WQ0040597_Application (FTSE)_20181217

State of North Carolina
WR
_ Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
' 15A NCAC 02T .0300 — FAST TRACK SEWER SYSTEM EXTENSION APPLICATION
`DIvlslon of Water Resources FTA 04-16 & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Application Number: b �� r� (to be completed by DWR)
All items must be completed or the application will be returned
1. APPLICANT INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's name: 3Town of Fuauay-Varina (company, municipality, HOA, utility, etc.)
2. Applicant type: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporation ❑ General Partnership
❑ Federal ❑ State/County ® Municipal
3. Signature authority's name: Jay T• Meyers per 15A NCAC 02T .01061b1
Title: Public Utilities Director
4. Applicant's mailing address: 401 Old Honeycutt Road
City: Fuguay-Varina State: NC Zip: 27526-�
5. Applicant's contact information:
Phone number: [phone] Email Address: [e-mail]
fuggay-varina.org
I1. PROJECT INFORMATION:
❑ Privately -Owned Public Utility
❑ Other
1. Project name: Sunset Bluffs Phase 13
2. Application/Project status: ❑ Proposed (New Permit) ❑ Existing Permit/Project
If a modification, provide the existing permit number: WQ00 _ _ and issued date: _ _
If new construction but part of a master plan, provide the existing permit number: WQ00_�
3. County where project is located: Wake
4. Approximate Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.628121 Longitude:-78.002652°
5. Parcel 1D (if applicable): 0658728946 (Wake County PIN)
(or Parcel ID to closest downstream sewer)
111. CONSULTANT INFORMATION:
I. Professional Engineer: Russell Briggs Number: NC 011889
Firm: B&F Consultine
Mailing address: 2805 Tobermoty-,Lane
City: Raleigh State: NC Zip: 27606-_
Phone number: 919 618-0180 Email Address: rbriggsAnc.rr.com
IV. WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY (WWTF) INFORMATION:
1. Facility Name: Terrible Creek W WTP Permit Number: NCO00066516
Owner Name: Town of Fugua-Varina
V. RECEIVING DOWNSTREAM SEWER INFORMATION (if different than WWTF):
1. Permit Number(s): WQ0038601 Downstream (Receiving) Sewer Size: _ , , inch
System Wide Collection System -Permit Numbers] (if applicable): WQCS�
Owner Name(s):
FORM: FTA 04-16 Page l of 5

VI. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. If the Applicant is a Privately -Owned Public Utility, has a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity been attached?
❑ Yes ❑No ®N;`A
2. If the Applicant is a Developer of lots to be sold, has a Developer's Operational Agreement (FORM: DEV) been attached?
❑ Yes []No ®N. A
3. If the Applicant is a Home.'Property Owners' Association, has an Operational A€.Tregment (,FORM: HOA) been attached?
❑ Yes ❑No Z A
4. Origin of wastewater: (check all that apply):
® Residential Owned ❑ Retail (stores, centers, malls) ❑ Car Wash
❑ Residential Leased ❑ RetaiI with food preparation/service ❑ Hotel and/or Motels
❑ School / preschool / day care ❑ Medical / dental / veterinary facilities ❑ Swimming Pool /Clubhouse
❑ Food and drink facilities ❑ Church ❑ Swimming Pool/Filter Backwash
❑ Businesses / offices / factories ❑ Nursing Home ❑ Other (Explain in Attachment)
5. Nature of wastewater: 100 % Domestic/Commercial °10 Commercial
_ % Industrial (See I5A NCAC 02T .0103(20))
Its there a Pretreatment Program in effect? ❑ Yes ❑ No
6. Hasa flow reduction been approved under 15A NCAC 02T .0114(f)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
➢ If yes, provide a cony of flow reduction approval letter
7. Summarize wastewater generated by project:
Establishment Type (see 02T.01140
Daily Design Flow "-b
No. of Units
Flow
Residential (413R)
300 gal/d.u.
17
5100 GPD
gal/
GPD
gal/
GAD
gall
GPD
gal/
GPD
gal/
GPD
Total
5I00 GPD
a See 15A NCAC 02T .01.14(b), (d), (e)(I) and (e)(2) for caveats to wastewater design flow rates (i.e., minimum flow per
dwelling; proposed unknown non-residential development uses; public access facilities located near high public use areas;
and residential property located south or east of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to be used as vacation rentals as defined
in G.S. 42A-4).
b Per 15A NCAC 02T .0114(c), design flow rates for establishments not identified [in table 15A NCAC 02T.01141 shall be
determined using available flow data, water using fixtures, occupancy or operation patterns, and other measured data.
8. Wastewater generated by project: 5100 GPD (per 15A NCAC 02T .0114)
➢ Do not include future flows or previously permitted allocations
If permitted flow is zero, indicate why:
❑ Pump Station or Gravity Sewer where flow will be permitted in subsequent permits that connect to this line
❑ Flow has already been allocated in Permit Number:
❑ Rehabilitation or replacement of existing sewer with no new flow expected
❑ Other (Explain):
FORM: PTA 04-16 Page 2 of 5

VII.
GRAVITY SEWER DESIGN CRITERIA (If Applicable) - 02T .0305 & MDC (Gravity Sewers):
1. Summarize gravity sewer to be permitted:
Vlll.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Size (inches) Length (feet) Material
8 379 PVC
➢ Section II & III of the MDC for Permitting of Gravity Sewers contains information related to design criteria
A Section III contains information related to minimum slopes for gravity sewer(s)
D Oversizing lines to meet minimum slope requirement is not allowed and a violation of the MDC
PUMP STATION DESIGN CRITERIA (If Applicable) — 02T .0305 & MDC (Pump Stations/Force Mains:
COMPLETE FOR EACH PUMP STATION INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT
Pump station number or name: _ .. .—
Approximate Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: Longitude: -_=
Design flow of the pump station: _ millions gallons per day (firm capacity)
Operational point(s) of the pump(s): _ gallons per minute at feet total dynamic head (TDH)
Summarize the force main to be permitted (for this Pump Station):
Size (inches) Length (feet) Material
6. Power reliability in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T.0305(h)(1):
❑ Standby power source or pump with automatic activation and telemetry - 15A NCAC 02T .0305(h)(1)(B)_
➢ Required for all pump stations with an average daily flow greater than or equal to 15,000 gallons per day
➢ Must be permanent to facility
Or if the pump station has an average daily flow less than 15,000 gallons per day:
❑ Portable power source with manual activation, quick -connection receptacle and telemetry - 15A NCAC 02T
.0305(h)(1)(C)
or
❑ Portable pumping unit with plugged emergency pump connection and telemetry - 15A NCAC 02T .0305(h)(1)(C):
➢ It shall be demonstrated to the Division that the portable source is owned or contracted by the applicant (draft agreement)
and is compatible with the station.
➢ If the portable power source or pump is dedicated to multiple pump stations, an evaluation of all the pump stations' storage
capacities and the rotation schedule of the portable power source or pump, including travel timeframes, shall be provided
in the case of a multiple station power outage.
FORM: FTA 04-16 Page 3 of 5

IX. SETBACKS & SEPARATIONS — (02B .0200 & 15A NCAC 02T .0305(f)):
1. Does the project comply with all separations found in 15A NCAC 02T .0305(f) & (el ®Yes ❑ No
➢ 15A NCAC 02T.0305(fl contains minimum scparations that shall be provided fnr sewer systems -
Setback Parameter*
Separation Required
Storm sewers and other utilities not listed below vertical
24 inches
Water mains vertical -water over sewer including in benched trenches
18 inches
Water mains(horizontal)
10 feet
Reclaimed water lines vertical - reclaimed over sewer
18 inches
Reclaimed water lines horizontal - reclaimed over sewer
2 feet
"Any private or public water supply source, including any wells, WS-I waters of Class I or
Class 11 impounded reservoirs used as a source of drinking water
100 feet
"Waters classified WS (except WS-I or WS-V), B, SA, ORW, HQW, or SB from normal
high water or tide elevation and wetlands see item IX.2
50 feet
"Any other stream, lake, impoundment, or ground water lowering and surface drainage
ditches
10 feet
Any building foundation
5 feet
Any basement
10 feet
Top sloe of embankment or cuts of 2 feet or more vertical height
10 feet
Drainage systems and interceptor drains
5 feet
Any swimming pools
10 feet
Final earth grade vertical
36 inches
➢ 15A NCAC 02T.0305(e) contains alternatives where separations in 02T.0305(f) cannot be achieved.
➢ "Stream classifications can be identified using the Division's NC Surface Water Classifications webpaae
➢ If noncompliance with 02T.0305(f) or (g), see Section X of this application
2. Does the project comply with separation requirements for wetlands? (50 feet of separation) ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA
➢ See the Division's draft separation requirements for situations where separation cannot be meet
➢ No variance is required if the alternative design criteria specified is utilized in design and construction
➢ As built documents should reference the location of areas effected
3. Does the project comply with setbacks found in the river basin rules per 15A NCAC 02B .0200? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA
➢ This would include Trout Buffered Streams per 15A NCAC 2B.0202
4. Does the project require coverage/authorization under a 404 Nationwide or ® Yes ❑ No
individual permits or 401 Water Quality Certifications?
➢ Information can be obtained from the 401 & Buffer Permittina Branch
5. Does project comply with 15A NCAC 02T.0105(c)(6) (additional permits/certifications)? ® Yes ❑ No
Per 15A NCAC 02T.0105(c)(6). directly related environmental permits or certification applications are being prepared, have
been applied for, or have been obtained. Issuance of this permit is contingent on issuance of dependent permits (erosion and
sedimentation control plans, stormwater management plans, etc.).
6. Does this project include any sewer collection lines that are deemed "high -priority?"
Per 15A NCAC 02T.0402. "high -priority sewer" means "any aerial sewer, sewer contacting surface waters, siphon, or sewer
positioned parallel to streambanks that is subject to erosion that undermines or deteriorates the sewer.
❑ Yes ® No ❑ N/A
➢ If yes, include an attachment with details for each line, including type (aerial line, size, material, and location).
High priority lines shall be inspected by the permittee or its representative at least once every six -months and inspections
documented per 15A NCAC 02T.0403(a)(5) or the permitee's individual System -Wide Collection permit.
FORM: FTA 04-16 Page 4 of 5

X. CERTIFICATIONS:
1. Does the submitted system comply with 15A NCAC 02T, the Minimum Design Criteria for the Permitting of Pump Stations
and Force Mains (latest version), and the Gravity -Sewer Minimum Design Criteria (latest_ version) as applicable?
XYes ❑ No
If No, complete and submit the Variance/Altemative Design Request application.(VADC 10-14) and supporting documents for
review. Approval orthe request is required prior to submittal of the Fast Track Application and supporting documents.
2. Professional Engineer's Certification:
M
that this application for
has been reviewed by me and is accurate, complete and consistent with the information supplied in the plans, specifications,
engineering calculations, and all other supporting documentation to the best of my knowledge. I further attest that to the best
of my knowledge the proposed design has been prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations, Gravity Sewer
Minimum Design Criteria for Gravity Sewers (latest version), and the Minimum Design Criteria for the Fast -Track Permitting
of Pump Stations and Force Mains (latest version). Although other professionals may have developed certain portions of this
submittal package, inclusion of these materials under my signature and seal signifies that I have reviewed this material and
have judged it to be consistent with the proposed design.
NOTE — In accordance with General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.613, any person who knowingly makes any false
statement, representation, or certification in any application package shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor, which may
include a fine not to exceed $10,000, as well as civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation.
North Carolina Professional Engineer's seal, signature, and date:
Applicant's Certification per
115A NCAC 02T.01 06(br)-:j WJ ,
is name & title from Application Item 1.3.)
attest that this application for
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of
this application are not completed and that if all required supporting documentation and attachments are not included, this
application package is subject to being returned as incomplete. 1 understand that any discharge of wastewater from this non -
discharge system to surface waters or the land will result in an immediate enforcement action that may include civil penalties,
injunctive relief, and/or criminal prosecution. I will make no claim against the Division of Water Resources should a condition
of this permit be violated. 1 also understand that if all required parts of this application package are not completed and that if
all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned to me as
incomplete.
NOTE - In accordance with General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-. 15.613, any person who knowingly makes any false
statement, representation, or certification in any application package shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor, which may
include a fine not to exceed $10,000 as well as civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation.
Signature:
Date: I Z �G'G IV
FORM: FTA 04-16 Page 5 of 5

pF WATFR State of North Carolina
`p� 4G Department of Environment and Natural Resources
T� Division of Water Quality
•� Flow Tracking/Acceptance for Sewer Extension Permit Applications
(FTSE 06-13)
Project Applicant Name: Town of Fu ua -Varina
Project Name for which flow is being requested: Sunset Bluffs, Phase 13
More than one FTSE may be required for a single project if the owner of the WWTP is not responsible jar all pump
stations along the route of the proposed wastewater flow.
I. Complete this section only if you are the owner of the wastewater treatment plant.
a. WWTP Facility Name: Terrible Creek WWTP
b. WWTP Facility Permit #: NCO066516
A11 flows are M MGD
c. WWTP facility's permitted flow
3.000
d. Estimated obligated flow not yet tributary to the WWTP
0.875
e. WWTP facility's actual avg. flow
1.137
f. TotaI flow for this specific request
0.005
g. Total actual and obligated flows to the facility
2.017
h. Percent of permitted flow used
67.2%
II. Complete this section for each pump station you are responsible for along the route of this
proposed wastewater flow.
List pump stations located between the project connection point and the WWTP:
(A)
(B) (C) (D)=(B+C)
(E)—(A-D)
Design
Obligated,
Pump Average Daily
Approx_ Not Yet Total Current
Station Firm Flow* *
Current Avg. Tributary Flow Plus
(Name or Capacity,* (Firm pf),
Daily Flow, Daily Flow, Obligated
Available
Number) MGD MGD
MGD MGD Flow
Capacity*"•
Basal
_r,-11 1.200 0.480
0.071 0.072 0.133
0.337
* The Firm Capacity of any pump station is defined as the maximum pumped flow that
can be achieved with the largest pump taken out of service.
** Design Average Daily Flow is the firm capacity of the pump station divided by a peaking
factor (pi) not less than 2.5.
*** A Planning Assessment Addendum shall be attached for each pump station located
between the project connection point and the WWTP where the Available Capacity is < 0.
Page 1 of 6
FTSE 06-13

Certification Statement:
I Jay T. Meyers, P.E., Public Utilities certify to the best of my knowledge that the addition of
Director
the volume of wastewater to be permitted in this project has been evaluated along the route to the
receiving wastewater treatment facility and that the flow from this project is not anticipated to
cause any capacity related sanitary sewer overflows or overburden any downstream pump station
en route to the receiving treatment plant under normal circumstances, given the implementation
of the planned improvements identified in the planning assessment where applicable. This
analysis has been performed in accordance with local established policies and procedures using
the best available data. This certification applies to those items listed above in Sections I and II
plus all attached planning assessment addendums for which I am the responsible party.
Signature of this form indicates acceptance of this wastewater flow.
ial Signal
Date
Page 2 of 6
FTSE 06-13

6tate of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
November 7, 2001
Mr. Michael A. Allway, Assistant Town Manager
Town of Fuquay-Varina
401 Old Honeycutt Road
Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina 27526
Subject:
Dear Mr. Allway:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
��'! 0 8.2001
Tow eta -Ver e
Town of Fuquay-Varina
Flow Reduction Approval
Wake County
On September 10.2001, the Division of Water Quality Non Discharge Permitting Unit received your
flow reduction request for future and present, but not yet tributary, single-family dwellings in the Town of
Fuquay-Varina. The letter requests approval of a residential flow value of 220 GPD/residence for these
dwellings.
The information provided water use information for 2000 and actual daily waste water flow recordings
for their peak month of May. Other supporting data was provided. The evaluation covered 90 homes that are
representative of the subdivisions in Fuquav-Varina in accordance with 15A NCAC 214.02190)(3).
Based on the information submitted. the Division hereby approves the use of 75 GPD per bedroom
per dwelling for residential units (225 GPD per three bedroom home) in all applicable non -discharge permit
applications for future sewer line extensions and present, but not yet tributary projects for the Town of Fuquay-
Varina. The Division did note that the average flow per residence in February 2000 was 271 GPD. Regardless
of the adiusted design dailv wastewater flow rate. at no time shall the wastewater flows exceed the effluent
limits defined in the Town's NPDES permit for the* treatment facility or exceed the capacity of the sewers
downstream of any new sewer extension.
Please submit a separate letter to the Raleigh Regional Office that requests flow reductions for
specific previously permitted projects (indicate permit number, project name,it flow, new flow
under reduction and the difference between them). If you have any questions or comments regarding this
M
matter, please contact arie Doklavic at [phone] ext. 371.
S ince
f-' Gregory J_ Thorpe, Ph.D.
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Flow Reduction File
1617 Mail Service Center. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% rec ycledll0°Io post -consumer paper

SCALE 1:24 000
1 0.13 0 KILOMETERS I �
1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000
I 0.5 0 1
RILES
1000 0 1000 - 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 - 7000 B000 9000 10000
FEET
FUQUAY-VARINA, NC
2016
NORTH CAROLINA-WAKE CO.
7.5-MINUTE SERIES
USGS QUAD MAP
SUNSET BLUFFS
PHASE 13
SUBDIVISION AREA

-i CAROLINA -- SHEET NUMBER 90
3',Wri
Haw Lak
r
% S L
A � of
CEO
L .� Ge$
i.
A .ice Z� "$9. XY ; WEB
C*r �. vrn � Bass Lake Rd
NoEl
4 r1
Na8 � as
p r52ti, r Nab x 'a
yip Woe
r02
10
JJ { Ly
r �Y :. F WeA
NO2
[30
Willi 1�1,
Ell
Sunset Bluffs w,aW
Phase 13 location way
!We'a .. V4 1AsC
C'D NRCS Soil Map
Wa I me6 as *�aB YYaq N*B
-04L
Ly
a s 9 'h'aB ' V Wad T hla
Ni+E] wag s h14C tt
coo Hef-bert Akins Rd ,vas
a9 No
WBIti
r w*¢
ti4 , % Arr trr NeA
woo James Slaughter Fed
Mvff 4— .p * *Nab A WEB 3
N
i'� 4r

USDA United States A product of the National
Department of
Cooperative Soil Survey,
Agriculture
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
RCS
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies. State
Natural
agencies including the
Resources
Agricultural Experiment
Conservation
Stations, and local
Service
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Wake County,
North Carolina
Sunset Bluffs Phase 93
December 5, 2018

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http:llwww nres.usda.gov/wps/
portallnreslmainlsoilslhealthl) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http llwww.nres usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detaii/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_O53951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc_) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TOO). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W , Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TOO). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
preface....................... .... .......................... .... .. ....................... ...,...,..........2
Flow Soil Stirveys Are ........................................5
Sol] map ....................... ................... .................................... ............................ 8
SoilMap....................................................................................... ..................9
Legend.... . . ................. ,,,........................................, .............................1(j
MapUnit Legend .. . . ......................,................................. ............................ 11
Map Unit Desuiptions..... ..............................................................................11
Wake CDunty, North Caroline ......................................................................13
DOB—lath;n loamy t-and, 2 to 6 peg` ent slopes......................................A3
GrC-- rkney sandy loam, B to 10 percent slopes ..................... ...............14
References..... ...................... .......................................................... 16
4

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes, the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

r—
O
C
O
AC
N
U
L
Q.
a m
in
w
'o
E
v
in
U
IA478b .&
z
ti
n
n
M fi 8b .M
R
co
g
_
Z
M-a $b
.a
z
�i

O
M
4)
W
U
a
w
a�
0
(0
C
O
N
3
U
O
p a
ro
U
o
a r ce d
a
N
a
a
3 c o
_ }• w d
m
Z
N O
M
C
c
n
N
aamEti
"'
cc
N
cm
Y
Z
ts�`E
n� �°
rd-0
y'v
E
"
omE
Na a
O
E
`1
di
. E C
m
R
EO
m
4 co
w
c
w w
�+
N
E D
b
N to
G d a
L L
Z
l0 N
N
N
U E H a
E
O C `� to
?
m
to
O (L
a
N C h s m
¢
4
O
a
'c O a
4Q
i
Q
m
q1 n3c
E
L)
tom�'L
m
U)
.G
r
r
}' t0a
o
a
U
to
to
Z
@
Q
>.
m
a E N
Y� c y
ami
to
=o E
`m 'w t
�.roa
n,` cg'
�3
o
N
sri
to
U)i
o
o a+� m
�'
Z
CD
a
ti— m
c
O
h a
c
a... O C
Zrr a m
E at
o.a
3�
o
"
o
a
E co
E— m N
a)
carat
a
a
c
o
9
�'
cc
d
E
c
aan�
=,
a
a
�a.aCL
r4:
m
3
nc'^v
tg
to
E tg
a
��
(a �c o
`'"
m>
a Z
m
E
o am
L
m
m�
Z
vQ
d C
cp
to
m
arm c�
O`
V!
m
E Ol .L+
C N
a
T 2
t7 lE
}: L W
W
N
O1
�d
a
ro
" 'c
a
N
_
.
O= C 'G
G-
oa
a 7.
m
`1
a ;� tp M 7
U
N 9
a
`7
Q
m Ol
�0
s
0 9 m a
Z
y
o
to
�mtutn
a-L"
E
N
Fyy
3eicm
E m
U.4
m
m
c
o o
O a m
rca
m� E
— �
vs
y a N
`
O'p C
Ica
O o N y W
a
O 0
aQ
O.O
a
�%
o
E-0 O
I t
CL
=°C%l e
An
m m
.0 c
n. d
L
UJ
E o
o 'a tm c
a
u3i a
W c� m
a E
w (i
�cd
a-s¢
N
F`o
0U)
O�
E_s
I
m
t)r
FL- s0 U)
N
N
N
7
m
LL
Id
m
U
0.
t
�
LII
LO
a
Mm
N
N a
pp
C/ G
Q a
C
in
J
m
m
E
c ir
m O
W a
to
m
to
U) w
>
O w =
w
o 2'
S 7
o a
JLL
O
�
a
C
�
Z
LU
43
; W
/
E
C�
m"
W
CL
O
N
O
to
N
N
4
C
y
0
d
C O
W dal
N
II
?
N
d
A C
N N
II
w
Q 4
IL
O
w
N
LL O
m
cc �
W
N
O
X_0o
m
u
w
U) w
m
t)
aK
w
m}mcNwa oi
w to
vm
c
in to
a
c
t it
x
Q j •:
'7 T�
00
T
JY
Y' +Qs
yt
{ N
.r
•.
a
H
0
T

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in Aol Percent of AQI
DoB Dothan loamy sand, 2 to 6 3.9 97.7%
percent slopes
GrC Gritney sandy loam, 6 to 10 0.1 2.3%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 4.0 100. -
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities,
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Wake County, North Carolina
DoB—Dothan loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 2spp1
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period. 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Dothan and similar soils: 92 percent
Minor components: 8 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit
Description of Dothan
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 12 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 12 to 40 inches: sandy clay loam
Btv - 40 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 35 to 43 inches to plinthite
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.60 inlhr)
Depth to water table: About 34 to 40 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (noninigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Fuquay
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Gritney
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
GrC—Gritney sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol- 2xh9x
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Gritney and similar soils: 94 percent
Minor components: 6 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Gritney
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform positron (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
AP - 0 to 5 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 5 to 43 inches: clay
BC - 43 to 50 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 50 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 inlhr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 36 inches
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profrle: Moderate (about 8.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Dothan
Percent of map unit: 6 percent
Landform: I nterfi uves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
1s

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres_usda.gov/wps/portal/
nresldetail/national/soils/?cid=nresl42p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda,gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_O53577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portallnresldetaillnationallsoils/?cid=nresl42p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasturel?cid=stelprdb1043084
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 43041. http.//www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres 142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http:/Iwww.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres 142 p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl42p2�_052290.pdf
17

RUSSELL BRIGGS 2635
GWEN BRIGGS W21153010098
RALEIGH, NC 27606
Date M
Pay to the f - [�
Order �f Ak +�_ 1 p 1 $ 490, OD
U !Y E 1 g Y ts C4'` 6 —W Dollars is
�6mI�NA
13 —foe
For,___ }
i3O'S3000 2 L9i: 1,063.06.5l 24t.1.6a■0 2635 ..
Cop
0

B&F CONSULTING
RUSS E L L B R I G G S, P. E_ 9 1 9. 6 1 8, 0 1 8 0
AMBER FARRELLY, P. E. 919.389.810,2
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL SHEET
IO: I.MMI
NCDE -DWR timber rarrelly
C(MPANY. IMII.
Fast Track Sewer Appfication 12/ 17/2018
NCDeptofFnvf,o
mental Quality
?018
R21
elgh k`'g'n►1
?I Office
ADDIWSS: PI II IN I. NL10M R
3800 Barrett Drive 919-7914200
RI::
Sunset Bluffs Phase 13 Fast Track Sewer Application
El kAW.t'NT D H)R ,iPPRO)VAI, ❑ 1'1.1-:A1-1: (:c)NINK:14T ❑ M.-PIN ❑ YLI:_1514 RI_c,Yr,N,I-,
N(lE'I.ti,'(,IIAIAII N':h 11I1i tit(nk(x PM s W D N (t1Ns11)I'RI.I) IJWTIMIN-1M' L NI.I 4;5 s1 .%1'D 01!I1 It\V:0'
Please find attached the requested forms and documentation for last Track Sewer Extension
application as it pertains to die approved project entitled: Sunset Bluffs Phase 13 (Subdivision)
Project Narrative: The proposed sewer is necessary to provide public sever scrx ice through
die above named property to service 17 residential units along an extension of internal roadworks
for adjacent approved phases to tic into the existing adjacent subdivision. '1-he existing sewerline
will be extended through die public roadway tight of way and public casements for service.
Please find attached the Following items for Sewer Extension Systems Extension Re"iew
• Two copies of plan sets for review
• One original of die Fast Track Sever System Extension Application
• One original of the Flow Tracking/acceptance for Sewer Extension Permit App.
• One USGS Quad Map for the project area
• One NRCS Soil Report and IN -lap for the project area
• Copy' of all items listed above on attached CD in .pdf format
• A check in the amount of $480.00 to NCDF.Q-DWR
Please let me know if you need anything further
"17iank you, /
Amber Farrelly, P.E.
amber.farrellr(trbandfc(,nsultltl g.colnnSllIt111gco171
919-389-8102
DePt ofEnvivonmeatal Quality
NC
2805 TORERMORY LANE • RALEIGH, NC 27606
�e1gh gegiauai Uffice