20190067 Ver 1_401 Application_20190111

SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
January 11, 2019
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
Attn: Ms. Tasha Alexander
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
2 0 1 90 067
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Ms. Karen Higgins
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Stoneridge Estates Subdivision (formerly Malik Property)
Request for NWP 3 & GC 4132
USACE Action ID: 2018-01267
NCDWR Project # RRO 18-179
Sage Project # 2017.78
On behalf of Stephen & Kathleen Malik (applicants and owners) please find attached the
complete application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from
the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR) that the activities associated with the proposed residential
development may proceed under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 3 and General Certification
(GC) 4132.
Project Purpose and Location
The purpose of the proposed Stoneridge Estates Subdivision (Project) is to construct a
residential subdivision with associated utilities to meet the demand for housing in this area
of Raleigh. In addition to the construction of the residential development, maintenance on
an existing pond will be completed. The pond's failing dam will be repaired and sediment
will be removed from the pond. The Project is located northwest of the intersection of
Stoneridge Drive and Ebenezer Church Road in Raleigh (Wake County), NC. The
coordinates of 35.8311520N, 78.718785°W, generally correspond to the center of the
Project.
:rt -. toraeri ge Estates Subdivision

Project Detail
The 16.98 -acre Project is a proposed single-family residential subdivision with 27
proposed residential lots. There are no proposed impacts directly Proposed impacts will
result from the maintenance of an existing pond and its dam. The dam has numerous
trees of various sizes growing on it. The roots from the trees have begun to create leaks
in the dam and are compromising the structural integrity of the dam creating a safety
hazard. The pond will be pumped down, the trees on the dam removed, and the dam
reconstructed in its existing location. Existing accumulated sediment within the pond
footprint will also be removed at this time. New pond inlet and outlet structures will be
installed and the emergency spillway will be replaced. Heavy equipment typically used
for construction projects (e.g. back hoes, bull -dozers, etc) will be utilized.
No recorded federally listed species are recorded as being located on the project site. An
occurrence of Michaux's sumac is documented within a 1 -mile radius according to the NC
Natural Heritage Data Base (see attached report). The project area is heavily wooded.
Habitat for Michaux's sumac was not found to exist within the proposed development
footprint. The Project will require the removal of trees but not within jurisdictional areas.
No bridge maintenance or removal is required. No wind turbines are proposed on the
Project. Blasting is not proposed for this project unless shallow rock is unexpectedly
encountered.
According to the SHPO website, no documented structures are located within the Project
area. A recorded structure, Cooks Mill Dam (WA -3714), is recorded as being located
approximately 0.3 -mile due west of the Project.
Project History
The project area appears to have been wooded since at least 1981. Sage completed a
delineation of wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers on June 6, 2018. A site meeting
was held with the NCDWR on June 27, 2018 and a stream and buffer determination letter
(NBRRO #18-179) was issued on June 28, 2018. A copy of the NCDWR letter is attached.
A site meeting with the USACE was held on June 26, 2018 and a PJD (Action ID: 2018-
01267) issued on December 10, 2018.
Avoidance and Minimization
The site plan proposes large lots along a single proposed road. No road or other utility
crossing impacts are proposed within wetlands, steams, or riparian buffers on the project.
Open space is planned in the northern corner of the project area as well as in the areas
between the primary drainage on Project and Ebenezer Church Road.
Project Impacts
No wetland, stream, or riparian buffer impacts are proposed. Proposed temporary surface
water impacts will result from the draw down of the pond (required for the dam
maintenance) and from the removal of sediment within the pond. The pond's surface area
is 0.953 acre. No other impacts are proposed.

Mitigation
No wetland, stream, or riparian buffer impacts are proposed therefore no mitigation is
proposed.
If you have any question, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
T'Sean Clark, -PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Attachments:
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
Figure 1-USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 -Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3 -Wetland Sketch Map
NCNHP report
NCDWR Buffer Determination Letter (RRO 18-179)
PJD (Action ID: 2018-01267)
Impact Maps (2 sheets)
Check for 401 -processing fee to NCDWR
SCori c`f IdY- (= L.Sldt;E" SuL)uiV I Sio 6 Pa g 3 Ci1_")

lid
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no. SAW --2016-
01126
DWQ project no.
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification— Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only. for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment info a mitigation hank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee, program.
❑ Yes
No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
7 h. Is the project located within a NC "DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
No
2. Project information
2a. Name of project:
Malik Property
2b. County:
Wake County
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name:
Stoneridge Estates
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Stephen N, Malik &!Cathleen K Malik
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
015016; 01122
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
1020 Dickinson Circle
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27614
3f. Telephone no.:
919-882-2880
3g. Fax no.:
N/A
3h. Email address:
malikAa northcarolinak.com ktkmalik gmail.com
Pagel of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
S. Agent/ConsuttantInformartion (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Mr. Sean Clark
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
5c. Street address:
3707 Swift Drive
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27606
5e. Telephone no.:
919-559-1537
5f. Fax no.:
NIA
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0785-37-3709
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.831152°N Longitude: 78.718785°W
1c. Property size:
+/-16.98 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Richland Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020201)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application. The Site is wooded and undeveloped with a pond located in the center of the Site. The canopy of the site is
composed of a mix of hardwood tree species (e.g. yellow poplar, red maple, white oak, northern red oak, mockernut hickory,
etc.) and loblofiy pine. Adjacent properties are primarily large -lot single-family residential properties.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: +/-0.129 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: +/- 315 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision and associated utilities to meet the demand
for housing in this part of Raleigh. Proposed temporary impacts will result from reconstructing an existing unbuffered
pond dam on the property and removing sediment from the pond.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project is a single-family residential subdivision that consists of 27 residential lots. A single residential street will
connect to existing adjacent residential roads. The proposed impact will result from the reconstruction of the pond dam that is
on the property. The dam has numerous trees of various sizes growing on it. The roots from the trees have begun to create
leaks in the dam and are compromising the structural integrity of the dam creating a safety hazard. The pond will be pumped
down, the trees on the dam removed, and the dam reconstructed in its existing location. Existing accumulated sediment
within the pond footprint will also be removed at this time. New pond inlet and outlet structures will be installed and the
emergency spillway will be replaced. Heavy equipment typically used for this type of construction (e.g. back hoes, bull-
dozers, etc) will be utilized.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Comments: Both the USACE and the NCDWR have
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
made determinations on the site.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
ED Preliminary❑Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Sean Clark
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE's PJD (2018-01267) was issued on 12/10/2018. The NCDWR's buffer determination (NBRRO #18-179) was
issued on June 28, 2018.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑Yes ®No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Corps (404, 10) or
Area of
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ (401, other)
impact
Temporary (T)
(acres)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
Choose One
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total wetland impacts
N/A
2h. Comments: No wetland impacts are proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average stream
Impact
number
(PER) or
width
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
(feet)
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
feet)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
0
3i. Comments: No stream impacts are proposed for this project.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of
impact number -
waterbody
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if applicable)
(acres)
Temporary T
01 T
Pond 1
Other
Pond
0.953
4f. Total open water impacts
0.953
4g. Comments: The pond dam is beginning to fail and will be replaced. Accumulated sediment will also be removed from the
pond while the dam is being repaired.
Page 4 of 10

S. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or -lake construction proposed,then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts. (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
Choose One
P2
Choose One
6f. Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5g. Comments: This project does not propose Pond or Labe construction
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If arry impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.Project is in which protected basin?
® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for
impact
6d.
Stream
name
6e.
Buffer mitigation required?
6f.
Zone 1 impact
(square feet)
6g.
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
N/A
N/A
N/A
No
0
0
6h. Total buffer impacts
0
0
6i. Comments.: The pond being repaired is not buffered. No impacts to riparian buffers are proposed.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Road and utility
crossing impacts have been avoided. No permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters are proposed.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
General techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction limits and prevent any accidental
additional impacts. Silt fencing and temporary basins will also be used for the overall site construction to prevent
sediment runoff into the streams and wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
F-1Paymentto in -Neu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible. Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Choose one
Quantity N/A
Type: Choose one
Quantity N/A
Type: Choose one
Quantity N/A
3c. Comments: N/A
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
cool
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments: N/A
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
NIA
0
3 (2 for Catawba)
0
Zone 2
NIA
0
1.5
0
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:.
lig. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: No buffer impacts are proposed for this project.
Page 7 of 10

E.
Storff water Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuser Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The diffuse flow plan is part of the Stormwater Management Plan being
❑ Yes No
reviewed by the City of Raleigh.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
23.9%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The project requires a Stormwater
Management Plan that will be reviewed by the City of Raleigh.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The project requires a Stormwater Management Plan that will be reviewed by the City of Raleigh.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Raleigh
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Raleigh
® Phase If
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other.
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
® Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5.
DWQ 401 unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes Z No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Poiicy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ER No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide.a short narrative description.
The development of this site will not increase or decrease the likelihood of future development in the area.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed project will tie into existing adjacent City of Raleigh sewer lines.
Page 9 of 10
PCN form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
0 Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
El Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Database was queried and a report dated June 8, 2018 was received from NCNHP which
identified no recorded federally listed species on the project site however a terrestrial plant (Michaux's sumac) was
identified within a 1 -mile radius of the site. The project site is forested with mature trees and habitat for Michaux's sumac
does not exist within the proposed area of development.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑Yes ®No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The proposed project takes place in Wake County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat that would support EFH
(i.e. salt marshes, oyster reefs, etc.).
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
D Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A physical records check at the State Historic Preservation Office or the Office of State Archeology was not performed. The
NCSHPOs website (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) was searched. No recorded historic properties are located on the project site.
A recorded structure, Cook's Mill Dam A3714 , is located approximately 0.3 -mile due west from the project site.
S. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: N/A
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Flood Map Service Center
(https.,Hmsc.fema.gov/portal/search) FEMA DFIRM Panel # 372007850000J, effective May 2, 2006
Sean Clark
01/11/2019
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Si nature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

DocuSign Envelope ID: 24756603-1656-4421-8124-045567081572
40
AGE
SERVICES
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks to Be Filled in By the Current Landowner or Leaal Representative
Name: Stephen N Malik & Kathleen K Malik
Address: 1020 Dickinson Cir Raleigh NC, 27614
Phone:
Email:
919-882-2880
malik(a,northearolinafc.com ktkmalik*a,gmail.com
Project Name/Description: Malik Property
Sage Project 4 2018.37
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, the owner or a duly authorized representative of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein
described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899. I also hereby designate and authorize Sage Ecological Services to act on my behalf as my
agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Notice: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by Sage staff. Please contact Sage to arrange a meeting
prior to visiting the site.
BY: ------
Print Name of Landowner or
Legal Representative
Stephen N Malik
6/6/2018 1 1:19:08 'PM EDT
BY: 6Q.t t - k Nl.A
Signature of Landowner or
Legal Representative
Kathleen K Malik
6/6/2018 1 1:45:05 PM EDT

reap Locatlon
YDURHAM FRANKLIN
WAKE N
JOHNSTON
Stream A
Pond 1
Legend
Q Project Review Area
USGS Topographic Map Figure 1
Malik Property
Sage Project #2018.37
Raleigh West Quadrangle
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
June 6, 2018 Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537
0 900 1800 ft

p�sr� 4
ray Vw.e .ip
R'n+rasm�
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Governor Roy Cooper Secretary Suss H Hamilton
June 8, 2018
David Gainey
Sage Ecological Services
10411 NC 96
Zebulon, NC 27597
RE: Malik Property; 2018.37
Dear David Gainey:
NCNHDE-6212
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of
natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile radius of the project area, if any, are also
included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of the project
area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance. Contact
information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https //www fws aov/offices/`DirectoUaListOffices cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund easement, or Federally -listed
species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney, butler& ncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS Tele hone i415) 707-3107 LOCATION
1651 Mail Service Center wnw,milio.org 121 'vvest }ones Street
Raleigh, NC 276£+5 1651 Raleigh, NC 27603

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Malik Property
Project No. 2018.37
June 8, 2018
NCNHDE-6212
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Last
Element
Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Group
Observation
Occurrence
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
Date
Rank
Amphibian
19862
Hemidactylium scutatum
Four -toed Salamander
2002-11-07
E
4 -Low
---
Special
G5
S3
Concern
Amphibian
12592
Necturus lewisi
Neuse River Waterdog
1979
H
3 -Medium
Species of
Special
G2
S2
Concern
Concern
Butterfly
32082
Pontia protodice
Checkered White
2002-08-18
F
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G5
S1S2
Rare
Crustacean
8854
Cambarus davidi
Carolina Ladle Crayfish
1999-04-10
E
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G3
S3
Rare
Dragonfly or
32043
Coryphaeschna ingens
Regal Darner
2004 -Pre
H?
5 -Very
---
Significantly
G5
S2?
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Freshwater
9646
Alasmidonta undulata
Triangle Floater
1995-09-21
E
3 -Medium
Species of
Threatened
G4
S3
Bivalve
Concern
Freshwater
14599
Fusconaia masoni
Atlantic Pigtoe
2003-05-02
CD
3 -Medium
Species of
Endangered
G2
S3
Bivalve
Concern
Freshwater
15926
Strophitus undulatus
Creeper
1998-05-08
E
3 -Medium
---
Threatened
G5
S3
Bivalve
Freshwater
280
Villosa constricta
Notched Rainbow
2003-05-02
E
3 -Medium
Species of
Threatened
G3
S3
Bivalve
Concern
Freshwater Fish
32571
Notropis volucellus
Mimic Shiner
1980-04-24
H?
3 -Medium
---
Threatened
G5
S2
Natural
14643
Basic Mesic Forest
---
1990
AB
3 -Medium
---
---
G3G4
S3S4
Community
(Piedmont Subtype)
Natural
30210
Dry-Mesic Oak --Hickory
---
2002-08-16
BC
2 -High
---
---
G4G5
S4
Community
Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
Natural
20429
Low Elevation Seep
---
2004-10-18
C
3 -Medium
---
---
G3?
S3
Community
(Typic Subtype)
Natural
15381
Piedmont Alluvial Forest
---
1987
C
4 -Low
---
---
G4
S4
Community
Vascular Plant
27845
Agastache nepetoides
Yellow Giant -hyssop
1964-07-25
H
4 -Low
---
Significantly
G5
S1
Rare Peripheral
Vascular Plant
14844
Gillenia stipuiata
Indian Physic
1985-05
C
4 -Low
---
Threatened
G5
S2
Page 2 of 5

Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Last
Element
Accuracy
f=ederal
State
Global
State
Group
Owner
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
Observation
Occurrence
City of Raleigh Open Space
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
NC DNCR, Division of Parks and Recreation
Preserve
Date
Rank
Vascular Plant
34884
Liatris squarrulosa
Earle's Blazing -star
2011-07-27
E
2 -High
---
Significantly
G4G5
S2
Rare Peripheral
Vascular Plant
7563
Matelea decipiens
Glade Milkvine
1972-05-24
H
4 -Low
---
Significantly
G5
S3
Rare Peripheral
Vascular Plant
36980
Matelea decipiens
Glade Milkvine
1994-05-15
BC
4 -Low
---
Significantly
G5
S3
Rare Peripheral
Vascular Plant
36978
Matelea decipiens
Glade Milkvine
1994-05-15
A?
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G5
S3
Rare Peripheral
Vascular Plant
36958
Matelea decipiens
Glade Milkvine
1991-05-04
X?
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G5
S3
Rare Peripheral
Vascular Plant
22341
Pseudognaphalium helleriHeller's Rabbit -Tobacco
2005-10-23
D
2 -High
---
Significantly
G4G5T
S3
Rare Peripheral
3T4
Vascular Plant
22688
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's Sumac
2006-02-03
Fr
2 -High
Endangered
Endangered
G2G3
S2
Vascular Plant
9412
Ruellia purshiana
Pursh's Wild -petunia
1994-05-15
X
3 -Medium
---
Special
G3
S2
Concern
Vulnerable
Vascular Plant
6342
Thermopsis mollis
Appalachian Golden-
1956-05-01
H
4 -Low
---
Special
G3G4
S2
banner
Concern
Vulnerable
Vascular Plant
24012
Trifolium reflexum
Buffalo Clover
2002-05
E
3 -Medium
---
Threatened
G3G4
S1 S2
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name
Representational Rating
Richland Creek Hardwood Forest
R5 (General)
Crabtree Creek/Ebenezer Church Road Slopes
R5 (General)
NEU/Crabtree Creek Aquatic Habitat
R5 (General)
William B. Umstead State Park
R2 (Very High)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name
Owner
Wake County Open Space
Wake County: multiple local government
Wake County Open Space
Wake County
City of Raleigh Open Space
City of Raleigh
William B. Umstead State Park
NC DNCR, Division of Parks and Recreation
William B. Umstead State Park Dedicated Nature
NC DNCR, Division of Parks and Recreation
Preserve
Page 3 of 5
Collective Rating
C5 (General)
C5 (General)
C4 (Moderate)
C3 (High)
Owner Type
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
State
State

Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
North Carolina State University Agricultural Research North Carolina State University State
Land
Triangle Greenways Council Preserve Triangle Greenways Council Private
Schenck Memorial Forest North Carolina State University State
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httDs incnhde natureserve.org/content/helo. Data query generated on June 8, 2018: source: NCNHP. Q2 April 2018. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 4 of 5

NCNHDE-6212: Malik Property
TS�
i
t
�4
.i
Nt._f
wE r
S
June 8, 2018
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 5 of 5
Tysonvill�
1:22,469
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.3 0.6 1.2 km
F— ­
F— PERE. G—, N—W Im ement P Carp.. GEBCO, USES.
FAONPS, NRCAN. Ge.S.-, IGN, Ked.— UL. OM—CO Survey, "It Japan,
METi. E. China tHong K—jJ sM,stopa. 0 OpenStreetWp co Wb.to., -d
rro GIS U-, c —tv

tkate:- Re�vurces
(,n%tronmental Qt alit\
June 28, 2018
Stephen & Kathleen Malik
1020 Dickinson Circle
Raleigh, NC 27614
ROY COOPER
MICHAEL S. REGAN
LINDA CULPEPPER
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
NBRRO 418-179
Wake County
Determination Type:
Buffer In term ittent/Perennial
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259) ❑ Intermittent/Perennial Determination (where local
buffer ordinances apply)
❑ Jordan (I 5A NCAC 213 .0267)
(governmental and/or intedurisdictional
projects)
Project Name: Malik Property
Address/Location: 3901 Ebenezer Church Road, Raleigh, NC
Stream(s):
UT to Richland Creek
Determination Date: 06/27/2018
Staff: Jeremiah Dow
Stream
Feature
E/UP(,)
Not12)
Subject
Subject
Start Ca)
Stop@
Soil
Survey
USGS
Too
A
UP
X
Downstream of Pond 1
Off Property
X
X
at DWR Fla
B
E
X
--
—
X
Pond 1
NA
X
—
—
X
X
(1) E = Ephemeral, I = Intermittent, P = Perennial, NP — Not Present
(2) Refers to riparian buffer rules only. Stream, wetland, or pond impacts are still subject to applicable water quality standards and permitting requirements.
Explanation: The streams)/pond(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS
Soil Survey of Wake County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map
at a 1: 24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked "Not Subject' has been determined to not be an
intermittent stream, perennial stream, a pond connected to a stream feature, or the feature is determined
State of North Carolina ! Environmental Quality Water Resources! Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail service Center Raleigh, Nath Carolina 2" 699-16 29
919 7914200

Malik Property
Wake County
06/28/2018
Page 2 of 2
not to be present. Stream features that are checked "Subject" have been located on the property and
possess characteristics that qualify it to be subject to the buffer rules. There may be other streams located
on the property that do not show up on the maps referenced above and are therefore not subject to the
buffer rules. Ilowever, if the stream features are present on the tract they are subject to all other
applicable North Carolina stream standards and permitting requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 0213,
and may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by
the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A
request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending
via US Postal Service: c/o Karen Higgins; DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 1617 Mail Service
Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via delivery, service (UPS, FedEx, etc.): Karen Higgins;
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 512 N. Salisbury Street; Raleigh, NC 27604.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, an appeal is requested within sixty
(60) days.
This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should
be directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Jeremiah Dow at (919)
791-4248.
Danny Smith,
Supervisor,' Vater Quality Regional Operations Center
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Sean Clark, Sage Ecological Services, Inc. via email at [e-mail]

3901 Ebenezer Church Road, Raleigh (Wake)
Buffer Determination 918-179
Legend:
- Approximate Site Boundary
Map provided by NCDEQ Division of
Water Resources
Locations are approximate and are pro-
vided for reference only ::

3901 Ebenezer Church Road. Raleigh (Wake)
Buffer Determination 418-179
.304...
n v t - n wvVU DR
350 :.,.
0
BOJ
VIM
Feature A:
Subject
Stan at DWR Ffau 10
.*fib .. ....
d�
Legend:
- Approximate Site Boundary
-A
DR
Pond l:
Not Subject
& P (�
i o. �tfjL L WA
k
C.)
F/
Map provided by vCDEQ Division of
Water Resources
Locations are approximate and are pro-
vided for reference only

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 2018-01267 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Raleigh West
NOTII'ICATION OF ,JURISDICTIONAL .DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Stephen & Kathleen Malik
Address: 1020 Dickson Circle
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: 919-882-2880
E-mail: malikAnorthearolinafc.com
Size (acres) 16.98 Nearest Town Raleigh
Nearest Waterway Richland Creek River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 0302020.1 Coordinates Latitude: 35.831152
Longitude: -78.718785
Location description: The property is located immediately northwest of the intersection of Ebenezer Church Road and
Stoneridge Drive, Raleigh, Walw County, North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters including wetlands, on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 TJSC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map, Figure 3, dated 6/6/2018.
Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining
compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource
protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be
affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters including wetlands, on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters including wetlands, at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters
including wetlands, on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 11 SC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters including wetlands, on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recornnend you have the waters including wetlands, on your project area/properq, delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

2018-01267
❑ The waters including wetlands, on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and. verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to C WA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Re ;ulatory Official identified below on. DATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present or, the ahove described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or out- published
regulations, this detennination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within water's of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Tasha Alexander at 919-554-4884 ext. 35 or
Tasha.l,.Alexander(&.usace.arm ,!Il .
C Basis For Determination: See the preliminary iurisdictional determination form dated 12/10/2018.
D. Remarks: Site visit was conducted on June 26, 2018. Potential waters are depicted on Figure 3,
Wetland Sketch Map, Malik Property, dated June 6, 2018.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delirreation,,deter•nrination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for tlrc above described site. if you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RPA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room IOM 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 33'1.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form/ft r ust be ceived at the above address by No a nlicable.
**It is not necessary to submi a FA ft�n to thet/qivAon Office if you do of object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date of JD: 12/10/2018 Exp' o ti n Date of JD: Not applicable

2018-01267
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please- complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.ariny.niiI/cm apex/i'?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Sate Ecological Services, Inc.
Sean Clark
Telephone Number: 919-335-6757
E-mail: SClarkAsageecological.com

•
GRADING NOTES
1. REFLTITOGENERALNOTESSIEETGIGZ
flEV11E7N. ]28.118
KNOW WHAT'S BELOW
ALWAYS CALL 811
BEFORE YOU DIG
hY MR ka MN. A hM d�
NOT APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT No NOf,e20M
DRNm2 BY CYI
CNECkEll
09Y PMA
MTE 90N?RB
SCALE VIM
PRELIMINARY
SUBDIVISION PLAN
FOR
STONERIDGE
ESTATES
LOCATION OF SITE
3901 EBENEZER CHURCH RO.
RALEIGH, NC 27612
WAIF COUNTY
TRANSACTION 0: 566666
No L BQH„LER
4180 PARICLAKE AVENUE, SUITE 130
RALEIGH, NC 27617
ph._ (910) 67&9000
NC(mBohlorEng.com
�FESSI
'� ♦\F�„A,; R�iote.1727
SNEETmm
GRADING PLAN
SNEET NWDER.
90 30 to 9 80 C"4,1�1'�,4)," 1 1
1'. eD
GRADING LEGEND
�
U
STIiE
RUC pN
EfibR1LwT TYFIGM. NOTE TE PROPOSED NOTE
a
CONTOUR
LINE
u—
W
EIEVAMTIT
ONB X18. 610.
ATION OF
IUB
z
p&
!!
1.4
I..;
OITS
rHE
LABEl�
z
MSI
W w
u$pC EF1 qW
0RR
STORM-]iM'�
LABEL '"�
x
O
G d
BEVIER �-
LNq E ;
tl
k
a
NEAO� OR
ENDMMLL
'AAD F.\
IKET
CURT
INLET
MONRORWO (m
WELL �Y
REVISIONS
BORING ;�
REV MTE NLIE
COM
'-
® SENCNMAmf ®
RENSIDM GER CITY
11/L,e COMMENTS
L� lEsr {ty
IL eeJ %r Y
7 12121ne ICVIcomm GERcITY
CarLERrs
NII:TRO PARK OVERLAY DISTRICT NOTES
'
T. SUFFER AREAS: ]3.010 SF
ZONE 120.S53 SF
ZONE 2. 11.1e6SF
2 MIPERVIOUS SURFACE A N AC
23 914 OF SITE AREA
_
KNOW WHAT'S BELOW
ALWAYS CALL 811
BEFORE YOU DIG
hY MR ka MN. A hM d�
NOT APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT No NOf,e20M
DRNm2 BY CYI
CNECkEll
09Y PMA
MTE 90N?RB
SCALE VIM
PRELIMINARY
SUBDIVISION PLAN
FOR
STONERIDGE
ESTATES
LOCATION OF SITE
3901 EBENEZER CHURCH RO.
RALEIGH, NC 27612
WAIF COUNTY
TRANSACTION 0: 566666
No L BQH„LER
4180 PARICLAKE AVENUE, SUITE 130
RALEIGH, NC 27617
ph._ (910) 67&9000
NC(mBohlorEng.com
�FESSI
'� ♦\F�„A,; R�iote.1727
SNEETmm
GRADING PLAN
SNEET NWDER.
90 30 to 9 80 C"4,1�1'�,4)," 1 1
1'. eD

POND PLAN OF WORK:
O IMPOUNDMENT E NO LONGER FUNCTION11 AS INTENDED WE TOA FAIL EMBANKMENT DUE TO
W1MENIMICE. THE STRUCTURAL STABILITY OF `IE EXISTING STRUCTURE IS THREATENED BY TREES
i PATH A SKHEMDANr AMOUNT Of SEEPAGE OBSERVED THROUGH THE EMBANKMENT TO REPAIR THE
NT AND INSURE THAT FT CAVI REMAIN SERVICEABLE '. E RAN OF WORK NKOPGSEO INCLUDES A
1 OF THE IMPOLRDMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW EMBANKMENT. PNINOPLE SPILL— PIPE.
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY OARING CONSTRUCTION. TEMPORARY STRVCWRES AND FILLS WALL BE USED
ANY FOU ONSITE EROSION CONTROL AND SEDIMENTS WAIL BE REMOVED AS NECESSARY. THE FIAL
BIT MPOLROMENT WLL EVI
SEE MINOR DEVIATIONS TO THE STRUCTURE'S CONFIGUO
NATN AS
I POIt ADEOU ATE SERVICE. GENERALLY MARTNMND A SMLM IMPOUNDMENT LOCATION AND
NEA POET#PAR
CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS:
COON SHALL BE PERFORMED LOW THE OBSERVATION OF A OLIALEIED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
EDAS A PE IN THE STATE OF NOMI CAROUHA THE GEOTECNHI I ENGINEER SHALL OBSERVE ALL
OF THE CONSTRUCTION M THE POND. THE FREQUENCY OF 0F"N-110H AND TESTING NUB BE
IF
FORTEE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEEA TO STATE IN HSMER PROFESSIONAL OPINION THAT THE
ITEMS OBSERVED MD TESTED VERE INSTALLED IN ACCORIDI T. THE APPROVED
C7T(N DMVMGS. SPECIFICATIONS AND HBAER GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. INCLUDING BUT
IMM
ISTALLATION OF CONTROLLED FILL AROUND PPE6 MD STRUC W RES EXITND MD ENTERING TME
EARTHWORK COMPACTION WTHIN ]FEET OF ANY STRM WRNS SNALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MEANS
IFR TAMPERS MANUALLY DIRECTED POWER TAMPERS OF PLATE COMPACTORS OR MINIATURE
PROPELLED ROLLERS
HALONµ OF STONES AND VISIBLE OND MIC DEBRIS SUCN AS BOOTS AND UUMNI AND FROM THE FAL
RAL PRIOR TO COMPACTION TO THE
AEOIASHALL NOT DENSITY SOILS SHANOT CONTAIN STONES OR
NC MATTER CONTENT -MEANING, THE PECd kNOATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNKAL ENGINEER.
ATENAL MINMLM DENSITIES AND MOISTURE CONTENT RANGES ANY FILL MATERIAL INSTALLED AT
R THAI SPECPEO MM WM DENSITIES AT MOISTURE CONTENTS OUTSIDE THE SPECBED RAGES.
NERVAeE NOT CONFORMING TO SPID-0 NEOUPEIENTS SHALL M REMOVED AND REPLACEO VAN
BL
PTAE MATERIALS
XI NTPBIOUS CON IRDL OF SURFACE WATER AND THE PLACEMENT OF CONTROLLED FILL
RCUTUNO OF COMPRESSIBLF MDAM UNSUITABLE BOER IN ADDITION TO THAT INDOATED ON THE
L. ALL SUCH LADERCUITPO SHALL BE PERFORMED AT THE DHBCRETgN OF THE DEOTECHNOAL
EER AND SHALL BE MONITORED AND DOCUMEHTEO
RENT OF SEEPAGE AREAB. SUBGRACE PREP ARA TOH FOLIIDATTON DEWATERING AND ROCK
DATION PREPARATION R E TREATMENT W TH SLUSH GROUTING DENTAL COMDRETE. ETC.)
ISTALATON OF MY RETAINING WILLS W THIN OR ADACENT TO THE POND
WE I%) OF 0041PACTION SHALL BE DIRECTED BY A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER MD BE PERFORMED AS
F THE NORMAL QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM FOR CONSTRUCTION TESTS SHALL BE CONDUCTED
EM WTH THE INSTALLATION OF THE COMPACTED FILL AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE
COON SO THAT TESTING CM M COAPUETED SHOULD THE RESULTS OF THE TESTS FDICATE THAT
iFIED DEOME OF COMPACTION HAS NOT BEEN OBTAINED THE FOR—S REPRESENTED BY SUCH
ALL BE REWORKED OR REBUILT ALL PORTIONS SHALL ACHENE THE. SPECEED MHIMUM DEGREE OP
ON
— rA — �-,BYf+A ELEv.as.B
— "��-TYBVIHEV.LMJIt
POND
WAI¢D tRAMOADK-�
— =•B OPORIMMODYAI ORFQ
/�-- TOP Di EMBNMYENT E'.Ev. SE5L0
I
l -EMERGENCY 9PLLWAT E LEN. 33W F
�- Boa smEs<aPa
--_ `/-PFmWBO AaOLBEY.174Co —
r
<' cP auwooYA PwE-
IREFEFTOOETALTIiSNfE'1 /
RPE
FaoeoriaN eEv: mm
POND CROSS SEC.'TION
Nor to aGME
NOTES
HEALPONOMSg ANOSTORMFAEVATIONSTOMPROV DAT
CONCURRENT SUBMITTAL.
TovaowuEYATpn
Dm1HiENCY BPLLWAV CREST JSLOPt.U..
Eli AllON�tW_
HF- pROI FDM•DFT --�{
EM1'RGLNCY SPI ,LWAIY
NOT To SOIL!
IeDIN•Rn
f1A98 eREIW L • L'
So. Y• --
�GT'PG'E nARKT+I
Fua."x`GOP°K'RWAM�aimax
YEfRYKI
EIfVAigq - -
PIWYxRNxP1�IM
K. N.B
DRAWDOWN ORIFICE
CROSS-SLC, TION
Nor oecAlE
GAJ G7
a
a
WU
�z
u IN 3
z
PEI° 6
F
y �
01z' i
HIM
M� p S
C
' Rt vls
COMMMENT
MENT
Rl1r GATE M
M
•
i
KNOW WHA 'S BELOW
ALWAYS CALL 811
BEFORE YOU 010
X'K ANLL PAMM. k.ARMY
NOT APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
DIUVM eY CEM
CHECKED BY, PMA
DATE OP,T/Ts
SCALE TA.BD
PRELIMINARY
SUBDIVISION PLAN
FON
STONERIDGE
ESTATES
LOCATION OF SITE
1801 EBENEZER CHURCH RD.
RALEIGH, NC 27612
WAKE COUNTY
TRANSACTION 8: 568588
BOHLER
mNDIRmmlIIPIB MCG M.LC
4130 PARKLAKE AVENUE, QUITE 170
RALEIGH, NC 17811
PM m '919)57&9000
NC@BOhlerEng.-.
:YA
�a�y �"wMEEi ems,`
FLS„A,"i01e.Tz 27
'SHEETMLE - --
POND PIAN
SNFET MIMBER
C-402