19920129 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19920101

APPLICATION
FOR
401 CERTIFICATION
LAKE JEANETTE
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
CONE MILLS/CORNWALLIS DEVELOPMENT CO.
POST OFFICE BOX 26540
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27415
PREPARED BY: L.
ALLEY, WILLIAMS, CARMEN & KING, INC.
POST OFFICE BOX 1179
BURLINGTON, NC 27216-1179
MAR - 4 199?

MARCH 2, 1992

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. APPLICATION FORM
2 AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM CORPS OF ENGINEERS
.
' 3. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF PROPERTY
4. CITY OF GREENSBORO (ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS)
' 5. ROADWAY AND UTILITY CROSSINGS
6. EXHIBITS A, B AND C
'
EXHIBIT A (WETLAND DELINEATION AND ROADWAY CROSSINGS MAP 1)
EXHIBIT B (WETLAND DELINEATION AND ROADWAY CROSSINGS MAP 2)
' EXHIBIT C (SEWER OUTFALL CROSSINGS MAP)

I

I

7

71
Application Form
1_l i l a

DEM ID:
ACTION ID:
t

JOINT APPLICATION FORM FOR
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION TO THE DISTRICT ENGINEER
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION CONCURRENCE
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE INDIVIDUAL SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
' WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone [phone]

WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: CONE MILLS CORPORATION / CORNWALLIS DEVELOPMENT CO.
2. OWNERS ADDRESS: C/O MR. DICK ROUTH
POST OFFICE BOX 26540
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27415
3. OWNERS PHONE NUMBER (HOME): [phone] (WORK):[phone]
' 4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR'RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL,
PHONE NUMBER: • SAME. AS ABOVE. ADDRESS,
5. LOCATION OF PLANNED WORK (ATTACH MAP).
COUNTY: GUILFORD
NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: GREENSBORO
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):LAKE JEANETTE
1 BASS CHAPEL ROAD (S.R. 2348)
LAKE JEANETTE (S.R. 2348)

6. NAME OF CLOSEST STREAM/RIVER: RICHLAND CREEK
1 7. RIVER BASIN: CAPE FEAR
8. IS THIS PROJECT LOCATED IN A WATERSHED CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, SA, HQW, ORW,
' WS I, OR WS II? YES [ ] NO [X]
9. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROPERTY? YES [X] NO [ ]
' IF YES, EXPLAIN. AUTHORIZATION BY NATIONWIDE PERMIT HAS BEEN GRANTED (ATTACHED
LETTER)
10. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
' j4 Q?$FS
2/3/92

-2-
11. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
FILLED: I AC_ (ROADwAYs)
DRAINED: N/A
' FLOODED: N/A
EXCAVATED.:5 AC, r11111.TTF.S)
TOTAL IMPACTED: 1.5 AC_
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK (ATTACH PLANS): ROADWAY AND ITTILITY CROSSINGS

1

13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: TO ACCESS AND SERVICE PROPERTY FOR PROPOSED
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
14. STATE REASONS WHY THE APPLICANT BELIEVES THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE
CARRIED OUT IN WETLANDS. ALSO, NOTE MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS. MANY OF THE UNNX-ED TRIBUTARIES OF RICHLM CREEK RUN FRCM THE LAKES EDGE TO PROPERTYS EDGE THERE
FIORE MAKING ACCESSING THE PROPERTY WITHOUT TOTAL AVOIDANCE GEOGRAPHICALLY AND ECONOMICALLY NOT FEASIBLE.
MEASURES OF MINIMIZATION OF WETLAND IMPACTS INCLUDE AVOIDANCE WHERE POSSIBLE. CROSSING AT LOCATIONS OF
LEAST IMPACT, PROVIDING BUFFERS, EASHMU PRdTECITON AND OTHERS.
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) REGARDING THE PRESENCE
OR ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED
SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE
PROPOSED PROJECT. HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES [ ] NO [X]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE ATTACHED.
' 16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH
MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT?
' HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES [ ] NO [X]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE ATTACHED.
17. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY DEM:
A....--..WETLAND DELINEATION MAP-SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, AND LAKES_ON
THE PROPERTY.
' B. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED BY
PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS
RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
' D. IF A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, ATTACH
COPY.
' E. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? R8SILENZIN.
F. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
' PUBLIC SaIER -
' 0 ER' SIGNATURE DATE

1
I
A

Authorization Letter From Corps

1
' I DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
y? P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
- -- - February 5, 1992 -
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199103436
t FEB 0 6 1992
Cone Mills Corporation
Cornwallis Development
c/o Mr. Dick Routh
post office Box 26540
Greensboro, North Carolina 27415
Dear Mr. Routh:
Reference is made to my letter dated September 30, 1991. This letter
confirmed the September 16, 1991, wetlands survey verification of the proposed
Lake Jeanette development located adjacent to Richland Creek, north of
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina. Also reference is made to site
plans of the proposed access roads and sewer outfalls for the aforementioned
project received by this office on December 24, 1991.
Your request dated January 13, 1992, stated your proposed plans to
' construct minor road crossings labeled 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 on the
aforementioned site plans. A review of these site plans revealed that each
identified road crossing is a single crossing of separate unnamed tributaries
of Lake Jeanette (Richland Creek).
For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, Title 33,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330, published in the Federal Register
on November 13, 1986, lists nationwide permits. Authorization was provided
for minor road crossing fills including all attendant features, both temporary
and permanent, that are part of a single and complete project for crossing of
a non-tidal waterbody, provided that the crossing is culverted, bridged or
' otherwise designed to prevent the restriction of, and to withstand expected
high flows and provided further that discharges into any wetlands adjacent to
the waterbody do not extend beyond 100 feet on either side of the ordinary
' high water mark of that waterbody.
The minor road crossings of the unnamed tributaries of Lake Jeanette
(Richland Creek) is authorized by nationwide permit provided it is
accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed conditions. Please be
aware that this authorization does not relieve you of the responsibility to
obtain any other required State or local approval. You should also contact
Mr. John Dorney, North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, (919)
733-5083, to obtain the necessary Section 401, Water Quality Certification for
the proposed road crossings.

a
1

' -2-
The site plans also revealed that you propose to construct the sewer
outfalls for the aforementioned development.
' For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, Title 33,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330, published in the Federal Register
on November 13, 1986, lists nationwide permits. Authorization was provided
' for the discharge of material for backfill or bedding for utility lines,
including outfall and intake structures, provided there is no change in pre-
construction bottom contours and all excess material is removed to an upland
disposal area.
Your work, involving the construction of the aforementioned sewer outfall
lines, is authorized by nationwide permit provided it is accomplished in
' strict accordance with the enclosed conditions. Please be aware that this
authorization does not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain any other
required State or local approval. Again, you should contact Mr. John Dorney,
t North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, [phone], to obtain
the necessary Section 401, Water Quality Certification prior to starting work.
This verification will be valid until the nationwide permit is modified,
' reissued, or revoked. All nationwide permits under which you are requesting
authorization were revoked on January 13, 1992. Reference is made to the
letter received from Alley, Williams, Carmen & King, Inc. of January 16, 1992,
in which you requested that the aforementioned nationwide permit authorization
' be extended until January 13, 1993.
Based on the information included with your letter, we concur that a
' significant commitment of money and resources has been made in reliance on the
nationwide permits in effect at the time of your project design process and
coordination with my staff. Accordingly, we consider your project to have
"commenced" in accordance with Paragraph 330.12 of our current regulations.
' Your work may continue under the original nationwide permit authorization
until January 13, 1993, provided all construction is accomplished in strict
accordance with the enclosed conditions. After that date (January 13, 1993),
' any uncompleted work within waters or wetlands will be reviewed in accordance
with the terms and conditions of the current nationwide permits.
Please be reminded that no excavated or fill materials may be placed in
any waters or wetlands areas without prior Federal permit authorization. Any
additional impacts to delineated wetlands will require further review by this
office.
t Thank you for your time and cooperation. If you have any questions,
please contact Mr. Thomas, Raleigh Regulatory Field office, telephone (919)
' 846-0648.
Sincerely,

a
' G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure

t

Copies Furnished (with enclosure):
-3-
Newkirk Environmental Consultants, Incorporated
C/O Mr. Mark A. Purcell
192 East Bay Street, Suite 201
Charleston, South Carolina 29401
ley, Williams, Carmen & King, Inc.
/O Mr. Franz K. Holt
300 East Wendover Avenue, Suite 403
Greensboro, North Carolina 27401
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):

Mr. John Parker
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687

Regional Office Manager
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
8025 North Point Boulevard
Suite 100
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27106
1

a

ii

CONDITIONS
a. Any discharge of dredged or fill material will not occur in the
proximity of a public water supply.
b. The activity will not jeopardize a threatened or endangered species as
identified under the Endangered Species Act, or destroy or adversely modify
the critical habitat of such species.
C. The activity will not significantly disrupt the movement of those
species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody (unless the primary
purpose of the fill is to impound water).
d. Any discharge of dredged or fill material will consist of suitable
material free from toxic pollutants.
e. Any structure or fill will be properly maintained.
f. If the activity may adversely affect historic properties which the
National Park Service has listed on, or determined eligible for listing on,
the National Register of Historic Places, or if significant historic
properties are encountered before or during work, the permittee will notify
the District Engineer.
g. An individual state water quality certification must be obtained or
waived. Conditions of certification will be considered to be special
conditions of the Federal nationwide permit.
h. The following management practices will be followed to the maximum
extent:
(1) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United
states will be avoided or minimized through the use of other practical
alternatives.
I (2) Discharges in spawning areas during spawning seasons will be
avoided.

(3) Discharges will not restrict or impede the movement of aquatic
species indigenous to the waters or the passage of normal or expected high
flows or cause the relocation of the waters (unless the primary purpose of the
fill is to impound water).
(4) If the discharge creates an impoundment of water, adverse impacts
on the aquatic system caused by the accelerated passage of water and/or the
restriction of its flow will be minimized.
(5) Discharge in wetland areas will be avoided.
I avoided.
(6) Heavy equipment working in wetlands will be placed on mats.
(7) Discharges into breeding areas for migratory waterfowl will be
a
(8) All temporary fills will be removed in their entirety.

1
1
Environmental Review of Property
?',iiI

iLl

Newkirk Environmental Consultants, Inc.
192 EAST BAY STREET, SUITE 201 • CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA 29401 • [phone] • FAX #[phone]
December 2, 1991
Mr. John Thomas
Department of the Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Regional Field Office
11413 Falls of the Neuse Road
Wake Forest, NC 27587-9408
RE: Lake Jeanette Development Nationwide
& General Permit Coordination
Dear Mr. Thomas:

t
s

Reference is made to our previous meetings regarding the Corps of
Engineers (COE) regulatory jurisdiction, as it pertains to the
proposed development of the Lake Jeanette tract (Cornwallis
Development Corp.) adjacent to Richland Creek in Greensboro,
Guilford County, North Carolina.
As you are aware, Mr. Ken Jolly and yourself have previously
reviewed in the field and approved the demarcation of the
boundaries of COE jurisdictional "waters of the United States"
(CESAW-C091-J-041). The "waters of the U.S." within the project
boundaries primarily consist of the Lake Jeanette reservoir
(Richland Creek) and its contributing tributaries. All of the
tributaries within the project boundaries are "above headwaters"
(i.e. less than 5 cfs avg. annual flow), and as is typical of the
piedmont have minimal adjacent wetlands.
Typically the tributaries are very incised, have very little
herbaceous vegetation within them, and are lined with mesophytic to
hydrophytic hardwood trees. Dominant tree species within and
' immediately adjacent to the small streams include sweetgum, yellow
poplar, red maple, American beech, American hornbeam, dogwood,
northern red oak and southern red oak.
Most of the jurisdictional areas do not have hydric soils so it is
not appropriate to classify them as "wetlands" relative to Corps of

Mr. John Thomas
December 5, 1991
' Page Two
Engineers regulatory jurisdiction. In regard to Corps of Engineers
'
jurisdictional "waters of the U.S.", the referenced tributaries are
' most accurately desribed as intermittent and perennial streams with
minimal average annual flow volumes. However, some of the streams
do have adjacent hillside seepage slopes that have been identified
' as jurisdictional wetlands.
' In an effort to eliminate unnecessary impacts and to minimize
unavoidable impacts to "waters of the U.S.", the preliminary
planning of the development was not undertaken until final
' verification of the Corps' jurisdictional limits was received.
When planning efforts commenced, the development was designed to
avoid and even buffer where possible all "waters of the United
' States". The only exceptions to total avoidance of impacts to
"waters of the U.S." occur in the areas of roadway and utility line
crossings, which for geographic, engineering, and economic reasons
were unavoidable.
Where at all posssible, the utility and roadway crossings were
' planned at locations of least impact to the tributaries. Design
objectives included crossing the tributaries in a perpendicular
fashion where they are most narrow.
' Each roadway crossing design falls within the manditory criteria
prescribed in 33 CFR 330.5(a)(14) for Nationwide Permit
' applicability, as indicated on the attached plan and profile
sheets. All of the proposed road crossings involve the discharge of
less than 200 cubic yards of fill material below the plane
' of ordinary high water, are designed to prevent the restriction of,
and to withstand expected high flows, and do not involve discharges
into any wetlands adjacent to the waterbody beyond 100 feet on
either side of the ordinary high water mark of that waterbody.
When a respective tributary is required to be crossed more than
' once, the additional crossing will be bridged with no discharge of
fill material being placed within the jurisdictional limits.
1 As per discussions with Mr. G. Wayne Wright and yourself, the
utility line crossings of the tributaries were designed to minimize

11

1
Mr. John Thomas
December 5, 1991
Page Three
impacts to the waterbody. The proposed construction easement
(including clearing activities) will not exceed forty feet (40')and
ground contours will be returned to their preconstruction
elevations.
Additional information regarding the environmental protective
measures to be incorporated during construction is presented in the
attachments provided by the project engineer. Also, a development
perspective from Cornwallis Development Corporation for the entire
project is attached for your information and use.
This letter, the enclosed engineering drawings, and the other
attachments are intended to serve as a request for the Corps of
Engineers to commence their review for authorization of the
proposed roadway and utility line crossings by Nationwide and/or
general permits.
If you have any questions or comments concerning the supplied
information please do not hesitate to contact me.
As always, thank you in advance for your timely review.
Sincerely,
' Mark A. Purcell
NEWKIRK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
' cc: Mr. G. Wayne Wright
Mr. Dick Routh
Mr. Franz holt

? C.O.G. (Env.Reg's)
1

I

1.

1.

1
' ARTICLE VII
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS
30-7-1 WATERSHED DISTRICTS
30-7-1.1 Establishment of Watershed District
The Watershed Protection District is hereby
established as an overlay district. The designated
watersheds under this ordinance are divided into two
' overlay sub-districts:
(A) Watershed Area: The Watershed Area, hereafter
referred to as "WA", consisting of the
' stream/river basin catchment draining into the
municipal water supply reservoir; and
(B) Watershed Critical Area: The Watershed Critical
"
"
, consisting
WCA
Area, hereafter referred to as
of the direct drainage area around the reservoir.
Land use within the Watershed Protection District must
comply with all the requirements of both the
underlying zoning district and the applicable
watershed overlay district.
30-7-1.2 Incorporation of Watershed Map
d
ilf
h
or
e Gu
This Section incorporates by reference t
County Watershed Map dated July 7, 1986, showing the
following designated watersheds in the county and the
municipalities: Reidsville, Greensboro, High Point,
Randleman, Randleman Dam, and Burlington.
30-7-1.3 Approval of Plans
No Enforcement Officer, Board, or Governing Body is
authorized to approve any plans or issue any permits
for any land in a watershed protection district unless
a watershed control plan therefor has been approved in
compliance with the requirements of this Section. For
?- the purpose of evaluating the design of all
development within the designated municipal
watersheds, site plans, plot plans, and subdivision
plans shall be submitted in compliance with the
requirements of this Article.
30-7-1.4 Applicability
This Section shall apply to Section 30-7-2 (Watershed
Areas) and Section 30-7-3 (Watershed Critical Areas),
and to all watershed areas within the County and the
municipal jurisdictional areas, except as provided
30-7-1

(3-B-1)

' herein. These requirements shall not apply to a
single family residence or residential accessory
buildings on a lot of record. Also, developments
participating in a public regional lake program may be
' exempt from runoff control requirements but not other
requirements of this Section.
30-7-2 WATERSHED AREAS
30-7-2.1 General Provisions
' (A) Watershed Area: These districts shall protect the
entire area which drains into any designated
municipal water supply reservoir from any activity
' which could degrade water quality in the
reservoirs.
' (B) Stream Channelization: Channelization of streams
in a WA district shall not occur except by the
approval of the Planning Board.
30-7-2.2 Watershed Control Plan
(A) Plan Required: A watershed control plan shall be
required for all development in a designated
municipal watershed, and shall be submitted to the
Enforcement Officer. The watershed control plan
shall include all applicable information listed in
' Appendix 2 (Map Standards) of this Ordinance.
(B) Plan Approval: The Enforcement officer may approve
' a watershed control plan in accordance with the
performance standards found in Table 30-7-2-1.
30-7-2.3 Improvements
(A) Construction of Improvements: The construction of
all improvements designed for watershed protection
and shown on an approved watershed control plan
shall be completed prior to the issuance of any
building permit, plat recordation, or pavement
installation.
(B) Maintenance Required: When runoff control measures
are part of a development, and such measures serve
more than one lot, an owners' association or
binding maintenance contract for the purpose of
ownership and maintenance shall be required.
(C) Maintenance of Control Measures: Maintenance of
runoff control measures shall be performed at such
time as the sediment storage volume of the
retention/detention measure has been lost to
sediment or a part of the installation is not
functioning as originally designed. The City shall
30-7-2
(3-B-2)

' have the responsibility to inspect and notify the
owner of the land on which the runoff control
measure is located. All maintenance shall be
' performed within ninety (90) days of the date the
City gives such notice. Failure by the property
owner(s) to perform the required maintenance or
repair within the stated period shall enable the
' City to perform, and recover the cost of, -such
maintenance and repairs from the property owners.
' (D) Recording of Permanent Improvements: All permanent
improvements including approved access/ maintenance
easement(s) (specific or general, at the owner's
1 option) shall be recorded on a Final Plat, and a
mechanism to insure the maintenance of the
facilities shall be established concurrent with,
or prior to, plat recordation. In the event a plat
recordation is not required, any improvement,
filtration/infiltration area, or owners'
association required by this Section shall be
' submitted for approval to the Enforcement officer,
and duly recorded after said approval.
30-7-3 WATERSHED CRITICAL AREAS
30-7-3.1 General Provisions
' (A) Protection Provided: Watershed Critical Area (WCA)
Districts shall protect those portions of
designated watersheds which lie closest to
' existing and proposed water supply reservoirs from
activities which could degrade water quality in
the reservoirs.
' (B) Channelization of Streams: Channelization of
streams in a WCA District shall not occur except
by the approval of the Planning Board.
' (C) Required Minimum Standards: All minimum standards
set forth in Section 30-7-2.2 (Watershed Control
' Plan) shall apply to WCA Districts.
(D) Required Improvements: All required improvement
set forth in Section 30-7-2.3 (Improvements) shall
' apply to WCA Districts.
30-7-3.2 Watershed Critical Area Applicability
Requirements of WCA Districts shall apply to:
(A) All development, excluding individual single
' family lots except as provided herein; and
(B) All road construction within the WCA District.
30-7-3
(3-B-3)

TABLE 30-7-2-1
WATERSHED AREA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
' Development Type Schedule
' 1) Residential development with two and one- Low Density Residential Scoresheet
half (2S) or fewer dwelling units per gross (Table 30-7-2-2). A score of one hundred (100)
acre. or more is required for passing;
or
Engineering Certification by registered profes-
sional engineer, with seal (Table 30-7-2-4),
of control of the first one-half (1R) inch
of runoff from impervious surface coverage.

2) Institutional, Commercial, Recreational, and Institutional, Commercial, Recreational,
' Industrial development with thirty percent
(30%) or less impervious surface coverage; Industrial, and High Density Residential
Scoresheet (Table 30-7-2-3). A score of 100
or more is required for passing;
or or
d
f
Residential development with greater than es-
pro
Engineering Certification by registere
two and one-half (2S) dwelling units per sional engineer, with seal (Table 30-7-2-4),
gross acre and with thirty percent (30%) or of control of the first one-half (1/2) inch
' less impervious surface coverage. of runoff from impervious surface coverage.
' 3) All development with more than thirty Engineering Certification by registered profes-
percent (30%) but less than fifty percent sional engineer, with seal (Table 30-7-2-4), of
(50%) impervious surface coverage. control of the first one-half (1R) inch of runoff
from impervious surface coverage.
' 4) All development with fifty percent (50%) or Engineering Certification by registered profes-
more impervious surface coverage. sional engineer, with seal (Table 30-7-2-4), of
control of the first one (1) inch of runoff from
' impervious surface coverage.
Note: The owner, developer, or person submitting the watershed control plan shall indicate which
Performance Standard shall be used for review and approval.
1

30-7-4
I' (3-B-4)

I

J
'i
TABLE30-7-2-2
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SCORESHEET
MAXIMUM POINT POINTS
POINTS FACTOR VALUE EARNED
20 1. Zone
AG or RS-40 10
PUD-R (Single Family Detached dt Cluster) 15
PUD-R Cluster Exclusive) 20
25 2. Impervious Surface
0-3% 25
3-7% 20
7-10% 15
10-15% 10
25 3. Proximity to Fioodway as Defined By The Federal
Emergency Management en
More than 2000 Feet 25
1000-2000 Feet 20
500-1000 Feet 15
100-500 Feet 10
50-100 Feet 5
10 4. Degree of Sol Limitation Defined on Pg. 29 and Table 7, Pg. 57
Guilford Count Sol Survey
Slight 10
Moderate 5
25 5. Drainage - Protect and Use Natural Drain ewa
Piped or Improved Drainage With Riprap 5
Dispersed Drainage or Protected Drainageways 10
Dispersed Drainage and Protected Drainageways 20
Enhanced and Protected Natural Drainageways. 25
25 6. Averse Sloe
0-6% Average 25
6-10% 20
10-15% 5
25 7. Land Cover - High Percentage of Natural and Stabilizing
Vegetation
Natural or Stabilizing Vegetation Along Drainageway
and on 25% of the Lot 25
Natural or Stabilizing Vegetation Along Drainageway
and on 15-25%ofLot 20
Natural or Stabilizing Vegetation
Along Drainageway and on 10-15% of Lot 15
Natural or Stabilizing Vegetation Between Units and Water 10
Ornamental Lawn on > 5% of the Lot 5
V etation on <5% of the Lot 0
25 8. Runoff Control Strategies
Maximum Runoff Retention 25
Moderate Runoff Retention 15
Runoff Detention in Excess of Minimum Requirements
of Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control 10
Runoff Detention Equal to Minimum Requirements 5
10 9. Sewage Disposal
Public Sewer S tem 10
10 0. Road dt Driveway Des' n
Impermeable Road Surface With Vegetated Ditches 10
Impermeable Roads With Piped Drainage and/or Curb and 5
Gutter and Enerly Disci stors

200 otal Total
Notes: 1) All plans must earn 100 or more points and meet all other requirements to be approved.
2) Do not use this table if gross density exceeds 2.5 dwelling units per acre.
30-7-5

(3-B-5)

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
' SINGLE FAMILY: Rated prior to approval of a Preliminary Plat. Impervious surface within each lot is assumed to be
2. A gravel parking area is not considered impervious surface.
3. Proximity to floodway is determined by measuring or scaling the distance from the floodway to the closest
boundary of the tract.
4. Self-explanatory.
3,000 square feet. Individual homes on individual lots are not rated.
MULTIFAMILY: Rated prior to approval of a site plan.
1 DEFINITIONS, EXPLANATIONS, AND STANDARDS
1. Conditional use rezonings will be given the appropriate bonus points if the use and site plan conditions
' meet the requirements of the bonus zone, such as clustering development on the best soils and terrain of
the site.
5. Protected Draina?ewav means drainage is channeled by pervious devices such as sod waterways, berms,
' channels, or swales which have been constructed to resist soil erosion by vegetating, netting, riprapping, or
a combination of those, and which allows infiltration of water into the soil.
Dispersed Drainage means spread out, as opposed to collecting the runoff in channels, so as to effect
' increased sheet flow and overland flow.
ImRroved Drainaeeway means channeled by impervious surfaces such as curb and gutter or concrete
(gunnite, bituminous, etc.) channels.
' Enhanced Drainagewav means carried by existing natural drainageways which have been enhanced to resist
soil erosion, including stream bank degradation.
6. Sloye shall mean the maximum inclination of the land surface from the horizontal as measured in
' percentage slope. The average slope shall be determined for the entire lot, tract, or subdivision before
development.
' 7. If all or part of an existing lot containing natural or stabilizing vegetation is dedicated to the public for
park or drainageway and open space purposes; such land will count in computing the score.
' Along Drainaggway means the area parallel to and within fifty (50) feet of the drainage channel.
Stabilizing Vegetation means any vegetation that protects the soil against erosion.
8. Maximum Runoff Retention means approximately one hundred percent (100%) of channelized runoff must
pass through permanent retention or wet detention pond(s).
Moderate Runoff Retention means at least seventy-five percent (75%) of runoff must pass through
permanent retention and/or wet detention pond(s).
f
ff
1 runo
must
Runoff Detention in Excess of Soil Erosion and Sedimentation means at least fifty (50%) o
pass through permanent detention pond(s).
Runoff Detention Equal to Minimum Requirements means velocity control of runoff.
Detention Pond means a pond which collects stormwater runoff, filters the water and releases it slowly over
a period of hours or days. It does not have a permanent pool and is sometimes referred to as a dry pond.
Wet Detention Pond means a pond that has a permanent pool and also collects stormwater runoff, filters
the water, and releases it slowly over a period of days.
Retention Pond means a pond that has a permanent pool.
9. No points can be earned for on-site septic tank systems or private sewage treatment systems.
'
10. Self-explanatory.
' 30-7-6
1 (3-B-6)
' TABLE30-7-2-3
INS IT11 ONAL, RECREATIONAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL,
AND HIGH DENSITY RFSIDENTIALSCORESHEET

1

11
11
MAXIMUM POINT POINTS
POINTS FACPOR VALUE EARNED
10 1. Impervious Surface
<7.5:b Impervious 10
75-15% 5
25 2. Prorrimi to Floodwa as Defined the FEMA
2000 Feet and Greater 25
1000-2000 Feet 20
500-1000 Feet 15
100-500 Feet 10
50-100 Feet 5
15 3. Soil -Hydrologic Soil Group (when 50% or more of the
site retains undisturbed
B 15
C 5
20 4. Drains ewa
Vegetated Waterways (a miss) 10
Minor Channels With Rlprap 10
Preserve Natural Drainageways 10
Preserve and Protect Natural Drains ewa 20
25 5. Land Slope whets 50% or more of site remains undisturbed
0-6% Average Slope of Subdivision or Lot 25
6-10% 20
10-15% 5
25 6. Undisturbed Area
Greater than 50% Undisturbed 25
30%-50% Undisturbed 15
20%-30% Undisturbed 10
10 7. Permanent Erosion Control
Revegetating Bare Soil Areas 5
Revs elation and Protecting Concentrated Flow Areas 10
60 8. Permanent Runoff Control Strategies
Natural Infiltration of Required Runoff from:
100% of Impervious Surfaces 60
75% of Impervious Surfaces 45
50% of Impervious Surfaces 30
Wet Detention Pond Meeting Performance Standards
Controlling Pollutants from:
100% of Impervious Area 50
75 % of Impervious Area 40
50% of Impervvious Area 25
Vegetative Filter for Sites With Less Than 25% Impervious
Surface Coverage Meeting Performance Standards 15
Dry Detention Pond 10
10 9. Sewage Disposal
Public Sewer 9juern 10
15 10. Road and Driveway Design
Water from Roadside Swales or Club Cuts Directed into
Natural Infiltration 15
Impermeable Reed Surface With Vegetated Ditches 10
Impermeable Roads With Piped Drainage and/or Curb and 5
Gutter and Energy Dissi tors
215 Total Total
Notes: 1) All plans must earn 100 or more points and meet all other requirements to be approved.
2) Do not use this Table if impervious surface coverage exceeds thirty (30%) percent.
30-7-7

(3-B-7)

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

1

r

RESIDENTIALICOMMERCLAL.,/INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISIONS: Rated prior to approval of preliminary plat.
RESIDENT AI.JINSTITUTIONAL./COMMERCLALIINDUSTRLAL SITE PLANS: Rated prior to approval of site plan
unless lot was prequalified by subdivision.
COMMERCIALJINDUSTRIAL PROJECTS WITHOUT SITE PLANS: Rated prior to approval of the building
permit.
DEFINMONS EXPLANATIONS, AND STANDARDS
1. Impervious surface coverage includes: paved parking lots, driveways, roads and streets; buildings or other
structures which cover the soil. A gravel parking area is not considered as impervious surface coverage.
Impervious surface coverage is computed by the equation: acres impervious surface divided by total acres in
the tract times one hundred percent (100%).
2. Proximity to floodway is determined by measuring or scaling the distance from the floodway to the closest
boundary of the tract.
3. Hydrologic Soil Groups as defined on Pg. 35 of the Guilford County Soil Survey (12/19117) and referenced in
Table 15.
4. Vegetated Waterways (swales) are to be constructed according to USDA-SCS specifications or equivalent
methods, and they are to include installation of channel liners (plastic, jute, or excelsior) where expected flow
velocity (10-yr. storm) exceeds three (3) feet per second.
Riprap Lined Channels are to meet Guilford County specifications.
Preserve Natural Drainageways shall mean no disturbance of natural drainageways by cutting, filling,
channelization, or destroying natural vegetation.
Preserve and Protect Natural Drainageways shall mean protecting natural channels against stream bank erosion
by riprap, or establishing soil stabilizing vegetation on stream banks, and/or providing for a natural or
revegetated buffer strip of twenty-five (25) feet or more on each side of the stream.
5. S1_ shall mean the maximum inclination of the land surface from the horizontal as measured in percentage
slope. The average slope shall be determined for the entire lot, tract, or subdivision before development.
6. Undisturbed Area shall be that portion of a lot, tract or subdivision not occupied by any structure and which
has not and will not be graded to change the existing contours or to destroy existing vegetation.
7. Revegetatine Bare Soil Areas shall mean providing a stabilizing vegetative cover on those areas disturbed by
grading of the site where no other land cover (structure, etc.) is to be located.
8. All runoff control methods or devices shall meet or exceed Guilford County design specifications. Retention
ponds will be considered in lieu of wet detention ponds on a case-by-case basis.
9. No points can be earned for on-site septic tank systems or private sewage treatment systems.
10. Self-explanatory.
30-7-8
(3-B-8)

Table 30-7-2-4

ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
The engineering certification required on watershed control
plans or construction plan drawings shall be of the following
form:
' ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
I certify that this plan will control the first 1/2 / 1 (choose
' one) inch of runoff from all impervious surfaces shown hereon,
and that the water quality control measures shown on this plan
meet or exceed the guidelines issued by Guilford County dated
¦
SEAL
Signature

Registration Number
30-7-9
(3-B-9)

t

30-7-3.3 Extent of WCA District
(A) Boundary of WCA: The WCA extends to the ridgeline
of the reservoir basin, or in the case of major
streams feeding the reservoir (Reedy Fork Creek,
Brush Creek, Horsepen Creek, East Fork Deep Creek,
West Fork Deep River, Little Alamance Creek, Big
Alamance Creek, Rock Creek, Richland Creek, Deep
River, Reddicks Creek, and Hickory Creek), to the
nearest identifiable major feature which crosses
the stream, and which is at least two thousand,
seven-hundred and fifty (2,750) feet upstream of
the reservoir.
(B) Identifiable Major Feature: The identifiable major
feature specified in Section 30-7-3.3(A) (Boundary
of WCA) may be a street, railroad, easement, or
similar travel way which is capable of being used
by emergency personnel to respond to spills.
(C) Inclusion of Reedy Fork Creek: For the purposes of
this Section, Reedy Fork Creek between Lake Brandt
and Lake Townsend shall be considered a water
supply reservoir with bank full channel equivalent
to normal pool elevation.
(D) Boundary Closure: For the purposes of WCA boundary
closure, a connecting line(s) is drawn between the
outer boundary ridge line and the line extending
along and parallel to the identifiable major
feature.
30-7-3.4 Divisions within the Watershed Critical Area
The WCA consists of four divisions as follows:
(A) Tier 1•
1) Tier 1 consists of those lands within two
hundred (200) feet of the normal pool
elevation and those lands within one-half
(1/2) mile of (High Point Lake, Oak Hollow
Lake, Lake Brandt) or one mile (Lake
Townsend) upstream of water intake
structure(s).
2) Tier 1 areas are intended for public purpose
and should remain undisturbed.
(B) Tier 2•

E
71
1) Tier 2 consists of those lands lying within
an area bounded by Tier 1 and a line parallel
to and seven hundred and fifty (750) feet in
distance from the normal pool elevation.
2) Tier 2 areas are intended primarily for
public purpose with the following exception.
30-7-10
(3-B-10)

3) Tier 2 area surrounding the two (2) proposed
reservoirs (Randleman Lake and Lake
Mackintosh) is not intended for public
purpose unless and until more than
twenty-five percent (25%) of the WCA for the
reservoir becomes urban in character, by
meeting any of the tests defined in NCGS
Section 160A-48(c).
(C) Tier 3:
1) Tier 3 consists of those lands lying within
an area bounded by Tier 2 and a line parallel
to and three thousand (3,000) feet in
distance from the normal pool elevation.
2) Tier 3 areas shall not exceed the WCA
Boundary.
(D) Tier : Tier 4 consists of those lands lying in
the area between Tier 3 and the WCA Boundary.
30-7-3.5 Runoff Minimization
The density and impervious surface coverage limits
defined in Table 30-7-3-1 shall apply within the WCA.
30-7-3.6 Land Disturbance Minimization
(A) Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan:
Refer to Section 30-7-4.1(A) (Plan and Permit
Required).
(B) Street Standards: Refer to Article VI
(Subdivisions: Procedures and Standards) for the
minimum street standards.
(C) Fragile Areas:

11

1
1) Wetlands shall be protected by dedication or
held in a water quality conservation easement
as follows:
a) Dedication may be required by the City
council.
b) Areas not required to be dedicated shall
be recorded as a water quality
conservation easement.
C) Areas held in a water quality
conservation easement shall be held by
an owners association where the water
quality conservation easement serves
more than one property.
30-7-11
(3-B-11)

L
1

Table 30-7-3-1
DENSITY AND IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE LIMITS
Residential Density Limitsl
(expressed as dwelling units/gross acre)
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4
No public sewer NA 1 du/5 ac 1 du/3 ac 1 du/1 ac
Public sewer NA 1 du/5 ac 2 du/1 ac 2.5 du/1 ac
Impervious Surface Coverage Limits
(expressed as maximum percentage)
(for use with institutional, commercial, and industrial uses)2
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4
No public sewer NA 2.5$ 4.0$ 12.096
Public sewer NA 2.5% 24.0%3 30.0%3
Notes:
1
2
3
The above residential densities shall not apply to
property in the city zoned for lot sizes less than forty
thousand (40,000) square feet on the effective date of
this ordinance.
Impervious surface coverage limits shall not apply to
property the in city zoned for institutional, commercial,
or industrial purposes on or before April 1, 1987, the
original adoption date of the Watershed Critical Area
Ordinance.
Impervious surface coverages may be increased in Tiers 3
and 4, when the development is served by public sewer, by
ten percent (10%) for institutional, commercial, and
industrial areas if the owners provide for on-site control
of the first one (1) inch of runoff from impervious
surfaces in accordance with this Ordinance.
30-7-12
(3-B-12)

2)
3)
d) The natural ground cover and the natural
tree canopy must be preserved with the
following exceptions:
i) the cutting or trimming of
overcrowded trees is allowed
provided that no trees in excess of
three (3) inches in diameter as
measured twelve (12) inches from
the ground are removed;
ii) utilities and erosion control
structures can be constructed and
maintained;
iii) normal maintenance by mechanical
means is allowed for the removal of
dead, diseased, deformed,
poisonous, or noxious vegetation
and pests harmful to health; and
iv) mechanical mowing of utilities
areas is allowed to control growth.
Open Channel Drainage
a) Drainage within developments shall be by
means of open channels.
b) All such areas shall have protected
channels or remain in a natural and
undisturbed state, except for road
crossings, utilities, erosion control,
and watershed protection devices.
C) Easement widths shall be as specified in
Article VI (Subdivisions: Procedures and
Standards).
Slopes
a) Areas with slopes greater than fifteen
percent (15%) which are adjacent and
parallel to natural drainageways and
streams shall remain natural and
undisturbed except for road crossings,
utilities, and erosion and watershed
protection devices.
b) Slopes greater than fifteen percent
(15%) may be protected by: dedication,
if the slope adjoins dedicated land and
is required by the City Council; or as a
30-7-13
(3-B-13)

I

I
I
I
I

I
I

11

Roadway and Utility Crossings

WE'IL%ND CROSSINGS
SURFACE AREA OF
FILL IN WETLAND
(S.Y.) VOLUME OF FILL AT AVERAGE
HIGH WATER IN WETLAND
(C.Y.) VILMIE OF FILL
AT CROSSING
(C.Y.)
CROSSING NO. 1 478 20 2780

CROSSING NO. 2 78 25 735

CROSSING NO. 3 244 30 600

CROSSING NO. 4 344 35 1155

CROSSING NO. 5 56 20 200

CROSSING NO. 6 1200 130 4445
CROSSING NO. 7 900 125 3555
CROSSING NO. 8
TOTAL 211
3511 SYDS 10
395 CYDS 500
13,970 CYD3

RIP RAP OUTLET PROTECTION IN WETLANDS
SURFACE AREA/S.Y VOLUME/C.Y.
CROSSING NO. 1 83 35
CROSSING NO. 2 53 22
CROSSING NO. 3 53 22
CROSSING NO. 4 130 54
CROSSING NO. 5 16 7
CROSSING NO. 6 128 53
CROSSING NO. 7 140 58
CROSSING NO. 8
Tl7TAL 40
643 SYDS 17
268 CYDS
AREA AND VOLUME CALCULATIONS
4-A-1

WTE.. 50,
TO 1.LL&AI Fns -
0-nLtjV G&,55INC,&
N
? v
tis

?-cMP? Fi.II.L To'gE
A M M ?D IDTEC.!?
?uz?.T?onl ?.s :W?.
egos. nEu
(To Be
U"r) E e( UT) 't"'? Pl Gai.? h EGTi o s ?.s.. s??r
N 0 6cALKf
TYPICAL SECTION OF ROADWAY CROSSING%
4-B-1
CftOSSINq

'1

PLAW
1low Iov'
?o
---N 89° UO'
CROSSING NO. I
SURFACE AREA OF FILL IN WETLAND _ 4"18 S.Y.
VOLUME OF FILL AT AVERAGE HIGH WATER IN WETLAND 20 C.Y.
VOLUME OF FILL AT CROSSING - y?ao C.Y.
4-C-1
INDIVIDUAL ROADWAY CROSSING MAPS

J
v
ar ? ?
??' 111
°? a 1'U "p O
W ? u
M
.i .n 3 s
? OV
'
3 TV
ij
i
i
i
i
i
?m
(3 Q?
r
4-C-2
it
.i'

??
\,AREA # x o
CROSSING NO. 2
SURFACE AREA OF FILL IN WETLAND = 1 8 S. Y.
VOLUME OF FILL AT AVERAGE HIGH WATER IN WEM-riND = 25 C.Y.
VOLUME OF FILL AT CROSSING = '735 C.Y.
4-C-3
V
CL --
a
a 'li
-2 4 ? W
\ ? ? ? m?WWWW IL

?
? o
z

v

i

i

1
4-C-4
O ?o O
r

c OSSING NO. 3
SURFACE AREA OF FILL IN WETLAND = 244' S.Y.
WINE OF FILL AT AVERAGE HIGH WATER IN WE`1IAND = 3o C.Y.
VOID OF FILL AT CROSSING = (goo C.Y.
//

4-C-5
E
E

v?
r
J

9
V
2 ?
? ? rnM
ov

J V
Q
P
up
.r
0
Ot
0.0
•
OL
Q
'O O
dmw
ty sY
on,
4-C-6
i
i
i

D
m
D
ti
m
F-
D
d
100p
1
CROSSIM NO. 4
SURFACE AREA OF FILL IN WETLAND = 344 S.Y.
VOUJME OF FILL AT AVERAGE HIGH WATER IN WET AND = 35 C.Y.
VOLUME OF FILL AT CROSSING = / 155 C.Y.
4-C-7
d
r
i
d
0
r
i
i
1
\

ILI\

I c r H .
l co or O1 VER •
4}C-8 X11
V l ao -
(3 (J
?

1 FL
1 M ?
now
1 A,
G ? 55
V?

1

CROSSING NO. 5
U,7RFACE AREA OF FILL IN W M AND = 549 S . Y.
OF FILL AT AVERAGE HIGH WATER IN WETLAND = 20 C.Y.
VOLUME OF FILL AT CROSSING = 200 C.Y.
i'

1

z
co
co
0
W
k'o
zzz

4-C-9
k,D
l.D
m

O
2
d
_V
f
QL
a
r?
all?
a- ,
Ufa
Z
J
N
_*e
11
LL
•
.m
O
Q ?
s?? X11
i
/,
1
1
/
tJ
MQ

? ? Op
O ?.
IZP
O'
4-C-10

r
i?

t
11
I.

CROSSING NO. 6
SURFACE AREA OF FILL IN WETLAND = 12 DO S.Y.
VOLUME OF FILL AT AVERAGE HIGH M= IN WETLAND = 1,30 C . Y .
VOLUME OF FILL AT CROSSING = 4449 C.Y.
4-C-11
r
v
v
•s
3
pu`?
O
C"
c
.
oW

oo
m
u
u y
i ?
L
?n
0
21
N.
4-C-12

1

I I
t
CROSSIIJG NO. 7
SURFACE AREA OF FILL IN WETLAND = `100 S.Y.
' VOLUME OF FILL AT AVERAGE HIGH DATER IN WETLAND = / 2 5 C . Y .
VOLUME OF FILL AT GROSSING = 3555 C.Y.

4-C-13

z

/7*1

? V
4 0
J 4.
W ¢
d
O
7
1
Q ?
Q
s M =M
ft? ...
N
Z
1 ?
\? V
3 ?
4 ?
4-C-14

7-90

1

C9

.S

'
1'c too
CROSSING NO. s

SURFACE AREA OF FILL IN WETLAND = 211 S. Y.
VOLUME OF FILL AT AVERAGE HIGH WATER IN WETLAND = /O C.Y.
VOLUME OF FILL AT CROSSING = 500 C.Y.
4-C-15

t
t

Z t
a.
u
.rt
r J,N
o v??

. N
?J
r
T?
V

0
.6
L
V
.r
0.
4-C-16
?w
O
1

z,.
01

Cv-oss%uG *- 2pc
4-C-1, 7?
i
? O
u
o u _11
OL : -
o?
Ja
_o
x
\ M

d
0
u
? O
U1 /
to 4-C- 19

1
1

t
f
1
? i
1 \ ? to
q3?
t/O q31
G?? ??GCPN?ER
\1

cA L
\ G'
?c-
1 R2 ?
4 1
R ? std
4-C-19 \
6
I'
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
Ise ? ?` ?? H?•
l/ER.
77o ! U2±s{,?lG
? ? 20 xlo ?I oo')
I Ae?N Pt P??
4-C-20
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

r

I ?
2
a`dld
0
t

-.2,
0
v
-:z
w
D?
J
? J
Q ?
J
d
4YPICAL SECTIONS OF SANITARY SEWER CROSSING''-'
4-D-1
b
0
03

F'
'o
?r
d

7
a
D

?? J
3
0
J
u1
s
0
v

a
?I
4-D-2
P11I
?o
19 / 00
_ J
\\ ??
\? ? 1191 pS 190
?- q
T \ I
\ 1 ??. \ N
` N ? ?j, ?. P ?? wu1MS•
1 1 c€? @ \ r '\%
/ Rop.vWA'{
ws To AJW-w '- '
P,PE
- 0 _ 1t/Eft,RaD ?
° OUTFALL #4
' (l2" S. S. # 0.22% GRADE)
CAPC/TY - 0.75MGD
5 FLOW= 0.15MG0 em
Z 9 10 L.F. C jZo S 1 S s-
0UTFAU--_4-Q__ __ llf
' ] Z" S S e 0.22' 0- est. s
1 I fLOW = 0..5o rn?jD
J r l,665 G.F..--; - •. ??_.
40-
4-E-1
' INDIVIDUAL SEWER CROSSING MAPS

1

?.
TRAIL.
rt-

\???\ I X11• ! !jrl /
r,

90 /
??\ '11I?1 'I ? i •
V P 1

t
i
1!

\ J

\
,t
4z 0
\ i
1
J ,J:s 1
1
src s 7-0,
ll ,ros f
,`ll \1
4-E-2
tjo
r
C

I ?
11lllG"
wc-ruNtw
AR.FA • L.'
7-6
K? 1
?l
rm v
751
•.? I?Oi ? J
N 1 ? 1
I

BpO
E D R
i..
1
K ENN
1
C O H S T
H
4-E-3
00
i 400l -
/ -,
787.4
loo
AI, O/i, \
' 749) / `,• 1 l ?i j
770
A. rep
4-E-4
MGD
616 2
1.1 MyD 4S9
--------------
160
\ \ \ -
790
CT so
o ° f.
C R-o 1 N
1
? T
' 707.4 I
UcA 14'
fill
?? 4-E-5
CAPAC/TY = 1. l O MGD
' FLOW= 0.35MGD
3,980 L.F. 'SO
Q? / Romeo u/a
J / rposs, y ,cos T
.74- - l
760
I
4 RaAoo 7
-
z c>&
lip,
790.
L80-16% GRADE) \ t / cgPqurV _ I. C) ?ti,
TY 3.00 MGD % J , i I i i : Fc.o? 3 0.-7 tpl'4 .--
?1.50 MG0
/ ? !'
F.
It SA
4-E-6

/x'00 ?\ \ \1
TTp 1
Vv ' 1 `?` \• i I
78
`'7s9yd
76 ¢
e07
A "A - 1 u it
i 6-/O
1 ReA ? W f ? ?c tJ . ,S ?W '(? C I
FRo 4Si S nle.5 , ? _ .
1 0 , 1 S.? 4.5
- 817
1 4-E-7
1'I
?l
r
-1--»o

t?
'i14

INV.-
(? 1 111 Teo 1
771.1 ? I
I
I
I
1 I I '
1
I
160
I
1
I
10 1
I 7so.1
?r
i
o4v o . ' .'
110
?• r
? `hoc

I rA. LL w 5
CI4 0.s. d 0.14-7• : gAM)
C
APACITY c1.6 M61D
FLO-W
c12t>.8)sI?S
4-E-8
j
-797
'TREES
.J
1 ,
I ? J
1 ? \
10
„ /I II
It I !!
r,

T I.o
/ S?1N
`'60

? TREES

1 4-E-9
MILLS CORPORA TION
1
' ?J I L,,; 180??
o
)I
, I
? I I
I
I, of
"V
l 017
'I
i 760-??
i
o•Z T77 \ (?? ? ? {
\ 7 J
1 J i

1 Exhibits

I

t., -
4
alley, williams, carmen & king, inc.
E N G I N E E R S & A R C H I T E C T S
BURLINGTON OFFICE KANNAPOLIS OFFICE GREENSBORO OFFICE
p.o. box 1179 1 740 chapel hill road
burlington, north carolina 27216
telephone [phone]
fax [phone]
p.o. box 1248 1 207 South main street
kannapolis, north Carolina 28082
telephone [phone]
fax [phone]
300 east wendover avenue, suite 403
greenshoro, north carolina 27401
telephone [phone]
fax [phone]
March 4, 1992
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Planning
Division of Environmental Management
N.C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Subject: Roadway and Utility Crossings of Wetlands
Lake Jeanette Area
Greensboro, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Dorney:
PLEASE REPLY TO:
Burlington
91229
I appreciate you meeting with Dick Routh, Mark Purcell, Chris Windham and
myself February 21, 1992 to discuss the subject project. I feel our
preliminary talks were helpful in putting together the 401 Certification
Application that we are submitting with this letter. We are enclosing seven
(7) copies of the application with supporting maps and documentation. As
mentioned earlier, I will be happy to meet with you at the site to help you
locate the proposed crossings.
If you have any questions relating to the enclosures or need additional
information, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
ALLEY, WILL , & KING, INC.
F' -a , K. Holt, P. E.
FKH/sj
encls.
cc: Mr. Dick Routh, Cornwallis Development Co.
LAURENCE A. ALLEY, P.E. JEFFERY D. MOODY, P.L. HERBERT A. CARMEN, A.I.A.
HAYWOOD B. KING, P.E. WAYNE B. PERRY, R.I.S. DEMETRFOS N. (ALLINICOS, A.I.A., R.I.R.A.
FRANZ K. HOLT, P.E. DARRELL 1.. RUSSELL, P.E. KENNF TH D. STAFFORD, A.I.A.

Conewitoo
BEGINNING OUR SECOND CENTURY OF EXCELLENCE
December 17, 1992
Mr. John Thomas
Department of the Army
Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Regional Field Office
11413 Falls of the Neuse Road
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587-9408
Dear Mr. Thomas:
Re: Lake Jeanette Development
Nationwide and General Permit
Action ID 199103436

nFr '2 31992
This is to inform you that we have completed construction of minor
road crossings labeled 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 on the site plans
received by your office December 14, 1991 and referenced in a letter
from Mr. Wayne Wright to me dated February 5, 1992. Mr. Wright's
letter of February 5, 1992 indicated that the nationwide permit
authorization was extended to January 13, 1993 provided all
construction was accomplished by that time.
There will be at least one more crossing of a wetlands which was
labeled Crossing #2 on the above referenced site plan that was not
accessible at this time, and as a result has not been constructed.
We will contact you about that and any other minor road crossings at
a future date.
We likewise have not crossed the wetlands with utilities at this
time.
Thank you for working with us.
Merry Christmas!
v
C. Richard Routh
Director of Real Estate Development
CRR:dly
cc: Newkirk Environmental Consultants, Inc.
c/o Mr. Mark A. Purcell
192 East Bay Street, Suite 201
Charleston, South Carolina 29401
Alley, Williams, Carmen & King, Inc.
c/o Mr. Franz K. Holt
300 East Wendover Avenue, Suite 403
Greensboro, North Carolina 27401
Cone Mills Corporation
Greensboro, N.C. 27415-6540
SINCE 1891
Page 2
Mr. John Thomas
December 17, 1992
cc: (continued)
Mr. John Parker
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
A /Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Regional Office Manager
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
8025 North Point Boulevard, Suite 100
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27106
Mr. Wayne Wright
Department of the Army
Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
919-378-2583 A W C K GSO 437 P01
A a ley, williams, carmen & king,
E N G I N E E R S & A R C H I T E C T S
SuRLINOON OFFICE
p-o- boz 11711 40 chapel hill road
burlington, no th carolina 27216
telephone 919122&SS34
fax [phone]
THIS TRANSMISSION CONTAINS
FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMO ,
IF
KANNAPOLIS OFFICE
p.o. box 1248 1207 south main street
kannapolis, north carolina 28087
telephone [phone]
fax [phone]
PRIVILE ED AND CONFIDENTIAL iNFURMATI N
JAN 26 193 11:29
inc.
GREENSBORO OFFICE
300 ta%t wendover avenue, suite 403
greensboro, north carolina 27401
telephone [phone]
fax [phone]S83
'ENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE PERSON TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED.
U HAVE RECEIVED THIS FAX IN ERROR, YOU ARE PROHIBITED FROM COPYING
RETAINING
TELEPHONE NOTIFY US
RETURN THE ORIGINAL FAX TO US BY UME
BY TEL MAIL.
DATE: NUMBER OF PACES:-
(INCLUDING, TRANSMITTAL SHEET)
T6: 0- o o ~?-
I: X
MENTS: -Z L?f
C

FROM: ?zr ltDt?'

tEfFERY 0. MOODY, V.E. NEReEA7 A. CARMEN, A.I.A.
?AURLNCE A- LEY, PA. DEMETIIEO5 N. CALLINICOS, A-1-A, R.I.P.A. WATHE 14AYWOOD B- KING, r.E- s. PERRY. R. S.
pARREL RRfLL L. RUSSELL. V.E. KENNETH 0. STAFFORD, A.I.A.
fAAN2 K. H LT, V.E.
919-378-2583 A W C K GSO
437 P03
JAN 26 193 11:30
•
inc-
lley, williams, carmen & king,
BURLI TON OFFICE
ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS
P.D. box 1179 740 Chapel hill road
burlington, north Carolina 27216
telepho a 9191226.5534
fax [phone]
KANNAPOLIS OFFICE
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
p.o, box 1248 1207 south main street
kannapolis, north Carolina 28082
telephone [phone]
fax [phone]
GREENSBORO OFFICE
ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS
300 east wendover avenue, suite 403
greensbora, north Carolina 27401
telephone [phone]
fax [phone]
PLEASE REPLY TO!
4, 1993
Mr. G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
69 Darlington Ave.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Re: Lake Jeanette Development
Nationwide and General Permit
Action ID 199103436
Greensboro
Dear Mr. Wright:
Mr. C. Richard Routh, Director of Real Estate Development, enclosed) regard Corporation
recently wrote to you (letter dated December 17, 1992 - copy
current status of roadway and utility crossings of wetlands at Lake Jeanette. As
indicated in Mr. Routh's letter, several utility (sewer) crossings remain to be 1993,
completed. Since current authorization will no longer be valid after January 13, erall we are now resubmitting these sewer crossings reviewlb It is our undMstap) 2
(N. Elm Sewer Outfall Construction Drawings) for your
that these activities are authorized under Nationwide permit #12 provided all work is
accomplished in accordance with current Nationwide permit conditions.
Cornwallis Development Co. hopes to soon begin Wonst be appreciated Thank you for
Outfall. An early review of this portion of work
your past cooperation and we look forward to hearing from you regarding authorization.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
ALLEY, WILLIAMS, CARMEN & KING INC.
b#--
FF K. Holt, P.E.
FKHJbw
cc: Mr. John Thomas
Mr, C. Richard Routh
Mr. Duncan Newkirk
HERBERT A. CARMEN, A.I,A.
-
LJ,URENGE A. ALLEY, P-E_ IEFFERr D. MOODY, PA
PERRY, R.l.bDEM¢rRE05 N. GAIUNIC05, A.IA., R.I.B.A.
HAYWOOD . KING, P wAYNE e. E• KENNETH D STAFFORD, A.I.A.
TRANZ K. HOLY. P.E. DARRELL L RUSSELL. P.E-
919-378-2583 A W C K GSO 437 P02 JAN 2b 193 11:29
it a lley, williams, carmen & king, inc.
KANNAPOLIS OFFICE GREENSBORO OFFICE
BURLIN TOM OFFICE
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS
ENGINEERS A ND ARCHITECTS
300 cast wendover avenue, suite 403
P.O. box 11791
box 1248 J 207 south main street
40 chapel hill road ?'
ereensboro, north caroling 27401
burhneton, n th caroling 27216 kannapolis, north caroling 28082 telephone [phone]
t .lephon 9191226-SS34 telephone 7(14!938-1515
fax [phone]
fax [phone] fax [phone]
PLEASE REPLY TO:
Greensboro
26)1993 91148
. John R. Dorney
vision of Environmental Management
to of North Carolina
partment of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
> North Salisbury St.
Leigh, NC 27604
ect: Sewer Outfall Crossings of Wetlands, Lake Jeanette Area, Greensboro, NC
John:
reviously discussed over the telephone, ;we have reapplied to the corps (letter
),sed) for the same sewer outfall crossings previously authorized under nationwide
iit and 401 certification. I have since talked with John Thomas and he says the
r authorizing the crossings under new Nationwide Permit should be in our hands
in two weeks. In addition, it is my understanding that previous 401 certification
pcolnstructionn of the 16"o tfalhshown?on as Cornwallis pages 4-E-3 and 4-E- 4 in he prev ous
n
ication for 401 certification.
call if you have any questions or comments.
. Al LY..\N w),
ALLEY, YVILLIAMS, CARMEN & KING INC.
W /4-
F Holt, P.E.
FKH/bw
cc: Mr. Conrad Hicks
Mr. Dick Routh
IEFFERY D. MOODY, P.L. HERBERT A. CARMEN, A.I.A.
LAURENCE A. A LEYP.E.
W A/NE H. PERRY, R.L.S. DE ME7 RE OS N. CALIINICOS. A.I.A., R.1. ,A
MAYWOOD 8. j.G? PA KENNETH D. STAFFORD, A.I.A.
FRANZ K. HO T, P.E. DARRELL L . RUSSFLL, P.L.
1

alley, williams, carmen & king, inc.
E N G I N E E R S & ARCH I T E C T S
BURLINGTON OFFICE KANNAPOLIS OFFICE GREENSBORO OFFICE
p.o. box 1179 1 740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1248 1207 south main street 300 east wendover avenue, suite 403
burlington, north carolina 27216 kannapolis, north carolina 28082 greensboro, north Carolina 27401
telephone [phone] telephone [phone] telephone [phone]
fax [phone] fax [phone] fax [phone]
May 6, 1992:.
Mr. John R. Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
Dept. of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
512 Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Subject: Public Notice Bill ($66.72)
Lake Jeanette
Roadway Crossings and Utility Lines
Greensboro, NC
PLEASE REPLY TO
Greensboro
X11
L WETLANDS GROI
VAR
UALItY si ,.
Dear John:
Enclosed you will find a check in the amount of $66.72 covering the bill for the
subject project.
Thanks for calling Monday with the news of approval.
Sincerely,
Fr K. Holt, P.E. _l
FKH/cb
ALEY?YVILLI?IMS; CARMEN. 19275.
%
&?KIN?INC:,
sE?1t31I?ERS.C'ARCHIT,ECTS
*.?BU?1LI'tJGTbNyaC?27215' , ` ` / > BB-920/531'
19 f
- < ?YY f\1
S 9 :)"? .`?!i ?? ?! ,l. 5 i ? -, ; r ? \, f t ? ,?'l ? t,?'? !t?/.?'???. ? ?'lr.?l t'(` ? <??` r-/?'?` w-?5? f.
nrj?????•?.??i
•` +f .> !> :'l,`??.,.A IS M lei A, rt ?v:. ? {? > ?<•, ;1's'U`i ?j r, ! a 1
l ?DO,LAR:S'? ?' > <
f . ?. _0 e l i ,? , . ? ht f r l !' : ? ? ? lAL•LEY; INIL?1/\MSIGARMEI?"?K?NG;>INC?
a > > \ a s 1f c 5 , . .\ ! , \`/,? li ?> yl y?AES.` 1
% NCNB Netlonaf8ank l `
of NorM C.rdku J` ?` a `/ ?1 l l , `, \ 1 > r I ! l ? ! '.' l> ? !
?tt?url'Inyton?NC;27215r?' `,t% r???
,??!>?f` ``'? l<??? •`,`' `?41?? ; ??%<,`Slits r:l??: ???.\ ,,<l,l?'t`,f`r;`f >?``y`/'t4{%;11A*? ???
.. i i f+ l.t ! ? ' `,? ? ' `/ ? ? a < > r?L?f? r???? 1 ', kj ` i?? ? ? F•tT `
FOR, '11! l,t?l.t?l Nf' \' N/
?i.Q53109'2.04 .s 08?L00074?ll,<?<, ?j?r?l r?r
I,otiq.2?5 ,
776 0 .S' `.. V" tOX Ol,'\??
alley, williams, carmen & king, inc.
E N G I N E E R S & A R C H I T E C T S
BURLINGTON OFFICE
p.o. box 1179 1 740 chapel hill road
burlington, north carolina 27216
telephone [phone]
fax [phone]
KANNAPOLIS OFFICE
p.o. box 1248 1207 south main street
kannapolis, north carolina 28082
telephone [phone]
fax [phone]
GREENSBORO OFFICE
venue, suite 403
carolina 27401
l 1/378-2754
3-2583
May 6, 1992
Mr. John R. Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
Dept. of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
512 Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Subject: Public Notice Bill ($66.72)
Lake Jeanette
Roadway Crossings and Utility Lines
Greensboro, NC
Dear John:
e TO:
L V
1
Enclosed you will find a check in the amount of $66.72 covering the bill for the
subject project.
Thanks for calling Monday with the news of approval.
Sincerely,
Fra z K. Holt, P.E.
FKH/cb
LAURENCE A. ALLEY, P.E. IEFFERY D. MOODY, P.E. HERBERT A. CARMEN, A.I.A.
HAYWOOD B. KING, P.F. WAYNE B. PERRY, R.L.S. DEMETREOS N. CALLINICOS, A.I.A., R.I.B.A.
FRANZ K. HOLT, P.F. DARRELL L. RUSSELL, P.E. KENNETH D. STAFFORD, A.I.A.
5TATE
4
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor
William W Cobey, Jr., Secretary
May 8, 1992
George T I'verett, Ph.D.
Director
Cornwallis Development Company
c/o Mr. Dick Routh
Post office Box 26540
rreensboro, North Carolina 27415
Dear Mr. Routh:
Subject: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal
Clean Water Act,
Proposed Lake Jeanette development
Project # 92129
Guilford County
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 2731 issued
to Cornwallis Development Co. dated May 8, 1992.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to
tiontact us.
Attachments
Sincerely,
cj?]_ >?
orge T. Everet
I
i
cc, Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regional office
Winston-Salem DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
Mr. Franz Holt; Alley, Williams, Carmen and King
k1 c11ONnl_ (A 14 [:5
A'11(willc lavcumllc Mo<,rewillc I'tlci)th Wi?11410im Aa'ilmingt(m Win.to n ?alcm
704/251 0208 919/4861541 714/(9,3 16')) 91911 71 470() 919/940o481 919/395 ;(0X) 919/8967(X)7
Pollution Prevention Pays
I'O_ IiO\ 29535, R,dcigh, North ( molina )76260S39 Iclchhomc 9197;37011
\" I,???.d t 1, 1 mq,L-„
NORTH CAROLINA
Guilford Count
CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the
requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the
United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500
to Cornwallis Development Company pursuant to an application
filed on the 4 day of March 1992 to fill about 1.6 acres of
wetlands and water for road crossings and sewer lines.
The Application provides adequate assurance that the
discharge of fill material into the waters of tributaries to Lake
Jeanette in conjunction with the proposed Lake Jeanette
development in Guilford County will not result in a violation of
applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines.
Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this
activity will not violate Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL
92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the
application and conditions hereinafter set forth.
Condition(s) of Certification:
1. That the activity be conducted in such a manner as
to prevent significant increase in turbidity
outside the area of construction or construction
related discharge (increases such that the
turbidity in the Stream is 25 NTU's or less are
not considered significant).
2. Stormwater controls shall be installed following
written DEM approval for the commercial area near
North Elm Street and the higher density
residential area (old wildlife club area).
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in
revocation of this Certification.
This Certification shall become null and void unless the
above conditions are made conditions of the Federal Permit.
This the 8 day of May, 1992.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
?reorge T. Everett, D rector
WQC# 2731
i
t•
STA7Z
State of North Carolina
.... Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
April 28, 1992
Mr. Franz K. Holt
Alley, Williams, Carmen and King, Inc.
300 East Wendover Avenue, Suite 401
Greensboro, North Carolina 27401
Dear Mr. Holt:
George T. Everett, Ph.D.
Director
Enclosed is a copy of the bill for $ 66.72 for the Public
Notice for your project entitled Lake Jeanette, road crossings
and utility lines, in Guilford County. As you are probably
aware, payment is required by 15 NCAC 2H .0502(f). The check
should be sent to me and made out to the Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources.
Please call me at 919/733-1786 if you have any questions.
JRD/kls
Holt.ltr/Vol.2.
:attachment
cc: Central Files
cinc:erely,
John R. Dorney
III ) ,I( )N,\I ( )I I I( 11,
\,11(:% ill( I.n? n,.\ ill, \ I,"w-%tll( l6lk c Il \V,nhint't,?1) A\ ilmnq!t.)ii AV'nnton ti.il. m
704/2S1 Q08 `)V18e.I,II 7(4; r,r, d It,,?) 11111 X71 171U1 90O1(.oU- l W), 0, iIxx) 'W) 81P) .;(X)
Pollution Prevention Pays
N ) liox Ralci?"h North (_.m,hiw 27o2o O) 0 lclcph(m, ')1') 711 7U1 ?
' Greensboro News & Rec
0
Published by ??f( 992
GREENSBORO NEWS & RECORD, INC.
Greensboro, North Carolina
WATER !?U.",c!?
NORTH CAROLINA, GUILFORD COUNTY
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State, duly commissioned. qualified, and
authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared
BETTY PITCHFORD
..................... ............................................ who being first duly
sworn, deposes and says:
CLASSIPIFD ADV INSIDE SALES MGR
1. That he is ... .................................................................of the Greensboro
News Company, a corporation, engaged in the publication of newspapers known as "Greensboro Daily
News" and "The Greensboro Record", published, issued and entered as second class mail in the City of
Greensboro in said County and State;
2. That he is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement; that the notice or other legal adver-
tisement. a true copy of which is attached hereto, was published in the
GREENSBORO NEWS & RECORD
on the following dates:
April 3. 1992
................................. ... ............
for ........... _PU131a.W. NOTICE .......................................................... and
placed through .N..C.DIV.ISI.ON..OF..FNVTBONMEN.TAL MANAGEMENT....
:1. That the said newspaper (or newspapers) in which such notice, paper, document, or legal advertisement
was published was, at the time of each and every such publication, a newspaper meeting all of the
requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina and was
a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina.
This ... ...3 ............. day of ............... APri.l......... 1 19.........92
..........................................................................
Advertising Director
..........................................................................
Local Advertising Manager
....................................................
National Advertising Manager
..........
Classified Adver ng Manager
Sworn to and subscribed befo this ... ..... day of .....April 19 92
Notary Pubhc w
.. .......................... ......................
My commission expires,
i
N
ON
Q \ h, A ^
jm pb aQ \^
o\ ¢O o?p
_ h \ Q b
s
?Qr Q
w Z
? J

j -4 c?1 J

C ,? w O ~

a
° " = Q
o

2 O
zCh w?+
ti
a n?
J
L ~ ?1
1 ? o x
'ter q
r?
J
d
2
00
CJ U N I -cp
Q CK \t
N
n
b
•
?O
b
b
rV
?
Q
^1 O
J
J
m
!1t ? 4
C) ?=
..a Q (9
^1 2 co
ryn ?v h2
? 2 2
p ;' 7 c? cu i
r h
ti
a~r-, J
Q 4
hW Q-
J
O
Q 2
U aW !?
s
?Ds?
mQ
F co)
m
o s h
UQ?aQ ?
4u aq
h
i Q O
Q m ?
3 0 C(/
Q
65
co
Q
U
w
mm
/ D T

p <
m

C:
z z

I
? o o
0
o
m
z
n
3 V O
m

I

i
Q
i

1 ^ o o
0
s
D
z x
D D D
3
m
m m
m O
D 70 c
!i z
0
O z
C
CD O
3 m
w m
cn
mm

m o

l n
O
N
0 O

' o
?
` W
m
n

n

< o

D v
,
f
CL ?.
N

o. ?
v o_
m

c
I

c z

<
o
a °. n c 0
o

a m
z
WMX
m
3 c
3 m (ni

3 ?
pp
m m
m O
70 m
O r z

uC
m fn ?C C
v co
?m
-?
o D
o

z

F

I z

z0
m
n

m
n
o

0
n
a n
r m

z

m
m

z
0
m
Z?
D
3 C m
a

'tZ O

c
A
Co
mm
m n
m

0
m
v
m
z
v ?
O
co n
c m
?o z
c <
m
m O
Z
? K
cn m
n z
o
O
m
c
Z r
Z ..
O D
0 z
O 0
v z
M D
= c
m M
m D
I r
m
m
U)
O
c
n
m
U)
srAR o
c ,
•? u.."rOe•
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor George T Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
April 15, 1992
Mr. Vance Arnold
1004 North Elm Street
Greensboro, North Carolina 27401.
Dear. Mr. Arnold:
Re= Lake Jeanette Project
Roadway and Utility Crossings
DEM # 92129
Enclosed for your review is a copy of the 401 Water Quality
Certification application for about 1.5 acres of wetland and
streams channel fill for the Lake Jeanette development. A public
notice for this project was published in the Greensboro News and
Record on April 3, 1992.
As we promised last spring and summer, I am sending you the
application for review for the additional fill associated with
this project. If you have any comments, please send them to me
by April 30, 1992. I can be reached at 919-733-1786 if you have
any questions. I have also sent copies to Kathryn Toxler and
Glenda Fletcher.
Sincere ly,
?( ?;
Joh R. Dorney
JRD/kls
,rnol.d.ltr/WPVo1.2
cc: DEM Winston-Salem Region
r ranz Holt; Alley, 4?ill.iains Carman * king, inc.
16I,,h \\,r.lnn?•+: ,n ACilmin?tun A1in?ti.n S,i?? m
7(L(?il(,?(I ?11?(q.tinl?11 n.(n?{Ir;M( 1411) ;'I l'IMI 1111 1111) ;1), OXYI VI'('007(X),
Pollution Prvvenfion Pavs
wh ti'-111 (au lin.i ''-(Ot? (h li l(
SIATI
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Strect • P neigh, North Carolina 27004
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Ms. Kathryn Tr.oxler
League of Women Voters of
1 YWCA Place
Greensboro, North Carolina
Dear Ms, Troxler:
April 15, 1992
Guilford County
2.7401
Fe: Lake Jeanette Project.
Roadway and Utility Crossings
DEM # 92129
George T Everett, Ph.D.
Director
Enclosed for your review is a copy of the 401 Water Quality
Certification application for about 1.5 acres of wetland and
streams channel fill for the Lake Jeanette development. A public
notice for this project was published in the Greensboro News and
Record on April 3, 1992.
As we promised last spring and summer, I am sending you the
application for review for the additional fill associated with
this project. If you have any comments, please send them to me
by April 30, 1992. I can be reached at 919-733-1786 if you have
any questions. I have also sent copies to Vance Hrriold and
Glenda Fletcher.
Sincerely,
J.. tin F - Dorney
JP D/kls
Trr)xler ltr./WPVol.2
cc: nEM Winston-Salem Region
T'ranz Holt: Alley, Williams Carman * King, Inc.
I:1 ( ,u iti-U ( (11 1( 1 '-
\?Iu?Illc Ii?'?ncvillc Abnn,??ills ILil?,chV\.r.hin?n,?i? AV'Imn,;1t,,r. A1'm,t?m?,tl,m
7
70.1 -2>I 6208 W) 18r' 1, 11 711.1 nr?t 1("?0 ?tlv ?;'1 ['IN! )4t,o1"'! v; ;'MMI rlV 8'4' ;'(N)
Pollution Prevention
y1?( 't37ti1?
I'(1 k?? IL1I( wh 'til)till (.n.?lu,.i I?Ic1,lt?nl,
STATt
4F
w
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Apr i. l 15, 1.992
Ms. Glenda Fletcher
Guilford County Greens
Post Office Box 29189
Greensboro, North Carolina 27429
Dear Ms. Fletcher:
Re: Lake Jeanette Project
Roadway and Utility Crossings
DEM # 92129
George T Everett, Ph.D.
Director
Enclosed for your review is a copy of the 401 Water Quality
Certification application for about 1.5 acres of wetland and
streams channel fill for the Lake Jeanette development. A public
notice for this project was published in the Greensboro News and
Record on April 3, 1.992.
As we promised last spring and summer, I am sending you the
application for review for the additional fill associated with
this project. If you have any comments, please send them to me
by April 30, 1992. I can be reached at 919-733-1786 it you have
any questions. I have also sent copies to Vance Arnold and
Kathryn Troxler.
Sincerely,
(?U? rf \'kJ
ohn R. Dorney
JRD/kls
Fletcher.ltr/WPVol.2
7c: DEM Winston-Salem Region
Franz Holt; Alley, Williams Carman * King, Inc.
\?h, I6 n1'.t, ? ill1 \1-'T' "Al, R'11"wh ' \V"a?l?in),tun A1?i?nnu;?tun Wimtnn
t Ih(, 1,11 0141r,3 I,),Kt `111),.'11( X1 ()11)'1)Ih 6.181 'll'?0) `XX) 1)11)'s""' 71X11
Pollution Prevention Palls
I'O 14rn ?`)??; ILi?1??e?h '?,n'?? (.n?l?uia ?;n?r?f1S3; Irlcl,l?lnx?')I')?; it ;nl?
....I? ,. A,
Greensboro News & Record
Published by
GREENSBORO NEWS & RECORD, INC. ?p
Greensboro, North Carolina 1?n
NORTH CAROLINA, GUILFORD COUNTY
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State, duly commissioned, qualified, and
authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared
BETTY PITCHFORD
................................................................. who being first duly
sworn, deposes and says:
CLASSIFIED ADV INSIDE SALES MGR
1. That he is ..................................................................... of the Greensboro
News Company, a corporation, engaged in the publication of newspapers known as "Greensboro Daily
News" and "The Greensboro Record", published, issued and entered as second class mail in the City of
Greensboro in said County and State;
of Environmental Man-'
tionr pursaant ater to Sec Ty 2. That he is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement; that the notice or other legal adver-
of the Federal Clean tisement, a true copy of which is attached hereto, was published in the
ct and Environmental
Nrnc Commission- nsnn wind GREENSBORO NEWS 8, RECORD
wedaads and siieam on the following dates:
for road and utility
on Lake Jeanette in,
Countv.
isinvlted.tocomment• April. .3, 1992
ilon no later than April t7, '
1992. Comments should be
sent to N.C. Division of Envi-
ronmental Management, Water .............................. ...................................................
...................
Gualily Plannin?, Post Office
Box 299535 Rale, North Car-
6N
0 X
ollna 27
-
5 5, Attention:
John Dorney. A copy of the
for .............PUBLIC . NQ`'.TCE........................................................... and
application is on file at the
Division office at 8025 N. Point
Boulevard, Sulte 100 Winston-
Salem, North Carolina,
ENVIRQNMENTAL . KA,NAGEMENT
placed through .N.. C. DIVISI
OF
ON
" " " " " " '
gio al ice
Winston-Salem R e .
..
..
[phone] during normal
business hours and may be
Inspected by the public.
John Domey
For: George T. Everett, Director
North Caroline ivi Dsion of
Environmental Management 3. That the said newspaper (or newspapers) in which such notice, paper, document, or legal advertisement
DATE: March 25, 1992 was published was, at the time of each and every such publication, a newspaper meeting all of the
requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina and was
a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina.
This .......3 ............. day of ...............April......... , 19...... ...92
..........................................................................
Advertising Director
.........................................................................
Local Advertising Manager
..........................................................................
National Advertising Manager
. ...... .... . .......
Cla ed Advertising Man
Sworn to and subscribed be re me this ...'3 ..... day of .....April ., 19 92
.....
?. - N o t a r ..
y is
Ivy
My commission expires: .................................. ...................
alley, williams, carmen & king, inc.
E N G I N E E R S & A R C H I T E C T S
BURLINGTON OFFICE KANNAPOLIS OFFICE GREENSBORO OFFICE
p.o. box 1179 1 740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1248 1 207 south main street 300 east wendover avenue, suite 403
burlington, north Carolina 27216 kannapolis, north Carolina 28082 greensboro, north Carolina 27401
telephone [phone] telephone [phone] telephone [phone]
fax [phone] fax [phone] fax [phone]
PLEASE REPLY TO:
March 26, 1992 Greensboro
Mr. John Dorney1 ..?.......o..?,,.._?,
Water Quality F D
Division of Enviu u, . 4
NC Dept. of Environment, tural Resources
P. O. Box 29535 WR 3 (1 IQ
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Subject: 401 Certification v??11?i I t??;rr
Roadway and Utility Crossings `..`._. -
Lake Jeanette
Greensboro, NC
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Per your request, we are enclosing three (3) additional copies of the
previously submitted application on the subject project. This application also
includes the support data.
If you have any questions or core ts, please do not hesitate to call.
sincerely,
ALLEY, WILLIAMS,, & KING, INC.
Fr z K. Holt, P. E.
/'C
cc: Mr. C. Richard Routh
LAURENCE A. ALIFY, P.E. IEFFERY D. MOODY, P.E. HERBERT A. CARMEN, A.I.A.
HAYWOOD B. KING, P.E. WAYNE B. PERRY, RA S. DEMETREOS N. CALLINICOS, A.I.A., R, I.B.A.
FRANZ K. HOLT, P.E. DARRELL L. RUSSELL, P.E. KENNETH D. STAFFORD, A.I.A.
?vt'QMVw-w
7 Cr7-?,
? SD , t yX (7a
161, IS-/
?1 s ? ?F ro act - Jfu
&4AC
9"J-1 Act V? a4,.)
r.z-' Wf,
? s Tom.
CSC S q C_ Q c`>s
own av? ?`? ooco
Kp-
?,3?.5'-??-1?j' sa.,??'I j?'JYN n c?u - a .l ?n ? ?rn? '?? 7`a
+
[AA W
?; r-?4J?A?1oU 1' Jv S bv+ t ?s cW, Q p b
bk CY) ?l
g
l cy) N y° s "' Sawn r
O ? y lI
rv
A, - SHEET NUMBER 15

MY

1
Ilnil..n'
kV.

V T'
I(Joins sheet 9)
N
r.C v
s ? F v
N2 , ii
a J
;T'I uk ? In
1 l)toll
- 3
S
C, t

Crr,?. hC2

Calt7 't?1
O

tai r.' r
?
,
?
; u
fn
1_? ?•
?
tN

'
.r .1 ,jwE p ? o
1 ?

C cC2 ! •'*? • , A
. O
°
t
• 7 st o

Y M Q(

) O
AC( r '
1•
f JY
!' 3 •
,
a . o

WWAW
Ce 2
alley, williams, carmen & king, inc.
E N G I N E E R S & A R C H I T E C T S
BURLINGTON OFFICE KANNAPOLIS OFFICE GREENSBORO OFFICE
p.o. box 1179 1 740 chapel hill road
burlington, north Carolina 27216
telephone [phone]
fax [phone]
p.o. box 1248 1 207 south main street
kannapolis, north carolina 28082
telephone [phone]
300 east wendover avenue, suite 403
greensboro, north carolina 27401
telephone [phone]
fax [phone]
February 13, 1992
Job No. 91229
fax [phone]
`x
r ?
E _Tf
c'-
CY)
Mr. John Dorney --
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Envirormiental,
Health and Natural Resources
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Subject: Lake Jeanette
Greensboro, NC
Dear Mr. Dorney:
PLEASE REPLY TO:
Greensboro
Our firm has been coordinating the permitting process with Cornwallis
Development Co. and Newkirk Environmental Consultants, Inc. regarding roadway
and utility crossings at Take Jeanette, Greensboro, NC. We are enclosing a
report that contains the following:
1) EEnvvirormental Review of Property
2) Information relating to site development
3) Roadway and utility crossings of wetlands
The Report also contains exhibits showing proposed roadway and sanitary sewer
crossings and their relation to the development of the Lake Jeanette property.
The enclosed report is to assist you in your review for Section 401, Water
Quality Certification of the proposed crossings. I hope you are able to review
a portion or all of the material prior to your meeting with Mr. Dick Routh of
Cornwallis Development Company, Duncan Newkirk of Newkirk Environmental
Consultants, Inc. and myself on Friday, February 21st.
LAURENCE A. ALLEY, P.E. IEFFERY D. MOODY, P.E. HERBERT A. CARMEN, A.I.A.
HAYWOOD B. KING, P.F. WAYNE B. PERRY, R.L.S. DEMETREOS N. CALLINICOS, A.I.A., R.I.B.A.
FRANZ K. HOLT, P.E. DARRELL 1. RUSSELL, P.E. KENNETH D. STAFFORD, A.I.A.
Mr. John Dorney
February 13, 1992
Page 2

In addition, we are providing a letter frcin Mr. G. Wayne Wright, Chief
Regulatory Branch, Department of Army, Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers,
giving their authorization of proposed activity under nationwide permits.
sincerely,
ALLEY, WILLIAMS, CARKW & KING, INC.
k.A??
Franznz. Holt, P. E.
FKH/cb
cc: Mr. C. Richard Routh
Cornwallis Development Co.
Mr. Duncan Newkirk
Newkirk Environmental Consultants, Inc.
alley, williams, carmen & king, inc.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO February 5, 1992
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199103436
FEB 6 6 1992
Cone Mills Corporation
Cornwallis Development
C/O Mr. Dick Routh
Post Office Box 26540
Greensboro, North Carolina 27415
Dear Mr. Routh:
r;.
Reference is made to my letter dated September 30, 1991. This letter
confirmed the September 16, 1991, wetlands survey verification of the proposed
Lake Jeanette development located adjacent to Richland Creek, north of
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina. Also reference is made to site
plans of the proposed access roads and sewer outfalls for the aforementioned
project received by this office on December 24, 1991.
Your request dated January 13, 1992, stated your proposed plans to
construct minor road crossings labeled 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 on the
aforementioned site plans. A review of these site plans revealed that each
identified road crossing is a single crossing of separate unnamed tributaries
of Lake Jeanette (Richland Creek).
For the purposes of the corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, Title 33,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330, published in the Federal Register
on November 13, 1986, lists nationwide permits. Authorization was provided
for minor road crossing fills including all attendant features, both temporary
and permanent, that are part of a single and complete project for crossing of
a non-tidal waterbody, provided that the crossing is culverted, bridged or
otherwise designed to prevent the restriction of, and to withstand expected
high flows and provided further that discharges into any wetlands adjacent to
the waterbody do not extend beyond 100 feet on either side of the ordinary
high water mark of that waterbody.
The minor road crossings of the unnamed tributaries of Lake Jeanette
(Richland Creek) is authorized by nationwide permit provided it is
accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed conditions. Please be
aware that this authorization does not relieve you of the responsibility to
obtain any other required State or local approval. You should also contact
Mr. John Dorney, North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, (919)
733-5083, to obtain the necessary Section 401, Water Quality Certification for
the proposed road crossings.
ou) `?
a

-2-
The site plans also revealed that you propose to construct the sewer
outfalls for the aforementioned development.
For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, Title 33,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330, published in the Federal Register
on November 13, 1986, lists nationwide permits. Authorization was provided
for the discharge of material for backfill or bedding for utility lines,
including outfall and intake structures, provided there is no change in pre-
construction bottom contours and all excess material is removed to an upland \ L
disposal area.
.? 33
Your work, involving the construction of the aforementioned sewer outfall
lines, is authorized by nationwide permit provided it is accomplished in
strict accordance with the enclosed conditions. Please be aware that this
authorization does not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain any other
required State or local approval. Again, you should contact Mr. John Dorney,
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, [phone], to obtain
the necessary Section 401, Water Quality Certification prior to starting work.
This verification will be valid until the nationwide permit is modified,
reissued, or revoked. All nationwide permits under which you are requesting
authorization were revoked on January 13, 1992.. Reference is made to the
letter received from Alley, Williams, Carmen & King, Inc. of January 16, 1992,
in which you requested that the aforementioned nationwide permit authorization
be extended until January 13, 1993.
Based on the information included with your letter, we concur that a
significant commitment of money and resources has been made in reliance on the
nationwide permits in effect at the time of your project design process and
coordination with my staff. Accordingly, we consider your project to have
"commenced" in accordance with Paragraph 330.12 of our current regulations.
Your work may continue under the original nationwide permit authorization
until January 13, 1993, provided all construction is accomplished in strict
accordance with the enclosed conditions. After that date (January 13, 1993),
any uncompleted work within waters or wetlands will be reviewed in accordance
with the terms and conditions of the current nationwide permits.
Please be reminded that no excavated or fill materials may be placed in
any waters or wetlands areas without prior Federal permit authorization. Any
additional impacts to delineated wetlands will require further review by this
office.
Thank you for your time and cooperation. If you have any questions,
please contact Mr. Thomas, Raleigh Regulatory Field office, telephone (919)
846-0648.
Sincerely,
s
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure

-3-
Copies Furnished (with enclosure):
Newkirk Environmental Consultants, Incorporated
C/O Mr. Mark A. Purcell
192 East Bay Street, suite 201
Charleston, South Carolina 29401
ley, Williams, Carmen & King, Inc.
V/oC/O Mr. Franz K. Holt
300 East Wendover Avenue, Suite 403
Greensboro, North Carolina 27401
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Regional Office Manager
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
8025 North Point Boulevard
Suite 100
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27106
a
f
CONDITIONS
a. Any discharge of dredged or fill material will not occur in the
proximity of a public water supply.
b. The activity will not jeopardize a threatened or endangered species as
identified under the Endangered Species Act, or destroy or adversely modify
the critical habitat of such species.
c. The activity will not significantly disrupt the movement of those
species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody (unless the primary
purpose of the fill is to impound water).
d. Any discharge of dredged or fill material will consist of suitable
material free from toxic pollutants.
e. Any structure or fill will be properly maintained.
f. If the activity may adversely affect historic properties which the
National Park Service has listed on, or determined eligible for listing on,
the National Register of Historic Places, or if significant historic
properties are encountered before or during work, the permittee will notify
the District Engineer.
g. An individual state water quality certification must be obtained or
waived. Conditions of certification will be considered to be special
conditions of the Federal nationwide permit.
h. The following management practices will be followed to the maximum
extent:
(1) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United
States will be avoided or minimized through the use of other practical
alternatives.
(2) Discharges in spawning areas during spawning seasons will be
avoided.
(3) Discharges will not restrict or impede the movement of aquatic
species indigenous to the waters or the passage of normal or expected high
flows or cause the relocation of the waters (unless the primary purpose of the
fill is to impound water).
(4) If the discharge creates an impoundment of water, adverse impacts
on the aquatic system caused by the accelerated passage of water and/or the
restriction of its flow will be minimized.
(5) Discharge in wetland areas will be avoided.
(6) Heavy equipment working in wetlands will be placed on mats.
(7) Discharges into breeding areas for migratory waterfowl will be
avoided. s
(8) All temporary fills will be removed in their entirety.
1
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
__? _? , _.____ "w•??` February 5, 1992
IN REPLY REFER TO Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199103436
Cone Mills Corporation
Cornwallis Development
C/o Mr. Dick Routh
Post Office Box 26540
Greensboro, North Carolina 27415
Dear Mr. Routh:
.7 C. r
n
v 1?f3Y

-,
Reference is made to my letter dated September 30, 1991. This letter
confirmed the September 16, 1991, wetlands survey verification of the proposed
Lake Jeanette development located adjacent to Richland Creek, north of
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina. Also reference is made to site
plans of the proposed access roads and sewer outfalls for the aforementioned
project received by this office on December 24, 1991.
Your request dated January 13, 1992, stated your proposed plans to
construct minor road crossings labeled 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 on the
aforementioned site plans. A review of these site plans revealed that each
identified road crossing is a single crossing of separate unnamed tributaries
of Lake Jeanette (Richland Creek).
For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, Title 33,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330, published in the Federal Register
on November 13, 1986, lists nationwide permits. Authorization was provided
for minor road crossing fills including all attendant features, both temporary
and permanent, that are part of a single and complete project for crossing of
a non-tidal waterbody, provided that the crossing is culverted, bridged or
otherwise designed to prevent the restriction of, and to withstand expected
high flows and provided further that discharges into any wetlands adjacent to
the waterbody do not extend beyond 100 feet on either side of the ordinary
high water mark of that waterbody.
The minor road crossings of the unnamed tributaries of Lake Jeanette
(Richland Creek) is authorized by nationwide permit provided it is
accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed conditions. Please be
aware that this authorization does not relieve you of the responsibility to
obtain any other required State or local approval. You should also contact
Mr. John Dorney, North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, (919)
733-5083, to obtain the necessary Section 401, Water Quality Certification for.
the proposed road crossings.

I
-2-
The site plans also revealed that you propose to construct the sewer
outfalls for the aforementioned development.
For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, Title 33,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330, published in the Federal Register
on November 13, 1986, lists nationwide permits. Authorization was provided
for the discharge of material for backfill or bedding for utility lines,
including outfall and intake structures, provided there is no change in pre-
construction bottom contours and all excess material is removed to an upland
disposal area.
Your work, involving the construction of the aforementioned sewer outfall
lines, is authorized by nationwide permit provided it is accomplished in
strict accordance with the enclosed conditions. Please be aware that this
authorization does not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain any other
required State or local approval. Again, you should contact Mr. John Dorney,
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, [phone], to obtain
the necessary Section 401, Water Quality Certification prior to starting work.
This verification will be valid until the nationwide permit is modified,
reissued, or revoked. All nationwide permits under which you are requesting
authorization were revoked on January 13, 1992. Reference is made to the
letter received from Alley, Williams, Carmen & King, Inc. of January 16, 1992,
in which you requested that the aforementioned nationwide permit authorization
be extended until January 13, 1993.
Based on the information included with your letter, we concur that a
significant commitment of money and resources has been made in reliance on the
nationwide permits in effect at the time of your project design process and
coordination with my staff. Accordingly, we consider your project to have
"commenced" in accordance with Paragraph 330.12 of our current regulations.
Your work may continue under the original nationwide permit authorization
until January 13, 1993, provided all construction is accomplished in strict
accordance with the enclosed conditions. After that date (January 13, 1993),
any uncompleted work within waters or wetlands will be reviewed in accordance
with the terms and conditions of the current nationwide permits.
Please be reminded that no excavated or fill materials may be placed in
any waters or wetlands areas without prior Federal permit authorization. Any
additional impacts to delineated wetlands will require further review by this
office.
Thank you for your time and cooperation. If you have any questions,
please contact Mr. Thomas, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, telephone (919)
846-0648.
Sincerely,
Is
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure

-3-
Copies Furnished (with enclosure):
Newkirk Environmental Consultants, Incorporated
C/o Mr. Mark A. Purcell
192 East Bay Street, Suite 201
Charleston, South Carolina 29401
Alley, Williams, Carmen & King, Inc.
C/o Mr. Franz K. Holt
300 East Wendover Avenue, Suite 403
Greensboro, North Carolina 27401
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Regional office Manager
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
8025 North Point Boulevard
Suite 100
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27106
I
r
ENGINEERING REPORT
OF
ROADWAY AND UTILITY CROSSINGS
' LAKE JEANETTE DEVELOPMENT
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
FOR
CORNWALLIS DEVELOPMENT CO.
' GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
BY:
1

ALLEY, WILLIAMS, CARMEN & KING, INC.
300 E. Wendover, Suite 403
Greensboro, North Carolina 27401
[phone]
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BY:
NEWKIRK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
192 East Bay Street, Suite 201
Charleston, SC 29401
[phone]

X04 ? z c
15816,

1
alley, williams, carmen & king, inc.
E N G I N E E R S & ARC H I T E C T S
BURLINGTON OFFICE
p.o. box 1179 1 740 chapel hill road
burlinglon, north Carolina 27216
telephone [phone]-SS34
fax [phone]
KANNAPOLIS OFFICE
p.o. box 12481 207 south main street
kannapolis, north Carolina 28082
telephone [phone]
fax [phone]
GREENSBORO OFFICE
300 east wendover avenue, suite 403
greensboro, north Carolina 27401
telephone [phone]
fax [phone]

' December 23, 1991
91061
Mr. John Thomas
' Department of the Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Regional Field Office
11413 Falls of the Neuse Road
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587-9408
PLEASE REPLY TO:
Burlington
Re: Lake Jeanette Development
Nationwide and General Permit Coordination
Dear Mr. Thomas:
Our firm has been coordinating the permitting process with Cornwallis
Development Co. and Newkirk Environmental Consultants, Inc. regarding Lake
Jeanette/adjoining Richland Creek, Guilford County, North Carolina. We are
F providing a report that has information regarding on-site wetlands,
developmental conditions, protective measures and crossings planned. This'
report is to assist you in your review for authorization of the proposed
roadway and utility crossings by Nationwide and/or General Permits.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the contents of the report;
please do not hesitate to contact me. An early review would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
' ALLEY, WILLIAMS CARMEN, & KING, INC.
K
Fr z K. Holt, P. E.
' FKH/sj
encl.
cc: Mr. C. Richard Routh
Mr. Duncan Newkirk
LAURENCE A. ALLEY, P.F. I[Tf ERY D. MOODY, P.L. FORBERT A. CARMEN, A.I.A.
' MAYWOOD B. KING, P.F. WAYNI S. PERRY, R.L.S. DEMETRIOS N. CAILINICOS, A.I.A., R.I.B.A.
FRANZ K. HOLT, P.E. DARRELL L. RUSSELL, P.J. KENNETH D. STAFFORD, A.I.A.
TABLE OF CONVENTS
1. I1:7RODUCTI013 1-1 to 1-2
2. rl?V I F;011N'r,idT/?I. RI V IEW OF PROPERTY
/±. Cover Lctter Requesting Review for
Authorization of Proposed Roadway
and Utility Crossings 2-A-1 to A-3
B. Departmen*_ of the Army General Permit 2-B-1 to B-6
3. I1dFORIIATI0N RELATING TO SITE, DEVELOPMENT
A. Cover Le,-ter 3-A-1
11). Attachment ;il 3-8-1 to 15-13
C. Attachment #2 3-C-1 to C-11
1). Attachment #3 3-D-1 to D-25
4. ROADWI,Y AND LITILITY CROSSINGS
/;. Area and Volume Calculations 4-A-1
5. Typical Section of Roadway Crossings 4-B-1
C. Individual Roadway Crossing !laps 4-C-1 to C- 20
D. Typical Sections of Sanitary Sewer Crossings 4-D-1 to D-2
1:. Individual Sewer Crossings flaps 4-E-1 to T:-10
5. Ia111BITS
"A" (Overall Roadway Crossings Map #1)
"B" (Overall Roadway Crossing flap 412)
"C" (Overall San. Sewer Cro>sing Map)

? Introduction

i'

T 1dTRnT)I1 CT T n Al
' Lake Jeanette, adjacent to Richland Creek is an approximately 270 acre lake
owned by and constructed by Cone Mills Corporation. Cone Mills and Cornwallis
Development Co, initially owned 946 acres of land surrounding the lake. The
property is zoned for residential (876 acres), commercial (34 acre) and
institutional (36 acres) use. Lake Jeanette is being developed by Cornwallis
Development Co. Cornwallis Development Co. has been focusing on environmental
concerns of which "wetlands" has been a major portion to date. Our firm, along
with Newkirk Environmental Consultants, have been working with Cornwallis
t Development Co. in the planning of future Development; the first stage has been
identification and mapping of wetlands and the mapping of future Roadway and
Utility Crossings and their relationship to existing wetlands.
' This report consists of three parts:
1. Identifying what type of wetlands exists and the relationship of
proposed roadway and utility crossings.
2 Request for review and authorization by the Corps of Engineers (COE)
for proposed "wetland crossings."
3. Provide additional information of proposed land usage and measures
being taken to maintain water quality and the protection of wetlands.
The Roadway and Utility Crossings have been carefully planned to limit the
impact that would occur on the wetlands. Avoidance where possible was a key
issue in the planning phase. It is, however, virtually impossible to develop
the property with any conformity without crossing the tributaries that exist.
There are eight remaining roadway crossings planned. In each case the
discharge of fill material will be less than 200 cubic yards below the plane of
ordinary high water. The crossings are designed to accommodate 100 YR storm
' flows. The Roadway Crossings will be wide enough to accommodate utilities
(water, sewer, gas, cable, power, etc.) so as to act as a corridor. This
lessens the number of times a tributary is crossed and therefore lessens the
total impact. During installation, slopes will be properly compacted and
' stabilized immediately upon crossing. Proper erosion control methods will be
used to prevent sediment from entering the tributaries. Rip Rap outlet
protection will be installed to protect the streams from erosion at the pipe
' discharge. The Rip Rap will be installed by undercutting the soil so its
placement will not be above the original contour.
' The structures will meet NC DOT & City of Greensboro Standards. Review and
inspection of the crossings will be done by the City of Greensboro. There is a
tributary which is proposed to be crossed twice due to extension of existing
roadways. These crossings will span the tributary so that fill material will
' not be placed within the jurisdictional limits. Plans and profiles along with
a location map of the crossings are provided in the report.

1-1
D
n
Introduction cont.
Page 2
Utility crossings outside of the roadway corridors will be sewer outfalls sized
to serve the drainage basin. Due to their purpose they require placement
downstream from most of the roadway crossings. There will not be a discharge
of fill material at the wetland crossings. Clearing for installation will be a
maximum of M FT and less where possible. Rip Rap protection will be used
where required for stream protection against erosion. The Rip Rap will be
placed in an undercut section so that original ground contour may be
maintained. Additional erosion control measures will be installed to prevent
sediment from entering the stream at the crossing. In addition stabilization
will occur immediately upon crossing. Haps of the proposed utility crossings
are provided in the report.
Cornwallis Development Co. will be developing Lake Jeanette property under
guidelines that they helped establish in addition to the City of Greensboro
i Watershed Protection District Ordinance that is restrictive and enhances
watershed protection and wetland protection. In conjunction with this
ordinance the City has developed a water quality conservation easement, flood
[r plain and open space dedication as a part_ of their ordinance along with other
measures to help protect tributaries. These are listed in Attachment 7011.
Cornwallis Development_ Co. is to identify all steep slopes, drainage ways and
jurisdictional wetlands and is to develop in a manner to protect these areas as
much as practical by avoidance, erosion control measures, easements, etc. In
addition, the developer will require property owners to stabilize and protect
disturbed areas through deed restrictions. These are some of the many zoning
conditions for development_ as listed in Attachment '12. Cornwallis Development
Co. commissioned Dr. Robert C. Borden to evaluate the effect of development on
C1 water quality in Lake Jeanette. His analysis shows that completion of the Lake
Jeanette Development will not have a significant_ 'impact on water quality in
Lake Jeanette. Dr. Borden's report is included as a part of this submittal as
Attachment 11. as Exhibits "A" "B" & "C" have been included as part of the report to help you in
your overall review of the proposed crossings and their impact on the wetlands.

1-2
n
Environmental Review of Property
f

7

Newkirk Environmental Consultants, Inc.
192 EAST BAY STREET, SUITE 201 • CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA 29401 • [phone] • FAX #[phone]
December 2, 1991
' Mr. John Thomas
Department of the Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
' Regional Field Office
11413 Falls of the Neuse Road
Wake Forest, NC 27587-9408
* RE: Lake Jeanette Development Nationwide
& General Permit Coordination
Dear Mr. Thomas:
Reference is made to our previous meetings regarding the Corps of
Engineers (COE) regulatory jurisdiction, as it pertains to the
proposed development of the Lake Jeanette tract (Cornwallis
Development Corp.) adjacent to Richland Creek in Greensboro,
Guilford County, North Carolina.
j As you are aware, Mr. Ken Jolly and yourself have previously
reviewed in the field and approved the demarcation of the
boundaries of COE jurisdictional "waters of the United States"
(CESAW-C091-J-041). The "waters of the U.S." within the project
boundaries primarily consist of the Lake Jeanette reservoir
(Richland Creek) and its contributing tributaries. All of -the
tributaries within the project boundaries are "above headwaters"
(i.e. less than 5 cfs avg. annual flow), and as is typical of the
' piedmont have minimal adjacent wetlands.
Typically the tributaries 'are very incised, have very little
' herbaceous vegetation within them, and are lined with mesophytic to
hydrophytic hardwood trees. Dominant tree species within and
immediately adjacent to the small streams include sweetgum, yellow
' poplar, red maple, American beech, American hornbeam, dogwood,
northern red oak and southern red oak.
' Most of the jurisdictional areas do not have hydric soils so it is
not appropriate to classify them as "wetlands" relative to Corps of
' 2-A-1
C
Mr. John Thomas
December 5, 1991
?. Page Two
Engineers regulatory jurisdiction. In regard to Corps of Engineers
jurisdictional "waters of the U.S.", the referenced tributaries are
most accurately desribed as intermittent and perennial streams with
' minimal average annual flow volumes. However, some of the streams
do have adjacent hillside seepage slopes that have been identified
as jurisdictional wetlands.
In an effort to eliminate unnecessary impacts and to minimize
unavoidable impacts to "waters of the U.S.", the preliminary
planning of the development was not undertaken until final
verification of the Corps` jurisdictional limits was received.
When planning efforts commenced, the development was designed to
avoid and even buffer where possible all "waters of the United
States". The only exceptions to total avoidance of impacts to
"waters of the U.S." occur in the areas of roadway and utility line
crossings, which for geographic, engineering, and economic reasons
were unavoidable.
Where at all posssible, the utility and roadway crossings were
planned at locations of least impact to the tributaries. Design
¦i objectives included crossing the tributaries in a perpendicular
fashion where they are most narrow.
Each roadway crossing design falls within the manditory criteria
prescribed in 33 CFR 330.5(a)(14) for Nationwide Permit
'i applicability, as indicated on the attached plan and profile
sheets. All of the proposed road crossings involve the discharge of
less than 200 cubic yards of fill material below the plane
' of ordinary high water, are designed to prevent the restriction of,
and to withstand expected high flows, and do not involve discharges
into any wetlands adjacent to the waterbody beyond 100 feet on
' either side of the ordinary high water mark of that waterbody.
When a respective tributary is required to be crossed more than
' once, the additional crossing will be bridged with no discharge of
fill material being placed within the jurisdictional limits.
' As per discussions with Mr. G. Wayne Wright and yourself, the
utility line crossings of the tributaries were designed to minimize
2-A-2

1 Mr. John Thomas
December 5, 1991
1 Page Three
impacts to the waterbody. The proposed construction easement
theirforty
1 (including clearing activbe1ereturned ottoexceed
preconstrDuctaon
ground contours will
elevations.
Additional information regarding the environmental protective
'
measures to be incorporated during construction is presented in the
attachments provided by the project engineer. Also, a development
perspective from Cornwallis Development Corporation for the entire
project is attached for your information and use.
This letter, the enclosed engineering drawings, and the other
attachments are intended to serve as a request for the Corps of
1 Engineers to commence their review for authorization of the
proposed roadway and utility line crossings by Nationwide and/or
general permits.
If you have any questions or comments concerning the supplied
on
information please do not hesitate to contact me.
As always, thank you in advance for your timely review.
1.1 Sincerely,
Mark A. Purcell
' NEWKIRK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
cc: Mr. G. Wayne Wright
Mr. Dick Routh
Mr. Franz holt

2-A-3

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
' Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
' General Permit No. SAWC081-N-000-0049
Name of Permittee: General Public
Effective Date: April 1,
Expiration Date: December 31, 1993
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
GENERAL PERMIT
A general permit to perform work in or affecting navigable waters of the
United States and waters of the United States, upon the recommendation of the
Chief of Engineers, pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403), and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1344), is hereby modified and renewed by authority of the Secretary of
the Army by
A District Engineer
U.S. Army Engineer District, Wilmington
Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
TO MAINTAIN, REPAIR-AND INSTALL AERIAL AND SUBAQUEOUS UTILITY LINES WITH
ATTENDANT STRUCTURES AND TO DISCHARGE EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIALS, WITHIN
CONSTRUCTION/ACCESS CORRIDORS, ASSOCIATED WITH UTILITY LINE MAINTENANCE,
REPAIR AND INSTALLATION IN NAVIGABLE WATERS AND WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES IN
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA.
1. Sgecial Conditions.
a. Work authorized by this general permit includes the installation of
pipes or pipelines for the transportation of any gaseous liquid, liquifiable
' or slurry substance and any cable, line or wire for the transmission of
electrical energy, telephone or telegraph messages, and radio and television
communication. This general permit authorizes the temporary placement of
' excavated material-1 rom_trenches_or footings# the temporary stockpiling of
excavated or fill material for backfill or bedding and the temporary placement
of excavated or fill material for construction of access roads within a
20-foot-wide corridor. All work will conform to the standards contained
herein. Other construction activities are not authorized by this general
permit.
be The discharge of excavated or fill material as backfill or bedding for
subaqueous utility line crossings, as regulated by Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act, (33 U.S.C. 1344), is permitted by regulation, 33 CFR 330.5(a)(12),
1
2-B-1

' pursuant to conditions found at 33 CFR 330.5 (b) and management practices
found at 33 CFR 330.6.
c. Except as authorized in 33 CFR 330.5(a)(12), this general permit does
not authorize excavation or filling in any emergent wetlands, forested
wetlands, beds of submerged aquatic vegetation or shellfish beds. Utility
' line routes will avoid areas of concentrated shellfish production and
submerged beds of vascular aquatic vegetation.
d. Construction of aerial utility lines in Currituck.Sound, Core Sound,
' lower Pamlico Sound, Falls Lake and Jordan Lake will be subject to specific
coordination with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as these areas are
important to avifauna migration and movement.
r e. To install a utility line under the authority of this general permit,
the permittee must apply to the District Engineer by submitting a written
description of the work and appropriate drawings, on 8-1/2-inch by 11--inch
' paper. Immediately upon receipt of an application, the District Engineer will
assign a file number and examine the proposal to determine the applicability
of this general permit. If the proposal satisfies the general permit
standards, the District Engineer will so inform the permittee by letter which
may contain additional, specific conditions to asaute that the work will have
a minimal impact on area resources. A.copy of this letter, with drawings,
will be furnished to the Director, Atlantic* Marine Center, National Ocean
Service, Norfolk, Virginia and to NOAA, National Ocean Survey, Marine Chart
Branch, Rockville, Maryland.
f. This general permit does authorize temporary -roadway access, as
defined herein and determined by the District Engineer to be essential for
maintenance, repair and/or installation of utility lines. This general permit
does not authorize any permanent, resultant changes in preconstruction
1 elevation contours in waters or wetlands. Any excess material will be removed
to a high ground disposal area.
' g. Temporary access roadways must not span more than one-half way across
any waters or wetlands at any one time.
' h. Temporary access roadways must be constructed of non-erodible
materials.
' is All work authorized by this general permit, including temporary
roadways, will be confined to a maximum corridor base width of 20 feet.
' j. The temporary
wetlands will be for
accomplish the work.

placement of excavated or fill material in waters or
the absolute minimum period of time necessary to
2-B-2

?1 4

-3-
k. Appropriate erosion and sedimentation control measures, in accordance
with State standarde and as directed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management, will be employed whenever excavated or fill
materials are placed in or near waters or wetlands.
1. This general permit does not authorize the placement of fill material
for roadways or excavation of channels in navigable waters. of the United
States, waters subject to regulation pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899. Equipment operating in such waters must work from a
barge or wooden mats.
m. This general permit does not authorize the placement of excavated or
fill material in designated trout waters, fin fish and/or shrimp nursery areas
or areas subject to anadromous fish spawning runs during the period between
March 1 and November 15 of any year.
j n. This general permit does not authorize a utility line crossing which
would adversely affect any public water supply intake.
o. In areas where a subaqueous utility line is to cross a Federally-
1 maintained channel, i.e., the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW)•, it will
be buried at a minimum depth 6 Feet below the depth of the authorized channel.
In other areas where subaqueous lines are subject to interfere with
navigation, they will be installed at a minimum depth of 2 feet below the
substrate.
P. The minimum clearance for aerial communication lines, or any lines not
transmitting electrical power, will be 10 feet above the clearance required
for bridges in the vicinity as established by the U.S. Coast Guard.
q. The minimum clearance for aerial electrical power transmission lines
will be governed by the system voltage as indicated below:
Nominal System
Voltage, Kilovolt

1

115 and below
138
161
230
350
S00
700
750 to 765
Minimum Clearance
Above Bridge Clearance
(As Established by U.S. oast Guard)
20 feet
22
24
26
30
35
42
45
2-B-3

. f -4-
The clearances for aerial lines are based on the low point of the line under
' conditions which produce the greatest sag, taking into consideration
temperature, load, wind, length or span and the type of supports.
' r. The District Engineer reserves the right to require that subaqueous
lines be placed at greater depths or aerial lines be placed at greater heights
if the public interest so indicates.
' s. This general permit does not apply to utility lines that are a part of
a water power project. Federal authorization for such lines must be obtained
from the U.S. Department of Energy.
t. This general permit does not relieve the permittee from the
responsibility of obtaining an easement to crone navigable waters from the
North Carolina Department of Administration, State Property Office, pursuant
to North Carolina General Statutes 143-341 (4)0 146-11 and 146-12.
2. General Conditions*
a. All activities authorized by this general permit that involve the
placement of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States will be
consistent with applicable water quality standards, effluent limitations, and
standards of performance, prohibitions, pre-treatment standards, and
management practices established pursuant to the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.
1344), and applicable State and local law. To assure preservation of water
quality, before any work is authorized by this general permit, an applicant,
if required to do so, must apply for and obtain a Water Quality Certification
' from the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management in accordance
with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
b. There will be no unreasonable interference with navigation or the
right of the public to riparian access by the existence or use of activities
authorized by this general permit.
' c. A permittee, upon receipt of written notice from the Wilmington
District Engineer of failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this
general permit, will, within 60 days, without expense to the U.S. Government,
' and in such manner as the Wilmington District Engineer may direct, effect
compliance with the terms and conditions or return the worksite to a pre-work
condition,
d. The permittee must make every reasonable effort to perform the work
authorized herein in a manner so as to minimize any adverse impact on fish,
wildlife and natural environmental values.
' 2-B-4
-5-
' e. The pezmittee must perform the work authorized herein in a manner to minimize any degradation of water quality. The activity will be so
conducted in such a manner as to prevent a significant increase an turbidity
outside the area of construction or construction-related discharge. Increases
such that the turbidity in the waterbody is 5o UTUIS or less will not be
considered significant.
f. The permittee will permit the Wilmington District Engineer or his
representative to make periodic inspections at any time deemed necessary in
order to assure that the activity is being performed or maintained in strict
' accordance with the Special and General Conditions of this general permit,
g. This general permit does not convey any rights, either in real estate
or material, or any exclusive privileges; and it does not authorize any injury
to property or invasion of rights or any infringement of Federal, State, or
local laws or regulations, nor does it obviate the requirement to obta
or local assent required by law for the activity authorized herein. is State
h. Authorization provided by this general permit may be either modified,
suspended, or revoked in whole or in part if the Wilmington Distract Engineer,
acting on behalf of the Secretary of the Arm
would be in the beat Y. determines that such action
public interest. Unless subject to modification,
suspension, or revocatlon, the term of this general pet all 5 rs.
Any modification, suspension, or revocation of authorizrationhwillbnot beathe
basis for any claim for damages against the U.S. Government.
'i. This general permit does not authorize the interference with any
existing or proposed Federal project and the
?J compensation for damages or in u Permittee will not be entitled to '
which may be caused by or result from existing corrfuture woperationsiund herein
by the United States in the public interest. n ertaken
J. This general permit will not be applicable to proposed construction
when the Wilmington District Engineer determines that the
would significantly affect the quality of the human proposed activity
environments
k. This general permit will not be applicable to
' r
when the Wilmington District Engineer determines, after anysnecessary
t?ction
investigations, that the proposed activity would adversely affect areas which
possess historic, cultural, scenic, conservation, or recreational values.
Application of this exemption applies to:
(1) Rivers named in Section 3 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers At 15
V.S.C. 1213)0 those proposed for inclusion as provided by Sections 4 and5(of
the Act, and wild, scenic, and recreational rivers eats
local entities. blished by State and
' 2-B-5
-6-
J
' (2) Historic, cultural, or archeological sites listed in or eligible
for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places as defined in the
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and its codified regulations and in
the National Historic Preservation Amendment Act of 1980.
' (3) Sites included in or determi
National Re ist ned eligibly for listing in the
ks.
$ ry of Natural Landmarks.
ke
(4) Endangered or threatened species or habitat
determined by the Secretaries of Interior or Commerce and conservedpInie3 as
' accordance with the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531).
1. At his discretion, at any time during the processing cycle, the
Wilmington District Engineer may determine that this
be applicable to a specific construction proposal. Ia®suchlcase,itheill not
procedure for processing an individual permit in accordance with 33 CFR 32
will be available. S
' BY AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY;
PAUL W. WOODBURY
oil Colones, Corps of Engineers
District Engineer
?i
2-B-6
it
I
Information

t

Relating to Site Development
r

CORNWALLIS DEVELOPMENT CO.
R O. BOX 26540 • GREENSBORO, N.C. 27415 • [phone]
A SUBSIDIARY OF CONE MILLS CORPORATION
BUILDERS
0
December 20, 1991
DEVELOPERS
Mr. John Thomas
Department of the Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Regional Field Office
11413 Falls of the Neuse Road
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587-9408
REALTORS
Re: Lake Jeanette Development Nationwide
& General Permit Coordination
Dear Mr. Thomas:
Although the attached information is not required or even sought
by you in connection with the road crossing permit, I hope you
will take the time to read it. As you are aware, the Lake
Jeanette development has attracted an extraordinary amount of
interest among special interest groups in Guilford County. Most
of their comments have been allegations, and we want you to have
the facts. They are attached.
Attachment #1 is a copy of the Water Shed Protection portion of
the Unified Development Ordinance which is in final draft form.
It is almost identical to the existing Greensboro Ordinance.
Attachment #2 is a copy of the 33 additional conditions agreed to
by us as a part of the Zoning Ordinance adopted by the City
Council on September 4, 1991.
Attachment #3 is a copy of a Study of the Lake Jeanette
Development Plan. This was commissioned by us to evaluate the
effect of the development on water quality in Lake Jeanette.
Dr. Borden's credentials are a part of this report.
I know this is a lot to read, but it may not take more time than
' is demanded of you by the special interest groups that oppose this
development.
Sincerely,
C. Richard Routh
President
CRR:dly
Attachments
1 3-A-1
1 coneei-oo
111:1:1\\1\1: IM K X1:1 :11\11 I:h:\1'IH\ 111 1:\1'.1.1.1.1.\1:1.
i
ARTICLE VII
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS
30-7-1 WATERSHED DISTRICTS
30-7-1.1 Establishment of Watershed District
' The Watershed Protection District is hereby
established as an overlay district. The designated
watersheds under this ordinance are divided into two
overlay sub-districts:
(A) Watershed Area: The Watershed Area, hereafter
referred to as "WA", consisting of the
stream/river basin catchment draining into the
municipal water supply reservoir; and
(B) Watershed Critical Area: The Watershed Critical
Area, hereafter referred to as "WCA", consisting
of the direct drainage area around the reservoir.
Land use within the Watershed Protection District must
comply with all the requirements of both the
?i underlying zoning district and the applicable
1 watershed overlay district.
30-7-1.2 Incorporation of Watershed Map
This Section incorporates by reference the Guilford
County Watershed Map dated July 7, 1986, showing the
,j following designated watersheds in the county and the
!J municipalities: Reidsville, Greensboro, High Point,
Randleman, Randleman Dam, and Burlington.
?l 30-7-1.3 Approval of Plans
} No Enforcement Officer, Board, or Governing Body is
authorized to approve any plans or issue any permits
for any land in a watershed protection district unless
a watershed control plan therefor has been approved in
?. compliance with the requirements of this Section. For
the purpose of evaluating the design of all
development within the designated municipal
watersheds, site plans, plot plans, and subdivision
plans shall be submitted in compliance with the
requirements of this Article.
30-7-1.4 Applicability
This Section shall apply to Section 30-7-2 (Watershed
Areas) and Section 30-7-3 (Watershed Critical Areas),
and to all watershed areas within the County and the
municipal jurisdictional areas, except as provided
' 30-7-1
' (3-B-1)

?. herein. These requirements shall not apply to a
single family residence or residential accessory
buildings on a lot of record. Also, developments
' participating in a public regional lake program may be
exempt from runoff control requirements but not other
requirements of this Section.
t 30-7-2 WATERSHED AREAS
30-7-2.1 General Provisions
' (A) Watershed Area: These districts shall protect the
entire area which drains into any designated
' municipal water supply reservoir from any activity
which could degrade water quality in the
reservoirs.
' (B) Stream Channelization: Channelization of streams
in a WA district shall not occur except by the
approval of the Planning Board.
30-7-2.2 Watershed Control Plan
(A) Plan Required: A watershed control plan shall be
required for all development in a designated
municipal watershed, and shall be submitted to the
Enforcement Officer. The watershed control plan
shall include all applicable information listed in
Appendix 2 (Map Standards) of this Ordinance.
(B) Plan Approval: The Enforcement Officer may approve
a watershed control plan in accordance with the
performance standards found in Table 30-7-2-1.
' 30-7-2.3 Improvements
(A) Construction of Improvements: The construction of
all improvements designed for watershed protection
' and shown on an approved watershed control plan
shall be completed prior to the issuance of any
building permit, plat recordation, or pavement
' installation.
(B) Maintenance Required: When runoff control measures
' are part of a development, and such measures serve
i
i
'
on or
assoc
at
more than one lot, an owners
binding maintenance contract for the purpose of
' ownership and maintenance shall be required.
(C) Maintenance of Control Measures: Maintenance of

' runoff control measures shall be performed at such
time as the sediment storage volume of the
retention/detention measure has been lost to
sediment or a part of the installation is not
' functioning as originally designed. The City shall
30-7-2
' (3-B-2)
i
have the responsibility to inspect and notify the
owner of the land on which the runoff control
measure is located. All maintenance shall be
'. performed within ninety (90) days of the date the
City gives such notice. Failure by the property
owner(s) to perform the required maintenance or
' repair within the stated period shall enable the
City to perform, and recover the cost of, -such
maintenance and repairs from the property owners.
' (D) Recording of Permanent Improvements: All permanent
improvements including approved access/ maintenance
easement(s) (specific or general, at the owner's
option) shall be recorded on a Final Plat, and a
mechanism to insure the maintenance of the
facilities shall be established concurrent with,
t? or prior to, plat recordation. In the event a plat
recordation is not required, any improvement,
filtration/infiltration area, or owners'
association required by this Section shall be
submitted for approval to the Enforcement Officer,
and duly recorded after said approval.
30-7-3 WATERSHED CRITICAL AREAS
30-7-3.1 General Provisions
(A) Protection Provided: Watershed Critical Area (WCA)
Districts shall protect those portions of
designated watersheds which lie closest to
F existing and proposed water supply reservoirs from
activities which could degrade water quality in
the reservoirs.
(B) Channelization of Streams: Channelization of
streams in a WCA District shall not occur except
F by the approval of the Planning Board.
C) Required Minimum Standards: All minimum standards
(
set forth in Section 30-7-2.2 (Watershed Control
Plan) shall apply to WCA Districts.
(D) Required Improvements: All required improvement
set forth in Section 30-7-2.3 (Improvements) shall
apply to WCA Districts.
30-7-3.2 Watershed Critical Area Applicability
Requirements of WCA Districts shall apply to:
(A) All development, excluding individual single
family lots except as provided herein; and
(B) All road construction within the WCA District.
30-7-3
(3-B-3)

r

- TABLE 30-7-2-1
WATERSHED AREA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Development Type Schedule
1) Residential development with two and one- Low Density Residential Scoresheet
half (2S) or fewer dwelling units per gross (Table 30-7-2-2). A score of one hundred (100)
acre. or more is required for passing;
or
Engineering Certification by registered profes-
sional engineer, with seal (Table 30-7-2-4),
of control of the first one-half (12) inch
of runoff from impervious surface coverage.
11
I
2) Institutional, Commercial, Recreational, and
Industrial development with thirty percent
(30%) or less impervious surface coverage;
or
Residential development with greater than
two and one-half (2S) dwelling units per
gross acre and with thirty percent (3091o) or
less impervious surface coverage.
3) All development with more than thirty
percent (30%) but less than fifty percent
(50%) impervious surface coverage.
Institutional. Commercial. Recreational

7

Industrial, and High Density Residential
Scoresheet (Table 30-7-2-3). A score of 100
or more is required for passing;
. or
Engineering Certification by registered profes-
sional engineer, with seal (Table 30-7-2-4),
of control of the first one-half (1/2) inch
of runoff from impervious surface coverage.
Engineering Certification by registered profes-
sional engineer, with seal (Table 30-7-2-4), of
control of the first one-half (12) inch of runoff
from impervious surface coverage.
4) All development with fifty percent (50%) or Engineering Certification by registered profes-
more impervious surface coverage. sional engineer, with seal (Table 30-7-2-4), of
control of the first one (1) inch of runoff from
impervious surface coverage.
Note: The owner, developer, or person submitting the watershed control plan shall indicate which
Performance Standard shall be used for review and approval.
30-7-4
(3-B-4)
1
1

J

1
A
A
A
A
A
1
1
w
i

TABLE30-7-2-2
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. SCORESHEET
MAXIMUM POINT POINTS
POINTS FACTOR VALUE EARNED
20 1. Zone
AG or RS-40 10
PUD-R (Single Family Detached A Cluster) 15
PUD-R Cluster Exclusive) 20
25 2. Impervious Surface
0-3% 25
3-7% 20
7-10% 15
10-15% 10
25 3. Proximity to Floodway as Defined By The Federal
Emergency Management en
More than 2000 Feet 25
1000-2000 Feet 20
500-1000 Feet 15
100-500 Feet 10
50-100 Feet 5
10 4. Degree of Soil Limitation Defined on Pg. 29 and Table 7, Pg. 57
Guilford Count Sol Survey
Slight 10
Moderate 5
25 5. Drainage -Protect and Use Natural Drain ewe
Piped or Improved Drainage With Riprap 5
Dispersed Drainage or Protected Dracnageways 10
Dispersed Drainage and Protected Drainageways 20
Enhanced and Protected Natural Drains ewe 25
25 6. Average Sloe
0-6% Average 25
6-10% 20
10-15% 5
25 7. Land Cover - High Percentage of Natural and Stabilizing
Vegetation
Natural or Stabilizing Vegetation Along Drainageway
and on 25% of the Lot 25
Natural or Stabilizing Vegetation Abng Drainageway
and on 15-25% of Lot 20
Natural or Stabilizing Vegetation
Along Drainageway and on 10-15% of Lot 15
Natural or Stabilizing Vegetation Between Units and Water 10
Ornamental Lawn on >5% of the Lot 5
V etation on <5%oftheLot 0
25 8. Runoff Control Strategies
Maximum Runoff Retention 25
Moderate Runoff Retention 15
Runoff Detention in Excess of Minimum Requirements
of Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control 10
Runoff Detention Equal to Minimum Requirements 5
10 9. Sewage Disposal
Public Sewer S )stem 10
10 0. Road & Driveway Design
Impermeable Road Surface With Vegetated Ditches 10
Impermeable Roads With Piped Drainage and/or Curb and 5
Gutter and Ene Dissi atone

200 otal Total
Notes: 1) All plans must earn 100 or more points and meet all other requirements to be approved.
2) Do not use this table if gross density exceeds 2.5 dwelling units per acre.
30-7-5
(3-B-5)

r

7

C
Ell?
I
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
SINGLE FAMILY: Rated prior to approval of a Preliminary Plat Impervious surface within each lot is assumed to be
3,000 square feet. Individual homes on individual lots are not rated.
MULTIFAMILY: Rated prior to approval of a site plan.
DEFINITIONS EXPLANATIONS, AND STANDARDS
1. Conditional use rezonings will be given the appropriate bonus points if the use and site plan conditions
meet the requirements of the bonus zone, such as clustering development on the best soils and terrain of
the site.
2. A gravel parking area is not considered impervious surface.
3. Proximity to floodway is determined by measuring or scaling the distance from the floodway to the closest
boundary of the tract.
4. Self-explanatory.
5. Protected Drainageway means drainage is channeled by pervious devices such as sod waterways, berms,
channels, or swales which have been constructed to resist soil erosion by vegetating, netting, riprapping, or
a combination of those, and which allows infiltration of water into the soil.
Dispersed Drainage means spread out, as opposed to collecting the runoff in channels, so as to effect
increased sheet flow and overland flow.
Improved Drainageway means channeled by impervious surfaces such as curb and gutter or concrete
(gunnite, bituminous, etc.) channels.
Enhanced Drainageway means carried by existing natural drainageways which have been enhanced to resist
soil erosion, including stream bank degradation.
6. Slone shall mean the maximum inclination of the land surface from the horizontal as measured in
percentage slope. The average slope shall be determined for the entire lot, tract, or subdivision before
development.
7. If all or part of an existing lot containing natural or stabilizing vegetation is dedicated to the public for
park or drainageway and open space purposes; such land will count in computing the score.
Along Drainageway means the area parallel to and within fifty (50) feet of the drainage channel.
Stabilizing Vegetation means any vegetation that protects the soil against erosion.
8. Maximum Runoff Retention means approximately one hundred percent (100%) of channelized runoff must
?. pass through permanent retention or wet detention pond(s).
Moderate Runoff Retention means at least seventy-five percent (75%) of runoff must pass through
permanent retention and/or wet detention pond(s).
Runoff Detention in Excess of Soil Erosion and Sedimentation means at least fifty (50%) of runoff must
pass through permanent detention pond(s).
Runoff Detention Equal to Minimum Requirements means velocity control of runoff.
Detention Pond means a pond which collects stormwater runoff, filters the water and releases it slowly over
a period of hours or days. It does not have a permanent pool and is sometimes referred to as a dry pond.
Wet Detention Pond means a pond that has a permanent pool and also collects stormwater runoff, filters
the water, and releases it slowly over a period of days.
Retention Pond means a pond that has a permanent pool.
9. No points can be earned for on-site septic tank systems or private sewage treatment systems.
10. Self-explanatory.
30-7-6
(3-B-6)

TABLE 30-7-2-3
1
INSTTIZTTIONAL, RECREATIONAL, CONWERCIAL, DMSTRIAT,
¦ AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SCORESHEET
u

G
1
H

MAXIMUM POINT POWIS
POINTS FACTOR VALUE EARNED
10 1. impervious Surface
<7S% Impervious 10
75-15% 5
25 2. Pro:dmi to Floodwa as Defined the FEMA
2000 Feet and Greater 25
1000-2000 Feet 20
500-1000 Feet 15
100-500 Feet 10
50-100 Feet 5
15 3. Soil - Hydrologic Soil Croup (when 50% or more of the
site remains undisturbed
B 15
C 5
20 4. Drain ewer
Vegetated Waterways (swales) 10
Minor Channels With Riprap 10
Preserve Natural Drainageways 10
Preserve and Protect Natural Drainagcwwjs 20
25 S. Land Slope where 50% err more of site remain undisturbed
0-6% Average Slope of Subdivision or Lot 25
6-10% 20
10-15% 5
25 6. Undisturbed Area
Greater than 50% Undisturbed 25
30%-50% Undisturbed 15
20%-30% Undisturbed 10
10 7. Permanent Erasion Control
Re:vegetating Bare Soil Areas 5
R tation and Protecting Concentrated Flow Areas 10
60 & Permanent Runoff Control Strategies
Natural Infiltration of Required Runoff from:
100% of Impervious Surfaces 60
75% of Impervious Surfaces 45
50% of Impervious Surfaces 30
Wet Detention Pond Meeting Performance Standards
Controlling Pollutants from:
100% of Impervious Area 50
75% of Impervious Area 40
50% of Impervvious Area 25
Vegetative Filter for Sites With LA= Than 25% Impervious
Surface Coverage Meeting Performance Standards 15
Dry Detention Paid 10
10 9. Sewage Disposal
Public Sewer 9yacm 10
15 10. Road and Driveway Design
Water from Roadside Swales er Curb Cuts Directed into
Natural Infiltration 15
Impermeable Road Surface With Vegetated Ditches 10
Impermeable Roads With Piped Drainage and/or Curb and 5
Gutter and Energy Dissi tors
215 Total Total
Notes: 1) All plans must earn 100 or more pants and meet all other requirements to be approved.
2) Do not use this Table if impervious surface coverage exceeds thirty (30°!0) percent.
30-7-7
(3-B-7)
L SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
' RESIDENTIAUCOMMERCIALJINDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISIONS: Rated prior to approval of preliminary plat.
RESIDENITALIINSTITUTIONAUCOMMERCIAI INDUSTRIAL S= PLANS: Rated prior to approval of site plan
' unless lot was prequalified by subdivision.
COMMERCLAL41NDUSTRIAL PROJECTS WITHOUT SITE PLANS: Rated prior to approval of the building
' permit.
DEFINITIONS, EXPLANATIONS, AND STANDARDS .
' 1. Impervious surface coverage includes: paved parking lots, driveways, roads and streets; buildings or other
structures which cover the soil. A gravel parking area is not considered as impervious surface coverage.
Impervious surface coverage is computed by the equation: acres impervious surface divided by total acres in
' the tract times one hundred percent (100%).
2. Proximity to floodway is determined by measuring or scaling the distance from the floodway to the closest
boundary of the tract.
3. Hydrologic Soil Groups as defined on Pg. 35 of the Guilford County Soil Survey (12/19177) and referenced in
Table 15.
4. Vegetated Waterways (swales) are to be constructed according to USDA-SCS specifications or equivalent
methods, and they are to include installation of channel liners (plastic, jute, or excelsior) where expected flow
' velocity (10-yr. storm) exceeds three (3) feet per second.
Riprap Lined Channels are to meet Guilford County specifications.
Preserve Natural Drainap-eways shall mean no disturbance of natural drainageways by cutting, filling,
channelization, or destroying natural vegetation.
Preserve and Protect Natural Drainageways shall mean protecting natural channels against stream bank erosion
by riprap, or establishing soil stabilizing vegetation on stream banks, and/or providing for a natural or
revegetated buffer strip of twenty-five (25) feet or more on each side of the stream.
5. Sloe shall mean the maximum inclination of the land surface from the horizontal as measured in percentage
slope. The average slope shall be determined for the entire lot, tract, or subdivision before development.
6. Undisturbed Area shall be that portion of a lot, tract or subdivision not occupied by any structure and which
has not and will not be graded to change the existing contours or to destroy existing vegetation.
7. Reve eg tating Bare Soil Areas shall mean providing a stabilizing vegetative cover on those areas disturbed by
grading of the site where no other land cover (structure, etc.) is to be located.
8. All runoff control methods or devices shall meet or exceed Guilford County design specifications. Retention
ponds will be considered in lieu of wet detention ponds on a case-by-case basis.
9. No points can be earned for on-site septic tank systems or private sewage treatment systems.
' 10. Self-explanatory.

30-7-8
' (3-B-8)
i
i
i
i
c
r
i
i
i
Table 30-7-2-4
ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
The engineering certification required on watershed control
plans or construction plan drawings shall be of the following
form:
ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
I certify that this plan will control the first 1/2 / 1 (choose
one) inch of runoff from all impervious surfaces shown hereon,
and that the water quality control measures shown on this plan
meet or exceed the guidelines issued by Guilford County dated
SEAL
Signature
Registration Number
30-7-9
(3-B-9)

30-7-3.3 Extent of WCA District
i
(A)
Boundary of WCA: The WCA extends to the ridgeline
of the reservoir basin, or in the case of major
streams feeding the reservoir (Reedy Fork Creek,
Brush Creek, Horsepen Creek, East Fork Deep Creek,
West Fork Deep River, Little Alamance Creek, Big
Alamance Creek, Rock Creek, Richland Creek, Deep
River, Reddicks Creek, and Hickory Creek), to the
nearest identifiable major feature which crosses
the stream, and which is at least two thousand,
seven-hundred and fifty (2,750) feet upstream of
' the reservoir.
(B) Identifiable Major Feature: The identifiable major
feature specified in Section 30-7-3.3(A) (Boundary
of WCA) may be a street, railroad, easement, or
similar travel way which is capable of being used
by emergency personnel to respond to spills.
f
(C) Inclusion of Reedy Fork Creek: For the purposes o
this Section, Reedy Fork Creek between Lake Brandt
and Lake Townsend shall be considered a water
' supply reservoir with bank full channel equivalent
to normal pool elevation.
' (D) Boundary Closure: For the purposes of WCA boundary
closure, a connecting line(s) is drawn between the
outer boundary ridge line and the line extending
' along and parallel to the identifiable major
feature.
' 30-7-3.4 Divisions within the Watershed Critical Area
The WCA consists of four divisions as follows:
' (A) Tier
1) Tier 1 consists of those lands within two
hundred (200) feet of the normal pool
' elevation and those lands within one-half
(1/2) mile of (High Point Lake, Oak Hollow
Lake, Lake Brandt) or one mile (Lake
' Townsend) upstream of water intake
structure(s).
' 2) Tier 1 areas are intended for public purpose
and should remain undisturbed.
' (B) Tier 2:
1) Tier 2 consists'of those lands lying within
an area bounded by Tier 1 and a line parallel
' to and seven hundred and fifty (750) feet in
distance from the normal pool elevation.
2) Tier 2 areas are intended primarily for
' public purpose with the following exception.
30-7-10
'
(3-B-10)
n

3) Tier 2 area surrounding the two (2) proposed
reservoirs (Randleman Lake and Lake
Mackintosh) is not intended for public
purpose unless and until more than
twenty-five percent (25%) of the WCA for the
reservoir becomes urban in character, by
meeting any of the tests defined in NCGS
Section 160A-48(c).
(C) Tier 3

r
I
r
f?
r
n
1) Tier 3 consists of those lands lying within
an area bounded by Tier 2 and a line parallel
to and three thousand (3,000) feet in
distance from the normal pool elevation.
2) Tier 3 areas shall not exceed the WCA
Boundary.
(D) Tier 4: Tier 4 consists of those lands lying in
the area between Tier 3 and the WCA Boundary.
30-7-3.5 Runoff Minimization
The density and impervious surface coverage limits
defined in Table 30-7-3-1 shall apply within the WCA.
30-7-3.6 Land Disturbance Minimization
(A) Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan:
Refer to Section 30-7-4.1(A) (Plan and Permit
Required).
(B) Street Standards: Refer to Article VI
(Subdivisions: Procedures and Standards) for the
minimum street standards.
(C) Fragile Areas:

F
1) Wetlands shall be protected by dedication or
held in a water quality conservation easement
as follows:
a) Dedication may be required by the City
council.
b) Areas not required to be dedicated shall
be recorded as a water quality
conservation easement.
C) Areas held in a water quality
conservation easement shall be held by
an owners association where the water
quality conservation easement serves
more than one property.
30-7-11
(3-B-11)

Table 30-7-3-1
DENSITY AND IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE LIMITS
' Residential Density Limitsl
(expressed as dwelling units/gross acre)
' Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4
No public sewer NA 1 du/5 ac 1 du/3 ac 1 du/1 ac
' Public sewer NA 1 du/5 ac 2 du/1 ac 2.5 du/1 ac
Impervious Surface Coverage Limits
' (expressed as maximum percentage)
(for use with institutional, commercial, and industrial uses)2
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4
No public sewer NA 2.5% 4.0% 12.0%
Public sewer NA 2.5% 24.0%3 30.0%3
t
Notes:
The above residential densities shall not apply to
property in the city zoned for lot sizes less than forty
thousand (40,000) square feet on the effective date of
I' this ordinance.
2 Impervious surface coverage limits shall not apply to
' property the in city zoned for institutional, commercial,
or industrial purposes on or before April 1, 1987, the
original adoption date of the Watershed Critical Area
' Ordinance.
3 Impervious surface coverages may be increased in Tiers 3
and 4, when the development is served by public sewer, by
' ten percent (10%) for institutional, commercial, and
industrial areas if the owners provide for on-site control
of the first one (1) inch of runoff from impervious
' surfaces in accordance with this ordinance.
30-7-12
(3-B-12)

L
d) The
natural ground cover and the natural
tree canopy must be preserved with the
foll owing exceptions:
i the cutting or trimming of
overcrowded trees is allowed
provided that no trees in excess of
three (3) inches in diameter as
measured twelve (12) inches from
the ground are removed;
ii) utilities and erosion control
structures can be constructed and
maintained;
iii) normal maintenance by mechanical
means is allowed for the removal of
dead, diseased, deformed,
poisonous, or noxious vegetation
and pests harmful to health; and
iv) mechanical mowing of utilities
areas is allowed to control growth.

2) Open Channel Drainage
' a) Drainage within developments shall be by
means of open channels.
b) All such areas shall have protected
channels or remain in a natural and
undisturbed state, except for road
crossings, utilities, erosion control,
and watershed protection devices.
C) Easement widths shall be as specified in
Article VI (Subdivisions: Procedures and,
Standards).
3) Slopes
a) Areas with slopes greater than fifteen
percent (15%) which are adjacent and
' parallel to natural drainageways and
streams shall remain natural and
undisturbed except for road crossings,
utilities, and erosion and watershed
' protection devices.
b) Slopes greater than fifteen percent
' (15%) may be protected by: dedication,
if the slope adjoins dedicated land and;
is required by the City Council; or as a
30-7-13
t (3-B-13)
? a
.e /16
00 "01
6( '0 D
' AMENDING OFFICIAL ZONING MAP BOOK
SOUTH SIDE OF LAKE JEANETTE ROAD WEST OF CHURCH STREET
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENSBORO:
' Section 1. The Official Zoning Map Book is hereby amended by
establishing original zoning to Residential 120S uses for the area
described as follows:

1

BEGINNING at a point on the southern right-of-way line of Lake
Jeanette Road east of the intersection of proposed North Elm Street;
thence S6701212811E 585.96 feet along said southern right-of-way line
to a point; thence S10°21'18"W 277.84 feet to a point; thence
S6703012811E 262.27 feet to a point; thence N2203914711E 269.90 feet to
a point on the southern right-of-way line of Lake Jeanette Road;
thence S670191E 470.26 feet along said southern right-of-way line to a
point; thence S2205212911W 270.00 feet to a point; thence S6702113311E
130.23 feet to a point; thence N2204913211E 269.86 feet to a point on
the southern right-of-way line of Lake Jeanette Road; thence
S6701115011E 304.43 feet along said southern right-of-way line to a
point; thence S1600413711E 312.74 feet to a point; thence S7900514911W
75.29 feet to a point; thence S0100612911E 99.50 feet to a point;
thence N8804214111W 833.99 feet to a point; thence 1905715411W 218.26
feet to a point; thence N8301612011W 131.87 feet to a point; thence
N0104915511W 27.00 feet to a point; thence N7301610211W 125.00 feet to a
point; thence N7701415811W 200.00 feet to a point; thence N1204212511E
240.92 feet to a point; thence N4003013411W 162.54 feet to.a point;
thence N4402115611W 369.22 feet to a point; thence N0100215511W 556.94
feet to the point of BEGINNING, containing approximately 24.92 acres.
Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective upon the date of
annexation.
05/1245

APPROVED AS TO
(OrPM AN0 LEGALITY
c
City Attorney

.he foregoing ci dinance was ? j^i?tEd by the
amity Council of the City of Greens)--.,.c ci the
7.J ! day of .... ......., 1911. t:id triii
become •':iz<five off.- 0#-
14J. 3o,1190• ?
.xr7ft isc. Tiils the ?. doy of ...:?
VIP --
........, 1Sc . Q..
f::!nc%t J. McPeak
„q \,\" Ok.- C \I*- ?-? A Z -1
.
i
3-C-1
c q
.iMENDiNG OFFICIAL ZONING MAP BOOK AND AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT a o
I
NORTH OF PISGAH CHURCH ROAD, WEST OF CHURCH STREET, SOUTH OF AIR 6 ?
HARBOR ROAD, AND EAST AND WEST OF BASS CHAPEL ROAD "?
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENSBORO:
' Section 1. The Official Zoning Map Book is hereby amended by
rezoning from Residential 1205 and establishing original zoning
to Conditional Use - Residential 120 (subject to those
conditional uses with limitations as set forth in Sections 2, 3
' and 4 of this ordinance) the area described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the eastern right-of-way line of
Bass Chapel Road, said point being approximately 3150 feet north
of Lake Jeanette Road; thence N660401E 272.10 feet to a point;
thence N010151E 718.88 feet to a point; thence S840491E 336.91
feet to a point; thence N000481E 682.60 feet to a point; thence
' N0205113011E 1791.67 feet to a point; thence S880021E 1833.57 feet
to a point; thence S870561E 398.63 feet to a point; thence
N130561W 120.0 feet to a point; thence S870561E 105.0 feet to a
point; thence S130561E 120.0 feet to a point; thence S870561E
1641.11 feet to a point; thence S870111E 1165.77 feet to a point;
thence S240541W 368.56 feet to a point; thence S810571W 310.09
feet to a point; thence S8105713011W 390.76 feet to a point;
thence S490521W 177.54 feet to a point; thence S130441E 368.48
feet to a point; thence S260411E 524.17 feet to a point; thence
S54°1713511E 621.13 feet to a point; thence N18°30'25"E 439.84
feet to a point; thence N840391E 19.41 feet to a point; thence
S02°28'20"W 1244.90 feet to a point, thence S020201W 927.83 feet.
to a point; thence N8703912511W 998.36 feet to a point; thence
S0202814011W 1086.73 feet to a point; thence S010251E 638.22 feet
to a point; thence S040341W 883.32 feet to a point; thence
S0303814011W 300.67 feet to a point; thence S0303914511W 225.10
feet to a point on the northern right-of-way line of Lake
Jeanette Road; thence S03103914511W 30.00 feet to the centerline of
Lake Jeanette Road; thence S7100014211W 695.94 feet, being the
chord of an arc along the realignment of Lake Jeanette Road to a
point at its intersection with proposed North Elm Street; thence
N63041143"W 254.59 feet, being the chord of an arc along the
centerline of proposed North Elm Street, to a point; thence along
said centerline N7104715711W 269.47 feet to a point; thence
S1703814711W 542.84 feet to a point; thence S8103912711E 372.37
feet to a point; thence S0700311611E 280.76 feet to a point;
thence S6504612211W 560.60 feet to a point; thence S4405514911W
220.91 feet to a point; thence S09 °30' 1611W 109.02 feet to a
point; thence S15 41 3011E 199.68 feet to a point; thence
S3304010811W 180.58 feet to a point; thence S3703115311E 406.53
feet to a point; thence S8703113011E 74.37 feet to a point; thence
S8603710011E 288.09 feet to a point; thence N6705210411E 977.75
feet to a point on the centerline of proposed North Elm Street;
' thence along said centerline N100231441W 58.07 feet to a point;
thence S8601613111E 118.46 feet to a point; thence S0902510311E
' 3-;C-2
A

1

r

1

400.05 feet to a point; thence S390031W 463.11 feet to a point;
thence N860161W 357.78 feet to a point; thence S0501814311W 498.18
feet, being the chord of an arc along the eastern right-of-way
line of proposed North Elm Street, to a point; thence S0704712011W
6.78 feet to a point; thence S0704712011W 40.08 feet to a point;
thence S0704712011W 449.94 feet to a point; thence S8505211011E
51.80 feet to a point; thence S0400810011W 1212.03 feet to a point
in the existing city limit line; thence along said existing city
limit line S7604710011W 200.62 feet to a point; thence N0304510011E
1271.85 feet to a point; thence S8505211011E 48.00 feet to a
point; thence N0704712011E 450.19 feet to a point; thence
N0704712011E 40.08 feet to a point; thence N0704712011E 12.91 feet
to a point; thence N0501912911E 492.02 feet, being the chord of an
arc along the western right-of-way line of proposed North Elm
Street, to a point; thence N860161W 601.31 feet to a point;
thence N860371W 614.10 feet to a point; thence N8703113011W
1773.68 feet to a point; thence N0104210011E 1138.04 feet to a
point; thence N8902610011E 412.65 feet to a point; thence
S0005510011W 227.13 feet to a point; thence S8502810011E 594.50
feet to a point; thence N0003713011E 1235.40 feet to a point;
thence N870041W 852.50 feet to a point; thence N020061E 504.69
feet to a point on the southern right-of-way line of Lake
Jeanette Road; thence N020061E 60.19 feet to a point on the
northern right-of-way line of-Lake Jeanette Road; thence N020061E
523.33 feet to a point;-thence N890001W 1004.70 feet to a point
on the eastern right-of-way line of Bass Chapel Road; thence
N890001W 69.64 feet to a point on the western right-of-way line
of Bass Chapel Road; thence N890001W 407.76 feet to a point;
thence N580591W 206.53 feet to a point; thence N890061W 1698.16
feet to a point; thence S590141W 1097.31 feet to a point; thence
N4503414311W 356.83 feet to a point; thence N7300711311E 403.75
feet to a point; thence N1700512311W 182.90 feet to a point;
thence N4600910311E 188.69 feet to a point; thence N3802912211E
233.88 feet to a point; thence N6304011211E 136.96 feet to a
point; thence N4302210311W 154.93 feet to a point; thence
N2802612811W 67.15 feet to a point; thence N0904811211E 91.00 feet
to a point; thence S8305812211E 239.51 feet to a point; thence
S6602613711E 108.78 feet to a point; thence N4001313211E 113.47
feet to a point; thence N6100310311E 178.87 feet to a point;
thence N5202915411E 225.35 feet to a point; thence N12°11'04"
352.05 feet to a point; thence N4600215611W 490.81 feet to a
point; thence N5604411911W 434.63 feet to a point; thence
N2400510011W 191.27 feet to a point; thence N650551E 92.18 feet to
a point; thence N2400510011W 261.25 feet to a point; thence
N640521E 510.57 feet to a point; thence N16056' 645.90 feet to a
point; thence N200141W 296.34 feet to a point; thence S8603913011E
551.78 feet to a point; thence S850471E 305.93 feet to a point;
thence S080031E 429.67 feet to a point; thence S860591E 354.04
feet to a point; thence S020371W 541.08 feet to a point; thence
N870081E 802.91 feet to a point on the western right-of-way line
of Bass Chapel Road; thence N660431E 60.27 feet to the point of
BEGINNING, containing approximately 662.1 acres.
3-c-3

I
Section 2. That the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit in
accordance with the above-mentioned change in zoning
' classification is hereby authorized subject to the following use
limitations and conditions:
' 1) Lake Jeanette shall be retained;
2) North Elm Street shall be extended from Pisgah
Church Road to Lake Jeanette Road. A maximum of five hundred
' (500) dwelling units may receive building permits prior to
completion of said construction of North Elm Street;
3) The maximum total units allowed shall be 1320:
(a) Section A shall have a maximum of 250 detached
' units. However, no land within one-half (1/2) mile of the high
water mark of Lake Townsend shall be developed at a density
exceeding one unit per acre.
(b) Section B shall remain as open space and shall be
dedicated to the City if requested.
(c) Section C shall have a maximum of 260 units.
However, no land within one-half (1/2) mile of
the high water mark of Lake Townsend shall be developed at a
density exceeding one unit per acre.
(d) Section D shall have a maximum of 230 units.
(e) Section E shall have a maximum of 320 units.
(f) Section F shall have a maximum of 260 detached
units; and
4) The area Reserved in Section D and shown on the
attached map will not be developed for five (5) years. If within
this time period said area is selected as the approved corridor
for Painter Boulevard, the developer shall dedicate that portion
as right-of-way to the City of Greensboro;
5) The residentially zoned property between the
commercially and institut_onally zoned property and Lake Jeanette
shall remain as a natural buffer which can be penetrated only for
construction of utility lines and trails.
6) Street improvement and utility installation will
be planned to fit the site with a minimum of grading and
clearing.
7) During vertical construction, when runoff will
' flow directly into Lake Jeanette or into a stream feeding Lake
Jeanette, temporary erosion control measures shall be provided.
8) Existing vegetative ground cover will be retained
and protected whenever practical.
' 9) Areas such as steep slopes, drainageways and
jurisdictional wetlands will be identified and the development
plan will be designed to protect these areas as much as
' practical.
10) Areas disturbed by Cornwallis Development Co.
will be stabilized and protected as soon as possible and the
' owner/developer will require property owners to do the same
through deed restrictions.
11) The storm water system will be designed to
control increases in runoff and decreases in infiltration within
' limits set by the City of Greensboro. Other than installation of
piping in jurisdictional wetlands which are covered in Condition
1 3-c-4

15 below, the owner/developer will only install curb and gutter,
concrete piping, and raceways where required by the City of
Greensboro.
12) An emergency response plan shall be developed in
conjunction with the City of Greensboro to deal with unpermitted
discharges into Lake Jeanette.
13) Except as provided for in 13a-c below, a setback
devoid of new impervious surface related to real estate
development shall be provided on the basis of 50 feet plus 4
times the percent of slope as determined in the first 100 feet.
(Impervious surfaces include: paved parking lots, driveways,
roads and streets, buildings or other structures which cover the
?j soil. A gravel parking area is not considered an impervious
surface.) However, in no case shall the setback be less than 75
feet nor more than 125 feet. Slope is defined-as the average
slope of the land area adjacent and perpendicular to the lake's
edge. The developer, at its option, can reduce the setback on
any section of the lake shore to the 75 foot minimum provided
there is no direct runoff into the lake from the portion of the
lot outside the 75 foot setback area. Runoff from the portion of
the lot outside the 75 foot setback will be diverted to a
retention pond or subjected to other passive means of erosion
control before discharge to the lake. Within the setback there
shall be three zones.
a. Zone #1 shall begin at elevation 749.6
feet (the normal water level of the lake) and extend up the slope
a distance of 25 linear feet. This zone shall be left in a
natural and unimproved state except for the installation,
operation and maintenance of walking trails; recreational
facilities and structures or boat landings owned or maintained by
an association of property owners; erosion control devices; and
streets, sanitary sewers, manholes, storm sewers, and bridges,
provided that such streets, storm sewers, sanitary sewers, and
bridges do not cross the zone at an angle of less than 45
degrees. The City shall be allowed to sew and maintain grass in
its sanitary sewer easement. The property owner will have the
right to cut dead trees.
b. Zone #2 shall run from the end of Zone 01
for an additional 25 linear feet. This zone shall be left in a
natural unimproved state except for the installation of those
improvements allowed in Zone #1 plus the following: the
installation, operation, and maintenance of sanitary sewer lines,
lift stations and manholes as needed. The City shall be allowed
to sew and maintain grass in its sanitary sewer easement. Owners
' shall be allowed to cut and remove understory vegetation and
small saplings which are less than four (4) inches DBH. The
developer reserves the right to install tunnels under roads at
its option. No fencing will be allowed in Zones 1 and 2 except
that required by public utilities or the City of Greensboro.
C. Zone #3 shall run from the edge of Zone
' #2 to the end of the setback as defined above. This zone may be
used for any purpose normally associated with a residential yard
including removal of trees, sewing, mowing and otherwise
3-C-5

IJ-J
L
I

maintaining grass, and similar activities. No impervious surface
shall be constructed in this zone except those allowed in zones
11 and 02. The developer will, however, require that the builder
of a home whose lot is located within this zone submit an erosion
control plan for approval of the developer. The developer will
b 'ld rs to minimize the removal of trees and
station failures.
encourage %A e
disturbance of vegetation and soil.
14. No utilities, except for water, sewer and storm
sewer shall be permitted in the setback from Lake Jeanette unless
running parallel and adjacent to a street.
15. Any piping within jurisdictional wetlands, other
than stream crossings, shall require that runoff from the piping
system be diverted to a retention pond or subject to other
passive means of erosion control before discharge to the lake.
16. At a minimum, Zones 1 and 2 will remain in the
same ownership as the lake, provided that owners of property
adjacent to Zones 1 and 2 will have easements for access to the
lake and/or walking trails.
17. The developer will work with the City of
Greensboro to design additional defenses against any pumping
section 3. This property will be perpetually bound to the uses
authorized and subject to such conditions as imposed, unless
subsequently changed or amended as provided for in Chapter 30 of
the Greensboro Code of Ordinances. Final plans for any
development to be made pursuant to any Conditional Use Permit
shall be submitted to the Planning Board for approval.
Section 4. Any violations or failure to accept any conditions
and use limitations imposed herein shall be subject to the
remedies provided in Chapter 30 of the Greensboro Code of
Ordinances.
Section 5: This ordinance shall be effective upon the date of
annexation.
ie tore-oing ordinance was adopted by the
.iy Council of the City of Gtoerrsboro on tile
7Q% day of 19.7... atri V:I
GECO'r1E ?:iEC:iVe on 1
t99a?
?Q,tJ. 3 0i T--.`LLB--r-'.'h's the ?p3?Y of
..1.??........ 19..7. .
Nancy I McPeak
City Clerk
3-C-6

.0
1
u
A
.a
i
AMENDING OFFICIAL ZONING MAP BOOK AND AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF
3??J
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6 00
SOUTH SITE OF LAKE JEANETTE ROAD EAST AND WEST OF PROPOSED NORTH
ELM STREET EXTENSION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENSBORO:
Section 1. The Official Zoning Map Book is hereby amended by
establishing original zoning to Conditional Use - Institutional
100 (subject to those conditional uses with limitations as set
forth in Sections 2, 3 and 4 of this ordinance) the area
described as follows:
BEGINNING at the proposed centerline intersection of
proposed North Elm Street and the realignment of Lake Jeanette
Road; thence N7100014211E 695.94 feet, being the chord of an arc
along the realignment of Lake Jeanette Road, to a point; thence
S0303914511W 30.03 feet to a point on the southern right-of-way
line of Lake Jeanette Road; thence along said southern
right-of-way line S7300315811E 264.91 feet to a point; thence
S0100215511E 556.94 feet to a point; thence S4402115611E 369.22
feet to a point; thence S4003013411E 162.54 feet to a point;
thence S1204212511W 240.92 feet to a point; thence S1204210811W
404.56 feet to a point; thence N8601613111W 492.35 feet to a
point; thence N8601613111W 118.46 feet to a point on the
centerline of proposed North Elm Street; thence along said
centerline N1002314411W 840.62 feet to a point; thence along said
centerline N19°11'12"W 275.10 feet, being the chord of an arc, to
a point; thence S6704112411W 469.33 feet to a point; thence
S8705615581W 115.86 feet to a point; thence N0700311611W 128.89
feet to a point; thence N8103912711W 372.37 feet to a point;
thence N1703814711E 542.84 feet to a point; thence S7104715711E
269.47 feet to a point; thence S63041143"E 253.74 feet, being the
chord of an arc, to the point of BEGINNING, containing
approximately 36.05 acres.
Section 2. That the issuance of a
accordance with the above-mentioned
classification is hereby authorized
limitations and conditions:
0,
A

Conditional Use Permit in
change in zoning
subject to the following use
1) Developer shall dedicate 100 feet of right-of-way
and construct North Elm Street from Pisgah Church Road to Lake
Jeanette Road prior to any certificate of occupancy for any land
zoned CU-Commercial N and CU-Institutional 100;
?- 3-C-7

2) The following landscape conditions shall apply:
' (a) Along all public street rights-of-way a street
yard averaging 15 feet in width shall be provided. Said yard
shall have a minimum width of 10 feet and a maximum (for
' averaging purposes) width of 25 feet. A minimum of two canopy
trees shall be planted for each 100 linear feet of street yard.
In addition, earth berms or evergreen shrubs shall be installed
' to provide partial screening of automobile parking from the
public street right-of-way.
(b) In parking areas a minimum of one canopy tree
shall 'be provided for each 4000 square feet of vehicular surface
' area (including driveways, parking areas, and service areas).
(c) Where the institutional development east of North
Elm Street abuts residential development, a minimum planting yard
' of 40 feet shall be provided. Minimum planting in this yard
shall consist of 20 canopy and uhderstory trees, 10 of which
shall be evergreen and 50 shrubs per 100 linear feet.
(d) Existing vegetation retained by the developer in
these proposed yards may be used for credit towards meeting the
planting requirements of these conditions;
3) All service and mechanical areas shall be
screened from Lake Jeanette Road and North Elm Street;
4) No building shall be located any closer than 40
feet from any other public street right-of-way; and
5) All utilities shall be installed underground.
6) If the impervious surface of that portion of the
Property Zoned CU - Commercial N is greater than thirty (30%) per
cent, the resultant runoff from the first one (1) inch of
rainfall shall be controlled.
7) If the impervious surface of that portion of the
Property Zoned CU - Institutional 100 is greater than thirty
(30%) per cent, the resultant runoff from the first one (1) inch
of rainfall shall be controlled.
Section 3. This property will be perpetually bound to the uses
authorized and subject to such conditions as imposed, unless
subsequently changed or amended as provided for in Chapter 30 of
the Greensboro Code of Ordinances. Final plans for any
development to be made pursuant to any Conditional Use Permit
shall be submitted to the Planning Board for approval.
Section 4. Any violations or failure to accept any conditions
' and use limitations imposed herein shall be subject to the
remedies provided in Chapter 30 of the Greensboro Code of
Ordinances.
' Section 5: This ordinance shall be effective upon the date of
annexation. ne lortgowl; ordinance was ndo:)'r-d b-,- the
;ity Council of the City of G.%cn-U)xo on the
..q.. day of ... ......., 19 7A. and will
t,-come effective '
01 +ww. This the.t: day at
..., 19..1.0...
' Nancy 1. McPacX 3-C-8
U"y Ctetk I
1

11
t

J

0
L

V'r
?,,,_....,. _AL ZONING MAP
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
,qo
J.
BOOK AND AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF
SOUTH OF LAKE JEANETTE ROAD BETWEEN PROPOSED NORTH ELM STREET
EXTENSION AND LAKE JEANETTE
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENSBORO:
v_11 9
61,30
Section 1. The Official Zoning Map Book is hereby amended by
establishing original zoning to Conditional Use - Commercial N
(subject to those conditional uses with limitations as set forth
in Sections 2, 3 and 4 of this ordinance) the area described as
follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the centerline of proposed North
Elm Street south of the intersection of realigned Lake Jeanette
Road; thence S19°11'12"E 275.10 feet, being the chord of an arc
along the centerline of proposed North Elm Street, to a point;
thence along said centerline S1002314411E 898.70 feet to a point;
thence S6705210411W 977.75 feet to a point; thence N8603710011W
288.09 feet to a point; thence N8703113011W 74.37 feet to a point;
thence N3703115311W 406.53 feet to a point; thence N3304010811E
180.58 feet to a point; thence N1504113011W 199.68 feet to a
point; thence N0903011611E 109.02 feet to a point; thence
N4405514911E 220.91 feet to a point; thence N6504612211E 560.60
feet to a point; thence N0700311611W 151.87 feet to a point;
thence N87105615511E 115.86 feet to a point; thence N6704112411E
469.33 feet to the point of BEGINNING, containing approximately
34.31 acres.
Section 2. That the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit in
accordance with the above-mentioned change in zoning
classification is hereby authorized subject to the following use
limitations and conditions:
1) Uses limited to a planned shopping center with
joint and shared parking, excluding gasoline service stations and
any use requiring underground storage tanks;
2) Developer shall dedicate 100 feet of right-of-way
and construct North Elm Street from Pisgah Church Road to Lake
Jeanette Road prior to any certificate of occupancy for any land
zoned CU-Commercial N and CU-Institutional 100;
3) A maximum of three (3) curb cuts shall be allowed
from North Elm Street;
4) The following landscape conditions shall apply:
(a) Along the North Elm Street right-of-way a street
yard averaging 20 feet in width shall be provided. Said yard
shall have a minimum width of 10 feet and a maximum (for
averaging purposes) width of 30 feet. A minimum of two canopy
trees shall be planted for each 100 linear feet of street yard.
In addition, earth berms or evergreen

L
' -2-
shrubs shall be installed to provide partial screening of
automobile parking from the public street right-of-way; Along
other public street rights-of-way the same planting conditions
shall apply; however, the street yard width shall average 15 feet
' with a minimum width of 7 feet and a maximum of 25 feet;
(b) In parking areas a minimum of one canopy tree
shall be provided for each 4000 square feet of vehicular surface
area (includes driveways, parking areas, and service areas);
(c) Where the commercial development abuts
residential a planting yard averaging 20 feet shall be provided
(minimum width of 15 feet a maximum width of 40 feet). Minimum
planting in this yard shall consist of 2 canopy trees, 3
understory trees, and 20 shrubs per 100 linear feet;
(d) Existing vegetation retained by the developer in
t these proposed yards may be used for credit towards meeting-the
planting requirements of these conditions;
5) All service and mechanical areas shall be
screened from North Elm Street right-of-way;
6) No building shall be located any closer than 50
feet to North Elm Street right-of-way nor 40 feet from any other
public street right-of-way;
7) All utilities shall be installed underground.
8) If the impervious surface of that portion of the
Property Zoned CU - Commercial N is greater than thirty (300) per
cent, the resultant runoff from the first one (1) inch of
rainfall shall be controlled.
9) If the impervious surface of that portion of the
Property Zoned CU - Institutional 100 is greater than thirty
(30%) per cent, the resultant runoff from the first one (1) inch
of rainfall shall be controlled.
Section 3. This property will be perpetually bound to the uses
authorized and subject to such conditions as imposed, unless
subsequently changed or amended as provided for in Chapter 30 of
the Greensboro Code.of Ordinances. Final plans for any
development to be made pursuant to any Conditional Use Permit
shall be submitted to the Planning Board for approval.
Section 4. Any violations or failure to accept any conditions
and use limitations imposed herein shall be subject to the
remedies provided in Chapter 30 of the Greensboro Code of
Ordinances.
Section 5: This ordinance shall be effective upon the date of
annexation. ne toregomg ordinance wac 3d0ptn„ r,;v ,he
CRY Council of the City of s-reen5jrc on the
O
••?•• d:,y of .......... . 19..I..Q, and tsilf
3 01 I...Owdn. rlr:: [i!C IN= dl *" ?•
Y
......... i?..90 .:..
Uu? t.t:ik 3-C-10
r
i- -lam-=p ? :- .Y•,r „}; • ?•? -
12
:; ;' 1•.i?'• ??•?- :?. -?. '??:?•_? ?.,.•..:.:.;.?.? „ ? »C••''" 1.;..1,:1-- Zw
C) c
C= Z
;a o my \ ,,, i :Y• :, - ef? .`i1- 1 \ 0 M
i; O / y
-bn
M N) C)
1> (D z
e:'? i.f >R• O z z n z A ? _ :: /'? ?•:, •? 4`,. r? ? .•f',:
d?r- O T WO= rrI X.
-)a M
1;r
N .? ::... ...... -'?'• ::Cyr ak ::'. / / .. i.
....
r c -
C/) m
- -------- - ---
i i
• e 2! r
I?
\
/ p l
zo
Z'
?I.
i•
,
1
t i' r(
r •'J
• A.. -
i
O
7
?J
r
::•:'•'
i
??q I
n
3
L ?.y
J
r
1•
i
I
4F
nY
rr 1
`•?. S.I•T?
:;•
'N
Asa. ..-
cl
i
Xx.
-JL
REQUESTED ORIGINAL ZO
rh' CONDITIONA NING TO
,? ?r• iSr
L USE-INSTITUTIONAL 100
L 36
.05 ACRES (E)
1 1a ?'; REQUESTED
ORIGINAL ZONING TO ??•?' ? ?\ ?%
RESIDENTIAL 120S ----
°1l.- .;',; .. 24.92 ACRES (C) 1

I Water Quality Management and Lake Jeanette

Robert C. Borden, Ph.D., P.E.
508 E. Franklin Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
919-515-7665
September 25, 1991

I*
3-D-1
2
,
Water Quality Management and Lake Jeanette
Robert C. Borden, Ph.D., P.E.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In North Carolina, the most significant water quality
problem in lakes and reservoirs is eutrophication.
Eutrophication occurs when the amount of inorganic nutrients
(nitrogen and phosphorus) entering a lake increases, resulting in
excessive growth of aquatic plants and algae. These nutrients
may originate in municipal or industrial waste water discharges
or in runoff from agricultural and developed land.
This study has been commissioned by the Cornwallis
Development Company to evaluate the effect of development on
water quality in Lake Jeanette. Future conditions in Lake
Jeanette were evaluated by first estimating total annual loads of
nitrogen and phosphorus to the lake and then using a series of
mathematical models to estimate the median summer phosphorus,
nitrogen and chlorophyll a concentrations in the lake.
These analyses show that completion of the Lake Jeanette
Development will have not have a significant impact on water
quality in Lake Jeanette. These results are not surprising
considering that: (1) the Lake Jeanette Development comprises a
small portion of the watershed; and (2) much of the area outside
the Lake Jeanette Development has already been developed.
The total annual load of nitrogen and phosphorus discharged
from Lake Jeanette to Lake Townsend was also calculated. After
completion of the Lake Jeanette Development, the annual loads of
nitrogen and phosphorus discharged from Lake Jeanette will be
significantly lower than from most other areas in the Reedy Fork
watershed. The annual loads of nitrogen and phosphorus from Lake
Jeanette will be similar to very low use rural land (90% forest -
10% cropland).

3-D-2

i

3
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Cornwallis Development Co. is in the process of developing
the area immediately surrounding Lake Jeanette in Greensboro, NC.
Most of this area will be developed as single family housing with
a portion of the land devoted to townhouse-condominium and
commercial-office space. This study has been commissioned by the
Cornwallis Development Co. to evaluate the effect of development
on water quality in Lake Jeanette.
2.0 LAKE AND WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS
2.1 Lake Characteristics
Lake Jeanette was constructed in 1942 as an industrial water
supply reservoir for Cone Mills in Greensboro, North Carolina.
The current lake voiumg is estimated to be approximately 3,250
acre feet (4.0 x 10 m ) with a maximum depth of 33 feet (10 m).
A summary of the lake characteristics is provided in Table 1.
The annual inflow was estimated using monitoring data from the
U.S. Geological Survey streamflow gage on the Haw River (gage No.
02096500 near Haw River, NC). The hydraulic residence time is
the amount of time, on average, that it would take to fill the
lake and was estimated by dividing the lake volume by the total
annual inflow. Relative to other lakes in the area, Lake
Jeanette has a long hydraulic residence time (0.62 years).
2.2 Watershed Characteristics
Existing land use in the lake's watershed is a mixture of
heavily developed urban and residential land and undeveloped
forest (Table 2). The distribution of different land uses in the
basin was determined by delineating different areas on the most
recent aerial photographs (March, 1990) and then measuring these
areas. Residential development densities were determined by
counting the number of houses within an area where development
density appeared to be constant. Percent imperviousness
estimates were taken from literature sources (NVPDC, 1979) for
comparable land uses and development densities. Soils within the
watershed are primarily sandy loams with a moderate to high
infiltration capacity (hydrologic group B).
2.3 Future Land Use

Cornwallis Development Co. plans to develop the area
immediately surrounding Lake Jeanette as a mixture of low to
moderate density single family housing, cluster development
(townhouse-condominium) and commercial-office space to serve the
area. The anticipated distribution of different land uses in the
Lake Jeanette Development is provided in Table 3. In order to
preserve and protect the water quality in Lake Jeanette, a series
of strict controls will be applied. These controls are set forth
3-D-3
' 4
Y in both the Lake Jeanette Conditional Use Zoning obtained for the
property and in the Greensboro Watershed Ordinance. A summary of
these controls is provided below.
1. Extensive erosion control measures will be used to prevent
eroded soil from entering Lake Jeanette.
2. The storm water collection system will be designed to
minimize increases in storm water runoff and decreases in
infiltration. Curb and gutter, concrete piping and raceways
will be install only where specifically required by the City
of Greensboro.
3. An emergency response plan will be developed to control
accidental spills or releases.
4. An extensive system of buffers will be maintained around
Lake Jeanette and its tributaries to prevent sediment,
nutrients, and other pollutants from reaching the lake.
This buffer system will serve to preserve the wetlands
surrounding the lake and enhance water quality by removing
pollutants during storms.
5. An extensive system of storm water management ponds will be
constructed to control runoff from retail, office and higher
5 DU/acre)
> 2
it
d
.
.
y
ens
density residential developments (
These ponds have been shown to be very effective at removing
sediment and nutrients from storm water runoff.
' 3.0 MAJOR TYPES OF POLLUTANTS
In North Carolina, the most significant water quality
problem in lakes and reservoirs involves eutrophication.
Eutrophication refers to an increase in the growth of aquatic
plants and algae which often results from increases.in the amount
of inorganic nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) entering a lake
increases. These nutrients may originate in municipal or
industrial wastewater discharges or in runoff from agricultural
and developed land.
Other significant surface water pollutants include fecal
coliform bacteria, heavy metals, toxic pollutants, and sediment.
The primary sources of bacteria in surface water are improperly
treated domestic wastewater and agricultural runoff. While storm
water runoff from developed areas can contain some bacterial
contamination, bacterial levels are often lower in urban storm
water runoff than from other land uses. The Lake Jeanette
Development will be serviced by newly constructed sewer lines.
Leakage of such bacteria from the development is, therefore,
highly unlikely.

3-D-4
r 5
r A primary concern expressed about land development is the
potential for heavy metals and/or toxics to be carried by storm
water runoff into downstream reservoirs, causing contamination of
water supplies. However, monitoring data collected by the N.C.
r Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) indicates that the
discharge of storm water runoff from residential and commercial

r areas is not causing water quality problems in North Carolina
a 305b report is published by NCDEM
Every two years
reservoirs
,
.
which summarizes water quality in North Carolina. NCDEM has not
identified any lakes or reservoirs where the use to the water
supply was adversely impacted by heavy metals or toxics in runoff
r from residential or commercial areas (NCDNRCD, 1988; NCDEHNR,
1990).
' Eroded soil which reaches the reservoir is rapidly removed
by sedimentation. In some cases, this will result in a loss of
storage capacity. However, as noted above, strict adherence to
r erosion control measures during construction and adequate buffer
ct
i
i
.
mpa
s
areas in the Lake Jeanette Development will minimize th
4.0 NONPOINT"SOURCE NUTRIENTS AND LAKE EUTROPHICATION
it The primary threat to water quality in Lake Jeanette is
increased algal growth and eutrophication. As a result of
development within the Lake Jeanette watershed, storm water
runoff is expected to increase, which could result in greater
amounts of inorganic nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) entering
the lake and increase the potential for eutrophication. One of
the primary objectives of this study was to investigate the
potential for increased eutrophication of Lake Jeanette. The
basic approach for this work is outlined below.
?r 1. Estimate nitrogen and phosphorus loads to Lake Jeanette
k
e
under existing conditions and after completion of the La
Jeanette Development.
r
2. Use available mathematical models to evaluate the trophic
state of Lake Jeanette under existing conditions and after
r completion of the Lake Jeanette Development.
The procedures used to estimate nutrient loads and water quality
in Lake Jeanette are described in the Appendix.
r
4.1 Nutrient Loads to Lake Jeanette
r A summary of the land use, nutrient loading factors and
total nutrient loads to Lake Jeanette is provided in Table 4 for
existing conditions. Under existing conditions, approximately
15% of the total phosphorus load and 23% of the total nitrogen
r load entering Lake Jeanette originates within the Lake Jeanette
Development. This is not surprising since the Lake Jeanette
Development only comprises 25% of the lake's watershed. The
r
3-D-5
r
It 6
Y remaining 75% of the watershed is heavily developed (over 50% of
f? land covered by residential, commercial or cropland). The major
nutrient load to the lake from within the Lake Jeanette
Development is from rainfall and dustfall directly on the lake
surface. Nutrient loads from undeveloped forest land are
actually lower than those from rainfall-dustfall because
significant amounts of pollutants are removed during infiltration
through the forest soils.
Nutrient loads to the lake were also estimated for future
' conditions based on the projected land use within the Lake
storm
i
al areas,
Jeanette Development. In single family resident
water runoff will be treated by passage through the stream
( buffers to remove dissolved and suspended pollutants. Runoff
l' from all commercial, office and attached residential (cluster)
development will be treated in storm water control ponds. The
storm water control ponds were assumed to capture and retain
runoff from one inch of precipitation (N.C. Div. Environ.
Management design standard). The phosphorus and nitrogen
trapping efficiencies were estimated to be 58% and 26% using the
equations developed by Reckow (1988) to estimate phosphorus and
L nitrogen trapping in southeastern lakes. Use of lake water
quality models to estimate trapping efficiency in storm water
ponds has been shown by Hartigan (1988) to be more accurate than
l other approaches. Baseflow pollutant loads were assumed to be
equal to the predevelopment loads. This assumption should be
conservative since the entire Lake Jeanette Development will be
sewered and the baseflow load will probably decline. Nutrient
loads from outside the Lake Jeanette Development were assumed to
be unchanged from the existing conditions.
t? Total nutrient loads to the lake after completion of the
Lake Jeanette Development are listed in Table 5. After
completion, the Lake Jeanette Development will contribute only
' 28% the total phosphorus load and 32% of the total nitrogen load
to the lake.
' 4.2 Water Quality Modeling Results
Existing and future conditions in Lake Jeanette were
evaluated using a set of mathematical models developed to predict
t water quality in lakes and reservoirs. The estimated total
phosphorus and nitrogen loads, median concentrations, and the
maximum chlorophyll a concentration in Lake Jeanette for existing
and future development conditions are listed in Table 6.
Estimated loads and median concentrations of total phosphorus and
total nitrogen after completion of the Lake Jeanette Development
' are essentially the same as the existing condition.
Chlorophyll a is a measure of the amount of algae present in
a lake and is often used as an indicator of the overall water
' quality of a lake or reservoir. The North Carolina water quality
standard for chlorophyll a is 40 ug/1. Under both existing and

3-D-6

y, future development conditions, the chlorophyll a concentration in
Lake Jeanette is well below the state water quality standard.
These results indicate that completion of the Lake Jeanette
Development will have not have a significant impact on water
quality in Lake Jeanette. These results are not surprising
considering that: (1) the Lake Jeanette Development comprises a
' small portion of the watershed; and (2) much of the area outside
the Lake Jeanette Development has already been developed.
5.0 DOWNSTREAM WATER QUALITY IMPACTS
' Lake Townsend is one of the primary water supply reservoirs
for the City of Greensboro and is immediately downstream of the
Lake Jeanette dam. Water released from Lake Jeanette will enter
Lake Townsend. While it is beyond to scope of this study to
perform a complete evaluation of water quality in Lake Townsend,
it is possible to draw some simple comparisons to aid in
evaluating the potential impact of the Lake Jeanette Development.
Available data indicate that water quality in Lake Jeanette
is currently and will continue to be of higher quality than in
Lake Townsend. On August 6, 1990, the N.C. Division of
Environmental management surveyed water quality in both Lakes
Jeanette and Townsend. At that time, chlorophyll a and total
phosphorus concentrations were significantly higher in Lake
Townsend than in Lake Jeanette. The calculations provided in the
previous section indicate that the overall water quality in Lake
Jeanette will not be measurably altered by the completion of the
Lake Jeanette Development. Consequently, the present and future
discharge of high quality water from Lake Jeanette into Lake
Townsend can only improve the water quality in Lake Townsend.
The relative impact of the Lake Jeanette discharge on Lake
Townsend may also be evaluated by comparing the nutrient loads
1 from the Lake Jeanette watershed with other land uses. The total
amount of phosphorus and nitrogen discharged from Lake Jeanette
into Lake Townsend during an average year.was calculated by
multiplying the average concentration of phosphorus and nitrogen
' in the lake by the total annual discharge. These loads were then
divided by the total watershed area of Lake Jeanette to allow
comparison with other land uses. After completion of the Lake

' Jeanette Development, the average annual loads for total
_- phosphorus and total nitrogen are estimated to be 0.2 lb/ac/yr
and 4.9 lb/ac/yr, respectively. These loads are comparable to
very low use rural land (90% forest - 10% cropland). Any
' commercial use of the rural land (timber harvesting for example)
would significantly increase the nutrient loads to the receiving
water. Existing nutrient loads in the Reedy Fork watershed were
' estimated in a previous report submitted to the N.C. Division of
d
i
i
ng an
st
Environmental Management (Borden, 1991). Under both ex
future development conditions, the nutrient loads discharged from
1
3-D-7
8
Y Lake Jeanette are much lower than from the remainder of the Reedy
Fork watershed. A summary of these loadings and comparisons are
contained in Table 7.
' Under both existing and future conditions, the total amount
of phosphorus and nitrogen released from Lake Jeanette into Lake
Townsend is very small. The total amount of nutrients discharged
from Lake Jeanette is probably lower than from any other
comparably sized watershed which discharges into Lake Townsend.
This is in part due to the high trapping efficiency of Lake
Jeanette. Approximately 73% of the total phosphorus and 37% of
' the total nitrogen entering Lake Jeanette is removed by algal
uptake and sedimentation. This process occurs in all lakes and
is a natural part of lake development.
r,
1

' 3-D-8
i
y
i
1
9
6.0 REFERENCES
Borden, R.C., 1991. Impact of Stormwater Management
Requirements on Pollutant Loads to the City.of Greensboro
Reservoirs. Comments submitted to the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission in response to the Proposed Amendments
to Rules for Surface Water Supply Watersheds Pursuant to the
Requirements of House Bill 156. August 16, 1991.
Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc., 1989. Watershed management study:
Oak Hollow and City Lake watersheds. Conducted for the City
of High Point and Guilford County, NC.
Hartigan, J.P., 1988. Basis for Design of Wet Detention Basin
BMP's. Proc. Current Practice and Design Criteria for Urban
Runoff Water Quality Control, ASCE, New York, NY.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1981.
?i Cooperative Programme for Inland Waters (Eutrophication
Control) Shallow Lakes and Reservoirs.
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community
th
i
n Nor
Development, 1988. Water Quality Progress
Carolina, 1986-87 / 305b Report, Rept. No. 90-07, Raleigh,
NC.
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources, 1990. Water Quality Progress in North Carolina,
1988-89 / 305b Report, Rept. No. 90-07, Raleigh, NC.
Northern Virginia Planning District Commission, 1979. Guidebook
for Screening Urban Nonpoint Pollution Management
Strategies. Falls Church, VA.
1 Reckow, K.H., 1988. Empirical Models for Trophic State in
Southeastern U.S. Lakes and Reservoirs, Water Resources
Bulletin, 24(4):723-734.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1974. Results of the
Nationwide Urban Runoff Program, Vol. 1 - Final Report,
Washington, DC.

3-D-9
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
1
n

fl

Table 1
Characteristics of Lake Jeanette
Surface Area 270 acre (109 hectares)
Volume 3,250 acre feet (4.0 x 106 m3)
Maximum Depth 33 feet (10 m)
Mean Depth 12 feet (3.7 m)
Watershed Area 4831 acre (1,955 hectares)
Annual Inflow 13 inches (5234 ac ft, 6.45 x 106 m3)
Hydraulic Residence
Time 0.62 years

3-D-10
10
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
11

Table 2
Existing Land Use and Percent Impervious in the
Lake Jeanette Watershed
Residential lots
Over 5 acres
2 to 5 acres
1 to 2 acres
.5 to 1 acres
.25 to .5 acres
Townhouses-Apartments
Total residential
Commercial-Office
Institutional
Agricultural
Water
Lake Jeanette
Other
Forest
Total
NA - Not Applicable
-- Total Area -- Percent
Acres Percent Impervious
32 1 6
57 1 9
380 8 12
422 9 18
541 11 22
244 5 35
1676 35 20
90 2 90
117 2 25
208 4 1
270 5 NA
23 <1 NA
2447 51 -1
4831 -
100 10
3-D-11
r .
y
Table 3
Anticipated Land Use in the Lake Jeanette Development
-- Total Area --
Acres Percent
Residential lots
1.0 to 2.0 acres 250 20
0.5 to 1.0 acres 371 31
0.25 to 0.5 acres
Cluster (average of 3 units/acre 84 7
with storm water controls) 170 14
Commercial-office 71 6
' Lake Jeanette 270 -22
Total 1216 100

1
3-D-12
1
12
Y
1
1
1
1
1
Y
i
1
i
r
w
r
i

H ,i2 ri C1 lD t0 N l? tb l11 U1 CT [? I tD C1 m co N 1 N tn W-"1
N
toH V'll1c1'NNtnOONf1OtD 1 ? NMt`cn 1 r- r-
l t-
.0 r1 M to H O n ri N O c'1 m N I N r-1 I- N r-i 1 N r l
O Nm TNHrir-1 V' ( H NM I tD tD C
)

z 4.)
N N 0

0
W U
0 M r"'1N%0 %DOr- Nr-1CnMLn W %D COtntD .
0 C-)
ai .0
4%? 10 1` 00 H C1 O M N N H
9 Co N ri
0
H H ri H r-i ri ? ''? td

z f0 V'N??OC'1Nl`lN??tD t?CO?tD -P
U1
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Vr tD tD (, co ri c,) O N N N ri r- co N ri
to r--4 H H r-1 ri ri r'1
1~
r. 0
O I~
.,-1 0
-r1 H,1? %D -:r tomNd'wd NOw 1 cr V•NtoO1 1 O Cn c•'1 aT
cd
H r-1 V' O tD O V V' r- M tD W ri 1 tD H ? co co I co O
l to
? ? l`1 M In C7 r-1 ri N H I m r1 1 ) m
C Cl)
U ?
a N

0 E)
x Id
qt co OIOr-4LO w 1Nm r-4 r-
O r-iHr-
00
0
C a U
O A 000 r-4Hr-iHHCl) 000 ,fir-BOO •
ri

N H
-
k a U
N it
v O CO o H v w to CO to r-i r-
Q\ ri ri r-

. . .
H
O
W W . . . . . . . . . . . .
0000HHHr-IN000 .
01-100 a
I H E-4 V
H

4 a °
(1)
H U 0
0Nt-awr-var, V'V Hcn 1
In
to V,tD0 1
tD
?
9
d, fd
z 10 Rf W mInCO OIllV ON Hco NON 1 rI r-1co d t- I H z O
'z
0 m-0-0N ri 1-4 coN N 0 .
1-3 P4 0 W
k1 1 N 1
Z
W I
- F-i
0 0 V A H c0
H U 000aco0.00N0riry' 1 +'1 0400kog 1 tD D .O
? ?
rz I co a cnz M O ?
a 04 w w U
W
O
C7
?
41 t1a U 4NI-Ot ovortN V 04 1 r-i tDvog 1
f? W C1tClwOI-T V'MriONmz I ri in HOriz I r-4
m r7 cn Vr d' N ri H U) 1 L Co I Ol EHI
W
O ,Y. E-4
H
)-I
a w °
m
z r
-1
n

W
1 •H
0

0)
H 03-I ••
?0?
W O
til
W
W 1-1 U E?
E-4 U
> (a
? W 10 0
z -I
)
o a) a) 0 In a) In
??77 a 0
r

$4 P I40 • 04 o .
0

??
-
co
0 10
O
0T-i?
h
I?b
o
I
4
Gasr to in r4 0 41 a) r b W O V rO W a 0
c7
V I~ 0 O 10 0 V 0 O
M P O O In 4-3 U -r-( 1~ a to to L4 0
0 0 4J 4J to c,4 P -ri b c0 O 0 to N O
t3l
O 0 N H 0 0 aW F. a a) 000(1) a) O O ?
a 40- 0> a > 1J 4 E- U o
HHHHH i 1 H a) HH (1) 4J
0 O
a
o
rn?
IzltSHH ro a?cdb 0
W -ri -r1 •.i -ri -r-I a) to to H >~ W -r1 •rl O G
0
1 H 3 O r
E-4 4-) +) 4J +1 4J m -r1 -H b?:D H 1
E I v 4 0 O a 0u
4=009C0 0 f-It~0--, (d Q1~O c
J pIn
0000003-1V 0 p41 11 (1)11)Vh
r
1 a
4
w a rOw
?10 rOV10104 0 mH 0 m p
-.i --I •r+ -1" 1 --I 9 r:? a4-) 0 0 O
v 0 m
?
L)
-., -,1 a) 0 o
4J W Q >,
o to M V) m to 3 9 10 O m p v A o to m )a m Q cn E- x z
E-4 000000 0 ZP(00 0
M%%99%PUHUawz O
cn Ei000m
mZPawa 0 4
m ro O
E4
rIN
3-D-13
13
14
1
Y
Y
1
1

to
tU
A
it
H

r-1 A 1-? M %D %D N ? 8 to 1- n C% I- 1 %D to t- Cl N d' N I CO C1
r- r
t-
td r-1 d0 V NNmmoNMO%D I C- (- Mencn 1 M 1
%D CO t- ;r %D r-1 I N
to r4 ON
4J
Q r? M m 1-q O 1- r" 1 N O M M N 1
N M d' N H r'1 ri v 1 N
r-1 r-1 N V-4 M 1 0 %D ?
«z 4J N
W U
C7 b
riNtO%D OL?Ne-1Mlntnw
?D%0 00 r- CO %D
O U
0 A
cat N 4
1
4 1o 10 9 CO
+-
?
kD 9 m CO
E-4 r-q -
1 ? 9
-1 .
,
H
z U
(0
d-Nt-1-C0 MNMNI- t- %D
I-I-co d'co t0
i1 d'1D1D 9COIIMONNNr-1 tO?OCOC 14
H H ri r-1 r? r- I
N

O
.H
,N
ri,Q
M1Dd'tnMN-a-kDd'NO1D 1
cr
% I
OsNNr-1oo
d?n' rn
r
-ri M tdr-A r-4 V O%DOvvr- M%Dwr-I 1 %0 ?n
OM0%O•a' co I W O M
(n en LO MHHN H I M N M 1-1 H I
1 C% M W
9? O O N
o a J-1
x
` -it w0aT-Itnw Lo Ntnrar 0)0H%D1-I-
.
.

)-1 U
ni
A
. . . . . . . .
8881-+l-ir-Irl.-+M000
. .
Orr-1008
O r-4
4 x
0 a U
.0 co o0%T-4v DlntOtnr??
CO 01r4%Dtl- r-
i A OOOOri.-lr- 404800 001-1008

0) z

a) w

H
U
NI?0wt- 0r-RrvT-1M
a
I In
8r- 0ri0 1
w
U b W M to w O to d' 0 rI CO N O N I H to t` co 1? (- r I r4
l
F3 W M y d' N r-1 1-1 N M r-' N c
l
W
O H I M Z
W
O
O 04J Q H
a Z U z
O O O O CO O O O N O i co
z
O O O O m 0 F-1
H
H
t- O
O W 1 W z
O
Iza U 4NI-0 w0d'O1?Nd'0 4 1 rq W 0 1-1-a'vr-Io U
N td w Mtf)OOd vmv-IONM'z. 1 H ?mr- w m r- z
f] M ?! r N ri r-I LO 1 M W N M 1-1 a
w E-t a
a H
W H
?
4J z w

w w
°D
w
+3 '
H
0 0Al >
H
As x ?( E-'
W
z O
Ln a
P W Ln z
r1 O
$4
UUU .0 9 ..
.'U a0) W
1 -rl
co to it r-i
O to r'I
O h
a
O
P. 10
Lt1 M In N
0 4J rz a
O U
0 4j co
w N
4)
rd Q)
0) 0
' 4J
)4
m w O O to 41 U -•-1 O L m O U) N U
A tv 4J 4J In N $4 -•i td O IM 4-J to N 1J -rl
O ONriOO ¢444 9 ra Q) Or-100-1~W In 0
40- a
°? :5 0
a 0
r-1 r-I H r I r-i I 1
Q
a to td 0 to 0 N P-4 H rd b 1
r -I r-I r-
a to to t0 M ri a 0
W •rl •ri -rl -rl -ri tv 0 CO H rz W -rl -rl •ri v t0
)
)
-1 3 ?
O
H 4J 4-) 4-) 4-) 4J N -ri -rl rO p r-a -rl
J-
H dJ d- r
cd O ?-a
9 = 9 :? U )-l 9 d-, to 4 r~ 1~ r sa U J a
a?tvtD000P4-1 (oP4J
b rd rd .0 rd A 0 W H 0 w p 4J
o 1)tva)11) 14
rd b rd 4J (1) P 4
o w a
-rl •r-I -1-1 -rt -r? r. 5 0 9% 4j d O
OlA1AMmto 3F4 rdON1.41 4J
A -rl -r1 •r'1 to 1~ N
0fnU2M0 941 .J W
]
A G
H
E t a) U Q) O O O O O S-1 fa O td 0 EA O O rOy r-4 O td ,r
0 4
s O
E-+
I?aaaQaEiUHU a,w3 In IAaa 9 UU3 m a
3-D-14
C
15

Table 6
Summary of Water Quality Modeling Results for Lake Jeanette
Existing Future
Condition Condition
Total Phosphorus
Load (lb/yr) 3053. 3637.
Total Nitrogen
Load (lb/yr) 33721. 37977.
Median Lake
Phosphorus Conc.(mg/1) 0.061 0.068
Median Lake
Nitrogen Conc.(mg/1) 1.49 1.67
Maximum Chlorophyll a
Concentration -(ug/1) 16.0 17.6
3-D-15

, 16
Table 7
t
Comparison of Nutrient Loads discharged from Lake e
Jeanet
with other Land Uses

Land Use Total Total
' Phosphorus Nitrogen
(lb/ac/yr) (lb/ac/yr)
r Lake Jeanette - Existing Condition 0.2 4.4
Lake Jeanette - Future Development 0.2 4.9
Forest (no-timbering) 0.1 3.
Cropland 3. 12.
90% Forest,- 10% Cropland 0.4 4.
Reedy Fork Watershed (average) 0.7 5.6

¦1 -

1 .

3-D-16
'

1

l

I
r
C

1

7

17
Nutrient Load Estimation
APPENDIX
The total amount of nitrogen and phosphorus entering Lake
Jeanette in storm water runoff during an average year was
estimated using nonpoint source storm water loading factors and
data on existing land use in the watershed. The land use within
the watershed was separated into hydrologic group B and C soils
because of the differences in storm water runoff from these
soils. The nonpoint source loading factors were developed by the
Northern Virginia Planning District Commission (NVPDC, 1979)
after an extensive study of storm water related nonpoint source
pollution in the occoquan watershed in northern Virginia. More
recent nationwide studies (USEPA, 1983) have confirmed the
accuracy of these loads (CDM, 1989). In addition to storm water
runoff, a significant nutrient load also reaches the lake from
rainfall and dustfall directly onto the lake surface. These
nutrient loads are also included in the analysis.
Basef low (dry weather) nutrient loads were estimated by
multiplying the average concentration of nitrogen and phosphorus
in baseflow by the total volume of water discharged as baseflow
during the year. The average concentration of total phosphorus
and total nitrogen in baseflow was estimated to be 0.05 mg/l and
1.0 mg/1, respectively. These average concentrations were
estimated from long term monitoring data collected by the U.S.
Geological Survey for streams in the Greensboro area and are
similar to the average concentrations used to estimate baseflow
nutrient loads for the City of High Point reservoirs (Oak Hollow
and City Lake, CDM 1989). The baseflow nutrient loads were not
separated into different land use categories. The existing
information on nonpoint source pollutants indicates that there is
no significant difference in baseflow water quality for different
land uses. The total baseflow volume was assumed to constitute
approximately two thirds of the total annual runoff of 13 inches
per year.
Water Quality Modeling
Existing and future conditions in Lake Jeanette were
evaluated using a set of mathematical models developed to predict
water quality in lakes and reservoirs. The median summer total
phosphorus concentration was estimated using the equation shown
on the next page. This equation was developed by analyzing data
collected by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on water
quality in 80 different southeastern lakes and reservoirs
(Reckow, 1988).
3-D-17
where P = Pin / (1 + Kp Tw)
' P = median summer total phosphorus concentration (mg/1)
Pin = average influent total phosphorus concentration (mg/1)
' = annual total phosphorus load / annual inflow
Tw = hydraulic residence time (yr)
' Kp = phosphorus trapping parameter (1/yr)
' Kp is estimated using the equation
Kp = 3.0 (Pin) 0.53 (Tw)-0.75 (2)0.58
where z is the mean lake depth.
The median summer total nitrogen concentration was estimated
using the equation (Reckow, 1988)
N = Nin / (1 + Kn Tw)
where
N = median summer total nitrogen concentration (mg/1)
Nin = average influent total nitrogen concentration (mg/1)
= annual total nitrogen load / annual inflow
Kn = nitrogen trapping parameter (1/yr)
Kn is estimated using the equation
18
Kn = 0.67 (T W)-0.75
The average chlorophyll a concentration (Chloro a) was estimated
' using the equation (OECD, 1981)
Chloro a = 0.43 (P x 1000)0'88
t

n
3-D-18

N

J
w

C

Robert C. Borden, Ph.D., P.E.
508 E. Franklin Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-515-7665 (Office)
919-515-7908 (FAX)
919-834-6172 (Home)
Education
Ph.D., Environmental Engineering, Rice University, 1986.
M.E., Environmental Engineering, University of Virginia, 1980.
B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Virginia, 1978.
Professional Affiliations
American Geophysical Union
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Water Resources Asso., (President PA sec., 1983).
Association of Environmental Engineering Professors
Association of Ground Water Scientists and Engineers
Ground Water Professionals of N. C. (Treasurer, 1989)
Sigma Xi, Tau Beta Pi
Universities Council on Water Resources
Registration
Professional Engineer, VA #14076, NC #14197
Employment Historv
1991 - pres. North Carolina State University, Associate Professor
1986-1991 North Carolina State University, Assistant Professor .
Teaches courses ground water nvironmentalchemistryPerfoorms conWninant transport,
water supply and pollution
relating to surface and ground water quality management.
1980 - 1983 F.X. Browne Associates, Inc., Project Engineer
Directed and performed a variety of projects including analysis and design of waste-
water treatment plants, stormwater management and flood control systems, non-point
source pollution controls and eutrophication management systems.
1978 - 1979 Albemarle County, VA, Assistant County Engineer
Served as Watershed Management Officer. Reviewed all proposals for
development in South Rivanna Reservoir watershed to determine potential impact on
water quality. Designed small facilities for storm water management, erosion control,
water supply and sewage disposal.
16
3-D-19
Robert C. Borden
August 1991
Technical Expertise
Surface Water Management of surface waters to minimize adverse impacts of
eutrophication, flooding amd waste disposal. Water quality modeling of lakes and
' reservoirs. Design of Best Management Practices.
Ground Water - Characterization and simulation of contaminant transport, physical,
chemical and biological processes in the subsurface. Numerical modeling of subsurface
' flow and contaminant transport. Analysis and design of ground water restoration systems.
Waste Treatment - Analysis and design of systems for the treatment and disposal of
' municipal and industrial wastes.
' Surface Water Experience
Storm Water Management. Directed comprehensive study of storm water management in
Independence, Missouri. Final recommendations included formation of a storm water
' management utility and construction of a system of regional detention basins. Also
prepared a detailed drainage manual for use by developers which defined procedures for
delineation of flood plains and design of storm water facilities.
Nonnoint Source Model. Developed mathematical model for predicting wet weather
pollutant loads for various land uses. Model incorporated the SCS curve number function
and a set of multiple linear regression equations to predict nutrient and suspended solids
?r loads. Incorporated model into storm water management ordinance to allow design of Best
Management Practices to control phosphorous loadings to a drin1drig water reservoir.
?I Eutrophication Modeling. Examined impact of proposed treatment plant expansion on
water quality in major Pennsylvania reservoir. Used available models to predict impact on
water clarity and algal concentrations.
?i Stream Modeling. Analyzed dissolved oxygen depression in Jackson River, VA using
QUAL-H model. Evaluated various waste treatment alternatives.
Zoning Ordinance Defence. Analyzed scientific validity of zoning ordinance to preserve
water quality in Occoquan Reservoir, VA. Developed data base for pending litigation.
Lake Restoration Studies. Directed several lake restoration studies. Work included
stormwater monitoring, development of nutrient budgets, water quality modeling, and
design of restoration alternatives.
1 Sedimentation Pond Manazement. Developed plan for controlling algal and bacterial
growth in a regional system of water quality management ponds.
Small Wastewater Treatment Plant Design. Designed and obtained permits for 60,000 gpd
expansion of wastewater treatment plant for Caesar's World, Inc. Work included
modification and expansion of existing pumping station and secondary treatment plant.
Also included addition of processes for nutrient removal and tertiary filtration.
Parer Mill Design. Developed preliminary design to upgrade 2.5 MGD lagoon system for
paper mill. Design included chemical addition, submerged attached growth biological
' reactors and mechanical aeration. Bench scale units were operated to obtain design
parameters.
' 17
3-D-20
1

August 1991
Ground Water ExF&nence
Super Fund Site. Simulated organic and inorganic contaminant transport in the shallow
aquifer system at the United Creosoting, Inc. Superfund site. Work included preliminary
hydrogeologic characterization, well placement, contaminant transport simulation using the
USGS Solute Transport Model, simulation of restoration alternatives, and report
preparation.
Aerobic Biodegradation Modeling. Developed mathematical model, BIOPLUME, for
USEPA to simulate the movement of dissolved hydrocarbons and oxygen limited
biodegradation in ground water. This model allows the determination of: 1) when is clean
up of contaminated ground water necessary; 2) what is the natural assimilative capacity of
the aquifer; and 3) when can clean up operations cease. Model includes advection,
dispersion, adsorption, atmospheric reaeration, and microbial growth and decay.
Injection - Production Test. Studied transport of organic and inorganic contaminants using
a three well injection - production test to measure dispersion and adsorption in a
heterogeneous aquifer. Data was analysed by comparing the statistical moments of the
concentration distributions in the recovery wells. Results indicated that adsorption to the
formation was not significant but that there was a large loss of the organic compound,
presumably due to biotransformation by subsurface microorganisms.
Enhanced Biorestoration. Demonstrated the technical feasiblity of enhanced aerobic
biotransformation of wastes at a Superfund site. Addition of dissolved oxygen resulted in a
reduction in dissolved polynuclear hydrocarbons to below the detection limit within the test
area. Field test was successfully simulated using a model developed to simulate aerobic
biotransformation in the subsurface.
Aviation Fuel Spill. Applied BIOPLUME model to simulate transport and biodegradation
of dissolved hydrocarbons at an aviation fuel spill in northern Michigan. Simulation results
were used in legal action and in the design of a ground water containment system. Work is
currently underway on the design of a full scale enhanced biorestoration system to restore
the aquifer.
Methanogenic Biotransformation. Developed mathematical model to simulate the
transport and biotransformation of organic contaminants in the subsurface under both
aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Model allows simulation of five microbial populations
and the biotransformation of organics via aerobic oxidation, nitrate reduction, iron
reduction, sulfate reduction and methanogenesis. Model is currently being tested at a field
site where iron reduction and methane production have been observed.
Dredge S ils Disposal. Developed dredge spoils disposal plan to minimize contamination
of ground water in the Pine Barrens Protection Zone. Supervised the collection of ground
water and sludge leaching data.
Pump and Treat Analysis. Examined feasibility of pump and treat for restoration of
DNAPL contaminated aquifer at a major Texas Superfund site. Experimental and
modeling results indicated that conventional pump and treat would require 50 to 75 years
at maximum possible pumping rates to meet EPA mandated cleanup criteria.
Advisory Panels. Advise EPA and API on potential methods for aquifer restoration at
Superfund sites and UST releases.
1
3-D-21

11

C

Pe r Rey'Pwesi Publications
Robert C. 130rum
August 1991
Borden, R.C., Influence of Adsorption and Oxygen Limited Biodegradation on the
Transport and Fate of a Creosote Plume: Field Methods and Simulation Techniques, Ph.D.
Thesis, 192 pp., Rice Univ., Houston, TX, 1986.
Borden, R.C. and P.B. Bedient, Transport of Dissolved Hydrocarbons Influenced by
Reaeration and Oxygen Limited Biodegradation: 1. Theoretical Development, Watr
Resourc. Res., 22(13):1973-1982, 1986.
Borden, R.C., P.B. Bedient, M.D. Lee, C.H. Ward, and J.T. Wilson, Transport of Dissolved
22(13) d Oxygen 1986. Biodegradation: 2. Field
Hydrocarbon Influenced Rebe Reaeration an
Application, so s
Borden, R.C. and P.B. Bedient, In Situ Measurement of Adsorption and Biotransformation
at a Hazardous Waste Site, Water Resourc. Bull., 23(4):629-636, 1987.
Thomas, J.M., M.D. Lee, P.B. Bedient, R.C. Borden, L.W. Canter, and C.H. Ward, L n°
hasis on in Situ Biorestora = U.S.
h E
i
mp
t
Underground Storage Tanks Remediation w
Environmental Protection Agency, Wash. DC, EPA/600/2 87/008, 1987.

? Rifai, H.S., P.B. Bedient, J.F. Haasbeek, and R.C. Borden, IOPLTJME II• omputer
t Trap rt under the Influence of Oxyz=
i
l nan
Model of Two-Dimensional Contam
Limited Biodegradation in Ground Water User's Manual- Version U.S.
1989.
EPA/600/S8 88/093
i ,
Environmental Protection Agency, Wash. DC,
M.D. Lee, R.C. Borden J.T. Wilson, M. Thomas, P.B. Bedient, and C.H.Ward,
CRC Critical Reviews in Environmental
minated Aquifers
t
C
i
,
a
on
c
Biorestoration of Organ
Control, 18(4):629-636, 1988.
Borden, R.C., M.D. Lee, J.M. Thomas, P.B. Bedient, and C.H. Ward, In Situ Measurement
Ground Water
ited Biotransformation
Li
,
m
and Numerical Simulation of Oxygen
Monitoring Review, 9(1):83-91, 1989.
and T.M. Yanoschak, Surface and Ground Water Quality Impacts of North
C
R
Borden
.
.
,
Carolina Sanitary Landfills, Water Resourc. Bull., 26(2)269-277, 1990.
Bramlett, W., and R. C. Borden, Numerical Generation of Flow Nets - The FLOWNS
Model, Ground Water, 28(6):946-950, 1990.
Borden, R. C. and M. D. Piwoni, Hydrocarbon Dissolution and Transport: A Comparison
J Contaminant Hydrolo v, Accepted for Publication
dels
M
i
' ,
o
c
of Equilibrium and Kinet
Nov. 1989.
Borden, R.C. and C.H. Kao, Evaluation of Ground Water Extraction for Remediation of
accepted for
Fed.
Contr
ter Poll
J
W
' ,
.
.
a
.
Petroleum Contaminated Aquifers, Res.
publication June 1991.
1
0
1 19
3-D-22
1
Robert '.. lioraea
August 1991
,
Rooks and Symposium Proceedings
Borden, R.C., P.B. Bedient, and T. Bouvette, Modeling Ground Water Transport at
r Quality
t
d W
e
a
Conroe Creosote Waste Site, Second International Conference on Groun
Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, pp. 88-go, 1984.
Research-ergo inns
' ,
Bedient P.B., R.C. Borden, and D.I. Lieb, Basic Concepts for Ground Water Transport
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 512-532,
Ward
H
ed
C
ality
Q
d W
,
.
,
.
.
u
ater
Modeling, Groun
1985.
R.C., M.D. Lee, J.T. Wilson, C.H. Ward, and P.B. Bedient, Modeling the
Borden
,
Migration and Biotransformation of Hydrocarbons Derived from a Wood Creosoting
d
G
roun
Process Waste. Proceedings Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemical in
Water - Prevention Detection and Restoration, Nat. Water Well Asso., Houston, TX, pp.

' 130-143, 1985.
bial
f Mi
cro
Dawson, C.N., M.F. Wheeler, and R.C. Borden, Numerical Simulation o
inite
Biodegradation of Hydrocarbons in Groundwater(a), Proceed. 6th Inter, S my on
1986
-358
353
F
' .
,
rance, pp.
Elements Methods in Flow Problems, Antibes,
M.F. Wheeler, C.N. Dawson, P.B. Bedient, C.Y. Chiang, R.C. Borden and H.S. Rifai,
Numerical Simulation of Microbial Biodegradation of Hydrocarbons in Ground Water(b),
t Solving Ground Water Problems with Models, Nat. Water Well Asso., Dublin, OH, 1987.
R.C. and T.M. Yanoschak, Effect of Sanitary Landfills on Surface and Ground
Borden
' ,
Water Quality: A Statistical Analysis, S,vm on oastal Wat. Resourc., Amer. Water
Resourc. Asso., Wilmington NC, 1988.
Borden, R.C. and T.M. Yanoschak, North Carolina Sanitary Landfills: Leachate
f th
' e
Management, and Water Quality Impacts, Water Resourc Res In Lt. o
Generation
,
Univ, of NC, Rept. No. 243, 1989.
' Gangadharan, A.C., T.V. Narayanan, R. Raghavan, G. Amoruso, R. Cochran, J. McArdle,
B. Locke, D. Bailey, C.d.D. Hartman, D. Henz, W. Thompson, J.
Trapp
Hall
W
F
,
,
.
.
Zieleniewski, J. Greber, J.M. Thomas, M.D. Lee, P.B. Bedient, R.C. Borden, L.W. Canter,
rground
d
U
f
' e
n
or
and C.H. Ward, Leak Prevention and Corrective Action Technology
Storage Tanks, Noyles Data Corp., Park Ridge, NJ, 1989.
Borden, R.C. and C.M. Kao, Water Flushing of Trapped Residual Hydrocarbon:
leum
t
P
ro
e
atical Model Development and Laboratory Validation, Proceedings
th
M
em
a
Restoration, Nat. Water Well Asso., Houston, TX, 1989.
t Browne, F.X., R.C. Borden, and C.J. Newell, Storm Water Management, tandard
Handbook of Environmental EneineerinQ, McGraw Hill, NY, in Press.
Douglass, J.L., and R.C. Borden, A Comparative Study of the Groundwater and Surface
Water Quality at a Piedmont Sanitary Landfill, Proceedings Ground Wate in the
Piedmont of the Eastern United States, 1989 (in press).
Douglass, J.L., and R.C. Borden, The Impact of a Piedmont Sanitary Landfill on Surface
and Ground Water Quality, Water Resourc Res Inst of the Univ, of NC, Submitted for
' review July 1990.
1 20
3-D=23

J
i

?l

1

Robert C. bornen
August 1991
D:r,ks and Svmoosium Proceedines
Borden, R.C., Remediation and Management of Hydrocarbon Contan inated Aquifers,
Professional Engineers of North Carolina,
Conference Presentations
Impacts of Stream Channel Morphology on Stormwater Management Options, Amer.
Water Resourc. Assoc., San Antonio, 1983.
Biodegradation of a Creosote Plume under Oxygen limiting Conditions, Amer.
Geophysical Union, San Francisco, Dec. 1984.
Measurement of Adsorption and Biotransformation using an Injection-Production Test,
Amer. Geophysical Union, San Francisco, Dec. 1985.
Numerical Simulation of Hydrocarbon Transport and In-Situ Biodegradation: Field Testing
and Analysis of Restoration Alternatives, Chapman Conf. on Microbial Processes in the
Subsurface, Amer. Geophysical Union, Snowbird, Utah, Oct. 1986.
Numerical Model of Organics Transport and Biodegradation from an U.S.T. Site., Soc.
Envir. Tox. and Chem., Wash., D.C., Nov. 1986.
Gasoline Transport in the Subsurface: Transport and Remediation, N.C. Sec. Amer. Soc.
Civil Engr., Charlotte, April 1987.
Use of Mathematical Models for Assessing the Assimilative Capacity of Shallow Aquifers,
Univ. Council on Water Resourc., Hilton Head, SC, July 1987.
Effects of Sanitary Landfills on Surface and Ground Water Quality, Charlotte, NC, March
1988.
Numerical Simulation of the Anaerobic Biotransformation of Dissolved Jet Fuel, Amer.
Geophysical Union, Baltimore, May 1988.
Anaerobic Biotransformation of Hydrocarbons in the Subsurface: Field Observations,
Amer. Geophysical Union, Baltimore, May 1988.
Field Testing of BIOPLUME: Effect of Oxygen Addition on Hydrocarbon
Biotransformation, Amer. Geophysical Union, Baltimore, May 1988.
Anaerobic Biotransformation of Hydrocarbons in the Subsurface: Field Observations and
Mathematical Model Development, SETAC, Wash., DC 1988.
A Mathematical Model of NAPL Hydrocarbon Dissolution and Transport, SETAC, Wash.,
DC 1988.
Dissolution of Trapped Nonaqueous Phase Petroleum Hydrocarbons, Amer. Geophysical
Union, Baltimore, May 1989.

21
3-D-24

Robert C. Borden
August 1991
Techni?Reu2rts
Study of Proposed Stormwater Detention Ordinance, Albemarle Co. Engr Off., 1978-
Analysis of Albemarle County Runoff Control Ordinance, Albemarle Co. Engr Off., 1979.
An Evaluation of the Impact of the Cove Haven Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion
on Water Quality in Lake Wallenpaupack, F.X. Browne Asso., 1981.
Water Quality Study of Teedyuskung Lake, F.X. Browne Asso., 1982.
Stormwater Management Plan for the City of Independence, Missouri, F.X. Browne Asso.,
1982.
' Stormwater Management Design Manual for the City of Independence, lssouri, F.X.
Browne Asso., 1982.
Watershed Management Study of the S. Rivanna Reservoir, F.X. Browne Asso., 1982.
Lake Wallenpaupack Water Quality Management Study, F.X. Browne Asso., 1982.
Lake Nockamixon Phase 1 Diagnostic - Feasibility Study, F.X. Browne Asso., 1983.
Columbia Lakes Diagnostic - Feasibility Study, F.X. Browne Asso., 1983.
Characterization of Ground Water Contamination for Hazardous Waste Sites, Final
Report to USEPA, Rice Univ., 1983.
Ground Water Pollutant Transport along Flow Lines for Hazardous Waste Sites, Annual
Report to USEPA, Rice Univ., 1984.
Analysis of Restoration Alternatives at UCC site, Report to R.F. Weston, Inc., 1984.
Ground Water Pollutant Transport along Flow Lines for Hazardous Waste Sites, Final
Report to USEPA, Rice Univ., 1985.
Modeling and Field Testing of Contaminant Transport with Biodegradation and Enhanced
In-Situ Reclamation, Annual Report to USEPA, Rice Univ., 1986.
'
Practical Procedures for Evaluating Attenuation of Ground Water Contaminants due to
N. C. State Univ., 1987.
Final Report to USEPA
i
,
on Processes,
Biotransformat
Wastewater
Ri
ver
Evaluation of Land Application of Sewage Sludge at the Neuse
Treatment Plant, City of Raleigh, NC, 1989.
Hydrogeological Investigation and Proposed Monitoring Plan - Whited Spring
Development, Submitted to Clearwater Springs, Inc., 1989.
Water Quality Management Study of Pembroke Jones Lake, Pembroke Jones Park,
Submitted to The John R. McAdams Company, Inc., 1989.
Evaluation of Water Flushing for Groundwater Remediation of the TZ-3 Zone - Motco
Site, Submitted to Groundwater Services Inc., 1990.
22
3-D-25

? Roadway and Utility Crossings
1

L

1

1
1
1
1
1
1
f
1
f
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
WET nM CROSSINGS
SURFACE AREA OF
FILL IN WETLAND
(S.Y.) VOLUME OF FILL AT AVERAGE
HIGH WATER IN WEITAM
(C.Y.) VOLUME OF FILL
AT CROSSING
(C.Y.)
CROSSING NO. 1 478 20 2780
CROSSING NO. 2 76 25 735
CROSSING NO. 3 244 30 600
CROSSING NO. 4 344 35 1155
CROSSING NO. 5 56 20 200
CROSSING NO. 6 1200 130 4445
CROSSING NO. 7 900 125 3555
CROSSING NO. 8
70TAL 211
3511 SYDS 10
395 CYDS 500
13,970 CYDS
RIP RAP (XAZ.E.T PRO'TECT'ION IN WElTTANDS
SURFACE AREA/S.Y VOID/C.Y.
CROSSING NO. 1 83 35
CROSSING NO. 2 53 22
CROSSING NO. 3 53 22
CROSSING NO. 4 130 54
CROSSING NO. 5 16 7
CROSSING NO. 6 128 53
CROSSING NO. 7 140 58
CROSSING NO. 8
70TAL 40
643 SYDS 17
268 CYDS
AREA AND VOLUME CALCULATIONS 4-A-1
YL?FIGA•t..
90TE: 50' .wLrrm..cr -tu_
TO A.U.Dvi 'raft, -FLIM
(.InUTY Ceb55114CAb

S
GKDSSIN(l
•
W vrr"iRT
C40Mf'.44fXtM F.Jt1. To'
W?f-AP* OAT.' ?• - isa• ."Zo ,?ssgEwa.?h_
was C6ctC .X
RrC?c)It? (To BE
U"Ds SCUT) ?i"`? PtGaL hEGTl O t?1 p s...sILT
N 0 sGAL?
TYPICAL SECTION OF ROADWAY CROSSINGS]
4-B-1

?! I I\II I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

N 8 9° 00
CROSSING NO. 1
SURFACE AREA OF FILL. IN WETLAND = - 4'7 8 S.Y.
VOLUME OF FILL AT AVERAGE HIGH WATER IN WETIAI?ID Zo C.Y.
' VOLUME OF FILL AT CROSSING - 2760 C.Y.
4-C-1
INDIVIDUAL ROADWAY. CROSSING MAPS,
1 PL Ate
wwmmmw?
1001
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
J
v
a r A? ?
w0 0
^? 3 11 to
? OV
Nl-
3 Nv '
i
i
i
i
i
?m
r
4-C-2
J
9
i
i
i

CROSSING NO. 2
SURFACE AREA OF FILL IN WETLAND =
VOLUME OF FILL AT AVERAGE HIGH WATER IN WETLAND =
VOIUME OF FILL AT CROSSING =
,AREA uX°
-18 S. Y.
ZS C.Y.
735 C.Y.
4-C-3
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
V
U
V
2?
lY t!1
a --
'0

0
IL 0
M
... :ow.

? o
\
\ ?? ?R

C?

4-C-4
o cn.
cam- C''
0
r? .
7-01

1 -
II '
I
1
CROSSING NO. 3
T r-
i?' 1 I ?i

I , 1
SURFACE AREA. OF FILL IN WETLAND = 244 S.Y.
IMOU ME OF FILL AT AVERAGE HIGH WATER IN WETLAND = 3o C.Y.
WLXM OF FILL AT CROSSING = lvoo C.Y.

4-C-5

1
Y
r
r
r
i
i
i
i
i
i
V
? ? Ot
4 a .. 0 1d
WWI
? -- z o Y
s 3.3 oL `u
? D C1
? cn
.Z
NO ?
14 \
,r
1J ? \
/
• ? V
O
0 ?-
4-C-6
i'
i'
1
1
D
d ?
r T
D
v i m
/ D
d
Ix'
Q I
CROSSING NO. 4
SURFACE AREA OF FILL IN_WETt.,r ND = 0344 S.Y.
VOLUME OF FILL AT AVERAGE HfG H WATER IN WETTIAND = 35 C.Y.
VOLUME OF FILL AT CROSSING = 1155 C.Y.
4-C-7
d
a
r.
r.
'r
i
i
.1
1\
1
\

N
RoF??r
i c 5 p Holz.
?= 1 O' Vag*
Ic- ?° •°
4TC-8
v
12
4N
?Q
E
?a
Q" X11
?Z o
aCJ

t
?i
30'
PEA
M ?•

'a z
CROSSIIC NO. 5
?7RFACE AREA OF FILL IN WETLAND = 5? S.Y. co
VOUJME OF FILL AT AVERAGE HIGH WATER IN WETLAND = 20 C.Y. °
ME OF FILL AT CROSSIM = 17-00 C.Y. -?
r

W
tlo

1 ?

4-C-9

M
0
3
_T!
I
_V
f
SY
a
r?
a
?a
j 3
N
11
0
Q vp
_Il so
.....
i
1,
I
1
1
i
i
i
i
i
v
Q ?

4
o
O
4-C-10

l:

1
1
CROSSING NO. 6
SURFACE AREA OF FILL IN W.ETIM = 1200 S. Y.
' VOLUME OF FILL AT AVERAGE HIGH VaTER IN WET M = 1'30 C.Y.
VOIM E OF FILL AT CROSSING 4445 C.Y.

4-C-11
J
v
•s
Z ?-
.OvM
.
0

0

O
:y
CL.
N'
O
C
c

i
i A
? ?n
0
9
4-C-12
1
1
1
w
r
w
n
r..
i
r
i
i
i
i
CROSSING NO. 7
SURFACE AREA OF FILL IN WETLAND = loo S.Y.
VOLUME OF FILL AT AVERAGE HIGH WATER IN WEIUM = 125 C.Y.
VOLUME OF FILL AT CROSSING = 3555 C.Y.
4-C-13

? V
o s O
OL
J 4.
W a
d
Z
0

•
0 ?
i Q
s M sM
1 ?
0
1 %IT
\? V
3 /
11
4-C-14
4 ?

n
U
u
1
790

? N
\t ?= too'

CROSSING NO. 8
' SURFACE AREA OF FILL IN WETLAND = Z11 S.Y.
VOLUME OF FILL AT AVERAGE HIGH WATER IN WETLAND = /O C.Y.
' VOLUME OF FILL AT CROSSING = 500 C.Y.
i
4-C-15
1 ,

AI
.v
01 ?
?J
r
LLI
0

?J

/

Q

V`

v
?
.
T
? V

aw
? Q
#Aim
4-C-16

-?.
t30
Cg-osscvjG *- 2A
4-C-17
}
w op a
t!.
o u _11
%mop
Q

o ?
J a
_o
\ M

c°?s
d
0
J'
v
i
O
V1 /-
l? ?
i

4-C- 1$
1
1
.1 ;J .
1 ?1
O
1 ?
l
I =
1 ? I
\ c
X30
1
clO ?3
•1 .G
1 ? ?P

c
tJ '
L
cA L
1 ?2
4-C-19 \
ca
r
?i
n
r
r
r
i
r
t 7s? ? s Cep ??
= Ib'vER.
??o GQp?5 4 00.3.4
20 Y, to' (1 004)
I
4-C-20
I1-
f
1
1
1
1
1
I?
y ?
flan?
20

? IJ
J

zt

o?
hJ

l
W
i

?, •9
?
d

r

0=
I ?
?Z

t

0
o?
2
w
D
?W
J
J? J
7
v
d
4YPICAL SECTIONS OF SANITARY SEWER CROSSINGS
4-D-1
J?
d?
is 7„3
1 ? ?d
oil
I'
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
? 7 J
0? p
? 2 n
i
oz
141

d
r
?,r®
Z n.
d
r?

3
Q
J
?J
1
.V/
V
C
11?
r
0
Z
4-D-2
/1 l? e i tee/ Cy . _°o
ov
(( .q,
?? 1 r X00
1 \ 790
190
1 ?
o
- - -
' N.-LZ `?.--
iVk
?. \ `? \
1
stl
uAmf To \ •\
Y
1 cv-o?>S @ ? ?. J Ro6.vWA`{ ?
tcA
I Jg 'ro A%
7no
- _ _ WFXL6}?? J
r
° / OUTFALL #4
(/2" S. S. 0.22% GRADE)
CAPC/TY = 0.75MGD '
FLOW : 0.15MGD (-t-1yy{u( (A) `
Z
10 L.F. C rLp S( 5 s
y 0UTFAL- if _4-Q_.. _ _ tt
fCool--. 0..50 m?D
--
75 .5
4-E-1
INDIVIDUAL SEWER CROSSING MAPS',

L r
AM.
,
i
790•
•.?? Aso _ ? l ? , ? % ? .- ?,? I ,
.100
0
76o?

i
i
820
I
0 ?n

ji;
ON. 5
errs
I ?
'\ ers erp.s
•? b10
??Y- S
?t Z° \
I ! 1
es,
! 1
uJS
i
4-E-2
eo

,

J

w?
A .0
? ;cam
I \ \.
i ,
?A `M `

I ((

E
J?1
0
a.qA
CONS,
K NN ETH
l J ?--
4-E-3
0
T E
00
Ti-fill ,? \!i ,
/?? ? X60 \ ? ?`. ?i \ ?1? \?\\`\ ?? , ,` ? I (1 ` •??•
7 i
' lets j
' 4-E-4
MGD
e,C z
_?...
,
\ \ - /
760
1.0
i 1 _ Ergo - - ;
LIV
?t
790
`?-
--- I
1 1 1 ?? _ RO
• T
130
' l 4-E-5
?1
6Z" S. S. @ 0.ZZ% GRADE),
CAPACITY. 1/0 MGD
II FLOW= 0.35MGD
,so
3,480 L.F.
R6AD WAY
?:' ' ' ? ' • • ,G{2o4S? y nlos
/Ip / •/ (b i
? T
760
RoAo 1-7
GR.OKt
may, ? ? .
?wawa
??o ' • 1 -2co` - ??
, i
p 90.115% GRADE) ??,
?
3.00 MGD J r 1 l i I : F[-vi,.l' > 0.? !.??'i 4 ` - .
1.50 MGD
t 4-E-6

,

-'•
`7S9 yo
76

b{1eium - ----- 007
10

1910 -

6

817

r 4-E-7

IFR
11
? 0.5j0
,l C
.J

! 771.1 \
? 1 it (moo ?
i
a v' ? : /1
• Wm.w?/rAY/Ott ',; ,
777,5
i
,
1
i
I

,
1 1
?` I ' 77e.s ?/? ? 'I
I ?
I j
1I '
160 7". 5
I
I
10
? I 7sa1
i 0
7
r
f
/t rj?-?
UT FA, L4- ' 5
ow 4.s.cz 0.14-7.:.yFEAM)
CAPACITY = 1.5 M&P
1
0 ? 1?Ji
200 CPD8's IIJ>S
4-E-8
i

? J 1
( 1
'TREES
]1 ?
i

V-V?l
r

FAS
1 \,
1
1
Leo
i 1 ? 777.16
Ji
7i
T I . o 0 34 r?+
Ce
?,,' .?1 776.7

s?
TREES

WcfL

1 4-E-9
MILLS CORPORATION
h;
--
760, 1-
\ ,: ; ' r \ t
i rot \ , c
18
ooo
90
i r/l
it \
I
f? t
10
tot

Exhibits
11
I

1

1
Y
•? Pun.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor March 25. 1992 George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
Greensboro News and Record
Post Office Box 20848
Greensboro, North Carolina 27420
ATTN: Legal Ad Department
Dear Sir:
SUBJECT: Public Notice
Please publish the attached Public Notice one time in the
section set aside for Legal Advertisements in your newspaper.
The publication should run on or before March 31, 1992. Please
send the invoice for publication and three copies of the
affidavit of publication to the address given below. Payment
cannot be processed without the affidavit of publication.
N.C. Division of Environmental Management
Water. Quality Section
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Attn: John Dorney
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please
call me at 919/733-1786.
Sincerely,
tt ve Tedder, Chi
ater Quality Sec ion
4
JRD/kls
PubNot.ltr/Vol.2
cc: John Dorney REGIONAL OFFICES
Steve Mauney, WSRO
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/733 -23 14 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007
Pollution Prevention PaNs
11.0. Rox 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
It
*IP NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

PUBLIC NOTICE is hereby given that the Cornwallis Development
Company near Greensboro, North Carolina, has applied to the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management for a Water Quality
certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water
Act and Environmental Management Commission rules in 15A NCAC 2H
.0500 and 15A NCAC 2B .0109. The activity for which the
certification is sought to fill about 1.5 acres of wetlands and
stream channels for road and utility crossings on Lake Jeanette
in Guilford County.
The public is invited to comment on the above mentioned
application to the Division of Environmental Management.
Comments shall be in writing and shall be received by the
Division no later than April 17, 1992. Comments should be sent
to N.C. Division of Environmental Management, Water Quality
Planning, Post Office Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-
0535, Attention: John Dorney. A copy of the application is on
file at the Division office at 8025 N. Point Boulevard, Suite
100, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Winston-Salem Regional Office
[phone] during normal business hours and may be inspected
by the public.
- NV-0
G orge T. Everett Director
North Carolina Di ision of
Environmental Ma agement
DATE: March 25, 1992
IIC

IMPORTANT
T
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
. C` i A ,
- J
ne ??ll=h ? ? S?? ?
AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
i
Message
Signed
N.C. Dept. of Environment. Health, and Natural Resources
y
02,
133 Printed on Recycled Paper
MEMO -?
DA
C ??. _ n ? 2p 1992 ro ?, n
TO: SUBJECT: ""^?
.QkjP-
Vo
1
Q?S
cal f a---
U 4 o
1 ?. ? ? rte.
0
I
From:
?? M,n? to Inn,
North Carolina De art edit of E ironment,
Health and Natural Resources
Printed on Recycled Paper
•? wnn, vd
4. . 0
of the cover letter from DEM.
Non-compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set
forth by a specific fill project shall result in revocation of
this Certification for the project.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management may require submission of a formal application for
individual certification for any project in this category of
activity, if it is determined that the project is likely to have
a significant adverse effect upon water quality or degrade the
waters so that existing uses of the wetland or downstream waters
are precluded.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or
group of applications prior to a Certification decision if deemed
in the public's best interest by the Director of the North Caro-
lina Division of Environmental Management.
This is the 21st day of January, 1992
DIVISION Off' VNVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
By /
Gebrge T . LE,(ierett, Director
gencert.26
jrd/gc
WQC# 2671
R . r
GENERAL CERTIFICATION FOR PROJECTS ELIGIBLE
FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERS NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBER 26 (HEADWATERS
AND ISOLATED WETLANDS)
This General Certification is issued in conformity with the
requirements of Section 401, Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the
United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Envi-
ronmental Management Regulations in 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500
and 15A NCAC 2B .0109 and .0201 for the discharge of fill mate-
rial to navigable waters and adjacent wetland areas which are
above the headwaters or to wetland areas that are not a part of
the surface tributary system to interstate waters or navigable
waters of the United States (i.e., isolated wetlands) as
described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (26) of the Corps of Engi-
neers regulations (i.e., Nationwide Permit No. 26).The category
of activities shall include any fill activity in these headwaters
and isolated wetland and water areas where the activity does not
result in the loss or substantial modification of 10 acres or
more of waters of the United States, including wetlands. This
Certification replaces Water Quality Certification Number 2176
issued on November 5, 1987.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified
category of activity will not violate Sections 301, 302, 303, 306
and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 if conducted in
accordance with the conditions hereinafter set forth.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Proposed fill or substantial modification of greater than
one-third of an acre of such waters, including wetlands,
requires a written concurrence from the Division of Envi-
ronmental Management.
2. Proposed fill or substantial modification of equal to or
less than one-third of an acre of such waters, including
wetlands, does not require written concurrence from the
Division of Environmental Management.
3. Proposed fill of greater than one acre in SA, trout,
HQW, ORW, WS-I and WS-II watersheds requires public
notice and an individual 401 Certification from the Divi-
sion of Environmental Management;
4. That established sediment and erosion control practices
are utilized to prevent violations of the appropriate
turbidity water quality standard (50 NTUs in streams and
rivers not designated as trout waters by DEM; 25 NTUs in
all saltwater classes, and all lakes and reservoirs; 10
NTUs in trout waters);
5. That additional site-specific conditions may be added to
projects with greater than one-third of an acre impact
which are proposed under this Certification in order to
ensure compliance with all applicable water quality and
effluent standards;
6. Concurrence from DEM this Certification applies to an
individual project shall expire three years from the date
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MA]
March 4, 1992
MEMORANDUM
TO: George Everett
FROM: John Dorne?? "t-r'
RE: Lake Jeanette Project, Phase II
Guilford County
MAR 6 1992
"WATER Q1_1 `'!...i
S i '0 1
You may recall the controversial 401 Certification which we
issued for 0.9 acres of wetland impact (Nationwide 26) for a road
crossing near Lake Jeanette in Greensboro last June. We had to
do a public notice then because our General Certification for
Nationwide 26 required notice in water supply watersheds.
The project applicants have now come in with a submittal for
NW 12 (sewer lines) and NW 14 (road crossings) for about one acre
of fill in wetlands and water (stream channels). By our new
General Certification, no public notice is required but the
applicants need our written concurrence. From our files, we
promised the local citizens and Senator Martin that we would 1)
require stormwater treatment to protect Lake Jeanette and 2)
individual certifications (i.e., public notice) for all future
fills.
I met with the applicants on February 21, 1992 to discuss
the project. Stormwater controls are no problem and I will work
with them. They expressed resigned acceptance about the public
notice concept but asked that I discuss the matter with you
before acting since (technically) public notice is not required.
Unless I hear otherwise, I will put the project out to public
notice next week.
JD/kls
Everett.mem/Vol.2wp
cc: Steve Tedder
Debbie Crane
Central Files
r OM"?!. tl
?? wC-

1--?9

-1 -Wavyr

fy J
? a•. .. K
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 4, 1992
MEMORANDUM
TO: George Everett
FROM: John Dorn q?"
RE: Lake Jeanette Project, Phase II
Guilford County
You may recall the controversial 401 Certification which we
issued for 0.9 acres of wetland impact (Nationwide 26) for a road
crossing near Lake Jeanette in Greensboro last June. We had to
do a public notice then because our General Certification for
Nationwide 26 required notice in water supply watersheds.
The project applicants have now come in with a submittal for
NW 12 (sewer lines) and NW 14 (road crossings) for about one acre
of fill in wetlands and water (stream channels). By our new
General Certification, no public notice is required but the
applicants need our written concurrence. From our files, we
promised the local citizens and Senator Martin that we would 1)
require stormwater treatment to protect Lake Jeanette and 2)
individual certifications (i.e., public notice) for all future
fills.
I met with the applicants on February 21, 1992 to discuss
the project. Stormwater controls are no problem and I will work
with them. They expressed resigned acceptance about the public
notice concept but asked that I discuss the matter with you
before acting since (technically) public notice is not required.
Unless I hear otherwise, I will put the project out to public
notice next week.
JD/kls
Everett.mem/Vol.2wp
cc: Steve Tedder
Debbie Crane
Central Files

MECKLENBURG COUNTY
Park and Recreation Department
November 3, 199-1
Mr. C. Wayne Wr-;(:Cnt
Crier, Regulatory Branch
Depar. -ment of -ahe Army Corps
of Engineers
..v. Box !890
Wil:niny--on, N. C. ?8402-1890
:.tear Mr. Wright:
21992
ADS GRDR.___-
IALITY SECTION
Attac:^.ec are compie.r.ec plans as per comments and revisions
recommenaea from -nose attenaing the site inspection on September
1>92 of McMullen :reek Greenway. The field inspection was
attended by Mr. Steven Luna from the Army Corps of Engineers, and
Ronnie Roberts and Ron Jones of our depar-.ment.
The -ollowing are comments in response to your letter dated
September 28, !992.
A. The greenway property is located within the floodpiain of
Mcfuiien :;reel: which limits the ability to locate the trail in
areas omner =han =loodplain land. A min=um dis Vance of 20' - 25'
ro,m -adjacent property lines was observed to provide a buffer -o
.hose property owners. Both the wetland and creek areas as well as
zhe ad; acent owners were the primar-I cons ideration in the placement
o: the proposed .rail.
L. evised detail drawings illustrate the use of retaining walls
and be arrwai :s r..hat were recommended during the September 2nd site
insper_Tion by Mr. Steve Lund.
There were no other :mitigation measures recommended other =han
-::ose orated at the aforementioned site inspection. Mitigation
:measures are addressed through the use of boardwalks and retaining
walls as noted on the plans.
D. Evers ef-or- has been made through the use of appropriate
drainage structures and trail elevations to insure that adjacent
properties will nom be negatively impacted by flooding with the
t:-nstrzcmion or this greenway trail.
00 N. Tryon Street - Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 - [phone] - FAX [phone]
- fr"
FILE: 10156
A:MCMULLEN
D:LABS 92
All services are available without regard to origin, sex. or disability

Page Two
I4r. C. Wayne Wright
November 4, 1992
_hank you for your attention to this matter and we ? ook forward to
:zear::r:; prom -you in The near futare. I you Nave any further
quez-.ions regarding -.his project. please do not hesitate to contact
„ohn Labs 3t 1 704) 336-3854.
c rely
Wa •n ie WeC.
-on
6
y

Copy T^?: John R. Dorney, Engineer
Robert Davis, =ivil Engineer, Engineering Deparz*nent
john ?:. gabs, Division of Planning
at:.achment
.
r
` DEPARIT= OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Action ID: 199203200
PUBLIC NOTICE
September 17,1992
R. WAYNE WESTON, DIRECTOR, MEECKLIMURG COUNTY PARK AND RECREATION
DEPARIMB4T, 700 NORTH TRYON STREET, CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28202, has
applied for a Department of the Army permit TO PLACE FILL MATERIAL IN WETLANDS
ADJACENT TO MCMULLEN CREEK TO FACILITATE CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE II OF THE
MCMULLEN CREEK GREENWAY TRAIL BETWEEN THE TIFTON DRIVE ACCESS AND THE
CHARLOTTE OUTER LOOP AT cHARLO TE, MECKLE NBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the
applicant and from observations made during an onsite visit by a
representative of the Corps of Engineers. Plans submitted with the
application show the proposed construction of approximately 6300 linear feet
of 16-foot wide (bottom width) gravel surface trail extending south from the
end of the existing trail to the right-of-way of the Charlotte Outer Loop
Highway. The proposed trail alignment is largely on forested uplands. Along
approximately 1250 feet of its length, however, the trail would encroach
approximately 5 to 8 feet into the upper edge of forested wetlands vegetated
with green ash, boxelder, sweet gum and red maple. An additional 300 feet of
trail would cross wetlands at two separate locations. These areas are between
stations 41+00 and 42+00 where it crosses a small perennial tributary stream
and near station 49+00 where the trail reaches its closest point to McMullen
Creek. The trail would also cross approximately 12 intermittent tributaries
or ditches all of which would be culverted. Additional drainage structures
are planned where there are no defined channels. The applicant has proposed
constructing approximately 150 feet of elevated boardwalk as well as 490 feet
of retaining wall to minimize encroachment into the most sensitive wetland
areas. Approximately 500 cubic of earthen fill material and gravel
5 acres of wetland to extend this
would be placed into approximatel r
burg County's 1980 Greenway Master
greenway trail which is part of M en
Plan. The purpose of the proposed work is to provide public recreation
benefits and link several residential subdivisions with shopping areas along
NC Highway 51 to the north and a planned sports facility at the McAlpine
Wastewater Treatment Plant to the south. The centerline of the proposed trail
has been surveyed, cut and flagged to facilitate field review. Plans showing
the proposed work are included with this public notice.
The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine
the need for the applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No
Department of the Army permit will be issued until the coordinated State
viewpoint on the proposal has been received and reviewed by this agency,
norwill a Department of the Army permit be issued until the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management has determined the applicability of a
Water Quality Certificate as required by PL 92-500.

-2 -
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404(b) of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within
the comment period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to
consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the
National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered
properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, and
this worksite is not registered property or property listed as being eligible
for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register
constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District
Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources.
Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical
data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit.
The District Engineer has determined, based on a review of data furnished
by the applicant and onsite observations, that the activity will not affect
species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened
pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of
the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity
and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable
impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a
careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular
case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The
decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which
it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the
general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern
for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which
may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative
effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general
environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values,
flood hazards, flood plain values, land use, navigation, shore erosion and
accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy
needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of
property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people.
For activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in
waters of the United States, a permit will be denied if the discharge that
would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental
Protection Agencies' 404(b)(1) guidelines.
Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or
criteria, a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer determines
that it would be contrary to the public interest.
-3-
Generally, the decision whether to issue this Department of the Army
permit will not be made until the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management (DEM) issues, denies, or waives state certification required by
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The DFM considers whether or not the
proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the
Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the Department of
the Army permit serves as application to the DEM for certification.
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be
reviewed at the offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Salisbury Street, Archdale
Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will be furnished
to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
The North Carolina Division of Environmental Management plans to take
final action in the issuance of the Clean Water Act certification on or after
October 9, 1992.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean
Water Act certification should do so in writing delivered to the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Post Office Box 27687, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27611-7687, on or before October 5, 1992, Attention: Mr. John
Dorney.
Written conmwents pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will
be received in this office, Attention: Mr. Steven Lund, until 4:15 p.m.,
October 19, 1992, or telephone [phone].

- O`T
jr?, ?49
> ?l
% E?
NC HWY. 51 HPINEVILLE RD
U
MATTHEWS
- PWTING STOQKPLE OF 4ak
( /) o
1 ?? G to
a ?/ G?ap?pP
NORTH

MECKLENBURG COUNTY PARK AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
PHASE II MCMULLWAY
SHEET SEPTEMBER 992 2 of 14
I
?. §3
1L1,
I
7
I L LL
N
w d
Y
3
j
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
t
?I
?I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i

R
W
z.
'IT
0
Q M
0)
Z
O1
c U
iR W
V Q
w Y
W
U ?
w Z H
Q Y O ??
U
O
v rn
rid x
u O
U
RI
v b
b u
0?4 71
N
+?
N p
? b
? N
? O
vN1 ?
N p
h
N
?N 0Op
N
I

I OS'LCS
?
o Sz'lES
oo'LES
ce'LEs
09'EE9
OE'ZES !
zo'EEs
R
09'EES =
orces
oo cc9

09 acs 9
0?•zc9
g
T? 1? I I - - -
LOWS 1
ES'LES
$
66'ocs

1
? S?'OES
o
z6 ezs e
OL'M
a
I ? d` .1 l T .? I I
6s'oes
v
9?'lES
S
LE'zes
6?'zES
S
69,110 s
6Z'lES
ocorg
91.OES
R
IFIDES
Q n ?
I

99
`V
/
/
4
I

;H
J
L
0
L
?d
?u
1 J?
7J $s
?b OF
b°
ss
H
J
TO r
R
x
I?
0
?M s
?i
n5 ?
W
3
3

F
?W
a
?F

W
W v
w
a a
r
W g3
U
U
Z
w ¢ 2 W
W m
D(/?w
Q Y Jg W`
? (L
0
N 6?
U) O
R
? II
b
?i
N p
N of
h N
h m
h
h
?
Y Oi 'O
l ? Y1
? ^
i(f m
' V01
Eo QCs
S
OS'l ES
o a9?cs
R
e91cs
0
e?,a£s

19'a£s
P I d ' to'cC91

X
X 8
OL'EfS n
ecAres
a ties ^„

W I i? !Cf
A
I
? 00'?C9

R
_
(
i aS•e «
ae•ces
0
•
OL'YCS
0
ac ties
g
So'?es a
9r£ES
? o
S9'£CS °
Q its ?jU
_I
'
p EES
LS

I 09 CCS 2
17 e9'aEs

R
OO ECS I!

OE'aES
0

1
I oe'Ies _
J L - 09'les
a
a
saICS w
?
? oa'?es
+
„
100
N
1441

h

N

N oo

„
a

i.\,?
5
to
o
o?
He
a
? r
i
I
Y
h
O
f
N
tp
h
h
h
° I
N
Y
?
O
vN

i
O
?

I
I
N
h
m l
O
r9'IC9

r
? . u•M OE'LCS
??
4-1
0 I
S
Q Ln ce zcs g
-P
Z ? v
W 9E ecs
a: ? N P 1 1 1 1 1 1
x r -i 8

Y
w
g? ?

U ? ? o rE•ECs

z L)
W = ? z W 1Lus
7 W o
J G
W 9 ? cz•?e9
? I
? n
? ? ? 'o
s

-
0
3
c
cs
N

E N Mots
J
t
/
-
ff
1 ?
O

0) 6? I

o a
0 I
0
0 rraa9
4

H
04
..
..
?.l OOQ?I W •
n
y
"
\
1
mb oa•La9
r
u
b
a9•LL9,
I m
-
a
G ` I 9L'LZS

J? OE'LZS c
'
v? I

u
co•9as

? c?•ezs «I
oz ezs

od g OZ'9ZS °w

Y

i
v oalecs
S
? oz?ozs „
..,.. - N. vom. w > >

11 MOLL" wroocu
I

E

- I

°o
I
y? i?•9Es
/ J v' S
? SC'8aS «
/ o. I

ce Gas
?;
/ w I o
•
9/ N S 09-ors x
N

colc9

• N A N h " ? Sy
I
V
PIP
S?
?kg
C?
N W
•

Y-f O

h O

N N

? e

h N
h
O
h
©
N
N
N
O
YO1
i
i
a

? ?r0?9

?r9t9
i ?

Or9C9 '

l?'?C9
? ?

Mcs

96'OC9
}}
a•u9 i

X o

O _
N
ro
u

9

d

C F W

L9'ots

o
sGus
crud
I
0?Yi9
R
sa•oa4 ;,

i m
u
W I OCUS
^ I S

l 9C'OCS J,
?Z'?C9
x
8
99'?CS
09'dC9

+
h
h
Yf
C
IS
N
N T1
U/
LL? o`
? L
H
?? 1N
z
4ftN
$
,?. NIYIq 7x17 'YM+ S
Na1Y7p, waww
1
a? a u \ ` H
?LL \
(low
1
11
1
f y,+p,w?+ +ow10""
SS3?9V 3AIIq PIOAIWJ M?
1
r-?
4-4
rH ? ?
-j c
W Q N
j
w g?
Z?
W_oz?
Jw(0
JJ= m?i
Q w ~
Q3:
?a
O
v rn
co
a
v 0
? II

8

8

b
R

LL
9 JS

.4 .
? H
??
R
hn ?

J J

's
w
• i ?O ?
N ?
N j N
N I N
N N 1
N N
N I ?,
• YI O,
f N

99•sxs
ca's zs
Ll'9ZS
xr•9Ls
c9.9xs
ze9xs
r9'9LS '
u'axs
O L9'SLS
SAWS

ta'Si9
09'499
L0'999
w'9zs ',
a'6ZS

I L6'6ZS
`II

? 06 OCS
I I
69 W;
r ?' 9o zcs
? I
ec•ces
Wx64
I e9'les
1 1 1 1 ? N I
so•?e9
cxross
o I 9r e9s
OL'9x9
I Le'L9S
fi 1
iii n P in
a
l?
1,

Ci
W
3

Np
r 0
?H
J+
:d
w
J_I
W
X14 y H /
i+
i
my
y
11
r1
4-4
O
}
Q o0
.r? W W
W N
Q a
Y ?
w g?
• w=QZa
?w
R.
D 1 iF
1 cD(nwp?
J

` Q X
W
3 ` /
G a.

I

o
d/
? 01
ra >(
U C
U) S
G
x ro a
v
K
U) d r
q

w
3
P•
I ?
? S W
Yp°yz ??
Ytl
R
ht
h-?

M
I'
V
1
I
?'
h
N
h
N.
h
ry
1!1

N
rJ ?l
h ,(1
lo'SZS ri
H I I H I M
9l'SZS
ie•szs
9r•szs
o9•szs
SL'SZS
R
oe•SZS
ee•szs
S
Se•szs
le•szs
LOWS
s'9Z9
e
eL'9Z9

? ?L'9ZS
S
L'9 ZS
SC'9ZS
9o Lz9
z9•LZS
oe•ezs
s9 czs
?S
ee czsT
e9'9ZS
Zr'9ZS
8'SZS
lS'SZS
9L'SZ9
i
O'9 ZS
9Z'9ZS
OS'9Z5
?Y
1!j +O
? O
YNI N
h O
N {?y
N O
N
h N
h ?
Yf
I '
r-?
4-1
1 f } O
?._
j W
A ' y
1 Y Y<
w g?
Q
? z
Q
w
=?Ww>
I g w
CC (n Wi o 44
r ? C Q Y J W
\\ ! ?d u
1
s_
0
l4
a
s 00
91
v
U
ooat?
W i (?)
N ib
M ?H
qq S?
8 ?
R

? ? I YOY
N p
„ N
2 0D
N ' ? ?
N ? O
h i ip i 'CJ ,D
. h Y7
LS'?ZS
9!'.Lfl
?E'SLS '
A
fle•9zs
E9•LZfl
LS CLS
r0'LZS
lfl'9LS ',
l0 Yta
3'Y a ;
' OWNS
WON ;
9ti•9zs
eo•azs

- ui' LS'SL
, ? ?o?sas

1
4
? cs•rzs

?
m ez•?zs
?e•?zS
9
9S'?LS
9a'YZS
LL'?Lfl
l9'/L9
90'sas
lt'szs
9E'SL9
' as

rdfl
OLD ?pNMENT
It&
b

's
o ?
p3

tr I
.
?

1
0
541
v p1
?H
.9?
1
?H
Y
4
3
d'
4-4
O
Q O
W ?ai
D:
r
w IL
R ?g
U_
Z U
W = ¢ z
jW
c m H w
J O V w
G Q W '
Y M
? a-
¦
I
I
Ili
s II
Ih
\ N ,
8 I
R ,
1 8
' C
1
W
f WW
m ?
ya 3
H
a
3
8
h
1
W
3
I ? p ?p N
' m ? ? i O C N ?
?
N Y?f U) 1
?
Hf h N ? N N ?
?
I SO'9LS
I L?'S Z9
R
oe'?zs

t f'e'tes
o
ss•ses
OZ'9zS
g
SL'9es
I
o ?s'LZs
u $
L9'LZS S
COWS

99'9L9
10'949
R
te•CZ9
ZB'tzS
m

OL•?ZS
90'9Zs
x ?
? !-'ss szs $
L?'9Zs
?
?
i 9L'LLS
i
~ I^„
_
C6'LLS?
I'
?
ee cis'„
96`9as
C6'9zs
SOWS
i

I
I
I _ 9z'9eS
a I o?•9Zs ;

m N'9Z9
0 l l A I
1e szs

In N
m 10
14
N n .n of
O
x
O
N
a
a
u
Ol
r-1
ro
U
v
u
0
b
[Y.

3Aiua 3HVl ypydyy
IT
n
I I
II
II
II
II
II
, I I
II
1 '
I
I
1 I
I
I
W
U
Y
I
to
I

r-l
W
0
z u
LU < m
W oUc
W¢ • N
Q V
w g
z
? LLJ
Q i
Y O W`
2a
a
rn
x
c
G
G
2
II
r-
a
a
c;
U.
2
Q
L
2
a
f
off ? ?
h 17
YI N I
YI N
1 Yl N I
Vf ?
N N
,!f ?
Jf
I I I I I II U ll l 1 11 11 1 1 11 ' --

H i l l H il l I II I II I

I HI 1 1 ,1 11 H 1 , 11 11 A

9C'6Es
e
9Z'9ES 0
a•cc9
u
11 1 11 J r*m
R
h sL'CCS ?
L9'LC9
S
ev?ES ?
LE•oes 44
7
S?'6ds
SB'9zs
?a Sts Q
E9'Lds
? . g
Zo•LES
??'9Zs
_ _ ? 99'Sds
9a•sas
0
u•?as

LL

9. e•saa

R
LL'9d9
96'9L9

In)
JW4 a

r
l?? \

4-4

N
<
O
i
f
ac w
M

w g
m

Z ~

w
2 H
=
? 4 V
8 S
i Q J
Y ? w
Uy yy
M CL 3USi

U300V 3AIN0 3XVI UOMNM"1

S
? o
rn

O

a
a

\ ?
?° r-I
\

w \ U

\ U
d y?
N9
JH ,?
? v
N? 9
iH ? • Y
0
Y
C J
y
? n
J ]31J
i

f O t0
1 1 N m f ? ? p ^ ?y m l

1A 1'f
h w
h N
0 N
h N
h
?
N O
N
9s ezs
R
SOW
09'084

Sl'SLS
61'989
8
z?'9zs
W

L- j
88'9ZS
40'889
le'LLS

66'984 i
64'oCS
R
49'OC4 =
LS'OC4

bz o¢s
WKS

u'ezs

i se•ezs
oo'ezs
y
09'889
S
ZL'BLS
u'ezs
o R
W o4'8L4
cs'9Ls
J
3 s
h 9Z'L84 =

1 ) 1
90'989
Q
44'984 s
MRS

? LL'984 Z
h {f(// ryp N ?

N
N
?
?

y?

y?

M
l N3 ?a
N
I
•r
O WIN
6
LO ? s,.
O?
IOWP
N
.Z
u
x x
Y
J J
a z
b
J
w
U=
0

<g
: R
i

11 o u

l l
A
A _.p
?I
I
I
L ?
?R
? J
a
w ?a-
w
cr- w
o
_g M
di
Q Y ? N
? CL m

b
3
N
ypr? n
1
u?
ZS
J
i
Aulmnoo -was"
t?
?tY
?a
N
I
I

V7
Q
3
y Cr
"40,
s ?
4J
X
U
?I
17-I
ro
u
v
ro
U
!J1

J

i tj r r
b? o
r
?

MEMORANDUM INITIALS:
Reviewer
TO: ohn Dorney WQ Sup,
Planning Branch Date: 25jE
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
***EACH ITEM MUST BE ANSWERED (N/A-NOT APPLICABLE)***
PERMIT_YR: 92 PERMIT-NO: 0000527 COUNTY: MECKLENBURG
APPLICANT NAME: MCMULLEN CK GREENWAY TRAIL PHASE II
PROJECT-TYPE: GREENWAY TRAIL PERMIT-TYPE: IND
COE_#: 199203200 DOT-#:
RCD_FROM _CDA: COE DATE _FRM_CDA: 09/17/92
REG_OFFICE: MRO RIVER-AND-SUB-BASIN-#: C-q, 6Y-v8'-3 t/
STREAM CLASS: G
STR_INDEX_NO: 11,137-7-5
WL_IMPACT? : PN WL_TYPE:/rf J?dltaex ddX" /A o LiR14(mca
WL_REQUESTED: d 35 WL_ACR_EST?:8/N
HYDRO_CNECT?: ®/N WL_SCORE(#): 37.,-
MITIGATION?: Yf MITIGATION_TYPE : /,)/fl
MITI GATION_SIZE:fyA
IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED?: ON
RECOMMENDATION (Circle One): ISSUE ISSUE/COND ENY
COMMENTS: L?-f?'ll:,._ ?, t'%ri(.(tl '.n ?fcl?A,. r?G'C.,c.a?tc*,-t
Yu (U lUc,?-lt.-? ?ltibt/n0?? !!(IC?- wr?? / lC
rrj eea_ ?1CGU-a . ? c? i?

el fee

?r? ? ra-rvlctg?

cc: Regional Office
Central Files
®r 2 9 IW
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO September 28, 1992
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199203200
Mr. R. Wayne Weston, Director
Mecklenburg County Park
and Recreation Department
700 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Dear Mr. Weston:
S: October 19, 1992
t L.
f
VJ!?ii Ai!!1'> t?R(I''?
Reference your application for Department of the Army (DA) authorization
to clear, grade and place fill material into wetlands adjacent to McMullen
Creek to facilitate construction of a greenway trail between Tifton Road and
the Charlotte Outer Loop south of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina.
On February 6, 1990, the DA and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) signed a memorandum of agreement (MOA) establishing procedures to
determine the type and level of mitigation necessary to comply with the Clean
Water Act Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. This MCA provides for first, avoiding
impacts to waters and wetlands through the selection of the least damaging,
practical alternative; second, taking appropriate and practical steps to
minimize impacts on waters and wetlands; and finally, compensating for any
remaining unavoidable impacts to the extent appropriate and practical. To
enable us to process your application in full compliance with this MOA, we
request that you provide the following additional information:
a. Permits for work within wetlands or other special aquatic sites are
available only if the proposed work is the least environmentally damaging,
practicable alternative. Please furnish information regarding any other
alternatives, including upland alternatives, to the work for which you have
applied and provide justification that your selected plan is the least
damaging to water or wetland areas. In particular, please address the
practicality of shifting the trail alignment landward to avoid impacting
wetland areas.
b. It is necessary for you to have taken all appropriate and practical
steps to minimize wetland losses. Please indicate all that you have done,
especially regarding development and modification of plans and proposed
construction techniques, to minimize adverse impacts. In particular, please
design alternatives such as the use of elevated boardwalks or floating mats
that would not require earthen fill.
4 • .•
-2-
c. The MOA requires that appropriate and practical mitigation will be
required for all unavoidable adverse impacts remaining after all appropriate
and practical minimization has been employed. Please indicate your plan to
mitigate for the projected, unavoidable loss of waters or wetlands or provide
information as to the absence of any such appropriate and practical measures.
d. Because the project is located within the floodplain of McMullen
Creek, please provide any information you have on the potential effects of
the proposed trail to increase flooding of adjacent residential areas.
This information is essential to our expeditious processing of your
application and it should be forwarded to us by October 19, 1992. Also, a
copy of this information must be sent to the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management to enable them to adequately evaluate your
application for a Water Quality Certification pursuant to Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act.
If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Steven Lund,
Regulatory Branch, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Copies Furnished:
Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency - Region IV
Wetlands Regulatory Unit
345 Courtland Street, NE.
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGIN
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO September 23 , 1992
Regulatory Branch
Action ID 199203200
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Dorney:
LS lU1 U LC;.
5 i?9Z
-, I --
`
G?;
Enclosed is the application of R. Wayne Weston, Director, Mecklenburg
County Park and Recreation Department, for Department of the Army
authorization aril a State Water Quality Certification to place fill materials
in wetlands adjacent to McMullen Creek to facilitate construction of Phase II
of the McMullen Creek Greenway between the Tifton Drive Access and the
Charlotte Outer Loop Highway at Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid request for
certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii.) of our administrative
regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section
404 of the Clears Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality
certification may be required under the provfsioris of Section 401 of the same
law. A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the
certification has bean obtained or waived.
In accordance with our administrative regulations, 60 days after receipt
of a request for certification is a reasonable time for State action.
Therefore, if you have not acted on the request by November 23, 1992, the
District Engineer will deem that: waiver has occurred.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Steven Lund, telephone (704)
259-0857.
Sincerely,
mic, e Wr ig
Regulatory Branch
Enclosure

-2-
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
r1?
MECKLENBURG COUNTY ft'tCH VED
Park and Recreation Department
it l_V 1 <) IM.
FILE: 8731-A
A:LUND REGULAWRY BRANCH
D:JONES. 1
September 3, 1992
Mr. Steven Lund, Biologist
Army Corp of Engineers
Room 75
Grove Arcade Building
37 Battery Park Avenue
Ashville, North Carolina 28801-2714
Dear Mr. Lund:
Attached are drawings for the second phase construction of McMullen Creek
Greenway. The construction of this portion of the greenway will extend a
pit gravel trail from its present terminus at Tifton Road to the proposed
right-of-way of the Outer Belt. Included within its length is one hundred
and fifty feet (150) of boardwalk and two sections of retaining walls
designed to lessen the impact on several of wetland areas (see attached
drawings). The trail is part of the 1980 Greenway Master Plan and
includes Lower McAlpine Greenway which will run north to NC Hwy. 51 from
the confluence of McMullen and McAlpine Creeks. Both greenways will serve
a number of residential subdivisions.
The first phase of McMullen Creek Greenway is heavily used by adjacent
residents and they are anxiously waiting completion of the second phase.
The trail will connect more residents with easy access to McMullen Creek
Shopping Center opposite the Hwy. 51 entrance, and will also provide
future connection to the proposed McAlpine Sports Facility at McAlpine
Treatment Plant.
As I have mentioned, this project is funded with bonds which must be spent
in the near future; your efforts to expedite the review process will be
appreciated.
Sincerel ,
Ron Jones
Park Planner
cc: R. Wayne Weston, Director
Nancy M. Brunnemer, Chief - Division of Planning Services
700 N. Trvon Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 [phone] FAX [phone]

APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-000
(33 CFR 325) Explrss 30 Sepfomb•r 1992
Pu tie reporting burden far thin coneeton of Information is estimated to average 6 hours per response br five nsforfly d caws. Including to time br reviewing fnetucsone,
waelninp arils W+g data eourees, pafsrtng and melntaNrq is dsla reede4 0-4 completing rind reviewing he coaectlan of Inlormefon. Applicatiorn for Wow at more complex
pro(eci s, a fovea M eerobgkatiy sensitive areas. could take up to 600 hours Sand oonments regarding fie burden estimate or any other aspeel of this -nevi on of tnbrmatlon,
including suggestions for reducing hie burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operation and Reports 1216 Jefferson
Davis H9fway, Sulte 1201, Ar1n9W% VA 1: '14302; and b l e Offbe of Mtanagrnenl and Budget. Paperwork Raductlon Project (0710-0003L Washington, DC 20600. Please DC
NOT RETU W your completed form to ~ at twee addresses. Send your ccmpfeud lomt to: Depart+nrnt o (Defense, U.S. Miry caps of Engineers. Aft- CECW-OR, 20 Mau.
Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20314- 1000.
The Department of the Army permd program is authorized by Section 10 of the Rivera and Harbors Act of 1899. Section 404 of the Clears Water Act and
Section 103 of the Marine, Prolection, Research and Sanctuaries Ad. These taws require permits authorizing activities in or affecting navigable waters of the
United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping 0
into ocean waters. Infonnation provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit, Information in this application is made a matter of
public record through issuance of a public notice. Disclosure of the information requested is voluntary, howevef, the data requested are necessary in order to
cominunicate with the applicant and to evaluate the pemwl application. If necessary information is not provided, the permit application cannot be processed nor
can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproduable copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application
(see sample drawings and Instructions) and be subnhitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An applicatK
thal is not completed in full will to returned.
.. L

1. APPLICATION NUMBER (7o be assigned by Copt) f3
3. NAME, A SS. ANO THE of AUTHORIZED AGENT
Ronal . Roberts
McDowell Park "' ' i'?•d'
15222 York Road
C
telep haaentotiurin9liurnesL2g2 RMUTAIURY "AKV

2. NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLr,ANT
R. Wayne Weston, Director A/C ( ) (Residence)
A/c(704) 588-5224 (office)
Park b Recreation Dept.
Mecklenbur
Count
g
y
700 N. Tryon Street Statement of Authorization: I hereby designate and authorize Ronald P.
Charlotte, NC 28202 -Roberts to act in my
Telephone no. during business hers behalf as my agent In the processing of this permit application and to
furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of the application.
A/C ( ) (Residency) SIG OF APPLICANT DATE
Atc ( 704) 336-3854 (Office) M
7- ?9r:
1 4. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY It
Ia. ACTTVITY
Mecklenburg County Park 6 Recreation desires to develop the second phase of McMullen
Creek Greenway which will extend a pit gravel trail along McMullen Creek from its present
terminus at Tifton Road to the, right-of-way of the proposed Outer Belt (see attached
drawings). The majority of the second phase trail is located below the 10 year flood
elevation and menaders through a number of wetland areas.
Alb. PURPOSE
The trail will provide area residents with access to the natural environment adjacent to
McMullen Creek and.will also link several residential subdivisions with McMullen Creek
Shopping Center at NC Hwy. 51 and the proposed McAlpine Sports Facility at McAlpine
Treatment Plant. The County wishes to utilize the standard 10' pit gravel trail through
the wetland areas to avoid the considerable length of boardwalk which would normally
be required, and which would make the project cost prohibited.
Ic. Dt$CHAAGE OF DREDGED OR FU MATERIAL
With construction of the second phase trail Park and Recreation will discharge 1,078.64
cu. yds. of fill material into the wetland areas. This material will be in the form of a
layer of Marafi 500x or equal fabric along with an 8" layer of ABC stone and a 4" layer o1
pit gravel for the trail and fill dirt for the shoulders on either side of the trail.
Drainage pipes of various sizes with flared end sections will be incorporated at
appropriate locations.
ENG FORM 4345, Jan 91 EanoN OF APA 6° is OBsoii-E E (Proponent: CECW-0N)
S. NAAIES AND ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS, LESSEES. flTC.. WHOSE PROPERTY ALSO ADJOINS THE WATERWAY
(See attached list.)
6. WATER800Y AND LOCATION ON WATERBOOY WHERE ACTiVM DUSTS OR IS PROPOSED
McMullen Creek between Tifton Road and the right-of-way of the proposed Outer Belt
(see attached map).
7.' LOCATION ON LAND WHERE ACTIVITY DUSTS OR IS PROPOSED
ADDRESS:
STREET, ROAD, ROUTE OR OTHER DESCRIPTIVE LOCATION
Mecklenburg County NC 28203
COUNTY STATE ZIP CODE
Mecklenburg County
LOCAL GOVERNING BODY WITH JURISDICTION OVERSfTE
6. Is any portion of the acllvity for which aulhoh ation is sought now complete? ? YES R' NO
II answer is 'yes' give reasons, month and yaw the activity was completed Indicate the adaling work on the drawings.
9. LW as approvais of certifications and denials tece)ved from otter ledetat inlerstale, stale of local agencies la any Structures, constructiom discharges of other
activities described in this application.
ISSUING AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL IDENTIFICATION NO. DATE OF APPLICATION DATE OF APPROVAL DATE OF DENIAL
10. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the activities described herein. I certify that 1 am laminar with the Information contained in the
application, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief such Information is true, complete, and aaurate. 1 further certify that I possess the authority to
undertake the proposed activities or 1 am ecling N the duty authorized agent of the applicant.

S NATURE DF ICAW DATE SIGNA OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed acliviy (applicant) or It may be signed by a duly
authorized agent it the statement in block 3 has been filled oil and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that Who", in any manner within the j xisdwtion of any department or agency of The United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick scheme, or device a material fact or makes any false, fictitiou3 or Iraudufent
statements or reprosenlabons 0r makes of us03 any false writing or document knowing aame to contain any false fictitious or
fraudulent statement or entry, shall be tined rat more than $10,000 of imprisoned not me than five years, of both.
IAevene of LNO FORM 4345)

Adjacent PrWertY owners to
McMullen Green GreenwaY - Phase II
Brian L. Dawson Rick Wells
8225 Inverary Place
8221 Inverary Place
Charlotte, NC 28226
Charlotte, NC 28226
Jahn William Davis Jennie M. Wilson
20 Inverary Place
8224 InverarY Place 82
Charlotte, NC 28226
Charlotte, NC 28226
Victoria L. Barrick
Mark S. Adkins
Place
8216 Ir?verary 8208 Inverary Place

NC 28226
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte,
Christopher L. Jarrett
James R. Parker Jr. 12040 Five Cedars Road
8200 Inverary Place
Charlotte, NC 28226
Charlotte, NC 28226
Karl v. Clark
Pamela K. Baucom
2 Five Cedars Road 12024 Five Cedars Read
1203
Charlotte, NC 28226
Charlotte, NC 28226
Charles E Waits III
Joseph E. Fanzie 12012 Five Cedars Road
3200 Mountainbrook Road Charlotte, NC 28226
Charlotte, NC 28210
David Lynn Ford John R. Pendleton Jr.
3021-F Heathstead Place
12006 Five Cedars Road NC 28210
Charlotte
Charlotte, NC 28226 ,
Daniel E. Pruden Mannel G. Manigault
2 Five Cedars Road
11936 Five Cedars Road 1193
Charlotte, NC 28226
Charlotte, NC 28226
Richard R. Gerke Patrick E. DancY
11920 Five Cedars Road
11926 Five Cedars Road NC 28226
Charlotte
Charlotte, NC 28226 ,
Dennis E. 'IhaXtOn Robert L. Freeze
8100 Stonemille Court
Court
8108 Stonemill
NC 28134
Pineville
Charlotte, NC 28226 ,
Richelle F. Eddy James W. Wood
8105 Stonemill Court
8101 Stonemill court NC 28226
Charlotte
Charlotte, NC 28226 ,

Nixon
Philip Secretary of Housing & Urban Dev.
15 North Edgeworth Street
Carmel
Lakes Drive
11839 Ca 4
NC 27401
Greensboro
Charlotte, NC 28226 ,
James 0. Durham Jr. Laurie A. Cunningham
12110 Rock Canyon Drive
11842 Carmel Lakes Drive NC 28226
Charlotte
Charlotte, NC 28226 ,

John D. Kimel Jeffrey Ted Hubbard
12104 Rock Canyon Drive 12100 Rock Canyon Drive
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Msureen E. Donlevy Robert Ford Meyer
12034 Rock canyon Drive 12026 Rock Canyon Drive
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Sigmund D. Swain Nancy Boyden
12020 Rock Canyon Drive 12010 Rock Canyon Drive
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
James R. Robinson Joel Charles McPike
12000 Rock Canyon Drive 11932 Rock Canyon Drive
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Mark L. Lofthus Victor Alan McCleave
11924 Rock Canyon Drive 11914 Rock Canyon Drive
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Gary R. Alston Joel Saperstein
11908 Rock Canyon Drive 7612 Deer Falls Lane
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Michael John Trinbley Henery Otto Dow II
7606 Deer Falls Lane 7600 Deer Falls Lane
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Michael L. Stout Dot L. Leonard
7601 Deer Falls lam 7630 Soaringfree Lane
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Jeffery J. Baker John W. Halstead
7626 Soaringfree Lane 7620 Soaringfree Lane
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Ronald A. Balm Jr. James H. Wilson
7614 Soaringfree Lane 8406 Tifton Road
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Julius Falcinelli Kristen Gannon
549 Birgham Place 8352 Tiftion Road
Lake Mary, FL 32746 Charlotte, NC 28226
Timothy Allen Caskey Kenneth L. Willams
8344 Tifton Road 8336 Tifton Road
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Jeffery Loren Vinyard Michael L. Bos
8330 Tifton Road 8322 Tifton Road
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Charles Milton Byrd David S. Fullem .
8314 Tifton Road 8635 Timbercrest Circle
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
•,
CpA_pay Properties Inc. Stanley H. Livengood Sr.
P. 0. Box 240945 8623 Tinbercrest Circle
Charlotte, NC 28224 Charlotte, NC 28226
Gary J. Neill Jayantilal G. Changela
8320 Park Vista Circle 8310 Park vista circle
charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Roland J. Paradis Jr. James P. Fauber
8316 Park Vista Circle 8304 Park Vista Circle
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Joseph Steiner Jerry R. Sikes
5415 Pepperdine Drive 8218 Park Vista Circle
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Armond Bint Hess Jetendra N. Suthar
8212 Park vista circle 8206 Park Vista Circle
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Gene S. Croker Sr. Kevin M. Conklin
8200 Park vista circle 8132 Park Vista Circle
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Robert L. Stewart Ricky Ray
8126 Park Vista circle 8120 Park Vista Circle
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
John S. Salisbury Alan J. Russell
8114 Park Vista Circle 8100 Park Vista Circle
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Rachel Sanders Carter Linda G. Middleton
8102 Park Vista Circle 8020 Park vista circle
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Thomas A. Mangum Michael S. Erickson
8014 Park Vista Circle 8008 Park Vista Circle
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Charles M. Scott Gary W. Poff
8000 Park Vista Circle 7938 Park Vista Circle
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Paul Arnot Lund Nielsen Jack T. Steiner Jr.
7932 Park Vista Circle 10323 Camelback Circle
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
Lloyd Keith Williams Timothy M. Riley
10329 Camelback Circle 10333 Camelback circle
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226
James C. Zoldoloski Donetta Butler
10401 Camelback Circle 10405 Camelback circle
Charlotte, NC 28226 Charlotte, NC 28226

Phillip Scott Cunningham
11531 Candlelight Court
Charlotte, NC 28226
Stewart Perim
11529 Lone Star Circle
Charlotte, NC 28226
Gloria G. Foster
11535 Candlelight Court
Charlotte, NC 28226

00 /
?y
41, /
d^ _ FN
0 C,96
000
m
of
C?
tiB
G,9
c
Z
00
xx??
H m n N
O H
?3: O G1
C 0 O
cn CrrJ > H
rhz??
10 ?-j
tri
m H x
t1J 7C
Q0 r?
N z
E
I n
IO S
c ?
m
D tT
Im
1
I
l
1

G\
00
Gtir ?

ante Hlnos
jilk
?A-Rk ROAD
C1FC
okid
OV08 30N301l\ .
d5
oa
Oa
e
?O
a?a
?o
o?
t`^
•O

Sam/ ? f`
dOO%
?ap .0
U
v ?4
i
V ?
f ?
goo
1 AgRq0k
_ oGT
? ^ gc.
U
NC HWY. 51 MATTHEWSHPINEVILLE RD.
?csr?c sTO?caa.e of !
1 SEP
1 I ?ri t .c C?'/?? 1 1
I?
U?
SITE MAP
NORTH t
MECKLENBURG COUNTY PARK AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT
PHASE II MCMULLEN CREEK GREENWAY
SHEET 2 of 14 SEPTEMBER 1992

to
IS

530.07
530.18
N? r
530.70

531.29 I

531.89 I I

532.49

532.37
531.18
I GI
>al
530.59

I
SI
529.70
J
529.92 s
i
530.15
v I

530.99
' 531.53

C 532.07 I
D
532.40 I
f 532.60

532.60
: 633.06 Y
? I
533.20

i 533.50 I
6
533.02
s 532.30
° 533.80 I
531.93 N I
o
531.00
531.25
g ?
531.50
Y
c
r
w
ri ?
?E
v
?r
?t
?o
a
r
M?
?a
r ?
S oo` ?
F4 4
7C "
N
II
? o O+
x a
%,O (D
0
m ? '_0
m?
w A,
r r
„pm D
(n C
mF
°, m C
R1
n Z
t
n
> Cm
(D z
r <
W
O
rh
N
.A

' cicw .
w ? 4fr - Mf?f
I
I
? I.
8 ?
i
II
11
i?
I
I t
t
i
?g
1
e
1
1 ?,V F ?ccFSS
i
I
y? om 1 +?? ?rt?? m?SC?
ga >
E
P
} N ?I
L
x
Fa{
Ax
?O
w
O hY O • O N O
531.00

531.25
531.50
1531.90

P

40
I
532.89
r
I ,
533.50.
533.57
?
•

I DI

1533.65 I .. ? I

533.78
J534.05
I I l I I
534.32
1
0
534.70
i
533.32

33.52
»
? I
534.00 rn
- -
-
; I V I

57i.ff

{ .

rn
>-
N

$74.04 n

u 534.12
o
534.19 I
I
533.70
g
o
!
?I
533.04

532.61 1
1
5
O

M 1531.69 J

'1

.
? T
531.62 a l
M, 531.50
11!31.03
I O I tl, 1
li
l ? I N ' N ?
a i N W W ?
D ?
•
p ?
,m ,
0 ?
O
N
10
a
u ?
D) N
?1 a
-,p (D
0
cm:
C
.?mmm r
:Zp=m
$? z
M
> A
r
s
m
.A ?
O
M
F?
.P

;V-
a2
T/
`„n
r nw
,3m
rrw
r

a
r $,
o ? sd
1
T
?I
r
D
r ?
r p
m
?n
end a 0? = r
• M<
A_
r
rE
r
00
ar
s
a?
b ?
. f

i
i
i
My
6C
s
Fa
A+

?o
Rai o i s w

531.03
530.60
529.97
l l I U
529.35 E i

8 r
I
? I ? j
526_72 J I
?
} _
528.20

u
528.20
v
20
528
I
.
I fi
I 1
II ? ?

201
528
1
II ? ? ?
.
? I I ? I I I
Iv 528.17

528.03
X1 527.90
527.76
m ?
1 527.62
s - I
627.88

828.44
q

Y
8? I _
m

530.22
ti

530.73
c
531.23
I
" 53t74

532.24
" 532.75
8
533.26
Y 532.93
s
532.29
531.64
U U
I N N U
I v'
W IT i
l m I N P ? ? m N O
i l O ? - J4 `--
n ,
rA
3
HC
?I
4
Li

nooo.•..acnw v -

r
x t?'
= H
?
n
Y n
N
O
Ir
I 8 ?'
D
t^

f ?

? Hf
C7 ? ? ?7
.m
a
n ? u
L fD
7 R• ?.?
4 ? a
.0 (D
x
5 cf) CE
mmmF
0 z
M
ZR A
a
m G)
D m
m
rt z
u, D
o
?n
.=
r-m
N
Pr' i
44
0
D
I
I
r
?v
=1
o?
nT
L?
a?
•
0
O
n
4
O
•
My
N O O O N x O
532.50
S31.S6
m
x
531.21
1
530.35
529.30 l 1
T i
l I
526_26 l
527AO -

[52627 I I

526.98 m
?
,
I I
529.65 I
530.67
i
yl(. I
rnil CIO
hILI?
YI
? II
I

5
0

0

629
o f <
629.90 ?
_ S
F
630.96
A
1532.67

I
53620 ?

63621
i 64021
t

O
m N
N
V'
N N
O N
? N
v W
N
O
O
7 Q
H?
eR
a„
°I q
e?
J
a*
H ?
A ¦
vy
?v
d
bA
[ T
S?

?
1

C+

?,p

\
j
i

\
,P
`

no s w a o
527.92
528.70

529.48 a

?

530.27 ?1
2
6
1531.05
531.83 I
532.61
533.39
I
s3z.ee
531.89 ?
? ?
, ?i
? l
? i l I I I
I
I ?
530.90 -
529.92
529.21
528.64
528.07
527.50
526.93
529:9
825.79

1525.57

526.11 N
526.64
526.92
528.67
1526.42
s2e.»
525.93
1525.68

U
?m ? {!I I N I N I V,
N I T. CJ ? 1 im y1
N '. N
O NI
O
r ?
r?
?m
Ls
r
7
4
N
8
g
8
a
u 0
b (D
x?
1,0 (0
O
n 2
?x
«
y
r r
U) E
Tm
9
s
==

F

p
O
y f7 m
Z

m • M
M ^
m I-
>
•, m•
N
Z
D? I
o
rh
.P
MOCK CANYON ORIV gs
.wM1O'
[l
m
1
11 ?,
1
ec 1 i ?
\ T
\ ?r
m
E M EMI.
1 ?M11 w
/ t
Y
ti
DIY _
T
E r+rr
Mr?
Qo ..
S
?rti
? 1
O
O M
N u N
O N
• N
O W
N V
O •
O
•
526.50
526.26
1526.01
1525.76

1525.51 I
1525.95
526.42
528.88

1 527.38
I n
I
'1527.83 Z
528.30
;1
1527.82

X1527.09 L
' 526.35

: 525.70 I
a
52&74
525.79
a
525.03
52.7
S
525.91
525.95
a
0 525.99
I
0 525.90.
0 525.75
0 525.60
O 1125..6
0 525.31
0
52 5.18
°1525.01
Q N o - m l . N Q' O

?m
D ??•F
? u
F
?f
? "

m?
A
n
?
•
M m
P
A" D o
?f
F ?
A? H` F
m "' ? r K
v
S? VN
m ? r
it G x ? I
A
7 a / r
r
(D /
J . 1 x
f _
X
un o
°mmFl'
QZ?-m $ m
z /<
m ` D
> T.?.
m i •
( m m
(D Z
rt, D
00 `
O
v
1 eN N N

O N

a N

O Y

N

1

O
25.5
525.36
525.21
525.06

524.91
y? I
1524.77

524.66 /11
524.56

524.46 V
r
n

524.34 I

524.23 1

1 F r Lj i
I
524.57 1

525.07 I ?
M I

25.57
i
m
I t I
526.06
526.46
526.36

526.24 ? I u
°
52&'M
526.01
526.51
527.04
527.57
1527.83
s26.9e
526.12
525.34
s?..9e
1524.57

C U N N
I+
I I N
m
I W
N
I
O?
O I
I
I
1
m ??.
r
Z
M Y
H i F, I
F] F ?
ilk
r N
H
00 r/ N
N
he
c n ??;'' \ uo ro
cn D m ? 'r
r
°p r
n
O p • m
-4 c
o?
r
a ?
;SAM
r D 7C S Y \
O m D? q I
?mC s /
m
<=m?_F /
,gZm
?g z /
0= n
?< M
m
ID I
m ? 1? z
a
?
N MM
(D > m . A
Z
o D
II
• I
? o ?
Ki ? o s ni a

F

12.,41
r- 4 I
I 8
528.40

526.28 L

526.16
526.05

528.33
528.88

; 527.39 I
' 527.93
1 I
1 _
;1527.28
1528.11
525.55
x
525.08
524.70
i
m
524.32

52394

526.01
s2e.ee
s
528.43
9 527.87
5 ^
527.31 v
i
• 526.75
S
526.20
• 525.55
o t
524.91

M 524.90

525.47

528.05 I
I
O
m ?
N U
j P . N
O N
?
i N
0 fJ
N ?
01 I?
0
i ?
? I
m
v
D
L
D
1
n
D
II
y
k
O
m
r
V! - r
v R
4
* g e.
a? ? ?op go
m = ?
r r
D?
mc
c C
ty< m
M
M
a
? a
?m
'* Z
o y
o <
?n
N
?P
a
4
M
8
G '
4
S'
gl
G t
Y
I 8
1 \b
yyyya
0 S\ M
II o
I?
' I
I
' II
A
E `
$ I
? .I
C
r
?q
R
H?
Ip R
?N
v
I

= H?
a ?d
a
8
r F / • S. u
N?
9
d??

v M
IS N NN
O N N
v Y
a w

a o
828.38

'o
5z5_77
--
-
-
-
-- -
--- - -- --

525.13 T
r

m

T
524.71 r
a
28
525
. i
N s2s
ee
0 .
528.4+

327.02
i
527.83

a 528.24
c T
F
528.95
a
G
n
529.45 0)
%
cn
n
530.37 W

m
531.49 -. ..
w
532.42 I I

? ro
533.78 1 h7
o
x

C

837.13

a 538.25
0
539.38

N

a
M
H

? ?
m ? N_
N
? U N
I ?' . O N
? {/
I m ? V'
N ? {mil
? I•
p I ?
? I,
O
gl`
FI
I
?I
=1
i
3
s
m
m
Z
?f
nI
m
x
w ?
' i
g ?
f
d
A4RRpR AK DRIVE
mc -=9
?OK
" D K:
r
$G) Z
_ 0
m
x
>?
a
?i 7J
m m
m
z
?Z
G
i E o i s N w o 1 4-

526.72 11

526.83
tj
U
r
526.55 w

526.46 1+
F
x

527.28
,• F
r
?
A
I ec
528.53
529.50 rn

, bOp
529.11
_
528.72
528.64
F
529.00

529.3 S a

529.71 ?
? - a
1n
530.01
n
F
?
(D
530.29
i ?
530.57

530.85 b

0
X
530.59

o_
528.99
i
a
527.91

0 527.45 w
,
?a
528.99 S
X

526.42

525.79
N
a 525.15 ((D
m
r*
54
524
. t?
N
= 524.05 01
x
t?

523.58
N
O I
? m
I N

N V

Oi U
N
O
I N
N
w M
N
m 1P
tJ
N ?
W
OI 1

O ?

J
g lM?N1T10'b / 1
r x /
?y No
F! 8
N F?
?r
? v? I
e N<
? 6N
O
\ Y,
G. \ o
D
cn c-
mF
=pp-m
3? n Z
n
< m
m
a
m
? D

8 d
9
°
w
S
t
y
g

Y `

\ bhr,a
\ 'Q.
\ ? l

all:
m omc>n
W
'z
ti
Q 0
r9 M
r
m
r. , I?
F-1 ;
°I R
r ?
II ? _
?rr
?MC
•
?• 4 e

a
F
?

z?
? A
? c
c?
?o
c
JC •?
N
?T
rr
Oil
m -.
? s
si IAN
d
3jr
T
T1 T C
N?.
I I
I ?

? a
I ff w
C
r. LL
:o C
a.
G
n
(D
a
U)
a
r
(D
N
II
a
ro
ro
n
0
x
0

s

9 R

O
,S
(D D
? N
?* m
Ith 171
O
rh
n
n
rn
t
i
;a
Jr?
Ott
4 ?
I
L
n?
R
Lr
?i
4
N
iv'-r

MEMORANDUM
TO:
SUBJECT:
John Dorney
Planning Branch
WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDA
***EACH ITEM MUST BE ANSWERED (N/A-NOT APPLICABLE)**
INITIALS:
Reviewer:
WQ Supv•
Date:
?
PERMIT_YR: 92 PERMIT-NO: 0000475 COUNTY: JACKSON
APPLICANT NAME: CULLOWHEE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
PROJECT-TYPE: WATER AND SEWER LINE PERMIT-TYPE: NW12
COE_#: DOT-#:
RCD_FROM _CDA: APP DATE _FRM_CDA: 08/26/92
REG_OFFICE : ARO RIVER-AND-SUB-BASIN-#: o'f o 4-0
?-
STREAM-CLASS: C•TY
STR INDEX NO: 2-79-31
WL_IMPACT?: Y N WL_TYPE:
WL_REQUESTED: WL_ACR_EST?: Y/N
HYDRO CNECT?: Y/N WL SCORE(#):
MITIGATION?: Y/N MITIGATION TYPE:
MITIGATION SIZE:
IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED?: Y(Nj
RECOMMENDATION (Circle One): SS ISSUE/COND DENY
COMMENTS : i r s :_S
J ?? es 7 To C y ?s_ r c/ (o, e e„?? k
uj. jL U/j ;/S' e- w? r1 42S J i Gi_r C?O3 I i4/ Za rs 71i .?.
4a tfi?? G/ 11 2? C? I ems'-II vP_,7 P. v,
I 62ric. r.", V Al, 7 P .?` c.-e-%, 9 Wet '1:z .?r?s ,7i c.N v
Lj, -r?P S7?eJ..t b&Aave- ?? ?C i?t/p??ccl• the rf17??? 1i'an ??p
9Pr?p?s?
cc: Regional Office
Central Files
.1,
State of North Carolina
Departinent of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor September 27?, 1992 A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.l:
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Acting Director
Jackson County School Board
c/o Mark T. Ledford
Ledford Eng9ineering, Inc.
Post Office Box 2217
Asheville, North Carolina 28802
Dear Mr. Ledford:
Subject: Proposed Fill in Headwaters or Isolated Wetlands
Utility Crossings
Jackson County
DEM Project # 92475
Upon review of your request for Water Quality Certification
to place fill material in 0.12 acres of wetlands for utility
crossings located at Hwy. 107, Cullowhee Creek in Jackson County,
we have determined that the proposed fill can be covered by
General Water Quality Certification No. 2664 issued January 21,
1992. A copy of the General Certification is attached. This
Certification may be used in qualifying for coverage under Corps
of Engineers' Nationwide Permit No. 12.
If you have any questions, please contact John Dorney at
919/733-1786 or 919/733-1787.
Sincerely,
. Preston Howar Jr. P. E.
APH:JD
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Asheville Regional Office
Asheville DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
REGIONAL OFFICES
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/571-4700 9 19/946 -6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer