330017_Inspection Report_20190110

i 00_J i q—Pc--06 l5
' � ,, iision ofWoat erResouerce 9 w i .'� Yy � S tFactyNumber 3 j ( 7 0 Diva n ofdan&WatrConer on r .� 6Other Agent � ... ;
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review t�Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: pop 9 Arrival Time:1 //2-3 Departure Time: 7/ 3 a County: Region:
Farm Name: )eh 2./f 2 c )(n v SOLI fff2-s-, Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: - Phone:
Onsite Representative: T /3 V&.&. e 2 Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
: 4 D esign Current w De g
m
sin Cnrient i,- Design f Current 'SwineCapacityop et Poultry Capacity Pop _ Cattle Capacity P'op -
ae
Wean to Finish '�a Layer Dairy Cow
'
fry, Wean to Feeder Non Layer Dairy Calf
--a,: Feeder to Finish ; = Dairy Heifer =_
Farrow to Wean , ='1 Design Ca eiit Dry Cow _
= Farrow to Feeder D Pou'lt Ca4 aci P.0� „ ,'. _, Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish ::: •La ers _ Beef Stocker
ii:P Gilts ' Non-La ers Beef Feeder
y Boars 1 _•Pullets Beef Brood Cow
°, O!ther, , , s tr e e e w -_` •Turke Poults �� 8
n
Other Other ��e = - °�
s
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: ,
a. Was the Conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA 0 NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) 0 YesVier
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 33 - / Date of Inspection: ///6 /1 q
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? Yes 0 No II NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes f' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): l ?1/
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ElYes N t ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Are Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need El Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop"tad
❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): `3e'/►1ad 41 5rn1
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 12 NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA p NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA .2 1V
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑Waste Application ['Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 33 - /-7 Date of Inspection: /`/6/(9
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA AZINE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA Er,/
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ElNANE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? Li Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
f "! %�',CB oar-cf G i--// c/ f, /2 ge !¢ -f /6' . P.v . 4- is
�,ng c Atha- yoe-� /v y C-dS 2 evPw h 5 w c t� • 7���',3' (�5�� � S��✓
'-/ o,) • p I ,f-� -/l i k. cr�c Q y opt sz or, a �.� -�
Ji�'W f U�r
/ �IG .
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: C1 (41 VP/ £(Z o 0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: -51=2.9.6-`�/e.-1/ Date: l //0 ( (
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015