19920061 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19920101

January 28, 1992
2p2122
Planning Division
7
Mr. John Dorney
North.Carolina Division of d
Environmental Management
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Dorney:
I refer to the proposed Vehicle Maintenance Shop, L.I.
13485, Fort Bragg, North Carolina. This proposed project
consists of road construction and site development work
associated with construction of a vehicle maintenance facility
just east of the proposed IMMD Phase I facility between Bragg
Boulevard and Murcheson Road, Fort Bragg. The only wetland
impacts from this project are associated with construction of a
storm drain outfall from a detention pond. See the enclosed
location map for more specific details.
We seek verification that this project is authorized by your
general water quality certification. Should you find that this
project does not meet the criteria for a general certification,
please consider this our application on behalf of the base for an
individual Water Quality Certification pursuant to Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act. The permittee's address should be listed as
it occurs in the copy furnished at the end of this letter.
We have applied to the Wilmington District for verification
that this project is authorized under Nationwide Permit Numbers
12 and 26 (NWP12 and 26)(33 CFR 330, Appendix A, Part B (12 and
26)) and Department of the Army General Permit (GP)SAWC081-N-000-
0049.
This project consists of an approximately 900-ft road which
would connect with a road to be constructed under the IMMD Phase
I project. The subject vehicle maintenance facility would
consist of a 900- by 1000-ft area to contain 3 vehicle
maintenance buildings, a detention pond that would be 150 feet by
350 feet, and approximately 525 feet of storm drain. The storm
drain would require clearing of a 20-ft wide corridor to extend
no more than 40 feet into wetlands at the edge of the creek.
Riprap would be placed 15 inches deep in an 8- by 12-ft area at
the storm drain outfall.

-2-
Wetlands for a large portion of the stream system north of
this site were flagged as part of the wetland delineation for a
proposed road crossing that has-been deleted from this project.
That road would have connected the site with Murcheson Road. The
storm drain would extend into the same wetland system, but beyond
the area that was flagged. Data sheets for that delineation are
enclosed.
If you have any questions, please contact Steve Calver of my
staff at [phone].
Sincerely,

M. J. Yuschishin
Chief, Planning Division
Enclosures
Copy Furnished:
Ft. Bragg - 18th Airborne Corps
Director of Engineering and Housing
ATTN: AFZA-DE-D
Fort Bragg, NC 28307-500
1
i
n a STA7Z a
yam. ° ""
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 k
James G. Martin, Governor February 5, 1992 George T. Everett, Ph.D.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
Mr. M.J. Yuschishin
Planning Division
Savanah District, Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 889
Savannah, Georgia 31402-0889
RE: Fort Bragg, IMMD Phase I, Cumberland County
DEM Project # 92023
Dear Mr. Yuschishin;
On February 3, 1992, I received an application from you for a
401 Water Quality Certification for your project entitled
IMMD Phase I project in Cumberland County. Our existing
regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0501 (a)) require that all applicants
for 401 Certifications submit seven complete copies of 401
Applications. These copies must be supplied by the Division of
Environmental Management to various state and Federal agencies as
$'z;f specified in the same regulations. Having copies available for
simultaneous review by other agencies will reduce the overall
processing time for your permit application. In the past, we
have not enforced this requirement and have seen processing time
slowed significantly.
Therefore, please send six additional copies of your 401
Certification application so we can initiate the comprehensive
review required by our rules. I am unable to do this copying
since there are numerous applications with this problem and our
regulations state that the applicant must supply these copies.
If you have any questions, please call me at 919-733-5083.
incer Vl ; s,
41--a- J hn R. Dorney
cc: Wilmington District Corps of En ineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regional Office
Fayetteville DEM Regional Office
Mr. John R. Dorney REGIONAL OFFICES
Central Files
Ashev§9vencpjXyJ '14GCs-N&Pesville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/733-2314 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
pp SAVANNAH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
F P.O. BOX SSS
SAVANNAH, GEORGIA 31402-OM
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF: February 25, 1992
Planning Division
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Dear Mr. Dorney:
In reference to your letter of February 5, 1992, enclosed are
six copies of the IMMD Phase I (L.I. 0191770) Project Summary as
requested.
If you have any questions, or require additional information,
please contact Steve Calver, one of my staff biologist, at (912)
652-5786.
Sincerely,
M. J. Yu ishin
Chi , P anning Division
Enclosures
x
11?
P ••1• a xx ? ^
N l/
q \ a
1 ? 1 ••1 /•, 1 ? '•?\ ? 250 ' ? R
I I IOC f ? ? ? _ /?
N ? w t
o ?
? ? ? • 2 o rte' e -
?-
nruiilf nu I u"
'.Ii1, 1/In Iu1 fI'1 {ilnl r'
uu
Ir
,• * ' ? ?ol,a ?, I 1 IIIII 1111111• •1111111 `?
??' ? ' ? • • ? I• ,1 III1{H4111{ rl/{//{I/114 ? / ? ';Q•a /111111/ II/111111Ifp _?• ......? •
1111 Ch
p C
r
lift li •
Ma .a ower dim l a
d0
• N 1 ?` \
\ • ds ?
O ?
? /' \ -a* ? ? la %'? Q` ` w ?• ,?::?`\\`` \• amts / t ?. aa?_ " /l ',. , "r, .\ a.
\. / r 1Y ??fj ? I:' ?!.. '1 ..d o? /? J i .?y.?• beb\M?) J l ,'?i? • / i'?f asa=? aY \?
)s N \ •IL N ?\ 11 q '?'^O a\rti!v_ly`? ? _??• .I ; ?? p•.1iit
M / v \'.9. N xsa 4? aa. h11=y •aA ( '? •,\j'' •,}•7G•t..??.
•' r r• • a0 %y? ? \ °\ ? ? /• •? ? • :?t ??•.? Z?(l? ]•:? Lei ?y?`, 1 ?•r
& 01, V ? ? '?._._._ - 's% ? ? ?•• ?" i )` r mot'
'• N 11 \" • 1
„" l
a a .rte • a ? . ,-/ , .••
a
M N m =' N ?" r{•e F?yE11LLG >PNC NG., Vim'\t?s
1
p r 4 ?
eta a ,. ....'N ¦` • 4• +• ? _ - a
4 r V2 Y
f?
STATE
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
February 1.7, 1992
Mr. M. J. Yuschishin
Department of the Army
Savannah District Corps of. Engineers
P.O. Box 889
Savannah, Georgia 31402-0889
Dear Mr, Yuschishin:
George T. Everett, Ph.D.
Director
Subject: Proposed Fill in Headwaters or Isolated Wetlands
Vehicle Maintenance Shop., L.I. 13485
Cumberland County
DEM Project # 92061
Upon review of your request for Water Quality Certification
to place fill material in 0.02 acres of wetlands for storm drain
at IMMD, Phase I, in Cumberland County, we have determined that
the proposed fill can be covered by General Water Quality
Certification No. 2671 issued. January 21, 1992. A copy of the
General Certification is attached. This Certification may be
used in qualifying for coverage under Corps of Engineers`
Nationwide Permit No. 26.
If you have any questions, please contact John Dorney
at 919/733-5033.
Sincerely,
GTE: JD
Attachment
MJY7.ltr/D-4
e rge T. Evere
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Fayetteville DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
Ms. Eunice Vachta, Fort Bragg
REGIONAL OFFICES
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 919/496-1541 704/663-1699 919/571-4700 919/946-6481 919/395-39(X) 919/896-7007
Pollution Prevention Pays
PO. 13ox 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 2762(1-0535 Telephone [phone]'
An Equal c ) ,;-tumv Af irmatfve Anion Emplo\ -r
r .,
000,
}
a
Z.
J
m
o?

W'
V /
vw? 5
INNER LOOP BOULEVARD
ITO BE CONSTRUCTED UNDER
IMMD INFRASTRUCTURE / DOL
WAREHOUSE OACA21-90-8-0049)

VICINIT
SCALE: I
I
-N-
-•ENERAL ^JOTES:
rI1E CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION OF HIS
itTOHAGE AREA WITH THE CONTRACTING OFFICER PRIOR TO BEGINNING
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.
THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK EFFORTS SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH
jGAL(r I OQ^? POST OPERATIONS.
5. UPON COMPLETION OF THE USE OF AREAS APPROVED FOR THE
CONTRACTOR'S OFFICE AND STORAGE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL:
RESTORE THE AREAS TO SMOOTH GRADES FOR DRAINAGE AND
ESTABLISH GRASS BY SEEDING/ SPRIGGING AND MULCHING.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL CONSTRUCTON OPERATION
THROUGH THE CONTRACTING OFFICER,
5. ALL RUBBLE 'SHALL BE REMOVED FROMTHIZ S" AID COPMO a
IN THE DISPOSAL #JWA. '
' 6. -BEFORE' CON=TRUCT'10N ?, fK OOMt1UCTOR. rrR1i?.; .
ft"f omp 4w A
l EMirfiN MD4 E 1??AMt
°
? l
TIAf /Nlplrlt am h>L. ¢r on, m" fM ..
?„ - ADJU{1"ED Al
la Kf ,
f Ir
RAN!-?
f
w. wff"

DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
Field Investigator (s) : GAL-`7? Date:
Project/Site:_Vd4-6Vl 5#F i34995 State: Ne-- County:
Applicant/Owner :F?- Pia Plant Community Name
--------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
;Yes __V_ No (If no, explain on back)
'Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbe
'Yes No x (If yes, explain on back) AF C?vsscl.?? t _G
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ot-: :5T-AK-;P_: AF +u o
VEGETATION SOILS
i
Dominant Indicator Horizon Depth Matrix Mottles
Plant S ecies Status Stratum ..to...inchs Color Colors
It e>-4: It 11 6"M lDqR 30
2. G1e}6? cxvk` (`a FAGW 5 .r H _7 3/1 77A, FrTrA. 41 _1?1 A,
S
4. a Ss ,A do a OFF C_ S 6y- 14- - 514
5. Ve-c..e...;.Flo-v-d ?'i/?rLw Sa-g 14-(& _ 61--2. ----- 9
617- ,7 .
8.
9.
10
Percent of dominant species that are OBL. FACW, and/or FAC
Is the hydrophytic v getation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: We," do»-- s pz<<es 0- FAC oa ?--ems-c
SOILS
Series/phase:
Is the soil o
Is the soil a
Is the soil:
Matrix Color:
Other hydric
Is the hydric
Rationale: _
Subgroup:
n the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined >--*
Histosol? Yes No >"- Histic epipedon present? Yes N0_?W_
Mottled ( 0-12 inches)? Yes \k No G eye ? Yes No Z
1? yr. 5 Y4(- Mottle Colors:
soil -indicators: soil, criterion met?, Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No ?Q Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes X No 1611
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: ?-
List o ther field vidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.

Is the wetland hydrolo y criterion met? Yes

_ s
c
No
-
`
Ration k I se
ec
ale: rim 4voc4

JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION= AND RAT10NALE....
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Ration ale for jurisdictional decision: G.-'=- L.oJ y _-

*Use Federal Manual for Identifying and
ineate°ng Jurisdictional. Wetlar?dsN
Del

.

x i
_ i
?yL?'.- zRS2tdCE+ `1}? Lek ? ..
Y. ?

DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
q M
Date:
Field Investigator(s): Ca
Project/Site: VW, ANT Sffof 13 `9S' State: J L County:.
Applicant/Owner: Plant Community Name:
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes _)IC No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No (If yes, explain on back)
------------------------------------------------------------ y,., -------------
VEGETATION SOILS C71 --%-Z
'8 .
9.
!10.
Percent of dominant
Is the hydrophytic
Rationale: X16
Indicator Horizon Depth
Status Stratum ..to...inchs
!FA C WW- s 0-2
Lo f3 - Co
- ?-
r C'
Matrix Mottles
Color Colors
2.5 d
't IZ 3
5%3 slCo
bf3 g
species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC (moo ?(o
vegetation criter on met? Yes -e No
i?-t -t ,, r,A- -r56 "% n c l o•,.. S Z7 e c, e S ? S A L ev r 16AM
SOILS
Series/phase:
Is the soil o
Is the soil a
Is the soil:
Matrix Color:
Other hydric
Is the hydric
Rationale:
Subgroup:
n the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined I>e
Histosol? Yes No - Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Mottled 10-12 inches)? Yes. X No Gleyed? Yes No '5'
7 Mottle Colors:
soil indicators: 1?crK-2-
soil criterion met? Yes No _<
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X- Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes < No 6-4 1+ 1,
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evide ce of surface i undation or soil saturation.
St ( ru- 5(?Q o\A ?-ec..•' 5
Is the wetland hydrolog criterion met? Yes No
c? cc? Ju s ?"`
Rationale: Inc,
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No -'4
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: Ott ?;¢. c, ?.o+
i
Dominant

DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODS
Field Investigator(s) : C?-° Date: I g
yQ4 11M
t/Sit ?3?g State
NT Safi : l--3C- County:
e:
Projec .
APphicant/Owner°: ?F+ flo-4s Plan-t- Community Name:
Do normal environmen tal conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes )C--No ..(If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly distu rbed?,--.---
Ye"s° No (If ` yes,: explain on back) =
-------------------- ---------------------------- --------- ---
l3-
VEGETATION SOILS

Dominant, Indicator Horizon Depth Matrix Mottles
Plant. SQecies..- Status Stratum. ...to... inch s Color Colors

2. ro.co-
ICTA ew s Z 3
4. k.. r h?'ol?ec - tAClK

6.
'
T
8. _
9.

Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: G-?

SOILS
Series/phase: Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No an Undetermined >e-
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No X_ Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled (A0-12 inches)? Yes No L Gleyed? Yes No k
Matrix Color: lovk 'f// Mottle CLolors: -
Other hydric soil indicators: 64 5?vecs(c
No
Is the hydric s?il criterion metY43
b c-l?? "cam ?,e
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
is the ground surface inundated? Yes No
Is the soil saturated? Yes 7c- No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe
List other field evidence of surface inundation
Surface water depth:
hole:
or soil saturation
Is the wetland hydrology crite ion met? Yes_ k No
Rationale: (nu n 90_ rt s s a 1Q r<<o?S
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes u No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
Ose Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands
DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
2S- Sz_pl- R /
Field Investigator(s): C&vwr Date:
Project/Site•_UE7N-MA-1Ni-Sfl°P 1348-el: State: J--)C County: C-umOa-_L?
Applicant/Owner: -^r 6(3/k(C& Plant Community Name:
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ?_ No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No x (If yes, explain on back)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
VEGETATION SOILS
Dominant Indicator Horizon Depth Matrix Mottles
Plan Species Status Stratum ..to...inchs Color Colors
1 . Q< ru ru-..n
, v?vS s2v? ?r?li C'1
2 ?1:?Prr_ T
A-G w ?7
-r (? v w.vs
O-lo to y?: 3/) 4 1 Ip 3
.
3. C,/villa r4ce-1N-1,&m --
FJ-eW Jh"r
1
'18 4/1 4/4
4
7r6 CIO
Sit
4. ?,-_(JL4C Cor% t?ce T CLil 5_
= IZ 7
-
5. Ma cc c-A i " s -i
8. G e -lu f, Ct 1?,, 1 cL F/k(, W l
wwSS
?
ha
7 C L ? --
d
,,,
. S ?
8
. _-
9
.
10.
Percent of dominant
species that are OBL, FACW, and/or e a ----
FAC 1OU /
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes x No
Rationale: MOR 7?4As-, --,o-2, ar- 7>,!A.1 .s a? w?1e'
SOILS
Series/phase:
Is the soil o
Is the soil a
Is the soil:
Matrix Color:
Other hydric
Is the hydric
Rationale: J
Subgroup:
n the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No,?K
Mottled ?10-12 inches)? Yes c No GleYed? Yes No
SOY( ? 1 Mottle Colors: Ibx2
soil indicators:
soil criterion met? Yes ?< No
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No x Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes -Y-' No -t-r_> 5 1VzrACE
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: "
List `other fiie_ld evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Wa 54uy-.?1 ?6--S4SLakkow Ycc+ e7 -) lsi?: Zvs ?'vw,? cAJZCSLtI,c? J?uQ f co?S c-4- 1Z'?
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes x No
«a --
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: 6_R-Q
*Use Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands
r ? ..f ?y
k
0

LL-
?' . 'ST ATION
... MATS LI °:]-
LLJ
C)
'ZI 3? EM ? w
<OCL
F LLV iI"
aa+w 1 1 i Z x4..
.? a:. N
' Y k 5 ;t 5? ! .M
1. ,a«• ? E .. ? i s ?"s ?`' ,ter w
.?.%..i6 ' 1. j ,'9 gy??'Z•'. S ^ ? ?: _. ? ?I?? ; : ?0 .
S 4
(nu
1,. 1
?? Wyk
s
W S
v w .n
I. > G 2
C, of
F
v ? ? ? (lG ?, 2 a
LL
r %A A?' -?
Lu?
S
Nam..
UP L,
?\ J

-
la
J
Z
W l
>CJ
Z r-/
W?
aO
I ?? o a
Za?oo+a
f/ o
?l/1 ? 1?11?1
( ? T
OLJ
Z Y.
\ \.,\ ?L rJr c?{ o?Q
1 f
i
x
7
/JS
Y
Y,
IQ.
u

l
VI '•
I rib A ? ? it •j,,
I ,
acre°"?? ? ? tox.. \\ „?? ,:\ m ?' -L ,?`?• l ?.,?e?. 3: .?. ?+
t
r J' w ?
aim
r
. - _ .ate w.R??
J
, Yf
J8
1.
40 -
*JIM! 4
R STATE
(?
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James G. Martin, Governor
Patric Dorsey, Secretary March 15, 1988

Paul D. Rubenstein
Chief, Compliance Analysis Section
Environmental Resources Branch
Department of the Army
U.S. Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 889
Savannah, Georgia 31402-0889
Re: Fort Bragg Cultural Resources Survey
Cumberland County, ER 88-7834
Dear Mr. Rubenstein:
Division of Archives and History
William S. Price, Jr., Director
Thank you for providing a copy of the report, "Cultural Resources Survey
of the Master Plan Lands, Fort Bragg, North Carolina," Gulf South
Research Institute and Southeastern Archaeological Services, Inc.,
Cumberland County." Although you requested written comments by March 4,
1988, we found we were not able to meet this deadline due to insufficient
time for a complete review. Your February 12, 1988 letter was received
by our office on February 19.
In general, the report is acceptable. However, because we do not consider
the Master Plan Lands Cantonment Area an extremely high probability area
for the presence of potentially significant archaeological resources, we
do not expect the same degree of detail and documentation that we would in
a richer historic area. The report satisfies our minimal requirements.
Our specific comments are as follows:
1. "Carolina" is misspelled on the cover.
2. Page 37-40, identification of the site boundaries for 31Cd201 is
unclear. Might outbuildings be present at this site? If so, such
information may affect boundary determination. Also, it would be
beneficial to indicate more specific information on how the
chronological determination was reached.
3. Since cemeteries are rarely considered eligible for nomination to the
National Register of Historic Places, additional justification including
historical background information, should be provided for the Ellis
Cemetery, 31Cd205.
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
[phone]
Paul D. Rubenstein
March 15, 1988, Page Two
4. The artifact photographs (page B-5, B-6) are very poor illustrations
and better quality prints should be included. Little detail can.be
determined from the photographs as they are.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at
36 CFR Part.800, and to Executive Order 11593, "Protection and Enhance-
ment of the Cultural Environment.'-'
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Ms. Renee Cledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
David"Brook, deputy' State
Historic Preservation Officer
DB;slw
bc: wort Bragg file
Claggett/Myers/Olives
County
RF
?;
f
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
SAVANNAH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 889
SAVANNAH, GEORGIA 31402-M
lF
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
January 23, 1992
Planning Division
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Dorney:
RE 8 799,2
WAT V'o
p?$nnfng ? a
I refer to the proposed IMMD Phase I (L.I. 191770) project
at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. This project is located in the
vicinity of the Knox Street/Bragg Boulevard intersection. This
project includes road work, sewer line construction, and gas line
construction originally part of the IMMD Infrastructure project
(L.I. 31284) and building site construction under the project
name IMMD Phase I (L.I. 191770). This work has been combined
into the latter project. See enclosed location maps.
Proposed wetland impacts include 0.8 of an acre from
construction of the north-south road segment and two 0.1-acre
areas to be impacted by storm water outfalls. See pages 6-8 of
the enclosure for surveys of the proposed impacts. We have
applied to the Wilmington District for verification that this
project is authorized under Nationwide Permit No. 26, (33 CFR
330, Appendix A, Part B (26), as published in the Federal
Register, Friday, November 22, 1991).
Please note that this project was originally flagged on
April 26 and May 9, 1991, using the 1989 Federal Manual For
Delineating Wetlands. The site was reflagged on September 6,
1991, using the 1987 Corps Manual. Pages 13-21 of the enclosure
contain data sheets for the original flagging. Pages 22-26
contain data sheets for the revised flagging. The original
flagging was surveyed and overlaid on project plans. Reflagged
points were hand plotted on the original survey by using a
compass and tape measure. Pages 9-12 of the enclosure show
location of the original and revised delineations.
9

-i2-
We seek verification that this project is authorized by your
general water quality certification. Should you find that this
project does not meet the criteria for a general certification,
please consider this our application on behalf of the base for an
individual Water Quality Certification pursuant to Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act. The permittee's address should be listed as
it occurs in the copy furnished at the end of this letter.
If you have any questions, please contact Steve Calver at
[phone].
Sincerely,
/?? 4??
M. J. YUSCHISHIN
Chief, Planning Division
Enclosures
Copy Furnished:
Ft. Bragg - 18th Airborne Corps
Director of Engineering and Housing
ATTN: AFZA-DE-D
Fort Bragg, NC 28307-5000

IMMD Phase I (L.I. 0191770) Project Summary
1. The location map at page
the location of the proposed
on pages 3-4. A location map
page 5. Detailed site plans
pages-28-55.
A and pages 1-2 of the enclosure show
work. Site development work is shown
for the proposed road is included at
for the road work are included at
2. The proposed road work consists of a segment approximately
3800 feet long road extending east from Bragg Boulevard with an
additional segment of 1800 feet extending south from a point along
the proposed road approximately 1000 feet east of Bragg Boulevard.
3. Proposed building site construction for the IMMD consolidated
general support facility includes construction of two buildings
within an area of 1300 feet x 1700 feet centered 2300 feet east of
Bragg Boulevard (SR87) and 1300 feet north of the south base
boundary. See pages 3-4 of the enclosure (Plate P-2) for more
details.
4. Proposed utility line work outside of the original Phase I
project limits east of Bragg Boulevard includes of sewer line
construction from a proposed new lift station west of Bragg
Boulevard (see plates W-6 to W-13, pages 56-71 of the enclosure).
It also includes gas line construction under Bragg Boulevard near
the base boundary and extending north along the east side of Bragg
Boulevard to the proposed road going east from Bragg Boulevard
where the utility line construction is within the clearing limits
of the proposed road. See plates P15, P-24, P-25 and P-26 of the
original drawings (pages 72-79 of the enclosure).
- A\-
? LAN q
., s
° 9I •
u '• . 7 Q
1 i IOC 1 ? ? ? 1a?` \
Y I u
\. Z 1 ?/ / 1 1 // , ? 11 O
` '?OV i \•/ 1 "11 1 1111'/111 111/1111/1 j Ii '?-
11 Illf"?'f I 1111 1 11 -' 1
' ? i .%S?1 :-, ,- I ? 1141 111 1 1111 tIMIi1i ' '
? • ? 1' uluiiiiiui Iul4i/lnu
?? ?- 1 •. 1 i • .. ? 1 '• 111 U 11111 1111
+? , •' Ilfiluuliii Illm?nlii .
• 1 . 1 :I•• ?Qw p = 11111111 III IIIIIIII II ?? V
i / ' III ' -' NI1111111 C
p ? C
Gol ?
Q ,? C rse m 1 `f e
,? pm // D C Sta 6
o'er Aim 1
so '
i
jsO as ? Q
?" ?,, Iii ? 1•? p `?- 0
?; ? )a 4 ?/=l\ FAI - u. ?,. ? ; w // '•?a , i . '_..5?%?? 1 ;`?.? ?'' \ ``? dl
S rid ,4 ,1 ? to o:? y MI ? i^ _ _ . ` 1
//1 ?? G \r rew ,? '`pia ? •M=1 ?•, ???? ? ? ? .•,/• • ? ??•. ??r t%S
?. \? 1, /• • •/' :I? ??.? ?ti?,? ~?/
• \ A M G ? r ?•?•.,.51
_? C 1 ` ? M 1?\?'a`3 •?aa : , s j?_. l/0i. : (•I I :1 , ?1:: ?
irj?
1 1 v0 \a Soh ?\ ?? i .t ; • C
?C J I •
M? " as • Ss' ?• \• •\ i?•• '\;• • •? '•
i `?.>: ? 150 •„ ? ? • '? ?. r•• '• \ : ::• ?r...••f ? ••
M ^ • '•
?J M \\ ' •+?? •F?`IE 1T?U l?l,? >! MA NL
vAos
,?+ ,•i. r " m '• .rat ' :• •? ?A?\ GO CAFIO.) M ,t p 1 M1u D
a
' , jrW2770AJ3 of P2o-T;-F"q- FD/t 94C721,y
. ? ? ° SN ? - ? UNDO? /.ar ?u p ?NFi'L9'si1zU cTV,2?• ?,eoy6?'
c I „•, _:6 s o? C Gt 3/28?? . /,j/L/ Ty L/ALI,-57
?' 4ccEtt /rl?.

3
ANDREWS
CHURCH
LAKE
A
4 TH STREET
TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUILDING
yGq
\rsiJ. NC AREA OFFICE
FORT BRAGG AREA ENGINEER
-`
°y BUILDING MT-2357
` TEL [phone]
SMAIONS
C` FELD
J LAKE
IDREWS CHURCH ROAD
BOUNDARY
LANE LAK\
?I

I
TEXAS
PONO
AS ARMY AIRFIELD
\
2
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
1. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE IMPLEMENTED
_ BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ORDER TO RETAIN SEDIMENT WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES
/ 87 OF THE PROJECT SITE AND PREVENT EROSION OF SOILS DURING ALL PHASES
OF CONSTRUCTION.
2. THE EROSION CONTROLS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE THE MINIMUM REOUIREO.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL CONTROLS WHERE NEEDED TO
CONTAIN SEDIMENT AND PREVENT EROSION. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
CONTROLS ARE TO BE INSPECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER EACH HEAVY
RAIN AND REPAIRED WHERE NEEDED. ALSO, THE ACCUMULATED SILT IS TO
BE REMOVED PERIODICALLY BY THE CONTRACTOR.
3. A SPECIFIED WORK SCHEDULE THAT COORDINATES THE TIMING OF LAND
;TATION •9 DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND THE INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND
SEDIMENTATION CC.',ROL MEASURES MUST BE PREPARED BY THE CONTRACTOR
AND SUBMITTED TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER FOR APPROVAL 30 DAYS
• BEFORE ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY BEGINS. CONSIDERATIONS FOR
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULING ARE SHOWN IN TABLE 6.0IA OF SECTION 6 OF
MO CONSOLIDATED THE NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND
AL SUPPORT FACILITY DESIGN MANUAL.DATED ISEPT.1988. THE CONTRACTOR MAY USE
THIS TABLE AS A GUIDE IN PREPARING A CONSTRUCTION SEOUENCE
SCHEDULE.
GENERAL NOTES
EXACT LOCATION OF HIS 10. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE
NG OFFICER PRIOR TO BEGINNING RELATIONSHIP OF ALL EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS TO THE DESIGNATED
BENCH MARK SHOWN ON THE PROJECT SITE. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL
SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH POST BE ADJUSTED AS APPROVED BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER.
IT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT OVERALL SITE DIMENSIONS AGREE
SHALL BE LOCATED OFF-POST. WITH THE INCREMENTAL LAYOUT DIMNENSIONS AS SHOWN. ANY DISCREPANCIES
SHALL BE ACJUSTED AS APPROVED BY CONTRACTING OFFICER.
AREAS APPROVED FOR THE 12. SEE APPENDIX .A• OF THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR COMPLETE LOG OF
,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE BORINGS.
DRAINAGE AND ESTABLISH GRASS 13. ALL EXPOSED DISTURBED AREAS TO BE GRASSED AS PER THE
SPECIFICATIONS.
R ADDITIONAL TREE CLEARING 14. ALL COORDINATES AND BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE STATE
ALL CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM.
15. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON THE ADJUSTED MEAN SEA LEVEL
THE DEMOLITION LANDFILL. (MSL) DATUM.
-ALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE
LY STORED AS DIRECTED BY THE
'LL PAVEMENT A MINIMUM OF III/z
.AND BREAK OUT TO FULL DEPTH
BISCOE
FORT BRAGG

OLIVE
VICINITY MAP
SCALE:NONE
LEGEND
(FOR ADDITIONAL LEGEND SEE W-1)
NEW EXISTING
-SO- -SO- STORM DRAINAGE
-G- -G- GAS LINE
-?-- 0 STANDARD MANHOLE N
?--- -? CATCH BASIN
E3 INLET
?- END SECTION
!- ?- PIPE CASING ASSEMBLY
f
.A..I PAVEMENT REMOVAL
). ;: •' •'•:?.;_? AS NOTED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
w '.•., 'w,l AS NOTED AGGREGATE SURFACE
r:^^ AS NOTED CONCRETE PAVEMENT

AS NOTED ROLLER COMPACTED
CONCRETE PAVEMENT
AS NOTED CONCRETE WALK
CURB & GUTTER
"--?- r
° - DITCH OR SWALE
777 p
-
?
I I I -
SLOPE > 1:5
(__250•__` ?250? CONTOURS
-X% -• SECURITY FENCE
•3?E iif' LIGHT POLE
"""""""•Si"•" SILT FENCE
® DITCH REVETMENT
0 Q SOIL BORINGS (AUGER BORING , SPLIT SPOON)
WOOD LINE
TREE
® ?,? TREE PROTECTION BARRIER
• LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION
F^? I--?
INLET FILTER
0 DITCH SEDIMENT TRAP
• o PROTECTION POST
" GUARDRAIL 20
LASER SIGHTING TARGET
TRENCH DRAT
'i•Sf SILT FENCE
-'---'?- Q UNDERDRAIN
Co
' © CLEANOUT
REDUCED ONE-HALF THE ORIGINAI„SIZE
MSFM Mu GFFELS ASSOCIATES W EW41CM OiSrRICT Y
i' ARCHTCCTORE AIQ ENGNEERMG SAVANNAH
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
O 1000 2000 4000 6000 S.C. ROGERS DA. RuCNANAN SWTNELD NIGNGAN SAVANNAH CEORWA
I'=2000 • IMMD MAINTENANCE FACILITY - PHASE I
D. J. BONM 1.. P(LOCATION PLAN
RE [a ?1
I,TS: :'t'?.w_JV?°?'4?--•- rnaT aaecr. NnRTU ream iu.
Lcocrvv vnwm vnrsl nEE r•nATO a 1 rAl NNs
I GENERAL REVISIONS _ - . ??"?"- P Acaa?•s•oo?a 218-15-02
'•Iro' :••ro' 1'•9•' •,.r P•D•' 1••Ir a:r SME0. IME OtlaNPliONN _ _ _
nsn art r
Nita.A Kwpa OAr4 K JIA. M
ftut. .s w.LO fH
T 3 2 _ PA

B
A
P-I
n a G
wuVylii
r _
T PONDYDEN
?ONGSTFEEA FORD

RONEYCUTT
u1R/D -1 V 2
p(1
P
(
\?'T0
\
,
1 •P?

ROAO
`
1 1
1 \
ml 1
r !I
r ? t 1 ?
z
v ? FUDER ROAD
J+ 0 ? ?a t
r
1
LIFT STATION °I •?\? Ile
LLL31Zg?? "'? -
_-? 87
DOL WAREHOUSE
.: CLi 3! 28q??
\ LIFT STATION 19
61.
? /9/770
IMMD CONSOLIDATED
GENERAL SUPPORT FACILITY
LZ /9/770)
NC AREA OFFICE /
FORT BRAGG AREA ENGINEER
BUILDING MT-2357
TEL [phone]

TEXAS
?
l? POND i
NONEYCUT7
SIMMONS
FIELD
J LAKE j

` SIMMONS ARMY AIRFIELD
?
\ ?
6D

-/-- 4
- / EROSION AND SEDIMENT
1. EPOS'ON AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEA°
B'f ".:c CONTRACTOR :N CPDER TO RETAIN
PF THE ?ROJECT SITE AND PREVENT EROSIC
OF CONSTRUCTION.
2. THE EROSICN CONTRCLS SHOWN ON T!4ESE F
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONA
CONTAIN SEDIMENT AND PREVENT EROSION.
C01jTPOLS ARE TO BE 'NSPEC'ED BY THE C
RAIN AND ?EPA:RED AHERE NEEDED. ALSO, T
BE REMOVED PERIODICALLY BY THE CONTRA(
3. A SPECIFIED WORK SCHEDULE THAT COORDIN,
DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND T^E INSTALLATiC
SECIMENTATION C' .-ROL MEASURES MUST 8
AND SUBMITTED _ O THE 000 ,'RACTING OFFIC
BEFORE ANY LAND DISTL'RBiNG ACTIVITY BEC
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULING ARE SHOWN IN T
THE NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMEN
DESIGN MANUAL. DATED ISEPT. 1988. THE C01
THIS TABLE AS A GUiCE IN PREPARING A CC
SCHEDULE.
GENERAL NOTES
} I. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION OF HIS 10.
STORAGE AREA WITH THE CONTRACTING OFFICER PRIOR TO BEGINNING BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. THE CONTRe

CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. RELATIONSHIP OF ALL EXISTING SPOT ELEV
BENCH MARK SHOWN ON THE PROJECT SITE
I ; 2. THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK EFFORTS SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH POST BE ADJUSTED AS APPROVED BY THE CONTI
OPERATIONS. II. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT OVE
I 3. THE CONTRACTOR'S BATCHING PLANT SHALL BE LOCATED OFF-POST. WITH THE INCREMENTAL LAYOUT DIMNENSION
SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS APPROVED BY COD

' 4. UPON COMPLETION OF THE USE OF AREAS APPROVED FOR THE 12.
CONTRACTOR'S OFFICE AND STORAGE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE SEE APPENDIX •A• OF THE SPECIFICATIONS F
OR

THE AREAS TO SMOOTH GRADES FOR DRAINAGE AND ESTABLISH GRASS B
INGS.
I BY SEEDING/SPRIGGING AND MULCHING. 13. ALL EXPOSED DISTURBED AREAS TO BE GR.
5. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL TREE CLEARING SPECIFICATIONS.
LIMITS. 14. ALL COORDINATES AND BEARINGS SHOWN AF
PLA
C
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS NE
OORDINATE SYSTEM.
THROUGH THE CONTRACTING OFFICER. 145. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON THE ADJU`.
7. ALL RUBBLE SHALL BE DISPOSED' IN THE DEMOLITION LANDFILL. (MSL) DATUM.
8. ANY AND ALL SALVAGABLE ITEMS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE
GOVERNMENT AND SHALL BE PROPERLY STORED AS DIRECTED BY THE
CONTRACTING OFFICER.
9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUT ALL PAVEMENT A MINIMUM OF II/Z'
TO 3• DEEP ALONG A STRAIGHT LINE. AND BREAK OUT TO FULL DEPTH
TO ASSURE A SMOOTH JOINT.
1.4le4rl'0VV 10.41>
' /tiff p ?N£?? ('L 11-91770)
64/Fr S 7--+770,OU ll? F4Ct LITY,
•=I•'0• - 1••1'-0. 11'=,•-0' I?x••'1•_0' IYq''0'
1 c• , r c• ..
4
r•.e0• r•a00• r=10e• 1'•60' 1••SB' 1'•.0' I'•]0• r•»• u•.IS•
10? ]0? ? Ise za ea n ?? ?? ? 1• r? >. .? 1• re ? 1• >'? ! ? ?? ? t).s
3 pn Z I
G
i
O?JaO?
i-

3. _
2
DI
4
C
8
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR BENCHMARK:
IMMD MAINTENANCE FACILITY 'FORK' 1987
BY RAGSO ALE CONSULTANTS. NC GRID COORDINATES: X c 2.011.414.789
SURVEYED 26 APRIL 89. Y c 496.957.114
EL 228.85
Ir..er r.zeeLter n••Ra• u••er n••.r u••De• n••?r u••Ir I
E 1M w 6 •. 0 r T• n n T. .• 1• r a n u r s u n eT-1T-ift s.; '
?l I,P=11
I I ` I,P
3
`. 1 1W-3
P-8
-P 1q' TL P-15
W-9 T W-7
KEY PLAN A
NO SCALE
EELS ASSOCIATES MC I ENGMEER DISTS. APUY
RICT. SA-WAR
ARCmyECTLPE ANO 1MJ ERMG CORPS OF ENGINEERS
$OIITMEKLD YCMGAN SAVANNAN GEORGIA
IMMD MAINTENANCE FACILITY - PHASE I
COMPOSITE SITE PLAN
sac w.n•Ta. a FAA a I ,a •n
F Ac.as•aoocs 218-15-02 P-2
3 1 2

0

TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR
IMMO MAINTENANCE FACILITY
BY RAGSDALE CONSULTANTS.
SURVEYED 26 APRIL 89.
GRAPHIC SCALES r •I -r •.I•-r •.I•_e. .,,.-o. '•I'•r .•I._a. I•.I•-r
: ••r-r r.r-a ..?r.zer •.Iw• r.u• rsr
5 ,4
y,t r p b •

• LAN VA Oh
M !
x?w

94

* 4b • j%
++ i i

I "Him,
SC
r
a
.. ! till
•I
1
`bm t? 1#
sty su 1 •?
as0

J
•

O
O
r
.. - `??Iv 11 :?•a ??;+ ,???;`' \a?) ? ?_. •?r, ?: '. ''? a
\ r ,;ss. •?d •p / `+ y" • a \ d, a _ ?•,F ?ssf •_ r
J • • ? ? N ?, ? ?' ?aa'J\???' " • r? MNI,\1 fi ?-/ `+ I + r ,Y ?•? ?ii ?
M ? a c.+ a ? `? ' fix)` •.. t•?.t''t`'S1 )?
?Y ? - A ? • r `` a ++\tiD a+ MI ?? 7101• •l: t'f <<? :':.• i? C_
O N s_ ?ss? y . ? . • ' .• ?r??f
1. __ yy' \\ ?.L.ti• t't??•;::,\t'?~?r,• ?,t•,
.aras? • S'? \ •1 1"? 111! \i. ?.
tA.
r ? ??a °s? . ?? / \ `? •• may, • \ •:?..••'•• • '• \
h N • 1( t 1 S •••••• ? ••
•
Y t 4 • Si • ?
s?? ,??•awQ i/. I + y mss a+t'.?? (m Nk> .,.,
o SN „• ?? Pf4 As CL-
• a
;V •
/ pA? dF
1MIAC> IN;;R )TM /2tz?t ?y1
o ' •'p r
47-

LAJa o J
I -
uW
o n p
co r r!1 m a
Tz-
a• ?\Q? s+y?, ? r , v aK; ,r s•T 1 ;;;;, r}a`s'7 f °o
27-
w Y-t
0- 4
a. LA.
.•rt yy,,a,,? ,??yi
Ycs,a fvr tP-
CO)
10
to CL
•?'? cr o
? q Y! ' ?,? `? - `-!- ??. ??``?R? r.. ;`t' ? ? is ?, ;'?_ `•? N ?'
-, x 2;r •? X .. x . O ? °? °???'?'`?r?:or4 •?a??"?r?•„st+lL.,. .?, t } r,_ ?t _' ?
Fes" c,•) }?r 4ac t.?, t
1.. SC T ??. " -k ? ? ? ..'4 ,T "r?4?'F'•'`Ir ? -+zy' ,' .L..?L. P `?'Y'rf?,?.'va,.
f, T,
,N '' ., _: ? '.. ?;. - ??-•. ? ., Res. m .. _. F? "'? ? Kx•?? ???
„? ? 1y.. -- ? - - - ? 'X.i 1, v4„..+! , ti 'E• \_, ., ,1 ice. ',?. M Z
?? `.. ?# ?? 7 ? .•,\,? .,` . ??? •".w. T •. 1 t }4 Fyn .. I1 ?
1 v? {??' •
•. 1„?t ft'{tt ?•i??• ?;{{tit{ iii$F?t!M,il
its
71
./40 '. - •.
?b
t

---------
t

I IIIIIIII ? ?? III 1
III. I I
I IIIIIIII I ?, I I ? I I
o I IIII ? IIII II
I N 1 II II I I
J IIII ICI II
I W IIII ? II I
III II II __
TII1 1!?11?,?
1111111, III,

Qo

+1

\ '? \
m
d
Y?
J
/O

411
_ j
Q
09 „ I
SR
m
- W
N
J
a ?
L
?? Z
LL

N
J
a
v
x
a
Q
Q
tn
N
?O
O
m
?G
}
? ,'f5-???y? J".r?? Y' S Ci L.U- ?` •Y, ?? 1. ?S`' •` < l2 - ! ?r
low
r 14arCt* x dram Z* t ?ay+ . ..C ^
-`-`' .
h
t
Y 1 Ot cti,
?y?r?2 ?'M?] °aL i J 'Y Y L
}r •? / ? d? Tay
4' tJ
r,r ? 1" sk?5 F.
9
?? y Z?yv fi 1
?•,;y o f:yZ ?? 1
S.
y}.k 6• Jvd k .:

aG
r-
C _

C,?'> t,•r ,1h MF R y
ice
(? ? ? ?r {' ` a' #• .j qt .rte r . a ? ?}? 1
^ -y{,, ? + S1'M ?"? [ r 2-?? sY +T? q9?''r a 1 i ?5 ?,+'?* r H r' -r` Ae. ?
.y
?rv7^\ ?fit?i ` ?sr `'? ?r„ F .?r' ?t• _ ? ?0 x ? r ?.r,Q'''? f• vll
t k:
{?. {?j, Y'r^'y'4???+a?( #yP q t,'t: •'W Yj?f It ?C?`',
f w? ? ?#3?.. vet?K'k ? ,+. i ? }- • ? 'i y M?'•:?: f rte' Y "'as?F-y. ?'.
iLLi T
F ' r i x{43 ?N ??' k 1 ! COX
47
x"If;.vYs
f!"'e??T"3 3..''+7' 'ICI,`'. -i :'y? ' <•3, Yk ? ?, ?f?. 'Q '
5
f. 4v
Y}'?-.? • Beyr is < <Ta:
Y: ?a

•

36
3S ?

Z
0
O
I
l ?qK
day
T
r0

f Vag T,()%-i+5
1
T? ws1-0? l,-? ^ ?n o-w s re-F??;?9
tom. ?, 67 Ivl
CPA d? g9 /1? i 4 9
• ,

I
?qK
I ? ?Q0
0
O
Kc
c
lS
I
1
1
1
1
1
r
r
r
it, -A fl ??w e 1
I 5L& 2-
0
v
/
1?0
f? (v
36
M }

N
i
;m
J -
1 ? 1 4
1)

1MA 'r ?-
pet t
r

u
44

M
ri
4

n
v
v

W\uv X
C,4

1
P9 12-
l
i•
DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODS
Field Investigator (s) : (f ALvrac Date: Z6 A1112 q)
Project/Site: I Mr^D 11V4--A s yr_Ty ma0 _ State: N(_ County: Applicant/Owner: Fr. BRAS (- Plant Community Name:
---------------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes _CK No (If no. explain on back) j-
Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X- (If yes, explain on back) c-PV00. °F nW'r 7 _? tea. QuNS `"
AT 5ov-11A rw?O ®r srC£
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION SOILS
Dominant Indicator Horizon Depth Matrix Mottles
Plant Species Status Stratum ..to...inchs Color Colors
1. I Ik-A a?abre• FAGW H c7-Z 10 YR 3/1
2. L?ow;a 'yci ola FAcw Slur Z- °I G/7-
Y>e `/4
1':h.,s -i a?aa
3. t:Ac -r 9_ i>f 6 2 g
4. pJecicln,vv% aau'% VU,vn r-PrGV la 14 -12>
5. C11e9no1?a Vire3?v,;ara ??CW Sl?c 18,41 N O
6. C.le?hro q(r?i ?r?li4 IP PT(_W `?hr
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant
species that are OBL, FACW, and/or
FAC
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes x_ . No
Rationale: tLNo rzs 7NAN 5-% op T:70" IP- 1 sp 6c te5 ARE fAe- e-R CuCn1=-K
SOILS
Series/phase: Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined >e-
-Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No '>f- Histic epipedon present? Yes No ?G
Is the soil: Mottled (10-12 inches)? Yes Vc No Gleyed? Yes No Y" s
Matrix Color: IDYM &/z Mottle Colors: rovrt
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes x No
Rationale: r' l?2ow?o. Z b%-Tk-\
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes ,c No AT- 5u2-> A CZ
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: lgr'
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
">91C- Sat L rt'2'?sEhi 1 --
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes 'c No
Rationale: -•rVz-in IH?,rck??zS '4'?'Es??
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes Y- No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: A L-c-
*Use Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands
Pei 13
}
DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
'ield Investigator (s) : C44v Date: -'& APR`s)
>roject/Site: MMt> ins R vow State: "e- County: c?nne?2? t?
?pplicant/Owner: r-r SRPc6? Plant Community Name:
.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>o normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
tes y No (If no, explain on back)
ias the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
fes No L (If yes, explain on back) 30" u n'-"ILL nc? t-- A
•-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
)ominant
?lant Species
1. L??bnia YY1at'is•na
2 , v, c?vt o off V; 't
3 . 'v?v e d a
4. G a alr; l'
Indicator
Status Stratum
t=PcG N
(= Pte-- T
F?cw
SOILS
Horizon Depth Matrix
..to...inchs Color
o -.,+
4-7 6
B.
7_
B.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant
Is the hydrophytic
Rationale:
species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC
vegetation criterion met? Yes No
SOILS
Series/phase: Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined X
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No x Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil: Mottled (10-12 inches)? Yes No Gleyed? Yes No k
Matrix Color: 1044 6?3 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators: n,on+s'
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No x
Rationale: d-4=0 ^%A -rC)dno "At CA
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No x Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No x
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
No r.c
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No x
Rationale: ?.,o ?? E? r r? i cf+cTb (Z S
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No 'K
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: C7'TXEraIA W-q- &'eEr
*Use Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands
Mottles
Colors
Pq (L-
10
DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
Field Investigator (s) : C l"., L_ Date: 26 4r fl?
t/Site:
MMT'
j 11 State: NC- County:
1
ec
!-
Pro
licant/Owner: Vii-
f ?g?t Plan t Community Name:
.
App
-- ?---------------- ------------------------- ----------
-------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
:Yes _ CK No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soil s and/or hydrology been significantly distur bed?
Yes No X (If yes , explain on back)
------------------------ ------------------- -------------------- ---- -
VEGETATION SOILS
Dominant Indicator Horizon Depth Matrix Mottles
Plant Species Status Stratum ..to...inchs Color Colors
2. L o?.%a (vc-td T?}CuJ 51 2- g
3. rAC T S-I1 ) S/1
;4 . II-13 z 5/4 5 8
5. 1?-1t3 2 s 8
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC ?y vD
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ?- No
Rat i o n al e: Vv,<ve -F d ? t S?-e u e s s PA C-
SOILS
Series/phase: Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No Histic epipedon present? Yes No>c
Is the soil: Mottled (10-12 inches)? Yes _X No 119yeYes No 3"
Matrix Color: Inyg 6A?_ Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:w
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes _,X No 64, -+
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: --"-
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology c iterion met? Yes No
Rationale: Pik ??,? c? des ??,r1n,- se;1) --0 ?+. p
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes x No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: CLU 7LfL ?
*Use Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands
F5 (5
A
DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
Field Investigator(s) : Date: zG AP'2 I
Project/Site: 1hAM -- v2 State: County: Gu?nt?t?zsar-??
!Applicant/Owner: :t'+ v-c•Plant Community Name:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
!Yes No .(If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ?---
.Yes No _JtC (If yes, explain on back)
----------------------------------------------------------------=--------
VEGETATION SOILS
Dominant Indicator Horizon Depth Matrix Mottles
Plant Species Status Stratum ..to...inchs Color Colors
ski?
G?
IPA
-2
coy(
?2 . ? CRCG? a ?vn S p ( ICS ? 'r-Ac- S
'DTI"
3 . c?,t a;? N 5? r
;4 . : n u 9 la r-A-- _T
5.

:7.
8 .
;9 .
110.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC -7 !S
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: there ?? ?ah 5o°% a??o??..noa-t" ? c;?s a-re SA C _e_-?5r_r?eiCer.
SOILS
Series/phase: Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined x
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No /' Histic epipedon present? Yes Nom
Is the soil: Mottled (10-12 inches)? Yes No L Gleyed? Yes No_
Matrix Color: lo't(Z 6/`f- Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators: to
Is the hydric soil riterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No _` Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No <
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
t u'-KZ
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No >e--
Rationale: 'IM ?`elc? ??d?`cc
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No I
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: Ur??e,,.ci ll
*Use Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands
?? Ito

\ , 0...1,

11}x\ / .'

fA
i /\ I
? - - t< \? MVy?f !C? l_ Cam' ?? 1'
;? , ? \ \` ? ? . ? . Li/i ??;/7.f,\/,\ i '` .\ ?/? I ? .... '° ? .4..?w?vi,?' : •, ii. ?rr?''?c?'??? / 1 ? mn' ?,?
r W •.
_.? ,t?r11 ?, •\. / /? //'/./r.?i`` ?1\ , `"1` I,r? -' w.w li ? '????' ?/?? CJ f 1 pf /./.
(Alm /? ?+ ? ?t } ? I / J' ' ? ? , _ L
•
`41 \' 1'? \' \ 4?. ? ?:. \ S? r? ` `? I i - ? •?? ?i' ? /? O )-w: 5,?.Y a ? ._?? `^`? .II ?l •?
1
Met
{ ??A, ? .. ?s.-?y 1 '???• \\\b?ll..••.l ', \\'',I .Y\ ? Iw?
i-
Y I ) I 1
?1\\? j11 `?, ??? '/i ?%/ , 14.1', `. .?i?-.,-,+\?l -1??1?.?'-?('?_??? •- \ O? li?^`.•..\
_ /,:,?. 1. Y /?` \' i •.. \ .\ ; ?\` ,'r'
14
? mo't' ?. ? ?? ? `? ?'. y Y ? I`1.- ? `x ' •\ _` r
js ••
-- ----------
:,. ._ ..,._. ?-.. _..,r:_,.AI? A\1`? ?.•?;'...... ?.. `_ ,_ . _ : _:•.. ..: ...._., ., ..,_ ...,.?G ?? ??_ •REGObt?unFn/
t
DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
Field Investigator(s): G,a-L V,c-M Date: ? NNJ" 91
Project/Site: 1JWMD 1AW2 5TAVCfUrZ,-f PQL State: Nc- County: cv.hr3 ?.A.MI?
Applicant/Owner: F-T-• Plant Community Name:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes /<-_ No (If no, explain on back)
Has the.vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X (If yes, explain on back)

VEGETATION SOILS
Dominant Indicator Horizon Depth Matrix Mottles
Plant Species Status Stratum ..to...inchs Color Colors
1. PI 'dA Ta?vs`1v i S 'FArc.-y T O-+ loyf< 4/I
2. erws a?.r? N l.. Sa.'?_ LF-P #-
4. (o-((0 7/•y IoyR 6/2,
5.
6.
T.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL. FACW, and/or FAC C>
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No >c
Rationale: pei AnoRs rf!?AN ls?% c flo?+.tc.??.,.? 5 i=_C.Fe5 Rmtm. 'FPcc CM Ws ATER
SOILS
Series/phase: Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined X
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No '< Histic epipedon present? Yes No )'d
Is the soil: Mottled (10-12 inches)? Yes '_ No WE Gleyed? Yes No X.
Matrix Color: WK '7/* Mottle Colors: 1oYR &/z
Other hydric soil indicators: t4oe,
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No x
Rationale: GjAeO A. 'Tn)c> 1kykb N
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No X7.-
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Nor,•EIs the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No x
Rationale: fJ0 Fri tN?>tcs?Ta? "'
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No ?G
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: --P-7E'RIA McST MEI'
*Use Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands
Fj t e
DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
?ield Investigator(s): C,Q?Ye Date: 1MAV 9)
?roject/Site: IMMfl W UtTt.)P 1>4 cL- State: 1v C. County: cvn+f3?Le.?+.,?
,kpplicant/Owner: FT. Smote Plant Community Name:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
)o normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes X No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No c _ (If yes, explain on back)
OH LaNTp.

VEGETATION
SOILS
Indicator Horizon Depth Matrix Mottles
Status Stratum ..to...inchs Color Colors
FAA- la -3 IoYC2 3 I
'Fpct -3-S 41,
FAt.w She- P, -1b 1
411 t.y 3
1=lNK- SI?r to -172 341
F(kGW 1Z_ I E; 3/c)
15 - I8 31t
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC i
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: Noxo 'R'AP- IS-%- mT V10". spas Aar TikC oR wm'ER
SOILS
Series/phase: ?- Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined X
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No K- Histic epipedon present? Yes No cZ
Is the soil: Mottle (10-12 inches)? Yes K No G1 ed? Yes No >_
Matrix Color: IoVK 4'1I Mottle Colors: I y-R -311,
Other hydric soil indicators: oR6?N?? 5'F,ai-it-Ca -Ali ftu(,t{c_u i C6.LuxKt-i
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes k No
Rationale: Low cN2b??t ??rt_ wrm oRG ?c si^wr,•?C,
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X.. Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes )C No Ar- Is "
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: '
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
e> e& P, N tG <a?'T-R\N ?t3 G G'*nFi NYDR-y* dot, L
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yeses No
Rationale: "? ia?25 tM=5;&T'%
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: Pic- (zmmu2i^ M'U'
Use Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands
?A I 9
Dominant
DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
Field Investigator (s) : G "'OR Date:-
Project/Site: 16Amr IN cNftE DoL_ State: NC. County: c?N.r?Et2?•Q-?-s?
Applicant/Owner: F-= gCtc.& Plant Community Name:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes X No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X (If yes, explain on back) tD -, N o-r ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-G
VEGETATION SOILS
Dominant Indicator Horizon Depth Matrix Mottles
Plant Species Status Stratum ..to...inchs Color Colors
1. F; r r. P6 tvs•• I s F Acv T y-'3 IoY R ('/z _
2. ?,IA%A GD:Da 116A u m N1 S'AY 3-8 6/Z
3. Quwejs 1Mor,lamc?;ca ti's S?nY 8-?0 6 6/!?
4. P4r;J%'uw? 246 o%) nur^ r-/krC'\J !f lo- ?'} b
5. Qvbvs etv:g., vs rA<-V S I-vr l ?f-1(o E' 6 2
6. Acis-4; du s4,;.Tk p'i? l• 1(? - 2Z 2 6
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL. FACW, and/or FAC I'711b
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No 5e-
Rationale: pa-f AAD" T?1.?N 50% p ti?nn?r.?ANT s??ci?s pRE v? kc aR t„w-T%-cR
SOILS
Series/phase: Subgroup:
Is the soil o n the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined >e
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No X Histic epipedon present? Yes No k
Is the soil: Mottled'(10-12 inches)? Y es X No Gleyed? Yes No X
Matrix Color: toYR (6 13 Mottle Colors: (cy R
Other hydric soil indicators: Nt. %;7
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No x
Rationale: G omomA c3 ca A y,?rr,z?N -moo bt16H

HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Nc'fhSE-
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No >4
Rationale: Nn 9=I67.Q 1NOreA-1 _D r-s t' e%:-- SIE + 1
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No >G
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: ?-9 t7,6Mvs +,Jey AeE-r
Use Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands
F, W
•
DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
Field Investigator (s) : CAi_veK Date: AX^Y 91
Project/Site: ItAmT> 01;eE /Po L Stater County: CuMf3?lZLA/?l7
Applicant/Owner: 13CIN-e-c- Plant Community Name:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes Y- No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No X (If yes, explain on back)
--Z-;5 -
Dominant
VEGETATION SOILS
Indicator Horizon Depth Matrix Mottles
Status Stratum ..to...inchs Color Colors
I:ZA?v 5112 0-7 toy o -- 411
?P<<.U Sta R 3-- 5 i C? Co
?f?c.w S7?f? C-??9 6 3
1:"Pt c U T °1- 2 e /3 6
N2 51.412 1Z-tg 5?
0.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL. FACW, and/or FAC°lo
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Ra t i o n a 1'e : r OT Av r v -r4^to E:-;? °/,. u., AArf- sP t;r__(E3 Are-- FAC Cr_ W Gv-zM
SOILS
Series/phase: --- Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined x
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No sc Histic epipedon present? Yes 110,X
Is the soil: Mottled (10-12 inches)? Yes _)I-' No Gleyed? Yes No x
Matrix Color: mylz Q3 Mottle Colors: tbyk 6A0
Other hydric soil indicators: N'or-e-
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No _
Rationale: `Ta? 6R
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No ';,4 Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
wo IJ.G
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: PC_> P ? inrn??t'TD25 7 ??N 1
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No ".C'
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: CrztT?tt?a (JC5F 1vis
*Use Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands
?S 2.1

DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
Field Investigator(s): Date:
Project/Site: (AA-up 1AJ;'1/A--c n , a5S State: .1-JC County: Cam,-.-{raw
Applicant%Own-er: -t-i- ORA-G Plant Community Name:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes _X No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _?e_ (If yes, explain on back) A
--------------------------------------------------------------------?--------
VEGETATION SOILS
Dominant Indicator Horizon Depth
Plant Species Status Stratum ..to...inchs
1. 7: v've ?_ C1 C'
2. Lt wtka ivgrdo? fi!ae W _ ?q
3, zj1?ra al?(.a/}LW?' 9??2
5.
6. is-t8
7.
8.
5.
10.
Matrix
Color
ny 3 )
S/ 3
Mottles
Colors
o?1R
SL s i
?G
s?
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
SOILS
Series/phase: Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined ,'c_
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No __ Histic epipedon present? Yes No?
Is the soil: Mottled O-Z__ 10-12 inches) ? Yes _ No Gle ed? Yes No
Matrix Color: (DI Mottle Colors: ItJ12 ?
Other hydric soil indicators: VLC_4_4- ?
is :?:e hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
lationale: > X 1_4- ,%?
HYDROLOGY
Ts the ground surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
?,::;t other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
N uu-?
Is the w?tland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: bb C-c 1
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant, community a wetland? Yes No ?I
Ratio-1l ,.;r ju;•'. ?ir.tional decision:
vu
N 1210 "04
*Usa llanu:-_l :or Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands
s,
P r
40
DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
Field Investigator(s) : ?q-t.vAo-trZ Date: St5Pr
Project/Site: 1A-AAC7 \NState: UC- County: C-U-- .A.-
Applicant/Own-er: --r in"(o Plant Community Name:
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes _?1- No (If no, explain on back) 3 -B
Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No >4_ (If yes
, explain on back)
-------------------------------------------------------1 - ----------- n ------ -
W.
7.
8.
s.
10.
Percent of dominant
Is the hydrophytiT,
Rationale: vNrsrc
VEGETATION SOILS
Indicator Horizon Depth 'Matrix Mottles
Status Stratum ..to...inchs Color Colors
n -Z o /L Z I n 3lG
?-.r?e? 3
FAQ 2 '? r 94rec 10
species that are OBL. FACW, and/or FAC to Dlb
vegete?jtion/' c?j iterion met? Yes >G No
#^ SD SOILS

Series/phase: Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined 5-
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No „X Histic epipedon present? Yes No
is the soil: Mottled (10-12 inches)? Yes No )_ Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: wfA VI Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators: S rr
hydric soil criterion met9 Yes 7,0, No
+c
3ationale: lo,,,.,
HYDROLOGY
is the ground surface inundated? Yes'
Is the eoil saturated? No
Yes '54 No is it
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe
L:-,t t ter field evidence of surface inundation
I;5 the w,3tland hydrology criterion met? Yes u
Rationale: .4c 0 ""A. ?
No
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant, community a wetland? Yes % No
RatlOn-11 ;.,r 4u'" -lir.tional decision:
4 ti,..n
*U:;? =d r:?1 Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictiona.1 Wetlands
Surface water depth:
hole:
or soil saturation.

Dominant

9
DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
Field Investigator(s): C.A-cv d2 Date: 6 5;0-r
Project/Site: 1M?? 1U RAVTR- State: County:
Applicant%O.wn-er: _*A-r f30r&co Plant Community Name:
---
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No (If yes, explain on back) G
------------ ? ---------------------------.------------------------ -?`'-- -------
VEGETATION
Dominant
Plant Species
1. v
2.
3.
goy- 4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant
Is the hydrophyti
Rationale: Zff,
Indicator
Status Stratum
MAIc -I-
?w
SOILS -
Horizon Depth Matrix Mottles
..to...inchs Color Colors
Q ^- 10 3
'? c Z 4
-? Z ?F3 6
°t-1 z !ol
12 - t 457' JP IS
species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC IoC???o
vegetation criterion met? Yes 'e No
?..- -01, b? dog s Z. -r,? 1-!:!"
SOILS
Series/phase: Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined ?e
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No - Histic epipedon present? Yes No
is the soil: Mottled (10-12 inches)? Yes c No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: ID 4R 4t'3 Mottle Colors: 7
?-'
?3
Other hydric soil indicators: "-' b v. -%°y2
hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: .N,, ??-tA ,.1 r,1.- _ -$-
HYDROLOGY
Ts the ground surface inundated? Yes No 4-1
Is the soil saturated? Yes No -Y-
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe
4.1::-t other field evidence of surface inundation
Is the ti?eland hydrology
Rationale:_ QctA
Surface water depth:
h o l e :
or soil saturation.
criterion met? Yes_ No 1?11
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No ?
Ratite-.-1? -iir.tional decision: 0'-U-67'. *Uso ?'od ?',%l lGanual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands
j?q

DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODS
Field Investigator (s) Date: ?O .Cerl-9
Project/Site: 1MMrJ 1,?JrAAC(: State: ?C-. County: Gw.-.
Applicant/Own-er: ?^c fc,
'"`t Plant Community 2iame
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? -
Yes _ L No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No Y_ (If yes, explain on back)
------------------------------------------------------------------- 3--? -----
VEGETATION
Dominant
Plant Species
1 . ? i ?•, ?S ?-o?rb a
2. ly?tta s?lyok+cn
3. l_; v-T- s vk,
4. • -r '
5. v?noSS
6.
7.
9.
10.
Indicator
Status Stratum
9pre, T
bBL 14
_
*=Ac%" - 139
SOILS
Horizon Depth
.to. .inchs
0_60
(0•-11
11-l3
1315
Matrix Mottles
Color Colors
_
toy "P_ 7-10
l
i
!{ k Ty
(n T1_ vi
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 0otl
Is the hydrophyticr•veget tinrr??, criterion met? Yes ?_. No
Rationale: u.?c Y Wu t0 -1- I &..A• e%1 L._ -
SOILS
Series/phase: Subgroup'
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined ?')C
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No Y_ Histic epipedon present? Yes No
is the soil: Mottled (10-12 inches)? Yes No Gleyed? Yes No _??e
Matrix Color: 10`12 Z/1 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators: --6-?g. •.?y
is '.?:e hydric soil criterion met? es 7_ No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
is the ground surface
Is the soil saturated?
Depth to free-standing
L:::t o?herj f ielO evide
15 the w-.tland
Rationale: Xe
inundated? Yes' No Y
Yes No 'X
water in pit/soil probe
Rcq of surface inundation
J_ It s,A- er
Surface water depth:
hole:
or soil saturation.
ydrology criter?'on met? Yes'_ No
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Ratin-.11 ;.,r ju-," -lictional decision:
+'U3 =d r:il !Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictiona.l.Wetlands

1 _g
DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
Field Investigator (s) : CA`'V.-M Date: Zs -Tarr 91
Project/Site: 1tit.MD IAzF9A-i7-2vLTVR'F- PD5_State: Aic- County:
Applicant/Owner: 4'T- Plant Community Name:
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes x No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No V (If yes, explain on back) O' A .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION SOILS
Dominant Indicator Horizon Depth Matrix Mottles
Plant Species Status Stratum ..to...inchs Color Colors
1. r->: by s a.. A7_ F /.k- e- 'T o _ R ,e 5-/4-
2. 1\1?csc e,-4,v?t,? z? T (?- t 2 _E 4Z s S
3. A-' -.1 V11111 ST- 9-1S
4. N"SSa S.q kJe kCA >=lkG -
5. M44C-Q
8. s FA-c-
7.
8.
9.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL. - FACW, and/or FAC 1?o`?lb
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes >e_ No
Rationale: 3'F d.a,. s{?- ?^?tE w L•-nDiu.
F
SOILS
Series/phase: Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined X
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No L Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled (10-12 inches)? Yes L No Gle,,ed? Yes No x
Matrix Color: JoyA 6(z Mottle Colors: )7/Z 'E%
Other hydric.soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes >e No
Rationale: t-twL_? ir-C> f2Vs(/ Ci1-rz '* z t- "F2,6rt-.K- ?- sl
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No ,-
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
?T,, ,?..,
bia ??tar.j -e a,? s ?
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes x No
Rationale: -P-1A Z-cN. ?-
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes Y- No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: &_u C." ate:-.,
*Use Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands
P9 Z?
}

U(rW TO ;7*<r -F?ul
NX-A-K V"6 (3Lvp
DP MAI" RD IZv)JN%.4j6
F-w TO 5-r w o r< rM o f 5 rrZ.
--Np(c.n L v1?w of
TRAIL TWeO v 6 -V
tvt,,o ps W ?I-H t.kJ
411le'
/7 MAY q I

py Z'7

i.

BENCHMARK:
'FORK' 1987
NC GRID COORDINATES: X 2.08,414.789
Y = 496,957.114
EL 228.85
ea r•xe• ra•• u•s• u•.ee' uT •..•• » Ir.ao• n'•xo• r•u•
6 w ». e. n St's T ?..S?? ,G-6?f3333"'"'I
NOTES:
.'-ATE ' 16 73R NEW : -NSTROC'::. . - JEhtEN:,
CuRBS.GRADES AND ETC.
2. SEE PLATF P-IFOR LEGEND.
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY &
REMOVAL /RELOCATION PLAN
P-t
P-r.

q

r ,

IB
I
A

M
a
a
J
a
w
_Z
J
U
H
Q
- -- - --------------------------

GRAPHIC SCALES •??• '? "a' ••r-r •.r-r •.r-e• ••r-r r.r-r +r•r r.r-r p•sr n••aM
ia-
.:
y-
q
4` ?a

.I
8
A
GRAPHIC SCALES •".-r r•°• •.r-r •.r-a• r-r r-r r•r-r r-r a•.r-r r.•
LINE PLATE P-7

,I
BENCHMARK,
'FORK' 1987
• NC GRID COORDINATES, X = 2,011,414.789
Y = 496,957.84
EL 228.85
R••.ea• n•.¢oe• u••Tee' u•.sa•
e w aw 0 w 8 m a ,s?S^^--.-6° I e• IT x W-2.- TT le T

NOTES:
I. SEE TE P-T6 FOR NE* CONSTRUCT,.. U. PAJEMo ,.
CURBS.GRADES AND ETC.
2. SEE PLATE P-IFOR LEGEND. -
J
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY &
REMOVAL/RELOCATION PLAN

t.
D
1 ,
1 `
i
CL
\ i 11
w
J
CL
z_
J
2
U
Q ?
1 I `1
, l I
/
CS-4
'1t 1
1 `
1
+ 1
1 1
1 `
1 1
1
,' 1 1
1 `
I l
1
1
Il
/ ,1l
1
I
I
I
i
1

l •y
-----------------------
A LINE PLATE P-7 1}f?•n•.r' I ••r-r ag•r•r

GRAPHIC SCALESe.. e : I?'•r-r 0-r 17f••r-r r•r-r 1K•.r-r r•r-r 1 n•••?r 1 ar I+1w r.ar
T90I6"2
;
5 4 3 3

NL rLA1L r-b
BENCHMARK:
'FORK' 1987
NC GRID COORDINATES. X 2.011.414.789
Y 496.957.114
EL 228.85
r..w• r.z?e r•:ee• r.ca• r•w• ••. e• r• m• za• r•• 11 1 :M w s .w n» : r f. u r I : r r• I

NOTES:
1. SEE PLATE P-!9 FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION ^P PAVEMENT.
CURBS.GRADES AND ETC.
2. SEE PLATE P-IFOR LEGEND.
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY &
REMOVAL /RELOCATION PLAN

0
C
t. /
y ?
B
A
MATCH LINE PLATE P-6
?'7
N
N ?
GRAPHIC SCALES ? j"-, .' N,41 NITS •.L•r .?..?. ..??-r r.?•-a i •.?•..• ?•.?•-?•
n'••w VIM ? ta raw a+w• r•w
r i w ai. i +G R a w/ ??n
B W 16Y•I
3
\
\
L\ \----------
--- ---------- i i
N

\ / f
\ \ 1 I
\ i IA-19
NOTES.
SE: '.TE F 2_ "OR NEW 7:-Z
CU?BS . GRADES AND ETC.
2. SEE PLATE P-I FOR LEGEND.
LINE PLATE P-9 COFELS ASSOLIATES
I SAVANNAH-1,
BENCHMARK: EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY &
1987 REMOVAL /RELOCATION PLAN
NC GRID COORDINATES: X 2,011.414.789 - -
EL 228.85 ml-aft?
K 5".6

c
BI
A
1 i

I
i
i
+
MATCH LINE PLATE P-9
F e
GRAPHIC SCALES? i44•ai••r 171'T-rt' b l?••rT•?3 r iY••r•r yr-r ij{•?r ?r •.r-r r.?w r.za• r.?w r.w r.y
?',1-µ43-?T 7 8
a ?w
ad„es,? 5 4 3

1 \
/ I
I L
/ I
I /
/
A-24

/
it
/
i
r
r

BENCHMARK,
'FORK' 1987
NC GRID COORDINATESs X : 2.011,414.789
Y = 496.957.114
EL 228.85
11-w u•.:••• u•a••• r•w• ?s»e•• } • • ?• a ¢• n ,a ,
•
f
NOTES:
1. SEE PLATE P-21FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENT,
CURBS.GRADES AND ETC.
2. SEE PLATE P-IFOR LEGEND.
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY &
REMOVAL /RELOCATION PLAN
P-1
P-11.

0
BI
AI
N \ 1
2` 1111 y 1 1 1 11
I I : II ?\\ ? l 1 11 \I? 1\ 1 11\ I,•I 1
?,? '? x,.,11 ` ••\ `\ '`\ ?\ 11 1
; I 1 1 1 '1 I
?, I I
?? 1 I
I ? I ?I' 1 1, 11 I
I • 1 ? ' 11 ' ! ??! i • I
:, I I I I
I I I (
1
I I '
' ? i I ,I 11 I !
III I I I I I I '
1;11 I i ? ? 1/ ? I I ?
I
i
1'I? I i i I• I i I i I III
I I I
1 1 .ry } ? I t l I I 1
• i' ? •, I I I i I i ? I ? 1\
y`? v'1 ? I ? I I
I 1 \
_ I ,'' 11 i1
l ,
I I I
F-1
i
r
/
/
i i
/
11 l
I I
/
I
I
! I
/
/ r
I ,
I /
I
/ I
I
/ 1/1 \ \\
/
/
2a
GRAPHIC SCALES /.I•-r I•'I•-r •.I•-r .I•-r •.I•-r •I•-r r•I•-r I •.I••r r.?••r ?••.v r.zw r.lw• r.ar I
w r .w r r s
ewzcs?z
5 4 3
I 1
1 III
N I I
ES •12
IE 227.2 ES 94
EL
1 • D = 65.00'00.8' \
1
13 STORM GRAIN CHO=41652.74
PC - • P-1i P-30 PROFILE DITCH SECTION I
STA 15.51.37 SLOPE O 0.05% -
DETAIL +
----------------
SECTION IV
O O.PL 1 -ES°I"
A
?^-' HEAV1=---??
WOODWORKING/
CARPENTRY
(FY 91 PROJECT)
BLDG I
ll (FY 91 PRO,
VAN SHOP
(FY 9fPROJECT)
CS-3
A-14
Ii _sr__ _ ya. ?\ •
CSC"
\. \ \ _ I --
LDG F. TIRE SHOP
RASE II (FY 91 PROJECT) ' l
A-15
(FY 91PROJECT) • ---------
1 I ?1 1,,
111 1
-- 1'I
P-20
BENCHMARK:
'FORK' 1987
INC GRID COORDINATES: X 2.011,414.789
Y 496.957.114
EL 228.85
n :eP•.c> w I e Ir•T•. Ir.zen•„•'J
CL
L
F-
-1
L
z
J
2
U
a
NOTE.
4 EXTEND REVETMENT WHERE SHOWN, IO' --
UPSTREAM AND 2G UGWNS.RLAM OF GRADE
CHANGES, CULVERT, OR PIPE ENTRANCES.
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE,
2. SEE PLATE P-IFOR LEGEND.
P-T
pw4 -6
P-16 P 18
P P
P-p 1 P-2
'C &&A2 .?.E P- p
`f3.27 a .I
P-
P?Y2 arlS
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
GWFELS ASSOCIATES NC U. ARMY
ARC.TECTWE AMO ENG:ERAG ENGNEER DISTRICT, SAVA
SOUTNEKLO MCwGAN CORPS OF ENGINEERS
SAVAMNAN, GEORGIA
IMMD INFRASTRUCTURE/D01. WAREHOUSE
LAYOUT. GRADING. PAVING. STORM
DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
FORT BRAGG NORTH CAROLINA
m -.,- Io rA[ - RArt
F ""•-"'-00" 218-15-01 P-17
I
I
12 STORMDRAI!
--- -_?` P-17 P-30 PROF E
DETAt -
FUTURE INTERSECTION
- -O
STA 12. TO 1 J?-
.? - - - StA 11.94.00 G
El 2
H - ''
_?\ - ?•
S O• 23S ? 8.547?
o

2w BC

/• HP E 21
j'
128 Bi?
y ti
L LIl 153.50'

? -. 1 .
1 .
W ._ I I 1
a_

LLJ 1
i1 1
ST ORM DRAIN PS
r,
PROFILE ? P-17 P-31
`.-.
g 1 µ -?-" DETAIL, I
1 rr ? 6 S T 0 R = flRAIN ) r
:
1 11H,r1,1 P-31 -PROFILE
-
CO
!11
. < 71.7• - 12'SD 0 0.571 p
ES •16
\
c
\ IE 227.50
. •Ig
CB
1
S
I.6 D
•
CB
18
\
CB • 16 .? 1.5
.,
-SD CB •17 '
TE 230 I 1

EXISTING WOODS ' tl

`
I I
t
o
?
•
DITCH S
CTION 1
;A 1 E
.%OPE\0I 0.05% I? I

•
`DITCH SECTIO V
SLOPE 0 O.P/.
_69.5' - 12'SD a 0.5%
E
227
EL 227.36
? \ -,?/
A-14
-DITCH SECTION IV
SLOPE 0 0.7% \ \
321 321
1 + +
t I \ +
` LDG H
ASE II
(F? 9, ROJECT)
MATCH LINE PLATE P-20
-(7
K..,..•. ti..,.m. „•.
GRAPHIC SCALES,';
: a c m ,» ?.• b ».»?A- n g? s T
B•v26SM2
5 4 \ 3
DITCH SECTION IV
SLOPE e Wi
\ ? \
_? e Z
a._ i

i

I ? 1 '?i I I I' ?1
I ,1 I
?-
11 r II I I
I?I' I 1 I ?I I}
' I ' I I, t
I
i jl, \Ilil l'I
Ti
• ? ?I I' X11
f. 1 1
a Z 'r; 111 ,
'I ' '111 1I. I
?? ?tW ?I i I
MATCH LINE PLATE P-15
I

N
\ I
NOTE:
1. SEE PLATE P-I FOR LEGEND.
_I
P-T
I P-19
pm4 P-16 .1,, r{ IB
P- Pt
P'
P-1D j P-2
-2F \ P-91
3; ~ ? 1 P-„ t
_2T P t
i
P
P?P2 ID-lT - '
f I
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
G.EEES ASSOCIATES MC ENGNIEER MU. S. TRICT YSAVANNAH
ARCNTECTURE AND ENGN[ERNG CORPS OF ENGNEERS
SOUTHf tlO MCNIGAN SAVANNAH GEORGIA
IMMD INFRASTRUCTURE/OOL WAREHOUSE
BENCHMARK: LAYOUT. GRADING. PAVING. STORM
*FORK' 1987 DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
NC GRID COORDINATES. % = 2.011.414389
Y = 496.957.01 FORT BRAGG NORTH CAROLINA
EL 228.85 s•E ANnAT•N n EAa .o. g
•z•o rv.•' r•w r.1. r•I• .nw xa• F 218-15-01 arc n
REWSIDEIS sCAA4 b'-P YfiT n
3 2 Z ...+. 'M:.Y: DGrc

• ?i
..:yam _-\
CI
a
H
Q
Q
Z
z
x
U
H
Q
81
AI
MATCH LINE PLATE P-19
I
I
)ITCH SECTION I
'LOPE, o 0.05%
I

3

CURVE DATA: I
R = 1538.00'
D = 65'00'00.8'
L = 1744.81
CHO = 1652.74
•?1
,?1 ti •I ;
I I
l'
------------------
1 _ A-26
------------
------------- ----- -----
-- T /
r -- i PAINT /
CS-2 \ PAINT PREP SHOD
/
r (FY 91 PROJECT)
--------------
- -------------- -
V /
BODY RFPAIV
HEAVY VEHICLE (F`P-21-!PROJECT);
ARTILLERY (FY 91 PROJECT) /
CT) ;(FY 91 PROJECT)
I I /
--
1 1 1 '' --
t CS-16
/ -
t --
I ;f
1FIBER GLASS
i? (FY 91 PROJECT)
i S
._ I
i
r
F--18
FIRE
)NTROL
I PROJECTI A-28
---------- ----
REP
EXCH
--------------
WAREHOUS
(FY 91 PROJE T)
••1'•r Sc••r-r ••P-0• .r-r q(•a•-r P•T-0• •.1'-r J'•rT
GRAPHIC SCALES r
SK." .2
5

r11r• r• I r..,N• i+as• r.x
,A na 3
- W _ 225 •,.:
STA 30+50 EXTEND NEVE'TUENT 50•
DOWN EXISTING SLOPE. WIDEN 0fTC/ -
BOTTOM k REVETYEN"
+ +
N
j
•
/Q1 ?
?,. / • .j GSM //
x IN
i /
NOTE-
L^ i / C. L SEE PLATE P-1 FOR LEGEND
27
PI 498.903.2480
E 2.013e94.5744 7?/
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
SOLITWIELO CORPS OF EW.IW RS
BENCHMARK, L YOUT, GRADING, PAVING. STORM
'FORK' 198T DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
NC GRID COORDINATESt X 2,011.414.789
Y 496,957.114 FORT BRAGG NORTH CAROLINA
EL 228.85 'u Aw
F 218-15-01 P-19
a

z?5
31
i
!1L
MATCH LINE PLATE P-18
{

PI
N 498,9 3.2480
E 2,013 94.5744
i VIM.. SCALES 1N. •r-r ••?'•r _ P.G••?•.r 111••r-r iS5••r-r i'K••?•-r r.r.r%•.r-r r.r-r 1r..ar_ ? _r- ?zw• u•.ur n•.p• =
?'rr'rTT 0 -i t -sue F b ?4 c• I b STS `r r> -
l90I65„1 •
5 4 7e. T 3
_ - ----
A"6
;
' ' ;I l I
-- --- --- CONSTRU TION
EOUIPM 7
(FY 91 PRO CT)
\
A-20 \
I I
\ + COMB T VEHICLE i .I N
R %AI - --
- A-lit E \-- -s---1 --- .Z I
A-22 -----
- /
-----------
---------------
rv '\\ OA INSPECTION; it
CC 91 PROJECT)
\\ \ i± A'_19 NOTE:
0 0.5% \ \\ i, I. SEE PLATE P-1FOR LEGENC.
\ FS W ?' I -1 P-7
\ P-19
pm4
P-16 P IS
( P P, \
A:23 l i_^\ dK2T P 1 .?• Pj1 \
qC/AND P-
Pgtz
POWER/GRO?IN10
SUPPORT' \
KEY PLAN
--'
NO SCALE
- -- ------
I
GAFElS ASS
III PLATE POCIA TES R1L J. • MY
+ ARCMTECTURE AND ENGVSERNG ENWNEER pSTRit T, SAVANNAN
-21 saTwKlu rC?G.M CORPS a ENGRAERS
SAVANNA, GEORGIA
IMMD INFRASTRUCTURE/DOL WAREHOUSE
BENCHMARK: LAYOUT, GRADING. PAVING. STORM
'FORK* 1987 DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
NC GRID COORDINATES: K c 2.011.414.789
Y 496,957.114 FORT BRAGG NORTH CAROLINA
EL 228.85 M 1-., - /u M %',E
--( r•.aer.tM r•me? r•cer•sr r..e• r•w• r•zer•ie• E,.lOI tac F o.c.nwaaon 218-15-01 P-2C
axs,a an n
a. n
REViSgxS xAw r. xa
3 2 Y[E, r
_. Ort 10.. 1 W-1. w.",
+ r MATCH LINE PLATE P-17
Q DITCH SECTION IV
I I SLOPE O 0.7%
I 1 ' STORM DRAIN n I 'I
PRDF1-E, P-20 P-31 I
DETIL
A
Ie STO M DRAIN ' r I 69' 12'SD O y`
t11 P-20 P-31 PROFILE
I ES •19
DETAIL I y I?? 1 IE 24.0
EL 224.56
EL 22 4 0 10.
EL 224 b 12-SD 0, X 69
30^ r I 1.8 i SD 20'
I•T . v
10' 50
_ 1 h I m I
°
20' i TE 27.5
''? u 1 ? I .i I r,v
ES •18 u' iI , n I ii 47' .:
IE 224.70 I' r1+ I ll ?1,? 11 I A.0
DITCH SECTION 1 i
SLOPE o 0.05,J:
I ?r ?:? •' II .r ,'.,? ,r / I '
1
i ? ?- I ' ? v r 1 -
STA I13.00; ii It
HP El; 228.0 A-22
FLIT URE?B B?
I r' 1 1 _ STh -9.75-_-__---
. -_
? 'I II I
STORM DFt
? ? I I AIN zo I , DITCH SECTION Iv
ERdfM11R; WO -31 { SLOPE O OJX
•? \ \\ v, DIET
,? \ I II Iu' I 8.7' - 12•SD o 0.5%
1. I \\ \ ?, I ?. I I p 0. I i 368.T- 12•SD 5% .00 1
i
EL 222.53
EL 224.00
1.9 1-10
N ` I ,u'• r •
\ EL 222.50
- ' -
? ES'•22 r m TE 126.
\ \ IE 223.00 c v iI ?!? 1I ..
21 ST?RM DRAI
\, o I -20 P-31 'PROF E J A•23
\\\LOP 2.Oi DETAIL DITCH ECTION I\ 1 II I
11 I
1 I ---
'? •\ , \.,.?- \a .200, A 11
--- ------ - _ ' -
\ I --------------- ------
MATCH LINE PLATE P-21
:-Y• m-•• -
GRAPHIC SCALESN '•1•-Y1 •q .• •.1•
•?'-m' I •.r-r
9('•`-•• Y p-.p_•. I••?M' I••PN• 1•.1N' 1••Y' r.e••
e9J16S?I
9 q
5 q
4,7 T 3
I.
11
>f
-
"
r r 1
------
----
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ir
--
--- - / ,
, r
, r
/ r
/
A-24 '
/
/
/
/
_-
---------- t
- ---------------
_---------7-- /
1

BENCHMARK,
'FORK' 1987
NC GRID COORDINATES, X x 2.08.414.789
Y x 496.957.84
EL 228.85
+aw i r•fr r•sr 1..r ,ti: 1•.ar ,+u•
u n ua.
3
2
A
1
NOTE:
1. SEE PLATE P-IFOR LEGEND.
2. EXTEND REVETMENT WHERE SHOWN.IO'
UPSTREAM AND 20'DOWNSTREAM OF
GRADE CHANCES. CULVERTS, OR PIPE
ENTRANCES, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
7. NO EARTH DISTURBANCE WITHIN THE
WATER COURSE DURING CONSTRUCTION
EXCEPT FOR FINAL PLACEMENT OF
CONCRETE FILLED FABRIC REVETMENT
BLANKET.
4. ALL CATCH BASINS IN ROADWAYS SHALL
BE PROTECTED WITH INLET FILTERS UNTIL
CURB IS INSTALLED. THEN PROTECT WITH
STONE INLET FILTER SEE DETAIL. P-41.
Y-I
`P; P-T
P-19
. P-1 'P-5 1 P 6
S:I P-16 plp 1 ?-IB
P -
\I P-20. \ ?\
P-10
.P-26 ? -ry 1
9912 P? 1. •i P-21
R?2T P•25 __
!3-tSKEY PLAN
NO SCALE
GIFEELS AS:000x EEER.. ENGINEER DISTRICT.
. SAVANNA.
SOU--ELO NO ENUNEG CORPS OF ENGINEERS
SW iNF4L0 1ACNiL.N S.V-. GEORGIA
IMMU INFRASTRUCTURE/OOL WAREHOUSE
LAYOUT, GRADING. PAVING. STORM
DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
FORT BRAGG NORTH CAROLINI
Hxf xMRAIIfN 6 Flf xA -.-
` F AcAf?n.t -. 218-15-01 P-21
fa u nF...fpt°?:, MW
D
C
B
A
I ? +
/ r
r I /
r 1
/ I
1 3
5 4 3
MATCH LINE PLATE P-20
---------------
\\;,S•=?,E(iS219.90'^•\ II WD ORIVE \ \ A - ----
------------
l1 P, _I? _ ?20'A 12.70 I _ • \. _
DITCH. SEE TYPICAL
CROSS SECTION. P-38
I -
-!f I Q. - "sp I` w `k-'EL 228.02
SLX) E 4.9% 80
II I I .\ \ t? 0• s \.,? . ,? \ ?P EL 227.0 - ----------
E
EL /' -° 1. A'A - ?? v ???-- .•? 228.40 -- - - ---------------
SEE NOT ?a zr' - I 1 1 EL 229.44 -
/
EL 228.40 ;
916
El 9.68 - ,
• ! ?I ?1 \
'LIFT` STATIOM, 56 ` 1 I 1
/ NEW 116t EL 22'8.53
j I CATE1 \ • ?? \ ,\ \• , l EL 226.77 I - EL 227.
L 228.53
EL 228.00
' ' v 1 \ EL 224.0
I i TIE NOS OF SILT. \ , \ 1 '\ +\` so, \t \ • r
FENCE TO DITCH
I I ISE( AIENT TRAP \\' \` \ 1
I I ! ti it • \ I ` \ 11 I 1•• ,\ •t \\ \•\ ? ? ? / j i?
i ? SEE PLAkES Er10 6 E•27 \I •?\ t ?\ \ ? 11, `\ \ / I A-24
FOR ABOVE &,BELO GROUND \.? '? \ i •
ELECTRICAL WORK IN HIS .1 \
1 AREA.
I/ 'i I I\\\ I i ? II I II ' I ,i ? 1I 11 i ? ? 1 i
i
i?_
?1 N1, • ?1 -- }?% r r r r
I 1 i I I t 1I i ?JI I j ICI A-10
I I I I fi .I 1 ?. EL 220.09 i i
I I I! I ' f l ? I I I III I I' I I • 1 I--
I I I 11 I• I E' 220.00
I ?I I ! EU 219.92
j ' ?\' CONTINUAT16N SEE IMM-1MAMTENANCE
FOR 4
! " \ \1 F ACIII(Y-PNASE.4gLA
r
.r i I I ?1 I
-I I 0'
.?•? I I i I ?? ? 1, I .I I 1 Bp• I I
.;L ITIOw r r
T' T A CONCAVE (BANS
•'! % ,1 1INS(ALI ENEIIAEN?D P WHEN', \\\
OSS TION.ITD.E GE.. \? • , r
i!. l 1 il? M AhURE EDGE + r'
\ __. -- `_ _ _ - 220 -- _ ?--?/--?\ 1 1 ??. •\I\ ` ,/
NC
FOR-
Le.t • !r? BE
•.r-r ••r-r ••r-r •a•-r r•r-r r ••r-r r•r-•• r••w ne•r r•rw r••r r•sr r.«
GRAPHIC SCALES :.' •' r i : r .• y »
g 4 3
t t
3
2
------------------ ---------- +
-
I l \
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-I- r r
J_---- ,
r ss p 0.40'. r f , \
------
- 1
- _- "
.' 1
12r IN + OUT 4ocyT SANITARY SEWER
PROFILE W W '25
/ f
r /
i
A-24 I
i
/
w
' a
' z
f---------- a
i
1
D
8
NOTE:
I. SEE PLATES P-IAND W-IFOR LEGENDS.
2. SEE PLATE W-13 FOR 10' FW CONTINUATION

BENCHMARK,
'FORK' 1987
/ 220 j
NC GRID COORDINATES, K : 2.00.414.789
S"m 1.
Y • 496.957.04
EL 228.85
r•xw r.:r• r.y r•er r..r :+?t
3 9
w`5
\
w- W-4

KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
A
'"ELS .SS000TES K ENWIIE ER CAST RiC i'I.YS.v.MN.N
.RCwITE CT{AE .NO ENE/IE[RN0
CORPS OE ENdNEE R$
SOUiNFElO rCNry.N S.V.MN.R. GE OROU
IMMD WFRASTRUCTURE/D0L WAREHOUSE
SEWER AND WATER PART PLAN
FORT BRAGG NORTH CAROLINA
s,u wn.Ta d nt O ft"I
F asooa 218-15-01 W-3

f r
5 4
3
a
2 1,11 I WO DRIVE
'I _ A • ---------------------------------
DITCH, _ ?TA 12.70
` L }; I SEE TYPICAL !: I
CROSS SECTION, P-38
DITCH SECT," I -?c; EL 228.02
SLOPE 0;4.9% " '?> r o
\ HP EL 227,0 /
l ? El! 2 +
EL 228.40 -
E fNT ?3 , = LLN _ N 17419:50. _
/ 1 zl EL 229.44
E
o '1 747: 1-14
g\\y`EL 228.40;.:
L 2 0 I L 25 :' *\ 2' S5 O 2 9.68 _ SAN-011---2-2----
TE 227.00
- INV 12' IN s OUT 204:97
1 l ?: ?- i 1 _ _ _ _ -
------------
f o A-9
NEW I6lA?10 t EL 228.53 • I
I(.ATEt .
EL 228.77
\ L 228.53 I
EL 228.gO--_ ..:: 1.1EL 227,56
I
ISED AIENT TRAP 1
SNMH 21
TE 228.0
l ; ' 1 J \ \WN,2',IN OUT 2\5.73
' I I I I 1
1
' / !I? ? I I? I II
A-10
? - N
/ i 1 /'!jr I'll j E 29. \
'? ' a' I I I I I T a
?! 11??1 I I TALL' EJINM1 T', 1.D P, WNEN
CROSS EDGE 6,E El -
/ ??7: i ME ? 11 \ \
:?/ /j/I l/1' I ? VIII
II
s?t-.,tf k) - 3/ cv.?-t `j
A-24
" 1 •
1
/
I
•
z -------------
EL 220.09
Ol----
,a

BENCH
FORK
NC G,
I l
I I
I I
I I
I ?
/
/
I \
I I n
/11 \ ?
GRAPHIC SCALES •?.r•?,°'"r "?.-r '•?'?' '•I`r ra•-r I •.r-r rn•-r r.•w u••t4r
•w r.? r i +ei
5 4 TCj
5? 3

f r

3
2 I
W-5
t` BLDG C I;
CANNIBALIZATION P01 +
(FY 91 PROJEC
----------------------
-
A-32
O. - - -
--------------------- -------------
--------------- ------------------ -- --------------- --------------------------
----------------- --------------------
--------------- ---
-----------------
----------------
)N/SEDIMENT POND
91 PROJECT) +
---------------
-------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- -------
--- -------------- -------------
----------------------
i
NOTE:
I. SEE PLATES P-IAND W-IFOR LEGENDS.
lr d?. I `. I W- W-41
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
D
C
B
A
BENCHMARK:
'FORK* 1987
NC GRID COORDINATES: K : 2.01.414.789
Y 496.957.14
EL 228.85
r.zM• T•.uNr r..r
3
2
GKEEll ASSOCIATES - ENGNEER , DISTRICT. R.,SA VAwNAw
ARCMTECTLAE AND [NGR(ERNG CORPS ST CT. ERS
SOUTIfIELO YCNIGIN SAVANNAH GEORGIA
IMMD INFRASTRUCTURE/DOL WAREHOUSE
SEWER AND WATER PART PLAN
FORT BRAGG NORTH CAROLINA
SIZE 1-nIin- E[A I[l RAR
IF 218-15-01 W-4
n
ECAIE. w.a wrT .1i

5 q
3
MATCH LINE PLATE W-5
q' STUB. 10' LONG S 0 0.401/ Ir- -----------------------
----- ---- ----- 10• STUB. 10'LONG
SAN MN
TE 23L
KV IYIN L, OUT 206.46 SANITA
WV N 218.00 PRI
` TREE CLEARING
\ CONTINUATION
FROM P-9
READY FOR
ISSUE POOL
(FY 91 PROJECT)22`'
t \
A-25 \ \
l
i \
t 1
1 \
1 \
--------------
SAN MH •24
TE 231.50
INV 12' IN 8 OUT 20'.74 I;
INV 10' N 225.OO'?
I BLDG C I;
'_lL Ji
CANNIBALIZATIO
(FY 91 PROJ
------------------------------------- - -
A-31
---"
_--•-----------
--------------
---------------------------- --- /
\ l - - --"---
--- --
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
DETENTION/SEDIMENT POND
< \ \\ + (FY 91PROJECT)+
J
w \
Z
J ` \
\ \
--------------
--------------- \ \
I- \ \ ----
------------------ --------------
\ \ ---
------------
-------------------------- \ ----
-
----------------------
--------------
----------------------
---- - 1 \ -------------------------------
----------------------
220 \ 225
225 ` \
\ \ ? 228
2
~ 215
Tel '-
4-1
SENCHA
'FORK'
NC GRu
GRAPHIC SCALES,_ \.rn ut! \•ar> ••\i-! •.r-r •.r-r r•r-r ! •.r-r r.r-r r..w r.»r r.lw rvw rvar
y « r•.r
5 q
i7t. < 62 3

3
2
------------- -
)USE
i
-------------- ----
--------------
-----------------
------------- ---
'r-----------
POL
BLDG F
"
--
t /
DOCK\`1I ------- - - /-.
RAL
I; W HOUSE ITEM
(FY 91 PROJE
I' A- 0 •
SA ARY SEWER - _ -------- SAN CAIN •2 \
I;
TE 26.00 \\\
YRBflCE? w- w-25 INV I •w 21 26
INV IQ N 2 .26
f
to STUB, LONG / 4 V
SAN MH N X25
TE 231.00 i
Nv 12'w 208.50
WV I0•E,208.63 _
INV'p'N 218.00 _ _ - - -
- 1p' S5 0 0.50%' -
'E W-4
BENCHMARK:
'FORK* 1987
NC GRID COORDINATES: X = 2,011,414.789
Y = 496,957m
EL 228.85
r nxar :••ter r.w I•••Jr :-..r 111 1••tr FM.
HrAL id
3 2
D
4
8
NOTE:
I. SEE PLATES P-IAND W-IFOR LEGEND
CwC?i.•.. "` 4? _ .ten` ; /?
?.
W.? w-4
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
A
G-FFELS .SS000IES AC ENDRK'.ER D1SIR,?C?'.r.rN.M
.RCUIECTWE AND ENUMEERMD CORPS OF T. SERS
SWiwFrtlD uCwG.M S.v '.' GECR'U
IMMD INFRASTRUCTURE/OOL NAREHOUSE
SEWER AND WATER PART PLAN
'ORT BRAGG NORTH CAROLINA
F D_'•' 218-15-OI w-5
4L4 •+ fa-Y S,QT
Put 14-

? i

5
4 3

CS-14
--- I?--
%C AND
_R GROUND
UPPORT ------------
-------------------
MATCH LINE PLATE W-4
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
5 BENCH
'FORK'
Pg ?? NC LR
••r•r ••r-r •.r-r •a••r •.r•r •.r•r r•r-r •.r-r r•r-r 1••.N' PRM" 1••IN' r•w r•?• r•.r
GRAPHIC SCALES,; r
5 a a
--------------
---------------
------------ -
WAREHOUSE
t
---------- --- ---------
r "--"

3 I 2

1` 1%
i III I'? ?? 1
SEA 7+70 HORIZONTAL
/ ' ? i ?j ? • DEFLECTION
AD-
-- ---- --- - .00 A 1•ot•I
400 .QO ryry- / 'O? 1
_ / / \y OFF 6 CI ? 1` ? 1
?LpJE
+ MATCH LIN

t- 235
- -
• -- L -
--_ -_ - -- 230
- T-O

?? 225
11 TT
220

' LOVER
F_. --T
__ - -

. a~
-
-_
_ -
-
'
_ -
LJ
--
T
-
- --_ - -4 - -
-
-J--.
t 215
- I N -r ;-z 210

0 0-= - - -- - -
-Lf -- ---
Q
-~
205

200

- '- --I ._-- - --• ...- I--- --T- ?- -' 1-- 198

.•Nr "tM•. tiles 1•.N• 1'.er 1•••r 1ti>r r•ar 1••Ir SYMOL Eo
3 2
N
0
B?
Z
_9-q
r '
rt
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
A!
(fFELS •SSOCI•tES NC 5. •RYY
M+C.TECiLAE u MN ERMG ENLIEFR p;TRICT• 5•VANN
SOMT.C,o rE?yl C5OIW5X ErWERS
GEJRWI I
IMMD INFRAStRUCTURE/DOL WAREHOUSE
SANITARY FORCE MAIN
PLAN & PROFILE
FORT BRAGG NORTH CAROLINA
sa r•E•Ra r nt r tiR
Y4 w
scrE, s llo.u +a? n 76 •
Do 6(? Y..e..._.
5 I q
13

•ls

STA
SAN
STA
SAN

'IT

-
_
- T
N
l
- _.
-
- -
_. _.

235 -
?
i
-- --
- - -
-.
--
- ---
- - -
? -- -
- -
-

2 -
- --
-
-
-
I .f t 1
30 - - - - - - -- - - -- -- -- -
-- - - - - - - F - - + - - - -
225

-
-- ? F-
?
-?- - - - - - - - -
t =
220
_
-

?- - - - - ,
C
4
_ OV
ER
215

- -? H- - - F- ?+ ?- - t F - - -? - - i- j
_
-
.-
-- - ? w ?w - - -
210 --' -? '-- - h'--- 1 _. _ .. ,. ., - - - - - - - -
- --- -- -- - _ .- r ? ... .._.?
205
1 - - -- - - - - - - --- -
-• _. - r- _ - _ i- _ -. _ _
_ {
200 -{ _ ' -

195 _.-_? .. --r- - - 1- - --? ? - _,__ _ __ - _ - - _-- •__ --.. _ _ _ -

z
2
L,,,-
GRAPHIC SCALES O!"it, J%7' JS

S I q - - -
a yr 3 -

1 ? 1
PLAN
SCALE: I' = 30'

1
255
- - -- - -- - -- - --

- -- 250
COVE -- --- -- - -- O?
S _ -? -- -- 1
245
_ y 1 - _ - - --
-- - - -- 10'-Fu - L - 4 -
--- -
- --
r r - i-
-(-
-r---
240
-a. - 1-

t- 235

14
230

' 22$
?-? ._ i. - r- .•- _
220

zIs
n•..w II'.tw rnw N•.?r? Ir?? s «T ? Tifi;T

2
N
i
W
z
2
0
a
w
co
Q5
ti
a
Ln
cp
W
a
J
CL
41
z
J
2
U
H
Q

4I -6 " j
Are .? `? ?: I
I
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
A
:.EEEIS AS50CI.IES NC
.RCMIECIENE .b ENUEERFG 0CR4ER d$iRICT 1S.V.NN4E
50.115 E.0 uCE.CUE JiwS or ENC.IEERS
S.v.NN.N ECRU.
IMMO I1NFRA}TRUCTURE/COL WAREHOUSE
?ANITARY FORCE MAIN
PLAN & PROFILE
FORT BRACG NORTH CAROLINA
m rw.r? qA M R.19 h.
F .r.E wm. O 218-15-01 M-7
1°"8 •7 D sv1 17
5
4
3
D
CI
PLAN
SCALE: i' = 30'
vi
7
S
0
i
W
A
' ?
255 - =E E-
-
-
-
-.
-I
-
-
-

--.?
_.;-
-4-
_
?-
--
_ L
- --
- -
-
-
Ir
.-_-
250

-

- --

-

--

_.

-

- _
--
-. ..-
- -
-
-
-

" -

-
-
-

-
r-
-
- --
_ t
- - - -
? i
--? 3
COV
t
245
_ r-
_
y
-}- y
-}-
_
_Ej
-Vi- - -'-- - -- - --
240
- 4-
EL -
235 - - -- - - -- - -- -
- - - -- -- - - _.- - --- --'- -..- - -

230 ._ -- -• - _ .. _. ? . ._• -- -- - - . ___ _ _- v?i-L -- - - -
225
-T
220

215
PROFILE
SCALEi MORIZ P = 30'
PERT I'= 5' '..;
t? •? P? Sq f`
GRAPHIC SCALES "I•.r ••r-r •.r•r ••r-r .r•r ••r-r r•r-r , .r- .
HOliya
5
4 t .., a
- 1 3 I _ 2 ( I
k
?i
7
`ter ;1 °
6
1 \\
E 6
00
i ,
25
i

t- 255

-- --
zso
_
f aSN GRAOE._ - -` --
-
r _ _ _

24
5
_4__ - -
- 12, w
1 -- 240

_"_
___
YN.2
LE4 RA
- -
-'
_ LQAT!0. R6r
_6 ELEJ Ti0 1 ._ - - -- t- - rf
235

- -` r , I -7- Z 230

- ?
- --- -- - Q -.- - -- -- - '--- -- --
225

?-
-L -
_1-.
-
-1.-
--?-•
-
__-? --
_? -
-_ C.-_...
_.-t
-
__ 220
_ 2i5
„y M' LuW w I•.w r. q- 1••W t••]Y t••ty
a t.ra to
3 2

1
c:
B
i.
j
N
w . .E r i
Z _ ?\
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
G "LS aSSX-Ei .•[ ErK.aEEA OK tRIEf•iSI
~
'K.TEE YA1MIM 1w r EWWEFMO C"Mp9 F.2s[FRS
SWT,wELD µ
.KwGIM < ?W
IMMU INFRASTRUCTURE/D.L NAREZUSE
SANITARY FORCE MAIN
PLAN & PROFILE
FORT RRAOG NORTH CAROLINA
wE -Amm a nA r tiw r
;
F ?.. b. b p 21e-15-01
YN F N-e
PILE. •t r0,fp fat 7 To

5 I
4
3

01
a,
N
N
ZqS
w -??-?
ti
-- - --
_ e•;aen. iea
F- (00 .... ----_-?
F-
?- --^-?:-_.?-
< ---- --- - -- --- KNOX STREET .3
19.00
ti? b;?
I l\
v
7
4
i
W

255 N.

-
?-.
-i -
-f
I
-
- tt
I , i
I
-
-
?
250 -- - - - - i
- - -. ? -- '- - - -

_ -' -- - --

-

_._ - EXISTING fifiADE -
__ - - -- ---- '---

_.
FlNISH
GRADE
245 .__. ,.._ 1 ...

}.
240 - l/5 -
-A _

-
-

I!

L UlwCLE
275 - -- --3 - -T•-- - - 'r _ _ ..-. _ +-- --_ .- - - - -- .:.... : 24 50 V ERIFY
--- ?. _

- '--

--

- -

-

-

- -.--

-_-

LO ATIO .

V
- --

TIO r
W -
-
-..., _ . : __ - - ~
270 . Oa - ?-- _- - , - - .-•_
r - - - - - -

?
225 -.. - . ._---- -_ - -- --- - - - - - - -- -- ---- , -.
- .
- r._..
- .__ +
- t - -. -
-
- - ..
-_ - -:? -
?: -

L
220 - -- r- -, ... - -- - -- - { I r- . }
I
-
12's 1
-
-
- I
:: i -
-
_ _
GRAPHIC SCALES . •"j% : ••r-r ••r-r n--r .r-r .r-r r.r- •.E. i w : .`` r•.- ... :'
eti u.ner a Erar -
e
5
3 2

N
1

-
- 91 E?
L
-
o ;--
-
-
-
_ _
-- - p - --?- -
-- -- -- - r - -- - - -- i- -?- -- - - - - --- -- -- ? - _?_ 255
_ {?^ - - - ?- l
+ - _ - r-
--
- -
- - _r - r
7 - - _ - - 250

245

-
' mviuuM
COvt - - . 1- ?` -- - - i-

..
.- ONISH GRA6E
- ?. - - r - -
r
-
240
ir.
w vw i - -_ w - - - - 235

2 -.
230,

225

L
_
220
_L y L ? + F-- --
'- - -?- - -
- - -7 - - 215

•••w T+»r r•ur r.Aw r•sr r+.r r•M• r•tr r•u• s.ra Ea

N
Z
O \
a ?.
w
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
Gf EEES AS:oCU rES K ENGKER D.5M.CT. SAYAANA.
sw,.CTtAiE b ENEIEERSq 'yps OE EVLMEERS
SW wf[l'J YC..LAN +E^RGI.
4AE0 INFRASTRUCTURE/DOL WAREHOUSE
SANITARY FORCE MAIN
PLAN & PROFILE
-Eq?FORT BRAGG NORTH CAROLINA
so -.t a .sA ?. w.n
f ....-.» 6? 218•IS 01 M-9
E+n A.
-_. _ _ sGEY .4 bRD ss.l A
I
5 I

-oo
' 0,54.96' N 498281.251
l
O ` 25.01' 51 p 6.08.58
555
P
V-

Ar
C1 ION 1 .LHO
/ :o'- _

5.00
/

hG,? , may /
ooo*l
;o /
25+98 - - +00
N 49 56.4.4 ;
_-

_
255
?
250 - -- -- -- -- - - -., - - ' - ? :.
_
1 - -1- -- - - -

3
245 ell E E: = I
- -- -
- -

--Wr?kmuml COVE
240 ;
I
- 215
i
'----

I
-
:
I

r

}
1

I - -

W
w
230

-
..
_... J
_ -
.. 111
I
h _
.
:
__._ ..

I
y

225 a

I t _
.

220
-- •-- }
--- - -
`. -
_ -
-f
{
ry - -
-
-- -- ' '
215
l
1
r ,"F
t '
ncasvQ
5
GRAPHIC SCALES , •.r -r, r .r •r -r •r -r •' -r '•', r r.l `. •.r- .r-r r.arn?_»?• r.rN - -J

3 I
2
• k
P-Oo by _ =
? S\
-:14a51,6 15 -00
?-
0-00
Y6
-Ii O-
EL 227.62
.. SF............... SF. .. SF . .. y. ,sE• 'SF. SJ
.. ............
DITCH ........ ... SECTI'
Q
?"0" "ONT 5 OPN SECTION ry SI OPE p O.IOH IV Y?y
OF ,,EUiHALS E p O.TOy,
AAE
-l

r- -
n
-r- 250
T"?

t-L
77

, --_-
'
--
- 245

-
+- ?- -

240
C6V R N
1
1
- . -,?- -'- - - - - t - - - -'? 235
?
._- -- r-- i- - '- ?- _
-- -- k
- I - - - - t- ...
N
230
•- - - .- _ - - + IL i
- - -
- __ ?- - -
-- - - -+- -- --?- -'-LU 225

1
2201

215

- _i .L 1 I _L
210
"'M' l+sM'. T+uw r.ar r•sr r••r r•s• r•zr r.Ir s.ra td

3 2

vi
•9
Z
?' I I
i
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
CiEELS •SSOCUT(S NC S. •iYV A
•RCk TEC" •!a [W=ftf: I ENWER p.STRKT• S•vNNAN
SWTN4l0 NiN.L•M CORvPSN OfE ERS
AK
iMMD INFRASTRUCTURE/DOL WAREHOUSE
SANITARY FORCE MAIN
PLAN & PROFILE
FORT BRACC NORTH CAROLINA
an (w!E•Tr ry `'- Ta•n
F u.ras. LY 218-IS-0I N-10
Y1l A
u•!E. .s.??? UYT •o so -

0
C
N
O
1+)
a
r
N
m
3
W
r
a
a
z
J
UU
N
Q

I
W
OITCN
SLOPE.

31
1
MAW

-•-_
4
..

L '°o? i. I .. $ -. -
- i n .•.- ....
-. _ _ ...- i..
.. ..__ _
250 1 j I
- I- - - _ -
1
245 ?- -. . ?.

J 240
..
V1 _- '
a

235 r
I
-
- "'
--
--6 MINIMU
M CQ R
?E

t

( --

-,

_

-

'MINIM

= 230 --. ?'- - --- ?- .. -- ---'I - ,. ) _ 1 .1-- -- - r .-`
?-
o
i
u 225
._
-110 CASM NO
i
220
_
?
Iy ;
F
,. _ n 1
? I
JI L
215

t
210,
-
5
GRAPHIC SCALES ISS..L r 1 _ ?rrr t y r-r ••r-r r.r •r-r
?TFbi??i •.L•- r I r ? s
?5 6 S
r
w? r •s .w w
i5-0o . - S
o.oo

10.00

FUTUR f /HT fRS fC

""t o
CATe
S A 46+29

0
a
.ItJ

r.Nr
wr t+x.r
r'r t•,IM• t• w 1•,6I
s t••ar 1•+]0•
u r•Tr
a :? m 1'•li•
i» E.ra xa

LL s .._ ---
z -
J ?• s-„i
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
A
:Ft(i5 aSSJCU tFS K FI......
s1 tE[*:A[ a.0 Etll[Cwrf. EYIEEq fJ$tP. SJufM aClar?
tLG ,a[.aG1M -•? f:* EaS
- :E Fva
iMMC ?NFRASTRUCTUREICOI NAREn0U5F
SANITARY FORCE MAIN
PLAN & PROFILE
FORT BRAGG NORTH CAROLINA
CYl wwar?? h[? Raw
aw n 1, N"p ?
8if-
KIEL w!EO ral NN
s "4
6,0
ter- --- - - -" -
5

Vi
7
W
W
Z
O
f

r?
Q
to
O
3
U-1
r
Q
J
CL.
W
z
J
2
U
r
Q
w ?? - .. ..
SHOP CFpt??
0
-Y?
r-r
GRAPHIC SCALES 19• •? -r? „I K••i -r i'd•.r•?• > • ?? r o x.•?..r'---?=?? -
Ila,
A
3
2 3" Sr4 6-
yr T"rte TT •?i??__ ?? r ? T _.
00

3
lvlvu
N
Ul
? a
{ i M
1p.0 17-y 53 00 4. FM 000 E'-+
....,.SF ............... SF............... y-.......•• •..... ................ S'-............... SF............,. SF .....••..... ,. SF..... ,. ....n$F.... --___-_9 yu..'„.... ,SF „?„?•, SF... Q
op 4 yOj j W
v? N ^ Z
srWia ?? N "/ J
=W
40 W W 2
. ? a
- _ -a
- - -------------------------

-
_ - a+ o i-

,..
?i?-- - '- - - ?. - 1 -- 250
-- - -
11
245

-
1 240

-- .. __ - - - -
- - - 235
---- - -_ - , .-
--- - -- ? ' - - $' MIN COVER -- 1
-- tXST GRADE
_ 7- 3:
?
230

225

220

11 ?-
- _ 215

_ - -_.•___ _. __ _ _.__._ _ 210
r

?'r Eti r t••twi ?, i u ? .G??'T .. i? ?r a s 1'. M' 1•.M' 1•.li';
3

2
2

D
C
B
I ;Y 5
s
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
1 A
CJEEES .SSJCI•fE5 K S. .?Y+'
1.4, JEERNG EMGE4ER OIS tRr[i, CIERS R
•R[ AE •.O EK
waL..LUI `- E•SEEERS
SJU.f EEO CJ
X CRLu
.MMO INFRASTRUCTURE/DCL *ARE?OUSE
SANITARY FORCE MAIN
PLAN & PROFILE
FORT BRAGG NORTH CAROLINA
rE •..r•? ;
n w•a
arr
F e. 6 218-15-01 WQ
sc•.A. .s .o.ES wEE o B?
s
a
3

U
? ?
yy
Oyu

Ql _.? - ?Tr-?TTTT ITT

N -
'

?
v

3
w .
1
4<Yt e..
I
:
.ut<<
< i
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
<
- --

48+ 10• M 9 •00 50+0?
I ! Ott' K i

52+07
Z ?7+00 ........ ?
J ??,..5f ..???. •..••, •..
•??,5,.. SF....... •??••••}::•?????••.????•.5;,,,?,.•??..•...5 :...............5c `..,.... ,....•c: ..o ... .
N ?
U
F N O
`o
Q W W Wp

O
?

F ml _

250 I

h f
,
i
J 240 _?_ - ?.._ _ _., .. _ .... .. ._. _.-._.
1 .

, _

_...

- ?.

?
l
I
,
l
; l
I
235 VT - - -- t- tt
_ __ ? - -: ? --.
._ I ;- - - _-
I
I
_
- 270 1 .- _- r '- - TMIN jCOVER ter- _.E%ST
?GRADE-? _--

- -
c
- --
W
t 225 [aI' - - - __ ; 1
Fu- -4 .. - _.

_
_
f
220 U

215
.

210
... .... .- I

GRAPHIC SCALES r-r '•r-r r-r I -r+ I e t •I r : -r :- r r•rr w
s~? + ?r •.,w I•.Y ,.yam
? :??n,e rw
YYQ
5
a --
i
? 3 , 44

3 2 t
z
'I
........g....???-7??5??+.......,.?<c ....w.P

,

250
----

245

L
- - 240
T.
235

230

t
- -?-
- 225

220

215

-- 210
I1+.N' !1•.aN• 11•.iM•, 11•.N' 1•.S?' y' 11••]R'
• w .s 1 s r as s w . M s T eiZ ? T'. i-?+Trr?-?i ?:z?*'r?+
3
m ;l
i /
2

z
w
al -
e r b \\j??
1 , / 1
'v-
D
CI
BI
M KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
A
Osffti .SS000 IES a¢
AACMTECTWE AW ENGaEERNG u. r
ENGNEER pSTRq I, SAVA-
SOUTK(LO rCMG.R S SMI? E HERS
JmmD INFRASTRUCTU
SANITARY F RE/DOL WAREHOUSE
ORCE MA
IN
PLAN & PROFI
LE
FORT BRAGG NORTH CAROLINA
m .RR.T?1 ? RH T? w.n
F .nw...<.. '70 rb-t5-0 (l
rn n 3
EtIL4 .. q.fR +?. .. e3 a

5
a
3
l
Ix-
N
57-00.
LLJ J lj NIA - _ -
A
4 '

3
2
+
'Al
1
E? v 1 /-EL 288.04
23B.90

i
Ii
I:
r•
D Ii
i
I
I?
it
0
BENCHMARK,
'FORK' 1987
NC GRID COORDINATES: z = 2,09,414.789
Y = 496.957.114
EL 228.85
ns.• t s , o•a
3
NOTE,
1. FOR INTERSECTION PLANS SEE P-36 8 P
2. FOP INNER LOOP -EMPORA- -%'NFll'ON
STRIPING SEE P-37.
3. SEE PLATE P-IFOR LEGEND.
NO SCALE
S 'M[
;•E[RHL EM1LM4ER ?'i5!a?f ? SavaNNa.,

VI?.G.1, ?j,1a5 ::r E.•.:.i`•i.ERS
1e.e W.l ?,^,P;aA
TgJCTU RE/DOL nAREHOUSE
RADING• PAVING, STORM
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
NORTH CAROLINA
i
?Z, 218-15-04 P•IS

vi. s K ? R

--- 5 - 4 --- 3
-? 7 STORM DRAIN
-7.- PROFI
D

MA I CH L".F PLATE P-18
+ 241
--
T ' 2
45' - 12' SO a 0.5'/_ _ r
IE; 233.00 CB •34 nz .1 .•`
EL 9 04 ??
.--/'- DITCH SECTION IV
/ -- 236.98-?'
-? - ? SLOPE o 1.00%, •- -
1- to LE
..i •\. ,DETAIL
az j /
2 v w S •4
C
?a EL 238.00
1 •I /
s %
CB •2 ?--
+- ' z37:e9- o " INNER LOOP BLVD
237.64
a 150' - 24' SO 0 0.1%
W '236.63 _ +237.42
---??'
? -- - Co •3
J _ /
237
.4??
U 237. ^ - '
234..
2 7 7 -: T`
237.29
J ?
r r 238. / o
236.44 ' 236.07
i' x'238. 37 -
.238.70 ?-/,1n1
g •4 '/ SO 2a8?9-236C8 -5 ?^ L._ .. /\ I'I
?'
TE 235.2,8 .,236.60 P 51'? 4 .54- •5
+238.22 10.00 ,,..?3&"w -
?238av7.98?-r7,38.2Y-+/7- /_
237.94
i
?2 8.08 -250' - 12' SO 0 0.5%-l
.235.35
.. - C8 '6 11
.236.57
:.236.67 , ._ f---
-
•5
4.97 IE 230.71 -?
.233.60 Q
s STORM DRAIN
P-IS P-30 PROFILE --
DETAIL
-232.65
?.,-4 233:07 / ..
231.50
232.27 /
I l_-

4 235
1?9 -
i
I o
23 3.2 a-- 1 3•- =3
?. STOR!
1 "
5P_a.3 PP
DETAIL
I
t
` u
i
w
?j
RAIN 2 9 % • +232.49
B 2 239
231.44
+230.54
231. a
+
',E Pt. ^, i P-26
•?ovsz
GRAPHIC SCALES l+•.••r-e •+r-•• .•r-r ..r-r yr-r i7(±+'. r, r• ?•Ly. .•
5 4
(573
I 3 = - , _
3
P-25
? I
T
fANSNISSION LINE
GNDIICTOft v
i
UNDER GROUND
? TEL MARKER -
EXLONG TEND RA GAS All IS EA RPALLEL `•
A. LATE
?P-27 FOR CONTINUATION 1
SING
IDE VENT, ???•`\
OS. BEND STA 3-85
J,

2
,III + ,II t? 1\? I L
_ 12`'
X12• 1
d
Il II
I I \
chi c' -CONC SIGN
^A 'fC BRACE'
a SS//J
Co. c?
1.1 T I O _ I
p
y
. ?-NOTE
p, THIS PIPE, IS
ABANOO o
?y
I
r. OO IMF1 1p?r \\
't \
-'------ --RCP
6 J K CASING -?,
-G 6• G G
- FOR' BR40G \
BOUNDRY "It '---iB 258d -TEL MR
CONC MON TE 235.24
N 495.925.60
E 204.413.06
DENCHMARK4 ,
'FORK' 1987
-' NC GRID COOROINATESK X 2.09,414.789
• Y = 496.957.94
EL 228.85
4+=w r•2•r raw r.u• r.er r.Yr r9f rvar rar NrOI Eul Klw
Sf W 11 ]. M ]. 7• I
9EV4so44s
3 - ?
NOTE:
I. SEE PLATE P-IFOR LEGEND.
_ "s \
P P-IS
P P-Ip
P-26 T
•? 1-12
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
C"i's ASS TES H CNGNEE9 ,
p. S.-AWWS YA ,Y
u4CTfc'MW u Ellri E.r CO9P$ a EMG•EERS
SOUIM•10 ncwGM $A VA,E41r GE09GA
IMMU 'NFRASTRUCTURE/DOL *AREHOUSE
LAYOUT. GRADING, PAVING, STORM
DRAINAGE a EROSION CONTROL PLAN
FORT BRA .?_ NORTH t!ARft IN,
4•t 44444.4 ? 44M ? 1411
f 4M•r4M4/• "1 (F21B•IS-Of p.=I
w
4ru, . • w•f t w
ID
C
BI
AI
5 q
3
MATCH LINE PLATE P-25
TRANSMISSION LINE --
3 CONDUCTOR
I GROUND .T .
1
UNDER GRCUNO
f +
i

f'7
N
a
w
a
J
a
w
z
J
2
U
Q
f
7
-,-30* LONG CA NG UND
':RAILROAD PR IDE VEN
Al -BOTH ENDS.
-BEND STA 3+45
I
4' HIGH
- CHAN IN(
FENCE .
Flow CONC NON
N 495.918.07
E 2.01.0107
TEl MAAKER
EXTEND GAS MAIN PARALLEL
ALONG RAILROAD, SEE PLATE
P-27 FOR CONTINUATION
• CO
_ BEND STAi3+1
C ?.
2? \
C\
I
I
+ G 6• G
6 wGN
NuN uMc
i ENCE
P'
GRAPHIC SCALES ., r •A :1 •i -r ••r•r •.,•.r •.r-t ra•-r I •.I••r rm- w •.aw r.?w ,.w- r,.y. ..
r
i4W
a w _
3 2
.TE P-26
??o
14.5'-1T 12' 12' 12' J2".
2S
N ?
STRI,E TAPERS PER NCDOT
REOUIREMENTS
IB
1
? ? I I
PLATE P-24
BENCHMARKt
'FORK' 1987
NC GRID COORDINATES, K = 2,011.414.789
Y 496,957.114
EL 228.85
t•••ttr P•ttM' I••IN• I••6r P•Sr t•••r t••y' vW •nr frr0. I4
Z .?

P-7
a ` P-19
P-4 ?P-5 P-6
.P.N,. , P p_16 P?T. j P-IB
6
P-ro ?l P-2
.P-26 P•9•
{{2212 A' \ E P-21
P-2: ",
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
A
•.;118885 --fES MC ENGNEEA DIj. I S ffiDI'YS•V•1M•N
•nCN IEC*unE •MD LMxv+•a: (cA t% ENGINEERS
so.TNE4l0 YICNIO•N I•NN• GE Once
IMMD INFRASTRUCTURE/DOL WAREHOUSE
LAYOUT, GRADING, PAVING &
STORM DRAINAGE PLAN
'ORT BRAGG NORTH CAROLINA
In ?I.1•E?, •{[ 4& tUR
F ?/ 218-15-01 =. -25
a.?, r • ,n.v (O E.a. Ea 26
i

4
MATru 1 INC PI ATC D_7r_
0
c
N
a.
W
Q
J
a
W
z_
J
2
U
H
Q
B
A
3
GRAPHIC SCALES °,r •?'r. •.? =r .r.r •.r-r .r-r r.Y•-h .r-r r.r-r s •u.1 - r i .. r r.?r• r.ar
nr
?+exv.z
5 A
',+AiCH LINE PLATE P-24
3 2
P-15
'C7
BENCHMARK:
'FORK' 1987 '
NC GRID COORDINATES: X = 2.011.414.789
Y : 496.957.114
EL 228.85
f•.•Alr 1••tN' 1'•qr 1••ir Sr 1 Ar 1:'•L' P•Ir :••Ir I A141oE t0
3 2
4
PEA P-16 PT?17. 1
P 19 P-5 P-*-
P-10 P-2
P-9• \
F•12 PcK l P-21 \
R$7 P-2S G
?i
P7
P_22 yr 4-tT
KEY PLAN
NO SCALE
C
B
P-7
A
'V EELS ASSCCIA:ES K S. ARYV
ARCw tCT Wf .. tNV4E:MG EEK'a4fF dS igtC T, SAVAT4fAM
SWI.Wlo WCIeGAN ?SavANUrEK.WEERS
EORGA -I
IMMO INFRASTRUCTURE/DOL WAREHOUSE
LAYOUT, GRADING, PAVING &
STORM DRAINAGE PLAN
ORT BRAGG NORTH A INA
a r.n•+w o q4 ? t4rfi ?A
IF
-78 ale Is a •zs
3
xt. • • +o'-m par tt 2T

Q
a
w
a
J
a
w
z
J
2
U
1--
Q
t?
IlritSSr \,` .
\ I1. t)).50
r9:
, (L
uaxx'? ' '+? Ilanls
u.mn
\? \ \
,

b
IT IZ??
.I 1
1
1
1
! 'I r>
1 ;I \
1 -?
11 ?
j 1!
MATCH • a1E P-25
1 "
i
1
1
. GRAPHIC SCALES "r-r ••r-r r-r r•r r-r •.r-r r-r ••r-r r•r-r .? r.w?r.t? .,,?r-•y. I-,x
5 4 3 -
t ,I

C7
•r%
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT''OF THE ARMY
SAVANNAH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 889
SAVANNAH, GEORGIA 31402-0889
January 28, 1992
2 3
SS
tee 1992
' r- 4Tta '/ 0
P1an"In9 B aq ?? y
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Dorney:
I refer to the proposed Vehicle Maintenance Shop, L.I.
13485, Fort Bragg, North Carolina. This proposed project
consists of road construction and site development work
associated with construction of a vehicle maintenance facility
just east of the proposed IMMD Phase I facility between Bragg
Boulevard and Murcheson Road, Fort Bragg. The only wetland
impacts from this project are associated with construction of a
storm drain outfall from a detention pond. See the enclosed
location map for more specific details.
We seek verification that this project is authorized by your
general water quality certification. Should you find that this
project does not meet the criteria for a general certification,
please consider this our application on behalf of the base for an
individual Water Quality Certification pursuant to Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act. The permittee's address should be listed as
it occurs in the copy furnished at the end of this letter.
We have applied to the Wilmington District for verification
that this project is authorized under Nationwide Permit Numbers
12 and 26 (NWP12 and 26)(33 CFR 330, Appendix A, Part B (12 and
26)) and Department of the Army General Permit (GP)SAWC081-N-000-
0049.
This project consists of an approximately 900-ft road which
would connect with a road to be constructed under the IMMD Phase
I project. The subject vehicle maintenance facility would
consist of a 900- by 1000-ft area to contain 3 vehicle
maintenance buildings, a detention pond that would be 150 feet by
350 feet, and approximately 525 feet of storm drain. The storm b.b;L
drain would require clearing of a 20-ft wide corridor to extend ?._
no more than 40 feet into wetlands at the edge of the creek.
Riprap would be placed 15 inches deep in an 8- by 12-ft area at
the storm drain outfall.

. , w
-2-
Wetlands for a large portion of the stream system north of
this site were flagged as part of the wetland delineation for a
proposed road crossing that has been deleted from this project.
That road would have connected the site with Murcheson Road. The
storm drain would extend into the same wetland system, but beyond
the area that was flagged. Data sheets for that delineation are
enclosed.
If you have any questions, please contact Steve Calver of my
staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
A i.Yischishin
M. Chief, Planning Division
Enclosures
Copy Furnished:
Ft. Bragg - 18th Airborne Corps
Director of Engineering and Housing
ATTN: AFZA-DE-D
Fort Bragg, NC 28307-500
? I'llll ',: r a
\` • 289
i LAN `rUZI On
x
'1 0 1
n? •1. • AT w : O 1
e?_? •? . Q X11 ©O _ ?•
YI ?
/ • ? • '? II DSO 1 s ? II
c>jr
2 i ?I 1 ?I 1 i O
u 1
_? i_ / r riii rul r nrl r/rr /
_ :Q fiurrr ?
_ 0 a
`'•? ? ' ; i 1? •% -' 1 s iiiiiiiiiur rnrl Uuw
?-
a c
Go! ? °
v
. C ,se TIN r Jam:
i R D f6 ' /
sta .• C ower Ai e
a <
aso
Inc
! 11 ? f[Y
. .?` ??? Sul t• L ! ? A p._ ? \
n 'Y \J1 i /
I\n,/ q 1 . \? .p r IP. \\+ 1 11 (1/ . ? ",\. is ss s_ N
? ? • r 11 .N » N +' ? ?. J1???c??\?M ? i 1 ,V?' t, `N M - '•
/? ? / ?? ?`" q• 1?'s + , ;3 y•a:r ? 11 ? t? ;. n'? , .r ` ?,+1'i1; _
"A' ` i • + •?.y+ ? ? 1, ? j' •?\.. •:?':?'? ?l L!`"e?1?..,;• '`'M ?"
is- .
IV le
?a as ? • S. . tyr•
N N • Ir ? `
q N • tl as ?? \t \. ?? r • :• :.[•• • ?, ?N '
M I,. OJ p N Al ,.••?`' ??TF ,IW `I/wG- MA
g ?p ..qt •.• S
441a 41

DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
Field Investigator (s) : Gf?t-vim Date: `? mAy `1
Project/Site: V -AVC5A- 1'> State: N?-- County:
'Applicant/Owner Pf? Plant Community Name:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes C No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbe
yes No (If yes, explain on back) AT-
-----------
-------- ----------------------------------------------------------
C'? 2p? SrAr-z 48+oo
VEGETATION
Dominant
Plant S ecies
11,
11
2. G1c ao 0. VN (tc
!3 , a edo ?
•¢ . a Sc d0 n
i
,6 .
?7.
9 .
110.
'Percent of dominant
Is the hydrophytic
:Rationale: ' keff
i
Indicator
Status Stratum
??W
FA-C-W s .r
FAC-T
4;'A- L 5 6v-
KiGLo 5:2:g
SOILS
Horizon Depth
.to. .inchs
0-
Lt -7
14--(l0
Ib-(9
Matrix
Color
IoV 30
3 l
,I, 3
f5/4
1. 3
b z
Mottles
Colors
# 3
6 B, 3 2
s
6 g
species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC I'CD
iletation criterion met? Yes 7 No
a.t ?v yd f do --- 5 9_e.4. _5 CA- FAC o r
I
SOILS
Series/phase: - Subgroup:
,Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No _>-- Histic epipedon present? Yes Nom
'Is the soil: Mottled ( 0-12 inches)? Yes _ No G eye ? Yes No
Matrix Color: FBI, Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No G
Rationale: ELt,- ? 10,0
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes X No 16 "
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: ?-
List other field vidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hyddroollo y criterion met? Yes No m
Rationale: n Lg C? yV C4 e c ?l r r(i l 6 dtr s sew( -
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
*Use Federal Manual for Identifying and.Delineating Jurisdictional Wetl
a
'a;

DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
Field Investigator(s): C 1'1 - Date:
Project/Site: VW- ?aNT 13 `?s? State: ?Q L County:
Applicant/Owner. Plant Community Name:
------------------ ------ ---------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes x No (If no. explain on back)
!Eas the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ?.
100 No /^c (If yes. explain on back)
=- -,a? -
7
----------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION SOILS
Dominant
.
i
,
3 rleit= alh 'a

'.? . 1 nv4 s ?

;?. G ?SStaci.c ?'tn?c?oc?
18.
4.
10. -
'Percent of dominant
Is the hydrophytic
Rationale: J6-
Indicator
Status Stratum
"T
VA C_ -7-
r A-C. ".
Horizon Depth
to. .inchs
16-IX
Matrix
Color
2,5 b
3
3
-f 41
6 r3
Mottles
Colors
-s B
species that are OBL. FACW, and/or FAC (0 `Jlo
vegetation criter`on1 met? Yes No M-
crC41 trA- ?O ?? h N 6rN S P'e c e S a-?? _ 1vt-?L\5LR 1
SOILS
Series/phase: Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined I>e
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No - Histic epipedon present? Yes Vo Z
Is the soil: Mottled 10,-12 inches) ? Yes X- No Gleyed? Yes No 115-_
Matrix Color: 7r Mottle Colors: Other hydr.ic soil indicators: hcrl-e_
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No _
Rationale: /'maw '(ea.1,'?k
HYDROLOGY"
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes ? xf No 0??1'..1 N- it
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evide ce of surface i undation or soil saturation.
5 r?u 5v o?c, -e
Is the wetland hydrolog criterion met? Yes No
Rationale 0 _<<c1 iu s Qv,¢
DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
Field` Investigator( 3): Date:
Project/Site: _ VO4 INNT 54kY- X341 State: N ?- County:
Applicant/Owner: Plant Community Name:
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes c No (If no, explain on back)
,Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?,_--,
'Yes. No (If yes. explain on back)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
T3 ,
VEGETATION SOILS
Dominant Indicator Horizon Depth Matrix Mottles
Plant Snecies Status Stratum ..to...inchs Color Colors
!2. o rocz W 3
3 . ?(Yla ,N SEW S ~? -7 - r I
4. k ?.? oieec tAC1? 3/2i g lre0.
5 . Iv 4 S?`r
6.
10.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC ?CC) C,
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: tie
SOILS
Series/phase: Subgroup:
GIs the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No '® Undetermined >e-
'Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No X_ Histic epipedon present? Yes No >c
iIs the soil: Mottled ( 0-12 inches)? Yes No L Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: ?Oy2 Mottle Colors: -
Other hydric soil indicators: 6yq
Is the hydric sgil c iterion et? Yes _ No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes 7G No
Depth to free-standing water in.pit/soil probe hole: .---
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology crite ion met? Yes_ k No
Rationale: 1nu`? so?? !?^es? Se?.1e r?o
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: c-o c,,,-4-=a w
*Use Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetla

? ?,:
°
? '"?
'kr
;
-!;
t?y
•.?"`
t
?
v
?L?
: ?1
??w?Y?
_
_ ,.
_?
p
„
aaer?:_ f
.s
rs„
. ar:s
.._.:
.:.
,. .lea
?.
?:
DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD*
• ?/-i?v?r . zS? S?J ?'!?
Field -Investigator (s) Date:
Protect/Site:, Vm4_IVAit-%f*}OP 13485 State: .- County':' Gun?S3?ztn??
_ _ ..,.
Applti,cant/Owner: }?- Pi f Plant Commuiii.ty Name: - -
- --.-.-------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
' Yes x No (If no, explain.on back)
Has the vegetation, soils and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?_
Yes No x (If yes, explain on back) 5A
----- --- --------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION SOILS
Dominant I.nd:ica.tor Horizon Depth Matrix Mottles
Plan S ecies Status Stratum ..to ..inchs Color Colors
of T10 rt,y n T r1 _ 7-
4. i y1 v5 SPXr7i v?cc 1. } (1-S .? ?. _
3. M Cy yII a f IV
k__... 1. _ ._ 5h
"r?n? 2os&
14
5. Ge eC 1`nly? S1? `?
+ _r. _.._...
all 61 \r,)
PerceiTt"of dominant ,species '?that are OBL 7ACW, and/or FAC DUB/?
Is-the hydrophyti.c.ve,getaton criterion met? Yes x No
Rat.i.anale s MOP-L )4AS? Sa c, o? ??• s P?rc? we- r_7
SOILS
Se.rieslphase: Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric-soils list? Yes No Undetermined -"
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No X Hist'ic epioiidon present? Yes
-Is the soil: Mottled ? 10,-12 'inches).? Yes ? No Gle y.ed? Yes No' '?
Matrix Colors (Oyu i Mottle Colors: fbX2
Other hydr:ic _so l indicat.grs _
Is the -hydr i.c soil criterion me.t? Yes No_
. Rat i anal.e : 81vG?a cs? 4-,
HYDROLOGY
Is.the ground.surface inundated? Yes -No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil :saturated? Yes No t-a s?jzrA c -
Depthto free-standing water in pi.t./soil probe hole:
Listother field evidence of sur`.fac.e inundation or soil saturation.
W&iw 54,.? o..o? ?s?atkoc-.-- Yoc+S ?s).\: a
.._.
._ -- - ?
Is th-ewetland hydrol-ogy, cr"it°er'ion met."Yes No
Rationale
JURISDICTION$L -DETERMhIQATION AND- RATIONALE
Is .the plant community a wfetland,. Yes k No
;
:Rationale .for jurisdictional decision:
s
Ts_eFe?eraZ Maiiual`'Tor -ldentiYnH -a?nd Der?7?ea?°?i?$ JirsiL?;c?`?32'
0
L7
LA
i+h
w .
r..
� u
40

-Ira :I QD
oo
LL-

'
o CD
"
MRT ?-

LLJ
mQ?

i QQ=
..
UXLLJ
,
?
CL to F- .
?r ? ?,
c -
z ?•?., 1
z7

- .r
Ste. ? $G'. ! "
is

S a ti #y ` yyty3a
A
'
'
-
' F
? ._
te,,
y .r r
Ye . •
cz
5
;?
? Y _,
,?
?•? s ?
? 4
w'

oaf

3
Yy y
? X
X
S.
4

It%,

o
x?
I 4 e Y
T
I ? ? a
rrr ?
<d+ , ? t ado ?[.
a?sts-
u `\
Wil V1,
'If
? ; ? ,. 'l':L • F \ 11.E `t .d '.
?i
y•
_ t
M P
- I
?c
?• ?;I v
1.? P

a
T:
iA6
.1_f y-S ? '^} ?- : C ? ,,•• r,: 1541.$ -
3
• r `

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James G. Martin, Governor
Patric Dorsey, Secretary March 15, 1988

Paul D. Rubenstein
Chief, Compliance Analysis Section
Environmental Resources Branch
Department of the Army
U.S. Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 889
Savannah, Georgia 31402-0889
Re: Fort Bragg Cultural Resources Survey
Cumberland County, ER 88-7834
Dear Mr. Rubenstein:
1,66-
Division of Archives and History
William S. Price, Jr., Director
Thank you for providing a copy of the report, "Cultural Resources Survey
of the Master Plan Lands, Fort Bragg, North Carolina," Gulf South
Research Institute and Southeastern Archaeological Services, Inc.,
Cumberland County:' Although you requested written comments by March 4,
1988, we found we were not able to meet this deadline due to insufficient
time for a complete review. Your February 12, 1988 letter was received
by our office on February 19.
In general, the report is acceptable. However, because we do not consider
the Master Plan Lands Cantonment Area an extremely high probability area
for the presence of potentially significant archaeological resources, we
do not expect the same degree of detail and documentation that we would in
a richer historic area. The report satisfies our minimal requirements.
Our specific comments are as follows:
1. "Carolina" is misspelled on the cover.
2. Page 37-40, identification of the site boundaries for 31Cd201 is
unclear. Might outbuildings be present at this site? If so, such
information may affect boundary determination. Also, it would be
beneficial to indicate more specific information on how the
chronological determination was reached.
3. Since cemeteries are rarely considered eligible for nomination to the
National Register of Historic Places, additional justification including
historical background information, should be provided for the Ellis
Cemetery, 31Cd205.
+' y
i
Paul D. Rubenstein
March 15, 1988, Page Two
4. The artifact photographs (page B-5, B-6) are very poor illustrations
,and better quality prints should be included. Little;detail;can.be
determined from the photographs as they are.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at
36tCFR Pam 800,-:and to Executive Order 11593, "Protection and Enhance-
ment-of the-Cultural-Environment."
Thaak`you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
David Brook?I)eputy- State/ l `r
Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
bc: !Fort Bragg file:;_. _
Claggett/Myers/Olives
County
RF
r -
lS U LS ? U ?5 '.?,'
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY $
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
RO. BOX 1890 APR - 6W2
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
WETLANDS GRO
CESAW-CO-E (1145b) 1 April 1992
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, XVII•I Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg, Director of
Engineering and Housing, ATTN: AFZA-DE, Fort Bragg, NC
28307-5000
SUBJECT: Action ID. 199201104, Nationwide Permit No. 26 (Headwaters and
Isolated Waters)
1. Reference memorandum, District Engineer, Savannah District, Corps of
Engineers, dated 29 Jan 92, regarding request for verification of
authorization under Nationwide Permit No. 26 for the Proposed Vehicle
Maintenance Shop, L.I. 13485, Fort Bragg, Cumberland County, North Carolina.
2. The proposal consists of an approximately 900-foot road which would
connect with a road to be constructed under the IMMD Phase I project. The
subject vehicle maintenance facility would consist.of a 900- by 1000-foot area
to contain three vehicle maintenance buildings, a detention pond that would be
150- by 350-feet, and approximately 525 feet of storm drain. The storm drain
would require clearing of a 20-foot-wide corridor to extend no more than
40 feet into wetlands at the edge of the creek. Rip rap would be placed
15-inches deep in an 8- by 12-foot area at the storm drain outfall.
3. The storm drain and outfall area with rip rap will impact a 0.1 acre
wetland area.
4. For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, Title 33,
Code of Federal Regulations (CPR), Part 330.6, published in the Federal
Register on November 22, 1991, lists nationwide permits. Authorization was
provided, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, for discharges of
dredged or fill material into headwaters and isolated waters provided:
a. the discharge does not cause the loss of more than 1 acre of waters of
the United States;
b. the permittee notifies the District Engineer if the discharge would
cause the loss of waters of the United States greater than one but less than
10 acres in accordance with the "Notification" general condition. For
discharges in special aquatic sites, including wetlands, the notification must
also include a delineation of affected specific aquatic sites, including
wetlands; and
c. the discharge, including all attendant features, both temporary and
permanent, is part of a single and complete project.
AL
CESAW-CO-E (1145b)
SUBJECT: Action ID. 199201104, Nationwide Permit No. 26 (Headwaters and
Isolated Waters)
5. Your work is authorized under paragraph 4a. above by this nationwide
permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed
conditions. This nationwide permit does not relieve you of the responsibility
to obtain any required State or local approval. Please contact Mr. Ken
Averitte, North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, telephone (919)
486-1541, to obtain a waiver or water quality certification for the proposed
work. This permit is effective upon receipt of the waiver or certification.
6. This verification will be valid for 2 years from the date of this letter
unless the nationwide authorization is modified, reissued, or revoked. Also,
this verification will remain valid for the 2 years if, during that period,
the nationwide permit authorization is reissued without modification or the
activity complies with any subsequent modification of the nationwide permit
authorization. If during the 2 years, the nationwide permit authorization
expires or is suspended or revoked, or is modified, such that the activity
would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit,
activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are under
contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit will remain
authorized provided the activity is completed within 12 months of the date of
the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify,
suspend, or revoke the authorization.
7. Questions may be directed to Mr. Steve Chapin at [phone].
Encl
WALTER S. TULLOCH
COL, Corps of Engineers
commanding
2
IL
t
CESAW-CO-E (1145b)
SUBJECT: Action ID. 199201104, Nationwide Permit No. 26 (Headwaters and Isolated
Waters)
CF (with encl):
Mr. John D rney
Divisio of Environmental
Nth Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Ms. L.R. Gantt, Field Supervisor
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Service
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Ken Averitte
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina. Department of
Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Wachovia Building
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
Commander
XVIII Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg
Director of Engineering and Housing
ATTN: AFZA-DE-E/Project Manager/Morrison
Fort Bragg, North Carolina 28307-5000
Commander
XVIII Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg
Director of Engineering and Housing
ATTN: AFZA-DE-D
Fort Bragg, North Carolina 28307-5000
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency - Region IV
Wetlands Section - Water Quality Division
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Mr. Steve Calver
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Planning Division
Post Office Box 889
Savannah, Georgia 31402-0889
3
A
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. Navigation. No activity may cause more than a minimal adverse effect
on navigation.
2. Proper Maintenance. Any structure or fill authorized shall be
properly maintained, including maintenance to ensure public safety.
3. Erosion and Siltation Controls. Appropriate erosion and siltation
controls must be used and maintained in effective operating condition during
construction, and all exposed soil and other fills must be permanently
stabilized at the earliest practicable date.
4. Aquatic Life Movements. No activity may substantially disrupt the
movement of those species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody,
including those species which normally migrate through the area, unless the
activity's primary purpose is to impound water.
5. Equipment. Heavy equipment working in wetlands must be placed on mats
or other measures must be taken to minimize soil disturbance.
6. Regional and Case-by-case Conditions. The activity must comply with
any regional conditions which may have been added by the Division Engineer and
any case specific conditions added by the Corps.
7. Wild and Scenic Rivers. No activity may occur in a component of the
National Wild and Scenic River System; or in a river officially designated by
Congress as a "study river" for possible inclusion in the system, while the
river is in an official study status. Information on Wild and Scenic Rivers
may be obtained from the National Park Service and the U.S. Forest Service.
8. Tribal Rights. No activity or its operation may impair reserved
tribal rights, including, but not limited to, reserved water rights and treaty
fishing and hunting rights.
9. Water Quality Certification. An individual state water quality
certification must be obtained or waived. Conditions of certification will be
considered to be special conditions of the Federal nationwide permit. Please
contact Mr. Ken Averitte, North Carolina Division of Environmental Management,
telephone [phone].

10. Endangered Species. No activity is authorized under any NWP which is
likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a threatened or endangered
species or a species proposed for such designation, as identified under the
Federal Endangered Species Act, or which is likely to destroy or adversely
modify the critical habitat of such species. Non-Federal permittees shall
notify the District Engineer if any listed species or critical habitat might
be affected or is in the vicinity of the project and shall not begin work on
the activity until notified by the District Engineer that the requirements of
the Endangered Species Act have been satisfied and that the activity is
authorized. Information on the location of threatened and endangered species
can be obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine
Fisheries Service.
11. Historic Properties. No activity which may affect Historic
Properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of
Historic Places is authorized, until the District Engineer has complied with
the provisions of 33 CFR 325, Appendix C. The prospective permittee must
notify the District Engineer if the authorized activity may affect any
historic properties listed, determined to be eligible, or which the
prospective permittee has reason to believe may be eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places, and shall not begin the activity until
notified by the District Engineer that the requirements of the National
Historic Preservation Act have been satisfied and that the activity is
authorized. Information on the location and existence of historic resources
can be obtained from the State Historic Preservation Office and the National
Register of Historic Places (see 33 CFR 330.4(8)).
12. Water Supply intakes. No discharge of dredged or fill material may
occur in the proximity of a public water supply intake except where the
discharge is repair of the public water supply intake structures or adjacent
bank stabilization.
13. Suitable Katerial. No discharge of dredged or fill material may
consist of unsuitable material (e.g., trash, debris, car bodies, etc.) and
material discharged must be free from toxic pollutants in toxic amounts.
14. spawning Areas. Discharges in spawning areas during spawning seasons
must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable.
15. Obstructions of High Flows. To the maximum extent practicable,
discharges must not permanently restrict or impede the passage of normal or
expected high flows or cause the relocation of the water (unless the primary
purpose of the fill is to impound waters).
2

16. Adverse Impacts from Impoundments. If the discharge creates an
impoundment of water, adverse impacts on the aquatic system caused by-the
accelerated passage of water and/or the restriction of its flow shall be
minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
17. Waterfowl Breeding Areas. Discharges into breeding areas for
migratory waterfowl must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable.
18. Removal of Temporary Fills. Any temporary fills must be removed in
their entirety and the affected areas returned to their preexisting elevation.
REGIONAL CONDITIONS
1. All fill material authorized by this permit must be obtained from an
upland source.
2. Use of this permit for livestock and domestic animal waste treatment
facilities is not allowed.
STATE CONSISTENCY CONDITIONS
1. All fill material authorized by this permit must be obtained from an
upland source.
2. Use of this nationwide permit for waste disposal facilities is not
authorized.
3. Established erosion control practices shall be utilized to prevent
violations of the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50 NTU's in
streams and rivers not designated as trout waters by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management; 25 NTU's in all saltwater classes and
all lakes and reservoirs and 10 NTU's in trout waters).
4. Proposed fill of greater than one acre in SA, trout, ORW, WS-1 and
WS-2 HQW watersheds requires public notice and an individual Section 401 Water
Quality Certification from the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management.
5. For activities resulting in the loss of waters of the United States
greater than 1/3 of an acre, the applicant must receive written concurrence
from the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management that the proposal
is certified under the Section 401 Water Quality Certification Program.
6. If the proposed activity is within the North Carolina Coastal Area and
the activity will result in the loss of waters of the United States greater
than 1/3 of an acre, the applicant must receive written concurrence from the
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management that the activity is consistent
with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
3
GENERAL CERTIFICATION CONDITIONS
1. Proposed fill or substantial modification of greater than one-third of
an acre of such waters, including wetlands, requires a written concurrence
from the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management.
2. Proposed fill or substantial modification of equal to or less than
one-third of an acre of such waters, including wetlands, does not require
written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management.
3. Proposed fill of greater than one acre in SA, trout, HQW, ORW, WS-I
and WS-II watersheds require public notice and an individual Section 401 Water
Quality Certification from the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management.
4. Established sediment and erosion control practices will be utilized to
prevent violations of the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50
NTU's in streams and rivers not designated as trout waters by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management, 25 NTU's in all saltwater
classes and all lakes and reservoirs and 10 NTU's in trout waters).
5. Additional site-specific conditions may be added to this Certification
in order to ensure compliance with all applicable water quality and effluent
standards.
6. Concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management that this Certification applies to an individual project shall
expire 3 years from the date of the cover letter from the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management.
4

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
CESAW-CO-E (1145b)
30 March 1992
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, XVIII Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg, Director of
Engineering and Housing, ATTN: AFZA-DE, Fort Bragg, NC
28307-5000
SUBJECT: Action ID. 199201104, Nationwide Permit No. 26 (Headwaters and
Isolated Waters)
1. Reference memorandum, District Engineer, Savannah District, Corps of
Engineers, dated 29 Jan 92, regarding request for verification of
authorization under Nationwide Permit No. 26 for the Proposed Vehicle
Maintenance Shop, L.I. 13485, Fort Bragg, Cumberland County, North Carolina.
2. The proposal consists of an approximately 900-foot road which would
connect with a road to be constructed under the IMMD Phase I project. The
subject vehicle maintenance facility would consist of a 900- by 1000-foot area
to contain three vehicle maintenance buildings, a detention pond that would be
150- by 350-feet, and approximately 525 feet of storm drain. The storm drain
would require clearing of a 20-foot-wide corridor to extend no more than
40 feet into wetlands at the edge of the creek. Rip rap would be placed
15-inches deep in an 8- by 12-foot area at the storm drain outfall.
3. The storm drain and outfall area with rip rap will impact a 0.1 acre
wetland area.
4. For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program, Title 33,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330.6, published in the Federal
Register on November 22, 1991, lists nationwide permits. Authorization was
provided, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, for discharges of
dredged or fill material into headwaters and isolated waters provided:
a. the discharge does not cause the loss of more than 1 acre of waters of
the United States;
b. the permittee notifies the District Engineer if the discharge would
cause the loss of waters of the United States greater than one but less than
10 acres in accordance with the "Notification" general condition. For
discharges in special aquatic sites, including wetlands, the notification must
also include a delineation of affected specific aquatic sites, including
wetlands; and
c. the discharge, including all attendant features, both temporary and
permanent, is part of a single and complete project.

CESAW-CO-E (1145b)
SUBJECT: Action ID. 199201104, Nationwide Permit No. 26 (Headwaters and
Isolated Waters)
5. Your work is authorized under paragraph a. above by this nationwide permit
provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed conditions.
This nationwide permit does not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain
any required State or local approval. Please contact Mr. Ken Averitte, North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management, telephone [phone], to
obtain a waiver or water quality certification for the proposed work. This
permit is effective upon receipt of the waiver or certification.
6. This verification will be valid for 2 years from the date of this letter
unless the nationwide authorization is modified, reissued, or revoked. Also,
this verification will remain valid for the 2 years if, during that period,
the nationwide permit authorization is reissued without modification or the
activity complies with any subsequent modification of the nationwide permit
authorization. If during the 2 years, the nationwide permit authorization
expires or is suspended or revoked, or is modified, such that the activity
would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit,
activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are under
contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit will remain
authorized provided the activity is completed within 12 months of the date of
the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify,
suspend, or revoke the authorization.
7. Questions may be directed to Mr. Steve Chapin at [phone].
Encl

WALTER S. TULLOCH
COL, Corps of Engineers
Commanding
2
A
CESAW-CO-E (1145b)
SUBJECT: Action ID. 199201104, Nationwide Permit No. 26 (Headwaters and Isolated
Waters)
CF (with encl):
Mr. John Dorney
Division Environmental
Man ement
Nor Carolina Department of
nvironment, Health, and
V Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Ms. L.K. Gantt, Field Supervisor
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Service
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Ken Averitte
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Wachovia Building
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
Commander
XVIII Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg
Director of Engineering and Housing
ATTN: AFZA-DE-E/Project Manager/Morrison
Fort Bragg, North Carolina 28307-5000
Commander
XVIII Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg
Director of Engineering and Housing
ATTN: AFZA-DE-D
Fort Bragg, North Carolina 28307-5000
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency - Region IV
Wetlands Section - Water Quality Division
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Mr. Steve Calver
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Planning Division
Post Office Box 889
Savannah, Georgia 31402-0889
3
f ?
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. Navigation. No activity may cause more than a minimal adverse effect
on navigation.
2. Proper Maintenance. Any structure or fill authorized shall be
properly maintained, including maintenance to ensure public safety.
3. Erosion and Siltation Controls. Appropriate erosion and siltation
controls must be used and maintained in effective operating condition during
construction, and all exposed soil and other fills must be permanently
stabilized at the earliest practicable date.
4. Aquatic Life Movements. No activity may substantially disrupt the
movement of those species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody,
including those species which normally migrate through the area, unless the
activity's primary purpose is to impound water.
5. Equipment. Heavy equipment working in wetlands must be placed on mats
or other measures must be taken to minimize soil disturbance.
6. Regional and Case-by-case Conditions. The activity must comply with
any regional conditions which may have been added by the Division Engineer and
any case specific conditions added by the Corps.
7. Wild and Scenic Rivers. No activity may occur in a component of the
National Wild and Scenic River System; or in a river officially designated by
Congress as a "study river" for possible inclusion in the system, while the
river is in an official study status. Information on Wild and Scenic Rivers
may be obtained from the National Park Service and the U.S. Forest Service.
8. Tribal Rights. No activity or its operation may impair reserved
tribal rights, including, but not limited to, reserved water rights and treaty
fishing and hunting rights.
9. Water Quality Certification. An individual state water quality
certification must be obtained or waived. Conditions of certification will be
considered to be special conditions of the Federal nationwide permit. Please
contact Mr. Ken Averitte, North Carolina Division of Environmental Management,
telephone [phone].
0.
10. Endangered Species. No activity is authorized under any NWP which is
likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a threatened or endangered
species or a species proposed for such designation, as identified under the
Federal Endangered Species Act, or which is likely to destroy or adversely
modify the critical habitat of such species. Non-Federal permittees shall
notify the District Engineer if any listed species or critical habitat might
be affected or is in the vicinity of the project and shall not begin work on
the activity until notified by the District Engineer that the requirements of
the Endangered Species Act have been satisfied and that the activity is
authorized. Information on the location of threatened and endangered species
can be obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine
Fisheries Service.
11. Historic Properties. No activity which may affect Historic
Properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of
Historic Places is authorized, until the District Engineer has complied with
the provisions of 33 CFR 325, Appendix C. The prospective permittee must
notify the District Engineer if the authorized activity may affect any
historic properties listed, determined to be eligible, or which the
prospective permittee has reason to believe may be eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places, and shall not begin the activity until
notified by the District Engineer that the requirements of the National
Historic Preservation Act have been satisfied and that the activity is
authorized. Information on the location and existence of historic resources
can be obtained from the State Historic Preservation Office and the National
Register of Historic Places (see 33 CFR 330.4(g)).
12. Water Supply Intakes. No discharge of dredged or fill material may
occur in the proximity of a public water supply intake except where the
discharge is repair of the public water supply intake structures or adjacent
bank stabilization.
13. Suitable Material. No discharge of dredged or fill material may
consist of unsuitable material (e.g., trash, debris, car bodies, etc.) and
material discharged must be free from toxic pollutants in toxic amounts.
14. Spawning Areas. Discharges in spawning areas during spawning seasons
must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable.
15. obstructions of High Flows. To the maximum extent practicable,
discharges must not permanently restrict or impede the passage of normal or
expected high flows or cause the relocation of the water (unless the primary
purpose of the fill is to impound waters).
2
C' . `!
16. Adverse Impacts from Impoundments. If the discharge creates an
oundment of water, adverse impacts on the aquatic system caused by the
elerated passage of water and/or the restriction of its flow shall be
imized to the maximum extent practicable.
17. Waterfowl Breeding Areas. Discharges into breeding areas for
atory waterfowl must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable.
18. Removal of Temporary Fills. Any temporary fills must be removed in
it entirety and the affected areas returned to their preexisting elevation.
REGIONAL CONDITIONS
1. All fill material authorized by this permit must be obtained from an
source.
2. Use of this permit for livestock and domestic animal waste treatment
acilities is not allowed.
STATE CONSISTENCY CONDITIONS
1. All fill material authorized by this permit must be obtained from an
source.
2. Use of this nationwide permit for waste disposal facilities is not
thorized.
3. Established erosion control practices shall be utilized to prevent
violations of the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50 NTU's in
streams and rivers not designated as trout waters by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management; 25 NTU's in all saltwater classes and
all lakes and reservoirs and 10 NTU's in trout waters).
4. Proposed fill of greater than one acre in SA, trout, ORW, WS-1 and
WS-2 HQW watersheds requires public notice and an individual Section 401 Water
Quality Certification from the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management.
5. For activities resulting in the loss of waters of the United States
greater than 1/3 of an acre, the applicant must receive written concurrence
from the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management that the proposal
is certified under the Section 401 Water Quality Certification Program.
6. If the proposed activity is within the North Carolina Coastal Area and
the activity will result in the loss of waters of the United States greater
than 1/3 of an acre, the applicant must receive written concurrence from the
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management that the activity is consistent
with the North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
3
.. . +
GENERAL CERTIFICATION CONDITIONS
1. Proposed fill or substantial modification of greater than one-third of
an acre of such waters, including wetlands, requires a written concurrence
from the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management.
2. Proposed fill or substantial modification of equal to or less than
one-third of an acre of such waters, including wetlands, does not require
written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management.
3. Proposed fill of greater than one acre in SA, trout, HQW, ORW, WS-I
and WS-II watersheds require public notice and an individual Section 401 Water
Quality Certification from the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management.
4. Established sediment and erosion control practices will be utilized to
prevent violations of the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50
NTU's in streams and rivers not designated as trout waters by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management, 25 NTU's in all saltwater
classes and all lakes and reservoirs and 10 NTU's in trout waters).
5. Additional site-specific conditions may be added to this Certification
in order to ensure compliance with all applicable water quality and effluent
standards.
6. Concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management that this Certification applies to an individual project shall
expire 3 years from the date of the cover letter from the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management.
4