20190083 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190115

pwk,__
MAS" of w,Rer Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r %
Is this project a public transportation project?*
O Yes O No
Change only If needed.
BIMS # Assigned*
Version#*
20190083
1
Is a payment required for this project?
b No payment required
What amout is owed?*
4 Fee received
r $240.00
O Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone] Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnson1
Information for Initial Review
Ia. Name of project:
Brookside Subdivision
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jennifer Burdette
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
1/15/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Big Branch
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
WS -Iv
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.693671
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Iredell
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-80.897026
Ia. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
V Nationwide Permit (NWP)
i- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
[ Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
r- Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r: No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes G No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes f No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
C Yes 6 No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r- Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
C Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Nass Crossing, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2581 & 1265
2c. Responsible party:
2d. Address
Street Address
7620 Red Bay Lane
Address Line 2
City
Parkland
Postal / Zip Code
33076
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
mattwilson9599@gmail. com
State / Rwince / Plegion
FL
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
r Yes r: No
C. Project Information and Prior Project History U
1. Project Information

1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Troutman
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
4731-63-8242,4731-62-5347,4731-71-3858,
IAMB
4731-71-4897, 4731-72-5297, 4731-72-4701,
2b. Property size:
4731-73-5031, and 4731-72-6926
58
2c. Project Address
537.97KB
Street Address
546.62KB
York Road & Massey Street
Address Line 2
City
State / Rovince / Region
Troutman
NC
Fbstai / Zip Code
Country
USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Big Branch
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS -IV
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
0305010111106
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Based on aerial imagery, the subject property was clear cut in 2009. It consists of secondary growth mixed pine hardwoods with three existing sanitary sewer easements crossing the
subject site. The immediate vicinity of the subject property consists of residential subdivisions, forested areas and agricultural fields and pastures.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
RYN17010_Figure 1 USGS.pdf
1.61 MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
RYN17010_Figure 2 Soil Survey.pdf 1.33MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.65
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
2,762
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to develop the property with the necessary infrastructure to provide suitable building areas for high-density, single-family home construction to serve the
current and future residents of the Troutman area.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project consists of a high-density residential subdivision including roads, sanitary sewer connections, stormwater infrastructure, and greenways.
Project impacts to jurisdictional areas includes one road crossing.The attached site plans (Sheets 1 through 5) depict the overall project plan view along with existing conditions, a
detailed impact plan, and road crossing profile and cross-section.
Heavy equipment typical for road construction, utility installation and grading will be used to construct the proposed project such as track hoes, bulldozers, dump trucks and graders
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
1 - Existing Conditions.pdf
IAMB
2 - Overall Site Plan.pdf
1.87MB
3 - Impact Plan.pdf
702.33KB
4 - Impact Profile.pdf
537.97KB
5 - Impact Cross Section.pdf
546.62KB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations

5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
F Yes r' No Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
s Preliminary r Approved O Not Verfied O unknown O WA
Corps AID Number:
SAW -2017-01728
5c. If Sa is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): George Buchholz
Agency/Consultant Company: formerly with John R. McAdams Company
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
Catherine Janiczak with the USACE issued a preliminary jurisdictional determination for the subject property on September 22, 2017.
Sd1. Jurisdictional determination upload
RYN17010_Pre-JDRecd_SAW-2017-01728-2.pdf 624.85KB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? *
r- Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
U
1. Impacts Summary
3c. Type of impact*
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
3e. Stream Type*
P Wetlands R Streams -tributaries
I- Buffers
I- Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
.... _. .......... _ ......... ...............
....... _.
2a1 Reason(?) 2b. Impact type * (?) 2c. Type of W.* 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested* 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
W-1 Road Crossing - Fill P Headwater Forest7A f�lo
th 0.070
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.070
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
29. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.070
F
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name *
3e. Stream Type*
3f. Type of
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
(?)
Jurisdiction*
length*
31
Rd Ang Headwall Installation
Temporary
Other
Big Branch
Perennial
Both
17
41
Average (feet)
(irefeet)
S2
Road Crossing
9
Permanent
Culvert
Bi Branch
9
Perennial
Both
17
132
Average (feet)
(loser feet)
S3
Road Crossing
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Big Branch
ffal-Jt-
��;;;Jnear
]-
fee)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0

31. Total permanent stream impacts:
183
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
224
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
41
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
A delineation of surface waters and wetlands was completed prior to designing a site plan to avoid and minimize impacts to these resources to the
maAmum extent practicable. One road crossing of Big Branch (York Road extension) is planned to connect the proposed development. This extension
through the development connecting to Massey Street also provides a much needed east/west connector for southern Troutman.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
As shown on the road crossing cross-section, the proposed culvert will be buried 12 inches below the stream bed to maintain aquatic life passage and
has been designed to maintained the dimension, pattern and profile of the eAsting stream. The pump around plan attached to the end of the
application has been developed to install the culvert without the flowing stream coming into contact with the excavation.
Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all phases of construction and installation
as described in the Erosion Control Plan sheet reviewed and approved by the NC Division of Land Quality and Town of Troutman. Al work will take
place during dry conditions and can be facilitated from high, non -jurisdictional, stable ground. The contractor shall install silt fence, inlet
protection,sediment traps, diversion ditches, tree protection, clearing only as necessary to install devices. All erosion and sediment control measures
will be
checked for stability and operation following every runoff producing rainfall, but in no case less than once every week. Any needed repairs will be
made immediately to maintain all measures designed. An erosion control inspections report is required and will be kept by the owner's representative.
Temporary seeding and permanent seeding plans are included to restore impacted areas. The project will meet all relative requirements of Best
Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control Structures as outlined through State and Local Stormwater Rules.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes C No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Wetland impacts have been minimized to less than the 0.10 acre threshold for mitigation. Permanent stream impacts from installation of the culvert have been minimized to 132 linear
feet, which is belowthe 150 linear foot threshold for mitigation.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes C No
If no, explain why:
The project is not located within a river basin or watershed that has a riparian buffer protection rule.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
r Yes C No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes C No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes C No
3. Stormwater Requirements
3a. Select whether a completed stormwater management plan (SMP) is included for review and approval or if calculations are provided to document the project will not cause
degradation of downstream surface waters."
C Stormwater Management r Antidegradation
Plan Calculations
3b. Stormwater Management Plan
3c. Antidegradation Calculations:
Comments:

The stormwater impact analysis, construction drawings and O & M agreements WII be uploaded to DWR once a project number is assigned. A paper copy of this information will also be
sent via US mail to Chonticha McDaniel in the DWR Central Office for her use.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15ANCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is a residential development. It is not anticipated that this project will result in additional
development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r No r WA
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater will be discharge to the epsting Troutman sanitary sewers that cross the project.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
f- Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
Sh. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
On August 16, 2017, McAdams received the attached letter from the USFWS indicating that the project is not likely to adversely affect the northern
long-eared bat and did not identify any other protected species that would be affected by the project. On January 4, 2019, a check of the Iredell
County list of protected species revealed no new species or critical habitat were listed after this correspondence was issued.
Consultation Documentation Upload
2017-08-16 rcvd from A. Rat2Jaff USFWS.pdf 210.99KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?
r Yes r No

6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
There are no waters classified as EFH in Iredell County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
(- Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
On August 4, 2017, McAdams requested an environmental reviewfrom SHPO. SHPO concluded in their response letter on September 11, 2017 that
they were aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
2017-09-12 rcvd from R. Gledhill -Earley NCSHPO.pdf 290.29KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NCFIRM Map Number 3710473100J; Panel effective date: 3/18/2008
Miscellaneous -
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
RYN17010-D13-Stream Diversion Plan.pdf
Signature
V By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
863.93KB
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Jennifer Burdette
Signature
Sign
Date
1115/2019

J Mc ADAMS AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Property Owner
PIN(s):
4731-63-8242,4731-62-5347, 4731-71-3858, 4731-71-4897, 4731-72-5297,
4731-72-4701, 4731-73-5031, and 4731-72-6926
Property Owner Name:
Nass Crossing, LLC
Property Owner Address:
7620 Red Bay Lane, Parkland, FL, 33076
Property Owner
Phone/Email:
_
-3 `ggoo 5� ✓v,�S�� �� �� ( . ,�d�c? ��, <_'�,
Project Name:
Brookside Subdivision
Project Number:
RYN-17010
Project Manager:
Rob Redd ick/Jen n ifer Burdette
Attn: Catherine Janiczak
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
Attn: Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
I hereby designate and authorize The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to act in my behalf as my agent in the
processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications, etc.
from this day forward.
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize
representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and NC Division of Water Resources
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigation and issuing a
determination associated with Water of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act/Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and/or Waters of State and/or Riparian Buffer Rules.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials to
enter the property when accompanied by The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. staff.
Print Property Own�er4 I e & Title Signature
r"� Z-0
� 11�'� n I � i
Date
creating experiences through experience 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 1919.361. 5000

ryeA
Frs1&WILDCEL
a� y United States Department of the Interior
Ul 0
a 7J
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
�4gCH 3, 1a�9 Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street Suite #B
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
August 16, 2017
Ms. Kelly Roth
The John R. McAdams Co., Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
Dear Ms. Roth:
Subject: Proposed Brookside Subdivision, Troutman, Iredell County, North Carolina
We received your letter of August 4, 2017 (received via email on that same date), requesting our
comments on the subject project. The following comments are provided in accordance with the
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.§4321 et seq.) and section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Without more detail about project design, the following comments focus on the potential impacts
to the streams and wetland in the project area.
Impervious Surfaces/Low Impact Development (LID) - Studies' have shown that areas of 10- to
20 -percent impervious surface (such as roofs, roads, and parking lots) double the amount of
storm -water runoff compared to natural cover and decrease deep infiltration (groundwater
recharge) by 16 percent. At 35- to 50 -percent impervious surface, runoff triples, and deep
infiltration is decreased by 40 percent. Above 75 -percent impervious surface, runoff is 5.5 times
higher than natural cover, and deep infiltration is decreased by 80 percent. Additionally, the
adequate treatment of storm water in development areas is essential for the protection of water
quality and aquatic habitat in developing landscapes. Impervious surfaces collect pathogens,
metals, sediment, and chemical pollutants and quickly transmit them (via storm -water runoff) to
receiving waters. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, this nonpoint-source
pollution is one of the major threats to water quality in the United States, posing one of the
greatest threats to aquatic life, and is also linked to chronic and acute illnesses in human
populations from exposure through drinking water and contact recreation. Increased storm -water
' Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (15 federal agencies of the United States Government).
October 1998. Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices. GPO Item No. 0120-A; SuDocs
No. A 57.6/2:EN 3/PT.653. ISBN -0-934213-59-3.

runoff also directly damages aquatic and riparian habitat, causing stream -bank and stream -
channel scouring. In addition, impervious surfaces reduce groundwater recharge, resulting in
even lower than expected stream flows during drought periods, which can induce potentially
catastrophic effects for fish, mussels, and other aquatic life. Accordingly, we recommend that all
developments, regardless of the percentage of impervious surface area they will create,
implement storm -water -retention and -treatment measures designed to replicate and maintain the
hydrograph at the preconstruction condition in order to avoid any additional impacts to habitat
quality within the watershed.
We recommend the use of low -impact -development techniques,2 such as reduced road widths,
grassed swales in place of curb and gutter, rain gardens, and wetland retention areas, for
retaining and treating storm -water runoff rather than the more traditional measures, such as large
retention ponds, etc. These designs often cost less to install and significantly reduce
environmental impacts from development.
Where detention ponds are used, storm -water outlets should drain through a vegetated area prior
to reaching any natural stream or wetland area. Detention structures should be designed to allow
for the slow discharge of storm water, attenuating the potential adverse effects of storm -water
surges; thermal spikes; and sediment, nutrient, and chemical discharges. Also, because the
purpose of storm -water -control measures is to protect streams and wetlands, no storm -water -
control measures or best management practices should be installed within any stream (perennial
or intermittent) or wetland.
We also recommend that consideration be given to the use of pervious materials (i.e., pervious
concrete, interlocking/open paving blocks, etc.) for the construction of roads, driveways,
sidewalks, etc. Pervious surfaces minimize changes to the hydrology of the watershed and can
be used to facilitate groundwater recharge. Pervious materials are also less likely to absorb and
store heat and allow the cooler soil below to cool the pavement. Additionally, pervious concrete
requires less maintenance and is less susceptible to freeze/thaw cracking due to large voids
within the concrete.
Stream and Wetland Buffers — We are concerned about potential impacts to the two streams and
the wetland on the subject property — a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will likely
be necessary to impact these water features. Natural, forested riparian buffers are critical to the
health of aquatic ecosystems. They accomplish the following:
1. catch and filter runoff, thereby helping to prevent nonpoint-source pollutants from
reaching streams;
2. enhance the in -stream processing of both point- and nonpoint-source pollutants;
3. act as "sponges" by absorbing runoff (which reduces the severity of floods) and
by allowing runoff to infiltrate and recharge groundwater levels (which maintains
stream flows during dry periods);
2 We recommend visiting the Environmental Protection Agency's Web site (http://www.epa.govlowowlnpsllidl)for
additional information and fact sheets regarding the implementation of low -impact -development techniques.
2

4. catch and help prevent excess woody debris from entering the stream and creating
logjams;
5. stabilize stream banks and maintain natural channel morphology;
6. provide coarse woody debris for habitat structure and most of the dissolved
organic carbon and other nutrients necessary for the aquatic food web; and
7. maintain air and water temperatures around the stream.
Forested riparian buffers (a minimum 50 feet wide along intermittent streams and 100 feet wide
along perennial streams [or the full extent of the 100 -year floodplain, whichever is greater])
should be created and/or maintained along all aquatic areas. Within the watersheds of streams
supporting endangered aquatic species, we recommend undisturbed, forested buffers that are
naturally vegetated with trees, shrubs, and herbaceous vegetation and extend a minimum of
200 feet from the banks of all perennial streams and a minimum of 100 feet from the banks of
all intermittent streams, or the full extent of the 100 -year floodplain, whichever is greater.)
Impervious surfaces, ditches, pipes, roads, utility lines (sewer, water, gas, transmission, etc.),
and other infrastructures that require maintained, cleared rights-of-way and/or compromise the
functions and values of the forested buffers should not occur within these riparian areas.
Stream Crossings - Bridges or spanning structures should be used for all permanent roadway
crossings of streams and associated wetlands. Structures should span the channel and the
floodplain in order to minimize impacts to aquatic resources, allow for the movement of aquatic
and terrestrial organisms, and eliminate the need to place fill in streams and floodplains.
Bridges should be designed and constructed so that no piers or bents are placed in the stream,
approaches and abutments do not constrict the stream channel, and the crossing is perpendicular
to the stream. Spanning some or all of the floodplain allows the stream to access its floodplain
and dissipate energy during high flows and also provides for terrestrial wildlife passage. When
bank stabilization is necessary, we recommend that the use of riprap be minimized and that a
riprap-free buffer zone be maintained under the bridge to allow for wildlife movement. If fill in
the floodplain is necessary, floodplain culverts should be added through the fill to allow the
stream access to the floodplain during high flows.
If bridges are not possible and culverts are the only option, we suggest using bottomless culverts.
Bottomless culverts preserve the natural stream substrate, create less disturbance during
construction and provide a more natural post -construction channel. Culverts should be
sufficiently sized to mimic natural stream functions and habitats located at the crossing site;
allow for water depth, volume (flow), and velocity levels that will permit aquatic organism
passage; and accommodate the movement of debris and bed material during bank -full events.
Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
In the event that a traditional culvert is the only option, the culvert design should provide for a
minimum water depth in the structure during low-flow/dry periods. Sufficient water depth
should be maintained in all flow regimes so as to accommodate both the upstream and
downstream movement of aquatic species. Water depth inside the culvert must be adequate for
fish to be completely immersed and all other aquatic life to move freely. The culvert should be
designed and installed at the same slope as the stream grade to maintain an acceptable water
3

velocity for aquatic life passage and for stream substrate characteristics to be retained within the
culvert.
Where feasible, we recommend the use of multiple barrels, in addition to the low -flow barrel, to
accommodate flood flows. Floodplain barrels should be placed on or near stream bank -full or
floodplain bench elevation and discharge onto floodplain benches. Where appropriate, install
sills on the upstream end of floodplain barrels to restrict or divert the base stream flow to a
single barrel. If the culvert is longer than 40 linear feet, alternating or notched baffles should be
installed in a manner that mimics the existing stream pattern. This will enhance the passage of
aquatic life by: (1) depositing and retaining sediment in the barrel, (2) maintaining channel
depth and flow regimes, and (3) providing resting places for fish and other aquatic organisms.
Measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any ground -disturbing
activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing native vegetation
should be retained (if possible) to maintain riparian cover for fish and wildlife. Disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native grass and tree species as soon as the project is completed.
The proper planning, design, and installation of stream crossings provide year-round passage for
aquatic organisms and preserve healthy streams. We recommend the following Web site for
additional information regarding stream -crossing activities:
http://www.stream fs fed.us/fishxing/pointers.html.
Utility Line Stream Crossings - Utility crossings (i.e., sewer, gas, and water lines) of streams
should be kept to a minimum, and all utility infrastructure (including manholes) should be kept
out of riparian buffer areas. If a utility crossing is necessary, we recommend that you first
consider the use of directional boring. Directional boring under streams significantly minimizes
impacts to aquatic resources and riparian buffers.
If directional boring cannot be used and trenching is determined to be the only viable method,
every effort should be made to ensure that impacts to in -stream features are minimized and
stable upon completion of the project. Our past experiences with open -trench crossings indicate
that this technique increases the likelihood for future lateral movement of the stream (which
could undercut or erode around the utility line), and the correction of such problems could result
in costly future maintenance and devastating impacts to natural resources. Therefore, as much
work as possible should be accomplished in the dry, and the amount of disturbance should not
exceed what can be successfully stabilized by the end of the workday. In -stream work should
avoid the spring fish -spawning season and should consider forecasted high-flow events.
Regardless of the crossing method, all utility lines should cross streams perpendicularly. We
strongly encourage that a qualified biologist monitor the work area until the work is complete in
order to identify any additional on-site impact -minimization measures. The Service may be
available to assist you in this effort.
To determine if any maintenance is required, the work site should be monitored at least every
3 months during the first 24 months and annually thereafter. Moreover, we recommend the
development of a riparian monitoring and maintenance program that would outline procedures
2

for the prompt stabilization of streambanks near the utility crossing (should any streambank
erosion or destabilization occur) throughout the life of this project.
Special consideration should be made with regard to sewer lines associated with stream crossing
areas. These lines should be maintained at all times in a manner that prevents hazardous
discharges to land or surface waters and should be constructed of ductile iron or a material of
equal durability.
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species - Because the entire project is more than
50 miles from nearest known northern long-eared bat maternity site or hibernacula and there is
suitable habitat in the surrounding area, the low probability/amount of "take" occurring as a
result of this project is discountable and we believe this project is "not likely to adversely
affect" this species. Though the project will result in the removal/loss of very little suitable
northern long-eared bat habitat, and the probability of bats using the project area is very low,
we recommend all tree felling occur before May 15 (or after August 15) to further lessen the
likelihood of the proposed project adversely affecting this species. Our concurrence with a
"not likely to adversely affect" determination is not dependent on this action - the cutting
moratorium is a measure that can be implemented to further reduce the probability of "take" of
this species. Obligations under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act must be reconsidered
if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species
or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently
modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or
critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments and request that you continue to keep
us informed as to the progress of this proposed project. If we can be of assistance or if you have
any questions, please contact Mr. Allen Ratzlaff of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 229. In any
future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-17-505.
E -Copy:
Olivia Munzer, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, olivia.munzergncwildlife.org
5

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi FI. I lanulton
September 11, 2017
Felly Roth roth cr,mcadamsco.com
McAdams
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
Re: Brookside Subdivision, Troutman, ER 17-1491
Dear Ms. Roth:
Thank you for your letter of August 4, 2017 concerning the above project.
Office of Archives and I listory
Deputy= Secretary- Kevin Cherry
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be
affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
[e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above -referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
amona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mad Semice Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-0599

W4
i
I i.
SUBJECT PROPERTY
(�• _ ~ ' STREAM FEATURE A
IM- 00
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
NOTES:
1. USGS; 7.5 MINUTE, QUAD, "TROUTMAN", NORTH CAROLINA; 2013 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY
2. LAT. 35.693671 N, LONG: -80.897026 W
0 1,000 2,000
STREAM, WETLAND, & BUFFER DELINEATION Feet
FIGURE 1. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC VICINITY MAP 1 inch = 2,000 feet
BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION DATE: 8/2/2017
WADAMS TROUTMAN, NORTH CAROLINA JOB NO: RYN-17010
DRAWN BY: roth
Y:\Projects\RYN\RYN-17010\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\RYN17010 Fiqure 1 USGS.mxd, 8/2/2017 2:58:21 PM, roth

SUBJECT PROP RTY
LC82
SRX.
KL
Cac
S EA F A URE B
P-.
P�CCt
CD2
1. USGS; SOIL SURVEY SHEET 36, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
2. LAT: 35.693671 N, LONG: -80.897026 W
Ca C
,dE
STREAM FEAT E A
Fr
ACX
C
Yr,
0 375 750
!Bj STREAM, WETLAND, & BUFFER DELINEATION Feet
FIGURE 2. NRCS SOIL SURVEY 1 inch = 750 feet
BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION DATE: 8/2/2017
WADAMS TROUTMAN, NORTH CAROLINA JOB NO: RYN-17010
DRAWN BY: roth
Y:\Protects\RYN\RYN-17010\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\RYN 17010 Fiqure 2 Soil Survev.mxd, 8/2/2017 3:35:38 PM, roth
I

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2017-01728 County: Iredell U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Troutman
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner:
Touche LLC
Bill Whitley
Address:
PO Box 475
Harrisbure, NC 28075
Telephone Number:
704-361-9879
E-mail:
whitleycollcAaol.com
Size (acres) 57.76 Nearest Town Troutman
Nearest Waterway Big Branch River Basin Catawba
USGS HUC 03050101 Coordinates Latitude: 35.693671
Longitude: -80.897026
Location description: The review area is located 0.265 miles West of the intersection of Wesley St. and GeorEie St. in Iredell Co.
PIN(s): 4731625347, 4731638242, 4731713858, 4731714897, 4731724701, 4731725297, 4731726926, 4731735031.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters including wetlands, on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 9/21/2017. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters including wetlands, on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters including wetlands, at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters
including wetlands, on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters including wetlands, on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters including wetlands, on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

SAW -2017-01728
❑ The waters including wetlands, on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated MAP DATE. If you
wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon completion. Once verified, this survey
will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is
no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on SURVEY SIGNED DATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Catherine M. Janiczak at 704-510-1438 or
Catherine.M.Janiczak(&usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 09/22/2017.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M 15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
JANICZAK.CATHERINE.MARIE.15355 DDNitclUs,o=U.S.Gowrnment,ouHDoDEouAPKI,,'u35USA,
Corps Regulatory Official: 87066 Date;2ICZAK.CATHE3IN1-04'0 E.1635587066
Date: 2017.09.22 09:43:21 -04'00'
Date of JD: 09/22/2017 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable

SAW -2017-01728
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.anny.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: McAdams Company
Kelly Roth
Address: 2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
Telephone Number: 919-361-5000 x210
E-mail: rothAmcadamsco.com

SAW -2017-01728
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
A licant: Touche LLC Bill Whitley File Number: SAW -2017-01728 Date: 09/22/2017
Attached is: See Section below
LAPPROVED
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of ermission A
RED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of ermission B
DENIAL C
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
INARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or hLtp://www.usace.gM.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoEyProgramandPerinits.asox
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SAW -2017-01728
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Catherine M. Janiczak
CESAD-PDO
Asheville Regulatory Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M 15
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunit to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant oragent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Catherine M. Janiczak , 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 09/22/2017
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Touche LLC, Bill, Whitley, PO Box 475, Harrisburg,
NC, 28075
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Brookside Subdivision, SAW -2017-
01728
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The review area is located 0.265 miles
West of the intersection of Wesley St. and Georgie St. in Iredell Co. PIN(s): 4731625347, 4731638242, 4731713858,
4731714897,4731724701,4731725297,4731726926,4731735031.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Iredell City: Troutman
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.693671 Longitude: -80.897026
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Big Branch
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 09/21/2017
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude (decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non -
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404)
Feature A
35.692782
-80.896392
2612LF
Potential Non-
wetland Waters
Sec. 404
Feature B
35.693086
-80.900507
15OLF
Potential Non-
Wetland Waters
Sec. 404
Feature C
35.692001
-80.896797
0.651 acres
Potential Wetland
Waters
Sec. 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figure 3. Existing Conditions (Dated 09/21/2017)
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000; Troutman_
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Iredell County, sheet 36_
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
JANICZAK.CATH
ERIN E.MARIE.15
35587066
Digitally signed by
JAN ICZAKCATHERI NE.MARIE.1535587066
DN: C=Us, -U.S. Government, O—DOD,
-PKI, O 1,15A,
cn=JA NICZAKCATHERINE.MARIE.15355870
66
Date: 2017.09.22 09:43:55 -04'00'
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
09/22/2017
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

LEGEN[
DATA
-4 EXIST
® EXISTING WETLAND
SUBJECT PROPERTY
PARCELS
- - - 2 -FT CONTOURS
MASSEY ST
slates:
1) Catawba River Basin - HUC 030501011106 (Stumpy Creek -Lake Norman). Panel effective date: 3/18/2008).
2) DWR Stream Index Number 11-831-(1); Big Branch; Classification WS -IV. 5) Field work completed 08/032017.
3) Town of Troutman and Iredell County watershed overlay: WS -IV Protected Area; 100 -ft 6) Jurisdictional limits have not been confimmed by USAGE.
buffers required on perennial streams. 7) Jurisdictional features have not been field surveyed by geomatics.
4) No FEMAfloodplains located within study area (NCFIRM Map Number 3710473100J; 8) Size and dimensional limits of all streams and wetlands are approximate.
0 150 300
STREAM & WETLAND DELINEATION Feet
FIGURE 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 inch = 300 feet
BROOKSIDE SUBDIVISION DATE: 9/21/2017
4c ADA N1 S TROUTMAN, NORTH CAROLINA JOB NO: RYN-17010
DRAWN BY: jallen
oiects\RYN\RYN-17010\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\RYN17010 Fiqure 3 Existinq Conditions.mxd, 9212017 3:37:37 PM, iallen
11

(N)
NC GRID (NAD83)
EXISTING
GEORGE STREET
ARIABLE-WIDTH PUBLIC R/W)
(PB 58, PG 73)
SHEET 1 OF 6: EXISTING CONDITIONS
Z u
u
O x 00
-1
-1 o
o o N
Q o
N
ZZQC7 II
u
O
LL
Z 0wco>-
m
Z w Q� z w
aO w w Q Q H
K _ 2 = u Q
f1 d w u 0 n
Z to
Q
J `0
LLL w ~ 00
w
QLn w Q
Z orf z
J
'01--o
c„
W U
O�
OOpo
O U w z
(DO
N1D o
x
W
S
Eo 2 N
o o
u ..N
^ N u O
E m.z
E
F of O
Ol 3 N
N C
o
U 0
L
O
U!
L
F
a ;
=

(N)
INC GRID (NAD83)
EXISTING
IGIE STREET
-WIDTH PUBLIC R/W)
B 58, PG 73)
INa bl, NV by) bHtt I L OF b: UVtKALL JI I It PLAN
Z u
u
Ox oO
-1 o 0
o o N
Q o
N
Z Z Q C7 II
K u Y ci c -I
O
LL
Z z w m }
m
Z U<U-jzw
a0wuii<<
K _ 2 = u Q
d d w u n
1-0
rl
LLI z I~00
wQ
i z
0
(n Lu N=
Y LLJ— U
ON(D
J � �
OQLUZpo
Lu
a
m0
0
S
-
E
E 3 ry
o m r°ii o
� l0 O
U CpN
^NU O
E m�z
���
E
F of p
� Ol 3 N
N C
o
U O
c m u
s w v 3
L
O
W
L
H
a 3
=

STREAM "A"
IMPACT AREA: 41 LF
STREAM "A"
IMPACT AREA
(CULVERT): 132 LF
3:1 SLOPE
(I
fi
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
(TYP.)
STREAM "A" —
IMPACT AREA
(RIPRAP): 51 LF
NC GRID (NAD83)
IIII 111111 II\\ I (�lll I (� -4
EXISTING GRADE
IL
HEADWALL (TYP.)
11� 1 i l l I mo/
- 1
f 3:1 SLOPE
YO KRD.. /n ��/ /,i N_
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 50 100 200
1 inch = 100 ft.
I
� I \LV �III�)I\Il I / \ � � � • � VA ��L�
>�l)N II
\lk
,\, I I��\�����,
IMPACT LEGEND
WETLAND "A"
PERMANENTIMPACT
AREA: 3,260 SF
(0.07 AC)
HEADWALL (TYP.)
RIP—RAP
DISSIPATER PAD
MENEENEEMENEEN TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
■.■.■.■.■.■.■■ TOTAL = 41 LF
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
TOTAL = 183 LF
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
TOTAL = 0.07 AC
SHEET 3 OF 6: IMPACT AREA 1 PLAN
z
Z g
a. 00
O0o 0
ado a
zza0
,Y��
O
LL
Z Z Lu
Z JWECa
a�zw
Z U :5;L, w 0JWaa
LL �
d aU�vvi�
T
H
C
w
ILD
W
Lu W
o
M Cr
ti U
J
v/
z N o
Y
W Lu
— U
OrI
(D oc
O
W O z
A/
Y�
(�c (D Z
m
Q
V o
�
ca
G
T
C
o E
°
oU
ti U
N
-mo
ao m E m
= :t
� o ov
E
m N
Z
m u
t
0
= 3
F-

870 870
1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00
VERTICAL SCALE
0 s 10 20
1 inch = 10 ft.
HORIZONTAL SCALE
0 50 100 200
1 inch = 100 ft.
SHEET 4 OF 6: IMPACT AREA 1 PROFILE
W
J
LL
Z O
d 00O 1 0
o o F N
Q O a
Z�
ULo N
0
LL
Zz W Co >
� m
Z W Q LU Z w
Z U � J w
J p J w Q Q H
F'Z dLLU0Ln
W I.o
W LU
LL ~
owZ
z
_ ago
\clf N
i — U
0 �
0 < LU
U Q
Co a�F-
o
0
F-
T
C
>
E
oN
E N
O
w 0 i
m
O" 6 oU
u C "
0,UN_i..
�, Z
b E
-mo cav
am E m
o N o
o a
3
cm u
t
0
n`�v
= 3
v

870 870
16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00
VERTICAL SCALE
0 s 10 20
1 inch = 10 ft.
HORIZONTAL SCALE
0 50 100 200
1 inch = 100 ft.
SHEET 5 OF 6: IMPACT AREA 1 CROSS SECTION
W
J
LL
Z o
K
d 00
0006 o0
O H N
Q O a
z�
ULo N
0
LL
Z z W m >
� m
JZ U Q LU Z w
Z U � J w p J w Q = or Q H
Z
0
00
W w ~
cn w
LU
Q cn z_
(/) J
clf N °
YU u
U
O cc
O QLU
LLJ
po
Q
m U o
Q F-
T
C
>
o m E
E3 ^�
woo °
O oU
..
1tiU
E m� Z
N
E
� b l
-mo cav
am E m
o N o
o m
m v E
—
v
3
cm u
t
0
n`�v
= 3
v

SEE SHEET EC -2 SEE SHEET EC -3
aMMMMMMM MM7MMMM
....... ■�■■.. ■■■ .■■ ■■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ENE ■ ■■■�.■■■■■■■. �r*. . ��■. .....*■■�■■I■■� .7 7.�■�. �.f. �. ....r..■� ..*MEM ... .........■���.■}..�■�■■■/zz
.■.�..■r .................... 1.
/
F
J
TR � PgOTE ON
1JMITS OF 100,0e -
FENCE/
■ _ �I / / _ _ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / � / / �� / bISTURC (rn� // /
Syy��T ENCE
■� STOCKPILE LOCATION / / / / � / / / / ( / � �/ / / / � � / / / �� = i �/ / � � � / / / / \ \ \ \ \ • \ � I \
i WRAPPED IN DOUBLE / 1 / /
■ ROW ,SILT FENCE WIT 19 I I / / /
i / / SILT' FENCE OUTLETS AT / I� / / / / / / / / I / \\ / i//�
ALL LOW POINTS / /
■ / / J / / / / ' / dell
SILT FENCE OUTLET
■ / / i / / / -AT ALL LOW—
■ // /� // // // / �/ / / POINTS (TYP.)
/
TEMPORARY
TEMPORARY DIVERSION I I I I
■ / / / ? / / / i DIVERSION / / / / / „� / / / / / / / / / / CHANNEL LINED WITH I \ / I I / T
/ / / // 111(MPERVIOUS/LINER MAT III
■ / / �? DITCH/BERM.
(TYP.) / / /
i i \ — l
TEMPORARY CHECK = / , � - � �% / / / / / _ /
■ DAM (TYP,) / �/ - / j / / / / / / / / / // / / / /
■ �y / / / / / / / / \ / I // // COFFER DAM
TE PRO�CTION / / / j/ ���� /� // / / \ - -- // l -SF I ��_ / / ------
Rt
F,ENCE/LIMITS OF /� I
SF
/DISTSF
URBANc(TirP. // ////��/ % i i j� \^\ /_ --- —� ---��/ l I I I / // //ice
NIL,
II /
10 z
■ // � � / / ��- / / l l l l 11 ll�/ll/ � // °/'�� �1��s��s
�` /
/ /�
/
■ � / ii / 1 I I I I I
TE,R�(P/
r�-
//COFFERI DAM
■ / �, 6 / / // / / / / / / / / / / \ \ �
xv
LU 14
71
LU i / LU
/ / // / 6 / / / // / / // // /�///' — / / / / /X/ / /// // TREE PROTECTION
■ / / / / / / / / / / /// / FENCE/LIMITS OF—
/ / / DISTURBANCE (TYP.) \
■� / 6\ / l l/ l l 11 l // / / / / / /// / / / / ////� �� x I
SILT�FENCE OUTLET \ I ' / �I 5�H 0
■ — i / l / l l l / / / AT ALL Low / \ / I V 1 / 1/22 /
■� i // / // /l / / l 11 / l / / / / POINTS (tYP-. \ \ \ I I r I / / IN 841?(0
■6 / / ///// /////// //// // / / / // / �/ �j//// // \\ok
`ih SILT FENCE l/ �/
06
---
/EX. �M /
y■"�■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■1 �11r�ii�■iiiii■■i■ ■��i■■■■/ii■i■■■■■■■■ii'■�i■■■■r■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■�ii�■■i■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■r■■�■■■�■■■■■■�i■i■�■�■■i■■�ifif■ ■■i■i■■■i■■■ ■i■ ■■ ■ti■■■■■i■■i■■■■■
SEE SHEET EC -6
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
-111111111, SILT FENCE OUTLET
INLET PROTECTION
t ' INLET PROTECTION
1� FOR EXISTING STRUCTURES
TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN
%0 FILTER BERM
CHECK DAM
—SF —SF —SF — SILT FENCE
TP TP TP TREE PROTECTION FENCE
LID —LD LIMITS OF
WOODED
DIVERSION
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT
'-'-'-'-'- W EXISTING WETLAND
INDEX MAP
NTS
EXISTING SEWER
EASEMENT PB 35,
PG 23
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
NC GRID (NAD83)
FINAL DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
'J
McADAMS
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone [phone]
fax [phone]
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
CLIENT
NASS CROSSING, LLC
7620 RED BAY LANE
PARKLAND, FL 33076
ATTN: MATTHEW WILSON,
MANAGING MEMBER
V)
EA "A"
ET EC -2
AREA I' '
SHEET/i -3
t -D
z�00
/
�o
��
/
/ �� EC EC -
rC
AREA C��
LU
SHEET EC -4
�■�
DC
AREA "E"
-
J
INDEX MAP
NTS
EXISTING SEWER
EASEMENT PB 35,
PG 23
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
NC GRID (NAD83)
FINAL DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
'J
McADAMS
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
phone [phone]
fax [phone]
license number: C-0293
www.mcadamsco.com
CLIENT
NASS CROSSING, LLC
7620 RED BAY LANE
PARKLAND, FL 33076
ATTN: MATTHEW WILSON,
MANAGING MEMBER
V)
V
t -D
z�00
�o
LU
N
W
LU
Q
DC
z
J
cC
Z
W
U
O °Cir-�
O U00
LU
z
cc Z
z
M
Q
Z
0
0
U
�N CARO. ),
c -FRSs %
= �• QUO
=
REVISIONS
N0. DATE
PLAN INFORMATION
PROJECT NO. RYN-17010
FILENAME RYN17010-D-2
CHECKED BY RMR
DRAWN BY JPM
SCALE 1"=40'
DATE 11. 26. 2018
SHEET
STREAM DIVERSION
DETAIL
EC -1
3