19920679 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19920104

s•
s
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street - Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary January 5, 1993 Acting Director
Mr. S. Franklin Wyatt
City Engineer
City of Greensboro
300 W. Washington Street
Greensboro, North Carolina 27402
Dear Mr. Wyatt:
Subject: Proposed Fill in Wetlands or Waters
Sanitary sewer installation
Guilford County
DEM Project # 92679
Upon review of your request for Water Quality Certification
to place fill material in 1.80 acres of wetlands or waters in
Little Alamance Creek for Sanitary sewer installation, Phase I
from Young's Mill Road to McConnell Road.located in Guilford
County, we have determined that the proposed fill can be covered
by General Water Quality Certification No. 2664 issued January
21, 1992. A copy of the General.Certification.is attached. This
Certification may be.used in qualifying for coverage under Corps
of Engineers' Nationwide Permit No. 12.
If you have any questions, please contact John Dorney at
919/733-1786.
Sincerely,
reston bHowardJ P.E.
APH:JD
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Winston-Salem DEM Regional office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files REC1oNALOFF1CEs
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/571-4700 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

TT M STArF o
ti ?nn
D
wu,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Seci•etaly
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Eric Galamb
Wetlands Section
FROM: Janet M. Russell
Winston-Salem Regional Office
SUBJECT: ALAMANCE CREEK SEWERLINE EXPANSION
Guilford County/#92679
DATE: January 28, 1993

The Alamance Creek Sewerline Expansion is 12 miles of new sewerline
which includes the following outfalls: Young's Mill, Southeast
School Road, Cooper's. Farm, Forest Oaks, and Lynwood Lakes.
Comments-were submitted earlier on the Young's Mill outfall since
it was the first to be reviewed and comments were needed as soon as
possible. A copy of those comments are attached.
Since that time the rest of the outf all lines have been reviewed in
the field. Also attached is a list of the outfalls along with
station numbers indicating those areas designated as wetlands by
the Corps of Engineers. If you check this list, you will note that
the Corps designated over 40 spots along these outfalls as
wetlands. These wetland areas range from bottomland hardwood
forests to small borders along stream banks. Some of them are
large enough to provide beneficial use as flood control, wildlife
habitat, pollutant removal, aquatic life support and stream bank
stabilization. Some of the areas were photographed. City of
Greensboro personnel were questioned about the stage of planning
this project is in. Many of the right-of-ways have been purchased;
essentially all of the planning and design work is complete with
actual construction to begin in the Spring.
8025 North Point Boulevard, Suite 100, Winston-Salem, NC 27106-3203 • Telephone [phone] • FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
A <W
Denial on any portion of these outf all lines would likely cause
many additional financial expenditures, time in redesign, halt in
bid letting, etc. etc. The overall impression is that DEM
personnel should accompany Corps of Engineers personnel when
initial design is just commencing, not as an afterthought before
the bids are let. This Regional Office is finding that comments
are well received if they are offered early enough.
In reviewing these 40+ areas designated as wetlands, DEM personnel
agreed with most of the Corps decisions. However, some areas that
were obviously wetlands were not designated while others that were
much less significant or marginal were designated. Joint review of
sites by DEM and COE might help to narrow differences in how the
two agencies approach wetland designation and preservation. Along
with this, all comments could be submitted early in the planning
stage.
With the aforementioned noted, the Winston-Salem Regional Office
recommends that the 401 permit be issued. If mitigation can be
required, it should be considered. Total wetland areas lost or
disturbed will be 1.8 to 2.0 acres (according to the application).
However, the Environmental Assessment Report indicated much more
than 2 acres of wetlands would be impacted. (?)
Please call me with any questions that you may have regarding this
project.
d 'd
1EMORANDUM INITIALS:
Reviewer: 11
CO : John Dorney WQ Supv : /h,
Planning Branch Date: la-_?-R
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
***EACH ITEM MUST BE
PERMIT YR: 92
APPLICANT NAME: CITY
PROJECT-TYPE: SEWE
COE_#:
RCD_FROM_CDA: APP
REG_OFFICE: WSRO
ANSWERED (N/A-NOT APPLICABLE)***
PERMIT-NO: 0000679 COUNTY: GUILFORD
OF GREENSBORO SEWER LINE
R LINE PERMIT-TYPE: NW12
DOT
DATE_FRM_CDA: 11/25/92
RIVER-AND-SUB-BASIN-#: 03-0(0 -O 2-
STREAM-CLASS: e'j 0sw
STR_INDEX_NO: ILo -11-1 t}- Z
WL_IMPACT?:&N
WL_REQUESTED : 1.8 O A c re S Tot A
HYDRO_CNECT? : UY 'N
MITIGATION?: Y10
MITIGATION SIZE:
WL_TYPE : F-r2SI I
WL_ACR_EST?: Y N
WL_SCORE(#): 15'
MITIGATION-TYPE:
IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED?: Y/N
RECOMMENDATION (Circle One): ISSUE ISSUE/COND DENY
COMMENTS : -1C y bobR I s ewe,- 1 ? ?cJ p ro 'e c I ?? / 02 r+1 ? ? e5
Av C fl of C reensboro 0u6 rm; tied 0%v en &rel-
-orojee : For cons?clerAt:Qr%f buf- ? pAc.k-Aaj_v rec_?ved
-( r'O'f 12?1ei41? WA S Inc-0Mp l? efC-2 • ?ar„?,en S ne
v; ew of iL:rs+ A
'A M:11 ZAd ?.- Mc. Gr-m-e.ll
;of\04
Q r- ; cep heeds A Cop q yP - ke D A ??e-6-A eS -Pcr
cc: Regional Office
Central Files
Ule , res+ o Ic 44\? f ro e c+ A nc9 f co f q 01P +ke__1
,1rv? ?c?E- Su•yr?-?Ar to Gor.P le.fc,"
6 n 0; ro n ,--.em-LA
ro e c_-r.
Lk-1 irev?e?.J o? ?he? ?,t??eJ P J
4 -0
WETLAND RATING SYSTEM WORKSHEET
Project No. or description 52 eo? 5 OF reensborv
0;4-q
Location N:5ewc r- l-in c-.,7
County Grui lard Nearest road or town Cionne-ll 12d
River basin Cj,o F Index Number /l,_H -I L4 - 2
Nearest stream 6. -AurFAlo Neer_) and classification_(:l AIV&J
Evaluator
Q.E.M.- WATL`K QuAI-ty
Agency and address A0 Mort;, Point -31ucJ - , f,J%nSfan-S?/e/r1
Date and time evaluated e-c-ember /J ( 9q Z /-0-00 am
Major Wetland Type ,rs+ Ierr^cei 130 -tong,1Ar4 t/Arcloju0d
Approximate size of wetland system .3 acres
Approximate extent of wetlands in area acres
within miles
Three most common plant species (in order):
I-roes, CTreen br•:,gr-S, -Ferns
Soil Series (if known) CiACAJ- C-1A c tdC_hAdk_ec_,-
Hydrologic indicators oe=nk
Direct surface hydrologic connection? YES NO
Existing Conditions
Drainage Ur\n^w, rn+A, neck f in ex-A Q I e-%
Disturbance presem-Vl.j Lk-disc ar'bed
Restoration potential 6roocl
Restoration value La,J
Is site known to provide habitat for rare, endangered or
threatened species? 00 If so, list species observed or recorded.
Item No. Score (circle one)
I. Location/Landscape
1 Natural area buffer 5
2 Sensitive watershed Q 4 3 2 1 0
3 Dispersal corridor system 5 4 3 ® 1 0
II. Ecological Values
ib
5
4
3
2
1
Q
utes
4 Special ecological attr
5 Wildlife habitat 5
5 4
4 3
3 (3
2 1
1 0
@
6 Aquatic life
7 Water storage 5 4 ®3 2 1 0
8 Streambank stabilization 5 4 3 2 1
9 Removal of pollutants 5 4 3 2 1 0
III. Human Values
10 Outdoor recreation/education 5 4 3 Q2 1 0
11 Economic value 5 4 3 2 @1 0
Total score Icy'
Site description and notes:

NWI wetland type
? Coastal Plain ? Sandhills Ed Piedmont ? Mountain
eK.
Nearest stream name 60%*kh 'NXr *+ to
River Basin and sub-basin P C 3 -Ofo-O 2-
Stream index number 119-11-14- Z Classification IJ?
Wetland area
Hydrologically
Wetland width 100 feet
Hydrological ly
U.S.G.S. or NWI map M c, (_EArSJ Ale, W6
Endangered, threatened, rare species
Source (NHP, USFWS, other)
•
Wetland type (select one)
• ? Swamp forest
Bottomland hardwood forest
? Carol ina bay
• ? Pocosin
Pine savannah
• ? Wet flat
? Perched

CF-iWd V,
? Shoreline
? Stream channel
? Salt marsh
? Brackish marsh
? Freshwater marsh
? Bog/Fen
? Vernal pool
• Water storage - •
Bank/Shoreline stabi I ization 2-
Pollutant removal

> -
< x 5.00 -
.. `C

Sensitive watershed -? _
• Dispersal corridor ...... .. 14'erlandscore .
• <><>::> :> x 0.75 = ?,
•
Special ecological attributes

d
.
• Wildlife habitat ......::::: •
Aquatic life value z
• x 1.00 = •

Recreation/Education - •
• Economic value •
• _
x 0.25 •

z
0
v
CAROLINA - SHEET NUMBER 28 01+1 OF are.nSborlo &-u-cy L lf%o

O
?h0 O
11
11 .,.
? O n
O
Xj 6 a e
u• _
i
II
II
11 '
i_\NV (
O
0• ? j1 ? s= E r ? ?; `
1 = Ire `?7~ ? 11 ` n
mss' n ?? ?? rt-?
• 1
? • i it - ? ? - ?? J {
° ? o - ?0

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
ALAMANCE CREEK SEWERLINE EXPANSION_
- GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

MR. ALAN CLARK, WATER QUALITY :SECTION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
512 NORTH SALISBURY STREET
RALEIGH, NC 27611-7687

(919 733-508
3

PIEDMO
T
N
OLSEN, INC.

ENGINEERS, ARC!NlITECTS, AND SURVEYORS

Jf

3.10 Groundwater Resources
Major regional groundwater aquifers do not exist. The water table is recharged in upland
areas And discharged to wells and as baseflow to streams. Past drilling records of water wells
in the study area indicated that the groundwater table occurs within 15 to 40 feet of the
ground surface. Low productivity wells in the water table aquifer provide an important source
of water in rural areas (U.S. Department of Transportation and N.C. Department of
Transportation, 1985).
3.11- Jurisdictional Wetlands
Jurisdictional wetlands are lands protected by Section 404 of the federal Clean Water
Act. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) enforces wetland protection, mandated by
Section 404, in coordination with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS), and state and local resource agencies. Jurisdictional wetlands are
defined and delineated by hydrology, soils, and vegetation. The federal manual forwetland
identification and delineation provides guidelines for determining when hydrology, soils, and
"r vegetation define a wetland (Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation, 1989).
j Wetlands are areas saturated with water for sufficient periods (generally for a week or more
during the growing season) to produce hydric soil conditions that support plants adapted to
habitats with low concentrations of oxygen in the sal. Guidelines in the federal manual also
define atypical wetlands that meet less than three criteria, such as wetlands altered or created
by man.
Wetlands provide habitat for plant and animal species, storage for floodwaters, and filter
sediments, contaminants, and nutrients from runoff. Wetlands may be altered only under
limited circumstances, of which the most important are water dependence of the project and
the absence of upland alternatives.
Ecologists used the project development maps, Guilford County soil map (Stephens,
1977), and USGS topographic quadrangles to determine potential areas of wetlands for field
investigation. The entire project corridor was examined on foot, and jurisdictional wetlands
.?_ delineated by the Federal Interagency method (Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland
Delineation, 1989) supplemented with the national list of plant species that occur in North
Carolina wetlands (Reed, 1988) and the U.S. Soil Conservation Service list of hydric soils
(SCS, 1989).
Sampling stations were chosen at intervals of 50 to 200 feet along each potential
wetland edge according to visible topographic, hydrologic, and vegetational indicators. Soil
cores were taken with an 18-inch soil auger, and soil color (hue, value, and chroma)
determined using Munsell soil color charts. Dominant tree, shrub, woody vine, and ground
cover vegetation were identified. Percent cover was recorded on the wetland and non-
wetland sides of each station: Hydrologic indicators (e.g., water marks, surface saturation,
oxidized root channels, water-stained leaves) were recorded. The wetland edge at each
station was marked with a numbered flag, and distance and direction to each wetland flag
was measured from a previous wetland flag, basepoint flag, or recognizable landmark. Red
survey tape was tied near each flag to facilitate location by surveyors and agency personnel.
17
The area surveyed for wetlands was 20 feet on either side of surveyed, proposed
sewerline corridors, or 100 feet from creek banks where no surveyed lines were in place.
Wetlands were measured as linear distances along the project corridor. Most wetland areas
were found in floodplains along tributaries to Little Alamance Creek and Big Alamance Creek
in association with Chewacla and Wehadkee soils. Some wetlands were located in the
floodplains of Little Alamance Creek and Big Alamance Creek. The Congaree soils found in
most of the project area did not support wetlands. Numerous intermittent tributaries join the
major creeks throughout the project area and narrow (bank-to-bank) wetland corridors exist
- along these tributary streams. Wetlands in the project corridor are mapped on eight
topographic sheets appended to this report. Wetlands adjacent to, but not in, the project ,
corridor are also indicated on these sheets.
Ave not Seen *Ke. 1' +o f o She et-5 ('e-I er re cl +0
3.12 Fish and Aquatic Habitats
Streams in the o ect"area
pr ) generally have low gradients, and sandy substrates
interspersed with riffle habitat. The fish community is dominated by minnows and sunfishes,
with smaller numbers of catfish, darters, and other species. Many streams have, been
impounded to form ponds and lakes which favor a fish community different from that in
streams, including many non-native species. Fish species likely to occur in streams and ponds
within the project area are listed in Table 4 (Lee et al., 1980).
_l Intermittent streams without permanent fish populations are important to down
stream
fish communities for their contributions to water quality, temperature, flow control, and food
-? production. - Several salamanders<(Eurycea and Desmognathus species) only maintain viable
populations in small streams with few or no fishes. Small perennial streams support few fish
species, but some are endemic to small streams, including the rare Carolina darter
(Etheostoma collis). Deciduous leaf litter provides the base of the food web in small streams.
Maintenance of a forested canopy is critical to these habitats for nutrients, and for
temperature and erosion control (Barnes and Minshall, 1983).
Medium to large streams (drainage basin area 50 square miles or greater) in the Piedmont
support the greatest fish diversity, including important game fish species. Both leaf litter and
instream primary production (algae and aquatic plants) contribute to the food base in these
habitats (Barnes and Minshall, 1983). Frogs (Rana species), northern water snake (Nerodia
sipedon), queen snake (Regina septemvittata), and aquatic turtles (Chrysemys species) inhabit
them, as do wood ducks (Aix sponsa), great blue heron (Ardea herodia), wetland-dwelling
songbirds, beaver (Castor canadensis), muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus), and other mammals
(Barnes and Minshall, 1983).
Ponds and lakes in the region are man-made. Fishery resources in impoundments are
dominated by mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), and
several. sunfishes (Lepomis species) and catfishes (lctalurus species).
18
164
The Guilford County Zoning Ordinance of 1988 evaluates proposed developments by
awarding points or engineering certification for incorporation of design features that protect
water resources. These features include reducing impervious surfaces, increasing distance
from floodways, protecting natural stream channels, choosing sites with low slopes,
maintaining natural vegetation, maximizing stormwater retention, providing public sewer
service, and using vegetated roadside ditches rather than curb and gutter. Because the
project area is only sparsely developed at present, incorporation of these design features in
new construction projects will result in a watershed with relatively low potential for serious
urban runoff problems.
Sewerline design measures to protect water quality include avoiding public water supplies
and high quality aquatic habitats, minimizing the number of stream crossings, and maximizing
the distance from sewerlines to streams to allow for stormwater infiltration and deposition of
pollutants (WRC recommends at least 50 feet). Construction practices should include
protection of stream bottom habitat from siltation by erosion control measures and retention
j of riparian vegetation buffers. Mitigation requires replacement of original contours and riparian
vegetation.
To prevent water quality degradation of Buffalo Creek, the T.Z. Osbourne wastewater
treatment facility must be capable of handling increased wastewater loads consistent with the
currently projected 850 lots. The T.Z. Osbourne WWTP has a design capacity of 20.0 million
gallons per day (MGD), and is currently treating 18.5 MGD. The additional 0.17 MGD will not
overload the treatment plant.
1 4.9 Groundwater Resources
The no build alternative will allow continued risk of groundwater contamination from
failing septic systems. The project will eliminate these existing septic systems and reduce
potential for fecal contamination of groundwater. However, the project will promote denser
development of the area, which may introduce new sources of potential contamination,
including fuel, oil, cleaning solvents, and paint solvents.
1 4.10 Jurisdictional Wetlands
The no build alternative will have no impacts on wetlands. The private package plant
alternative will have little or no impact on wetlands depending on the sites selected and on
their rates of failure.
The sewerline construction alternative will impact 17.8 acres of wetlands. Most of the
wetlands are in bottomland hardwood forests and the remainder in fields or on tributaries
(bank-to-bank wetlands). These wetlands are marked on the topographic maps appended.
1 26
This is part of an environmental. assessment prepared by Piedmont
Olsen, Inc. of Raleigh for the Alamance Creek Sewerline expansion
in Guilford County. April, 1991

Construction and maintenance impacts to wetlands are unavoidable. Construction of
sewerlines will be limited to a 20 foot corridor in wetlands consistent with General Permit 49.
Impacts include soil compaction from heavy equipment and filling from deposition of spoil.
Impacts can be minimized by using wide track equipment, completely removing excess spoil
to uplands, and restoring original contours. Impacts on bank-to-bank wetlands throughout the
project area can be minimized by crossing streams at right angles. Impacts due to
maintenance and operation of the sewerline will be minimal if no herbicides are sprayed and
if heavy equipment is not used to maintain the corridor. Corridors will revert to wetland
vegetation after construction, though none will develop larger trees if the corridor is
maintained by bush-hogging. The best maintenance practice is hand-clearing. Secondary
impacts to wetlands will include runoff and pollution associated with increased urbanization
in nearby uplands.
4.11 Fish and Aquatic Habitats
Stream habitats should receive minimal impacts by following certain procedures, such as
locating the sewer corridor at least 50 feet from the stream; avoiding destruction of large
1 diameter trees; avoiding small depressions (vernal pools) which provide amphibian habitat; and
minimizing the removal of canopy. During construction,.amphibian-Iabitatcould be enhanced
by constructing small depressions that hold water during the winter-spring rainy season. No
stream bottoms should be taken by construction. Stream bottoms damaged by construction
should be restored by rip-rap emplacement, boulder emplacement, and avoidance of
channelization.
4.12 Terrestrial Plant and Animal Habitats
l Wetlands have the highest ecological habitat values, followed by hardwood forests, pine
forests, fields, and urban areas. The no build alternative has the least impact on terrestrial
habitats. The sewerline construction alternative has the most impact on mixed mesic forests.
Approximately 85 acres (using sixty foot corridor width) of mixed hardwoods, nine acres of
bottomland hardwoods, ten acres of pine/hardwood forest, and six acres of pine forests will
be impacted by the project. Construction will have less impact on terrestrial habitats in
subdivisions than in forested areas.
New sewerline rights-of-way in forests will increase forest edge habitat and may result
in an increase in species diversity along the margins. The right-of-way is not large enough to
cause habitat fragmentation for deer or raccoon, but salamanders may be adversely impacted
by removal of vernal pools and canopy. Maintenance of disturbed areas in agricultural fields,
I along powerline, and in subdivisions has reduced habitat quality, and impacts will be less than
in forested areas. The destruction of large diameter trees should be avoided both within and
outside the construction corridor.
I
I
27
r
This list was submitted to The City of Greensboro by the Corps of
Engineers. It designates station numbers where the Corps designated
wetland areas along the Alamance Creek Sewerline Project.
Yau r, 5 s // ??f 5
/toy' Td

-?Y -,A 2S- 6 zYf fa
7"3u 1v 2 ?f
?Su ?0 3r746'0
V3f Ov fo ?`StS?

d v 7e
K3
f ov
?v
S Y?la
Sf r7c 00 fo s f-3 v
4;Y? ? 4;,
-
s-f3 f

?3 f'3v to 7-S U

13 I` ?? ? ? ? f4 ?
3v ?/D ?v 3o f ? a
32 f ?a f? 3,f ? o

• • 4
/ JAI jj ?"
,Z O -74',, 7` Q D
7' eo

f ?? {7j 377`I?O
?3??v

Y1 Y YI 1O
?! 6 . ? ?U ? ?''I7C %v
lv 7v ?? f v
7` 742 fv sD {o v

76 ?Z 74 s?v
74
o0
?37-c-

7

3 f ID -/v 13 ?e /O a t 3v 7? /oaf E. O
k-1W 7-d 257 ?v 103 24 zj- f-d -/oj tY.s?

3ZF ?? A 3Zf ?v
3bf 10 7?' 3? t Iv
Sy -f 3o Sy f Ga
S6 ? Yo ?? S? f s?

i
74

w -?
[EMORANDUM
'0: John Dorney
Planning Branch
INITIALS:
Review
-2 1?-S 2
;UBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
***EACH ITEM MUST BE ANSWERED (N/A-NOT APPLICABLE)***
PERMIT_YR: 92 PERMIT-NO: 0000679 CO GU
APPLICANT NAME: CITY OF GREENSBORO SEWER LINE`
PROJECT-TYPE: SEWER LINE PERMIT_TYP
COE_# : DOT_# --
RCD_FROM CDA: APP DATE_FRM CDA: 11/25/92
REG_OFFICE: WSRO RIVER-AND-SUB-BASIN-#: O3-0(0-0 2
STREAM-CLASS: (!5 WSW
STR_INDEX_NO : Ito -I1- E}- Z
WL_IMPACT? : DN
WL_TYPE: FTaA
WL_REQUESTED: ?.8p (acreS TOtA
• s ,rst?
Phq??+;?,?e?
HYDRO_CNECT?:ON
MITIGATION?: Y10
ITIGATION SIZE:
WL_ACR_EST?: Y N
WL_SCORE(#):16
MITIGATION-TYPE:
IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED?: Y/N
RECOMMENDATION (Circle One): ISSUE ISSUE/COND DENY
COMMENTS : C/ tptR I ,S eule'- 1;w p rv a cf 15 La m V es
Iona . ?? L,'f? of C?eenSbow .Su6.???f?c1 ?e? enE•rei
piec? r'or CotNSiderAt;vr% buf- f)C?lpRC.k_Aay rtCeiwd
1_0PIN l?leLoAS Ln C-0fy\ efe? . nfS r'ef'lect
t- v rev ew OF T-;rs+ Ptirisew 6n1u neAresf fo
young is fti m ZAd 4- Mc- Comm-11 7?d y ?e5iot?ra 1
rF
c: Regional Office
Central Files
for
owo
Ll,e, ,res ro?e cif- A ncO A Co L? H
..LN1 Aqc? S,,,,Ar LV COP,P
t??eJ Project;
r'ev, eLJ o? -?ker e-^
der

WETLAND RATING SYSTEM WORKSHEET
Project No. or description 112 6? 5 Ot-4-y OF Gceen56orv
Location. ?C't s• J-4n C---7
County, ui lArcl Nearest road or town MCj Conn e-11 l?-a .
River basin Cjd P Index Number le,,=&-144-7-
Nearest stream 6• -AuT Alo eep and classifications A/
Evaluator M. usse I/
-D. E, M- WA Ted QUA I ;
A y
9ency and address _AOzS Nort?. Pont Blitc1 _ . td;^Kfan-
Date and time evaluated d7e?cemloer 1,7q,-,, /-3* p°
Major Wetland type_ ,rs+ Ierr^cei'8of-fof-^ JAe4 -HgrCJW000J
Approximate size of wetland system .3 acres
Approximate extent of wetlands in area acres
within miles
Three most common plant species (in order):
6gC'A,rorcl -gees, CTI-een br;Ar-Sl Ferns
Soil Series (if known) CACkI t C-1A ?- WC-hAdt-ec'-
Hydrologic indicators
Direct surface hydrologic connection? YES NO
Existing Conditions
Drainage Uy%Mw,mAA? ,-Aec1 -no"I Q IA i '-%
Disturbance_ Preser,414 W%disj urbe
Restoration potential C-rovc1
Restoration value LotJ
Item No.
I. Location/Landscape
1 Natural area buffer
2 Sensitive watershed
3 Dispersal corridor system
II. Ecological Values
4 Special ecological attributes
5 Wildlife habitat
6 Aquatic life
7 Water storage
8 Streambank stabilization
9 Removal of pollutants
III. Human Values
10 Outdoor recreation/education
11 Economic value
otal score VT
Is site known to provide habitat for rare, endangered or
threatened species? 00 If so, list species observed or recorded.
Score (circle one)
5
©
5 4
4 3
3 2
® 1
1 0
0
5
5 4
4 3
3 2
© 1
1
0
5
5 4
4 3
0 2
2 1
1 QO
0
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1 0
5
5 4
4 3
3 (2
2 1
O1 0
0
Site description and notes:
- v
U.S.G.S. or NWI map
NWI wetland type
? Coastal Plain ? Sandhills 16 Piedmont ? Mountain
Nearest stream name ;50ukh ' -PPAID Cree
River Basin and sub-basin GAP £ CAP ?3
Stream index number 1 [o - Il - L Classification
(O-OX
Wetland area • 3 acres Wetland width 100 feet
.. ,...?.,e?*o.? C3 Hvdrologically isolated
Endangered, threatened, rare species
Source (NHP, USFWS, other)

Wetland type (select one)
? Swamp forest
• -1 Bottomiand hardwood forest (9tood Q1A??>
? Carolina bay
• ? Pocosin
•
? Pine savannah
? Wet flat
• ? Perched
? Shorel ine
? Stream channel
? Salt marsh
? Brackish marsh
? Freshwater marsh
? Bog/Fen
? Vernal pool
water storage %3_
• Bank/Shoreline stabilization 2-
Pollutant removal •
.,..,,. x 5.00 -
<? `

•
•
Sensitive watershed
I
-

•
' Dispersal corridor z Wedand score •
>> x 0.75 = '> ><':'_><'`<'" •
Special ecological attributes •
Wildlife habitat «

Aquatic life value -
Z •
•
•
1.00

• Recreation/Education

'
Economic value
? _
1
..?. •
•
> x 0.25.
:»>::

?
CRROLINA - SHEET NUMBER 28
y OF (5rems6otb SLt?,>o,r (-,nom
t, n r?? :; F r E

:r
j
, r En8
-.fir ??, •
,.? '? '??
. r-. pt, 8 _y• -

W. n.
y??il
..
'' _ -FnB
.rte"
CS yT
• ,? .

s
.73 -sr

d ? 1
f ?

''. MhB2 PB ii ::z F
Mh62 c
rr K
CnRr P r`
A, V. AC
?r ` f. 1 + Q t: 7 2 E18 pG j t
ri _ryc:,, ,E g ? r .ate}•'.'?'('? a P .? h? 1,7hBl E? (.t
" +z _T?? r MhC
E it
r, En8 .•! -.4
VI Vk? CnC •EnC` - f (;
FnG En? 1 Sa `\ fi "fir :?
mhB2 t;
r CnC r ?j x • •\ EnB
EnR
Ell f'nB rtC Cr8 ?t r r hB
??. Cnt M f+7.. << U
s `
C En8?1i or ? 11MI ) a ',? Ct B ,
0 • • " I ••`` - sir i
1y0 e
u
u .f
e

_ ? ? ' z5=
u ?
,a

B!? u; ?•? ; `? 75
o \ (,'J
Il
II
U '

o ?/ 6
a
l?: n
75
a
';t! r
It. .I
II .O ,? r
125 =_: ? 75 -,
.2q _ 70o I

DEM ID: Z' ACTION !D: H 20149e,
JOINT APPLICATION FORM FOR
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION TO THE DISTRICT ENGINEER
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION CONCURRENCE
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE INDIVIDUAL SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER WATER QUALITY PLANNING
CORPS OF ENGINEERS DIVISION OF ENVIRON IN3T
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NC DEPARTMENT OF EN N N ".,
P.O. BOX 1890 AND NATURAL RES
WILMINGTON, NC 28402-1890 P.O. BOX 29535 2 52
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E RALEIGH, NC 27626-0
Telephone [phone] ATTN: MR. JOHN DORN Y
Telephone (919) 733- o. V1 I Ij SEcP ?or
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: G iYY OF 612e5-u6F;01z0
2. OWNERS ADDRESS: 300 W, inWAS{- oez-i iow 4romj-
G2[E?.15FSo?zo i I k:)fz:; H' GAF-00 WA 074oz
3. OWNERS PHONE NUMBER (HOME) : - (WORK) : (gig) 3-73- 2302
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME. OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER: 5. rP-;WV L10 WYATT - GtfY 1 tia61NF-F-F
300 W. WA6ki"61 -00 Steer P. 0 go X 3,156
6rzeef,i6iBoizo , how-'m ?fAgoj-,IIJA Z7u a?_
( 9i9 ) 373 7- 302-
5. LOCATION OF PLANNED WORK (ATTACH MAP).
COUNTY : 67 U I LFOEU
NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: eE?,!si3ap,-o
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
7 e5?E AT7ACHE? MAP
6. NAME OF CLOSEST STREAM/RIVER: [.irrL- F AL-A ,tNcs l3EAvr-z Qiz, F- k:-5
7. RIVER BASIN: 14.4w R.v?rz
8. IS THIS PROJECT LOCATED IN A WATERSHED CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, SA, HQW, ORW,
WS I, OR WS ii? YES [ t,] NO [ J
9. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROPERTY? YES [ ) NO [?)
IF YES, E==LAIN.
10. EST-TMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LCCATED ON PROJ"cCT SITE:
I _ ?U ac,Z?s
3 :2
It-

e
-2-
11. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTED BY THE FROPOSED PROJECT:
FILLED: NjQ
DRAINED: N/A
FLOODED: _N/A
EXCAVATED: VAO-tAV L-E
TOTAL IMPACTED: I.?? AGUES
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK (ATTACH PLANS) : luSTAL-!, ATION t;F -'s4n1 i-1AL'Y
5F-wri? W P'fk ALL, F;-/-AvAZCD AaF-As Ri- UZMtO 1 TC r-y -1I.1( 4 eADE UPvni
Cc M f Tli ?E cr Cowc'raw i ! t%N
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: ?poposED ScwEz, 5rs-,t?M Fop :?:;can4E?Asr
4!?ii.llLFOP4> ccGuwrrY
14. STATE REASONS WHY THE APPLICANT BELIEVES THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE
CARRIED OUT IN WETLANDS. ALSO, NOTE MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS. 'T+iF- loFo4eAp++Y of TiAE P9oPC5L=-D P90JECT Rf?QUIRES iHf- ALi4,NMEI.I-r"fD BE
pi.Ac ED AT LowOZ r-LEVAT'ly I -> w EAP THE CXEE ?S TD AvLJ O ULIDUE GC 11S r'Y.uc7 fcMJ
AwOMAiWTI:NA. 49 (,c7si Fc°rz Mi.iLoPoi= LIFT SiA77oiS
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) REGARDING THE PRESENCE
OR ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED
SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE
PROPOSED PROJECT. HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES [ j NO [?]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE ATTACHED.
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH
MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT?
HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES [ J NO [i/J
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE ATTACHED.
1i. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY DEM:
A. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, AND LAKES ON
THE PROPERTY.
B. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED BY
PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS
RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
D. IF A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, ATTACH
COPY.
E. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? RESi©C?miAL 4 A4p,,c:iiLrvieAL
F. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
WAsfi; WATEC2 ML4- Bi: TRFAMD A7- 14c Girrs 'T, F 05&ewE 7ZEAT1 izw FLANr AND
DiS?la?2GirD iNia Soi-irH F3UrF,&l_b CzEGL- IQ lz?vj Fo;zv- 64siki,
` A Z?11-23 -9Z
bWNER' S S.-'= rE Dr
r- GAIJ l lNV vo YO UN
R AD
ZL 24'
3000 R
F
31? /'' !
16" F.M.
DR •
1-0 r 'GS MILL
ID .F --
ILAMANC.
FALL
am
?V 11' U 07,3-? AIt
C,???.?' +1 L
RD %' 15"
e
HIC OR
2 MEADO'
"
1
'ALL
O
LITTLER o
ALAMANCE
PUMP ° ?
STATION
?4w
o
THEAST 5CW-10 0L
ROAD O F'4LL
AMANCE ELEM WARY SOUTHEA:±T S(.WOOL
HODL _
l ~ BEAVER CREEK
FUME S fATION N
• 1--PROJECT "D"
EST OAKS
L
FO ST OAKS
SEC . 17 ?.
CO( CO-COA GARDMATE a 33E5 ?y ?'? FAF
PROSECt "A "-
HUN RS RIDGE
SECS 1.2,&3
0
F? NESDIT ee
DR -
kLD
EN
.CT.. 1.2.&3
,f l-J4TFRS RiDt5E Q
FUMP SfATlr1ft
/SEC
JWOOD
1,2
ROT E "D' PROJECT "E p#
RD
O ODE FOREST
0 SECT. 10
10"
12 A
RD
PROJECT "C"
WILLOW 8
SECTS. 1.2 35
RD
BIG ALAPIW ICE:
,6 F.M. •a? ?FIR;f' "t?r1^ft
f ??PPR,OTT ..E.. 1 ALAMANCE CHURCH
OLDE FOREST
PUMP S ATION ,.9
)LDE F REST O1?'G
Sga 11 ?4L
OLDE FOREST 18" 3389
SECT. 12,1
40
SECTS. 1,2 8 1 - - S"
" D
BRANDON 3
11SWELL STA N
g c
RRtn z F" vw_w x 3M
34 \ 3407 RD
\b 3370
FIGURE
PROJECT "C'. No. 10
ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR INTERIM
SERVICE TO TARGET SUBDIVISIONS
LEGEND
PROPOSED CITY OF GREENSBORO
CHWATER ?¦'¦"' FACILITIES (UPSIZED)
PROPOSED CITY OF GREENSBORO
FUZZY HOLLOW FACILITIES (UNAFFECTED)
Q ALTERNATIVE FACILITIES
RECOMMENDED TO SERVICE
TARGET SUBDIVISIONS
°II "'J' ° 4°0° '•••¦'•¦' ADDITIONAL PROJECTS
® SUBDIVISION
w r To SGAI.E
¦ 6-M! UPDATED PIII MM LL LM WA JOB NUMBER 89034
WATER AND WASTEWATER STUDY CITY OF GREENSBORO uA J8LE4T011N ENGINEERING GROUI', INC.
DESIGNED CONSUMNG F..NGINF•FKq
ALAMANCE CREEK AREA DRAWN N.B.S. "'-9 smu ?j ; i
1 -90 REVWV COMMENTS CHECKED D.W.P. rF1EftDlw, Im 2M
QUILF UR{7 COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA MY. BATE PUMPTI4"1 BY SCALE 1" A 10C T?wr Mq eeaaen
CROJECT ?WDATE CREW
LOCATION Cal ' 'Tv(jo s7Nm? 14 FLAG feet, at degrees,.-from
_011 0
CONDITIONS: dry normal wet DIMENSIONS:
HYDROLOGY:
SOILS: UPLAND WETLAND
S
VEGETATION: S .y
species percent cover species percent cover
wetland non-writ wetland non=wet
TREES: > 5" DBH-and >-20'tal' WOODY VINES:` climbing and .> 3'
.. :, j art , t ,'?k
,•u
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS:
.> 31-and < 5" DBH or < 20'
G. As1-
Sry)no 1r)0.,d 4
-?j ?tggd P?a,n
GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;
also woody plants < 3'
Lan?cer?
(,L?d
??uvGf. ?IU,? lvvj
1
f ? 11
v?(?Wa??t ? C/?=?- tarvvtt

t? C " / ?'J'0? Q ro S.4

Roo,A ply. n uQ `
e
Sy Cu r? a r2 ?o
(,,,' U,,4 1?w' S4,t MCJ)
r rrio z ? were S? ? ?^?
v
- ? ?cu+ro. ? 3
j d ?? S (1nGr14??' 1 •

Qf90
,/-S"Ak

,r -

PROJECT CJ? ???rv_ C?, DATE CREW
LOCATION I'? L ??I? a1a•?,?G;?c2 Cr.ae?- .
FLAG = feet, at degrees, from
u.vud ed, o\meta
ckrPc'
CONDITIONS : dry normal wet DIMENSIONS:
HYDROLOGY:
SOILS: UPLAND WETLAND
VEGETATION:
species percent cover species percent`Cover
wetland non-w,?t wetland non•wet
------ ----------------------- -
---------- ----- -' -------
TREES: > S" DBH and > 201tal; WOODY VINES: climbing and.> 3'
SAPLINGS &
31-and SHRUBS:
< 5"
' GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;-
DBH or < 20 also woody plants < 3'
6.?
J
IJGS?Z Y?1PS,? ?urps? ?jy
u

PROJECT CREW
LOCATION
FLAG ?15 feet, at degrees, from'av+?
190" x
CONDITIONS: dry normal wet DIMENSIONS:
HYDROLOGY:
SOILS: UPLAND WETLAND
VEGETATION:
species percent cover species
-----wetland non-w??t percent cover
_ wetland non-wet`
TREES. > 5" DBH and >-'20'tal? --------------------=------=---
WOODY VINES: climbing and.> 3'
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS: GROUND COVER: non-Wood
> 3' -and < 5" DBH or < 20' Y plants;
also woody plants < 3'

S
L5

r
f
}1
S ?'Y
t:
` v
V /
1..
j

U.
4
PROJECT ?rJ)?' ?? mow`` _ SCI d - '
CREW
LOCATION Gy , ,
FLAG 1,(0 = feet, at degrees, from

n
?? 3 a a 3?
-<<.?. ??
CONDITIONS: dry normal wet DIMENSIONS:
HYDROLOGY:
S-?cv.?, c?c (, In
SOILS: UPLAND
WETLAND
of c,4 A.

VEGETATION:
r?.S I cvV?n-
r '
species percent cover
wetland
non- species
percent.'Cover
- ------ -------------------- wetland non
-wet'
TREES.
> S" DBH and > 2Q???1; .
------------------------.
WOODY VINES: climbing and.> 31
:i..\CG?Gr? ? 1 ??Q fJ l?
CQIA
l
iJlr ?i«? `.StV ?
? ??U
LZ S1' E-
? 1 o i Sun Svy
?Z T U 5 °?o
----------------
---------------
---------------
- -------------- -- -------------

---------------

-------------
------------- -

-

'SAPLINGS & SHRUB;:
> 3' and < DBH or < 201 GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;
also woody plants < 31
LT 5T 3U
---------------
----------------

t S, t? - gQ aU

i r
i

ti
HYDROLOGY: t .J e?"
U'
PROJECT DATE CREW r w I
f
LOCATION f?A?-'
FLAG 1t)a = feet, at degrees, from
a To r X ;0 At e? l>> ?r'
CONDITIONS: dry normal /wz DIMENSIONS:
SOILS: UPLAND WETLAND
VEGETATION:
species percent cover species percent cover
wetland non-ws?t wetland non=wet
------:----------------------- •-------------------------=---
TREES: > 5" DBH and > 20'tal,' WOODY VINES: climbing and .> 3'
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS:
> 31•and < 5" DBH or < 20'
,
GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;-
also woody plants < 3'

U `fin ra 55 G eC? POO t?.OZ

C, f
LzTU Soma
LT

i
f

PROJECT
CREW
LOCATION
FLAG d3 ay feet, at y degrees, from
aU0 !. ;10;_,r -?;
CONDITIONS: (dry normal wet DIMENSIONS:
HYDROLOGY:
?1- ?UW R? 1 a l
SOILS: UPLAND WETLAND

VEGETATION:
species percent cover species percent.'eover
wetland non-w=it
----_______ _ wetland non-wet
--
TREES:
TREES: > 5" DBH -and >-20'ta1: WOODY-VINES:-------- ------
and .> 3'
t_4. ?\.A IS-0\q
= ?)t3 H
OLv C tS`ao"
L=S,r 12-?y gat}
c u S„ ,? ??
---------------
---------------
-------------
SAPLINGS & SHRU
> 3' -and < 5"
8v .
cs
s -'
-----------------
-----------------
GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;.
DBH or < 20' also woody plants < 3'
-----------------
------------

PROJECT
CREW
LOCATION C1.1 I
FLAG feet, at degrees, from

??c '
x cv?> Cyc ?? a?
'14- . ?
CONDITIONS: dry normal wet DIMENSIONS:
HYDROLOGY:
SOILS: UPLAND _ 0?.6 ?j S,3 WETLAND o? • S Y s

VEGETATION:
species percent cover species percent cover

_ wetland non-w,,t
__ _
-
wetland non-wet
--
TREES. > 5" DBH and >
20'tal1 -------------------------- '
WOODY VINES: climbing and.> 3'
LYTu x _ 1 uo
??AP^ GSY„
nsvz ? 1. _- ,
Lr ST
---------------
-
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS: y'
> 3' and < 5" DBH or < 20? ?..??
GROUND COVER: non-wood
y plants;- `
also woody plants < 3'
• _ Liss t?,,,????

i
r
CONDITIONS: dry normal wet DIMENSIONS:
HYDROLOGY:
PROJECT ?WDATC CREW
LOCATION ,
FLAG ;'I 1.1 feet, at degrees, from
?2?,:? _ lac' r _ •:F

SOILS: UPLAND WETLAND _a•?C j
VEGETATION:
species percent cover species percent cover
wetland non-wot
------ wetland nonwet
----- _ ------ _ - .: _ _
TREES: > 5" DBH and > 20'tal; WOODY VINES climbing and .> V
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS:
.> 3' 'and < 5" DBH ``or < 20'
GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;'
also woody plants < 3'
3v %6
y
l?.
1
- ---------------

P;
oln?'?
PROJECT I?orck Co DATE {-?` - 4 { CREW
LOCATION j'}z:•.,I
FLA'G` = feet, at degrees, from
CONDITIONS: dry normal wets
HYDROLOGY:
DIMENSIONS: 1 o: - ;YCOSk :f ?eng?}` ?SG???
SOILS: UPLAND WETLAND
VEGETATION: F r ti
species percent cover species percent-cover
wetland non-wi-t wetland
non-wet'
TREES: > 511 DBH ..nd > 20 f tal s WOODY VINES: climbing and.> 3'
SAPLSNGS & SHRUBS: GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;'.
> 31-and < 5" DBH or < 20' also woody plants < 3'
U ? nrU S cD ?Q .•
I?05a" sA
?J
r
1??5 GC?A \??:1 T:???..?1 1 v?i-., r_ l ?iC?01?j???-G?O??
4
I I? l
to wuuc?? ?1Cs;.!' ?? ?c.4-o{? C?2??pw o
UZe
ULW
I'•
I
sv1 S? - VQT4? ?? ,^ `? ??e T`v`J s
LTTU

'V C\r

PROJECT CREW
LOCATION t cc, ,
FLAG = feet, at degrees, from
,..
CONDITIONS: dry normal wet

DIMENSIONS:
--------------
HYDROLOGY:
SOILS: UPLAND WETLAND
VEGETATION:
species percent cover species
wet 1.3 nd Percent 'cover
non-w,--t wetland
nan_wet
-------- ----- ---------------------
TREES. > S.. ---
DBH and > 201 tal; WOODY VINES:
climbing and.> 3+
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS:
> 31-and < S" DBH or < 20'
GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;
also woody plants < it
----------------
---------------
----------------
.}4t- :wen

r
3'l U
I ??, 5 ?
("N?c Q e 5 ?cvv\
1- 12

LAS I ??.:
L?? t
Lp.? f C fi,; ??
Sam
c

U

%
CONDITIONS: dry normal wet DIMENSIONS: CI—
% 0
PROJECT
DA'I'S CREW
LOCATION Cal
FLAG = feet, at degrees, from
Pap-IT
HYDROLOGY:
SOILS: UPLAND
VEGETATION:
_ WETLAND
species percent cover species percent`cover
wetland non-w,`t wetland
------------------------------- _____ non 'wet
TREES: > 5" DBH and >20'tal: WOODY VINES--------?------'=---
climbing and.> 3'
L-IST 010
L cd ! J -?u cIE? ?- ,
ARC
------------
----------- ------------
------------
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS:
> 3' -and < 5" DBHor < 20'
A6*W 1S Se f c? kek 5 ( 0
'. C u
0 y G5 1 0
GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;
also woody plants < 3'
Jai ?'

PROJECT
UA'I'E CREW
LOCATION Gy
FLAG S? = feet, at degrees, from
J
CONDITIONS: dry normal 'wet, DIMENSIONS: HYDROLOGY: _f SOILS: UPLAND WETLAND
VEGETATION:
species percent cover
species
wet percent.'cover
------ wetland non-w??t wetland
-•-----__--_. _ non-wet
;.
TREES: > 5" DBH and > 20'tal; WOODY V--------------'----------
IVES: climbing and.> 31
C 1 S 5- IS Ad
--------------
------------
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS:
.> 3' and < 5" DBH or < 20'
c 1 LAx\ 5
GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;
also woody plants < 3'
err

PROJECT 4 4, S ] , /W
DA'I'S
CREW
LOCATION r
FLAG 9- ,Feet at"?'
degrees, from
"-
`
.. ?r J
1
1 j. t
_ CONDITIONS: dry?rma1 wet
HYDROLOGY: SOILS: UPLAND

VEGETATION:
WETLAND ?. s
species percent cover species pezcent.'eovez
wetland non-w,, t wetland
----------- non 'wet
TREES. > S" DBH and >-2r)'tal.. --------------------=------=--- -
WOODY VINES: climbing an
d.> 3'
------------
--------------
------------
-
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS: GROUND COVER:
> 3' and < 5" DBH or < 20' non-woody plants;-
also woody plants < 3'
Tr_
.sue -------
u
DIMENSIONS:
r
x
PROJECT DA*rE.W
C REW
LOCATION t Cp
FLAG
feet, at degrees,
from
L 401'J`;f?
t
51 = _ w _

CONDITIONS: dry% normal wet DIMENSIONS:
HYDROLOGY:
t.?: _
SOILS: UPLAND
VEGETATION:
WETLAND
species percent cover species percent cover
wetland non-wot wetland
--------------- _ non-wet
TREES. > 5" DBH and > 20'tal.' - --------------------=----==---WOODY VINES: climbing and.> 3;'
--- -- S,rnt ,;-
L - -'4_
(A I
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS:
> 3'-and < 5" DBH or < 20'
.
¢ -
_ I ? C' i
J z
GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;.
also woody plants < 3'

66 -0
8 ? 6 l J?;

d
a
• PROJECT 74/WDA•TE
CREW
LOCATION t '
FLAG _ feet?w degrees, from
% T r V
CONDITIONS: dry nt?rmal ?+et DIMENSIONS: r' J Irlp -?•; =
HYDROLOGY:
SOILS: UPLAND WETLAND
VEGETATION:
! iry, ,y;
1
---
species percent cover
wetla
d ?. species percent cover

--- n
non-wt?t
- wetland non-'wet

TREES.
> 5"

DBH and > 201ta1; --

WOOD
Y VINES: ---------
----=- --
-
climbing and.> 3'
_? L' fi u a o
'rt'

- - ------------------
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS;
> 3' -and < 5" DBH
' GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;
or < 20 also woody plants < 3' •

PROJECT (1'vl ?? ?Ol` ?? > '?/WDA'i•E ilk d-?
CREW
LOCATION Cal
FLAG 'at degrees, from
CONDITIONS: dry normal wet DIMENSIONS- My ! /'/ 'Ira
HYDROLOGY:
SOILS: UPLAND
VEGETATION:
species percent cover
wetland non-w,-.r
-----------------------
TREES: > 5" DBH and >-201to1
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS:
> V.-and < 5" DBH or < 20'
0
_a 10,.
WETLAND
species percent cover
wetland non-wet
WOODY VINES: climbing and .> 31
GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;-
also woody plants < 3'
c ?dl i
PROJECT
LOCATION
FLAG feet, at degrees, from
u
CONDITIONS: dry normal' wed DIMENSIONS:
HYDROLOGY: . .
J r
SOILS: UPLAND `° ?p
VEGETATION:
species percent cover
wetland non-wot
TREES: > 5" DBH and > 201tal:
/ <-- i
c
--------------
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS:
> 3' and < 5" DBH or < 20'
ETLAND /
species percent cover
wetland non-wet
------------------------
WOODY VINES: climbing and .>
3f
GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;.
also woody plants < 3'
_ s V
rt
V
PROJECT ?vc f??Dl` /WDA-rc CREW
LOCATION CSI
FLAG _ P9 _ nfeet, a7? degrees, from
V_ 0
CONDITIONS: dry normal DIMENSIONS:
c
HYDROLOGY:
,;t
SOILS: UPLAND - WETLAND
R,
VEGETATION: e?1 0
species percent cover species
------`---------wetland non-w??t wetland nd t non-'wet'
TREES: > 5" DBH and > 20'tal! WOODY VINE----------=----?- --- -
S: climbing and.> 3'
------------
t_.
-tllH .may,:
-------------
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS:
> 3' and < 5" DBH or < 20'
6C
GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;.
also woody plants < 3'
4_0
-------------
t '
PROJECT i UA'i'E CREW
LOCATION .
FLAG a 1_ , Y
feet, a t (? degrees, from.
CONDITIONS: dry;'" nor
HYDROLOGY:
wet DIMENSIONS: '; ?f %?,•!??+?,,}
SOILS: UPLAND !1 \]", ,?%
a
VEGETATION:
species percent cover
-wetland non-wot
TREES: > 5" DBH and > 20'tal.!
4 !1
- ------------
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS:
> 3'-and < 5" DBH or < 20'
I 4r,
i
WETLAND 4' S / C1
species
percent 'cover
wetland non:-'wet
.
WOODY VINES: climbing and .> 31
-----------------
-------------
GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;-
also woody plants < 3'
'r 1='
.V> -

n?` J
? `??
.!'? ..
?. J\.
? ?
?_\`
\ :..?
r,
f
?\_ \.
\ ` ri^`V'
l
??-1
l \
?i. t?..? M1 -•• t
}
??
7
? I .
t PROJECT

LOCATION CREW
A=..
FLAG = p?? feet:, a t 0 degrees, from _ n n??XI`ZG9. °'`

s? .

CONDITIONS: d r normal wet .?
?' DIMENSIONS: '"30
-?

HYDROLOGY: 'F' j `f'%i;t?•+,,?; f
SOILS: UPLAND WETLAND + _S
VEGETATION: r/ L 1
7
'
,
?
species percent cover

wetland species
percent cover

-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - non -w'.t
- -
M wetland "
non-wet
--
TREES. > 5" DBH and ?
20'tal, ------IN----------------=-=---
WOODY VINES: '
climbing and.> 31

t ?5-
-------------
----

`. ------------
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS:
> 3" -and < 5" DBH or < 20'

GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;-
also woody plants < 3'
?b4.v
va
t. '
P,)r, e.-

t '
PROJECT / J 6DI d)__ WDATSAiw CREW V ,
j LOCATION
FLAG I1
I J ?
feet,
1, 3
CONDITIONS: dry normal
HYDROLOGY: at degrees,
?v
wet DIMENSIONS:
from
SOILS: UPLAND lJ`' WETLAND !?
VEGETATION: ' -

species percent cover
wetla
d species percent`eover

--------------- n
non-w,'t
-- _ - _ wetland
non-wet
TREES: > 5" DBH and >20'tal; ________
- - -
WOODY VINES
:
- - - - - - - --- - -
climbing and > 3'

4- =
4, 77
I

SAPLINGS & SHRUBS:
> 3''and < 5" DBH o
'
GROUND COVER: i?
non-woody plants;-
r < 20 also woody. plants < 3'

H
w
? ---J
PROJECT DATE CREW
LOCATION
FLAG I feet, at degrees, from 'rG' ?f'` 4

CONDITIONS : dry normal we t DIMENSIONS:
HYDROLOGY:
'
SOILS: UP LAND WETLAND '? f 1`

VEGETATION:
species percent cover species percent cover

--- wetland non-wot
------------------- -
------ wetland non-wet`
-

TREES: > -------
5" DBH and > 201tal; WOODY VINES: ------
=----=---
climbing arid.> 3'

v? r

SAPLINGS &
1 SHRUBS: GROUND COVER: non-woody plants; `
-and
> 3 < 5" DBH or < 20' also woody plants < 3'
( lei

PROJECT l?Ilkl`?. DATE CREW ?? J'? % ':??' .
LOCATION
r S
r ,.
FLAG = feet, at degrees, from 41

5-0
CONDITIONS: dry ;normal / wet DIMENSIONS:

HYDROLOGY: Wis. E. iv},k? <?L?`i'?0!?+
SOILS: UPLAND WETLAND S \? 5 ??-
VEGETATION:
species percent cover species pezcent'Cover
wetland non-wait wetland non_wet
TREES: > 5" DBH and > 201tal: WOODY VINES: climbing and .> 3'
4,^ /t41
?1/ t 4?
Fri, K%P
4;: ) ; `?
SAPLINGS & SHRUBSS
> 3' and < 5" DBH or < 20'
L
L-? P -
GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;
also woody plants < 3'

r

PROJECT DATE CREW

LOCATION
FLAG feet', ' at,.- from

CONDITIONS: dry normal wet DIMENSIONS: !

HYDROLOGY:

SOILS: UPLAND WETLAND

VEGETATION:

species percent cover species percent 'cover

------ wetland
------------ non-w,'t
------ wetland non-wet
TREES: > 5" DBH and > 201tal} WOODY VINES: climbing and .> 3'

€,
SAPLINGS & SHRUBS: GROUND COVER: non-woody plants;-
> 3' -and < 5" DBH or < 20' also woody plants < 3'
?? r V cL n r j? f.r! 41;7P