20190082 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190115

DWR
IDIOM n of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
tial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
G Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20190082 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required What amout is owed?*
* Fee received r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone] Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Durham County Reuse Water System Extension to BASF
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jennifer Burdette
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
1/15/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Burdens Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
16-41-1-17-1-(0.3)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.891103 -78.869994
FA. Processing Information U
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Durham
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
* Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
rJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
F Standard (IP)

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
12 - Utility Lines
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
W Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r- Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r- Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
O Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
F_ Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
BASF Corporation
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB: 001159, DP: 000624
2c. Responsible party:
Nigel Armes, Site Director
2d. Address
Street Address
100 Park Ave - Tax Department
Address Line 2
City
Florham Park
Postal / Zip Code
07932
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Kyle Manning
State / Ffovince / Pagion
NJ
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r- Yes r No
r- Yes r No

3b. Business Name:
County of Durham
3c. Address
Street Address
5926 NC Hwy 55 E.
Address Line 2
cfty
Durham
Fbstal / Zip Code
27713
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Morrisville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0737-01-98-2755.1-00
2c. Project Address
Street Address
26 Davis Drive
Address Line 2
cfty
Durham
Fbstal / Zip Code
27709
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Burdens Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
16-41-1-17-1-(0.3)
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300020605
4. Project Description and History
State / F rminoe / Fbgion
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
2b. Property size:
125.692
State / F rmin / Region
NC
Courdry
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The linear project area extends approximately 1,000 LF from a recently permitted reclaimed water main along Burdens Creek northwest of the BASF property to a location on the north
side of the BASF building. Land use in the vicinity is forested, office and freeway. Refer to the attached USGS Location Map (Figure 1), Durham County Soil Survey Map (Figure 2) and
Existing Conditions Map Wth aerial (Figure 3) for more information on the project setting.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
02—FIGURE 1 Vicinity Map.pdf
1.99 MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
03—FIGURE 2 Soil Survey.pdf 2.11 MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:

30
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to extend reclaimed water service to the BASF facility located at 26 Davis Drive in Morrisville, NC.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The proposed project involves installation of a new reclaimed water line connection from the BASF facility to a proposed reclaimed water line along Burdens Creek northwest of the
BASF facility. The utility project will not result in any new impervious surfaces. The proposed reclaimed water line will need to cross Burdens Creek to connect to the proposed reclaimed
water line on the northwest side of Burdens Creek. Heavy equipment typical for utility installation and grading, such as track hoes, bulldozers, dump trucks and graders, Will be used to
construct the proposed project.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
04_FIGURE 3 Existing Conditions.pdf 2.49MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r NIA
Corps AID Number:
SAW -2015-02552
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): George Buchholz
Agency/Consultant Company: McAdams Company
Other:
C Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination was issued by Eric Alsmeyer of the USACE on March 15, 2016 (USAID: SAW -2015-02552). Ryan Eaves of Durham County issued a stream
determination for the project area in a letter dated September 26, 2017 (see attached).
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
05_2016-03-21 rec. USACE Signed JD PLAT - streams and wetlands.pdf 1.31 MB
06_2017-09-26 RCVD from R. Eaves City of Durham - Stream Determination.pdf 211.54KB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r Wetlands W Streams -tributaries Q Buffers
F Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
M Jurisdiction* length*
,f Utility installation Temporary Excavation Burdens Creek Perennial Both 22 30
Average (feet) (linear feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
0
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
30
3j. Comments
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
30

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Clr ck all that apply.
F Neuse r Tar -Pamlico
F Catawba r Randleman
F Goose Creek W Jordan Lake
F_ Other
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
Figure 4 Inset - Exempt P Burdens Creek No 1,203 401
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 1,203.00
401.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 1,203.00
401.00
61. Comments:
Supporting Documentation
07_2018-12-12-DRC17000-Preliminary Plan Set.pdf
08 FIGURE 4 Overall Impact Map.pdf
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
8.27MB
424.17KB
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Stream, wetland and buffer impacts were avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable in the design of the project. There are no
proposed impacts to jurisdictional wetlands. There 30 LF of proposed stream impacts, 1,203 SF of Zone 1 buffer impacts and 401 SF of Zone 2 buffer
impacts. There is one impact area where Burdens Creek will be open cut to install the reclaimed water line. Directional boring was considered for the
stream crossing; however, this option would necessitate impacts to the wetland north of the proposed impact area in order to dig a bore pit. It was
determined that open cutting Burdens Creek would have the least impact to jurisdictional surface waters. The open cut of Burdens Creek will be
conducted in the dry utilizing cofferdams and pump-arounds to maintain normal downstream flows and minimize flooding to the maximum extent
practicable. Excavation within the channel will be completed within as short a period of time as is feasible. After construction, the stream bed and
banks will be returned to pre -construction elevations and will be stabilized and re -vegetated, as appropriate, immediately upon completion of the
stream crossing. The attached Overall Impact Map (Figure 4) depicts the proposed project plan view and includes an inset showing the proposed
stream and buffer impact area.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
A Sediment and Erosion Control Plan for the project will be developed and approved by Durham County, and the
project will comply with the supplementary NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit (NCG010000). Permanent
seeding and matting will be utilized for erosion control as construction progresses. During construction, disturbance will be limited to the length that
can be stabilized at the end of each work day.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
All stream impacts are temporary and total 30 LF and 0.014 acres. No permanent stream impacts or impacts to wetlands are proposed. The Jordan Lake buffer impacts are Exempt
according to the Table of Uses. All impacts will be minimized to the maximum extent practicable, as described in Section E.1 a.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No

What type of SCM are you providing?
F- Level Spreader
F- Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
r Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
09_Diffuse Flow Statement.pdf
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r- Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
43.29KB
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r- No
u
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
f Yes
r No
Comments:*
The proposed project is an extension of a proposed, previously permitted reclaimed water line. it is not anticipated that this project will result in
additional development that would impact downstream water quality.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is an extension of a proposed and previously permitted reclaimed water line. it is not anticipated that this project Will result in
additional development that would impact downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r- No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r^ Yes r No r' Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?

r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
f Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
The USFWS Raleigh Field Office's species list for Durham County (https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/durham.html) and the NC Natural
Heritage Program Data Explorer (http://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/map) were accessed on January 4, 2019 to determine if the project will impact
Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat. The USFWS iPac tool could not be accessed to generate an official species list for the project
area due to the ongoing Federal government shutdown. The USFWS Raleigh Field Office website lists three endangered species in Durham County:
Michau)(s sumac (Rhus michau)di), smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) and dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterdon). Additionally, Carolina
madtom (Noturus furiosus), Neuse River waterdog (Necturus lewisi), Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni), green floater (Lasmigona subviridis) and
Septima's clubtail (Gomphus septima) are listed as At Risk Species. There are no critical habitats listed within Durham County.
There is no suitable habitat for Michawes sumac or smooth coneflower within the project area. Based on the USFWS Raleigh Field Office website,
dwarf wedgemussel is not known to occur in the Cape Fear River basin. Therefore, it is believed that no adverse impacts to threatened and
endangered species and their known habitat will occur due to the construction of the proposed project.
Consultation Documentation Upload
10_2019-01-07 NCNHP project_report _7862.pdf 946.67KB
11_DRC17000_speciesconclusiontable.pdf 158.76KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
f Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The NOAA Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Mapper (http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/) could not be accessed due to the Federal
government shutdown. Since the project is not in a coastal area, it is not anticipated that the project area is in or near an area designated as Essential
Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) HPOWEB online mapping tool
(http://nc.maps.arcgis.corrdapps/webappvievver/indexhtmi) was accessed on January 7, 2019 to determine whether there are any historic properties or
districts in the vicinity of the project area that may be affected by construction of the proposed project. No structures or properties with historical or
cultural preservation status were identified within 0.25 mile of the project area. An Environmental Review request (see attached) was sent to the SHPO
on January 7, 2019 to solicit their comments on potential impacts to historic and cultural resources that may result from the proposed project. A
response has not been received at the time of this application submittal.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
12_2019-01-07_DRC17000_Cultural Resources Env Review Ltr.pdf 163.88KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
An underground reclaimed water line crossing will be installed within the FEMA floodway and the One Percent Annual Chance Flood Hazard area of
Burdens Creek. Since the proposed reclaimed water line will be installed underground (via open cut of Burdens Creek) and no new impervious
surfaces will be added, the proposed project will not increase the base flood elevations along Burdens Creek.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA FIRM panel 3720073700J (effective 5/2/2006)
Miscellaneous v
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Signature
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
. I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');

• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Jennifer Burdette
Signature
Sign
Date
1/15/2019

iJ
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In
Name: BASF Corporation —Nigel Armes, Site Director
Address: 26 Davis Drive, RTP, NC 27709
Phone: [phone]
Email: Nigel. armes@bas£com
Project Name/Description: Reclaimed Water Line to BASF
Project Number: DRC -17000 Project Manager: I Mike Sanchez/George Buchholz
Date: June 6, 2017
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Samantha dailey
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Property Owner Certification
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purposes of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 he Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Nigel Armes
Property Owner (please print) Property Owner Signature
6/7/2017
Date
Raleigh-Durham Charlotte
2905 Meridian Parkway 343
Durham, North Carolina 27713 3436 Toringdon Way, Suite 110
[phone] Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
[phone]
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com

11T1
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In
Name: BASF Corporation — David Broad, Site Operations Manager
Address: 26 Davis Drive, RTP, NC 27709
Phone: [phone]
Email: david.broadabasf.com
Project Name/Description: Reclaimed Water Line to BASF
Project Number: DRC -17000 Project Manager: I Mike Sanchez/George Buchholz
Date: June 6, 2017
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Samantha Dailey
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, hereby designate and authorize The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. to act in my
behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by The John R McAdams Company,
Inc. staff. /�L---✓
David Broad
Print Signature
6/7/2017
Date
Raleigh-Durham
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, North Carolina 27713
[phone]
Charlotte
3436 Toringdon Way, Suite 110
Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
[phone]
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Communities
McAdamsCo.com

m
a41,
t1. USGS; 7.5 MINUTE, QUAD, "SE DURHAM", NORTH CAROLINA; 20162. LAT. 35.891103, LONG: -78.8699940 1,000 2,000FIGURE 1. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC VICINITY MAP 1000:::3000= FeetDURHAM COUNTY REUSE WATER SYSTEM EXTENSION TO 1 inch = 2,000 feetBASF VERSION: 1MORRISVILLE, DURHAM COUNTY, NC DATE: 1/4/2019McADAMS JOB NO: DRC-1 7000
X:\Projects\DRC\DRC-17000\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP -updated 1-2-2019.mxd, 1/4/2019 9:47:37 AM, roth

1 = N WsE `� / r, Gu
Uri'
lir
/ sE F -
wsc \
Zb r
Grove
/ w
t r r'J5B � Ws r
\ Cc ,-"WsB � � 1 �. / /I•: _ . ws8 C
Cc
wsc
WsB
wsc "SE Ur\ sA WsE c sE wsc
lWSE� ' S4 sB Or
! f WsC.
f\ do f
wsc
Pf W 54 MTC
wsc r wsc,
WSB Ws8
`ws8
wss wsc PROJECT AREA _,
wsc N J c -
a 3 F'fE `t WsC 1,C. Y.-.. WsC
w
wsc
r m WsE 3 Gwsc
-
WsE
1 Gu y� Ch _ Ws8
Gu
WsC:
WSB
-:'
wsc \ �� �. '�� wsc
%
WsE
VV s -
i t
CrC V WSB WsC VV S.
wsc
q� WsE WsE wsC `� / WsE \
J-WsE
Cc wsl \ k \
{ wsc
wsE se wsc WsC' s4
yyc� i
— - \
wsc n \ WsE WsC
WsE WSE wsc \ WVC2 \ \
WSB WsE C
wsc . Gu
r5
wsc s\ WSE<..
4 -
i Cc 4` Cc I
Gu .A =---
Ws8 -.. \
i
WsE -
WsE wsc
WSB
wsc i I _ _ = _ r= - crL; �.
�..
\ Ws8 Ws3
NOTES:
1. NRCS; SOIL SURVEY SHEET 36, DURHAM COUNTY, NC (1976)
0 660 1,320
FIGURE 2. NRCS SOIL SURVEY Feet
DURHAM COUNTY REUSE WATER SYSTEM EXTENSION TO 1 inch =1,320 feet
BASF VERSION: 1
DATE: 1/4/2019
MCADAMS MORRISVILLE, DURHAM COUNTY, NC JOB NO: DRC -17000
DRAWN BY: roth
X:\Projects\DRC\DRC-17000\Storm\Wetlands\GIS\FIGURE 2 SOIL SURVEY -updated 1-2-2019.mxd, 1/4/2019 9:48:51 AM, roth

DURHAM
COUNTY
�O
Engineering and
Environmental Services
September 26, 2017
Ms. Kelly Roth
McAdams
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
Re: Reclaimed Water Line to BASF Stream Determination
Ms. Roth:
Durham County has reviewed the June 9, 2017 buffer determination submitted by McAdams for the Reclaimed
Water Line to BASF. We concur with the buffer determination for the perennial stream feature (Burdens Creek)
identified. The associated buffers apply.
Thank you,
Ryan D. Eaves, CFM, CPESC
Division Manager
Stormwater and Erosion Control Division
120 East Parrish Street, Law Building, 1st Floor, Durham, North Carolina 27701
[phone] 1 Fax[phone] dconc.gov
Equal Employment/Affirmative Action Employer

Existing sanitary sewer line
Zone 2 buffer impact
Proposed sanitary sewer line
N Previously permitted reclaimed water line
Proposed utility easement /, — ,� �/-------- /- 10' maintenance corsde��
10'constr tion corridor
10' construction corridor
Zone 1
Temporary buffer impact Z
�e stream impact
/ J Existing stream (Burdens Creek) Burdens Creek
30' Zone 1 Jordan Lake buffer �� Limits of
%y Zone 1 Jordan Lake buffer disturbance
` 20' Zone 2 Jordan Lake buffer
Zone 2 Jordan Lake buffer Proposed
reclaimed
water line
0 20 40
LEGEND Feet Zone 2 buffer impact
1 inch = 40 feet
Limits of disturbance Limits of disturbance
--- Proposed easement
- - - Construction corridor
Proposed reclaimed water line
Proposed reclaimed water line \�
--- Existing sanitary sewer line
— Proposed sanitary sewer line
2 -ft contours
Existing wetlands IMPACT TOTALS
r Existing stream ® Stream impacts = +/- 30 LF (0.014 ac.)
Zone 1 Jordan Lake buffer Zone 1 Neuse buffer impacts = +/ 1,203 SF
0 Zone 2 Jordan Lake buffer Zone 2 Neuse buffer impacts = +/ 401 SF 1 \
50 100
"0
FIGURE 4. OVERALL IMPACT MAP
1100=3EEM=Feet
J
DURHAM COUNTY REUSE WATER SYSTEM EXTENSION TO BASF
1 inch = 100 feet
MORRISVILLE, DURHAM COUNTY, NC
VERSION: 1
DATE: 1/4/2019
MCADAM.-
JOB NO: DRC -17000
DRAWN BY: roth

The proposed project is an extension of a reclaimed water lines and will not result in any additional
impervious surface. As such, no new ditches or surface water conveyances will be created as a result of
this project and diffuse flow through the buffer will not be altered.

♦ 1♦ ♦♦ Rd'I ♦ ♦���11 ♦ ♦ \�I RSI ♦ ♦ 1 ♦17 ♦ 11 1tt 1 ♦ ♦ ♦ �rd'I ♦ t1 t1 4�l'I ♦t ♦ ♦ ���'I ♦ 1 \'I ♦ 1 ♦ ♦ 1 1 \'I 11 1 1 [7 V�11 4'I \`I \''I ♦ ♦ ♦♦ R^7 \`I ♦ ♦ NI 1 \'I 11'/t ♦ F/ ♦1 RSI ♦ 11'I ♦t
11,11 111111�11A II Ly�Q ol 111.1111►,!1 I ►1010,,p l ►11101H 111111111104 ►11��1111�i1�1 1111111,!►11111111 ►11111111111111 111.1 ►1N 1w11111,11111 ►111101 lX1111 ►111111111,1111111li 51111111111� X11 11111
111140111111111111 loll 11►1ION ►1►11►011►11111 N 111 1111IN 11►;�I I ��I 111111
1:1 /� 1 It111 /��11 III 111 11111 /�/� 1111
1►11/� ►111►;; ►;x;111:1111
11:1 11:1 11:1 11:1 11 111t.� 111I1►1
►:4►; 4►JI�I►J► IJI1►1I►:•IIIIII114►1►; I►:1I►11►1I►:11DJ►:4►1O1.1►;41�►; 11►; 4►; I►:X11►4►J►��1�►;; �V;11►11►Q►;11►1►; 11111milli ORION f►1►:il
111►11X1111111:Q14111J►:oNII 11►; 1►1101111►J►:11►11l11111►;11llllll► Q411 I►%17►:11►11:IFX41IN111111EI@P' 1G,11ON@l; I►:"11►�"l1►:1p1;111►11111
1111 INDI ►;i1►11oIEi5000011111111111 111Ei1 E�;I E�IP,I►1►1 OI I P,� � "llp,1111111P0,11; 1111►1lliIR 11111111
I.I►:4►:QEM
E� �IE�G ���1�4E1�4E�G81:�IE�IE�1�41� 1.19�81:4:8� �1:4d�31:Q

NCNHDE-7862: Durham County Reuse Water System Extension to BASF
v
"'ko Ad
January 7, 2019
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
c o
s
�n
d
FwY y
40 Q
\ N
\ i
\ 3
Ne�4on Ch A��O •'.1 ?
%"I0 1
� I �
® O P n N
1 �Y
I'
I
147
® I�
I� Ro
I O
40.
Iq5"y� II
5 421 R
Nelson cres
e,
N�' Mernon Ave / 2 k�
P / m
4,atrttn.i. / E
rV I
Rd
1:21,095
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.275 0.55 1.1 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), —sstopo, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and
the GIS User Community
Lowes Grove
F:IereNt/rRtl
E N
4
3Dr
iW I
55�
O
u
m 'p-
N
O
? 4�
D
d
1 = Engl rt Dr
0�
D
p
o
I
O`
- --
n
- -—- `- -- — - -
I �
��rrovr Ln
0
1 5�
t
_
gotdens
Creek
v°
\ p
\
Y
Lak view Dr
e6k
gurtlens
\
� z
\
,'y�
�tal PMwY
9 cfG O1
N
W�E
N
S
$s
January 7, 2019
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
c o
s
�n
d
FwY y
40 Q
\ N
\ i
\ 3
Ne�4on Ch A��O •'.1 ?
%"I0 1
� I �
® O P n N
1 �Y
I'
I
147
® I�
I� Ro
I O
40.
Iq5"y� II
5 421 R
Nelson cres
e,
N�' Mernon Ave / 2 k�
P / m
4,atrttn.i. / E
rV I
Rd
1:21,095
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.275 0.55 1.1 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), —sstopo, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and
the GIS User Community

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Durham County Reuse Water System Extension to BASF
Date: January 7, 2019
/ Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
-Species
Dwarf wedgemussel
(Alasmidonta heterodon)
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Not known to occur in the Cape Fear River
basin, based on USFWS Raleigh Field
Office website.
Michaux's sumac
(Rhus michauxii)
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Habitat assessment indicates no potential
habitat present
Smooth coneflower
(Echinacea laevigata)
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Habitat assessment indicates no potential
habitat present
Bald eagle
(Heliaeetus leucocephalus)
Unlikely to disturb nesting
bald eagles
No Eagle Act permit required
No known nest within or near the action
area
Critical habitat
No critical habitat present
No effect
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
1/7/2019
Signature /Title IDate

TI MCADAMS CULTURAL RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW > DRC -17000
January 7, 2019
Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4617
Re: Cultural Resource Environmental Review
Durham County Reuse Water System Extension to BASF
Morrisville, Durham County, NC
DRC -17000
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley:
McAdams has been contracted to conduct a site investigation for the proposed Durham County Reuse Water System
Extension to BASF site located at 26 Davis Drive in Morrisville, Durham County, North Carolina (hereinafter referred
to as the project area). The linear project area extends approximately 1,000 LF from a recently permitted reclaimed
water main along Burdens Creek northwest of the BASF property to a location on the north side of the BASF building.
The subject property is shown on the attached U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 -minute Southeast Durham, NC
topographic quadrangle (Figure 1). The subject property is owned by BASF Corporation. The project area is forested;
land use in the vicinity is forested, office and freeway. Figure 2 depicts the subject property on an aerial photograph
of the area.
McAdams conducted a review of SHPO's records for the subject property on January 7, 2019. No structures were
identified within 0.25 -mile of the subject property.
We are requesting consultation regarding the project's impact to historic properties. If you should have any questions
or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
MCADAMS
Ke lyRot
Environmental Consultant II
Attachments:
Figure 1 USGS Exhibit
Figure 2 Existing Conditions Exhibit
creating experiences through experience 1 of 1