19920573 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19920116

CZ R, INCORPORATED
Environmental Consultants
47 9 College Acres Drive
Unit 2
Wilmington, NC 28403
TO:

WE ARE SENDING YOU l=J Attached via L, ? under seperate cover via the following items:
? Shop drawings ? Prints
? Copy of correspondence ? dhange order
? Tracings
Samples
? Contract documents
?
COPIES DATE OWC. NO DESCRIPTION
by l l? C o? w ai ,? Z 1 t)
.74
( v ( , L)

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
?
For review and concurrence
?
For your information
('
`
L
-I As requested
?
For review end comment
?
FOR BIDS DUE
REMARKS
? No exceptions taken
may be used as submitted ? Resubmit coples for «vlew
? Exceptions as noted ?
may be used subject to comments Submlt copies for distribution
? Returned for corrections ? Returncorrected prints
19 ? PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US

If enclosures are not as noted. please advise us at once.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE 177 D ?G 1 Y- Z PRO ECT6N0.
ATTENTION
SUBJECT
G? o.?
i-.. lJ " ?.. fir? -tt
SIGNED: -
N V le ` yC 1 (; Ul KHLL1LH-L)UKHHI'1 Hltrt-uK. 1 HU I HC1Fk1 1 Y
Post-It" brand fax transmittal tiieuut 7B7Y ant oaoea ? -7

apt. Ph ono N
F" fax x

171 '
.. arfi-h1 Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Rcsourccs
Division of Environmental Managcmcat
512 Xforth ialishury SrrFAt • RaInigh, North CarntinA 2760
S ?F •?
James G. Martin, Covcrnor November 6, 1992 A. Preston Howard, Jr_, RED.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Acting Director
Mr. Torn Quesenbe=ry
Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority
P.O. Box 80001
RDtJ Airport, ?I, C. 27623-0001
Dear Mr. Que3enberry:
3ub ei:t: Fr(ijiuzicd Eill in weriiinri. or warar.s
Inter, hange at RDU Ai.rporr
wake County
_)EM Project # 925%3, COI: 41492000:51
Upon review of your roqucnt for 401 Water Quality Certifioatior to place
till mdtorial in 2.37 acre3 of wetlarA3 or water& for pzopoaed intcrchnngc
located at r,,D'U F.imout near Sr, 1002 and Aviation Parkwav in WaXe County, we
have determined that the Ilroponed Lill c nit LN uveretl by Ge:irLCl i7d.tr Oualit.y
CefLiiicaLiun No. 2671 is.3ued L76:tuary 21, 1992. A COPY Of the Gereral
Certlficutio:i is attached. Tnis Cerrificar.inn may 17e used if., aualifying for
coverage under corps or EnginePrsr u;dr innwi.ia 2e?rmi r. No. 26- An adA i r i nna
nonditinn is rha*. in adoiri4n to toe- rnit;-rSati.orl plan preyenceCi by ^ZR in their
30 supr.amrer :1.992 submittai, groundwater r,,u-.t bo rwonitorrad during the tint
year after plan:inq to ensure that adequate hydrology is presant. Annual
reports on groundwater, soil and vegetation monitoring must be s i;,mitt mod- in
triplicate to DRM during the throw _vcor.a o: monitoring.
If you have any Gueation3, p1cciic contact John gozncy et 919-733-1706.
Sic>c•Fre?}?` j ?
P Aston Howard,/)*. P.E.
jrd/rduair.ltr ?/
Attachment
CC: Wilmington District Corps of tnginee.,:5
Cofps of EngineeLJ Rtlltigh F_cl:;l `ifi;:c
Rcilt zlgii DEM Rruiuaol OfZlc:e
Mr. JohP. Dorney
c e-nt-_ral FilP_S
Mr. Al.ewanrler smi.rh, r_ZR-Wilminjton
Mr. R,rn Ferrell
ABl-,cville pefeUCviho fioore:,,ilIc Ralei&h WnshinEtoil Wilr.,tngtan wtr.uonsstcm
704/251.6200 919/488.1541 705/663-1657 91)1571-1700 919/946 6481 919,095 3900 91)/Z96 700.1
yoltutloe Crevautloa Yays
P.O. Box 29535. P.nlcigl,, Alorili C&rolina ii626-0535 `1'clechon? 919 733-7615
A:, F,,vuel ?)r rJ:li rj .ti ffu .:l GLv A Q 1"t'. iiP10yCr
Nov 12 192 17:01 RALEIGH-DURHAM AIRPORT AUTHORITY P.2.`2
C-ENERAL CERTIFICATION FnF PRQJE(_T5 T?'L"IC,IBLL
FOR CORPS QF ENGINEER$ NATIO-Na7TDF PFRMT r TdMF r-R 7F (HRAf)rrJ.A F.Ri
AA'D I:I0Z._7?TFD WQTLhND5)
This General Certification io i^.?ued in conformity vi-__n sine
requirements of Section 401, Pool i.c Yaws 92--500 and c)C-217 r.he
United States and subject to the Forth Carolina Division, of ':,nvi-
ronmental Management R gulations in 15.A NCAC 2H, Sect1Cn .0500
and 15A NCAC 2B .0109 and .0201 for the discharge of fill rn<:ce
ria.l to navigable waters and adjacent wetland areas which are
nt')CIVP' I.;l'tt_ he ACIWAt.eeti (Ji l-.ei wetland arras that are not a Bare of
the surface tributary system to intcrotatc watczs or navigable
waters of the United States (i_e_, isolated wetlands) as
described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (D) (26) of the Corps of Engi--
neery xegu:l.a,tiona (i..c.t Nationwide Permit No. 26) .The category
of at,t i.vi t i.e.s shall i ncl1)(1a any fill hcti_vit.y in t-.}rr--se. hea:_waLeEs
and isolated wetland and water arcao where the activity doe: not
result in tllo loss or substantial modification of 10 acres or
more of waters of the United States, including wetlands. .his
Certification replaces Water (duality Certification Number 2175
lssiaed on }'1CuP,.nhc- ), 19H / _
The State of North Carnl.i.n<i cent; i fie5 I-.}tai. I.}tE? ;Jc <:ii_rcl
category of activity will not violate Sections 301, 302, 3G2, 305
and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 if conducted.;
dCC;C:L'daitC:e wii_ii Lhe C:und_LiO.,iS I1CL?_inarlLeL: set foi:th.
Conditions of certi.ficatian:
I Propo sect till or substant_al modification of gr?ate:r than
Ur't -i_il:crc9 of an aC:T:? :;! s;t_c_h waters, including wctl•:. .d5,
requires a written concurrence from the _niv=;;ion of Envi-
ronmental _ Management.
2. Proposed fill or substantial modification of equal ?.o or
168vS-.than one-third of an acre of such waters, including -
wet.l;inds, CIDRS, rIOL r-uuire wriLLei' Concur:_-:once iTorit tl-Le
Division of Environmental Management.
31 proposed fill of greater than one acrti in SA, -ruu'_;
HQW, ORW, WS-I and W;;-Ii watersheds requires public,
notice and an individual 401 (;erti fication from. z2he
sion of Envirc_enmenLa M:sn?LC rri int.;
4. That established sediment and erosion control pract.ccs
ar4 utili2ed to prevdnt violations of the apprnpr.iate
t.i; : 1:) i rl i t.y wa-t.Fr quality standard (SO NTUs in streams and
river8 not designated as trout waters by D)•;M; 25 :rli:s in
all saltwater classes, and all l akPS rind rNS(-rvc)irs; 10
2Ms in trout waters) ;
5. 'That additional Sire-specl is conditions ml :iy be e.d?. ?O t_t)
p .o jeers with u,,?eater than one-third of an acre ir;paet
which are proposed under this. Certification in order rn
with all bppllcable water quc111C.V and
e=fluent 3tanaa)dc,;
6. Concurrence from rJEM r_h:i s C: .L L i fication _applie5 t7, an
d2tc
individual project shalt expire three years t om tYLi?
[: • ?: NOV 12 '92 17:02 RALEIGH-DUKHHf`1 H1KHOH' I H,J H I,JKI I Y
of the cover ictter from UEM.
Non-compliance with or vi01atior. o" the condit.i ons h?r? i , 5rL
forth by a specific fill project _:1,,11 result in revocation of
this CRr.t.ific aLion for the project.
The DirteuLor of the North Carolina Division of Environmental.
ManugemEnt may require zubmission of a formal for
individual certification foe any project. in this category of
activity, if it is determined that the projecr is 1ikp.ly Lc; have
a signifi.oant adverse eILe,:I. „pon water quality o? degrade the
waders so that existing uses oz the wer-land or downstream o,,;,r.P.CS
are precluded.
Public hcaringo may be held for speciL-ii-C- applications or
group of applica:AMIS prior to a Certification decision if deeme(i
in the public's best interest by the irector of the North CaLu-
11- na Division of EnvironmenL a l M?nage:nent.
This is the 21st day of January, 1992
pIVtS1UN / A J7R(.)TIIgfF.1TAL YLAI7kuEME:NT
,
By
GeO3:ge '1' . er r?t.t., Director
gencert.26
jrd/gc
wQc- 2671

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO November 23, 1992
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199300014 and General Permit
No. CESAW-C082-N-000-0031
Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority
Attn: Mr. Tom Quesenberry
Associate Airport Engineer
P.O. Box 80001
RDU Airport, North Carolina 27623-0001
Dear Mr. Quesenberry:
Reference is made to the application of September 29, 1992, submitted on
your behalf by CZR Incorporated, regarding your proposed construction of a new
interchange of S.R. 1002 with S.R. 3015, and airport access roads, across
unnamed tributaries to Brier Creek, Brier Creek Reservoir, and adjacent
wetlands, at Raleigh-Durham Airport, Wake County, North Carolina. In that
letter, you requested Department of the Army permit authorization for the
placement of fill material impacting a total of 2.37 acres of waters of the
United States, to facilitate the proposed construction.
On January 1, 1992, we renewed general permit, Action ID No. 198200031,
(copy enclosed), that authorizes the placement of fill material associated
with the construction, repair, or replacement of bridges across navigable
waters and waters of the United States in North Carolina, including
cofferdams, abutments, foundation seals, piers, temporary construction and
access fills, approach fills, detour fills, and box culvert installation, as
part of work conducted by or in full compliance with the standards and
specifications of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT).
Your proposed work is authorized if you can comply with all permit
conditions, including the enclosed special conditions, and implement the
proposed mitigation plan, including monitoring. Please read the enclosed
permit to prevent an unintentional violation of Federal law. As this
Department of the Army general permit does not relieve you of the
responsibility to obtain any other required approvals, you should contact
appropriate State and local agencies before beginning work.

-2-
If you have questions, contact Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, Raleigh Regulatory Field
office, telephone [phone], extension 23.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
Copy Furnished (with enclosure):
ne writ
Chief, Regulatory Branch
CZR Incorporated
Attn.: Mr. Sandy Smith
4709 College Acres Drive, Suite 2
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-1725
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
5 ?
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. Annual monitoring reports will be submitted within 30 days of site
monitoring (August-September).
2. One copy of each annual monitoring report shall be submitted to the
corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, and three copies shall be submitted
to the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management.
3. Annual monitoring reports shall include photographs, sample plot data,
groundwater monitoring data, and soils data.
4. An "as built report", including final elevations, photographs, sample
plot locations, and well locations, shall be submitted to the Wilmington
District within 30 days of the mitigation site construction.
5. Construction of the mitigation sites shall be initiated at such time
to provide for planting of seedlings within the first suitable planting period
(December 1 through March 15) following commencement of project construction.
If project construction commences in the period December 1 through March 1,
and the permittee must delay planting until the next planting period, the
permittee must submit a written request, including justification, for a permit
modification.
6. In the event that the hydrological success criteria (saturated within
12 inches of the surface, ponded, or flooded for at least 26 consecutive days
(12.5%] of the growing season) is not met during the first year, hydrologic
monitoring will continue in successive years until the success criteria has
been met and documented.
7. All distrubed areas adjacent to the mitigation site will be stabilized
to prevent sedimentation into the mitigation site.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Action ID No. 198200031
Name of Permittee: General Public
Effective Date: January 1, 1992
Expiration Date: December 31, 1997
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
GENERAL PERMIT
A general permit, issued September 1, 1982, to perform work in or affecting
navigable waters and waters of the United States, upon the recommendation of
the Chief of Engineers, pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403), and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1344), is hereby renewed and modified by authority of the Secretary of
the Army by the
District Engineer
U.S. Army Engineer District, Wilmington
Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
TO AUTHORIZE THE DISCHARGE OF DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL IN WATERS/WETLANDS, IN
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ASSOCIATED WITH THE MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND
CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES SPANNING NAVIGABLE WATERS AND WATERS OF THE UNITED
STATES, INCLUDING COFFERDAMS, ABUTMENTS, FOUNDATION SEALS, PIERS, APPROACH
FILLS, DETOUR FILLS, BOX CULVERT INSTALLATION, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION AND
ACCESS FILLS, AS PART OF WORK CONDUCTED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (NCDOT), OR OTHER STATE, FEDERAL, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY.
1. Special Conditions.
a. Written confirmation that the proposed work complies with this general
permit must be received from the Wilmington District Engineer prior to the
commencement of any work. To enable this determination to be made, the
permittee must furnish the Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers, the
following information:
(1) A map indicating the location of the work.
(2) Plans of the proposed work (on 8-1/2-inch by 11-inch paper),
showing all pertinent structures, elevations, dimensions and quantities of
materials and locations of all structures and/or fill in wetlands or waterward
of the normal/high water elevations.
r
w

-3-
f. Upon completion of any work authorized by this general permit, all
temporary fills will be completely removed and the area reestablished as a
wetland. In such instances, a restoration plan will be submitted to the
Wilmington District Engineer for approval. Information in the restoration
plan will be in accordance with special condition i. below.
g. All fills, temporary and permanent, must be stabilized to prevent
erosion of fill material into adjacent waters or wetlands.
h. In cases where new, permanent fill is to be established and an older
fill (approaches, causeways, etc.) is no longer to be maintained as a roadway,
the older fill shall be.removed and the area reestablished as a wetland. In
such instances, a restoration plan will be submitted to the Wilmington
District Engineer for approval. Information in the restoration plan will be
in accordance with special condition i. below.
i. Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United
States must be minimized or avoided to the maximum extent practicable at the
project site. In reviewing an activity, the Wilmington District Engineer will
first determine whether the activity will result in more than minimal adverse
environmental effects. For activities that are determined to have more than
minimal impacts, compensatory mitigation will likely be required. To expedite
the process, it is recommended that the applicant provide a mitigation plan
with the request for authorization. Creation and restoration proposals will
include, but are not necessarily limited to, a description of work, schedule
of work, and monitoring plan, and be in accordance with currently approved
District and/or Corps-wide mitigation guidelines. Mitigation banking may, in
some situations, be considered acceptable compensation.
j. If an easement to cross a state bottom is required by the North
Carolina Department of Administration, State Property Office, such an easement
will be obtained prior to proceeding with the work authorized by this general
permit.
k. Activities in all mountain trout waters must comply with all pH,
temperature, and turbidity criteria established for such waters by the North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and/or the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management. Work that may result in the sedimentation of trout
waters will generally be prohibited from November 1 to April 15 to avoid
impacts to trout spawning.
1. Before discharging dredged or fill material into waters of the United
States occurring within the 25 mountain counties of North Carolina that
contain trout waters (listed below), the applicant will obtain a letter of
approval from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and furnish
that letter to the Wilmington District Engineer.

-5-
2. General Conditions.
a. All activities authorized by this general permit that will involve the
discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States will be
consistent with applicable water quality standards, effluent limitations, and
standards of performance, prohibitions, pre-treatment standards, and
management practices established pursuant to the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.
1413), and pursuant to applicable State and local law. Activities that will
involve the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United
States will require that an applicant apply for and obtain a Water Quality
Certification from the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management in
accordance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act before any work is
authorized by this general permit.
b. There will be no unreasonable interference with navigation or the
right of the public to riparian access by the existence or use of the
activities authorized by this general permit.
c. A permittee, upon receipt of written notice from the Wilmington
District Engineer of failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this
general permit, shall, within 60 days, without expense to the U.S. Government,
and in such manner as the Wilmington District Engineer may direct, effect
compliance with the terms and conditions or return the worksite to a pre-work
condition.
d. The permittee must make every reasonable effort to perform the
authorized work in a manner so as to minimize any adverse impact on fish,
wildlife, and natural environmental values.
e. The permittee must perform the authorized work in a manner so as to
minimize any degradation of water quality. The activity will be conducted in
such a manner as to prevent a significant increase in turbidity outside the
area of construction or construction-related discharge. Increases such that
the turbidity in the waterbody is 50 NTU's or less are not considered
significant.
f. The permittee will permit the Wilmington District Engineer, or his
representative, to make periodic inspections at any time deemed necessary in
order to assure that the activity is being performed in strict accordance with
the Special and General Conditions of this general permit.
g. This general permit does not convey any rights, either in real estate
or material, or any exclusive privileges; and it does not authorize any injury
to property or invasion of rights or any infringement of Federal, state, or
local laws or regulations, nor does it obviate the requirement to obtain state
or local assent required by law for the activity authorized herein. These may
include, but are not necessarily limited to, a Dredge and/or Fill Permit, a
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Permit and a Water Quality Certification
pursuant to Section 401 or the Clean Water Act.
-7-
1. Permittees are advised that development activities in or near a
regulatory floodway may be subject to the National Flood Insurance Program
which prohibits any development, including fill, within a floodway that
results in any increase in base flood elevations.
m. At his discretion at any time during the processing cycle, the
Wilmington District Engineer may determine that this general permit will not
be applicable to a specific construction proposal. In such case, the
procedure for processing an individual permit in accordance with 33 CFR 325
will be available.
BY AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
/s/
Walter S. Tulloch
Colonel, Corps of Engineers
District Engineer
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO November 23, 1992
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199300014 and General Permit
No. CESAW-C082-N-000-0031.
?I
Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority
Attn: Mr. Tom Quesenberry _ 91992
Associate Airport Engineer
P.O. Box 80001 WETLANDS 'ROUP
RDU Airport, North Carolina 27623-0001 WATER UALITY SECTION
Dear Mr. Quesenberry:
Reference is made to the application of September 29, 1992, submitted on
your behalf by CZR Incorporated, regarding your proposed construction of a new
interchange of S.R. 1002 with S.R. 3015, and airport access roads, across
unnamed tributaries to Brier Creek, Brier Creek Reservoir, and adjacent
wetlands, at Raleigh-Durham Airport, Wake County, North Carolina. In that
letter, you requested Department of the Army permit authorization for the
placement of fill material impacting a total of 2.37 acres of waters of the
United States, to facilitate the proposed construction.
On January 1, 1992, we renewed general permit, Action ID No. 198200031,
(copy enclosed), that authorizes the placement of fill material associated
with the construction, repair, or replacement of bridges across navigable
waters and waters of the United States in North Carolina, including
cofferdams, abutments, foundation seals, piers, temporary construction and
access fills, approach fills, detour fills, and box culvert installation, as
part of work conducted by or in full compliance with the standards and
specifications of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT).
Your proposed work is authorized if you can comply with all permit
conditions, including the enclosed special conditions, and implement the
proposed mitigation plan, including monitoring. Please read the enclosed
permit to prevent an unintentional violation of Federal law. As this
Department of the Army general permit does not relieve you of the
responsibility to obtain any other required approvals, you should contact
appropriate State and local agencies before beginning work.
i ?
•
-2-
If you have questions, contact Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, Raleigh Regulatory Field
office, telephone [phone], extension 23.
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure
Copy Furnished (with enclosure):
CZR Incorporated
Attn.: Mr. Sandy Smith
4709 College Acres Drive, Suite 2
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-1725
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
rK. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
WETLAND RATING SYSTEM WORK
RATING SHEET
oject No. or description ga579
)cation
County Nearest
River basin
Nearest stream
aluator
Restoration potential
Restoration value
road or town 72,06( &"P" d

and classification
U u v U] J J L5 t
ency and address DE, /A - -P P-6
1
to and time evaluated I6( ?S 2 NOV ' 5 1?
j or Wetland Type F7-69 WETLANDS GROUP ._?
Approximate size of wetland system
-??_.
Approximate extent of wetlands in afea /oD acres
within miles
Three most corzmon plant species, (in order)
it Series (if known)
3rologic indicators
Direct surface hydrologic o necti n? NO
.sting Conditions
Drainage L?In?l?1?4
MeGC
Disturbance
site known to provide habitat for rare, endangered or
ned species?.Ajo__If so, list species observed or recorded.
m No.
tion/Landscape
Natural area buffer
Sensitive watershed
Dispersal corridor system
logical Values
Special ecological attributes
Wildlife habitat
Aquatic life
Water storage
Streambank stabilization
Removal of pollutants
Human Values
10 Outdoor recreation/education
11 Economic value
Score (circle one)
5
5Q 4
3
2 1
0
5 4 3 2 01 0
5 4
5 4
5
4 3
(31 02 1
2 1 0
0
.
5 4
3 2 1
2 0
0
5 4
5 4 3
3 2
2 1 0
0
5. 4 3 2 0
5 4 3 2 1 C)
Sim
Total score
Site description and notes:
S;f? .co ox?
97-r? --vx t is it ,co
13

/J
MEMORAN15UM INITIALS:
eviewer:
TO: John Dorney ?WQ Supv: r-
Planning Branch Date o 0 9.?
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
***EACH ITEM MUST BE ANSWERED (N/A-NOT APPLICABLE)***
PERMIT _YR: 92 PERMIT-NO: 0000573 COUNTY: WAKE
APPLICANT NAME: RDU - AIRPORT AUTHORITY
PROJECT-TYPE: ROAD CROSSING/BRIDGE PERMIT TYPE: GP31
COE_#: DOT_#:
RCD_FROM _CDA: APP DATE_FRM CDA: 10/02/92 B
`
REG_OFFICE: RRO RIVER_AND _SUB_BASIN_#: $ri
erNeai= AA--?
o3aS?o2
STREAK-CLASS: C NSW
STR_INDEX_NO : 27-33 -4
WL_IMPACT?:?N
WL_TYPE : T7'8y" - IIJF
WL_REQUESTED : Q. 6 Cl oe & pAw c4m4,?0a = I5ga e W WL_ACR_ESV : 6D? N
HYDRO_CNECT? : 01N WL_SCORE (#) : 16 M C& P6S?S17F?
MITIGATION?: ON MITIGATION TYPE: o't.P.cU4`& e p•76jq WI,4
MITIGATION-SIZE: ® Git/tQ.
IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED?:3/N
RECOMMENDATION (Circle One): ISSUE ISSUE/COND DENY
COMMENTS: ill 15 ouel'Mme e,e;sh`.o r1n-r?o?? ???aitiast2- dPV;ce.S h? or_J" in lbw -
U e?Yai lha rilem?. OS (S? oneK PSevv40i/ r a f?!oY?<t }?j
Cvr? „, a ?r,?. Brk.r C'?ee? .c/h2rc o 6 9 QC;lrrs 'S /?occe.5*, 6/1, rnodona? VXL,-, G/•G J
?ird.•P ; s .?.,,??ie-,n r?-rs,??sp,? ?.7`T/i;s s;?. /I?j.?iq?'? ,??i?, a.?'1/7?a?S a?c.Q?11`a.?C?. ,c%7?-s
o / aa; =?a is deo? lie tw"h" j11 11 s to
G?ark w? lei aro.rZr,ver C?an?ole a? 57"--,' /,z,"' ? S.

0 r 3? - 9 s
cc: Regional Office CzR ??c. Cli,st ?adi?cuad
Central Files m' ?r,A%F'"t ?`?' " 7>am ?`,?1 Zu?rs° sur?pristc? ?a see :f
?ro?ose ? ?r,7- if lames 6. i('' S Z Gvaoraf qD: ?l ?h?n ? ? do if. /'h?iie .io 0
oxa(, duranio?i?a?,, ffce d OARAL 't1d. /f ;s ncaS e SAaj4_Vj
n,X?ke qe-?r • 7?e. m: q?q?,?i? w; 6l c?a.?c ? ? ?o?a/.
6u;m atd A-Lda-L. ,4 ?/?szrr rkr 1 ?'?.z a n r,?
/? c??? eo u?, ?i e?7 a? .?nht.??ovv . % x ?urh.e J
o??-?' a a U?r plc yo fe s f? e ?t PaL Ge ?t she el a cr.?c?u1
14 AlgV? Va
4& B"``?` . Not S?vc¢ w4
?S?
?tao ?cc,Lrz,M, dl,?et li?O
z 3
z
L7 2? ,
. . ???? ? acs W
?4 4--
yL, (r t
/ / L' ?'? rn s ifr_ ? 4TLH -
F
Aze-
IMPORTANT
Date ( / Time
V WHILE YOU WERE OUT
M
of
AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
Signed
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources

Application fob' Department of the Army General
Regional Permit Action ID No, 198200031 and
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
Section 401 General Certification No, 2575
In Support of the Proposed
Raleigh-Durham Airport Interchange

`X
C
a
I
alt /// \? ?!

0
is 0
OCI
K
? .L
//=== - rte`' ??.
It
C
.c
i?
Aw
Applic to
Ralelgh-Durham Airport Authority
M CZR Incorporated
4709 College Acres Drivie, Suits
Wilmington, NC 28403.1728
°, .h s =1 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
UNIVERSITY PLACE, SUITE 2
V bAItVGTON, NC 28403-1725
f , TEL M 9) 392-9253
?' 4 v FAX [phone]
A1'ool;, ? 413 30September 1992
Mr. John Dornejr..' :
Water Quality Planning !
Division of Environmental xr. 19- 9?
tC`Dep?: `01 EnVir'onrner t, H t
.,.Natural Resources
,,i`
WETLANI)S
0.0., Box 29535 A
iWeigh, N 7t;26-` i5 4 ;+ N _
Re'' Section, 401 .Water, Q?ual dicat gn :in Support of-Authorization for Department of the Army
heral Regional Pei'M"it N"'e 0,8,200031. for an interchange at Raleigh-Durham International
i" Airport
[fear M Dorr;ev .,`?
The Raleigh quPfiam.: i" e`rrra?io Arrpor .:(RDU), has-.proposed anew interchange to more
?fficiehtly route traffic amonhlterstate 4 Airport, oulevard (tR 1002), Aviation Parkway (SR 3015), and
interchange will affect four wetland areas
4rpon access roads in Wake Countyhe posed
totaling 2,37 acres 7? Environmental Ass eijt,(F?), and Flrlding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for
d ui ?lov?rri?ec?985 Alrq4ev?luation of the EA and FONSI was approved in
tha,pr,lea wgs..approve
'fS lettei:rs notiffcatlvn of the RDU's desire to invoke your General Certification No. 2675 in
.Depaff+?ent of fhe?4rmy General Regional Permd Np. 19820031 to perform work in or affect
?viga?l'e, tnrate d wataf s of jhe UnitetS States:-The proposed work will be conducted by the Raleigh-
[ L,rham rpon.., Authority,; 'supported by the Federal'; Aviation Administration and North Carolina
D`artrien o 'transportation (NCDOT) Division of Aviation. After construction, the interchange will be
maintairied by thp,.NCDOT.`-Seven copies of a notebook containing the completed 401 Application Form
and supporting documentation (including a proposed -mitigation plan for unavoidable wetland impacts)
are included with this letter. A copy of the notebook has also been sent to the Wilmington District Office
and the Raleigh Field Office of the.U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Please wall rite at (9 IQ) 30if you t any tme or neW further W4wms*n. 'l:ttank
yoO for your assistance. 4
Yours I r a u? f
o ?
F ( P i t A i L
APSlddm' ?
op'.
cc: Wayne Wright, COE Wilmington District Office
Edc Alsmeyer, COE Raleigh Field Office
Team Quesenberry. Raleigh-Durham Airport -Authority
1150 SOUTH U.S. HIGHWAY 1 / SUITE 201 / JUPITER, FL. 33477-7236
[phone] / FAX [phone]
Application for{D€°"parti 6"nt oaf tfi, if Gtr tbf
Regional Permit AAn I `N.Y 1121 fare
North Carolina Divisiar ? ion r t ManaJ.6
Section 401 Gendtd meiti6it Nb. ,'
in Support t lit, ra po° ed
Raleigh-Durham Airport Inter'ai g ?tigt ° ' F r r
/ \? `? t t J r
e f 4 "t' ,
/ . "!'•,e 1 ? ? /3 i i ?) ar??'lJ?i3.a`?J..P .?? 7,J' ?? ?S _ ???? .
I?
' t k a ? P
'"{ . vl .1? f? ,? r+t '?A's'c ..fie,-??°).?"?a i•r ?? '?
tc-
o L r ?' a' r• k ` 1... `.
, ?. cant: Ralelgh-Durham Airport Authority
R incorporated
4709 College Acres Drive, Suite 2
Wilmington, NC 28403-1725 Y . ?
3 , ) J'! k k C ?/?Yy?
3. 1, 4
LIST OF CONTENTS
Section 401 Certification Application- Form
Supporting Text
Applicant
Agent
Activity/Location
Purpose
Discharge of Fill Material
Adjoining Property Owners
Prior Work on Requested Permit
Affected Wetlands
Timetable
Plans of Proposed Work
Mitigation
Figures
Photographs
Wetland4,qurvvyg
Wetland. DAW Fria
Correspon¢f6n
DEM ID:
ACTION ID:
JOINT APPLICATION FORM FOR
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION TO THE DISTRICT ENGINEER
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION CONCURRENCE
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE INDIVIDUAL SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority/Tom Quesenberry
2. OWNERS ADDRESS: P.O. Box 80001
Rnrr A;,,rt, NC 27623-0001
3. OWNERS PHONE NUMBER (HOME):
(WORK): 919-840-2100
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER: CZR Inc./Sandy Smith
4709 College Acres Drive, Suite 2
Wilmington, NC 28403-1725
919-392-9253
5. LOCATION OF PLANNED WORK (ATTACH MAP).
COUNTY: Wake
NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: RDU Ai rt NC
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
Vicinity of the intersection of Airport Boulevard (SR 1002) and Aviation
Parkway
6. NAME OF CLOSEST STREAM/RIVER: Brier Creek
7.. RIVER BASIN: Neuse
IS THIS PROJECT LOCATED IN A WATERSHED CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, SA, HQW, ORW,
WS I, OR WS II? YES [ j NO M
9. HAVE ANY SECTION 4011 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROPERTY? YES [ j NOJ
IF YES, EXPLAIN.
10. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
2.37
2/3/92
-2-
11. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
FILLED: 1.94 permanently, 0.02 temporarily
DRAINED: 0.41 temporarily
FLOODED:
EXCAVATED:
TOTAL IMPACTED: 2,37
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK (ATTACH PLANS): Refer to supporting Text
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Refer to Supporting Text
14. STATE REASONS WHY THE APPLICANT BELIEVES THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE
CARRIED OUT IN WETLANDS. ALSO, NOTE MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS. Refer to Supporting Text
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) REGARDING THE PRESENCE
OR ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED
SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE
PROPOSED PROJECT. HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES [X] NO [ 1
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE ATTACHED.
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH
MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT?
HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES [X1 NO ( ]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE ATTACHED.
17. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY DEM:
-- A. WETLAND.DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, AND LAKES ON
THE PROPERTY.
B. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED BY
PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS
RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
D. IF A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, ATTACH
+ COPY.
E. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Airport Property
F. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
Z
.?h??- 11211,
OWNER'S SI NATURE V *Y
RD14 DATE
Application for Department of the Army General
Regional Permit Action ID No. 198200031 and North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management Section 401 General Certification No. 2675
in Support of the Proposed
Raleigh-Durham Airport Interchange
Applicant:
Agent:
Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority
P.O. Box 80001
RDU Airport, North Carolina 27623-0001
Telephone:
Telefax:
919-840-2100
919-840-0175
Contact: Thomas L. Quesenberry, Associate Airport Engineer
CZR Incorporated
4709 College Acres Drive, Suite 2
Wilmington, NC 28403-1725
Telephone:
Telefax:
Contact:
Activity/Location
919-392-9253
919-392-9139
Sandy Smith, Technical Staff
Construction of a new interchange of SR 1002 with SR 3015 and airport access
roads at RDU Airport, Wake County, North Carolina. The activity is identified as State
1
Project 8.2401201; Federal Aid Project RS-9202(1), R-2030; and Federal Aviation
Administration Airport Improvement Project 3-37-0056-14.
Impacts are proposed to occur on eight sites (Figure 1) that fall under jurisdiction
of Section 404(b) (1) of the Clean Water Act (wetlands and Waters of the US), hereafter
referred to as "wetland sites". The wetland sites are located on an unnamed tributary to
Brier Creek Reservoir (Sites 1, 2, and 3), Brier Creek Reservoir (Site 4), and two unnamed
tributaries to Brier Creek (Sites 5, 6, 7A, 713, and 8). Brier Creek is part of the Neuse
River Basin. Brier Creek is currently rated Class C (suitable for fish and wildlife
propagation, secondary recreation, and other uses requiring waters of lower quality) with
a supplemental classification NSW (nutrient sensitive waters, which require limitations on
nutrient inputs).
Purpose
An Environmental Assessment (EA) for the subject was approved by the Federal
Highway Administration on 23 September 1985, and a Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) was approved on 18 November 1985. The opening of the American Airlines hub
at Raleigh-Durham International Airport (RDU) in 1987 resulted in traffic volume previously
predicted for the year 2005 (average daily traffic volume of 25,000 vehicles entering and
exiting the terminal area) being reached by the year 1990. Revised projections anticipate
traffic volume to more than double by the year 2012. The proposed interchange will more
efficiently route traffic between the airport and its three primary access routes: Aviation
Parkway, serving traffic from 1-40 East; Airport Boulevard, serving traffic from Durham and
1-40 West; and the proposed Aviation Parkway extension to the Northern Wake
Expressway, serving traffic from US 70 and northern Wake County.
The interchange design has since been revised to handle the anticipated traffic
volume. Field investigations and review of the EA and FONSI have concluded that no
2
major changes in the proposed action, anticipated impacts, or affected environment have
occurred. The reevaluation of the EA and FONSI were approved on 25 March 1992.
Discharge of Fill Material
Approximately 2,177 cubic yards of upland fill will be placed on the eight wetland
sites (Table 1). The amount of wetland permanently filled will be 1.94 acres, 1.59 acres
of wetlands and 0.35 acre of Waters of the US. An additional 0.43 acre (0.02 acre of
wetland and 0.41 acre of Waters of the US) will be temporarily filled and returned to
original contours at project completion.
Adjoining Property Owners
All property adjoining the project area is owned by the Raleigh-Durham Airport
Authority, with the exception of a small parcel adjacent to Airport Boulevard in the western
portion of the project area which is currently a North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) easement that is going to be transferred over to the Raleigh-
Durham Airport Authority.
RDU Airport is considered a separate entity from the surrounding counties and is
not given a land-use designation by them. RDU Airport considers the property adjoining
the project area as "Airport Property".
Prior Work on Requested Permit
No portion of the activity for which authorization is being sought has been
completed.
3
Table 1. Acreages of each wetland site that will be permanently lost due to this project
and the volumes of fill proposed for each. A total of 1.94 acres is proposed to be filled.
Wetland Site Wetland Area Waters of the US Area Volume of Fill (yd3)
1 0.05 -- 34
2 0.08 -- 70
3 0.08 -- 192
4 0.09 0.05 124
5 0.17 0.28 382
6 0.24 -- 93
7A 0.12 -- 205
7B -- 0.02 6
8 0.76 -- 1.071
Total 1.59 0.35 2,177
4
Affected Wetlands
All of the wetlands in the project area have undergone hydrologic change due to
past development of the airport and its attending roadways and the dam creating Brier
Creek Reservoir. Three wetland habitats totaling approximately 2.37 acres will be affected
by the proposed project: maintained areas, alluvial forest, and stream/lake.
Maintained areas that will be affected by this project total 1.20 acres. These
wetlands are located just north of the intersection of outbound Airport Boulevard and
Aviation Parkway between Aviation Parkway and the fuel storage facility (Sites 1, 2, and
3, comprising 0.21 acre; see Photo 1) and between Aviation Parkway and Brier Creek
Reservoir (Site 4, comprising 0.09 acre; see Photos 2 and 3), south of the ambulance
quarters on Aviation Parkway on both sides of the road (Sites 7A and 7B, comprising a
total of 0.14 acre; see Photos 4 and 5), and between Terminal Boulevard and Taxiway A
(Site 8, comprising 0.76 acre; see Photos 6-8). The vegetation in these areas is kept in
check by periodic mowing. There are no trees in these areas and the only shrub is black
willow Salix ni ra . Dominant herbs include common cattail ha latifolia , soft rush
Juncus effusus , wool-grass Scir us c erinus , Nepal microstegium Eulalia viminea ,
and asters Aster spp.).
Alluvial forest that will be affected by this project totals 0.41 acre. This area is
located in the floodplain of an unnamed tributary to Brier Creek that passes under
Aviation Parkway just south of its intersection with Airport Boulevard (Sites 5 and 6,
comprising 0.17 and 0.24 acre respectively; see Photos 9-11). The canopy and
subcanopy are dominated by tulip poplar (Liriodendron tuli ifera , sweetgum
(Liquidambar s raciflua , cherrybark oak uercus falcata, white oak (Q. albs), and
black cherry Prunus serotina . The shrub stratum consists primarily of red maple Acer
rubrum and tag alder Alnus serrulata . The herbaceous stratum is sparse and
dominated by Nepal microstegium, greenbrier Smilax rotundifolia), and violets iota
spp.).
5
The stream/lake areas that will be directly affected by this project total 0.76 acre;
0.28 acre of stream and 0.48 acre of Brier Creek Reservoir. The stream drains runoff
from the airport grounds and is located west of Aviation Parkway just south of its
intersection with Airport Boulevard (Site 5; see Photos 9 and 10). The lake area to be
filled (Site 4) is on Brier Creek Reservoir and consists of 0.05 acre proposed to receive
permanent fill and 0.43 acre proposed to either be temporarily drained or to receive
temporary fill. The temporary fill will be removed and the bottom restored to original
contours as soon as construction is complete.
Timetable
The proposed project has an estimated commencement date of October 1992 and
completion date of April 1995. Sites 1, 2, 3, and 8 will be filled early in the construction
process, and Sites 4, 5, 6, and 7 will be filled later. The temporary fill in Brier Creek
Reservoir will be removed as soon as possible upon construction completion. An older
fill on an unnamed tributary to Brier Creek that will no longer be maintained as a roadway
due to this project will be removed upon construction completion, and the area will be
reestablished as a wetland.
Sediment control plans will be implemented by individual contractors in accordance
with the Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual (NC Sediment
Control Commission, NC Dept. of Natural Resources and Community Development, and
NC Agricultural Extension Service; Sept. 1988).
Plans of Proposed Work
The orientation of Sites 1, 2, 3, and 4 is provided in Figure 2. Sites 1, 2, and 3
(0.21 acres) will be entirely filled for the eastbound and westbound lanes of Aviation
Parkway and associated ramps. The drainage represented by Sites 1 and 2 will be
enclosed within a 72-inch reinforced concrete pipe. The existing approximately 265 feet
6
of 72-inch pipe under aviation parkway will be replaced by a series of 72-inch pipes,
totaling approximately 660 feet. Figure 3 depicts a cross-sectional rendering of the
existing and proposed ground levels at Sites 3 and 4.
A temporary dike will be constructed in Brier Creek Reservoir for the purpose of
dewatering the construction site of the permanent retaining wall (Site 4). A cross section
of the temporary dike and the retaining wall is shown in Figure 4. The retaining wall and
associated fill will permanently cover 0.14 acre of wetland, while the temporary dike will
cover and dewater 0.43 acre of wetland.
All of Site 5 (0.45 acre) and most of Site 6 (0.24 acre) will be permanently filled for
the eastbound and westbound lanes of Aviation Parkway and an associated ramp
(Figure 5). The stream channel portion of Site 5 will be enclosed within 540 feet of
double 7-feet by 6-feet box culvert. Figure 6 depicts a cross-section down the double
box culvert and the existing and proposed ground levels. The installation of the double
box culvert will be carried out in two phases. In the first phase (Figure 7), the upper half
of the double box culvert will be installed out of the main channel flow. At the same time
the lower portion of the channel will be temporarily moved to the north of its present
location. In the second phase (Figure 8), the lower half of the double box culvert will be
installed and channel flow will be directed through the culverts.
Both Site 7A and Site 76, totaling 0.14 acre, will be permanently filled for the
eastbound and westbound lanes of Aviation Parkway (Figure 9). Figure 10 depicts the
existing and proposed ground levels in a cross-section through Site 7A.
All of Site 8 (0.76 acre) will be permanently filled for a taxihold access road and a
fuel road (Figure 11). Figure 12 indicates the existing and proposed ground levels on a
cross-section of the site.
7
Mitigation
Construction plans have been prepared that take into account the February 1990
Memorandum of Agreement between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) concerning the determination of mitigation
under the Clean Water Act Section 404 (b) (1) guidelines. Encroachment into wetland
areas has been avoided where possible, and where necessary, adverse impacts have
been minimized.
Figures 13 and 14 display respectively an overhead and cross-sectional look at a
portion of Airport Boulevard west of its intersection with Aviation Parkway. The road is
parallelled and crossed by a channelized portion of Brier Creek. Even though the
outbound and inbound lanes of Airport Boulevard will be widened, the construction has
been planned to avoid wetland impacts.
This project will involve the unavoidable permanent loss of 1.2 acres of wetland
maintained areas, 0.41 acres of alluvial forest, and 0.33 acres of stream/lake areas. The
maintained areas have been subjected to hydrologic change and the vegetation is
presently regularly mowed. These disturbances minimize the value of this wetlands type
to the environment relative to the alluvial forest and lake/stream areas. Compensation for
the unavoidable loss of a combined total of 0.74 acres of alluvial forest and stream/lake
areas is proposed through creation of 1.0 acre of alluvial forest. Sufficient opportunity
exists immediately adjacent to the 0.41 acre of alluvial forest (Sites 5 and 6) that will be
lost due to the project for on-site wetlands and flood-storage mitigation to occur (Figure
15). This area is part of a floodplain between two unnamed tributaries to a sedimentation
pond (Figure 16), and is not under jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. It
is underlain by Mantachie soils, which are listed as "hydric" by the U.S. Soil Conservation
Service. The Soil Survey of Wake County describes Mantachie soils as flooding
frequently but with short duration. The vegetation on the site is relatively young and
8
homogeneous (see Photos 2 and 3). The canopy consists of sweetgum, loblolly pine
(Pious taeda), and red maple. The shrub layer is primarily sweetgum and tag alder.
The mitigation site is bounded to the west by a freshwater marsh (see Photo 13)
and to the east by a mixed forest slope (see Photo 14). The marsh vegetation consists
primarily of false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica), soft rush, common reed (Phragmites
australis), climbing hempweed (Mikania scandens), and smartweeds (Polygonum spp.).
The mixed forest has a canopy of loblolly pine, red maple, sweetgum, and red cedar
(Juniperus virginiana). The understory is open and is dominated by flowering dogwood
(Corpus florida) and sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum). The marsh is located on
Mantachie soils while the mixed forest is located on the non-hydric series Pinkston sandy
loam.
The mitigation site will be cleared, graded 1-2 feet, and covered with a layer of
topsoil so that the lowest level of the mitigation area will be 6-12 inches above the highest
marsh elevation (Figure 17). Bare root stock seedlings of mast-producing wetland tree
species common to piedmont bottomlands such as willow oak (Quercus phellos), swamp
chestnut oak (Q. michauxii), overcup oak (Q. lyrata), cherrybark oak (Q. falcata), green
ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), and black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) will then be planted on
the site on approximately 9-ft centers.
A 20-ft wide buffer or levee will be left between the mitigation area and the primary
tributary to the sedimentation pond. This tributary is 2-3 ft deep and 5-8 ft wide. Its
primary source of water is the airport grounds. Wrack and evidence of scouring in the
mitigation site (see Photos 15 and 16) indicate that this tributary periodically overflows into
the mitigation site. This source, in addition to the adjacent freshwater marsh should
provide adequate hydrology for the mitigation site.
Two 0.05 acre plots will be established within the mitigation site. The transplanted
seedlings within those plots will be sampled annually at the end of the growing season.
9
Sampling will consist of measuring height and root collar diameter and noting mortality.
This mitigation plan will have a three year goal of a minimum of 320 trees surviving on the
site. A final mitigation report will be prepared and delivered to the Raleigh-Durham Airport
at the end of the three-year period. The report will summarize growth rates and mortality
of transplanted trees and provide photo documentation of saturation and/or inundation
at the mitigation site.
10

O
U ? L-dj ji ?,j,?l
L
ml? 0"
00 p
2_4F

c

O 713
Q
p U #O Wetland Site RDU Interchange
300 0 300 600
Wetland Site Locations
DATE: 9/23/92 APPROVED BY: /fP5 SCALE:
DRAWN BY HNTB
U I)oe COLLEGE ACRES D-E
CZR, INCORPORATED UNIVERSITYPUCE SURE2 CP 1196
E?•I.onm. - C-.1i..?. WILMINGTON. NC 2BaOIl 725
Figure 1
. '. /50 50 100 ? /j

9 (?
> O
? G
O ?
v
n
d
,330
320_

TEMPORARY FILL
WETLAND AREAS
WETLAND FILL AREAS
jU
II O
? O .
?N
-<

RDU Interchange
a. \
SL65
r'1 I 335
Wetland Sites 1-4
DATE: 9/23/92 APPROVED BY, A) P5 SCALE:
DRAWN BY HNTB
1I09 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
CZR, INCORPORATED UNIVERSITY p `ACE SUITE 2 CP 1196
En.l......:.l Cen.Wl.na. WILMINGTON. NC 28403-1725
Figure 2

N
0
00) co
Z
= N
> O! Ch
W
Y
O
W 3

N
<

? m
< v
LL
o
a
C'3 W
f"
D
L
!L
W CC
W O N
N
o ?
c oN

N to LL
O I
f
p p
m m O
V? a r
<6Z
N
,
C i } (Ydi
LU
J
O
W
/

r C
O w
> ?
_
o,

MATCH LINE A

., N a
Q
Fe
aB
\

\ / U)
O
C)

? c\j ?-
CE
a

z I
o? I i?

/ ? a
N
U
>a 3 I
a ?
a /
? C
O

I

I o

1 w Z

' 7
0
a

N
J
m
P
CO m

w '
I O
I ? LL

o

w
>
w
~ I L
W J
Q
I
Q I
Z
Q I
J I
h 1
W I
/
1
I /

I O O
Q N
I
N r?rJl ' O 1
M ? M
I
N O
O 2
an
00

`

O O

1 a o ?
? N N
¢ Q
d Nll H? 1VW S >

i I I I I I? I I I i o b
^N
N O N O N O N p

N N P P M M N N 'n O
M M M M M M M M M M

O p
M N
M
I
N p
P P M
M M M M

Fj n O
M M M M

N
M

8

M
OI ?I DM IOI DO z
1'n I'n I'n r() r
m
J Z '
a
0 a a 2)
v LL
0 v ¢
o
OD
a>
_ Q O
_w;r
0)
ii. c +- s
006 ki
OJ c m <s?
U) r(-) Z W L Y wz
C) m ?
al w
N W ltl _ -
?II II II ° a
??II a a8
11 0.
a. z
E
?I N c0) 2
Q? M zu
O 1 - rn
N
~ U
a
0
w
O G
Y
W -
?N ?
III,
J N f•-
O > 0
Z 0 F-- 0U
Z _u n O Q Q
Q - - „ W
W W
Z th
000
1
cr-
LC\j
C\j M I O I 0
0 I Ore l
D=rt:C'TRZES

\\ `9 9 a `?2J •?
S-I(2' .?.
330
335
340 -??

l -
\ 1
I
( 1 i
55• I 345 U\
s
I \
325 ?? ...o ••\
oi.
RDU Interchange
CZ R, COLLEGE ACa. DRIVE
CZR, INCORPORATED UNWERSI VPgCE.SUITEZ
En.l.onmen..l Cnn........ WILMINGTON. NC ZB<03,1725
CWN BYHNTB
CP 1196
Figure 5
50 50 100
1 Ii 1 /
?\
N L^i •-
rl u r Lo 1 i
J
WETLAND AREAS Wetland Sites 5 and 6
WETLAND FILL AREAS DATE: 9/23/92 APPROVED BY: !S SCALE:
m
F-
z
00 o g Z <o
o
Sri
c >
00
n ; a
LLB
U U LL
¢
? N O
\ I ?
W ?
I LL-

I
01
E
NSri
C O yo
ctL w UUV
I .C Paz
I L oo ?z
? U
C co
w?

I O W
I:) f3 0
MATCH LINE B a) ? Q 2
a F'
In a
Q 2

a
i U 0
I
I i z
.
rn 4
?
N
I < U
o a
N O
OZ
00
I
m
I
a0 a
5
I <
\ I
v Z
I ? I

I
m w I G7
I Z I
I- LQ
o - -I w

x
}
w
> I

Q
' U
I J .

z m
p
c
x
m
\
I
?JVJ < w ? I
C1 x

m - 1

i

0
?
I
? ° i
I
r o o 0
's v e a

/ 1
C N I
z m
03
? a

< i

m I o 0
( o
O 0
0 O I
I O c
i
I
L4
CC cc
O
w
I I I I
I
I I
I 8 3NIl HO1VW = >
o 0
a s

Yf

/mi
K

-
a it 11
.-
l h
I M h r
j
50 I 0 50 100 I
? 3c0 ;?? ? ? - o \ ? -l
Ln C)
E C) ru r-)
P S \ "\?S2Q `_ ?J
t:cj
_ I 330 the
` _.J DSO ? f ` • ' ? ??.\ ????.. ? i 3. ',/
1 O ',
30 m
335 ? •'?',;I I ? '
3S0
NIA I \ `3SS.`
L7 k'Rca.
TEMP. CHANNEL CHANGE
SEE DETAIL 'B'
ATm=,_ ?--

355 DETA I L r B'
i -I 355 • ., I 345
? '35?
? 7 h
;AS' 340.
330
2 a
i 'Sr109' rI?
E SE :'T cE'S,i
RAMP,A `?$TSTA. 35+74.42 =
RAMP.BC STA.431+21.12-J RT
J f 1r ,i I I
i
\_4
_.-:325
0 l44 - -
RDU Interchange
Phase One of Culvert Installation at Sites 5 and 6
DATE: 9/23/92 APPROVED BY, SCALE:
DRAWN BY HNTB
U .209 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
CZR, INCORPORATED UNIVERSITY PUCE SUiTE2 CP 1196
En.i._E____ <.....i?...?. mLMiNGTON. NC 28.03 725
R ure 7
50 _ Q 50 loo .I
N 1
iE'\Tn cs .'? \ 2 r' N T°? vI
1 K l -
.,,J I - DSO I4 ? \? I"h/'•
\3 `1\ ?'C: 335 ? .^?•
01
DEr„
-335
--340 l , I ,1? \35s
F ?
1345 NI ''/ •) ' ?1 N1 L7'. 6'RC9, ``-? -
/ , f r
.7 -7
1
355
/ i
j /
?. - 555• .. 345 1 1 '•
35 / 3401. k I
. ?. ,, 35, ter, r Qq
3 1 325 I ?. \? ?.
330 320 S-194 ,0 1 315 - o. N - - ` \
r 5 109: 1 •. _
E SET ??S 1 .n1j ?\ X
100
.RAMP A 1ST STA. 35+74. 2 =
AMP.BC STA.,31+21.12=1 RT j I
RDU Interchange
I
Phase Two of Culvert Installation at Sites 5 and 6
DATE: 9/23/92 APPROVED BY: ?J SCALE:
DRAWN BY HNTB
?7 U 4709 COLLEGE ACRES ORIvE
CZR, INCORPORATED UNIVERSITY PLACE SUITE 2 CP 1196
En+l.on-E-1--.- Ce..uIE WILMINGTON, NC 28403-1725
Figure 8
50 0 50 I C
MR NO
PT STA. 405+50.22
AA- ,

385
- ; 5 707... ; :.....
W.B. AVIATION PKWY. STA.
E.B. AVIATION PKWY. STA.

5

WETLAND FILL AREAS
r ?
%. CRAMP
B. A'
- 7S3?
761,
Cl
RDU Interchange
Wetland Sites 7A and 76
DATE: 9/23/92 APPROVED BY: Iff5 SCALE:
DRAWN BY HNTB
U 4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
CZR, INCORPORATED UNIVERSITY PLACE. SUITE 2 CP 1196
Enironm.?l•I Ca?.?li.n?. WILMINGTON, NC 28403-1725
Figure 9

111

1 _ # r -_AVi?tTfQH K3t1LY - - io= s== o===io= -10
-

.:_
..

1. .

is
1
7
_M a
_ _1
( -- -
'
I '
1 _ .__?_. _._._.
F ._. ___. .. _
.. .. _......._..{ - --_..

J-7 .:-= ==_ -
RDU Interchange
Cross-section C-C' from Figure 9
i DATE: 9/23/92 i APPROVED BY; AT'' iSCALE:
DRAWN BY HNTB
CZ R, COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
CZR, INCORPORATED UNIVERSITYPLACE. SUITE 2 CP 1196
En... P 1 Cen.u -'. VALM,N,TO.. NC 28400.1725
Fgtre 10
0
cya49 a ?
m o
m
a p?19 ?dN`Wy? -
m
D
0
D
n m
N
N
'Z W
? A .U pp ?
< CD
0 at
i 00
m co .?+ U
n?Q < Q. CD O
$?o 0
n
?Sm =
N
((DD
U
O
o m
A
T n > a
C z m o
m
s rn =
Z
co
D
EXISTING GROUND LINE
TAXIHOLD ACCESS
ROAD
HORIZONTAL
VERTICAL
10 o 10 zo
?o o ?o ? zo
WETLAND
Site 8
0
0 m
m w
M M
16+50
SOUTH FUEL
ROAD
D'
390
380
. /' 50_ _ Q 50 100 /
JE ?.
' 290 ? -><_.---x-?--
100 295
---3
ti- J
ouT / ND' A ORT LVD.
-...-may.
310
3
105 ? - --------- ?_. __ _ - - - - -----
j - ? ?'- ? ---• 9-307 -- --
9 _I15
- - - r T SLVb.
305
315 10
29L 30a, \ a.
3z
WETLAND AREAS RDU Interchange
Brier Creek Channel Along Airport Boulevard
DATE: 9/23/92 APPROVED BY: S SCALE:
DRAWN BY HNTB
4709 COLLEGE ACRES DRIVE
CZR, INCORPORATED UNIVERSITYPLACE. SUITE 2 CP 1196
En I......I., Cen.uh.nu WILMINGTON, NC 28400 172S
Fi ure 13
--10-- 5- 0 - - -- 10- -- c0---

o O \
¢1
w 7 ?
CL
cf)
(D
a
D
N m O
_ N
,z w t
3o N O I
?O
?y
°< C I
Aga o O
03
N CD CD
O 7 m ? 1
nsn rr 1
$co n
vm
O
a
>> O
z m D W
z
1
W
t
0???17[
0
D
D
0

O
9

°
--1 r
? z
o s d
m
Z y -
Z .?
? O
Z
06
?S
D J
N m ??
co
w
'z
30 N
.77
O (p
D9 315
d
? = V 0 ? C 320
g t = CD 1 520 ?_
m C0 S 1 005
m C w )
CD D
e?
(DD 500
H p
O Oy0
C /
n D D
C ? z m
CD
? W
? Z llll
w
0 0
m ? .
o t
? r
Z Z
CG) ? - U
G ? °o b
-I w
r {,? \ w w
Z o
Z w o o•
N
CP
l+
N
X06 • ,3\ o
cr
?o
d
0
D
m
? m
'z
n p ?
iO N O w
:o O o.
a n ((D 3t5
@o ?
C 320
0 (fl
w
c?i ? a ? O ,_-• 5Z4
n ?
o ? ? ? 544
-rD
m O
NN< O O?S.
T a n
C ? z m
CD
V z
00
g?
r A.

+.. i '?„ -- ` r l ? '? "' ? ? •t .7 ?ice y r
?F 119- 5 kt ? ?? '-t. ? a
OS f .
i:'4 Is-
--Vq 4& A-, i-; t ."..mmmwr.-¦_? rrimmmmmr

""?'.?+?.
r

r
..?.. ors
"" ,?,?r, ,r
k. r

?r
?
w 'p`r f ?. t ?.C '1i•?- ? 1I1;. _ A k..-... .:
K- _

2411,
W. 2

?

?
1•??.
??? ? '
??? °°
?
? i?
?
?
- _
.
r
. ?.. -...r, ? ?+1+1?
?. ,- s..s7t
=:aYl?
?t;.:t -
.:r
a
r gj r? b q`? !?
r a
gr J{, f
p•?• ?1;? y -.? ?,y\r?°?'?s ?*S 'tea
r?,'??- 1TI r \k rr,1
C _
? i?
,. "

s f ?i°f :a: X .i
M!�� l�
M � I __aY f '1'
� F '7

--
'iF r
{ ya k [y ! ? +a
-,"k._ - lw s

fK.? ?wV` - ? • 1

I '
L. ?
} ' ??
__ ?

4

6i
0
?? 9
I im

h

':
.,x : 7

i'
???'? ? ? tI? yrrv
I 1 �Av
4 !r.
t 4y.. •. < �' rat / 'Il X �/ s "� � �r
Y
fit"
y t i
3'i
• � �� � �. . � 1: F t5il�l; � � a � ..r
_ i� �� � ,���r*a��� ',=~tom - `� •F_
..r 1 x. ?icy
X►

r

M,
�
'
�{
\ :"
�/� \
\
, �.
\�7,�®=

?? ? ,.,+ , ? r ?, ,:. ? ? ? %,'G 3' 111!' 8??? ? °? R?
'' #?
? '
'
?
' t
?,
I ? ., ?, a
?,
1p?? ?} ?' i ?1? ? r `? y'. Mfr iti?; r l.?i.• Xy ? '? ?( ???
•
y' ? W, ?9 r:
7 ?

- --R

404
i
)A
1
l f.S. ARW CORPS OF
CERTIFICATE
Wetland Site 4
PY/

Site 3
JURISDIET?
BOUNDAR
0.08 ACRES
FRS

TNs certifies Illat INs copy of INs plot ocurolety depicts the
boundary of Ile Jurisdiction of Section 404 of Ile Clean Water Act
In lM areas Impacted by the present proposed activity, as
deleimined fry Ile undersigned on His date.Otler areas of
Jurladlctlon may be present on the site but have not been
dellosoied. Unless Itere Is a chonpe In Ile law or our published
roqulalians,INS determination of Section 404 Jurisdiction may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed ttree years from this dole.
TNs determination was node uillzlrg the 1967 Corps of En9irxrers
welloods Delineation. Mono/.
fnomel C
(tine)
/date//?
? 171 ((
> \
??SO

#2"G'lll I i?"
Wetland Site 2
_CT/ N 404
S CT ION
U ARY
7- RES
,
Wetland Site 1
0
0
0
l ?
C_ o
TERM NAL BLVD. <'
Wetland Sites 1, 2, 3, and 4
RALEIGH-DURHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
SECTION 404 JURISDICTION BOUNDARIES
FOR
AIRPORT ACCESS ROADWAY INTERCHANGE AND TERMINAL LOOP ROADWAY
LEGEND
006, 102, COE DATA FORM PAIR
1001, 1027
RDU PROJECT 070102
JANUARY l0,1992
0 /00 200 400 600
- ARY,
?A, FE Z.

X443
• ?= ? Xi
;_ \so
u

- 10N-.A0UXtDA_RM`-'
ACF?S
S CTIQ
`.? -,T
_ -A S-1-
Wetland Sit
e 6-
1 \604 /

------- -------- -
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
CERTIFICATE
I his certlflas /hat Iris ccpy of lNs plot acurotely depicts the
txxrndary of me Jurisdiction of Section 904 of the Clean Woter Act
in lib areas Impacted by the present proposed activity, as
determined by tre undersigned on this dole. Ombr areas of
jurisdiction may be present on lie site but rove not been
delineated. Unless here is a ctange In 1/e low or our publisied
regulallons.lNs delerminallon of Section 404 Jurlsdlctlon may be
reeled upon for a period not to exceed Wee years from tNs dole.
This determination was made ullllzing Ite 1967 Corps of Engineers
Wellmxrs De/lneallon Manual.
LG /;V L ? v `r lr?ll
rnomel ?? C, .
rill/bl L?7
42
\ 1
/ : f?:24:60

D
Wetland Sfte 5

,, :JI veL
RI/ 10N-; I\DARY;'
0.2,1-AeR
Wetland Sites 5 and 6
RALEIGH-DURHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
SECTION 404 JURISDICTION BOUNDARIES
FOR
AIRPORT ACCESS ROADWAY INTERCHANGE AND TERMINAL LOOP ROADWAY
RDU PROJECT 070102
JANUARY l0, 1992
408,
504 COE DATA FORM PAIR
0 /00 200 400 600
rdorel
r?
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
CERTIFICATE
TNs certifies that this copy of Ws plot ocurotey depicts the
boundory of Me Jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
In the areas Impacted by the present proposed activity. as
/ determined by the undersigned on Pis dote. Other areas of
jurisdiction may be present on the site but have not been
dellneoted. Unless (here Is o change in the low or our published
regulollons.lNs determination of Section 404 Jurisdiction may be
relled upon for a period not to exceed tree years from this dote.
TNs determination was mode utilizing the 1987 Corps of Englneers
Wetlands Delineation Manual.
(nom)
Illllel ?""?"S?GCt/?C%PiGj(r/51
(dole! -?/ /??
Wetland Site 7A
i
O
A COUNTY
S FACILITY
3 .. a7
U D i
\? 0. 2
Wetland Site 7B
0
C
ION 404
-ION BOUNDARY
ACRES
LEGEND
206 COE DATA FORM PAIR
Wetland Sites 7A and 7B
RALEIGH-DURHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
SECTION 404 JURISDICTION BOUNDARIES
FOR
AIRPORT ACCESS ROADWAY INTERCHANGE AND TERMINAL LOOP ROADWAY
RDU PROJECT 070102
JANUARY /0, 1992
0 /00 200 400 6GYJ
?I111??375
1 ° DU AIRF
4- AUTHOR
AINTENI
+
X /
D k r
X
/ e l
/ 57P
X- -X -X
° F1-
ROPOSE WET LAN S
0.7 CRES
06 ' 04-- Wetland Site 8
-
."?
-/"--
TAX

U.B. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
CERTIFICATE

0 , This certifies that this copy of this plat
accurately deplete the boundary of the
jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act under the present law and
regulations as determined by the undersigned
on this date. Unless there is a change In
the law or our published regulations, this
determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may
be relied upon for a period not to exceed
° three years from this date.
(name) y
(title)
(date)
4 0°/ -,4? 8--
Wetland Site 8
RALEIGH-DURHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
PROPOSED WETLANDS
FOR
TERMINAL AREA ROADWAY PHASE II
RDU PROJECT 070109
AUGUST 16,1991
11?? -- i-m?m I
0 200 400 600
M114nd Jrftr I
pr' unt6 ?Aw Me] s ?w) i ? f1G? !,02 7
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator s): Date: /1 ,Dam 91
Project/Site: D2 State: L Cou ty:
Applicant/Owner: t41M14 - Plant Community #/Name: ?aacevuJ ail w14
Note: If a more detailed she description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do norma(,environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes No (If no, explain on back) ?
Has the vegetation,?s oils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No ? (If yes, explain on back)
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plat pecies Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum

yPLA a ilk odl
1 T
,?
11. -
2. coq 049W Fhu? - -? 12.
3. (K Vo-- -- - -- -- 13.
4. --- --- ----- 14.
5. -- ----- - - - 15.
6. --- - ----- 16.
7 --- --- - -- 17. -
8. 18.
9. --- -- ---- 19.
10. - - ---- 20.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/ FAC S/ 7.
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: --
L ? ??
Series/phase: Pta„+te1 SOILS S Subgroup:2 Fl-y" ki- )k'r)uk!!VA
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes ?/ No _ Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? vas ?L No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: R A S* ?' _ Mottle Colors: Y1P S /
Other hydric soil indicators: - ??
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes ? No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water in ph/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Zit
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes / No
Rationale lor'jurisdictional decision:
i This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy."
B-2
weTima JI R
?? ?+e=? s ?xu<<
DATA FORM
027
, ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1
Field Investigator s): . Date: P Per- -1/
Project/Sfte: )W :TA 01!h Lll? 12-State: NL County
Applicant/Owner: ?UAA Plant Community #/Name: y10???°D`?' ?1c'
Note: N a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal?environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
T
Yes
' No (N no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation oils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No (If yes, explain on back)
---------------------
------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. Tw„cu a Fh/-??1- 11.
2. 44 ?i U n Ptx N>'? 12.
3. MEW °k ----._ - 13.
4. -- - --- 14.
15.
6. 16.
7. --- 17.
8. -- 18.
9. -- --- - 19.
10. 20.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACK and/or FAC 4YI `0
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes _ No
Rationale: -- Seriestphase. Nn! ' ?te StJ SOILS
I '+L Ffu n?? 4X2)yw7?S
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined _ 0
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No *Histic epipedon present? Yes No
is the soil: Mottled? Yes?No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: /,a R -Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No V/
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes ? No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water in ph/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes _- No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: -
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy."
B-2
Welland Jlft oC
}?'aw W f Wt
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(sl J Sv*'4 Date., I/ ??- 9)
Project/She: AN `le State: 11L Cou ty
Applicant/+Owner: APMAA L*' Plant Community #/Name: ? IAt AID" ?
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a fteld notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ? No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetatiosoils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No ? (If yes, explain on back)
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
1. N'oh#' Afi ttA
2, r _ AuS
3. ?u5
4 5A)" A S
. lf
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
loc, ( "-4-
Indicator
Status Stratum

Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, andJ/?T FAC
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ? No _
Rationale: -
SOILS h _ ??)? ?1J
Series/phase:? tt°i Sbt 5 - Subgroup:2 L F1 yvt L u I
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes ? No _ Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No Histic epipedon present? Yes, No
Is the soil: Mottled? Ye No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: 119 YR U Mottle Colors: YR L !o r? 7o?p
Other hydric soil indicators: VA I W_j
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
/ HYDROLOGY Zn
Is the ground surface inundatedy Yes ? No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes ? No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: b u
List other liski evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrolo§y criterion met? Yes _. ? .- No
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL. DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
I This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy."
;7317"
B-2
wt,TIAKd 3t z
pta"'? .6?w 41 J?jpe_ At_;jj? % p>D I "T
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODi
Field Investigator s): SM& Date: « Del, W
Project/Sfte: t? OD L4 State: NL Cou ty
Applicant/Owner: Plant Community #/Name: A",?k"Du, 41A-0?
Note: 9 a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ? No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation 4oils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No t?/ (If yes, explain on back)
Dominant Plant Species
1, 3 hW A?.
2. Y1 t>nlcnS
3. S4NA k
4. iN l r lu?"?
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC < S!?o
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No W
Rationale:
' ' l' 1
JJAa?IC" toils SOILS 2 )"e_ F)L4Ye RC, lT???D?9uepTS
Series/phase: -Subgroup. R
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes ?? No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No -;71- Gleyed? Yes No ?-
Matrix Color: /PMottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
HYDRO OGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes __/ No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: r/tu
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes
Rationale: _
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMI A71ON AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes __ No
Rationale for Jurisdictional decision:
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy."
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Status Status Stratum
hF ?_
DISL --
Stratum

Dominant Plant Species
it.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
No
1
B-2
WA'ay%j S)6 3
P??t? ?us? Wdw Aad s BAgs oob-plI) flay ably
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Y r 9 G;?cr 119 . .
Field Investigator s): ,A } Date:
-Av Project/Site: XPLIA o
A 1-7- State: Wt- County:
??
Applicant/Owner: - Plant Community #/Name: ryA-m4 ch
Note: N a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a fie ld n tebook.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Pwd so l)S
? N
Y
If
l
- - - - --
f
SunoWrj) Sai 1J
y?
es
o (
no, exp
ain on back)
d? 6x?d tzeal
Has the ve
etation s
ils
d/
b
h
d
l
i
ifi
di
t
b
tl `J
rhir??r.+z? m
g
o
, an
or
een s
y
ro
ogy
gn
can
s
ur
e
y
?
Y
N
e
d
W
N
l
i
b
k
es
o
(
yes, exp
em
z*eA o
a
n on
ac
)
)1 F))
-
--------------------------------------
VEGETATION ------------
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1 TKhtsts e !as Fier `a? 11.
_N" kfif?IiA 6611 12.
2.
3. WY991 QO i W dL ? 13.
4. 14.
5. 15.
6. 16.
7. 17.
8. 18.
9. 19.
10. 20.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAG 75,)70
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ? No
Rationale:
SOILS 1
Series/phase.. ?11 on AnWm Satvt? It-girl Subgroup:2 yq'4 ??&- LI11;6 $? fD A h
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No-Histic epipedon present? YesNo
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes -? No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color. C YJR &2- h4offla Poloorrs: a 1D YR N L S Ayws di m in S61 Other hydric soil Indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface Inundated? Yes ? No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water In pit/soil probe hole: Su?4 el
List other field evidence of surface Inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland
Rationale:
criterion met? Yes ? No
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes ? No
Rationale for'jurisdictional decision:
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy."
B-2
weAWAJ site 3
fincj jr,? ?u>,? S?? i ' ??jr? ?f ?ao?s D1b0 -Q1 j / f jGc? Dblo tv?,
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator s): SrMi una? AY7rA 6t Date: PeW"V'- jell /
Project/Site: W? 8 State: W -- Co 14Applicant/Owner. RWAA Plant Community #Mame: r ? a» `''"
Note: If a more detailed Site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ? No (H no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No ? If yes, explain on back J „ All "
-( -- P-----, ----
Dominant Plant Species

Indicator
Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species
upl, 11.
FAf,- 12.
FAA, 13.
q PL 14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 4 Si 70
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
1 VEGETATION
, s >: vir n
2. s 'A ??i cKS
3. r? Lq ? a turd
4. 'u t?? nkkv???
?s sn.
5-
.
7.
8.
9.
10.
SOILS
Series/phase: U M i'1446h sanjy ICAM Subgroup:2 &A,-At. J?YS?roJ1?rp?-S
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No I-'-Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No -V Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: 1O YR- Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Yes No-7' X12 N
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMIfATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No /
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy."
Indicator
Status Stratum
B-2
U4aflmd Site
f )ah )v2 ?
t,1,1t' Crftk (f ???s I ft, - IDS)
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investiga or s): /4j )-A f- AYE` y Date:
Projewsite: oZ State: AL Coupty. ?',!A
Applicant/Owner. ANA Plant Community #/Name: shmb-sckt+ cuj Awe-
Note: If a more detailed site description Is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normalenvironmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ? No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation soils, and/or hydrology been significant disturbed? ,
Yes No ?? (If yes, explain on back)
--------------------- ex?Y.A? FW a yt? sty0jr
------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. 541'x nlAyA D16L 5?1 11.
2.
3. JNnuaS a suS Fi4cwt 12.
13.
4. Minx sxs •
-? t 14.
5. 15.
6. 16.
7. 17.
8. 18.
9. 19.
10. 20.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC > 57 /o
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ? No
Rationale:

SOILS
Series/phase: ectaYAW ym si4 )"im Subgroup:2 g) .L U?1f?uY???S
Is the soil on the hydric soils list Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No ?-Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Ye -7' No Gleyed? Yes No ?-
Matrix Color: IG YR S L Mottle Colors: LP YR
Other hydric soil Indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY ' / rl
Is the ground surface inundated?] Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes ? No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: SuY?te,
List ppthee?? figqld evi4e?ence of surface inund lion or soil saturation.
QxrdttG_d _1hizosvhew?, suy'AcQ& ?
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes ? No
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes - No
Rationale for'jurisdictional decision:
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy."
B-2
Ide'lland JIte `t
6»er CW-t k flox-'Wbll{ Cfl=s )0?- )08) fkv_? )b 2r
DATA FORM
?_'?'? ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigators : AP "'?i t AY TA k Date: 91 _
Project/Ske: State: NL Co_yynty• ?Applicant/Owner. ROWA Plant Community #/Name: h44cW q
q3 ahe.
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ? No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation,,"oils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No ? (If yes, explain on back) h)?. k 4 yW J !?A
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status
1. +02NA'?1 OkOreLts FAC-
2 Lew_ (W UPL.
3. /ta tt:•+r
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
VEGETATION
Indicator
Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
11.
?. 12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Percent of dominant spades that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC < Std.,
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
)W mr, S14 lb 4m SOILS Subgroup:2 Tyaw 14jif lyVe'n4S
Series/phase: °?°`
Is the soil on the hydro soil list? Yes No Undetermined- /
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No v Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes • - No ?- Gieyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: 7? Y? Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No ? Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No -71-- Depth to free-standing water In pk/soil probe hole: ? )Zrr
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy."
B-2
•I- `_ I r WaAnd 511& S
??! I I M ?J 6 Jui in W^v A4-44;n 61YJ I 4ve vt J-, -Fj,?J q 4?)a O wef
DATA FORM
ROUpNE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1
Field investigator(s): o ? Date: 0 Dec q1_
Project/Ske: State: County:
Applicant/Owner: RI)La Plant Community #/Name: - (2 "Vi eSf
Note: H a more detailed eke description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
-------------------------------------
Do normal, environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ? No (H no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No _ ?" (if yes, explain on back)
-----------------------------------------

Indicator VEGETATION
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
j. L'
Li
'
it.
a aG
2.
11A4
4. VACA 14.
6. t?lor u FAG_ 1 s.
7. ViM;rA b 17.
8. a ---- -- 1 t3.
- - - - ----- 19. -
10. -- - ---- 20.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 7 5'f ?o
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes v-' No
Rationale:

SOILS
Series/phase: ?01?? ???! Subgroup:2 ium?- ??u`r?rr ri? 11? t1
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes ? No Gleyed? Yes No ? -A 0 V P, WE- Matrix Color: - Mottle Colors:_ 7_5
Other hydric soil in icators:
Is the hydro soil criterion met? Yes ?? No
Rationale: -
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface Inundated? Yes No V/ Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No =
Depth to free-standing water in ph/soil probe hole:. _
List ojheyfield evidepce of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the Wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes _I_/ No
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes ? No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy."
B-2
WeTjA14 v 51 fe 5

DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Invsstig tor (a : D A Date: - (o Dec ql
Project/She: State: County: , Wa
Applicant/Owner: Plant Community #/Name: __tlLu?
Note: If a more detalled she description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
--------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? -
Yes _ /L No (11 no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No _L,," (H yes, explain on back)
-----------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status_ Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1.
) )V-U- cGL?o? 11.
14A iAlCa
2.
LIIV?p -F 12.
3. {?nuS ft t'5
4. l?G fstt {oC 14.
5. wo vi ; 15.
- -- --- -
6. ra k? Gt. 1 s. --
7. v?iGPXA Gk 17.
- --- -
10. 20.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC _L- 500
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No ?
Rationale: -
?) I SOILS ?_- , I
Series/phase: ?aN1 IG will _? Subgroup:2 kG FIHymk- J?1_ k4 ?s
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined 1
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No _ Fiistic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mott ? Yes No t? Gleyed? Yes No 1T-
Matrix Color: O V(2 Mottle Colors:
Other hydro soil indicators:
Is the hydrlc soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: ---
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface Inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No 7
Depth to free-standing water In ph/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation. - -
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: --
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No V/
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy.-
B-2
L_A 1 (( I t*jAn d S1 F8 b
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI p? 1
Field Investigator s): 4f sr'Date: ??//.?, joa_.L ?
/V
Project/Sfte: e- State: G County: A
Applicant/?Owner: - AAAA - Plant Community #/Name. a uVtq
Note: N a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ,/ No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetatio soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No (If yes, explain on back)
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Indicator
Status Stratum
FAL*

FA ?T
C
SAG
1. Li0114iJAM4AY 66ACifh A
2. Nr"l Z_4'ilinf?T
3, Lirib &% or1 ?P
4.
5. key M rym
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

Dominant Plant Species
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, an"r FAC Z577-
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ? _ No
Rationale:
Indicator
Status Stratum
SOILS )
? ?jLm Al 1?`Q?1S
Series/phase: I'IAr1tt??G Sei?S Subgroup:2AaO
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined v -- ,-- P
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No ?Histic epipedon present? Yes?_ No
is the soil: Mottled? Yep ?G No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: A 1Z 012- Mottle Colors: A? Y??
Other hydric soil indicators: -- Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes --- / No ? Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: _
List othet field evidence of surface inundatiom qr soil
Is the wetland
Rationale:
met? Yes ? No
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes _?_ No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: -
i This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 ClassNIcation according to "Soil Taxonomy."
»S
B-2
?,frllmJ Site Le
5r: ;:i , f*%" [Wt IA br w A Y;44, Ovd r br- of s 1 e? % 1`611
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): frilA Date: )b ve' - 9I
Project/Sfte: AAA State: JYL County: A e
Applicant/Owner: Plant Community #/Name: N?1XC 3
Note: N a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ?? No (N no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation/ soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No V (N yes, explain on back) '
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
1. Anu _
2. Li u?' y`t ?cu
3.
4.
5. Ur1?n+?wrii
6.
7. lav?icen'Arn??
g isos tcjt'bS' ca?rt?a
9.
10.
> S7b7v
Indicator
Status Stratum
FAI_ _
F L- ca
i
_

FAG _ I
FAL, _
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes V No
Rationale:
SOILS
Seriestphase: &WM Sun )DAM Subgroup:2 w4ic. D j5,6 Jar t
Is the soil on the hydric soils lis ? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No _Iv;?'_Histic epipedon present? Yes No
is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes No V7
Matrix Color: /b YA !7A?__ _ Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No ? Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No ?? Z 0
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes __ No ?
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classif ication according to "Soil Taxonomy."
Indicator
Status Stratum
Dominant Plant Species
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
No
1
B-2
Weiland StFe to
Ate, A1'1a1;M 19yd fWn c ,ula?,?e gwcr?us lad 2",4p
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investig tor(s);. IT? + hY Date: 9 - 41
ProjecUShe: N 2,00 t State: _z_e__- Counhh(( Applicant/Owner: AP14 Plant Community #/Name: 1w?°uS aS ?
Note: If a more detailed the description Is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do norm?Venvironmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ??// No (If no, explain on back)
Has theyegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significant / disturbed?
Yes ? No (If yes, explain on back) t and W @1 ort oij 4vd p )a in
--------------------------------------
VEGETATION
rV 02
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Indicator
Dominant Plant S ecies_ Status Stratum
1. Fula to YiwtrnM FAL b
2. 3uruus e l uS _ FAL.W.1- I
Dominant Plant Species
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Percent of dominant spades that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC St yo
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
Indicator
Status Stratum
SOILS _ 1
Series/phase: j4A SAN )64M Subgroup:2 lI12;L. ??TS
Is the soil on the hydric soils list Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No -7"--Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Y8 = No Gleyed? Yes No -
Matrix Color: Ib YR 711 Mottle Colors. le YA i ?1-ff
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No /-
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: ? j t,
List pt 7 field evidence of su ace Inundation or soil saturation
oxifh? rhiuosahtr?S. sit MWA, >'?+"ck? ri
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface Inundated? Yes No ? Surface water depth:
Is the wetland
Rationale: _
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland?
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
Yes/ No
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy."
criterion met? 4 es ? - No
B-2
WelikKd 511f, 7A
vss 1??ip w+ 19v? ?Vm 4w?MkM(16 quov,r?fj fIAZ 261P wp
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator s): 4"V V
+ 1 Date: ? - 91 -
ProjecUSite: A 2a? -state:-A(/-
Applicant/Owner: County: 41 W n Plant Community #/Name: 16,04 i- Note: N a more detailed the description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ? No (11 no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation oils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No (H yes, explain on back)
Dominant Plant S ecies
1. QUeYW AA
2, nu vir '?tia??o?
3. Otvwmi S A
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
hF IA _
oft-
FAIA
pLy-mm; FAa(_
? YtY rntCxJ
vtr
E44 )FON
Y1n o, Sr.

11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
FAQ- ?-
A&+
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACK and/or FAC
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:

SOILS ? r
Series/phase: ^ °?A K '°aM Subgroup:2 T? 411 u?71
Is the soil on the h dric soils list Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No - v7-Histic epipedon present? YesNo
Is the soil: Mottled? Y s -' No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: It YA 413 -- Mottle Colors: X ?
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No ?
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No ? Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: ? (L
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERM?IJATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No 7
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy."
No
B-2
yVW1KV10 )1rcj
luxi= P4? b , -
DATA FORM
,I'ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investiga ors ; ?A Date: I Vy )`l9?
Project/She: ire'k r ^e State: L County:
Applicant/Owner: #?Dq Plant Community #/Name: drshrr - S ) 14)e.
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ? No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No '? (If yes, explain on back) r eol, np
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION

5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Dominant Plant Species
2, us u
3, 5 ? ni ?
Su S ?u1
4
Indicator
Status Stratum
b$L
E A/44
013E
rAtvJf
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
it.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC ;1Q%-
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ? No
Rationale:
1t, " SOILS
Series/phase: cj Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No ?LHistic epipedon present? YesNo
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes -? No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: 715' 18 41 - Mottle Colors: 7,5 YR 2 0
Other hydric soil indicators: CO0'Y?? son - -
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No ?
Rationale:
HYDRO GY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No ? Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No-7
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: r? g n
List Ather field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met?
Rationale:
. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes / No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy."
No
B-2
10 tWAy /-CA
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investiga or s)- ksy" Date: J 1 11
Project/SRe: eiwgrvl a YPA Y *4141 0112 State: L Count?y
Applicant/Owner. RD lant Community #/Name: dit?uy - w ?'-???
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ? No (H no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No -? (If yes, explain on back)
--------------------- -,avd
------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Spec s eStatus Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1, _Ku W (fAeYariA )-WA) Uft, 11.
2. 12.
3. 13.
4. 14.
5. 15.
6. 16.
7. 17.
8. 18.
9. -- 19.
10. 20.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
SOILS
Sedes/phase: Mee LthJ Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No Histic epipedon present? Yes No
is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Qleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators: ?
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: 4 IY4
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No ,
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrolo0y.criterion met? Yes
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy."
No
B-2
We,tlA)?d ?? fe, b
_WJWy k fIAt o 1'6_-
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investig or )• '°'' Date: q JWV 1r,
ProjecVSke: rew? A`s" r State. --94-- Co??rr??ty: WA
Applicant/Owner: AM Plant Community #/Name: diltur `"?'?'
Note: If a more detailed the description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. U
---------------------------------------------------
Do normall nvironmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ? No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No ?? (If yes, explain on back) r+rkv?a ra?M 6?
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. /U1em y'A Lwt 11.
2. gltah NM i FAL ?- 12.
3. J4WAS e 4 _ McWt 13.
4. 14.
5. 15.
6. 16.
7. 17.
8. 18.
9. 19.
10. 20.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC S! !v
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ?? No
Rationale:
SOILS
Series/phase: I1AJr, ZpYIJ Subgroup.
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No -;74-Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yos No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: to YR W2 Mottle Colors: YR 9 JPYA Z?V
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No-?
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field,ovidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL, DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes _ No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy."
met? Yes _v-"' No

B-2
WalAnd A rC
jAXIWIJ a, flz 10 ?P.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator( k-54- L Date: aSN? l9`? ?
Project/Site: state:. County:
Applicant/Owner: Rnia giant Community #/Name:
Note: If a more detailed Bite description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ? No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significa tly disturbed?
Yes No ?- (H yes, explain on back) M r-w M Yt'y -------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. (fiarari jo c UPI- 41
2.
Mb iuS FAC
uS u n M FAQ
3 klwol
4 N i wM,l A?
5. Duc1?PSrtea ! to N1
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Indicator
Status Stratum
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC T S/ `To
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ? No
Rationale:

Serles/phase: I 1A C Zan Subgroup.2
Is the soil on the hydro soils list? Yes ?_ No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No Histic epipedon present? Yes
is the soil: Mottled? Ye No ? Gleyed? Yes No •?-
Matrix Color: 19 YR VA Mottle Colors:
Other hydro soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No ;q r 4
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for'jurisdictional decision:
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy."
No
Dominant Plant Species
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
SOILS
No
B-2
d r .+.
4
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
I
James G. Martin, Governor Division of Archives and History
Patric Dorsey, Secretary William S. Price, Jr., Director
August 26, 1985
MEMORANDUM C7S-
ofvtslom To! C. D. Adkins, Manager Planning and Researc
h Branch Division of Highways Department of 'Transportation FROM: David Brook, Deputy State
Historic Preservation officQr -
SUBJECT: Wake County, SR 1002 at SR 1316, Environmental
Aosezcmant for proposed road improvements and
interchange, state Project 8.24011201, Federal-Aid
Project RS-9202(1), £R 86-7091 and CH 86-E-4220-0090
R_ ?.© 30
We have received notification from the State Clearinghouse concerning
the above project, as wall as your lettor of July 30, 1985.
' We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no properties
of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance which would
be affected by the project. Therefore we have no comment on the project
as currently proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at
36 CF'R part 800, and to Executive order 11593, "Protection and enhance-
ment of the Cultural Environment."
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley,
Environmental Review Coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:slw
CC. Clearinghouse
109 East Jones Sheet ,@ Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
(919) 733-1'305
1
United States Department of the Interior
° HSH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Division of Ecological Services
P.O. Box 25039
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5039
x
%
0
August 13, 1985
Mr. C.D. Adkins, ?Manager
Planning and Research Branch
H.C. Division of Highways
N.C. Department of 't'ransportation
P.Q. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Subject: Make County, SR1002 at SR1316, State Project 8.2401201,
Federal Aid Project RS-9202(1)
Dear Mr. Adkins:
This responds to your letter of July 30, 1985 requesting our coIuments
on the proposed project. These comments are submitted in accordance
with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 $to t .
401, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 661 at seq.).
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is concerned that any Project
constructed within the corridor designated for planning purposes by
the NCDOT would have an adverse impact upon fish and wildlife
resources of Briar Creels and its associated floodplain. The soils in
the project area are predominantly Congaree, with some extensive areas
of Chewacla. Chewacla soils are potentially hydric. Therefore, the
habitat of the area is probably palustrine forested, temporarily
flooded, with a predominance of broad-leaved deciduous vegetation.
Any document prepared in accordance with provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act should address the impact of the proposed new
highway upon the fish and wildlife resources of Briar Creek and its
associated floodplain. Inclusion of the following information in any
document prepared will greatly facilitate the Service's revie ;
1. Description of the fishery and wildlife resources within the
study corridor sod within any areas which may be affected by
the proposed construction activities.
2. Acreage of branches, creeks, streams or rivers filled as a
consequence of proposed highway construction.
3. Acreage of the floodplain cleared, filled or otherwise
altered as a consequence of proposed highway construction.
f 4. Linear feet of waterways relocated as a consequence of
proposed highway construction.
j 5. Acreage of upland habitats eliminated as a consequence of
proposed high construction.

.4911L -- _ -- ---- - . -1 ...-..
6. Techniques which will be employed for designing and
r.nnAtrurting any relocated stream channels.
7. Mitigation measures which will be employed to eliminate,
reduce or compensate for habitat looses caused by the
proposed project.
In accordance with the Fndangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, it
is the responsibility of the appropriate Federal regulatory agency to
review its activities or programs and to identify any such activity or
program that may affect -.ndangered or threatened species or their
habitat. If it is determined that this proposed activity may affect
any species listed as endangered or threatened, formal consultation
with the Fish and Wildlife Sorvicele Endangered Species Field Office
in Asheville, North Carolina, must be initiated. If this project is
determined to be a major Federal action, having significant impact on
the human environment and requiring An Pnvironmental impact statement,
you should formally request from the Asheville, North Carolina Office
a list of endangered and threatened species which may occur within the
impact area of this project. Requests for species consultation should
be directed to the Endangered Species Field Supervisor, Endangered
Species Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 100 Otis Street,
Room 224, Asheville, North Carolina 28801.
We appreciate the opportunity to
your consideration of them. Please
progress for this project.
provide these comments and encourage
continue to advise us of planning
Sincerely yours, ? ?x
Lir- ??-
L. K. (Mike) Ga'TaL
Field Supervisor

EJ North C;arolinc>! Wildlife ReSOUrces Commission Ed
512 N. &jjisbLity Sirc•c•t, R;dcikli, Norch (,RRAiMI 7_7611, 91Q-733.3391
(::Irulcti R. f=ttll"N'c)(xi, f:xcxuCi??c (.?iFCCCc)t'
January ?n, ipa?
U.-K-11-0-p- A...H__P _U I!_
`O Alexander P. Smith
F ROTI : Jahn M. Ald ratan `
RE : Patmnt i n l p?rrr rn?h n£ dwarf wedge muevol in Briar Cr ek
T completed muc eel cur.yoy= of Brier Creok and nearby crccka in
the vicinity of RVU International Airport during May, 1991.
Brier Creek is highly dQgraded in this area and is not
appropriate habitat fox, tho dwarf xcdgc muQael <Aie_r3M dan.'tai
heterodvn?, a federally listed Endangered species. Therefore,
there is an extremely low probability that the dwarf wedge
mussel exists in the two aream identitled on }•aur provided
maps,