20190062 Ver 1_401 Application_20190109

W W
ETLANDS
. & WATERS, 1 NC
Mr. David Bailey
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
RE: Nationwide Permit 29 Verification
Verona Subdivision
Burlington, Guilford County
SAW -2018-01856
Mr. Bailey and Ms. Homewood,
� �2
Januar 2, 2019
y
Ms. Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources
Winston Salem Regional Office PAID
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd. Suite 300
Winston Salem, NC 27105
2 0 1 90 062
Attached please find a Pre -Construction Notification for a Nationwide Permit 29 Verification for impacts
associated with a proposed residential development on the subject property, referred to as Verona. The
site is located on US Highway 70 in Burlington, North Carolina. Impacts associated with this request
include 141 linear feet of permanent impacts, 23 linear feet of temporary impacts to jurisdictional non -
wetland Waters of the US and 0.476 acres of impacts to jurisdictional wetlands Waters of the US. We
are also requesting a 401 WQC from NC DWR for the above referenced impacts.
Proiect Purpose and Need
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision to meet the growing
demand for housing in this region and to fulfill the economic expectations of the landowner.
Project Description
The proposed project consists of the proposed development, appurtenant parking and infrastructure,
stormwater facilities, widening of US Highway 70, and a connection to an existing off-site sanitary sewer
system. 112 linear feet of permanent impacts to Tributary 1 and 0.033 acres of permanent impacts to
Wetland A100 are necessary for a road crossing in order to access high ground. 29 linear feet of
permanent impacts to Tributary 2 are necessary in order to widen US Highway 70 such to meet the DOT
driveway specifications. 0.443 acres of permanent impacts to Wetlands A300/400 are proposed for
construction of internal subdivision roads and grading of lots 29, 53, 71, 72, 103, 104, 105, 106, and 107.
23 feet of temporary impacts to a jurisdictional tributary are necessary for construction of an open cut
off-site sanitary sewer connection.
The site will be constructed under an approved sediment and erosion control plan. Temporary impacts
for construction of a sewer crossing will be done in the dry utilizing a coffer dam and pump around in
order to minimize disturbance and degradation of downstream aquatic resources and will be removed
following completion of construction activities. Following construction, the stream channel will be
restored to previous contours and the banks allowed to re -vegetate.
Christopher Huysman WETLANDS & WATERS, INC. Tamp Bandy
170 Dew Drop Road 4108 LB Propst Drive
Sparta, NC 28675 Conover, NC 28613
336.406.0906 828.302.3437
[e-mail] [e-mail]

Avoidance and Minimization
The project has been carefully designed to minimize impacts to aquatic resources to the maximum
extent practicable. Standard NC DOT headwalls will be utilized to act as energy dissipaters and minimize
stream disturbance. The crossing location was chosen at the most narrow section of the stream/wetland
area in order to minimize disturbance. The proposed wetland impacts are occurring in wetlands that
have been highly degraded due to long standing and ongoing agricultural activities. A NC WAM
assessment was performed, with the subject wetlands on site ranking as low quality. Impacts are
primarily proposed in wetland areas not adjacent to or abutting the tributary, with the majority of the
wetlands within the riparian corridor of the stream channel being avoided. Following construction
activities, these avoided wetland areas will be allowed to naturalize along with the entirety of the
preserved stream buffers.
Construction of the open -cut sewer installation will utilize a pump -around such that work can be done in
the dry and impacts are minimized to downstream aquatic life. Immediately following installation of the
sewer line the stream bed will be returned to original grade with original stockpiled substrate.
Compensatory Mitigation
As the proposed impacts are occurring in wetlands assessed to be extremely low quality, compensatory
mitigation for permanent wetland impacts is proposed at a 1:1 ratio. The wetland areas that are to be
avoided will be allowed to naturalize. As permanent impacts to jurisdictional tributaries are less than
150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation for these impacts is not proposed.
Attached documentation to support this request is as follows:
1. Pre -Construction Notification
2. Impact Exhibits
3. Division of Mitigation Services Acceptance Letter
4. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Report
5. NC WAM Field Assessment Form and Rating Sheet
Please do not hesitate to reply if you have any questions or require further information to process this
request.
Best regards,
Perry Isner
704.773.4239
CHRISTOPHER HUYSMAN WETLANDS & WATERS, INC. TAMP BANDY
1 70 DEW DROP ROAD 41 OB LB RROPST DRIVE
SPARTA, NO 28675 CONOVER, INC 2B61 3
336.406.0906 826.302.3437
[e-mail] [e-mail]

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Q Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number, 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑x Yes No
11d. Types) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certiflcatlon — Regular ❑ on -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
i
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes 0 No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑Yes No
1f. Is payment Into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
Yes ❑ No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes Q No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Verona
2b. County:
Guilford
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Burlington
2d. Subdivision name:
Verona
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
n/a
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Randy & Cheryl Ingle
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
004857-02112
8c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
1691 Wheeler Bridge Road #A
3e. City, state, zip:
Burlington, NC 27215
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
Agent Q Other, specify: Buyer, under contract to purchase
4b. Name:
Attn: Patrick Quinn
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Eastwood Construction
4d. Street address:
6601 Six Forks Road, Suite 100
4e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27615
4f. Telephone no.:
704.942.0248
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Perry Isner
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
5c. Street address:
4108 LB Propst Drive
5d. City, state, zip:
Conover, NC 28613
5e. Telephone no.:
704.773.4239
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property Identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
8834775066 (partial)
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 36.07695 Longitude: -79.55013
1c. Property size:
48.4 acres
2. surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Back Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-V;NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site Is currently used entirely for agricultural purposes, primarily for cattle pasture with a dilapidated barn also present. An existing hom"Ite is
not part of the project area and Is to remain undisturbed. Existing land use In the vicinity of the project includes residential, some commercial, a
municipal park facility, and agricultural.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.52
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 632
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project Is to construct a residential development to meet the growing need for housing in this region.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of the proposed development and associated infrastructure Including roadways, stormwater facilities, and sanitary sewer.
Typical earth -moving equipment will be utilized including but not limited to excavator, pan, dumptruck, bulldozer, etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
(R] Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
[E Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Perry Isner! Tamp Bandy
Agency/Consultant Company: wetlands & waters, Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
SAW -2018-01866
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes 91 No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain In detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
R] Wetlands[]x Streams — tributaries Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
Impact
(acres)
W1 P
Culvert
Headwater Welland
No
Corps
0.033
W2 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.298
W3 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.145
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.476
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
UT to Back Creek
INT
Corps
3
112
S2 P
Culvert
UT to Back Creek
INT
Corps
3
29
S3 T
Sewer Open -cut
UT to Back Creek
PER
Corps
5
23
S4 -
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
164
31. Comments:
Permanent impacts are limited to 141 linear feet for purposes of a subdivision road crossing and widening of Hwy. 70. Following temporary impacts
for purposes of open -cut sanitary sewer installation, stream bed and banks will be restored to original contours and immedlately stabilized per the
specifications of the erosion control plan.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed Impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indiv ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
Impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of Impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
51. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any Impacts require mitigation, an you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 0 Other: Jordan
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 P
Road crossing
UT to Back Creek
No
5846
3904
B2 P
Road widening / SCM
UT to Back Creek
No
1264
2798
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
135 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
7110
6702
61. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts are primarily necessarily for access to high ground and widening of an existing Highway to meet the specifications of the required driveway
permits. Wetland impacts are occurring to low quality, highly degraded wetlands. The majority of the abutting wetlands on site have been avoided,
and the riparian buffer will be left undisturbed and allowed to naturalize.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Project will be constructed under an approved sediment and erosion control plan such that materials incidental to construction activities are not
transported Into downstream receiving waters.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ © Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
[fl Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-Ileu fee program is attached.
Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.46 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete If Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) —required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
El Yes No
6b. If yes, then Identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for Impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitig tion is proposed (e.g.. payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment Into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is It adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
© Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
>26
2b. Does thls project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Project Includes construction of a large, permanent stormwater BMP as shown on the attached plan which will adhere to Phase ll specifications.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Burlington
3. Certified local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's Jurisdiction is this project?
Burlington
21 Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
[] USMP❑
apply (check all that apply):
Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other.
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes�]x No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑Q No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 G. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCA 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300),'DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑x No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
F1 Yes ❑x No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the vlolation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
171 Yes x❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Project Includes construction of sanitary sewer to tie into existing off-site system.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
❑ Yes El No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Impacts?
❑ Yes [R] No
5c, if yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Query of the NC Natural Heritage Program; report is attached.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
T ❑ Yes ❑x No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
❑ Yes [xj No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC SHPO Web GIS service. Project Is near listed Andrew Gibson Farm, HPO Site ID GF0585, which will be left completely undisturbed.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes Q No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer
TO C- NF= V(2C-LT-Cf X,
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
1�- -� tCS
Date
Applicant/Ant's gnature
(Agent's signature is valid only If an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

5TREAM5
n
INTERMITTENT
A
5TREABUFFER
\ \\
ZINC I
32,666 �f
BUFFER ZONE 2
23360 5F
TOTAL BUFFER AREA
56026 5F
5TREAM NO.2
135 LF
BUFFER ZONE 1
5,103 5F
BUFFER ZONE 2
4,101 �F
TOTAL BUFFER AREA
10,404 5F
WETLAND5
TOTAL YETLAND AREA
66,396' 5F
LEGEND
- 5TREAMIPONP BUFFER ZONE I
5TREAM/POND BUFFER ZONE 2
WETLAND5
TOTAL 51TE AREA: 46.557�M
W
SO 51 'RAFTERR
ZONE 2 1 ZONE I ZOlg I ZONE 2
STREAM E9IFFER — TYPICAL 5EGTION
NOT TO 50ALE
ZONE I F15T REMAIN NATURAL AND UND15TURBED.
ZONE 2 MAY BE DISTLRBED BUT 1415T BE REVEGETATED,
ALL BUFFER DIMEN510P5 ARE FROM 5TREAM BANK, TOP
OF SLOPE, OR EDGE OF G0NTIGIJa NBTLANDS (WN&EVER
PRODUGE5 A GREATER ERFFER).
1 �
VICINITY MAP
N. T. 5.
I �
I
I
r �
NE11AI38,4& ^ AREAA \ _ 5
� 30'uNDISTURI �
— 20' MANAGED
RE -90U& LMO
NOT PART OF O
\ \\ 5MIV1510N
`'�--c---
1 0 I 1�EIRY[fEI I DRIVEI
I I I I 1
a
L J
IEX. 15'
GMP
n
u
• •• •• ••I ••I
•
■rrn7��
mlF1�1� ,
P.. -men ■
arewnecsa.
FAfi1100D
ems
EXHIBIT
DELINEATION
STREAM, BUFFER5
I YETLANDS
oxwis swa r.m
vx9srin.
WI
n
I
A
I I I
\ \\
A
N
—x
.
`
rn
trnp� ---
r
—`
rt,
to -"I
�''o
I
JC
FARM vIEWI DR
PLAN
L15T
51HEET WH
5HEEF W-2
DELINEATION EXHIBIT
IMFI EXHIBIT
t- —
— rn
Z
1
9w W3
PROHLE5
5NEIET"
PROHLE5
SHEET W-5
DETAILS
SHEET"
TEMORW WALTS
5111ET W-7
WETLAND !PACTS
a
L J
IEX. 15'
GMP
n
u
• •• •• ••I ••I
•
■rrn7��
mlF1�1� ,
P.. -men ■
arewnecsa.
FAfi1100D
ems
EXHIBIT
DELINEATION
STREAM, BUFFER5
I YETLANDS
oxwis swa r.m
vx9srin.
WI

IMPAGT5
J1 WIGTOK STREAM
141 LF IMPAGT5 (PERMANT)
23 LF IMPAGT5 (TEMPOARY)
WLM AREA
20,1215H
TOTAL SITE AREA: 46.55 AG±
I
50BLIFFEFERM BUFFER AM
33pp
22p
ZONE 2 ZOITE I A I ZOTE 2
5TREAM BUFFER — TYPICAL SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
ZONE I 46T REMAIN NAILRAI AND UNDIS71R28ED.
ZONE 2 MAY BE D15TI.RBED BUT M15T BE REVEGETATEO.
ALL BUFFER DIMENSIONS ARE FROM 5TREAM BANK, TOP
OF SLOPE, OR EDGE OF GONTIGUOUS VETLAND5 fHHIGNEVER
PRODUGE5 A GREATER BUFFER).
1 �5
6RAPHIG 5GALE
0 100' 200' 400' 600.
I” = 200'
C
mrrn' -
■l VA's„u
F.�Trnao
aaa ex was vao, v+� m
cHeww lee
� wv *saxe
wm er a -»m
'g "e IMPAGT5
EXHIBIT
5TREAM, BUFFER5
t YETLA DS
IAI')
E6EHE?
5TREAM/POND BUFFER ZONE I
5TREAM/POND BUFFER ZONE 2
METLAND5
METLAND IMPAGT5
TOTAL SITE AREA: 46.55 AG±
I
50BLIFFEFERM BUFFER AM
33pp
22p
ZONE 2 ZOITE I A I ZOTE 2
5TREAM BUFFER — TYPICAL SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
ZONE I 46T REMAIN NAILRAI AND UNDIS71R28ED.
ZONE 2 MAY BE D15TI.RBED BUT M15T BE REVEGETATEO.
ALL BUFFER DIMENSIONS ARE FROM 5TREAM BANK, TOP
OF SLOPE, OR EDGE OF GONTIGUOUS VETLAND5 fHHIGNEVER
PRODUGE5 A GREATER BUFFER).
1 �5
6RAPHIG 5GALE
0 100' 200' 400' 600.
I” = 200'
C
mrrn' -
■l VA's„u
F.�Trnao
aaa ex was vao, v+� m
cHeww lee
� wv *saxe
wm er a -»m
'g "e IMPAGT5
EXHIBIT
5TREAM, BUFFER5
t YETLA DS
IAI')

CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
I. NO CONSTRUCTION TO BE61N UNTIL All NECESSARY SITE DEVELOPMENT
PERMITS ARE OBTAINED (INCLUDING A GRADING PERMIT FROM HICDEQ).
2. FOLLON THE APPROVED EROSION CONTOL PLAN AND 5EaENCE IN ORDER
TO CLEAR AND GRADE THE SITE.
3. INSTALL 51LT FENCE ALONG THE LIMITS OF DI5TLRBANCE WTHIN TIE IMPACT AREA.
4. ENSURE THAT A COFFER DAM AND RAP AROUND 15 INSTALLED TO DIRECT
RUN-OFF DRAINA6E FROM THE NETLAND5 THROWH THE SITE.
5. COFFER DAM AND PUMP AROUND MU5T BE LET IN PLACE UNTIL HEN 48' RCP
STORM 5E LER PIPES ARE INSTALLED. SEE DETAIL ON SHEET N-4.
b. GRADE 5ITE SUFFIGIENT TO ALLOW FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE PROP05W
48' RLP STORM 5EIIER UNDER PROP05ED ROAD.
1. CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW THE DETAILS OF THE APPROVED ER05ION CONTROL
PLAN TO ENSURE THAT NO OFF-5ITE SEDIMENTATION OGU 5 DURING C01,15TRUCTION.
6. SITE SHALL BE STABILIZED IN A TIMELY MANNER AS PER THE REGVIREMENT5
OF THE APPROVED ER05ION CONTROL PLAN AND THE APPLICABLE
NCDER STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS.
625
i
620
615
610
N
QI�Aa
r OM
ry
O
Q
+
O w
ROP. GRA
E
8
p OF 48p
p 02,6
6/2�
PIPE
3UIRED AV&
12'
X. GRADE
0+00 0+50 1+00
5GALE I'= 40'HORIZONTAL
I' = 4' VERTICAL
a
a4 ml rl7:
0i
NARRATIVE
48' STORM SENE2 PIPES TO BE CONSTRUCTED FIRST AS PER THE irtgtsaen
CONSTRUCTION 5Ea ENGE ON THIS PLAN AND/OR AS PER ANY W135EGIL ENTLY r i
APPROVED 6RADIN64RO51ON CONTROL PLAN. THE INTENT OF TH15 PLAN 8uwtte..
15 TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND DETAILS %U THAT
THE CONTRACTOR CAN ALLOW THE EXI5TIN6 DRAINAGE THAT RUNS FROM x,
NORTH TO 5" ALONG THE STREAM TO GONTIHINE TO FLOW TH IW7HH THE
511E UNTIL THE NEN STORM 5EPU 15 IN-PLACE AND FUNCTIONAL. „•A
f—JJFFJWF,Tni 5�TH3R11 REAM Hu
48' STORM
W HEADWALLS
GIAY� I
RIP -RAP PAID%
i
W
-_
QI�Aa
r OM
IMPACTS
EMBIT
STREAM, BUFPER5
t YETLAMDS
6RAPH16 5GALE
0 15' 30' 60' 90'
aw�rn
I._30 1 I✓

BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE I - 1,264 5F
ZONE 2- 2,798 SF (INCaDE %M DAM)
GON5TRUGTION 5EQUENGE NARRATIVE
I. NO CONL5TRUGTION TO BEGIN UNTIL ALL 1EGE%ARY 51TE DEVH OPNE+HT 48' 5TORM 5DI R PIPE5 TO BE C401,15TRUCTED FIRST A5 PER THE
PERMIT5 ARE OBTAINED 0WAIVIN6 A GRADING PERMIT FROM NGDEQ). C06TRUGTION 5159UENLE ON THIS PIAN AW/OR AS PER ANY SUBSEQUENTLY
2. FOLLOW THE APPROVED 8ZO51ON GONTOL PLAN AND SEQUENCE IN ORDER APPROVED 6RADIN5/ERO9ON CONTROL PLAN. THE INTENT OF THI5 PLAN
TO CLEAR AND 6RADE THE 51TE. 15 TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE CONSTRUCTION NOTE5 AND DETAIL5 SUCH THAT x. ",a,
3. INSTALL 51LT FENCE ALONG THE LIMIT5 OF 0I5TURBANGE WITHIN THE IMPACT AREA THE CONTRACTOR CAN ALLOW THE EXI5TIN6 DRAINAGE THAT RUTS FROM
4. ENSURE THAT A COFFER DAM AND PUP AROUND 15 INSTALLED TO DIRECT NORTH TO SOUTH ALONG THE 5TREAM TO CONTINUE TO FLOW TWZ 16H TIE
RUN-OFF DRAINAGE FROM THE VETLAND5 THROX+ THE SITE. 511E UNTIL THE NEN 5TORM 5EVER 15 IN-PLACE AND FUNCTIONAL.
5. COFFER DAM AND PUMP AROUND MU5T BE LEFT IN PLACE UNTIL NEW 24' RCP
5TORM 5B*R PIPES ARE INSTALLED. 5EE DETAIL ON SHEET PH -5. *
b. GRADE SITE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE PROP05M
24' RGP 5TORM SEWER UNDER PROP05ED ROAD.
T. CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW TIE DETAIL5 OF THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL
PLAN TO ENSURE THAT NO OFF-51TE 5MI434TATION OCGUR5 DURING CONSTRUCTION.
8. 51TE 5HALL BE 5TABILIZED IN A TIMELY MANNER A5 PER THE REQUIREMENT5
OF THE APPROVED ER05ION CONTROL PLAN AND THE APPLICABLE I I I 1
NCKNR 5TANVARD5 AND REGULATIONS.
\ \�
u of .uRISDlcnox. o o
\ ��\ STREAM
v1vC 302 LF OF
15" P ®3-5%
615
X39 \ EX. 15" \
G
612.44 \
610
605 ' '
0+00 0+50
5GALE I' = 40' HORIZONTAL
I' = 4' VERTICAL
1
24'
I \�
I
6RAPHI6 56ALE
0 15' 30' 60' QO'
I.=30'
} - 0 0
IMPAGT5
EX141BIT
5TREAM,BUFPER5
I WETLAND5
www"cva na
�
ry�
j
O
o u�W
Ed
u-
Q
�~f1g
620
PROP.
GRADE
EX.
GON5TRUGTION 5EQUENGE NARRATIVE
I. NO CONL5TRUGTION TO BEGIN UNTIL ALL 1EGE%ARY 51TE DEVH OPNE+HT 48' 5TORM 5DI R PIPE5 TO BE C401,15TRUCTED FIRST A5 PER THE
PERMIT5 ARE OBTAINED 0WAIVIN6 A GRADING PERMIT FROM NGDEQ). C06TRUGTION 5159UENLE ON THIS PIAN AW/OR AS PER ANY SUBSEQUENTLY
2. FOLLOW THE APPROVED 8ZO51ON GONTOL PLAN AND SEQUENCE IN ORDER APPROVED 6RADIN5/ERO9ON CONTROL PLAN. THE INTENT OF THI5 PLAN
TO CLEAR AND 6RADE THE 51TE. 15 TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE CONSTRUCTION NOTE5 AND DETAIL5 SUCH THAT x. ",a,
3. INSTALL 51LT FENCE ALONG THE LIMIT5 OF 0I5TURBANGE WITHIN THE IMPACT AREA THE CONTRACTOR CAN ALLOW THE EXI5TIN6 DRAINAGE THAT RUTS FROM
4. ENSURE THAT A COFFER DAM AND PUP AROUND 15 INSTALLED TO DIRECT NORTH TO SOUTH ALONG THE 5TREAM TO CONTINUE TO FLOW TWZ 16H TIE
RUN-OFF DRAINAGE FROM THE VETLAND5 THROX+ THE SITE. 511E UNTIL THE NEN 5TORM 5EVER 15 IN-PLACE AND FUNCTIONAL.
5. COFFER DAM AND PUMP AROUND MU5T BE LEFT IN PLACE UNTIL NEW 24' RCP
5TORM 5B*R PIPES ARE INSTALLED. 5EE DETAIL ON SHEET PH -5. *
b. GRADE SITE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE PROP05M
24' RGP 5TORM SEWER UNDER PROP05ED ROAD.
T. CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW TIE DETAIL5 OF THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL
PLAN TO ENSURE THAT NO OFF-51TE 5MI434TATION OCGUR5 DURING CONSTRUCTION.
8. 51TE 5HALL BE 5TABILIZED IN A TIMELY MANNER A5 PER THE REQUIREMENT5
OF THE APPROVED ER05ION CONTROL PLAN AND THE APPLICABLE I I I 1
NCKNR 5TANVARD5 AND REGULATIONS.
\ \�
u of .uRISDlcnox. o o
\ ��\ STREAM
v1vC 302 LF OF
15" P ®3-5%
615
X39 \ EX. 15" \
G
612.44 \
610
605 ' '
0+00 0+50
5GALE I' = 40' HORIZONTAL
I' = 4' VERTICAL
1
24'
I \�
I
6RAPHI6 56ALE
0 15' 30' 60' QO'
I.=30'
} - 0 0
IMPAGT5
EX141BIT
5TREAM,BUFPER5
I WETLAND5
www"cva na

IMAM.. .. -..�-
NA
�►�yy�d►����i�S���ii�y\� r, =i
;Si�jR a I
�ruil
• ', N ,
,y !i JR y - G d 9 r. .-... , .
VAi4, ii '►.�I l�pr�' 7 � .. • �i� � biz,
.AS'OF
jjl� @Rp
e �\ 1

NOTE: AS BEST POS516LE, INSTALL STORM SEI'
DURING DRY CODITRON5. HOYEVER , IF
NECt ARY,
USE A COFFER DAM W/ FLW AROUND.
INSTALLATION NOTES
A. INSTALL SANDBA65 DAM UPSTREAM OF CULVERT AND
PUW WATER INTO DOYN5TREAM.
B. REMOVE COFFER DAM AND PUMP AFTER AFTER BY-PASS
STORM 5U 5 FULLY FRICTIONAL.
AE
— `
I
5..44
—
m
I\
DATS OF
I
23 LF
EX.IHEA
�T�EhP
�I
rLL
SAND
COFFER DRAM
I I
I
I
I
�
F
\
—_I—
I
SCALE I' = 40' \I
I I
OFF5ITE TEMP 015TURBAWE
TO INSTALL SANITARY 5ENER OUTFALL
2+00 1+50 1+00 0+50 0+00 575.00
SCALE I' = 40' HORIZONTAL
' = 4' VERTICAL
■r ' go
tl i 19'/x:\■
r�snom
5Ti6l EV EIZ5

00 O' O
bl
I � o
C)D
NO
I I I t o I
f \ \
E } E f f
/N
��
m
f f E f f Q5,
t E f
I E
a
m� � g VERONA 5UBDIV51ON
1282 BURLINGTON ROAD `
ROCK GREEK i0NN6HIP, GUILFORD COUNTY
3@ ff BURLIN6TON, NORTH CAROLINA °' +
3{ - :,

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Patrick Quinn
Eastwood Construction
6601 Six Forks Road, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27615
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
December 27, 2018
Expiration of Acceptance: 6/27/2019
Project: Verona Subdivision County: Alamance
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8 -di it HUM
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Cape Fear
03030002
Riparian Wetland
0.476
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Perry Isner, agent
Sincerely,
At�du�
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
�DWQ
Ueparlmen�of Eml1onnr 1OuMlty
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality ! Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street i 1652 Mail Service Center j Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies user manuai version am
USACE AID # NCDWR#
Project Name Verona Date of Evaluation 06/05/18
Applicant/Owner Name Eastwood Homes Wetland Site Name A300/400
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization P. Isner, W&W, Inc.
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Back Creek
River Basin Cape Fear USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit 03030002
County Guilford NCDWR Region Winston-Salem
n Yes M No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees) 36.07695 -79.55013
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
®B ®B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
❑C ❑C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
®C ®C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon > 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
®C ®C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ®A ®A > 10% impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
®C ❑C ❑C z 20% coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D s 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E ? 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
OF OF OF >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer —assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
❑Yes ®No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_ 50 feet
❑B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
❑<_ 15 -feet wide ❑> 15 -feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑Yes [:]No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
❑Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
El ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet
❑C ®C From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F OF From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet
❑H ❑H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
®A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
❑A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
®B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A z 500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres
OF OF ❑F From 5 to < 10 acres
®G ❑G ❑G From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
❑I ®I El From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ®K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A
❑A
>_ 500 acres
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
®D
From 10 to < 50 acres
®E
❑E
< 10 acres
❑F
❑F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas i 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
❑ B 1 to 4
®C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
®B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
®B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
o ❑A [-]A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
cc: ❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
❑A
❑A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
❑B
❑B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
®C
®C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A
❑A
Dense shrub layer
❑B
❑B
Moderate density shrub layer
®C
®C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
®A
®A
Dense herb layer
❑B
❑B
Moderate density herb layer
❑C
❑C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
r
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name
Wetland Type
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Sub -function Rating Summary
F
u
n R
c a
ti ti
o n
n Sub -function Metrics 9
H
y
d
r
0
0
9
y Surface Storage and Retention Condition
Sub -surface Stora
W
a
t
e
r
Q
u
a
t
y Pathogen Change
Particulate Change
and Retention
Condition
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
Condition _
N
Condition/Opportunity A
N
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) A
Soluble Change Condition

it L
a O
t Physical Structure Condition W
L
O
Landscape Patch Structure Condition W
M
E
D
U
Vegetation Composition Condition M
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition
Water Quality Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
Habitat Condition
Overall Wetland Rating LOW
G
Condition/Opportunity
H
Y
E
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
S
L
O
Physical Change Condition
W
L
O
Condition/Opportunity
W
Y
E
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
S
N
Pollution Change Condition
A
N
Condition/Opportunity
A
N
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
A
it L
a O
t Physical Structure Condition W
L
O
Landscape Patch Structure Condition W
M
E
D
U
Vegetation Composition Condition M
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition
Water Quality Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
Habitat Condition
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

�Yat'"'U17g4,
y nR
®t VWM•gf��
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Governor Roy Cooper
February 9, 2018
Meagan Jolly
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
529 North Graham Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
RE: Ingle Property
Dear Meagan Jolly:
Secretary Susi H_ Hamilton
NCNHDE-5301
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. These
results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund
(CWMTF) easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butleKa ncdcr.gov or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS: Telephoner (919) 707-81D7 LOCATION -
1651 Mail Service Center www.ncnhp.org 121 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 Raleigh, NC 276D3

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Ingle Property
February 9, 2018
NCNHDE-5301
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the NCNHP database
does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The
use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare
species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our database.
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Guilford County Open Space Guilford County: multiple local government Local Government
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Natural
Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve,ora/ccontent/help. Data query generated on February 9, 2018; source: NCNHP, 01 January 2018. Please resubmit
your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Ingle Property
February 9, 2018
NCNHDE-5301
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name
Last
Element
Group
Observation
Occurrence
Low
Date
Rank
Butterfly 34484 Neonympha helicta Helicta Satyr
1980 -Pre
H
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Accuracy Federal
State Global State
Status
Status Rank Rank
5 -Very
Significantly G3G4 S1?
Low
Rare
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type -
Guilford County Open Space Guilford County: multiple local government Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve org/content/helo. Data query generated on February 9, 2018; source: NCNHP, 01 January 2018. Please resubmit
your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

1
Whitastt
N
W+L
S
February 9, 2018
❑ Project Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 4 of 4
1:24,307
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.325 0.65 1.3 km
Sources Esri, HERE. Del - r . Inter—p. irwrement P Corp., GEBCO. USGS.
FAO. NPS, NRCAN, G -Base, ION. Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey. Esri Japan,
METI. Esri China (Hong Kong), "sstopo. Mopmylndm, O OpenStreetMap
contribubrs, and the GIS User Community