19920070 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19920101

LITTLE & LITTLE
12 March 1992
Mr. David Franklin
Dept. of the Army (? ( f(
Wilmington District
Corps of Engineers is
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
iurrI AhM,' PDA-R')
Dear Mr. Franklin,
After discussions with John Dorney, N.C. Division of Environmental
Management, Water Quality Section, we have decided to modify the
requested permit area of the Nationwide 26 permit application for Sandy
Springs Planned Development, Fuquay-Varina, NC, submitted February 21,
1992.
As shown on the enclosed, revised permit area map, we are now requesting
authorization for placement of dredge or fill material on 0.53 acres in Phases
2A and 3A of Sandy Springs. We understand that this area will be combined
with the areas originally permitted May 21, 1987, File No. SAWC087-N-092-
0333.
Please contact me if you have any questions, or need additional information.
Si cerely, I P-1??
M - A- ot
war A. Partner, A.S.L.A.
Enclosure: Revised Permit Area Map
p.c: Eric Alsmeyer, Raleigh Regulatory Office, C.O.E.;
John Dorney, N.C. D.E.M. Water Quality Section;
Karl Blackley, The Westminster Company.
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE/PLANNING P O. BOX 1448 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602 9191821-5645

.w•.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor March 24, 1992 George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
Mr. Mack.Little
Little and Little
Post Office Box 1448
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Dear Mr. Little:
Subject: Proposed Fill in Headwaters or Isolated Wetlands
Sandy Springs Subdivision, Phases 2A and 3A
Wake County
DEM Project # 92070
Upon review of your request for Water Quality Certification
to place fill material in 0.53 acres of wetlands for road
crossings and lot fill located in Fuquay-Varina, in Wake County,
we have determined that the proposed fill can be covered by
General Water Quality Certification No. 2671 issued January 21,
1992. A copy of the General Certification is attached. This
Certification may be used in qualifying for coverage under Corps
of Engineers' Nationwide Permit No. 26. Any plots for lots with
unfilled wetlands must contain deed restrictions which prevent
additional fill unless specifically authorized by COE and DEM.
If you have any questions, please contact John Dorney at
919/733-1786 or 919/733-1787.
Sincerely,
4ergUeTT. Everett
GTE:JD
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regional Office
Raleigh DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files REGIONAL OFFICES
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/733-2314 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
,. $UTF a
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
WATER QUALITY SECTIOI\
FAX # [phone]j?(
?o
TELECOPY TO: ?V CJ ??re-t'
FAX NUMBER: Y3 ( - 2- 3 2-
FROM: r C ??1? d? n / rrr PHONE: 253- / -ZE
NO. OF PAGES, INCLUDING COVER SHEET.
COMMENTS:
Y,9-4 ti 1

TRANSMISSION REPORT
, .i
******************************
( MAR 25 '92 09:27AM )
********************************************************************************************
* *

* DATE START REMOTE TERMINAL *
MODE TIME RESULTS TOTAL DEPT. FILE
* TIME IDENTIFICATION PAGES CODE NO.
*
* *
* MAR 25 09:23AM 9198312329 G3 ST 02'51" OK 04
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
*
*
* *
* *
* *

* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
********************************************************************************************
?.
`s
r
?" ? `,,,
??
a??
x ?r?.°;
MEMO
DATE:
TO: SUBJECT: w-
From:
Q,
.. North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
•? a ?Y ? ?(? Printed on Recycled Paper
"w 6 5(ATF y,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
WATER QUALITY SECTION
FAX # [phone]
TELECOPY TO:
FAX NUMBER:
FROM: vs. G PHONE:

NO. OF PAGES, INCLUDING COVER SHEET:
COMMENTS:
TRANSMISSION REPORT
*W90

( MAR 12 '92 11:12AM )

?c
* DATE START REMOTE TERMINAL MODE TIME RESULTS TOTAL DEPT. FILE
TIME IDENTIFICATION PAGES CODE NO.

MAR 12 11:10AM 919 571 4718 G3E ST 88'59" OK 02

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-37;
TO: _Mr.
lr.
IqLq
'?(Q Qa1 INSTANT REPLY
¦
TAKE
PRIDEIN
AMIE M ?
Please excuse this form. We thought you would prefer a speedy reply to a
formal letter. This is provided in response to your notification fetter to
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concerning Federally-listed endangered
and threatened species. This reply should be forwarded to the Corps of
Engineers Regulatory Branch. .
Re:
2
Date
Based on our records, there are no Federally-listed endangered or
threatened species which may occur within the project impact area.
The attached page(s) list(s) the Federally-listed species which
may occur within the project impact area.
If the proposed project will be removing pines greater than or equal
to 30 years of age in pine or pine/hardwood habitat, surveys should
be conducted for active red-cockaded woodpecker cavity trees in
appropriate'habitat within a 1/2 mile radius of project boundaries.
If red-cockaded woodpeckers are observed within the project area or
active cavity trees found, the project has the potential to
adversely affect the red-cockaded woodpecker, and you should contact
this office for further information.
The service concurs that the proposed project is not likely to
adversely affect Federally-listed endangered or threatened species,
their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently
proposed for Federal listing under the Endangered Species Act, as
amended.
Staffing limitations prevent us from conducting a field inspection
of the project site. Therefore, we are unable to provide you with
site specific recommendations at this time.
Questions regarding the enclosed information should be directed to the Corps
of Engineers' regulatory staff member who is handling this rojebt.
2
Biologi ate
? J
CONCUR: 72-
Endangered Species ODat
Coordinator
REVISED JANUARY 1, 1992^
Wake County
Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) - E
Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) - E
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) - E
Dwarf wedge mussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) - E
Bachman's warbler (Vermivora bachmanii) - E'
There are species which, although not now listed or officially proposed for
listing as endangered or threatened, are under status review by the Service.
These "Candidate"(C1 and C2) species are not legally protected under the
Act, and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7,
until they are formally proposed or listed as threatened or endangered. We
are providing the below list of candidate species which may occur within the
project area for the purpose of giving you advance notification. These
species may be listed in the future, at which time they will be protected
under the Act. In the meantime, we would appreciate anything you might do
for them.
Bachman's warbler (Vermivora bachmanii) - C2
Bachman's sparrow (Aimophila aestivalis) - C2*
Nestronia (Nestronia umbellula) - C2
Carolina trillium (Trillium pusillum var. pusillum) - C2
Southeastern bat (Mvotis austroriparius) - C2
Loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) - C2
Yellow lance (mussel) (Elliptio lanceolata) - C2
Atlantic pigtoe (mussel) (Fusconaia masoni) - C2
Diana fritillary butterfly (Speveria diana) - C2
*Indicates no specimen in at least 20 years from this county.
`A
ti
,?y?'daa S?A7f' a
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James G. Martin, Governor
Patric Dorsey, Secretary
March 6, 1992
Mr. Howard A. Partner
Little & Little
P.O. Box 1448
Raleigh, N.C. 27602
Division of Archives and History
William S. Price. Jr., Director

Re: Sandy Springs Development, Phases 2A
and 3A Fill, Fuquay-Varina, Wake County
ACOE NWP, ER 92-7907
Dear Mr. Partner:
Thank you for your letter of February 18, 1992, concerning the above
project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no properties
of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance which would
be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the
project as currently proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at
36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
David Brook
Deputy.State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
cc: a Wright, ACOE, Wilmington
Wa
Dorney, DEM, Raleigh
109 EastJones Street 9 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807
e`a SrA7ga,
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James G. Martin, Governor
Patric Dorsey, Secretary
March 5, 1992
Kevin C. Martin, President
Soil and Environmental Consultants, Inc.
3818 Bland Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27609
Re: Matthews Glen at Planters Walk, Knightdale,
Wake County, ACOE NWP, ER 92-7913
Dear Mr. Martin:
Division of Archives and History
William S. Price, Jr., Director
Thank you for your letter of February 19, 1992, to Eric Alsmeyer of the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no properties
of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance which would
be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the
project as currently proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at
36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
cc: W?a1' ne Wright, ACOE, Wilmington
.?dohn Dorney, DEM, DEHNR, Raleigh
109 East Jones Street 0 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807
o
•
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James G. Martin, Governor
Patric Dorsey, Secretary
March 5, 1992
Mr. J. Michael Stocks
Appian Consulting Engineers, P.A.
P.O. Box 7966
Rocky Mount, N.C. 27804-0966
Re: Develop Light Industrial Park S/D near
Rocky Mount, Nash County,,ACOE NWP
ER 92-7896
Dear Mr. Stocks:
Division of Archives and History
William S. Price, Jr., Director
Thank you for your letter of February 12 1992, concerning the above
project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no properties
of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance which would
be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the
project as currently proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at
36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. if you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
cc: Wa ae Wright, ALOE, Wilmington
ihn Dorney, DEM, DEHNR, Raleigh
z
109 EastJones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807
s •?+
Mr. Mack Little
Little and Little
P.V. Box 1448
Raleigh, NC 27602
Project #92079
Dear Mr. Little:
March 2, 1992
The Division of Environmental Management, Water Quality
Section has reviewed your plans for wetland fill for 1.4 acres of
wetlands at Sandy Springs Development, Fuquay-Varina in Wake
County for residential lot fill. Based on this review, we have
identified significant uses which would be removed by this
project. These are wildlife habitat and dispersal, water storage
and.pollutant removal. Furthermore, insufficient evidence is
present in our files to conclude that your project must be built
in wetlands. Therefore, we are moving toward denial of your 401
Certification. However, since this is a Nationwide 26 project I
will have to p,-ft out a Public Notice before DEM can deny the
Certification. Until we receive this information, we are
requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and/or the N.C. Division of Coastal Management place
your project on administrative hold.
Please provide us with information supporting: your position
that your project must be constructed.in wetlands. Specifically
can you construct your residential lots on nearby upland or prior
converted farmland? Any documentation such as maps and narrative
which you can supply to address upland alternatives may be
helpful in our review of your 401 Certification. Please respond
within two weeks of the date of this letter. If I have not heard
from you by then, I will proceed.to public notice.
i
„a STATE o,
,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
REGIONAL OFFICES
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 9191486-1541 704/663-1699 919/571-4700 919/946-(A81 919/395-39(x) 919/89(1Ax)7
Pollution Prevention Pays
I)(.). Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-05.35 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Aliirmanvc %,u- Fnq,loyer
t 4''ie
Mr. Mack Little
March 2, 1992
Page Two
If you have any questions, please call me at 919/733-5083.
Sincerely,
J hn R. Dorney
JRD/kls
Little.ltr
cc: Raleigh DEM Regional Office
John Parker, Coastal Management
Wilmington Office COE
Central Files
so
i
LITTLE & LITTLE

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To Mr. David Franklin
Dept. of the Army
Wilmington District
Corps of Engineers
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
DATE 9 March 92 JOB NitmBER 2600.35
RE: Sandy Springs Planned Development
Fuguay-Varina, NC
WE ARE SENDING YOU _ Attached _ Under separate cover Via
Shop drawings Prints Plans Samples
X Copy of letter Change order
COPIES DATE SHEET DESCRIPTION
1 3/6/92 1 Res onse from NC Div. Archives and History
Specifications
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
For approval Approved as submitted
X For your use Approved as noted
X As requested Returned for corrections
For review and comment
FOR BIDS DUE
REMARKS
Resubmit copies for approval
Submit copies for distribution
Return corrected prints
PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
coPYTo Eric Alsmeyer, Raleigh office, C.O.E.; John Dorney, NC D M Water Qualit ; Karl
Blackley, Westminster Co.
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. SIGNED: low
owarcl
Partner
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE/PLANNING P. O. BOX 1448 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602 9191821-5645
a STA1F a
/ C
North Carolina Department of Cultural _Resources
1
?~ 1
James G. Martin, Governor Division of Archives and History
Patric Dorsey, Secretary William S. Price, Jr., Director
1.„ < 1992
March 6, 1992 LITTLE & LITTLE
Mr. Howard A. Partner
Little & Little
P.O. Box 1448
Raleigh, N.C. 27602
Re: Sandy Springs Development, Phases 2A
and 3A Fill, Fuquay-Varina, Wake County
ACOE NWP, ER 92-7907
Dear Mr. Partner:
Thank you for your letter of February 18, 1992, concerning the above
project..
We have.conducted a review of the project and are aware of no properties
of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance which would
be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the
project as currently proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at
36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
cc: Wayne Wright, ACOE, Wilmington
John Dorney, DEM, Raleigh
109 East ones Street 0 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807
LITTLE & LITTLE
TO: Ron Ferrell
Water Quality Section
Div of Environmental Management
NC Dept. of Env., Health and Nat. Res.
PO Box 27687
Raleigh NC 27611-7687
APPLICATION CONTENTS
DATE 19 February 92 JOB NLwBER 2600.35
RE: Sandy Springs P.D. Wetlands
COPIES DATE PAGE DESCRIPTION
1 2/13/92 1 Wetlands delineation map with permit area: 50' Scale
7 2/13/92 1 Wetlands delineation map with permit area: 8.5 x 11 reduction

7
no date
1 Location Map adapted from Fish and Wildlife Service National
Wetlands Inventory: 2000' Scale
1 Dec. 1991 1 Engineering Site Construction Plans: 100' Scale
7 Dec. 1991 1 Engineering Site Construction Plans: 8.5 x 11 reduction
7 2/12/92 6 total Wetland Determination Data Forms
7 no date 1 Wetland Determination Data Form Location Map- Not to Scale
7 no date 1 Water Quality Section Wetland Rating System Worksheet
7 no date 1 Notes for Wetland Rating System Worksheet

7
2/9/92
1 & 2 Joint Application Form for Nationwide Permits that require Section
401 Certification Concurrence
7 2/18/92 1 Copy of notification letter to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
7 2/18/92 1 Copy of notification letter to N.C. State Historic Preservation Office

LANDSCAPEARCHITEC7'URE/PLANNING P. O. BOX 1448 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602 9191821-5645
( wo
O
D
i ? r•• D ? opy2?•? Dm
>1>
y O
C© O
co
D W.
i ? ?' •
?r n
ta3ya 00 %
1
?i II II I ?? ? ,
\ ?{ i,I II I a
?i
RA VEN-THORP} IRISE
r? I Ii-- ,! 1
? I E r/ gq ?
a
i \
v y
10 \ ?i s
.3n8\zml ??
r
\ m
?a
s?
9N
a
r
? w
/ bn
s
?s 4

I
I
\ e
a
r
/ ? sy
01
yn
n
m
O
w \ I

q
4 i1
q

tii /< ? OD .

I Q
r aci_ W
7 --I
? 2?
?? /
:sus===='-
I 8 ?
( J I
1 ? 'I y'` m mwl ? \
II i awl ?`?
.I• 1, t j .,. ? ti /a y ` .? I
111 - - - - -'y ^ O / ` ` ACP? }
y%

n

"w
N

.• \ aON T"
i N
h
ti
m?
i
'• g zm
\ m ?: CAIRNS DR
Ifl
?n
on
J..
i
® 1 i I (-w' ? ?1 ^O
r
M
Aso
\
/ a$
Z
a

A
® >vo
q?q

•2
• a
0y60 /"oe
h

N )E
/ J3
's s a a E a ? a : 'a a tl o s ?
s 8 8 y= r s= a i s tl = e s

rat ? b ? ? ? F y t ? ? ? a tt F

I
I'
1 1- I
I I I I
I I
Z
I yy
L a
3

I
I
I I 1
I I I i
1 I
?
I ee
L H
11)c
C
C 't. C
L G 1L 1
"- I
I
I
I
3
I I I I I 1 1 I I I k v yy
G yt
G ?
I 1 I I 1 I I I I I i b
?
e
s
G y sis ? y?y tyy G i ,q'e Gyy Y iRI ? ?i ? ,?
g AA e?j p pp S g $ $
i- s
1
?? I?;, --11 \p \ ?5 FR ?IMI ARC' ?
1 ti \d
1 I 11 tl NOT POR CONS ?UCTION 0?tl 422
/
N
H
SANDY SPRINGS
PL
NNED DEVELOPMENT a?? CARO?? ' Dote: DEC., 1991
-
A '
o
FUOUAY VAR/NA, NORTH CAROL/NA A s<e?e: HORIZ, I• • 50'
STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASES 2-A & 3-A
try: V.S.D.
MASTER PLAN, SAN. SEWER. WA TERMA IN. STORM SEWER CL-L
q,B
u 11
I I I _
uu T- I m
H Y 1
n ,
1. I

I T m
O + # 0
l
I y
s;

m
D p D a
z r
o <
v .D..I
?
m ?
s
D
y
0
Z v
m m f T -i D
m
Z f N V. Z
O D P.
n 9. g x m fs' D

C z m r

m =
o r
m
m
=
*1 z
m m C < m
L. y m m r N
Z
rn

0
o o
a

o
m m o
o
m
a
m
0
4 a
TATE LANNING & ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX IBM
RAM M, NORTH CAROLINA
276W-8346 a'•.
W?T??? !-oG°'??ou
To ycp{.?
\o?v
G
O?
?O
PAR-r i l-f o.P-Ea
2.50 At.
704.0e S.F. 0.02 At.
TO SE APPROVED by
INDICATE CORP OF POI E POINTS NGI NEERS
WETLANDS *A* TOTAL
112, 299.69 S.F.
WETLANDS 8 TOTAL p
g6
QN?
113,003.77 S.F.
2.60 4t
WETLAND TOTAL
1 SO
t°9
x1p p?
lit.
' '''1:'•`o'tij?:`'' ;':`'t':::,`' 9 8?i N30•25117"E
:t:`r.::{ 49.60
..
a)
c\j
A Y
O C1 N
10? '
ro
O
P Z
. 1•
i?
4 W
V
N
i O
LO W? O
$ W
O
O
\
h
;:':;u:::::;:'•::i N O)
cli
i '??i?::• ii:i Vii' ` :i5? i+ r"."i.;`; . r:'.r.:ii:`,•:'.:;i: W
ti
to
vd .':1 (n
?! Y
:y
`\ W
v'
id,
C
............ N ?
•; ••':'.:.`'Lo!p.;`i?:iFi:1:?i??i:.:;ir(i:'C"?` M
M
\yL N
co N w
O t
N
4 ?
i°• o
V)
.h
??''•\, N t°'O
P
• W ?
P
P \is`
? p
N
P
N
R=675.00 ?'a W
N37e1 E A
•° L- 79.05
02' 'p N
RAVENSTHORPE ORIVF
\. `\\ S' . ZL-__ f '8+'r 3 7
1401
0-' `PISBHfiJ?a f\,-= --? --`?.?:r %/ 1•? r``'-4i ti\ r,\\ ?o`•yry).B.T??'a ` :, s ?
;1•??i`'; .?-
N PL
Cem?
PFOI}1 ?. i,/ PFO A f t t pUgtiC?
'-198
ARC,
1 `\\, ? \;. - •.J 1 fi /r-;- ^ ? - .•. ,, ? C,\? ., 1, `` \\ dry ?? .
'' ? ?? Iii "` , ?Lu`\, ? \ ?..-_ ._ +"' ? ' / 'i-' /i 14 l! a ? . t ,.•?tl\' ?T..V`?•
i 1351,
n1aw
erno lal.? a _ // ' -- ' ,,00 / ' \~??\???•
{{?? ?'•
Crountry. C1,Jtr-- . . ?: - •? ' ; /= , l
/rso` DUBHh Blih: 6 . 43
X?1'$FfFf _i ! \ ' / ^ . !' (. ` •y //!' \ ; 44z ?. iletC 1 1J -' 1 {?`
r \?ralCreRlc_ /! •a+ /? !! ?C ?' \`+ L0 •--P'ar
:? \ It i i c,;'?i : \ .I•?J? p8p - tti! 1469
'? - - \_"i 9 111A i• ?,'' i5?w`.-' _. g? \ $\ , _ ?}•l" /? . , / ?? (? 1 ` __ _^ _ _ •t
"?, t' ??,'•?`\ T-+? i?-Y-LXi i`,!? y\ ;~j 1 L? ` ( -4 !? Q ±-W Burl
'J
{l~ tii 1? '1
iff
?P Bklh iF'tJBi?h aoo,?- ter,-'?
oNV,
I't
"wil 37-7 f//?Q i I // _ \ .; , t .? ? ? N ?•`??. 1 !. Y/ r ? 1 .\•. III i - t
j ? t ? , ! , F??BNty i• .t @hh ?ncolniAetg ?-> x ?` \: ,?' ;) ``?`,4? ? -?'" °_?-cOO
1. ,.
'Synn -..? `•'`' ?\ \ Lal'?V! ?ll?
11• 4 /? I ?'`\\ J'f/ `` ?g ' •?-. ' i I\ /.? q 1r1 S'J• ?,? ?'1''?
104 R1BHir' _ '; .. i 1
pUgH? a? ;fit $< I ' B1lh
t ` ;?,. -??`, •?1 81.11'1.`\-' \?'i? .? 350 _r -.
? J - `?-?Hh {it:1 u'r -?_ ? i!' ?' ? ? I ? - RrN ; r? ,?:: ?I ?70? Pl
p-?l / g Y r
S 1 py
?
Cx"
?_ PUB h pua"h l' Mosp tal Q ! +'
} 4 (? ?.aYNti , vua,?h--?J=' 11 / ? } • ? . , , ; ._., Sandy Springs P.D. -
' ?} ?,- Jt u : so ahh' ;401; Phases 2A & 3A
;? t t ?v cue Wetland Areas
/ ' In ?BHh , - _ : -
' U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
)Bhx ) PUBHh`?.-Hh t °?„?,?,. } • National Wetlands Inventory
?. • Fuquay-Varina, NC quad sheet
Scale: 1 " 2000'
1
.3.ebyt• I ?\?., g1 ?? i
\ m
h
RA VENTHdRPE DRIVE ?? ,R ® $ €a
\' ??J ,a 1 / s ® s CAIRNS DR.
? I I c II? ? p? s ® 4 I -- •??£
`1 I .'t h
e l ? ® .?' /
it t' - --- J, a
® i
Zvi
_' / '?I I Ll?, ® ? •469 ^ 7'
41, 7
?;
a4ty. K q
41
\ h
\ a `,
r 7= --" II \ ?5da r P R ??\}1\. I M I A R ?Iy? ?pr , ??z ..
r 1 ,', ?p°.} 1 b \ tl NOT I%@ CONS*UCTICN V
SAND"Pkl"G
PLANNED D
°
N
< •
? °EC 1B9
-
EVELOPMENT fp0°
YS
.l
!
FUOUAY VARINA, NOR1H CAROLINA •
s..... w°z•r. °o
STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASES 2-A 6 3-A
1 s
9f
? o...• ti.. vsa
MASTER. A/W N,SEI}'?R,?_?' I_E?7AIAMl. STORM_+E?IYF.R.. ,..
`*",?,.?!0.` c,, n.?,_ as:rxu.?.?.,-.,....,. -• ?••••••.,..__.It......
TATE LANNING & ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
P.O. 9ox low
"Aefl=NORTM CAROLINA
b
i IT# 16
? ti> F o c' 2
?" rE1 ? ?y T P Y
H ? ? m m r
?s€€p m
Ian £ E
a _
e a
1`a •• i 'e i t •'i i i• e i
i i i• • • s i x • : .

L C C G L C L ¢` C C L. L. f
. . . . . . , e ! i
1 1. . . ! 0
C C L G L L C ?tl C!.... j•

aa
a
a
a
aa
a
aaaa
a
a t?
ppg
L
e
C
5
56
6
9g.
1 7 A 7 7 i A 4} y 5$ S ??
DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Applicant Application Project
Name: The Westminster Company Number: Name:
State: NC County: Wake Legal Description:Township:
Date: 12 February 1992 Plot No.: 1-U Section:
Sandy Springy
Phases 2A & 3A
n/a Range: n/a
Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer, (5 if only
1 or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Status
Trees
1. Red Oak FACU
2. Water Oak FAGW?
3. Scarlet Oak --
4. Red Maple FAC
Saplings/shrubs
5. Red Oak FACU
6. Black Cherry FACU
7. American Holly FACU
% of species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes X No
Soil Wehadkee (Wo);
Herbs
8. Fipoiooewa --
9.
10.
Woody vines
11. Smilax FACU
12. Vitis --
22% Other indicators:
Basis: Facultative/051- species present
Series and phase: Wagram (Wa5) On hydric soils list? Yes Wo No Was
Mottled: Yes ; Nc X Mottle color: Matrix color: 10YR 5/4
Gleyed: Yes ; Nc X Other indicators:
Hydric soils: Yes ;No X Basis: Absence of indicators
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes ; No X Depth of standing water:
Saturated soils: Yes , No X . Depth to saturated soil: greater than 18 in.
Other indicators:
Wetland hydrology: Yes ; No
Atypical situation: Yes ; No
Normal Circumstances?
Wetland Determination
Comments:
X
X
No
Basis: Absence of indicators
Nonwetland X
Determined by: Howard Partner, Little & Little
Source: Tech Report Y-87-1 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Jan. 1987
Prepared by Little & Little Landscape ArchitecturelPlanning PO Box 1448 Raleigh, NC 27602 2112192
Yes X
Wetland
DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Applicant . Application Project
Name: The Weotmincter Company Number: Name:
State: NC County: Wake Legal Description:Township:
Dater 12 February 1992 Plot No.: 2-U Section:
Sandy 5pringo
Fhaoeo 2A & 3A
n/a Range: n/a
Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer, (5 if only
1 or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Status
Trees
1. 5weetg u m FACW
2. Red Oak FACU
3. ReciMaple FAC
4. Loblolly Fine FAC
Saplings/shrubs
5. 5weetgum FACW
6. Dogwood FACU
7. Magnolia FAC
% of species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes X No _
Herbs
8. Gooseberry --
9.
10.
Woody vines
11. Carolina Jessamine FAG
12.
63% Other indicators:
Basis: Facultative species present
Soil
Series and phase: Wehadkee (Wo); On hydric soils list? Yes Wo No
Mottled: Yes ; Nc X Mottle color: Matrix color: 10YK 4/4
Gleyed: Yes ; Nc X Other indicators:
Hydric soils: Yes ;No X Basis: Absence of indicators
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes ; No x Depth of standing water:
Saturated soils: Yes-, No X . Depth to saturated.soil: Below 18 in.
Other indicators:
Wetland hydrology: Yes ; No
Atypical situation: Yes ; No
Normal Circumstances? Yes X
Wetland Determination: Wetland
Comments:
X Basis: Absence of indicators
X
No
Nonwetland
X
Determined by: Howard Partner, Little & little
Source: Tech Report Y-87-1 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Jan. 1987
Prepared by Little & Little Landscape Architecture/Planning PO Box 1448 Raleigh, NC 27602 2112192
DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Applicant Application Project
Name: The WeotminSter Company Number: Name:
State: NG County: Wake Legal Description:Township:
Date: 12 February 1992 Plot No.: 3-U Section:
Sandy Springs
11haoc5 2A & 3A
n/a Range: n/a
Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer, (5 if only
1 or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Status
Trees
1. Red Oak FACU
2. Red Maple FAC
3. Loblolly Pine- FAG
4. Pignut Hickory FACU
Saplings/shrubs
5. Red Oak FACU
6. Red Maple FAC
7. American Holly FACU
% of species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC:
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes X No _
Soil
Herbs
8. Wild Onion --
9.
10.
Woody vines
11. Blackberry --
12. Smilax FACU
13. Poison Ivy --
220/. Other indicators:
Basis: Facultative Species present
Series and phase: INagram (WaQ On hydric soils list?Yes No X
Mottled: Yes ; Nc X Mottle color: Matrix color: 10 YR 5/4
Gleyed: Yes ; Nc X Other indicators:
Hydric soils: Yes ; No X Basis: Light candy Soil; no indicative color, gleying
or mottles
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes ; No X Depth of standing water:
Saturated soils: Yes ; No X Depth to saturated soil: greater than 15. in.
Other indicators:
Wetland hydrology: Yes ; No
Atypical situation: Yes ; No
Normal Circumstances? Yes X
Wetland Determination: Wetland
Comments:
X Basis: No evidence of wetland hydrology
X
No
Nonwetland X
Determined by: Howard Partner, Little & Little
Source: Tech Report Y-87-1 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Jan. 1987
Prepared by Little & Little Landscape Architecture/Planning PO Box 1448 Raleigh, NC 27602 2112192
DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Applicant Application Project
Name, The Westminster Company Number: Name:
State: NC . County: Wake Legal Description:Township:
Date: 12 February 1992 Plot No.: 1-W Section:
Sandy Springs
Phases 2A & 3A
n/a Range: n/a
Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer, (5 if only
1 or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Status
Trees
1. River Birch 051-
2. Tulip Poplar --
3. 5weetgum FACW
4. Red Oak FACU
Saplings/shrubs
5. River Birch OBL
6. Tulip Poplar --
7. American Holly FACU
% of species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC:
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes X No
Soil Wehadkee (Wo);
Wetland
Series and phase: Wagram (Was) On hydric soils list?Yes Wo No WaB
Mottled: Yes ; Nc X Mottle color: Matrix color: 10YK 3/2
Gleyed: Yes X ; No Other indicators:
Hydric soils: Yes X ; No Basis: Gleying, matrix color
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes ; No X Depth of standing water:
Saturated soils: Yes ; No X . Depth to saturated soil: greater than 15 in.
Other indicators: Butressed tree trunks; Debris lines
Wetland hydrology: Yes X ;No
Atypical situation: Yes ;No X
Normal Circumstances? Yes X No
Wetland Determination:
Comments:
Herbs
8. Arundinaria gigantea FACW
9.
10.
Woody vines
11. Smilax FACU
12. Vitis --
35% Other indicators:
Basis:. Facultative/OBL species present
Basis: Indicators above and hyciric soils
X
Nonwetland
Determined by: Howard Partner, Little & Little
Source: Tech Report Y-87-1 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Jan. 1987
Prepared by Little & Little Landscape Architecture/Planning PO Box 1448 Raleigh, NC 27602 2112192
DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Applicant . Application Project
Name: The Westminster Company Number: Name:
State: NC County: Wake Legal Description:Township:
Date: 12 February 1992 Plot No.: 2-W Section:
Sandy 5pring5
Pha5e5 2A & 3A
n/a Range: n/a
Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer, (5 if only
1 or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Status
Trees Herbs
1. Tulip Poplar -- 8. Vaccinium sp. FAG/05L
2. 5weetgum FACW 9. Arundinaria gigantea FACW
3. Red Oak FACU 10. Myrica cerifera FAC
4.
Saplings/shrubs Woody vines
5. Tulip Poplar -- 11.
6. 5ourwood -- 12.
7. American Holly FACU
% of species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 500/. Other indicators:
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes X No Basis: Facultative/05L 5pecie5 present
Soil
Series and phase: Wehadkee (Wo); On hydric soils list? Yes Wo No
Mottled: Yes ; Nc X Mottle color: Matrix color: 10YK 3/1
Gleyed: Yes X ; No Other indicators:
Hydric soils: Yes X ; No Basis: Gleying, matrix color
Hydrology
Inundated: Yes ; No X Depth of standing water:
Saturated soils: Yes X ; No . Depth to saturated soil: ±12 in.
Other indicators: Butressed theee, debris lines
Wetland hydrology: Yes X ;No Basis: Indicators above and hydric soils
Atypical situation: Yes ;No X
Normal Circumstances? Yes X No
Wetland Determination: Wetland X Nonwetland
Comments:
Determined by: Howard Partner, Little & Little
Source: Tech Report Y-87-1 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Jan. 1987
Prepared by Little & Little Landscape Architect urelPlan ning PO Box 1448 Raleigh, NC 27602 2112192
DATA FORM 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Applicant Application Project
Name: The Westminster Company Number: Name:
State: NC County: Wake Legal Description:Township:
Date: 12 February 1992 Plot No.: 3-W Section:
Sandy 5pring5
Phases 2A & 3A
n/a Range: n/a
Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer, (5 if only
1 or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known
physiological adaptations with an asterisk.
Indicator Indicator
Species Status Status
Trees
1. Tulip Poplar
2. 5weetgum
3. Red Maple
4.
Saolinas/shrubs
5. Tulip Poplar
6. 5weetgum
7. American Holly
Herbs
-- 8. Cinnamon Fern FACW
FACW 9. Carolina Jeooamine FAC
FAC 10. Arundaria gigantea FACW
FACW
FACU
% of species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 50%
Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes X No
Soil Wehadkee (Wo);
Series and phase: Wagram (WaQ
Mottled: Yes ; Nc X Mottle color:
Gleyed: Yes X ; No Other indicators:
Hydric soils: Yes X No Basis:
Hydrology
Matrix color, gleying
Inundated: Yes ; No X Depth of standing water:
Saturated soils: Yes X. No Depth to saturated soil: 0 in.
Other indicators: Butressed tree trunks, moon on trunks, Standing water nearby
Wetland hydrology: Yes X ;No Basis: Indicators above and hydric soils
Atypical situation: Yes ;No X
Normal Circumstances? Yes X No
Wetland Determination: Wetland X Nonwetland
Comments:
Determined by: Howard Partner, Little & Little
Source: Tech Report Y-87-1 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Jan. 1987
Woody vines
11. Blackberry --
12. Poison .Ivy --
13. Honeysuckle --
Other indicators:
Basis: Facultative species present
On hydric soils list? Yes Wo No WaG
Matrix color: 7YR 3/0
Prepared by Little & Little Landscape Architecture/Planning PO Box 1448 Raleigh, NC 27602 2112192
PA
H
z
a r0-+
O H
a ?
W U
O
w a
A
H
A W
W W
z x
6 cn
a r, ?
a H
C7 c? W
z za
F-I C O
?a 1 H U
P4 N H Cn
cn W O
W z H
x W O
?n Pa A .Zi

f
?2]•2CEE IS ]fi i
CAIRNS DRIV
'NX

E
im
N
M
N
N
7
C1
N
lD
? W
sn
O ?
O N
a
O
r ?
1? N
WETLAND RATING SYSTEM WORKSHEET
Project No. or description SANDY SPRINGS
14
U
Location
County Wake Nearest
River basin Neuse
Nearest stream Basal Creek
road or town Fuquay-Varina
and classification B
Evaluator Howard Partner
Little & Little, Landscape Architecture/Land Planning
Agency and address Post Office Box 1448, Raleigh, NC 27602
Date and time evaluated 12 February 1992 11:00 a.m.
Major Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Approximate size of wetland system 2.6 acresw in evare'
Approximate extent of wetlands in area122 acres
1 Mile Radius within 3.1 6Q.milee (based on Draft US Fish & Wildlife Service
*
Three most common plant species (in order) : Nat. Wetlands Inventory,
1)Tulip Poplar 3)'Red Maple Fuquay-Varina Quadrangle)
2)Sweet Gum
Soil Series (if known) Wehadkee (Wo) and Wagram (WaB, WaC)
Hydrologic indicators Buttressed tree trunks, moss lin s
Direct surface hydrologic connection? YES NO
Existing Conditions (to tributary
Drainage Intermittent stream flow & culvert flow under roads of Basal Cr.)
Disturbance Hand clearing in some areas (short term)
Restoration potential High potential - restoration not required
Restoration value Low restoration value
is site known to provide habitat for rare, endangered or
threatened species? No If so, list species observed or recorded.
Item No. Score (circle one)
I..Location/Landscape
1 Natural area buffer 5
2 Sensitive watershed - 5 4 3 2 1
3 Dispersal corridor system 5 4 0 2 1 0
II. Ecological Values
ecial ecological attributes
4 S
5
4
3
2
1
p
5 Wildlife habitat 5 4 3 2
6 Aquatic life 5 4 3 2 0
7 Water storage 5 4 3 2 1 0
8 Streambank stabilization 5 4 3 $ 1 0
9 Removal of pollutants 5 4 3 2 1 0
III. Human Values
10 Outdoor recreation/education
5
4
Q
2
1
0
11 Economic value 5 4 3 2 1 0
Total score 13
Site description and notes: (See attached notes: separate page)
do
Notes: for Wetland Rating System Worksheet
Existing Conditions
Low restoration value: Based on total wetland rating score of 13.
1. Location/Landscape
3 Dispersal Corridor system. Wetland A is located at the upper end of
its watershed. Hardwood forests extend upstream from wetland A, for
only a few hundred feet,. and are of limited area. Wetland A is not a
link in a system of dispersal corridors, but the upper reach of a single
dispersal corridor.
Il. Ecological Attributes
7. Water Storage. (See 3 above) Wetland A provides flood storage for
an upstream watershed of only 66 acres.I -
8. Streambank stabilization. (See 7 above)
9 Removal of _.pollutants. (See 7 above) Wetland A has some ability to
remove pollutants, but limited opportunity to do so. Watershed
includes only cemetery (5.5 Ac.), open space (9.3 Ac.) residential (43
Ac.), and commercial (8.2 Ac.) use land. Developed land is serviced
entirely by the Fuquay-Varina municipal sanitary sewer system.
III. Human Values
10 Outdoor Recreation /education Hunting is not permitted in
designated planned development open spaces. Potential use
includes bird watching and walking.
11. Economic value No commercial activities are permitted in planned
development open space.
1 Total watershed area from Sandy Springs Planned Development Street and Utility
Improvements, Phase I, by Tate Lanning & Associates, October, 1986. Subareas from
Sandy Springs P.D. Master Land Use Plan, by Little & Little, April 10, 1986.
-_
f
DEM ID:
ACTION ID:
JOINT APPLICATION FORM FOR
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION TO THE DISTRICT ENGINEER
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION CONCURRENCE
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE INDIVIDUAL SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT.
The Westminster Company
1. OWNERS NAME:. r.lo Mr Karl Blackleg, Vice President for Land Development
2. OWNERS ADDRESS: Post Office Box 518
Cary., North Carolina 27512-0518
3. OWNERS PHONE NUMBER (HOME): N/A (WORK): [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER: Application prepared by: Mr. Howard A. Partner
Little & Little, Landscape Architecture Land Planning
Post Office Box 1448, Raleigh, NC 27602 Phone: [phone]
Phases 2A and 3A Sandy Springs Planned
5. LOCATION OF PLANNED WORK (ATTACH MAP). Development, Fuquay-Varina, NC
COUNTY: Wake
NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Fuquay-Varina
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.): Traveling north on
NC Hwy. 55 out f Fuquay-Varina, turn left on Wyndham Dr. at Sandy Springs
entrance signs, 200 yards north of Wilbon Roa , turn right on Balfour Downs
Circle (2nd right) and proceed 350 feet.
6. NAME OF CLOSEST STREAM/RIVER: Basal Creek
7. RIVER BASIN: Neuse River
8. IS THIS PROJECT LOCATED IN A WATERSHED CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, SA, HQW, ORW,
WS I, OR WS II? YES [ ] NO [xx] "B" Classification
9. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [xx]
IF YES, EXPLAIN.
10. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
2.6 acres on Phases 2A and 3A, Sandy Springs
2/3/92
a
-2-
11. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
_.FILLED: 1.4 AC.
DRAINED:
FLOODED:
EXCAVATED:
TOTAL IMPACTED : ar. _
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK (ATTACH PLANS) :Road cons truction
--- assoniated storm drai n_._install ation. and
14. STATE REASONS WHY THE APPLICANT BELIEVES THAT THIS ACTIVITY
MUST BE CARRIED OUT IN WETLANDS. ALSO, NOTE MEASURES TAKEN TO
MINIMIZE WETLAND IMPACTS. Re- ired for road and utilit-v access
space areas
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE
SERVICE (USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS)
REGARDING THE PRESENCE OR ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR
LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT IN
THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES [xxJ NO
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE ATTACHED.
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
OFFICER (SHPO) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN
THE PERMIT AREA WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES [xx] NO [ I
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE ATTACHED.
17. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY DEM:
.A. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, AND
LAKES ON THE PROPERTY.
B. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL
DATA SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION
LINE..
D. IF A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THIS
PROJECT, ATTACH COPY.
E. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Single family
residential
F. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
Connects to Town of Fugizav Varina sanitary sewer svst?
14..gn R utit Proms, 7' Z _z- ,a:z
OWNER'S SI URE DATE

LITTLE & LITTLE
18 February 1992
L. K. Mike Gantt Field Supervisor
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
PO Box 33726
Raleigh NC 27636
Dear Ms. Gantt,
Little & Little, on behalf of the Westminster Company, (PO Box 518, Cary, NC
27512), is applying for a Nationwide Permit 26 for filling of approximately 1.5
acres of wetlands at Phase 2A and Phase 3A of the Sandy Springs Planned
Development, located in Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina.
Based on field investigations, we believe that there are no endangered or
threatened plant or animal species on the affected site, or on adjacent wetland
areas.
For your convenience, I am enclosing copies of the application documents that
are being submitted to the Wilmington, NC District of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, and to the Water Quality Section of the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management.
If you require any additional information, or want to arrange a site visit, please
contact me.
Si cerely,
Howard A. Part er, RA.S.L.A.
Little & Little
enclosures: 401/404 application documents
p.c. Mr. David Franklin, C.O.E., Wilmington District; Mr. Ron Ferrell, N.C.
E.H.N.R./D.E.M., Water Quality Section.
l.: I:AI),1C:1/'E:IRCllll'FCTl R1i TlAY.W.V; PO. hU.V I 1 (h RA1.1-7GII..\'()RI'llCA No ll.V1 2-002 919 821-50-15
LITTLE v LITTLE
18 February 1992
Renee Glenhill-Early
NC State Historic Preservation Office.
Div. of Archives and History
109 E. Jones Street, Rm. 201
Raleigh, NC 27601-2807
Dear Ms. Glenhill-Early,
Little & Little, on behalf of the Westminster Company, (PO Box 518, Cary, NC
27512), is applying for a Nationwide Permit 26 for filling of approximately 1.5
acres of wetlands at Phase 2A and Phase 3A of the Sandy Springs Planned
Development, located in Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina.
Based on field investigations, we believe that there are no historic properties on
the site, or on adjacent wetland areas that can be affected by the proposed
project.
For your convenience, I am enclosing copies of the application documents that
are being submitted to the Wilmington, NC District of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, and to the Water Quality Section of the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management.
If you require any additional information, or want to arrange a site visit, please
contact me.
Si cerely, W 4 6i??
oward A. Partner, A.S.L.A.
Little & Little
enclosures: 401/404 application documents
p.c. Mr. David Franklin, C.O.E., Wilmington District; Mr. Ron Ferrell, N.C.
E.H.N.R./D.E.M., Water Quality Section.
1..-1.A1)\.:I/)I..IR(III 11 (:7.I,K /'I,.INV"1 A6 1'.O. R(?VI118R.1I.1i1(;1I.NOKTII (A1,1OI.1.A.1 2-602 919 821-i615
V's
February 17, 1992
MEMORANDUM
To: John Dorney

Throug : Arthur Mouberry, P.E.- Regional Supervisor
Tim Donnelly, P.E.- Regional Water Quality
Supervisor
From: 0;
Subject:
Karl Shaffer- Soil Scientist
Sandy Springs Development
Water Quality Concerns
Wake County
On February 13, 1992, I went to the above development to
perform a site assessment for proposed wetlands impacts. The
following information is submitted for your records, as well as a
copy of the rating sheet and topo map (attached):
1. The wetlands rated at 26 points (47 percent). The wetlands are
characterized mainly by floodplains adjacent to tributaries of
Basal Creek (class B NSW). The floodplains are typically 50 to
100 feet wide with poorly drained, nearly level soils. The most
significant value would be realized with water storage and
resulting nutrient/sediment/pollutant removal. This benefit would
be even more valuable once the upland portions of the tract are
developed.
2. It is unclear with the plans how much of the wetlands will be
impacted and if there are planned structures for stormwater
control. In addition, other areas of wetlands exist on the total
tract in addition to the map of Phase 2 which I was sent.
3. Some areas of wetlands have already been filled prior to my
visit. Have these been permitted? I could not assess an accurate
acreage of existing fill. One of these areas in particular has a
tributary (possibly intermittent) channelized with no silt fence
or other safety feature to prevent sediment from entering the
watercourse.
4. A small area of fill is requested in Phase three. There does
not appear to be reasonable justification for the roadway
requiring this fill. The road does not serve any lots and dead-
ends at the property line.
WETLAND RATING SYSTEM WO
RKSHEET
roject No. or description ?Alk SVFW .`
ocationtvti?z
County Nearest road or town River basin L[Lea,?e ,
Nearest stream and class ification.d, S510
valuator
jency and address r/•'?
ate and time evaluated CT' IDor Wetland Type , i=/r?F-s f; I-1 4= is5 -n ='
Approximate size of wetland system acres
Approximate extent of wetlands in area acres
within miles
Three most common plant species (in order,
,
>il Series (if known)
,drologic indicators.1? /?, _?' e; f
Direct surface hydrologic connection?" ?ES'1'NO
isting Conditions
Drainage
Disturbance
Restoration potential
Restoration value
site known to provide habitat for rare, endangered or
ened species?;;'.;;, If so, list species observed or recorded.
em No.
ation/Landscape
1 Natural area buffer
2 Sensitive watershed
3 Dispersal corridor system
ological Values
} Special ecological attributes
i Wildlife habitat
i Aquatic life
' Water storage
8 Streambank stabilization
9 Removal of pollutants
Human Values
10 Outdoor recreation/education
11 Economic value
Total score
Score (circle one)
5
4
3
2 0%
1 0
5 4 2 1 0
5 4 3 2 !J-/ 0
5 4 ?S 2 1 0
5
5 4
4 3
(3)
, 2?

2 1

1 0

0
5 4 ,
rJ 2 1 0
5 4 (.3] 2 1 0
5 4 3 `'2 ,, l 0
5 4 3 2 il> 0
?L
Site description and notes: ??
r".• Jam, l / !r /
J ?'? ;(?? ELI-1C!1".: ? L2-rl f'-ff2%:.7?L".? l/?[ ?'?t: ?,Z > ? (J-?+? + Y?? / ?/,? r
eui ?/-G?'1. •,QiJ?/? /ll-?r%u > ?? ?/?.,1?.
?? /GGk_?,;?? -l<•?,t'?, "? .?.-v???'.r.rc ??2?2%?n ..??Lu_(7?! l-c' .?'/I?C??'?r2F?..
rr

N 26 M/. w w w w
AFOR w
R6 A ZL?IHD9 M! oo wn Ul o N w
,
,'. •. • _ --=r ..J j JIL ^Oy\ 09,
'\??\•) _?
IN ?NQ
1 w /•? a1v'•,/ 1 ;;':r
u . ( l/
l \
Z
1 lr
- 1 L
111 , A ?, ?, ? ??• '.?, _ Ili , ? ;• ,,ie,. ??;' ? i A'. ?\? /?? ? ?•,J„j
:
00
Q ._
7 III ,%?,.1 `? ?"? ' '? ?/ _ • \-_/ _ rn > -// III. •. ? ?!'?.
f f J/?/ ?r?.c ?1 SIR\l\y j ?j\\?• 1 - r -= II_?/-- -/%.-?Nii?drd --- \?.? ( ° O -'?/
A/
01,
\ ?--- r ,
Q
I w ,
• ?I
-1
,
IV*
? 6 F
n /
i
i
=J ??• C\?' i, ' . 1 _ rr (? ? i ??-.L. fl ° / ? i? 1 ? 1? ,:? Y i N / Ct? ? I? " it (' ?, ? //0???//j
?.c•? ?-'?1 ®r ? ai I!, :?L ??_?I i )/ J? I? III - ?7 -- ? ? •. ?`'?''° ./?'' ?. --. .`v? 'i I ;?? /? /,_ i??..?1=/
..
so\
\_J I 1? a L? t ,• u? n?`=? II`n - Io II I k 9 _I/ / \ ?j / Y ,,c:
J?? ?r. Z I?-__ _- ci Z") // l \ •C J? v
0 co
I ,' u \ . " ??w„ i 2 -? ? flo ?m `If . <• °I I? ? ; i ! ,? \ '. \ l o ?- r ? ? \, ? ? ?/
Sad ., ?__?-/I r• \ ? •? ?? ,I< Ja III i 'N z ? \ ? i.? s ?. 11 _ w ?
_/'/? I ? //. I '?/?• - ? ? W I ?-, ? .i? _.N \J?\?,. 1tl ?\ /-l?? gym/ 1 ? \?_ __? ?\ ?\ ? ?a\ % 1, ?'
...'1ENN/Sy .\ \?•• `\??- I o• o. \\ r/) ^ I /
t ??r o
rf
it-
ells . • ? o , ,??1 ?,? , ;,?' 'J ? _ ? ` ?/? ? ?\ ?
\- 400 ?-
? -•_yr. sa ?'-.*i13 • l./ ( •-\'r ?% \ \? ! Ind ? ` \?? ? ? _c'?? ?--T-?? a 1
t /.(1 . I ii t \ \\ (_. `\,- ?_%? / ?? //,J \`\•' 11\...`?/ / 1 ` ?1 ^ \'/. - ?? ?L34,\;
Cem 422
400 ? ???
1 15
- {\?? 38 y
Radio Tower
h 435
•:I j. l -' ? -" -- _ - 401 - ?--??
Slppihaw. 7 / 1
Coun try Club.
94 1 ro is c_??y?y? ? \? .
Basal Creek ?... _ ?'?- ,'.. ?O grd 442 ' •I? f- ?ti ``i'?? . • filer
Ch _ U ?.B0?? •, ??i' - ??? Park
P
- ?.. ?.. 479
?.ak Chapel
•` \ \ - 40'
SOW ;:ST
r UncolnlHeig ch
quay Sprin
?.? ! - •?? l , : i E JONES ST
Fu_quay-Var}n ?.
\ 1 j 9
Eli h
/• `" ' - ,
1 1 I f II Sch..
• ?/( ?:; t E ACADEMY L1 ST J I/r--'J i-
42
Ce ;L
'
\?
s?-+ ?R? J • • ' : ??' ??( _ \° !SPRIN r ( ?? / '1 ?, , wf
Hospital
00
J 11
\ \?. / °•?\ \ ? ? / - ?`\? ? \ Ste"
Is ii r=-,

i sw