U-5790 PJD request

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): March 2o�s
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Mason Herndon, NCDOT
5501 Barbados Blvd, Castle Hayne, NC 28429
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
NCDOT/ U-5790 NC 132 (College Rd) Corridor Improvements in New Hanover County
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
NC 132 intersection with Carolina Beach Rd and surrounding streets
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: New Hanover Clty: Wilmington
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 34.13885 °N; L011g. 77•89375 �W.
UIIIV@I'Sa� Tra11SV@rS@ M@rCat01': NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N
Name of nearest waterbody: Mott creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters:
4237(streams) linear feet: 3- 6 width (ft) and/or 2•98 �Pond) acres.
Cowardin Class: R2uB, R3SB, R4SB
Strgarp F�OW: Intermittent and Perennial
Wetlands: 0�209 acres.
Cowardin Class: PFo
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
TI�Ja�: None
Non-Tidal: None
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
� Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
�✓ Field Determination. Date(s): �une 2s-2s ana au9ust �s, 2016
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
❑✓ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
appl�nt/consultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
� Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
�✓ USGS NHD data
� USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 24,000 - Wilmington
❑✓ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Cltat1011: Soil Survey New Hanover County 1977
� Nat1011a� W@t�a11C�S IIIV@11tOP')/ 1'Ylaj��S�. Clt@ Ilal'Yl@: New Hanover 100k quads
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
� 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: ❑`� Aerial (Name & Date): Nc one nnap 2o�s or
� Other (Name & Date):
� Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
� Other information (please specify):
�

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarilv been verified bv the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
�

U-5790 US 421 & NC 132
Estimated amount of
Site Latitude Longitude Cowardin Class aquatic resource in Class of Aquatic Resource
review area
WETLANDS
WB 34.140573 -77.891897 PFO 0.116 acre Non-section 10 wetland
WN 34.143888 -77.896674 PFO 0.027 acre Non-section 10 wetland
WY 34.128741 -77.897640 PFO 0.021 acre Non-section 10 wetland
WW 34.131934 -77.896309 PFO 0.045 acre Non-section 10 wetland
PONDS
SPH 34.143682 -77.891579 0.108 acre Non-section 10 non-wetland
SPI 34.143578 -77.890782 0.281 acre Non-section 10 non-wetland
SPJ 34.143493 -77.890179 0.143 acre Non-section 10 non-wetland
SPK 34.143881 -77.895826 0.184 acre Non-section 10 non-wetland
SPL 34.144253 -77.895471 0.041 acre Non-section 10 non-wetland
SPM 34.144481 -77.896138 1.212 acre Non-section 10 non-wetland
SPN 34.142632 -77.897388 0.121 acre Non-section 10 non-wetland
SPO 34.138802 -77.891887 0.558 acre Non-section 10 non-wetland
SPP 34.136789 -77.893670 0.050 acre Non-section 10 non-wetland
SPQ 34.136034 -77.893787 0.070 acre Non-section 10 non-wetland
SPR 34.132837 -77.893042 0.036 acre Non-section 10 non-wetland
SPS 34.134454 -77.896722 0.083 acre Non-section 10 non-wetland
SPT 34.137526 -77.896054 0.008 acre Non-section 10 non-wetland
SPU 34.143322 -77.898905 0.019 acre Non-section 10 non-wetland
SPV 34.143893 -77.895305 0.066 acre Non-section 10 non-wetland
SPW 34.136068 -77.896391 0.005 acre Non-section 10 non-wetland
STREAMS
SA 34.142691 -77.890499 R3SB 370 linear feet Non-section 10 non-wetland
SB 34.140682 -77.892113 R3S6 1,281 linear feet Non-section 10 non-wetland
SC 34.136171 -77.896200 R4SB 124 linear feet Non-section 10 non-wetland
SG 34.143631 -77.896598 R3S6 52 linear feet Non-section 10 non-wetland
Mott 34.143616 -77.895295 R2UB 2,410 linear feet Non-section 10 non-wetland

�15�7 � ` _ — Be�:il�.•
US 74 = � --
US76J;' ; ��--
' � �
,'--k�
` �, �
a
- N� .
NC 133 -_-
�` ____
�.0 1 ;;
US 117
S�
ilmington
� a2t
C� \\
v
- NC t33 = � ���
_ -c� �
__ _ �
_-_- m
- �.
— G
�
-- -�'1
North Carolina
Coasta! -
- - _ Land frust_ - - _ :
Orto�� Plontation
! �o;dinqs,
L6f-
NC 133 _-
� 1.,.
-. U5d21
��, _
� �� m
c���
ZI=
�
���Z
O
<
n II �
� � n
O
�;C
{ I �
I �
�� �. .
��:a��,.. ��r:�� t,
i " `-1
N �
_ _ �,
—_ i � .— /
- us n
- - U5 76 � �
. ' `'� �
_-. T � _ _ �v;. -: ; i .
_� -� � i
T _'�/
� �
'- /
. �
/
/
_ G�� � i %
\ .
�� ��, ;. �, �
;�,.:;r,uerne,�r
�bJusunbvr �
Fs[aur+�;�
Resour� e
f�; �;
Atlantic Ocean
Ir
Z; � . Y•-_.YI � �'"
� r,' ���a��
�
Legend
L_� County Boundary
a U-5790 Project Limits
Noles
I_ Coordinate System_ NA� 1983 S1atePlane Norih Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
2 Base Imagery_ Open Sireet Map_
o��ia�me�_ sia me� ass.,mes oo �espoos�e�inv ro� aaia n pprea m eiea�oo�� ro�mai_ me �eao�em
�epa rwi �espoore�riy ro� �e��rymg me ao���aoy a �a �ompieieoess or me aaia_ me �eap�em
eieasessiamec�isore�emempiovee�.o onnaoisaoaagems,r�omaoyaoaao
aa�ms ads;og m aoy way r�om me comem or pro��s;oo or me aaia_
o i z
nniles
1 126,]20 (at orig'inal document size ot 8 Sx11 �
I�a
Project Locat'ion I]I001113
Prepared by AEB on 201 G10.12
NewHonoverCo�nly,NC ie[hn'icalReviewbyMMR201G10.21
Independen� Review by ALC 2016-10.25
CI'ien�/Plojec�
NCDOT - Division 3
US421 at NC132 Intersection Improvements
TIP U-5790
Flgure No.
�
iltle
Project Vicinity Map
Ppge O1 of O1
US 117
NC 132
�5��%
NC 132
NC'-'
,
us z� - �-
�
� ��
�
Car�n�o._ �
Beoch Aiiport -�
_ _- , /
�
= _= i
_- = usa2i /
- l
-_ - I
� I
1
V%
j

1'���a���L,+���1���
it���► ::ia �i�i���� �1
rrb � �i�rT�+ �#r•t-��
�„�_
Legend
� U-5790 Project Limits
� Topoquad Boundaries
Noles
1_Coordinate5yslem_ NA� 1983StatePlane NorihCarolina FIP53200 Feet
2Base feat�res USGS ] 5 Min iopoq�ads
Carolina Beach iopoq�ad
Wilmingtoniopoq�ad
o�aa�me�_ s ia me� a�s.,mes �o �e�poos�e�inv ro� aaia n porea m eiec�o��o ro�mai_ rne �eo�o�e�i
�epis rwi �espo�rea�iv ro� �e��ry�ng ine ao���aoy a �a �ompieie�ess or me aa ia_ me �eaP�e�i
eieasessiamec�isorr�oemempiovaes.o osuuaoisaoaageois,rromaovaoaan
�a�m� a�����g �� a�Y waY f�om ,he �o�,e�; o� p,o����o� of �he aa�a_
0 800 1,600
� Feet
124.000 �at ori9inal doc�menfsize olBSxl i�
:I�d
Project Locat'ion I]I001113
Prepared by MMR on 201]-GS
NewHonoverCo�nly,NC iechn'icalReviewbyALCan201]-0bO6
Independen� Review by AEB on 201 J-0&25
CI'ien�/Plojec�
NCDOT - Division 3
US421 at NC132 Intersection Improvements
TIP U-5790
F'igure No.
2
rue
USGS Topoquad Map
Ppge O1 of O1

sa eo°N aa°fl�o°N �a
; .- �. ... ., � � - �t
.. . s� � : _ �r i+� .. .' �: .,r ._ , �. - `•;:, " . , ,� , _ ," �, . � �?�'-.� , �.. �. .. � +., � � Ir „�. 1F _ ,.n:. � � � � .:.7�'t ♦ � «i! ' �.aF/,. -�� �" ...C'_ ' m...�', S;'�y's '
n
:�a �•�. � 4`� , 'sSr. . ,_ _ a. . p . .. . r.^ , ;�^ - � �. �. � ♦ "1: � t::.. +�' '_, :i* � , .a- �' �'`S�
° f. � . � „ j- � .`�k� �,� . a1:"!r+if' '. ' qr: ,� _ � . .: „� _ �+'� ,�fr i'- ��= a� r' �#. �`,
.
� � �
s
�
4t ( x !� <�`� � ' +w 'a ;.: b.
".� .Y '". :'_ . .. .. ... - . -- . ..:k`k. -.. . , � �. . .- -It.� . �� :"a � .. �' .^.,. sd� -�.� f � I� � pC,_-�.�, � „'iut'A, �� - . 4y`�, .. r.
,. ,
�.�. ,,.; . � ,. ., e� _ .- �J�f.., .... � ,� .. .+:. .� � �r .. , s , . '2. . aF:��-- l3 .,. .... s � -�: �. : .,� > �` ..)> •.�: �, �.{+r. ,,,•.t�,
�w
.. .. , f :. . .r_' .,». .._.v:, . .- , . .: �- �� .`s 4�p` - . .�r' ,r ��= .' � ... .r . . _ . - . �r '-'t'�h .t• : � _ �.; R,�.
.
>. ,.� ' _ ;. .� ,�. .._ . .�. ,..s , ,w.� -.1� . :�p �_�. �l;F �`��� ,. . _ � ' % �,�' ` � f �.-, � '':�
,; <
� .. ,� , _ - .., .. i g�,,�. ��T . ,. .{ . _ . ..J, ,� .. .. �, . - .. . � . � :� . fi ` .Z' � . :�i >�'. . '�F ��`�,�� 7M�' ..r�. .. �� - �d9' . ,.�t s .i�x � r,���� `� .
h. �� • 1� �' � 1�`��� .;`. ..._,. �� � .�+�y ¢�:.: . 1..p�.. � .: r i ._y..� y�.f �.�.. �, ..� -* .� ...� l;f \ lr:� .�� V ;� �_�' i:9R �j`. `'� ' „� � �'�. ..
� . ��y --.-� � r. , p+ � . �s ^X'. ,_ � . ; ' . • . �' ,.. R ' � f ��-:� RR� i !'�. ,, .. a�.}r. - ����Z�.MRt- z° ,� . a.. `.'�t"1�.1L„ �!'�',� "t�p.,. �' � � s,�`,.�-. ,� .:.x - �e� .�,..
�� � � .. .�i` '•. .� . � ��!- - _ . . � � . rG!. ., 7�.:_ ......: � .. . ,. .., .' ..�;-.. � . .�. �; �:j � . . ,.'S,s• -ne... F F < .i'��• ..v^ , �.u�
�r;, �3 � �- _'�°F_ 1R. . � .... .,�e.iE,. . . �' ��� ,c ..r •. 4, . r ,c , ,.�, .s, r _ ,..,^ . ,.,�,• :..6•.::. " `�'.�,� c�. � ..:f, '.S�'. � ;tr f _"�-, �'`"'� '
�. � k f ' �r� � F �. �' _ .� .'dZ. � s � ;saY.��".., ys .'"�' � ���• •� .:2x.4 .�.. .
, . - .. ,, ..a. � � .,' .,�` - .. � � , .�' � _d`: : � ,. �`t. P . e. « �
. y-
b . ... .,� � .,_ ,, .� � . . ,.� .�- ,.r:. ,,, _ �: ,�:� .�y� �'y -�.� +�`�:��: �,� ,�• =� �, ,
d� �J., r � .J �"� �'�� �r'r. �'f � f ..' ee � �,� .�.C� � �:.c> .. we� `.,i. tf� i;ia �y� �►.
g� ,�� .��. 'Y.• � f� ��g F :�i(T#::.:� F �!F,.. i�� Ja g ; te .�1� `'+I�� '-FZ,� ����
r . . a.. .�. , g.
' �^.���"^!- y.,.,`s„q �. � _... ' . � e!�It. . �, � �'d• ' ` �.-'*'s .:f�. �:i"�., � / :� . . 'g �.£� . �,. �.� �e. . -:::.�.t' l.,�I� [ .';.s ..z• .'�, „'=.- ErT'�1 �. q� �•�
p� � r.�,�- •�.e _ r . „ , ,1� � . �- s t« �: ^� i h.a r ,;. � ^� � .,¢ = ` r � } «a,, , � n :?r� ` � % 1 � *� ,;' � �. I',�! � . a a A z r'�
�g` I .«,.�, F :.:;1• T T� .�' ,.' •� .,�,_�_("� �:� $,.�.:.., .. , . �, -�� ,,,_.,� �"['�� : .�� e�d��� ��.1� ��"t�� n1 '�. / .y .C��fM'�i'' _ .�r�f`, ."+,-..e� `iFc
. �: a� Y • . fl-. � �.. _.�. ..r� r ,. �'.. , � : 4F . .... ,. •f ?�., ..C. .'>' N `� � 't+1:.. j ,�#:.'y .:j `t!r. ��.. . k:}.
'�.� � :. -= .' : . �. . � '� -., -. �;'-t�:. ., ..� : �, �.s'_�. �% �. 1 �. . �.`- .E.;� at� t
� (� ,.
,f � �✓ �&' '� . : . , , 'M- � ` ` .¢-' ` ,:,, " c:TM C' , ��' � : S .F'i ,�_� � _ � ,�� �, �
. .� _ _ ..�'�` ..: 'P+l; � , ,. .. . . _ v , , �+ .. _, . �� : � ., �y,,,� �, g � • 5 �
} y.��, �� . r_ �. r �� --�f'q. c r.,M.. ...�. _ � P" iI: � . tt �• �- . ` � �.
� i_.'; '.(�. -R � �' _i>"� ,.n- - ._ .: �-0-'_"�r�r � .,...:_ - c- : ` �:t, �` '.:, ', �,. .. ..! ..r�"":*+w'� . `�.. / � ♦,4 bs_ ..7_• .'�
� ,
..., f,� .. �:.�'� . �.- <� . � '.l� .. ,P ' J�.. !F � `�, � ;- ..s.. .,_. ., . r.�„ �IF� .� ../�. ���r� � ! �- ����'C .. . f�_ ��C. �'
�� . . . �. r�. .. .. �. d. . . �6 . �'} . ti � � r _ n.�, . f" J� . v` ♦� �- ��
° ; r: r� . . r, , . �� . + r = s ,: . � , y j.,.. �: y. : � q. � �, .� � i'a'r �� i' ; T � '� • �?�
,
w. . .,�,'s�. �., _,( _... : �- �.. , ,- � � r� -., .� . . �.� A -.�" _ :-ii' . . �:�t�� ,�! I { . '+�?:-e�:�( �'.�^X,�� .Y.
,., .
; -� . E ... �= �� ..� v�.. �tF' �:.• . .....,.,. �. r}_.' �/.:. � .. ..,. ; .. ,.._, ,._ d_.� . �{{�'-, ':r�. - $ _..� u� '�� �'` + - ��-rm :l� .f
.
� , �
� , e / . FS4 , .e , . .-n n � . �i , . ��� .., � .. . �, • �F ... /��. �f�V i .: J ,. _ ./� .:'�a,C- , ! � �'i`� y � ''T_ , l I � �� - Y.�l,T,�` � .#e.,�; {' �'<
. .T �..�{ . ... . :i.. ' , i._ .- . �.., .:e.�..:.: ... .� _ . , ,._: F�� �. .i . � .�,- � ; -�.. _ :� .. .�?'� .��. �'"� . -vM-, " �..zi •L_ ��z V • {. . � �{�. �I+. �� . R ..�: ��g � �_.F
dr,. �:: ..� , .x = '� � ��/� , .,., a`�, : ,.. . r�- �T� :� 'j� � , rr� � %�'l;� � 3'r; n �� .h ,.+F:?i
y� .; r
,. .`. � i �L ���.�. . t�:� -.�:. � a . .. . .♦ . � �. � v Y : � . .� + -� v.,.-. .�.',�"Ce' M1 r: r t . - � . . . e � ? Y{� .��, % i . :.:j.
� . �i'
A f.. . � .. , � . .. S. � I . , f�: ..I�y,. .. �' , - . .� . ... . .a-�ki" s : i��'i � . .. . �' � `�' � v./ ��7i�� _# ' � (��-� ,9 -�r,.. � eh; �
.�5,� _ , . ., . . t .. � _� � ...:. :.: : .,,, • .�n � ''"`�s�' r� - y ���rj� '�i'��r`'!` . ��d . ,,,�
_ _.. , z�� ,�,.. . . s.. .. . . , .. ,.Sf�A � ��
- " , n � . .,;;•,y.. .. ,, y ` ; �
� � ; l'. = .-:�- . . . � >� .� `�. �� � -� t�� . ,. .. r ; �!;" .��!! ,.. ;,�..�'.�:� .•w ; . , . .. .s ., J / � ":�'• • � T` s-�c.° � >Xi. t Z �' �'y ✓
�: �. • '.. �.. . .,t�:k � ��.. :..,h,y,s. ;�� �.�1 �, �', ,}� ,� _.`: �: � + \.:, . -.,;� . „r-' a. .�. ..-._ f� � a. '�!" .�a ��'�C% ` �,a <T�'9i� � �1'f , . •
y/��_ . �,...` �.. . ' " ,C�'� ..�f' .vr . .�.-.,� a /�, ,...i.. �r.'-�, , . A�., .k .,'f� ,AJ� __ �._ C` �_. `�1,. f• ��. '�� ���• ♦
.,y� .A ♦� �_ ..�. JI�...k ..:� -"i .. .}„ , � �. ':� .'�, �-� "':� ..� �y,.;., v.�. rs:wi�. / E � �'��T�1� �..- �`�� ��' Yt� ��� A
�,, 'r.',�. , � r; '� , ; . '��• , r.. �.� . w �,.r { . , ..,'w , ir�! IFF : ,:,`v` :#.. �:.. / ; �.' �' J 1,� ��
�a,� . _ �.��+� . . ..: �" �` -. ; .,,.,� ...� , r �. �eC'��� .,. � i; . .. ,,.,, , .t. .,�.. -a ♦ ,� • - Y
,; ..
p ,. f
� . .-� . . .,,, �e 'i r.� F _ ���� -. � . _ #,.,,: , . r `� � + :. , � ��z.i�':� -.�r?' ;��'k�!" �� . ��'r
,
. .,,- .,.
+.17'x; . �.��.� .rr-�. 'X�„^" ,�:�'.. y� .5::. ,�.i�- :�� Fos � � .�I: ti'� .'�.+ : �,Y� �, .C.� �:,M.: .}r„ °e= , . • . � � �siC �� ��' ,�,.., *.
w � .'
=.r;
�e .. �. ,i-`-.� -,..�. -.a er.�� ,..�� _ �- .�t.,; �,. .., .�•+._-. �..- s , �.G= i. ` x�,. ' .�f;'.. �t: r.. �l. . w. , �ar,'O,. � � .,s .!. r ��S
� �•,.�� • ; < � -..�, � �. �. � . p � � � .y . ±� ,, ���� 4" ,Y.a� �� �� ` :oP) +ti �,� , �: iy^' �" .x
� �y-
. �, . . �
,. �,,�¢
� `:
r , ` . '! M ��.:.` a ` -.i .r. . �1'4 ' , '. . ., r� 'y. . /� .`t -:, �: � .a �'� ,Vt.: �.l �a -�g'.,3., /� fl �� 'h. .�,.
.
/' . �S .. _• iJ. -,: ^ .. �.� , .�, '}t•� .� :�(�. .. F ...,.� ...-i < s :� � �� �'"..%- .e• 'r .�. '�i; �� �.l���
.
� ' . '
,, �r\t
, '
--. 'yjl:<' :.. .Yi� -. w. ..•�i..+;� j ,;. { �6 pi ..-'�,, / r -'k..X'y. .tr� ��i'5,�,.fi'�2s."� ��tit��. V K:��.,� ..� .����.;y. . . .., , , .�.' , ,ft .,.
r�� , - � ^
_..
,�,� _ , �-, � �r a ,. _ � � ' ,_,, �'' �::; .y �. 2 z: : ��,e--f ��� ,s �.#?'.� ��''-;' �'� � .� s. � �, s,. �l;i.,.
• - j'�'�.' i�. �., . �i � ,:is-�� 7C. � . � .,� .; e"_ .� i . �.•�� �•, r �., . .:.;a .. � � .,s..:i� ' +a:�. ':;� .. '��as., .�@1 .;�:, x:- ..L ¢ .3r 1u ?a �A:-� s'-
,
..���.,V � .( �-• � r � .. .y � , D �fAi i . �-6 �'AT . mA.. �:. - ti+� r$ L; F'� .� � . ��`�^�� _ 64�: 1,; •D� �'g �f �" r1 , ...y, � �t ..'
�' 'C 3,. +za..i. , "�":r . ,,�L+� �,rt'. �,.�'.^*y =_. �� /�, �k.�'� _- " -- ,� �1.. ,:3�'.•. • •, �:'i'�' �L'�.
N'�. �':.�1 " Fy 8''.r -.�": _ ir�l'" . 4J Y� .. � ��" � �s �,: ; � � . �,. � #t� 0 ��"
,' � .i <
_.�, „� _ �, �
,�. p . ,� , � . �, , . .�, -•' a ' �' � �- �..: , i. ' +'q'� � ie, �.e. a �.-., ` .'¢ ��;'�.n �� r�'� ��• 3 3: A _ .;�'y'M(a��F�, �. .� � s..
, , ,,. .r_ � � r� - - • �
, - � f : -- �- , „� . ,�; �'y�r-:, ?� �:�, I� �-�. �. (�
. )� _ ( /�
��+� -�y ,�� '���i. .�- �• N ,� 1'\ .�+ � *J .. � =' -. '.(1.�'R"' f . _�\ �i(f�...i.rt ;�`,.J 3�fir ��J�`���� . �. . �. � �7.�'�',I r j`. +�*Ay/i�''�
� ��.. , � _ .F+: . ° ., . �f��� r � �; , '�°2 ,`x �+,�. e;,pF f,�. �t 't �
� '
. _,.. . �
, . ��C -
�. -�, .:�' ..:,:.-��Wr_.,T�',�� r�Q� :.. ,.,,k .� �. .�'�-��� ..,,� .,.',t�,�,�` �m.. ��`-�c�'�E+':.w ,'J� - - � � �.1 '�?� _Gf. �, .:n�` -��
� � - PF04Bd � 9� f..,
. r p �
� - .�n�. �;��-� ;�," �:: .,, , , y . �f; : , . . : �''�' � :_. .�k , -�'�', � c'� �' :�; > �E _ - �3/4gd �', . ,� � ; -��r d:..
. . . �j'`r
"`�.^��__:s�r^a, t_�''-�.'fi��iE` ^ .;..._._t,*� ': + ..,,� �' �� -�v w_r. "+#�e�`s,:', " �i' �, � � �✓ 8x ? �`, �"�•'4.
.;
' _' --, , .. , , . . � . -
.
.� .'
: T .
:
. � ..� �ae.' ;�-�. �.a'�41 - � �� � T.� �lY..
_ . ". � E� �. . '
. . ...- _' - � -.:. -.. ' � $ �
,.
., . •- -� .., .' .- e;: , y..,._ - �
_ .� �.� � � f �`"' � i.�. 1 „ .�.. �
,. r .. , � . .. - ._�,.
� �
. .. �h - '�,(
' J 1 � /° .' Tl- � �A _ ,.�,'� ..�d �.�.; ,, , ,. .,.z,.. '..,� ,e X ;� �4 ° �� ���) "�s1< �� :'ys. ��` ��' �� .`"�.
• :� ' • r=` ''�' T'�„� �, r , " - '; . . ,�±-. ,�`-,t ,'�,pv� �„� 0 ,�_ ,.,Y. �e-, �e+� ':..,,�x4> s�,.'' �
„ ��.. �, ... -�: , � �'4� , -� ., ..�. , = �`-'�� �.f �. � �--�v � , '-`�`_`: r,. _ +i"�� ��-h , C: :�. :s.��-..�«• �. -j:.. ,� .�;'�.
/ � ��
_:
. ..,.^;�. `�1k�.:��� R< ��% �., �N � �%` �'. � . ,.,k',. :� - �; .�u�.., a ���.�, n dri�-' 2-r .. 'Sr. , h� � �� .r<" . v� .�` '.s
.'B: . g �. ' � . . .
, � . -- ..
�� . . � . .. . _ . . _ :.� _ ` . � . f ! �_ � a�� #� it` � .. . .. . �p� � ,
... . , . . ; . „• t.. s
.. � .e� f ... �... c.. �.�� ; r-:.�� �,:� -.��..< � �Nc.-...� �c. .�" - . •�. - � .�,���,a �V�, �.� C,\� f�,�^ s��'�tYfa�.
^
-.�, :'�- . � <s 9� � •• "�)- �.; �.. , . ,S./:. ,� . . ,,.. .� �5� .. . i!� �g_ _�� ..�. ..,?� .X, 1e� ..tk -•'`j , .1�{��� F
-_ ° �- . : l" r�. „ , , . . . , ., • •, • _ , � `�o ''�1 � �t f �'�' � � ,
,�% . ��a . f� �a i,t •. ''� !' . �- � `I `c� ,` _"�', a' 'r� ��� `#r � •,� �+,> >F
, •
, �, ... .
: _.;: / � , y,,, , � - . . ♦. , : ' . � .: �•.= v't � . �ca .<'l t �"� �.?� 'c;"��" C. y - 'r ,
r , ., { ' , j . ,
,
_ �;
„' � , 1�..._ _ �:�.j . � f•..> .' ., . ' r��� ..'� .I ..:."'S. .,F.'� �r. � �,; .. '�_.��„r ' � ��' �,( .R�:�n t.+� �.:��•y„ � 1 {�,A w�!". :� l.+�.��.. ..�� ,��^ � .�,,�,. 1'�� `
��, . � r .. , , i � , T.� > , : .. ;. .. s. { .:� . . . r ., -. �,i il'�' �,.«� � ,C ,:•� e;�;,• �`
, n . ?�ts. ,F.j � �,.. .� t. � ,,, . .,� :, ��, � �''` .
. . . . �/ , Y . . ; ; ,,.: , �, ._. � --. . ,, ' --� �-a. r�i 1�' . f' � � .� .��r � `
. $ � • �{ ,� �:: . � i 4 0 > . � . , � �1► . . , .. ��P t j , .,.. � �,` • :pr� jr . `��� �� ► �
?': y..� � , . .:.>� , . .-. ,. .. . . .�.:,... �� :� .... � :. -. ... .: 5 . e� . 'r �� ti �t��y4,� + ` - �'
� r .}� . .„ .' ♦ . . _ :, s'� / e. . ... �j ; ,.. /� i-- r� _ „-� .. r � �$ � � . � a.
. .- � . ,_ . , ..» ; . � . , - c. � �. _, . _ ,f � �� �,.1 +. -.� .. � � ` .... .d; �� • ; y- . ��i • . . . r • . .. ah'y�' � .
�� � .J . ��. . , . .�`, ,.. ...._ -.. '. '., . >, .:, ; . � .,.c.�. ..:. .. ; � , ` , .�.6�� t+ - .a: ^;4",Y'i� � �� �f `/.,:" � I�L rr`T"�.T . ��- �, r �� p.
<Jf` .;f _•.+ ii A�*` F� .�\ -:- .,► x:� $i�"�-s � -£.� ��� �,t s�a ':'.i ��� ��e � . . T� .Ct ., -,,� , �!
�( � ��. . f 'i .-`� i!�'.,�' _ �.s.. �' 'ai `� ��'SlR:; „Y: '_tt' a, R.IY -
a �
. ; • � . ::, ,:.. � 'g �,,
,p� eo.
?� � `�' �,.�. �. , :.� _� .
�^� + ` �'. _ • -�`.n`c-��. , •:n . .ti -_ ' . �`+:} d"y..pk'"i' 'fY�v� ``:K:,i ��' _ .�'�
_� . ... ..... .: �, , . si
�
� . .. . ,. . . r� � `�,, - . .� s. . � a A � _. .ir, x�� . , ;�*a : � � " � / = °a` ' �s . 1 � f !°� _ „�• x' I�P' P, r
�f � .. .. , , _, � ' �.,j�
� r
�
. -�'
�', ` .. . : ., . f ., . � , .. Q! c, . <,. .. � � �� -� ... >arx- ..c'r . �1 � , Q s ",ts�` , � � �' 9,TMi j .�' �tl�e r � f .,� s 1.�'
� a..�-���._ • . i�.�: .: . . i� . �,_....� : .: :..� . .! .. . :�. . ..� �t. [.c,,a,� :x!: - � �/ , � � �� _�. ..�F�:�..� �..�... � �.'a
� __ _ � . ,�. .. j^. . �,:. : : ,.� G ,i .. _ .�_ r, -:.�p� ° .; -,.. �y _ _ .r� --
--�. --, �, ,. , ., ,. ,. �, �y �, N . �' ..: l ,. eHX �, , � s,- � '� �� , I` s4 ° � "` -- T
. - . /�.. ,. � . ,. _ :. `� .. 6� ... t� . .: .: .+ , .:: �r` " R• � . �;�..
. . ;r : T� _.;. .�� . �f,.:., ,:.: , ..�.- , t :ic� t..,,E . x, ...r. ..� �; �i.� �,+ ..g �.�.�` . �i.�;:-�- _ �� 's,
' �`1-- -�� .,, �a .,_ 1....,.. . : ::;::_. '+7'�. . .. - � .F' �x .: :. - � � `� �+,. ./ -�t��.�'��r. 'ls _
�
+�
,
:
'�++
' � . , ,...,. , . �"'�tha �- r . , • 'y , : 3 . s .. .- . p , - ', . .'a. �^:. ,, 3; � ,�. ���'�i�, ..., k -
r
; r , . � ., . ,_ _ _ . .,.. ..: ;e. r'i _.�.- , � �.: . . �/ �r- � � �_ '�� �` .,_,G, �'
�
I� . ., � -� .. ter� 1 ,. r:./+.y. ��_; . •.: .�... � .� � , :�.. . : . �� �� ,;!!��.. '� . ��-r - : ..:.� 8 . � ,.�.'�:�rr (�� ..��_ � ��rC �.;, a
�, . ,. �, _..... _ ve �,.. . .. �...�. . . �..,�'' : 31' ,; .�.. .a�� ,.'{'��+, � `,`t_�. Hx� Fa ,; _�-���- .�eM":.
., ,�. � � . -_� .'y , ..... -� �. �/ . .: ,�. �.: �� � �:. . .... � .. �t..,. ., � .� . �+. .,r`,� ' �,�"-��,s,� :rr � ^�!�� ,�,�'+�k..
. -. ., .. , ... .,! �.. i . �.: , ,�a�r . � �...� � . y, .�"a ., �..> �y.• . A.' � �� ���� - rg- ��,r� -�s ( �� ; �'�► ,'�4 �.`�p�,�:� ^ � +�.c�...
, t' .. ,� /��.� �
w .�4 -+ �� � `i. / y_ . . .. �i-+�= • _ t� �� e�{ .s� ,!. .'! ��., � _ f:t4 Y• -.t
. ,, �, ) � �... ,a.. . .. , �
. . .� . � ,/` .. � ,; _
.� .. . ,.. _,,,.. '�. �.. ,�� �7„1 � ;� �p� L'... ;-Y' `, , F` .� - -r- . ,��.,�., �X d � ,i'i .,b � "��.
� ,,�,
. . . . -�. .��.-. , ;. // ��� s .., -, . .: ! . { .7 .t.� .�{.'�. �. ' 'rr_ '' :``. � _ a`'4 "#`€<�..�-+. _ „ �. �:"i�� �- �� _ � �4 x,: .� '..� �
NWI Wetlands Ma ed in the Pro ect Limits: :. : \ =:. .. , ! « ., ,� , , � �� P' ; y J' ; � � ib r'� Ql � <rai-�: �. � . ,, �.���°, � 1 • .�� � �� ��,�` �.:
PP 1 �., �e � /� l� �4 e ,� iF� -r �s�' .�t �..� ��,��: �x� s�� ���. �i 7; .� �.[ i� �t. - ...� ,�'>i
_.: Y. ,� ` .t, . /�" ,. , �,, . Sy_ , w�k " • .� h, ' 'rS ,.r : �� [-� ''��' +�:s�. ! � �=� o� ..,7" 3. c . � r `- _ �'�'. .. r�'�i �^ �` 's - .� f � � . �°,:.%
.
¢ . C , �'F'-%��. �> .r � � '4 k ; as. '�.� �r• � � �'�� ``� "N , �� '
..�..x� M���� �''t.2��, � � i� . ,<� �r , , � .: �" fi
y , � . . , . , . �e .
PABHx- Palustrine A uatic Bed Permanentl Fiooded 7 = � :`:� -,` - ` � o -- t< , � • •�- a*r ,, ' ' • ' "�
q Y ,� .r . .,�. � f:.:. . : ,K'�`. � . _�. � � �. , � . .•,., �i. i ... „M � ► � � v /-� ��� ,i ?' 7 '�. °�'`:e� L ;� �a � ��,�:'�, +��'' . , � � _ �� :,•-��; �'� ,; ��.; �!' � ��: ; 3 .�.., ,� � = Y-;:. y-st�-
Excavated ,v'. , �i •.., � ,.�_ r� � : . � _ �.�, - �'�3' �F��� . ', : r � � �� �i , ,� � t, r . an�,��. � �,� r ��:: - XX:�
r, %✓ m�':� .t, .� . s � /A , �.;�. .� �; , , ts ��- ��-i"y - '�� .'�; tx*1 �7�= r '� 'x "��Nt+, �<y, � � ,.� -�
,' r
.
\ , .. . Z �r�,,.
, < �° `�• r •, �(
� �g ,
' \~ �''✓.. `�r. , ����� �A, �,�.�y.. ..,: �:.. ' n .��` 4'�t� � f7,.%�` � 34 .X;���4,.� ��:_' ,4,�.� #, `�«�`€
. z.
� �
•� . \ si� . . .� .. ' . � .. � '.. ; �� p ., •
. " .:. („ � � ' .. �
. . . s .i� .. • i �: ���\ . �' `�
t+��i'` �- . l/'t, �T . T .,+e .. �' t � f� J : r�, A _ f ' � � � �� � � _ ' � .� ^� de'�'i .
PFOI /4Ad - Palustrine Forested Broad-Leaved ' � ; �`,;;�`, i . �y , , ��- �, s .� ,iy Jp .a -"'� _:�,«;,�� i, , °;�
..
, �f �
� i � t ,, � '� f;,i' . f � c. r . • . � , ,� ' y ��. .: � ' v,. � �� .�6�
- Deciduous/Needle-LeavedEvergreenTemporarily `--� �$�.� '� �'� � ^ � ry �`'� ��""' - . 3' �` t, r`- r� -� .-'� "��. -�..,, ,s��:
i �� r1 F'�a�°�1r� .� `; ., �� , ��:�, . V - r- _. . ; ,.�.1 ,.. rtii i� � � ` �: t- :;d;': �`�- �- j _ q� !Y �; ' Ts:.�M.j.�p,_ � - _ "--+�'!"r
Flooded Partially Drained/Ditched � � _ -!�„'' , + d> :��"�,:,,.� - '� �`� " �;-`�' ��°`,n, � � ^ � '�--
� �
, `Fc, i ='�'� � e�. c �.. � ..�3`. � .,�� � . � 9, 'F� ,�� �� �;., �,� ; _
� - ��
. ,. �.. • .�,
. • '�f.'�:r d' , t� < , '' ` r , e `;, 'x r a�.�G��' � �� �, � . ` � � I ��': �. �; �i+E
, ar. , ,� � . - „ � < _ . _,�, ;� ,�.�:$��, : ,�I � , � �
, , _ ' ���
j ,„
N . *.
�
. - tr'� � ��.''•, /". �l� �:- . '� ;.,?� �. ,r,•..-�. ...00; �.,> ..� ..'�������� � �--';:.];.,.�< . � .'�i;�� i-ae� � �.�v o-:�o�'.�. . =��.1rr `�+' �C.�.:a , '�" •
PFOI /4Cd - Palustrine Forested Broad-Leaved � �-_ „ -�T���� .. y . � ;� ; r�`��,.; '�► ,.- � � � s , ' �;�;, `, - � ��, ° _�. � 1�"''� : \,
.: `� '.,. . � St � r .. , ,::_�� �{" - .� �'`,�, .`> .�- � 4���r- .a`�"Z �"'".�; -4 _ •iA-� _ �.:v.. . . i_, �.
f'` '. �` , �._.. ;: P r .;.•tf `t �. i� . t � � . '."��, ,,k��€-' ;� I I � �. . � , ir� ,
, . _. �r-
° Deciduous/Needle-Leaved Evergreen Seasonally �, ;,•�t',. '-: . C .. ., >: ' - .. � � „ ,� _. TT , :, � €"` ir,�'�` �,;:. , , � .,#;;as�, " a'� '�p,�'- , x „ 1 ��,: ,; �,,�,, ., ;
. .,•y I . 7 . , .. , , - .- f5 Y , k p w ' "�^u:. q� ' .t _ _ S �, d
Flooded Partiall Drained Ditched �j� �`� ��� �� � rf �'�
Y l � 4 f i , ,� : €: -_ ��'` r. �; � A'�,�. _ �•i ?�,� ` J � o .:* "j.,,,+�,�«:a _ i i'�-` �i- c �, �
� �j��!.fi; 3'�.-= w= a;- .,��� T� � �-:t�:a �.'�'. 'l�� .�� p .n��_� � s �., 3 .!_'�1'-'��_ I I �e. . �:.
.Y.: ��!'` �- t���S�, r.. �e ,s .T � �� �"�.�:7 ..q ,�.. ,� rs. i 4.,�...� ..�: i+�
� q I #s%1 .�- i8. �a �Ft �"M. •�, �. '.C' r s � :r:.'a . �-- x ,#` � t
- .T9'>'c% .�. � � "i ` s! n �_` �'.;� �'�''}"' � ., �y
' '� �: _ ;? �� ./ . ' �h.$.. - ,•� , , � ��,.. *. , �- � �. `'.,��. �. ". r r, �. r..
.. . `.. , � ��x
PF03/4Bd - Palustrine Forested Broad-Leaved . • • �i�< , � r ,,, F , � a x� �, � � ;, � r< >_ §��; �;� ,,k.,. - l"""'t'--.. * � ° ,,.:_. �,r ;l
��_.,�''�: � �,.r s �, ��.��' . � t,R, i .� 1. ..•� '.e'�� .f,:,�w, � � x;o;�� .;�r:t1.r.
Evergreen/Needle-Leaved Evergreen Saturated �. .. � .�,. . ," ;' >- `'�►,: � , ` � ; � ,+�,;5: �..� � : :f 9:: � +(�`,1��' ,+, ' } , jn �'. ,, , .�Y' _ �.�, . i�.i. t'�g `r�
. . . -. r �� . r� ' i t ,,. . �t. �.. �� � . .. .. . . �P : , . '� �.. . � f • . -�;1 . _ �+,. �, . . r i �' ;�3.�°'4''b�` � _ ;¢�1+,� � ',� , .. P ,etP., ' -, �� .�'�` +'a, -�r ,�"�.-'�" �:: �.
Partially Dramed/Drtched : .,- �? ,,. '� � ,, ., ,�' � : _ -:.; � ' f � 4.
,f..�, . `e ��- . {�� f.. .,,. . � •�, `sr '�� �"j,\ �..r�� M�.< . , '`4: -�� r. t T �. :�,.�, �:�e�- .��", ��:-ise ���E�*';!
. �.
�,n� . .._ �., -. .
�
P �'` -��, i ;
�"�.�. • �, f ^ ` . ` � ' ,. . _.? `�' tP'r � _, . " �' , t ' _ �.tr� i�`��' ,� �i;�, �kR *�ti-��` '��e�' -i. •;"• � ,�,` i:,•;��
<.;'�.
, _". •� � � � � �. , ,A .�,. ; : ..c .. ' ",� 6: � � :' � ^a..,. �` a'�'�' �� � s �
PF04Bd - Palustrine Forested Needle-Leaved Evergreen � � . l= . ��� . , �4� r:��� °,�� �� .� ': ; , . ,. , __ - s� >�� �� �e��:^ �*ig'`�' �'
. . . � ...<, . M 'lI> .� >.. . .. ., .: �� �_. ,^�t',3i'. � i,v, . ` ..,�� ::y. .�' � � � ����' � ��?�J.�v-�'. �m,'`�.�M.,e. ,,.,'� `, `�. .. ?, .{"�s.r#F 'f �
.. � . .+ , . ` .
Saturated Partially Drained/Ditched ; . ,,, �, .i :. - , j : 3, ,�. � ,. r ,� l�f � _ ,. ,� . &_ � .: .r . p �;� ����'w � F .: �,�,�. ��.r ;'\t� , ., : 6�1���'�Ft . .
. tp f . , <� . � � � r • � �, er�' K, ,. ; • . � �. � ,tr , ;�: . ` i x - � a�`'��:, j / � .� ��u�� t. ��,s -� � �,�
. .
� ; � . � � _,i . �- v �� �'� '- � . P . . � t3? _ .� ��� F� �'`�� '�'. �°'� � . � ���'' `'� � � '''
PUBHx - Palustrine Uncolidated Bottom Permanentl ` � ' ' � � �'' /� �' .� � ' : � �., �` _ :�`' .' < '"� s T;'+,"t � ( „�r , " t��r,° '
i� (�- . �� �.+ ti . :` ,...� .;,,. s \� �v�.� �. ' .�'� 1� � �.' i � ��` �� t �• ��� i Y � � �. -'�.`�a�' l� ' �� . a,q
� ,.,
.� : _ .. .�' - , v
. -
Flooded Excavated . " �.� �„ R. � � �r, �.' �k i _ + ,� ,��� ,�. rE° � v^
. f' s
� - #,i,�:��' ,k .•�Qf4` � ^ � .�� �.�a�„ ""' .f i�.� '�i'z � � . �',�€ ' '�"y'' , �'` y _ •-.
F., . � �� :F� �. . =.y� ..�r�� ' '��'� � �� ..�''- _ ," i�.�� ''+�,.. ': � ��°,r�",,4 ,
, y��.
. .<. ., . ,_�", `� �-.. .,:<:,� .�� .�,^�'S� "��l� -- . �y ��4 �.r• ����
,
,
!��' " : . .., , ,
, F
�
. � .
34` '0"N 34` '0"N 34` '0"N
Lege nd o 1,200 2,400
�,
� U-5790 Project Limits NWI Wetlands Feet
:F
9�'
/�/ Selected Roads - Estuarine and Marine Deepwater 1:12,000 (At original document size of l 1x17)
'�� Hydrography (NHD) Estuarine and Marine Wetland Project Location »�ooi�i2
New Hanover Coun}y, NC Preparetl by AEB on 2016-10-12
Freshwater Emergent Wetland re�nn��a� Re��ew bv MMR 2o,a-,o-z,
-Intlepentlenf Review by ALC 2016-10-25
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Client/Project
Freshwater Pond NCDOT - Division 3
�� Lake US421 at NC132 Intersection Improvements
TIP U-5790
Riverine
Figure No.
3
Title
Notes
1. CoordinateSystem: NAD 1983StatePlane Norfh Carolina RPS 3200 Feet National Wetlands Inventory Map
2. Wetlands and waters data provided by USFWS
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI).
3. Orfhoimagery OO NCOneMap, 2015.
Page Ol of O1
Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no resoonsibiliN for data suoolied in electronic format. The recioient acceots full resoonsibiliN for venfvina the accuracv and comoleteness of the data. The recioient releases Stantec. its officea. emolovees. consultants and aaents. from anv and all claims ansina in anv wav from the content or orovision ofthe data.

u<.,n
M1C 1 i1
Wilmington LS,,
US ?r.
_-�t
- � r� � — NC 132 —'
�o �;
- �- - Mongemer,t-
- Mosonhnrn
� . dL'3: fs�o!,;me
Legend
� U-5790 Project Limits
/�/ Selected Roads
�� Hydrography (NHD)
Notes
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Norfh Carolina RPS 3200 Feet
2. Soils data provided by USDA,
NRCS Pender County Soil Survey, 1977.
3. Orfhoimagery OO NCOneMap, 2015.
�
Soil Mapunits Mapped in the Project Limits
0 Be - Baymeade fine sand, 1-6%
� Bh - Baymeade-Urban land complex, 1-6%
0 JO - Johnston soils
� Kr - Kureb sand, 1-8%
- Le - Leon sand
0 Lo - Leon-Urban land complex
- Ls - Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0-2%
0 Ly - Lynn Haven fine sand
0
- Mu - Murville fine sand �
0 On - Onslow loamy fine sand
� Rm - Rimni sand, 1-6%
- Se - Seagate fine sand
- Sh -Seagate-Urban land complex
0 To - Torhunta loamy fine sand
- Ur - Urban land
_ W - Water
� Wr - Wrightsboro fine sandy loam, 0-2%
1,000 2,000
Feet
1:12,000 (At original document size of l 1x17)
9�a
�H
ProjectLocation 171001712
New Hanover Coun}y, NC Preparetl by AEB on 2016-10-12
Technical Review by MMR 2016-10-21
Intlepentlenf Review by ALC 2016-10-25
Client/Project
NCDOT - Division 3
US421 at NC132 Intersection Improvements
TIP U-5790
Figure No.
4
Title
New Hanover County
Soil Survey Map
Page Ol of O1

34' '0"N
f /+ , .. FT � . �" � . . �•� ,� ., R .:.: w.,. -
l �.� ����r ! ��.� r, �'/�,�tt.",� .ii '�� � , �,�' '��,.Rc�s •�» .:�'("�-... .r`• _ $ -��: � � i
' , 7+1, . e: q�� ay��� . ,. � .pw'�• `r � � � . � , � : .:'��[�� ''� �rY' �' � � � . '�r� i' 'F . �. g _ 5�`�R'�"•� ..'l�i�
. ro �, �. �/,�, � !" : %�, - 7 �. =�v`, r,� +_ ��ir +A�'� "'"'d.; ��- :: rr "ta+� "? •.;(� � • , e. ,w�',. s": , > }t y+�s�,' ._
'��.. x"°"'tl.� F . • ,�A� ' � � (; #'-'� � ��H.F�i�� „+ � ��� � �' i
.s r !� ;��•�a. 'y. � �"\ � ' ' "��' a� .i�� � �.. a, �Fr� > F s".�"e� i�9; -�,• r Y �• 4 itr4, c �t•.: ° �/
,�`f�P- .li�*' J ` � v�,,�1� �a r ��� �< ��� Ol� � � y. �, �.S'�y �� '�`Y�j�:le'�•, .�''. " ��, �j�r1'�� �` ; `''�'� Ts� �� .� `'..: �' � F > b. s" � '
a �a ��� /�� � ��'1.��.wi�i , y ♦ .., t��f�,�.-�}��15^S,+i�.jtyEt;{.�,��'�V`�,FG...,�'"�j' • �'� �`� �,�
Z, � � �j+,�`'9i'�� � i..,�� .�r _ �-*�l �a�, t��'C��� .�. � �.'s�,- � �� {`�. �° :�� ♦ / '� ��.:. �
� '
+�� ���t `���� � � � R - �'- � '''d •''r � '��"�
`�c-�� � 1w�.��� �1 '
�'��t'?��� .i� '..
�C R y ef��a � � �' .
"R'��� „ _ '� �..
� �, _T -.�_ ��".��'�--�- S PM
���e, T,�#'`q���.� �•��. � k���;�. ��� � � � �� `� ; � �4,r��1� �.� �` �� �� � '� . .. � ._ � � �s . � �� �� ' �� :� . �� .' �4 !k� . .. � �.:.t� , w,�rl�.�'►c'�,.`��---._��`F.
.. , . � �, ,,< �.,,�� . :! � .. 4�. � � � , , j 7 ,1;
�'� r e � ��, �'�' � 4��R,� 'v � • � -
; . � � ;� �;�,`;���� <�, � � 'J;. .� k .y,, �� °!�P '; � � x „ �i. . ,
_
"s.y� :�j,�. � . . �.�.. .. � , �`?� �,4Yr �y4,•. „r, ' x. ' . ,'
'
' �'':.��`'�'!�� � y.x t• d�j:.rw �� .,,:�ti.l� �/' � .. �.. '�> , +�" `1�1',,'"�, . -,�°��i'� ��°� ,�€fy-.""�-r,. ' . .. . .��l� /.+:` _ . � �
.
.
. ,. I�
°..� ... .. , � 7 ., � '' �,w f �.. �
. � , ,�� 1" �. �. . � ��,� �, -�s "' — � �''��, !�
r A 's.. �„� .. � � � , �� � '��� �' `�,�"�'.y�'.n- _ :- � t - .,-. / ,� .:...
. , �,� ,� .��d ;� ..� � � ,a � t, ,._ � + .
�' ��
/"� t, , ,� �v,� 4� ,qr.` `�a�,k�r,r��` x Q � •� R�� �.' «, ., �;r � �w. .
�� �'�'`,�' .{y�. ., ,,� . � . � j`��t��, � ��,5 gy�, .. � � X �:i�}.� '' � s B �k t.��� , ` �`••.� .� , . �"� /
r ^ • -_
�� k ,�4> ,'� ,����, P� � � � , �
�"n� d� � ,, � �` �, SP, � �`.,a {�,��,�- Q� '�r �, �y� "' °,. �� � .`� `
, -.t � ! _. � � � �� � �� .; : � �� --.;:�_ � .� �
��,,;, .�; �.�� ;. � `>. SPI � . �_. ,�, ., �4 . , ._L .�; ,, �� /, ,`. � �
�9ri"�"�' �,b� R-- [ � , - _ `�+..,. 4, / .
�� �. ,�[R�I' , _ �� � , ,�,
8� ��n5e�� ��y, ',` 2' �i, . : �.� �#'r � 4- � i � ',� ;:t. �.'�lx,:. � . "� � _"�. �
.
�� 'r� "'�.,�`�r�.�` • SPH �'�. 1 � 1 wb-up $ • ti.,_ ` ' y �� t �.- rp� .
� � �M ��y .�� d ���, .:r� � I� � M! .* .a � l ` . �MV6: .
� . R�. .. ,� � y. ,. Wb-Wei SP� c� r� - � � �� A..
.__..,_ _ ",..� �,, �F • . « O � S� ' t K. ? �'e x � ���*:� ' '�,?
-_ _ _ -..,. � ._, :�� _
� � _ __ COLLEGE RD SB SB � i �,, �- .��'�`� F ''� � �
� � � ' S.�, - �. ) � t. �c �,; 3 ��
"� � ' :: ` . SB SB :_�< ,, �► i�� � . F�; � , • �,�i�" SPR
, ,�� - , , . �? x ��� fi � ,. �. ' _
. '
< _ .. . �.
p �-:�'`/,� � `� ' �` -
. " . � �'�� ::+� � =� ,�.. °� � , . _ ' �� ��:��.� tr--,��; ��� "` � �, � .�. ��
,;, / , '��."�f' . =t..'.� , );� �� : . � .. . - . _ . _, _ r,�` •_: ,,,, -;��_`� �' P;� .8'' � � • Py�: � •. " :,� . � � �`, '� � :
., a
4 �� � � � ` M . � I � � � '�� , ..� � , _ •+�.. � ,. � df � t C' :� ��..,� . � \� �� � ��'-,�l
� ��;�°"y ��y ,Fr � r �' �. , — - . �� �_ '�� .�J �Q�� �
� �� �, 0 a r . ' _ . -. u_i.. S ��
� '�'*A rt -I C , "� 1,,1,� ] � � ' 'tt�" etn � : � -�-- , . ` - - . �./-�R . S
^�' °l� � � �r, "r�,q�' t� �, � ���` ��..,, �,,< ���Nq
�� � � , '� � � ,� `:+ ��r, �'' , ��l � ° � ` 1 � BEA CH RD �r i
' `",� �,•,� � : - �'" SPV �w, � , �� - . a
„ � ,
i °, �,�
. � _
.: . . . %�
,
�� SPL � �p�� �;/i�► : + �,� i' � • ' � a�
.
`�� �,� `,�e `y�., � i"�j, '� � �.�-_ �� tr� ��;�';
�»•,;e ` F;:; » � SPK �`' � `� � � I �' � PT � ��
�� � . . '�, � . F � C�
� .x',�' `` <��t �' PM o , , ,'�'��' �',p � , �.= . �' S W �k �' ` t
• r„ .,. " SG : ��R� � � ; �'a`�. SP,S, ;�
� R�a �; ` � � , , ' - ;� �`, �, ,
� � WN � �� � � �:.. ��4�y[ �'= '� rpII INSET 2 z ���,`�"�"' ;�,."� ��'�;:
�` � ' . \ � `{ v E�J�� . ��a�, � +�'� �� ,Jr ,'� ` �:.}-•���������wr� I
� SPN i�' � � � r_ , „„�"��`�2 _ '�'.E��� � �� , �� �
; '� :; I N S ET 1 0 �''� �,�,-' � 4`���" � ���'� r p ,,;, i� �\! h' � � a r� . '►-�;�;� �►1�y � ,� �� �t�.s' a
� i� � �� � �R� �.
`+It' '�t.�� •� `�� '` �a,. •� �•P: ��� ��'���^'"r. '�� �1C� :.J1.��� �� •tqi���`,��i;���-- •.I�,�.,�'4�;�v�` .Rrs' � �
'� \... � '�\ � ,_'�'� ..���:, �' �. '�- � � �(a �:. �� � • �iS' e� ��':� � ��"w./'�:;� � , \ O \��"�a. � ��.•�.�
,
, . .
- . .
�.
�
'i Y, ' �e+ y,� +r: ,
�e ' e ,�1"; . .�'' �� � �, •rE .� `�;�� � , i`-
����,,�.r'" ,�'�.y�� �i. SPU '�`' `; v." ��'y, �"'� `t '. iE�. (.� �i: � �, ". i����-.•;.. ` 'r �t ' ��
P� �`+.. •'� . �.�'�. r?F, �r. 't��" .�,� .. �� f'1iaG �'� .\e ,�', i1' y�.Y�`}� . ��MM�:fl. �' •;'L.1 'rl.
.. �„+�, , "•� "��,/�' ��T,�. � �''�F- ��.. ��. � .;L,fl;�+i, •1' �. rr:,�`- ��� �; �
IY�' �+�,� ���t . i' ��{� p� ''�.�,��'� �.� �. 3�E,. af,� ��r �f�' ir, ';xr. �'t : �'�`�'�' e
'! . �'� 'M'�` � �, �. !� �'r�Y '� ���> � i. �.. * � � r� / is�A r `J�J, Y � ; �
lY�' ,
� �.*_ 'f� l �„'C ;'yk, �' �: #�' ,,,e �`��" p p. � }r*:,�. �,�� 1
. � '�. " ':,�� a�'. ���.�y�,�, ��"'�: . �,, .. ,�,h�"� . �;`�,� `r, • �. 9�rZ �� v,H '•�'�i1� ���l�f" hr.�':;;' y�� 'i� L� 1�/
�\ , �ia �' ^-"$.:°*-• ,/�,�" r�'�ti ?��'�'���. , ;�' e .'�' c�t�' :� ��a=' ' r1. �—� R� !I .
,
.
.y�, ,
. j$ .� n� {� ^�` y ryR g. $ �5p�
." s� .� � '� S'°�` ��4�{ r'��.�.R"�s�:i! I,�`j�kRf�.� Js .�Y �Lr ! .y�,� 0f �741I _ ��7 "r . ..j. -.
� � ,. ' a ��A 1 �p. •r
q� ` �i. P. , <.�� 'M-vk.4-" i s^t .'-.� /�' ,C:1 � 4; �i��d,� �'. .��K'�`' �� • �"J
�,. ' .',,,,"d�. � � " , I
_ .
,
r S.�-�. � � F � ::'i N�
� � ♦ . �. �. ,�,.
•. � .!
� • .:�;: , � . ,� ►.� , � -
� ^ '�;�, � `.�., .�,.. � . !sb , rN ,��-���'�, ��r I� � ;� �..
� �,, f ,� D ��j, y�'
_ �.,��/ �*�i�'b ��t��� � ,�ir,-� ;.p,.t-• .�'�.�,�`�3c" �.. �.�R_ ��:�'�in r� � ��.�a ?� b' 1. � . �' �r° i�' .
_. +ii/ !:_,
'" w � `- � `
5 o-, c` yi � c
�� 4 . ,
'�� �`;�t
<
��`^�..�.
r�� N i
Z � f
z
�a i
0
� ii�
v,c'
�
Legend
� U-5790 Project Limits
Parcel Boundary
NHD Hydrography (Outside Study
Area)
Selected Culverts
Potential Non-Wetland Waters of
the US (Intermittent Stream)
Potential Non-Wetland Waters of
�� the US (Perennial Stream)
nlotes
�.�^- W-5103 (SAW-2015-00950)
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
2. NHD provitled by USGS
3. ParCel dafa from New Hqnover County
4. Jurisdictionpl Wpters Delineation completed by Stpntec in June 2&29 and nugust 18, 2016
5. OrfhoimpgeryOO NCOneMpp, 2015.
Disclaimer: S}an}ec assumes no resoonsibilifv for tla}a suoolietl in elecfronic forma}. The recioienf acceo}s full resoonsibilifv forverifvina }he accuracv antl
Potential Non-Wetland Waters of
the US (Perennial Stream)
Potential Wetland Waters of the
United States
Potential Non-Wetland Waters of
the US (Pond)
W-5103 Wetlands (SAW-2015-
00950)
._. �.
R1i
,
,,a
� i" •�.
� ��
� :�� � :
������k
,�.���
� : ��
��� ,
� � �
� �*~ �
���. �
��r
� ��
Moit
��
wN ����P��
GP�o�\�P�p'G��O
�
O�'\�P
�
GP
10 50 100 200 Feet ` Mott
/T'F� ,� P
SPT
INSET 1
�� y • �
� � F: h�
,
° � . �M sPw
�.
� INSET 2
0 50 100 200 Feet
WW
�� - ���`�, . � *� .�,'� r,
C � � . p�� � �. � �� � � �
�a�
� . �'��� ; ��� _ , �
���/ � _ � � r r,.� �
. �/ Y �����
9/# I , f� � �,; y� t,�+
�
�r . � .r�`' IR y � •
i�
� „ . . ,, � a
�,.� * �'ly ��! � � �'�I'� ,-
�9 _
v�� � ��r�'�..
�" �C
YK r �
�,. �i r� _
t +��:. +'� �•,'�"r < A � : . �
0 500 1,000
Feet
1:7,200 (At original document size of l 1x17)
ihe confeM
�
��
_ _ . .._. _ _ �! ���;���
•1 � � � '� ` �'f : %.X��
� x:J'• ' :��� i�i'�^Z.'yR• � �
Sta ntec �a
� �+
ProjectLocation 171001713
New Hanover Coun}y, NC Prepared by AEB on 2016-11-09
Technical Review by MMR 2016-11-17
Independent Review by ALC 2016-11-21
Client/Project
NCDOT - Division 3
US421 at NC132 Intersection Improvements
TIP U-5790
Figure No.
5
Title
Approximate Jurisdictional
Features Map

Review Area Photos:
�4°:
�r ��t �-- �� A. r �• :� �,
� " . �. `* �i .,N`�"� �." . "1 �a �
Photo ]— Wetland WB — headwater forest
� - �- �
��� �
�� � �
�� �
��� �:
y�E
:;�; ,
:� �
��
�� � .�
. �� -.
. >. �
s . � : ��
, � .,
�
.. ,���,
d., � , �
s:` w bF.v��a, � # . .. w�+W
� �;`''"� �.,ti �, � �,','_ i`�..�►
Photo 2— Stream SA — perennial at Junction Creek Dr looking upstream

Photo 3— Stream SB — perennial between College Rd and Clayton Horn Dairy Rd looking
Photo 4— Stream SC — intermittent west of Carolina Beach Rd looking downstream

.�. .
�'
�, � ��P
_ ��-- - .
,�:
iy4,'''��::,:
t. re. Y�� -. � -... ?� ,. ,. �, `sd ad' ww y` Y ��,�fa. .
k �,¢� �
�� � ��a� � 4.., �" "�"�s'�F`:� �;/«Y `'f��� re
i .� "� �� � �-�° #a • a�" � ��{ ,� �
�b �
!3 � ���( � �� r''�F i�. ` ''r' u���? `� � uk 4 ,.
�, ��F ,�,�,y{�„'�q.,g�, 3�����,.} �. ti�, ev.r' •��`�Y� .�R��,,,•.r�xy'���,'y,;.�� s.,
. ,� . * ,c a. . . >5s. .« � . �;��. & . . � x. s,r n, •��:� . �: a. . ..
Photo 12 — Mott Creek — perennial east of College Rd looking downstream
,��-
.� ,_. _. _��.w.
��, � �
1 •��,4 � a . ��:.h , . � �„�� $ � `-i. .. �' b�
Photo 13 — Mott Creek — perennial west of College Rd and east of Carolina Beach Rd looking
downstream

Photo 14 — Mott Creek — perennial west of Carolina Beach Rd looking downstream
Photo 15 — Hewletts Creek — perennial east of College Rd looking upstream

of Mott Creek to the east of College
r's�:i: t . �
w
• < ;.�+i r� ,
t_�? ,�.. �'i
. . . �.. 3� , . .. .. , � .. � „ . � . . .
Photo 19 — Stormwater Pond SPI, adjacent to the right bank
Rd

NRTR ID: WB
WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
Project Name:NC 132 (Colleqe Rd) Nearest Road:Clavton Horn Dairy Rd
County:New Hanover Wetland Area: 0.116 acres Wetland Width: 30 feet
Name of evaluator: A. Baldwin and A. Coleman Date: 6/29/16
land Location
Adjacent land use
(within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
on pond or lake
X on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other
Series
X predominantly organic-humus, muck,
Or peat
predominantly mineral — non-sandy
predominantly sandy
raulic factors
steep topography
ditched or channelized
total wetland width >= 100 feet
X forested/natural vegetation 10 %
X agriculture, urban/suburban 60 %
X impervious surface 30 %
Dominant Vegetation
(1)Laurel oak
(2)Netted chainfern
(3)Southern maqnolia
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently
flooded or inundated
X seasonally flooded or inundated
intermittently flooded or temporary
surface water
No evidence of flooding or
surface water
Wetland type (select one)*
X Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna
Headwater forest Freshwater marsh
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina Bay
Bog forest Other
*the rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
---------------------------------------
Water storage 1 x 4.00 = 4
Bank/Shoreline stabilization 5 x 4.00 = 20
Pollutant removal 1 * x 5.00 = 5
Wildlife Habitat 2 x 2.00 = 4
Aquatic life value 2 x 4.00 = 8
Recreation/Education 0 x 1.00 = 0
* Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within'/z mile upstream,
upslope, or radius

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjecUSite: College Road City/County: Wilmington/New Hanover Sampling Date: 6/29/2016
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WB - UP
Investigator(s): A. Baldwin & Z. Ellerby Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): tOe SlOpe Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR - T Lat: 34.140409 Long: '77.891711 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Se - Seagate fine sand NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Yes No X —
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that applv) � Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (613) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2) Q Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation (A3) Q1--f Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (61) I--I Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) Q1--f Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) I--I Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
� Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ,Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
� Iron Deposits (65) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) ,Q Shallow Aquitard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) II FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a Water-Stained Leaves (B9) II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Point: WB - �P
Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) °/a Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
� Liquidambar styraciflua 20 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2 Liridendron tulipifera 20 Y FAC
Quercus ni ra 15 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant
3• 9 Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% �,q�g�
6.
� Prevalence Index worksheet:
$ Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
55 = Total Cover OBL species 10 X �= 10
50% of total cover: 27�5 20°/a of total cover: � � FACW species � 2 x 2= 24
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: � FAC species 150 X 3= 450
� Magnolia grandifolia 40 Y FAC FACU species � x 4=�
2 Quercus nigra 15 Y FAC UPL species � x 5=�
3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 FACW Column Totals: 172 �A� 484 �B�
4 Liquidambar styraciflua 5
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 35
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
� Magnolia grandifolia
2 Parthenocissus quinquefolia
3 Woodwardia virginica
4 Vitis sp.
5 Woodwardia areolata
g Arundinaria gigantea
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover: 23.5
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: �
FAC prevalence Index = B/A = 2•8
70 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 14
25 Y FAC
5 FAC
5 OBL
5 FAC
5 OBL
2 FACW
47 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 9�4
� = Total Cover
20°/a of total cover: �
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Test is >50°/a
3- Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplinglShrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WB' UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moistl % Color (moistl % Tvpe, Loc Texture Remarks
0- 5 10YR 2/1 100 50 CS M S
5- 8 10YR 2/1 100
8- 13+ 10YR 4/1 100
25 CS M S
10 CS M S
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) T❑� 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
� Histic Epipedon (A2) � Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) LJ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
� Black Histic (A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) � Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) �T-I Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
� Stratified Layers (A5) � Depleted Matrix (F3) u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
D Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) D Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
D 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �❑I Red Parent Material (TF2)
� Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) � Redox Depressions (F8) u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
D 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) � Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) � Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
� Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
� Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) D Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) � Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
� Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
D Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
� Stripped Matrix (S6) � Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
� Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjecUSite: College Road City/County: Wilmington/New Hanover Sampling Date: 6/29/2016
ApplicanUOwner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WB - WET
Investigator(s): A. Baldwin & Z. Ellerby Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): tOe SlOpe Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): �
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR - T Lat: 34.140402 Long: '77.891692 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Se - Seagate fine sand NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that applv) � Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (613) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2) Q Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation (A3) Q1--f Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (61) I--I Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) Q1--f Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) I--I Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
� Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑✓ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ,✓Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
� Iron Deposits (65) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) ,Q Shallow Aquitard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) II✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a Water-Stained Leaves (B9) II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 13
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 10 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. sampiing Point: WB - WEr
Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) °/a Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
� Quercus laurifolia 30 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2 Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Y FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3• Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% �,q�g�
6.
� Prevalence Index worksheet:
$ Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
40 = Total Cover OBL species 40 X �= 40
50% of total cover: 20 20°/a of total cover: $ FACW species 70 X 2- 140
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: � FAC species 10 X 3= 30
� Magnolia grandiflora 10 Y FACW FACU species � x 4=�
2 Quercus laurifolia 10 Y FACW UPL species � x 5=�
3 Column Totals: 120 �q� 210 �g�
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 10
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
� Woodwardia areolata
2 Osmunda cinnamomea
3 Arundinaria gigantea
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover: 30
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: �
20 = Total Cover
20°/a of total cover: 4
40 Y OBL
10 FACW
10 FACW
60 = Total Cover
20°/a of total cover: � 2
� = Total Cover
20°/a of total cover: �
Prevalence Index = B/A = � •8
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
� 2 - Dominance Test is >50°/a
3- Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.
Sampling Point: WB ' WET
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moistl % Color (moistl % Tvpe, Loc Texture Remarks
0- 7 10YR 2/2 100 Muck OM - Fibric/Hemic
7 - 11 10YR 2/1
11 - 14+ 10YR 2/1
100
80 10YR 5/2 20 D M
Muck OM - Sapric
Mucky S
C=Concentration
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
ZLocation: PL=Pore Linina. M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) T❑� 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
� Histic Epipedon (A2) � Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) LJ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
� Black Histic (A3) D Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) � Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) �T-I Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
� Stratified Layers (A5) � Depleted Matrix (F3) u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
D Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) D Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
D 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �❑I Red Parent Material (TF2)
� Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) � Redox Depressions (F8) u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
D✓ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) � Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) � Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
� Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
� Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) D Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) � Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
� Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
D Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
� Stripped Matrix (S6) � Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
� Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
�ate: 6/28/2016 Pro�ect�site: MOtt Creek
E�a�uator:A. Baldwin & A. Coleman
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 3�.7 'rj
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
county: New Hanover
Stream Determination (circle one
Ephemeral Intermitten erennia
�atitude: 34.143577
�ongituc+e: _77,8Q505
Other
e.g. QuadName: WI�Ii1lClgt011
A. Geomorpholo (Subtotal =13 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, � O 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 es = 3
a _1���-`-' �"-'--- --- --` --`--' --- -"-- --`--- '
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = �0.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?
0 1
0 1
1.5 1
0 0.5
0 0.5
No=O
2 U
2 3
0.5 0
1 1.5
1 1.5
es=3
C. Biology (Subtotal = � 25 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed ACW = 0.7 � OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Phragmites and parrot feather observed in channel.
Sketch:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # Mott (indicate on attached map)
;,�„ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: A. Baldwin and A. Coleman
3. Date of evaluation: 6/28/2016
5. Name of stream: Mott Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 1.02 Sq Illl
9. Length of reach evaluated: 1,975 ft
4. Time of evaluation: 15:30
6. River basin: Cape Fear
8. Stream order: SeCond
l0. County: New Hanover
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (eX. 34.s�z3t2�: 34.143577
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude�eX.-��.ss66>>�: -�7.89505
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) PhoYo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Locarion of reach under evaluarion (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) locarion):
Behind Lowes Foods on S College Road
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: Thunderstorms yesterday
16. Site conditions attime ofvisit High 80's, recent downpours.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 3.4 aC
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 70 0�o Residential 15 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
10 0�o Forested 5% Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: 3.5 ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 5 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scared using the same ecaregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a scare of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 38 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 4
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max poinis)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 6
(extensive alteration = 0; no alterarion = max points)
Riparian zone ,�
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max poinis) �
,.� Groundwater discharge ,�
� 5 (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4
,.� Presence of adjacent floodplain �
�, 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2
� � Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
g Presence of adj acent wetlands 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 Q
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 �
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2
(extensive deposition= O; little or no sediment = max points)
1� Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0- 4 0- 5 -
(fine, homogenous = 0; ]arge, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 4
� (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
,.F''., Presence of major bank failures 4
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Q 14 Root depth and density on banks 0- 3 0- 4 0- 5 2
E,,,, (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production �
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substanrial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 �
� (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F1 � Habitat complexity 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 �
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Q 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 �
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
Substrate embeddedness *
19 (deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max) NA 0- 4 0- 4 -
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0- 4 0- 5 0- 5 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 21 Presence of amphibians 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 2
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 22 Presence of fish 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 0
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 Q
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 38
* These characterisrics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
�ate: 6/28/2016 Project/Site: SA
E�a�uator: A. Baldwin & A. Coleman
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 3�.7 'rj
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
county: New Hanover
Stream Determination (circl ne
Ephemeral Intermitte Perennia
�atitude: 34.136916
Longitude: _77,89��74
Other
e.g. QuadName: WI�Ii1lClgt011
A. Geomorpholo (Subtotal =12 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, � O 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a _1���-`-' �"-'--- --- --` --`--' --- -"-- --`--- '
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = �o )
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?
0 1
0 1
1.5 1
0 0.5
0 0.5
No=O
2
2
0.5
1
1
es =
�
3
0
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = $ 75 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed ACW = 0.7 � OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

� USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SA (indicate on attached map)
;,�„ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: A. Baldwin and A. Coleman
3. Date of evaluation: 6/28/2016
5. Name of stream: UT to Mott Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 0.0927 sq ml
9. Length of reach evaluated: 350 ft
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (eX. 34.s�z3t2�: 34.136916
4. Time of evaluation: 16:45
6. River basin: Cape Fear
8. Stream order: First
l0. County: New Hanover
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude �eX.-��.ss66>>�: -7�•8g0074
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) PhoYo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Locarion of reach under evaluarion (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) locarion):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: High 80'S - Sunny to T. StOrms
16. Site conditions at time ofvisir. Cloudy, high 80's - downpours/T. storms earlier.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: NA
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 85 % Residential 5% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
5 0�o Forested 5% Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: 3 ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1.5 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scared using the same ecaregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a scare of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 45 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 4
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max poinis)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 �
(extensive alteration = 0; no alterarion = max points)
Riparian zone 4
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max poinis) 3
,.� Groundwater discharge 2
� 5 (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4
,.� Presence of adjacent floodplain ,�
�, 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2
� � Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 �
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
g Presence of adj acent wetlands 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 Q
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 2
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 3
(extensive deposition= O; little or no sediment = max points)
1� Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0- 4 0- 5 -
(fine, homogenous = 0; ]arge, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 2
� (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
,.F''., Presence of major bank failures 2
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Q 14 Root depth and density on banks 0- 3 0- 4 0- 5 2
E,,,, (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 4
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substanrial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 2
� (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F1 � Habitat complexity 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 2
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Q 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 -rj
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
Substrate embeddedness *
19 (deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max) NA 0- 4 0- 4 -
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0- 4 0- 5 0- 5 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 21 Presence of amphibians 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 2
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 22 Presence of fish 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 0
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 2
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 45
* These characterisrics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
�ate: 6/29/2016 Project/Site: SB
E�a�uator: A. Baldwin & A. Coleman
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 33
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
county: New Hanover
�atitude: 34.137093
Longitude: _77,89��86
Stream Determination (circle one Other
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia e.g. QuadName: WIIIi11C1gt011
A. Geomorpholo (Subtotal =15 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, � O 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a _1���-`-' �"-'--- --- --` --`--' --- -"-- --`--- '
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9 5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?
0 1
0 1
.5 1
0 0.5
0 0.5
No=O
2
2
0.5
1
1
es =
��.J
0
0
�
C. Biology (Subtotal = $ 5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Home Depot
SWP
Outlet
------- --- --- ----� Concrete Culvert 6 ft

� USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SB (indicate on attached map)
;,�„ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: A. Baldwin and A. Coleman
3. Date of evaluation: 6/29/2016
5. Name of stream: SB - UT to Mott Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 0.41 Sq 1711
9. Length of reach evaluated: 175 ft
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (eX. 34.s�z3t2�: 34.137093
4. Time of evaluation: 10:40
6. River basin: Cape Fear
8. Stream order: First
l0. County: New Hanover
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude �eX.—��.ss66>>�: -7�•8g0086
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) PhoYo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Locarion of reach under evaluarion (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) locarion):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: Rained yesterday
16. Site conditions at time of visit OverCaSt, high 80'S
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 2•75 aC
19. Does channel appear on USGS qu � map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear 1n USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use. 5% Residential _% Commercial 5% Industrial _% Agricultural
50 0�o Forested 10 0�o Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: 4 ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scared using the same ecaregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a scare of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 44 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 -rj
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max poinis)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 Q
(extensive alteration = 0; no alterarion = max points)
Riparian zone 3
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max poinis) 2
,.� Groundwater discharge ,�
� 5 (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4
,.� Presence of adjacent floodplain �
�, 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2
� � Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 3
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
g Presence of adj acent wetlands 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 Q
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 Q
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2
(extensive deposition= O; little or no sediment = max points)
1� Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0- 4 0- 5 -
(fine, homogenous = 0; ]arge, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 4
� (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
,.F''., Presence of major bank failures 4
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Q 14 Root depth and density on banks 0- 3 0- 4 0- 5 2
E,,,, (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 4
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substanrial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 �
� (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F1 � Habitat complexity 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 2
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Q 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 -rj
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
Substrate embeddedness *
19 (deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max) NA 0- 4 0- 4 -
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0- 4 0- 5 0- 5 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 21 Presence of amphibians 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 �
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 22 Presence of fish 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 0
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 2
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 44
* These characterisrics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
�ate: 6/28/2016 Pro�e�t�site: SB - UT t0 MOtt �atitude: 34.140658
E�a�uator: A. Baldwin & A. Coleman
county: New Hanover
�ongitude: _77,892096
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 32 . 7'rj
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Stream Determination (c
Ephemeral Intermitten�
e� I Other
ial� e.g. QuadName: WIIIi11C1gt011
A. Geomorpholo (Subtotal =12 5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, � O 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a _1���-`-' �"-'--- --- --` --`--' --- -"-- --`--- '
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = �o )
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?
0 1
0 1
1
0 0.5
0 0.5
No=O
0
2
0.5
es =
3
3
0
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = �oz5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed ACW = 0.7 � OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

� USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SB (indicate on attached map)
;,�„ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: A. Baldwin and A. Coleman
3. Date of evaluation: 6/28/2016
5. Name of stream: SB - UT to Mott Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: 0.41 Sq 1711
9. Length of reach evaluated: 815 ft
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (eX. 34.s�z3t2�: 34.140658
4. Time of evaluation: 10:40
6. River basin: Cape Fear
8. Stream order: First
l0. County: New Hanover
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude �eX.—��.ss66>>�: -7�•8g2096
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) PhoYo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Locarion of reach under evaluarion (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) locarion):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: Rained yesterday
16. Site conditions at time of visit OverCaSt, high 80'S
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 2•75
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 25 % Residential _% Commercial 30 % Industrial _% Agricultural
40 0�o Forested 5% Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: 4 ft 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1 ft
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scared using the same ecaregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a scare of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 44 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 -rj
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max poinis)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 Q
(extensive alteration = 0; no alterarion = max points)
Riparian zone 3
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max poinis) 2
,.� Groundwater discharge ,�
� 5 (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4
,.� Presence of adjacent floodplain �
�, 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2
� � Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 3
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
g Presence of adj acent wetlands 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 Q
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 Q
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 2
(extensive deposition= O; little or no sediment = max points)
1� Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0- 4 0- 5 -
(fine, homogenous = 0; ]arge, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 4
� (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
,.F''., Presence of major bank failures 4
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Q 14 Root depth and density on banks 0- 3 0- 4 0- 5 2
E,,,, (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production 4
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substanrial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 �
� (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F1 � Habitat complexity 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 2
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Q 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 -rj
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
Substrate embeddedness *
19 (deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max) NA 0- 4 0- 4 -
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0- 4 0- 5 0- 5 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 21 Presence of amphibians 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 �
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 22 Presence of fish 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 0
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 2
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 44
* These characterisrics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
�ate: 6/29/2016 Project/Site: SC
E�a�uator: A. Baldwin & A. Coleman
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 2 �. rj
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
county: New Hanover
�atitude: 34.194431
Longitude: _77,$$$� $
Stream Determination (circle one) Other
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial e.g. QuadName: WIIIi11C1gt011
A. Geomorpholo (Subtotal =� ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, � O 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a _1���-`-' �"-'--- --- --` --`--' --- -"-- --`--- '
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = $ )
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table?
0 1
0 1
1.5 1
0 0.5
0 0.5
No=O
0
2
0.5
es =
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = s.s �
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # SC (indicate on attached map)
;,�„ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: NCDOT 2. Evaluator's name: A. Baldwin and A. Coleman
3. Date of evaluation: 6/29/2016
5. Name of stream: Stl"eam C
7. Approximate drainage area: 2•31 Sq Illl
9. Length of reach evaluated: 125 ft
4. Time of evaluation: 12:30
6. River basin: Cape Fear
8. Stream order: First
l0. County: New Hanover
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (eX. 34.s�z3t2�: 34.194431
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex.-77.ss6611): -77•88818
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) PhoYo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Locarion of reach under evaluarion (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) locarion):
Holly Tree Road by The Woods at Holly Tree
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: Rained Yesterday
16. Site conditions at time of visit Sunny, mid 80'S.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: NA
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 5% Residential _% Commercial 90 % Industrial _% Agricultural
5 0�o Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: 5 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): �
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scared using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):31 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS Coastal Piedmont Mountain SCORE
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 2
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max poinis)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alterarion = max points) 0
Riparian zone ,�
3 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 0- 6 0- 4 0- 5
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max poinis) �
,.� Groundwater discharge ,�
� 5 (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) 0- 3 0- 4 0- 4
,.� Presence of adjacent floodplain ,�
�, 6 (no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) 0- 4 0- 4 0- 2
� � Entrenchment / floodplain access 0- 5 0- 4 0- 2 �
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
g Presence of adj acent wetlands 0- 6 0- 4 0- 2 Q
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0- 5 0- 4 0- 3 Q
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0- 5 0- 4 0- 4 �
(extensive deposition= O; little or no sediment = max points)
1� Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0- 4 0- 5 -
(fine, homogenous = 0; ]arge, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0- 5 0- 4 0- 5 2
� (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
,.F''., Presence of major bank failures 3
a 13 0-5 0-5 0-5
� (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Q 14 Root depth and density on banks 0- 3 0- 4 0- 5 2
E,,,, (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
� Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production �
15 0-5 0-4 0-5
(substanrial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0- 3 0- 5 0- 6 �
� (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F1 � Habitat complexity 0- 6 0- 6 0- 6 2
� (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Q 1 g Canopy coverage over streambed 0- 5 0- 5 0- 5 4
x (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
Substrate embeddedness *
19 (deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max) NA 0- 4 0- 4 -
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0- 4 0- 5 0- 5 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 21 Presence of amphibians 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 �
O (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
� 22 Presence of fish 0- 4 0- 4 0- 4 �
� (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 0- 5 �
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 31
* These characterisrics are not assessed in coastal streams.