Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDEQ-CFW_00070264Re: Cape Fear Reclassification (15A NCAC 02B .0311) S Subject: Re: Cape Fear Reclassification (15A NCAC 02B .0311) From: Nancy Pate <nancy.pate@ncmail.net> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:36:41 -0400 To: "Crumbley, William" <william.crumbley@osbm.nc.gov> CC: Elizabeth Kountis <Elizabeth. Kountis@ncmail. net>, Doug Lewis <doug.Iewis@ncmail.net> Hi Will, I've attached the information which I have. Elizabeth and Doug, if you have anything additional to add, please do so. Nancy Crumbley, William wrote: Hi Nancy, I was wondering if I could take a look at the impact analysis DENR created for the Cape Fear reclassification that was published in the 7/15 register. I am impressed that so much information was included in the "Reason for proposed action" section. I'd like to know a little more about the area and potential impacts (which is hopefully in the analysis). Thanks! Will Please note my new email address below'* Will Crumbley Economic Analyst NC Office of State Budget and Management william.cnnnbleyaa osbm.nc.gov 919-807-4740 Nancy Pate <nancy.pate(cDncmail.net> APA Coordinator NCDENR Office of General Counsel Content -Type: application/msword '-Fiscal Note Attachment for Cape Fear River.doc Content -Encoding: base64 _............. - Content -Type: e: pp tionlvnd.ms-excel OSBM4 2-13-08 GCFA Cape Fear River.xls' Content Encoding. base64 1 of 1 7/18/2008 12:09 PM DEQ-CFW 00070264 ...:::::...... .:::.:...: . . N u.. ha ng lrr icfi na s brrr� 2. 08;;:;.:<.:::;:.;:.:<::.::.;:.:;:.;:.::<.:<.:<.:<.::::.< :...... �J- ob. r ;DOE} »#�tevas l>:=F :b:r € .:... .. Division/Section lWater Quality/Planning Prepared by Elizabeth Kountis Phone no.:733-5083 x369 Email:elizabeth.kountis@ncmai1.net Phone no.: Email: Subject of Rules I Reclassification of Cape Fear Kiver segments to vv�-iv ana vv">-iv um Admin. Code Citationj 15A NCAC 2B .0311 101 Log Number of Impact None Local Government State Government DOT Federal Government Types of Impact, cont. x Private Sector Fee Increase Substantial (>$3,000,000 OSBM: Not Significant OSBM: Significant Fiscal Impact (Round to nearest $100) FY 09-10 $ - Local Government Impact $ - State Government Impact $ - Federal Government Impact $ - Private Sector Impact $ - Totallmpact Cost- Net Present Value (NPV) Local Government Impact $ State Government Impact $ td Federal Government Impact Not Applicable Private Sector Impact Totallmpact $ - FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ Cost- Annualized NPV #VALUE! #VALUE! Benefit- Net Present Value (NPV) Benefit- Annualized NPV Local Government Impact $ - $ - State Government Impact $ - $ - Federal Government Impact Not Applicable #VALUE! Private Sector Impact $ - $ - Total lmpact $ I #VALUE! Discount rate = 7% and 20 year time horizon Division of Budget, Planning, and Analysis Review Signature Date Approved Director, BPA Denied OSBM Review Signature Date Approved OSBM Designee Denied WE DEQ-CFW 00070265 FISCAL NOTE Rule Citation Number: 15A NCAC 2B .0311 Cape Fear River Basin General Rule Topic Matter: Reclassification of Cape Fear River segments to Class Water Supply -IV (WS-IV) and Class WS-IV Critical Area (CA) DENR Division: Division of Water Quality Staff Contact: Elizabeth Kountis, 733-5083 extension 369 Screening Analysis: This rule does NOT • require a federal certification statement under NCGS 150B-21(fl) • meet the criterion of Federal Exemption found in NCGS 150B-21.4(b1) • meet the criteria listed in NCGS 150B-21 relating to Temporary Rules • meet the criteria for a Technical Correction laid out in NCGS 150B-21.5 • meet any of the criteria cited in the Help file list of a series of situations which may render a rule obsolete INTRODUCTION (Purpose, Benefits) All surface waters in North Carolina are assigned a primary classification by the Division of Water Quality with the intent of protecting their designated best use. Numeric and narrative Water Quality Standards are associated with each classification. The most common and basic classification for freshwater is Class C, which protects for secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish and aquatic life propagation and survival, and agriculture. Secondary recreation includes wading, boating, and other uses involving human body contact with water where such activities take place in an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental manner. Other primary classifications are assigned to protect waters for such uses as shellfishing (Class SA), drinking water supply (WS-I through WS-V), and primary recreation (B). Primary recreational activities include activities such as swimming, skin diving, water skiing, and similar uses involving human body contact with water where such activities take place in an organized manner or on a frequent basis. Supplemental classifications are sometimes added to ensure additional protections, such as for Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) or High Quality Waters (HQW). Five Water Supply Classifications are in effect based on the Water Supply Watershed Protection Act (North Carolina General Statute 143-214.5) mandates. This legislation required the Environmental Management Commission to adopt rules to protect the state's surface drinking water supply watersheds. The five Water Supply Classifications, WS-1, WS-II, WS-III, WS-IV, and WS-V are intended to reflect the variability in the types of water supply watersheds across the state. The Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority ("the Authority") has requested that portions of the Cape River in Bladen and Cumberland Counties (Cape Fear River Basin) be reclassified from Class C to WS-IV CA and WS-IV (PA). The reason for the reclassification is to allow a new intake structure to be placed in the river in order to supply initially Smithfield Packing Company, and in the future, potentially several southern coastal plain municipalities with an additional source of potable water. In October 2004, the Environmental Management Commission (EMC), the Division of Water Resources, and the Lumber River Council of Governments (COG) entered into a Cooperative DEQ-CFW 00070266 Agreement to assure that area groundwater resources are monitored and "a regional plan for long-range, sustainable water supply sources is developed" that would include Smithfield's participation and investigation of additional water sources, including surface water sources. A regional plan was developed, the Authority was formed to include representation of several municipalities, and this proposed reclassification is an outgrowth of that plan. Bladen and Cumberland Counties are the only local governments with jurisdiction in the reclassification area. Bladen County supports the reclassification, and Cumberland County does not object to the proposal. In addition, the Division of Water Resources does not object to the proposal at this time, given that the requestor has stated that nearly all water to be removed from the Cape Fear River will be returned to it. Furthermore, the Division of Environmental Health does not object to the proposed reclassification, and the waters to be reclassified meet water supply water standards according to 2007 DWQ studies. For a proposed riverine WS-IV intake, the area that is within 10 miles and draining to the intake is known as the Protected Area (PA), and the area within 0.5 mile and draining to the river intake is known as the Critical Area (CA). The proposed CA would extend along the river from the proposed intake, which is to be placed approximately 2 miles upstream of County Road 1316, to a point approximately 0.5 miles upstream of the proposed intake. There are no named tributaries to the Cape Fear River in the proposed CA. The proposed PA would extend along the river from the proposed CA to a point approximately 1 mile upstream of Grays Creek. The proposed PA includes several entire named tributaries, as well as the lower portions of many named tributaries, to the Cape Fear River; most of these waters are presently classified C, and the remaining waters carry the B classification. Approximately 160 acres of land and 30,628 acres of land will be included in the new CA and PA, respectively. If reclassified, development and discharge restrictions will apply. There are several animal operations and one NPDES wastewater discharger, Dupont Fayetteville Works, in the proposed water supply watershed; the above -mentioned animal operations and discharger most likely will not be impacted by current regulations associated with this reclassification. There are not any known planned dischargers and developments in the entire proposed reclassification area according to DWQ staff in the Fayetteville Regional Office and local government staff. The proposed area is rural in character, with primarily forested lands, row crops, and residences. Bladen County and Cumberland County are the local governments with jurisdiction in the reclassification area, and these local governments would need to modify water supply watershed protection ordinances within 270 days after the reclassification effective date. The state's effective date of the reclassification is expected to be May 1, 2009. PERSONS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED RULE AND THEIR RESULTING EXPENDITURES (1) Regulated Parties (a) Wastewater Dischargers DEQ-CFW 00070267 There is one existing discharger in the proposed water supply watershed that most likely will not be impacted by this reclassification according to DWQ NPDES Program staff. In addition, there are not any known planned discharges into the proposed waters. Cost/savings = $0. (b) New Development There are not any known planned developments in the area to be affected by the reclassification. Cost/savings = $0. (c) Local Governments As mentioned above, Bladen and Cumberland Counties are the only potentially affected local governments, and these govermments have existing water supply watershed ordinances. These governments will be required to modify their water supply watershed ordinances within 270 days after the effective date of the proposed rule in order to reflect the changes in surface waters classifications, and resulting changes in land management requirements. There is a one-time cost to local governments associated with the modification of their water supply watershed ordinances. This expenditure includes costs for revising water supply watershed protection language in the ordinance as well as the water supply boundary on maps, plus administrative costs and public notification and hearing costs. Many factors make predicting these costs very difficult, i.e. these responsibilities may be carried out by a hired consultant and/or local government staff, may be a part of other projects undertaken by a local government, or may be combined with regional efforts. If local government staff are capable of handling these responsibilities, these tasks would be covered under their normal duties. Value = Not Measureable (d) Department of Transportation (DOT) There are no known proposed DOT activities to take place in the area to be affected by the reclassification. Cost/savings = $0. (2) Implementiniz Agencies (a) Division of Water Quality (DWQ) The NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Central office and regional staff will oversee the processing of the proposed rule as well as the implementation and enforcement of the requirements of the proposed rule. DWQ staff will handle the administrative procedures and provide educational and technical assistance and rule/policy evaluations. In addition, there are DWQ staff who will specifically oversee and assist local governments with watershed planning and ordinances. The Division has staff who issue permits as well as conduct inspections and take enforcement actions. DWQ monitors and keep records of compliance associated with their inspections and enforcement activities which are based on discharge limits, permits, and other regulations invoked by the reclassification. DEQ-CFW 00070268 Any rule/regulatory development, monitoring, record keeping, permitting, inspections, enforcement, or other activities required as a result of the reclassification and for which DWQ is responsible will be incorporated into work loads of existing staff. Cost/savings=$0 (3) Public Beneficiaries (a) Humans The benefit to the public is that these reclassified waters will be able to be used as a public water supply source, and any users of this water supply source will benefit. Reclassifying the waters will help protect the water supply for human consumption by decreasing the risk of contamination of this drinking water supply via invocation of wastewater discharge and stormwater management requirements along with water supply water quality standards. The benefit to human health from this rule is not measurable; it would not be possible to associate any specific savings with the above -mentioned benefits. Value = Not Measurable (b) Environment/Ecosystem The restrictions on land use which protect the water quality through stormwater management strategies and other narrative and numeric water quality standards benefit human health as well as ecosystem health and environmental assets. The protective management criteria will help to mitigate impacts from new development, and will also benefit fish and wildlife. More specifically, portions of the area proposed to be reclassified may experience lower levels of development density as well as decreased pollution, which may increase and improve habitat and in turn propagation and survival of aquatic life including wildlife and fish. DWQ currently does not have adequate data and models to quantify the potential savings associated with the increase in wildlife habitat or reduction of pollution that may be realized as a result of this rule. Value = Not Measurable THRESHOLD DECISION AFTER PRELIMINARY RULE EVALUTION The analysis of the proposed rule DOES NOT show an estimated annual economic impact of $3 million or more. The analytical support for the threshold decision is that it was determined that costs will not exceed $3,000,000. 4 DEQ-CFW 00070269