19920181 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19920101

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Exec
MEMORANDUM D t5 lUJ U
TO: John R. Dorney M 2 5 iM
Division of Environmental M nahem t
FROM: Dennis Stewart, Manager
Habitat Conservation Program ._ /
DATE: May 20, 1992
SUBJECT: Comments on Section 401 Water Quality Certification for
Section 404 Nationwide Permit Requests
Biologists on the Wildlife Resources Commission staff have
reviewed the permit applications listed and we are familiar with
habitat values of the project area. Our comments are provided in
accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U. S. C. 661-667d).
Based upon information provided, it is our opinion that
Section 401 Water Quality Certification can be issued without
significant impacts on fish and wildlife for the following
projects:
1. City of Raleigh, Triangle Central Park, Wake and
Durham County Line
2. Bellsouth Telecommunications Inc., Phoneline
Relocation, Johnston County
3. Town of Rockwell Gravity Sewer Line, Rowan Co.
4. Research Tricenter South Development, Durham Co.
5. Proctor and Gamble Manufacturing, Guilford Co.
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on these
projects. If we can provide further assistance, please call on
us.
DLS/lp
cc: Stephen Pozzanghera, Habitat Conservation Biologist
. STATE u
e ..
i?+~ W
u
r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
April 22; 1992
George T. Everett, Ph.D.
Director
Eric McAl..l st.er
Proctor and Gamble Manufacturing Co.
6200 Bryan Park Road
Brown Summit, North Carolina 27214
Dear Mr. McAlister:
Subject.: Proposed Fill in Headwaters or Isolated Wetlands
Commercial fill
Guilford County
DEM Project 92181, COE # 199200248
Upon review of your request for Water Quality Certification
to place fill material in 0.40 acres of wetlands for commercial
fill located at Brown Summit, in Guilford County, we have
determined that the proposed fill can be covered by General Water
Quality Certification No. 2671 issued January 21, 1992. A copy
of the General Certification is attached. This Certification may
be used in qualifying for coverage under Corps of Engineers'
Nationwide Permit No. 26.
If you have any questions, please contact John Dorney at
91.9/733-1786 or 919/733-1787.
Sincerely,
e rge T. Everet?
GTE:JD
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regional Office
Winston-Salem DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
Ill( .I( >N:AI (tl ? It lti
\?.hc?-ills I.n??n????ilh? \luurc.vilc ILiL if?h \V?',i?hmt?tun A1?ilnun??tuii AV?in.???n ti,i??in
1,',I (,?U ?)w },4nI?al (11 nnt I?;X? ?I'? I II(M) 114 r, r?1, l 1?i i'AN1 vl ,(X
Pollution Prevention Pays
I'O 13i rs ?'» 3i. ILdcit?h, Ni?rth ( ,nnlin,i ?7r?io U? t? I? Ir??In nn '?I't ;' 2 2 'W

DEM ID:
ACTION ID:
APR 2 (1992
JOINT APPLICATION FORM FOR
NATIONWIDE PER IT Qu RE NOTIFICATION TO THE DISTRICT ENGINEER
NATIONWIDE PER ITS ?y 19M ;.SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION CONCURRENCE
NATIONWIDE PER lo -:.iAl INDIVIDUAL SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENG='dEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NC 28402-1c?O
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]`1
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEME14T
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COM?LETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) CC?IES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMEN'. PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: Proc`er & Gamble Manufacturing ComPan
2. OWNERS ADDRESS: 6'=D0 Bryan Park Road
Browns Summit, North Carolina 27214
3• OWNERS PHONE NUMBER (HOME): 919-230-8826
(WORK): 919-621-9222 x386
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGES:='S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER:
5.
LOCATION OF PLANNED "ORK (ATTACH MAP).
COUNTY: Guilford
NEAREST TOWN OR CIT'': Browns Summit/Greensboro
SPECIFIC LOCATION (=';CLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
6200 Bryan Park Roac. 5921 Summit Avenue (Physical Plant location).
6. NAME OF CLOSEST STRE=.M/RIVER: Reedy Fork Creek
7. RIVER BASIN: Haw R-ver
8. IS THIS PROJECT LOCATED IN A WATERSHED CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, SA, HQW, ORW,
WS I, OR WS II? YES - ] NO [X]
9• HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROPERTY? YES ] NO [X]
IF YES, EXPLAIN.
10. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUM-3ER OF A,,RES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
4.25 acres
2/392

-2-
11. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
C FILLED: 0.4
DRAINED:
f FLOODED:
EXCAVATED:
TOTAL IMPACTED: 0.4
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK (ATTACH PLANS): Three bay expansion to
to manufacturing facility. 3?i_ve bay expansion of warehouse facility.
These expansions are directly tied to existing plant facility.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Creation of stormwater retention pond.
14. STATE REASONS WHY THE APPLICANT BELIEVES THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE
CARRIED OUT IN WETLANDS. ALSO, NOTE MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS. Site master plan requires northward expansion of facility. Area
determined as most feasible for creation of stormwater pond is in a natural.
basin on the property. Routed incoming stormwater_around- as much of wat"land
as possible. followed USACE Conditions (attached).
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) REGARDING THE PRESENCE
OR ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED
SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE
PROPOSED PROJECT. HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES [ ] NO [X]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE ATTACHED.
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH
MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT?
HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES [ ] NO [X]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE ATTACHED.
17. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY DEM:
A. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, AND LAKES ON
THE PROPERTY.
B. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED BY
PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS
RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
D. IF A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, ATTACH
-COPY.
E. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Cattle grazing, farmland.
F. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
Not applicable.
&- I . C (?t ?? 4( 22019 z,
OWNER'S IGNATURE DATE
--------- ---

n - P o
// HI
1
[I Y
3.1
1 I
t ? 1 1 I' 11 III I
1 1
- - -1 11r I1 li `'? l ilj ,i ?11?I .. ii}1 II II: I ,?II I
Il II? I' `' ? ? + ?I I 11 If ''f ,1 l! IIJ II p!! II (1111 !11;1- ,
I , I I11
; ;, n I I is
r f II { I Il Ills h' II lili ' (;''
1 I
II I .
11 l ^
I 1 ? .I ? If?ll
._ '+ I ?? . ?I L ,? t .I' I III I I ??''I !{1 ill
I! II. I;' ; ; J I€I E{i , ?, at,? (III ;, (!f. !. ; l?h`1 11
{ l l I? ` Il I lil I I tt ??}} ??? h r rl „} r r 1 feii ;? I '
, ? d II ... j l h ? ? '' n •,., I' jai ? III , I+ ? I ? lil I I Itl 'll (? I t ('? I I
tr
`? I Isf?l
! I ?I iII i11 ?I? it
I : I? ? ?. III I? III., , ? II ?, ,, ,r,,?r,
I
G i Iit II III 'Ii ?' i' 1 .1n II fill `.III II I' I" I hI,I
' '1 . ? III I ,III (`1!II !? li ';' ? _
•rCl - ?tI'I? 111' 1 .., I?L,I II 111 ..I II 1 'I(? 1'I' - '1 IP I il'II;I II!. IIIr11{Ilt , ?._ 7. y.
' ,1411 . ) J l ?; kli i ? u. I lrl I I?'),I IlI1', I ??11 I ,? 11 r1t Er :?
?? +I!Ij ilill t I ?1 q
4J
- ? Ir
II
o `!' _ + I fl 'III II;I?? ; ? - I ?iu sir ? h Ir,_ _>-
o?l,
+l 'l
bD Yi I?Y!i? Ih? I`1!Il? ({rI i I (I ' ;11:1:':, I -I'°;I k ?II
G t `I l I. Lu, i '
----------------------- -
•? /?? I f{r ] it J I I vErJ'. h LN I'-l
21,
(?i? - -- X11 I 1 f I ??
.
' I 6 ?a I
1 1, n 3 lLJ tl , li 1
..............
_1-I (---_
I a r r'
C lli -- J
?J7 1 ?
o i ..I. ,.. I u y
i

r ,
CONDITIONS
a. Any discharge of dredged or fill material will not occur in the
proximity of a public water supply.
b. The activity will not jeopardize a threatened or endangered species as
identified under the Endangered Species Act, or destroy or adversely modify
the critical habitat of such species.
C. The activity will not significantly disrupt the movement of those
species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody (unless the primary
purpose of the fill is to impound water).
d. Any diGi:iiarge of "irodgcd F?l 1. Tn nr.: al wi 1 ). congist of suitable
material free from toxic pollutants.
e. Any structure or fill will be properly maintained.
f. If the activity may adversely affect historic properties which the
National Park Service has listed on, or determined eligible for listing on,
the National Register of Historic Places, or if significant historic
properties are encountered before or during work, the permittee will notify
the District Engineer.
g. An individual state water quality certification must be obtained or
waived. Conditions of certification will be considered to be special
conditions of the Federal nationwide permit.
h. The following management practices will be followed to the maximum
extent:
(1) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United
States will be avoided or minimized through the use of other practical
alternatives.
(2) Discharges in spawning areas during spawning seasons will be
avoided.
(3) Discharges will not restrict or impede the movement of aquatic
species indigenous to the waters or the passage of normal or expected high
flows or cause the relocation of the waters (unless the primary purpose of the
fill is to impound water).
(4) If the discharge creates an impoundment of water, adverse impacts
on the aquatic system caused by the accelerated passage of water and/or the
restriction of its flow will be minimized.
(5) Discharge in wetland areas will be avoided.
(6) Heavy equipment working in wetlands will be placed on mats.
(7) Discharges into breeding areas for migratory waterfowl will be
avoided.
(8) All temporary fills will be removed in their entirety.
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
7 June 1991
Mr. Monte Miller
The Procter and Gamble Company
11511 Reed Hartman Highway
Cincinnati, nII 45241
Dear Mr. Miller:
Subject: Project Update
Brown Summit Site
Guilford County, North Carolina
Law Environmental Project No. 55-1570
112 TOWNPARK DRIVE
KENNESAW, GEORGIA 30144-5599
404-421-3400
Law Environmental is pleased to provide you with this project update as you requested. We
have completed our field delineation of jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including wetlands,
on the Brown Summit site in Guilford County, North Carolina. We have estimated that the
extent of jurisdictional waters, including wetlands, is approximately 4.52 acres for the 285
-acre subject site. Based upon your conceptual plans for the proposed expansion, the project
may impact some of the jurisdictional area on the site.
We recommend that the jurisdictional boundaries be verified by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE), Wake Forest field office in order to determine the need for further
USACE coordination or wetland permitting. We will submit the necessary documentation,
site data sheets, and maps to the USACE for the verification site visit. We will inform Mr.
Eric McAllister at the Brown Summit facility of the date for the verification visit.
Following completion of the verification, we will submit a letter report and figure of the
verified wetland boundaries in order to assist Procter and Gamble or your contractor in
surveying the jurisdictional boundaries. If you have any questions regarding the verification
process or the project please contact either Drs. Dorothy M. Gibb or Richard W. Whiteside
at [phone].
Sincerely,
X0 ?? ??•
orothy Ph.D.
Senior E vironmental Scientist
Richard W. Whiteside, Ph.D.
Principal Environmental Scientist
DMG/RWW:bjp
cc: Mr. Eric McAllister, The Procter and Gamble Company, Greensboro,NC
o _
w
F LL w
za O ?
3 J
N °L
` u p J
` J
Q vl
wzo
Ada w a F O Z
4i/ ` -10 W u o ?UH
6 x - w
w u ? 0Ln3 n
1 1 J ?{
II ajOZ o
>1
1
? I a
4 '.
W
- Z
EL _ 0 U
p rc z
Z ;
J o
a
W
r
? J
\\ III' III
\ Il?n•
_ K
r / _ 'aura
O ? t n T
// _ _: O v? cWi L 1-
n
i
1 r W ?'oa?n oo?
u 1 < ¢ ¢ i a ? ?
_ d o
? -'_-- -¢mw°z
~o w ¢ cD
I
a
Od ` J
y6 //
O
ti~
CHHCX-LIST FOR
Performing a Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation
within the State of Georgia
I. ?At ainimum for all sites subJeet to Jurisdictional delineation by
Corps personnel, the requestor should have boundaries clearly marked
and make prior arrangements for access to and throughout the site to
/ reduce the time and number of visits required to inspect the site.
2. VX The following procedure for a Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation
is suggested to expedite the process. Other or lesser methods may be
acceptable and appreciated. However, they are likely to do less to
expedite the process than the procedures below. Please specify if
other or lesser methods are used.
3. ?/ Copy of request for jurisdictional determination
4. ? Name of person and/or firm performing the preliminary jurisdictional
determination.
5. Use procedures outlined in Federal Manual for Identifying and
Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands, by the Federal Interagency
Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989, available from the
U.S. Government Printing Office. Use the following as appropriate:
a. bl"'_8ou ine On-Site Determination
i. Hydric Soil Assessment Option
or ii. Plant Community Assessment Option
or b. Intermediate Level On-Site Determination
or c. _ Comprehensive On-Site Determination
and d. _ Where appropriate, Disturbed Area and Problem Area Procedures
6. ? All data forms, maps, drawings, photographs, and other documentation
required by the manual to support the wetland determination and
delineation should be forwarded to the district Corps office prior to
Corps inspection of the site.
7. _ Clearly mark property boundaries and wetland boundaries in the fle-1'
and on map,
s drawings or aerial photographs prior to inspection
/ the site by Corps personnel.
8. ?! Send two copies of the above information to:
Bequest for Jurisdictional Determination
-r thin the State of aoorgia
Your Name 'TiM // Phone
Address IT I (own f ark Dr, ; City ?1,.woe,s'GW
State 6-2-14
Zip Code 3Q
Property Owner's Name gnd ?yw•?6/e Co, ; Phone x
Address 6".. 5b0ro ; City
Location of the Property: City
State /VG
Zip Code /
County 6 a1*(_-ra
Distance and Direction from Landmark (highway, intersection, bridge, etc.)
/L2-1- e?-- p e_,kc,/os e_)
Nearby Water Body (lake, river, creek, swamp, marsh) A_q? -0
Type and Purpose of Work Proposed (if known) FIC0,?y
Kind of Equipment to be Used (if known) 4 ?7,-Il /nav?'2y
Name and Phone Number of Person to Contact for On-Site Inspection, if Needed
Date Construction is to Begin or Was Begun 14,5, P
Date Jurisdictional Determination Would be Required 17.2
Provide justification for expeditious handling (in less tha- 3 Months)
?oc1' ?x?ansJon co4k-- c.7f- ofpdn d(n-rJ rj'-4 ko)( Attach extra sheets as needed:
A PBBLIMINARY JURISDICTIOItAL DETERMINATION (ESPECIALLY FOR L,"GE OR DIFFICULT
SITES) BY A QUALIFIED CONSULTANT WOULD ZVEDITE THIS DETERMINATION (SEE
ATTACHED CHECX LIST).
THIS BEQUEST MUST INCLUDE A VICINITY/LOCATION MAP SHOWING TEE PROJECT'S
LOCATION AND BOUNDARIES (portion of Quadrangle Sheet, Count,: Road `dap, or
Other Map Showing How to Find the Site, Its Size, and Boundaries)
If available, provide TWO COPIES of the topographic survey. grading plan, site
development plan, and/or conceptual plan for the property.
I hereby request a jurisdictional determination on the above described
property and give the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permissicn to :onduct an
on-sate inspection and I certify that I have the authority ',o :Hake said
request and.give said permission.
.,.gr.ed
Field Irtwstigatc#s): S - .,
Project is s? , X,'/- "J
Stale
ApplicarttAownar. Putt C:oatmunity sl
Notes: If a more detailed site din is necessary, use tha back of d
-----------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes L--- No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yea No _ (K yes, explain on back)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Data:
County:
llhsme: L? e ?/? ?
si form or a field notebook.
-------------------
Pond
f n °I
?LI ?anU ?y'?Gi Yoiiif ?•
-+----- ----se_e
VEGETATION SO I LS
Inductor
Dominant Plant Soecies Status Stratum Horizon Depth Matrix 1(ottles

1. ? ,?? /?. -a,,,?a FAG k? OS ?h . to.. . inches Color CQ,]„Q,=;
?3 - 1.? /o ?.. ? •?'Z?'?

? Car U s C o ro ?'r! ?•. n ? ?i?C

& o
?
_
rP r ry6.:. AC OS ?i
6.
7. ?,X? ,. r C l</ OS/M
2-
?,
9. lu ?4 D /?L /rte
_
IC). °K r ?kCc? ??
Percent of dominant species that are OBL. FACW, and/or FAC ?c G7
is the hydmphytie vegetation criterion met? Ye
Rationale S'O`S o-?"-moo =" / sty-??.?s ", e f?9? F.- Cw
o r- O/_T Z_ . '?
Lc/a-44,1(" ?r P SOILS
Series/phase: Z
is the soil on the hydria soils list? Ysa Subgroup:
No Undetermined
is the soil a Histosol? Yes -No v Histic epipedon present? Ys No
Is the soil: Motried? Yes !/ No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color. Mottle Calory:
Other hydric sail indicators:
Is the hydrie sod criterion mat? Yes No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes t- No Surface water depth: v l ??? spew uitl
Is the sail saturated? Yes l% No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/scil probe hole: -G
Mark other field Indicators of surface inundation or scii saturation below
__4,,-t7xidized root zones
_::V ll?ater marks
?/grift lines
ester-borne sediment deposits
41Nater-stained leaves
Surface scoured areas
--Wetland drainage pattems
?Wrphological plant adaptations
Additional hydrologic indicators:
Is the wetiand hydrology criterion rtu?t7 Yes ? No
Rationale: /vC .Y Z„ '
JURISDIC77ONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes 6-' o
Rationale for jurisaiaional decision: /??-
Field Uwstigator(s)• S-' Fri Ecpw?r2S . , ` Date: _ y=
ProjeWsIte: upum ;
Apppyr P,, oc%r r •., 6 /r Plant Community /Name: C?=-
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the bade of data form or a field notebook
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal emrironmental conditions exist at the plant community? ?/?><lr.? D,?-, ?o K?' oZ
Yes t," No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? -2
Yes No (If yes, explain on back)
-----------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator SOILS
Horizon Depth Matrix Mottles
Dominant Plant Soades Status Stratum . , to... inches Color Colors

1
L,«,.le...,e;•r SI4/w<, F/uti
f c
Or l -azi Y/Z
.
Q
r1,v
0.51
?---
Z /
4. 4 c CC -. ? s I*d -
& 41H vS s a wI&IL FAw t
---
/
7.
IL
L /, a
i
-
9. Mug /1'0»S cava,r, t FAC W ?_ -
10 Z v h cvs eR _ %s . DTI( +' -- ----
Percent of dominant species that are OBL. FACW, and/or FAC /60
is the hydrophytie vegetation criterion met? Yes c/ ?'-v ? „? s o c / . c a r ?
L? c/?o +• •+ i1 ca
Rationale: ?J r?• a? o916
SOILS
Series/phase: lie AAd k1ev -Subgrcup:2
is the soil on the hydric soils IW? Yes t- No Undetermined
is the soil a Histosai? Yes No ?- Histic appxbn pr"ont? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes 11-1 No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color. /(715 e 'OE motto Colors: r r2 y/?
Other hydric soil Indicators:
Is the hydric sod criterion met? Yes C-1 No 1
Ck
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface Inundated? Yes v-" No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes L?, No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
Mark other field lndic=m of surface inundation or soil saturation below.
Oxidized root zones
Watermarks
Drift lines
Water-home sediment deposits
L, `Water-stained leaves
surface scoured areas
Wetland drainage patterns
Morphoiogicai plant adawntlons
0 J.
Additional hydrologic indicators: ? -?? ?'$ s Q 4 u a? 'ro
is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RA710NALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes t/ No
Rationale for juhsd=ional decision: 7/7 f4 -pc
Reid lnvestigatc#s -T P bee w ?•? ^,/-, Dm:
IBG't/.slte• ?0,,., S?.ntn,.` States /V G_ rcantr
-?.Z•L1/?/?
AppUcantCwner. ?' Pkn! Community ?tlNams: !rte/on
Nots: If a Moro detailed site din is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmrjnt^.i rn m-irtt,7ns e°.: ,, at the plant community? I Yes No (l'l no, explain on back) oPi'no Pv 3
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly deurbed?
Yes No _ (If yes, explain on back) tm?
s`???•? 1
-----------------------------------------
VEGETATION SOILS
Dominant Plant bxi1c nr Horizon Depth Matrix Mottles
1.-s--?Species st"I_q _ i ?•K stratum
?s /?+???( / ; t o ... i/ c h e s SC o o L/ -C010
FA
2 (?' 757,-, 7777 _7 r.^
g, ?u6vs s??_ FAc ??r ?.
7 74v. FAC
8. GOh Fr ?rti sdori'?n FACC_
9. Cyrn u c/sr.+r(a
to. Su n ip r/` JS v?'?tr t? rt i. r?i? FAC U
Percent ? dominant species that are OHL FACIV, and/or FAC
vegetation criterion met? Yes ??t.- No
Rationale: er ,«or"e- oa, v "s F.?? FA G? CSRL t/?wa..w.?
r d /AR 41eti AS snor{ "HST rGJ?/? oFz t, .c
v/+ i^ n t1 (" O Cf /SOILS
Series/phase: e / / A Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? es No (/ Undetermined
Is the sail a Histasol? Yes _ No =Histic eppxian present? Yes No
is the soil: Mottled? Yes No L--,'- Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color. Mottle Colon. -?-'
Other hydric sail Ind c=rs: ya
Is the hyLdric sail criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: S G h 4 ?w/C/??C (`{?a/ lT ?PNIQ/?lf ..ate ?r
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface Inundated? Yes No " Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No `c/ _
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
Mark other field Indicators of surface inundation or sod saturation below:
Oxidized root zones
Water marks
Drift lines
_ Water-bome sediment deposits
Water-stained leaves
Surface scoured areas
Wetland drainage pattems
Morpbofogical plant atfaptatlons
Additional hydmiogfc indicators: moo„
Is the wedand hydrology criterion met? Yes
Rationale: zV??a - rr 4 , , l ;e ,?,4,,
JURISDIC710NAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for'Uns?dictional dedsi9n:
_L_ r 4 .I
? TMic rata f^•7Tf rvn i... ... ..? t___?_ ,?
L 7f

11 N IN
VIK
Ji.
61
%
=,M I \• I
800/
787
Q?brn G???? ? • - ?' ?' :?'<-? l .'.? 1?\ I_ •J ? I ,,\? ? ! r I 1 ? ? ?; ? ? ? o V.???? \' l ? f
Procter & Gamble
Storm Water Discharge Permit Application
Sirrine Project No. R-1419
Construction is expected to begin in September 1991, and proceed for approximately
14 months.
PROPOSED MEASURES TO CONTROL POLLUTANTS DURING CONSTRUCTION
AND APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL
REGULATIONS:
Diversion ditches will be used to direct clean, non-sediment carrying water away from
land disturbing activities. Ditches will be used to transmit sediment latent water to silt
traps or basins. The collected sediment will be periodically removed to ensure their
functional design. Ground cover ^rill be, placed on di,,turbed slopes as soon as
practical to minimize and control erosion. During earth disturbing activities and
construction, all sediment control measures will be observed regularly and cleaned
and repaired as needed to maintain proper sediment control and to ensure their
functional design.
Detailed drawings of silt fence locations can be found in the Drainage and Erosion
Control Calculation document and the Erosion Control Plan drawings mentioned
previously.
The applicable State regulations are the General Statutes of North Carolina, Chapter
113A - Pollution Control and Environment, Article 4 - Sedimentation Pollution Control
Act. Applicable county regulations are the Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control
Ordinance for Guilford County, effective 17 September 1990.
081591 4
r
Procter & Gamble
Storm Water Discharge Permit Application
Sirrine Project No. R-1419
PROPOSED MEASURES TO CONTROL POLLUTANTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION AND
APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL
REGULATIONS:
All finished graded areas will be suitably protected for long-term erosion control by
seeding and mulching. Rip-rap will be placed at the discharge of drainage piping
and steeper section of new ditches.
The applicable State regulations are the General Statutes of North Carolina, Chapter
113A - Pollution Control and Environment, Article 4 - Sedimentation Pollution Control
Act. Applicable county regulations are the Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control
Ordinance for Guilford County, effective 17 September 1990.
ESTIMATE OF THE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT, INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA
AFTER CONSTRUCTION, NATURE OF FILL, AND SOIL DESCRIPTIONS:
The U..S. Soil Conservation Service Unit Hydrograph method was used to calculate
the runoff from the constructed site. This method is recommended for sites which
exceed twenty acres, and is based upon developing curve numbers instead of runoff
coefficients. The composite area curve number for the constructed site is estimated
to be 69.
The increase in impervious area estimated to be approximately 9 acres.
No fill material will be brought in for this construction project. It is planned at this
time to use on-site soils for all fill work.
081591 5
Procter & Gamble
Storm Water Discharge Permit Application
Sirrine Project No. R-1419
The soil types in the construction area are Cecil (CeB2 and CeC2) and Madison (MaE
and McD2). Detailed descriptions of these soils are attached along with a soil map.
RECEIVING STREAM
Runoff from the proposed three bay warehouse expansion and the grading for future
expansion will flow to Reedy Creek. Runoff from the grading for the parking lot
expansion will flow to a small un-named creek which discharges into Hardy Mill Pond
within approximately one half mile from the Procter and Gamble site.
081591 6
I
I CtL D
4 '•I
i 1)
• / .iL // O;'? //•i? % ??t SITE t,
fool n,
-f? ?1 fe s a/r it/
r ; ? war- ?/ ? e
1. I r
2 A? e ( F
116
r / t •l aa'^ I ` i
REFERENCE:
LOCK WOOD GREENE FIGURE 1
DRAINAGE AND EROSION E i I RRI NE SI TE LOCATION
CONTROL CALCULATIONS NVIRONMENTAL PROCTER AND GAMBLE
UNCONSULTANTS BROWN SUMMIT SITE
RalolVr North Coroltno GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SIRRINE PROJECT NO. R-1419
OVNCAN-r A11N[LL• INC.. CHAR OTTt 344 ,00-411-4011
+`. r•, _____ 5 a?yii i.';olif?;%fiuit'dY1'tIi'llL:iiUl7rti;`n(ij}i'r,'(i}iijiij!ii4??.fi(?? '
T i"i 'Ii 1111 R111LL1ii'ililli?Ij4'?i{:lip ..:y?r 4i -- ??"'??•'-•?••(' i ; {•
}? ?'? ill,:'•? `
` `?•
i

.. ? a . I:r; ; . , ..rr. :Ili ,:1?=? ?'".• , %i f i ? ` t 1

N
? 3-3
I I
?
'
{
5?+••
'
?•'
/i?if ?': ) 1t ? ,
.-??1 c
I I
. ( (
, i
?
•.
i i 1 f?' li::== `
• 1 III '\```` +ti `i \:,:..`\••j'j ?Jl:-???\? ? its !I ?tl? I
:. ? i? ? ?•'\ 1

F \ -
>, I

.....

i tit t r "•' ''

r.

4E m

i 3 BA Y EXPANSIONS ? L1

?•
? S•
r'
?rJrr 1 j? j 1
A

v .. .• • 1
y,+- ./.-
_
J
' I 1 11
3
P
- 1
8

,. r
OF 0
is
o ??
--------- ??-? Ex
-
? nsl n

w. rn,
51 5cw
.
t 1 1 I III
!1 C
,
_....._. ... -
1
k--PARKING PLATFORM
REFERENCE:
LOCKWOOD GREENE
ENGINEER$
®NSIRRINE
EN C OvN SOULTA NTS
Raleigh, North Carolina
FIGURE 3
CONSTRUCTION AREA
PROCTER AND GAMBLE
BROWN SUMMIT SITE
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
0YI,CAM-?AA"9LL, IMC.. CMA0fI071E 111f, 600-432-4011
SIRRINE PROJECT NO. R-141
CeB2-Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes,
eroded. This well drained soil is on broad ridges on
uplands. The mapped areas are 4 to 50 acres or more in
size.
Typically, the surface layer is brown sandy clay loam
about 6 inches thick. The subsoil is 46 inches thick; it is
yellowish red sandy clay loam in the upper part, red clay
in the middle part, and mottled red clay loam in the lower
part. The underlying material, to a depth of 85 inches, is
mottled red and yellow loam.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few small areas
of soils that have a sandy loam surface layer. Also in-
cluded are a few small areas of Appling, Coronaca, Madis-
on, and Mecklenburg soils.
The organic-matter content of the surface layer is low.
Permeability is moderate, available water capacity is
medium, and the shrink-swell potential is moderate. Reac-
tion of the subsoil is very strongly acid or strongly acid.
Depth to bedrock is more than (30 inches. The seasonal
high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet.
About one-half of the acreage of this soil is used for
woodland. The rest is used for cultivated crops, for
pasture, or for urban and industrial uses. Slope, erosion,
runoff, and permeability are the main limitations in the
use and management of this soil.
This soil has moderately low potential for row crops,
such as corn and soybeans. It has moderate potential for
hay and pasture plants such as fescue, sericea lespedeza,
red clover, and white clover. Proper pasture management
helps to ensure adequate protective cover, which reduces
runoff and controls erosion.
This soil has only moderate potential for most urban
uses because of the moderate permeability, which limits
performance of septic tank absorption fields, but this
limitation generally can be overcome by modifying the
field or increasing the size of the absorption area. The
potential for recreation is moderate.
This soil has moderate potential for broadleaf and
needleleaf trees. The dominant trees are shortleaf pine,
maple, loblolly pine, Virginia pine, sweetgum, red oak, and
%%hite oak. The main understory species are dogwood,
cedar, holly, pin oak, sassafras, and black cherry. A clayey
subsoil is the main limitation in the use and management
of this soil for woodland. Capability unit IIIe-2; woodland
group 4c.
CeC2-Cecil sandy clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes,
eroded. This well drained soil is on narrow side slopes.
The mapped areas are 4 to 25 acres in size.
Typically, the surface layer is brown sandy clay loam
about 6 inches thick. The subsoil is 46 inches thick; it is
yellowish red sandy clay loam in the upper part, red clay
in the middle part, and mottled red clay loam in the lower
part. The underlying material, to a depth of 85 inches, is
mottled red and yellow loam.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few small areas
of soils that have a sandy loam surface layer and a few
small areas of soils that have slopes of more than 10 per-
cent. Also included are a few small area-9 of Appling,
Coronaca, Madison, and Mecklenburg soils.
The organic-matter content of the surface layer is low.
Permeability is moderate, available water capacity is
medium, and the shrink-swell potential is moderate. Reac-
tion of the subsoil is eery strongly acid or strongly acid.
Depth to bedrock is more than 60 inches. The seasonal
high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet.
Most areas of this soil are in woodland. The rest are
used for cultivated crops, for pasture, or for urban uses.
Slope, runoff, erosion, and permeability are the main
limitations in the use and management of this soil.
This soil has low potential for row crops. It has
moderate potential for hay and pasture plants such as
fescue, sericea lespedeza, red clover, and white clover.
Proper pasture management helps to ensure adequate
protective cover, which reduces runoff and controls ero-
sion.
This soil has only moderate potential for most urban
uses because of moderate permeability and slope. The
limitation of slope can be reduced or modified by special
planning, design, or maintenance. Erosion is a hazard
when ground cover is removed. The moderate permeabili-
ty limits performance of septic tank absorption fields, but
this limitation generally can be overcome by modifying
the field or increasing the size of the absorption area. The
potential for recreation is moderate.
This soil has moderate potential for broadleaf and
needleleaf trees. The dominant trees are shortleaf pine,
loblolly pine, Virginia pine, sweetgum, red oak, and white
oak. The main understoiy species are dogwood, cedar,
holly, pin oak, sassafras, and black cherry. A clayey sub-
soil is the main limitation in the use and management of
this soil for woodland. Capability unit I Ve-2; woodland
group 4c.
Mc132-Madison clay loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes,
eroded. This well drained soil is on narrow lower side
slopes. The mapped areas are 3 to 35 acres in size.
Typically, the surface layer is reddish brown clay loam
about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is 29 inches thick; the
upp ?r part is red clay, and the lover p":rt is rnotG?d red
clay loam. The underlying material, to a depth of 80
inches, is mottled reddish yellow sandy clay loam in the
upper part and mottled reddish yellow sandy ioam in the
lower part.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few small areas
of soils that have a sandy loam surface iaver and a few
areas of soils that have rock fragments on the surface.
Also included are a few areas of Cecil soils and a few
areas of other Madison soils.
The organic-matter content of the surface layer is low.
Permeability is moderate, available water capacity is low,
and the shrink-swell potential is low. Reaction of the sub-
soil is strongly acid or very strongly acid. Depth to
bedrock is more than 60 inches. The seasonal high water
table is at a depth of more than 6 feet.
Most of the acreage of this soil is forested. The rest is
mainly in pasture. Slope, runoff, erosion, permeability,
and mica content are the main limitations in the use and
management of this soil.
This soil is unsuited for cultivation. It h,?:_s moderate
potential for hay and pasture plants. Proper pasture
management helps to ensure adequate protective cover,
which reduces runoff and controls erosion.
The potential is low for most urban and recreation uses
because of slope, permeability, and mica content. Erosion
is a hazard when ground cover is removed.
The soil has moderate potential for nee-3leleaf and
broadleaf trees. The dominant trees are shortleaf pine,
loblolly pine, Virginia pine, sweetgum, red oak- and white
oak. The main understory species are dogwood, cedar,
holly, pin oak, sassafras, and black cherry. A clayey sub-
soil is the main limitation in the use and management of
this soil for woodland. Capability unit Vle-2; woodland
group 4c.
MaE-Madison sandy loam, is to 35 percent slopes.
This well drained soil is on long, -arrow side slopes ad-
jacent to streams. The mapped areas are 3 to 60 acres in
size.
Typically, the surface layer is reddish brown sandy
loam about 5 inches thick. The sum soil is 29 inches thick.
The upper part is red clay, and the lower part is mottled
red clay loam. The underlying mar.=rial, to a depth of 80
inches, is mottled reddish yellow sandy clay loam in the
upper part and mottled reddish ye?ow sandy loam in the
lower part.
Included with this soil in mapFi:g are small areas of
soils that have a clay loam surfaces layer. Also included
are small areas of soils that have = thinner surface layer
and subsoil than this Madison soil =nd that have a loamy
subsoil.
The organic-matter content of t_a surface layer is low.
Permeability is moderate, available xater capacity is low,
and the shrink-swell potential is lc ?. Reaction of the sub-
soil is strongly acid or very st---Dngly acid. Depth to
bedrock is more than 60 inches. T-_ seasonal high water
table is at a depth of more than 6 f"__t.
Most areas of this soil are forest' j. The rest are mainly
in pasture. Slope, runoff, erosion, ,7rmeability, and mica
content are the main limitations i_- the use and manage-
ment of this soil.
This soil has low potential for °°ops because of slope
and erosion. It has low potential for hay and pasture
plants. Proper pasture manager-_?nt helps to ensure
adequate protection.
The potential for most urban anc recreation uses is low
because of slope.
This soil has moderately high =•_ tential for broadleaf
and needleleaf trees. The main t_-=es are northern red
oak, southern red oak, white oak, -._st oak, maple, sweet-
gum, shortleaf pine, and Virginia .one. The dominant un-
derstory species are dogwood, ced._. holly, sassafras, and
black cherry. Slope is the main liir_-ation in the use and
management of this soil for wocc='.and. Capability unit
Vle-1; woodland group 3r.
I. \
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
N INtiM)[11O '[qNI
,700 BRYAN PAk1< IMni,. R AVN Y IN9M11. N( )It 111 (n1.(?i INn ,?>I I
I I I I I'I IONI (',P): All
C1?
?$ APR ? 11992

April 20, 199:
Mr. Eric Galamb
North Carolina Department Oi Environment.,
Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 276£7
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Eric:
Enclosed is information pertinent to wetlands impact at our Browns
Summit facility as a result of construction. 1: have also attached
a completed Joint Application Form for your review. As noted can
the form, l have not contacted the State Historic Preservation
Officer or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. I will forward the
responses from their assessment of our site to you upon receipt.
In the interim, please contact me, if 1 may be of assistance.
EL (a-,
Eric McAlister
1
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPAPRIECEIVED
GREENSBORO PLANT mc. Dept, of EHA
6200 BRYAN PARK ROAD, BROWN SUMMIT, NORTH CAROLINA 27214
TELEPHONE: [phone] MAR 12 ?(?
1 2
MAR Z
Eric Galamb, Environmental Technician IV
North Carolina Department Of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
Water Quality Section
8025 North Point Boulevard
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27106
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
March 10, 1992
Eric:
I enjoyed meeting with you on Monday, March 9 to discuss our
construction project and associated wetlands impact. Thank you for
your advice and assistance in meeting the applicable state
environmental regulations.
Incidentally, I am sharing the information and joint application
form you left me with the other Procter & Gamble facilities in the
state. I also sent a copy to the consultant who delineated our
site's wetlands for their future use in North Carolina (Law
Environmental Incorporated; Kennesaw, Georgia).
My apologies for the delay in meeting with you on Monday. Please
contact me if you need additional information or if I may be of
assistance. I may be contacted at the number on the letterhead or
by using a voice mail pager. My pager number is 919-230-8826.
Eric McAlister

_ `
LL
L
v I_
J.

U

_ J .

1.
LL1

WETLAND RATING SYSTEM WORKSHEET
Project No. or description aOc4r 1 -lva ??
Location / /
County ?'1 ?0 ((f '/
o Nearest road or town / rrw, SwN?,u f'
River basin 10.,
Nearest stream & vl- Ck- and classification C A5?J
ERIC GALAMB
A _ t address DEM -,jISJ?7(F
l
ime evaluated
y? C . Land Type
)ximate size o 4i\ - o - 1 A
wetland system 0"/0
acres
I ?
b
?
? )ximate extent of wetlands in area acres
c
.
within miles l?
?-
Three most common plant species (in order):
Soil Series (if known)
Hydrologic indicators
Direct surface hydrologic connection? YE NO
Existing Conditions
Drainage q,1Gu"a W
Disturbance
Restoration potentia
Restoration value
U
Is site known to provide habitat for rare, endangered or
threatened species?_ If so, list species observed or recorded.
Item No.
I. Location/Landscape
1 Natural area buffer
2 Sensitive watershed
3 Dispersal corridor system
II. Ecological Values
4 Special ecological attributes
5 Wildlife habitat
6 Aquatic life
7 Water storage
8 Streambank stabilization
9 Removal of pollutants
Score (circle one)
5
5 4 C3 ) 2 1
5 4 3 2 0 0
5 4 3 2 0
5 4 3 2 0
5 4 *3 2 0
5 4 3 2 0
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 C?i
III. Human Values
10 Outdoor recreation/education 5 4 3 2 1
11 Economic value 5 4 3 2 1
Total score
Site description and notes:,---,, 13

.77. 7
17,7 7 ?1 ,
LAJ
1-4
:I ..,. ?. .. ...., ? ? N mow

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
December 31, 1991
Regulatory Branch 1<JJ
Action ID. 199200248 Pqu ??9
(,A^ r...
The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.
c/o Mr. Eric C. McAlister a
6200 Bryan Park Road ` c .1.,.. ?? h
Brown Summit, North Carolina 27214
Dear Mr. McAlister:

Reference the meeting on July 10, 1991, with Mr. John Thomas of my staff
and Mr. Barry Edwards (project consultant with Law Environmental) onsite of
the Procter and Gamble Manufacturing Company facility located off U.S. 29,
adjacent to Reedy Fork Creek, Brown Summit, Guilford County, North Carolina.
The purpose of this meeting was to inspect thes_te for waters and wetlands
subject to Department of the Army permitting authority. This letter also
confirms the November 19, 1991, wetlands survey verification.
Based upon aforementioned onsite inspections and review of the
aforementioned survey, we recognize this surveyed alignment to be the limits
of our regulatory jurisdiction on the property. Unless there is a change in
the law or our published regulations, this determination of the limits of
wetlands may be relied upon for a period not to exceed two (2) years.
Also reference your application, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act, for Department of the Army authorization to impact jurisdictional
wetlands in the construction of the proposed facilities expansion at the
aforementioned Proctor and Gamble Manufacturing Company facility.
Our review of the referenced application includes site plans that
indicate proposed grading impacts to approximately 0.40 acres of wetlands
adjacent to an unnamed tributary of Reedy Fork Creek on the site. All other
development is located on high ground.
For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, Title
33, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330, published in the Federal
Register on November 13, 1986, lists nationwide permits. Authorization was
provided for discharges of dredged or fill material into non-tidal rivers,
streams, and their lakes and impoundments, including adjacent wetlands, that
are located above the headwaters and other non-tidal waters of the United
States, including adjacent wetlands, that are not a part of a surface
tributary system to interstate waters or navigable waters of the United
States.

?, t

4 , & , e
-2-
Your proposed work, involving adverse modification to less than an acre
(0.40 acre) of waters of the United States located above the headwaters of
the aforementioned tributary, is authorized by nationwide permit provided it
is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed conditions. Please
be aware that this authorization does not relieve you of the responsibility
to obtain any other required or local approval. You should contact Mr. John
Dorney, North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, [phone],
to obtain the necessary Section 401, Water Quality Certification prior to
starting work.
This verification will be valid until the nationwide permit is modified,
reissued, or revoked. All nationwide permits are scheduled to be modified,
reissued, or revoked prior to January 13, 1992. It is incumbent upon you to
remain informed of changes to the nationwide permits. We will issue a
public notice announcing changes when they occur. Furthermore, if you
commence, or are under contract to commence, this activity before the date
the nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have 12 months from
the date of the modification or revocation to complete the activity under
the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit.
Please be reminded that no excavated or fill materials may be placed in
any waters or wetland areas without prior Federal permit authorization.
Please contact this office for any future proposed impacts in any water or
wetland areas subject to Department of the Army permitting authority.
Thank you for your time and cooperation. If you have any questions,
please contact Mr. Thomas, Raleigh Regulatory Field office, telephone (919)
846-0648.
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure

-3-
Copies Furnished (without enclosure): Copy Furnished (with enclosure):
Mr. John Parker Law Environmental
North Carolina Department of Environment, c/o Mr. Berry W. Edwards III
Health and Natural Resources 112 Townpark Drive
Post Office Box 27687 Kennesaw, Georgia 30144-5599
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
V Post office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Regional Office Manager
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
8025 North Point Boulevard
Suite 100
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27106