330067_Inspection Report_20190110

iv — 6IY — Vc- UC)L1
ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 3 - 6,'7 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Oper • n Review p'Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: /pp//9 Arrival Time: �" Z :pa /Z
Departure Time: V4 County: Region:
Farm Name: `3 y�,,/e� c4* 5 rbc(,-S f.9-f -, Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: -Tr: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current 'Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry 'Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 6: ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes Z1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 33 - ( 7 Date of Inspection: //to /(Q
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 124,
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA FjNE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA /(.1W
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Di NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document El Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No El NA El NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. El Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
('V-2& 6CY*r G,,4./lad c'n � fad 41- / lii/ ph Sina// i,j o
// ig . p. 0 . 4• 4-ri C.,0
LAB ✓fit" 15T` \\Jo D , P luise C►°,-/( 01—FoGPGaLe frt y
504 bl /L ( cokp /c,4wc.e
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: In -14 I y z.va
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L3e-t--5 4a,-. (61,/e / Date: / l /0 119
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015

Facility Number: 3_3 - 6 7 Date of Inspection: 7//d (I q
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: P
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Ny❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes di No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta re ,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yeso❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
El PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): i3e,- - t'n1
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Di NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No El NA NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Cod
['Rainfall ❑Stocking El Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Su
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued