20060197 Ver 1_Individual_20060206

~Po~~,al2a~i
~~~ (~~~~ ~~~x z.~zz
~~lilnrrn~~ri, ~/6a~fl~ ~~azt~ina,~8/s02
~~~+Tr»~~ ~~ta~~r~ ~if~~~ ~ai~ 2 0 0 6 0 1 9 7
.38I~ `~~tr~lrfsrrrl/e.A;~isPh,cre f~rrfp/5
February 1, 2006
~~
E
TO: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
RE: 401 Water Quality Certification Application for Helmsdale at Landfall;
New Hanover County, NC
Dear Cyndi:
~1~1y,~: ~~o-~.~,z-oor»
rirrcrtTr. /nr~7au~i. ~zef
COPY
Enclosed is a 401 Water Quality Certification application for your review. This application is submitted
on behalf of Helmsdale Investors, LLC for the construction of Helmsdale at Landfall located in Wilmington,
NC. This tract is landlocked except for access from roads within the existing Landfall Subdivision. The only
way to develop the site is to incorporate it into Landfall. The applicant plans to build forty-eight lots within the
site and several wetland fingers need to be crossed in order to gain access to uplands. The proposed project
would impact 0.295 acre of 404 wetlands and 72 linear feet of stream. Due to previous impacts within the
Landfall Subdivision, cumulative wetland impacts exceed the threshold for a Nationwide Permit.
The application form, project narrative, associated maps, and site plan are enclosed for your review.
Furthermore, the $475 application fee is also enclosed. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you
for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
~ ~~~
Kim Williams

Encl.
Cc: Ms. Jennifer Frye, ACOE
Ms. Noelle Lutheran, DWQ
Ms. Stephen Rynas, DCM
Mr. Ken Kirkman
Mr. Thad Moore, Helmsdale Investors, LLC
Ms. Cindee Wolf, Withers and Ravenel

~~~CZ~ cy~~G~%U~2j ey~ZG.
~ ~ ~G>,~~v2a~i
~ab~ ~f ~ fox 2522
~v~y2~~~, ~d~i ~a~i0~ uc 2802
~d~ ~ ~ ~~
3805 ~~u~l~~ile ~~2ce ~uri~e 45
~~iria~ir2~2, ~28~03
February 1, 2006
TO: Ms. Jennifer Frye
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
RE: Individual Permit Application for Helmsdale at Landfall; New Hanover County, NC
Dear Jennifer:
~/aane:940-~52-0004
~a~:940-~52-0060
~,~v~~v~i~. ~~2 ~2~c. rem
Enclosed is an Individual Permit application for your review. This application is submitted on behalf of
Helmsdale Investors, LLC for the construction of Helmsdale at Landfall located in Wilmington, NC. This tract
is Landlocked except for access from roads within the existing Landfall Subdivision. The only way to develop
the site is to incorporate it into Landfall. The applicant plans to build forty-eight lots within the site and several
wetland fingers need to be crossed in order to gain access to uplands. The proposed project would impact
0.295 acre of 404 wetlands and 72 linear feet of stream. Due to previous impacts within the Landfall
Subdivision, cumulative wetland impacts exceed the threshold for a Nationwide Permit.
The application form, project narrative, associated maps, and site plan are enclosed for your review.
The wetland survey is also enclosed and awaits your signature. Please contact me if you have any questions.
Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sin erely, ( 1 ~
W ~'~
Kim Williams
Encl
Cc: Ms. Noelle Lutheran, DWQ
Ms. Cyndi Karoly, DWQ
Mr. Stephen Rynas, DCM
Mr. Ken Kirkman
Mr. Thad Moore, Helmsdale Investors, LLC
Ms. Cindee Wolf, Withers and Ravenel

(9G'~~~v~GG~
~a6~ ~~~ ~~ 2522
~'~v~r„0~~2, ~/Yd~if~i ~a~id~icc 28402
~a~2e2~ ~2cr~n,~2 ~~e ~' a/~c
3805 ~2 a~d~i~e ~~~s~uce ~ui~e 45
~~inz~, ~/j'~28/~03
February 1, 2006
TO: Stephen Rynas
Federal Consistency Coordinator
NC Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 2857
RE: Request for concurrence; Hehnsdale at Landfall; New Hanover County, NC
Dear Mr. Rynas:
~~aaie: 9~0-~i52- 000
~a~:9~0-~52-0060
~,r~c~rrr~. ~~r a~. nPi~
On behalf of Hehnsdale Investors LLC, Land Management Group, Inc. requests concurrence from the Division of
Coastal Management of the applicant's consistency certification. The applicant is proposing to construct Hehnsdale at
Landfall, which is located in Wilmington, NC. This tract is landlocked except for access from roads within the existing
Landfall Subdivision. The only way to develop the site is to incorporate it into Landfall. The applicant plans to build forty-
eight lots within the site. However, several wetland forgers need to be crossed in order to gain access to uplands. The
proposed project would impact 0.295 acre of 404 wetlands and 721inear feet of stream. The applicant has applied for an Individual
Permit and a 401 Water Quality Certification for this project. Cumulative wetland impacts within the Landfall Subdivision
exceed the threshold for a Nationwide Permit.
We have reviewed the State's coastal program regulations (ie.15A NCAC 071Vn and the local Land Use Plan for
New Hanover County. The proposed project complies with the enforceable policies of North Carolina's approved coastal
management program and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program. Enclosed is a copy of the Project
Narrative and the Individual Permit application, which describe this project's compliance with the coastal program
regulations, specifically avoidance and minimization of wetland impacts, water quality protection, and mitigation.
Please let me know if I can be of further assistance in this process. Thank you.
Sincerely,
~~~~~
Kim Williams
Encl.
Cc: Ms. Jennifer Frye, ACOE
Ms. Noelle Lutheran, DWQ
Ms. Cyndi Karoly, DWQ
Mr. Ken Kirkman
Mr. Thad Moore, Helmsdale Investors, LLC
Ms. Cindee Wolf, Withers and Ravenel

~y ~`~ E 0 1 9 7
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
Privacy Act Statement
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10: 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting, navigable
waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for
the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routing Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating this application for a permit.
Disclosure; Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided however, the permit application cannot be processed nor
can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Ehgineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. ~ 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 13. DATE RECEIVED 14. DATE APPL. COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not
Helmsdale Investors, LLC required) Kim Williams
c/o Mr. Thad Moore Environmental Consultant
Land Mana ement Grou ,Inc.
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
Preston Development Company Land Management Group, Inc.
100 Weston Estates Way P.O. Box 2522
Ca , NC 27513 Wilmington, N.C. 28402
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NO. W/AREA CODE
a. Business [phone] [phone] (phone)
b. Fax [phone] [phone] (fax)
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize Land Management Group, Inc. to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application. SEE ATTACHED FORM
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE -Helmsdale at Landfall
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
UT of Howe Creek
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
New Hanover North Carolina
COUNTY STATE
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Off of Arboretum Drive in the Landfall S/D
Wilmington, NC
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN
Tax Parcels R05100-002-011-000; R05100-002-010-000; R05100-002-012-000
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
From Wilmington, take Military Cutoff Road into the Landfall Subdivision. Site will be on Arboretum Drive, on
right (see vicinity map).

18. NATURE OF ACTIVITY (Description of project, include all features) -The preferred project consists of constructing 48
lots within the properly and building two roads; wetland fill for four road crossings and two driveway crossings will be
needed to provide access to upland within subdivision. (See Project Narrative)
19. PROJECT PURPOSE (Describe the reason or purpose of the project) - To provide access to 48 lots within subdivision.
(See Project Narrative)
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. REASON(S) FOR DISCHARGE - To construct road access to lots within uplands. (See Project Narrative)
21. TYPE(S) OF MATERIAL BEING DISCHARGED AND THE AMOUNT OF EACH TYPE IN CUBIC YARDS -Clean, compacted
sub-grade soil materials, clean ABC aggregate, pavement etc all-above street reinforced concrete culverts at map
specified locations. See map for area in each location.
22. SURFACE AREA IN ACRES OF WETLANDS OR OTHER WATERS FILLED
0.295 acres of 404 wetlands and 72 LF of stream
23. IS ANY PORTION OF THE WORK ALREADY COMPLETE? no IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS, LESSEES, Etc., WHOSE PROPERTY ADJOINS THE WATERBODY
(see attached sheet)
25. LIST OTHER CERTIFICATIONS OR APPROVALS/DENIALS RECEIVED FROM OTHER FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL
AGENCIES FOR WORK DESCRIBED IN THIS APPLICATION N/A
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL* IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the
information in this application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work
described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant.
~ t a6
SIGNATURE OF AP~A~(,T ~,(,..~ DATE
18. U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly
and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or
representations o rmakes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall
be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.

a

PROJECT NARRATIVE
January 2006
Helmsdale at Landfall
New Hanover County, NC
INTRODUCTION
Helmsdale Investors, LLC is proposing to construct Helmsdale at Landfall, which is located in
Wilmington, NC. This tract is landlocked except for access from roads within the existing Landfall
Subdivision. The only way to develop the site is to incorporate it into Landfall. The applicant plans to
build forty-eight lots within the site, which is located at the intersection of Arboretum Drive and South
Moorings Drive. Several wetland fingers need to be crossed in order to gain access to uplands.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The 40.5-acre project site is located in Wilmington, NC off of Arboretum Drive in New
Hanover County, NC (Figures 1 & 2). According to the New Hanover County Generalized Soil
Survey, the site consists of Johnston loam, Murville fine sand, Craven fine sandy loam, Onslow loamy
fine sand, Rains fine sandy loam, Kenansville fine sand, Seagate fine sand, and Torhunta loamy fine
sand soil types (Figure 3). Land use to the north and east of the tract is-residential and consists of the
Landfall Subdivision. A forested area that has been dedicated as a conservation area by Landfall exists
south of the site (Figure 4). An unnamed tributary of Howe Creek forms the western property
boundary and several fingers of this creek extend across the tract, forming approximately 8.55 acres of
freshwater wetlands within the tract.
The site is currently undeveloped and forested. Uplands support longleaf pine (Pinus palustris),
red bay (Persea palustris), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), blueberry (Vaccinium crassifolium),
and wiregrass (Aristida stricta). Wetlands within the tract consist of fingers of the unnamed tributary
of Howe Creek. The upper reaches support red maple (Ater rubrum), ironwood (Carpinus
caroliniana), loblolly pine (P. taeda) and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera). The creek along the western
property boundary contains standing water and supports bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) and black
gum (Nyssa sylvatica) trees.

The presence of any plant or animal species is determined by the availability and abundance of
suitable habitat. Habitat with the potential for supporting federally listed threatened or endangered
species was identified by reviewing natural resource databases, aerial photographs, soils maps, and
topographic maps of the property and by walking throughout the project area. A search of the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program database was conducted to determine whether any state or federally
listed rare species have previously been observed within or near the project area. This search found no
known record of rare species within the project site, but located four records .within aone-mile radius .
of the site. Two rare plants were observed approximately 1000 feet southwest of the site. The snowy
orchid (Platanthera nivea; state-listed Threatened) was observed in 1989 and the twisted-leaf
goldenrod (Solidago tortifolia; state-listed Significantly Rare) was observed in 1964. Two rare animals
were also observed. The chicken turtle (Dei~ochelys reticularia; state-listed Significantly Rare) was
noted approximately one mile south of the site and the Carolina diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys
terrapin centrata; state-listed Species of Concern) was observed one mile east of the site
On January 10, 2006, staff of Land Management Group, Inc. evaluated the tract for its potential
to support federally-listed threatened or endangered species (Table 1). No federally protected species
were observed within the site. Uplands within the tract are forested and contain some fairly large
loblolly pine trees. However, the uplands are densely vegetated and do not contain appropriate habitat
for the red-cockaded woodpecker, which requires large stands of mature pine trees in which to nest and
forage. Wetlands within the tract are thickly vegetated and would not support rare plant species, such
as Cooley's meadowrue and rough-leaf loosestrife. Although the western property boundary consists
of a tributary to Howe Creek, this feature is fairly small and would not provide suitable habitat for the
American alligator or the shortnose sturgeon.
Table 1.Federally-listed endangered and threatened species known to occur in New Hanover County, NC,
excludine coastal and marine species.
Common Name "Scientific Name Status
Animals
American alligator Alli ator mississi iensis T(S/A)
Red-cockaded woodpecker . Picoides borealis E
Shortnose sturgeon Aci enser brevirostrum E
Plants
Cooley's meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi E
Rough-leaf loosestrife Lysimachia as erulaefolia E
2

KEY:
Status Definition
Endangered A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
Threatened A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range:''
T(S/A) Threatened due to similarity of appearance - a species that is threatened due to
similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its protection.
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
The alternatives evaluated include. a no-action alternative, off-site alternatives, on-site
alternative site layouts, and the preferred project.
No-Action Alternative
The no-action alternative would keep the site in its current, undeveloped condition and would
keep Landfall from expanding its subdivision into this area. The no-action alternative is not considered
feasible for several reasons. Wilmington is experiencing rapid growth. It would leave approximately
40.5 acres of land. undeveloped. This would cost the current owner of the tract approximately
$4,000,000 in potential revenue. Without annexing the tract into Landfall, the tract would be
unbuildable since there are no other ways to access the site. The inability to expand development
within this tract of land would be a significant loss of return for the applicant and a loss of upscale
housing for the community.
Alternate Sites
The proposed project will become an expansion of the existing Landfall Subdivision.
According to its regulations, Landfall can only annex those tracts of land that have their sole access
from Landfall. Based on these rules, the off-site alternatives evaluated were adjacent, undeveloped
tracts without alternate access. Only one tract, meeting these criteria was located.
Grant Farm Tracts
These three tracts encompass 26.02 acres and are located on the north side of
Arboretum Drive, west of Pembroke Jones Lake (Figure 5). The tracts currently contain one
residence and farm land. Wetlands likely exist on the northern part of the property, where
3

Howe Creek forms the border. Landfall has attempted to purchase the tract from its owners,
Adair and Louise Graham, but they are not willing to sell. Therefore, the development of this
site by Landfall is not considered a feasible alternative.
On-site Alternatives
Two on-site alternatives were evaluated. The first option is an alternate roadway pattern that
would stop before crossing any wetlands. The second is developing uplands within the entire site by
bridging all of the wetland crossings.
1. Alternate Roadway Pattern
An alternate roadway pattern was evaluated in which wetlands were not crossed (Figure 6).
This site plan allows the development of thirty-two lots. A short cul-de-sac off of Arboretum Drive
would provide access to lots # 1 through # 17 and the existing Arboretum Drive would provide
access to lots #18 through #32. In addition, one very large lot (#8) would be entered from South
Moorings Drive. This alternative would develop sixteen fewer lots than the preferred alternative,
which would be a loss of approximately $2,786,000 dollars (Figure 7). Because of this financial
loss, this site plan is not considered a viable alternative.
2. Bridging Wetlands
The applicant evaluated the potential to develop forty-eight lots within the site and cross
wetlands by constructing bridges. In general, bridges are not considered to be a wetland impact by
the Corps and DWQ and could provide a mechanism to avoid any wetland impacts within the tract.
Four bridges would need to be constructed to NC DOT standards, which would cost approximately
$1,000,000 total (Figure 8). In addition, two smaller bridges would be needed for driveway
crossings in Lots #10 and #18, which would cost approximately $250,000. Because of this cost,
this option is not economically feasible.
Preferred Project
The preferred project consists of constructing forty-eight lots within the property and building
two roads; one narrow private drive that would parallel Arboretum Drive and would provide access to
Lots #34 through #48 (Figure 9). The other road has a 50' right-of way and would extend from
Arboretum Drive to South Moorings Drive and provide access to Lots #1 through #33. This road
4

would require crossing four wetland fingers, one of which is a stream as well. Culverts will be installed
at the wetland crossings (Figure 10). Utilities would also be extended into this area, within the road
right-of--way. Additionally, two driveway crossings would be needed within Lots #10 and #18.
POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
The proposed project would impact 0.295 acre of 404 wetlands and 72 linear feet of stream
(Figures 11 & 12). Secondary impacts to wetlands and water quality could occur during and after
construction of the project through erosion and stormwater runoff. -These potential impacts will be
minimized by the development and implementation of a Stormwater Plan and a Sedimentation and
Erosion Control Plan. These plans will reduce the potential for erosion or runoff into wetlands and
other water bodies located off site.
It should be noted that a total of 83.5 acres of wetland disturbance has already occurred within
the greater Landfall Subdivision. These impacts have been permitted by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Division of Water Quality, and Division of Coastal Management and the required
mitigation has been completed (attached).
MITIGATION
To mitigate for proposed wetland impacts, restrictive covenants will be recorded on all
remaining wetlands within this tract to prohibit any wetland fill beyond what is being requested here.
This will protect approximately 8.25 acres of wetlands. In addition, approximately thirty acres of
coastal and freshwater wetlands within Landfall will be placed into preservation. Finally, the applicant
plans to create at least 0.295 acre of wetlands within an area owned by the Homeowner's Association
of Landfall that is located off of Drysdale Drive (Figure 13). The applicant is in the process of
developing a complete mitigation plan for this area.
5

01/30/06 09:45 FAX [phone] PRESTON DEVELOP%ENT CO.
01/27/2006 11:31 9104520060 LANDMANAGENIENT
ACx~N'z' AUTHORIZAxXON FORM
TO WTIOM IT M,A.Y CONCE,RN':
~ 002
PAGE 02/02
I/we, the undersigned, hereby authorize Land Management Group, lire, to act as our agent in the
preparation az~d represe~atation o£ information related to the petmitt application for the Helmsdale
project located in 1Vew Hanover County, NC. All questions in regards to this project should be
directed to Land Management Group, Tnc. , ~ '
Si.ncercly, ~~
~~ ~ E
' Owner/Appliewt ~'
l-'31-0~
Date

Adjacent Property Owners
for
Helmsdale at Landfall
William B. Towles
6301 Towles Road
Wilmington, NC 28409-2122
Dock McAllister
c/o Arbor Point
905 Arboretum Drive
Wilmington, NC 28409
Regency Court, LLC
1337 Regatta Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
Landfall Council/Associations
1749 Drysdale Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
Frank H. Kenan Chapel/ Landfall
1500 Renaissance Plaza
230 Elm Street North
Greensboro, NC 27401

a~ ~ ~ ~~ -
~~i ~~ y~ ~1~ ~ ~+a
1
t
~~ i•~
aLU ~ '
`~ vs T' , ~ ~..
F-y..~
~~.~ ~~
: ,
:' y ~iwe;a~i
SuA~x~
I sire ,
wow fixrcu
na,; .o .
w.r
Q
~~
~-:~S ~_
xP.
t{(,
+. j C
j •'~ wA
.[_.
!/~N, 2( n\Y 9, ~/~~
l M i
f
i. '+w to }..: ._.........~.._ ...__._....:- ...
C n
..~.; y/
l
:. t
;,
_ ~:: '~ ~ i
~ a
32
{7pawL. ~ ).q~ '_ F 1 ~`-.~ ~{ iWxfh( .I~nz ,
1 4 ~~ ~r t g f Nai:fM al FSpAltinC '.
r { ~, I .f~ J6i 4rsEa h f2[xrve '.
~ ~ a4 isw ~ ~ Siyws ... a.,n. ~ ~ _ , .' ~ _ I
Myrtle ~~y,
•. ~ , ~ - ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5~' ~-' G~roe j.~'y,
~1 DeLorme ,
A ~. { ~
~) ~
-'-~: t' ~ , ~Fg 6 2~'
`, ~~ ~ y
~~ SITE ?~a~2 - ~~`~ ~ ~~)AN?~lc
~; ahD 5 ,
Map Source: DeLorme North Carolina Atlas and Gazetteer, pg. 84. SCALE 1 " = 2.4 miles
Helmsdale at Landfall Land Management Group, Inc.
New Hanover County, NC Environmental Consultants
Wilmington, N.C. Figure 1. Vicinity Map
individual Permit Application lama 2006
40-05-298P ~}'

r ,~~
~~
3
M,
Mx~M'
i
s
~ '`.,...
~k
~ M~#,
~+' ~
~~i~.. r'`/~
~.
--. w~
,,3 _' _... ,...~
+1•
e
~. ~ ^
•
•
• ,
w
~_.
~~
,.,,ao,
=~
f
Site Boundary ~~ 1"
~~~.
Ma Source: USGS To o ra hic g g SCALE 1 " = 1000'
p p g p Quadran le, Wri htsville Beach
Helmsdale at Landfall Land Management Group, Inc.
New Hanover County, NC N;nvironmental Consultants
Wilmington, N.C. Figure 2. Topographic Map
Individual Permit Application lama X006
40-05-2~)RP ry --
~.
,,
_.--_ ~ ;
-~-m,
,!,r
• • r ~ J~
^ t
1 ~~'". ~~
~1

~t8
& "'~~
" z-,
;~"'-.ti i

'„ yV+~ ,

1-a , .emu
1,~ .. ,,;.,,,
!t , ' °°~
To
~. .
. ~Q
~~~~~~~
~~~
Site Boundary ~ ~'~ 6 2G
~,~;,
Map Source: New Hanover County soil survey SCALE 1 " = 1000'
Helmsdale at Landfall Land Management Group, Inc.
New Hanover County, NC l?nvironmcntal Consultants
Wilmington, N.C. Figure 3. Soils Map
[ndividual Permit Application Janua 2006
40-OS-298P ~'

~*
~'*
~.
'~ ~
~~
~ ~' ; ~ - t
r E t
~ ~ ~
~, ~ _~.
~,• ~,raa ,~~'~ '~`
~* ~ ~,y, ,"'~,

~"
i
~ ~ ~ s
,«
g
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
a
~"'.~,~ ~ ' ~ ~ ice. ~ ~~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~~~, ~yb ~ ~ . t5 ~" '~"
,~ ~qy '"~ is k • ~~ ~ ~~ ~y ~` ~ t~ ~~,
~~' 7 .. -. ~ ~t ' y, . ~' ~" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. k. ~
~!° " 9
w
;3 p m ~~ y 4 q ~ µ'
~ My ^a,~ib" $; ~. /i~,~°~" ~' R#s 7~4~,~ ~'s. ~ fir. i. ~ .~'YF i ~ `:.
S ry~•,= . ~.~
~ ; ~ ~" ui; . ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ; .t
v ~ J
ti ,, s "
~ a
," •,..
~ ~' ;
!£4" ''fir, s ~ A~~ ~ • ~ . r ~: , ~ ~ ' ~ > ~ :,
3~ . y,~,,~ yR • ~ s ! ,+~ ~w
T M~~iwk FM ~ ~ 4 Y % f +~' ~~ $ ,"9e 'A y R.~ ~r ^_ *I
'~Yt er ~ ~ "TMjr*
!._l
FEFj ~ ~nr.c
WEiZgyO ~p~s;Ct~~~
SCALE 1 " = 400'
Helmsdale at Landfall Land Management Group, Inc.
New Hanover County, NC Environmental Consultants Figure 4.
Wilmington, N.C. Aerial photograph of site.
Individual Permit Application Janua 2006
40-OS-298P ry

f..~V.~. - a~. ~' a ~ a~" ~'~ . ~, +y.. ~Y "~ '~' '~, ~ ~, ID *.~,.' ~ av.'s ~ ~~ ,~~,~p, '" y~~
1
~- t •~ ' A C .' 'k .M?
~ v
F s s ~ ~~ ~ ,~ ,~ a is ~ ~~ , ~: a~. '~; R ~,.,, ° *~`'x~„
its a ,~ .L. ,a ~°~ .. ~.. * ~ ixa ~ ~,~. fisp; ~.. ~., #., a.
~" ..,ar, Fit` ~ , I ~ a ~ }~"
t ~ ~ 1~ ~ R 4 5 ,~'9 #19~,"'
4'~
.,~$ ~ ~"
" ~ ~ ;'
r ~`' r^-~
.~` `g;=
~.~
~.:_
' ~
a ~ ~ Jp+
4 ,, ,,°a'~~"s~ ~' ~ x ~ ~" ~ i
:4.i. ~ ~x?a ~~
~ x ~
~r;~: '~°' ~'; `~
~~ `~ ~ ~~~~ ~, f °~"°
~, „ s .
"i. ,.
° ~x a ~ ~
a
:~ ~ ~ ~,
y. R sf.'i" p' ~d ~.:a ~
°$' d ~ ~Ty"
~ we
~ . ,'~ ,~ a°_ .,
5~
p 5 ~ St~a
,,
~ y.
a
~d ~ ~
~` ~' -

~~ ~ _~ $~,
~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ..
~@ "d ,c x:~ ~ .d
' '~ ~ ~
~"
4. ~ '~
~~ "' g ~ fi~
4, 4_".7
l~ .E ~ 4.~.
FEB ~ 20G6
WETlAh'DS AWD STbt7htvtif~~~ ul~ w+jnt+IGN
SCALE 1" = 1000'
Helmsdale at Landfall Land Management Group, Inc.
New Hanover County, NC Figure 5.
Environmental Consultants
Wilmington N.C. Off site alternative:
Individual Permit Application Janua 2006 Graham Farm Tract
40-05-298P ~
~m~k:
c,

$.R
~~
(Mia ~~o~!~d ,ss)
~_
'U'~ ~71.D(C~ .qP~
tlY~
~a:
Fa w
~- ~ L
1 r rOm ~
J
_~ ~_ om
~~ 1 1
g~ ~~ ,
--
~~
J
on
J
1 ~N
aN I
J
ON
J
S
3
j N ~
'"~
3 --
d
'-IQ ~IJOOI.J 4~S
Ks
:~~,
~~~~ r
,~
. ./ \.
r
W
Q
Z
W
H
J
Q
W
'F-
VJ
W
mW
1..V
r~
V
J
J
a
0
z
J
Q
W
J
Q
J
W
2

HELMSDALE
PROFIT ANALYSIS
1 /20/2006
LAND
INFRASTRUCTURE
CLEARING/STUMPING
INTEREST
MARKETI N G
COMMISSIONS
SURVEY
ENGINEERING
LAND PLANNING
LEGAL
ACCOUNTING
ON SITE MANAGEMENT
TOTAL EXPENSES
SALES PROCEEDS
MEMBERSHIP PROCEEDS
TOTAL PROCEEDS
PRETAX PROFIT
MITIGATION EXPENSE
PRETAX PROFIT AFTER MITIGATION
PROFIT DIFFERENTIAL
AVERAGE SALES PRICE
COMMISSION RATE
2/1 /2006
32 LOTS 48 LOTS
4,000,000 4,000,000
539,000 930300
81,000 129000
330,780 342,519
100, 000 100, 000
384,000 576000
16,000 24000
50,000 65,000
20,000 25000
20,000 22500
10, 000 10000
25,000 35000
5,575,780 6,259,319
6, 400, 000 9, 600, 000
640, 000 960000
7, 040, 000 10, 560, 000
1,464,220 4,300,681
- 50,000
1,464,220 4,250,681.
2,786,461
200, 000
0.06
HELMSDALE AT LANDFALL
FIGURE 7. COST ANALYSIS

A~I~^~7'cAV
~~ ^ ~~ ~.
co~ucnorr IlMtooucrs ~Nc
:t CfSlO]lCt7 :.C:U.3?~MY
Jack Webb -Estimator
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
DATE: December 15, 2005
COMPANY: Withers S< Ravenel
ATN: Garry Pape, P.E.
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
QUOTE # 2902A-E
RE: Wetland Crossings
We are pleased to quote you a price on the Steadfast Bridge described below. The
floor will be a 20 gage galvanized composite floor deck. Reinforcing steel and pouring
of the lightweight concrete shall be by the owner or contractor. This bridge will be
fabricated from A572 carbon steel and hot-dip galvanized as per ASTM A123.
All Steadfast Bridges carry a 10 year limited warranty. Shop drawings signed and seal ed
by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of North Carolina will be provided.
Location: Wilmington, NORTH CAROLINA
Bridge Type: Beam Truss AREA #1 AREA #2 AREA #3 & 4 DRIVEWAY
Width in feet 34'-0" 34'-0" 34'-0" 16'-0"
Span in feet 28'-0" 77'-0" 60'-0" 60'-0"
Type steel A572 GALVANIZED A572 GALVANIZED A572 GALVANIZED A572 GALVANIZED
Type floor (shipped loose) CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE
Floor thickness 8" 8" 8" 8"
Field splice YES YES YES YES
Dead Load PSF 105 115 115 125
Live Load PSF AASHTO AASHTO AASHTO AASHTO
Vehicle Load LBS. HS - 20 HS - 20 HS - 20 HS - 20
Assembled Weight LBS. 32,484 125,606 89,587 52,123
Vert. abutment load KIPS 146 277 239 182
Horiz. abutment load KIPS 6 17 14 14
Truss height in feet N/A N/A N/A N/A
Beam camber NONE NONE NONE NONE
Hwy guide rail YES YES YES YES
Bearing pads YES YES YES YES
Setting plates YES YES YES YES
Special features NONE NONE NONE NONE
Bridge cost delivered $58,080 $202,159 $147,643 $90,744
times 2 bridges.
$295,286
Total of all bridges $646,269
Delivery: 6 to 8 weeks (delivery schedule subject to backlog at time of drawing approval).
Bridge will be delivered to nearest location easily accessible to over-the-road trucks.
Teflon slip pads and setting plates shipped with bridge.
No slopes or skews are included unless. specifically mentioned above.
Anchor bolts, sales tax, unloading, erection, supports, and abutment designs not included.
Terms: 1/3 down, balance 20 days after delivery, pending credit approval.
This quote is valid for 30 days. Please call if you have any questions (866-294-9767).
Your Name Here
Your Title Here
Accepted By:
Title /Date:
STEADFAST BRIDGES * 400 Union Hill Dr., Suite 250 * Birmingham, AL 35209 A CONTECH Company
NOTE: ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE INSTALLATION HELMSDALE AT LANDFALL
(APPROX. 30% TO 40% ADDL) FIGURE 8. BRIDGE ESTIMATE

i
- ' ~ ' _..~'
"
~.,..,
I'

~~
/
i
I
` i I
__
' i j
~.. _
,, r ;
I
,.
/ ~ .1 ,.
~' ~ ~ 1 1 1
1
J
W d
~ ~N
N
4 = O~~
f ~NN ~'I,
- J O ~ ~ '
~ ~ Q U
c2
° ~' ~ '',
>o m',
W 4U~o f''
Z 41YLL N 1
z'j On N
~+ ~Zl~i ~
n ~ m 3
~N3 ~
'I~ :50. d
W y~E01
~ n3
W ~
z ~ I
`ti
z 3
~ NMI
a °
a ~^o
wZaN~
wawoa
o~zzo;
z~arrn
~ waw
w 3U~
~ c
a ~
1 ~ ~
j ~ ~~~ 1 ; z
- ~ '~
.~
.\ .,\ \
~ _ a
•' II
" II ~ o
~~ 1 -
,' 3
.'y.•~•.•e• :.
i
rv" ~~ ~ 1 - a
.,/ a --II ~_ ;. ~ pit
II ~ ' al
h _
= i ~ _ _._._.._._._._ --if o
aI',
~~ ~ ii
ii ~
. ;_u ;-
I ,,
e ii, _ i
~ ~I
_..___. o it
-- - - ~- _.._-~R
11 ~ ~ :.
Figure 9. Site plan showing proposed
wetland and stream impacts.
200 100 0 200 400
SCALE. 1 "=200'
z~~83 i
~i,~i~E
W-1
r
/
~ _ ~` ~\
J
1. _ ~ ~\
'.
I ~, t
~ 1 ~ 1
1~
1 ~ 1
1 ,
1
j
,\ 1
j
. .; ,,,;:
..
ti
_. ~---
6

_ - _ i
,
-_ ,
~~,~ / ~ soot ` \ ~ /
1~6 ~ 26
t535i __ ~ /
_~-~~ '-~ 526553fi ~ ~ /
I C35 ]> ,\
55,424 $, F. I - _
1 I \ \ @~' ofiU - _ _ ~' t-43.528'
. ,_ __ ---~ I _.
_ - - I \~~ 6\ X30291'.-_ - ~ 515134 E
__ __ ~ I
ITT GH 8 '
N az ..... 1 _ 24 ....~ r _ I - 5 55'51 ti' E 391 efi' - - - - L +3053 I
w>a awry I I 125,868 SF.J ~ r______ __- _. .. - __. \. ( _
a ~ 36 831 5 F 1 ~- ~ - \ I
~ \ 21 I r - X~ /
o _ ~ ~ - ~f
ro ~ I
°s f ` \ \24.566 S. F.I I I 20 J I ~ X --F-- -~ I i .~_ ~ I I I / I '~ rr arsa'Ia
\ "I 70,605 S.F I 'I~' I
Uo ~~ _,-I ( 1 23 \ \ I /J I III I \ ~ I 1 E ~ E 5152'
- O ~ I ~~/ ~ I I I 1 1 I I ~ _} -~ I~I I I \I ~ I -~ ay o3,
k ~2a,296 S.E~ \ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I ~ 1
\ S ~ ~~ ~ I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I ICI j I I I I I I h
~~ I ~ ~ I I~ I I I I 11 I I 10 I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I
© S S~~ / ~ ~ 15 11 I 14 I 13 I 12 I
v 36,020 SF. ~ ~~ 11 1 1 I I~ I I ~ I ~~ I~ I I~ I ~4 I I 3~ I~ I I~ I~ I
I 19 I 131,035 S.F. 30,962 B,F. 30,889 S.F.I 70,816 S.F 33,292 6.F,1 33,706 8.F.1 133,120 S.F.I 30,506 S.F. 30,433 S.F. 30,360 SF. 30,287 S.F. 30,215 S. F. 30,369 S.F. 31,234 SF. 32884 S.F.° I
' ~' ~ C I 124, 74fi SF I I I III III III III I I I I I I I
' S AF 22 } L ~ I I I I I I I I i 111 III III III 1111 III I~ I II' I£
\ S A\ 30,170 S. F. / ~ ~~ '. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I i I
® ~ ~
"~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ L__J L___J L__J __J ___~ L.___~ ~___~ L___J L__J J__J L___J L__J L__J L__J ~_~I ~
~ A i
~ ~ <
y . - 34,855 S F > ~ ~ \ - - - - - -
/ * V/// / ~ ~^\ \\ ^\~ N5616'I]"W 150109' - -
~~~~~ ~. V ~ < Av A 38.150 5 F
~~ / ~ Y A Al
~' Y iii ~ A V A 6,727 SFdA g .,~ g ~ ~ i
~ \~'~
o /~~ \\ \ ~\ 16\\\\\ '~~\\\ ~ ~ ~b „n, SECTION ~'2 I`'r-~~J *~,~/N ~
` / . i
~.
i ~
i ~ f
,. ~ 26,0 S.F. ~~ \ 26,037 5 F \ \\\ - ~ =100' /
i
~, i
i i \ \
i i \ ~s
i i ~'.
'~ \ J ~ ~ v ~. ~,. ~~ "
PROFILE q2 TION g5
't 1028 SF i. ~ i 1•_10D SEC110NOOp3 SEf=100' /7 ~ 1.
i •~ ~•
~. \. i /
- / 41 ~ 5\
i',~ /
~,, - ~ ~-ice A ~ 39,001 SF i~ / / ~ PROFI ~ g'S
i
ROFl
,~ ~~ _, ~ ® ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ /// i A - R FF k3s e•aa•~s' E 91 s1, t t - ._
w - ~ ~ // - /// /// 1 1 r.
FE ~,,. '. ~ g ~ / ~ 37 271 S F - \ ~ ~ / / / O / / / 7 / f f l a 7 I 1 ~
/ i /,, .. ~ ~ ~ / 32,564 S.F. / / I ~ I _ .._. -
'~ ~ x , , ~ / 60,070 SF,
~, ~. ,.
/
_ ~
~,~~ ,• ~ '. A ~ ~~ 77 /30,530 S.F. / / '~~ 11 I PASSIVE ~ r
5y~I PROFILE y1 - / / ` ~ ~/ / / / / 45 J p' ~~~ ,'CPUMON ~~ _. - - L ('r'1 ~ ~~
~~1 I°=100' ~, ,. ~. 5 / / \ ~~ // //: 'I .k4EA ~ i
~ / /.;~,~ 7 4391 F ~ _
it
-., .... - - 2 / // ~~ ~ G / '1491 1
~~ ~" -~r
w
SECTION ~1 '. ~ ., ~ / ~ ~ / ~ ~ (. 46 -. ~. ~A I __
I"=100' \. "~'~ -% 38,792 SF. / / / / ) ~ 56,595 S.F. ~ I I
,.,.../~... ~, FILOEOp6 1, ~ ~-~~ ~ /~~ 3fi // // ~ /~~`~ ~ ~ ~~~ 1'I~ 11111 411
PRO _ -,~
7 ~ ~ 4
70,969 S.F. / / ~- J ~ I -
SECTION q6 / ~ - / / / / _ _
' a ~ .~ :~ / / / 224,614 S F. / O / / ~ .
1"=100' ~', r., -.2 ~ , ~ ,
/ ~~ /// 7 / 38 ~// ~I ~, __ ~
, ', l - - ~ L_ / /'21,944 S.F., / 39 ~.I I ~~ _ ~
,/ ~'. ~ ~,.,_~ ~~-.,J /256315.E 11 40 I ACTIVE ,. OG1 ~fi I ~
U13"
,~ W\ aeo a> ~ ; I 122.777 SF I COREAN ' :.~q s5 ~ .. _._ w
~" (I ~ I !~ ~~..- rc
--__~
d ~
a
«.
I
,:
,u~ ~,
-,,.,
. ~
~~v ~ r `~, 1 ~ ~ - -CERTIFIED 404
~\ ~ ~~ '~ ~ ~ ~ - " ~ WETLAND AREAS w
aRaFILE pa (TOTnL - e ss nct) N
~ ~ ~ - ~ ,' ~ I"-100' w
- ~ ', '~,'. =~ '.. ~., ,r r ,~ ~ r~~3I - iOFAL PROPOSED a
., _, ,, i A,„ ,,,. _..
-' ~ ~ ~- - ~ ~' WETLANDS FILL AREA ~
~f fi
SI[{WALN
1L' v LLE7 GUtiEA~
19~-
0' F9.5A
6' aAG X24' VALLEY GUrtEA
I- IS`-o' ~'-a
~
I AVPAOx 7 La~-a.
O O

~ $ ~ " ~
n~ Ao ~ p
LOC AL STREET SECTION
PROFILES ~1-~(4
mGr m s ~t
a
= 12,852 SF.t ~
SECTION ~,4 ~
'~'°° PRELIMINARY
NOT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION
s'-a' s'-o'
ASPHALT ASPxALt
POlxi
~5F95A
~' ABC
TYPICAL DRIVEWAY SECTION
PROFILES ~5-#6
xar ro SCUE
FIGURE 10.
C
W"
}
Z°
W a
~ ~ oC
\ ~ ppN
/~ ~ m Lo
rn .°_.' ~ N E
_ 0
N N° to u
f( N~m C
~( W aUao
~r1/ Z v"~ "
Z -
rn Q ~znr
d
V! J ~ -m ;
~/ - 3~N 3
IIiI a'tv 3
W ~ o£o
W ^3°'
I Z ~
2
3W
F Q
3 0
a>~~g
zr~~
wiwZa
^~Z c
z00>~,
QU~Q~
3u~
a ~
0
a
z ~
- O Z
a Q
J U H
J ~ W
O to
Z ~t
F OV
Z J
z W
O O
Q
J ~
~ ~
> ~
~ o
Q a d
x Q
3
w z F
Q a_ Q
_ ~
~, Z
~~o
w~ ~
Z
~ W
3 3
lob No. 26s7e3
Dmx~n By: BCC
Checked BY, uen
Date. 10/5/2005
Scale: I'=100'
W-2

..
~~v v .~
~•~
~-
", \ ...
~'
''` w /
...
-.
_ ~ ~ - / 'a.
".,
".:
,,
a n ~ \ ,. ,~,,~
,~
'..
,,
r;
~,
_.
.~
------~-
.:.
,, s. --
`~' ~ -
- -.
.~
... ~. ~..
~ ..~ .
i J i' ,
-
,:.~ ,:
~~
.,
::
~ ~ ~ Sfir:`eam
;;. .. -
o
`{.
~.
..
-...
..., -
,,
~~\~.
,:
~ ;.
~. ....,.
.._-- - ---.-1--._... _ ~ 312 . ~ s , .'~ ~ a
....
.:: ;,
,.:
.~ , '-
~,
~~ ~~.
~~ .....
,,
~~ =
.:.~
., ,~
..
. ~. .... .
~,
3
.. .~
2 - ~~
;.,
,: _
._
:-
z
.~,
.,
-;-
` \71
:.: , .
,~.
.;
,,
~;~
.:
~. .. ;~ , .
..
.:, , : , ;~
..
~..
,~ ., ,: ~
., 3 ~
V `:;:
.;. y ~ "' ~ ., i''~ of Q~ ~/'~$ p~1 ~. /,,
.,- ,,
,`
i __ _
/ .,
.:~
y - % ~- ~
/ ` ~ / ~ /.
i
w `'- _
... .. - '
~ ~ .,~ '.
,;; ,•:
= ~.,.',
.y, - ;
.......
~. _, a; C
/,, -~ f ~
.-
-- 20'
%`~~ ,,- ~ ... ;~. ; _ - ,, . ~~- ;~'`; FIGURE \ 1~1 ~ ~ ~ '~.~
u
...
WETLAN'U AREAS 1 lelmsdale at Landfall
50 25 0 50 _.._............ _.~ ............................................... .
(roTAL - a.55 Ae.f> Proposed V1letland Impacts #1 - 3; Stream Impact #1
--TOTAL PROPOSED
WETLANDS FILL AREA
scA~E: i "=50' ~ - Withers & Ravenel
~LIMIl~4~aF~Y January 2006 Land Management Group, lnc.

.ss�2ar
Proposed wetland "
preservation area ,
A I[ A N z '
s
4AA3 A7
AhOFMImet '
s n utiDttu
t
r
e
d
> 7l t-Xl '
WE
Single Family Hom" '-mw
Patio/Multi-Fanjjty Hotttes
I_ydumi dt lAndfaU
k �1
.. +9. . � it ffi y M a R 'Fr '� q � , t •>
'_ `S; < it4at � 'e} � tom, .1 � � � .t. � `3 x _ �i • I III � � .��YE 2
+
.•�j AREA
Val
J y Y
F «
i .
{N
f
� n
-
a
�A
„ s
a t sa
vHelmsdale at Landfall site _-
•r % Mk71AtRt
t
COMURVA(ION
AREA
aT at: A�
fisYY >-
'`7Prdposed mitigation
�i
t
.s s.
X
C7f_'fered by Landfall Reilly, LLC
Thi- k — dior ;,t ( h,,r r
800.227.8208 0 910.256.6111
ww-w landfallrealty.eom