20190111 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190124

D1�VR
�irlslan af Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
F Yes
C' No
Is this project a public transportation project?"
� Yes r No
Change only rf needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
20190111
Is a payment required for this project?*
f No paymentrequired
� Fee received
F Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Cenhal Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Yonkers Road Improvements
1a. Who is the PrimaryContact?*
Doug Keller (Agent)
1b. PrimaryContact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
1/24/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Crabtree Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C:NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.809933
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Is this a NCDOT Project?*
C' Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
,r! Section 404 Permit (w�etlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Longitude:
78.886618
Ve rsion# *
1
What amout is owed?*
r• $zao.00
C' $570.00
Select Project Reviewer"
Rob Ridings:eads\rgridings
1c. PrimaryContact Phone:*
[phone]
::

�J Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified bythe Corps?
G Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
14 - Linear transportation
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
�J 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after-the-fact permit application?"
f Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
C' Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
� Yes r No
Acceptance LetterAttachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
C' Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
l' Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
rJ Owner � Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
City of Raleigh
2b. Deed book and page no.:
WA
2c. Responsible party:
Amy Billings
2d. Address
Street Address
222 W. Hargett Street — 4th Roor
Address Line 2
�Y
Raleigh
Fbstal / Zip Code
27601
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:"
[e-mail]
r 401 Water Quality Certification - 6cpress
17 Riparian Buffer Authorization
S[ate / FYwince I Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
*
C' Yes r No
r Yes C' No
C. Project Information and Prior Project History "

1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(rf appropriate)
1 c. Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2. Project Identification
2a. Propertyldentification Number:
WA - City Owned
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
�ty
Postal / Zip Code
3. SurFace Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:"
Crabtree Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
QNSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010804
4. Project Description and History
2b. Propertysize:
28 Acres
State / Aovince I F�gion
Country
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Development in the area is small businesses with mostly cleared lots and some wooded areas.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
C' Yes r No � Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.15
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
972
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:"
To provide improvements to 2.3 mile Yonkers road by providing more connectivity to the surrounding businesses, including a consistent curb and gutter section with a multi-use path
along the south side of the road.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
To Improve the e�tisting 2.3 mile Yonkers Road by providing connectivity with curb and gutter and a multi-use path to the surrounding businesses. The primary purpose of the proposed
project is to provide an efficient and safe roadway connector from Capital Boulevard to New Berm avenue, parallel with I-440. Equipment indudes typical construction equipment such as
backhoes, dump trucks, bulldozers and excavators.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
Sa. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
G Yes �' No C' Unknown
Comments:
Sb. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
G Preliminary �' Approved C' Not Verified r Unknown C' WA
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2016-01134

Sc. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Ms.Tasha Alexander
USACE
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
The determination was made in the field �nnth RK&K in 2016.
Sd1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?"
� Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activit�/?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
IJ Wetlands II7 Streams-tributaries
r Open Waters I� Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
�J Buffers
�' I
2a. Site #* (') 2a7 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type *(') 2a Type of W. * 2d. W. name" 2e. Forested * Zf. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(') area*
� Prot letionand Toe P Isolated Wetlands WA (see NRTR) Yes Both OA5�)
�Fill Slope and Toe T Isolated Wetlands WA (see NRTR) Yes Both 0.020
Protection (acres)
�Fill Slope and Toe P Isolated Wetlands WB (see NRTR) Yes Both 0.010
Protection (acres)
�Fill Slope and Toe T Isolated Wetlands WB (see NRTR) Yes Both 0.010
Protection (acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.030
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.090
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.060
❑ 3a. Reason for impact (') 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width* 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction" length"
Site 1: Fill slo e; Outfall Permanent Fill UT to Crabtree Creek Perennial Both S 7
S1 P
improvements Average(feet) Qinearfeet)
Site 1: Fill slo e; Outfall Tem orar Fill UT to Crabtree Creek Perennial Both 8 12
S2 P p Y
improvements Average(feet) Qinearfeet)
Site 2: Fill slo e; Outfall Permanent Fill UT to Crabtree Creek Perennial Both 7 10
S3 P
improvements Average(feet) (linearfeet)
Site 2: Fill slo e; Outfall Tem orar Fill UT to Crabtree Creek Perennial Both 4 14
S4 P P Y
improvements Average(feet) Qinearfeel)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0

3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
17
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
43
3j. Comments:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
fJ Neuse
� Catawba
r Goose Creek
r Other
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
26
� Tar-Pamlico
r Randleman
r Jordan Lake
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Total Temporary impacts:
Zone 1
4,090.00
Zone 2
2,085.00
Total Permanent impacts:
Total combined buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
Supporting Documentation
14193_Hyd_Permit Drawings.pdf
Yonkers_Hyd_Fu II. pdf
Zone 1
1,90200
Zone 1
5,992.00
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
Zone 2
2,814.00
Zone 2
4,902.00
4.43MB
22.6MB
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Steps were taken to avoid and minimize stream and wetland impacts during the final design of Stage 1 B-Phase II. The original interchange concept
included ramps in all four quadrants of the Morrisville Parkway interchange with NC 540. The final design includes ramps and loops in the northwest
and southeast quadrants of the interchange. This design eliminates impacts to WC-6 and SC-8 in the southwest quadrant of the interchange without
adding any new or additional impacts. In addition, careful design of proposed grades and the use of 2:1 fill slopes minimized impacts at the remaining
sites.
1b. Specificallydescribe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The Contractor will be instructed to followthe erosion and sediment control plans, induding routine maintenance to devices. Specific attention will be
paid to work in the streams and wetlands as well as the management of base flows.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
C' Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
�

Wetland impacts are belowthe PCN threshold per the Nationwide Permit Summary Chart (1/5/17)
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
� Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
� Wetland Swale (higher SM/VT)
� Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
�J Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
C' Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
F Yes r No
Local Government Stormwater Programs
r Phase II rJ NSW � USMP r Water Supply
Please identifywhich local government stormwater program you are using.
City of Raleigh
Comments:
This a linear transportation project providing storrrrvvater treatment to the maximum eMent practicable. The project will install 12 bioretention cells to treat stormwater runoff. Storrrrvvater
calculations are included with this submittal.
In regards to the diffuse flow plan, the project is not creating any new outfall locations.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federallstate/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
� Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
�
�
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15ANCAC 26.0200)?*
� Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water qualit�*
C' Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This is a service road to I-440 and will unlikely be improved to included additional lanes or impervious surface under future projects.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?"
� Yes r No � fWA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
Sb. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
C' Yes r No
Sd. Is another Federal agency involved?*

� Yes
Se. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
C' Yes r No
r No
r Unknown
Sf. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
� Yes r No
Sg. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
C' Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
C' Yes r No
Si. Does this project involve (7) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
C' Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Field surveys by individuals noted in the NRTR attached in the Consultation Documentation Upload below.
Consultation Documentation Upload
Yonkers Road_NRTR_11_29_15_revised 07082016.pdf
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
f Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
There are no Essential Fish Habitat areas identified by the National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) in the study area.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
143.54KB
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
f Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?"
This is a previously developed site. Planning documents were not required by the City prior to design
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Sa. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
F Yes r No
Sb. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The City of Raleigh is the floodplain manager for this jurisdiction. The design team and the City agreed that no net fill increase in floodway will result.
The City has reviewed the design and deemed no further regulatory review is v✓arranted.
Sc. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA map numbers 3720171500J, 3720171400J, and 3720172400J as well as associated FIS reports.
Miscellaneous
Comments
Please see the combined PDF with required maps and figures included under miscellaneous attachments intended to reduce the piece-wise upload of documents. Also uploaded are
the following: Roadway plans (including profiles) and cross sections; landscape plans; stormwater analysis; BMP O&M manual; and erosion and sediment control plans.
Miscellaneous attachments not previouslyrequested.
14193_Rdy_Full.pdf
14193_Rdy_XPL.pdf
SHLA final 65 % 02.02.18.pdf
Yonkers_Stormwater_Ana lysis. pdf
Yonkers_BMP O&M Manual.pdf
Yonkers_EC_F u II. pdf
Combined Desc Viciniry Soils Quad PropOwners.pdf
Signature
*
�J By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
14.26MB
7.49MB
7.68MB
9.46MB
340.83KB
14.62MB
17.97M6
�
n
. I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a"transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");

. I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
. I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Douglas M. Keller
Signature
��at� <��I�°?
Date
1 /24/2019