_U5892_PreJD_Request_Rev20190110.pdf

urisdictional Determination ReQuest
11S Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace. army.mil/Missions/Re�ulatorvPermitPro,�ram/Contact/CountvLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARI.OTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number. [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D— PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D- NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
►:�
B
C.
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: U.S. 220 (Battleground Ave.) Widening-See Figure 1: Vicinity Map
City, State: Greensboro, NC
County: Guilford County
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): N/A (Linear Transportation Project)
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: NCDOT- Division 7; attn: Jerry Parker, DEO
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
� Other, please explain.
1584 Yancyville St., PO Box 14996
Greensboro, NC 27415
[phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
� I am the current property owner.
� I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultantl
� Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATIONZ
Name: NCDOT- Division 7; attn: Jerry Parker, DEO
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address
1584 Yancyville St., PO Box 14996
Greensboro, NC 27415
[phone]
[e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,a
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
� I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
� I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
� I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
� I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section lO list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
� A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
� I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
� I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
� Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F.
❑✓
�❑
❑
G.
0
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter OS-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional infortnation
to inform my decision.
ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 9 �• 3 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
� Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 36.135849
Longitude: -79.859607
� A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than l 1x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For A�proved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
� Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.miUMissions/Re ulatory-Permit-
Pro �ram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑
�❑
�❑
✓❑
❑�
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
AJD5, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination FormB
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
� Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
u
�
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
aNC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
� Other Assessment Forms
� www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/re_ug lator.�gdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_A�p_A_Prelim JD_Form_fillable.pdf
g Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re u�y-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made a�ailable as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and properry location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approvedjurisdictional determination (A7D), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2- PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Jerry Parker, 1584 Yancyville St., PO Box 14996, Greensboro, NC 27451
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: GUIIf01"CI c�ty: Greensboro
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
�at.: 36.135849 Long.: -79.859607
Universal Transverse Mercator: � 7
Name of nearest waterbody: HOI"Sepe11 CI"eek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH ��MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority
number (decimal (decimal of aquatic resource resource (i.e., wetland to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) in review area vs. non-wetland resource "may be"
(acreage and linear waters) subject (i.e., Section
feet, if applicable) 404 or Section 10/404)
see attached table

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
� Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
� Offce does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
� Data sheets prepared by the Corps: _
� Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Suroey Hydrologic Atlas:
� USGS NHD data.
� USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■� U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000/ Lake Brandt
� Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Guilford County, 1977
� National wetiands inventory map(s). Cite name:
R■
State/local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
� Photographs: 0■ Aerial (Name & Date): NC Statewide Orthoimagery 2014
or � Other (Name & Date):
� Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
� Other information (please specify):
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
�'6
Sig ature and date of
per on requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior fo finalizing an action.

Estimated
amount of Geographic
aquatic authority to
Site Latitude Longitude resource in Type of Which the
number �decimal (decimal review area aquatic aquatic
degrees) degrees (acreage and resource resource "may
linear feet, if be" subject
a licable
WA 35.777064 -79.822280 0.02 ac. wetland Section 404
WB 35.775978 -79.822553 1.34 ac. wetland Section 404
WC 35.778600 -79.820320 0.40 ac. wetland Section 404
WD 36.136016 -79.861099 0.03 ac. wetland Section 404
WE 36.133779 -79.858821 0.08 ac. wetland Section 404
WF 36.133174 -79.858335 0.05 ac. wetland Section 404
WG 36.127769 -79.852187 0.02 ac. wetland Section 404
Horsepen 36.136738 -79.860447 470 If non-wetland Section 404
Creek
SA 36.123097 -79.844302 176 If non-wetland Section 404
SB 36.126076 -79.850100 2,743 If non-wetland Section 404
SC 36.128332 -79.852770 362 If non-wetland Section 404
SD 36.130825 -79.854330 157 If non-wetland Section 404
SE 36.134521 -79.857756 152 If non-wetland Section 404
SG 36.133516 -79.858310 58 If non-wetland Section 404
SH 36.133844 -79.858633 31 If non-wetland Section 404
PA 36.125653 -79.848065 0.89 ac. non-wetland Section 404
PB 36.125374 -79.849531 0.21 ac. non-wetland Section 404
PC 36.134686 -79.858149 0.35 ac. non-wetland Section 404
PD 36.133136 -79.856894 0.15 ac. non-wetland Section 404
PE 36.134059 -79.857918 0.04 ac. non-wetland Section 404

� r F 4 �* �r t. � � '+ �,,, ti -y r _ -. �,�� r -
' � ��� � _ �. r' � �'� s,�� � � F . N
�� f � ., �
, r f �+"`�„--t � � �.
. } °' a � — �r�.
r ��.- *
�� r �.l f �. ` � � �` _�� .��r�,� �'•, * '." r ' �� '���-: �
. �� � �y�� v4 �j� f i _ jC�
. 7 � � �� � ��, � a�'y�� �—_ �
� .. t . .�* � � � � �� � 4 r y� �e. — � ■ # '�" j''
�- i � �y • k � 44. � a. � '•` - �-i y
� r�+r r� �� � � ' ' ' � � � !� _ �„ " r� # � � � : :,+�+ ���+i �,�'� �
+" ��� ' � � � . � _ ��, * j' : '�#� e � #i'
'4'�,� � PV•E � - ' �`
� ''��I��ry- -C��SW,O�`-De - { ! � �� ' ��` # F y�
8 ��' 1 ; # ,
� �°r+ � �j
_ � 5�. ��� � r �, � i _. ��,# 'f��
� �` s ' `; --•-_—,� � � = i �
� ., �
� '��!�::,_, �.� _. ,�� � � - � � �
{J �� . � �. . � � � f � � . - - 3 � - _� ' ' . O � � . ■ v �� .�r
�_'�, ~ 1. � . _ � . � . ..�.� 'n p
r �--�iti�sl� ° � �. ^4�_. ��.�, -- � .: i '. . 1�� � Q i #,.�
P• �� _ ti ' `. �. .
�i �-` �. - �� . , ' _ = =^. — _ + _ � � _ _—' � . I
-�+-�5 � � ��� � � -- - ' ,'� � � �� � � ! r � �
�� �`'; � �'ti 64 �' ,f � - - �,' _ � � � � ���� m I r
' ' '�� 5,�.� � 4 � � *' � �� � � O 1p�
��� . � r
�_���•I -r' � � �?�''� �i � _ � - ' . � �' � ���� a � �-s �,.� �
-� � ' � ,} r �, � � ,- s� a°' �--� � � � �i �.� � .
•� � 4 _ �-- �-,a-' v �_ _ f �+ ,Q :
} � ,�
': � � - 1 f � �
a r "�- �
�� a` �.•�. . 9 220 �_ �� ,r - ���'` �
��� a �, ���; 'y�_ y .-J_ �.- _�N - ,� _ - —� _ d:.' �,= ti � �!�'��
• , i � '�� � � ��` � * .�� ~ � � r� � ��
� � ' � J �',� ■ � �' .
��� �.� f � • ■ � ' i
� �� � '' y ,y � y _ '' � � � � ' . �. � �
� i _ � _ �_ J ,■ �� ' p.
,,Y � + � } I ! ���
� �� ^ i�. r' � ; -' •� � '
�
'ti ~p '� �j s R.D�N R� � � f �� � -� � 4` r { f
� ` �• � � ��G,A � + �
' i � — ' RICHFfjE� p � NE . -_ � � �
�
F _ . ,. R>o � -• _" _ - �`�■* y , y
�—�—.� t— — � i
{' '�� ,.r-� � �.� •��� r•.. __# � �
. ' .�' ,�,_4u r f �- • • � �' � � � a�."'+�
� � . ., � � ��
. j . �
� {� ., { { •�,�� � � . �ti � -� �'_ �� '.�� ` �
�1''�7� � .�' �r� ' ' .°�4 � � � .. _ '. _. . � . . � ti. , Y � �i �R�
� �
•� . � �. '! ' � .• •. � � � � � ,�, �� . �� •' ��� � � • � ih
�� . ` ? � .� a � . •.' . � i• � � _ �_ e
� � � e• # � � � } �� � ��
; �� _, � f • ,� �,' � �,*'' '°�. —=�R,'ITIS,1-��LAKE-D•R �• h
�` — f � # � �`1
,
� ���� . J � .�� ��±,� . �? �_ � •� •� � � ■ ,�i * I I
r' . e �+- r '" ` y
� $ . 1 � _ . � , , �, � � �, '� � � •� �
� '" �����' � �� I � � �� �*. � �,�l,,��,� �4�'. . "���* � r� �
` _ -�l'_ � a, f �'' .� � _ _' '�'
. � ,
_� - . , ,r' '
� ~. �i . �.�+ � �, � �� +�—�, . F� �i, �� .�I � � � � . 7 ..* � - � � f •
�� � {�
� -i I `.y� � � .. � � � . i - � i r: ' i # �" q ' �'` � ti.r .
F �r •s � � �,� ,� 4 ' t�'� _� �
r �
� -. . k , , °�� ,� *
� � � �.� y 9 a i � � . p � J�,+�,�_ ''i +'� �
F � r ' � �� � .-,� � � � T�y h � � ;• � � I , � - � � � �
} � � F � � � � � `� � '� � i5 �
� �'d r-S r '.r�e, • � y'� �. 5 .. ..�.
� � � y
'�� � � ;� I �� ��' - � �
� � n'� _ �
� � �-..�--y- y :�,... =.� �
" Legend � � i 5 �� �.� w.w� , ` � . . ' � .•, .
� ' � ' Y �- 4� y
�.. � � , � -�-n� ��� � �
, � Project Study Area 'w s � - �= `- • �i � � �
f� � _- — - �.�� ,� i�
4 �•4. �
; _ ��
_ 4 �
0 800 1,600 - "- "� . � � ` -._� `� � ' 1
Feet ��� -,� � � '+ � ��_Q � � �'
•� '�k �. .'�.-- • Y { � ''4
��.�° "°"'„ ��g Figure 2: USGS Topography Map
� TIP# U-5892
s Widening of US 220 (Battleground Avenue)
9�`p,yr OF �ANy � Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
Auaust 2018

+ F-•
. y�-_� ,�!" i�Y � ~ ��' '"���'"`�` .. - �`F�- �, ''` N
� !_ * � �' , �,,.
• . �-' ■ b � rrt,� �y { - ...7 .}� -� r� - �
- ^.^ � : �; � ��,,� _ ��i, ,. - .��"' �_� �.rT"-
7�r
� r :, �.
. i � �ra :':. - '
.
� � ,�.. � _ � R_ �.._ . ... r '
q . � - �
� • � '�" ., � � '' �� i • .
" � �reek , � ' .
� �- ,._: . . . , �'�P" �, #
� y 3
i r ,. �
�D �' � '�` �` �`�� � �
_ _ .. �
� .�� �� r � . - .,, ,
� �
. _ . .
' � s�µ4� - ! . � �� • �•. � 4 � ,.
}^ �' �.• �� ..
. � ' �. f �•
�'� —' .. � �" . — , • � r,. . ` ++ }�r �; i
n._, �
� . . : ,V._ ' � � ;. i � ; ' �r ,�„�
r � �' r�i �, �.�n__'i r ��," �) �
_ .�a . I' Y � B' . . . . }~ �_ r �
n.�. .
rr„" � ' ,� '� y
�i�. � �. � �`."i —"'� m...�`r�_ f _ � �:''� f
� '�i ; ����f.r -��' . ,p'^•�_ ��� � 4
� ' �� •
� ' ' `
.:
— €�� ,.,_ ' .y= ��
,J j ; �
,.. '� � � f � �+h�� �• � "'r' �,�� • " � : -
M ' � ��.�� ..
� E�- � �t P• ���
..� 1 4 •��•��* :
',.�` + R= - ' : 4 " _�'i'` _ �`' �L , , � '���j.
, .
: .. -
r , � ' � �''r '.: : .- ' = f �.
a � r"-' � " l .+ .. „'' ��1�. F � .
� �� e � . k�""" _ � i`'� S• N
. 5.. ,� ; r ,
4, , � � � � �� � ,A<
t ` # q �,�►':� ':b �'`3 w ��''" � R
:.. ^ ; ��R ` - � � , � r '•; 4 �! �!, . � 1M'`�
�F �
!.� � t ��+'� x �,� ���' ,R,� r- �
,r � �►. `�''-' " 220 '. ��"� � � � ' .,' ! -
� � , ��� � - . . '� �,#�� r � � �rI � � ��_ Lr �■ �"�-•
• .� «�." � � !� r
��„�' +„}y r . , �L�--� �F "M�'' ;.?, � w
, � ,
� �. � � � ;. ti. ► .
��* .. �� �r �' , • :►' -- _
: .� � �i '�� + - � . '�r : �.�
��!4 .� . , • ,.• . `+r �`
ri �M�� '{ .� �7�5'�.i►'_ �3 ��� � �'� ^ � �� �F �'� !
1 p
y 1� •�' � �'' �' Y
. � `�.
�' � 4 t " �
I #• J �' �.
f '
^�
.
. '
4r!!w� ..� r `�tli' i ��r �j�t y�' �� �'�c .,�� i, •
r` ��� !�' .�. f � �, r � _ �_.
. � �� � . ,, , �,_,,_
{. �, � � �. � F d
!�� ' � " T L s � � �� +�a � ��if � �A I �l �_ ! • �� �. ' . �� "
•" r
� Potential Non-wetland Waters of the US (Int. Stream)
��- Potential Non-wetland Waters of the US (Per. Stream)
%� Potential Wetland Waters of the US
Potential Non-wetland Waters of the US (Open Water)
� Potential Non-wetland Waters of the US (Stormwater Pond
� Study Area
�
� �p� 'Y
���
'��r of ��,�
�,' � �� . � � ��r
� �, , .�,,, �
r � ���-� � �
�.`� '; �,���'.� +�� �_
� �•
� � '`�
�,.
y =�� ��
� ' � �,. � ,�.
� �- :�' � '�- -
- 0 750 1,500
Feet
�r
Figure 3: Jurisdictional Features Map
TIP# U-5892
Widening of US 220 (Battleground Avenue)
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
Januar 2019

� �. �. . ; �.�;: _ � .
c�� ��� _ ��� �:� ,�, � N
� r Wa� � � �'�� _ � � � r � rR a�`� r`�
E iE� : �
� ,...�"`� _
,�,. ` :`-.,,� � s � �
�
, ,, �
.� :, M�� -� `
;_ �
, , r �, .
� : �� . . �
. :,
,�; ��_ , ,� ••,......».�..�,..+w..r'� `
z �-.f �" � p� � A �� �' �� � i,+_
r ��� l.r� � t� �:# %✓ ' � R� 1��.�..
�- ' . : . . _ _ �: ��
. . . � � . �.�.: ;: �� �: ' ; .•. ..,.. , � '�� ��.
� � , W � � � �, � ��� � r� i
_ , ' • ;. _ �
, ,� , _ _ � ,�: . �-� � ;i�-'�,[ '%��lt�.
�'~ � "'"'"'�� � � � � �� � � °' �� �
F . , �� �t.�. _:, �. a
;, . , . , _ IIA�C� � �''-� � �
� � �, • � . - .
� �`�tY =�: , .�..�,W,e,.•/" �+�, , � , � �� ,�
Y
.. . m8:�. "� � �:�'Y.�vl. ..
. �*,. . � � ��v:,��
� �� ����� �,�'� � �� � ��
� �G � �
_. � . �, .,.�y '^ � r � '` � � .
' �` ��,�-"`„ ��<:
� �
� � � ��'� �
.. i. �� . _ im r :. /5��� . A ..
a ,, �.v ^� 4 }'� � �: � � ;
' ; . ,.�. ., .. , .
,:.: .. � . • �, "�` _ �� x �3 � ����.
� �''' r � ' � �
'` � -� � • .,.. <. .. - ..,.- � � � . Y :.� , ,.... ...-. �.�€ .: R�� g •: � .�:f�hK
�a�. ' �
� �,, $
� '� � .� � �r � J� � .� .�
`i e '� �. � k � +
�"a: . - �e .
�� ;�, �. � � � �
,� � � s
i ' ��'� �r - �' V � � �ti � .
._�� {,� ��%'' � r '� q +� � ,��. � ,�—• � � �
�-• �� � �e , '� fg � � �
� ,-� . .'"� .:
"`,�.��'' , � � �
r ,,. �, �-, , � *
� � �. 6 s���°'rr�,�' �.k ,.� � r F �
� 1 � � 3 /�yf e.:; . � L . .. . �
+ ' t � ,�'o- �'• R'y�:. . � A` ��G .; � n ' � �
j:�,1 .. - '+t �� � f F t r , p ` •* 4 r . t { ss 5 � � .. .:�
-li`�i ��� t1' y.a � '' .. � ' s � t„y Y���
, �.
� ...
;; � �1� r'' }�, ��� _ ,' • ' �� y,� �"�
� �' i7��� y� ��,$ g `. 6 `, f �' i.
% % �� � � `' 5,� � �'�." �G�,� .� d
���., �' - �:. � �
.
�
� �. . �
.
� £: s " �`�:'��,� � � ,r �a ' ���
� t.. .
.. ... . _ F . . � y ��'W� �~ �r
. : , .y ' ,. , . .
.: .: . ' � � . i '�
�1l � , >
«� � � �+ ' �
r�� _ } . ' � � � . ;*
� � �;� .. ' � �; # �3 � r �,
� ` � �'''� � ` _
" �, i C*" �,_. , * ' .� _.�.3' a
_ � � i ' r� �g.. � '. , ._ } k M . "'
i/ j
�t' �j► � $ M M � �
4
Legend , � � �t �� f � �'�''°_ �;� .
� � � '� � �, ,� � { �,: � -:
� Project Study Area . = � � � � ; ��
n� +n : .y. .. . .. _�,k �a � I .z. �r► . �,�. .
_ h �.. ��.. ..- `"� ,�— � �„ ' � �;�F ' � _ ` , ' k.;a �`� r+j' � ,�
_ .
'?=- �� � S'�r.l � • �'� . yt; A � � ,, {� � �..
0 800 1,600 �' �:< . ;: ;
Feet `ti � ,�� � �;
�
��,�F "°"'„ ��g Figure 4: NRCS Soil Survey Map
� TIP# U-5892
s Widening of US 220 (Battleground Avenue)
'' � Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
`��r OF 7R��9
Auaust 2018

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 8/7/2018 ProjecUSite: TiP# u-sss2 (us 220) Latitude: 36.123080
Stream SA-INT
EV8IU8tOY: W' Sullivan and M. Richards County: Guilford County Longitude: -79.844304
(Kimley-Horn)
Total Points: 21.5 Stream Deter (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral termitte Perennial e.g. Quad Name: Greensboro
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 10.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple 0 1 2 3 1
pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 0
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 6
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
16. Or anic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
SA-INT is an intermittent reach of SA-PER, originating at a culvert located within
50 feet of the study area boundary. SA flows northwest, outside of the study
area, and parallels the boundary of the study area. SA-INT flows into SA-PER.
Pooled water is present and some banks are incised.
BKFW:
BKFD:
WW:
W D:
Substrate
Clarity:
Flow:
10'
3'
8'
1' pool
snd/grvl
sl. Turbid
pooled

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 8/7/2018 ProjecUSite: TiP# u-sss2 (us 220) Latitude: 36.123080
Stream SA-PER
EV8IU8tOY: W' Sullivan and M. Richards County: Guilford County Longitude: -79.844304
(Kimley-Horn)
Total Points: 32 Stream Determination (ci e Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermitte Perennial e.g. Quad Name: Greensboro
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 15.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 2
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple 0 1 2 3 2
pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 0
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 2
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 8.5
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
16. Or anic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 8
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
SA-PER becomes a perennial reach at a strong headcut. A strong meander is
present within the stream channel and is incised. SA-PER flows northwest,
outside of the study area, into PA and parallels the boundary of the study area.
Then SA flows out of PA, into stream SB inside the study area
BKFW:
BKFD:
WW:
W D:
Substrate
Clarity:
Flow:
10'
2'
4'
1'
snd/grvl
clear
moderate

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 8/7/2018 ProjecUSite: TiP# u-sss2 (us 220) Latitude: 36.126103
Stream SB
EV8IU8tOY: W' Sullivan and M. Richards County: Guilford County Longitude: -79.850144
(Kimley-Horn)
Total Points: 38.5 Stream Determination (ci e Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermitte Perennial e.g. Quad Name: Greensboro
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 20.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 2
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple 0 1 2 3 3
pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 2
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = g
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
16. Or anic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = g
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
SB is a strong perennial stream with bedrock present throughout the channel
that flows northwest and parallel within the study area boundary. The stream
then flows offsite below New Garden Road. A variety of fish were also present
within the pool and riffle ecosystems.
BKFW:
BKFD:
WW:
W D:
Substrate
Clarity:
Flow:
15'
1.5'
12'
6"
sd/gvl/bdr
clear
strong

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 8/7/2018 ProjecUSite: TiP# u-sss2 (us 220) Latitude: 36.125795
Stream SC
EV8IU8tOY: W' Sullivan and M. Richards County: Guilford County Longitude: -79.848738
(Kimley-Horn)
Total Points: 20.5 Stream Det ' ' circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemer Intermitten erennial e.g. Quad Name: Greensboro
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 8 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple 0 1 2 3 1
pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 7.5
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
16. Or anic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
SC is a weak intermittent channel, degraded by residental dumping. The
channel flows along a steep slope inside the study area into SB.
BKFW:
BKFD:
WW:
W D:
Substrate
Clarity:
Flow:
5'
6"
3'
2„
sand/silt
sl. Turbid
weak

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 8/7/2018 ProjecUSite: TiP# u-sss2 (us 220) Latitude: 36.130862
Stream SD
EV8IU8tOY: W' Sullivan and M. Richards County: Guilford County Longitude: -79.854276
(Kimley-Horn)
Total Points: 33 Stream Determination ' Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermitt t Perennial .g. Quad Name: Greensboro
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 15.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple 0 1 2 3 2
pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 2
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
16. Or anic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 7.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
SD is a rip rapped lined channel that is likely originating from a pond upslope,
located outide of the project study area. SD flows west, into the study area, and
is culverted under the adjaccent road and shopping center.
BKFW:
BKFD:
WW:
W D:
Substrate
Clarity:
Flow:
10'
1'
8'
6"
snd/gvl/rr
clear
moderate

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 8/7/2018 ProjecUSite: TiP# u-sss2 (us 220) Latitude: 36.134549
Stream SE
EV8IU8tOY: W' Sullivan and M. Richards County: Guilford County Longitude: -79.857654
(Kimley-Horn)
Total Points: 28.25 Stream Determination ' Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermitte t Perennial .g. Quad Name: Greensboro
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 11.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple 0 1 2 3 1
pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 0
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 2
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9.5
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5
16. Or anic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 7.25
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0.75
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Stream SE flows into pond PE, which appears to be a constructed stormwater
feature. The stream is a degraded, altered perennial channel with a gabion-lined
bank. The stream primiarily recieves stormwater input from surrounding parking
lots. Sandy substrate within the channel is evidence of high flow.
BKFW:
BKFD:
WW:
W D:
Substrate
Clarity:
Flow:
8'
6"
3'
2„
snd/gvl
clear
moderate

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 8/7/2018 ProjecUSite: TiP# u-sss2 (us 220) Latitude: 36.133180
Stream SF
EV8IU8tOY: W' Sullivan and M. Richards County: Guilford County Longitude: -79.858808
(Kimley-Horn)
Total Points: 21.5 Stream Det ' ' circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemer Intermitten erennial e.g. Quad Name: Greensboro
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 9.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple 0 1 2 3 1
pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 0
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 6.5
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
16. Or anic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
SF is a weak intermittent channel that is lined with rip rap. It is located within 50
feet of the study area boundary and flows into SB. Tadpoles were observed
within the pools located throughout stream SF.
BKFW:
BKFD:
WW:
W D:
Substrate
Clarity:
Flow:
6'
2'
3'
6"
snd/gvl
clear
pooled

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 8/7/2018 ProjecUSite: TiP# u-sss2 (us 220) Latitude: 36.133529
Stream SG
EV8IU8tOY: W' Sullivan and M. Richards County: Guilford County Longitude: -79.858303
(Kimley-Horn)
Total Points: 25 Stream Det ' ' circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemer Intermitten erennial e.g. Quad Name: Greensboro
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 11.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 2
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple 0 1 2 3 1
pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 0
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 1
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 7.5
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
16. Or anic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
SG is a weak intermittent stream, originating at a headcut, that flows northwest
into SB. Hydrology within the stream is primarily driven by surface water runoff
from an adjacent parking lot.
BKFW:
BKFD:
WW:
W D:
Substrate
Clarity:
Flow:
10'
1'
3'
6"
snd/gvl
clear
slow

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 1/9/2019 ProjecUSite: TiP# u-sss2 (us 220) Latitude: 36.133844
Stream SH
EV8IU8tOY: W' Sullivan and M. Richards County: Guilford County Longitude: -79.858633
(Kimley-Horn)
Total Points: 30 Stream Determination ' Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermitt t Perennial .g. Quad Name: Greensboro
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 14 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple 0 1 2 3 2
pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 2
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 0
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 2
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 2
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
11. Second or reater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = g
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 1
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
16. Or anic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 7
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
SH is a weak perennial channel that originates at a culvert outfall within the
study area. SH receives flow from a stormwater pond across Battleground
Avenue. The outfall has downcut to interface with groundwater. Iron oxidizing
bacteria and algae were present throughout the channel.
BKFW:
BKFD:
WW:
W D:
Substrate
Clarity:
Flow:
6'
2'
4'
6"
snd/gvl
clear
mod

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: TIP# U-5892 US220 (Battleground Ave.) Widening City/County: Greensboro/Guilford Sampling Date: 8-7-2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WA-UP
Investigator(s): W. Sullivan and M. Richards (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 1-2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N Lat: 36.129200 Long: -79.852743 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CeC2 - Cecil sandy clay loam NWI classification: PUBHh
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Upland observations were taken 5 feet from and 2 feet higher in elevation than wetland WA on a slight hillslope.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required�
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applvl Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave SurFace (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No primary or secondary hydrology indicators were observed. No water table or saturation observed in the upper 16".
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species?
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 20 Yes
2. Pinus strobus 15 Yes
3. Cercis canadensis 10 Yes
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 23
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Cercis canadensis
2. Phytolacca americana
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Fuscuta spp.
2. Rumex acetosella
3. Juniperus virginiana
4. Liquidambar styraciflua
5. Microstegium vimineum
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Sampling Point: WA-UP
idicator
Status Dominance Test worksheet:
FAC Number of Dominant Species
FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
FACU Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 37.5% (A/B)
45 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 9
20 Yes FACU
20 Yes FACU
40 =Total Cover
20 20% of total cover: 8
40 Yes FAC
10 No UPL
5 No FACU
5 No FAC
5 No FAC
50% of total cover: 33
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2. Hedera helix
3.
4.
5.
65 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 13
15 Yes FAC
10 Yes FACU
25 =Total Cover
50°/a of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
FACW species 0 x 2= 0
FAC species 85 x 3= 255
FACU species 80 x 4= 320
UPL species 10 x 5= 50
Column Totals: 175 (A) 625 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.57
1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type� Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
4-8 2.5YR 4/8 100 Loamy/Clayey
8-16 10YR 5/6 50 5YR 4/6 50 Loamy/Clayey split matrix
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark SurFace (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
No hydric soil indicators were observed.
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: TIP# U-5892 US220 (Battleground Ave.) Widening City/County: Greensboro/Guilford Sampling Date: 8-7-2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WA-WET
Investigator(s): W. Sullivan and M. Richards (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): seep/depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1-2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N Lat: 36.129192 Long: -79.852690 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CeC2 - Cecil sandy clay loam NWI classification: PUBHh
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland WA is a seep, located in a low depression that drains into an older culvert. The culvert then flows under US 220 and into stream SB.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required�
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applvl Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave SurFace (B8)
X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
The hillside seep recieves hydrology primarily from groundwater.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species?
1. N/A
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. N/A
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Microstegium vimineum
2. Carex spp.
3. Polygonum hydropiperoides
4. Lobelia cardinalis
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
)
50% of total cover: 48
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. N/A
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
20% of total cover: OBL species x 1=
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Sampling Point: WA-WET
idicator
Status Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
�
m
m
e
Yes
Yes
No
No
FAC
FAC
OBL
FACW
95 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 19
=Total Cover
50°/a of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
X Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type� Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 2.5YR 4/2 100 Sandy
3-8 5G 6/1 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark SurFace (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Wetland WA is underlain by riprap at 8 inches below the surface.
Sampling Point: WA-WET
ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name
WA
Wetland Type Seep
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Date 8/7/2018
Assessor Name/Organization WTS (Kimley-Horn)
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
Sub-function Rati
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology SurFace Storage and Retention Condition NA
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition NA
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Particulate Change
Soluble Change
Physical Change
Pollution Change
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes Rating
Hydrology Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Condition MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: TIP# U-5892 US220 (Battleground Ave.) Widening City/County: Greensboro/Guilford Sampling Date: 8-7-2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: w6-wD-UP
Investigator(s): W. Sullivan and M. Richards (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 2-4%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N Lat: 36.129133 Long: -79.852667 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CeC2- Cecil sandy clay loam NWI classification: n/a
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point WB/WC/WD-UP was recorded at a representative location 30 feet from and 3 feet higer in elevation than wetland WC on a hillslope.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applv) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (61) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No primary or secondary hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species?
1. Ulmus americana 30 Yes
2. Acer rubrum 20 Yes
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Acer saccharinum
2. Acer rubrum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. N/A
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
2. Lonicera japonica
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: WB-WD-UP
idicator
Status Dominance Test worksheet:
FACW Number of Dominant Species
FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
50 =Total Cover
25 20% of total cover: 10
)
15 Yes FACW
10 Yes FAC
25 =Total Cover
13 20% of total cover: 5
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
5 Yes FACU
5 Yes FAC
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Total °/a Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
FACW species 45 x 2= 90
FAC species 35 x 3= 105
FACU species 5 x 4= 20
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 85 (A) 215 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.53
1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations� (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
�Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must bE
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type� Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 2/1 100 Loamy/Clayey
2-4 5YR 3/4 100
4-16 2.5YR 3/6 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Sampling Point: WB-WD-UP
ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Soils revealed no indication of groundwater or saturation.
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: TIP# U-5892 US220 (Battleground Ave.) Widening City/County: Greensboro/Guilford Sampling Date: 8-7-2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: ws-w�-weT
Investigator(s): W. Sullivan and M. Richards (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): bottomland depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-1°/a
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N Lat: 36.136919 Long: -79.861401 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: CeC2 - Cecil sandy clay loam NWI classification: n/a
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil X, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetlands WB, WC, and WD are bottomland wetlands located within the floodplain of Horsepen Creek. The wetland point was taken at a
representative location within WC.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applvl Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (610)
X Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (61) X Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
X Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Hydrology within WB, WC, and WD is fed primarily from groundwater and surface runoff from surrounding development. Iron oxidizing bacteria is
present throughout wetland WC. Additionally, Horsepen Creek frequently overtops its banks and empties into these active floodplains.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species?
1. Acer rubrum 30 Yes
2. Acernegundo 15 Yes
3. Platanus occidentalis 10 No
4. Quercus pagoda 10 No
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 33
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Acer rubrum
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
4. Asimina triloba
5. Viburnum dentatum
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Microstegium vimineum
2. Polygonum hydropiperoides
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Sampling Point: WB-WD-WET
idicator
Status Dominance Test worksheet:
FAC Number of Dominant Species
FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
FACW Total Number of Dominant
FACW Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
65 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 13
15 Yes FAC
10 Yes FAC
5 No FACW
5 No FAC
5 No FAC
40 =Total Cover
20 20% of total cover: 8
10 Yes FAC
5 Yes OBL
50% of total cover: 8
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
2. Smilax rotundifolia
3.
4.
5.
15 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3
5 Yes FAC
5 Yes FAC
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Total °/a Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 5 x 1= 5
FACW species 25 x 2= 50
FAC species 100 x 3= 300
FACU species 0 x 4= 0
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 130 (A) 355 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.73
1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
X 3- Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations� (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
�Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must bE
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: JVB-WD-WE�
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type� Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/1 100 Sandy loam
4-10 7.5YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
10-24 10YR 4/2 50 7.5YR 4/4 50 Sandy loam; split matrix
�Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (F21)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, X Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) MLRA 136)
Sandy Redox (S5) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Stripped Matrix (S6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Soils within WC are significantly disturbed due to recent development in the area. It is likely the soils have been churned with fill and are in the
process of converting back to anaerobic conditions.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WB
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Date 8/7/2018
Assessor Name/Organization WTS (Kimley-Horn)
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
Sub-function Rati
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology SurFace Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NO
Particulate Change
Soluble Change
Physical Change
Pollution Change
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
HIGH
HIGH
YES
LOW
LOW
YES
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
NO
NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes Rating
Hydrology Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) YES
Habitat Condition MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WC
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Date 8/7/2018
Assessor Name/Organization WTS (Kimley-Horn)
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
Sub-function Rati
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology SurFace Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NO
Particulate Change
Soluble Change
Physical Change
Pollution Change
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
LOW
LOW
NO
LOW
LOW
NO
LOW
LOW
NO
NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes Rating
Hydrology Condition LOW
Water Quality Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NO
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WD
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Date 1/8/2018
Assessor Name/Organization WTS (Kimley-Horn)
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW
Particulate Change
Soluble Change
Physical Change
Pollution Change
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
LOW
NO
LOW
LOW
NO
LOW
LOW
NO
LOW
LOW
NO
NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes Rating
Hydrology Condition LOW
Water Quality Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NO
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: TIP# U-5892 US220 (Battleground Ave.) Widening City/County: Greensboro/Guilford Sampling Date: 1-8-2019
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WE/wF-UP
Investigator(s): W. Sullivan and M. Richards (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Levee Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N Lat: 36.133779 Long: -79.858821 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Ch - Chewacla sandy loam NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point WE/WF-UP was taken at a representative point located between wetland WE and the levee of stream SB.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applvl Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (61) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No wetland hydrology indicators were observed at data point WE/WF-UP.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species?
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 20 Yes
2. Acer rubrum 10 Yes
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Yes
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 20
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Acer rubrum
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Allium vineale
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Sampling Point: WE/WF-UP
idicator
Status Dominance Test worksheet:
FAC Number of Dominant Species
FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
FACW Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 70.0% (A/B)
40 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 8
20 Yes FACU
10 Yes FAC
10 Yes FAC
40 =Total Cover
20 20% of total cover: 8
5 Yes FACU
50% of total cover: 3
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2. Lonicera japonica
3. Smilax rotundifolia
4.
5.
5 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 1
10 Yes FAC
5 Yes FACU
5 Yes FAC
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Total °/a Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
FACW species 10 x 2= 20
FAC species 65 x 3= 195
FACU species 30 x 4= 120
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 105 (A) 335 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.19
1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations� (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
�Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must bE
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WE/WF-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type� Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/3 80 10YR 4/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey
4-16 10YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
�Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (F21)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) MLRA 136)
Sandy Redox (S5) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Stripped Matrix (S6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
No saturation or water table was observed at data point WE/WF-UP.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: TIP# U-5892 US220 (Battleground Ave.) Widening City/County: Greensboro/Guilford Sampling Date: 1-8-2019
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: wen�vF-weT
Investigator(s): W. Sullivan and M. Richards (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N Lat: 36.133740 Long: -79.858912 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Ch - Chewacla sandy loam NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point WE/WF-WET was taken at a representative location within wetland WE. Both wetlands WE and WF are riparian wetlands located within
the floodplain of stream SB, a strong perennial system. Wetland WE is bound topographically by a steep fillslope and a stream levee.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applvl Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (610)
X Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
X Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetlands WE and WG contain pooled surface water and iron oxidizing bacteria.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species?
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Yes
2. Acer rubrum 10 Yes
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Yes
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 15
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Ligustrum sinense
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2. Smilax rotundifolia
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
5 Yes FAC
5 Yes FAC
10 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Vegetation is sparse due to frequent residential maintenance.
Sampling Point: WE/WF-WET
idicator
Status Dominance Test worksheet:
FAC Number of Dominant Species
FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
FACW Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 85.7% (A/B)
30 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6
10 Yes FAC
5 Yes FACU
15 =Total Cover
8 20% of total cover: 3
Total °/a Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
FACW species 10 x 2= 20
FAC species 40 x 3= 120
FACU species 5 x 4= 20
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 55 (A) 160 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.91
1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
X 3- Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations� (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
�Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must bE
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WE/WF-WEl
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type� Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 4/2 60 5YR 4/6 40 C M Loamy/Clayey
6-12 10YR 4/2 20 5YR 4/6 80 C M Loamy/Clayey
�Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) X Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (F21)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) MLRA 136)
Sandy Redox (S5) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Stripped Matrix (S6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
The water table and saturation was present at the soil surface within wetlands WE and WF.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WE
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Date 1/8/2018
Assessor Name/Organization WTS (Kimley-Horn)
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW
Particulate Change
Soluble Change
Physical Change
Pollution Change
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
LOW
NO
LOW
LOW
NO
LOW
LOW
NO
LOW
LOW
NO
NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes Rating
Hydrology Condition LOW
Water Quality Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NO
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name
WF
Wetland Type Seep
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Date 1/8/2018
Assessor Name/Organization WTS (Kimley-Horn)
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition NA
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition NA
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition NA
Particulate Change
Soluble Change
Physical Change
Pollution Change
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes Rating
Hydrology Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Condition MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: TIP# U-5892 US220 (Battleground Ave.) Widening City/County: Greensboro/Guilford Sampling Date: 1-8-2019
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WG-UP
Investigator(s): W. Sullivan and M. Richards (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Slight hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N Lat: 36.127701 Long: -79.852051 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: CeC2 - Cecil sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, eroded NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point WG-UP was taken on a slight hillslope approximately 20' south and 1' higher in elevation than wetland WG.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applvl Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (61) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No wetland hydrology indicators were observed at data point WG-UP.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species?
1. Liriodendron tulipifera 10 Yes
2. Platanus occidentalis 5 Yes
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 8
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. llex opaca
4. Rosa multiflora
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Hedera helix
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
60 Yes FACU
60 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Vegetation is sparse due to frequent residential maintenance.
Sampling Point: WG-UP
idicator
Status Dominance Test worksheet:
FACU Number of Dominant Species
FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 42.9% (A/B)
15 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3
10 Yes FAC
5 Yes FAC
5 Yes FACU
5 Yes FACU
25 =Total Cover
13 20% of total cover: 5
Total °/a Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
FACW species 5 x 2= 10
FAC species 15 x 3= 45
FACU species 80 x 4= 320
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 100 (A) 375 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.75
1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations� (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
�Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must bE
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WG-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type� Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 7.5YR 3/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
6-14 2.5Y 5/3 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey
�Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (F21)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) MLRA 136)
Sandy Redox (S5) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Stripped Matrix (S6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Soils were at data point WG-UP were red and churned up from residential maintenance and grading.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: TIP# U-5892 US220 (Battleground Ave.) Widening City/County: Greensboro/Guilford Sampling Date: 1-8-2019
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WG-WET
Investigator(s): W. Sullivan and M. Richards (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Headwater depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N Lat: 36.127769 Long: -79.852187 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: CeC2 - Cecil sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, eroded NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland WG is a small headwater wetland located at the edge of a residential yard. Wetland WG seeps from the bottom of a hillslope and drains into
intermittent stream SC.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that applvl Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
X High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) X Drainage Patterns (610)
X Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland WG originates at a knickpoint at the base of a hill where groundwater seeps. WG then drains downslope into the channel of stream SC.
Standing water was present to 1" within WG.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1. Acer rubrum
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Chasmanthium laxum
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Sampling Point: WG-WET
idicator
Status Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
)
5 Yes FAC
5 =Total Cover
3 20% of total cover: 1
5 Yes FAC
50% of total cover: 3
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
5 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 1
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Vegetation is sparse due to frequent residential maintenance.
Total °/a Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
FACW species 0 x 2= 0
FAC species 10 x 3= 30
FACU species 0 x 4= 0
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Column Totals: 10 (A) 30 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.00
1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50%
X 3- Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations� (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
�Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must bE
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WG-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type� Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 2/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
4-12 2.5Y 5/2
12-18 10YR 3/1
70
100
10YR 4/6 30 C M Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
Prominent redox concentrations
�Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) X Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) MLRA 136)
Sandy Redox (S5) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Stripped Matrix (S6) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
Saturation and the water table were found present at the soil surface.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WG
Wetland Type Headwater Forest
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Date 1/8/2018
Assessor Name/Organization WTS (Kimley-Horn)
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW
Particulate Change
Soluble Change
Physical Change
Pollution Change
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition
LOW
NO
LOW
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
NO
LOW
LOW
NO
NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes Rating
Hydrology Condition LOW
Water Quality Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NO
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW