wastewater Collection System. This proposed concept for the MARSOC
is the culmination of meetings, conversations, and other data gathering efforts that have
occurred between MARSOC personnel, Base facility planners, NAVFAC—MIDLANT,
and the project design consultant, HBA Architects, Inc.
An approximately 1,857 acre tract located in the southern region of the
installation, east of US Highway 17 and north of NC State Highway 210 was evaluated
and determined to be suited for a secure facility large enough for the MARSOC. It is
mostly forested, but includes, roads, mission support openings like tactical landing zones,
urban areas, and an existing waste water utility right-of-way. The existing waste water
utility corridor (18.7 -km) runs west from the Stone Bay area then north along the eastern
side of U.S. Highway 17N to the Marine Corps Air Station New River in Jacksonville,
NC (FIGURE 2).
Operational and support facilities that make up the Master Plan have been
identified in numerous Military Construction (MILCON) projects that have been
programmed for funding throughout fiscal years 07 and 08. The Master Plan has also
identified future projects in the master plan that have not been programmed and are
currently unfunded.
FY 07 construction includes over eleven projects; a headquarters building,
maintenance facilities for boats, motor -transportation assets, and communications
equipment, a clinic, several barracks, a tele -communication exchange building, a sewage

lift station, a utility plant building, a gate sentry house, associated roads, parking and
utilities, and a new waster water line across New River. These projects have a total
budget in excess of $235 million.
The waste water distribution system identified in the MARSOC Wastewater
Collection System Study will link the MARSOC Complex to the installation's advanced
waste water treatment plant (WWTP) located near the mouth of French Creek. This will
require a new raw sewer line to be installed within a portion of the existing waste water
line ROW, construction of a new waste water utility corridor along Verona Loop Road
east to Rhodes Point, a new lift station, and directional boring of a new line across New
River.
These concept projects will be constructed through a Design/Build acquisition
strategy that has been developed by the Marine Corps' contracting agent, the Naval
Facilities Engineering Command, Mid -Atlantic (NAVFAC-MIDLANT). Detailed
construction drawings and project descriptions for these specific construction projects are
not currently available.
Construction of proposed facilities in the Special Operation Forces (SOF) Marine
Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC) Complex and the MARSOC Waste
Water Collection System Study to be awarded to Design/Build Contractors is expected to
begin in Fall 2007 and last for approximately three to five years. The size of the proposed
facilities is approximately 183,042 square meters (1,970,248 square feet). Proposed roads
would be roughly 2.2 kilometers (1.4 miles). The proposed security fence that would
surround the MARSOC Complex would be about 7.3 kilometers (4.5 miles).
Design/Build criteria will incorporate avoidance and minimization measures in
order to comply with the national policy to permit no overall net loss of wetlands.
Design/Build criteria will ensure all facilities avoid to the maximum degree practical,
wetlands destruction or degradation. Any facility requirement that cannot be sited to
avoid wetlands will be designed to minimize wetland degradation and will include
compensatory mitigation as required by wetland regulatory agencies in all phases of
project planning, programming and budgeting. Draft designs will be provided for agency
review and comment as they become available.
MARSOC MASTER PLAN CONCEPT
A MARSOC master plan concept for Special Operation Forces (SOF) Marine
Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC) Complex has been developed Site Plan
- Master Plan Wetlands Impact January 24 2007 (FIGURE 3). This concept plan will
serve as the base upon which numerous design/build projects will be developed in
support of the MARSOC. This contract will build operations and training facilities for
use by the MARSOC. This facility will provide specialized training for non -conventional
missions performed by the Marine Corps in the evolving Homeland Security/Anti-
terrorism role.

The estimated 544 acre site for the MARSOC complex site is mostly wooded and
will require clearing and grubbing. The construction will consist of exterior brick veneer
buildings with cast -in-place concrete foundations. Related amenities and site work
includes earthwork, grading, landscaping, drainage, storm water management, parking lot
and paved roadway, sidewalks, site excavation, sanitary sewer system extensions,
domestic water extensions, a new steam boiler plant and distribution lines, fire
suppression water pumps, electrical utilities, telephone, Local Area Network (LAN),
emergency power systems, and an antenna tower. A fire station, an enlisted dining
facility, and an exchange building, will be constructed to support the MARSOC Complex,
under a separate contract(s).
Construction proposed under this contract will include all grading, drainage,
fencing, and road demolition, as well as road improvements and new road construction to
access and support the new facilities. The entrance to the complex will be modified to
provide secure entry to the new facility and permit access to the existing firing ranges and
other facilities already existing in the area.
Construction proposed under this contract includes the following facilities:
FY 2007:
A. two-story Headquarters Building;
A one story Intel Ops Facility;
A motor transportation/boats/Communications/Electrical Maintenance Facility with a
Pumphouse, Washracks, Pads Fueling Points and Oil/Water Separator;
Four (4) 3 story Bachelor Enlisted Quarters;
A'two story Transient Barracks;
A Battalion Aid Station (clinic);
A Gate Sentry House;
A Single Story Telecom Exchange Building;
A Utility Plant Building;
A Sewage Lift Station;
A Communication Tower
A Helicopter Landing Pad
FY 2008
A Supply Warehouse with Mezzanine;
A single story Academic Building;
A Paraloft/Dive Locker/Training Tank;
An Armory with Covered Weapons Cleaning;
A Military Working Dogs Facility;
A single story EOD Facility;
An Indoor Small Arms Range;
A Fitness Center;
An Isolation Facility;
A Pre -deployment Staging Area;
An Outdoor Covered Classroom;
3

A Covered Boat Storage Shelter;
A Materials Storage Shelter
A Classified Materials Incinerator;
Three (3) Ammo Supply Magazines;
A Shoot -house;
A' four story Urban Trainer;
A Decontamination Facility;
A Target Storage Shed.
The design of each of the buildings in this project, and several of their
components are governed by numerous technical criteria including:
• UFC 4-010-01, "DoD Minimum Anti -Terrorism Standards for Buildings"
• P-80 DOD Facility Planning Criteria
• UFC 1-200-01 Design: General Building Requirements
• UFC 3-600-01 Design: Fire Protection Engineering for Facilities
• IBC International Building Code (IBC), 2000 Edition
• NFPA 101 Life Safety Code, 2000 Edition
• NAVFAC Planning & Design Policy, July 2002
• ADAAG Accessibility Guidelines for ADA Compliance
• UFAS Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards
• OPNAVINST 5530.13B Physical Security Instruction for Conventional Arms,
Ammunition, and Explosives
• MIL-HBK-1037.1 Training and Recreational Pools
Proposed locations for future, yet unfunded projects have also been identified in
the MARSOC Master Plan concept for planning purposes only.
MARSOC WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM PLAN / STUDY
The MARSOC Waste Water Collection System plan will utilize portions of an
existing waste water distribution system that currently provides service to all of Camp
Lejeune including the Stone Bay area (FIGURE 4). The existing wastewater collection
system was constructed in the mid-1990s and consists of a series of wastewater pump
stations and force mains that pump flow from the Rifle Range to US 17, Camp Geiger,
Camp Johnson, and Tarawa Terrace ultimately discharging at the French Creek WWTP.
The existing waste water distribution line (10 inch main) within the project area
runs from the Stone Bay Rifle Range west to U.S. Highway 17 north to a lift station
along Hwy 17, then to the Marine Corps Air Station New River in Jacksonville. The
proposed waste water collection system will require an additional, new (12-16 INCH)
line that will be installed adjacent to the existing line within portions of the existing waste
water distribution line within the existing mowed and maintained right -of way (ROW).
New construction of an additional waste water distribution line and ROW is proposed
from a point at the intersection of U.S Highway 17 and Verona Loop Road (southern
11

intersection) east towards New River. This new ROW is proposed within the road
shoulder along the north side of Verona Loop Road to a new lift station.
The site for the proposed Verona Loop pump station is located in an area north of
the intersection of Verona Loop Road and Rhodes Point Road. The existing site is
wooded and will require clearing and grubbing. The pump house will be constructed of
cast -in-place concrete with an exterior brick veneer. A portion of the building will be
below grade. This sub -grade portion, as well as the building foundation system, will also
be constructed of cast -in-place concrete. New site work at the pump station site will
include the pump house, bituminous paved drive, parking, fencing, sidewalks and
associated concrete pads for new equipment.
The new line will continue from the proposed pump station along the north side of
Rhodes Point Road to the New River. Installation of the new line will consist of a
combination of excavation and trenching as well as directional boring beneath waters of
the U.S. where feasible in order to minimize impacts to wetlands and waters of the U.S.
Temporary impacts to wetlands due to the associated excavation, backfill, or bedding for
the installation of the waste water lines are expected.
A directional bore under the New River from Rhodes Point is required to connect
this waste water line to the Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) near the mouth of
French Creek. The river crossing will be a single line without the casing pipe (multiple
waste water lines have been installed under the New River at Camp Lejeune and use
single line, uncased pipe).
Contractors specializing in directional bore work have completed similar projects
in North Carolina and Virginia. The current proposal is to drill one, single length crossing.
If geotechnical data is favorable it is possible for the line to pipe to be drilled in a single
length. However, for planning purposes, it should be anticipated that a marine exit will
be required in the middle of the river crossing to support to two separate drills. A
temporary marine support structure will need to be constructed to handle and dispose of
the fluid discharged from the drilling for separate drills.
The river crossing will likely be issued as a Design/Build RFP package. Since the
river crossing requires specialized equipment and experience, contractors develop
proprietary techniques that they will not release for design details as part of a typical
Design/Bid/Build package. Therefore, detailed project descriptions for this portion of the
project are not currently available. It is expected that the design will conform to
applicable sections of the North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and
Design Manual (NC ESCM), 1993 Edition.
SOILS
Soil types within the project area were preliminarily determined using the Onslow
County Soil Survey (USDA 1992). Soils at MCBCL are comprised primarily of loamy
fine sands and fine sands. Eight soil types are mapped in the MARSOC project area,
three of which (Muckalee loam, Bohicket silty clay loam, and Leon fine sand) are listed
5

as hydric soils by the National Technical Committee on Hydric Soils (USDA 1995).
Hydric soils are influenced by seasonally high water tables and typically have high
organic content and small particle size. Non -hydric soils occurring in the project area
include Baymeade Urban land complex, Baymeade fine sand, Kureb fine sand, Marvyn
loamy fine sand, and Pactolus fine sand (FIGURE 5).
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Archeological investigations of all high probability soils at the MARSOC
compound having a moderate or high probability of containing archeological remains
have been completed. Based upon the results of the required archaeological
investigations, no further surveys are necessary, and no adverse effects to National
Register (NR) eligible archaeological sites are anticipated. Consultation with the NC
State Historic Preservation Office and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation is
nearing completion to resolve adverse effects to the NR eligible Stone Bay Rifle Range
Historic District that would result from project implementation. (Appendix A).
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT
Copies of this application and a Federal Consistency Determination will be
prepared and forwarded to the North Carolina Dept of Coastal Management requesting its
concurrence.
NURSERY AREAS
The North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries has established permanent
designated nursery areas in all coastal fishing waters in order to protect fragile estuarine
areas which support juvenile populations of economically important commercial fish
species.
There are three categories of nursery areas in coastal waters within the boundaries
of Camp Lejeune; Primary Nursery Areas, Secondary Nursery Areas, and Special
Secondary Nursery Areas.
Primary Nursery Areas are located in the upper portions of creeks and bays.
These areas are usually shallow with soft muddy bottoms and surrounded by
marshes and wetlands. Low salinity and the abundance of food in these areas
is, ideal for young fish and shellfish. To protect juveniles, many commercial fishing
activities are prohibited in these waters; including the use of trawl nets, seine nets,
dredges or any mechanical methods used for taking clams or oysters.
Secondary Nursery Areas are located in the lower portions of creeks and
bays. As they develop and grow, young fish and shellfish, primarily blue crabs
and shrimp, move into these waters. Trawling is not allowed in the Secondary Nursery
Areas.
Special Secondary Nursery Areas are located adjacent to Secondary
Nursery Areas but closer to the open waters of our sounds and the ocean.
The majority of the year when juvenile species are abundant, these waters are
0

closed to trawling.
An unnamed tributary of Stones Bay that dissects the project area has been
designated a primary Nursery Area by the NC Div of Marine Fisheries. (FIGURE 6)
ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT
The proposed project will not adversely impact essential fish habitat (EFH) or associated
fisheries managed by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the
National Marine Fisheries Service.
FEDERALLY -LISTED THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES
Rough -leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia) is the only known Federally
threatened or endangered plant species identified near the project area. High probability
habitat was surveyed for Rough -leaved loosestrife (RLL) and no occurrences were found
within the within the project limits. There would be no adverse effects to the federally
endangered RLL as a result of constructing the MARSOC complex.
Federally endangered red -cockaded woodpeckers (Picoides borealis) inhabit parts
of MCB Camp Lejeune. Although there are no RCW clusters within lh mile of the
proposed compound, this area has been designated as future habitat to support Camp
Lejeune's Mission Compatible Recovery Goal of 173 active clusters. The area bounded
by Stone Creek, HWY 210, and the New River had been designated for 6 future clusters
and corresponding foraging partitions.
Cutting of habitat will result in the loss of one future cluster and partition, and
portions of foraging partitions for two future clusters. Informal consultation in
accordance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act has been initiated with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (Appendix B) regarding impacts to Federally endangered red -
cockaded woodpeckers.
The Federally threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) has been
observed in flight within the vicinity of the project area. However, aerial surveys of the
lower reaches of the New River conducted on 2006 revealed that there are no nesting
bald eagles within the project area. There would be no adverse effects to the federally -
threatened bald eagle or it's habitat as a result of constructing the MARSOC complex.
The Carolina goldenrod (Solidago pulchra) is considered endangered by the state
of NC, and considered to be a species of concern at the Federal level. This plant is found
within the power -line easements around the GSRA, west of the MARSOC project
location but there is no known occurrence within the project limits.
The American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) is listed as Federally
threatened only because of its similarity of appearance to the American crocodile
(Crocodylus acutus), which is in fact threatened. Alligators may be encountered in or
near tributaries of the New River. However, the likelihood of alligators occurring within
the project area is unlikely. Therefore, there would be no impacts to American alligators.
7

NATURAL COMMUNITIES
Within the North Carolina coastal plain region, the natural vegetative
communities of low-lying areas are predominantly comprised of extensive coastal
marshes, interior swamps, and pocosins. Most upland areas are dominated by pine with a
variable understory depending on fire frequency, hydrology, and landscape position.
Natural communities of the area were identified and classified into two broad categories:
upland and wetland communities. Upland community profile descriptions were adopted
and modified from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) classification
scheme (Schafale and Weakley 1990). Wetland communities were classified according
to Cowardin et al. (1979).
UPLANDS
Following the classification scheme of Schafale and Weakley (1990), the upland
communities found in the project area most closely approximate the Mesic Pine
Flatwoods, Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Coastal Plain Subtype), Dry Oak -Hickory
Forest, and Pine -Scrub Oak Sandhill community types. Distribution and composition of
these communities within the project area reflect the effects of topographic positioning,
hydrologic influences, fire frequency, and past land use practices. Where Mesic Pine
Flatwoods and Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest occur adjacent to each other, a transitional
mixed pine -hardwood community occurs.
Forested areas within the MARSOC project area have been managed by the
bases' Forestry Section (Timber Management Section and Forest Protection Section) for
the past 60 plus years since the establishment of the base. Forest management practices
include prescribed burning, wildland fire control, salvage operations as a result of storm
damage or beetle infestations, conversion of off site species to longleaf pine, and other
silvicultural treatments as documented in the Camp Lejeune Integrated Natural Resources
Management Plan. Relic fire -plow lines and forest access paths are visible throughout the
project area.
Mesic Pine Flatwoods
The mesic pine flatwoods community is found primarily on broad interstream
upland terraces in the project area. Loblolly pine is the dominant canopy species, with a
lesser component of water oak (Quercus nigra), sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua),
and tuliptree (Liriodendron tulipifera). The shrub layer and mid -canopy are often dense,
with horse sugar (Symplocos tinctoria) and wax myrtle (Morella cerifera). Common
understory species include seedlings of overstory species, Ilex spp., blackberries (Rubus
sop.), common greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), broom sedge (Andropogon virginicus),
and bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum).
Mesic Mixed Hardwood
The mesic mixed hardwood forest community includes loblolly pine, tuliptree,
southern red oak (Quercus falcata), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), white oak

(Quercus alba), water oak, sweet gum, and mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa). The
mid -canopy includes young trees of the above-mentioned species, but also included
ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), American holly (Ilex opaca), horse sugar, and
sourwood (Oxydendron arboreum). Generally, the lower slope vegetation is comprised
of species found in the adjacent stream floodplain and included such species as inkberry
(Ilex glabra), sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia), fetterbush, and leucothoe (Leucothoe
racemosa). The upper slope vegetation usually included species more commonly
associated with the drier pine -scrub oak communities, and included dwarf huckleberry
(Gaylussacia dumosa), creeping blueberry (Vaccinium crassifolium), staggerbush
(Lyonia mariana), lamb -kill (Kalmia angustifolia), and bracken fern.
Dry Oak -Hickory
The dry oak -hickory forest community is dominated by white oak, post oak
(Quercus stellata), southern red oak, mockernut hickory, and pignut hickory (Carya
glabra). The mid -canopy is typically comprised of young hickories, flowering dogwood
(Cornus florida), sassafras (Sassafras albidum), and sourwood. The shrub and
herbaceous layers are very sparse, with low ericaceous shrubs such as dwarf huckleberry,
staggerbush, and creeping blueberry.
Pine -Scrub Oak Sandhill
The pine -scrub oak sandhill community is characterized by a very sparse open
canopy of loblolly pine and a relatively dense understory of scrub oaks and hardwoods
that are able to tolerate xeric conditions. Turkey oak (Quercus laevis), blackjack oak
(Quercus marilandica), and bluejack oak (Quercus incana) dominate the understory, with
sassafras, persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), sand post oak (Quercus margaretta), and
flowering dogwood scattered throughout. A low shrub layer is also present, dominated
by ericaceous shrubs.
WETLANDS
The Cowardin et al. (1979) classification is divided into five major Systems:
Marine, Estuarine, Riverine, Lacustrine, and Palustrine. The delineated wetlands in the
MARSOC project area are in Estuarine and Palustrine Systems. Estuarine wetlands
consist of deepwater tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands that are usually semi
enclosed by land but have open, partly obstructed, or sporadic access to the open ocean.
Palustrine'wetlands include all non -tidal wetlands dominated by trees, shrubs,
persistent emergents, mosses, or lichens. The Palustrine System groups vegetated
wetlands traditionally called marshes, swamps, bogs, fens, prairies, and ponds.
Palustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetlands
Scrub -shrub wetlands include areas dominated by woody vegetation that is less
than 20 feet tall. The vegetation is comprised of true shrubs, young trees, and trees or
shrubs that are small or stunted because of environmental conditions. There are five
subclasses of scrub -shrub wetlands: Broad-leaved deciduous (SS 1), needle -leaved
7

deciduous (SS2), broad-leaved evergreen (SS3), needle -leaved evergreen (SS4), and dead
(SS5) (Cowardin et al. 1979). The broad-leaved evergreen subclass was found in the
project area.
Palustrine scrub -shrub communities are variable in both structure and species
composition. Relative landscape position and hydrologic regime normally dictate this
variability. These communities often possess a low canopy of tree species along with a
persistent shrub stratum. Common shrubs of this community include inkberry, red bay,
titi (Cyrilla racemiflora), fetterbush, highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), wax
myrtle, evergreen bayberry (Morella heterophylla), sweet pepperbush, winterberry (Ilex
verticillata), and swamp rose (Rosa palustris). Where the shrub and small tree -canopy is
less dense, an herb stratum may also flourish. The herb stratum is extremely variable;
however, it commonly includes a number of fern species such as cinnamon fern
(Osmunda cinnamomea) and royal fern (Osmunda regalis).
Palustrine Forested Wetlands
Forested wetlands are characterized by a woody overstory canopy that is greater
than 20 feet in height. There are five subclasses of forested wetlands: Broad-leaved
deciduous (FO I), needle -leaved deciduous (FO2), broad-leaved evergreen (FO3), needle -
leaved evergreen (FO4), and dead (F05) (Cowardin et al. 1979). The broad-leaved
deciduous, broad-leaved evergreen and needle -leaved evergreen subclasses were found in
the project area.
The canopies of broad-leaved deciduous forests within the project areas are
dominated by black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), red maple, and sweet gum. Common mid -
canopy species include American holly (Ilex opaca), red bay (Persea borbonia), sweet
bay (Magnolia virginiana), loblolly bay, and ironwood. The canopies of the needle -
leaved evergreen forests are dominated by loblolly pine; however, the mid -canopies are
comprised of species similar to those of the broad-leaved deciduous forest. The
understory of this community is usually poorly developed, but may be composed of black
gum (Nyssa sylvatica), red maple (Acer rubrum), red bay, and sweet bay. The shrub
stratum includes inkberry, fetterbush, wax myrtle, horse sugar, sweet pepperbush, titi,
and highbush blueberry. The herb stratum typically consists of ferns, vines, and
seedlings.
Estuarine Emergent Wetlands
Estuarine emergent wetlands are dominated by emergent, rooted herbaceous
hydrophytes that normally remain standing at least until the beginning of the next
growing season. Vegetation is strongly influenced by salinity and soil type. Estuarine
emergents are either persistent (EM 1) or non-persistent (EM2). The persistent subclass
was found within the project area.
Persistent emergents in estuarine environments tolerate flooding twice daily, and
form thin fringe marshes, broad meadows or dense pocket marshes in response to wind
and wave action, water depth, soil type and elevation. These communities are strongly
dominated by the smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora). In the higher elevations
where flooding occurs less frequently, saltmeadow cordgrass (Spartina patens), saltgrass
10

(Distichlis spicata), and black needlerush (Juncus roemerianus) are the dominant species.
In the upper edges of the fresh and brackish ecotone, big cordgrass (Spartina
cynosroides), switch grass (Panicum virgatum) and wild rice (Zizania aquatica) are
common species (Lippson and Lippson 1997).
Estuarine Scrub -Shrub Wetlands
Estuarine scrub -shrub wetlands are dominated by woody vegetation less than 20
feet tall and may consist of true shrubs, young trees, or trees and shrubs stunted by
environmental conditions. Estuarine scrub -shrub communities can be divided into five
subclasses: Broad-leaved deciduous (SSI), needle -leaved deciduous (SS2), broad-leaved
evergreen (SS3), needle -leaved evergreen (SS4), and dead (SS5) (Cowardin et al. 1979).
The broad-leaved evergreen subclass was found within the project area. Scrub -shrub
estuarine wetlands are in the upper regions of the tidal marsh where flooding only occurs
during excessively high tides. Salt spray, moist soils, and irregular flooding keep this
community in an early successional stage. The wax myrtle, marsh elder (Iva frutescens)
southern red cedar (Juniperus silicicola), and groundsel tree (Baccharis halimifolia) are
common species (Lippson and Lippson 1997).
Estuarine Forested Wetlands
- Estuarine forested wetlands consist of low-lying hardwood, pine, or mixed coastal
plain trees that are 20 feet or taller. These communities are dominated by species that
establish after severe disturbance but do not do well under chronic salt water stress. There
are five subclasses of estuarine forested wetlands: Broad-leaved deciduous (FO1),
needle -leaved deciduous (FO2), broad-leaved evergreen (FO3), needle -leaved evergreen
(FO4), and dead (F05) (Cowardin et al., 1979). The broad-leaved deciduous broad-
leaved evergreen subclass was found within the project area.
Estuarine forests occupy the upper edges of fresh and brackish marshes and the
lack of flooding allows the community to mature and persist. Canopies contain loblolly
pine, bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) and sweet gum. The understory may include
young red maple, sweet bay, and a mix of shrubs such as wax myrtle, highbush
blueberry, and swamp rose (Lippson and Lippson 1997).
Wetland Delineation
The USAGE, Wilmington District Regulatory Staff verified the wetland
boundaries in the field on July 31 and August 1, 2006 (FIGURE 7). There were an
estimated 345 wetland acres (19 percent) delineated in the 1,857 -acre Stone Bay project
area. Of the total wetland acres delineated, an estimated 248 acres (72 percent) were
forested wetlands, and 50 acres (14 percent) were estuarine, forested and emergent
wetlands. There were 47 acres (14 percent) classified as palustrine scrub -shrub broad-
leaved evergreen wetlands. Acreage estimates for each community type are presented in
Table 1.
11

Additionally, an estimated 16,076 feet of linear wetlands (palustrine scrub -shrub
broad-leaved evergreen) were mapped. The linear wetlands are of variable width from
one to six feet wide and usually connect smaller wetlands to larger tributary wetlands and
tributaries. Linear wetlands were mapped as separate hydrological features. The
maximum acreage of linear wetlands features in the project area was 2.2 acres based on
the maximum width of six feet.
Community Type Acreage Percent of Total
PF041/SS32 33.2 1.8
PF04 18.8 1.0
PF013/34
2.1
0.1
PFO1/SS3
40.2
2.2
PFO1
153.4
8.3
PF03
0.5
<0.1
PSS3
47.3
2.5
E2EM 15
28.3
1.5
E2SS3
4.1
0.2
E2F01/SS36
7.9
0.4
E2F01
9.3
0.5
Upland
1512.2
81.4
TOTAL
1857.3
100.0
Table 1. Wetland acreage estimates by community type of the Stone Bay project area, Marine Corps
Base Camp Lejeune, NC
'PF04 palustrine forested needle -leaved evergreen
2PSS3 palustrine scrub -shrub broad-leaved evergreen
3PF01 palustrine forested broad-leaved deciduous
4PF03 palustrine forested broad-leaved evergreen
SE2EM1 estuarine intertidal emergent persistent
6E2F01/SS3 estuarine intertidal forested broad-leaved deciduous/scrub-shrub broad-leaved evergreen
STREAMS
Streams can be generally described as flowing surface water in a channel resulting
from stormwater run-off, groundwater discharge, or a combination of both. The
definitions of streams provided by the North Carolina, Division of Water Quality
distinguish stream features as ditches, canals, ephemeral streams, intermittent streams,
modified natural streams, and perennial streams. An unnamed tributary of Stones Bay in
the project area has been mapped as an intermittent and perennial stream by the United
States Geological Survey area (FIGURE 8).
Ephemeral and intermittent/perennial streams can be found in association with wetlands
within the project area (FIGURE 9). Intermittent streams identified in the project area
were observed after recent rainfalls. The streams can be best described as headwater
systems. Stream origins that begin as seepages in pine flatwoods type habitat become
very narrow often 1-2 feet wide for significant distances as the topography increases with
movement downstream. The topographic relief in the headwaters areas supports channel
forming and sediment transport and deposition downstream. Movement downstream
12

revealed continuous bed and bank features with some interruptions. The benthic macro -
invertebrate community is appeared to be weak due to the input of sediment. Most of the
jurisdictional wetland area was confined to the stream channel without any riparian
wetlands. Channel slopes in the upper portions of the streams were surprisingly steep
with low sinuosities. Riffle—pool sequences were often absent in the headwaters areas.
Indicators of depositional bars were infrequent and often lacking. Head cuts were
observed in some areas with well incised channels. However, this was a feature that was
not common in the project area. Hydrologic indicators such as the presence or absence of
water in the channel, leaf litter accumulation, and sediment deposition was observed.
Water in the channel in the upstream areas closest to the project site was absent to weak
with moderate to strong leaf litter. Well incised channels identified in the headwaters
area widen, and become less visible due to reduced topography. The streams ultimately
form riparian wetlands with active floodplains that connect to the Stones Bay estuary due
to the lack of channel forming features.
WETLAND IMPACTS
Building and operating the MARSOC Complex will cause temporary and
permanent, unavoidable impacts to wetlands due to mechanized land clearing, cutting,
and filling required for the construction of roads, facilities, buildings, waste water
distribution lines and other infrastructure. These estimated impacts are based upon the
MARSOC Site plan concept. Avoidance and minimization measures to avoid wetland
impacts will be incorporated into the design/build process.
Construction of the MARSOC Complex may require impacting (clearing, cutting,
and filling) an estimated 12.5 acres of wetlands (approximately 9.3 acres of riparian
wetlands and 3.2 acres of non -riparian wetlands), and 12,800 linear feet of stream
impacts (Table 2).
Temporary impacts to wetlands due to the associated excavation, backfill, or bedding for
the installation of the waste water lines are estimated at 1.41 acres (calculation based on a
trench /excavation width of 5 feet). However, detailed construction drawings and project
descriptions for this specific construction project is not currently available.
Wetland Type
FY07/08
Future
Total Area (Acres)/
Projects
Projects
Linear Feet
Non -Riparian
3.0
0.5
3.5
Riparian
6.0
3.0
9.0
Stream,
Linear Feet
6,900
5,849
12,749
Cumulative Wetlands Impact/
Linear Feet Stream
9/6,900
3.5/5,849
12.5/12,749
Table 2. Summary of estimated wetland impacts at MARSOC Complex
13

200 0245
WETLAND MITIGATION
The Greater Sandy Run Wetland Mitigation Bank in the GSRA on Camp Lejeune has
over 500 credits of pine flatwood, pocosin, and bottomland hardwood credits available for
compensatory mitigation (FIGURE 10). A summary of the credits available in the GSRA
Wetland Mitigation Bank is provided in Table 3.
The MARSOC facility is located in GSA Cataloging Unit 03030001, adjacent to GSA
Cataloging Unit 03030007. The Geographic Service Area (GSA) for the bank is that portion of
Camp Lejeune located within Cataloging Unit 03030007 as shown on hydrologic unit maps
prepared by the US Geological Survey. Camp Lejeune proposes to use the Greater Sandy Run
Mitigation Bank as compensatory mitigation for portions of the MARSOC facility (Appendix Q.
This will allow practical and economical compensatory mitigation for the MARSOC project.
Camp Lejeune also proposes to provide wetland mitigation for riparian impacts and stream
impacts by making payment to the NC EEP if no on-site wetland mitigation alternatives are
available.
Credit Type
Total
Approved
Approved
Approved
Mitigation
Unused
Mitigation
Mitigation
Mitigation
Mitigation
Credits
Mitigation
Credits
Credits
Credits
Credits
Pending
Credits,
Established
As Of
Used
Available
Success
Total In
In Bank
27Apr06
Criteria
Bank *
Pocosin
886.8
785.5
485.61
299.89
101.3
401.19*
Area,
Pocosin/Pine
Flatwoods
Big Shakey,
143.4
143.4
127.56
15.84
0
15.84
Bottomland
Hardwoods
Burned Pine
135.5
135.5
0
135.5
0
135.5
Plantation,
Pocosin/Pine
Flatwoods
Burned Pine
84.8
84.8
0
84.8
0
84.8
Plantation,
Bottomland
Hardwoods
Total 11250.5
1149.2
613.17
536.03
101.3
637.33*
Table 3 Summary of Greater Sandy Run Mitigation Bank *These totals based upon approval of
performance criteria in all portions of the bank.
REFERENCES
SOF Marine Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC) Complex Master Planby HBA
Architecture and Interior Design, Virginia Beach, VA 23462
Wastewater Collection System Study Rifle Range and MARSOC Stone Bay Marine Corps Base
(MCB). Camp Lejeune. NC by C. Allan Bamforth Jr., Engineer — Surveyor, Ltd.
Kroskin Design Group Bowman, Foster & Associates, Warren Smith & Sons
14

Stone Bay Wetland Delineation Marine Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC)
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Jacksonville, NC Final September 2006
by Geo-Marine Inc., Hampton, Virginia
15

Marine Special Operations Command (MARSOC), CWA Section 404 Individual
Permit, Section 401 Certification Application
FIGURES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Project Overview
Figure 3. Site Plan — Master Plan Wetlands Impact
Figure 4. Waste Water Collection System
Figure 5. Soils
Figure 6. Primary Nursery Areas
Figure 7. Jurisdictional Wetlands
Figure 8. USGS Quadrangle
Figure 9. Streams
Figure 10. Greater Sandy Run Wetland Mitigation Bank
16

2 0 0 7 0 2 4 5

r/
■
fB
LIMA
t11 i t It'll
i
3., • 1
•
It
k IL
y �, } /%1 /�+ '� � � ����►'j',! � ��' ��%r;, ���..,. y,� ♦ moi, j�--� �,,.� �'
r+�
`rte01,=
_
00 �1.
WW11 lk mAiFIRM IaI a:1WIAI \1WT/=I/;\►19

MaC
BaB =
BaB_
Mk
GoA
MaC
BaB
MaC
BaB
MaC
Pa
Mk
BaB
MaC ni
MARSOC MASTER PLAN
IMARSOC
MCB Camp Lejeune
Onslow County, NC
MaC
Prepared: January 22, 2006
Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
Environmental Conservation Branch
w
Bo
MaC
GoA BaB MaC
N
A
0 1,500 3,000
Feet
1 inch equals 1,500 feet
BaB
Figure 5. Soils
MaC
MaC IBo

N
MARSOC MASTER PLAN n
Primary Nursery Areas
Special Secondary Nursery Areas
Map Source: 2004 Aerial Photograph
MARSOC Prepared: January 22, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
Environmental Conservation Branch
0 1,500 3,000
Feet
1 inch equals 1,500 feet
Figure 6. Primary Nursery Areas

_2 45
WETLANDS PFO1/SS3 PSS3 E2FO1/SS3 N
PF04/SS3
PF01 � E2EM1 E2F01
PF04 - PF03 E2SS3 0 2,000 4,000
PFO 1 /3 Feet
Map Source: 2004 Aerial Photograph 1 inch equals 2,000 feet
MARSOC Prepared: January 22, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune Figure 7. Jurisdictional Wetlands
Environmental Conservation Branch

N
MARSOC MASTER PLAN A I
Map Source: USGS 7.5' Quadrangle, Sneads Ferry
MARSOCI Prepared: January 22, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
Environmental Conservation Branch
0 1,500 3,000
Feet
1 inch equals 1,500 feet
Figure 8. USGS Quadrangle

WETLANDS
N
EPHEMERALSTREAMS
INTERMITTENT/PERENNIAL
Map Source: 2004 Aerial Photograph
MARSOC Prepared: January 22, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
Environmental Conservation Branch
0 1,600 3,200
Feet
1 inch equals 1,500 feet
Figure 9. Streams

2 0 0 7 0 2 4 5
N
MARSOC MASTER PLAN A
GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank
Map Source: 2004 Aerial Photograph
MARSOC Prepared: January 22, 2006
MCB Camp Lejeune Author: Land and Wildlife Resources Section
Onslow County, NC Organization: Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
Environmental Conservation Branch
0 6,250 12,500
Feet
1 inch equals 6,250 feet
Figure 10. GSRA Wetland Mitigation Bank

Marine Special Operations Command (MARSOC), CWA Section 404 Individual
Permit, Section 401 Certification Application
APPENDIX A
Cultural Resources Coordination
17

r1l I
Preserving America's Heritage
December 29, 2006
Mr. Scott A. Brewer, P.E.
Director, Environmental Management
United States Marine Corps
Marine Corps Base
PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542-0004
REF: Marine Special Operations Command Development
MCB Camp Lejeune, Onslow County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Brewer:
On December 4, 2006, the ACHP received your notification and supporting documentation
regarding the adverse effects of the referenced project on properties listed on and eligible for
listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Based upon the information you provided, we
do not believe that our participation in consultation to resolve adverse effects is needed.
However, should circumstances change and you determine that our participation is required,
please notify us. Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(b)(iv), you will need to file the final Memorandum of
Agreement and related documentation at the conclusion of the consultation process. The filing
of the Agreement with us is required in order to complete the requirements of Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act.
Thank you for providing us with your notification of adverse effect. If you have any questions or
require further assistance, please contact Kelly Yasaitis Fanizzo at 202-606-8583, or via email
at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Raymond V. Wallace
Historic Preservation Technician
Office of Federal Agency Programs
ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 809 • Washington, DC 20004
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] • achp*achp.gov • www.achp.gov
0

Michael F. Easley, Governor
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy secretary
November 30, 2006
MEMORANDUM
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation office
Pew B. Sridbal. Adaunimator
TO: Rick Richardson
Base Archaeologist
Camp Lejeune
FROM: Renee Gledhill -Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
SUBJECT: PA for Marine Corps Spectral Operations Command (MARSOC) Development,
Stone Bay Rifle Range Historic District, Onslow County, ER 06-2352
Enclosed please find the signed signature page to the Programmatic Agreement for the above referenced
undertaking. We are submitting it to you via facsimile transmission to add to the document and submit to the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact me at 919-7334763. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Enclosure
1.0eatloa MaWat Addrea TelephoadFaa ----
ADM7NISTRA11oN 507 N. Bkmm Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigb NC 27699.4617 [phone]!733-8653
RESTORA710N S1 S N. Blount
Street Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Savice Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/7154801
SURVEY d PLANNING 515 N. Blount Sawk Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Savin Center. Raleigh NC 276994617 [phone]/7154801

CONSULTATION PACKAGE
FOR THE
MARINE CORPS SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND
(MARSOC) DEVELOPMENT
IN THE VICINITY OF THE
STONE BAY RIFLE RANGE HISTORIC DISTRICT,
MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP LEJEUNE,
NORTH CAROLINA
AUGUST 4, 2006

MARSOC BACKGROUND
Marine Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC) was approved by the Secretary of
Defense on 28 October 2005 after a joint recommendation by the United States Special
Operations Command (SOCOM) and the United States Marine Corps (USMC). MARSOC
created this special operations unit within the Marine Corps to join with the Army, Navy, and Air
Force special operations to fight the war on terrorism. MARSOC headquarters will be stationed
at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (Camp Lejeune), North Carolina (see Figure 1). Personnel
will be stationed at both Camp Lejeune and Camp Pendleton, California. An activation
ceremony was held at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune on 24 February 2006.
MARSOC Headquarters Complex Program
At present, Camp Lejeune has no existing building facilities that could support a complex for the
new MARSOC command. The proposed new complex consists of six facility groups, with a
number of buildings required for almost every group:
➢ Administrative and Headquarters
- MARSOC Headquarters
➢ Operational, Maintenance, and Mission Support
- Communication and Electrical Maintenance, Motor Transportation Maintenance,
Pumphouse, and Battalion Aid Station
➢ Training
- Academic Instruction Building, Outdoor Classroom, Paraloft, Dive Locker, Indoor
Small Arms Range, Shoothouse, Urban Trainer, Decontamination Facility, Breacher
Facility, Target Shed Storage, Obstacle Course, Quick Reaction Range, Fitness
Center, and Training Pool
Housing
- Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Transient Quarters, and Dining Facility
➢ Community Facilities
- Chapel, Fire Station, Exchange, Post Office, and Child Development Center
➢ Supporting Facilities
- Supply Warehouse, Isolation Facility, Armory, Kennel, Explosive Ordnance
Disposal, Incinerator, Small Arms Magazine, Materials Storage Shelter, Utility Plant,
Helo Landing Pad, and Covered Boat Storage
The MARSOC complex is scheduled to be constructed in two fiscal years, FY07 and FY08.
Fiscal Year 2007 projects total over $164 million and include the MARSOC Headquarters,
Communication and Electrical Maintenance, Motor Transportation Maintenance, Pumphouse,
Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Transient Quarters, Dining Facility, and Battalion Aid Station. The
remaining facilities will be constructed using FY08 funding totaling $88 million.

Sites Considered
Camp Lejeune explored three locations for the MARSOC development: Court House Bay, Stone
Bay, and Hadnot Point (see Figure 2). A list of advantages and disadvantages was established
for. -the three alternatives, each of which is presented below:
Alternative 1: Court House Bay
➢ Positives
o Has the fewest environmental constraints
o Allows for the most compact complex
o Provides close water access
o Offers possible cost avoidance due to existing facilities
o Can use existing training pool and fitness center
➢ Negatives
o Is not the most isolated alternative because of civilian traffic from Highway 72
o Involves unknown impacts to Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC)
and Special Mission Training Center (SMTC) expansion
o Would have noise impact on local community
o Conflicts with Marine Corps Engineer School (MCES) training and large student
population
o Limits potential future facilities expansion for current Court House Bay tenants
o Could encroach on Engineer Training Area (ETA) 1 and ETA 6
Alternative 2: Stone Bay (Preferred Alternative)
➢ Positives
o Provides isolation: compound can be placed in low -population area of the base
o Can use existing training facilities of the Special Operations Training Group
(SOTG) and Weapons Training Battalion (WTBn)
o Is located close to training areas
➢ Negatives
o Involves environmental constraints that make location of facilities more difficult
o Endangered species impacts for red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW)
o Is the most costly alternative, due to required utilities upgrade (estimated $5M
plus)
o Leaves little room for future expansion
o Has potential effects on Stone Bay Rifle Range (SBRR) Historic District
o Requires demolition of five historic family housing units
o Provides limited water access
Alternative 3: Hadnot Point
➢ Positives
o Offers reduced utility costs
o Has available community support facilities

➢ Negatives
o Would have noise impact on local community
o Is near most congested area of the base and would increase traffic congestion
o Is located close to housing and other developed areas
o Requires skeet range to be relocated
o Requires dog kennels to be relocated
o Provides no water access
After intensive studies of each of the alternatives, Stone Bay was selected as the preferred
MARSOC development location. Stone Bay was ultimately selected because the site:
➢ Has an isolated location
➢ Minimizes the impact to the current Camp Lejeune population
➢ Enhances security and force protection
➢ Has potential water access within the compound
➢ Has potential use of existing training facilities Special Operations Training Group
(SOTG) and Weapons Training Battalion (WTBn)
➢ Offers some support facilities that will suffice until MARSOC military construction
(MILCON) is completed
MARSOC MASTER PLAN
From April 24 through May 5 of 2006, Camp Lejeune held a charette to develop the master plan
for the MARSOC development. The master plan consists of six facility groups: Administrative
and Headquarters; Operational, Maintenance, and Mission Support; Training; Housing;
Community Facilities; and Supporting Facilities. The master plan building arrangement is
shown in Figure 3.
The master plan calls for the realignment of Rifle Range Road to the west. The road realignment
takes place south of the Stone Bay Rifle Range (SBRR) Historic District and will allow for the
highest density of MARSOC facilities to be located just east of the realigned roadway. The
entire complex will be encompassed by a perimeter road and security fence.
The master plan identifies locations for all the required facilities. The headquarters building is
on axis with the parade field and flanked on the north by an academic instruction building and on
the south by an intelligence and operations building. A maintenance and support complex is
located to the southwest of the intelligence and operations building. Additional buildings are
located to the south and southeast of the intelligence and operations facilities. Training facilities,
including a shoot house and urban trainer, are located farther southeast from the highest density
of development. An ammunition bunker is located along an existing unpaved roadway. A boat
ramp and pier are located along the New River just north of Everett Creek. The location of the

boat ramp and pier are preliminary. Access to these facilities will utilize a new road spurred off
of an existing unpaved road that runs from Rifle Range Road to the New River.
Two bachelor enlisted quarters (BEQ) will be constructed north of the parade field. A third BEQ
is proposed in the future to form a "U" shape. A Reserve Training Center will be built north of
the BEQ complex. To the north of the headquarters building is a transient barracks, with the
MARSOC perimeter fence located just north of that. A fitness center is just north of the fence,
followed by a fire station, dining facility, and chapel. These community facilities are specifically
located outside of the secured perimeter to allow use by those inhabiting the SBRR Historic
District.
New utilities will be constructed throughout the MARSOC development. The utilities will
generally follow road alignments and run perpendicular into the individual buildings. The utility
systems will tie into existing systems near the current gatehouse and building RR8. The sanitary
sewer line will run along the proposed future roadway to State Route 210. The sanitary sewer
line will be crossing sites 3ION1261 and 3ION1337 where an existing utility corridor runs
parallel to State Route 210. The sanitary sewer line may impact site 31ON1261 which is located
slightly north of State Route 210 and just west of the MARSOC boundary. The line will follow
State Route 210 to State Route 17 and turn north along State Route 17 to Grey Point Road. At
the.intersection of Rhodes Point Road, the line will follow Rhodes Point Road and cross the New
River to a developed area on the east bank. The sewer line will be constructed within existing
utility alignments running alongside the existing roads.
STONE BAY RIFLE RANGE (SBRR) HISTORIC DISTRICT
The SBRR Historic District was found eligible for the National Register of Historic Places
(NRNP) in 1999. A nomination package was completed by Louis Berger & Associates, Inc.
(LBA) in 1999 and accepted by the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).
The SBRR was designed to enable Marines to achieve and maintain the Corps -wide requirement
of proficiency in the use of pistols and rifles. Essentially, all the Marines who passed through
Camp Lejeune during World War U spent time at the rifle range, regardless of rank,
specialization, or race. The SBRR Historic District is directly and significantly associated with
Camp Lejeune's historic wartime mission.
The SBRR Historic District (see Figure 4) consists of 60 contributing buildings and five
contributing architectural sites. Non-contributing resources include nine buildings and one
object. As part of Camp Lejeune's Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP),
the Treatment of the Built Environment categorization serves as an indicator of the degree to
which Camp Lejeune has to consider alternatives to the proposed action that would avoid
adverse effects on historic properties. The SBRR Historic District is a category 1 resource
worthy of long-term preservation because it possesses a very high integrity of location, design,
setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Some individual facilities within the
historic district contribute to the historic district, but are considered category 2 or 3 resources.

Category 2 buildings are worthy of consideration of long-term preservation and should be
preserved over the long run if doing so does not seriously impede the mission of the installation
or activity. Category 3 buildings constitute only minor aspects of a historic district, and their
removal would not materially compromise the significance of the historic district.
The defining features of the district are its resemblance to a medieval English village with
clusters of buildings around common open space. The majority of the buildings have red brick
exterior walls supporting gabled or hipped roofs. The overall architectural style is Georgian
Colonial Revival, which is used throughout Camp Lejeune.
The southernmost section of the district contains five housing units for officers, located on Rifle
Range Road. These units were built from standardized designs that are found at other locations
throughout Camp Lejeune. The housing units are clad with aluminum siding, with some
vertically oriented to create a "board and batten" effect. The units have either hipped or gabled
roofs.
The central section of the SBRR Historic District consists of one-story and two-story brick
buildings arranged in a rectilinear fashion with consistent spacing and setbacks. The buildings in
this area include a dining facility, bachelor officer quarters, a recreation building, post exchange,
barracks, and classrooms.
The northern section of the SBRR Historic District consists of three pistol ranges, three rifle
ranges, and one longer rifle range. Each of these ranges has small associated buildings such as
firing line sheds, control huts, operation centers, and small magazines.
Proposed MARSOC Facilities Located in the SBRR Historic District
The majority of development from the MARSOC master plan will take place to the south of the
SBRR Historic District. The master plan locates four new facilities (dining hall, chapel, fire
station, and target storage shed) within the boundaries of the historic district (see Figure 5).
To accommodate the dining hall and chapel, the five officer housing units (RR39, RR40, RR41,
RR42, and RR43) are proposed for demolition. During Public Private Venture (PPV) housing
investigations in 2004-2005, it was determined that officer housing is no longer needed at the
rifle range, as it is no longer mission critical for the officers to reside near the rifle range.
Additionally, the economics of maintaining housing units so distant from other housing units is
costly. The PPV master plan recommended vacating these housing units and relocating the
tenants to similar houses in other Camp Lejeune neighborhoods. The layout and design of the
housing units in the SBRR Historic District does not easily adapt to other uses—they could not
easily be converted to barracks, they are too small to provide adequate office space, and they are
incompatible with industrial uses.
The new dining hall, fire station, and fitness center will become the new locations for activities
currently held in the existing historic buildings RR3 (mess hall), RR6 (fire station), and RR8
(gymnasium). Although these three historic buildings (RR3, RR6, and RR8) were investigated
for demolition during the master planning processes that took place before April 2006, they were

removed from the demolition list during the April and May 2006 design charette. Camp Lejeune
is currently programming these facilities for reuse by tenants presently located at the SBRR
Historic District.
The MARSOC master plan also calls for the demolition of four additional facilities that
contribute to the SBRR Historic District: RR56 (storage building), SRR57 (outdoor volleyball
court), SRR58 (outdoor combination court), and SRR59 (outdoor handball court). Building
RR56 is a 190 square foot storage building located directly east of RR8, the gymnasium. The
facility has been vacant for some time and serves no immediate purpose; new and larger storage
facilities will be available within the MARSOC development plan. Buildings SRR57 (outdoor
volleyball court), SRR58 (outdoor combination court), and SRR59 (outdoor handball court) are
no longer necessary for the mission of the Rifle Range or MARSOC.
A target storage shed will be located at the intersection of Booker T. Washington Boulevard and
Rifle Range Road. This facility does not require demolition of any existing SBRR Historic
District buildings.
MARSOC Effects on Historic Properties
Although some buildings in the historic district will be reused and others will be demolished, the
MARSOC master planning process ensured that no unnecessary or arbitrary demolition of
historic properties occurs. MARSOC will bring an overall positive redevelopment to the area.
Due to the long-term commitment of MARSOC to Camp Lejeune and this site, the SBRR
Historic District will be afforded long-term viability without compromising its integrity. The
following table shows the buildings that MARSOC will affect.
Building #
Category
Pro osed Action
MARSOC Im act
RR3
2
Adaptive Reuse
No Adverse Effect
RR6
2
Adaptive Reuse
No Adverse Effect
RR8
2
Adaptive Reuse
No Adverse Effect
RR39
2
Demolition
Adverse Impact
RR40
2
Demolition
Adverse Impact
RR41
2
Demolition
Adverse Impact
RR42
2
Demolition
Adverse Impact
RR43
2
Demolition
Adverse Impact
RR56
3
Demolition
Adverse Impact
SRR57
3
Demolition
Adverse Impact
SRR58
3
Demolition
Adverse Impact
SRR59
3
Demolition
Adverse Impact
Tar et Storage Shed
N/A
New Construction
No Effect
Demolition (Category 2 Facilities): RR39, RR40, RR41, RR42, and RR4
The proposed construction of a chapel, dining facility, and parking lot at the current location of
buildings RR39, RR40, RR41, RR42, and RR43 will require that these historic category 2
housing units be demolished, an adverse effect. As category 2 buildings, these resources are

worthy of long term preservation, but such preservation would impede the mission of Camp
Lejeune and MARSOC.
The demolition of these five housing units will have no adverse effect on the SBRR Historic
District. The housing units are located at the southern edge of the district, and their removal will
not affect the density of the district core that centers on buildings RR3 and RR9. The district as a
whole would still retain its defining characteristics through the remaining buildings, such as the
barracks, recreation building, bachelor officer quarters, mess hall, and rifle ranges.
Demolition (Category 3 Facilities): RR56, SRR57, SRR58, and SRR59
The proposed demolition of buildings RR56, SRR57, SRR58, and SRR59 is an adverse effect for
these individual properties. However, the demolition of these structures will not have an adverse
effect on the SBRR Historic District. These facilities are all support structures and are all
located away from the district core. All four facilities are category 3 structures, which are
categorized as only minor features of the historic district, and their removal would not materially
compromise the significance of the SBRR Historic District.
Adaptive Reuse: RR3, RR6, and RR8
Due to the construction of a fitness center, fire station, and dining hall, three facilities (RR3,
RR6, and RR8) within the SBRR Historic District will lose tenants. The removal of use will
have no adverse effect on each of the facilities. Camp Lejeune is currently undertaking a
programming study to locate alternative uses for each of these facilities. Because the rifle range
is still used and the SBRR Historic District buildings are occupied, there is ample opportunity for
the adaptive reuse of these three buildings. Adaptive reuse is acceptable for the SBRR Historic
District as noted in the ICRMP and SBRR Historic District Management Plan because the
association and design that make the SBRR Historic District eligible for the NRHP are expressed
through external characteristics. Appropriate treatments include interior alterations that avoid
changes to the exteriors of the historic buildings.
Neiv Construction: Target Storage Shed
The construction of a target storage shed will have no adverse effect on any specific buildings
within the district or on the district itself. The shed will be constructed on vacant land that was
never developed and requires no historic building demolition. The immediate surrounding area
consists of small range houses and magazines. The district will not be affected because the
building will be constructed using the design guidelines outlined within the ICRMP.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES WITHIN THE APE
Camp Lejeune uses a predictive soil model to determine areas that have a high probability of
containing archaeological resources. This predictive model identified various high probability
soil areas within the MARSOC area of potential effect (APE). Camp Lejeune has systematically
tested each of these high probability areas and found numerous archaeological sites, the majority
of which were determined to be ineligible for the NRNP. These previous investigations and
results are described below and shown in Figure 6.

Previous Studies
Loftfield, 1981: Site 31ON319
Site 31ON319 is a Middle Woodland site located along Everett Creek. It was identified in a 1981
archaeological and historical study conducted by Thomas Loftfield. This site is potentially
eligible for the NRNP.
Wayne and Dickinson, 1987: Site 31ON404
Site 31 ON404 was found in 1987 and documented in a report by Lucy Wayne and Martin
Dickinson. The site consists of an artifact scatter and is potentially eligible for the NRNP.
Outlaw, 1993: Sites .310NS34 and 310N535
In 1993, Espey, Huston, & Associates, and Principal Investigator Alain Outlaw undertook an
archaeological survey for a wastewater treatment update. The survey identified two
archaeological sites near the SBRR Historic District: 31ON534 and 31ON535. Site 310N534
appeared to be a small farmstead dating to the first half of the nineteenth century. Site 310N535
was identified as an intact Early to Middle Woodland resource procurement or campsite. The
two sites were found to be potentially eligible for the NRNP.
Further investigation of sites 31ON534 and 31ON535 were undertaken by R. Christopher
Goodwin & Associates in 1994. Goodwin redefined 31ON534 as a multi-component prehistoric
and historical site. The historical component was found to have little potential for identifying
intact historic deposits or features and was recommended for no further work. The prehistoric
component included a dense concentration of pottery and a lithic scatter. The prehistoric
component was identified as requiring additional investigation. The investigation of site
31ON535 uncovered no additional artifacts and no further archaeological investigations were
called for that site.
Site 31ON534 was further studied in 1996 by Goodwin. Goodwin found that the site lacked
specific concentrations of prehistoric features or artifacts and that only a minimal portion of the
site had avoided disturbance. Based on the site's lack of ability to address potential research
questions, 31 ON534 was determined to be ineligible for the NRHP.
LBA, 1997: Sites 31ON605-31ON623
In 1997, Louis Berger & Associates, Inc. (LBA) performed a cultural resources study of 321
acres of shoreline along the Stones Bay area of the New River. The survey identified 19
archaeological sites (31 ON605-3 ION623), 18 of which contained evidence of prehistoric
occupations, with three also containing historical materials. One site contained only historical
materials. LBA found that the prehistoric sites represented Woodland period sites. The
materials found in the historical components dated to the late eighteenth to early twentieth
century and appeared to be small debris scatters. LBA determined that none of the 19
archaeological sites were eligible for the NRNP. The North Carolina Department of Cultural
Resources (NCDCR) concurred with these findings in a December 30, 1997, letter.

TRC Garrow, 2001: Sites 31ON1005-31ON1018 and 31ON945-31ON947
Site 31 ON 1014 was identified in a 2001 TRC Garrow survey of high -probability soils near the
SBRR Historic District. The site has a high density of deposits associated with a variety of
Woodland period occupations. Intact cultural deposits are present at the site, and the site has the
potential to yield importation information regarding the prehistory of the area. TRC Garrow
recommended the site as potentially eligible for the NRNP. Sixteen other sites (31 ON 1005-
31 ON 1013, 31 ON 1015-31 ON 1018, and 31 ON945-31 ON947) were identified and
recommended as ineligible.
TRC Garrow, 2004: Sites 31ON534, 31ON1261, and 31ON1319-31ON1337
TRC Garrow surveyed an additional 315 acres in 2004. Numerous new sites were identified, one
previous site (31ON534) was revisited, and nine previously recorded sites were found to be one
large site (31ON1319). This investigation concurred with Goodwin's study that site 31ON534
was not eligible for the NRNP. Four sites were recommended as potentially eligible for the
NRHP: 31ON1261, 31ON1319, 31ON1322, and 31ON1337. The remaining sites of 310NI320,
31ON1321, and 31ON1323-31ON1336 were determined to be ineligible for the NRHP.
Site 31ON1261 is a large prehistoric and historic site that shows evidence of a substantial
cultural stratigraphy that could produce cultural features which contribute to the archaeological
record of the region. TRC recommended that this site was potentially eligible and should be
avoided by future activities. Site 31 ON 1319 is a multi-component site and shows evidence of
several long-term occupations. Cultural stratigraphy and features are evident in areas that are not
heavily disturbed. TRC recommended that this site was potentially eligible and should be
avoided by future activities. A moderate density of Early and Middle Woodland pottery and a
single lithic were recovered from site 31 ON 1322. The prehistoric site may contain significant
cultural stratigraphy and is potentially eligible for the NRHP. Site 31ON1337 is a prehistoric and
historical site located adjacent to State Highway 210. There are some minor disturbances on the
western part of the site, but overall the site retains integrity. The site can be split into two loci
with the historical component lying to the north and the prehistoric component to the south. The
site was recommended as potentially eligible for the NRHP with preservation through avoidance.
SEARCH, 2006: Sites 31ON1596-31ON1600
In 2006, Southeastern Archaeological Research, Inc., (SEARCH) undertook a survey of 172
acres located within the MARSOC project area. SEARCH investigations resulted in the
expansion of one previously recorded site (31 ON646), identification of four isolated finds, and
five archaeological sites (3ION 1596 through 31ON1600). Site 31ON646 was previously
determined ineligible for the NRHP by TRC Garrow. SEARCH investigations concurred with
this finding. The four isolated finds were determined to be unlikely to yield additional
information concerning prehistoric occupation of the area and were deemed not eligible for the
NRNP.
Three of the five archaeological sites were determined to be potentially eligible for the NRNP:
31 ON 1597, 31 ON 1598, and 310N1599. 31 ON 1597 is a relatively small but dense Middle
Woodland period site with apparent intact deposits, and 31ON1598 is a multi-component
Woodland period site with a moderate density of artifacts and apparent intact subsurface

I
eposits. 31 ON 1599 is a multi-component prehistoric and historical archaeological site.
Prehistoric sherds were recovered from 31 ON 1599, as well as historical brick, and bone, and
shell fragments. Based on the number of artifacts, apparent intact subsurface deposits, and
multiple cultural components, the site was found to be potentially eligible for the NRNP.
Preservation in place was recommended for the three potentially eligible sites.
The other two archaeological sites (31 ON 1596 and 31 ON 1600) were found to be not eligible for
the NRNP. 31ON1596 and 31ON1600 were small, low-density transitional Early and Late
Woodland period site. Both sites were determined to be ineligible due to the limited artifact
collection and small site size. No further work was recommended at these two sites.
MARSOC Effects on Known Archaeological Resources
Ineligible Resources
The archaeological sites that have been found to be ineligible will not be affected by the
MARSOC development. These sites are shown in the following table:
31 ON0534
Ineli able sites with no im act from MARSOC
31 ON0613 31 ON0623 31 ON 1013 31 ON 1325
31 ON 1335
31ON0535
31ON0614
31ON0646
31ON1014
31ON1326
31ON1336
31 ON0605
31 ON0615
31 ON 1005
31 ON 1015
31 ON 1327
31 ON0945
31 ON0606
31 ON0616
31 ON 1006
31 ON 1016
31 ON 1328
31 ON0946
31 ON0607
31 ON0617
31 ON 1007
31 ON 1017
31 ON 1329
31 ON0947
31 ON0608
31 ON0618
31 ON 1008
31 ON 1018
31 ON 1330
31 ON 1596
31ON0609
31ON0619
31 ON 1009
31ON1320
31ON1331
31ON1600
31 ON0610
31 ON0620
31 ON 1010
31 ON 1321
31 ON 1332
31ON0611
31ON0621
31ON1011
31ON1323
31ON1333
31 ON0612
31 ON0622
31 ON 1012
31 ON 1324
31 ON 1334

Potentially Eligible Resources
The MARSOC APE and sanitary sewer corridor contains ten potentially eligible archaeological
sites, as shown in the following table and Figure 7; details for the effects are provided after the
table.
Site #
Proposed Action
MARSOC Impact
31ON0319
Preserve in place
No effect
31ON0404
Preserve in place
No effect
31 ON 1014
Currently being evaluated for
NR eligibility
Potential adverse
effect
31 ON 1261
Currently being evaluated for
NR eligibility
Potential adverse
effect
31 ON 1319
Currently being evaluated for
NR eli ibili
Potential adverse
effect
31 ON 1322
Preserve in place
No effect
31ON1337
Currently being evaluated for
NR eligibility
Potential adverse
effect
31 ON 1597
Preserve in place
Noeffect
310N1598
Preserve in place
No effect
310N1599
Preserve in place
No effect
No Effect (Preserve in Place): 31ON319, 31ON404, 31ON1597-31ON1599
Five of the ten potentially eligible sites (31ON319, 31ON404, 31ON1597, 31ON1598, and
31ON1599) are located significant distances from the MARSOC development and will not be
affected by current MARSOC construction and activities.
No Adverse Effect (Preserve in Place): 31ON1322
Sites 31ON1322 will be affected by the MARSOC development, but not adversely. According
to the master plan, site 3ION 1322 is approximately 400 feet southwest of the sniper stalking
area, and no additional construction activities are planned near the site; the site will therefore be
avoided and preserved in place.
Potential Adverse Effects (Additional Investigation): 31ON1014, 31ON1261, 31ON1319,
and 31ON1337
Camp Lejeune has contracted with SEARCH to complete Phase II evaluation testing at sites
31ON1014, 31ON1261, 31ON1319, and 31ON1337. The primary aim of this testing will be to
establish if these four sites are eligible for the NRNP. The testing will be completed prior to the
beginning of MARSOC development in the area surrounding the sites. Methodologies, testing,
and reporting will be produced in accordance with North Carolina Office of State Archaeology.
If any of these sites are determined to be eligible for the NRNP, Camp Lejeune will either avoid
the site or consult further regarding mitigation measures.
Site 31ON1014 will not be directly impacted from the current MARSOC development master
plan, but is in close proximity to MARSOC activities. According to the master plan, site

31ON1014 is within the Explosive Safety Quantity Distance (ESQD) arc for the ammunition
bunker. The site may be affected by training or other activities nearby.
Site 3ION 1261 may be impacted from the construction of a new sanitary sewer line (see Figure
8). An existing sanitary sewer line transects the southern portion of the site but the new line may
or may not be constructed within the existing disturbed area. Additionally, the proposed sewer
line has a 100 meter construction buffer where the line could be constructed and this buffer
exceeds the existing disturbed area. If site 31 ON 1261 is found to be eligible for the NRNP, the
new sanitary sewer line would adversely affect the site.
If site 31ON1319 is found to be eligible for the NRNP, it would be adversely affected by the
MARSOC development. The relocated Range Road will traverse the widest section of the site.
A new Reserve Training Center and parking lot will be constructed on the eastern edge of the
site, and a BEQ will be constructed on the southern edge of the site. A sniper stalking range will
overlap the site on the far northwestern corner. The impact of these three developments would
adversely affect the site if it is determined to be eligible.
Site 31ON1337 may be affected by the current MARSOC master plan and construction of a new
sanitary sewer line. The 100 meter sanitary sewer construction buffer partially overlaps the
historical component of the site, which is located in the northern portion of the site.
Additionally, a future entrance to the MARSOC development is proposed that would also affect
the historical component of the site; the prehistoric component, which is in the southern portion,
will not be affected by either construction activity. It is anticipated that the proposed road will
be constructed within the next three to five years. If this future road is constructed in its current
proposed alignment, the site will be adversely affected if it is found to be eligible.
PROPOSED MITIGATION EFFORTS
Camp Lejeune proposes the following mitigation efforts for the adverse effects to the individual
contributing elements of the SBRR Historic District and archaeological sites.
Photo Documentation
Camp Lejeune proposes to undertake photographic mitigation of the facilities proposed for
demolition (RR39, RR40, RR41, RR42, RR43, RR56, SRR57, SRR58, and SRR59).
Photographs of each of these buildings will be completed with 35mm black and white film, color
slides, and digital media. Negatives and contact sheets will be produced and labeled according
to the North Carolina Division of Archives and History Standards.
For the five historic housing units, Camp Lejeune will photograph overall views of the property,
each visible elevation, details of the interior and exterior architecturally significant elements and
streetscapes showing the relationship of the property to the street. For the remaining buildings
(RR56, SRR57, SRR58, and SRR59), Camp Lejeune will photograph the structures and their
relationships to other buildings in the surrounding area.

In order to mitigate the adverse effects on the historic district, Camp Lejeune will document
overall views showing the relationships between the buildings and reproduce any available aerial
photographs.
Archaeological Testing
Camp Lejeune is currently completing Phase II testing at sites 31ON1014, 31ON1261,
31ON1319, and 31ON1337. The primary aim of the testing will be to establish if these four sites
are eligible for the NRNP. The testing will be completed prior to the beginning of MARSOC
development in the area surrounding both sites. Methodologies, testing, and reporting will be
produced in accordance with North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA). If this testing
determines that any of the sites are eligible for the NRNP, Camp Lejeune will either avoid the
site or consult further with the OSA regarding mitigation measures.
Interpretive Materials
Camp Lejeune will create interpretive materials that provide a history of the SBRR Historic
District. These materials will include a brochure that can be placed throughout Camp Lejeune
libraries, public affairs offices, and other public gathering spaces, as well as in selected locations
throughout the SBRR Historic District and MARSOC development.
Camp Lejeune will also produce interpretive signage that can be placed in select locations
around the SBRR Historic District. These signs could show a map of the district with historical
photographs. Text describing the district and its role would complement the graphical displays.
Camp Lejeune could produce up to three signs, located near buildings used for large gatherings,
such as RR3, RR8, and one of the Range Operation Centers (RR20, RR21, or RR22).
Design Review
The design of the new target storage shed to be located within the historic district will follow the
design standards outlined for the SBRR Historic District in the ICRMP. The design guidelines
that apply to this new construction are contributing site features, elements of building
configuration and orientation, circulation, landscaping, building exteriors, and wall openings.
Updated Boundaries for SBRR Historic District in ICRMP Update
During the next ICRMP update, it is proposed that the SBRR Historic District boundaries be
revised to reflect the loss of the five historic housing units and ancillary structures. Instead of the
southern boundary turning south at Powder Lane and running south along Rifle Range Road, the
southern boundary would continue to run east across Rifle Range Road. The proposed boundary
is shown in Figure 9.

CONCLUSION
The MARSOC development will be constructed adjacent to and within the existing SBRR
Historic District. The development will bring an overall positive redevelopment to the area and
the SBRR Historic District. The MARSOC master plan calls for the demolition of five officer
housing units (RR39, RR40, RR41, RR42, and RR43), one storage shed (RR56), and three
recreational facilities (SRR57, SRR58, and SRR59). Although these buildings are proposed for
demolition, the MARSOC master planning process ensured that no unnecessary or arbitrary
demolition of historic properties will occur.
Camp Lejeune has completed intensive archaeological surveys of all high probability soils
throughout the MARSOC boundary. These investigations revealed ten potentially eligible sites
and fifty-seven ineligible sites. Four of the potentially eligible sites (31ON1014, 31ON1261,
31ON1319, and 3ION 1337) maybe affected by MARSOC construction and are currently
undergoing Phase II testing to determine if they are eligible for the NRNP. The remaining six
potentially eligible sites will not be affected by the MARSOC development.
Camp Lejeune is proposing various efforts to mitigate the effects of development. These efforts
include photo documentation, archaeological testing, interpretive materials, design review, and
updated SBRR Historic District boundaries.

Fioure 1. Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune and location of MARSOC Headquarters

Figure 2. Sites considered for MARSOC Headquarters

Fissure 3. Proposed MARSOC Headquarters site plan

Figure 4. Stone Bay Rifle Range Historic District

Future 5. Proposed MARSOC site plan overlaid on SBRR Historic District

Figure 6. Previous archaeological surveys and identified sites

Figure 7. Proposed MARSOC site plan overlaid on archaeological sites

Figure 8. Location of proposed sanitary sewer line and buffer

Figure 9. Proposed new SBRR Historic District boundary

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Pear B. S■ndbock. Adminisa■ w
Michael F. Easley, Governor Office of Archives and History
Lisbeth C. Evans, secretary Division of Historical Resources
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary David Brook, Director
November 30, 2006
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Richardson
Base Archaeologist
Camp I..ejeune
FROM: Renee Gledhill -Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
SUBJECT: PA for Marine Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC) Development,
Stone Bay Rifle Range Historic District, Onslow County, ER 06-2352
Enclosed please find the signed signature page to the Programmatic Agreement for the above referenced
undertaking. We are submitting it to you via facsimile transmission to add to the document and submit to the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact me at 919-7334763. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Enclosure
•— _. Mailin= Address TdepheaelFaa
ADMtNrSTRATION 507 N. Bloom Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Sorvice Ccneer, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 (9193733.4763x/33-8653
RESTORA710N <,15 N. Bloom Saner, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Rileigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]!7154801
SURVEY R PLANNING 51 S N. Boum Street, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center. Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]x1154801

Marine Special Operations Command (MARSOC), CWA Section 404 Individual
Permit, Section 401 Certification Application
APPENDIX B
Threatened and Endangered Species Coordination
18

United States Department of the Interior FILE
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
January 18, 2007
Mr. Scott A. Brewer, PE
Director, Environmental Management Division
Marine Corps Base
PSC 20004
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542-0004
Dear Mr. Brewer:
The Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed your December 4, 2006 letter regarding
the proposed construction of the Marine Special Operations Command (MARSOC) compound to
be located in the "LC" and "LD" training areas, south of the Stone Bay Rifle Range, on Marine
Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, Onslow County, North Carolina. The project would provide a
consolidated headquarters facility and compound with an improved level of security from outside
traffic.
Your letter addresses the proposed action in regard to potential effects to federally protected
species known to occur on Camp Lejeune. Our comments are provided in accordance with
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 USC 1531 et seq.).
Construction of the headquarters, supporting buildings and parking lots will require the cutting of
approximately 179.8 acres of forested habitat, of which 135.5 acres are suitable or potentially
suitable RCW habitat. No RCW clusters occur within a `/z mile radius of the proposed
compound. However, the pine forest within the project footprint is being managed as potential
habitat to support the installation's Mission Compatible Recovery Goal of 173 active clusters.
Pine forest removal will result in the loss of one future cluster (identified as SB H11) and
associated territory, as well as portions of territories that would eventually support two more
active clusters (SB H10 and SB H14). With stand conversion to longleaf pine on appropriate
soils within the partitions for SB H10 and —H14, Camp Lejeune expects these territories will be
able to provide a minimum of 120 acres of good quality foraging habitat per cluster. The
installation would retain enough contiguous habitat post project to support at least 197 active
clusters which at the current rate of occupancy (an average of about 88.1 % over the past five
years) would allow the installation to reach its RCW recovery goals. Camp Lejeune's Mission
Compatible Recovery Goal is 173 active clusters.
Your December 4, 2006 letter also points out the affected future territories listed above are
located near the Stone Creek Gamelands, which although currently populated with young pine
stands is expected to provide suitable RCW foraging and nesting habitat in the future. These
forested lands, along with approximately 160 acres of mature longleaf pine Camp Lejeune is

seeking to protect, would contribute to the creation of a vigorous RCW population in the Stone
Bay area.
Sewer pipes serving the proposed MARSOC compound will be buried within existing rights of
way between the project location and U.S. Highway 17, continuing north on 17 then east on
Verona Loop Road and Rhodes Point Road. Camp Lejeune identified high -probability habitat
for the federally listed rough -leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia; RLL) in the vicinity
of portions of the proposed sewer pipe route. High -probability habitat was surveyed for RLL
within a 25 meter buffer. No plants were detected.
Based on the information contained in your December 4, 2006 letter, we believe the proposed
construction of the MARSOC compound and supporting facilities is not likely to adversely affect
the red -cockaded woodpecker, rough -leaved loosestrife or any other federally listed endangered
or threatened species or species currently proposed for federal listing under the Endangered
Species Act, as amended. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a) (2) of the Act have
been satisfied. We remind you that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
The Service recognizes the substantial roles Camp Lejeune performs both in providing the
environment for military training that promotes the combat readiness of operating forces, and as
a steward of high-quality natural resources for the benefit of the American people. If you have
any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. John Hammond at (9 19) 856-4520 (ext.
28). Thank you for your continued cooperation with our agency.
Sincerely,
� • tnj
ervisor
2

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARM cogs OW
mewnw
Mr. Pete Benjamin
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Dear Mr. Benjamin:
Wr" VUR7%
5090.11.1
BEMD
1t04,W
By this letter, Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (MCBCL) initiates
informal consultation under Section 7(a) (2) of the Endangered
Species Act regarding proposed construction of headquarters
facility and compound for the newly -established Marine Special
Operations Command (MARSOC) that will be stationed aboard Camp
Lejeune. This project has potential to affect two listed
• species known to occur on Camp Lejeune, red -cockaded woodpecker
(RCW) and rough -leaved loosestrife.
Background and Purposo for tho Proposed Action
In October of 2005, the Secretary of Defense approved a joint
recommendation to create a Marine Corps Special Operations
Command (MARSOC), and the decision was made to station MARSOC
personnel aboard Camp Lejeune. The proposed project in this
consultation -will provide a headquarters facility and compound
for MARSOC.
MARSOC has some unique facilities and infrastructure needs,
including a consolidated compound with the ability to provide a
high level of security from outside traffic. This special unit
will require isolated facilities for training and mission
preparation. Facilities do not currently exist at Camp Lejeune
to.meet the MARSOC requirements for a consolidated compound.
Available facilities are scattered throughout the base and will
not support the command. The MARSOC unit requires a battalion
headquarters, company headquarters, general supply warehouse,
electronic and communications shop, small arms range.and an
addition to existing gas chamber. Currently, none of these
facilities exists.
Proposod Action and Potential 8ffects
Red -cockaded woodpecker - The proposed MARSOC compound will be
located in the LC and LD training areas, south of the Stone Bay

5090.11.1
Rifle Range, between the New River and Highway 210 (Fig. 1).
Construction of headquarters and supporting buildings and
parking lots will require the cutting of approximately 179.8
acres of forested habitat, of which 135.5 acres is suitable or
potentially suitable RCW habitat, (Fig 2).
Although there are no RCW clusters within 14 mile of the proposed -
compound, this area has been designated as future habitat to
support Camp Lejeune's Mission Compatible Recovery Goal of 173
active clusters. The area bounded by Stone Creek, HWY 210, and
the New River had been designated for 6 future clusters and
corresponding foraging partitions.
Cutting of habitat will result in the loss of one future cluster
and partition, and portions of foraging partitions for two
future clusters (Fig. 2). Timber stands containing future
cluster locations for these two clusters will not be impacted by
the proposed action. Habitat loss and remaining habitat for
each of the 3 affected partitions is shown in Table 1. When
potential habitat (i.e. non -pine habitat on soil types that can
support longleaf pine) is taken into account, the two remaining
• affected partitions will retain enough habitats to meet the
recovery standard of 120 acres of good -quality habitat per
cluster. These partitions retain approximately 150.1 and 133.1
acres of suitable or potentially suitable RCW habitat after
project completion.
Table 1. Acres removed and remaining potential acres per partition.
Future
Partition
Pine acres
pro -out
Pine
acres out
Pine acres Convertible
post -out acres left
Total Potential
acres
SB H10
157.2
21.3
136.2 13.9
150.1
SB'Hll
143.1
110.1
33.0 35.0-
69.0
SB H14
109.6
4.1
105.5 27.6 1133.1
Rough -leaved loosestrife - Sewer pipes serving the proposed
MARSOC compound will be buried in an existing right of way
leading from the -project site west to HWY-.17. The -proposed
route will go north on 17, and then East on Verona Loop Road,
and Rhodes Point Road (Fig. 3). The new pipe will be buried in
existing rights of way on HWY 17 and Verona Loop Road, but
depending upon final placement of the pipe, it may cross through
high -probability habitat for rough -leaved loosestrife. A plant
survey was conducted in high -probability habitat along the pipe
route, including a 25 m buffer on either side of the proposed
route. No rough -leaved loosestrife was found along the proposed
pipe route. In addition, no other listed plants were found
along the survey route.

5090.11.1
Conclusion
Although construction of the MARSOC compound will result in the
loss of one future RCW cluster and partition, Camp Lejeune does
not expect this loss to jeopardize the Base's ability to meet
the recovery goal of 173 active clusters. After the loss of
this partition, Camp Lejeune will retain 197 potential
partitions on Main Base (Mainside and Verona). In order to meet
the Base recovery goal 87.8% of available partitions would have
to,be occupied. This closely corresponds to Camp Lejeune's
cluster occupancy rate of 88.1% over the last five years.
It is important to note that most of the 197 partitions are
larger than necessary to meet the recovery standard of 120 acres
of good -quality habitat. As habitat improves through
management, such as burning, hardwood control, and through aging
of the forest, the number of acres needed to support a cluster
will likely go down. Also, as Camp Lejeune has seen in the
past, pioneering and budding may lead to unexpected cluster
locations as well as higher -than -planned densities of RCW
clusters. All of these factors could contribute to an overall
• increase in the actual number of available partitions, and a
corresponding increase in the likelihood that Camp Lejeune will
not only meet, but exceed its recovery goal.
Iri addition, the affected partitions lie close to Stone Creek
Game lands as well as a piece of property to the south of the
Base that could help contribute to a robust RCW population in
the Stone Creek area of Camp Lejeune. Stone Creek Game lands,
although mostly young timber, could provide foraging habitat for
Camp Lejeune Clusters, and will someday support clusters. Camp
Lejeune is currently seeking to protect approximately 160 acres,
much of which is mature longleaf pine, directly adjacent to this
area. If successful, this effort, and the presence of Stone
Creek Game lands, should help ensure that Camp Lejeune is able
to maintain a viable population on this part of Base.
Based.on the evidence provided above, Camp Lejeune believes, and
seeks U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concurrence, that the
proposed project is not likely to adversely affect listed
species.
As'always, Camp Lejeune values the working relationship it has
maintained with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife S6rvice and will
continue to contribute to this valuable association.
The point of contact regarding this matter is Mr. Craig Ten
Brink, Environmental Conservation Branch, Environmental
3

+._ r `'�, 1 � � � �,. � tip: Y • �..
1 y 1 k .sr uC7; t Jr ti+a 1--
ww���qy %e YS'Y•l } ' j ,.., ! ^�•� � e�+�, � � • 4 ` d ^ µyd
k
r g
r
wisV� . «n ?' .�. a tR ,r; 'w .''•• yJ T �, •'. .,"� �+. .w �.,h�a4r' ��* - '.„f+•
g �:s� ��� I 1 t4 `, e,R„4'�k�1yc��,n'�°`'L Z'�`y"0..*�.,�^a�;•� t,=,'�6.
iT L
.41
4 el
_t.� *i`�4• � .ft 1 � 4 �1%�'. rt''�n h •+7 mow, cF f ♦ , ,it
^
�IC' i : i � �^..r' ' ��,r7 1:•t��rp� :L "rr �f„r..'r` 4,�''#fN '.:y � i '
ir
. �} � • � • ., � � i+y �� � � '4 M VFW '
~ T Jti 1 ♦,.
-, r 4%; -

5090.11.1
Management Division, Installations and Environment Department at
[phone].
Sincerely,
i
SCOTT A. BREWER, PE
Director, Environmental Management
By direction of
the Commanding Officer
Enclosure 1: Figure 1, Project Area
Enclosure 2: Figure 2, MARSOC Timber Cuts
Enclosure 3: Sewer Line Route
4

Marine Special Operations Command (MARSOC), CWA Section 404 Individual
Permit, Section 401 Certification Application
APPENDIX C
Wetland Mitigation Coordination
19

J
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
CESAW-RG (1145b)
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
29 January 2007
MEMORANDUM FOR Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, PSC Box
20004, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542-0004 (Attn: Mr. Scott Brewer)
SUBJECT: Action ID: 2007 286 067, Use Of Mitigation Credits In The Greater Sandy Run Area
Mitigation Bank For Camp Lejeune Projects Outside The Geographic Service Area
1. This correspondence is a response to your December 12, 2006, request for concurrence or
recommendations for Camp Lejeune to utilize the Greater Sandy Run Mitigation Bank to offset
unavoidable wetland and stream impacts outside the designated service area defined in the
Mitigation Bank Instrument (MBI).
2. General Provision Number 13 of the MBI does allow the Marine Corps Base, as the bank
sponsor, to utilize restoration credits from the bank for use with projects outside the service area.
Therefore, you may propose the bank's use as appropriate mitigation for this project. The permit
process will dictate whether or not credits offered from the bank will serve as appropriate and
practicable compensatory mitigation to replace functional losses to aquatic resources. The
District will determine what level of mitigation is appropriate based upon the function lost or
adversely affected as a result of impacts to aquatic resources.
3. Should you have questions, please contact Mr. Brad Shaver, Wilmington Regulatory Field
Office, at telephone [phone].
CF:
Mr. Marty Korenek
U.S. Marine Corps, Camp Lejeune '
Environmental Management Department
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542-0004
XOHN E.
Colonel, I
Commanc

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS r 4 5
MARN E CORP& &A&E
PSC BOX 20M
CAMP LEIEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA 20"2.00"
W REPLY REFER TO -
5090.11.2
BEMD
DEC 1 2 4W
From: Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
To: Commander, United States Army, Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District, Post Office Box 1890, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28402-1890, (Attn: Mr. Mickey Sugg)
Subj: USE OF MITIGATION CREDITS IN THE GREATER SANDY RUN AREA
MITIGATION BANK FOR CAMP LEJEUNE PROJECTS OUTSIDE THE GEOGRAPHIC
SERVICE AREA
Encl: (1) MARSOC Site Plan - Master Plan Revised, September 29,
2006
Ref: (a) Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) establishing the
Greater Sandy Run Wetland Mitigation Bank, dated 6 Nov 2000
1. The Secretary of Defense has decisioned that the United.States
Marine Corps stand-up a Special Forces detachment to be known as
the Marine Corps Special Operations Command (MARSOC) and locate it
at Camp Lejeune. An alternatives analysis was performed in order
to determine the best location for this unit on Camp Lejeune. The
analysis considered existing infrastructure, the ability to provide
utilities and support services, proximity of existing live -fire
ranges, distance to airfields, security, and accessibility. The
analysis revealed that the site best suited for a secure facility
large enough for the MARSOC was a 1,857 acre tract near Stone Bay
Ranges in the southern region of the installation located west of
US, Highway 17 and north of NC State Highway 210. The site is
located adjacent to the existing Stone Bay Ranges. It is mostly
forested, but includes some existing utility right-of-ways, roads,
and mission support openings like tactical landing zones. An
unnamed tributary of Stone Bay disects the site. This tributary
has been designated as a Special Secondary Nursery Area by the NC
Division of Marine Fisheries.
2. A wetland survey of the project area was completed September
20-06. The USAGE, Wilmington District personnel field verified the
wetland boundaries on July 31 and August 1, 2006. There were 345
wetland acres (19 percent) delineated in the 1,857 -acre Stone Bay
project area. Of the total wetland acres delineated, 248 acres (72
percent) were forested wetlands, and 50 acres (14 percent) were

Subj: GREATER SANDY RUN AREA MITIGATION BANK, USE OF MITIGATION
CREDITS FOR CAMP LEJEUNE PROJECTS OUTSIDE THE GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE
AREA
estuarine, forested and emergent wetlands. There were 47 acres
(14 percent) classified as palustrine scrub -shrub broad-leaved
evergreen wetlands. Additionally, 16,076 feet of linear wetlands
(palustrine scrub -shrub broad-leaved evergreen) were mapped.
The linear wetlands are groundwater discharge channels of
variable width from one to six feet wide and usually connect
smaller wetlands to larger tributary wetlands. Linear wetlands
are separate hydrological features not included in the total
acreage of delineated wetlands in the Stone Bay project area.
The linear features are not uniform in width and will be
evaluated for potential impact on a case-by-case basis; however,
the maximum acreage of linear wetlands in the project area was
2:2 acres based on the maximum width of six feet.
3. Planners and natural resources staff have conducted numerous
design charettes and developed a conceptual master plan
(.Enclosure 1) that minimizes the unavoidable impacts to wetlands
and other natural resources that will occur during the
development of this area. The total number of wetlands impacts
currently estimated for this project is 10.2 acres.
4. In July 2006, Camp Lejeune provided a written request to the
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) to seek their approval
to accept payment for unavoidable wetlands impacts (5 acres of
.riparian impacts, 15 acres of non -riparian impacts, 200 feet of
linear, cumulative stream/warm impacts) associated with this
project. The NC EEP agreed to accept mitigation responsibility
for providing compensatory mitigation for 5 acres of riparian
impacts and 200 linear feet of stream impacts (warm). They.
suggested we contact the Hofman Forest Mitigation Bank for
purchase of non -riparian mitigation credits for 15 acres of non -
riparian impacts.
5. Camp Lejeune currently has 435.39 unused pocosin/pine
flatwoods mitigation credits available in the Greater Sandy Run
Mitigation Bank. General Provision Number 13 of the MBI states
that the Geographic Service Area (GSA) for the bank is that
portion of Camp Lejeune located within Cataloging Unit 03030007
as shown on hydrologic unit maps prepared by the US Geological
Survey. It further states that the "District may authorize the
Sponsor to use the Bank to mitigate for impacts beyond the GSA
on a case-by-case basis, where the District determines this to
2

Subj: GREATER SANDY RUN AREA MITIGATION BANK, USE OF MITIGATION
CREDITS FOR CAMP LEJEUNE PROJECTS OUTSIDE THE GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE
AREA
be practicable and environmentally desirable" when the Sponsor
is the permit applicant.
6. The MARSOC facility is located in GSA Cataloging Unit
43030001, adjacent to.GSA Cataloging Unit 03030007. Camp
Lejeune requests that the District authorize the use of the
Greater Sandy Run Mitigation Bank for use as compensatory
mitigation for areas on the installation located outside GSA
Cataloging Unit 03030007. This will allow practical and
economical compensatory mitigation for the MARSOC project and
other future projects located within the boundaries of the
installation.
7. Please consider this request and provide your concurrence or
recommendations that will allow Camp Lejeune to proceed with
this work. Point of contact is Mr. Martin Korenek,
Environmental Conservation Branch, Environmental Management
Division, at telephone [phone] or e-mail at
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
SCOTT A. EWER, PE
Director, Environmental Management
By direction of
the Commanding Officer
Copy to:
Ms. Cyndi Karoly, NC Div. of Water Quality 401/Wetlands
Unit
Mr. Stephen Rynas NC Div. of Coastal Management
Mr. William D. Gillmore NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
3

0SWO
!k
m o n -u a nTiu m m
x z c ;u ;o n� <X x x �+
Z o>� n
cDiu `0CD '0oo � -
D
oz z m o
CD fn mm O
U
U p c
to
// J1
L
SITE FLAN - MASTER PLAN REVISED
MARSOC HEADQUARTERS FACD September 29, 2006
MCB, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina

_tem
lei] " it
PROGRAM
August 2, 2006
POC Martin Korenek
PSC Box 20004
Camp Lejeune, NC 28542
Project: Marine Special Operations Command
2 0 0 j 4
County: Onslow
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin
Cataloging
Wetlands
(Acres)
Stream
Buffer
Buffer
Unit
(Linear Feet)
Zone 1
Zone 2
(Sq. Ft.)
(Sq. Ft.;
Ri arian
Non-Ri arian
Coastal Marsh
Cold Cool Warm
White Oak
5.0
0
0
0 0 200
0
03030001
0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 mitigation -to -impact ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the
compensatory mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or
CAMA Permit. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact David Robinson at [phone].
Sincerely,
William Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Brad Shaver, USACE- Wilmington
Noelle Lutheran, DWQ-Wilmington
Doug Huggett, DCM-Morehead City
File
Rub
o" Our fm&
ruc9... P ... Pr
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS SAN
PEC SOX 200M
CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA 2BU24 M
Mr. David Robinson
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Dear Mr. Robinson:
PERMANENT FILE
N REPLY REFER TO:
5090.11.2
BEMD
"JUL 18 �nn�
Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune is currently developing plans to
construct and operate a Marine Special Operations Command Center
(MARSOC) on Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune. Our Facilities and
Environmental planning staff have developed an overall site
concept that will allow this new complex to be developed in
numerous phases over a period of several years. The complex
will cover several hundred acres and include new administrative
buildings, barracks, live fire ranges, security fencing, etc.
along with roads and utility corridors in an area that is
currently undeveloped. Every effort will be made by our
planners to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and other
natural resources to the extent possible. However, our current
concept for a complex of this size simply does not allow us to
avoid wetland impacts altogether. As a result, Marine Corps
Base Camp Lejeune would like to pursue off-site mitigation
options through the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(NCEEP) as a way to mitigate for unavoidable wetland impacts
associated with this important project.
Our hopes are that early coordination will allow the NCEEP to
identify suitable mitigation options and streamline Section 404
Clean Water Act permitting requirements. As suggested per the
discussion during a meeting held at your office on April 19
2006, we are providing a NCEEP In Lieu Fee Request Form for the
MARSOC project. Our current estimate for unavoidable cumulative
impacts to wetlands is 20 acres. This estimate includes non -
riparian and riparian wetland impacts. Road and utility
corridor crossings that result in impacts to streams (designated
as Primary Nursery Areas by the NC Division of Marine Fisheries)
in the project area will be designed to minimize the footprint
and lessen the impact to these sensitive systems. We will
provide revisions to you as we refine our plans. Please see the
enclosure for other information about the project site.

5090.11.2
BEMD
Point of contact is Mr. Martin Korenek, Environmental
Conservation Branch, Environmental Management Department, at
telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
Qzi�r -k�
SCOTT A. PREWER, PE
Director, Environmental Management
By direction of
the Commanding Officer
Enclosure: (1) NCEEP in Lieu Fee Request Form (for MARSOC
complex)

NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, NCEEP
IN LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM
Revised 1/19/06
Print this form, N in required information, sign and deft, and either mail to NCEEP, 1852 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27899-1852, or fax to 919-715-2219. Attachments are acceptsble for clarification purposes.
1. Name of Applicant or Agent
�arlimp- Ce r a 4 e C.06 W Lt;tua V. i
P! -
Naar of Business of Applicant or
Agent
ent "? M .. 41 ria t1aft —J
3. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box)
Sc QoX .1-000 -
4. City, State, Zip
5. Telephone (e9, 919-555-1212) q I O— 4 51— 7 ;L 3 S
S. Fax (optional) '910-451-1787
7. E-mail (opdonan
_ _ m a r �' i vw . � p r ! i1►►t � � t�Smt. ew:1
1111.4flo%%S < �i o er'rf�.� G m 08694
9. Project Location (nearest town, city) IA
5 AS �r• N C-
10. Lat-Long Coordinates (optbnal) �� e r y iiw 3 y e� s r 3 n
.11. Project County 7
12. River Basin (
13. Cataloging Unit (a -digit)
14. Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) (e.g., 0.13)
-�acrts
18. Non -Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.)
16. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.)
17. Stream Impacts -Cold (ft.) (e.g. 1,234)
NO4
18. Stream Impact -Cool (R.)
191ormus�WWOVE11 %m./ .s O V f4-
20.
20. Buffer Impact -Zone 1 (sq. ft.) (e.g. 12,345) N A
[!1. Buffer Impact -Zone 2 (sq. 1t.)
AIA _ I
Check (4) below N this request -ii--a., 9"tu A scant or Agent:
_ revision to a current acceptance, or
_
re -submission of an expired acceptance
Daft: j
Buffer mitigation applicable only in the Neuse, Tar -Pamlico and Catawba river basins, ,and the Randleman Lake
Water Supply Watershed.
For help in determining the Cataloging Unit, go to EPS's'Surf Your Watershed' web page:
Direct a1 questions to David Robinson at 919-715-2228 or devid.robinson&wmail.net
aNCLOSURE( 2 )