330030_Inspection Report_20190110

(V V d-r) Vk
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 33 - 36 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Oper ' n Review Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: u/f') Arrival Time: OD D I Departure Time: //2-0 County: Region:
Farm Name: 5r ie -0-0 8n SD n /%d4/2solo Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: T /3r2wZ/L Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca.aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish MIZE Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-Layers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
■
Other •Turke Poults
Other 111 Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 77 ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes o ❑ ' ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes o ❑ NA 0 NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 3 - 3 D Date of Inspection: /7/6 (!9
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): l —
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental rest .notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need El Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA El NE
El Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): (36).-4ztyc114/ h7G; ,-4-IA S
13. Soil Type(s): �J
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Si;
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
rE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 1 j
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 1 NNE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers El Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Sury
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 3 - 3 , 'Date of Inspection: /7/D //
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No El NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
/1 I
1—�2 sA /ia d i /'t I 2C� �ZY.Qe, eik}r a al- l7• // D h Of CY e k (49)o&t
P 41) Go
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: I QI 7 ) (zo D
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /3 il/ Date: I ( I I 19
Page 3 of 3 ! 2/4/2015