DEQ-CFW_00081672

From: Catherine Oubby[cathehne.dabby@gmaiicom]
Sent: 8/4/2017253:21PyW
To: K8unger, Bridget [/o=ExchanXeLabs/ou=[xchangeAdministrative Group
(FYD|BOHFI]3PDLT)/cn=Kecipients/cn=c54elf65Ocea49968a5aba689cZO4f I-bcmunger];Khtzer,]amie
[/o=ExchanXeLabs/ou=ExchanXeAdministrative Group
(FYD|BOHFI]3PD[n/cn=Kedpients/cn=cee93o49dO1445a]b54Ibb327dcdcQ4O-jbkritzer]
Subject: Greetings
HiBridget and Jamie lsuspect you are very busy vvththe latest news regarding Chcnlnuruand Gcn}{.
l am trying to get on answer to questions on a separate topic: coal ash regulation -- for a story running
l`zn not sure which DE0/ communications person to ask.
Below are the questions.Can you point me inthe right direotionY
d—Uf| ionm—><|— —>
Has NC DEQ taken a position on this effort to revise the rules.
Here is a another publication' story touching on the topic hap-1/southeastenergy w-s-.com/2017/06/1-'I/as-coal-
Cathy
CuUbnfiuo[k66yl]mgmyalist
919.4236163
OEQ-CFVV_00081672